skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> I have less than 10 servers I maintain so a lot of these new fancy viewers is overkill for me.

There are several layers to the complexity of "web scale orchestration" however, and you definitely can get the same tooling/features on a much smaller scale with less complexity involved.

I.e. you can rent a few baremetal servers from hetzner, give them an internal lan interface and setup k3s on that internal network. Now you can add capabilities as you want and need them: I.e.

* deploying longhorn for a distributed storage backend with easily configured backup.

* Certmanager for cluster wide https certificate provisioning

* Promstack to get healthchecks etc

* Loki for the just now mentioned logging aggregation

Each of these capabilities are usually just one deployment command (kubetcl apply/helm install) and will enable this capability for all existing and future deployments on the same cluster.

If you have a weekend to experiment and want to explore what it actually feels to use that kind of tooling I can only encourage you to maybe try it out. The whole experience has gotten pretty nice over the years, and while it is pretty much the same you already know... Just differently, it does solve it in a very reusable way, which makes it ultimately (at least now after about 1 year of usage) much more straightforward to figure out then just a bunch of shell scripts

After I got over that it's done wrong, (as in: not what I've come to know/expect) I kinda got to like it, especially for small scale stuff (a 4 node HA cluster with 64gb ram each costs slightly below 200€ per month on hetzner, and they're using nvme storage, so really fast IO)
Side note: I love this style of "artwork". I also enjoy old books with paintings, older maps and whatnot and can look at them for hours.

Maybe it's because I work in print media and know how fast and good modern tools are, so I can estimate (and value) how complicated it was to create all the graphics in former times.

So: Great project to bring back the old style for modern data.
IME, ninja doesn't solve that issue. At least not in the versions I've used.
I did it out of necessity. There were no jobs and there was a market. I had the expertise. Nowadays it's all different.

I stopped working for other people about 9 years ago.

Things went well, 2 years ago my main source of income went away. So I've been trying to rebuild - or - find a job with similar freedom.
But the job part isn't working for me. I can't seem to bear authority.
Server side WASM appears to be thing as well.

https://www.infoq.com/presentations/wasm-server-api/

So that would allow you to run PHP on the server as well ;-)
I have a Bip and absolutely do not trust Amazfit with my data, which is fine because I don't use their app.

I use the open source Gadgetbridge app instead and it works well: https://gadgetbridge.org/
> 4th Edition isn't too bad, besides needing a BA degree for the basic rules and a Masters for magic.

Which is a requirement that should rather trivially be fulfilled by the HN audience. :-)
Email me (it’s in my profile) if you want help in the internship department.
Why do supporters of exclusive native development have to act all pretentious about it. You are developing mobile apps, get over yourself.

Guaranteed you could not tell if 10 randomly chosen apps were developed natively or cross platform. I'm sure you will say you can though.
The JS part of your comment isn't correct at all. ASI rules are fully described in the very first JS spec, and in 20+ years of JS coding I can't recall ever having heard of browsers handling it inconsistently.
The advice I usually give to customers is:

* .org if you're a non-profit with international presence.

* .com is good for most international businesses.

* .eu can be used as an alternative to .com for businesses and organizations in the EU.

* Country-specific tld's should only be used for services aimed at those specific countries.

* Avoid .net unless you're a network operator (edit: the same applies to .aero unless you're doing aviation stuff).

Anything else can be considered to be of novelty value only. Do not base your business on one of the new gtld's, but feel free to use them for landing pages or specific campaigns. Skip the cool domains like .io. Exception: .nu, which has long been used as a secondary tld in Denmark and Sweden.
I don't think that beats

["1", "7", "11"].map(parseInt)

returning

[1, NaN, 3]
Still not sure how to get this onto PSVR2 when it comes out but it's exactly what they need.
2. sounds an awful lot like "renewables are not a viable form of energy and require gas". One gas replacement - nuclear - needs no backup. The other - renewables - needs backup of a scale that exists only on paper.

