skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Perhaps the canopy is supposed to be jettisoned, but the system is designed to send people right through it if that doesn't work.
The middle east similarly never asked for democracy. They largely see no use for it.

Full quote helps.. I realize the Iranian people are far more into neoliberalism than their leaders are, and that not everyone in that part of the world desires Sharia Law over neoliberalism. I certainly did not intend to insult those that do desire freedom / representative government in the region. But I do believe they're in the minority.
Have you had Fatty Tuna? OToro? It is super flavorful and luscious, much more so than the leaner cuts of Tuna. In my experience most tuna in sushi places and rolls is Akami (which is good, but not as flavorful).

Might be worth trying out if you haven't.

More info here:

https://www.umami-insider.com/tuna-otoro-chutoro-akami/
Pretty hard to hear DC, thats 0 Hz.
There’s practically nothing you can buy to get more time with your grandchildren.
There are dozens of countries if not more that have a FPTP system but have multiple viable parties.
The bank's customers might not be very happy they the bank gave their money away.
No, when we normally talk about code we have some vague notion of a formal system that works according to its specification, and thus that !isSorted loop example is pretty clearly invalid. And even if you do allow for random bit flips, surely that’s more likely to happen to the boolean returned by isSorted than for enough bits to flip to make the array sorted.
Sorry I drifted off b/c you’re not interesting
How to write a personal letter (2021)
The algorithm is exact, but probabilistic. That means that if you repeat it enough times, you're almost certain to find a solution.

Here's an example of how that works. Suppose you have a polynomial f(x) of degree n. I'll show a probabilistic algorithm that'll find an integer k such that f(k) != 0 with probability p >= 1/2.

Here goes: pick a random non-negative integer k below 2n. That's it, that's our answer.

What's the probability that f(k) != 0? Well, a polynomial of degree n can have at most n zeros, so at most n out of 2n non-negative integers below 2n are bad answers, so the probability of k being bad (i.e. f(k) = 0) is <= 1/2. Thus, probability of getting a correct answer is >= 1/2.

Now, probability 1/2 might seem pretty bad, we're, after all, rather likely to get a wrong answer. There's a simple way to deal with it, though: just repeat the algorithm as many times as you need. For example, if we repeat the algorithm 10 times, the probability of getting 10 wrong answers is 1/2^10 = 1/1024, rather small indeed. After 100 times, the probability of getting wrong answer is negligible.

Of course, it's easy to come up with an exact, non-probabilistic algorithm for the problem above. However, my probabilistic algorithm is O(1), while it's easy enough to prove that no constant time, non-probabilistic algorithm for the problem exists. I imagine that the situation is similar with the algorithm in the paper above: I'd wager that we get almost-linear time thanks to probabilistic nature.

Oh, and I was also cheating above somewhat: sure, my algorithm is O(1), but verifying that the answer is actually correct is O(n), so I cannot get an arbitrary small probability with my algorithm using the method above in constant time. The situation is, however, better in the context of maximum flow problem, because one can, in fact, check whether a flow is maximum in linear time, so that we can amplify the probability of getting a correct answer without losing the linear complexity.
That’s not what I’m looking for in those kinds of interviews. For example, one of my fav problems has a Range Sum Query tree idea as the main solution. But I’m more than happy to lead any developer to the solution, they come away happy with new knowledge, I see how they respond to hints and think on a new problem. Always fun and heard a lot of direct thanks for that from interviewees.
Thanks, also to sibling comment!
Possibly something along the lines of a chrooted user for $app that all users log into? Said user would run the application program instead of a shell probably, and actual auth for end users would be more like an http auth style setup instead of "logging in" to the server.

