skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Majority can be good for helping decide defaults but it's a horrible metric to declare it must always behave like so. Particularly when the majority are in a minority of at least one of the choices, which I strongly suspect would be the case here.
The previous poster said "I want less government in every way - let local people decide for themselves what they want to do." You replied that "local people decided what they wanted to do was invade other countries and commit mass murder." I pointed out that there was quite a lot of government involved in this decision, referring to the well-known history of certain WWII fascist dictatorships in which the entire society was effectively subjugated under the authority of a single person. Your response is... to... agree? I'm not sure how your argument counters the original poster's plea for less government.
> It also seems clear to me that "well-regulated" is not there to be any part of the point of the Second Amendment.

Well, it's critical to the point in that a working militia can serve a purpose, and a broken militia can't.

Contemporary documents make the point of the Second Amendment very explicit - its purpose is to prevent the United States from maintaining a standing army. But that's not what it does or what it claims to do; that's just the reason it exists.
Is who would pay for the date really a big factor in anyone’s decision about who to date? Seems like a pretty basis on which to start a relationship!
> npm install

Sorry, lost me at this part. Have a better installation story like a single executable.

Beyond that, what does this do that curl, wget, et al do not? How is your interface better than those? Is it robust in the face of errors? What http protocol versions does it support?
Hey it’s our Internet friend!
Golang for written communication when you want it to be searchable but day to day usage Go works just fine.

The single letter variable approach is sensible and not dogmatic -- e.g., `i` in a tight for loop makes sense.
The issue here is more of how vague the rules were and what interpretation the moderator team/algorithm used. If my rules are "you can't be mean" and you say "I don't like how you [...]" am I within my rights to say that was "mean"? Because that's basically what happened.
Yes it has.

It doesn't matter that the segregation was originally pushed for with the benefit of male prisoners in mind. If you look at the conditions for women in prison before and after sex segregation, it was an improvement.

We shouldn't be regressing back and allowing men to be incarcerated alongside women again, unless there is a provably good reason for this - which, so far, no-one has demonstrated.
For me it's almost always 10 minutes later than the estimation (Europe). I just add 10.
IMO a person who wants to store music on their phone locally doesn't want to supplement streaming, they want to replace it entirely. If they didn't then you're right, all of the major DSP's offer local storage through their apps and the 128/256/512 GB options available from iPhones is fine. (no idea what the limit is like for Android phones, I'm sure it's much more)
yea god forbid the poors are allowed to talk amongst themselves
> Collapsing the entire history of a nation into a narrative about a minority within the nation.

That’s a very succinct way of putting it, thanks for this comment.
Wow, keep voting me down and ignore that this is a real world example that happens all the time. Making accommodations for off menu items at ethnic restaurants is often determined by race but it isn't being done out of racism.
You claimed "the baker in your example was willing to bake them a cake. They were never denied a cake". That's 1) referencing a specific baker (the one GP mentioned with a definite article) and 2) a positive claim about that baker.

From the very first page of the Colorado Court of Appeals order on Craig v. Masterpiece Cakeshop https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/16-111...:

>In July 2012, Craig and Mullins visited Masterpiece, a bakery in Lakewood, Colorado, and requested that Phillips design and create a cake to celebrate their same-sex wedding. Phillips declined, telling them that he does not create wedding cakes for same-sex weddings because of his religious beliefs, but advising Craig and Mullins that he would be happy to make and sell them any other baked goods. Craig and Mullins promptly left Masterpiece without discussing with Phillips any details of their wedding cake.

>The parties did not dispute any material facts. Masterpiece and Phillips admitted that the bakery is a place of public accommodation and that they refused to sell Craig and Mullins a cake because of their intent to engage in a same-sex marriage ceremony.

