skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
My personal, completely layman's theory, is that the dual universe theory is the localized correct approach (there may be other dual universes outside ours), and that at the big bang matter on the other side became entangled as it entered our universe (or dimension?), and that in some sort of cosmological osmosis, matter that broke that barrier and became entangled seeks to return to it's original state (in the other universe) or some similar sort of equilibrium, likely through black holes and white holes. (eg, other universe a white hole here would look like black hole there, and vice versa). Gravity pulls stuff together until it finally collapses into creating a semi-localized blackhole (explaining the theory of a blackhole in every galaxy). Gravity in this case would then be a second tier effect of entanglement which is locally weak but cosmologically strong, with gravity being the opposite. If this were the case, the main place to focus for experimental predictions to reveal more on this would then be probably be anti/dark matter experiments.
you have two forgot password pages?

https://recipehunt.app/forgotpw and https://recipehunt.app/forgotpw2
I moved away from the clusterf^%% of the front end for that reason. The backend is much more stable.
50cm long hammerhead terrestrial worm species
"The solution is trivial: [possible solution]! Well, unfortunately, [problem with solution]."

The issue here isn't so much sarcasm than that "is" should be read as "seems" here. But I don't see any other idiomatic reading that is sincerely calling the solution trivial.
Georgia Tech online masters looks like it does. I found this in the article author’s links when he breaks down the schools. Id really like to take this class too so it stood out to me.

https://omscs.gatech.edu/cs-6747-advanced-malware-analysis
Those both seem to be on the same level as NaturalNews and InfoWars. In other words, I see no fault at all with PayPal's decision.
Why is there no hovertext on two of the images? Has this ever happened before?
Right, the government should make sure housing is available at all levels. Presumably it’ll have to do very little to make sure luxury housing is available.
> it's almost inevitable that you'll do more harm making the money than you can possibly do good spending it.

levels.fyi claims a Google 'Senior SWE' earns $358,000 a year, while [1] estimates some of the most cost-effective charities can save a life for $4500. If that Googler donates a mere 10% of their salary, that's 8 lives saved a year.

So I'm kinda sceptical of what you call 'almost inevitable' here.

[1] https://www.givewell.org/charities/top-charities
I spent over 15 years of the start of my career at startups, and was typically the one woken up by alerts and/or the operations team (when there was one) to help decode alerts. That really shaped my logging philosophy around log levels.

FATAL = The system is basically non-functional, even in some partially-working way. Alerts fire.

ERROR = Something went wrong in some part of the system. The system may be mostly or partially working, but an important thing is broken and should be fixed. Depending on the where the error is, it may need to be immediately addressed or at least very soon.

WARNING = Something isn't working right, but it's possibly transient and the system has was a handling this via retry or other workarounds. This should be addressed at some point if possible, but shouldn't require immediate intervention.

INFO = This is the log level that the system is designed to run at. It provides enough human-readable context to see how the system is running. Most importantly, it provides just enough information provide context to WARNINGS/ERRORS/FATALS that may occur somewhere in a given request. The goal is to balance information w/performance.

DEBUG = All the things, all the time. Default mode for developers, and when diagnosing issues that require much more depth of information than provided at INFO level. It is VERY RARE to run at this level in production, as INFO logs should provide enough request context for a developer to reproduce most issues, but can be enabled for short bursts in production on one server in a cluster, or some other limited form to capture necessary information.

A guiding philosophy on all logs is to persist them in a central location (and locally w/rollover just in case persistence is broken), and is to flow some request or context ID through the system so logs from a single request can be easily identified and related log statements correlated with each other.

At my last startup, it was almost a year effort to clean up the logs. Such things like app pool crash on startup were logged at DEBUG, and the application starting successfully was logged at ERROR. Combined with an effort to improve overall quality, hit a first milestone of going 3 months without the ops team requiring escalation to developers outside of business hours (i.e. they could identify and fix things based on logs). Eventually, out of business hours alerts because a "I don't remember the last one" thing.
Presuming you are correct:

* Some number of people are sensitive to latency

* Some people are unable to read my website

You're gambling that there are more people who would walk away due to latency, than there are who would walk away due to being unable to interact with your site at all.