At that point I think you're about as safe as "Generic PHP Web App" - I'm sure I've missed something, but that's where I'd start looking.
I don't know why I found this so funny, but it gave me a real laugh this evening.
Previous Migadu user, current Mxroute user

Both are excellent, Migadu raised prices so I snagged a lifetime Mxroute sub for $100 and have been content. Migadu gave seemingly more control and cleaner admin interface, Mxroute seems a bit slopped together but like I said, has worked flawlessly and was happy with both
Interview with Arthur C. Clark at MIT Futurism Conference (1976) [video]
https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnkoetsier/2022/03/23/top-app...

AppAnnie is the source, but you could use Facebook earnings as the source too as they reported 2.9B active users last quarter.

Only two companies in the world have apps that scale to 2+ billion users. Google and Facebook.
So how exactly do you configure it?
Funny how they all seem to be correlated. /s
China’s Covid-19 Czar pushed TCM treatments from co’s he invested in
Hmm:

> Development of Kmscon stopped in March 2015. There was a successor project called systemd-consoled, but this project was also later dropped in July 2015.

That doesn't sound very promising. Why can't kernel itself ship a more advanced terminal?
SHA-XXX is also not an acceptable password hash.
This is a great idea, but no so great for managers.
I tried everything, starting with Remember the Milk (!) almost two decades ago, to Evernote, Asana, Todoist, Basecamp, Trello, text files on a shared folder, etc. I never was able to stick with any of the solutions for longer than a few months. Each one had something annoying that would distract me from the core goal of getting the work done.

I decided to go back to basics, and went to pen and paper. Got a simple (but gorgeous) kit from Ugmonk [1], and I now use it to prioritize my day/week. Ugmonk follows the classic GTD style of Today / Next / Someday, which helps keep you focused on what is immediate / medium term / long term.

I still use Trello for brainstorming, and to store things online that I'm working on, as well as archive for comments/screenshots/links, things I need to follow-up on, etc.

The combination of Trello for online storage, and a paper-based prio list that is right in front of me seems the perfect balance. I look at Trello a couple of times per week, and write my priorities for the day/week on a Ugmonk card every night.

In parallel I'm testing Obsidian as a long term knowledge library. The client app is way better than it was last year, but I still need to create the habit of taking notes everyday.

[1] https://ugmonk.com/pages/analog
That is true, but the pertinent question is: how much less?

If the world is ending tomorrow, then much less. If we discover immortality tomorrow, then much more.
I do not think literally hundreds of people work on these hacks.

But besides, in remote environment it is easier to be that guy who grabs the money and runs. $10k is $10k for a single person.
Basically the same here. It's gotten to the point where I have to think about how much real estate my parents own, and they're just a pair of middle class people who never cracked six figure salaries but worked diligently at decent jobs and invested where possible. I hope to never need to inherit from them, but it would be a nice to have. I certainly don't envy Millenials or Gen Z who don't have family wealth - I don't think they'll have much chance to build the legacy our parents did.
I would add that it can be very emotionally challenging to put yourself through this many times.

If you do interview runs with 20 different companies you are very likely to be lied about the process, their interest in you, or neglect to share important context about the open role. You will be lowballed multiple times.

It can be straight up awful and then only way to be able to compare those with an actual good opportunity is the hard way: giving them your all each time until you learn how to decline to move forward.

There is a reason people don’t switch jobs. It’s hard. Expect that and parallelize the process do not apply to companies one at a time.
Correct. The hierarchy is getting steeper and harder to climb.

Men who don’t feel connected to a clear path of ascension become desperate and often either dangerous or losers.

It’ll be interesting to see what happens to the increasing number of men who feel they have “fallen off the path”. Could be scary
With the Listerine case the end of the contact is when they stop selling Listerine.

A royalty fee agreement is pretty different to an NDA.
The only situations that _require_ unsafe are FFI (talking with C libs) and bare-metal access (assembler, embedded, drivers, etc.). An interpreter is totally in the clear on these subjects and should not have anyone reaching for unsafe.

Of course, unsafe _can_ also be used to implement code that takes shortcuts beyond what the borrow checker may be able to handle. But if you're building an interpreter, speed is probably not a primary concern anyway.
Interesting that they're doing this for new grads.

