skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Eros did not just represent lust but also love. Agape is a context more limited to christianity, which kind of has anti-sexual overtone.

But there were many Erotes representing all kinds of desire and attraction

> Anteros ("Love Returned"),[1] Hedylogos ("Sweet-talk"), Hermaphroditus ("Hermaphrodite" or "Effeminate"), Himeros ("Impetuous Love" or "Pressing Desire"), Hymenaios ("Bridal-Hymn"), and Pothos ("Desire, Longing," especially for one who is absent)
I believe that this is partially because default shells (mostly bash) are not 'really' beginner friendly, and you usually need to spend some time configuring them to be comfortable working with them. That said, i use fish shell so what do I know :)
Looks like the commoditization of love/dating apps and social media begins to show its ugly tail. Stories from my circle of friends/families:

- Girls obsessed over their physiques. Going skinny to the point it wrecked their hormones.

- People who are married just shy over 2-3 years are thinking on divorce, or have girlfriends/boyfriends.

- People having open relationships.

- Girls randomly make out in club with some random strangers they just met.

- Guys obsessed on having model-like girlfriends.

- Girls are doing nose/face/boob job more.

- Girls have Excel sheets that track potential guys according to some criterias (i.e, high paying jobs like law, medicine, graduated from an Ivy league, height, body type, etc)

Or maybe its just my circles are messed up lol.
Today, people like to collect data in all possible variations. The data itself can be sold, but equally they show that they can do it. so at best they can secure an order for data storage.
Oh how I miss this... If Vivaldi has this feature, I might have to switch.
Would love to schedule whatsapp messages using some cli/web based tool
This isn’t an article that is “based on a paper”, and instead sources from multiple.

It’s really frustrating that this sort of lazy and dismissive middlebrow comment that misrepresents the article ends up stuck to the top.
So Redis isn't really a distributed locking system. The locks are all managed by a central, non-distributed server: Redis. But this kind of lock is useful too. One nice approach to handling crashes in a system like this is to use the idea of fate sharing [1]: you upper-bound the lifetime of a held lock by the lifetime of the TCP connection it was taken on. When the connection goes, the lock is auto-released. To support this, Redis would have to have some kind of EXPIRE_ON_DISCONNECT command - I don't know if it does or not.

The idea of fate sharing is very general and useful: you can, for example, introduce reconnectable sessions, and attach shared state to those, which gets you transport-independence and the ability to recover from transport failure.

[1] Clark, David D. “The Design Philosophy of the DARPA Internet Protocols.” ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 18, no. 4 (August 1988): 106–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/52325.52336.
wow TIL. But yeah, that intuitively makes sense.

"Factorial ANOVA results showed that the group of nonpill users obtained higher scores on the PMI scale than the group of pill users (considering the fertile phase of the cycle)." where PMI = Partner's Masculinity Index

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S17436...

In short, pill birth control reduced the desirability of features considered traditionally masculine.
Racket is a competitor to Python, that is IMO a better Python than Python itself. The only thing lacking is popularity, which is probably both a good and bad thing.
It's not like oil and gas execs werent working to inhibit this. This milestone could have been reached years back. E.g. tariffs on imported solar panels have been around since Obama.

The only reason they couldnt stop this future was because the plunge in price was so precipitous.
The author clearly didn't studied the matter and she's speaking from personal and enviroment-she-can-perceive point of view, no offense with this part. After reading the entire post, I can see she's biased with her own perception on the matter. Reading other articles, who are also biased just make it worse.

When you look at the data, you realize the dating world for men is close to doom. Only a small fraction of men will traspass genes and most women compete for the top 20% men. The rest of the men are invisible. 1/3 of americans males, from 18 to 30 are virgins and it's climbing. Less marriages, more divorces initiated by women, and the list of stats goes on.

Also, among all the sexual dynamics that benefit women, you have the services, which are done in order to milk the men who aren't attractive (not only good looking) for women. These men sustain Tinder economy, for example, as all the algorithms are made just to milk men money just to land some opportunity of attractions.

Anyone interested should start reading papers, studies, and it will be surprised instead watching TikToks, tweets, etc.
Well, if you can get your device infected by playing Candy Crush and similar, I expect the entire Spanish parliament to be spied by Pegasus:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xfcIMCYXSxQ
My work group uses it all the time, but always preceded by “festering”.
Absolutely, the bane of PC (Mac slightly less so) sequencers of that
era was kernel scheduling. With an OS like Windows you had layers of
unpredictable buffer synchronisation. It wasn't until AV optimised RT
kernels came of age after 2010 that PC sequencing offered satisfactory
results - by which time almost all of the generative signal code is
internal anyway (as plugins, VSTs etc).
We lost the previous war with RF, then paid a huge price for that in 1932-1934. 7 million adults (this number is accepted by RF in 2008) and 23 million children (this number is not accepted by RF) were murdered by hunger during «Holodomor».

