skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
To prevent someone from building something that returns certain inferences that might be true but are politically taboo.
Emacs is quite popular and has some of the most skilled programmers I know using it. I'm really surprised that there hasn't been a neovim-equivalent project for emacs. Or maybe it's out there and I just don't know about it?
The court works on their opinions in public silence for months, what "hot take" court opinions are you talking about?
How many jobs have you applied for? Start applying places. Get in anywhere and your second job will be much easier to get. Just watch out for manipulative contracts.
The sin is the opinion itself, everything else is secondary.
I'm not sure what you mean by the ignoring process part. Is it the way they were appointed or something to do with the justices themselves?

Government is ignoring processes and right at all levels to some degree. I sympathize with the idea that rule of law has become a joke since nobody can enforce it on the people in power.
The fact that liberals peg their views of the Supreme Court’s “legitimacy” on a cluster fuck of an opinion as Roe v. Wade speaks volumes.

Roe is so bad that it has long united libertarian conservatives (who hate it because it makes up a right out of thin air) and social conservatives (who had abortion on the merits).

In addition to that it manages to be wildly out of line with international norms, which:

1) Generally recognize abortion as an issue for the legislature.

2) Typically draw the line for elective abortions at the end of the first trimester, not viability. The abortion laws in Denmark, Germany, Italy, France, and Spain would be unconstitutional under Roe.
Latest sign that the republic is falling. Of course it will still look like it's here for a long time (e.g. the Roman Empire mostly had the same institutions, in name, as the republic) and the decline will be slow-ish.
Where did you learn to RE feature phones? Did you need special equipment (e.g. JTAG)?
Oh, well. Roe is really bad law. I mean, just pure made-up gibberish. A real defilement of the Constitution. You should be able to love abortion and hate dada arguments for it at the same time. (I think?)

Abortion will still be legal as a practical matter. Some people might have to travel to the next state over, of course.
That's because you don't need the same scale of people to run a cryptocoin. It does it itself, more or less, with some maintainers. You can trade value with anyone anywhere in the world without all those banks and people. So in this case, it's an extremely important point.
> The court works on their opinions in public silence for months, what "hot take" court opinions are you talking about?

The subject of public discourse at this hour.

https://www.politico.com/news/2022/05/02/supreme-court-abort...
Of course. I'm not even vaccinated.
Well. What can I say? I've been unaware of the hour record.

What I can do say is that at the times I described my sustainable top performance on flat grounds without (noticable) winds as 55kph for one hour. Though that is hard to compare to something done in a velodrome, or on closed streets, since I did that in normal traffic. OFC I had to sometimes stop because of red lights which I couldn't overrun without crashing or causing crashes. Also I needed something to eat after that, like a banana, or an apple, maybe some nuts, and to drink, water, orange juice, or something isotonic.

However, in cities I've comfortably gone with the flow of cars, sometimes overtaking them, outside of them there was now flow, because less cars.

Maybe it's a good thing not knowing what the record is? :-)

Regarding the route on google maps which I posted, and you reposted, I don't know
wtf google is doing! The route it shows when I click your repost isn't what it showed me when I reconstructed it to show!

Edit: rechecked right now, it is even showing me another one.
That is unusable, because for the one I reconstructed to show here I already marked the vias to get the right one. Somehow that seems to get lost in the link it presents to share.

Edit: further reading about those records...

I wore lose fitting t-shirts, and short sport shorts. no helmet, and didn't shave my legs. Also, the heresy of not wearing pure white socks! And no special shoes clicking into the pedals, just normal running shoes fitting into something called "Tretkorb" on the pedal.
Of course. To somebody in Zuck's position, shoring up the power of the status quo is common sense.
He has an older tweet mentioning the visit https://twitter.com/_SecondThought/status/132335626258786304...

Journalists surveilled by the DHS for documenting police violence in the US (the best I could do with your very specific request) https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jul/31/dhs-intellig...

