skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Show me something exciting I can do with it that I can't do with twitter, instagram, or Snapchat.

This is correct. Communities grow around "something". Create an utility, a game, or anything, and you have a community form around it. It's impossible to replace facebook with a new facebook because people are already in facebook.

Mastodon , Matrix etc are missing this key feature: Make it dead-simple to integrate with an existing community. Let every wordpress site easily integrate their users with mastodon or matrix, and you will see adoption. As it stands right now, people don't have a real incentive to run a server, maintain a community, and possibly be legally liable for that community. So only the typical ideologues of OSS will run instances, and they will be extra cautious because for them it is only a hobby.
Yep, as always, trained AI models can only be as good as the training data.
Nice to know, thank you.
> But it does seem more efficient than traditional speaker designs.

The numbers you have mentioned do not tell that. I have a pair of 4W speakers which can make impossible any dialogue in a 15m^2 room if working on full loudness. The secret is big but lightweight moving parts (diffusor of big square) and absence of bass.
It'll be cool if bellard ever figures out how to take on a competitor to dall-e with his very impressive technical chops
I am absolutely not well-versed in JS framework internals, but isn’t this reuse the difference between Solid’s <For> vs <Index>?
I can't understand why people fall for such obscurified nonsense. The concepts are based on one person's rather poetic imagination, and they are, like everything else in psycho-analysis, notoriously lacking evidence of any relation to reality, even by the low standards of psychology. To think that it is more than time-passing for attention seeking rich people is delusional.
You’re comparing short entertainment videos vs something meant to break down subjects and teach them bit by bit.

Nobody is using Vsauce to help them study a college course. The videos simply don’t exist, and I say this as someone who’s watched the channels you mentioned.
This is called observational bias.

Imo the truth is much scarier: advertises know us better than we known ourselves. There's also the idea that we are so alike, advertises can generalize to great success.
sesearch lets you query the rules on a system.

sesearch -A will show you every thing that is allowed, and gives you (a lot of) lines like:

allow httpd_t httpd_t:dir { getattr ioctl lock open read search };

Which says that things (i.e. processes) with the httpd_t label are allowed to perform getattr, ioctl, lock, open, read, and search operations on directories with the httpd_t label.

ps -Z and ls -Z will then list the labels of processes, and the labels of files and directories. If your processes label does not have an allow rule for your file label for the correct action you are denied.

The only trick really is that when it reports a label as say "system_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0" thats 4 different colon separated fields and the only one you really care about is the type field "httpd_t", because thats what the rules are defined for (unless you're the NSA or doing Very Interesting things (the other fields are user, role, and security level, but the default Red Hat etc selinux policies dont use them))

There is no wiki with definitive list of labels because they are just strings and the policy writer can call them what they like, even the _t suffix is just a convention to denote the type.
Maybe you could do something like Holoplot[1] does with their full size beamforming speakers.

[1] https://holoplot.com/technology/
It sounds like when all processors on the Earth will stop working... Not a good times it might be.
You don't seem to understand the fundamental contradiction. Demanding growth/capital accumulation, where there is no growth can only be satisfied by taking from one group and giving to another.

Endless hoarding in nature is not a problem, as your capital depreciates over time. This depreciation means that the amount of wealth you can store is a function of your ability to replenish the loss, i.e. your income. What capitalists have done is quite remarkable, they simply declare by force that this loss does not exist. So now everyone struggles to pass off this now hidden loss to everyone else, as if the division of labor were a negative sum game.

Imagine if you owed a capitalist 100 hours of your time and they decide to only use 50 hours of that and simply wait those 50 hours. You still owe the capitalist 50 hours but you also lost 50 hours from waiting(=unemployment). Your productivity must double to stand a chance. Another 100 hours pass, you lost 150 hours and must still work 50 hours. Now you must be four times as productive. Productivity must keep going up, just to stand still. At some point you are unable to increase your productivity at the rate your time is being lost and you are no longer able to give what is owed. The capitalist will now call you a thief, you stole the 50 hours you owe him, completely ignoring that your loss of time is far greater than 50 hours and yet as if to rub salt in the wound that time spent needlessly waiting is not worthy of being called theft.

I hope it is clear that "urgency" does not exist for those with money, only those with physical capital and those with mortal bodies that are dependent on work to earn money to afford the minimum quality of life society demands have to worry about that. I want people with money to worry just like everyone else, then nobody will have to worry.
You're missing the point that no bank wanted to loan Trump money. This was the wealth unit of DB, not DB proper, because they were already having problems getting their money back from Trump. The wealth unit was a way to connect foreign investors and loanees, meaning they didn't have to put up their own money and could avoid regulations around banking loans.
The problem is that we have built all our software on Unix. The Unix security model is based on an attack model where users have to be protected from each other on a terminal server. Code is implicitly trusted and exploits were an unknown unknown.