Personally I suspect that to be a poor tradeoff.
> Users have then tried replicating it and got varying results. Some reported that Apple Music is only kicking third-party apps (and not first-party ones). On the other hand, some users found the Music app replacing the company’s own apps as well

Pretty clearly a bug, and this only happens when reinstalling the app (which I doubt people do very often).

I am not surprised that Tim Sweeney weighed in with a breathless take.
> Because it’s not the job of a standard library to be opinionated about how people use data structures.

Well, they're not being opinionated about it per se, they're just not supporting (up until now at least) highly-optimized use of lists. There are tradeoffs to consider here beyond what we have discussed in this thread. Check the OCaml forum threads on optimizing list mapping for the various considerations.
Shopify's API shows what the minimum ante is for a public-facing GraphQL API:

* Exotic rate limiting based on the quantity of data returned, not on the number of calls made over time. As a client, it is nearly impossible to throttle your code in any way other than "try and maybe it fails sometimes".

* Tortured graph structure with edges/node/cursor levels in the tree. Navigation is a pain in the ass. See code sample below.

Furthermore, you must provide root query navigation for every object. Shopify doesn't do this. So you end up with nearly impossible places to query to because you need to cursor into a parent to find a particular node, then cursor into its children to get to the right node. There's no limit to the crazy. Building complex shipping profiles with Shopify's API is a nightmare.

Here's a real-world query I pulled out of my code:

query ($id: ID!, $zoneCursor: String) {
deliveryProfile(id: $id) {
id
profileLocationGroups {
locationGroupZones(first: 1, after: $zoneCursor) {
pageInfo {
hasNextPage
}
edges {
cursor
node {
zone {
id
name
countries {
code {
countryCode
}
}
}
methodDefinitions(first: 150) {
pageInfo {
hasNextPage
}
edges {
node {
id
name
active
methodConditions {
operator
field
conditionCriteria {
... on Weight {
unit
value
}
... on MoneyV2 {
amount
currencyCode
}
}
}
rateProvider {
... on DeliveryRateDefinition {
price {
amount
currencyCode
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}

I would much, much rather do this with a series of REST calls. Stripe's API is much more pleasant.
It's "previous" generation of devs that build Hibernates and Entity Frameworks and other ORMs.

I work with "data" systems, where everything has been migrating in the other direction - to SQL - from custom code for last 5 years or more.
> Well, you have to make money somehow and users will never pay for social media

Somehow Mastodon has 3 millions of users despite those problems AFAIK, and growing exponentially.
Lighting (and computing / electronics) are something of outliers.

Electric motors haven't become remarkably more efficient --- the starting point was already quite high.

Thermal resistance heating (water, space, cooking) operates at a 1:1 ratio.

There's been some increase in refrigeration, air conditioning, and heat pump operations, but that's largely a marginal improvement, certainly nowhere near that of microprocessors and LEDs.

You want to look at net total per-capita consumption. And the good news is that electricity usage in the US does appear to have largely flattned out since 2000. Though I can remember a great deal of efficiency discussion in the decades preceeding that, which ... seem to have had little effect. Consumption has roughly doubled since the late 1960s.

https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=49036
Lol the arrogance in this comment. “The hundreds/thousands of people who work on theoretical physics are just too dumb to step back and take a look at the big picture.”
Eh? That's an FAQ, in the FAQ section, written in the style of an FAQ. The next line, which you didn't quote, has the solution. There's nothing wrong with it.
We badly described cartoon characters to an AI. Here’s what it drew
I have no idea what you're talking about. Like, when exactly did that happen? Most people who enjoyed the new show and dropped out did so with the Thirteenth Doctor (Whittaker). There were some episodes that made me roll my eyes (e.g. the Rosa Parks one) but personally I mostly I lost interest because of the pacing and the IMO blandness of the characters and the lack of chemistry between them (again, this is just me).

