skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I also have a similar question: how could a consistent hash ring "infinitely scale"? As the number of nodes increases, the chances that some nodes flip-flop their membership will increase, and the system will become less reliable. Such temporary instability is very annoying for operations (alert mitigation in particular), especially when the requests per second is high.

I think there's a reason that large-scale KV stores use range-based partitions, such as FB's Tectonic and Google's Colossus (Colossus uses Spanner for metadata, and Spanner uses hierarchical range-based partitioning).
Or get a margin account, as that's all Instant D&W is.

My TD Ameritrade lets me buy from deposit instantly, and doesn't "show" margin usage as it clears, even though it's clear from the amount I can buy that it's just the margin on the account.

Withdrawals are basically instant, too though the ACH takes its normal time.
It’s a big assumption that you can even handle the error at the callsite, or that you will actually handle it correctly there, or just write some low-effort attempt because the overall picture is more important for now, but later on you won’t notice how it is not correct and it will just silently fail.

Exceptions are in my honest opinion better on every single front. Checked exceptions would be the panacea but Java’s version is not the best due to subclassing. But overall bubbling up exceptions is the correct thing to do — in most cases a problem can’t be meaningfully handled at the call site. Let’s say you want to read from a file during a HTTP request but the read fails n methods deep. There can be any number of other error occurrences and the only sane choice here would be to return some error code to the web client requesting the site. Why do you want to handle it n times instead of only at the goal?
There is no such thing as zero-order kinetics in atmospheric chemistry.
I think a lot of it is about commitment. Apple has a lot to lose whenever it changes the CPU architecture for Mac, especially if it gets stuck with two for longer than expected. For Qualcomm and similar, a foray in Notebooks is just something interesting. For Microsoft such a foray is always limited by its x86 ecosystem losses.
Thank you - that explanation makes sense, apology accepted. :)
Do they publicly index this information tho?
I knew that ever since he partnered with Hersheys. We all know real aristocrats only use Dutch cocoa.
Right. That's this much vaunted de-escalation training that is going to fix everything, is it?

So I go to arrest someone. He decides that he doesn't want to be arrested. How do you de-escalate that?
One thing I'm trying to understand is: Is this a garbage collector for Rust; or is this a garbage collector implemented in Rust for another environment.

It's confusing because the author refers to their Emacs VM; but then refers to Rc in Rust.
Unrelated to topic, but I just want to point out how absurdly aggravating it is to have sites hijack my back button via pushState.

I really wonder if there would be major problems if replaceState/pushState were sequestered behind user initiated events.
Laser beams. We can only hope that this whole solution is dependent on laser beams :)
There isn't a material difference between those two things. What precisely is private information - outside of information stored solely inside your head. Even medical records can be made public through certain actions so pretty much everything is potentially public information.

Making things easier to find can be a threat - it's why there's a lot of compelling discussion around websites that take rosters of arrest records and post them on big scary websites along with pictures and lurid descriptions of the person's crime - offering to remove the information for a fee.
Trust, but verify.

If an action or activity has the potential to result in death, maybe a bit more due diligence.
I feel the same way about those bots that tell you about insignificant security vulnerabilities in some project you abandoned. It's basically spam.

That said, this does seem like it is a bit more useful. As long as they actually read the changes and make sure they aren't false positives. Which I'm guessing they didn't do for 666 repos.
Having looked at FoundationDB a bit it wasn't clear why I would choose it. It has transactions, which is nice, but not that big of a deal despite how much time they put into talking about it. I actually don't even need transactions since all of my writes commute, so it's particularly uninteresting to me.

They say they're fast, but I didn't find a ton of information about that.

Ultimately the sell seemed to be "nosql with transactions" and I just couldn't justify putting more time into it. I did watch their excellent talk on testing, and I respect that they've put that level of effort into it, and it was why I even considered it, but yeah, what am I missing?
For how I conceive business Musk is a borderline scammer.

