skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You're putting landlords should lose money before there should be abundant and affordable housing. Landlords still lose money, these policies remove housing from the market, cause distortions, and lead to the luxury / affordable split.
'negatively' all of a sudden.
Well, it's easy to use for users, it maintains itself for the most part and doesn't break compatibility. It is also easy to setup. And to customize. It provides many tools out of the box, including though you would not think. An example that surprised me is the automatic addition of lazy loading for images at some point when browsers started supporting it natively without any intervention from me, which is very good.

With a caching plugin it's as fast as a static website most of the time, which gets me 100% on Page Speed Insight, and the hosting is on a domestic connection. I've made sure to not use too many extensions and javascript-heavy things, to disable some stuff and avoid huge assets but I've not spent that much effort on it.

I've been maintaining a few WordPress websites since 2015 and I would chose WordPress again today for any new site on which non technical people must intervene (to write or manage content). It just works and is user friendly.

I'm not sure any CMS would save you if you don't do your security homework though.
What do you want to do after your MBA?
Nuclear today is competing against cheap, dispatchable natural gas. That's not relevant to a model of a carbon-free grid, where nuclear could displace the higher costs required to get dispatchable power from wind/solar.

Nuclear's main cost is capital, so using an artificially low lifetime biases heavily against nuclear. The model accounts for operating costs separately. Whether other tech will make nuclear uncompetitive is what we're trying to find out with this model; if we start by assuming that, and limit nuclear lifetime accordingly, then we're making a circular argument.

I did notice that fixed O&M costs are expressed as a percentage of capital cost, so if I take them at face value and halve the capital cost, to be conservative perhaps I should double the O&M from 3% to 6%, which I hadn't done before. That doesn't change the German and Thai results, since for those I only changed lifetime. But in the US, it means capital cost of 3000 still results in a grid without nuclear.

But is that number correct? Not quite. Across the nuclear fleet, the average US nuclear O&M cost is $132/kWh, or 125 euros: https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2019-03/documents/at...

That's only 2.1% of 6000. If we lower capital cost without lowering O&M, we get 4.2% of 3000. That puts a small amount of nuclear back in the US market.

However, they default to a discount rate of 10 for nuclear, and only 5 for wind/solar/battery. I don't see any reason to use different numbers here. Setting nuclear to 5, with the above changes, gets us back to a 100% nuclear US grid. Even if we take O&M back up to 6%, a capital cost of 3000 and discount rate of 5% means a 100% nuclear US.

Comparing overall grid cost of two examples: With no nuclear (due to 10% discount), the US average grid cost is 53.7 EUR/MWh. With 100% nuclear (due to 5% discount and 3000 capital cost), the US grid cost is 48.6 EUR/MWh.

In any case, this has changed my view somewhat. I'd thought that nuclear was a clear winner over storage, but it looks like nuclear's place is at least marginal in the US. We have copious wind and solar, and nuclear only lowers overall grid cost if we can manage the sort of nuclear costs they've achieved in South Korea. But in countries less favorable to wind/solar, nuclear dominates.
Nvidia is now Big GPU? lol
Nah it's what you get for GraphQL only being an API which people inevitably conflate with the database itself (a harmful trend that probably started with SQL databases).

If you want to use GraphQL you should look for a database supporting it as an interface, or failing that look for an ORM system that supports GraphQL and whatever backend you want.

Trying to convert SQL to GraphQL or GraphQL to SQL is both equally difficult and has little to do with it not having an algebra (also I think most of it is just algebraic types, possibly lacking a proper sum type).

God forbid you should try to modify anything with GraphQL though, that part makes no sense whatsoever.
>why do you waste so much time on the internet.

Because it's better than your regular life and what you have to do at work. And nothing realistic will give you the means to go beyond those.
How Peglin Made $1,049,413 in 1 week
Sure the NFT idea might be, but play to earn has existed in many online worlds for decades. If someone can make a living inside a virtual world, they can survive. It’s only going to get more popularized given big tech is hardly regulated.
Because my career has curved away from solving problems to find/replacing parameters in template repos
This is a good point.