But the show was pretty much about identity for most of its first ten series, not to mention that you could say that there is an inherent aspect of transness to the character of the Doctor (especially their experience with other characters familiar with past incarnations of the Doctor). The show plays a lot with gender, especially around the timelords.

Heck, even on a purely literal textual level the show is extremely LGBTQ from the start. Captain Jack Harkness is openly bisexual (or pansexual) and flirts with the (male presenting) Doctor who is clearly intrigued. The "love triangle" subplots largely play out more as depictions of polyromantic relationships rather than sources for drama. Even without featuring any clearly trans characters, the show is fundamentally queer if you even barely scratch the surface of it.

I guess if you want to consider the show overly "woke", that started as early as when Martha Jones became a companion because her race became relevant to the plot. The only thing that changed with the newer series is that the writing IMO got sloppier.
In some cases we have rented a mother in law unit. Are different apartments in the same building under the same roof?

I tend to be broader about community then many folks in the States. Imo, you live with the people in your local area, whether that's house, apartment building, or block.
PS has been pretty slow though. I’ve liked the fact that you can pipe objects, but it seems to slow down the startup time of the shell.
Syntactically it's a reference to an apology. Semantically it sort of is, but the phraseology of indirect an apologies are common when the speaker wants to distance themselves from the wrongdoing. This tends to happen either from embarrassment or lack of sincerity.

In this case, the comment from an MS employee in this thread indicates a potential lack of sincerity. If not for that I'd probably give more benefit of the doubt.
> Declaring war?

> Making a plan for war?

These two are, on the stipulation that it's a war of aggression and not a defensive one.
An end to high cholesterol and heart attacks by editing human DNA
But not written with an intention to market themselves I guess. If merely expressing their true intents works in their favor while not boasting about it, I would not call it marketing.

Nevertheless, it nearly costs $0 to host the site, so even if this is marketing, no spending on it.
Show HN: Find a Known Redacted Algorithm
> without having to "attach a debugger"

I can't see how a thing that is basically a debugger except it remembers the program state after each statement, can possibly work without "attaching" it, or running the program under the debugger, like you would with any other debugger.

It's not like I can say, here, I've hit an error and now I want the history of the program's execution that was never recorded.
Fun thought: The toxoplasma gondii wants to spread, and it's gonna make its victim go out and socialize, even if that means breaking COVID rules. The more push back there is, the more reckless and crazy the victims get.

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/article/mind-cont...
(https://archive.ph/S5nB9)
There you go.

A reminder that taking your daily dose of digital drugs like Facebook™, Twitter™, Instagram™, TikTok™, etc is not very good for the mind and only gives you symptoms such as being addicted to infinite doom-scrolling as designed by the creators, involved 24/7 with the outrage machine with brainless parrots reposting or retweeting the same manufactured content and manipulating the discussion and also demoralises what is real and unreal; especially when all of them have an algorithm dictating what is seen and unseen.

I know what you are thinking and I get it. It's extremely difficult to leave for good and delete your account(s). The second best way to avoid it is to delete the app(s) or turn off notifications and log out of all of them.

If you can handle a week away from it all, then you are on your way to your first step to changing and breaking the addiction.
Curious. Did that change more recently? When did you enter?
The commons was once scoped, even in the early days of the internet because the world wasn't turned on. Now the world is the commons. So you have a million impressions and they trend toward the apocalyptic, even though the life of an American today (I will scope my observations to Americans because it's the US and Denmark I know natively) is vastly improved from, say, an American GI drafted into Vietnam or the kind of character portrayed in Upton Sinclair's The Jungle.

Teens are feeding on this firehose and thinking the world is ending and it's not just geopolitics. Now their memetic competition is global. The whole world's customs must be cast off and wholly rejected. Sex and identity too turn apocalyptic.