But I wholeheartadly agree with the above message.

As you said new elements could come in to make you re-evaluate your admiration

By the same token new elements could come in for me to re-evaluate my stance and if we are indeed at the dawn of an era where CEOs become even more politcians, showmen, pop-culture icons then I'd have no problem tipping my hat to Musk as a pioneer of such new powerful trend.

Similarly I'd also tip my hat if "creative accounting" becomes the norm and also embracing the concept of manifestation and "self-fulfilling prophecy" concerning the stock price which has to be pumped at all costs to make sure that there is always enough air flowing on the wings to keep the company in air.
You might take a look at Personal Capital. Their free service will answer many of those questions for you and they have a decent retirement simulator to understand what your chances are of having enough money for the rest of your life.
I have never seen a lawyer give an opinion about that. One way to read the GDPR is that it outlaws all search engines, for this reason. More likely it is a huge barrier to entry for new search engines.
At least via the web interface for Vanguard the way I do it is start with a buy order, and then when it says "where funded" hit "new deposit" or whatever it is.

They then let me buy whilst the money is inflight.
Might be missing something, if I deposit $100 and use it to purchase stock, they cannot use my $100? What does that even mean given that money is fungible?
Tech Rout Gives Nasdaq Its Worst Month Since 2008
She had an initial 2-shot course, but shied away from the booster after she found out she was pregnant (in late Oct, iirc.)
You're saying replacing red negative numbers with poop emojis wouldn't just make your day?
Have you ever met a lawyer who thinks that kind of TOS is valid in any way?
The MIDI Files by Rob Young. "a comprehensive, easy-to-read reference package covering everything you ever wanted to know about MIDI."
If this a realistic representation of your situation, I have a tiny piece of unsolicited advice: open a retirement account like a SEP IRA. You can contribute up to 25% of your salary in there, and avoid those steep NY/NYC taxes. That can save you a truckload of money.

And I know NYC rent is steep. I lived there as of 6 months ago, and spent a hell of a lot less on rent, and had an apartment no reasonable person would describe as "barely survivable"—it was a beautiful place in Downtown Brooklyn. Rents have increased a bit, as they have everywhere, this past year. But $3,500/month is.. more than ~1/3 of NYC residents take home a month total.
In my experience it's anything but great. It's so slow and such a huge resource hog might as well run a full on Windows VM.
How exactly could Sweden or any other country destroy Islam by having a minute fraction of its population migrate there? What percentage of Islamic people in the world are actively being ‘oppressed’ in countries they voluntarily fled to? The key word here is voluntarily.

What you’re seeing, the watering-down of Islam, also happens to Christianity and all other religions in Western countries. It’s what happens when there’s a bazaar, rather than a monoculture. Your sentiment is correct, if not slightly unhinged. But there is nobody out to get you, no more than everybody is out to get everybody else. It’s not all a big plot.

In my opinion, refugee intake in Sweden has been more about Swedish white guilt (for whatever reason) and thus self-destruction.
You're saying they'd sell it to the next customer, but Robhinhood wouldn't sell it to the next customer - so that's where this seems to break down. When a RH user placed a sell order why couldn't the buy side of their order book add that?
Definition of strawman.
That's weird. Are you sure wherever or however you're storing them isn't damaging them somehow? Or maybe your player is on the way out? I've played some very old discs that work just fine. I haven't had any issues with DVDs despite having a few from the early 2000s.

Library discs are another story. Those are abused to hell and back.
Iron Salt Aerosol for Climate Control
I use Google Suite for my small company; out of the last 12 monthly invoices by Google, 3 were marked as spam by Google itself.
> in your [US] hometown

Also, the clickbait stripper could probably be expanded do something about 'with this neat tool'?
They do, but the way they fund the development is to check with people using their platform and ask if they want financial advisement services. It is probably one of the better business models out there that still gives you something valuable for free.
> How is anything rooted here? The lifetime changed from 'arena to 'root but I don't see a root being created.