The distinction Masterpiece argued was that they were discriminating against Craig and Mullins on the basis of gay marriage, not on the basis of being gay. See e.g. Elane Photography v Willock for why this argument doesn't work.
No, during the 1930s they were actually publishing articles calling for the rounding-up of "undesirables" like Jews and homosexuals, and imprisoning them or killing them.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daily_Mail#Support_of_fascism:...

This is within living memory.
It's not at all clear to me that the FAA was originally going to certify them under those rules. Note the carefully worded text here:

> developers of winged eVTOL aircraft including Joby Aviation, Archer and Beta Technologies have been proceeding on the assumption that their aircraft would be certified under the FAA’s overhaul of small airplane certification rules that took effect in 2017.

"developers...have been proceeding under the assumption" is doing an awful lot of work in that sentence...
Where would you house trans prisoners?
Super cool idea! Thanks for sharing.

TI searched for "fish" and a result from PubMed from 1977 was the first (non ad) result. It seems to be taking the paper publication date rather than the date it was put on the internet (which is fair I suppose). Similarly a result further down was from poetry foundation and the date seemed to be the poem publication date rather than the page. Just not exactly what I was expecting at first.
It's how everyone grows food. Have you ever been to a farm?
Having Fidelity support Bitcoin, Dogecoin or Ethereum is about as difficult and expensive for them as supporting a new stock or commodity exchange, and about as risky... as long as they don't act as a market maker. They'll almost certainly make money on fees.

Meanwhile they get the marketing value. They spend over $100MM annually on advertising (by way of a quick googling, I have no special insight) so it seems reasonable that they like being talked about, especially by people who might otherwise be avoiding them.
I searched for covid 19 and got articles from 2001, they all look recent though
Creative Nomad
I want to abandon streaming too, but because the service is sh*t, unreliable, non-friendly.

The self curated playlist idea on a nice dedicated device is also very attractive, not least because I still do that on streaming, pity that its support is an Nth tier for the providers behind 'intelligent' and 'AI' and 'just for you' bullsh*t pushed into my face, dealing with own lists is very often a struggle or even an uphill battle.

Yes, I should pick up the old habits too and pay attention more to 'own mix albums', elevating the experience.
Everything on that Wikipedia article should be considered incorrect at best and outright fictional at worst.
There’s a brief window after you purchase a new vehicle where the maps aren’t hopelessly out of date… and then what?

When I went looking at how to update the maps in my car I had to dig so far I ended up in the basement in a locked room with a sign that said “beware the tiger” digging through the bottom drawer of a dusty filing cabinet. I’m fairly certain that nobody had ever purchased the updates before.

And they were like $500.

Alternatively, you don’t even need a new phone… just use Google/Apple/etc maps and they’re evergreen _and_ generally contain live information on road closures, traffic density, etc.

So you get more functionality and updates with a phone for free. It’s no wonder people don’t want to use the built in nav. (Never mind that it doesn’t pause my podcasts when it starts talking over them…)

I have nav in my car because it’s basically bundled with a bunch of other creature comforts I did want. The only use I’ve ever found for it was on long road trips where I’d like a rough idea how much further to go / etc, but don’t want to have my phone screen on for dozens of hours or have to be fiddling with my phone to get progress updates. Highways don’t change often so it’s been fairly competent at that.
> So please explain how “Own this NFT that points to Snoop’s Bored Ape” or “Own this NFT that points to Snoop’s NFT that points to his Bored Ape” is grounds for any legal action. There is no misrepresentation, deception, copying, infringement, or whatnot.