YouTube quickly rolled back on the supposed shadowban, but it's very well documented by users on Twitter, Reddit and YouTube, to the point he would need to have a bot army to fake it. I mentioned the warnings on the video as further evidence of YouTube (specifically or systematically, IDK) targeting the video.

Now where you have a good point in my opinion is that he could have shared info on the agents, if he had this info and was legally allowed to. There are reasons he could have not shared, but it's still a good point of speculation.
My guess is that they've "fingerprinted" the model sufficiently that they can identify content that has been created with it.
Ending up in the wild is an eventuality, whether FB creates it or someone else, why draw it out?

Bandwidth concerns is nonsensical these days, fb has nearly unlimited resources in that department.

Set it free! It wants to be free.
This is really exciting. I wish we had nuclear power here in Australia. I know I might get downvoted for this comment. But with advancement in technology and large amount nuclear fuel (Uranium deposit) available, it's a great choice.

1. Vast swathes of uninhabited land can absorb some of the risks/fears associated with a nuclear accident. With technology like this, the risks are even lower.
2. It's lot cleaner than coal and natural gas, which are still the primary sources of our electricity.
3. There will be a huge demand for electric cars in the near future drawing massive amount power from the grid. Nuclear power would be a lot cheaper and enable us to truely go green.

Of course the coal companies won't like that. I can't see any reason why don't have nuclear energy. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
I'm not exactly advocating for the power SCOTUS has, there are a whole host of things like the case you pointed out. I speaking more in principle that "mob rule" doesn't end well for those not in the mob
The laws are still coercive and discriminatory though.
Human institutions aren’t perfect? Throw them all out!
Out of curiosity, what's the file size on that?
The whole case of Clarence Thomas’ wife Ginni Thomas is outright insane.

Like, truth is stranger than fiction levels of insane. From what I learned of the Supreme Court in the most advanced classes offered at my highschool, to then seeing that debacle go down…

Like, it’s impossible to not view the joint as one of the biggest jokes & public failures of our government.

Furthermore, it’s very much an “and this is what’s in plain view” sort of thing. I, and I presume most HN users, have always known the US gov is a bit of a gigantic joke… but I can’t really imagine how much worse things probably are in private after seeing that play out.
Oh right just be rich or not live in red states, how could I be so stupid as to worry
State of Affairs: May 2 – By Katelyn Jetelina
Nortel DMS-10 telephony switch springs to mind. They run in landline phone company switching offices amd date back to the early 1970s. Those things are indestructible in the face of all kinds of disasters.
> look at the sale of edX to 2U

yes, that would be interesting to see the details, like the specific tax+governance documents for whatever specifically got those assets from the non-profit, as you point out. IANL
People focusing on the leak rather than what was actually leaked is testament to just how effective conservatives are at propaganda and messaging..

We don't know if this is a majority opinion. It may be a minority opinion in the hopes of becoming a majority opinion. It may not even be real (although that seems unlikely). It could've been leaked by someone on the right to drum up on support but my guess is it's more likely to be someone liberal-leaning who leaked such a bombshell opinion as a massive regression for bodily autonomy and social rights.

If so, that person is a hero. Straight up. Just like then Bradley now Chelsea Manning leaking Benghazi video was (and is) a hero.

People have consciences whether you agree with them or not. Even in wartime and with unprecedented security measures the Manhattan Project was leaked to the Soviets basically immediately by people who saw the US having a monopoly on atomic weapons as being bad for the world.

It's also why I basically don't believe pretty much every conspiracy theory out there, particularly if it involves a lot of people (eg faked Moon landings). Governments are terrible at keeping secrets simply because they're made up of people and those people have motivations of their own.

The Supreme Court is and always has been a political institution. All of the talk about constitutionality is just moralizing and window dressing in expressing a political view as law. This is the same Supreme court that ruled that "citizens" did not include people of African descent [1]. This is the same Supreme Court that in the Reconstruction / Redeemer era completely undermined rights of former slaves.

