skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I think it can work. I do not share the view that it will automatically work.

Consider, for a moment, the US electoral system. In structure, it's largely representative democracy. The people who win the elections become the leaders. Those people make policy decisions, or appoint other people who make policy decisions, for a lot of people who then proceed to get very angry at those policy decisions.

But at the same time, a lot of those angry people did agree with the concept of what a government is supposed to do for its citizens. They just think it's being done poorly or corruptly. Some of them give up on the ideal being achieveable at all, and greatly reduce their idea of what a government should do, possibly to zero, with the idea that individuals or groups can do it better for themselves. Some instead yell loudly about the things the government is doing wrong. Which of these groups is right is irrelevant; all I want you to see is how a reasonable person can get to any of those conclusions given the current state of the world.

Now, back to unions. What some of us believe is that this issue of leaders not effectively representing people's interests is inherent to sufficiently large democratic systems - I'd tentatively put the threshold as "when you know more about the candidates from media than you do from knowing them personally", as that's the point where it becomes feasible to skew voters' opinions en masse. We don't see large unions as having sufficient protection against a charismatic but incompetent/evil person getting put in charge, and doing the usual things such people do with power. It's hard to get such people out of power; see your least favorite incumbent politician for an example.

I do happen to be in favor of voluntary unions, because for some people that risk is acceptable for the benefits unions provide. I am very much not in favor of any form of "you must associate with this union in some way to work here" arrangements, because some unions are useless or actively bad, and removing the option to not participate in those removes the only feasible escape hatch for those who need it.
I disagree with the premise. I understand people wanting to break bad habits with their phone, but it's like saying "feeling anxiety about not having a refrigerator at home shouldn't be normal." When a tool gets invented that makes our lives easier, what we didn't know we needed before becomes indispensable. These things, problems though they may bring, are extremely empowering, and we take it for granted.
The dalai llama is believed to be the literal reincarnation of the bodhisattva of compassion, so not a mere mortal.
Adafruit is particularly egregious with their cloud service integration and marketing. It just seems to be the way they're heading.
Speaking for our org, but it's because most business logic in our backends is about the same level or more complicated than String.contains.
He readily admits that he's not the most sociable person (which is corroborated from watching pretty much any of his self-described "rant videos"), but the flow he gets into when doing board repair is remarkable. I'm not sure if he owes it to a really impressive knowledge of EE or the fact that he exclusively repairs Macbooks, but it's crazy how every single feasible repair looks like it's second nature to him.
Wonderful movie, but good god is it long and hard to watch at times
I was poking at the comment I replied to.
This is so cool! I’ve wanted something like this for ages now and was shy to build it. Really looking forward to getting stuck into this, thanks for taking that huge first step!
> you likely wont get another shot

I'm not really that familiar with legislative processes, but this seems ridiculous if it's true. Isn't it the job of the house to write bills? What else do they have to do? Why won't they get another shot?

I think it's just a lack of political will. Not from regular people, but from politicians. People love to point to a huge 1000+ page bill that didn't pass because the guys voted it down and say "oh well we can't have X because the other guys voted against it". If "your guys" are really interested in having X, why don't they just write another bill that contains the minimum language to enact it?

We should really reject these massive "omnibus" bills out of principle. No one even reads them! There's no reason we can't have simple, targeted legislation that is limited to exactly one topic.
This is an absolutely absurd answer for someone looking for the simplicity of Heroku.
Yet if you point out that women live longer than men on average, and equality of outcome there would require huge government funding into men's health, or allowing men to collect social security earlier so they have equal retirement years, the same "progressives" will usually oppose those measures!
The people who live in those places are also facing existential problems that get completely ignored by people like you. The solution is to give individual communities like states more control over the law so that people who feel strongly about things like this (on both sides) have more control.
> People propose hypothetical situations as part of a question all the time and then you're asked to try and come up with an appropriate answer for that situation. Opting to discard the hypothetical and answer based on your worldview is of course something you're free to do.

Nobody is discarding the hypothetical, just confronting the unstated and unsupported assumptions upon which it is predicated.

> You really can't conceive of any possible way that disadvantaged groups could be given more resources?

As an aside — membership in groups based on race, gender, or disability says nothing about an individual’s disadvantage.

Resource redistribution based on identity group is, in of itself, an inherently biased and discriminatory proposal.

> Resources are "created" all the time.

