skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The author makes some fair points but I also think part of it is learning. It sounds like they had finished learning React and the ecosystem and all that was left was finding React bugs, and occasionally identifying ways to work around React's way of doing things. While they are still at a stage of learning Web APIs which means exciting discoveries.
They'll be glad to uphold a Federal ban passed by an upcoming Republican Congress and White House.
I think you are more interested in knowing how policy makers react to macroeconomics situation. I believe reading economical history is a good start. Definitely not an expert myself.
Well, I played the first one first, and I liked that one better. Especially once you get to Monkey Island, it's one gag after the other: the three-headed monkey, the head of the navigator (which you trade in for a leaflet called "how to get ahead in navigating"), ShishKeBob and his pals ShishKeJoe and ShishKeLarry, ...
What would stop a future Republican Congress / White House from banning it at the Federal level, and SCOTUS from upholding that?
> I'll bet that the Intel moniker was kept around because websites saw Safari" combined with "ARM" and started serving iOS-specific cases.*

Sometimes just the keyword "Safari" will get you the mobile site (looking at you arista.com).
Postmark has been acquired by ActiveCampaign
> It's surprising how many people still think biology is somehow simpler than IT.

How many people? Is that an opinion you've actually come across in the wild? It would surprise me.
er, wow, apologies for the typo there I meant to say "I have nothing against solar, by the way."
I use tabbar and confine dired buffers to their own group, which makes it actually useful that they stick around.
This reminded me of the amusing way the leas character (Guybrush) was named. Obligatory wiki linkage [1] but basically due to a Deluxe Paint filename convention.

[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guybrush_Threepwood
That all makes sense.
Although in my experience, if you're really being careful about not sending spam, you've got a lot more to worry about from your VPS being blacklisted than your own IP personally.

>> I’m somewhat worried about the possibility of DDOS

The one time I got severely dDoS'd, because I'd let a friend run a tiny static website off my server that attracted that kind of attention, the hosting company I was with shut my account down immediately and asked for $5000 in reparations. I had to backdoor into the server and salvage whatever I could. That was a hardened box in a military grade facility. I don't think a VPS is going to be kind. Push comes to shove, if it's in your house you can pull the cable.
Thanks Kaze, I'll take a closer look at it again.
Don't understand the idea of wanting people to pay to be on twitter. If I mostly consume stuff on twitter and don't have a lot of followers why would I pay? if I don't have a commercial interest for my twitter account why would I pay?
In OCaml I think this could only happen with the interpreter (e.g., an interactive toplevel). At least today the compiler complains if you try to define two types with the same name in the same context.

The problem is that it would happen often in the interpreter when you were interactively trying stuff out, because when you're trying stuff out, you change the definitions of things.

Python actually sort of has the same problem not only when you use an interactive interpreter but even when you reload a module: the new class definitions don't modify the old one, they just get bound to the same name. So it's easy to end up with two alglayout.Vbox classes or two diff.Formula classes in the same interactive interpreter at the same time. But it's much less of a problem in Python because Python usually doesn't care what class things are, just what methods they define, so objects belonging to both classes can coexist peacefully. The usual exception is when you have an isinstance check somewhere.
I got my kids some Math Art Fun dice. These included a rhombic d12, d24, d48, d60, and the mighty d120, plus some assorted skewed dice. Shoulda gotten a d30 too. These are absolutely fabulous dice, even if they have limited use. And they're cheap.

https://www.mathartfun.com/DiceLabDice.html
Cool indeed. I think MI caught the spirit of gameplay for me, alongside iconic titles like Elite and Civ.

Pirates of the Caribbean had a similar spirit.

I'll likely be handing over cash for this version. If the new game has the same banter and half decent puzzles, it'll be a winner, for me. Something to get my daughter to play with me if she has the patience of walking about the place!
If you are finding difficulty in converting your Figma to HTML CSS code? Then, you are on the right platform! Copycat provides you with the Figma plugin through which you can easily convert your designs. Figma Plugin does the exact copy of the design in the code form. Through this, you can target creating animations, networking, and interactions. Using CopyCat, HTML/CSS developers can develop UI faster than any other site.
On the web that is fine. As a native app, it should fit in with the platform. On iPhone Google use the Android design language, and it produces apps which simply do not meet expectations.
It's 2022 and most websites don't trim spaces in inputs
How is it that when you paste an email, phone number, otp code or any other information in a form that doesn't support spaces, instead of trimming them it slices the end of the string or the validation fails.

How is it that all those websites doing js string manipulation on the fly can't do a simple:

"string.trim();"
Show HN: Find the 10 highest and 10 lowest correlations to any stock
During the start of the year I was thinking how could I bet against certain stocks (in my case mainly Tesla) without using derivatives and the risks that come with them.

