skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> I believe Air France does their flight training completely different from the US. Lots of stick time with manual controls (vs fly by wire).

I'm sorry, but I call BS on what you are implying here.

First, post 9/11, most European airlines killed off their Ab-Initio programmes.

Therefore for most European airlines, the only route to getting a seat in the pointy end is the so-called "Direct Entry" route. This either requires pre-existing civilian qualifications and experience (i.e. unfrozen ATPL with real-life hours in the bag), or otherwise being ex-military with equivalent qualifications and experience in that world.

For the few airlines that do offer Ab-Initio, then I'm afraid it's complete BS if you think ab-initio trainees for any European airline just get dumped in a simulator and trained how to follow the magenta line. They will follow the same route as anyone else, i.e. they will be sent off to the US or Australia (because of the consistent weather, not anything else) and will work their way through the usual route SEP -> MEP -> Hours building .... they will then come back to Europe and finish off by getting an EU license. Only once they've got their commercial qualifications and have built experience will they then start Line Training which is where things like MCC come in, and that's where sim time starts coming in.

Simulators are expensive to run, even more expensive to buy, and there are not many of them around. They typically run 24x7 and are used for refreshers for existing crew as well as training new ones. To think there's enough spare capacity floating around to train green newbies from zero is a pipe dream.

Finally, on a practical note the newbie in the right seat will always be paired with a more experienced captain in the left seat. You will never find two noobs up front.
Swift surely does it, I advise reading a bit of what the compiler actually generates.

That is why, as Apple decided to fix of their ARC optmizations, they had a talk at WWDC 2021 about ARC gotchas for code that will behave in a different way due to the new optimizations.

"ARC in Swift: Basics and beyond"

https://developer.apple.com/videos/play/wwdc2021/10216/
I think they'd make an excellent content for a loading screen on a game. Pick one at random and give the player something to think about while they're waiting. If this happens enough times, you'll get some repeats, which will help reinforce the message or at least re-trigger the thinking process.
I could write an essay on this topic but it's far too complex of a topic to summarize in a quick comment.

But for example, quickly: One thing I personally do is journal every day (yes every day) before I do anything else. That is, I get up, grab a coffee and write roughly 1000 words. I will choose certain topics on which to journal and focus on these for a few weeks, for example: looking at how my relationships are going, how I interact with people, where I find myself energised and working well with others, and where I'm getting annoyed or frustrated or otherwise have some issues. I try and increase my levels of consciousness around certain topics in my life to gain a lasting impact and changed and improved behaviors. I use certain techniques like sentence completions (thanks Nathaniel Branden!) and also asking myself provocative questions (e.g. "What did today's experience touch in my history?") to gain learning and insight in certain areas of my life.

The point being that to genuinely CHANGE as a person (in my belief), reading a list of snappy aphorisms is useless, you need to change your habits, daily routines, you need repitition and work. Sincere self reflection is difficult, as is changing the habits and brain patterns of a lifetime.
I joined a company remotely for the first time in March.

I've been able to avoid stalling by anticipating questions I could have and ask them ahead of time. That might be a (partial) solution to this problem.
Towards the low end of that, but even at 12% it just means you can afford lower leverage.
Aren't these illegal now? Or at least, frowned upon.
Can I ask what the name of the book is?
Thank you for one of my new favourite tools!
I have a personal story with OpenRA.... I learnt my first lesson on open source contributions from them: Talk to the maintainers before you submit stuff.

I did not like the var keyword in C#. They did.

I understood them 1 year later ;) Since then I am using var and I am MUCH faster adopting new styles. Thanks!!!

Does Spock AI still exists?
The best approach I've seen is to have the secrets in a vault and to keep the vault URL in an env var (so different vaults can be used for dev and prod, for example). The secrets location within the vault is held in a variable defined in an application config file which is checked in to source control. At runtime, a piece of code consults the variable and queries the vault using the provided location and then dynamically configures the db connection with the returned credentials. The credentials are dumped from memory once the transaction completes.

(I should also point out that this is in a batch ETL system.)

The nice thing about this approach is that it is virtually impossible for secrets to end up in source control. The risk is that the vault becomes a major single point of failure.
Do you think this is an primarily caused by Airbnb?
I think "remember" takes on various shades. Is name recognition the same as understanding what they did?

Most people will recognise the name Julius Caesar but few could say much more (at school I had to read his Invasion of Britain in latin so I know a little - utterly failed the subject)

Ask someone about Aristotle and 99% will have no clue. A Greek maybe.

I would say that outside of people associated with a religion, only names will sometimes live on.
In other words, you have chosen to assume. Storage cost is plummeting for the same reasons wind and solar costs did and still are: manufacturing scale.
I think it uses that phenomenon in service of memorization, but memorization definitely occurs. If you review a text fully, the latter levels don't have any letters and by the time you reach them you have fully memorized the text and only the order of the sentences remains hard to recall.
> It takes about 30 seconds to realize that the above patent has zero novelty.