In this example, the Vec has been rooted previously. So pushing an object into the Vec will make it "transitively" rooted (accessible from the root). You would root a struct with the root_struct![1] macro, which works very similar to the root! macro shown in the post.

However you made you realize one error; The rooted `Vec` in the example you pointed is a by value type, but in the implementation you can only get references to rooted structs, so that example needs to be updated.

> But later we see roots not obeying a LIFO order, under "Preventing escapes" where roots are dynamically created and destroyed in an arbitrary order.

Objects are just a copyable wrapper around a pointer, so they are not the part that has the LIFO semantics. inside the root! macro[2] there is a `StackRoot` type that is the actual "root". The object just borrows from that so that is has a 'root lifetime and is valid post gc. The actual root struct is not exposed outside of the macro.

I hope this makes the distinction between "roots" and "objects" clearer. Objects are just pointers to heap data. When we root an object we store the data it points to on the root stack and create a new `StackRoot`. Then we say this object is rooted. But the struct that "does the rooting" is inside the macro and not exposed. Rooting a struct works similarly.

[1] https://github.com/CeleritasCelery/rune/blob/5a616efbed763b9...

[2] https://github.com/CeleritasCelery/rune/blob/5a616efbed763b9...
also most cs people who are smart tend to think they are average because they are surrounded by other very smart people. I hate that mindset of "oh if you work hard, you too can get a FAANG job making 400k"
And? I was going to type out a reply but got me curios whether this is a solved thing already.

It is a thing already:
http://www.sulasindustries.com/technology/
Belgian data retention law is about to criminalize Signal
The bill includes a new law proposal that:

- Mandates metadata retention for ALL communication related services (including ISP's, apps like signal, etc), under very vague constraints

- Forbids strong encryption at rest. Failing to cooperate in decryption can also yield imprisonment.

Another, related newspaper article (Dutch, paywalled alas): "Chat app signal to be illegal through new data retention law" [0]

[0]: https://m.standaard.be/cnt/dmf20220429_94515802
You are getting lost in implementation details when interpreting my statement.

If you insist on being excruciatingly precise, then what I have been wanting for multiple years is a Mac that has a display that works via reflection, rather than emission. I do not care in the slightest whether it is by moving around electrically-charged bits of ink, flipping around tiny little tiles, shivering the atoms of the screen into a new configuration that reflects the desired wavelengths, by broadcasting a magical sigil into my brain that makes me think I'm seeing an image when I'm actually seeing a piece of bare wood with a spell carved into it, or any other implementation details. I merely care that it is working with the sunlight instead of fighting it.

And I am sad that the R&D funding for reflective display technologies seems to have largely dried up, leaving only a slow series of underwhelming announcements of new displays from E Ink Holdings, Incorporated. Whose name is sufficiently generic that it would probably be at risk of becoming a generic name for any reflective display technology even if they weren't the only people making any attempt to push it forwards.

This is what "I have been wanting a color e-ink Mac I can work with under direct sunlight for so long now. I will be waiting many years longer." is intended to unpack to.
Ah I [vaguely] remember something about a large gap in German history where no one got a diploma. The argument was that forging lists of names and attributing credentials to them without works or publications was very complicated.

If I remember correctly, it was the same period for which Morozov demonstrated the astronomical records to be way off.

Funny stuff.
If I walk into a store and buy something and they never mention the surprise extra contractual terms I need to go looking for on the website, then those surprise extra contractual terms aren't part of the sales contract. He's entitled to a refund if the EULA terms were not disclosed to him before purchase, because he purchased a camera and it can't be used as a camera until he agrees to an additional contract.
Counter Opinion:

Well-meaning DSL constraints very quickly evolve into hackish defacto "actual code". Every. Time.

