skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
With certificate transparency, I dont think SXG's expiration is a real barrier to broader use. The hardnosed shitty browser attitude around right now: it will collapse in the face of obvious utility, other people will implememt more aspirational & liberal systems. This stance is untennable in the face of the obvious huge value of being able to look at old signed content, particularly when coupled with certificate transparency systems. This conservative standard will is just a minimal & obvious agreeable starting place, something to appease the rejectionist low-caliber safari-alike attitudes, but adoption will give way to expansion, given the immense user value of signed content. I say this as a core core protester against these pathetic loserly expiration timeouts[1].

I get maybe not putting all your chips in SXG basket. I disagree with a bunch of the protest: this seems like a sensible, basic, obvious layered enhancement to the existing web. Safari & Mozia are (as is the mood today) being terrible shits as usual, the regressives.

Contrasting ADX versus SXG just feels so wild, because SXG is a small refinememt to a vast world spanning & complete ecosystem of technology that has already taken over the planet. It directly targets the one complaint you make: http-server centricity, & sets dynamite to that one old bad no-good base. And ADX is an standalone completely isolated alternate world, it's own reality. This tension, whether we need a baseline which is 100% new & novel & redefines the entire problem space on it's own terms, completely from scratch, or whether we can hack & improve & enhance what we have: I dont feel like there's any camp at all left to defend improvememt.

Ideally SXG would be used woth additional user-encryption. User subdomains, eith their own keys would be swell. Turning sites into sites of sites is what SXG really starts to permit. Layering in some .well-known to be more cryptographically portable with identities ks just another small enhancement, just more layering, albeit yet-more-idealism.

Tear it all down, start over... it's the mode. I agree, this debate needs more than HM comments. But this tension & conflict, this view of the world & how it evolves or revolts: it's been trying to make revutions & insist no bounds, nothing today can possibly be good enough for tomorrow. And two plus decades latter, it's made such tiny impact, is so niche.

I accept your snub, getting told im exasperated, but it's for a real reason, it's because these decades have failed to deliver & so few have willingly tried improving what is (Safari & Mozia being a quite vocal modern anchor keeling things in place, a modern astrpturfing shouting class against trying anything, especially). This effort does have the social capital to perhaps emerge & birth something new, but we could also just improve & greatly fix everything that ready is. With minor, layered, small, principled enhancements.

[1] https://github.com/WICG/webpackage/issues/597
I thought it was free to install and didn't charge $1 until the following year?

EDIT: looks like it was $1 on IOS and free everywhere else: https://venturebeat.com/2012/12/03/facebook-whatsapp-talks/
Telling people "be more mindful of your emotions" is less than useless. Facebook etc. have many thousands of some incredibly intelligent people whose sole job is essentially to "hack" your emotions to keep you scrolling and scrolling.

It's like telling society at large "diet and exercise" to lose weight, but when so many places are incredibly un-walkable, and food scientists produce foods engineered to make you want more. Yes, "diet and exercise" does make sense individually, but obviously that strategy has failed miserably for society at large given we are fatter than ever.
I am sorry, I can’t interpret someone pining for “shared gods” charitably. We are a secular country that welcomes all beliefs.
if the low wage earner currently uses subsidies like food stamps, and raising the minimum wage causes those subsidies to become out of reach, then the low wage earner would make a calculation and see if the lost subsidies are higher than the gained minimum wage.

If more subsidies are lost, they are worse off, and thus, would rather stop working and get the maximum subsidies instead.

If minimum wage raise is higher than the subsidies lost, the cost of subsidies is "saved" by the taxpayer. but the businesses paying those wages might not want to pay more, so they might decrease number of jobs as a response. Therefore, you'd end up with more unemployed as a side effect.

Neither is a good outcome imho.
Right, in fact, when I was researching for this article, I thought that the fact that the restriction didn't apply when installing apps via the session-based installation API was a loophole/because it wasn't fully implemented in DP2.