… and inequitably distributing newly created resources disadvantages the identity groups you choose to selectively marginalize.

> A harsh and immediate refusal to even consider a hypothetical scenario like this indicates a lack of imagination on your part, not a failure on the part of the researchers.

My imagination is quite capable of encompassing what the researchers believe about their hypotheticals, and why they’re wrong.

My imagination is further capable of encompassing why they believe that the disagreement of the majority of their study subjects represents a misperception of reality, as opposed to a recognition of the flaws inherent in both their ideology and work.
s/years/multiple decades/
Yeah, fair enough, I'm just bitter after my shiny new associative array failed and I had roll back to a worse option.
Those numbers are wrong by an order of magnitude, because the original estimation was based on faulty math. The actual dose needed to bring serum levels up for most people would be far higher.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4210929/
At first I read "except Java"
Capitalism concentrates power within oligarchs. Communism concentrates power within bureaucrats.

They don't even attempt to solve the problem. The decentralisation of power isn't even being considered.
What dose and diet changes did you do?
You might very well think that; I couldn't possibly comment
I believe the response is to you stating you could hire junior devs at lower cost so that you can hire more people and therefore not be zero sum.

Posters example is hiring 2 juniors instead of 1 senior. The senior has one less job opening to apply for and is thus disadvantaged.
https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2022/05/how-to-play-multiplay...

They are using analog signal processing equipment, the latency is probably less than a ms.
I read the post and really enjoyed it. I had my adblocker on, and didn't run into any issues with ads, or the scrollbar. I thought the content was thorough and well-written, and is encouraging me to explore this methodology a bit more. It seems to pull on a bunch of threads I've come across in the therapy, mindfulness, and general productivity advice. Some of the author's own anecdotes seemed a bit reductionist, but I appreciate that they tie back to business, making them feel immediately actionable. It feels like every one of these sections could be a chapter or few of a book, but I guess that's the whole point.

The section on values was the most helpful to me personally.
You're old fashioned.
Hey! That's my question :-) I've been doing pretty much exactly this for the past 10 years. A common solution I've seen is a single while loop with gnarly logic inside to monkey with the string index, rewind when no match, etc. Then imagine that kind of code in your business critical backend.
Brian Cox: How Can We Trust the Objectiveness of Science? [video]
Sure.

Combine that with Depression Quest's narrative mechanism of graying out choices that aren't available to you (eg. applied to actions precluded by a deficit in impulse control, a common side effect of lead poisoning), and that could be very effective, especially if the player character is a child or adolescent which constrains the available degrees of freedom a bit more to something sane and tractable (eg. a kid might steal a stereo from a car, but it would be okay in that context not to have carjacking be an option).
Not only is twitter small compared to WhatsApp, it's tiny, and has had static (no) user growth for seven years (previously reported 300 million active monthly users, recently announced it had been over reporting...). The tech and journalism communities exist in a bit of an echo chamber. Twitter might be a "household name" but it's importance for mass communication is a bit overblown.
Video is cut off on mobile
Parkinson is essentially a mysterious oversensitization to dopamine autoxidation in the dopaminergics neurons mitochondria membrane.
Parkinson is therefore a solved problem.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29486701/
That abuses the word "privilege" to the point of making it useless to communicate the point you're (likely) trying to make (which I agree with, if it's what I think it is) effectively in general.
Didn’t even know screen cheating was a thing. That is just how the game was played. No player is at a disadvantage.
That would certainly be true had I done that from day one as I had mentioned. Their documentation as with most medical documentation is based on the lowest common denominators. They will not risk explaining why one might do what I am doing.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29486701/
A Case for an Open Source CS Curriculum [pdf] (2018)
Heresy! GNU is the only true path! Linux is the slippery slope to Windoze! /s
Yeah, that's not just fraud, that's a targeted attack. Definitely not getting the whole story here. How'd they get your card number?
Flight evolves all over the planet, across diverse environments.

But in any case, there will be some commonality in environments across many planets, owing to what environments are the most probable hosts of life, and to the fact that the laws of physics are universal.
Building a routing system for Pellet, a Kotlin web framework
Stuff like this is an example of the failure of the market, because it's market wide and it's not like a service that actually puts labor into handling cases will find an advantage in the market and thus there is no incentive for it. This is a place where regulation actually makes sense.
The value of an auction site relates to the number of users it has, so it's difficult for a competitor to appear and dislodge it.
This is why I like my smart watch. I can walk out of the house without my phone and still stay in touch if it’s really needed (it usually isn’t) - I also like that I can triage notifications without touching my phone, if I try doing that with my phone I usually end up messing around with a lot more than I had originally planned.
Also using it for music and having the assistant available fills out the main uses of my watch.