I do understand the intent of a constrained DSL mapping to constraints of underlying resources, but more often than not those constraints are short-lived in the lifespan of the DSL, and quickly give way to it becoming a badly architected near-turing-complete programming language.

Ansible (which you've listed) is a prime example: it's not YAML, it's a frankenstein of YAML + logic-heavy Jinja-hacks that really remove a lot of the constraints of pure declarative YAML. The only thing holding it back from becoming a horrible logic mess is very deliberate and well-marketed community convention.
ARM does develop their own core designs which they license to many companies. However, they have several different licenses available which range from using ARM's designs, tweaking ARM's designs, up to the Architectural license which allows companies to develop their own ARM ISA compatible cores own their own. Apple is one of the companies which has an Architectural license. The current cores used by Apple were designed by Apple and not based on designs from ARM.
Riffpedia has a better article[0] then I could write, but the TL;DR is SMoD used to try to do DMCA takedowns against over stoner metal Youtube channels, as well as running a pay-to-play (as in, the bands pay to play) festival for a couple years. The latter being the bigger issue from what I've heard; stoner metal ain't exactly a well paying genre to begin with, the fact the SMoD basically makes money off uploading other peoples albums (he keeps all the ad revenue) and then makes bands pay to play in his festival was widely seen as a "dick move".

[0] https://riffipedia.fandom.com/wiki/Stoned_Meadow_of_Doom
He has follow up books like the one I suggested. It hasn’t gotten better. Division is stronger at socioeconomic lines than ever afaict. We replaced race and sex division with class.
> in your non-rural [US] hometown
The latter, implemented in Rust (in my understanding).

They bring up Rc<T> because using reference counting as their implementation is in theory a possibility, which they then quickly (and rightfully, imho) dismiss.
If a broker that handles a very large portion of retail trades suddenly blocks purchasing a security that retail trading has driven the price up then it stops retail pressure and the stock price will obviously drop.... you could say Robinhood cost retail money by removing the upward pressure on the stock. The SEC report on the incident mentions the price rise was mostly due to retail FOMO, and not the suspected short squeeze that got the early folks attention.

A laymen would look at what Robinhood did and think Robinhood cut the fuse to the short squeeze bomb.
Was latency ever an issue with movies? I know mine works without issue on pulseaudio+bluez by delaying the video to sync it with audio (which is actually noticable with an old noname speaker when you pause/play the video - the video stalls, then (i guess) the audio buffers are filled, and movie starts playing with syned a/v, and then when pausing, maybe half a second of audio is still played after you've paused it).
Was hoping for that answer. Good for you! I've been weighing when to take the plunge myself. I can't support my family with what mine is making on the side right now (10% of my day job salary), though I know if I were full time on it I'd be seeing more return. Just feels like a high dive into a small pool and I'm trying to suss out the right moment. Any tips/lessons learned?
A lot of my infection control colleagues are rightly terrified of keeping people on ECMO or mechanical ventilation due to infection risk, that are extremely hard to treat.

This was especially acute during the early phase of the pandemic, when the combination of the intensity of care COVID patients required + the PPE shortage meant some compromises that they'd really prefer not to make.
Our society is in a big change phase so anything need to fall apart while the new emerge. So far we see the decline, still too early to see the new.

Beware a thing: while things changes, an old model disappear a new one is gestating human needs do not change that much in fundamental terms. Our eating, sleeping and sexual needs are still the same. So not "all" fall apart but something at a time, something will remain, something grow, something change, something disappear etc.

We have electrical lights since "much" time, but we still have stearic candles on sale. In the past they was a big industry, now is marginal, but it's still there. Civil construction techniques have changed much, but we still have the concept of construction companies. Dress have changed much, but not that much. We still have pants, skirts, jackets, hats in new shapes, different tissues but essentially the same since hundreds of years.

What's really falling apart is the present paradigm, the economy-centric society of neoliberal capitalism that it's about to overthought itself to remain in power.
Does it matter?

