skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yeah, if you're looking for a package, you'll want to stick to the Cloudsmith .deb since it's bound to Caddy's GitHub release workflow so guaranteed to stay up-to-date: https://cloudsmith.io/~caddy/repos/stable/packages/

P.S., from the guidelines:

> Please don't comment about the voting on comments. It never does any good, and it makes boring reading.

edit: and an official response https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31170881
Small trading company hijacks thousands of Amazon listings marked “generic”
I found “How to Read Lacan” by Zizek a great introduction as someone who has 0 psychology or philosophy background. As another poster mentioned Im still not sure how much “there is”, but I found the concept of the Other to be interesting. But I also don’t think it’s too healthy outside of a clinical setting to try and reduce human desire to a formula. People should try to understand each other one-on-one without diagnosing or labeling either party’s behavior. It feels like a lot of interest in Girard and Lacan stem from trying to manipulate or predict people, which may be a useful tool some of the time (doctor <> patient) but is no way to live day-to-day!
Since your data is append-only have you considered something like just sticking all of the data in s3?

Might be awkward to deal with things like updating threads, but just editing the s3 file containing the json response for a given thread might work, and then you can skip having a database entirely.
"it may not be the GC that's to blame, or not entirely: it's all the bloated crap they are pulling into the image"

Again, you keep waving your hands in the air and saying if you don't do that, you'll be fine.
Can it be indexed by search engines? I feel that this is extremely important to differentiate this platform from something like discord, and more towards reddit/twitter/forums
She can't have been that far away, didn't she live in Egypt? I'm fairly sure the moon is always further away
For Apple biometric ID this is purely theatre, because devices can be compelled rapidly to require passwords.

If the cops concerns you, I recommend practicing the lock sequence, and if they don't, perhaps we're not citizens of the same country.
I don't know or care about your class based disdain, I said I have sympathy for it and if I was in the situation I would have mild disappointment and consider moving but probably be content with delivery services
For me, it already is. I use Google Pay extensively, which checks SafetyNet during regular operation, and I hear the Netflix app even disappears from the Play Store if the phone fails SafetyNet. (Sure, you can install it from APKMirror or whatever, but...) I expect some other banking apps on my phone wouldn't work either.
They all started the projects from 2009-2013 picking Rails, the most popular web framework at the time: https://insights.stackoverflow.com/trends?tags=ruby-on-rails...

If you were to follow in their footsteps, you'd also be picking the top popularity web framework for your time, which as of now is things like Next.js and Django.

Big recent-era startups:

OpenSea (Django / Next.js)

Notion (Node.js)

ScaleAI (Python, Node.js, Next.js)

Substack (Node.js)

Rippling (Django / Next.js)
Sure, but if you google the definition of the word we're all talking about, there's no mention of impossible. Just someone that, "see[s] the worst aspect of things or believe[s] that the worst will happen".

So basically, it's the person you might want around when you're building a bridge, or a jet, or a shuttle.
Also, I just realized who I'm talking with, loved your article/presentation on "Starting Over".
Meta is already trading at a much lower P/E than Google, so it’s fair to say that it’s priced in.
For an accessible introduction to patent legalese, I'd recommend taking a look at a recent edition of the book Patent It Yourself by David Pressman. I can't say it'll cover all that I learned as an examiner, but it's well written and covers a lot.

Also: A lot of the legalese I encountered as a patent examiner was "lexicographic definitions", that is, where a patent applicant writes somewhere in the patent specifications that a certain term or phrase has a particular meaning. Applicants didn't always make those easy to find... I recall one where (as I recall) they defined "insulation" to including something that can cool something down, which strikes me as simply wrong and confusing. That definition was basically hidden right in the middle of the patent application. It was necessary to find that definition to understand the claims. If the term is something I hadn't seen before then I would have just search for it, but for something common in the field I examined like "insulation", I wouldn't normally search for that. This is really annoying and unfortunately okay under USPTO rules.
> Billions of people believe things on faith that have no empirical backing, and do so despite access to an unprecedented amount of scientific evidence to the contrary.