I've thought about whether you could have a site like this for experienced teams.

Lots of people stay at employers that suck, because they like their teammates and don't want to let them down. I think it would be a game changer if experienced teams could jump ship in one go. It would certainly benefit the new employer as the cost of hiring would be less, and the time to getting productive would be less. From the employees side, a company that's in the market for an entire team is an attractive prospect, since it's likely to be in a growth phase and well funded

Informally, it's not that rare for a complete team to leave a company and all, or mostly, end up at the same new employer. But formally lots of people have non-solicitation clauses and it may also be some kind of tort to invite people to violate them. But I do wonder how easy or hard such a site would be to legally defend.

That would be the kind of 'disruptive innovation' I could get behind: changing the balance of power and making people's lives better.
They could fill the headcount. It’s another dumb policy that prevent them from filling it.

Works needs to be done and there’s no one to do it, the fact you can’t hire is a problem.
Had a potential coach, who I was ready to pay $25k for a single day, ask me to sign a contract that included a clause that gave them power of attorney in the event of a contract dispute.

I said, this seems intense, I’m ready to hire you, just drop this clause… and she wouldn’t do it.
A fun note on this: https://cryptopals.com/sets/7/challenges/52
Sticky notes app on my Mac. Easy and stays in my face until I’m done.
What is required is people arguing in good faith and telling the truth. Systematic omnipresent bad-faith argument appealing to strong emotions and flat-out lying about basic facts can easily overwhelm people’s reasoning, empathy, and capacity for independent fact checking.
>as the company is actively attempting to sabotage his political moves
I think you mean undermine his and the state's democratically legislated power and ability to represent the people of the state of Florida. It's that simple. Disney isn't even mentioned in the legislation, nor are the 6 other corporations affected beside Disney. They can try and fight it on legislative grounds, but if they try anything other than that they will open themselves up to outside discovery of all the things they have concealed while they have policed themselves, most notably crimes and their corporate liability related to children, guest safety, and environmental protection and hazards. Disney like one of those blurred out areas on Google maps when it comes to such inquiries because they police themselves. Unless they try to fight it on anything but procedural/administrative grounds. That's when they open themselves up to exposure.
People have been horny since ever. Simply having exposed breasts might not be universally considered 'erotica' but representations of people actually having sex? Nah that's pron.
Yeah, that’s a lie people tell themselves. If someone was gone for 2 months, suddenly someone would start counting and tracking. But nobody does because of course, it’s not truly unlimited.
fortunately every other major corporation is completely trustworthy
Clearly an i9 is insufficiently advanced. ;)
nice writeup! been doing something similar for same reason, lines 83-96 cut to chase in this gist, https://gist.github.com/DotDotJames/ce331904848fc6cfecc80c52...
the person linked in this submission is one of said geniuses.
Does this organization work with the EleutherAI team?
sadly, Microsoft didn't get the memo

https://stackoverflow.com/a/70434510
Pull any single petal or leaf from the flower, and yet it still grows and thrives. We can see each of the petals and leaves are of a kind with the others, so perhaps their removability doesn't imply that lack of membership in the flower.

In persuit of this mystery, we looked closely at the flower, found all the petals, stamen, and roots were in fact made of little plants themselves. Often these "cells" are of different shape shape and function in the flower, but chemical stimulation seems all it takes to coerce most to take on a different role.

The truth perhaps, is that there isn't a flower, only a civilization of these "cells" but thier behavior, cooperation, and the structures of sugars that build around themselves are what makes up the "flower" and that it's current form was borne of millions of years of iteration and experimentation in form and function made it what it is today.