I surmised that this loophole was intentional so as to not hamper third-party app stores from providing users with apps that use the AccessibilityService API, but I was only able to confirm my suspicion after contacting Google PR.
Well media (both social and traditional) bombarding kids with the message that everything is falling apart certainly won't help foster a generation with a positive, can-do outlook. As a parent I look for ways for kids to "look on the bright side" about life, even if I myself are concerned.
exactly. the equation has changed. people who dont fit in are now even more fucked. everyone is obligated to play this high stakes game that nobody asked for and that wasnt filtered through any kind of intelligent societal deliberation. nobody seems to be worried that kids make the rules in public schools, they bully each other viciously and kids who graduate from the system cant point to the country of portugal on a map. its full blown insanity.
I've found that a lot of websites don't like "+" or even intentionally detect it to reject it or subvert the user's interest.

I think a good system would be a randomly generated handle like nick836742@example.com where my real email probably isn't nick@example.com, but the number is different for each service.
> It's much faster (and far more politically tenable) to electrify as much transportation (e.g., EVs) and heating/cooling as possible while moving our grid to clean energy.

Vehicle turnover is very slow, so I don’t expect this to happen as quickly as you might be thinking: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/03/10/climate/elect...

Improving public transit doesn’t have to mean huge rail projects though, it can just mean running buses more frequently and giving them their own lanes to skip traffic. And we don’t have to massively resettle people, we can let (and encourage) towns to densify and build more bike/ped/transit infrastructure.

This also isn’t necessarily fast, no. But I don’t think it’s either/or; I think we need both.

> although I think we can decouple density and walkability.

I don’t think we can. The two are directly opposed to each other. The less dense a place is, the further apart everything is, which inherently makes it less walkable. Certainly you can (and should) build sidewalks anywhere if they don’t already exist, but past a low enough density nobody is going to walk anyway unless they’re forced to.
How does any of that apply to Whatsapp the application though? The question was not answered.
> Having separation between the HTML on the server side and the JS on the frontend side is exactly why React become popular.

But did they really. Cuz now i see .jsx files with sql calls, adding in static js and css, and logic with mixed html in... Its honestly blowing my mind how we got to this point.

We all agreed biz logic, and view should be separated. and that html, css, js should also be in sperate files. and then .jsx or the like came along and merged them all back together in some of the ugliest code ive seen in years.
That comment was one rollercoaster of a ride. Very poetic, in a good way. Android was my favourite smartphone OS since it championed user freedom. Now that this freedom is reduced, there isn't much holding me there vs, for example, iOS.
> 2.0s almost never succeed

Video games? DotA?
I believe that he is remorseful, but for judging the world as being beneath him and not being able to see the beauty of others' games in some sense.
TBH that's part of its appeal. JS is a mess, React is a relatively clean tiny little playpen inside a hoarder's house. If you're used to the stacks of newspapers and pizza boxes, it's a shock.
I still wear masks when I go to a store for a quick visit. It's entirely optional though and the mix is 50/50. I find this normal.
It’s leakers all the way down.
I sometimes think it's more for the pleasure of the person posting it than anyone else
Ask HN: Do managers make purchasing decisions based off Gartner’s Magic Quadrant
I have seen a few comments in various HN threads suggesting individuals in leadership positions make purchasing decisions based on whether products or solutions are listed in Gartner’s Magic Quadrant market research listings. I’m not yet in a position where I get to help much with purchasing decisions, but was curious how common this practice is from folks in these positions or in the room when these decisions are made.

As an outsider, it surprises me that those in leadership positions wouldn’t prioritize feedback and guidance from team members rather than relying on a quadrant list from a market research firm.
instead of $2.50 -> $100, why don't they make it like... $2.50 -> $5 and actually sell them all?
That would probably be a cheap price for delivering gasoline that cost ~$0 to put into those containers.
https://docs.goplaid.dev completely embrace low-JS in the Go world, you can write pretty complex UI interactions without write a single line of JavaScript, but only Go code.