If you concentrate on the leaker here you're missing the big picture. You're falling into right-wing propaganda about the sanctity of the Supreme Court. It's a myth and a lie.

[1]: https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/what-americans-really-t...
Unlikely. The more obvious intent is to provide a tool to campaign on for the next several months and boost the sagging approval of the president. Something to rally around.
> Banning abortion is a death sentence or worse for so many people.

Why?

(And why is abortion itself not a death sentence for the aborted fetus?)
We should have moved on this in the sixties when it was possible. It's impossible to get traction on this ever since.

Maybe the nuclear subs will provide impetus
Competition will do the work—if my business deals with the tax by raising prices for consumers, your business can instead invest into R&D to figure out how to keep prices steady. Your business wins, and the consumer wins.
This is an interesting idea for waste heat. Is the waste heat a nuclear power plant produces significant? My understanding is you want all your heat working to spin your turbine.
As soon as there's a better option, certainly.
You think GPT-3 generates text that's truthful? Have you used it even once?
The OG calc.exe still ships with the LTS[B,C] versions of Windows 10.
Can someone open a Bittorrent seed if you get it
Desalination through waste heat is also viable. It's "free" energy in the sense that it would have otherwise gone unused.
Not only that, but even if I pay that price, I can't share lists with my wife? I would really love to use it, but that just seems ridiculous in this day and age.
As other mentioned algorithms I found that ideas behind Bloom filter (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloom_filter) and Geohash (not to be confused with geohashing or geo caching, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geohash and Z-order curves) are extremely elegant and inspiring.
First time in my life seeing a localized ISA
They always have been. Meta has made a number of open contributions for the ML/AI community, one of which is PyTorch.
Heads up - the GPL is a copyright license, not a contract with users.

Ironically, the SFC I think tried to file their case in state court. Copyright law is a federal matter.

I've no doubt they will drag this issue out in circles forever. But you pretty much know that if they aren't willing to litigate a copyright license in the normal venue - they've got a problem :)

This is what is so worrisome. Now we hear from the SFC that a GPL violation is NOT a copyright violation? This is a ridiculous and yes, extreme interpretation of what most developers would have understood.

Let's check back in on this in the future and see if they can even keep this in state court to try and avoid copyright law.
Everyone can be sad, but that's not depression. Similarly, everyone can be forgetful or distracted, but that's not ADHD.

Your "don't beat yourself up" is just as unhelpful as telling depressed people to "cheer up".

ADHD is a neurological disorder physically affecting the brain. It causes executive dysfunction that people can't think themselves out of.
Interesting concept, but I think Big Query ML [1] has been providing similar features for years now. Curious to learn what are the differences, other than offering this as a Postgres plugin.

[1] https://cloud.google.com/bigquery-ml/docs/introduction
Contrary to the popular belief, there isn't a huge gender gap on this issue: https://news.gallup.com/poll/245618/abortion-trends-gender.a...
A drink is far less likely to spill if you use a straw.
>Why are we using the "Alt" designator?

For the same reason we need an arbiter of truth as an arm of Homeland Security. Apparently there is only one approved opinion or -truth-, for varying degrees of truth.
I doubt it's a success. Outside the HN bubble, the overturning itself is the main subject of discussion in places like reddit. In fact, if you take a quick look at the HN "new" queue, you'll see plenty of flagged/dead submissions that directly mention the decision but this one is the only one that gets through because HN disdains mainstream partisan topics like abortion.
> Some people might have to travel to the next state over, of course.

For the wealthy, this is no big deal. For the poor, that's a huge problem.

Especially since the next state over might well have their own restrictions that, e.g., require multiple doctor visits and a waiting period.

Poor women will die as a consequence of this decision.
"People focusing on the leak rather than what was actually leaked"

Have you taken the time to read it? It is the majority opinion. They vote first, then go to write opinions and dissents. It is not a dissent..
Or small teams that self-organize. Sort of the axiom behind "Agile Manifesto."