But can you find good corroborating evidence in 30 seconds? I'm pretty sure the applicant's lawyers would have a field day with "Patent Officer X rejected this due to their own critical thinking", no?
> you're yanking the content those other people actually created

I didn't get the impression they were directly scraping other sites.

Also, it is very unlikely the recipe originated from those posters. I would guess those people learned the recipe from friends/family/cookbook/website, made some small modifications, then re-posted it in blog format.

I find searching for recipes online to be difficult for the same reasons they mentioned and I appreciate the attempt at another solution. Hope this one catches on.
[Full disclosure: we have three kids]

> Screaming tantrums are hard to give rational explanations over. Do you wait your turn to speak between screams or just talk over them?

Screaming tantrums are a great demonstration of just how irrational young humans can be. I was (and am) firmly of the opinion that even when confronted with crazy it's crucial to [attempt to] remain rational in your response ...

Speaking of irrational, one of our favourite anecdotes (one of several thousand...) when our eldest was a toddler, he was playing in the garden and for no good reason decided it would be a great idea to throw small rocks .. at our parked car.

I was in the house and heard this strange <clunk> <pause> <clunk> <pause> <clunk> sound coming from outside...

I stepped outside, he'd done about a dozen rocks by that point, judging by the dents in the panels of the car.

I was so angry I recall managing to tell him firmly to stop but then having to actually walk away, leaving my wife to explain that "Daddy is so cross he can't actually speak right now..."

He never did it again, thankfully. He's 12 now :)
Two reasons:
Short people have not faced anywhere near the scale of injustices as Black people in America historically have, so there is not much of a cultural desire to right the wrongs done to short people or people with slightly lower facial symmetry.

Secondly, all those characteristics are subjective, and are continuous measurements, not discrete properties. How do you define short or unattractive?
So IIRC the rental car company is selling you a waiver of sorts that says they won’t come after you if you damage the car, not insurance per se. The car’s always insured. A credit card company is probably a more unattractive target than an individual.
If you want to enrich locals at the expense of tourists, the straightforward way to do that is just raise property/sales taxes and payout the revenue to locals.
I'm sorry but there is already a degree for that that is 50% computer science and 50% electronics.
> Having a billion dollars is totally fine if nobody knows you have it!

As someone who grew up with rich and poor people in my social circles I can assure you that fame is not the only phenomena that can drive people with a lot of money into unhappiness.

Most rich people I know of are more afraid to loose money than their poorer peers. When rich people interact with any sort of person they always have to suspect it is because of their money which leads to a very little trust into their environment. Their kids are not allowed to do anything, because they could be targets of kidnappings. Their houses are like fortresses. Or they live a false life and have to pretend they own less than they do which also doesn't feel natural.

Sure, I can imagine some billionaire who is not affected by all these things, but generally this holds true. There is quite definitly a sweet spot of wealth you can have in terms of happiness.
Can anyone offer insights to how reliable this article is? I don’t know the field and am reduced to looking at superficial signals, like: I see business school bylines and the “see additional publications by this author” links don’t turn up anything… but the Nature imprint seems impressive?

Can anyone weigh in on the methodology or data?

(Interesting to note that the linked page puts this article in something like the 99th percentile for how much it’s tweeted, which I would put squarely in the “reduces my confidence” category…)
API Management architectural and deployment patterns 101
Companies indeed should be standing up more for their user's rights. At the same time, the situation isn't really companies itching to hand over data to law enforcement. Law enforcement demanding access to data without warrants or any meaningful accountability measures is the core of the problem. They're very complicit in this whole deal, and in no ways a victim.
The intverter should be able to be configured with export limits. In a lot of jurisdictions that's mandatory anyway. Still better to over-specify so that in Winter you get the full amount while in Summer you just throw some away. Or take up a power-intensive hobby like Bitcoin mining in Summer.
>It seems to say that "given a system we know everything about, there is no way to go to a system that has some unknown things to us".

That's backwards: information is the negative of entropy. The 2nd law says that entropy never decreases, so information never increases (it can only be preserved or lost).
> Think about a world where if 100 people knew what you did yesterday you were a celebrity

I think you’re off by some orders of magnitude, but I understand the sentiment. I was a lot older in 1998. I can tell you that people have not changed since then even if the technology has (enabling voices to be heard that previously weren’t)
> He also told me the licences were easier to get than in Europe. I think you have fallen into the 'US is best trap'

He has, and yes European licenses are tougher.
This is a form of maintenance that really makes me believe to just host a VM I administer is the better option.
PG's graph is from a battery of questions about very general things, like whether there should be a better safety net, immigrant friendlier policy, stricter environmental policies etc. Even if voters didn't change their policy opinions, it could be that as the elected officials veer further right due to lobbying or whatever, and then citizens have more stern answers to this poll as the actual enacted policies get more divorced from voter opinion.
But this only works in direct sunlight.