I think it's interesting that in a time where most of our deliberation is being mediated through disembodied media we are becoming disembodied, quite literally. We no longer identify as Male/Female/Human because the activities we take part in are physically formless. Our Internet identities are fungible, easily swapped unlike those in the embodied world. From this vantage, it's easy to sympathize with the desire to recontextualize identity in sex and gender to match the inner experience.

But from a Buddhist perspective, taking refuge inside another identity holds the same promise of suffering as the identity previous. And that's primarily what I'm seeing: self-immolation all across the Net. All of us burning privately and publicly to become the empresses and emperors of our own identity mountains. It's a race to the bottom and it's divisive. We are abandoning strata that are more inclusive ("we are all workers") for strata which are more exclusive ("we are black but you aren't black enough", "we are queer but you aren't queer enough”, "we are women", "no we are women", etc.)

I have more to say on a grand unified theory scale but I wouldn't be answering your question any more if I continued so I will stop here.
I agree, it seems like a waste of everyone’s time, unless the government was executing some nefarious agenda.
I was inspired by someone else who did it and posted about it on Reddit somewhere a long time ago. So there are at least two, but likely many more than two of us out there.
I meant to say 'major metropolitan' - Thanks for the clarification
Caseys suggestions were pointless because Direct2D is fast at drawing western text without coloring? Didn't casey open an issue because the terminal was slow with coloring?

It seems like you managed to optimize Direct2D with your 'glyph cache' pixel shader but that doesn't mean caseys suggestions were pointless.
Specifically, what should they be doing? What policies?
By not disclosing it they hide the fact that their core business growth may be at risk in case of a cryptocurrency crash. And they may know that if they sell directly to crypto miners.
Yeah and if you really don't want the frontend and backend teams to have to talk to each other, you can let the frontend maintain their own views.

The elephant in the room is that backend simply don't have enough work if you let people use javascript and sql to its full potential.
Just wait until you piss off a Cobra Chicken (Canadian Goose)
I don’t think that the drama was caused by misunderstood sarcasm.
Wasn't the first internal combustion truly new? And the first computer? And the telegraph, etc? If they are just examples of a better something, what was the something?
Interesting that the SEC didn't know while probably everyone in in the world knew at least since 2017 that graphics cards are hard to buy because of the cryptomining demand.

Maybe one these things that are so obvious and hence not explicitly mentioned.
Legally, yes it would be the same situation. If they were tracking research labs buying product and then got something wrong about it on their disclosure they'd be in the same situation.

Legally it is all about the disclosure.

Conspiracy minded crypto super fans might find it hard to believe but ultimately this is a small slap for a dorked up disclosure that can be easily avoided by Nvidia. The amount of crypto related purchases could be 100% and as long as Nvidia doesn't dork up disclosing that (or even saying what they know accurately) nothing happens here.
OMSCS alumni here. Almost all my classes had student organised study groups over video chat. But it does require you to seek them out and participate in class slack usually. Overall I had far more class related interaction than I did in my on campus undergrad.
Per the Federal Reserve, total Household Net Worth before COVID-19 was $110 trillion. Two years later on 12/31/21, it clocked in at $150 trillion - a 36% increase - the largest increase ever over such a time period.

Isn’t it odd that during a period of economic turmoil, household wealth increased by the most on record? Indeed this strange dichotomy can be understood in large part by low rates and QE.

What would explain the increase of household wealth pre-2008, before QE was even invented? The economy was in turmoil for a few months but then everything picked up again. GDP, corporate profits surged. Unemployment fell.

Home prices and stocks surged in the 80s and 90s despite high interest rates.

The fed raised rates from 0% in early 2016 to 2.5% by late 2018 and the stock market and economy did fine.

Correlation does not mean causation, as it's said. 0% interest rates forever didn't help japan until possibly only very recently. why is it suddenly different here.
> I think we all need to consider the possibility of moving off of GitHub,

I've come to that conclusion, too. I moaned and groaned when Microsoft bought GitHub, but did nothing about it. Now I've begun the migration process.