The only time I regret it is if there is something that i’d really like to photograph.
Highly doubt 5k IUs is the issue. Some select quotes from "Vitamin D Is Not as Toxic as Was Once Thought: A Historical and an Up-to-Date Perspective" by Michael Holick in Mayo Clinic Proceedings [0]:

> Ekwaru et al recently reported on more than 17,000 healthy adult volunteers participating in a preventative health program and taking varying doses of vitamin D up to 20,000 IU/d. These patients did not demonstrate any toxicity, and the blood level of 25(OH)D in those taking even 20,000 IU/d was less than 100 ng/mL.

> The evidence is clear that vitamin D toxicity is one of the rarest medical conditions and is typically due to intentional or inadvertent intake of extremely high doses of vitamin D (usually in the range of >50,000-100,000 IU/d for months to years).

[0]: Holick, https://www.mayoclinicproceedings.org/article/S0025-6196(15)...

[1]: Ekwaru et al, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25372709/
That assumes your body is absorbing all of it. I suspect a lot of people's aren't, hence the high doses. I have found for example that 1000iu in the form of drops under the tongue has dramatically more effect than 1000iu in the form of a chewable tablet.
> When someone’s values are so different it’s hard to have any sort of meaningful conversation.

I recommend having 'deep' conversations. Dig down into definitions, in to differences perceived, find where your perceptions differ. Then you can propose experiments that would change one perception or another.

Most people do not have the time for that for one reason or another(including myself sometimes), but it has worked for me and might for you.
No, this is not how these systems work. You're correct that they don't say "fraud/no fraud" but they generate a score (like a credit score) based on a massive number of inputs, and there are thresholds over which action (account ban, etc.) is taken. It does not in any way map to "types of fraud" and it does not map to the TOS. It's about identifying activity or accounts that look sufficiently similar to previous bad actors.
> The rest: conflation.

Conflation with what?
> I'd much, much, much rather have one proficient, in my timezone developer at 200k.

Yes, but do you think you'll get proficient developers on the west coast for just 200k, when unicorn startups and FAANGs pay at least twice that for great people?

For the fully loaded cost of one really good developer in the Bay Area (400k) you can get four equally good developers anywhere in Europe (I'm not even talking Eastern Europe here), who will happily shuffle their schedule to accomodate a few evening zoom calls or reply to a few mails.

The talent pool in this industry is global, and it's extremely hot everywhere, but ignoring purchasing power parity is just self-deception.
And yet you are trivialising the experience of the person you are replying to.

How rude.
Could you expand on the “for the outdoors” comment and explain why those people are self centred? Assuming this must be an American cultural thing
Agreed 100%. Something I enjoyed doing a lot during the height of the pandemic was getting in my car and simply driving around, looking specifically for places I haven't been before. I'd drive up and down mountain roads, through small towns I'd passed through before but never paid attention to, and then when I was eventually unavoidably hopelessly lost, I'd pull out my phone and Waze my way back home.

For me, having that power to find my way home no matter how lost I'd get gave me the freedom to get out and explore.
From what I can recall, the Brooklyn Public Library allows for non-local sign ups for a fee.
> the ICs are slackers, loafing around, lying on tickets, getting bogged down and not speaking up...

And let me guess, bringing them back to the office is going to quickly turn them into happy and productive coworkers?
L-Dopa is not a treatment. It's absurd to think it is.. Just like stimulants, agonists or dopamin precursors. They are necessary palliatives except they simultaneously worsen the disease because dopamin kill humans since it oxidize.
Selegiline is one of the few dopaminergics to actually target the problem.

Never heard about the Cuba approach, I'll have to study it
> Back in the times and places where noble titles were taken seriously as markers of increased social legitimacy, stripping people of them was an acknowledged thing.

It was not an "acknowledged thing." It was a bloody, brutal affair. Men fighting for titles is probably the one thing that measures up to religion in terms of lives lost.

