skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
There's problems on any side, if they're direct FAA employees they end up being paid way more than other similar FAA employees - though given that the only major airplane manufacturer is Boeing you could just charge Boeing enough to pay all FAA airplane examiners the requisite amount.
Pure speculation, but if I had to hazard a guess, it's because the job is becoming increasingly inhumane.

More and more, nurses have to act like robots to remain in compliance, and that's not what any of them signed up for, and the increasing lack of intangible reward that comes from caring for people and creating a human connection, means they demand more explicit monetary reward for temporarily suppressing their humanity to do the job.
Oh god, if there is anything I despise in marketing, it is bullshit like this. It is just insulting.
"a Java VM" =/= the JVM most people's understanding of the word.
My issue with fast mail et all is storage is so unnecessarily expensive. I have many gigs of email that I don’t want to lose, but I also don’t want to pay many tens of dollars/month to host it.
I took the question differently, but I may be wrong. I took the question as which tech industries will do well in the coming recession so as to work for them and have solid dependable employment during the recession, not how to invest to take advantage of it. I suppose I took it that way because that's my place in the world (a worker not an investor).
A hospital isn't the place to be unless you have a specific, acute need to be there.

They're looking to stabilize you and get you able to survive outside the hospital, not to solve a mystery.

Great place to go if you need it, though. Got internal bleeding? Get that taken care of. The risk of a debilitating or fatal hospital error isn't that high, so absolutely go when the risk of not going is high.

TV, though, has trained us to expect to get everything figured out and root causes solved too. Unfortunately, that's just not realistic even if many of the complaints in this thread were solved. There are a lot of nasty rare diseases and conditions, and strange manifestations of conditions, that will still be missed if they have 60 minutes with you instead of 8.

You should also realize that doctor quality varies as much as any other skill. SHOP AROUND. I've had better luck with second, third opinions than I have trying to pester an original doctor into changing their mind. There are doctors out there who appreciate it if you bring up a written self-history of the condition, the strange aspects or other things that may or may not be related, what has or hasn't worked so far, etc.
You can equally define helper functions to update registers in C.
Today I struggle much more with finding relevant information and having to sift through endless SEO crap and fake articles. Back in the days (early 2000s to early 2010s) I would have enjoyable information consumption and discussions with people freely, nowadays I have to filter through a lot of crap and have to be careful how I speak in order to have discussions.
On the other hand, I just had a lengthy conversation with my dad on why he shouldn't drink chlorine dioxide, and that a Bitchute video from a guy who got a "doctor's of philosophy of medicine" from a diploma mill who had a patent application on drinking it to cure COVID, was selling books and lectures on his crockpotery, and had charges brought against him for two deaths resulting from drinking the thing might not be the best authority on the topic.

For people that are very good at research, self-advocacy and research is absolutely a night and day difference from just going in to the doctor for 15 minutes and being rushed through the system. If not for that in my own chronic health condition, I'd be on immune suppressants right now vs a much lighter treatment regimen in conjunction with generic/supplements supported in limited academic research abroad (the funding bias in research for patented vs generic/non-patentable treatments is its own topic).

But that's not the majority of people, and far too many think that they are capable of "doing their own research" when they aren't equipped to do so at all.

Particularly when it comes to medicine, that's a dangerous misconception, and Dunning-Kreuger is actively killing people who can't discern between snake oil and a meta-analysis.

So many of the people doctors are dealing with that are Googling ARE idiots who endanger themselves with their 'research.' Which sucks for the people who are actually good researchers and dealing with biases towards self-research.

Though in my experience, typically good doctors very quickly realize you're adequate at research and work with you as a treatment partner, and it's the people like my dad who will fight against actual research efforts in a quest for confirmation bias.
I don‘t quite understand why most of that wasn‘t blocked on their (i guess) government ISP?
Sleep is also a competitor to screen usage.
No, because they already know this is going on, and they know the small number of phone models available in NK.
I don't mean to by cynical, but this is kind of my feeling. Throughout the pandemic I saw story and story about nurses getting overworked and being underappreciated. There was lots of talk of a nurse exodus.. and yet it's never happened. Even now it's just talk of a possible exodus. Maybe there are just no similar fields to switch into with comparable pay, but it seems as though nurses are sticking it out in the grand scheme. Are plenty of older nurses retiring? Yes. Are some younger nurses also leaving the field after being burned? Yep. But for the majority of nurses, the pay is still worth all the difficulty they see. Hearing about a co-worker getting attacked by an anti-vax patient is alarming, but until it happens to you you're not gonna make any major life changes to avoid that
They can open-source the specifications and protocols these tools use and let someone else build Windows versions if they wanted to.
Yeah he seems very depressive, going through some personal stuff.