We don't live in a technocracy.

The crux of the matter is you don't get to decide what other people think or believe.
Spain had been a republic for almost 10 years when Franco took power. For most of the years when Franco was in power the king had no real powers even though Spain was again formerly a monarchy. Once Juan Carlos was named heir to the throne, he publicly supported Franco while secretly planning the return of exiled politicians and resumption of democracy. He was pretty badass overall.

Maybe you're confusing it with Italy?
Most work isn't directly involved in the kill chain. That's a ridiculous dismissal.
As much as i hate ad culture, i also hate the pay-to-make-product-not-suck model. It makes me feel manipulated.
Still making shit up.
For the code review step, sure, commit messages don't really matter unless your team reviews PRs commit-by-commit.

How many times do you actually change the default squashed message? If you write a series of garbage commit messages, I don't particularly trust that you'll write a very good squashed message, either. How many times do people skip updating the PR description with new information or features from comments? If your commit messages are good, the auto-squash message will be good and one will have a network dependency on GitHub to figure out what decisions went into that change.

In general I agree with your goal of a great commit log: 1 PR = 1 commit in the main branch. But I feel like GitHub is just the wrong tool to use if you want that. I used to use Gerrit, where commit messages _are_ your PR description. Sure, it makes you interact with git in some unfortunate ways, but the tradeoff is enforced commit cleanliness.
Which is aligned with US date formatting.
The first app I opened up was ResEdit; the jack-in-the-box gave me a big wave of nostalgia...
But yeah, it's hard to separate fond memories of youth from the changes in computing. Plus when I was a kid learning HyperTalk and then C on System 7 it was all for fun; no one was asking anything of me. Now my coding supports my family; I haven't done any coding for fun since a few years ago when I took a sabbatical from my SDE job and worked half-time as a farm hand.
No American parent perhaps. The name doesn't have negative connotations elsewhere. For me, it's more associated with the previous pope and the actor than with Arnold.
Optimists are mostly people like crypto hodl crowd or sales people who tries to convince you that everything will get better if you just buy their product or people who fall for MLM scams or those who buys lottery tickets etc. They will call you a pessimist if you disagree with them, and tells you to be more optimistic.

In my experience this kind of optimist is way more common than the "sees real world opportunities" kind. Most people are not optimists though, if you try to sell them an opportunity they will scrutinize it and most likely refuse the offer unless you are someone they trust even if they would benefit.
GitHub (by default) uses the name of the PR as the merge commit message and also includes the commit message of each commit in the log. Having whitespace-altering "Dummy commit to trigger CI, ugh!" commits in a git history isn't good but it still clutters the `git log` with stock squash+merge GitHub use.

I can't speak for everybody, but if GitHub goes down completely and I only had access to my git logs, I'd struggle to recreate ~20% of the information scattered across issues and PRs. This issue is external to merging preferences, but it's definitely not solved by squash-merges and descriptive merge messages.
This sounds very promising. It'd be nice if audio verification was added and that the lip movement matches the audio. Maybe for v3.1?
Ah, just making sure you meant your company and not the US. Glad we reached an agreement.
Here is my understanding of what Deutsch and the paper by Popper/Miller are trying to say.

There are three concepts involved: an evidence "e", for example "I extracted 1 black ball"; a hypothesis "h", for example "the urn does not contain only white balls"; a theory "h <- e" that, by means of logic or otherwise, deduces the hypothesis from the evidence. Your (qsort) theory is that if you see a black ball then the hypothesis is correct.

Everybody, including you, me, and Deutsch, agree that if the probability of the evidence goes up, then the probability of the hypothesis goes up as well.

What Deutsch and Popper/Miller are also saying, however, is that if the probability of the evidence goes up then the probability of the theory goes down (proof in the paper).

