skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
That’s a great point and it gave me the epiphany that perhaps being always on/connected, i.e. smart phones combined with everything else is actually the cause of change. You can’t just get up and walk away (obviously you can put your phone down, but then you are cut off!)
It was published in 2013, though. Much has changed in terms of tooling, right?
For comparison there was a successful class action against Sony for removing Linux support from the PS3 in an online update.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OtherOS
I wouldn't classify it as very harsh at all.
Hummingbird is another tool that does this.
https://github.com/finestructure/Hummingbird
Recognize Digits Using ML in Elixir
You are describing some make-believe fantasy land - it took physicists decades of begging to get the measly couple billion for the LHC and we spend almost 250 billion a year on casinos every year. If that is your measure of privilidge, then a pitboss at casino has more privilidge than an average phisicist does. And by design they produce nothing on value and never will.

Other proffeshions that command huge budgets include Architects and bricklayers - we spend 2 trillion on construction in a single year, that's more than all spending on Physics for all of recording history combined. Or doctors, city planners, bankers, etc.

I don't know what beef you have with themm but at least run this mental experiment: Imagine a girl brings her boyfriend over for dinner, and he tells them her parents he a physicist working on the most cutting edge research. Is their first throught going to be 'oh, that's great, if they get married she will live a life of privilidge?'. If the parents had to advise between him and a heart surgeon, or a senior manager at a bank, a succefull lawyer, a developer at google - what do you think it will be?

Bottomn line is this: when pressed on privilidge, you can't come up with anything measurable where physicists will be even be in the top 10, because such a metric does not exist. it's just some impression you formed that you are trying to justify.
Interestingly, competition is worse for consumers in some respects here. It's resulting in fragmentation of the market such that people are too many services for 1-2 shows each
What people should do is have a small SD card with all of their private keys and passwords stored away safely. This SD card should be kept in cold storage (e.g. in a safe where you keep personal belongings), and never be accessed unless in absolute emergency (lost your YubiKey etc and can't get in anywhere, etc.)
AWS has entered the chat.
I am against SMS 2FA.
Show HN: Interactive Circle of Fifths
Yes, but you can't guess a TOTP. You can guess a password. But I hope that Github will make their FIDO2 support better.
If your SSH key is encrypted, it’s 2FA.

Either way, it’s not phishable (unlike passwords) so it’s way safer.
I thought this was fairly well known with respect to the defaults customizations. There is a repo here: https://macos-defaults.com/#-what-s-a-defaults-command

...but it is missing a lot of them, which are scattered across the internet. Some others worth checking out are aggregated here:

https://gist.github.com/romanhaa/9804183f242991007b316a59c4b...
When talking about digital cameras, each "pixel" is a single color sensor. Blame marketing.

Also 4:2:0 is 6 values per 4 pixels. 1.5 bytes per pixel at 8-bit.
For a U.S. analog, we use the State Plane system. The states have (multiple) custom projections to suit local accuracy needs. Like another commenter said, WGS 84 uses ellipsoidal coordinates that are not suitable for the Crossrail's construction. If it were really so easy, American states would "just use WGS 84" as well.
There is a disconnect between what I want and what providers are trying to offer me. I want quality content with powerful search. Providers seem to think I want a huge unsearchable library from which they will make recommendations. Netflix has lots and lots of great original content, but given a random show, it's far more likely to be average or less (versus, say, HBOmax).
I just tried it on a stock machine and it is not. Do you have any third party system utilities on yours? Or are you clicking near the (larger) title bar area?
You mean 10%?
I tried to benchmark GraalPython for the talk but the compatibility situation was so poor that I wasn't even close to being able to run any benchmarks.
Yes the mafia cannot exist without stealing. News at 11.
please watch! fall in love with coral! https://youtube.com/watch?v=aGGBGcjdjXA
How would you know?

Between deliberately bad search and a bias towards pushing you to waste time rather than entertain, they bury their own content and deliver swill.

Netflix got away with it because they were the only game in town. Disney really broke the seal and delivered a good platform. Apple is delivering strong content that compensates for the horrific application.
I believe that Anvil is a competitor: https://anvil.works/
Any idea what the price on a fully populated board will be? I'm having trouble finding it on the website.
Hence my comment about the methodology. And HBO Max doesn't have anything that's exceptional?

For that reason, it doesn't really make sense to focus on the specifics of a handful of outliers as unreliably ranked by RT (I think). The real message is that large as Netflix' catalog is, it doesn't necessarily have a lot more highly ranked content than other sites have. (Which roughly squares with my anecdotal impressions.)
I like the tracking features of Shop app, hate the recommendation of products. Just be a tracker and don’t try and sell my more crap.
I pay for all kinds of stuff daily. I just dont like to be extorted and enslaved.
I agree. '&' should not mutate.

