skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> How that actually happens is not "a rule is broken leads to a ban", but rather, rules are combed through when a ban is desired.

I had the experience of moderating one of the larger political forums on reddit and in my experience this still happens. There were some mods who clearly had ideological axes to grind despite their insistence of impartiality.
Kubernetes Manifest Life Cycle
Hope you don’t mind but I’ve copied this So I can refer back to it ;)
Well yes, that too. But the facts from around the world are that the market power of even benign retailers is less effective at creating high standards than regulation.
Enums enable two things:
check current type from union of types
and exhaustivity check in switch

The former is solved by reflection, the latter by sealed classes.
Part of why partisan gerrymandering has become such a problem is that the tech makes it easier to gerrymander.

But mostly, political party matters much more than ever before. The electorate is more ideological and the candidates for office are much more loyal to the party platform. In an era where political party mattered less than, say, geography, then partisan gerrymandering was less of a national problem.

Of course, there are several types of gerrymandering and this is just one of them. The best summary of possible solutions and their limitations I've seen was done by 538 as part of a larger gerrymandering project: https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/its-probably-not-possib...
There is an unfortunate fallacy here. Your notion "the real world" conflates the physical world with a social milieu. The physical world is (at this scale) immutable, so of course we must conform to it and update our science-like models.

But there is no absolute requirement to conform oneself to a social milieu. A social milieu changes. It can be altered. It supports a vast number of models. And milieus overlap so densely that one can just go play somewhere else.

Disclosure: I used to be a Lisp bigot, but I got better.
How similar/different is it to AWS Aurora?
I'm not a pilot, but isn't this plane like the easiest to pilot and thus land for someone inexperienced? If this was a jet, the passenger in question would probably be pretty screwed?
The Cloud Native Community Needs to Talk about Testing
as a software dev you know that soft anonymous telemetry of how a user use what you do is very valuable to make decision on how to make things....

I wish there was way everywhere to collect with privacy and being accepted by user as not something we want to spie people on... but as always there is (a lot ) of abuse in this area so this may never going to happen
Why isn't it enforceable?

State attorney general notices his kid's social media app is giving algorithmic instead of chronological results, subpoenas social networks for number of under-18s in Minnesota, files charges, court sets up enormous fine.

Which part of this process is impossible?
WordPress will continue losing market share for the simplest reason: people fed up with the coercion of Full-Site Editing (FSE) by Automattic.

Community's reaction via comments' section [1] for Gutenberg plugin was a clear indication that people will eventually go away, had they not revoke their decision.

They haven't which led to the fork [2] of WordPress thus dividing the community, at least for a while.

Had they listened to their community to acquire Elementor and make it part of WP core, things would have been a lot better today than they currently are I'm afraid.

They have wasted countless resources and valuable time that could be poured in improving Elementor and WordPress in general.

I have tried to find tutorials, articles, and books about using FSE and couldn't find anything updated.

It's just sad to be honest with you...

[1] https://wordpress.org/plugins/gutenberg/
[2] https://www.classicpress.net/
Or you could have situation in between. Have people vote for candidate and share the votes between party and then rank those candidates in order of votes received.

Would mean that winners would first be the most popular and the extra votes would still go towards the party. And the unpopular in terms of votes received candidates of party wouldn't get elected.
Gerrymandering and a first-past-the-post electoral system can result in parliaments where a clear majority of all voters chose party X, yet the majority of seats are held by party Y. (There are several examples of these in the American states.)

That doesn't seem to represent "what voters want" very well.
> You cannot have both, unless you're willing to have a legislature that has something like 5,000 people in it, which is not practical. (For instance, the USA has 50 states, so if we wanted 100 representatives from each state, the legislature would have 5,000 people in it — clearly not realistic.)