I need to study the paper more carefully, because I am not 100% sure that it is strictly correct (there are many factors that would transform a < into <= if they were 1, and I suspect that some are), but I believe the weaker statement that if the evidence goes up the probability of the theory does not go up at all.

In any case, this conclusion is consistent with what all scientists have believed forever: the only way to increase confidence in a theory is to try to break it. Or at least they believed this until fact checkers and censorship came along and threw the baby away with the bathwater.
> But doesn't Nim compile to C and therefore it can interact with the entire C ecosystem?

You can directly call C code, yes. You can even work with macros! It's a lot nicer when you can import a package that provides an abstraction layer over the C code, though (for example, my `ruby' package)

> call C functions without having to worry about different naming conventions

Yes. In fact, if you hand-write your C bindings instead of using something like c2nim, you can completely change the name of the function. This is a snippet from my aforementioned `ruby' package:

proc evalString*(code: cstring): RawValue {.importc: "rb_eval_string".}
On today’s internet, a frank post mortem delivers value to customers and PR gold too.
From what I'm reading many newer devices require a locked bootloader, else SafetyNet will fail. So realistically I think that means only Pixel phones could work, since they support relocking the bootloader with a non-stock ROM.
Like what? (Honest question)
You need a study to confirm you don't give away food when you're starving?
I think what the author means by "the gamblers fallacy is not a fallacy" is that they are saying "what people commonly call the gamblers fallacy, is not actually a fallacy (and also not the gamblers fallacy)". That is, people are attributing gamblers fallacy to events that are not necessarily independent. And the author uses "koins" as an example for an object that has a 50/50 probability on average, but the flips are actually not independent events. And the author explains how in many cases, people don't know if events are independent (even for coin flips! As the flipping mechanism can introduce correlation between events) so they should be careful when declaring gamblers fallacy
Steam Train from 1945 Just Hauled 50 Freight Cars in 2022
If you set your HTTP proxy to theoldnet.com (and add an exception for web.archive.org), and then set the port number to a year (try 1997, for example), you will get web pages served from the Wayback Machine, from that year.

It's like sending your entire browser back in time.
I'm pretty sure the poster above you is referring to the differences between the number of letters in the following words: "CLEOPATRA" is closer to "MOON LANDING" than "THE BUILDING OF THE PYRAMIDS".

Actually its the distance in time.
My vim will automatically wrap when I am typing a git commit message.

Should be set by default from here: https://github.com/vim/vim/blob/2f0936cb9a2eb026acac03e6a8fd...
vi :set tw=70
What?! Do you know what the job of a CEO is? I answer your comment with your question. How do you know he tweaks some code? What proof do you have?
They’re a frontend to Citadel to “unlock” value for the investors.

It was never meant to compete with real investing tools but instigate transaction fees and accumulate retail behavior data for the market makers
I don't follow why you think that argument is enough. Surely a persistent, long term trend of worsening energy availability would be exactly the sign of energy poverty? There are only two possible signs of energy poverty - a trend of stable low numbers and a trend of dropping numbers!

You might disagree for great reasons, I'm just stumped by what you wrote.
>None of the major social media companies made any real effort to make moderation transparent.

Because most people don't care about this. For most websites, making moderation transparent only opens you up to more abuse and does nothing good.

>None of the major social media companies made a real effort to come up with a solid set of content rules that most people can agree with upfront (at least in principle) and that doesn't change after every major news story.

Because it's literally impossible to do this.

>Also, I am sick and tired of social media CEOs, VPs and founders pointing a finger at their users and saying "you, users, are the real problem here". This is bullshit. An average interaction on (moderated!) social media is significantly worse than an average interaction in (unmoderated) real life.

