skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Return to a reverse chronological time and/or down selection of rage-bait content.

id rather have a choice among several recommendation systems. chronological timeline is the simplest and the worst
That works because there's money involved in the accounts. Where does the money come from to manually verify all the socmed accounts?
My wife cried when she got her first period because she didn’t want to turn in to a woman. She was a tomboy.

Then, you know, hormones happened. It’s insane to think that kids can be trans because a huge part of what makes us men or women happens during puberty. I didn’t think much about my gender until puberty hit either.
An intermediate step between real hardware and emulation could be buying the hardware for a MisterFPGA.
Unless the state you're living in has made it illegal to transport someone across state lines for the purposes of getting an abortion. It has been done in a few places.
That's when you get a Filipina call center associate to talk to the AI and ask it questions without arousing too much suspicion.

https://vanemden.com/books/neals/jipi.html
the saudis had actual employees in twitter looking at people's private info and passing it along to them, and the US dropped charges so people sued instead

https://www.theverge.com/2020/7/28/21345794/twitter-employee...
This is true, sure, but it's not that different than what happens without AI. If I buy an AI-powered service from some company, yah their training data could have been handcrafted my malicious actors within for some nefarious purpose. But alternatively, if I buy a (non-ML/AI) service with a giant cascade of business logic...the same thing is true. Yah I guess someone could go through the million lines of code to verify there's nothing malicious in place, but a) who wants to pay for that and b) look up the obfuscated and underhanded C contests.

The answer, as always, is not to rely on one solution as an oracle. Use a layered approach, let AI be one signal but not that only one. Provide your own training data, mix it up every few months.
What team size would you say this applies to?

At the moment I have flexibility in how many people I hire underneath me and would like the team to remain small enough where I can be both a force multiplier and part of the force. The goal is to be an elite small squad.

The other option is to hire a larger number of people, handle more of the project scope, and cease being an IC. However I'm new to being a formal manager and am guessing this would probably be bad for my sanity.
There are parts for this.

https://www.sparkfun.com/products/15801

https://blog.adafruit.com/2017/01/05/fusb302-breakout-board-...
> Replace the entire team with dang

Train AI model based on HN moderation by dang

Sell high quality moderation as a service for other plaforms

Profit?
It’s hard to overstate how difficult this is.
I'm sad to see parent post at the top of the page. It nitpicks the one most abstract bullet and calls the whole thing unactionable. I think that's silly. I enjoyed your article and agree with many points.
one can buy a variety of super super cheap very small boards or pigtail adapters with dc barrel jacks, in the usb-pd standard voltages: 5v, 9v, 12v, 15v, 20v.

You asked how does that work. Well, search for "usb-pd negotiation" and find out. Typically a source enumerates what it can do (lists some "power data objects", pdos) and a device files a request based on one, but I believe devices can & do ask for arbitrary things they want, especially if they dont find what they hope for, & them latter fall back to slower often 5v backup voltages if they can (or not). Thats the two sentance summary but theres a ton of info & its easy to learn more & you can download the spec & find out yourself if searching around still leaves you eith questions.
John Darnielle wants to tell you a story
3a(1). Know their numbers are going to be crap on Thursday, double panicked
I love the irony of having to physically visit a friends house to experience virtual reality. Made me giggle.
Any idea if ARM will be officially supported?
The Xcode XIP is chunked and can be decoded in parallel, but not seekable unfortunately.
Initially? Not a whole lot. The point though, is that you used ruby/rails to rapidly build a startup, and then you have a successful business that is _stuck with a massive ruby/rails monolith_. This is where you start extracting services, or refactoring around engines, or some other strategy - doing that involves a huge amount of careful refactoring, and Sorbet can really help.
Although you're joking, it's important to note that the angle of birds being killed by wind farms is a tactic used by people who want to see wind projects fail or not happen but want to dress this up in environmentalist sounding language. It's not that birds are never killed by wind turbines, it's that this is scrutiny only applied to wind turbines by the fake-environmentalists when they'll happily accept the environmental destruction of other methods of power generation.

Close to heart because I know of a major wind project cancelled in my area due to the government commissioning an 'environmental review' which concluded the whole project had to be canned because it'd endanger a parrot. Meanwhile, the logging continued unabated...
I agree, hence the mechanic engineering degree is basically worthless IMO.
Even in your example, any person with a functioning brain would understand your X and Y examples. So what exactly to mechanical engineers learn? As someone that went through it, I can assure you it's almost nothing. It's just a 4 year grinder so they can put a stamp on who can do medium level math and put up with the grind. The learning is up to you after.
> he has sued and insulted and bullied people he disagrees with, he employs gilded-age tactics against workers who want to unionise...

Those aren't related to transparency.

