skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
What you’ve described is a complete and accurate description of the “hydration” approach which the article (also correctly) describes as pure overhead. The approach proposed in the article/implemented in Qwik dispenses with re-running the JS which already ran on the server and just carries on with the state it produced.

The SSR/hydration approach:

- Benefits SEO

- Usually benefits initial content on the screen

- Has a bunch of performance penalties after that as JS is loaded, parsed, and (usually blocking) recreates the data structure representing its initial state

Qwik’s approach (at least conceptually) skips that third point for everything until an interaction needs to respond to some state change based on an interaction, and does that with only the information needed for that event.

In a tweet thread, I described my mental model of this as effectively developing like I’m building an app where all the server/client UI code is shared, but the UX is like I wrote plain HTML with some jQuery or whatever to make a few elements interactive. What Qwik does is determine which parts of the server code need to be the compiled jQueryish code, but only calls it when needed.

An equivalent React codebase would re-render the entire page (well mount point) even if most of it will have no meaningful effect.
I guess it depends on what part of the 1900s... I grew up (also in the 70s&80s) as a "latchkey" in an area that was built in the 50s and 60s and had the same experience of walking and riding to school. This seems like a "reality TV" phenomena of the last 25 years. Certainly, there are suburban deserts that are completely unwalkable, but most housing is not like that (certainly not "affordable" housing) simply because it was built earlier. Of course this is almost entirely dependent on where you live.

https://eyeonhousing.org/2018/08/half-of-us-homes-built-befo...

High growth Tech areas like Seattle, San Jose, Austin, Phoenix are ~10x bigger than they were ~40 years ago. So those are much more likely to have this low density housing than Boston, SF, NYC.

What I find weird is that even completely walkable schools/neighborhoods have parents that almost all drive kids to school every day. Parents legitimately worry about being labeled as endangering their kids, if they don't drive them. Interestingly for me this is more acute for immigrant families, who are worried about fitting in, than local families who will tell the vice principal to "shove it" when warned about the dangers of walking to school.
From what we've seen, it's a control thing. IT or execs want control & reporting. So they force everyone on Jira.

But then the people actually working day-to-day need flexibility. So they end up creating extra spreadsheets off on the side where they work, but those get out-of-date.

During broad pre-build research (even beyond Jira), we found that spreadsheets consistently shadowed the real data in SaaS apps -- ranging from Jira to HR software and everything in between.
Do you have any favourite dev reaction videos?
Update: false alarm.
Ah Dan O’Dowd. He was an early customer of Tesla, and I recall him bragging about owning two red Tesla Roadsters and a Model S.

In any case, I fail to see someone with only one main agenda item could win the Senate. What are his viewpoints on other issues?
https://twitter.com/CapitolPolice/status/1516911625709801472
Going to hazard a guess that he’s mad that Tesla isn’t a customer of his embedded-software-testing product https://www.ghs.com/
It’s less class and a matter of who needs whom. Tell an investor to sign and NDA and he says pass. An employee or potential employee doesn’t have the bargaining chips.
MusE 4.1
Anyone happen to know what the standard is for when something officially counts as data collection? i.e. do you always have to send things sever-side before it counts? With all the fuss about things like cookies, I wouldn't even be that surprised if a form input that went nowhere could somehow still get you in trouble.
Name of the game is traction by any means available. Sounds cynical but I've been following politics closely for some 40 years.
I'm excited to see more profiling tools for Python!

This sounds like it does peak memory, which is critical for batch jobs, since that's the bottleneck. Memory is fundamentally different than performance in that it's a limited resource, instead of cumulative cost; making any part of the program faster almost always helps speed up the program (at least a little, or at least reduces CPU load), but optimizing non-peak memory has no impact. You have to be able to identify the peak in order to reduce memory usage.

If you want peak memory profiling for Python that also runs on macOS, check out https://pythonspeed.com/fil/ (ARM support has some issues, but once I unpack my new Mac Mini I plan to fix it.)

Ways memray is better than Fil:

- Native callstacks.

- More kinds of reports, and ability to do custom post-processing of data.

- Much lower overhead (but not always, see reply).

- Subprocess support.

Fil I suspect has better flamegraphs: https://pythonspeed.com/articles/a-better-flamegraph/

And if you're running Python batch jobs, and want both peak memory and performance profiling in production, check out Sciagraph: https://pythonspeed.com/sciagraph/

(You can probably cobble together something like Sciagraph with py-spy + memray, but you won't e.g. get timeline reports designed with batch jobs in mind.)
Thanks for at least trying to explain!