I don't think "she'll be right" is hemmed in in complacency, it's just an acknowledgement that there are more important things to worry about.

Uptight foreigners (usually American or European) are incensed by the attitude.

And to be honest, there are far worse corporate behaviours and attitudes in Australia than "she'll be right"
"Good" is such a relative term right now. It's really more of a "You didn't get screwed." Everyone is paying dealer options unless they're buying one of the few cars that isn't selling. Same with MSRP if not MSRP + Dealership Owner's Next Vacation markup.
Seems like my email in the format word.other@gmail.com doesn't pass some check. I'm getting this error:

Sql error: error returned from database: new row for relation "workspace_invite" violates check constraint "proper_email"
When buying the dip doesn’t work: An analysis of the dot-com crash
Bananas also contain hydrogen. That's plenty of energy if you have a Mr Fusion
The Only Good Thing Left About Facebook
Manage Your Stocks Using Google Spreadsheet and API
Affordable, meaning reasonable pricing. Ie, not like Palo Alto's 3 million for 1200 square feet.
I think it's ridiculous. I think if the government wants you to "declare" something they need to make it explicit and how important that is to "declare". This is probably just someone in that department trying to get their name in trade rags in order to get a promotion.
My problem with graphql is that it makes part of the stack opaque for backend developers. You can't just inspect network requests in the browser and parsing graphql and front end code to understand what's being requested and how is a huge pain for debugging.
When you account for total revenues by sector it's the commodities trading business which comes out ahead though.

Just adding up Vitol, Transfigura, Cargill and Koch Industries you get to 665B in revenues.

Commodities trading is a behemoth, everything that surrounds us had to be mined and refined at some point, and most of it comes from very far, way beyond a 10-mile radius, thus prompting the need to move commodities around.
The Federal Reserve was created by the government, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Reserve_Act
, and their leaders are nominated by the US President and confirmed by Congress.

However, it is supposed to be independent from the politicians on a day-to-day basis, and people seem to like it that way.

I believe you are somewhat wrong in stating the Fed is not government.
Is the "controversial assumption" you are referring to that EAs tend to care about all individuals regardless of distance (in space or time) to themselves?

If your "obligation" is to help those in your country before you help those in other countries, should you also then start in your state, or your city, or your block, or your house, before you turn to help others outside the narrow focus you choose? This all seems very parochial in a world that is very interconnected.

Consider, should the millionaires living in a rich neighborhood support their local school first, before their philanthropic concern extends to the further-away poorer areas?

The comparison EA people try to get others to focus on is that in the world of philanthropy, counterintuitively, you literally can have 1,000 times more positive impact with the same amount of money. It's like doing the same amount of good $1,000 can with just $1 donation - when given to cost-effective charities. And based on research, I hope it doesn't surprise you that, you can get these kinds of multiplier effects only when you focus on helping those that can be most-effectively helped, who predominantly are not in the US.
Getting a blood clot is a significant complication that does result in death sometimes.

FDA puts strict limits on Johnson & Johnson Covid-19 vaccine

https://www.cnn.com/2022/05/05/health/fda-johnson-johnson-va...
>That speaks more about the community than I want to believe, sadly.

You're the one passive-aggressively chiding me for not rehashing a technical conversation already discussed to death three for four rounds of refterm submissions ago.
No, they were not truly "new". The first "computer" was very different to what we have now.

An actually novel idea was Einstein's General Relativity, but even that built on top of Riemannian geometry, which built on top of other ideas. Another actually novel idea was the Copenhagen interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, and that needed Heisenberg to sit in a park and observe a person going under lights and then back into darkness.