From the outside, the termite mound (and all the termites inside) are reasonably all the body of one organism. Just as reasonably they are not functionality different than a human body or a human civilization. The only difference between an i9 and your bones is the story you tell yourself about it.
Typo on the calendar version: ‘electronig’.
Nerves in the CNS hardly ever heal or regenerate, tetraplegia is usually damage to the cervical nerves which are CNS
Go to thrift stores, buy cheap old electronics and appliances, then take them apart together and talk about the pieces. The take the pieces apart and talk about their pieces.
Catalan Leader Infected with Pegasus Speaks Out
No, I think you were mostly correct. Submitting a form on a Web 1.0 site—typically search or guest books—was hardly an experience you’d call “interactive”, especially today. Every form submission required a refresh, and sites were usually very static. Web 2.0—and honestly, I’ve always thought these classifications were rather hazy—was where you started seeing the ability to submit/request data without requiring a page refresh. I remember Flickr as being a good example of that, with their dropdown menus, drag-and-drop UI, and smooth form submission.

So while it’s technically true that Web 1.0 was in some limited sense interactive, I agree with your comment that 2.0 was where interactivity as we think of it really began, especially regarding forms. Also worth noting that if you look at how others define Web 2.0, a common theme is the focus on user-submitted content, which is consistent with your impression of what 2.0 was.

(And to be clear, I’m hardly a teenager; I’m 40, remember 1.0 and 2.0 very well, and have spent more than half my life building both kinds of sites professionally.)
> I'm not sure why you might think otherwise.

I asked a question if diversity and inclusion affect assimilation. I am not thinking one way or the other; the question was not rhetorical.
That a hypothesis that has no feasible molecular basis can be called "leading" is a mark of the bankruptcy of Darwinian evolutionary theory.
Right. AWS is for those unable to budget, pre-plan, prepare.
I've watched a (the?) video that explains how you developed the landing/catch mechanism for the drones a couple times when it's gotten posted here over the years, and it's seriously one of the coolest things I've ever seen, both the iterations and the final design you arrived at.
So…rather than us guessing about which particular piece of information, you could just tell us and stop being so cryptic?
(unless P=NP in which case all non-trivial problems in P are also NP-Complete)
> Killing a chat product that has always been a net loss for the company might not appear to be a failure.

Doing that once, yeah, doing that over and over, no so much.

At this point the smartest thing to do it just kill them all and definitively say: "No more, this is the end of Google chat apps."
I presume this article has been flagged not because of what the University of Waterloo is doing, but rather that it is felt that the link on HN is for the purpose of subjecting progressive ideology to ridicule?
whoooow ! problem of current web is exact opposite - there is too LITTLE information about content, i would love to have some additional tags,
bring some LATEX into web!

so we can have UI "skins"/ themes for all pages exactly same, because it will be client side software responsibility to render it and user chooses theme as user wants / needs i.e disabilities, machine reading so i can actaully use my 4000 dollar gpu with 4gb vram to read text for me. and because of STANDARDIZATION those themes will be universaly working, not i can choose drakoola on reddit but i have to choose monokai on gogole news because those are most similar themes to each other, which i get dictated to use by corporation. corporation dictates how ti should look. i want t oit to look exactly same. it will be easier to consume, less traffic will be needed becasue les page loads, content can be dynamically added i.e. new reddit comment etc

do not use BOLD, use EMPHASIS, do tell me what content of picture is by inserting WORDS INTO DESCRIPTION so i can choose if i need to load it or it is just some placeholder /ad which i dont have to see

and most people forgets that HTML is NOT meant to be read by people but read by MACHINES.

HTML is as bad implementation of latex as RSS is bad implementation of USENET

same primitive s... as with current AI, it can tell you if there is dog in picture but it cannot tell you more about that picture, what exactly is meaning/essence of picture of that dog in there.

im not trolling , im not joking.

web 1 was awesome because i can literaly PUT FREAKING links to content directly, web 2.0. YOU CANT. this should be made mandatory, make dark web 10 % of web !

i was flabbergasted when i think google? announced that you can now create a hyperlink to a specific location in another Web page like WHAT ? you mean i can actually use thing i used in freaking firefox 2.0 or in netscape navigator ? you cant be serious ! XD

but this is state of thing. try to link some FAANG forum page from 2013. you cant because hierarchy of whole "forum" changed and you have to manualy search for answer

and not even start about twitter which dont let you browse without logging in. i dont mind logging in if logging is NOT paired with my number etc.