We will do everything possible to avoid repeating of the genocide, but RF is a strong opponent with a lot of resources, so we need to be smarter, see better, be better equipped, and be faster. Otherwise, they will just push us inch by inch to Western border.
If you develop on Chrome given that it's the largest, then you have the following issues:

- Firefox will render stuff wrong

- Safari will render stuff wrong and something will break
I'm not a fan of PSOE by any means, but why are you spreading such bullshit?
> But that exact same person in a different time, place, or career, might not be disrupted.

If you are not disrupted, you do not have a disorder. Psychiatric medicine is about you and how you feel about it. If you feel like you can make a life change and have it not impact you, great! Do that.

> A hunter gatherer might actually [...]

That's nice, but it's not what you are and not how your life currently looks. So why do you think it's relevant? I don't understand this reference.

> Its like saying someone who is very tall has a disorder because it makes them a poor horse jockey

It is not, because this is about mental quirks that impact your life to such an extent that you feel you cannot adequately live it.
There are good APIs for doing that like messagebird.com
As someone who's always lived next to the "original" (Swiss) Lake Geneva, I was confused as to why I'd never experienced this D&D enthusiasm you've mentioned
Personally, I've never gone to a bar looking for love (and rarely ever even looking for sex). I just wanted to get drunk in a different atmosphere. Every relationship has come through either friends/acquaintances or random encounters + striking up a conversation.
Interesting idea for proof of work, a large nonlinear function where you find weights so that f(x_0) = x_1 < x_0 or something like that. To exploit ML advances.
Try SubSync, open source movie subtitle synchronization app. Build in feature like this in VLC would be awesome.

https://subsync.online/

Discussion on HN (4 months ago): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29794153
That's not the issue. You can already download weights of other models through BitTorrent or from large archive sites like Hugging Face or the-eye. OpenAI just doesn't want to release them, so that they can sell access to it through their cloud service.
Can we acknowledge that just because we don’t have a particular problem, doesn’t mean other people won’t? Will these companies be profitable? I have no idea. No one does. But I don’t understand this sentiment unless you’re being forced to use their product.

When you start investing you quickly realize how difficult it is to gauge a “good” idea. The only thing that matters is how the market responds and it seems like these solutions have a small, dedicated and quickly growing user base.
Funnily there's been old news stories that American owners were going to Ukranian forums to download hacked firmwares for these tractors, so the Russians^W thieves should also just figure out who those Ukranian coders are.
- In Visual Studio (not VSCode) I want to be able to go through all changed lines like I can go through all bookmarks.

- In Visual Studio I want a tool that shows me show many "hops (calls)" a C# method is away from another method.
Hot take: men don’t want promiscuous women as long-term partners, fundamentally people desire long-term partners, and the commoditization of sex contributes to weak relationships and broken families.
The impression I have — and I’d be very interested to find out if I’m right or wrong — is that governments basically all spy on each other all the time, and they consider this normal and only problematic when it touches certain very specific projects.

Something about it being important to know the capabilities of your friends and your enemies, and to test the quality of your intelligence and counterintelligence assets before it becomes critical: you don’t want to start stupid wars you can’t win, nor waste money fighting wars to end the non-existent threat of non-existent WMDs.

I can’t tell the difference between espionage that gets overlooked, espionage that gets chest-thumping and wailing and gnashing of teeth, and espionage that gets kinetic responses, but I assume there must be such divisions.
But I really do see it as a huge issue with apps. In the "old" dating world, people would smell each other when they agreed to meet on a date, meaning before they invested time and effort. In the "new" dating world, people spend effort chatting and setting up the date but then it can still fail due to mis-matched pheromones.

On the other hand, I just learned that with pill-based birth control the effect nowadays is weaker than it used to be. So maybe you're correct and my perception is just outdated.
What exactly is “messed up” about open relationships and making out with strangers?
C++ has a myriad of wonderful language features that exist entirely within C++ and cross no language boundaries. I really adore C++ as a language but unfortunately I find little pragmatic use for it unless I'm working 100% inside C++ and using native APIs only. If you're doing that, it's a dream. Rust, on the other hand, speaks the same ABI as C, and with serde, can read and write to most formats and/or APIs with utmost ease.

C++ I find can get a little unwieldy quite fast, but is generally easier to keep simple. It maps to higher-level concepts in easy and intuitive ways. Rust, I hate to say it, but unless you know best practices / idiomatic Rust from the start, you'll have to do a lot of refactoring as you learn the language. Some constructs simply aren't possible using safe Rust. Many embrace the limitations, many else frustrate themselves again and again until 'the Rust way' drills into their heads. But, of course, once you get a feel for it, it's pleasant to write in.