Of course you can always do a MadLibs-style search and replace on rhetoric.

But are the resulting linguistic similarities relevant in the real world? Isn’t all the real impact on people - who aren’t mere language models - dependent on the relevant magnitudes, & other salient distinctions?

We real people suffer financial losses, or bleed, or starve, or die in revolutionary purges & prison camps. Of those 4 outcomes, only the 1st one can be blamed on some subsets of the 13yo cryptoeconomics movement. For the last three, you've got to wage a "socialist" war on other traditional economic arrangements over decades.

Crypto believers don't have "limitless patience". If after 100y, the fiercest crypto zealots have killed tens or hundreds of millions, they'll update their beliefs. (Probably, much sooner.)
That first image is incredible. The effect is so strong.
Letting the user pick from preset mortality tables seems like a pretty sensible approach to me. Thanks for the link; bookmarked!
Yes! the fact you are asking this belies your understanding of the cloud.
No it has benefits only for the private property owner, never for society at large. All private property is this way. Capitalism is a system that deifies private property, so it will only ever get more and more 'private'
How Apple got its dark mode (2020)
Good point.

The paper does cross-validate the models, and I am told that cross-validation properly penalizes overfitting with too many parameters… but I don't understand the statistics well enough here.
Oh wow!

> And I got: $ go run Example.go hello, world! hello, world!

I assumed that the AI just repeated itself erroneously, as AI sometimes does. But no, it wrote it twice "deliberately":

> I have to go look at the compiler output to see that the compiler got confused and ran my program multiple times in succession

I was not expecting that.
<tinfoil hat> Tesla, or Musk, specifically, won't play ball with the agenda so must be made into an example.
>UPDATE Police say ‘no threat’ at US Capitol after evacuation. Evacuation at the U.S. Capitol caused by U.S. Army team skydiving into stadium for the Washington Nationals.

Major evacuation because of adsb emitting plane?

No I doubt this.
Another take: OP has an oled screen, and the effect is produced by the dark-on-black ghosting. This is happens with dark scrolling objects on black background on my samsung phone, and creates a fluid 3d effect for this particular picture.
No self-respecting elf would be caught dead doing dwarf work.
An options contract is the right to purchase shares at a certain price.

Your vesting gives you the right to purchase more shares.

If you do not purchase those shares, there was no gain, so there was no tax.
FSD (Fools self driving) is the deception created by Tesla, misleading customers to purchase a package (and even hiking prices for upgrades on some unlucky customers) that does not work as advertised, malfunctions and has mountains of safety hazards which also is putting the lives of other drivers at risk.

This contraption is long overdue for a formal investigation.
> Who are you to tell people how to devote their time?

A person who has had to spend an inordinate amount of time getting involved in these things throughout my Life because better coders/developers are too busy navel gazing and just having 'fun.' Honestly, I acknowledge I'm not really good at this, I'm way better at many other things: but I've been able to do a lot with what little I do know. Specifically to put and lead the right teams to accomplish certain goals and go into things solo where I have to.

And it's taken a toll.

> It would be better for all concerned if you would take a break from posting these kinds of directives and get back to developing actual solutions to actual problems.

I've tried, in fact it's why I went to IBM before trying to sound the alarm as they had so many multi-nationals as clients that expressed interest in wanting to spend money on R/D but none of the gatekeeprs cared about broken supply chains and Amazon's consolidation and eventual domination of the SC and shipping Industry (they likely had investments in Amazon) as a result until things broke down during COVID. While funding was around, VC and smaller funds alike have all poured their money into the Stonks frenzy and NFT BS during COVID so there was little to nothing left with to make a PoC let alone pilot-test anything of value that couldn't match the ROI of those hot markets, even to automate warehouse inventory systems in real-time with just NFC to help with forecasting.

(Now things are worse and capital is fearful after large losses in December and the war in Ukraine has made everyone afraid of what will happen for the next 6-18 months.)