> He has sued whistleblowers,

The logic is that Tesla/Musk are suing whistleblowers to silence them because of embarrassing information. Why would Twitter's algorithms be embarrassing to Musk? Or its moderation policies?

> Words are cheap (especially when you're virtue signalling about things which don't impact your bottom line), but actions speak louder.

Exactly, all the more reason to treat words as a special case and not restrict them.
It all makes sense and I don't have much in the way of an argument against it fundamentally.

But it does make this career path rather miserable to me.
I’m not sure this is what you’re looking for, but I love NTS Radio.

It’s basically 2 radio stations that both stream 24 hours a day. Different people host 1-2 hour shows once a week or month.

You can browse archives by host, mood, and genre tags. The app includes each show’s playlists, and you can search spotify for songs (at least in ios) played on each episode. It’s become one of my favorite music discovery tools. And it’s free.
Indeed, there's an argument that the culture around anything (including software) is the main thing. And if the culture thrives, then that becomes the stable backup (or rather stable living vessel). Isn't there a Linus Torvalds quote that he has the world's largest distributed backup system for his code? But the point isn't that he bamboozled people into keeping copies of the Linux source everywhere -- it's that he started and oversees a living and helpful project.

I had a teacher who was known as a master printer. Students would ask, "How can I make a truly archival print?" His answer: "Show me something you make worth keeping, and I'll tell you."
Supported since v92 https://github.com/mozilla-mobile/fenix/issues/19785
A thing running on my computer should be able to communicate on a way no intermediary can decrypt with your computer.

This is not nearly so fuzzy as you imply. Signal gets it. Plenty of online systems can advertise & do end to end encryption. Your softened down incorrect definition is a mis-example: end to server to end is not e2e encryption.

Security keys should be useful on the web for end encryption. They are not. There is nothing to debate about this situation, itcs well defined & clear. The web is missing a huge gap.
CO2 density: 1562 kg/m^3

Sand density: 1520-1680 kg/m^3

LN2: 806 kg/m^3

CO2 is just disappearing sand as far as these systems are concerned. They probably use the same equipment that they use for sand.

Plus LN2 is way colder and harder to handle and also it's a liquid.
Where did they come up with this name?
No, I understand how big Hikonyan was. I doubt even 1% of that success trickled down to most of the other mascots.
Being guilty of a lot of things doesn't necessarily mean they are guilty of all the things. Are they guilty of all of things they are accussed, or just accepted as the culprit because they're the Russians? If I was wanting to attack US tech, I'd be sure to make it look Russian.

I'm not Tucker Carlson trying to get you to think Russia isn't all bad, but I'm also saying that when it comes to hacking, there could be others involved.
> A hacker who manages to infect the industrial equipment that controls wind turbines could manipulate the machines’ brakes to stop power production, said Trond Solbert, managing director for cybersecurity at Norwegian risk-management company DNV GL.

Do that to a couple thousand wind turbines and yes, "better buy their gas now". Even better if you do it the other direction - take the brakes off in a storm, and you get https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l3tqjuvy7i0.

There's a lot of interest in this sort of thing. https://www.wired.com/story/how-30-lines-of-code-blew-up-27-...
It seems you don’t understand the notion of conditional share ownership. These aren’t bearer bonds or cryptocurrency. Within the corporate structure that allowed you to be issued/sold these shares at the outset are stipulations that the board can liquidate your shares, under certain conditions. Evidently, those conditions have been met. An arbitrary definition of ‘fair’ doesn’t play into it.
If they can't generate power from renewables and the only option left is Russian gas, then it is likely.
I think to test this, to make sure it doesn't become Truth Social (where all speech is free, but speech against the owner is bannable), that someone needs to tweet critical and/or trolling things about Musk all the time, as a sort of canary. For example, this photo of him and Ghislaine Maxwell.

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2020/07/03/20/30363780-8488279-...

I don't doubt his vision of free speech but I highly doubt his ability to prevent his ego from getting in the way of executing it. This is the same person that cancelled someone's Telsa order out of spite when they were overly critical of a launch event.
It’s about the fact that those adversarial inputs can be designed in by whoever creates the model without the existence of those inputs being detectable (within reasonable computational bounds) by analyzing the model. Moreover, apparently any input can be slightly tweaked to become such an adversarial input, if you know the right key. That means that the model can be made to “lie” on roughly any input, without that fact being detectable on the model.
I thought this would be about spending quarantine time eating sorbet and refactoring Ruby code.
The shareholders appointed the board to act as their fiduciaries in respect to the governance of the company. They voted for them. Among the powers they granted them is the power to accept an offer to buy the company.