It also integrate heavy duty UI component library like Vuetify, So you can use it easily in Go code.

It even go further to have presets that help you easily build Admin UI with much flexibility. https://docs.goplaid.dev/samples/presets-detail-page-cards/c...
Strongly disagree, when has society ever decided less access to information is ideal? Our descendants will create better platforms that can allow users to better filter for their emotional needs and they'll likely have better tools to understand their own emotions.
I'm a bit torn about it to be honest. On one hand, it's sad/frustrating to work with colleagues who can't be bothered to figure git out. On the other, it is sometimes nice to have a less technically-difficult distraction (or at least one in a different problem space) from what I actually get paid to do.

Maybe the right thing is to lean in to it, and become a git consultant! I'm a bit scared to see if that's a thing - would be a sad commentary on the state of the software industry.
So happy I came across this, I've had an eGPU dock (HP Accelerator) that does this. Took a whole day to figure out that the such was the cause and I've never seen the issue since I stopped using it's ethernet port
People are annoyed at the holier than thou BS given in instances like this or that Netflix doc. People who are keeping the millions made from social media and purporting to now be doing benevolent work. Most don’t care if you just worked for FB and aren’t saying silly stuff.
Sorry, but to be very clear, all I see in the link is just a forum discussion. No clear request showing ownership and right to claim source code, no clear response from someone clearly representing the distributor of the product saying no source code shall be provided.

There is gpl-violations.org. Has anyone tried them?
There's an excellent podcast (What Roman Mars Can Learn About Con[stitutional] Law) with Roman Mars (of 99% Invisible) and Elizabeth Joh (of UC Davis) that discussed many aspects of this leak and potential ruling here.[0]

They discussed the potential value in an anti-Roe-side leak. It may hold justices to an early decision. I'll let Ms Joh make the case better than I could.

[0]: https://learnconlaw.com/63-the-leaked-draft
Interesting! do you have any links talking about that standard? I'm super interested in Julia and this seems like a good opportunity to learn something I've been missing so far.
I recommend "app prison" or a similarly un-nerdy term to get some traction. e-Prison sounds like something the FSF would come up with.
the parser gets more and more complicated as you score methods, this gets really, really, really nasty once generics get involved

just an awful feature that solves no problems that can't be better done with other features that, for whatever reason, just aren't as popular
Took a look at the website -- why do you have a page which pretends to objectively review competitors and then decides that your project is the best app development tool without acknowledging the obvious conflict of interest?

https://budibase.com/blog/open-source-low-code-platforms/
I probably implied more causation than I meant. I know nothing about fasting causing my high cholesterol directly. What I do know is I thought my weight not going up liberated me into eating whatever my heart desired in my 4-5 hour feeding window. This feast/famine mentality did me no good given my personality type and I probably ended up eating a lot more food and snacks than I would of otherwise.
It doesn't come with a Comma Three which is required for the device to function, costing an additional $2000. $3000 in total.
New update at https://status.heroku.com/incidents/2413 as of MAY 5, 2022 02:21 UTC the core paragraphs are

> On April 7, 2022, a threat actor obtained access to a Heroku database and downloaded stored customer GitHub integration OAuth tokens. Access to the environment was gained by leveraging a compromised token for a Heroku machine account. According to GitHub, the threat actor began enumerating metadata about customer repositories with the downloaded OAuth tokens on April 8, 2022. On April 9, 2022, the attacker downloaded a subset of the Heroku private GitHub repositories from GitHub, containing some Heroku source code.

...