After I had success betting on the oil price with a highly correlated investment fond, I came to the conclusion that negative correlations could be used to bet against the price of other assets. Unfortunately, it is not easy to find correlations between assets if you don't know which assets to compare in the first place.

So I created a website where you can find the 10 highest and 10 lowest correlations of certain assets.
All sorts of articles get nominated for deletion for all sorts of reasons, why is this one being posted here?
Great. This will be VB6 all over again: tightly coupled apps (coupled frontend/backend, coupled SW/OS/HW) depending on a runtime that will go unsupported or killed within 5 years, and will soon require a VM to run at all.

Vendor lock-in, technical debt, no scalability, terrible code efficiency. Great way to save a few bucks...
They're all components of charitable debate, being charitable doesn't end at interpretation.

Steelmanning takes resources you're essentially donating to the opposition's view in the pursuit of forward progress, it's in a very literal sense charity.
The title & subtitle don't seem to match the content.

The body of the article indicates the author simply doesn't want steelmanning to provide a negative incentive to present a more complete argument even if parts of it are not as strong as others. It seems reasonable that this should be avoided, but also an extremely small concern:

If people are streelmannig you, then pretty much by definition they are not going to dismiss your entire argument just because a part of it isn't as strong. If premises $A and $B are sufficient to support claim $F then presenting weaker premises $C and $D take away nothing at all while still adding some small value.

I just don't see how this is at all an issue for a group of people already engaging in productive discussion techniques. And if a reader/audience is not, then they're not going to steel man you to begin with, so it's a moot issue.

The examples provided where an argumenter "paints themselves into a corner" are example where the argumenter did a poor job of trying to make a counter claim, in one case engaging in their own strawman argument. That's on them, not the principle of charity.

And what's the alternative? The author says "take a step backward, look at what your saying to see if it makes sense." Which seems trivially obvious to the point of not really needing to be stated
It applies as a general rule.

It just seems like there's really not much of an issue here, and could instead be summed up with a single statement: Don't allow steelmanning to don't descend into commiting fallacies of your own.
And the answer is... Nvidia.

Cool idea, by the way. I'll have to play with this more.
Codec2 goes up to 'only' 3200b/s. Seems like there's a hole there for open codec between 3kb/s and 6/12kb/s.
Xmake is also based on tbox as a c base library.
Yes, it's kWh what is important to consumers. For example, an average 4-person family in Germany uses between 2600-5000 kWh / year vs. about 10 kWh / year in the USA.

All in all, the greatest feature of SMRs in my opinion, is the scalability they offer. I'd have also added decentralization, but I'm far from familiar what is most optimal in terms of electricity networks.
The wonderful thing about Dnd, especially old dnd was that fun superceded the rules. If you are fighting goblins and it's boring, then that's the groups fault for not making it exciting in some way.

(The goblins realize they're going to lose and start fleeing, they ambush in an interesting way, they are a distraction for something else, one of them has a bomb, the party has to fight them in their underwear using camping gear as weapons, etc etc etc)

or you do something else to preserve the fun such as simplifying the encounter

(You easily crush the puny goblins while only losing (1d6 health), After seeing the might of the wizards powerful spell the goblins start bowing down before him, you quickly make a game to see who can knock a goblin the farthest and the rest run off, etc etc etc)

The thing that I love like crazy about dnd is that you don't have to do anything that you don't wish to. Anything that is boring, annoying, frustrating, etc can be easily discussed in the group and house ruled away. The only limits and annoyances are the ones that you have chosen to allow to continue.
And the batteries?
Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid

Douglas Hofstadter
Dog.prototype = new Animal()

This is nonsensical, it is assigning an object instance into a prototype.

Dog.prototype = Animal

would make sense.
I certainly can tell with Slack.
Registering your own domain name still puts you at the mercy of public opinion in the form of registrars. Sure, becoming persona-non-grata to registrars doesn't happen every day but it does happen and it certainly isn't becoming less common.
Forth is simple to bootstrap, but maybe not so easy to learn or reason about, because it isn't really taught in any schools or popular online materials. There are tons of resources for thinking about and writing compilers for C-like languages, and there's a decent chance that someone with a CS degree has done so doing their coursework.
I'm not a Nuclear Power physicist, but you can Google up images of a whole lot of them.

There's at least one common feature that you see in all of them - the giant cooling towers, often pictured emitting large white fluffy steam clouds while they're operating.

They're also all on massive permanent rivers, lakes or the ocean.

