skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This is grossly inaccurate. Sure, it's possible that someone can just be socially stunted in a way that looks "autistic" to non-autistic people. But that's not at all what autism is.

I'm autistic. I have a great understanding of my own emotional state and how it affects my mental function, and I often use this understanding to get myself out of situations before they deteriorate into me having a breakdown. Meanwhile you have allistic people everywhere who will neglect to eat and gradually start getting angry at everything with no awareness of what's going on. Who's the one lacking emotional intelligence?

I'm also perfectly fine at understanding most social norms; I just find a lot of them ridiculous, irritating, and counterproductive, so I'm inclined to fight against them, which goes variously well or poorly depending on the audience. (It tends to go very well around other autistic people!)
It's a PII covering our butts thing more than anything. Wanting to absolutely minimize what we know about our users.
Should add a similar rule for AirBNB
I'd be interested in hearing about a better model.

To me they're all terrible in one way or another.
In my experience the apps are more often worth paying for. Probably a viscous circle. Android always feels like a garbage bin I have to scrounge through to find some gems imo.
Yes there are. FIDO specifies different authentication levels and level 1 allows access to the master keys (it allows for pure software implementations). I think this page gives a decent overview of the levels... https://fidoalliance.org/certification/authenticator-certifi...
SHOP stock has been absolutely slaughtered in the last 6 months.

They're either super geniuses with long term vision the markets can't see, or people have completely lost faith with them for exactly these kinds of moves.
Proximity to where the products are housed.

Most companies, especially small ones don't do the volume required to make stockpiling enough products close to the consumer to make it worthwhile.
"rm -rf" blowing you foot off is a Unix Right of Passage(tm).

You will do it at least once in your career. If you're old enough you will do it twice. If you're really old, you get the joy of doing it a third time.

The subtlety increases each time because you do learn.
> Societal privilege is not measured in terms of the net income of the people who hold the privilege, it is measured in the influence those people have over the workings of society.

For example: the military industrial complex commands huge budgets despite having produced nothing of value for the last 50 years. It commands these huge budgets because generals, senators, and admirals have societal privilege. When a general, senator, and CEO say that society should write a check for billions of euros to build the F-35 or blow up some children, society does it. That is societal privilege.
I know very few people on any desktop os that don’t use plugins or third party apps to customize their experience but it’s only when macOS is discussed that it gets painted as something outrageous.
Between their introduction of Surface phones like the Duo, and their Microsoft Launcher, it seems like they're aiming for that down the road.
If you've managed to limit your investment in alcohol, feel grateful. I massively increased my investment starting around 2019. The pandemic was a boom time for my portfolio. I'm now looking to take some profits and diversify into areas that are less harmful to my liver and other vital organs.

Running shoes sounds like a future investment opportunity I'd like to explore.
kids is a cool film, but not much of a cautionary tale. it's more like a 90s urban euphoria, in that the message is really more to adults: "this is what teenagers are actually doing right now".

what (imo) would make requiem for a dream really effective is that it shows the transition from the "honeymoon phase" of drug use to the "consequences phase" really well. I think this is the part that teenagers really don't understand (or at least I didn't). when you're starting out, it can seem like a lot of the anti-drug messaging is just fear mongering (and it is, to an extent). but most people that age don't yet have the perspective to distinguish between harmless fun and a slow motion crisis.

trainspotting is also great, and a bit more realistic than requiem for a dream. but if I had to pick one of the two to show to teens, I'd probably pick the former.
I know many cooperations in automotive use the UML tool from Enterprise Architect. There is code generation available: https://sparxsystems.com/enterprise_architect_user_guide/15....
When all you have and all that surrounds you is garbage, and the future is what you make it, the future is probably going to be garbage.
Would a government agency purchase app behavioral data off the gray market to intrude on the lives of the public? Yesterday's CDC story says 'Yes!'
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rStL7niR7gs
True, but especially if you are obese, find your TDEE (Total Daily Energy Expenditure) and make sure you eat close to that. You shouldn't cut more than 1000 calories a day from your needs. If you do that over a long enough time period, you can lose muscle and your metabolism will slow and become more efficient to protect yourself, making it harder to lose weight.

If you have already done this, you will have to enter into a period of building exercise and adding muscle weight back onto your body before your metabolism will work the way it should.

Sure, this is anecdotal but I was eating 1600 calories a day OMAD and my metabolism dropped to burn 1850 calories a day. (As measured by a VO2 Max machine as part of a dexafit scan), which is about 750 calories a day under what it should have been. My standing body temperature was also hovering around 97.3 instead of 98.6

Since then I've been eating more, closer to 3000 calories a day and exercising with heavy lifting 3x a week and my metabolism has come roaring back. I haven't had another VO2 Max scan but my standard morning body temp is now 98.3. In the months I've been doing that I have gained 1 pound, but I am sure a good chunk of that is muscle.
The github.com documentation pages I read on this topic yesterday said the MFA requirement was for web sign-on and https GIT repo URLs. It explicitly said that SSH-based git repo access would not be affected. Has anyone seen contradictory statements published by github?