There are very few truly novel ideas in history, and even those built on top of other works.
"What we desperately need today is higher rates, not merely as a temporary measure or to restore a sense of near term credibility, but higher for longer, in order to promote long-term economic vibrancy. In the near term, this will cause economic pain and wealth destruction."

There is an apt analogy to be made with forest fires and recessions.

You can keep forest fires from erupting for decades - and we have done that in much of the American West. But the fuels continue to build up and, eventually, a fire that cannot be managed will explode violently - and cause much more damage than the aggregate of all of the smaller fires along the way.

Business firms fail. Employees of those firms lose their jobs and suppliers are left unpaid. Nobody likes this but it is the circle of life of the economy. Keeping these firms alive with cheap and easy rollover of debt is akin to letting the fuels build up in the forest: when the day finally arrives that these zombie firms cannot finance or rollover debt we will have an explosion of defaults and bankruptcies that consumes far more than the laggards we supported along the way.

We need regular recessions the same way we need regular fires in the forest.
Let's not stereotype a whole category of people.
What does observability mean? Can you translate this into a concrete question?

As for flexibility, do you mean authentication or authorization?

SSO can be done at the SQL server level (MSSQL has it and so does Postgres, don't know about others), but handling the SSO part in your app and using "set role" and passing a user ID for your row level security policies to use is easier to set up and more flexible.

Clean separation between user and machine accounts can absolutely be done with MSSQL and Postgres.
https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cookbook:Table_of_Contents
I subscribe to a different take on what has happened to interest rates the last 40 years. I think market driven rates have been going lower and the fed has just responded by lowering their rates.

With interest rates so low, money is poring into the stock market driving it up. This is helping the wealthy. But I also think the interest rate problem is caused by wealth inequality, with more invested money chasing fewer productive lending opportunities, and this is because more money is in the hands of savers and less in the hands of spenders.

I personally am hoping after the inflation rate comes back down we see larger net wage inflation than price inflation, returning money to the hands of the working class. (Of course, it would be tricky to push for this too much as a policy because we certainly do not want to cause a wage-inflation spiral. I don't think that is a given though. As they say, the best cure for high prices is high prices.)
I don't want to guess the variable names or comments even after finding the algorithm
I have had cases where it takes ~2 hours to hit a bug case. You cannot afford that time waiting for the debugger. You must achieve that with logging. You might be able to figure out, with that logging, how to hit the bug faster and then you can use the debugger to step through, but I have found the use of a debugger to be beneficial in fewer than 20% of bugs I am trying to solve.
Nothing particularly wrong with Powershell, esp. given how much it's used with MS infrastructure; it's a high-value skill in IT shops everywhere, including the DOD's own. Nothing wrong with REPL's either.

The original author's point about debug logging remains, however.

These are all tools in your toolbox that fit different circumstances differently. Challenge yourself to learn new tools.
> changing sexuality

The sexuality is not "changing" significantly, what changed is that it's getting less dangerous to 1. realize that you are not straight 2. not be straight 3. tell people (including polls) that you are not straight...
grayscale your phone. Its subtle psychology that keeps you coming back
A structural problem is that in the cities where young people congregate, rents are high, and therefore spacious "third places" aren't likely to be viable.
I don't think I'm conflating it. jseban's comment indicates that anyone who knows how to write simple SQL queries would get no benefit from using GraphQL to consume data, which must mean that there is a simple SQL query that can be written to fulfill any GraphQL query.
Fertility rates are dropping, and national population growth is slow across the West -- the problem is generally where the housing is rather than how much there is in aggregate. Old estates in the hinterlands are cheap, that's not where the wealth transfer is happening. Google will yield you some fantastic estates across the UK and Western Europe costing less than half of a modest 2br ranch-style home in Palo Alto.

> I don't think it will meaningfully reduce cost of home ownership.

More housing would absolutely meaningfully reduce the cost of home ownership. Just look at cities like Detroit and Pittsburgh that, for a time, had a surplus of housing and a declining population: houses became super super cheap.