I'd like to spell out some big-picture thoughts on 2FA. Security and convenience are antithetical to each other. Sometimes better solutions come along where you can have a little bit of both. But ultimately, they're trade-offs.

Do you value security, or do you value convenience? And in what proportion?

Furthermore, increasing security also increases fragility. There's more to go wrong. Posters here have been talking about losing their devices, and so forth. These are legitimate concerns. These points have rebuttals, such as recovery procedures, and so forth. OK, and you're sure grandma is up to the task, is she? All these convenience tools: they're easy to use until they aren't.

So not only do you have to think about security vs convenience, you have to consider downside risks on both ends of the spectrum. It's not as easy as saying "moar security" and reading press reports about the advisability of such systems.
Can someone ELI5 the point of GraphQL? Are there any good papers/blogs describing GraphQL antipatterns?
But Agent, I started my rig up at 8:00 am that morning, not 8:01 am like the power company records say...
You should finish the masters, and meanwhile get an internship for the real world experience you crave.
Over the years I fell into a role where I get called in to help solve business problems in different parts of a large tech company when the team working on it gets stuck. I always begin by gathering the key stakeholders and asking "What exactly are we trying to accomplish?"

After working enough of these through to resolution, I've noticed that more than half the time, the key to the root problem is found in the answer to that first question. That's how I learned to start with that question and then to carefully probe the exact terms and associated meanings in the various answers that emerge around the table. As I gently push toward agreement on a clear, concise problem statement different definitions, scopes, boundaries etc emerge. It's rarely a short conversation and oftentimes we never get past that first question without discovering something really key to unblocking the situation.
What's confusing to me is I swear I've read press releases from Nvidia that have clearly said "we're not adding new GPU production capacity because cryptocurrency miners are creating a demand bubble that's going to pop." Maybe from 2019 though, so maybe they were just waking up to it in 2018.
> But I don't see any other idiomatic reading that is sincerely calling the solution trivial.

Agreed - it may not be obvious on first glance, but there's no other reasonable reading.
Sure but in this case it was grossly over-estimated compared to the under-estimated side. Casey did the implementation [1] to prove the point and also made explanatory videos [2] of it.

[1] https://github.com/cmuratori/refterm
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hxM8QmyZXtg&t=1052s
Yes, you are being deliberately obtuse.
It was for 2017-2018 though.
I don’t think a full Scheme implementation is as slow as Python in general. What I’m hung up on is the claim that it’s so absolutely trivial to write a language implementation faster than Python that basically anybody at any skill level could do it in a weekend, and still have time for Sunday afternoon bocce.
Sure, this is an informal environment, but Casey is acting as an individual working on an issue in their own time. The MS employee above is acting as a defacto representative of MS whenever they speak about their work in public.

Casey is also responding to unprofessionalism initiated by MS. (Though admittedly the "they started it" defense isn't a great one)
Ncommander: 5/7 at 9AM ET,stream trying to compile the Movie Maker source
@Ncommander: Tomorrow, 5/7 at 9AM ET, I'm going to stream trying to compile the Movie Maker source while fundraising for @AbortionFunds because of SCOTU's draft judgment against Roe vs Wade.
Effective altruism in a nutshell: “I can do more good by persuading/forcing more people around me to do more good — and to do it efficiently, I should spend most of my time on it, and not trying to do good myself”.

Well, eventually you run out of other people.
The problem that GraphQL was trying to resolve is real: reasonably-sized REST projects usually ended up inventing their own awkward, ad-hoc mini query languages on top of REST.

But GraphQL as a solution is not great. It looks nice in the first place, but there is too much hassle to deal with.

P.S. I've seen quite a fraction of GraphQL projects actually using Node.js as the backend. If that's the case I would recommend TRPC[0] over GraphQL - it's more seamless and straightforward.

[0] https://trpc.io/
Show HN: Skiplist in JavaScript