Edit to add: I mean SSH git access using a keypair registered with your account. (I don't know if there is some legacy option to use SSH with passwords, which I imagine would be discontinued if not already.)
It is incredible how empowering it was a tool to upload photos, tag friends in them, and distribute them when it launched. The introduction of the feed was the beginning of the end.
Tulips had value in 1635 then two years later the market collapsed.

I don't know what's going to happen in the future. Eventually the flow of people new to cryptocurrencies will stop. I figure one of three things will happen:

1. Values hold and people treat cryptocurrencies like gold.

2. The market collapses.

3. Somebody finds something useful to do with cryptocurrencies and values appreciate with less volatility.
Important quote: “We’ll never have a viable nuclear industry in this country until we take the profit motive out of it.”
> A staircase isn't accessible, but still allowed. The accessibility is in an alternate implementation provided for those who need it.

Exactly this -- some things just aren't going to be for everyone. If we truly wanted to make buildings "accessible", all stairways, and even printed signage would have to be banned, as there exists someone who cannot benefit from it.
I think the first iteration of this system will definitely receive the synced key material in RAM.

It's possible that the TPM spec will be updated to allow for loading pre-encrypted data into the TPM store as a response to this. Alternatively, existing secure computing systems (SGX/TrustZone) can also be used to decrypt the synchronised key relatively securely.
https://antivirus.com/2021/11/25/google-is-making-2fa-mandat...

https://techcrunch.com/2021/12/02/facebook-two-factor-mandat...

https://www.wsj.com/articles/tech-companies-push-users-to-ad...

https://www.twilio.com/blog/mandatory-2fa-account-login
But they are talking about Amazon. That is not a small company.
But you can't drag left or right first. If you do, you won't be able to move the window. You either have to decide which one you want to do on the first click.
The Airbnbs (2020)
TRS-80 Color Computer
I would reply to a sibling comment, but I believe this ought to be top level. I believe the author is conflating "D-Notices may be used to ask the press to self-censor" versus "'the man' is censoring Assange". So far as I am aware, nothing in the Assange trial would actually warrant a D-Notice, and if sensitive information were to be presented to the court it would be done in closed session anyway, since they at least theoretically have that option (they'd have to convince the judge of the need for this, if I understand correctly).
It's a pity companies seek profit above all else?
I'm a big fan of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics model, where they archive and make public everything throughout the publication process: preprint, peer reviews, and author responses.

https://www.atmospheric-chemistry-and-physics.net/
TOTP doesn’t have any shared identifier, just a shared randomly generated secret. FIDO2 generates unique IDs for each user/site pair, so there’s no mining possible even if a user uses the same hardware token for multiple sites.
> then you realize that mathematicians figured all this stuff out in a really elegant way that composes and provides just a solid bedrock.

Can you expand on what mathematicians discovered and how it can be applied to coding? Or does it require a certain programming language? I'm looking at the Hyperfiddle website and trying to understand how these concepts are connected. Thanks!
> Does it not have the same outcome that greed or excitement is overriding morality?

Yes but many things can override morality. I believe it all comes down to how strong you hold are to your morals. But I see your point and it’s probably the case.

> That's a very pessimistic view that you expect most people to function from a lack of conscience. You're probably not wrong that it's more common in the business world as well where there's more to gain. I used to think that too, still to some degree but I understand that most people's selfishness is give themself a comfortable amount.

I don’t think it’s a lack of conscience but moreso an overide of it. I think depending on the incentive a lot of people would overide their morals. Though maybe not most people. Idk.
Conveniently done already in Louisiana, where mankind has placed a line of concrete pillars twenty three miles across a lake. :)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_Pontchartrain_Causeway#/m...
(which are they?)
Ah, I misunderstood. I apologize.
My key takeaways:

1. This year, “Bambi: A Life in the Woods” has entered the public domain, and the Chambers version has been joined by a new one: “The Original Bambi: The Story of a Life in the Forest” (Princeton), translated by Jack Zipes, with wonderful black-and-white illustrations by Alenka Sottler

2. Stephen King called “Bambi” the first horror movie he ever saw, and Pauline Kael, the longtime film critic for this magazine, claimed that she had ever known children to be as frightened by supposedly scary grownup movies as they were by “Bambi.”