What's happening now is that housing stock is increasing 0.5% per year, while city population is increasing 5% per year, and then policymakers are turning around and saying "look, we're building more housing, and prices keep rising, it's not working!" -- of course, because cities need to build enough housing to satisfy demand, not just "more housing". Each year we have a new housing deficit, the housing "debt" goes up. To reduce prices, you need to build more than the demand is, which we are so far from doing it is laughable.

> Infill development is more expensive

This, too, is per policy. The sweet spot price-wise for construction costs alone is 4-5 story apartment buildings; outside parts of SF, Manhattan, and a few other inner cities, we aren't there yet. But the cost of infill development these days also includes (1) drafting environmental impact reports; (2) multiple sets of meetings with neighbors to convince them not to oppose your plans; (3) delay and stalling tactics from well-heeled neighbors who oppose your plans anyway (see: CEQA); (4) extensive requirements on insulation, window area, solar panel inclusion, etc. that push costs upwards; and finally (5) years of paying property taxes while you attempt all of the above to get your plans approved. That's leaving out (6) extremely high labor costs for construction, because construction workers need housing too, and their rent is also super high.

We are not going to see meaningful change until we remove at least some of the constraints on housing construction and new supply can begin to exceed new demand. In California, lawmakers are starting to wake up to the problems, but solutions are slow to come.
>Paul’s not a genius

This post feels like shallow, Malcolm Gladwellish, wrap-a-simple-idea-with-a-random-narrative stuff.

Paul McCartney might be the greatest pop musician/songwriter of the 20th century. Some (most?) of his best works were performed after the Beatles. If he's not a genius, then no musician is a genius.
My only problem here is once again the fine is meaningless. $5.5 million is couch change for Nvidia. The fines are supposed to deter these actions. This has no effect whatsoever.
I think it's akin to addiction. Internet secretes the pleasure chemicals in brain. And it's fun.
>Paul’s not a genius

This post feels like shallow, Malcolm Gladwellish, wrap-a-simple-idea-with-a-random-narrative stuff.

Yes, MVPs are good. But Paul McCartney might be the greatest pop musician/songwriter of the 20th century. Some (most?) of his best works were performed after the Beatles. If he's not a genius, then no musician is a genius.
I see now what you mean, youre talking about structural interfaces, like Go and Typescript have. Yes, concept functions are those applied to generics.

You may not like structural interfaces, but they're much better at decoupling data from how it's used. People who have used both Typescript and Rust often wish more languages worked with structural interfaces like Typescript does.

It's easy to see why, looking at the examples in the article.

I believe in decoupling, and think a good language will have as little coupling as possible. To each their own though!
It's not the same though. tRPC requires no code generation.

With tRPC if I change the return type of an API, I get instant feedback on my frontend code with errors and autocompletion.

Is my understanding correct?
disclaimer: I'm not a shill for Fastmail, just a happy (family plan) user after Gmail did me the favor of changing pricing and having me look around for alternatives.

$10/month is surprisingly high for temp-mail.org's service. Fastmail is $3-5/month paying monthly, and that includes full regular email service plus (at the $5/month level) your own domains, and on top of that they offer the disposable email address service. It seems like temp-mail's only extra feature is accepting cryptocurrency.
The names of the commenters may not be highlighted but they are still in the images. If "the first, insulting, reply" refers to "of the screenshots on Twitter" lhecker would be the second to reply.
> code in my own biases to the program to make it work properly

Isn't this, in theory, what the "algorithms" are trying to do for you? They see what you interact with and try to optimize for "similar" content to surface these gems for you automatically, since it will keep you in their platform longer.
OP is asking about OpenVMS *on VAX*, 3 CPU architectures ago, which is definitely a dead platform
Leaving a small sliver of 2G service would have avoided obsoleting a lot of devices. Support emergency calls, very low data rate applications, and play an announcement if someone tries to make a call "we're sorry, your phone sucks, or we're too lazy to let it provision a VoLTE profile, so buy something new if you want to talk"
I'm doing these mini vacations so often now that they feel routine.

