skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This is generally a healthy way of eating, but one word of caution:

Without any carbohydrates at all, your SHBG levels will generally get very high, and you may end up with long-term hormonal issues. It's also questionable whether very-long-term gluconeogenesis is good for your liver. More studies are needed.

Paul Saladino, who used to be very strict carnivore, has recently recommended introduction of fruits and honey into an animal-based diet to address the SHBG and long-term gluconeogenesis concerns. He is still vehemently against grains and vegetables, but regularly includes 100-150 grams of carbohydrates from fruit/honey sources daily now, with positive effects on his (hormonal) blood work.
I'm pretty sure they're burying Ukrainians because they're invading Ukraine. If they want to avoid diseases they can stay home. There are photos of dead civilians in the streets.
I know Russians exactly as you have described - they have abandoned their home and family, unable to partake in such a sick society for any longer. Yes, they're the sane Russians.
When I worked in a city in an office that didn't have a cafeteria, lunch was often a great time to go out, take a walk, get a meal in Chinatown or wherever, etc. To be honest, I don't think I'd really have thanked my employer for some likely mediocre catered meal.
Buses are also a good option. It used to be a nightmare to work out which bus(es) to catch, but with modern mapping apps it's easy.
Reminds me vaguely of some of the collapses the existing media giants experienced when first dipping their toes into the Internet in the mid to late 90s, thinking it was a new medium they could just flow info.
This is what I do. When the "to watch" list of shows I got recommended or am otherwise interested in watching on one of the services gets a few items on it, I buy a month of subscription and immediately cancel. Then watch the stuff during the month, and some time later get another month of a different service. This has been working great for the past couple years.
I see your Opus 1 and raise you Billy Cobham - Heather https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e3E9vx5vVck
I see people say things like this on here, and I don’t get it. I’m a manager, I know a lot of other managers, and none of us want to go back to the office nor force anyone else to.
> X gigs of high-speed, Y or infinite gigs of low speed

But then why even bother with the paperwork to get approved to be a part of the program? Why doesn't T-Mo just ignore usage below some average throughput speed for any traffic?
I don’t really like this view of the world. I think they are correct about the lack of certainty and doing things while you can, but often big goals, like having a child, professional success, monetary success, etc. can cause us to miss life, too. Everything is a trade off. There’s always opportunity cost and you can always look back and see what you may have sacrificed to get where you are.

It’s needlessly depressing to wallow in this mindset. I personally value being a good person and my connections with people. Sure I could focus this energy on one human I bring into the world, but that’s not objectively better than anyone else I affect positively.

And I know having a child is a transformative experience. I’m lucky enough to have lots of little cousins and Have volunteered with programs for kids for years. Kids are amazing and bring magic to the world as you grow older. I just think that wrapping all of your identity and self worth up in a single goal is asking for disappointment. It’s not fair to you or the child.

Try to appreciate your real impact on the world. Did you improve someone’s day today? Did you restore someone’s faith in humanity? Is someone comforted right now by their trust in you? That’s the good stuff. Make that happen any way you can.

If you do want a child, go for it. Time IS ticking, but if you can’t or didn’t or are considering bring one into a bad situation or relationship to quell an existential fear, don’t worry. It’s fine. You can still find meaning and have an impact through your connections with others.
The way I look at it: the year after I die will be just as difficult as the year before I was born. IOW not a care in the world.

I understand being afraid of death because self-preservation is built into us, but unless there really is some hellfire that some of us will be thrown into for all eternity (unlikely but boy would that suck), then logic dictates that it will bother us just as much as our non-existence bothered us for the billions (trillions?) of years before our births.
CNN's arc has been interesting to say the least. Widely lampooned as 'Chicken Noodle News' when it launched in 1980 as a lightweight 24 hour cable channel in the style of the broadsheet 'USA Today' newspaper it gradually became more and more top heavy with pompous oped bloviators, pretentious 'situation room' shows.

A minor part of inexpensive cable packages in 1980 alongside MTV, it somehow became very expensive to buy despite running endless ads. CNN's current Neilsen numbers are abysmal, it's hard to imagine why they thought people would pay even more for 'plus' content, especially given their predominantly retirement age+ demographic. Meanwhile Joe Rogan is averaging 11m views per podcast with Tucker Carlsen and his script writers a very distant second at around 3.2m. (CNN got .8m fpr their most viewed primetime show Q3 2021)
It’s only technically true that there are a finite number of resources on the planet. But I don’t think that’s true in any meaningful sense. This isn’t zero sum - humans are able to expand the available resources and have already demonstrated they are capable of that.