Pumping/Delivering water for that purpose is basically not feasible.
Sprint had unlimited 2G “Vision” data as far back as 2001. You could “stream” live video from 10-12 cable channels at 1fps. By 2005 you could stream video at 15fps.

https://www.sprint.com/business/program/newsletter/march05/p...
I just recently discovered that. Tried holding convos about some of the “handyman” type apps in the specific subreddits and everything pretty much by approval only.
What's your point? You're just repeating what they said. WebViews which reach out to slow backends will render slowly. That's about it.
I have heard about Resolve for color grading, but how good it is when it comes to editing? Is it simple and intuitive enough to make few edits, add titles for YouTube videos?
I predict fewer users, an even higher percentage of based investors.
Anyone care to reframe the question or improve it?
If it is like many other models, part of the reason would just be to reduce their bandwidth costs. The models can be huge, and they want to limit those who just want to download it on a whim so they don't rack up $10k+ is bandwidth charges, as has happened to many others who hosted big models out on S3 or something.
But that ceases to make any sense the second you have renewables cheaper than nuclear. Then renewables start cutting into that base load as well, whenever they can.
I like that you inject "[More than half]" when referring to the nearly 35 million workers in 1977.

Except there were over 90 million workers by then [1]. The FRED series you picked is not all employed people.

> And we saw how great these investment plans worked out for the poor folks that had planned to retire around 2008.

Ah, cherry picking, the best of all logical fallacies.

It's already known that those pensions didn't turn out too well either, since most of the people in that time now get most of their retirement income from Social Security.....

>to pump money into to Wall Street

And now the bias shows. Why not own some productive assets? What do you think pension plans do with money? Sit on it in a safe? Invest them all in the employing company, increasing risk, so that when/if the parent company fails the people get screwed? (Which happens and still happens a lot).

[1] https://www.jstor.org/stable/41840558
Ive exported several simulink models. Long functions, yes. Globals, no.
Did we learn anything? When the next pandemic comes, will we screw ourselves over again?
Most will never say the truth or the whole truth in public unless you are paying them or they can back their words with their portfolio. “Show me where your money is.”
Raoul was excellent, and I can highly reccommend any of the pre ~2019 content - he is now a born again Crypto shill.
I think you're referring to Victor Eijkhout's book(s): https://theartofhpc.com/

These are great references too! They actually popped into to my head only after I replied! Google search was struggling to find the page for me too, I had to look up the author by name.
The fact people in government and private industry knew the risk 18 years without addressing it it probably the most damming thing about nuclear power. The public simply can’t trust the industry or regulatory bodies. Which means they must assume avoidable disasters are going to be a regular thing.

I don’t have an issue with nuclear power but IMO the industry should be forced to pay for a ~1T insurance policy to avoid bad incentives rather than the government simply taking on the associated risks.
There needs to be an icon set for gallows, gibbets, witch pyres, and
dragon lairs and for coastal areas, sea monsters, whirlpools,
mermaids, treasure, and of course an edge of the flat world.
Android chrome sends the manufacturer and build. Might as well send my serial number.
Can you actually stack multiple 3090s arbitrarily like that?

That is use multiple 3090s to load a single model for inference.

I thought that at most you could use two 3090s via NVlink.

Stacking multiple cards would open some real cheap options.

Like a real budget option would be something like a few ancient K80s (24GB version). eBay price was around $200-300 last I checked.
.
I don't think it's possible to learn macroeconomics "properly", in the sense that one can learn e.g. quantum physics "properly". I pick quantum physics because not every expert agrees on some of the tail end of theoretical things, but there's broad agreement on the main parts of it. Those main parts are more than the average person will ever need to use.

This is not remotely true with respect to macroeconomics. It's absolutely routine that you can find even two orthodox economists (or hedge fund managers, or other practical folks if you prefer) who look at the same situation and predict incompatible outcomes. You don't even need to go down the various heterodox rabbit holes; people ostensibly operating from the same theory routinely make opposed predictions.

It's still worth learning some of the vocabulary, because it is useful for understanding what people are talking about. Of course learning is also gratifying for its own sake, and don't let anyone dissuade you if that's what you're up to. Still, I don't think it makes sense to learn macroeconomics on an expert level for a practical purpose. I don't think it's possible to define what an "expert level" even is.
Valid critique in legacy sense, the class syntax of course mitigates much of it. But why would you want to delegate constructors?
In all fairness, we shouldn’t be trusting ourselves, even. (Not always, anyway.)
This! This is my exact experience (well, with Mac:s and Amiga:s). My father introduced courses in Desktop Publishing and Digital video editing in the late eighties and into the nineties in his county school. He understood computers to such a degree that he could successfully teach others to use them.

He is older now, still fully cognizant and lucid and gladly aging has not taken its toll yet, but he has mostly given up on computers for the very reason you write about so well -- interfaces became more and more fractured.

Things are not where they ought to be, they look different across different applications on the same operating system, they behave in different manners, and all these idiosyncrasies add up quickly, so he resigned and became mostly a consumer of content rather than a user or creator of such. He still has an old PowerBook (next to his modern M1 one) with an old copy of Adobe Illustrator as a poor man's CAD to draw and print things like cable installations and load-bearing sections of walls. It saddens me because he has such a great talent.