That security model is almost completely useless now. Terminal servers are an extreme edge case. Services implement their own security model between users. Special “Users” for services is just a hack that tries to use an inadequate system as much as possible.

The Unix security model is deeply baked in everywhere and it’s nearly impossible to tack on a security model fitting to todays requirements afterwards.
So too did MMA fighters when that sport first emerged.
I read GP as a joke referring to Fast's VCs lack of due diligence. If it was serious and not a Fast joke: that's even funnier.
Also, it ends with "don't forget to like and subscribe" in a Brazilian accent. x)
Lol. They’re building out an api. You can write apps in whatever language you want.
Right, but it does mean “we suggest you don’t use this”.
The logic is that you talk about dozens of things around your phone per day yet you never see an ad targeted at you, you only notice it on the rare occasion it does happen. So either Apple is deciding to only target you with ads very rarely or it’s a rare coincidence.
So, this looks like basically a flexible electrostatic speaker? Which means almost no bass and highly directional?
Back into consolidated revenue. Rarely are consumers made directly whole.
Fine Details of AWS Lambda Function URL Feature
Directional audio is produced by sound interacting with your ear, so this would not produce spatial audio (unless you would wrap your head in the thin film speaker). What you want is 1 speaker per ear and a software modelling of the HRTF:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Head-related_transfer_function
No some email will always get marked as spam.

It's the world we live in.
Your customers are used to it.

Most people are willing to hunt in spam folders for transactional email they care about.
Imagine how many decades of human lives were part of developing all this.
Russia cuts off Poland and Bulgaria from its gas in war escalation
No, the difference is that if you pass to Solid's <For> a signal to an array, and make a node for each of the values of that array, and then you change the signal to point to an empty array, then Solid just deletes those nodes and they eventually get garbage collected, if you then pass the signal an array containing some values then new nodes are recreated. The difference is that in Voby, if you explicitly opt into this, nodes are not deleted but kept in memory when going to an empty array, and new one are not created when going back to a non-empty array, those nodes kept in memory are repurposed.

As a rule of thumb if you don't have any API for explicitly opting into recycling it's not happening, it's not a safe optimization that can be applied all the time.
> It's about keeping ppl on track when the repetition and practice gets boring.

That's the missing ingredient for online learning. I think being part of a class, having friends there, and not wanting to be left behind plays a huge role.
I don’t think that generational GC can totally decouple pause times from heap size in the worst case, which is what is important for latency-oriented workloads.
Journald indeed supports structured logging.

Try `journalctl -o json` to see all the fields that get logged. Applications can add more.

So it very much means that a webserver logging to journald can already provide it all with fields for the vhost, status, URL, referer, and whatnot, and you can just search the log by that and don't need to do your own parsing.
> Unless you have 100% test coverage (and if you had, why do you still need a sandbox then?)

100% test coverage does not guarantee absence of vulnerabilities in any way.

> you will miss error handling and optional code paths that you didn't enable in the configuration, and handling code for circumstances you didn't trigger and didn't foresee.

Having sandboxed many things, this is plain false.

Normal applications and daemons have no reason to call reboot() or stime() and so on in any obscure code path.

If they do, the sandbox should stop them and that's a feature and not a bug.
I've been longer (but not much), and in my time programming I believe the biggest difference was pre-jquery vs post-jquery. I use React nowadays, and the jump from jQuery to React was IMHO smaller than the massive improvement to life that was jumping from non-jquery to jquery. Specially when accounting for all the community libraries, you could just plug and play massive projects that would take you months otherwise.
When do we need columnar queries? I never really found a need.
Yes I used AWS Redshift, but used it like a Postgres db.
As someone without a leg in this race, I found the added context of “lightly documented” useful. It does help tell the story
Lots of phones support relocking to a user provided key (OnePlus does for sure) but it's a less trusted state than locked to the vendor key, I don't think it counts as good enough for full SafetyNet
FTC Cybersecurity Compliance, GLBA, FCRA and SEC
That's not really great advice either, temporary solutions/workarounds have a tendency of sticking around permanently.
Does it really work, if they really want they'll implement it themselves like DocumentDB. Just makes everyone else's life hard.
Unless you happen to be a blind person or something like that.

But I share your sentiment nonetheless, I have zero desire to become part of the group of persons that got used to voice control and would therefore miss it if it wasn't available (as long as I don't turn blind I guess)

For the blind however, I guess it's a huge win that ad-driven voice control gadgets exist and are available to them. I'm sure their options would be basically nonexistent if they were the entire market.
> These are civil, white collar crimes.