I've asked time and again for costed *TWh-scale* storage, the proposals are never forthcoming. Because, on first principles, they're far too high and unlikely to ever decrease. Ask actual investors - which I have - in private, and they'll admit it.

Almost nowhere are renewables outcompeting nuclear. What is outcompeting is greenwashed gas.
You could not load some modes if the file you're loading is large, in the somewhat extreme case fundamental-mode usually performs fine.
I really miss poring over big sheets of paper to find nice routes to cycle over... Especially in France, the Michelin 200.000 maps are unrivaled to not only find your way, but also have a good feel how the road and the landscape looks like. [1].

These Michelin maps have a great feature I've not seen elsewhere: traffic intensity is rendered with color (white=quiet, red=busy) and road-width is rendered as width, binned at a few standard widths. I would love to see that on openstreetmap.

[1] https://www.viamichelin.nl/static/1.462.0/html/michelinmap.h...
Besides, large chunks of Servo have already made their way into Gecko as part of Quantum: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gecko_(software)#Quantum
The modern Agile sweatshop is the one that manages by deadlines using timeboxed sprints. Not very agile by definition, yet the term stuck and people better find a new one.
There's a lot of references here to jq being 'arcane'. For me, one of the challenges in improving my jq fu has been to find examples of larger programs, from which to learn.

One thing that seems to be perhaps a misconception amongst some is that jq invocations are short and only 'one-liners', and that a 'real script' (in a 'real language') would be better in many cases. I think this lack of larger program examples probably helps to perpetuate this misunderstanding too.

Anyway, I was inspired enough by the article in question to write up some of my own thoughts on jq and statelessness: https://qmacro.org/blog/posts/2022/05/02/some-thoughts-on-jq...
> oval car sticker symbols

Unfortunately, international vehicle registration codes are NOT compatible with ISO country codes. It's not even close, IVH are variable-lettered.
Square Enix to sell western studios to Embracer
Yeah if you did this now you’d get something like “this expression is of type t/1 but an expression of type t/2” to disambiguate.
Non-latest macOS versions still receive security updates. Safari 15 is available for Big Sur and Catalina. It's not like one has to always upgrade to the last major version.

When they go out of security support these machines work quite well under Linux (as I could test myself, I recycled a bunch already).
A good framework hides all of this, and gradually reveals how it works to the user/coder.

I think Next.js does this very well, although I'll admit that their "getting started for total beginners" documentation spends way too much time explaining the magic. If I were to throw someone into the deep end to make their own mistakes, as I assume we all did with PHP, I would tell them to git clone https://github.com/vercel/next-learn/tree/master/basics/lear..., and then experiment with "pages/index.js".

Hot reloading that you get out-of-the-box with most JS frameworks is a massive improvement over static HTML, or PHP.
Also capacitive touchscreens. The resitive ones of older Smartphones wouldn't have worked for the revolutinary UI
Along with a host of other server side "languages" - ASP, PERL/CGI... all this has been done before. Just as we've come full circle on infrastructure where we were trying to eke every ounce of performance out of memory and CPU cycles because supply was short, now we do so because we're charged by the cycle, memory overhead, bandwidth we're beginning to recycle concepts like server side rendering... which has been done since as long as PERL/CGI existed back in the 90s.

It's funny how we just keep reusing the same ideas and calling them new... it makes me wonder why the history of relevant technologies aren't taught in software development classes so we can actually forge a path forward instead of keep doing the same things over and over again...
"there's a baby in that bath water"

I love this turn of phrase. I might steal it.
Nothing, necessarily. Primary initial motivation for tmux seemed to be to create a BSD-licensed "screen" for the OpenBSD userland. In any event, tmux quickly appeared in NetBSD's package collection and I was an early user. Comparing the source code is where I saw a difference. Maybe I am just dumb but I found the tmux approach was easier to comprehend and I could edit tmux source easily whereas I found screen was more difficult learn and I never felt comfortable editing the source code. I also thought when it was released tmux's documentation was more elegant than screen's. I do not follow screen anymore. Things may have changed after screen finally got some competition.