I think his (pinboard) Twitter-bio said something dark like "The light inside is broken, but I still work" at some point.
If two apps can both identify a user then they will be able to combine that data. Apple took away the one identifier they controlled. What are they going to do next?
That's true, even if you switch DNS, they can still see the destination IP of every connection you make. That still means they can't see individual search terms though.
May be you've been grandfathered into a white list when things weren't so sophistcated 20 years ago?

Have you tried setting up a brand new email server with a fresh IP from say, Digital Ocean or AWS?
I will probably order 2-3 sets of parts just to have on-site using some random serial numbers of issued equipment. That should give me the flexibility you mention.

This is still not enough, but for large companies with strict security policies it is a welcome development. Basically, having ability to achieve factory seal on a display assembly in-house for approximately $1000 in equipment is a huge win.
I like that word because it illustrates America better. You're always on the edge of multiple cliffs:

the deportation cliff;

the prison cliff;

the insurance doesn't pay the doctor the half million they extort cliff;

the no financial aid cliff;

the debt cliffs (more like a mountain range unto themselves);

the you're fired or unemployment on your resume or bad resume cliff;

the addiction cliff;

the fertility (especially for women) cliff;

the sickly child cliff;

the disability cliff;

the homelessness or lose your house or get evicted[1] cliff;

And my personal favorite: the lobotomy cliff. It's the beautiflest as seen from below!

There's others I'm sure. Lots of cliffs to go around! Everybody gets lots of cliffs! No parachutes though, but if you're looking for a good time you can ride a motorcycle off them!

[1] So this one is...it's weird. I talked to a homeless kid (over 18 yeah but still a kid) and asked him, "so what do I do if I end up on the street? What strategies..."

"Just don't end up on the street."

"But if I DO end up on the street then what I do is I..."

"No. The street is cruel. You wake up with people spitting on you, or pissing on you, depends on the night. You for one, you specifically would get gutted and murdered by the guy you pissed off the other time who threatened to do just that. Just do whatever the FUCK you have to do WHATEVER ANYBODY ASKS to not end up homeless."

That's what I call a cliff.
10b/year of improvements. Who else is doing this?
I have to ask: what mechanisms are in place to thwart cheating? Specifically, paying for someone to take all those tests in your stead. Though it's possible to cheat at traditional universities in individual courses, it becomes increasingly hard over the duration demanded for attendance even on an accelerated schedule for lots of small reasons that add up.
Not sure if the last sentence is in jest or not, but here's a list of crashes for just one of their plane models:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_accidents_and_incident...
I don't mind a significant portion of the funds going to help minorities out.

Ah, but which minorities are those?
> The odds that an 18-22yo traditional college student will overlook a 5-9 year age gap because you share a lot of interests and can have interesting conversations are much higher than the odds that another 13yo will overlook the fact that you have no shared interests at all because hey, you're the same age.

I see both as same odds - mainly zero.

A lot of people ITT who are like, “I’m so high IQ - I went to college when I was 13” like many of us out here didn’t have that option. (Rubs very much the same way of r/iamverysmart) It’s not as difficult as people make it sound. Most of your education growing up is a complete joke - it’s just babysitting. Exclaiming that you were some version of detective Conan is also quite cringe.
check out this post[0] on some alternatives. We missed engineyard and a few others but it can help give some context.

[0] https://tooltip.com/reports/managed-hosting-or-paas-for-boot...
When IBM acquired Tivoli, preserving the company-hosted Friday beer bash was part of the contract.
Data collection, anti-trust and privacy policies. Right now it is the wild west and consumers have no idea what is being collected and how they are being profiled for ads.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wqn3gR1WTcA
But what do you care how they file names are stored on disk, as long as you can read directories and traverse paths using UTF-8?
> re-designing a layout that minimizes travel time for nurses when they are delivering to patients.

I think talking about micro-optimizations like this misses the forest through the trees.

It's neat and cool. Fun to wring out those last bits of efficiency. But the fact you even need to discuss it shows how hiring adequate amount of bedside staff is the absolute last thing any medical system will do.

> revert to simple heuristics that left them understaffed at some times while being overstaffed at others

Showing that they were better than modern day automated shift planning.

I will submit that if your hospital floor staff is not 50% idle on your average given fully-staffed boring day, you are understaffed. Only extremely exceptional events should cause your staff to be booked 100%. When it happens it should be root cause analyzed and be immediate cause for executive concern.

The trope of card playing nurses should be true, because of all industries there are - you want surge capacity in healthcare. Both physically speaking in terms of warm bodies available, as well as mentally speaking in brains not being stressed to their max the entire shift.