> It's the same concept. If a corporation commits a civil crime, the maximum in damages it can repay is the amount of damage it caused, give or take interest.

It sounds like you're just making that up. I found the agency and the page on the regulation being breached:

https://www.accc.gov.au/business/business-rights-protections...

The maximum penalties per breach of the ACL including unconscionable conduct, making false or misleading representations, and supplying consumer goods or certain services that do not comply with safety standards or which are banned:

For corporations, will be the greater of:

* $10,000,000*
* 3 times the value of the benefit received, or
* 10% of annual turnover in preceding 12 months, if court cannot determine benefit obtained from the offence.

The penalty for this particular "civil crime" (if that is actually what it's called), does not talk about repaying damages at all, and it can be 3 times the value of the benefit.

So what's the basis for what your seemingly contradictory claims?
Cap is Only Part of the Story, we need PACELC
I reckon this is great for anyone who already can self learn when they were in high school.

The cons is that how many people were self motivated in high school? I certainly wasn't. Online highschools fail those who need mentors and teachers to push them forward.
Best Marketing Twitter Threads
> Youth is not an achievement. Experience is.

Old man yells at cloud vibes here.

> It's also a data breach incident (denial of service, unavailability)

How is unavailability a data breach?!
I think op is talking about beamforming when he talks about directional audio, where a large array of speakers would allow you to e.g. send audio in one direction only. The more speakers, the tighter the control.
By "full-stack" here I mean frameworks which handle both the frontend and backend simultaneously, in a seamless way. The closest thing framework that I remember from the MVC/P era which attempted this was Meteor.js, but it was really horrendous to use in my experience.

Otherwise, it was very common practice to serve an Ember or Angular app as static files Nginx or directly on a CDN. Wrapping them in a server-side framework was always a bespoke process which required you to effectively maintain two frameworks, and stitch them together yourself (unless you count Ember + Rails in the early days, but even that is a stretch IMO). When SSR was introduced in any framework, it was usually not used to its full potential to be able to accomplish the use cases I discuss in the post, like authentication, API endpoints, etc. It was just used to render the app on the server. It did not fundamentally change the DX of the framework.

I honestly was pretty skeptical of these latest frameworks until I gave them a shot! It doesn't sound that revolutionary until you actually start using them, and things which were previously quite difficult become absolutely trivial. I highly recommend trying them out some time.
I always liked the Khan model where you do the theory at home and in school you do the work on online platform.

The teacher can focus on helping the people who need help, or ask a more advanced student to help out the struggling student.

The also allows that in school you could do more interesting stuff then just the teacher giving the same boring lectures over and over.

For me, I would have blown down the math part of the whole thing like 3 years early and would have had so much more time on French. Not that I would have enjoyed that but still.
>old tickets usually don't get migrated to the new system

Well, our current issue tracker was migrated from Jira and I can still see all the ancient Jira tickets just fine (I mean what's important: the comments).

In any case, something is better than nothing at all.
Apparently you haven’t. DrPhysicsA is literally ALL of physics. Strang is ALL of linear algebra. For any topic there’s someone who’s done it better then KA. I agree that it requires meta-organization, and that’s a valuable contribution, but KA should stick to that par, bcs their teachers are uniformly soporific.
I was responding to the claim about “main thing is customer explicit consent. one where customer fully understands what he consents to.” Maybe I misunderstood.
This is complete nonsense. You’re clearly not an Australian lawyer.

Deterrence is regularly a factor in civil infringement cases brought by regulators.

In other civil lawsuits, ordinarily damages are strictly ‘compensatory’. However, ‘exemplary’ damages also exist in some circumstances; and functionally identical to punitive damages.

https://legalvision.com.au/what-are-exemplary-damages/
> but containers aim to provide many of the same benefits that SELinux does

Absolutely not. They are not designed as security tools in the first place. Especially docker, with its huge attack surface.

You are confusing containers with sandboxes.

Furthermore they don't implement anything resembling RBAC.
> and then you're running "privileged" WASM routines

That's pretty much where snap ended at, isn't it?
Actually docker is much worse due to the large attack surface.
Streaming and "professional esports" are very different. Sometimes there are overlapping parts.

> Even ppl who suck at gaming are making huge income with streaming

Who? Ppl who suck at gaming but have a big audience have other skills (e.g. they are entertaining).
Additionally, they are trying to imply the common trope of “voice assistants are listening to everything we say all day for ads”, whereas their test methodology was to actively use the top skills for those interests and perform actions.

While I don’t like the sharing of such data for ads, it’s a far cry from Alexa processing voice in the background with zero interaction.
If they can make this transparent all the way through, it might be useful for creating tactile interface on capacitive touchscreens.
bees against honey
My bad. I guess earning ~$100k is in-sufficient.

https://changelog.com/posts/i-just-hit-100000-per-year-on-gi...
Exemplary damages is the Australian legal term of art for damages that are functionally identical to punitive damages.
This leads to the more interesting side that he's built a custom inference setup to run more efficiently.