We are well past earths natural carrying capacity for our species - and we have been for quite a long time. But humans have solved those problems. Yes we’ve created problems in the process, but we are solving those too. So far nothing indicates to me that humans can’t continue solving the growing pains on earth long enough to get access to the (nearly) limitless supply of resources available in the cosmos.
Likely the very fact that there's been all these articles about Netflix losing will cause them to lose more.
And if you're set on building an "entire DB engine" then you can just as well go the full mile and go for relational. As opposed to SQL.
I think partisan and sensational is just a human thing. Those particular networks are definitely a generational thing
Honestly for me I just do not know all the content Netflix has because the browsing is so bad. I wish instead of pushing shows to me best on algorithms, it would just let me browse categories and recent additions etc in a simpler way. Maybe categorised by year.
If I needed to parse SQLite3 schemas, I might just fork the Lemon grammar for SQLite3 from SQLite3 and make it produce an AST.
FWIW: Fox Nation is much smaller in scope. It's basically a bunch of opinion shows (barely more than podcasts, honestly) designed to feed into a cyclic link sharing ecosystem that already exists and is somewhat starved for "legitimate" content. Basically these are links that people who are being fed Breitbart and InfoWars stories click on, because they're "serious news" they can't otherwise get on the internet.

(Also, IIRC most of their revenue is still advertising from freely distributed content, not subscriber fees.)

CNN+ was instead trying to do all this from the ground up, while competing with a much more robust existing ecosystem. Centrists and lefties already have Slate and Vox and Politico and of course all the existing "print" media sites to fill their "legitimate" news needs. What was CNN going to give them that they didn't already have?
A big thank you to all the authors for sharing this!

I also need a skeuomorphic one for another project
We need a maturity revolution across the entire globe for any technological immortality to be created that is not as a maximum profit seeking corporate nightmare. I suspect we're at a point technologically we can finally see the horizon, but like a mirage it is further away than it appears.
I'm not sure that anyone can seriously believe there isn't collusion happening among telecom companies, the failed Comcast and Time Warner practically had it in writing that there was collusion. Anti-trust action isn't ever going to happen though, so there isn't much that can be done.
Shameless self-promotion [1]: my svg icon search engine that searches almost 100K icons from 100+ sources, including Tabler (with a finite scrolling list! [2])

[1] https://IconSear.ch/

[2] https://iconsear.ch/sources/tabler/icons.html
I totally respect that.

As I have been talking to people, I have noticed people who are frequently shopping and checking out products are WAY more ahead of the game because they are exposed to more ideas.

I hate shopping so this was my way of trying to quickly get at good ideas while quickly removing bad ideas.

I've been thinking a LOT about the user data collection side. The app is pretty explicit in terms of trying to narrow in on preferences. It's kind of a requirement if you are going to help someone find a unique gift. But it still feels a too much like data harvesting. So how to strike that balance?

Right now I believe I have turned off all ad/app tracking (although I am pretty new at this so maybe I've messed something up. If you know more about this than I do and you see something wrong please let me know). As a user, I only want the information I share to be used for THIS purpose. Not to keep spamming me with more ads.

If I could figure out a way to give you more control over your own data would this still be a flop for you?
Generational. Younger generations get their unhinged "takes" from Twitter and podcasts.
I am unsure why you have made a conclusion about my state of affairs? I am happy with my life, but I am not churning out advice for someone who has it much worse than I.
There's a lot of assumptions here. The "our parents screwed us over" is almost exclusively American phenomenon - in a lot of places around the world, current generation is unimaginably more wealthy than their parents ever were. My own parents were living in a house without a washing machine and a fridge when they were my age, and owning a car was a very rare luxury. What we have now was once reserved for the elites, or maybe for people from other, richer countries.
Insane that literally no US bank is actually focusing on this. Are retail investors so insignificant that none of them even tries to differentiate and steal customers?

You'd think with the insane demand of electric cars, other orgs would start to realize that people want to be a part of the solution.
Why does it need to be a 20-30 minute journey? It would take a lot longer than that to drive that distance.
> There are solutions that please both sides of the table

I'd love to hear about some of these. As someone who sits firmly on one side of the table (live in central London, don't own a car etc.) my default position is to reject anything which encourages the use of private motor vehicles in the city, so I definitely think I should try to hear the other side!
> The death rate is 100%, no-one gets out alive. So we should get as much out of this life as we can.

I don't think one flows from the other. It could be argued that since the death rate is 100%, nothing really matters. Once dead, we are not going to miss the life not lived. Growing old is a sure way to have regrets.
If I read the article right, with a merger in the offing, they realized that the entire project was likely to be cancelled before launch when the reconstituted executive team performed a thorough review of every line of business.

It's quite common for ventures like this to be put on hold while a review is conducted, and even if the venture is sound, such things often wind up dying because of infighting over the review or loss of momentum. The article suggests that the team, anticipating this outcome, rushed the launch to make it more difficult to cancel the service.