And all of this before refuting the central point: the duke of some random duchy in 1305 had no "increased social legitimacy" in any way that matters to contemporary humans. He was able to petition whatever king he served, and he could rule over his own land insofar as someone with a bigger army didn't mind. It is, on face value, ridiculous that we're discussing this as a viable state of affairs.
Airbnb CEO calls the office an 'anachronistic form' and 'from a pre-digital age'
Bullshit. Invent any new title you want, you will still get powerful people who aren't holders of that title and whom control the holders of that title. If thats all you wanted, inventing a new position won't do shit. This only furthers the argument that what you actually wanted if that was your goal is to start severely limiting the power of someone who reaches a certain level of wealth or influence etc.

I think you are making the mistake of reading too hard into these writings and somehow managed to invent a meaning in it. The reality is unfortunately as simple as that these people imagine they would get to be kings and rule over everyone. The philosophy dropout verbose word vomit is required to obscure this simple and obviously idiotic point because of course why would anyone pay attention to it otherwise.
Even the people who are directly in charge of protecting the country have raised concerns about this.
Just reminding people that Session is nothing more than an implementation of signal with a blockchain behind it for some reason.

I tried it, I was interested in it, I always like to try new encrypted messaging methods. I like blockchains, but I don't like when one is shoehorned in when it is unnecessary, and I'm especially wary when a project with very little original development includes blockchain stuff, scams abound.
It’s uncomfortable for the Thiel-funded new right movement that their dream state is essentially realized in present-day Russia, and they’re not able to explain how their ideas would lead to a different outcome.

Protectionist policies, focus on national identity, celebration of traditional values and gender roles; a “national CEO” whose transformative powers transcend the slow, frustrating democratic machinery. This describes both Putinism and the American right’s goals. It’s not a coincidence that they were increasingly cozy with Russia until Putin rolled into Ukraine.

Putinists love to make the claim that Ukraine isn’t a real nation (and Steve Bannon went on record to agree). It’s worth noting that the same arguments would apply to Canada. If the Thiel-funded right succeeds, they’ll eventually need a war to fuel the nationalist fire. Why not a reunification of the North American colonies? Canada is obviously controlled by decadent forces that need to be purged, just like Ukraine…

Trump wanted to buy Greenland. Good old territorial expansion is part of this value system.
Noweb was an amazing little tool. Very sweet clean architecture with a simple straightforward textual intermediate representation, accessible to simple pipelined processing, and a lovely community of add-ons.

And then? It was reimplemented in 'icon', incompatible Proteine, too, and the community feel apart.

That's a real pity because noweb got almost everything right.

However.

Imnsho the real challenge for literate programming is IDE support. Not only do you embed languages into each other. In addition you chip chop your code into fragments and distribute them all over your file...
I suspect that lots of people ask for O(n) when they mean Θ(n) instead which specifies both an upper and lower bound. For example, specifying Θ(n^3) as the running time for a bubble sort would be incorrect whereas O(n^3) would be imprecise but not incorrect.
> Have you used LogSeq?

Not OP but, personally, I was very disappointed when I found out that Loqseq doesn't support free-form text / Markdown as it's an outliner (only).
Just remember the handy acronym "PACKET ROUTING"!
You can just edit the kernel config file before compiling.

https://github.com/openbsd/src/blob/master/sys/arch/amd64/co...
Well yes, it can happen. I don't know if that "causes" misogyny, but is rather the result of it. It's paradoxically the case that societies with less gender equality tend to have greater STEM equality [1], and vice versa. Because women in these unequal societies have very little broad opportunity, they rush to one of the few opportunities that's even possible for them: STEM. They'll push themselves to do it even if they don't want to, because it's their only meal ticket out of their situation. Women in more equal societies presumably have more of a voluntary choice and tend to choose STEM less as a result.

[1] https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/095679761774171...
Also bought a Matrix Portal and have had a lot of fun with it! Dabbled in writing a raytracer for it, but I don’t know enough about ARM nor C++ to optimize it for decent frame rates. Now the thing runs a newton’s cradle simulator using Box2D, and that’s been a fun desk toy.
>In science if you know what you are doing you should not be doing it.

>In engineering if you do not know what you are doing you should not be doing it.

>with apparently only one life to live on this earth, you ought to try to make significant contributions to humanity rather than just get along through life comfortably — that the life of trying to achieve excellence in some area is in itself a worthy goal for your life.
KeePass?