In this case it's simple to do:

net1 = pin1, pin2, pin3
design = net1, net2, net3...
A more generous interpretation of your sentiment could be:

This is a fantastic resource that anyone with a passing interest in the OCaml programming language needs to be aware of.
I definitely point and call to myself when doing deploys and running DB migration scripts... just to make sure I'm not changing production when I don't mean to.
This is exactly the redefinition and recentering process that infuriates me as the parent of a severely autistic child. The "autism" that people are self-advocating against ending and which dominates media discourse is a world of difference away from the totally disabling condition my daughter has. Yet the connotations of the term "autism" have been hijacked away from her by media attention focused on large numbers of high-functioning and self-diagnosed people agitating for their own agenda.

Yes, a lot of neuroatypicals are perfectly happy with their current situations -- as long as they receive accommodations at school and at work and online based on their diagnosis. Their _medical_ diagnosis. I am not for a minute trying to advocate that they be forced to take treatments they don't want. What I do object to, strenuously, is the diversion of resources away from severely impaired people who can barely communicate, let alone advocate for themselves online.

These people _do_ have a true medical condition, are suffering, and have the right to the support of the medical and research community just as much as the less impaired group has the right to forego that support.
The site looks all-caps to me and the image is invisible when using the site's dark theme.
It’s inevitable, consumers aren’t gonna support all these (subscription) streaming services. Gonna be Disney and one or two other streaming services in 10 years.
Indeed. But it also devalued them by $150B in the span of 6 months.
They still have a zero carbon liquid fuel so you can't compare it directly to refined fuel.

Fossil fuels should be eventually taxed into oblivion. Even at current taxation level their distilled fuel would be competitive if tax exempt for example in Europe.
No need to mandate it, Netflix should have realised the end game of competing with their own suppliers.
Finding Nemo also has a sad beginning. And the beginning of Up is both sad and sobering. But none of those I see as traumatising. On the other hand, The little prince basically sells suicide to kids. And all the teachers always praise this book and force kids to read it while obviously the book is not written for children.
Did not know that. Makes sense though, given that decaying fruit is acidic.
I wish there was a feature or an app that would prevent moving and lock windows in place instead of this.

For example, Spark (email) annoys me cause you can drag the window by dragging the search box, so sometimes clicking that to focus causes the window to shift by a couple pixels
Cinder does this (invalidation), and both Faster CPython and Pyston use guarding.
> This should work in apps not just the browser

Apple, Google and Microsoft all have native API variants of the Web Authentication API. These typically use entitlements requiring authorization back to a website. This means e.g. a Twitter application could leverage the same authenticator registrations as twitter.com, leveraging both platform and roaming security keys.

>... and should work with my logging into my laptop in the browser and leveraging my phone as a FIDO "key".

The press release details this commitment; for instance, I can use an Android phone to log into a website on my Mac. An example of such an option should be visible on all shipping desktop Chrome browsers if you do a Web Authentication registration or authentication request (I believe unfortunately currently titled something like 'Add an Android phone'). On the Apple side, being able to leverage this is currently sitting behind a developer feature toggle.

One can hope that this will be extended to say the Windows platform itself - at that time, I would expect be able to use my iPhone or Android phone to log into any Windows machine on an AAD-backed domain.
This sounds good, but is not a robust and reliable methodology. There are many problems including:

- Some authorized resellers mix in counterfeits with real goods.

- Other authorized resellers are only authorized to distribute certain items, but get others through 'shady' channels.

- Some resellers will sell returned or repaired items.

- Most resellers don't actually have time-limited deals.

- Agreements lapse, and figuring out who is permitted to distribute what is complicated.

- None of these measures are actually verifiable by the concerned consumer.
Is the insect apocalypse upon us? It's complicated, say researchers
Exactly that. I want to see more competition on price, features, and quality, and less on content availability.

It'd also make it easier to enter both parts of that market, as a production company or a distributor, which is currently something that only a company with an enormous pile of cash and/or ownership of an existing large catalog of material, can realistically do.
There’s vastly more high-quality television being produced than any other time in history. From my perspective, subscribing to one of the major services gives me a better experience than cable TV ever did, at a much lower cost. If I run out of stuff to watch I can always switch to another.
I had an epiphany below that it’s not just internet/social media as much as ALWAYS being connected to it via smart phones/tablets. Back in the day you got up and walked away, went outside, watched TV and you were completely away from it. Now we all carry it with is everywhere we go.
The Next Decade in AI (2020)
I like Rust but I’d use this for so many things!
Devouring the Heart of Portugal
Hum... Ok. Then the answer is that most cases do not demand as much analysis time as you expect, and the ones that demand more still can gain something from dynamic behavior analysis in a JIT.

