skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
There is no such thing as a genetic "Swede". Literally every trait you could name is neither exclusive on its own or in any particular combination with Swedish people.

And no, humans were not bred like dogs, so your math is both offensive and completely useless.

At this point I'm beginning to think you're being intentionally hateful.
DNSSEC doesn't help privacy, it helps security.
Unfortunately most of the families in my circle that are not in tech don’t own computers anymore. They literally just turned the PC off one day and then a few years later unplugged it and put it in a closet to collect dust, with zero chance of ever purchasing another thousand dollar replacement. Their toddlers are amazing at driving tablets/phones though. Who is going to crack the SmartPhone native WoW 2.0?
>The whole opinion of roe v Wade was predicated on the fact the government had no right to people's health information

The Due Process violation is not about government right to health information. It's about the govt not being able to deprive people of things without due process.

Here's the full SC ruling [1]

[1] https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/410/113
sqlite also has roots in the us military (navy iirc). this could explain the US govs willingness to adopt.
That is not an example of a bottleneck, nor is it an example of a genetic adaptation occurring recently, as both happened more than ten thousand years ago.

And none of this has anything whatsoever to do with the cultural concept of race. There are people who are not "Tibetans" who have this genetic adaptation, and there are "Tibetans" who do not have this genetic adaptation.

Further, the pairing of this genetic trait with other genetic traits does not exist. Having this genetic trait does not make you more likely to have a set of other genetic traits, and none of the genetic traits add up to a specific "Tibetan" set of features or traits, all of which you would need to have to be called "Tibetan".

There is no such thing as "genetic race".
The main reason differences don't exist is that the group of people they always want to claim has the differences (black people) aren't genetically related to each other and have more diversity than the rest of humanity.
"The Fine Article" (though more traditionally, and/or depending on tone, "The Fucking Article").
Specialized Diverge does have fender/rack mounts (although you need to replace the stock seat post clamp with another one for the top rear rack mounts, but Spec does sell one). It's not exactly a utility bike, but for touring around civilized Europe it's a very good bike. :-)
It's a clash of ideals, for sure. A commercial company avoids literal translations for obvious reasons; you want to ingratiate yourself with as large an audience as possible and using terminology that most people don't understand is alienating. Putting a translator's note to educate viewers about Japanese culture isn't really an option.

Fan translations don't have the same restrictions in place and while it can lead to infamous examples like the keikaku one you mentioned, it can be much more enlightening, enriching, and enjoyable. Most of the time they help provide cultural context and some of these are widespread enough in anime fandom that even the official translations will use things like honorifics.

Ultimately, I think it's good to have both. I view it as sort of the "introductory" level and the "intermediate" level of anime watching.
I think outside of the formal logic space the concept of invariants still are core to programming. Many different strategies such as pure functions, unit tests, type systems, isolation of global state, all key really key around the concept that their are logical truths that always hold for a given program. This is a key way to build large complex programs. it’s impossible to hold every detail of what the code does, so having certain things be known truths goes a long way to enabling one to reason about code.
I hardly use video on my meetings. I tend to use screenshare and voice only except in circumstances where a higher fidelity is required.

I find working together on a document keeps attendees focused (along with a few tips/tricks like polling individuals, aligning current discussion with others' previously stated ideas and writing what people say as verbatim as possible)
That’s how pretty much all of my contracting engagements work.
BEDMAS in Canada (Southern Ontario) circa 2000.
Cache invalidation isn’t a hard problem
>... The Mafia? Any other criminal or terrorist organization or individual? The police operating under an incorrect warrant? A creepy ex?

The mafia is easy. Pay them and they DGAF what you do. Creepy ex is more or less a non-issue because any threat of violence one person can bring can be matched by another one person.

It's the police, terrorists and other well resourced but potentially capricious organizations (like the CDC, or any other federal bureaucracy, obviously the trigger happy ones are higher on the list), the kind of organizations who can send a dozen thugs to kick in your door and who have diffused responsibility across so many people you can't "get even" that you don't want coming after you.

>the CDC is at worst going to do what it thinks is best for you,

Every horror in history was committed with the best of intentions.

Edit: and to be clear, I'm not too worried about the CDC themselves, I'm worried about the legions of useful idiots that will happily take whatever they say and run with it. If the CDC makes BS or politically charged recommendations there is a myriad of other institutions (government and otherwise) that will see that as their ticket to do whatever bad thing they were already fishing for a reason to do. I don't want anyone having my data. But given the choice I'd rather have people who want to sell me penis pills and time shares have my data than people who want to tell me how to live.
At work, we have a codebase that is used by numerous projects. The solution for project specific changes is 'checkout the repo, and make your changes locally'.