And some problems require not large numbers of people thinking a little about it, but rather long periods of time uninterrupted for one or a few people to think deeply about.
I have no problem with someone taking issue with a specific instance of overturning precedent, or the logic used to do so. But I don't think it's correct to say this never happens or ignores the process. We could look to a myriad of rulings related to slavery, Jim Crow, segregation, etc in which courts previously ruled on flawed precedent that was later overturned (although many bills were also used to help those changes along). It's rare, but it's a type of action that still exists within the overall legal process. I didn't realize the court held constitutional decisions as easier to overturn than statutory ones.

https://theconversation.com/the-supreme-court-has-overturned...
Can someone explain in non-legal way why the court believes an individual has right to decide whether they can wear a mask or not but not whether they can have a medical procedure or not? What's the main difference between these two?
Yes, ideally all the energy released by the reactor would go into the turbine. But no engine is 100% efficient, and waste heat is inevitable. Waste heat is "free" energy in the sense that it would have otherwise not been harnessed for something useful.
It takes some mental gymnastics to say that elective abortions to 24 weeks is a “human right” that’s so important it must be read into the Constitution—implying that countries like France, Denmark, Germany, Italy, and Spain are violating human rights by limiting abortions to the first trimester.

But to go further and say the Supreme Court “has lost all credibility” by returning US law to the international norm—where abortion is a legislative determination—is breathtaking.
Location: Washington DC

Remote:Yes

Willing to relocate: Yes

Technologies: Java, Python, C, Elasticsearch, Git

Résumé/CV:https://1drv.ms/b/s!Ain05HEzvEvJelutoYRDHmpZ_CA

Email: kevintat1999@gmail.com

Hi I am a recent graduate from the University of Maryland College Park. I've done one internship in a California music analytics startup and am currently looking for jobs that can help me grow as a software developer. I am willing to relocate if necessary however I prefer to stay in Washington DC.
Plastics aren’t a system. Some plastics are likely to be manufactured in 100,000 years simply because their made from abundant atoms, non toxic, and have useful properties. The current global economy on the other hand isn’t stable across months let alone hundreds of years. But that doesn’t matter much, the meat your eating today probably didn’t come from a wild animal like the meat your ancestors where eating 100,000 years ago but it’s still edible. Different systems to produce essentially the same thing across vast stretches of time.
It doesn’t really seem to be innovation, just rediscovering 100 year old scams and failures that have to be readdressed.
We never really had deadlines, especially not firm ones. Things went out when they were done, we maintained very minimal technical debt and a very high quality app. Things got love when they needed it, not on a timeline. We had a very loyal customer base.

We got bought out. We got firm deadlines for features we didn't want from on high. Quality dipped, technical debt soared, and customer retention dropped. Our overall sales went down in the name of pushing out low quality features fast.

It was nice while it lasted.
The main topic is inappropriately flagged, but you can clearly see the meltdown and why it's flagged.

In terms of a breach, I don't believe I've seen anything like this. They seem to have figured out who leaked this. That person will have to live with their decision. I don't know how they will justify or rationalize it, but I don't fathom I would want to be them right now.

Insider threat is very commonly a breach/leak issue. People who have legitimate reason to have access can decide what to do afterwards. No magic DLP is ever stopping someone who has real access. You have to pat people down and wand them for metals and even look for concealed sd cards. It far more security than they are ever subjecting to these people. So the hole is open.

The only way to prevent a breach when the hole is open is to ensure there's no need to leak. If discussing or planning to repeal roe vs wade. The supreme court should be doing this all in public. It doesn't have to be all out news event or even live for that matter.
I never new it was a bug, I just assumed the Autotools was too complicated for most developers to configure it correctly.
I think I've actually asked you something like this before, but is there a compact way to write a constitutional amendment that creates a right to privacy?
> the possibility of her changing her mind and walking things back.

