skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
That’s an old trope, but it’s not really true. My TV has a user guide, so does my fridge, my brush cutter and my soldering iron. And, while I wouldn’t say that “hooked” is a term used widely across the whole software industry - though obviously in this context it’s more common - nevertheless, it’s hardly a term we share exclusively with drug consumption.

In fact, without thinking about it much, I think the nearest similar industry may possibly be day-time TV.
Perhaps because 65 has exponentially more energy in collisions and more likely to cause death? If it is limited to 40, death is less likely and therefore chance of negative news. So I would venture just a risk calculation for initial release.
It reminds me of "How to Measure Anything" by Douglas Hubbard [1]

I read "How to Measure Anything in Cybersecurity Risk" but the relevant concepts are from his original book:

- every measurement is an approximation

- you can determine a more accurate valuation (or probability) by thinking in terms of bets

The book isn't primarily about negotiating, but it is about estimating based on incomplete information, which applies to all negotiations. Avoiding a round number doesn't need to be arbitrary. By calibrating your estimation process you can come up with a more precise number, which can also boost your confidence.

The result is both having a more specific valuation in mind, and being more comfortable with the outcome regardless of whether the deal worked for fell apart.

1: https://www.howtomeasureanything.com/books-by-douglas-hubbar...
maybe everyone in north korea or 18th century france is also low T. it’s probably a chemical imbalance
We have pretty rocks that trade for much less transaction cost. Let's use those as currency versus consuming entire stars!
Job interest in Twitter skyrocketed more than 250% since Elon Musk move
That question makes as much sense as asking “but what will be destroying the loop?”.
I love hearing things like this. It's not like it tells me something I didn't already know, but just saying it in a new way that gives me hope I may eventually find a strategy that works better.

In my case it's carrying too much weight around. Even though I know objectively how much better it feels to be lighter, how much better I feel all around. I want to be thinner, and I want that even at the exact moment I'm eating something while I'm not actually hungry. I tell myself "You ought not to be doing this." as I actually put it in my mouth.

So I end up asking myself repeatedly WTF, why am I sabotaging myself even in spite of conscious recognition that this is exactly what I am doing.

Because as you say, I know I want to be lighter. I didn't say anything about wanting to eat less. You're a genius, thanks for giving me a new way to think about this. Even if it doesn't work.

Off to the fridge... (I kid, I kid... or do I)
When soon-to-be moms are advised to push hard, the baby it's not the only thing that comes out, usually.
Code morphing with Crusoe (2003)
Why is it called citizen science?
I don't understand how if you're on a team in which you control both the front end and back end, you wouldn't understand these factors - "Will the server send IDs as ints or strings? Will it accept either? Which params are optional? What shape does the data come back in, an array of results, or an objects with results nested somewhere? etc"

Surely you would know all the answers to these questions because your team control the entire stack.

If it was the case that the FE and BE teams were separate, then these would be reasonable considerations, but I just don't see it in a team dealing with full control.
This is what I do with my personal blog. I actually kind of use it as a personal documentation guide. If I can write it for someone else to use I can re-impliment it myself
A good church can be like group therapy. You see the same people. You have common issues. The core challenges are discussed. There is a guide book that everyone agrees is the best. There is a group counselor that helps everyone work through the book to heal together.
That's kind of the whole point. If a decision or policy has predictable consequences that aren't being addressed, either the decision-maker is unaware of those consequences or is accepting of those consequences. Asking the question removes ignorance as a possibility, and lets the conversation continue.

Sometimes the answer is "No, I was unaware, and I will adjust my decision." Sometimes the answer is "Yes, here are the consequences of the alternatives, and here's why I believe this set of consequences to be best." Sometimes the answer is "Yes, I don't care about those people." By asking the question, these three types of answers respectively give the other person an opportunity to improve themselves, give you an opportunity to learn from the other person, or give the audience an opportunity to learn not to trust the other person.
In England it is legal as long as the walker determines it is safe to do so.
The last time I needed to do this - to gather a bunch of files from old hard drives, and organize them so I could back them up - I ended up using fdupes. This looks very cool, and would probably have been a bit easier.
Not very impressive... I like those better, myself: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HipTO_7mUOw
Besides the research discussed in the other comments we have now many documented cases of people falling into extremely cold water in the winter, being pulled out after an hour, and recovering. The warming has to be done properly though, if you just pull them out and heat them up immediately they'll die. If you just pull them out and let them warm up very slowly in a warm room they'll die. You have to heat them up as evenly as you can at a certain rate.