> Separately, our investigation also revealed that the same compromised token was leveraged to gain access to a database and exfiltrate the hashed and salted passwords for customers’ user accounts. For this reason, Salesforce is ensuring all Heroku user passwords are reset and potentially affected credentials are refreshed. We have rotated internal Heroku credentials and put additional detections in place. We are continuing to investigate the source of the token compromise.
Show HN: A go linter to check goroutines for a defer
Are looking for this?

search: >'AI Content Moderation'< @DDG : <https://html.duckduckgo.com/html/?q='AI Content Moderation'>
That is not a direct quote. Your semi-quote "but diversity also makes things come apart for a large secular nation like the United States" is inaccurate and extremely misleading; Haidt clearly ends the sentence at "come apart", and you left off the "And so" starting the next sentence.

The actual quote, starting at 9:20, with as much fidelity as I can muster:

"We have this idea that umm... that diversity is good, and diversity has many good effects. But.. diversity also makes things come apart. And so for a large secular nation like the United States you have to look at what are the forces holding us together, what are the things blowing us apart. Now diversity makes [a] group more creative when you have good norms, when things are well structured. We have to think really carefully about how to get the benefit from America's diversity, but it's hard to do because if you critique it you could get in big trouble. Now in terms of what actually holds a country together, traditionally it's shared gods, shared blood, and shared enemies. That's what nations usually have used. So we have a challenge, and it is a great experiment, and when social media came in -- when everybody was on social media beginning around 2012, 2013 when it gets hyperviralized, umm, the ability to have any shared understanding of what we're doing shatters. Social media allows us to participate in microstories that kind of bubble up and are gone. There is no ability to have a common understanding of what we're doing. Not that we ever were all one nation and all on the same page. But there's a qualitative change when it's like... here's the story of the day, and.. and.. umm.. uhh.. so there's no possibility for shared stories in the age of social media, widely shared stories. Umm... uh... there's huge decline of trust, trust in each other and trust in institutions. And here I'm drawing on recent social science - uh, political science research showing that social media generally leads to a decline of trust. Social media's incredibly powerful for tearing things down. And that can be a good thing in a dictatorship. But it's very bad at building things up. And in an ailing democracy like ours where our institutions need to be improved not ripped apart, it generally has... has made things worse."
I think everyone's concentration is deteriorating, but kids don't have the benefit of having experienced life without social media. From the very beginning they've been immersed in this, making their problems that much worse
The majority of Americans live paycheck to paycheck. This is a precarious condition that leads to a lifetime of stress. Most people are living in extreme stress conditions.

I wouldn't call living paycheck to paycheck "making it." Most people aren't making it--by the numbers.

I know the type of person that posts these kinds of incredibly out of touch comments on here. You work at a corporation, or your skills are currently in high demmand. You are surrounded by people making good money. This insulates you, leading you to extrapolate the conditions you are living under over the WHOLE WORLD--today's world!

Let them eat cake?

In today's world it's: let them withdraw from their 401k if they fall on hard times.

It's ridiculous and frankly insulting and dismissive of the plight of many struggling people. It's the old aristocratic mentality: anyone that doesn't succeed is a fuck up. It's a method of projecting the failings of the system onto those it fails, used over and over throughout history.