3. The film in question is, of course, the 1942 Walt Disney classic “Bambi.” Perhaps more than any other movie made for children, it is remembered chiefly for its moments of terror: not only the killing of the hero’s mother but the forest fire that threatens all the main characters with annihilation

4. With the old Prince’s prompting, Bambi concludes from this experience not that we humans are a danger even unto one another but, rather, that other animals are foolish for imagining that we are gods merely because we are powerful

5. It was adapted from “Bambi: A Life in the Woods,” a 1922 novel by the Austro-Hungarian writer and critic Felix Salten

6. What makes it such a startling source for a beloved children’s classic is ultimately not its violence or its sadness but its bleakness

7. The implicit moral is not so much that killing animals is wicked as that people are wicked and wild animals are innocent

8. Salten insisted that he wrote “Bambi” to educate naïve readers about nature as it really is: a place where life is always contingent on death, where starvation, competition, and predation are the norm

9. What purpose are scenes like that one serving in this book? Salten maintained that, despite his own affinity for hunting, he was trying to dissuade others from killing animals except when it was necessary for the health of a species or an ecosystem

10. What are we to make of this muddy, many-minded story? Zipes, in his introduction, blames some of the confusion on Chambers, contending that he mistranslated Salten, flattening both the political and the metaphysical dimensions of the work and paving the way for Disney to turn it into a children’s story

Other works of Felix Salten: https://www.locserendipity.com/TitleSearch.html?q=Salten
> rush at the attacking bear without thinking, for example

Would that work? I don’t see a bear backing down and I don’t see the human winning either.
Is that not a projection of the posters view of the hn crowd as being “older age”?
Yes, the .slint file without a .rs file is a complete example.

They can be viewed with the online editor. For example, the cells:
https://slint-ui.com/releases/0.2.2/editor/?load_url=https:/...
The cells example is actually not finished and admittedly missing a lot of features, it is far from being a spreadsheet.
Sorry if you see it this way but I very, very honestly did not understand what he was trying to say. Yes I'm quite aware of the issues you are talking about, but it was more the structure of the sentence that I just could not follow.
At least the WebAuthN standard seems to be moving in a different direction [1], which is also surprising to me.

In a nutshell, it will be possible for relying parties (i.e. websites) to detect multi-device/backup capable authenticators if required, but disabling multi-device functionality would require a very explicit opt-out, not an opt-in, on the relying party's side.

[1] https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/1714
The market values them at $53B. That's not a small sum.
Show HN: JSON Editor for macOS
How would that work in practice? Key/certificate revocation is notoriously hard.
Of course people who are Left leaning will disagree with the candidates produced by the Right. This would be like saying the Left produced Hillary when it could have chosen Tulsi, and because of that Trump won, and so Trump is actually a reaction to the Left's inability to find honest, non-career politicians that care about the average American instead of growing America's influence worldwide.

I think it's clear that one party is concerned about globalization, while the other party wants to focus on the problems at home... and of course every rich person with large, globalized companies, will obviously side with the party that will let them hire cheap labor, and circumvent any laws that might benefit Americans at home. It really seems like the parties have flipped during that past two decades or so, and now the Democrats are the party of the rich, and so it is in the best interest of Google, Apple, MS, etc. to align with that. Elon seems to be one of the few, if not the only one going against the grain in this regard.
I'm excited to see it happen!
Specifically, I would call the haphazard implementation of classes in JS one of these examples of a place where really true OOP should have been added, but they couldn't because they had to support existing keywords and web pages and language conventions, so we end up with the hacky syntax that is in the spec today.

Another example is the mess with for each loops, with .forEach, and the for..in syntax, and the peculiar behaviors therein where nothing does what you think it would coming from any other programming language.

Then you have things like "should I use var or let". It's embarrassing frankly. And don't even get me started with the uneven and confusing state of modules across the different ecosystems that exist now.

For someone who has worked in js since the pre ES5 days, it's fine, because we know the history and we know "oh, forEach is a legacy thing, don't use that if you can avoid it" but to newcomers it is extremely overwhelming having this sea of available functions and syntaxes and not knowing what to use. I know because I have had to talk through this with hundreds of coding bootcamp students as I used to serve as a mentor for one of the major ones. I tell all of them that the JS of today is a spaghetti soup of 30 years of tech debt, because it's true.

What's worse, is for newcomers, there is no way of viewing just the new/blessed syntax without going through each ES version and reading through the changes. It is very hard to distinguish the skeletons from the things you should use unless you know the entire history, and that fact is javascript's biggest smell to date. And it's also impossible to explain the new syntax in isolation without a story about what it replaced and why what it replaced fell out of favor.