No it's not bullshit, I'm taking from this reply that you haven't spent any amount of time moderating an internet forum. (Feel free to tell me if I'm wrong there) The users are the real problem and it's the entire problem you're getting paid to solve when you work for these companies. Nobody would use these services if they weren't solving these problems. Real life interactions usually only involve a handful of people and don't require figuring out how to get everyone in the world to get along with each other. If the users were capable of "coming up with a solid set of content rules that most people can agree with upfront" they would've done so already and we wouldn't even be having this discussion because there would be no need to demand that Twitter try to do it.
Keep a Bug List
So as you make locks, why dont magnetic keys that repel pins get used to make it harder to pick a lock?

After all how would lock picking lawyer measure the magnetic strength of the pins?
Lived from 69 to 30 BC according to Wikipedia… definitely closer to th moon landing .. by almost a thousand years..
For the Mac lineup, it’s hard to say that their software is the reason people buy their laptops (it’s not that Mac OS is bad, just that it’s a small difference in the overall experience in the grand scheme, in if anything, is more limited than windows in term of apps/games support)
That is why main() has a static constexpr, to force its execution at compile time. A trick I learned from Jason's screencasts.

Although, you're right. I tried it back at home on VC++ and its static analyser wasn't happy.

My idea was to make use of template metaprogramming to generate the string buffer, there are a couple of examples of such attempts.

However, I guess with such amount of additional code, I should declare defeat on the original comment.
Kids always waste their time in high school. The tools just change. You can’t possibly tell me you and your cohort were on average more focused than the current generation. That’s basically just teenagers for you lol
so funny you say that. I wear a g shock with my tux.
> Although the design of most languages concentrates on innovations in syntax, semantics, or typing, Go is focused on the software development process itself.

This important fact is often missed in flame wars. No, Go is not the most expressive, performant, or pure programming language. But it is darn pragmatic and has produced amazing results in just a decade of widespread availability.

An example of that pragmatism:

> The language provides strings, hash maps, and dynamically sized arrays as built-in, easily used data types. As noted earlier, these are sufficient for most Go programs. The result is greater interoperability between Go programs—for example, there are no competing implementations of strings or hash maps to fragment the package ecosystem.

Some language enthusiasts argue that strings shouldn't exist in programming languages, because they don't actually exist -- after all, they are just byte arrays that can be decoded in a variety of ways. But in the real world, "strings" are everywhere (e.g. this comment), and it is a great benefit to having them easily available to the programmer with little to no ambiguity.
Reading Blue Mountain & Northern in Pennsylvania decided to activate one of their vintage Steam Trains on a real route, delivering real freight today. Fans of vintage steam-engines can see the Twitter post for some video.
I believe one way around this is to posit that there exists a minimum time, T = 0, and that the universe had low entropy at that time. In this case, the symmetry still exists in principle, but it doesn't exist in practice in our own space-time, which thus has a well-defined arrow of time (at a macroscopic level).

Of course, it's also possible that we have not yet discovered some other law of nature that is deterministic, but breaks CPT symmetry, that might define an arrow of time at the microscopic level as well. After all, QM still has the measurement problem, where the Born rule I believe also breaks CPT symmetry.
Yes, I agree with all of that, but I note that everything you say applies equally well to the site I linked.
There's a good chance this was made in Github's squash+merge dialog.

Edit: never mind, it's auto wrapped at some number
He’s literally just griping about kids being kids in it
Yup; a VC I brunched with a couple weeks ago said cloud is dead and he’s looking for alternatives
Same here... I'm not too sure how the Topre switches in the HHKB do work but I went from years and years on Model Ms to Topre. I'm using HHKB since so long I don't even remember when I started using them. I tried all the Cherry out there but Topre is my favorite switch by very far.
same. it's hard to describe how 10-year-old me felt about 8bit dithered graphics sparkling through phosphorus but 30 years later the magic is gone. I can't point to any one thing (maybe the advent of webapps) but it has something to do with software just generally becoming more and more sucky.
I'm thinking children or spouses, you may be able to trust them not to murder you in your sleep, but accessing your device while you sleep to be able to play some games or read your texts is something they would probably do.
>> do you ever laugh at the weirdness of it all?