The thing is, the law isn't just a regex you apply to what the seller said and it tells you if the seller broke the law. That ain't how it works. At the end of the day it's going to come down to whether the seller mislead the buyer.
This is why I try my best not to miss any front-page threads. I wonder if the vomeronasal organ played a role in the whole covid / olfactory bulb system and role in the ano/parosmia.
Are you sure? https://hpjansson.org/chafa/
I doubt it. Consider the high wing loading, high drag, and lack of certain control surfaces. Any power loss will result in a quick stall and unrecoverable spin. Most of those powered lift aircraft rely on a mix of redundant systems plus a ballistic recovery parachute for flight safety.
> I don't have a solution, but we can't pretend that speech isn't much more powerful in today's society

I am not actually convinced of this: speech is a lot more spreadable today, but there is also a lot more of it from a lot more angles. Just as a greater supply of currency drives price inflation, a greater supply of opinions drives speech inflation: your opinion can spread across the world in seconds, but people give far less of a damn than they used to.

> Furthermore the environment favors evolution towards short, poorly thought out, poorly reviewed, "engaging" (and enraging) yellow-press like content.

I can think of no period in history where this wasn't the case. Bread and circuses have been the go-to of those in power since the dawn of history.
> Contemporary documents make the point of the Second Amendment very explicit - its purpose is to prevent the United States from maintaining a standing army.

It's worth noting here that this is frequently cited and correct, but misses a critical point: this was before permanent paramilitary police forces, and one of the main reasons for fearing the establishment of a standing army is that this armed force with a distinct and insular culture from the citizenry would inevitably be used for internal security as well as against external enemies; the fear of standing armies is perhaps most accurately understood as a fear of permanent, insular domestic security services extending so far as to fearing permanent defense forces that could be turned to that purpose.
> There's no additional cost to exploring as many artists and genres as you want.

Not that I want music discovery to cost more, but I do think a consequence can be that it’s also easier to not discover music you might otherwise have. If I buy an album, and it doesn’t immediately capture me, I have N-1 other tracks waiting to change my mind. And I’m invested in that possibility. Endless discovery possibilities gives me an incentive to move on to another artist. Sure, I might like that other artist too. But pretty much all of my now-favorite artists were a pass before they grew on me.

I’m not saying that’s the attitude everyone should have, or that others wouldn’t or even ought to explore this way. Just sharing my own perspective for whatever it’s worth.
> You can't ignore federal laws just because the constitution doesn't say anything about them.

Not unless you're Sam Alito, no.
amazing how some discussions boards from 2000 are still intact

goes to show how permanent the internet can be
I'm grabbing some popcorn for this show. It should be a good one. It should also tweet the trades so others could follow.
What made you think of that?
Ha! That doesn't apply to Mac, Linux, iOS, Android. Which the browsers support and consist of far more devices.

Relying on every user to honorably-do-the-right-thing AND every OS/browser/video software to coordinate to make it happen is foolish. Nice in an ideal world, doesn't work in practice.

Don't get me wrong. I am all for the maker of the codec getting some monetary reward for their clever work. But this is a dumb way to do it.
Nice project. How are the request waterfalls done?
How does a truly censorship resistant communication network handle child porn and spam? If the answer is "it doesn't" then it will never be mainstream.
I am ok with boring success. The problem is that the media or common public cheer to VC-startup because terms like indieHackers, bootstrapped business or lifestyle business are not cool.
I can definitely bet that if we a have fancier name for this kind of business or funding strategies it will be different.
It must be cooler to create a profitable privately-owned business than a VC-owner business in loss
over a year ago. I explained that I worked on game engines in college and they were terrible and overengineered and wildly inefficient and I wanted to do things better going forward.
I actually think this is a mistake. Lots of kids use it as a handheld gaming device. It is perfect for that. iPad Mini is also great for that but iPod is cheaper and can be replaced more regularly.

When Apple came out with the iPod Touch it made a huge impact in the handheld gaming world. It even caused some gaming companies to focus on handheld more. Now with the Nintendo Switch (even 3DS), SteamDeck and even prior with the PSP there is more competition there. However, it still allows kids to have a device that has their Apple games and not have to use parents phones or having to get them a phone to play.

iPod Touch was one thing Apple had over competitors before the iPad and iPad mini, there wasn't a comparable Android handheld that wasn't a phone.