This alone would help immensely with the shortages to prioritize allocation and address shortages, I wrote about wanting to create a prototype for the CO2 shortages in the UK [0] that was going o impact everything from medical supplies,food, to beverages and the only viable answer I got was that the need was obvious but every project manager wants to see AI or ML being used to even take any interest. There was a hackathon sponsored by Google at my school but honestly, I had too much to focus on with what I knew was the impending invasion of Ukraine--I was in Ukraine during the proxy war between Belarus and Poland assessing the situation and stress-testing the payment rails with Bitcoin which as you may have realized played a huge part in supplying the Ukrainian military and helping with supply runs and humanitarian aid during Capital controls as we've already done this in 2013-14.

0: https://theconversation.com/the-uk-carbon-dioxide-shortage-s...
Speaking as a self-pronounced bike geek (hence the username), I love seeing e-bikes gain in popularity, since they help normalize cycling as a mode of transportation. Normalizing makes motorists more aware of my existence, and it also increases political pressure to build and maintain cycling infrastructure.

One thing I have mixed feelings about is the fact the people riding e-bikes aren't required to get a license to operate them on public infrastructure. People who want to operate motorcycles on public infrastructure typically have to pass tests (often after taking classes) to qualify for a license. In the classes they teach you about how 2-wheeled vehicles with a motor on the back wheel can get finicky under a variety of situations. The author of the linked article learned that lesson the hard way. I've learned that the hard way even on a leg-powered 2-wheeler. (One lesson: Treat any wet piece of metal on the road as you would a cluster of tiny marbles.)

One e-bike rider who would often pass me on a trail (usually well above the 15mph speed limit) on my morning commute just kept on blasting through corners as the weather gradually turned colder through the fall season. One morning there was enough frost accumulated on the pavement that I saw him slide right out on a patch of frost while he gunned the throttle around a corner like he probably did for the past ~100 times on his commute.

Another co-worker of mine was cycling in to work for a while. Part of the commute went down a steep hill. I warned him that, when he sees that the grass is frosty in the morning, he should probably take another route that's not so steep. Sure enough, on the first of said frosty days that year, he showed up to work with a messed-up elbow. He told me he remembered what I told him, but he thought, "Okay, so the grass is frosty. The road looks okay, I guess. How dangerous can it be? I'm sure it will be fine." It wasn't.

The thing about traction on a bike: You've got it, over and over and over again, until suddenly one time you don't. And the instant you lose traction, you're generally gonna have a bad time.

Unless someone somewhere has drilled that into your head in the form of a class or test or whatever, you're not going to know when you need to slow way down and possibly dismount. Or avoid a specific route altogether. Or swap out for studded tires. Or even maybe take the bus that day. You'll be likely to just keep doing what's always "worked" up until then, to your peril.
> I'm not clear on the point being made here
> Instead it is being driven by more women in education and work, as well as greater access to contraception, leading to women choosing to have fewer children

Whilst extreme, having large families was a way of life in order to survive because the rate of attrition was high until hygiene & sanitation became more common place, its not just access to contraception or women in education because OnlyFans negates the latter point succinctly!
It's so odd to see Musk become a boogeyman for the political left. I'm hard pressed to name a single individual that's doing more to combat global warming than Musk is via fleet electrification.
April 21st, 2022. According to the release schedule: https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/jammy-jellyfish-release-sched...
To be fair, a fairly basic premise in Christianity is that the truth is unknowable, we as humans are too limited to grasp it, and it is only through divine revelation we may have access to the truth. You really shouldn't be finding people claiming to have all the truths about God's acts, plans, and nature -- at least that's a sign they haven't quite grasped fairly central themes in the faith.

Interestingly, there's an extensive tradition of negative theology, that is the study of what we can't know about God. This isn't exclusively a Christian thing, but seems to be the result of the Skeptic tradition of Hellenic philosophy coming into contact with the Abrahamic faiths.

John Scotus wrote that "God is not, because he transcends being". Something to think about.
With a cellphone and bitrefill, you can use crypto to buy gift cards for most retailers. By the end of the year you may see direct Lightning support in some places too.

It's a better time than ever if you're trying to live without a regular bank account.
What discussion? Canada doesn't like freedom of thought, and likes to police thoughts? That's not newsworthy, it is an irrelevant backwater country with no substance of it's own.

What's even a Canadian? a deeply religious Hutterite in Alberta? An Inuit with their own tribal/folk religion? An atheist in coastal British Columbia or metropolitan Ontario? Catholic Quebecker? A somewhat religious Hindu immigrant? religious for appearances only Middle Eastern immigrant? a Scottish Druid?

Canada is just a hotel, with really bad weather.

As for "discussions", at the very core, belief is freedom of thought.