When you consider that oxygen deprivation is the primary cause of cell death it makes sense. Cooling down the cells greatly reduces their metabolism and thus oxygen requirements. But cooling the heart down before the brain just makes the brain run out of oxygen first. The more oxygen-dependent the organ the more critical it is that organ be cooled first. Conversely you can't warm up those organs before the heart and lungs or they'll survive that long time of cooling only to die during warming due to lack of oxygen.
Probably not a good analogy, since generally there’s an RTC running even if the computer is off. ;)
To start with: We decided to apply for what's called a "D7" visa. Skipping over the details, it allows us to reside in Portugal long-term; it is somewhat analogous to the U.S. "green card". And, after 5 years, we can apply for Portuguese citizenship (which, of course, gives us access to the entire EU).

The application process was straightforward, if tedious; mainly obtaining a bunch of documents that proved that we were not wanted criminals in the U.S., that we have our own health insurance, and that we had sufficient financial resources that we would not become dependent on the Portuguese social system. It took us about four months to get everything together, and cost in total ~ $200USD (fees for various agencies, both U.S. and Portuguese). You have to submit your documents to the Portuguese consulate that is "attached" to your part of the U.S.; in my case, that was in San Francisco. It was a hassle (made worse because of COVID), but just bureaucracy, nothing worse that that.

We spent about three months in Airbnbs around Portugal to decide where to live, so that cost some. We just signed a two-year lease on a nice 3 bedroom apartment. We were able to do that prior to opening a Portuguese bank account (we used Wise to transfer the money from our U.S. account), but we are working on getting a local account; it'll make paying rent, utility bills and random purchases much easier. (Example: I managed to find a local store that has a Raspberry Pi 4 2GB, but I couldn't buy it online, because their website could not accept a U.S. billing address for my credit card. Grr.)

And yes, we still have financial ties with the U.S., primarily our retirement accounts, and we still pay U.S. taxes. Fortunately, Portugal and the U.S. have a "no double taxation" agreement, so we do not also pay Portuguese taxes on our retirement funds.

The cost of living is significantly lower here than it was in the Seattle area. Our money goes much further. The people are wonderful, the country is beautiful (by and large), and it is much safer than the U.S.--and feels that way! And, all of Europe is a short plane or train ride away.

If you are truly interested in trying this, I strongly recommend the "Portugalist" website: https://www.portugalist.com . James, the man who maintains the site, has a wealth of information on visiting and moving to Portugal. So far, all his advice and suggestions that we've used have been excellent.
> The Fed mandate says "stable prices AND maximum employment". It says nothing about setting the fed fund rate in a way that enables investors to earn money from lending to an entity which has a zero default risk.

I was not saying that the Fed mandate says that the fed must do this. I was challenging YOU who said that investors should consider treasuries capital preserving and default risk free. Neither is true-- inflation rate is meant to characterize the buying power of dollars. Whenever inflation rate exceeds the overnight interest rate, then the purchasing power of anyone holding cash or short term treasuries is by definition losing principal in a guaranteed way. Defaulting on a pure fiat system is also basically pointless, dollar denominated debts can always be met with money printing, so inflation is really the only way a default happens. And we did actually default in 1971 when Nixon ended convertibility of dollar to gold.

> When investors are very scared it happens that they get very defensive and pay the Fed govt. for the privilege of parking their money in US Treasuries.

I think you have something inverted here in your understanding (unless you are talking about negative interest rates?). You pay to borrow, you get to collect interest if you park capital. If you want to park money in US treasuries, that's a long treasury position and the government is paying you for the privilege of being able to use your dollars for a while. How it would work is you start with your asset (say a stock) sell that for dollars, then sell the dollars for a treasury, which pays a coupon upon maturation (gives you back more dollars than it started). So investors with a parked cash position are not paying the government, the government is paying them. When there is a panic, I agree the demand for treasuries goes up, and that is why you see the long term rates go down-- as demand for treasuries goes up, they start to be auctioned at a lower premium. The only people paying the government interest on the treasuries are those who are borrowing money, for example banks.
Yowza, $1300.

I've read that ultrasonic diffusers and humidifiers can do a lot of harm by atomising whatever is in the substance you fill them with. In the case of humidifers with non-distilled water this could mean heavy metals coming out of the faucet, or whatever biofilm crud has built up inside the device. Lots of essential oil diffusers ask to be filled with water and a few drops of the oil. I imagine the oil itself is often filled with non-scent molecules that you probably don't want to be breathing, depending on quality and reputability of source.

It all seems like an easy category of footgun; easy to cause more damage to your health than benefit.