We make handheld/mobile games and our iPod Touches are nice to have to test smaller screens over using iPhones and optimizing for the smaller devices makes the iPad devices perform better. Lots of gaming companies buy touches up.

I think this is a mistake that will impact them on some of the handheld gaming side. It will also mean more parents phones being used over getting them a more expensive iPad or iPad Touch. It may end up with less devices sold and less games played on Apple devices.
As a pilot, I can't see any reason to fine for an oxygen mask deployment at all and very little reason to fine for an engine failure resulting a safe landing (which is the incredibly overwhelming majority of them in airline transport category aircraft). That would be like fining a driver for a hard braking incident or triggering their ABS.

Not everything needs to have an economy created out of it.
Mmmm how does this work? Searching for Harry Potter gives Wikia results which aren't the oldest one out there.
I learned something new about my father through an old news article that came up when searching his name. I won’t say what it was, but it is something personally meaningful to me that explains some childhood memories that never made sense to me before.

For curiosity I tried the same search for his name on google.com and went through about ten pages of results without finding this link.
I rarely see mentioned Parse Platform.

It has most of the features that all this shiny new tools have (and more) but is way older. It used to be a Facebook hosted solution but it was opensourced and is still actively maintained, has SDKs for most languages and frameworks, REST & Graph QL API, live queries...
And there are still some sites that host it for you for free (limited), but you can always self host it yourself...

https://parseplatform.org
> I suppose then that you oppose vaccine mandates?

Yes, it is wrong to force someone to undergo a medical procedure against their will.

> It's fortunate that childbirth typically leaves the mother with all of her body parts.

This is, simply, factually incorrect.

> By definition an abortion is an intentional killing. The killing of the child isn't an unfortunate side effect, it's the primary purpose of the procedure.

Also factually incorrect.

> A medical procedure to save the life of the mother isn't an abortion.

Dude, it takes a 3-second Google search to determine that this is false
Damn he sounds rad
> Orwellian is an anachronism here.

How so? It's not a word that would have been known to the founders, but neither is "2A". It makes no sense to claim that when we talk about the founders, we can't legitimately use our own language but must instead use theirs.
Ms von der Leyen career is a train wreck of non stopping disasters. It makes sense she would end up as the non-elected European Commission chief...

"Ursula von der Leyen has always left a trail of disaster":
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/ursula-von-der-leyen-has...

"The scandal hanging over Ursula von der Leyen":
https://www.politico.eu/article/the-scandal-hanging-over-urs...
Why are Covid-19 cases increasing in the San Francisco Bay Area?
Except one of the (standard) services of the bakery was "custom wedding cakes". And he didn't refuse to make some specific art that depicted homosexuality or whatever, he refused to make any custom wedding cake for a gay wedding. As in, they could have requested the exact same cake as a straight couple - let's say white, three tiers, pink icing - and he would have refused.

Just like if your 'service' is making meals to anyone who comes into your restaurant, you can't deny black customers. This seems like the same thing to me.
You don't have to take bad faith arguments at face value.

When the baker says that his wedding cakes are a custom work of art tailored to each client, he's bullshitting you. He simply wants to discriminate against gay people. It really is that simple. There is no material difference between drawing flowers on a cake for a gay wedding and drawing flowers on a cake for a straight wedding, the same as there being no material difference between drawing flowers on a cake for an interracial wedding and a non-interracial wedding. When people make up false pretenses to justify their discrimination, your job as a rational human being is to identify it as such, not be a sucker.

I absolutely guarantee that if a straight couple had came in, commissioned a regular wedding cake, and then once the cake was done said "Oops we're not gonna buy it, can you sell it to our gay friends' wedding instead?", the baker would not have sold them the cake at that point, because again, it's about who he's selling it to, not what he's making.
cmd-tab to the minimized window then hold option(alt) before removing your finger from cmd will restore a window (or create a new window if none are available). I don't know if it's documented somewhere, which is a real shame because it's not obvious, but I guess that's been the behavior since Leopard (10.5).
Yes. And you can prevent whoever you want from posting on your website. Legally, social media platforms are under no obligation to uphold free speech.