What that has turned into is 'checkout the repo and make a new directory structure that symlinks everything back to the original'. The keeps the maintenance burden relatively small as you can easily update the base version, and only need to worry about the files you changed.

I certainly wouldn't recommend using this approach for anything; but it is not as terrible as it sounds.
In the early 1990s, I went on a bicycle tour in Ireland with a friend for a couple of weeks. At a fair somewhere in County Mayo there was such a lottery. After that, when my friend asked me something I did not know, I always replied: "Do I know where the cow poops?"
Our latest guide details setting up Arize AI's ML observability platform with Gradient Deployments. Follow this guide to learn how to integrate Arize within Gradient Deployments to monitor data drift, traffic, and other model monitoring metrics. http://blog.paperspace.com/monitoring-deployments-with-arize...
Even more subtly, if there is one insurance company that makes a lot of extra return on their "float" (the money that has been paid in premiums but not yet paid out in claims), they may actually sell insurance that is a "bad bet", i.e. is expected to have underwriting losses, but that the time value of money makes profitable for them.

In that context other insurance companies can't compete unless they also are making huge returns on their float. It drives risky behavior by insurance companies in exactly the opposite way you'd prefer.
I don’t think there is much of any risk of accepting it except that you may not be able to comply with KYC.
No, socat is for sockets, not for “serial”.
That's a fair point, though in practical terms I think Lucas just took the roundabout way to arrive a metaphor involving the real world Maquis (as opposed to Star Trek's odder counterpart): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maquis_(World_War_II)

There's still a lot fewer "shades of grey" in "French rebels versus Nazis" than in all the complicated geopolitics of Viet Cong versus US military. Lucas may have used the idea from the Vietnam War, but he didn't just filter it through a WW2 aesthetic, he entirely embedded it in it.

To my mind Star Wars isn't exactly the franchise for "maybe the Empire are the good guys in the story" shades of grey. (Though admittedly I also find it appalling how many people cosplay the Empire and how much merch there is and seeming adulation the Empire gets. Though it is seemingly great for Disney's bottom line if people don't think of the First Order as a Nazi Regime that exploded entire planets worth of people like the text tells us they are.)
When I need to shuffle around and/or rename my media files, for instance, it's risky to operate on the originals themselves. I've screwed up hundreds of mp3 files by issuing a bad `rename` command. I've lost the hierarchical structures of genres and artists and albums and such by accidentally moving them into the same directory together. And so on.

If you `lndir` your mp3 directory to a functional copy of it, a playground of sorts, you can move things around and rename them without having to worry about scenarios like having to listen to a bunch of mp3s in order to put them back to where they're supposed to be.

When you're satisfied with the re-organization of your files, you can replace your symlinks with the original files. Since none of the directories are symlinked, you never have to worry about `cd`ing into a place you didn't intend to.
Are they insuring densely populated countries against the consequences of disastrous nuclear reactor accidents?
A counter point: Danmachi.

You'll get plenty of search hits off it.
> the myth that "Writing in Safe Rust automatically makes your code memory-safe"

Of course you're right that that isn't true as stated, but I think it's interesting to try to situate this point along a continuum of other similar points:

1. C with Valgrind and sanitizers isn't always memory safe, because those tools are limited by test coverage.

2. Python isn't always memory safe, because many libraries including the standard library call into C code.

3. Pure Python that doesn't call into any C code isn't always memory safe, because the interpreter might have bugs.

4. Provably correct Ada with a provably correct compiler isn't always memory safe, because the proof checker, the compile-time hardware, or the runtime hardware might have bugs.

I think we all agree that there are important differences between 1 and 4, beyond the simple fact that the defects get less common as you go down the list. Here are some things that stand out to me:

- In cases #2 and below, the application code isn't "at fault" for any memory unsafety that comes up, and whatever code is at fault can be fixed to restore memory safety without changing the application.

- In case #1, there's no clear boundary in any sense between "safe code" (which we know isn't at fault for memory unsafety) and "unsafe code" (which might be at fault). There may be a distinction between code that's well covered by tests and code that isn't, for example, but it's often not easy to tell which is which. In case #2 and below, the boundary is pretty clear.

- In case #1, the amount of "unsafe code" in an application probably grows linearly with the size of the application, or maybe we just consider the whole application unsafe. But in cases #3 and #4, unsafe code is confined to low-level dependencies that get a lot of "battle testing" compared to how much code is in them. Case #2 is kind of a gray area, and we need to look at what dependencies the application is using.

So where should we situate Rust in that continuum? Is being able to write unsafe Rust code more or less risky than being able to call into C? It's certainly a lot more convenient to write an `unsafe` block than to cross the FFI barrier, and maybe that convenience is dangerous. On the other hand (contrary to some common misconceptions), unsafe Rust still benefits a lot from the borrow checker and other safety features, and it might end up having a lower rate of defects for that reason. Maybe it's too early to tell?