This is not to say there is nothing one can do with tmux that one cannot also do with screen, or vice versa. There could be. I only opine that tmux is elegant, and more elegant than screen.
I tried Spacemacs and was fairly happy other than the performance. Scrolling and even auto-indent were visibility slowing down my typing. It depended on the language but Rust, which is probably my most common language, was distinctly bad.
Ok devil’s advocate. What’s more original? Thor 3: Ragnarok? Or Jojo Rabbit? Both great films imo; both by Taika Waititi.

The former features marvel’s Thor, who’s commercial af. But it goes to a new world, has a markedly different tone, humor, themes, and plot. The plot hits themes of humility and identity and the specifics of the ending were, imo, not very predictable.

Jojo rabbit is set in WWII with all original characters with some great bits, but an overall plot that’s fairly predictable.

You could easily argue it’s still Jojo rabbit, but is there anything obviously bad about how original Thor 3 is? I think no.

And there have been lots of great movies in the past year even. Everything everywhere, Last Night in Soho, massive talent, etc.

Edit: the formulaic rom coms and action movies and comedies were the bigger issue to me. A mildly novel setting, or perhaps, novel buddy cop duo, added far less interesting material than things complained about here.
I'd say the Apple Newton in 1993 made touch screens mainstream quite a bit earlier. And things like PalmOS were clearly based on the excitement that came from the Newton. The Newton itself wasn't that successful due to its reliance on writing recognition that didn't work that well (at least in the initial versions of NewtonOS) but that ironically added to its place in pop culture. Like in The Simpsons where one of the school bullies has a Newton and is trying to take a note reminding him to beat up the annoying teacher's pet Martin, only for the system to interpret "Beat up Martin" as "Eat up Martha".
>Pot, meet kettle.

No, this is incredibly wrong. The source here is me. You can choose to not believe me, but it's a source. I'm sorry but I just don't illegally carry a tape recorder into every meeting I go to just to prove something to a person on the internet. If you want me to elaborate then just ask a specific question, please stop with these "gotcha" tactics because they don't do anything. If you were referring to this person's writings, the article that was already posted is a source.
"occasionally goes boom requiring an $800 billion clean up bill why build it?" is an absurd way to describe the small number of incidents we've had in the past - they can all be attributed to egregious chains of human errors and/or bad planning. To quote:

But some 18 years before the 2011 disaster, new scientific knowledge had emerged about the likelihood of a large earthquake and resulting major tsunami of some 15.7 metres at the Daiichi site. However, this had not yet led to any major action by either the plant operator, Tepco, or government regulators, notably the Nuclear & Industrial Safety Agency (NISA). Discussion was ongoing, but action minimal. The tsunami countermeasures could also have been reviewed in accordance with International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) guidelines which required taking into account high tsunami levels, but NISA continued to allow the Fukushima plant to operate without sufficient countermeasures such as moving the backup generators up the hill, sealing the lower part of the buildings, and having some back-up for seawater pumps, despite clear warnings.

We already know that the Chernobyl incident was due to even more egregious human error and poor planning.
The Bruce Nuclear plant in Ontario had an industrial development adjacent to it to take advantage of steam from the plant, but I don't think it ever really went anywhere and they demolished the infrastructure related to it in the early 2000s.
It might be in general in the US most houses are on a level 2 of "Three little pigs" construction rating, aka made of wood while in Spain most houses and apartments, and in cities most people live in apartment, they're built with bricks which is more fire resistant. Anyway, it might also be that those apartments are decades old and maybe newer constructions do have smoke alarms and sprinklers. I'd say in office buildings they do have smoke alarma and sprinklers by law.
Could someone please explain ? :
type 'a list = 'a :: 'a list | []

The article says "::" is a Data Constructor. I can make sense of
type 'a = Left of 'a | Right of 'a
where Right and Left are the Data constructors but I don't see the link with the part I don't understand.
> It's also worth considering that reason and debate are not an especially useful method for arriving at truth.