Madison said the same thing, but we didn't have contemporary communication tools. My company's Slack has over 5,000 people and works just fine. Why is it unrealistic to repeal the Permanent Apportionment Act of 1929 and increase membership in the House by an order of magnitude?
Most of us moved on to better terminology 4+ years ago. The only ones derailing conversations are grumps like yourself who refuse to get with the program. Why is this so important to you?
I fully agree he should have gone to the Capitol. That was reckless of him. I also believe he should have said something early than he did. I don't think he blew it off as I don't think he had any intention of going there with the crowd. While he used the words "we" and "let's" I think that was referring to the crowd and it was just the way Trump talks and he did not mean to imply he would go with them.

I don't think that matters. He did not tell them to go into the Capitol and he told them to be peaceful. I don't think you have thought through the outcome of this. It seems like you are saying that a person giving a speech to a crowd is responsible when some people in that crowd along with others not listening to the speech do something bad an hour later. Especially when some people claim they thought they were allowed to do that bad thing because some police opened some doors for them.
The problem with a naive interpretation of Chesterton's fence is that it encourages stasis in cases where we don't have the knowledge or resources necessary to "fully" understand the reasons (or whether any even exist) for the current state of affairs. And in fact, there's no way to guarantee that we "fully" understand all reasons for the current state of affairs. Thus Chesterton's fence essentially deteriorates into the precautionary principle, which is bad epistemology. This quote from Wikipedia's section on criticism of the precautionary principle applies just as well to Chesterton's fence:

"of the two available interpretations of the principle, neither are plausible: weak formulations (which hold that precaution in the face of uncertain harms is permissible) are trivial, while strong formulations (which hold that precaution in the face of uncertain harms is required) are incoherent." [0]

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precautionary_principle#The_pr...
This explains feelings I’ve had watching Euphoria. I’ve noticed a worsening physiological response just watching the show, so haven’t finished season 2.

Initially I felt there was some catharsis to get out of it, but I’ve had to stop myself and ask what the effects really are. More cortisol? Less shock from real trauma? I’m not sure.

Yet I was drawn in by the trauma, and the thought - formed somewhere in my mind - that these dark, traumatic things were more authentic, and so there was something real and authentic to get out of watching it. But so far, there isn’t much of a thesis, or something, to really think about and learn from. So I’m done for now.

edit: formatting
So, one of the cool things about this repository (Hi! I’m the engineering lead for the Terminal/Console/… team. I’m biased!) is that it also contains the source for ConPTY and the rest of the Windows console host[1]. Every change made here flows back into Windows, and vice-versa.

In this repo, you can find some of our terrible secrets and workarounds and debugging hooks and perhaps even some explanation for why things work the way they do. Or don't work the way they should.

If you’re looking for a good[2] way to spend a few minutes, search for “LOAD BEARING” :)

[1]: If you build the “Host.EXE” project and copy the resulting OpenConsole.exe over %WINDIR%\System32\conhost.exe, it’ll work just fine and you’ll pick up a bunch of the console changes we’ve made in the past few years.

[2] Goodness not guaranteed, void where prohibited, etc.

EDIT: Oh, kaelinl mentioned this in a sibling comment to yours. Sorry about that! I've also reworded parts of the main comment body to flow better.
> Well, I think our criteria for what constitutes 'journalism' are very different!

You presented a Youtube video by a pro-Russian activist who has been repeatedly caught out lying.

I presented an actual journalist and credible domain expert who has not.

That's my definition of what constitutes 'journalism'.

Fundamentally, if you find Anne Applebaum unpalatable, there are a hundred others who are reporting truthfully from Ukraine, and not pushing Putin's propaganda.

If you want to find 'the opposing view' about Ukraine, find a credible journalist or news source from the Russian free press and present their views. That's if you can find any remaining free press in Russia:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_freedom_in_Russia

> As of 2022, Russia ranked 155 out of 180 countries in the Press Freedom Index compiled by Reporters Without Borders.[1] In the 2017 Freedom House Freedom of the Press report Russia scored 83 (100 being the worst), mostly because of new laws introduced in 2014 that further extended the state control over mass media.[2] Freedom House characterized the situation as even worse in Crimea where, after the 2014 annexation by Russia, both Russian jurisdiction and extrajudicial means are (according to Freedom House) routinely applied to limit freedom of expression.