I suspect with the political instability of this nation, we won't be having these types of arguments much longer. As the system fails, debates will become viciously partisan. There will be no more "if you try hard, you can succeed." Everything will be reduced to, "Submit to the will of the party, and you're good. Don't and you're a traitor deserving of elimination." This is what happens when people retreat behind slogans and refuse to address reality. Things break down, then things get out of control because we have failed to adapt. Then comes the age of horror where the system has to destructively seek a new equilibrium.
From what I gather it doesn't pay as well as other engineering subgenres, so presumably the market is telling us we don't actually need that many?
That cuts both ways, ability to excel and take on responsibility within Google isn't equal to ability to succeed at Google. That's an argument against making outside hires start at a lower level.
Somehow this doesn't match your username.
FWIW, I'm tearing the bandage right off for my next phone. If my phone won't treat me like a big boy, I might as well switch to iOS and get a marginally better user experience.
Like I said, if the domain is super specific, it is solvable. That Taco Bell example is real. A private equity company was considering purchasing them from Yum Brands and they wanted to know what the customers liked or disliked. If all of your text is Taco Bell reviews, then you can train a model to spot sarcasm by having a human tag a portion and letting the model extrapolate from there. The model will determine which words (e.g. authentic, gourmet, and homemade) correlate with sarcasm. This breaks down if you try to apply it to all restaurants because what is clearly sarcasm for Taco Bell may not be for Lupe's Mexican Cantina. In the end, we went with a more objective approach. I broke the reviews into sentences and analyzed independent and dependent clauses, identified nouns, verbs, and adjectives, and used those to determine the main idea of the clause. I noticed that 1st person nouns and verbs are what the reviewers said about themselves (e.g. I was hungry or I rolled into the drive-thru) and 2nd and 3rd person was about the restaurant (you need to train your employees, the taco was cold or the cashier gave me the wrong order). Looking at the sentiment of the clause and its subject/verb phrase gave us exactly what we needed. In the end we had a list of ideas like "cold taco - negative", "waited forever - negative", "super cheap - positive" which we used a logistic regression classifier to put into categories like price, service, selection, ambience, etc.
same. I did in the past, but work has basically made me hate computers, so I've done everything I can to remove computers from my life outside work hours.
But maybe it is to get hired ?
Woodstock ‘99 website is still operational
It isn't about power. It is about fairness. Legislatures are ostensibly representing the majority. How does the minority get a fair hearing before a legislature whose express job is to serve the majority?

Continuing to argue that the shitty thing the majority did, should continue to be arm wrestled over politically, not in the courts, means you think the majority should always win. That is the nature of politics in a democracy!

The very issue at hand is the Court becoming political and therefore granting political victories and losses, thereby no longer being viewed as capable of providing fair hearings.
Any chance to be able to get the dmg directly from Tailscale vs the App Store? It's been a pain on MacOS as not everyone wants to mix personal accounts with corporate laptops
However, in high school, many of other kids are in fact playing stupid games. Boys hang out do stupid things, or compete who’s the bigger bully. Girls play social games with bullies.
Unironically agreed. I haven't liked a mobile OS since circa Android 5.
Roguebook, Rocksmith 2014
I don't think of social media - especially casual image sharing sites - as being particularly information-rich.
Taco Bell is food for chihuahuas, not humans.

To correctly analyze the sentiment of that, your software would have to have the "Yo quiero Taco Bell" ad series from, what, the 90s maybe, in its database. It's snarky, but it's not the outright slam that the words themselves would seem to indicate.

That's the problem. There's sarcasm. There's parody, which if done well can be impossible to tell from the real thing. (That's somebody's law - too lazy to look it up right now.) Those are bad enough. But when a sentence drags in cultural knowledge, you have to understand the cultural knowledge to accurately assess the sentence. It's tough to ask a program to "get" not just what the reference is, but how that affects what a sentence is actually saying.
"we don't want Rust generics to be Turing complete" Has good implications, like good IDE support
VW sells out of electric cars in US and Europe
> This is incredibly naive. React's sole success relies on Facebook heavily pushing it in the conference circuit. "How React Saved my Life" was the go-to talk title in the 2010s.

I was around when React took off. People may have been aware of it because of marketing, but every web developer I know wanted to immediately switch to it, even before class components, because it represented a fundamental paradigm shift in how web applications would be built, and it was self-evidently better than anything else anyone had thought to suggest.

The was a popular talk because _it was true_. React changed frontend web development from a tedious chore offloaded to the junior-most members of your team and elevated it to something everyone takes seriously.

It was a very, very long time before there was anything useful competing with React. Nothing really started to compete with the sheer volume of people who wanted to work with it until JSX proliferated across the frameworks. Just JSX alone was enough to convince people to switch to React.