JS has been adding new language features at an alarming rate, doing so poorly, and the reason for this is they have to walk on eggshells so as not to break existing web pages. Multiply that by 30 years and you get the mess that is everything since the netscape days. Things really got off the rails with ES6+, though, in terms of adding "awesome" new stuff without fixing/reworking old stuff. It's just plastered on in time-sensitive, fragile layers.
I do NOT want to use my phone. It cannot be considered to be a secure device given the 'network' baseband control chipset will never be owned by the phone's buyer and has full access to the device.
I work as a self-employed part-time consultant. There is no severance, nor do I care for one.

I took my finances into my own hands, and as a result I am financially comfortable.

I see severance as a gimmick in some cases, or as a way of kicking a company when it's down in other cases (maybe if it's a small one).

I see insurance as a gimmick also. Have an adequate emergency fund, and it acts as an everything-insurance, similar to pooling various insurance types together.
While we're at it, let's imagine a world where BeOS succeeded on the desktop. People without the technical inclination to run open source would have a choice of multiple competing commercial desktop environments rather than the current duopoly.
As someone who lives near a beach, I cannot tell you how true this is.

I used to fish a lot, and would constantly see younger people, usually but not always women, come near me (because I'm away from the crowds) and setup a tripod and spend 20 or so minutes taking different selfies, then leaving.

I can 100% guarantee you the vast majority of those were going on instagram, writing a long story about how a day at the beach is good for your soul, etc...when in reality they just drove to the beach, took a few photos, then went home.
Not OP but current employee.

They "underpay" compared to Google, etc and compared to the Bay. But Shopify is a Canadian company first (I'm in the US) and they pay me a salary well over the average for my area (double), not much less than what I was offered by other remote companies (within ~$10k) but pushed north of $200k/yr by adding stock.

We also recently received info on a new pay structure that basically lets us choose how much of our TC is $$$ and how much is stock. We're excited and people will be given raises. There are news articles you can read online.

Shopify also aims to be a "100 year" company. It means not paying in the top 10, but also not overworking employees or firing the bottom 10% every year.

As someone who isn't in the Bay... they pay just fine for new hires and for tenured employees once they finish raises.
They posted an engineer (and a film crew[1]) to stand on the relevant platform at Tottenham Court Road while the TBM was boring through, to watch for anything going wrong. That's trust :)

1. For this documentary. The title hasn't aged well... : https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b08ry6fy

I wonder if the Bond villain is responsible for the late opening of the eponymous Station?
I would argue that "usable by everyone" is an unreasonable goal which tends to result in catering to the lowest common denominator.

For example, take buildings -- they typically have stairways, often as a fire escape route. However, stairways are not usable by everyone. Should we ensure that buildings have no stairways at all because there exist some people who can't use them?

To apply this analogy to web accessibility, consider WCAG 2.5.5 Target Size -- in order to pass, click targets must be 44px by 44px. Seems reasonable right? Try designing a desktop spreadsheet program with 44x44 click targets. It's basically impossible to do in a way that doesn't severely impair the design for people who can click smaller targets.
Same for Thailand. News channels have evolved (in a bad way) to cover what the celebrities posted on FB or IG the day before.

Maybe it's going to be like KFC where it's well alive and lively in countries outside of the US.
I think there's at least a couple ways these are different:

1. It's easy to start ignoring such notifications if you regularly log in to new devices (or if logins expire). I don't think this is true to the same degree with notifications of recovery code usage.

2. Devices can potentially be spoofed.
It would be great if authentication via SSO would be possible on clients that are not running the Tailscale client. A bit like Cloudflare Access. Currently, I’m using both to manage access to my servers.
I feel like this blames the individuals rather than the systems. Ultimately all politicians are just reacting to their environment, those who get elected have been selected as "victors", while other personalities get pushed aside. But ultimately this is why most politicians seem very similar, it's just a selection process.
The top ten most traded collections last week are all knockoff cryptopunks (ranked 17), which itself is bulk-generated crap from a combination of templates.

It's hard to imagine a more cynical industry.
The most successful ones threw people into situations that were completely unlike real life for 99.999% of the population.

Survivor? Real World/Big Brother? An interview/apprenticeship with Trump with completely made-up "challenges" each week?

None of these are real in any meaningful sense.
There's a big difference in values between the financial independence retire early crowd, and the conspicuous consumption techbro crowd. FIRE is a trauma-informed strategy, and what your friends are doing is meeting what they see as their own needs for personal safety, and to be honest, they might be right. Make hay while the sun shines, etc.

Even if both groups might be seen as hoarding wealth, the value sets, and therefore the behaviors are very different, and the stories they tell themselves are different. The conspicuous consumption self narrative is "I deserve to have nicer things than the people around me." They need the external validation of others, and they need to be seen as better than their peers.

The difference is that I suspect a FIRE person is going to be more likely to give to charity, more likely to check on their neighbors to make sure they're okay, and more likely to figure out ways they can be useful in their community. I say that because that strategy frames wealth as a solution to a problem, and not a measure of one's worth.