But anyway yes, I totally agree that the Rust community has a hard time getting the messaging right about how safe code and unsafe code work. But even though this discussion is really important to Rust, I'm not sure it's a "Rust problem" per se. I think it's actually quite difficult to talk clearly and correctly and precisely about memory safety in general.
Please stop violating the HN guidelines. I get that you're emotional about the subject and have a religious zeal for it, but that's no excuse for name-calling.

There is no evidence that anyone you're replying to is writing in bad faith. They may be wrong, although you've failed to show that in any way that satisfies intellectual curiosity, but that doesn't justify personal attacks and slimy rhetoric[1].

[1] http://coolhaus.de/art-of-controversy/erist32.htm
Kind and caring != understands dog behaviour.
99.999% of agonistic behaviour is driven by fear. What a normal person thinks is a kind & caring behaviour can be terrifying for a dog.

Non-pointers point. Some pointer don't.

Non-retreivers retrieve. Some retreivers don't.

Non-herding dogs herd. Some herders don't.

Most dogs play-fight. "Fighting dogs" have to be trained to fight to kill.

Breeding is clearly a fantastic determinant of physical characteristics which pair well with the desired behaviour, and does contribute a little bit towards behavioural instinct, but (as per the *peer-reviewed long term study* in question) isn't on its own a good predictor of behaviour.

The ~.001%, by the way, is termed idiopathic aggression (sometimes called cocker rage, but again is NOT actually well-correlated with cocker spaniels). Idiopathic means of unknown cause.
I started walking regularly (averages to about 9km a day) over a year ago. It transformed my life.

I was walking a little bit before, but not regularly. Since I started doing it every day I lost 35 kg and got much happier. I just can't continue to be angry about anything after walking for 1 hour with a good book on the headphones.

Now I'm usually doing about 5-10 km on work days and 20-35 km on free days. I skip if the weather is too bad but it's rare. For example I love walking when snow is falling as long as it's not the heavy wet variety.

I agree that sometimes it's better not to listen to anything - you can recognize these days by the fact you don't actually listen to the stuff on the headphones. Then I just turn it off or put some instrumental music instead.

As for where to walk - I prefer countryside nowadays, but that's probably because countryside here is very walkable. Small roads have pavements or the traffic is so low it doesn't matter. And the expectation is that people walk on them so it's pretty safe. There's only one road nearby that sucks for walking as I've learnt the hard way. Never again.
That seems to be theoretical. Are there any examples of eradicating a zoonotic disease that caused a pandemic (without it going away naturally)?
You are absolutely correct from a theoretical standpoint. Completely neutral, independent medical experts should, on average, make better health decisions than an uninformed populace.

The problem is when we transfer those assumptions to the real world, all of the most important adjectives in that prior sentence start to fall apart. The managers in the CDC are not neutral or independent. They are by and large bureaucrats who have professional reputations, career trajectory, office politics, and other competing incentives that compete and often conflict with their stated goal of making the "best health decisions" for everyone.

This has resulted in the absurd patchwork of logically inconsistent mask and vaccine rules that we've all be subjected to for the past 2 years. For me, this has firmly demonstrated that the structure of these institutions and their methods of public communication have lost the public trust and we cannot give them broad, sweeping powers.
haha, me too
I walk 3 miles, each morning (takes about 50 min).

Here's a useful tool, for planning routes. A friend wrote it: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/easyroute/id605127860
Yup. New York has a gifted and talented test that's supposed to require no preparation, but kids are competing with other kids who have spent time/effort/money to prepare: https://www.amazon.com/s?k=new+york+gifted
I’m so tempted to try this. I never wear a sport coat. Well, unless I’m in a suit, which is a couple times a year if I’m unlucky.

I wear a short sleeve polyester t-shirt in black. I own a dozen of them, all identical, and wear them most days. My wife hates it.

The black is not good on very hot days. It’s surprising how much difference a light color makes. But, I can’t seem to keep light stuff clean.

I don’t know if I could stand my arms in a sport coat, but I guess it’s no different from a regular jacket in the winter.
Yes, they could if they care too. Folks have done this with (relatively) small contributions.

Most companies are willing to share their code as GPL requires when asked.

What they aren't willing to do is provide authorization keys etc to hardware etc as they don't feel GPLv2 requires that. Because most GPLv2 devs ALSO don't think GPLv2 requires that not a lot of litigation there.

