skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Have you tried this before? As far as I can tell, tmux expects to pass the client's terminal fd over the unix socket. When I try it, I get something like this in strace (passing fd 7):

> sendmsg(5, {..., msg_control=[{cmsg_len=20, cmsg_level=SOL_SOCKET, cmsg_type=SCM_RIGHTS, cmsg_data=[7]}], msg_controllen=24, msg_flags=0}, 0) = 16

And then the client relays an error:

> open terminal failed: not a terminal
The essay itself introduces a novel word: "drogadicts." I assume it's teledigitally translated from Spanish.
I disagree, or rather, I don't think I did a great job describing how I define my version of "literal thinking".

To use a specific example, virtually all big, new ideas are some version of the "underpants gnomes" meme: (1) collect underpants, (2) ???, (3) profit. That is, all of these big ideas have a big helping of unknowns that need to be figured out - after all, if things were already all known, it wouldn't be much of a new, big idea.

However, in my experience, big ideas that are likely to come to fruition are ones where proponents are actually able to break down the unknowns in the "2. ???" step into discrete problems that need to be solved or elucidated. This is in direct contrast to "bullshitters" who have a distinct inability to even identify what the critical unknowns are in the first place.

For example, take the crypto space (low hanging fruit I know because there is so much BS and grift in the crypto space). I think there are some areas where crypto ideas will prove useful - I've commented before that finding a replacement for the antiquated backend settlement our financial system uses in the US is a perfect application. But I contrast this with tons of crypto ideas where proponents care barely explain why setting is a benefit over existing solutions, or else they conveniently ignore all the issue the existing system solves that they pretend somehow don't exist with crypto.
Personalisation as a concept needs to die. It’s sold as a shiny cutting-edge thing and sounds like it should be a good idea, but no one seems to realise that beyond the hype the tech is surprisingly shitty, like Web3 or voice apps. And the ones that do know aren’t going to let on because they’re the ones trying to sell personalisation software.

Personalised ads result in vast amounts of corporate surveillance and still don’t work. I’ve never understood why contextual ads aren’t seen as good enough. If I’m looking at reviews for baby products, for example, then probably going to be interested in ads for similar baby products.

And with personalised content or product recommendations, very few companies have the breadth and depth of content that even begin to make it worthwhile, and even those that do can’t seem to do more than show you more of what you’ve encountered before. YouTube and Instagram’s personalisation algos can be downright annoying ‘You watched that one video randomly? Okay, here’s hundreds more like it, crowding out all the things you do watch regularly.’

Good search and discovery tools are always better than a stupid recommendation engine, and they’re all stupid.
> It's trivial in quadratic time too, of course, although I would expect a candidate for a senior role to be able at least to find the linear solution, if not to start there outright.

I would not call this trivial. The code in your post is incorrect. For example, it cannot find "ababc" within "abababc", since after the first mismatch we skip too much of the haystack.

The real solution to this is Knuth-Morris-Pratt, where we must precompute for every index in the needle the longest needle prefix that fits before it. I would not expect your average interviewee to derive or implement this.

An easier linear time solution (in my opinion) is rolling polynomial hashing. But if you actually expect solutions in an interview you should settle for the naive quadratic algorithm.
Oh. In that case I have no idea what they're doing, unless it's just a shibboleth synonymous with "content" as it's typically used of late.
I know that some people find value in this, but for me, I wish I could turn off the recommendation engines on Netflix, Amazon, Spotify, and wherever else they are in services that I use. Whatever notions of similarity that they use to generate recommendations have nothing to do with how I judge things, and for me this is just noise that makes those services slower to navigate.
Yeah, realistic guns and sights were only introduced to FPS several years later. Those were a major draw of Counter Strike.

You'll find the same in Quake, Quake 2, Doom, etc
> ... is going to be inside a vehicle

False
Not when it comes to an account ban. You become a pariah to support lines.
On paper, SCotUS _can_ be held accountable by the public through their representatives. The process is called impeachment. The house _can_ impeach a sitting Justice, and the Senate _can_ vote to remove them from office. This currently is unlikely, but the it _is_ possible.

The "easier" route is for the legislature to "see" the ruling and pass a law that counter-acts it. The general public can _also_ call their own Constitutional conventions and pass amendments to the Constitution to hold SCotUS responsible.

The real "problem" is all of these solutions, by design, require significant effort. If you want changes, you will need to make them happen.
> the epitome of the dark side of individualism

In short: anyone who isn’t part of the tribe is a dangerous threat.
First, that's not very reassuring.

Second, Snowden tried to use official channels, but that failed and he wasn't so stupid to let them cut him off before he could pursue others.

But third, you'd fault him for not using technologies that either didn't exist or weren't effective at the time and ignore the fact that they only became so precisely because he revealed what he did? Seriously?