[EDIT: typo]
https://github.com/microsoft/CBL-Mariner

Microsoft's linux platforms presently run mostly on Ubuntu. You're right that one way out of that dependency would be to buy Canonical. They chose to make their own top level Linux distro instead.
How far did the helium have to travel to damage the devices? Did they recover after some time?
> Open primaries

I don't get the idea of open primaries - why should someone who is not a member of a party get to vote on who the party wants to represent them?

Imagine there was a Women's Equality Party party (there is in the UK.) Should a large number of men, with no interests in women's equality, be able to come along and tell the Women's Equality Party who will represent them in an election?
As someone with a lot of Flutter experience, I can second this. It usually works pretty reliably until someday you upgrade and cocoapods keeps complaining even when you clean everything and rebuild.
Amd changed their windows drivers to not output video if it detects its running in a VM. Nvidia went the other way and stopped doing so.

Both can/could be bypassed with some libvirtd xml magic, but still. Nvidia seem to slowly stop being assholes, AMD started already.
Thanks for engaging, I will try to write an answer when I get the motivation
Just bought a 6600XT, and it's been great.

Literally just plugged it in and installed the driver packages I didn't on initial setup, on most distros it would've literally been plug and play.
Similar weird problems in portrait mode on my iPhone 13 Pro. My youngest daughter comes out looking like an unholy tellytubby on crack for some reason.

Got fed up of trying to negotiate with the bastard thing and bought a Nikon mirrorless instead. Absolutely no regrets.
I feel like the only thing a manual would be good for would be distracting you from flying the plane just long enough to enter some position that you (as someone with no training) won't be able to recover it from.
Seeing people as persons, judged and viewed as individuals, has been one of the major contention between the center/center right and the left. The two sides that been fighting hardest to push identity politics away from the political discussion is generally the same group that view the left and the far right as being two sides of the same coin.

If the goal is getting people to see you as a person and the strategy you are deploying to reach that goal is pushing people away, then it might be worth looking into the effectiveness of that strategy.
to be fair and try to dismiss your comment, it does seem the word Microsoft has been associated a lot with opensource companies and technologies lately.
who doesn't want you reversing their apis, Google? Oh ..
I've been a fairly serious flight simmer for about 20 years now, including 13 years of DCS, and have flown the DCS F-18 since it's initial release 4 years ago. This topic gets discussed a fair bit within the flight sim community, and we mostly conclude that we'd likely get the F-18 into the air, but would most likely kill ourselves: either passing out from lack of tolerance and training to handle the G forces, lack of familiarity with the sensation of flight which can wreak havoc on your inner ear and result in vertigo, dizzyness, nausea, or paying attention to any of the hundreds of small details and checks that real pilots do that you don't do in DCS (is the OBOGS working properly? cabin pressurization working properly, icing, etc). Simulator pilots would also not likely be able to handle any inflight emergency or problem in the air. Then, assuming we didn't already kill ourselves during the flight, we'd at best damage the aircraft during the landing, or kill ourselves and destroy the aircraft at worst.

Still, DCS offers a tremendous value as a low cost training platform. The DCS A-10C module was built for the US Air National Guard to use as a training simulator platform to train A-10C pilots, and other countries and airforces are increasingly using DCS to train their pilots. A Spanish company built the Aviojet C-101 module for DCS because it is used in the Spanish airforce and they wanted to use DCS as a training platform. A Chinese company built the JF-17 module for DCS. An Italian company is currently building an MB-339 module for DCS.