Is it somehow OK for someone to build a dossier on another person as long as they use that information for their own purposes?
GLTF is so great can import stuff from SketchUp
Am I the only one reading this differently?
“including but not limited to information about your [RED Camera, Camera Module, computer, system and application software, usage, content, and peripherals].”
As in: information about content, not actual content.

I mean, yes, metadata is bad enough and it’s still an awful license, but I really don’t agree this suggests RED would be “capturing frames from their commissioned videos and transmitting them behind the scenes to advertisers.”

Am I the only one reading it this way?
RH defaults accounts to margin accounts to support their "instant deposit" feature.
> Why is this dependant on receiving threats?

It is not.

From the form [1]: "...that has POTENTIAL to create significant risks of identity theft, financial fraud, harmful direct contact, or other specific harms..." (emphasis mine).

The requirements section states that you may request removal due to the page having "personally identifiable info" OR doxxing content "used in implicit or explicit threats".

Now, there's exceptions to this (e.g. public records, newsworthy content), but nowhere it says you have to receive threats first before requesting removal.

disclaimer: Googler, but no relationship with the team, and have no other knowledge of this policy other reading the public blog post.

[1] https://support.google.com/websearch/answer/9673730
I'm curious to know if short term rentals are an actual problem, compared to the much bigger, largely proven, and much less publicised, issue of hedge and investment funds buying out entire blocks of buildings.

I myself lived in Madrid for 5-6 years, and what seemed to drive the cost of living up weren't the people owning one or two rental apartments, but corporations and banks buying entire buildings up. At least in Spain, there has been a connection between banks not making large chunks of their real estate stock available, and investment funds buying on the scarcity.

> Anyway, cities are for citizens, not for freeloaders.

This feels like a bit narrow sighted.

While these workers you are talking about don't pay income taxes in these cities, they do pay other taxes (utilities, consumer products, etc.), and other than public infrastructure, they usually do not have free access to most services without paying (education, most healthcare).

So who's "freeloading" here? I would admit that they pay less taxes, but that doesn't mean that they pay zero taxes.

And another question arises. I myself am a Spaniard residing in the US. Would I be considered a "freeloader" if I go back to Spain and work for my employer in the US for a month or two? Do nationals get that consideration?
Their full site uses an en dash: https://www.cnn.com/2022/04/29/us/texas-migrant-arrest-progr...

I'd be aghast if a double hyphen was the house style for a major news outlet.
Do you know what he wants to build?

Probably has lots of different things that he wants to learn so help him explore each.

Python for command line stuff and backend stuff, vanilla JS, html, css for blogs or web pages.

There's also either online classes like Udemy or in person camps or summer programs that would be great, he can meet ppl his own age trying to code too.

I know a few years back iOS coding classes were the rage, now it'll probably be something with blockchain...

In terms of code editor maybe just sublime or atom, no need to go super complicated, he'll figure out what he needs as he builds expertise.
In this case, annual reaction mass of OH is more important than the concentration at any given time. The concentration of any highly reactive molecule will be very low, but that doesn't tell you how much was created or consumed.

Methane levels don't impact OH levels (it is always consumed immediately). OH generation levels can impact methane levels. CO levels can compete with methane for OH as is it generated.
Information about 'how to grow a potato' and a season or two of experience working out the kinks of growing a small crop of potatoes on available land near you are two very different things.
Bit old now, but enjoyed Steven's TCP/IP book too as he explores the various protocols
The real issue to me is that Robinhood said they were halting GME trading to "protect users" or something along those lines. The CEO of one of their direct competitors, Webull, came out and was honest with people, and straight up told them that the clearinghouses raised collateral requirements to 100% for GME trades. Not sure how Webull's revenue did in comparison, but I'm hoping their policy of being honest was better for them than Robinhood's lame PR lies.
I hear ads on the radio for "reputation management" companies that, in part, use similar methods.