The man who understood and maintained these surveillance systems better than almost anyone decided he couldn't trust anything but extreme precautions employed by an expert against the technology of a decade ago, let alone today. As above, Intel agencies aren't truely accountable, are ridiculously capable and will never accept the situation of being stumped by obvious threats because they use Signal and Tor. If they need a how-to website they've already lost.
Nothing is stopping you from learning these topics on your own. In fact the vast majority of these topics I learned about on my own before encountering them in university.

The problem with asking mainframe questions is that they aren't as relevant in today's landscape. Meanwhile TLB is relevant for performance, UDP is a very common network protocol, consistent hashing is relevant for designing distributed systems, etc. Especially if you are just self teaching yourself you aren't going run into a chance to work on a mainframe unless maybe you use a mainframe emulator, but why?
Do you have a source for the claim that Thiel supports a return to monarchy?
Well, when the water covered the first floor, they started building on stilts and that will give them a few more cycles... and that will get them to atomsistors....
Next step, the Planck structures begin, along with concentric knobs to adjust the fine constant etc...
That's not really typical of most of his work, which is really sleek and quite beautiful (IMHO). I reckon a Mead designed a parking meter would look like a chrome robot valet. There would be no buttons.
It'd be nice to see horn volume tied to speedometer or outside noise level (maybe some already are?). After all it's meant to be a safety device not a device you can stick your ear next to comfortably in any scenario.

If you're going 70 and want to signal to the guy left of you to not merge into you "it's too loud for a pedestrian to safely stand right next to" isn't very relevant (in both perspectives). At the same time if you're going <5 mph on a comparatively quiet backed up street there is no reason it has to be the same volume as the first case.
If you want to go beyond Power Toys, take a look at TC UP:

https://www.tcup.pl/index.php/en/
I assume, perhaps incorrectly, that everyone has the same catalog (at least for my fairly boring taste in music) and actively choose Spotify’s personalization over Apple Music’s tighter integration with my phone, car, etc. Just a single data point though.
I’m pretty happy with https://photoprism.app so far. It’s self hosted, has features I really wanted such as maps and face recognition for grouping photos. Only issue is the lack of a mobile app for viewing photos but their mobile web version is not that bad. I’m using an app they suggested to sync my photos from ios and have photoprism automatically import and process the new photos. Do try it out.
>To the request to name a single brand based on personalization, music brands like Pandora and Spotify are built on personalization:

You mean the recommendation engine? Hardly ever it worked for me.

What Spotify is built on is "play albums/songs you select or follow playlists on genres you like". The recommendations are tacked on, and bad.
That's pretty much true of most people spouting off about a Big Regime Change. I know entirely too many Communists who think that they're going to spend their time designing uniforms, or just raising baby goats. Everyone thinks that they're gonna get their ideal world out of it.
Another possible view is that a large part of the problem in Russia is the massive, unchecked centralization of power and distributed, smaller governments would be better in this case.
It's one of the reasons I stay on Windows. I haven't found a Linux tool that works as well for file indexing.
Stressing over WFH is what a leader does when they’ve run out of ideas for real innovation. It exposes how weak and powerless they feel.
No, I choose Spotify's UI over Apple Music's.

I also prefer Spotify user-run playlists better, which I pick myself, searching for genres and songs explicitly.

Nothing to do with preferring the personalization.
FWIW - the bus factor statement proved true. Dylan vanished without a trace a few years back. No message in IRC, the blog, source control, or anything.

And the community just kept trucking.

Have since confirmed he is alive and well.
Games generally don't let you make narrative decisions though - it is still rare and troubled that this implementation is attempted and executed. When they do, those decisions are still one of the more complex pieces of media humans ever create: an interaction of interpretation between the writers, artists and player interpretation as well as the technical limitations of the system.

Story branch decisions in gaming are to some extent just an evaluation of what the writer's think of your world view - at least when it comes to consequences. Arguably they can only really be constructed as a trial between two opposing narrative voices - resolve questions of character via the wisdom of the crowd.
An alternate solution guaranteed to work in every case and bounded to a maximum of 14 steps (for each side):

both players can just encode the number they know in binary and say “I don’t know” for a zero and “I know” for a 1.
We are all just puppets enslaved by the processes we create and confused by our limited experience.
Yes, when I see someone using Explorer instead of Total Commander, I feel sorry for them.

There's an enhanced TC called TC UP with additional utilities:

https://www.tcup.pl/index.php/en/
You want to switch to an already running app? Alt tab or win tab doesnt do that?
Microsoft, Volkswagen are working to enable HoloLens to be used in vehicles
The underscore is to avoid conflicts with your own attributes named make, asdict, etc. So you could do:

MyClass = namedtuple("MyClass", ["make", "asdict", "fields"])
x = MyClass(make=10, asdict=11, fields=12)
print(x.asdict)

The "underscore-to-avoid-naming-conflicts" approach is used elsewhere in the Python standard library, too, although another example isn't coming to me at the moment.
I think they’re referring to the official emulator?
KISS is a fantastic piece of software. Arguably a better learning tool than LFS IMH(umble)O. It’s tiny footprint and git backed package manager really helps you get a sense of what a Linux distribution really is without much to distract you.