My guess is that if SFC does get a smaller kernel contributor to assign copyright the kernel devs may try and remove their contribution.
Without transparency and some level of clarity, you cannot expect trust from others and the cynics will remain cynical.
This question has led me away from big box stores and more to online clothes retailers. Certain brands give a really comprehensive breakdown of what their clothes are made of and how they're constructed. Right now I'm thinking of a pair of Outlier pants that I've had for about 4 years or more by now, probably have 500 wears in them. They have some minor fading and a couple of burn holes from standing too close to campfires, but are otherwise unscathed. They were something like $150 when I bought them but I was sold on the textile they used (very durable high-nylon synth blend), and in this case it paid off -- I would have blown holes in the knees of jeans 5 times over in the same period.
This is a nice idea in theory, but the issue then becomes inconsistent moderation that affects what is visible to everyone. If you get banned or have posts deleted on one platform, presumably those posts disappear from that instance, and thus the Fediverse as a whole.

This also leads to some pretty insidious siloing since (at least with Mastadon) you can have instances block themselves off from other instances or instances at large, which seems pretty unhealthy.

Not to mention, people don't typically want to pay for these services, or pay to host them, they want to access them for free. On top of that, with something like Twitter, the desire is to be visible to all, rather than just a few. Most people use Twitter to interact with 'the world', not just a local part of it.
>Trusting your gut over a paper published in Nature. Bold move!

Not really bold, just sensible and rational when there is a large amount of evidence the paper is wrong. After all, many papers are found to be wrong. I believe there was even a study that measured the ability of people to predict which papers would turn out to be not replicable... I'll try to find a link to that and post it here.
> Botnets are almost entirely ISP router/modem combo devices.

Above you say they are IoT devices. I don't mean 'gotcha', but to learn: What does the population of botnet devices consist of?
They were known in the 90's for insuring pro wrestlers bodies if they were injured to the point that they could no longer perform. It was pretty common to hear about a wrestler retiring with a "Lloyds settlement".
I just do whatever I feel like on that particular walk. I'd say 40/20/40 on whether I want to listen to a podcast/audiobook, listen to music or walk in silence.
It depends on how security conscious you are. Technically you can route things through remote nodes and thus avoid downloading the blockchain. But the monero community is security conscious and usually recommends downloading the blockchain, which takes a while if you do it the “right” way and don’t just find a copy of it hosted somewhere and download it.

If you are ok with skipping that, you can use something like CakeWallet to create a wallet on your phone and then give someone a receiving address
If your machine is compromised, it’s only a matter of time until they get the credentials anyway. Whether you have more time than them is ultimately the question.

I don’t think the vulnerability you mention here is “worth working around” for most apps, where you can trust the hardware and OS you’re running on. For those that can’t trust the OS and hardware they are running on, this may be legitimate. Even then, if you can’t trust that, what are you doing running software on it?
Doubtful. Unless you think in 2100 that rape victims will be forced to carry babies to term and people will mourn early miscarriages as if a toddler died. I would be extremely surprised.
Multiplayer | Founding Software Engineers (Full Stack) | Remote (SF HQ) | Full Time

Early-stage opportunity, significant equity and technical decision ownership.

Multiplayer is an async collaboration tool for hybrid/remote knowledge workers that makes it easy to search across conversations, track work across apps, and find out what others are working on. We're an ML-centric product, much how Gong brought analytic, search, and assistive features to unstructured sales convos, we're doing it for the whole enterprise.

Tech Stack: Typescript, GraphQL, Postgres

Contact: join [at] multiplayer.work
> spongy, weird texture, bad flavor.

That describes every store bought frozen meatball I've ever had, sponginess particularly. But if I make meatballs myself and freeze them, they come out fine. Something about the way factories make meatballs just isn't right.
To just receive: download the wallet software from getmonero.org and generate a new wallet.
The are also multiple point of sale solutions available.

To automate payments: run a node and use any of the RPC libraries available for various languages.
The digital world ought be soft, mendable, a place where we could try our hand. But rarely so.

Malleable Systems Collective being one modest outpost for trying to make software soft. Not a lot of broad recognition of this challenge.
I’m curious how the method of collecting data is biased away from dogs who are less likely to be talked/bragged about by their owners. Also, that suggests it is likely more likely to represent a person’s/family’s _current_ dog and to ignore previous dogs. Dogs which are given back, thrown away, currently homeless, in a rescue organization, or were put down are likely to not be represented in this survey. Those are likely to have less breed-predictable temperaments, so I would assume the results here are a ceiling, not necessarily accurate.
Yes although the performance is probably largely due to occlusion? Also the sprites do not collides with their environnement
The prequels weren't exactly full of shocking plot twists that weren't clearly telegraphed or just shown on the movie poster (young Anakin with the Darth Vader shadow). I don't think Jar Jar was ever going to be evil.