If you bought shares after the last annual shareholders' meeting, well... presumably you were happy enough with the current board members and the company bylaws to buy the shares in the first place. You did... do some diligence before you invested, right?
Assuming Twitter is serious about publishing their feed algorithm [1], it's possible they're merely anticipating the EU's upcoming Digital Services Act which was finalized over the weekend. Among other things, the Act will compel large platforms to "make the working of their recommender algorithms (used for sorting content on the News Feed or suggesting TV shows on Netflix) transparent to users." [2]

Twitter's EU user base is probably [3] above the 45 million threshold that triggers the strictest transparency requirements under the Act. So perhaps they figure if they're going to be forced to disclose anyway, they might as well do it proactively.

[1] If it's even coherent to talk about their feed ranking system as a single algorithm — see the other comments in this thread.

[2] https://www.theverge.com/2022/4/23/23036976/eu-digital-servi...

[3] https://www.statista.com/statistics/242606/number-of-active-...
Being a https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perfect_graph is not monotonic under adding edges, and it's certainly an interesting property for a graph to have! (But yes, most interesting properties are monotonic under adding edges)
I could see GPT-3 being added in the empty space.
Wrt 2:

It's a bit complicated. The "market price" isn't really the target here, if you are talking about the price of the stock on stock exchanges. It's accepted that there is a thing called a "control premium" - basically it is more valuable to own >50% of a company because in addition to having an economic stake, you can now control the company. So when you are buying a company, you generally have to pay more (20%+) than the "market price" because you are also purchasing the "control premium".

So, there is a zero sum game going on here. That control premium is going to be divided up between the buyer and the seller based on the strength of their bargaining positions. For various reasons (poison pill included) board has a stronger negotiating position in extracting the "control premium" than do individual investors. If you weaken the current shareholder's bargaining position (by for example not allowing the board to negotiate price) you increase the share of the control premium going to the purchaser and decrease the share going to the current shareholders.

FWIW the poison pill is controversial. But from a "Law and Econ" perspective - this is the main justification.
Seattle's KING-FM radio is good at making classical music more approachable, and they present the tale the Adagio as one of their juiciest intros whenever they play it. I'd never heard this much about the Adagio's background (a classical DJ can only provide so much detail in 30 seconds or less), but their attitude has always been more or less "wherever it came from, let's enjoy it."
$20 says it's the "dark" timeline. People will stay on Twitter for a while, but then the spam/ads/bots/pr0n/neo-nazi/harrassment will reach a tipping point, and almost everyone will bail out. It'll be like when News Corp bought Myspace for half-a-billion, then sold it for $35 million.

dril will need a new home, but we'll always have Milkshake Duck, corncobbing and facing God and walking backwards into Hell.
Wow this feels historic for some reason.
Lines of code and number of files is equally meaningless as nearly any other metric of complexity. I'm inclined to say that changing 178 files probably means they're too small.
I don't know that we are. I recall large enforcement actions against employers by previous administrations.

Why was / is there such resistance to mandating e-verify for more employers?
Signal is a chat app (a very good one!), not a generic application layer like HTTP. When we're talking about the breadth of the services available on the web, there are plenty of contexts in which TLS is an E2E scheme. Not every use of TLS is E2E, but I didn't claim that.
This precisely points out the problem. Moderation is human, algorithms can't do it and humans are inconsistent.

I've been a moderator before, within a team of moderators. There were varying views within that group from 'ban the slightest aggression or just disliked person' to 'give people as many chances as can be afforded, ban is last resort (my view).'

Members got 'banned for nothing!' or regarded as 'why is that person still here?' Depending who you asked both statements were wrong...

It just doesn't scale massively without something like Reddit's subsite moderation structure. FB, Twitter, etc all can't do it at scale across one public community and algorithms can never be nuanced enough and are extremely vulnerable to political/ideological bias ('misinformation' labels are a simple example of this, regardless of what you think of their accuracy or usefulness).
It’ll be something about race
Huh, really? I have tweetbot for Mac. I thought I looked and it didn't block promoted tweets on iOS anymore. I'll check it out thanks.
Something Sharp
The AI Writer pages should be logos with the header "ENGINEERED TO GET YOU HIRED AT TOP COMPANIES"

Which URL besides "https://www.rezi.ai/rezi-blockchain-verified-resume" have the press logos on them?

https://www.forbes.com/sites/ashleystahl/2021/03/10/how-ai-w...

https://thenextweb.com/news/your-resume-gets-six-seconds-to-...

https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/345208

https://nypost.com/2020/01/02/this-resume-app-can-help-you-l...

https://mashable.com/deals/jan-2-rezi-resume-software-subscr...

https://www.nbcnews.com/select/shopping/punch-your-resume-le...
> Netflix is a media company that was valued like a software business. Software businesses have near-zero marginal costs. Media businesses have very high marginal costs; making just one more show is not the same as adding one more feature to your ERP SaaS offering.

Zero marginal cost has nothing to do with the cost of developing a software feature (or a show), it refers to the cost of adding and servicing one more customer or user.