> TextSynth employs a custom inference framework to get faster inference (hence lower costs) on standard GPUs and CPUs.
This only makes sense if you believe in a transcendent soul which controls the body but is unaffected by it. Otherwise, you must accept that your body influences your decisions.
A lot of fiction isn't just about "look at this whacky world I invented". Especially dystopic fiction usually tries to tell us something about our own world and its potential future.

But the main point with my comment was to re-frame what was advocated, from their fantasy of "one small store owner doing the best for their customers" into "a surveillance system where every corporation tracks your every move for profit".
Cool, imagine wall-paper made out of this stuff ...

Could it disrupt the hifi speaker market?
Also, what is the point of a fine if it doesn't go to the people that the company wronged? Where does this money go? To the corrupt government entities that don't give a shit about the fees consumers have been charged?
The parent comment is completely incorrect as to their understanding of Australian law.
Honestly, I'd be most interested in whether or not I'm still alive. I'm sure there are plenty of ways to get rich or famous, but those aren't exactly interesting. It's highly doubtful any significant changes in society or human nature would come about in such a short time, and politics are more likely depressing than useful or inspiring.
I think rainbow six siege is pretty niche comparing to Valorant, Apex Legends or (more in asia) Staraft.
I don't think transparency of internal Company controls/audits has anything to do with Section 230.

Section 230, in brief, only provides immunity for social media providers from being responsible for the content that is posted by users on their platform. It has nothing to do with internal company policies. Rather, Section 230 actually enables internet companies to moderate content through the Good Samaritan protection.

So, it is actually worse that Twitter was moderating content in majority countries (except USA) where Section 230 wasn't even recognized. Revealing what exactly happened behind the scenes would not be a sufficient reason for litigation.

When Twitter was pulled up in India for its opaque moderation policies, it tried to quote American laws for its defense. In fact, when Jan 6th happened in USA, Twitter was quick to ban accounts of those who took part in the protests. 70,000 accounts were purged from Twitter. However, Twitter refused to ban accounts of those Khalistani terrorists who vandalized the Red Fort on Jan 26th in India and only partially complied with Government of India's orders. This double standard was visible to majority of Indians. So it is not like Twitter actually follows the laws set by the Country it is operating in either. There are multiple instances where Twitter has refused to follow directions by Government of India or by the Courts in India. You can read more about it here: https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/have-to-follow-ind...

So yes, moderation policies cannot be opaque. It has to be transparent. The reason for transparency is so that we know exactly why and for what reason was an account banned/shadow banned. If the Government of India sends a legal request for take down of accounts, it has to be complied with. Twitter cannot decide to invoke US laws in India.

Also, read this to understand more about this issue: https://techcrunch.com/2021/08/10/twitter-now-in-compliance-...
civil infringements can incorporate deterrence as a factor for damages awards also
> Most of what they complain about have tooling, documentation and solutions. They're just not using them.

OP's problem is that they do not want to learn. In general - if you see a person complaining about SELinux - it's because they have no interest in learning.
Deterrence is a factor in civil infringement contexts also
After working on a number of projects that tried to apply conventional commits properly, I found something like this to be more effective and sustainable.

Specifically, I'm quite fond of https://gitmoji.dev

- Commit messages are shorter, even with ticket IDs.

- Commit log is easy to read

- Less prone to typos (chroe vs chore)

- Easy to enforce with push rules

- Easy to generate changelogs/release notes

- Easy to measure (metrics)

- Helpful IDE integrations

- It's a bit more fun than conventional commits

See https://github.com/tiangolo/fastapi for an example
I think OP means e.g. a video call where each person's voice is played back from where their mouth is displayed on screen.
Fedora comes with manpages. So for instance, say you want to place http pages outside of /var/www. Fedora comes with the selinux-policy-doc package, which gives you the httpd_selinux manpage:

https://linux.die.net/man/8/httpd_selinux

It's a tad dense, but in the Sharing Files you can find a section explaining what context is used and for what. You can also look at the existing context, eg:

$ ls -laZ /var/www
total 4
drwxr-xr-x. 4 root root system_u:object_r:httpd_sys_content_t:s0 33 mar 17 17:32 .
drwxr-xr-x. 21 root root system_u:object_r:var_t:s0 4096 abr 18 10:57 ..
drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root system_u:object_r:httpd_sys_script_exec_t:s0 6 mar 17 17:32 cgi-bin
drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root system_u:object_r:httpd_sys_content_t:s0 6 mar 17 17:32 html

And copy those for your own use.