Incessantly, to the extent that I find it hard to believe in society in any meaningful fashion, as it’s all just reified concepts stacked atop one another. It isn’t such a leap from “why aristocrats?” to “why states? Why employment? Why three meals a day?”.

The best answer I’ve been able to come up with is security/fear. At almost every scale from PNG tribes to federalised blocs of nations, people rally around the strong man, the protector who exacts a fee, and they follow the rules and expectations set by them. These days, aristos are generally superseded by democratic governance, but the underlying principle, the Leviathan, remains the same.
Or like I don't need to fully implement it for the next interview.
The NCAR Fire
They're working with a bizarro Blank Slate theory according to which every student should simply be learning their math by themselves, and if they fail it's their own darn fault, or perhaps society's fault, or anyone else's fault, but certainly not the teacher's fault. Because the teachers all have Education degrees, and that's what they were told in Ed School. So don't anyone dare "demean" their job by suggesting that they have actual work to do in properly educating their students.
TikTok-Famous Doctors Are Getting into NFTs and It's a Mess
Out of sheer curiosity - why name it M3O?
I just read up a bit. What a weird development. I normally resort to user scripts and bookmarklets to transport the search query between pages. Didn't know things got this bad.

Clicking on an open search js link[0] also doesn't seem to work anymore.

I've added auto discovery[1] here which seems to work. FrogFind should add this bloat to their pages :)

[0] - javascript:window.external.AddSearchProvider('http://blog.go-here.nl/yacy-opensearch.xml');

[1] - http://blog.go-here.nl/8603
A/UX is very picky about hardware. You can run it in the Shoebill emulator
That's correct. See https://caddyserver.com/docs/install for our recommended installation methods. Only the .deb via Cloudsmith is fully automated, every other method requires some humans to publish the release, for a variety of reasons.
This is why I love LockPickingLawyer. Generally never more than 3 minutes long. Yet by confining himself to such short videos, he has to maximize the time used.
Given that the blog doesn't load for me, I guess the datacenter remains unplugged?
I believe the technical description of a Labrador Retriever is "dumb as a box of rocks."
> Classic whataboutism entirely deflecting the question.

Pointing out that in the same circumstances someone did the same thing is a strong argument that they think it is morally justified, or at least acceptable.

The argument here is that the escalations in Ukraine are geopolitically unwise and that NATO doesn't have a moral reason to be involved after the shenanigans they pull. So why are they funnelling in weapons and working so hard in support if not to provoke a NATO-Russia conflict? We can rule out the idea that they are good people by looking at the organisation's past actions.
Having to blink a one-time code might be an interesting way to auth.
It's hard for me to square your claim that there's a dominant belief that all humans are blank slates of equal ability with the sheer volume of messaging I see in both government-sponsored and private media about embracing differences, follow your own goals, find your talent, etc.

I see a lot more stuff that would lead a kid to believe "it's ok that I'm not good in math" rather than "I could be good in math if I wanted to be."

Frankly, I think this is actually worse educationally than what you suggest.

We need to find more ways to reward effort instead of pre-existing ability (regardless of how that pre-existing ability is gained... the kid whose parents got him ahead of the curve through high school math and then bombs out after taking university-level Calculus is similarly harmed by the current system as the one who's shunted away from ever being challenged).
Emacs + magit and auto-fill-mode
As others have said, this is just loss form investments, due to the general market correction. If you want to see it in the press release, look for "Other income" in the press release (the most interesting part is on page 9).
I reject the premise: pessimism doesn't sound smart. It's just the middle-brow position when you have sufficient information to make short-term predictions but lack the vision to identify potential paradigm shifts that can be put into play (sometimes by you). i.e. most pessimists are just hill-climbers stuck in some local trough.

In any case, I liked Peter Thiel's model in Zero to One better: definite vs. indefinite thinking coupled with pessimist vs. optimist thinking.
Sadly searching HP stuff still returns whatever modern tech they’ve reused old product names on.