As it happened, the launch fizzled. But if I'm reading it right, the service was doomed from the moment the merger was finalized. Perhaps if the launch was a surprise success, it might have survived the merger.

So perhaps the rushed launch was a "Hail Mary," and while it seems embarrassing, it's no more embarrassing than launching a Hail Mary pass in the dying seconds of an American football game and seeing it picked off and run back for a touchdown.

Such things are of no real consequence, because the game was already lost.
They are among the most notable users of OCaml in the world, and have taken significant stewardship of the language. They sponsor, attend, and publish at multiple academic conferences, especially in the realm of programming languages.

I don't think I can say I support their company's primary mission, but their commitment to improving the world of software through various means (language influence, academic publication, open-source software releases, etc) is admirable and well worth respecting.
Maybe this partly explains why some of the CNN+ YouTube clips were getting orders of magnitude more views than the channel itself.
>t's bizarre to me that the first thing you list that you dislike is "their target audience is boomers"

It's like fighting rage culture of the news with more rage.
Tried it out using my SO as an example and immediately got some great ideas that I didn’t know existed! Thanks for sharing :)
Session ids != usernames/passwords.

Not even close. Why?

* Re-use across sites: people unfortunately reuse passwords across services. That means that getting access to these cookies would be great for credential stuffing attacks. A session identifier is no use for that type of attack.

* Re-auth across devices: you can't typically exchange a session for another session on a different device, but you sure can do so with a password.

* Session ids can be revoked with less user impact (they have to log in again). Passwords can be revoked too (it's a password reset), but it impacts users far more.

As other comments mention, passwords should be manipulated in memory, only stored hashed and salted by a strong algorithm, and seen by the bare minimum of software. Preferably handled by software designed for handling passwords and other sensitive credentials. There are commercial options, free options, and open source options.

(Full disclosure, I work for an auth company.)
I reached the same conclusion as you when I became a biology student and started to learn about morphogenesis, epigenetic reprogramming, DNA repair enzymes, etc.

I wouldn’t have said that a few years ago and would have accepted my fate. However, now my perspective has changed because we’re on the verge of a revolution in biotech (we’ll, one could argue we are in the middle) where we understand enough of the aging process - not all of it - to reverse it or at least slow it down.

However, I’m really disappointed with some of the people in the field such as David Sinclair who have become snake oil salesman and almost charlatans, pushing inconclusive science as facts (e.g. resveratrol, sirtuins, etc) and I think it hurts the field more than anything else.

Interesting years ahead, that’s for sure. I wouldn’t mind living a few more decades as long as I’m healthy and active.
Just so i'm clear on what this is - is this just a bank with a very developer centric and expansive API?
Is a great game but doesn’t challenge my point. The other successful game that transcended Pico-8, Slipways is also great but again isn’t really challenging the point. Also note my point isn’t a slight on Pico-8 itself or enjoying working with technical limitations.
Love the concept.

Having ported a Flutter mobile app to web before, it was simple.

One feedback: The spacing between rows of content gets too big on my vertical pc screen. It seems to me you are trying to make one row take the whole height of the screen.

Feel free to contact me, I would love to contribute. My email is in my profile :)
It’s the median, not the average. And I think for CNN the median is definitely lower than that, but for FoxNews it’s about right.
Or mitigated the issue by disabling the affected feature.
Corporations pay lobbyists so they can bend or ignore the regulations that would otherwise constrain them. Thank you for helping me make that point.
So, you offered to man the phones, get spimd and spamd and you don't know anyone enough to mention "hey, we're pissing a lot of people off, here"?
Durable Tech
>In most applications, a compromised server could just serve a login page that doesn't do the client-side hashing anymore if the malicious actor wanted to collect credentials, so I don't see how this added complexity is really adding any security.

That takes much more time and requires the attacker to be able to, unnoticed, change the served data.
Netflix does not pay in shares, they pay in all cash as their job compensation.
It's just different age groups get unhinged on different platforms. LoL. Even though TVs are for older audiences, they do use unhinged content from platforms for younger people.
This may be a neat use case for bpf at some point.
Good riddance, CNN is horrible and deserves to fail. CNN's false equivalency, "both sides" reporting a la CrossFire has done untold damage to our country and greatly contributed to political polarization. I want objective news--not something that's just giving air time to lobbyists from two different political factions to give their spin. CNN always hired laughably awful people like John Bolton Andrew Cuomo. Jeff Zucker really destroyed credible news programming and hurt America.
Assuming the intention is not to miscommunicate, remote workers need access to the communication pipeline and decisions graph. With hybrid working, many of these are happening face to face, around the watercooler etc, and the burden falls on the office worker to duplicate this work digitally. That is not effective so eventually no longer happens, so remote workers lose out, and office work prevails.