now imagine having this in your emacs / lynks (webbrowser) window wouldnt be that freaking crazy nice? you can choose which users comment will be highlighted ( friend, replying to you, contains some word...) CLIENT SIDE so there will be less bandwidth and resources wasted fro coprporation.
Why isn't this being called a humanitarian crisis by our illustrious Western leaders?
Very narrowly targeted comment to note that f(g(x)) and f(x) || g(x) are different operations.
Off topic question. I am an electrical engineer and a software developer. Can anyone guide me on books and resources to design this sort of a drone?

Quad copter drones are easier to make, and have a lot of resources.

But, I feel these mini plane types drones will be the workhorses in coming years.
>>Okay... the thing is that you can't give the state the ability to enforce property rights and simultaneously not give the state the ability to confiscate assets arbitrarily, because it's the same ability in both instances.

To some extent that's true, but it could still be true that certain limits on the state's power to seize private property make private property rights more secure overall, because:

1. You can increase the cost for the state to seize private property, which would make it less likely that the state does so in cases where there is less justification, i.e. when doing so violates private property rights.

2. You can make it so that the state can only seize private property when a person reports a theft, by denying the state the ability to engage in mass-surveillance over who owns what. This limits when the state can seize private property to when private property has been stolen, and largely prevents it from seizing private property when it has not.

Cryptocurrency has both of these effects.
I wonder whether the Shanghai situation will be what finally catalyzes real political reform. The people have put up with a lot from this regime over the years. Shanghai has historically been where anti-government movements get going. It will be interesting to see what transpires over the next few months.
Pix2Seq: A New Language Interface for Object Detection
Both of my tech jobs specifically have had non-solicitation clauses to prevent me from doing this type of thing. They both have 1 year lock outs on convincing my friends to quit their jobs
One particular use case I'd like to bring up (that you did mention!) are couples as well as grad students. I met my husband in graduate school for our masters, but when we were looking for jobs, it was extremely difficult to find companies that accepted us both even though we applied for the same positions. Like, I would get into one company, but my SO would get rejected. Eventually, we settled for different companies in the same city, but it was SUCH A PAIN and stressful. The other alternative we looked at was just both working remotely. So, I would have loved something like this so we could've just applied together!

Also, I also agree that one-application should work. There's no reason that it's necessary to do so many interviews. Questions were pretty much the same and they weren't relevant to the job at hand, so why ask them? To assess my skill? Then, a single central application would do.

Still, I would like this for non-grads as well. So my husband and I can use it lest we do this entire thing again. Also agree that knowing someone intimate increases retention. I really dislike the company I work at, but it pays well and my family is here!
Fatty farmed salmon is really not good, nor good for you.

In singapore I avoided buying salmon due to it being 100% farmed salmon. Instead I paid extra for New Zealand King salmon which is partially farmed, better tasting, healthier.
Because "it's for covid", and our illustrious western leaders are either covid maximalists or focused on Ukraine.
That's assuming NSA told the world (/ people who go around posting stories about their day-job to the internet) immediately after succeeding with the crack. Much better opsec to wait a for a period at least as big as the time it took to crack, leaks less information about the magnitude of compute you can harness.
The article poorly reports the context: Argentina is a corrupt country at all levels and the government and state are screwing employees and companies. The tech sector is more sophisticated and have ways to deal with this moving to new jurisdictions or evading controls but the phenomenom goes beyond tech. International companies are moving out from Argentina except the ones which doesn't have another option.
Its not just the swappable part. I think they have modularized all the electronics and GPS communication systems inside it, so that it is always booted and on standby. As soon as it is incorporated into a drone, it will be ready for work.

Another innovation is the clip on wings.

I think this is clever engineering and a necessity for their time to fly requirements.