You can search online and find images of Chinese fighter pilots using DCS for training. There are a ton of things you can train to in DCS very cost effectively - practicing communications, tactical formations, administrative tasks and procedures, weapon switchology, etc. It doesn't completely replace real flight training of course, but it sure can help countries and militiaries with limited budgets stretch their training budgets.

> I also wonder how come most of this isn't classified

All of the "good stuff" is very, very classified. Particularly electronic warfare, radar performance, modern beyond visible range tactics, modern weapons performance porifiles, nuclear weapons delivery profiles.

A lot of the "nuts and bolts stuff" and basic training materials is unclassified and readily available. If you read through and study all of these documents you'll be well on your way to being a fairly competent virtual fighter pilot:
https://www.cnatra.navy.mil/pubs-pat-pubs.asp

Most of the topics discussed there are fairly "traditional" fighter pilot stuff that have been discussed by airforces for over a hundred years now, so aren't really secret, even though they're being flown in a modern jet trainer like the T-45.
There is a "super" risk issue I am trying to put into words.

Somewhere there is a different approach to capital structure and corporation structure. The one we have ... it works yes. But it's not the only one and we can see problems. And we should try to encourage some experimentation- Mittelstand is one divergence from the UK Limited company model that kind of came packaged with the industrial revolution. (That it came from the UKs big rival in the revolution says a lot)

Why should Bezos or Musk or any early founder get so much of the upside ? Is having a hierarchical command structure stable ? As the oil / Electric / Silicon revolutions start to come to an end, will we need different corporate and capital structures to handle a more sustainable model?

Why should public markets demand quarter on quarter growth as if that was a natural state of affairs (which tends to force every PLC to be a conglomerate whether it wants to or not (tech giants not withstanding). Should companies not be like Unix commands and just do one thing well?

All these are choices - we could have smaller companies, democratic companies, different companies. But we choose not to. (Don't say they are competed away in the market - how many co-operatives exist to be competed away?)

Maybe we can continue the kind of tech-social change we have been seeing for past 200 years. If so keep the scaffolding up. But otherwise maybe we should experiment with new forms of organisation. Because that's what has helped humans rise out of the mud - how we worked together to build something ... less muddy.

And choosing the right kind of organisation for the job at hand is crucial. And an equity corporation controlled by one or two people employing millions who have no say in its direction, might not be the right choice.

So fund a few wild cat companies - we might surprise ourselves.

Edit: literally just ran over this comment :
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31346487 (ignore my dumb sarcasm after). But the point is that a congress with 5,000 congressmen is a wildly different beast to the current one. And potentially better (very arguable). But that it's such a crazy, reject it without thinking idea is the whole point - there are alternatives to our current system (and yes that does include fucking it all up and crashing the economy - but we are risking that anyway).
> It seems for them the solution is to destroy privacy for the entire population.

a bit of overreaction never fails to double back on poor arguments.

> Please ask this to the European Commision instead.

as a matter of fact I do.

I participate actively.

Do you?
> presumably works only with their own userspace drivers.

For now, the plan is to replicate the way AMD drivers

Work, with having shared firmware but separate user lands, one closed and the other libre(MESA for AMD, Nouveau++ for nvidia?)

More details here from Red hats Christian schaller

https://blogs.gnome.org/uraeus/2022/05/11/why-is-the-open-so...
As I said, I’m not saying it’s the case here. It’s just collateral damage of the disinformation age we live in. I’m not trusting "trends" in data unless I spend 1 or more hours looking it up myself and hoping I can avoid being mislead.

Here I guess it didn’t help that the first map was trying to convey a link between Macron voters and British inhabitants. Anytime I see suggested links between voters, culture, immigration, etc. I’m prudent. It’s surely interesting in its own, but I can’t resist asking myself "why is the author mentioning this? Did he came across this data and then found interesting correlations? Or was he looking for trends that would bring support to some views he has? It’d be ok-ish if such approach was open, like, "here’s my thesis, and here’s data supporting this thesis." But when there’s no thesis, just "interesting trends", pretending it’s up to the reader to make his own conclusions… More often than not, it’s a dishonest cherry-picking with some more or less forced untold conclusions waiting to be made.