There are two discussions happening about this, though. One is simply a critique of the social media platforms, i.e. they may be legally entitled to do this, but is it actually the right way to behave? The second is a question regarding whether or not it should be legal. To be clear: it is legal. But given that these are functionally monopolistic entities, and they do operate as the de facto town square, should they be made to accommodate broader speech?
Congress has a long history of targeting specific companies and groups, such as United Aircraft and Transport. https://www.historylink.org/file/5368
Way better search (or is it content?) on certain keywords. Feels like all the noise in `Latest Tweets` is filtered away.
I’ve used the community Helm chart and it’s nowhere near production ready. I had to spend several days configuring it to be usable in production. Which isn’t that big of a deal, but it doesn’t look actively maintained at the moment and could probably use a fork.
Are you saying we had systems for spreading rummors that were just as efficient and sophisticated as today's, 40 years ago?

I'm not sure I have the right words to explain what kind of environment I mean. A platform such as twitter is a directed graph with billions of connections, all operating instantly. Tweeting is effortless, retweeting even more so. For many people this means sending something to thousands (sometimes millions) of others to see needs less than a couple of seconds of effort.

My claim is that the radical increase in efficiency and volume comes with radically new problems of scale.
Having lived in the same house for 10 years and done a bunch of work on it, what I find fascinating is the age of the photos they stitch together. I can look at the arial view and it's from when I had the swimming pool, switch to 3D and see it's once I built the chicken coop, rotate to look east and "Oh look, that's after we put on the solar panels".

I wonder what drives the frequency of when the maps images are updated.
Presumably the same way as any other provider: you don’t.

Any service that allows resetting passwords by email has this risk, unless the service supports MFA and the user configures it.
Of course you can, as long as you don't receive any public money or use any public infrastructure or funding whatsoever.
The deep dives into Dorsey's leadership a few years ago were fascinating. He came across as incredibly indecisive, spineless, and incompetent. It was and is baffling to me that he became the CEO of two notable companies.

All that to say: this seems very much in character for him. He's basically agreeing with Musk criticizing decisions he made just in the last couple of years, including appointing the current CEO.
> One thing I've wondered is when Effective Altruists are going to stop calling AI ethics neglected.

AI ethics isn’t neglected because AI ethics doesn’t matter. AI alignment matters. If a self-bootstrapping generally intelligent AI emerges the only important thing about it is “Is this aligned with human values?”. If the answer is no we’re all going to die because we’re made of atoms at the bottom of a gravity well and it’s going to use all the atoms there before getting out. The ethics of AI is completely irrelevant in comparison.
Ask HN: Predictions on Crypto?
Crypto currencies and technologies seems to be going through an especially volatile period with a lot of skepticism and lack of confidence. What are your long and short term predictions for the crypto ecosystem as a whole?
> More often than not, when someone has a take like this, it usually means they're a TERF but I can't find anything she's publicly written that's obviously transphobic so I'm scratching my head as to what the actual issue is here.

Sorry the witch hunt didn't work out like you'd hoped.
if you’re on a Mac, Artillery has a Homebrew formula too. We have an official Docker image too. Other ways of installing are on the roadmap too (self contained tarballs and binaries).

As to what it does better than curl/wget. Probe is geared towards interactive use with HTTP APIs. So you get syntax highlighting and pretty printing for JSON, built-in querying, request waterfall visualizations, and ability to set expectations on every response.

HTTP/2 is supported.
> because energy use is not a problem

In what fully decarbonized country do you live? Iceland?

https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/energy-consumption-by-sou...
Spotify also has an e-mail login option
Mashgin Hits $1.5B Valuation with AI-Powered Self-Checkout System