Originally it was often used in a theoretical sense, as the cost of getting another copy of your software on a retail shelf wasn't really all that close to zero, but it certainly kept dropping from year to year, and with the advent of the web, downloadable applications, and SaaS business models the marginal costs dropped enough that Freemium business models became possible, and even wildly profitable, especially if you were deriving some business value from the free users in aggregate that you were selling to the paying customers.

Anyway. The zero marginal cost model is a really good way to think about Netflix's fight with ISPs over interconnect fees. It wasn't that Netflix couldn't afford the fees the ISPs were demanding in order to allow their customers to connect to Netflix without throttling, or even that it would have impacted their profits much. Rather, those fees would simply have messed up Netflix's ability to lay claim to having a zero marginal cost business model (because the fees would scale with the number of users), which would have nuked their PE ratio and driven their valuation down.
> It sounds like a robbery, plain and simple.

A lot of work and planning goes into the sale of a company, and there are a _lot_ of safeguards to ensure such a sale isn't done in a way intended to "rob" a large amount of shareholders[0]. You don't really "own" a stock in the regular sense of ownership simply because of the absolute mass of laws and regulations that surround both what you can do with your shares and how much they're worth.

0: https://www.lw.com/thoughtLeadership/the-latham-and-watkins-...
I knew about hot-racking. That actually makes sense. But why not 8-hour shifts instead of 6?
Among Europe’s Ex-Royals
"horrifying"

This is the "phobia" part of "transphobia".
The relations are not as bad as the media portrays them, and stuff like this would actually make them worse.

It also looked like iraq had weapons of mass destruction and iraqi soldiers were killing babies... but a few years later, it looked a bit different.

This war is just one of the many in the last decades, and the west only cares, because it's the russians doing it and not americans/nato. The world that didn't care about a 20 year long occupation of afghanistan (... and iraq, syria, libya, etc.), because the media didn't tell them to care... now they care, again, because of the media. So yeah... an attack, where russia literally gains nothing and the result is only worse relations seems iffy to me.
They're a fleet-in-being: their mere existence limits what an adversary can plan to do. In the case of boomers, they limit the ability of the adversary to plan a successful nuclear war
I've noticed Apple products can feel like they buzz when plugged in, but I assumed it was just the inverter and poor grounding...

Do you think a multimeter or oscilloscope would be able to pick up the potential between the device and ground?
Nobody is forced to use Twitter. You don't get to vote against Elon, but you can simply stop using the service. On the other hand, you have no option to stop using your government, short of moving to a different country.

The billionaires you mention can only remain powerful as long as they can convince people to willingly hand over money in exchange for the goods and services they provide. They don't get to collect taxes at the point of a gun or simply print money the way the government does.
Yes, Google has a quadrillion internet search queries, but that only helps if your interested in solving problems that require a quadrillion internet search queries.
I think they may be referring to legal precedent that has been set, I.e. fire in a crowded theater, but that’s just my off the top of my head guess from mobile
You don't perceive people in powerful positions being assholes as a problem?
So then he'll be doing what he said he didn't want to happen, just now to the people he doesn't like?
Slightly tongue in cheek, but perhaps you could use ML to automatically typeset it. I've seen some ML that would convert a design to HTML and I'd imagine this isn't too far removed from that.
The most effective method to make Passive Income utilizing EGC.
The National Portrait Gallery: Ways to make a good museum better
In my experience, it varies. The common theme I've seen is that people with serious paranoia issues tend to turn on their friends and those who love them the most.

I'm not trying to say they aren't capable, only asking the question of how large the differential might be.
I can't speak for Europe, but I see that container trucks are already a significant fraction of America's highways. I can't imagine a few electric Hummers will make much difference.
What is preventing anyone from posting the comment word for word on Twitter? I don't even use Twitter much and I've seen worse.
Because of originals like Return to Space, Fyre, and Formula 1?

Sen..si..tive.
Yeah... not buying it. If russia did that, it would make them even less likely to buy russian gas again... they'd probably just buy overly expensive electricity from neighboring countries and fix their wind production.
Uber faces $26M (AUD) fine after admitting to misleading Australian customers
Would be interested in the CCP article
Obvs, and capacity per unit weight is one such front. But my question was specific: he said 3x, coming to market in 3 years, or by 2020. It has been longer, and capacity is up nowhere near 3x in places I watch.

Is it still to come, or did it not pan out? Judging from the link in the other reply, it is not expected until well after 2026. Shame he (probably) won't get to see it.
This is just flat-out wrong and it's a joke that this is the top comment on a "financially-savvy" forum.

Shares aren't a blockchain, you can't just perform a 51% attack.
Such a service exists. Here are two examples:

https://www.myscreenbreak.com/

https://waldenpond.press/