How much difficulty you'll have with Rust or C++ depends on what problems you try to solve, and what your approach to programming is generally. If you're more of a pragmatic "I write simple programs that actually do things" I don't think you'll have any problems with Rust. It's very straightforward. And the tooling is second-to-none. If you like to partake in exploratory programming, trying out different theoretical models and different abstractions, C++ caters to that by allowing you to write more elegant designs than in Rust, with the downside that it also lets you make worse mistakes.

The wider cross-language library ecosystem is mostly C-based I've found, so, in C++ you can just use those libraries directly with no hassle (the only hassle being the build system, or lack thereof). Rust can use those libraries as well (as long as you don't have a gut-reaction "ew" to using `unsafe` everywhere) but unfortunately the safe and idiomatic Rust library ecosystem is kind of on the bleeding edge at the moment. Hopefully things will stable out soon, and all these hip new technologies will come to fruition, but that day is not today.

I know this isn't really nudging in one way or another but really it comes down to what you value in a language and what projects you want to see through using these technologies that will determine which one you like better. Have fun!
I think the first paragraph of the article gives enough justification on why you would want to analyze this subject with logic:

> I’ve been in a relationship for a while, but before that I dated for several years and experienced it both as 1) really fun and 2) terrible psychological torment. Lately dating videos on TikTok, Rethinking Sex by Christine Emba, this post by Oliver Traldi, The Agony of Eros by Byung-Chul Han, and Why Love Hurts by Eva Illouz have made me think about why people seem to find the modern dating market so unsatisfying.

If dating is both "terrible psychological torment" and "so unsatisfying", which describes a situation that is worse than "really fun" is good, it might be a good idea to think about why. Maybe that's how dating has always been and will always be, maybe not and we can improve the situation. What's certain is that not thinking about it won't change anything, it is accepting the status quo. The author seems not okay with that.
they arent expressions, defeating the whole point

that isnt syntax for partial appication, and the protocol system for structrural typing is syntactically and practically absurd

the question is "why do data processing libs in python look syntactically illegible" and the answer is largely, as youve posted above, that python doesnt support useful syntax
> always peg me as “long hair, don’t care.”

Get a hair cut? Sharpen your dress code? Ask one of your female friends to go shopping with you, get a makeover.
> did not get a professional diagnosis

If they did, then they felt it was an issue at the time. Clearly they don't anymore, so it has stopped being a disorder.

> Over the years I have managed to do a lot better

Great! So you've fixed it. Now you don't have a disorder anymore, just a quirk of the mind.
Plastic is made from oil, and has limited recyclability (the polymers degrade so at best you only down cycle). Aluminum is one of the most abundant materials in the earth’s crust, and once refined is basically infinitely recyclable (or so the story goes). Aluminum is also reasonable light and strong, with good thermal properties (if your laptop chassis gets too hot, it has other design issues at this point IMO).
https://csvkit.readthedocs.io
My solution for C software that I maintain is handwritten ./configure of 200-ish lines of code, dealing with specific issues that I've encountered, supporting specific systems that are supported (Linux, macOS, Emscripten, MinGW). It looks and feels like Autotools script, outputs a file for make to include later, etc.

If you're a user, familiar

./configure && make && sudo make install

will do the trick for you.

If you're a package maintainer, ./configure supports all the --libdir flags that packaging system sets, (handwritten) Makefile respects CFLAGS, DESTDIR, etc. All of it is extremely hackable since there are no silly layers of preprocessors between you and make.

I guess the secret sauce here is having only OpenSSL as a dependency and the project being a fairly small library.
As long as they get past the regulatory red tape that's holding everything back
I skipped all this being religious. I knew my wife for years. Over a year we started to hit it off and got to know each other as good friends. I asked her out and proposed one week later. Four months later we were married.

It's old fashioned but our emotional and physical involvement was proportional to our level of commitment at every stage.

It won't be the way most people want to go but it seems to have saved much of the heart ache modern dating appears to cause.

Just one data point from someone that did it a little different.
This is the worst type of working environment, when everyone on the team is trying to "educate" and evangelise and "build culture" which is nothing but sucking up to the manager, instead of trying to be realistic about solving issues and delivering value.
Might just be selection bias though? Western countries are a lot more open about that sort of thing than many other cultures, and most Western countries are also US allies. Therefore even if every single leader of a country got targeted, you would still expect the majority of (published) stories to be about US allies.
At the Boundaries, Applications Are Not Object-Oriented
A tool that checks your broken python/pip install and fixes it properly.

https://xkcd.com/1987/
Arguably, the only way to add zero complexity is to never add a feature. It's unclear what the point of that would be, given that it is trivial to stay on an older C++ version if this is your goal.
>In NL the concept of ‘sick days’ doesn’t exist. If you are ill, you are ill