And the next day your panels are staring in the wrong direction.
Are you mapping your source code from the host to the vm?
(full disclosure: I also was once a child)

you write that your experience as an autistic is that you have "more of a thing for justice" than might be expected from the general population.

I read that as an aspect of autism is to serve as a magnifying lens on on particular aspect of what it means to be human.

So, the trauma you report from being punished might have been felt stronger by you than it would have by someone with a different mental makeup, but that doesn't mean that the other person didn't feel it.

Conclusion: Your hightened awareness allows you to make explicit something which to others is just vaguely troubling. Thus your view is closer to the universal human truth than those who deny it.
It is what people assume they are. Nobody does a CS degree for fun, they do it for a job in the field.

Although there are code boot camps and the like, they arent as recognised as unis.
This is super cool and I'm glad someone's trying it. The digital nomad lifestyle is really fun and worth trying for a lot of people, at least for a few years.

I'm skeptical this will work out for Airbnb though. My personal experience is that people who self-select into this type of lifestyle are not going to be as productive. There's too much to do and see in a new city, people to meet, foods to try, parties to go to, coupled with much less oversight.

A critical component for remote work productivity is having a routine that somewhat mimics the routine of going in to the office. That said, it can be really hard to detect low performers, and the market is really tight right now so this might be around for a while.
That story isn't true. The reason why wages/bonuses were raised/introduced by Ford is because of turnover.
As someone who already thinks very little of people throwing their cigarette butts out of the window, I would not want to set an example that littering is acceptable to my own kids.
Fun fact, there's vodka made from San Francisco fog: https://time.com/4317269/fog-vodka-san-francisco-hangar-one/
> If a someone is on a trip abroad and gets a call/email from a customer from another country, they are technically working. Would that require a work visa?

Depends on the country in question of course but many places have different visas:

- Visitor visas: Usually valid for only a couple of days / weeks and geared towards business travelers. These usually allow working in the country.

- Tourist Visas: Usually valid for weeks/months and geared towards tourists.

If you are on the first then working isn't a problem. If you are on the second then (as the name implies) it is kind of assumed that you are a tourist/on vacation and as such won't be doing any work at all.

So to answer your question: If you are on a trip (I interpret this as a couple of days at best) then you won't need a work visa. If you want to stay there for a while though then technically yes.

> The world is changing and laws aren't really keeping up.

Are they though? I think it is fair to say that if you are staying in a country for an extended period of time (longer than a visitor visa) they have a right to tax you.
Docker is double slow on M1 mac compared to Intel linux.

First, you run virtual machine vs just running natively on Linux.

Second, you emulate x86; and, unlike other x86 that are emulated directly on M1, you emulate it in software through QEMU, because M1 cannot virtualize and run x86 at the same time

So it’s just really slow.
>> it becomes harder to understand

> Not really..

Oh Yes!

As usual in blockchain defense, you must make a lot of assertions.

> Yes. That's decentralization.

Please not that tone. You don't assume you need to teach me, I even did some programming when this was new to try out the new tech. The proponents always only ever have a lot of hot air and a lot of faith, but never anything real.
You can do this without jitter by having the panel with a bend in it and comparing power from the 2 sides. The difference drives a motor controller directly.
Children misbehave because they are intrinsically evil, as all humans are. With experience comes manners and the understanding that suppressing your evil nature is beneficial to yourself.

Are you treating other unleashed monsters with the same respect?
In 20.04 it's not a problem. Do it myself.

22.04 is too new that anyone could say they never regretted. At least you need an alternative way to maintain your browser.
I call them the Primadonna Locust. Announce Big Project inside (and outside!) the organization. Make it look shiny from day 1 but avoid all complexity rabbit holes. Keep all cans of worms closed. Make lots of presentations. Convince everyone into the cult of Big Project. Once it's delayed for too long, move to another, likely bigger, company eager to implement a copy of Big Project. Take anybody good at selling, prototyping, or technical. Leave the rest (losers) to deal with making Big Project work. Loser management will NEVER admit they got swindled, at least not in the open. Heck, they might even like how Primadonna Locust will hit their competitor as hard.
Yeah same, I don’t think I can recall a tantrum my kids had that wasn’t “rational”. Obviously all kids are super different, but for us it’s always low blood sugar, lack of sleep or being “trapped” where he wants do do something he can’t be allowed to.
My interpretation is that the article is just talking about people with a bachelor's or master's degree in computer science. In the same vein I just call them computer scientists, but they are different from people that do science at a university. I expect scientists at universities to push the state of the art.
I’m surprised you see those two pieces of “advice” as being different schools of pedagogy, because to me they are very much the same. The latter is a better approach, but it’s still a very flawed approach to childcare that were largely ”deprecated” in the 90ies in my country. Because neither of them deals with the child as more than a piece of clay, or an, animal as the author even highlighted.