I understand these ideas don't end up with maximal efficiency. I am likely naive as well - but it's pretty clear that hospital systems are being operated in an intentional manner to keep staffing cut to the bone right up until the point the system or people break.

This doesn't just hold true for healthcare, it's endemic in a lot of service industries where the bottom tier employees are expected to live in service of the profession and take up all the slack from above.
> Children often get upset about rules that are enforced on them, and feel "worse off." Doesn't mean it's harm.

Are you saying that losing the benefit of the special district doesn't actually make Disney worse off, and that they are just an immature corporate child lacking the maturity to understand the benefit Daddy DeSantis and Mommy Leg are giving them by taking away their Reedy Creek sucker?

Or is this a complete non-sequitur to distract from the fact that Disney would, in fact, be worse off after the change?
Do you live next to the freeway? EVs will reduce car noise in low speed neighborhoods
How do you automate setting that environment variable?
Incidentally, Tesla cars come with a music production app called Trax [1] pre-installed, which is actually just a re-skinned fork of LMMS [2]. Perhaps Kia might port this to their in-car infotainment systems in a similar way?

[1] https://cleantechnica.com/2020/01/16/the-hyphenate-makes-a-b...

[2] https://github.com/teslamotors/lmms/tree/Trax/0.1
Definitely, but it's more ergonomically annoying with IDE stuff others complained about. [1]

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31185723
So...Disney would be worse off without it?
I think maybe I'm miscommunicating the point. Yes, if overtime isn't needed people should be sent home. Hospitals agree on this; they don't want to pay overtime if it's not needed.

The issue I'm pointing to is that sometimes it's "needed" because of a bad process, like when there is redundant work. Sometimes it's needed because the system needs slack to compensate for disruptions in system dynamics. Sometimes it's "needed" because "that's how we've always done things." Point being, if it's needed, it should be because it contributes directly to better patient outcomes rather than bad processes.
If you can only speak in terms of partials/other-math-lingo - it speaks more to your own limits than the limits of others.

This is something you should - uh - think about.

I mean this honestly. Being able to convey ideas to many people of different backgrounds is a skill and an intellectual pursuit. If you’re incapable of talking to people except in nerd shit - you’re not really any smarter or whatnot than them. You’re just insular.
Plenty of low end titles also have good comfort options without requiring top tier GPUs to achieve stable framerates, my personal picks are Rec Room for a social experience and "Garden of the Sea" for a chill single player experience. Both have snap-turn and teleportation as first-class movement option.

I wanted to go deeper (esp. with VRChat) so I eventually caved in to free movement. It was very motion sickness inducing at first, but doing it bit by bit you get used to it after a while.

Personal recommendation for any VR experience: I have a bar stool in my VR space where I can lie on or just sit. The difference from a chair is that it doesn't offset you vertically when you lie/sit, which tends to mess with games.
Agreed on both points. However, tribal politics don't really get nuance or follow details closely.

Simply by appearing to be attacked by the left, Musk gets interest/support from the right (or, at least, the not-left). The old right is dying, literally, from a demographic perspective. With the gradual removal of the current dead-weight (heh) of conservative boomers, the right is necessarily going to shift from reactionary paleo-conservatism to something else.

The right's skepticism of science is substantially (but not entirely) directed towards science institutions not the scientific method per se, i.e., conspiracies are hiding the real science. Although Musk is not to the right, he comes across as turning over entrenched institutions (the good old boy clubs of the space and transportation industries). As long as Musk doesn't overtly attack the right, they may be broadly supportive.
I agree with you, and I wanted them to know my needs so we all succeed. Hilariously the guy never asked my pay needs (low) and talked to me about the top of the pay range. I didn't care to correct him since the expectation was overtime all the time for everybody. Looks like a management culture I don't want to struggle against, so I can look elsewhere.
Meta owns over 50% of the VR headset market (over 60% of the headsets used on SteamVR). With the amount of money they are pumping into the space, combined with how invested Zuck is personally, there is no doubt that they will dominate this market. They are investing huge sums of money just to get developers to build for their platform. If you are long on VR, you should be long on Meta.
Yes that never made the slightest sense to me. As someone married with a kid, when I get a raise or bonus it goes to my retirement -- not as a change in quality of life for a child who already has food/shelter/education. The kid still gets the same amount now as when I made significantly less. The idea that a kid needs more money because you worked overtime is quite possibly one of the dumbest ideas I've ever heard. At best it's simply backdoor alimony.
Brutal, but not entirely false.

There is something to be said for writing a book that people claim to have read, though.
Its just corpspeak for "we don't want to commit to you getting time off or a possible slight payout"
This thread is such a train wreck. Just admit you hate Apple and it doesn't matter what they do, you will find a way to make it a bad thing. Some of the complaints here are just hilarious.