This is why good fully remote organisations decided to not have an office, and appreciate transparency, working in the open, supporting one another etc. Of course these values are not exclusively fully remote.
Oooohhh, I am super curious by what you mean by this. How is gifting culture different outside of North America?
I'm unfamiliar with this Twitter feature. Who is using it to make money?
And I think Better Call Saul is even better than Breaking Bad
"The thing I find interesting with Netflix is how much they spend on content and what a terrible rate of return it has."

Bingo - that's the real reason for the long term (or secular ) decline we're seeing. With 0% interest rates, it didn't matter what the payoff time horizon for Netflix was. With 4% interest rates, longer horizons are gone. Couple that with Netflix being a discretionary expense, and we see the compounding effects of inflation.

Two things will happen - we'll see the real value of Netflix's library content. Do people really value that at $12 per month.

And we'll also likely see an appreciation in the value of the library content from legacy studios like Paramount/NBCU etc. - who have complained for the longest time that this is undervalued relative to Netflix.
> Hard disagree, big-endian is right and little-endian is wrong. At least, unless you think this year is 2202

Our numbers originate from people using a right-to-left script...
FAANG or FANG without N becomes a very unfortunate acronym.
Non-remote work is the same as hearing a low ball offer in negotiations. I’ll keep looking unless I’m desperate. And if I am desperate, I’ll leave as soon as I’m not, as is with tradition.
> I think we’re approaching a point in human evolution where we should all be obsessed with death. Like, spending R&R time on biology.

I believe we are going in that direction in general. Then one day some crazy person wakes up and decides to wage a war and kill thousands for some fantasy, threatening the rest of the world with nukes.

So at the end of the day biology itself is not enough, preventing climate change is not enough. Similar to what we have in IT security, we need to have a way for coordinated global action that would correspond to new threats. As a humanity, we more or less started to learn how to deal with a global pandemic, what are the gravest mistakes, how the governments must not communicate with the public and so on. We are constantly learning and evolving.
Did you select “Remember me” in your test?
Commuting is very expensive, and obvious it's going to be a shock after we've been working from home for the last couple of years but there's one thing that really pushes things over the top for me. I live in a suburb outside of London and take the train to work.

My commute costs me £28.60 for the train and £4.80 for the tube if I buy a ticket daily.

Or I can buy a flexible season ticket - 8 days over a month £200. Or £25 for the train and £4.80 for the tube.

Or I can buy an annual ticket for £4080 + 4.80 for the tube.

So here's the cost:

* 1 day a week in the office: £1603.20 annually -33.4 per day for one day per week

* 2 day a week in the office: £2860.80 annually -26.2 per day for an extra day per week

* 3 day a week in the office: £4291.20 annually -29.8 per day for an extra day per week

* 4 day a week in the office: £5001.60 annually -14.8 per day for an extra day per week

* 4 day a week in the office: £5232.00 annually -4.8 per day for an extra day per week

The pricing is just stupid. The "season" tickets only provide any significant discount when you're traveling into work 4+ days a week. If you're travelling in 60% of the time, you're paying 80% of the price. 20% of the time? 30% of the cost. It's nonsensical.
I'd add Arcane on Netflix, which is also on the top 20 shows of all time on IMBD.
In HFT single-threaded performance is king so that's why we're all still on Intel. AMD is making progress but not just quite there yet.
I imagine many millennials and younger realize they don't get much benefit out of watching the news, especially as other media channels (Facebook, Twitter trending, Reddit r/popular) can get them actual breaking news when it happens. If people do want to see more traditional news, having an news app instead of watching it gives them the freedom to read the news when they have the time for it.
All of the time. Isn't this what computers are personal for? Doesn't everyone?
This begs the question how effective remote work would be if society actually catered to it, rather than catering to mass transit to the city. Most arguments rely on the status quo of western society as a whole, and many still rely on the pandemic situation.
My thinking is that we're approaching this from what we would like to do, and our bosses are approaching this from what is of the most monetary value. They're paying rent. They really don't care if the software development business model no longer fits sitting in an office, they're paying that rent and we had damn well better get our asses in that office. They're willing to lie to get us there too.

In case you're wondering where I'm coming from, my company switched to purely remote. Yet we're still renting a huge office, and we're told to go there every once in awhile. But we're purely remote. It seems pretty obvious that we're just remote until someone can crack the whip and make us go back so they feel like they're getting their money's worth on rent.

I think the other thing worth mentioning, we're not alone. This is going to be done to all of us. Remote work is great, but it turns out companies aren't run for the benefit of the worker.