Isn't that illness called a sick day? Like I said, everyone calls it unlimited sick days, but in Austria, and I think in Poland, Germany too it's limited to 90 days per year. Sick longer than 90 days gets your cased evaluated by a doctor's committee and probably moved to disability pay. But I doubt there is such a thing as unlimited sick day. Sure, you can be sick for an unlimited time, but your employee and insurance status will change after a certain number of days.
I am interested in this. OP do you work for Sun Vision? Y'alls presentation media is absolute shit. You need better mics and cameras. You need to show them in multiple lighting environments. Get a thing that holds and camera (phone or whatever) and moves back and fourth on a linear rail.

Also, people will watch a shit video with good sound but will turn off a useful video with bad sound. You have bad sound in every chunk of media I've looked at. If you want to succeed (and I think you really have something the world needs), spend a few hundred bucks on some mics that don't suck.
Another Firing Among Google’s A.I. Brain Trust, and More Discord
I suspect that growing up in the Manchester area in the 70s was the inspiration both for the wonderful Beasley Street by John Cooper Clarke: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=37QUUwp9xIs and for Frightened by Mark E Smith (The Fall): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T4dP43KWaSU
Most the of the conversation around Pegasus has rightly focused around how shocking and casual the widespread sale and use of this malware is.

But, I wonder if there's another story here: nearly all world leaders have a target-able device with cameras, microphones, GPS, and personal and professional conversations (and therefore contact lists) which they carry with them 24/7. At what point does the risk outweigh the convenience? I'm not sure what the solution is, but I wish that smartphones were not seen as a default necessity for everybody. Risks such as Pegasus are introduced, and it seems hard to go back to how things were.
It feels like having your heart outside of your body and it's running around recklessly.

Having children changed my outlook on the future quite a bit. First, I feel much more repsonsible and interested in the ecological future, because I intensely love people who will have to deal with the consequences in the future. Second, I hope I will be able to have a natural look into the problems of future generations, when I am old - there is a "strong bond into the future" for me. Third, while I don't feel it's a "future me" that I talk into sleep every evening, it feels like my human legacy. Considering my current reality, my children are probably the biggest impact I can have on the future.

BTW I guess all this is true regardless of genetic bonds.
Definitely possible to enforce it. They have a functional legal system and a 'very active' counter intelligence team.
Same, I bought mine for 600 euros in 2014, still running fine with additional 4GB and a SSB but I had to drill the plastic chassis and put three small bolts to keep the hinge and the chassis together. Just like the previous one. I am planning keep it for another ten years but still if I ever buy another ruggedness of the chassis will be absolute priority.
I'm not asking for "support" i'm asking for syntax. The question is why the syntax of data processing in python is illegible, not "are things technically possible in python".

Commenters here are keen to say "but dont you know!" -- and, yes, I do.
The top of the list is an open-source library toolbox for higher-order spectral analysis including time-frequency in a compiled programming language (C, C++, D, Rust, etc) for real-time applications.

This is an example of an old third party higher-order spectral analysis toolbox in Matlab but now Matlab has built-in toolbox due to its increasing popularity in signal processing of communication, biosignal, etc [1],[2].

The next generation communication systems (e.g. WiFi 7, 6G) will probably utilize this form of signal analysis for higher bandwidth and efficient communication [3]. The modern biosignal analysis (ECG, EEG, etc) is already moving toward time-frequency analysis and to have an open-source real-time time-frequency toolbox will be a game changer [4].

[1]Higher-Order Spectral Analysis Toolbox for use with Matlab:

https://labcit.ligo.caltech.edu/~rana/mat/HOSA/HOSA.PDF

[2]Time-Frequency Foundations of Communications:Concepts and Tools:

https://www.mins.ee.ethz.ch/pubs/files/SPMAG2013.pdf

[3]The OTFS Interview – Implications of a 6G Candidate Technology:

https://www.6gworld.com/exclusives/the-otfs-interview-implic...

[4]Analyzing Neural Time Series Data: Theory and Practice:

https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/analyzing-neural-time-series-...
That is gambling which does produce the occasional miracle, but that is only a superior tactic in the aggregate. Sow 100 dandelion seeds so that 5 of them actually germinate somewhere.

To consider that the superior tactic you have to be willing to accept the failure rate and treat your one and only entire life as just one of those hapless shots in the dark.

Besides this is isn't a valid analogy anyway because we're only talking about self-awareness not engineering a partner.

And the comment you just wrote yourself, about self-inflicted limits, was an example of advice and learning, and every reader is better for having read it and become less ignorant about that.
I want a VSCode extension that has some simple geometry features for obj files, like viewing, slicing etc.