And this is why all those "XYZ is good/bad: debate me" arguments that make up so much of politics, religion and philosophy are so, so tedious. They do nothing to advance anything or find anything new.
To better understand your point, I'd like to know what you think steelmanning is. Can I ask, why do you think steelmanning doesn't involve asking and listening?

(see how easy it can be)
I have only tried the regular PinePhone (since I only own that version) they both share the same modem (iirc), so there shouldn't be much of a difference.

> "Did the modem randomly die without you doing anything"
Yep

> "Or under high load it gave out sometimes?"
No, it would be just idling/sleeping and it would crash on me. It's not like it would automatically restart itself either. It was just dead until I rebooted the phone (which is slooowwww), restarting the modem manager and the modem it self, didn't fix it reliably for me either, only sometimes that would actually work, that whole process of restarting the modem and reentering your PIN could easily take multiple minutes.
Under load (e.g. Firefox) it would just have the same (crashing) behavior.

I have had more missed phone calls because of it, than I'd like to count.
Certainly, but one of the deciding votes here won their seat very recently claiming precedent in this specific case made it settled law. That appears to have been a lie.
Why Hy?
I think that a Tesla phone makes strategic sense for Tesla and I think that it could do very well in the market. Tesla certainly has the engineering talent on the software and hardware side to make it happen.

I asked an Electronics engineer with a background in communication links. He told having a mobile phone connect to Starlink should be perfectly doable with the major caveat that it will only be for text messages as the data rate will be slow. As an example, the data rate of GPS satellites to any GPS receiver is only 50 bits per second. Connecting to a Starlink satellite will be faster than that and voice might de doable buts leads to other problems so it will most likely be just text messages. If it happens ... :)

However, there's no room for a Tesla Pi phone. Since iOS and android are 10-20 years ahead. It's impossible to compete against them, and even if tesla went with the android ecosystem they won't be able to compete with other Android manufacturers like Samsung in terms of price and quality. Not to mention there's no innovation left in smartphones that's why everyone is shifting to foldable phones where there's room for innovation.

Tesla will have no competing power in that segment, even Apple is at risk of being left behind. The only innovation in smartphones nowadays is in socs and Tesla has no experience in semiconductors let alone compete against the big sharks. So if Tesla can't make use of Starlink in their phones they will have nothing to offer, maybe they'll be able to make use of neural links but good luck in convincing people of putting chips in their heads except maybe people with disabilities.
The Rise of the 15-Minute Meeting
> HTTP never had any standardized way to communicate feature sets

Except for the "Accept", "Accept-Language", "Accept-Encoding" and "Accept-Charset" headers (the last is phased out because UTF-8 is now used universally).

I don't think extending it much further than that is reasonable without introducing some binary encoding for a giant bitmap, and even that would eat more bandwidth than it's worth.
voters are in favour of both

---

While public support for legal abortion has fluctuated some in two decades of polling, it has remained relatively stable over the past five years. Currently, 59% say abortion should be legal in all or most cases, while 39% say it should be illegal in all or most cases.

---

U.S. support for legal same-sex marriage continues to trend upward, now at 70% -- a new high in Gallup's trend since 1996. This latest figure marks an increase of 10 percentage points since 2015
When you read posts like this, and also the previous, linked one [1], you can clearly see that Ron is a smart and humble guy. I really dislike the fan mob that it's starting the hate because RTMI is not going to be a throwback and retro-game.

> Monkey Island 1 and 2 weren't pixel art games. They were games using state-of-
the-art tech and art.

This is SO true, and as much as I loved those games, as much as I stopped playing modern videogames and as much as I love the style of Thimbleweed Park, going forward for an artist like Ron is what _defines_ an artist. If you like MI1 and Mi2, just play MI1 and MI2 again as I do from time to time. Just like you would watch again a movie from the '70s or listen to the Beatles. But you cannot ask an artist to stay always the same because you loved their first works.
https://github.com/Igalia/wolvic/issues/58
That's only for the 4-man dungeons. You still need to run the Crystal Tower raid, for example.
The fact that this problem took 25 years to fix is maybe the more damning thing. It wasn't a bug, exactly; it was a usability problem. Clearer demonstrations of development priorities could hardly be given.
Mid-price movies are the ones that have mostly gone extinct.