So, I just stay away from such articles, even if I know some of them aren’t dishonest. It’s collateral damage of the disinformation war.
In the US, the Senate directly causes the tyranny of the minority that we're currently experiencing.

The House also has representation issues: since the total number of representatives in the House hasn't increased over time as population has increased, there's a "floor" on the number of per-state representatives that causes smaller states to have outsized representation.

The article doesn't really deal with any of this, though: it assumes each "district" has the same number of people in it, which isn't the case for House or Senate seats when you consider the entire country. The article is more about considering the representation within a single US state, based on its division into districts.
Tachyum Announces World’s First Universal Processor
Purely chronological feed? No "suggested" content? Sign me up! Can we mandate this for all ages?
“What I did to destroy Russian pantonne bridge over Siverskyi Donets”
I think the name switch is unlikely to get you into trouble. My country has the reverse of the US (First name is last name and last name is first!). I've been switching regularly and this only confused people who wanted to address me by my "first name".
I was reading that the bottom 20% of earners in mexico make between 50 and 100 euros a month. Is this accurate?
>> Now i wouldn't want anyone to be discriminated but still it makes sense to limit green card based on nationality

> Why though? If Google is hiring an engineer, it doesn't make a distinction and does so purely on skill. Why should it matter if said engineer is from Argentina (arbitrary example) instead of India?

Because the priorities of the system don't have to be the same as Google's. Specifically, the US decided it prefers to get immigrants from everywhere rather than letting a couple big countries flood the queue.
It's clever, though the bolt feels kinda chunky. I wonder if it would work to stretch everything vertically a bit.
Wix and Squarespace are imo infinitely harder to make look good/maintain than Wordpress (at least without Gutenburg). Just some basic tasks are needlessly difficult or impossible. I still think Wordpress is the go-to easy to build/maintain CMS.

IMO, I think Automattic introduced Gutenberg way too soon to Core and introduced it as very half baked. Still to this day it's very half baked to an incredible degree, some pages will just break outright and resort to JSON errors, not to mention the built in blocks are awful and 3rd party blocks often break. That probably turned off a lot of people. It's still easier to just buy a theme that has a built in page builder and you'll get similar Lighthouse scores to Gutenburg (this being for average users, not custom themers, etc).
I would think so too, but I'm not sure where this is all going. There was never enough people 20 years ago, there is a lot more people needed now and the whole tech space seems pretty poor at growing talent. This seems to be creating a pricing at the margins issue by the deep pockets out there. Maybe the drop is going add more people onto the market, but I'm not seeing it yet.
And? Personal anecdote has no bearing on the question of whether or not foreigners are ethically or morally entitled to immigration and citizenship, or whether the process should be made easier.
reading it from the README it does seem they use fedora/spec for packaging? is it ubuntu repackaged with rpm?
I have been working on a Hacker News client using Flutter, if anyone is interested:

https://github.com/Livinglist/Hacki
>> When they propose such open-ended legislation there should be an ability for an outside party to make every single one of them fill out a survey of "Would this be allowed/disallowed under the new law?"

You claim the lawmakers are too stupid to understand how tech works, but you're completely failing to understand how the law works. It's rarely (if ever) black and white. It's the job of the courts to interpret and decide what is allowed/disallowed under the law.
My app[1] has 5 figure daily users (if that's considered somewhat big) and is written in Flutter.

I love Flutter. It made all this so much easier.

[1] https://stockevents.app
“Those who can’t, teach.”

Sarcasm, up there. I don’t actually believe that quote, but it fits in this context.

Write documentation, write blog posts, make videos about concepts or tools that interest you (enthusiasm is contagious), as you learn them.

Make them for any skill level you feel comfortable with.