What's next? :P
When the organization busts out phrases like "student-centered," you know it's entirely about the needs of the organization.
All of this IAC crap was sold to barely-tech-literate engineering managers as “declarative makes the complexity go away!” so every IAC vendor wed themselves to YAML or HCL or JSON, but of course the complexity doesn’t go away and so the vendors came up with increasingly absurd ways to DRY up this YAML (text templates a la Helm or encoding a DSL into your config language a la Terraform and CloudFormation). Eventually people realized this was madness and what’s really needed is a programming language that can resolve to these static manifests, so these vendors in their zeal to forever misunderstand the assignment came out with CDKs so we can compile source code to YAML with a whole bunch of pointless inheritance to really make a mess of things.
Yes, I was responding to an argument for the minimum wage, not the amount. If offered $9, no one would do the work.
See Hasura https://hasura.io/
National Robotics Engineering Center (NREC) | Software, MachineLearning, Computer Vision, Simulation, IT | Pittsburgh, PA, USA | Full Time | ONSITE, Hybrid | H1-B VISA

Featured Openings:

Software Team Lead - https://www.nrec.ri.cmu.edu/careers/software-team-lead.html

DevOps Engineer - https://www.nrec.ri.cmu.edu/careers/devops-engineer.html

System Engineer - https://www.nrec.ri.cmu.edu/careers/system-engineer.html

Controls Engineer - https://www.nrec.ri.cmu.edu/careers/controls-engineer.html

Machine Learning Engineer - https://www.nrec.ri.cmu.edu/careers/ml-engineer.html

Data Engineer - https://www.nrec.ri.cmu.edu/careers/data-engineer.html

Computer Vision - https://www.nrec.ri.cmu.edu/careers/robotics-engineer-comput...

Robotics Technician - https://www.nrec.ri.cmu.edu/careers/robotics-technician-2.ht...

All Current Openings: https://www.nrec.ri.cmu.edu/careers/index.html

NREC, a robotics research and development powerhouse, is looking for experienced developers, especially in embedded systems, robotics, perception, deep learning, data science, and AI. For more than 25 years NREC has brought together a critical mass of software and hardware engineers to take technology from the laboratory to the real world. NREC maintains a diverse portfolio of projects, from Augmented Reality driver assistance to full off-road autonomy and from advanced teleoperation to full autonomous manipulation. We are part of the Robotics Institute at Carnegie Mellon University, focused on commercialization of robotic technologies, and employ over 160 people in our off-campus facility.

If you have questions about NREC or are interested in any position, contact Christine DeCarolis (cdecarolis@nrec.ri.cmu.edu). In your communication, please mention Hacker News.
A lot happened around that time: Technology and automation really started taking off, sending productivity way up. Global shipping costs plummeted, giving way to a new era of international trade. The first personal computers started entering the market. Trade relations with China opened up around that time. Households started moving from single-earner to dual-income.

It was a time of rapid change. That particular website is usually used to suggest that the only thing that changed was the gold standard, but it's been debunked and refuted all across the internet.
I have found that people who grew up on the internet tend to have a "third place" that's online, which it sounds like for you is discord. That kind of makes that your priority over a real-life third place like a pub or something, since it's where all the people you are super familiar with are it's easier just to stick around that.

For me all my online third places disappeared (specific IRC chats and forums), and I never really found another. I'm on discord but they're very shallow places for me now. I spend most of my time online just on YouTube, and the rest of my time at work, with my partner or family, and doing hobbies. It's a very reasonable offline-life but I do find myself missing a third-place. Maybe I need to join a gaming clan or something.
What if the societal trends were in the opposite direction? Should you evolve or become a dinosaur then too? If so, why bother caring at all?