What kind of equivalent program does Google offer for Pixels?
The other distinguishing feature of those "reviews" is that they often take the form of "Author A.B wants to write an essay about X. Here are 3 or 4 books somehow related to X that A.B will comment on during the course of their essay."
Fly.io isn't one of the "three big CSP's" but they are awesome.
I just wanted to add on to your comment - if someone's looking for a high-quality design house/organization (though not in the typical sense), I'd highly recommend looking at Type7. They're based off Porsche from what I understand, and while most of their content appears to be on Instagram (and in some ways they're more a collaborator rather than a design studio), they've got an absolutely amazing aesthetic.
Good documentation around how proprietary software behaves so it can be troubleshot (in the automotive field this already exists, they don't give you raw source code but they give you the exact sequence of operations under which a trouble code is set - for example, "this DTC is set if the battery voltage goes below 11V for 2 seconds" or oscilloscope waveforms of raw sensor signals) and a ban on bullshit restrictions in the name of "security" such as the binding of Touch ID buttons to the mainboard.
No, I meant that using Chinese networking equipment was banned because it wouldn't have a Five Eyes backdoor.
No, more likely you'd see a ton of alternative medicine and self-diagnostic/treatment options for young people. I'm not entirely sure that I wouldn't want this.
Yeah, it'd be a bad look for a self-publisher, but it seems like traditional publishing has enough indirection that it could work... and compared to the sausage-making that drives "book buzz" it's relatively mild.
When I read "instrument" and "kia" in the same headline I was expecting something creating music of creaking, ratting, flapping, grinding, whistling, or scratching sounds.
Disappointing that for all the work they did, they didn't look at an actual piano to get the key geometry right. Specifically, black keys aren't centered between the two adjacent white keys, they are offset to allow all keys (white and black) to be approximately equal width at the back of the keyboard.

It looks weird and awkward the way they do it.

See: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29941801#29943285
You can’t argue with these people. Almost double the software support period and average device service life of the nearest competitors still counts as ‘planned obsolescence’, yet none of those competitors get dinged for their device lifetimes. It’s complete dislocation from reality.
I do, and don't have a good solution unfortunately. I'm more of a short attention span reader - I'll read a few paragraphs on something but usually not more.

But I find myself reading constantly. So much so my wife keeps asking me to take a break and rest my eyes.

As a result, I feel like I actually know a little bit about a whole lot, which isn't that useful other than maybe trivia. Also, my memory has become pretty bad, which I attribute to reading too much, but it could just be age catching up with me.
If it was only open to their customers, that’s a closed relay, and typical for an ISP.
Something that has always bothered me about STEM degrees in the US is the requirement for about a year of non-STEM coursework as a degree granting requirement. I think this is ridiculous.

Sure, yes, general education is important. And this is what secondary education should be for. The idea of consuming a year (or more!) of someone's time while pursuing a STEM degree on such coursework is, in my opinion, deeply misguided.

This is particularly true in a systems where a student is paying from $30K to $60K per year for this education. Sorry, but, if I have to spent $50K per year the last thing I want to do is burn it on course work that is utterly irrelevant.

Taken a different way, this means that a STEM Bachelors in the US could be completed in three, rather than four years. That is huge. That means higher graduation rates and people available to work faster.

That does not mean that nobody would or should take these courses. If someone is interested in sociology, history or political science, by all means, provide the courses as electives --not as graduation requirements.

Let's be free market and let the market decide. You can stipulate that a student must take five electives to graduate. These electives are not on forced subjects. You can take more STEM courses or choose to go into non-STEM classes (geography, world history, business, whatever).

Yes, this would likely reposition some of the stuff nobody cares about. And that's the right way to do it. If you have to pay back $200K to $300K in student loans, the system should not force you to burn 1/4 of that cash on bullshit no company is ever going to pay you for.

I truly think this is one of the great injustices, and maybe even the tyranny, of a system that, in my opinion isn't connected to reality at all. These non-STEM courses are cheap (in terms of the cost of offering them) courses that universities stuff into the student's shopping cart. The profit margin on these is probably outstanding when compared to some of the other subjects (for example, Chemistry requires labs; Robotics requires machine shops, tools, etc.).

From a competitive perspective, any nation that can focus their STEM degrees strictly around STEM to graduate people with the same capabilities as the US in 3 years rather than 4 is going to have an advantage over the long run. Not only are out graduates absolutely saddled with ridiculous debt, they have to invest another year or more for the same job-relevant education. Like I said above, no company is going to pay someone for that shit.

Sadly, I don't think this will ever change. There is no political value in going after this issue. If politicians can't use something to their benefit, it gets no attention at all.