Also, you can combine the two to get something better than any single analysis alone.
> Full HD at 30 fps would be 59.33 MB/s, barely but still fitting into that limit.

That limit is too high even as a theoretical max.

You could do raw 720p.
>And yet, he stopped 2 of the 3 shots on him securing the game win

>which wound up being the game winner to help secure a 4–2 win for Dallas

Hodges was playing for Anaheim. Plus, stopping 2/3rds of your shots is pretty terrible.

Linking Scott Foster's page would have made more sense, he stopped all 7 shots, but even he would probably agree he isn't that great.
> Convergence was, if you go back and re-watch that video from the iPhone launch linked above, the big selling point of the iPhone. It is a media player, an internet browser, and a mobile phone all in one. And these days, it is a camera, a satellite navigation system, and a payment card too. So it is not enough to make a good phone, you have to make a good all-of-those-things.

Or people have to be willing to go back to "Not all of this in one thing."

And there are some nice benefits there. "Separate things" don't tend to data mine in the way that modern smartphones do, and I'm not too concerned about my not-at-all-networked camera submitting stuff upstream without me realizing it. I don't mind having music separate again, and I've been re-acquainting myself with internal navigational skills using paper maps and written directions to get around.

It was nice when "all the things" were on a single device, and I've done that, but as I'm more and more opposed to "turning everything I do into extracted behavioral surplus," going back to separate things makes sense - and, realistically, it doesn't suck nearly as much as I expected it to.

I now carry a phone that does calling and texting and... if I'm in the mood for pain, some bluetooth audio to speakers. It'll do calling via BT to the car if I bother to turn it on, and that's about as fancy as I normally get. Though anymore, I'm as likely to forget the phone as not when I go places.

Photos are done with a pocket camera now, going back to that which I did for years. I take fewer photos, but it's fine, and it also means that working on projects I'm documenting, I don't have the distraction of the phone there. I have a camera, and it takes pictures.

It's a different approach to life, more of a return to a 90s/early 2000s approach, but I've been quite happy with it, and find it a welcome change from "Everything in one device."
So the most priviged people in the world are telemarketers, casino pitbosses, High-frequency traders and developers working on spyware?

There are many careers that produce not just zero, but negative value to society, and academia is nowhere near the top of that list.

Also, have you seen what professors have to fill out to get a grant to fund their research?
>the most successful products in the world did it anyway

A few successful projects in the world did it. There's likely far more successful products that didn't use it.

The key metric along this line is how often each language allows success to some level and how often they fail (especially when due to the choice of language).

>should be lauded rather than scrutinized

One can do both at the same time.
Basically a public access endpoint to services which authorizes with SSO to the same endpoint which your tailscale account authorizes and could let you access HTTPS services.

You could do other things too like exposing services publicly without auth (by tailscale anyway) like ngrok.

I can conceptualize it well, but, I'm not a huge fan of the idea honestly primarily because tailscale is so easy to use.
That’s a specific setting, under Settings > Dock & Menu Bar > Double-click a window’s title bar to zoom | minimize. It should default to zoom on a fresh install.
You can right now buy handsets made even by the US’s primary competitor, China. Go nuts, have a blast.

https://www.amazon.com/s?k=Huawei+phone
Array Builder
US$43 billion per year is US$473 billion (or more likely US$350 billion at the time) over the 11 years it took to build the LHC. So maybe 2%.
(Founder of Aptible, a Heroku-like PaaS focused on security and compliance)

> dev teams face limits on what they can build securely, platform teams face limits on what secure by default and monitoring features they have time to implement, security operations teams have a lot of data points to look at, and in theory even changes in personnel in a couple of teams can have an impact on the threat posture for a given set of a company.

I couldn't agree more. It's too bad, because I believe most companies should be solving this by building on a battle-tested platform that provides a safe path for devs. In theory, platforms like Heroku improve cloud security by reducing margin for error. In practice though (as we're seeing), these platforms can introduce new security vulnerabilities in the layer they introduce on top of IaaS.

I also very much appreciate your comment about having a better way to evaluate the security of platforms without relying on public breach reports, or implicitly trusting what platforms say. I think the best thing is for platforms to be 100% transparent in how they implement security, namely by:

1. Running alongside IaaS services instead of layering a black box on top of them (coordinating, not fully abstracting)

2. Providing clear accountability for security defaults: every security default enforced by the platform should be represented in a validation that end users can view (if not alter)
Yes. But what I am saying is since gmail becomes paid for custom domains, you _then_ decide, you might as well pay someone else.
If you mean vehicle emissions that's a consequence of our country's car-centric design. I lived in a large Asian city for a while and nearly everything that could be carried by a single person was delivered delivered via electric bikes/scooters, both online retail and food delivery.
> Nim goes further there by removing the need for tools like Pandas and numpy. You don't have to write code in "Pandas-style" because native Nim is equally fast and sometimes faster.