Does anyone know more about this kind of effect and whether it's dangerous?
I think other manufacturers will also be taking responsibility for liability when they come to market. It is just insurance. You can already pay an insurance company to accept liability. The difference with lv3 self drive and beyond is that insurance companies no longer have the data to correctly price their policies, because this is all new and they rely on historical data. The car manufacturers believe they have that data, and are now in a position to take that slice of the pie. I expect that once things settle down, the bulk of your insurance will be paid as a yearly fee to the manufacturer to cover self driving (and the manufacturer will likely offload much of the risk to Big Insurance).
> I think its possible to make an argument for lots of things, in the name of safety.

I think the word you are looking for is `Nanny State` [1]. People's opinions on issues like this always tend to be based on political tribalism. If it's from my political party, then they are so amazing that they care about other human beings so much. If it's a political party I am opposed to, how dare they infringe on our freedom.

It's very hard to find good faith discussion.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanny_state
Ask HN: Does this exist: cmux-like TCP multiplexer in Rust?
Is there a library written in Rust providing comparable functionality to the cmux golang package?

> cmux is a generic Go library to multiplex connections based on their payload. Using cmux, you can serve gRPC, SSH, HTTPS, HTTP, Go RPC, and pretty much any other protocol on the same TCP listener.

https://github.com/soheilhy/cmux
Sorry if I upset the team. But I don't think it was ok to let the image being published in the front of all newspapers worldwide, and forgot to mention the color comes from the libraries used to compose the "map". It would be equally scientifically correct if you used a blue color or white, since it was a completely arbitrary choice. I know it defeats from the "picture" story, but just was too much overlooking for my taste. I want to see how "creative" the new release will be.
Ask HN: What is the best BCR investment company can make in cyber security?
Many books that I've read explain about Pareto rules, if the same would be applied to cyber security which ones are the most efficient?

Just heard company I work for spent a huge amount of money so just got interested how they spent it.

First I thought about DX Connect, separate infra from the public internet that would be beneficial but how about its BCR?

Thanks.
From the company's point of view this is correct reasoning. The sooner people realize companies do not have any responsibility to be moral the better
Surely you read the study? I admit it was a bit obtuse in its conclusions, but you have to agree, yes, their methodology was sound. Just look at the p value!

You can laugh at it, but this stuff actually works.
I agree with everything you've said here.

I do wish science could catch up to some of these old-and-probably-quite-true traditions.
> The point they're making is that this is coming and the groundwork is already being laid, both legally and technologically.

So they are basically claiming that something is a problem, even though it is something that's straight up currently physically possible (but someone who reads that statement without knowing the actual details wouldn't know that it isn't currently possible)?

Disingenuous at best. Especially given that the parent comment said none of that. They essentially mocked people who believe that it isn't possible, and when they got pointed out that it isn't actually physically possible right now, the response is "well, not right now, but look at future possibilities!".
Free speech requires a lot less dirty work...
Which toml package to use in Python?
I'm not even sure what you're asking, sorry. I don't think you can infer I'm in some bubble, or my head's in the sand, because I don't conclude from this article that we should scrap the official secrets act
Sorry - 'hit the nail on the head'. Literally: (you touched == tetigit (tangere)) ([the] point == rem (res)) (with [a] needle == acu (acus))'.[0] 'Point' (res) is already abstract - 'matter', 'thing' - not being used figuratively like the rest of the phrase.

It's one of those phrasoids which is permanently stuck in my head from Latin classes when I was a teenager, but I might've been wrong in thinking it was one of the more widely-recognised ones.

[0] 'You' is implied by the second-person verb ending on 'tetigit', 'with' is implied by the ablative case ending on 'acu' (the 'ablative of means'), while 'the' and 'a' are filled in altogether since Latin has no concept of definite/indefinite articles.
Posting this at 5pm on a Friday sounds about right, yeah?
I would be delighted if this WOW! Signal was like the Interstellar books falling off the shelf — if you know you know
The transition to IPv6: Are we there yet?
This may be the closest thing I've personally seen: https://github.com/timvisee/advent-of-code-2021
I agree, It seems like we are in a race to the bottom in which, where if we don’t target engagement in the manner derided here, we fear having our lunch eaten.

Make no mistake, I am 100% with the author here (at least philosophically), but it’s really hard to avoid in practise. In my forthcoming project, on the one hand I want to have a soft touch with users in terms of engagement, but on the other hand the wrong investors will not care. And as I learned in my previous project, you can’t always know if you have the right investors until it’s way too late.

Engagement (in the classical sense) is essential for a successful product, and I’m really hopeful that we can find, agree to, and implement limits around what we will do to manage it. But in an industry where this behaviour is the norm, it also becomes the expectation.
I’ve seen at least a couple cases where lexer time dominated overall compile time.
Hmm, how would you see detail on the art of the day?
I used https://schema.org/Recipe for mine over h-recipe because that's what Google had references in https://developers.google.com/search/docs/advanced/structure...
But we could apply GPT-3 and send alien speech back ...
Yup. Nailed it.