From there, expanding out to larger and more complicated tool chains is a trade-off conversation.

I learned a lot from KISS and I’m glad it exists.
A close friend of mine with celiac disease says it was a whole different world after 2014 or so. Like being on an alien planet and being in a familiar place.
Is there any reason to use Obsidian (i.e. another standalone app) instead of this?Looks great
I said semblance of accountability for a reason. Still, Supreme Court justices are appointed in limited number by elected politicians - who have to justify the appointment based on their supposed professional credentials - to discharge a specific set of duties

They certainly would not be more accountable if their appointments were more aristocratic in character (i.e. they inherited them from their ancestors who had been appointed for arbitrary reasons by an unelected monarch) and, like aristocrats, they didn't have to explain how and why they exercised the powers given to them.
I put some decent money into Star Citizen. Then I ended up in jail for over 8 years. I remember thinking, "Well, at least Star Citizen will be finished when I get out..."
The ability of others to exist outside of a vehicle does not have any implication on whether the other driver is in one regardless of how convenient it would be if it did.

Something like https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31309299 can be thought of to try to solve both problems instead of limiting good solutions to be only those for a single perspective.
Okay, so first of all, you know very well that "moral objections to decentralized governance" is not the problem people have with blockchain technology.

But beside that, perhaps I didn't quite make the point of my comment clear enough. You're trying really hard to convince me of things. I know very well how this works, and what problems it solves, and I do think it's a good solution to this problem.

The main reason I'm not going to buy one of these isn't anything about the technology; it's because I already have a solution for myself and I have no reason to bother switching to another solution.

This isn't about my opinions. I'm explaining why the general public is going to continue to ignore this otherwise valid solution. The marketing around it actively ties it to a thing that most people have negative opinions of, and makes the feature they actually want seem like an afterthought. Even here, you repeatedly refer to it as a hardware wallet, because that has always been the primary focus of those devices.

The effect of this is that the average non-blockchain-person just sees you posting a lot of comments in a tangentially related thread trying to sell them on blockchain tech. Do you see why this, from the perspective of a non-blockchain-person, is counterproductive?

You will continue to have trouble getting people to adopt these devices until either the marketing focus changes or public opinion on blockchains changes. And one of those is going to be much easier to accomplish than the other.

I am not telling you this to bash blockchains. I do have negative opinions on that space, but I don't care to debate them here; nothing would be accomplished by either of us by doing so. I am giving you advice on the way your message is perceived by others.
The building is on the moon. Happy now? No of course you aren't.
Yes, I would have guessed that complaining something is sold on the platform wouldn't get you very far, that's way outside the range of a typical customer support rep. They have a place to report IP infringement, and I suppose counterfeits would come under that umbrella, but it's for the rights holders only to use. Not customers who might have purchased one or noticed one listed.

For standard run of the mill customer support they're still pretty great. I was shopping for new wireless earbuds last fall and tried out a few different ones. 2 of the 3 were defective and I didn't like the third-- they hurt my ears to wear them.

For the two defective ones, I'm not sure why but the normal return button wasn't available and I had to go through chat support. I explained they were defective and I wanted to return them. They told me they'd issue the refund, no need to actually mail them back, so I didn't have to go through that hassle. And these were high end ear buds, a total of $400 worth of tech.
That's a tautology
What is it that Rectangle can do that Moom can't? As a long-time Moom user, I've never come across an example of "amazing thing [other MacOS window management extension] does that Moom doesn't," but I always try to be open.

(There's also the possibility that there are amazing things I wouldn't use, of course. I have discovered that while I like keyboard shortcuts and Moom's hover dropdown for window resizing/movement, I find "drag a window to the screen edge to resize it" to be a maddening anti-feature.)
My gut is that I'm looking at two sides arguing past each other.

Most major value creation happens well before Disney+ or Pandora. They just have somewhat broadly defined parameters that will get you more of the same, from what has been created.

As easy examples, there are a lot of good kids shows that adults could enjoy, but my guess is that they are not recommended to most adults. Just as really good folk music is likely to get suggested to someone that hasn't listened to folk music. Or music/movies from another nation.

Which is all too say that the personalization is ultimately a customer fitting themselves to what they want, from what they know. Dropping someone in fresh with no prefit is probably a lost cause. Even though that is how most personalisation talks brand themselves.
Yeah that's how my group of friends came to see it. It was just another skill we could compete with. Some of us could watch the other three screens most of the time and hardly look at our own, which led to strategies of running around while staring at floors and walls to mask our position better.