Don’t get me wrong. Both ways work, and more modern pedagogy builds on the lessons learned from these approaches, but the best way to deal with crime and punishment isn’t these methods, it’s to deal with children rather similar to how you would deal with an adult but then comfort them as though they are children. If that sounds weird to you just imagine how annoying it would be for you if your boss started complimenting you on every thing you do that aligns with what they want to cultivate in you. I know some people might like that, but most of us would feel like we were being treated like idiots. The effect is a little different in children, but some will still feel that way and others will grow up to be very compliment seeking and spend decades in therapy learning how they I be themselves.

What you’ll want to do is to calmly explain why X behaviour is amazing and how proud you are of it. When that is actually true, and then only for as long as it takes for your children to learn that saying thanks when someone give them something is good. Similarly you calmly explain why Y behaviour is terrible, but it’s not like you can’t use reasonable amounts of punishment to teach about consequences. By reasonable I mean things similar to “if you don’t stop hitting the cat in the head with your doll now that I’ve explained why not to do so 20 times, then I’m going to take the doll away for the rest of the day”.

The biggest influence, and most important advice, is consistency. If you say that you’re going to take away the doll for the rest of the day, or when you say no to ice cream, then you absolutely have to follow through. Except when you were wrong, or when you’ve greatly miscalculated the importance of something, and if you’re consistent enough otherwise, then this will simply teach your child that it’s ok to be wrong and admit it. On the flip side of this, you actually have to say yes. One of the biggest challenges I personally faced when I had my first child was that it’s ok to sometimes have ice cream along with your breakfast within modern pedagogy. But it turned out that by saying yes when there is no reason not to, then it becomes really easy to say no because a no is just accepted as your offspring knows that it won’t always be a no.

I think a lot of good parenting is working on yourself though. I mean, why are you getting worked up over what a 4 year old is doing? You have an infinite amount of patience compared to them.
Sturdy (YC W21) Is Hiring (Stockholm, Sweden)
>What I meant is that you can launch a co/go-routine and have a channel that only it can read. That is like 70% the power of having an actor system.

You can also iterate over an array in parallel and only modify the current element and that is like 70% of the power of having an actor system.

"Structured concurrency is a programming paradigm aimed at improving the clarity, quality, and development time of a computer program by using a structured approach to concurrent programming." - Wikipedia
My feelings about Mac OS X are similar to the author's. I switched from a Windows XP/FreeBSD dual boot configuration to Mac OS X Tiger back in 2006 when I bought my first modern Mac, a Core Duo MacBook. I've remained a Mac OS X user from Tiger all the way to Mojave. Mac OS X in the 2000s to me was heads-and-shoulders better than the competition. It had a well-designed user interface, and most applications conformed to the Apple Human Interface Guidelines. It also provided me a Unix shell whenever I needed it. In my opinion Mac OS X peaked at Snow Leopard; in fact, I'd be comfortable using Snow Leopard (or even Tiger) as my daily driver today if it supported current hardware and if there were a modern web browser for it. It was a nice marriage of NeXT technology and an updated version of the venerable Macintosh user interface. It felt much more pleasant than Windows of the era (though I admit I liked Windows 7), and the desktop environments for Linux and the BSDs simply didn't compare.

Then came the Tim Cook era, and with it came the gradual locking down of the Mac, both in terms of hardware (for example, the soldering of formerly upgradable components such as RAM and storage) and software (for example, notarization). The user interface also gradually started adopting more iOS influences, which I think take away from the desktop experience. Due to my disappointment with Apple's direction (especially since roughly 2016), I opted not to upgrade my aging 2013 MacBook Air and 2013 Mac Pro with new Macs, instead switching to a Microsoft Surface Pro (running Windows 10) and a custom Ryzen 3900X build (which runs both Windows 10 and FreeBSD). I miss macOS, but I enjoy the openness of PCs, and I enjoy the flexibility of Windows and FreeBSD.

I am keeping an eye on two very interesting projects that attempt to replicate the spirit of early Mac OS X: helloSystem (https://hellosystem.github.io/docs/) and airyxOS (https://airyx.org/). Both projects are based on a FreeBSD foundation, but the major difference between the projects is airyxOS is a much more ambitious attempt to reimplement macOS's infrastructure (even going as far as to aim for supporting "trivial" Cocoa applications), while helloSystem has different (Qt) underpinnings, with an emphasis on replicating the Mac OS X look-and-feel and promoting adherence to the Macintosh Human Interface Guidelines. If these projects become successful, this will provide people who desire the early Mac OS X experience modern systems that will maintain that experience.