We have the Disney-level Mega Movies with ONE BILLION DOLLAR budgets. These are the ones that are made by a committee of producers and executive producers and shareholders. They're too big to fail, so they'll be tested and re-tested and re-shot until they WILL make a profit. Currently they will also include a Chinese movie star and won't touch any subjects too sensitive for China, because multiple tens of percents of profit will be made in there.

Then we have the Blumhouse[0] type 5-20 million dollar movies. They give a hard budget limit and won't pay the actors much - they'll get a share of the profits instead. They're cheap enough to not bankrupt the production company if it flops, but will make immense profits if they succeed. The Company won't usually affect the production much, giving the director free reign to do what they want.

What's missing in today's world are the $10-$100M, movies. These have a big enough budget to not have to cut corners much, but still small enough to not draw the attention of The Executives who want their favourite things in the movie - letting the director enact their vision. The only mid-budget movie I can think of in the recent years is Michael Bay's Ambulance[1], shot with $40M.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blumhouse_Productions
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ambulance_(film)
I used kdenlive for basically forever. Look up nixipixel's videos on kdenlive lol.

One day though I had I had a weird library problem #linuxproblems

So i checked out pitivi and ya really liked it, converted me.
The specs of the device linked in OP aren't that far off the PineTime. Maybe if we ask very nicely we can get the source code and begin work on a PalmOS port!
I’ve started referring to my “phone” as a “palm pilot” because, well, it’s hardly a “phone.” Long live the PalmPilot!
what about the dignity of the innocent victims of US bombs?
What matters is prioritization and momentum.

You're gonna get more people aligned if you focus on things that other teams happen to be working on at the same time. If you decide to work on something else when there is a huge infrastrucuture design project going on, just because of some precommitted sprint plan, you're gonna play catch up later.

If you keep dropping a task for another because of arbitrary sprint plan, you're gonna be jerking yourself and the team around and never getting people get aligned with what you're building for long enough and it'll ge harder to get feedback from them.

Momentum matters, especially for multi product teams, such as in data science and data engineering.
India IT Ministry orders VPN providers, crypto players to store data for 5 years
Sure—but those other rights must still exist and come from somewhere. Where does the right to abortions until viability come from?
I seriously doubt Bezos was exercising his rational economic interests when he bought the Washington Post.
It is equivalent to the following:

type 'a list = Cons of 'a * 'a list | Tail

...but with a fancy syntax for Cons and Tail.
Nuclear technology has never really matured to be industry-led, and is quite obviously heavily subsidized now; surely it's not inevitably always going to be that way though. At one time, the wisdom re: solar power was that PVs were simply far too expensive to be used for large-scale power, and yet, here we are now.
that means that USA is not a "great civilized country", "a great democracy", "the land of the free", but a place that depending on where you were born or actually reside, can look much more like North Korea.

Good to know.
A list is either the empty list [] or

Two pieces of data (with the constructor ::) with 1 being the head of the list (type 'a) and one being the tail of the list (type 'a list, a recursive definition).

:: is an allowed identifier in oCaml. If that is not allowed, the typical names are Cons for :: and Nil for []
At my last employer (very large, not FAANG) every project started with a deadline for when it had to be done, but few details on what was being asked for, followed by detailed estimates being required that were then only used for budgeting and not how hard it was to meet the deadline. Then inevitably all the details changed daily until the deadline was missed and recast again. Rinse, repeat, until eventually the project was canceled. All of this because the company had too many execs who wanted in on expensive projects, a product team with no ability to say no, and thus the development teams worked long hours to no avail. Shipping small incremental versions was considered anathema. So one could work on a project for 18 months and ship nothing only to start another project that also didn't ship.