The game has a lot of tricks too as I recall. Grenade launcher grenades only explode when hitting the ground, not other surfaces, so if you know what you're doing you can kill someone half way across The Complex with one. Oh, and some guns can shoot through doors, but the door must be open(ing) for it to actually register the hit, otherwise it is just rendering a tracer. Stuff like that.

Perhaps someday I will have an opportunity to save the world with my license-to-kill, postols-only, Complex skills. Only then will my misspent youth make sense.
Yes these are the ones. I'm sorry to hear they can go uncollected. In our case they are always collected and often reused. It helps that the trees are being planted in the local area (the hills surrounding Stanford University) and the crews regularly check on them.
TLDR: oxybenzone from sunblock gets glucose attached, which turns oxybenzone into a UV light driven catalyst. The catalyst doesn’t degrade, and the UV light catalyses biological molecules of the coral, damaging or killing the coral, particularly bleached coral lacking protective symbiotes.
Philippines election: 'Politicians hire me to spread fake stories'
Yes, there was a brief humorous reference to that in the article: "The correct approach would be to run config after editing the kernel config, but the plot restricts us from doing that."
And the Democratic Party claims voters should not be required to show photo ID to vote.
They're in IPO mode and systematically purging anything remotely controversial. My 9 year old account got suspended for saying that the admins enable pedophilia. They actually IP banned me so I can't create a new account.

People are even being mass-banned for upvoting controversial content or participating in certain subreddits. Sometimes the admins lock users out of their accounts so they can't log in, appeal the suspension, or delete their posts/comments.
Oh good catch, I even crossed out the right ones in the above code block. Edited to be (2, 2), which is a better example (since (1, 3) was already cleared out). Thanks!
I really wonder if these guys (Rober's team) are physically safe being in the US. The scammers were literally trying to kill them in India. Way to go all the way with the infiltration. They got typed passwords via CCTV then harvested as much internal data as possible before revealing all.
How did your process go, old sport?
The last time I tried to sell something on eBay, it was an RX 490 card. A buyer with an obviously fake profile pic clicked the "Buy It Now" button, and then shortly after I received a forged PayPal payment confirmation email with links to .ru domains. The shipping address was one of those international drop-shipping places in New Jersey (to get around the "only shipping to US addresses" restriction). So basically, total obvious scam.

I collected the evidence and submitted a report to eBay's fraud department. After the required waiting time I submitted a nonpayment report and got a credit on my eBay account about a week later. It took another 2 months to get a check because they told me that they were having operational issues because of the pandemic. A year later I checked to see if the scam account was still active, and sure enough it was.

Not sure how blatantly obvious scammers who get detailed reports of faudulent activity reported to eBay's fraud department manage to keep their accounts active, but it seems kind of impressive.
Literally half the OP article along with half the comments here explain how XML is a problem, how it is not equivalent to any other serialization format, etc. IMO the funniest example is stanza ids. That problem wouldn't exist even if they just used said XML in a remotely sane manner. But they really wanted to go all in on it. It's the XML mindset, the need to complicate things.
Having had these experiences, the god I saw and became one with was a being with a childlike sense of wonder at the universe it had accidentally created.

More of a "whoops, woah cool" than a "let there be light"

Very much unlike of the Christian conception of God.

I'm not describing this well, because I can't describe it well. But I can't imagine anyone experiencing something similar would be a jerk about it. See the universe unfiltered though the mind's perception and it just...is. Timeless and meaningless.

Consciousness and ego create their own meaning.
> You're missing that part where soft contribution is dropped.

Is it really, though?

Chatting over Slack can help everyone involved as it cuts down on meetings or even the need to focus synchronously on someone else's issue, and you can create group meetings with a couple of clicks. It's also trivial to setup an internal wiki.

It sounds like you're up selling in-person meetings while completely ignoring how everyone has been working for two years now.
This is not entirely related, but I think anyone over 65 should be highly encouraged to watch kitboga videos on YouTube to get a sense on how these scams work. Some senior orgs are doing it already, and not only are the videos absolutely hilarious and entertaining, they're very informative for seniors who would otherwise be scammed.
The only way I can see that working is if QA and the dev team are in separate timezones.
What is the boundary line between selfishness and narcissism?
The post is about marketing and ad targeting. For Spotify to satisfy their question of a "brand built through personalization", Spotify would have had to do something like sign up for google/facebook ads, target the demographic of "music listeners" and convert enough users to end up with a successful business. That's not how spotify built their business.

You're talking about their recommendation engine for users they already have, which is completely different.
Does this mean all the billions spent on targeted ads, all the gigatons of CO2 emitted running that crap JS in browsers worldwide, all the people annoyed, all the hours wasted, all the malware pumped and all the privacy violated, ... it was all for nothing? Suck it, marketers.