The George Costanza scenario: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IW78swzn_Bs
I run http://bulletpitch.xyz (a news letter that reports on startups), so always looking to collaborate with great start ups to help share their vision
Didnt the exchanges cancel the trades during the flash crash in 2010. I am sure the buyers of those transactions which were able to buy shares of good companies for pennies would not want to reverse those transactions.

Knight was not a big player so the exchanges had no reason to keep them happy.
Yep. This is the atomic bomb of American politics, and that's what happens when you set it off.

The comments about institutions and trust and process seem to miss the point: those are the first casualties. It gets uglier from here.
I feel like "impartial AI judge" is at least the top 3 most common sci-fi topics.

I've yet to see a work that puts such a concept in a good light. Even if humans are prone to corruption, the theoretical point of a judicial system is to deal with the edge cases that are never clear cut.
You think it's a good thing that the judiciary is an ivory tower with absolutely no regard for public perception? These nine people are unelected and appointed to their positions for life. They are insulated from political pressure by the other branches of government. But it is incredibly damaging to a democratic republic if government is unaccountable to the people.

Not to mention, the basic premise of THIS OPINION is that public debate about controversial issues is healthy. Anyone complaining about this leak being damaging are doing a great job of undermining the basic premise of the opinion.
I immediately understood the joke, maybe it’s a German humor thing.
You have to either be extremely naive or totally oblivious of the current political climate in the US to think this ends with only a ban on abortions after 24 weeks.
I run http://bulletpitch.xyz (a free newsletter that reports on startups.)
I have read it. My understanding from reading elsewhere is these situations can be fluid. At the time it was written it may well have been a draft majority opinion. Votes can change. Also, if you accept that the court voted to overturn Roe, the reasoning for doing so can still change. There may be other competing draft majority opinions that are, say, more limited in scope (eg 15 weeks instead of 20).

Nothing is really final until it's published so I am cautious of taking it at face value as established fact. That's all.
> would you start a major project today using Cobol? No.

You might not start a project in it, but goddamn I bet you could make a boatload of cash doing consulting work to keep ancient COBOL systems running. Even today that's pretty lucrative business if you have the skills and connections.
This post is gonna be too hot to make reasonable arguments, but I think they're talking about how Garland was never confirmed when Obama appointed him. At least one of these seats should've been someone else.
Like Roe, Obergefell would be another decision where if the Supreme Court overruled, it would simply make the law the same as Europe: https://eclj.org/marriage/the-echr-unanimously-confirms-the-...

Likewise in affirmative action. You just listed three things where the supposedly arch conservative Supreme Court is simply making our law the same as France.
Many states have already decided they don't care how many women are forced to give birth to their rapists children or die due to medical problems surrounding their pregnancy. Even before this ruling there are places where women's lives have been endangered because accessible clinics were forced to close.

No matter what state you are in, being an American citizen should guarantee you certain rights. Not being forced to give birth, and having access to healthcare should be among those rights. It's terrible that we've moved farther from that as a nation.
My previous technical account manager got his three initials at amazon.com. One day I might join Amazon, but I don't think I'll get my initials (A. W. S.)
What a mess of a thread. LWN charges for the privilege of engaging in these discussions, right?

This instance on LWN seems more toxic than the HN average. Unencouraging gatekeeper nonsense. What's the upside for SirCmp?
A draft for the majority of SCOTUS opinion can hardly, and should not, be seen as a “hot take”.
The Supreme Court isn't banning abortion. It's moving the issue from the federal level to the state level. It will be members of state legislatures and their governors who will be banning abortion and obviously not in all states.
The attitude which results in this kind of extreme rhetoric and unjustified bashing of institutions will lead to the decline of the US. For a civilization to remain strong and flourish, it has to have some confidence in itself.
Depends which model, but assuming the largest: 175B * 16 bits = 350GB. Half of that if it's quantized to 8 bits. Good luck finding a GPU that can fit that in memory.