Can you clarify this? Is there an equivalent data stack in Nim? Or is it that nim is lighter-weight because, for example, it permits transforming tabular data into language structures natively (i.e., without library support)?
This sounds like a great idea at Amazon's current scale, but I struggle to see how this is possible at a company with <20 head count. There are so many different areas that need attention when running a business, and many of them require less than one person's full time.

...Maybe the move is to bring process-driven management to the startup. You outsource all non-core processes, including payroll, benefits, invoicing, accounting, legal, HR, finance, etc. You could then have an eng leader, a product leader, a sales leader, a customer success leader, and a "vision" leader. Sounds like a lot of the VC backed startup world, actually.

...but at that scale, each "single thread" contains multitudes. In "engineering," there's recruiting, mentorship, internal tooling, existing process maintenance, new project scoping & architecture, sprint planning and execution, the list goes on. So the "single-threaded" eng leader is actually multi-threaded across all these different sub-areas.
It's interesting to see this done as a deliberate procedure. I thought everyone did that almost instinctively, as if telling themselves "OK, focus". I certainly do it, except for the vocalising.

Even just doing a generic pointing gesture at nothing when trying to think through something unrelated to the physical world.

I wonder if those trained to do it deliberately are trained to use the right hand regardless of their natural preference, since the left side of the brain is more associated with focus and logical thinking.
Authenticator apps, and SMS help them derive you have identity -- which is more secure for them and you. Hardware token via WebAuthn (etc) is only more secure for you.

When they say "for the sake of security" they mean for them too.

There's a reason they want you to verify using one of the first two methods first.
> What sharply distinguishes the abortion right from the rights recognized in the cases on which Roe and Casey rely is something that both those decisions acknowledged: Abortion destroys what those decisions call “potential life” and what the law at issue in this case regards as the life of an “unborn human being.”

How is that not saying that because abortion specifically involves a few cells then the right to an abortion is not the same as other privacy rights?

Yes, elsewhere they make other arguments about tradition with regards to abortion not being a privacy right. They don't use a singular argument.
I don't know if you're being sarcastic, but your vision sounds like a nightmare and not very far removed from Gattaca.

> moving the trust boundary away from the control of the user entirely. I also don't enjoy it, but it would solve a lot of current problems we see in information security.

Every despot throughout history has noted that freedom can be traded for security, but I thought that most of us would agree that freedom is more important.
Man, this is low even for FB's standard
Which is pretty ironic when the scroll bars are so elusive when you actually want to drag them
California, bay area
Unfortunately this is not true when you're trying to undergo a SOC 2 audit.
They also expect 1/3 + 1/3 + 1/3 == 1. Decimals won't help with that.
Now it's like Apple is openly inviting governments to crackdown on it for anticompetitive behavior.
They are employed as software developers, it speaks to software developers holding a priviliged role in society.

If the privilidge was in academia, they would have stayed where the privilidge is
Right. I don't care about the shows/movies I don't want to watch on a streaming service. I only care if there are enough shows/movies on there I do want to see.
Fortnite fights its way back to iOS (sort of) without the App Store
Closing the window and not closing the app is great and one of my favourite things from switching to macOS from Windows. At the same time, the Zoom thing is ridiculous. Some apps do the right thing (e.g., Firefox), while some leave you scratching your head (Finder).

Ctrl + Opt + Return is the only reason I have Rectangle installed.
I agree it's probably better than nothing for many people.

It's still pretty much the worst form of 2fa there is, and not nearly as secure as people assume.
There isn’t any all-caps?
While Ratio is usually the right way to evaluate things. Is that applicable in this case? Doesn't what matters is the number of good shows not the percentage? If I watch Netflix I can find three Exceptional shows and a bunch of Outstanding shows, including three at the high end of outstanding. If I watch Apple TV + There are no exceptional shows and only one at the high end of outstanding, but the ratio seems better.

I guess it would depend on discoverability.
"We are more than excited to announce the launch of the Turing Pi 2 on Kickstarter on May 11, 2022, 9 AM PT. The board price tag starts at $199 for super early birds, plus $10 for each Raspberry Pi compute module adapter. Become the first to start utilizing the immense potential of the Turing Pi 2. Hop down a rabbit hole of the self-hosted revolution."
Author here: thanks for the feedback. I'm not really sure what you mean by all-caps, would you mind elaborating?
On the other hand, a lot of people are fine with putting unremarkable content on as largely background noise. That's what a lot of broadcast TV was. So there's probably at least some market for a large catalog of OK stuff rather than more of a focus on prestige TV.
This looks very similar to airplane.dev, is that intended?