IMO the people calling this "burnout" have no idea what they are talking about.

Calling it burnout assumes you're working too hard and if you just rest a bit then come back to do the same bullshit work it will be ok.
I-bonds are looking like a good option for the next year or so.
Using TS type inference to its fullest is a major part of tRPC so I don't think it has much of a benefit to you if you're ok with generation.

In my experience, you can iterate more quickly without generation. I've used GraphQL and having a separate system to generate code and types was not a good experience. If not done properly, your schema and types can also easily be out of sync.
lbrito, do you currently live in Portugal? And, how did you learn Portuguese? My wife and I are working on it (she is much farther along than I am), and man is it tough! So many times I thought I was speaking really clearly and correctly, but the person at the pastelaria just gives me a really confused look. (At which point I dig out my translation app. :-/)
“That was your first mistake; you took your lucky break and broke it in two.”
Heroku has always been the opposite of transparent.

I still don't forget how they handled the Intelligent Routing fiasco from back in the day.
> I started as Heroku GM a few weeks ago with intense enthusiasm to be a part of such a storied team.

Wow talk about terrible timing.
Should the Password Go Away?
Companies have been trying to go "passwordless" for years, but getting there has been tough. Google has a whole timeline on its blog post starting from 2008. Passwords work fine if they are long, random, secret, and unique, but the human element of passwords is always a problem. We aren't great at memorizing long, random strings of characters. It's tempting to write down passwords or reuse them, and phishing schemes try to trick you into giving your password to a third party. When a security breach happens, username and password pairs are easy to share, and there are huge databases of compromised credentials out there.

The FIDO blog post says: "These new capabilities are expected to become available across Apple, Google, and Microsoft platforms over the course of the coming year." Apple, which seems to have started the whole "passkey" trend, already has a system up and running in iOS 15 and macOS Monterey, but it's not compatible with other platforms yet. Google's passkey support has already been spotted in Play Services on Android, so it should quickly be supported by even older Android devices as soon as it's ready.
That isn’t a very charitable take. It’s been 24x7 for them, the acknowledgement is most welcome, in my opinion. I’m not sure waiting until Monday 9AM Pacific just to avoid these type of comments would be the right choice. The internet is 24x7 after all.
People have been saying the same thing for over a century. Take the following passage from Fernando Pessoa's Book of Disquiet, written in the 1920s:

> I belong to a generation that inherited disbelief in the Christian faith and created in itself a disbelief in all other
faiths. Our fathers still had the believing impulse, which they transferred from Christianity to other forms of illusion.
Some were champions of social equality, others were wholly enamoured of beauty, still others had faith in science
and its achievements, and there were some who became even more Christian, resorting to various Easts and Wests in
search of new religious forms to entertain their otherwise hollow consciousness of merely living.

> We lost all of this. We were born with none of these consolations. Each civilization follows the particular path of
a religion that represents it; turning to other religions, it loses the one it had, and ultimately loses them all.

> We lost the one, and all the others with it.

> And so we were left, each man to himself, in the desolation of feeling ourselves live. A ship may seem to be an
object whose purpose is to sail, but no, its purpose is to reach a port. We found ourselves sailing without any idea of
what port we were supposed to reach. Thus we reproduced a painful version of the argonauts’ adventurous precept:*
living doesn’t matter, only sailing does.

> Without illusions, we live by dreaming, which is the illusion of those who can’t have illusions. Living off our
inner selves has diminished us, for the complete man is the one who doesn’t know himself. Without faith, we have
no hope, and without hope we have no real life. Having no idea of the future, we likewise have no idea of today,
because today, for the man of action, is nothing but a prologue to the future. The energy to fight was stillborn in us,
for we were born without the fighting spirit.
>The Heroku team and their colleagues have worked around the clock, including nights and weekends

Can someone more familiar with an event like this tell me what they are working so hard on? I imagine securing the vulnerable service and resetting various credentials doesn't take that much work.
> And maybe go on to found Amazon which changed many communities and the world

When Princeton applicants write admissions essays about “wanting to change the world” they don’t mean “… by driving Main Street out of business and making it easier than ever to buy cheap Chinese crap instead of American made products.”
> whether to keep them or not

Why host name??
Maybe that’ll change, there’s a new Sheriff in town as the saying goes? Bob was previously General Manager of AWS Elastic Kubernetes (EKS) which seemed to have a good reputation and to engage with its customers pretty well.
It depends on context, for example this is true for SQL server if you have a filtered index based on datetime.

If you use a constant or set a @variable ahead of time, it will use the filtered index, but if you just use =now() equivalent

(or in SQL server GETDATE()) it will not.
(You may also need to use OPTION(Recompile))