While we came to where we are today as mostly a slow decline, I would say it was a two-punch combo that finally broke user interfaces for good: First the complete annihilation of skeuomorphism in favour of design without any cues whatsoever, it might have looked ugly and certain abstract concepts might not have mapped well to the semantics of the physical world, it still offered a clear distinction of what was "interact-able" and what was not. And second, the introduction of Electron-type applications finally ended it.

I'm not sure there is a way out of this hole, so I am mostly resigned to not complaining to developers of apps like the original author either. Because what good does it do?
Most men I know who were teens and college age during the 1960s openly say they primarily went to rallies to get access to easy sex. Doubt any of them would admit that on a survey, claiming much nobler goals instead.
Not for nothing, Everything Everywhere All at Once was produced by the Russo brothers who directed Avengers Infinity Wars, Endgame and Captain America movies. Also Michelle Yeoh is a pretty huge star both here and in China. Just saying it's not exactly an indie film. But it was original, for sure.
I am gonna steelsraw this and make a point that the author is simply arguing for benefits of intolerance when dogmas misalign which maybe good or bad and depends entirely on one’s commitment to her dogmas
HN should have descriptive subtitles though, the title of this piece only makes sense once you know the context, and if browser UA isn't of interest then that's wasting clicks. "An analysis and history of web browser UA strings" seems like a good subtitle to me.

Also, if someone takes a conversation in a direction in a forum that you don't want to follow then best response is usually 'don't follow'.
For personal use i go with .de DENIC comes with a privacy shield equivalent build in. .de domains have not constraints on who can own then. DENIC (and things sorounding .de) have been processed by german civil courts. As long as you do not plan to violate German Law (no holocaust denial etc) .de seems a good alternative to .com if rule of law goes sour in the US or the UK or the .com is already taken.
Another alternative is https://thehelm.com:

Helm is a personal, private email server that won't share your data.

The Verge
Not sure if it would work, but wouldn't it greatly complicate creating a backdoor when the host's memory is very heavily constrainted? e.g. an AVR-based "computer" that would hardly do much more than actually translate assembly to machine code?
Then once the hive mind discovers said subreddit it gets deleted by mods especially if it is right leaning.
What was special about the first two Monkey Island games (at least for me) was the atmosphere. I mean, just look at this screenshot: https://www.adventurecorner.de//uploads/images/games/monkey1... Parts 1 and 2 had this effect on me, with part 3 the magic was mostly gone unfortunately. If Return to Monkey Island manages to recapture some of that, I don't care if it's pixel art or whatever else...
Next does a really good job of emulating what worked about the PHP model while still having a framework behind it.
Big Tech monopolies have amassed far too much control over society — over our daily lives, our economy and especially over the news, content and information we gather and read.

Oftentimes, Big Tech’s power is concentrated in the hands of just a few individuals who are primarily motivated by a desire to turn profits or promulgate a particular worldview

Seems like 'big tech' is guilty of the same crimes as the current broadcast media, yet no similar call to action to rein in old media.
What makes you think that Australia wouldn't have egregious chains of human failure or bad planning?

Pretty much every country with civilian nuclear energy had some big scandals or incidents around them[1]. Humans just can't be trusted to build a 100% safe process.

[1] Just to name a few: Three Mile Island (US), Sellafield (UK), Brunsbüttel (DE), Saint-Laurent (FR)
You probably want finance as much as macro. Take a master's degree (not sure if these are as common in the US as in Europe). This stuff is hard, you need to spend time on it. Failing that, follow the advice of lesswrong and read textbooks.
I personally _love_ Thomas Sowell's work. Basic Economics would be a great start, especially now with the current housing crisis. Very amusing and interesting read aswell.

He's got quite a few (albeit politically tinted) interviews with the Hoover Foundation on Youtube.
Unfortunately "asking nicely for source code" almost never works. I would prefer supporting companies which intentionally collaborate with the FLOSS community.
Working with Virtual Time in SQL
https://www.youtube.com/c/BenEater

find "Building an 8 bit breadboard computer".
I have a degree in economics. Both of my parents have PhD’s in economics from MIT and were professors of economics with dozens of published works. I grew up around economists including multiple Nobel prizes winners in economics.

None of this has anything to do with being good at investing on a personal level. Like nothing, in fact I would argue that it’s probably harmful and in my experience causes people to overthink things.

Economics as a profession has a fucking terrible track record of predicting financial markets or broad macroeconomic trends. At this point I’m not sure it’s even clear what economics is for but I can say with confidence that it’s definitely not the place to start if you want to get better at investing.
Dutch TV illustrates Spanish PM hacking story with Blender script