If one can no longer have whatever wacky beliefs anything from cargo cults to ufo religions, anything really - now we are getting into thought policing. However, Canadians appears to think policing thought is not damaging to society, who would've expected a hotel of a country with no culture of its own and history of mere 300-400 years to have any other opinion? It is profoundly important to have freedom of belief, conscience and thought. As long as others doesn't infringe on my freedoms, they can believe whatever nonsense.

To think that institutions that supported humanity for thousands of years, helped us survive until today, through all sorts of disasters, difficulties and strife, are all of a sudden damaging to society? Only a lunatic could believe this.

The better question would be to ask why is there a global resurgence in religion? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Desecularization

P.S.
I'm not sure why you assume everyone you are talking to online is Christian? Religions vary wildly, and all have very different values. Some don't even have concepts of "salvation" or enlightenment. in others, even some similar concepts might exist - even your personal existence and well being is actually of little to no concern in some creeds, as they are inward oriented.
Bicameral mind has a very different idea of how people were. https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Bicameral_mentality

\tangent Becoming aware of how differently the same words can be interpreted, even in person, makes me question whether actual communication is possible, at all. Shared context help tremendously (e.g. talking about a physical location), and concerns are clear, so there's only a few things a person might mean. In general, I think human beings do much work in calibration, along with their instinctive compulsion to conform. It also suggests one explanation of their intolerance and fear of difference.

The uncanny vall=y is most dangerous, when communication seems oc%ur, without a cautiona&y flag that a check is ne@d#d.
"Others familiar with the rollout stressed that O’Dowd’s team has privately been adamant he’s not trying to unseat freshman Democratic Sen. Alex Padilla, who was appointed last year when Kamala Harris ascended to the vice president job. Instead, O’Dowd’s play for the Senate is likely being carried out as a cost-saving measure and to significantly enhance the likelihood that networks will air his TV spots. Running for office entitles him to the lowest available ad rate in the run-up to the election — a perk that could save him considerable money depending on the ultimate spend. But a bigger advantage, two people familIar with his plans said, is the higher degree of first amendment protection a political run could give him for his loaded claims against Tesla."

This is why. Sweet deal on the airtime.

Source: https://www.politico.com/news/2022/04/16/don-odowd-elon-musk...
A basic problem for the Democrats is that the Democratic billionaires run vanity campaigns while the Republican billionaires just buy elections.
The subreddit is definitely biased against men, but I don't know if it's representative of society at large. Reading the subreddit often feels jarring and alien to me but that may be because most of its users are American and the US has lots of social norms (especially regarding gender) that are nonsensical to me as someone who grew up in Scandinavia. On the other hand, I assume Reddit users are not very representative of the average American, and people who participate in a subreddit about judging social behavior are probably not representative of the average Reddit user.
It's great that your co-habitant was able to open a bank account. Given fees, including credit union (low) minimums or activity rules, it's risky with an unsteady income stream.

To spend time worrying about this is time that will never be returned. And it continues for many as trust is asked for.

Yay stress. There was a lot of yelling outside today, my eye hurts.
I was initially on Tesla's side of this debacle. Innovation is good and Tesla is definitely innovating. Over time it's becoming more clear that Elon pushes for engineering marvels to happen on an unrealistic timeline. I suppose it's a net positive as the team is driven to fulfil their potential. If they could start doing that without driving over pedestrians it would be even better.
No, of course not. I’m not talking about the user experience. I’m talking about native support in the fetch API to take downloaded data and save it to a file. User experience might be the user being prompted for a location, etc, just like now when saving a file through a hyperlink download.
Are you suggesting that USA's "entire economy" is premised upon whether the sanctions on Russia work or not? Russia effectively sold itself to China for.. what? The Donbas region? C'mon. This was all a massive miscalculation and the Russian people are going to be paying for it for _generations_.
Works just fine for my two cars thanks... I feel like you haven't driven one?
Right. In essence, I think these details of the redistributive function are what make it Ponzi-like or sound.

On one end of the spectrum, you have personal and "defined contribution" saving and investment schemes: the individual carries a personal pool into their later years where they draw it down. How are differences between the contribution+performance and lifetime needs reconciled? Estates pass inheritances or individuals are bankrupt and we recursively ask ourselves what sort of system will cover their needs.

In the middle, you have what I think you want. An insurance pool redistributes the contributions, performance, and needs among a cohort. How are the aggregate assets and lifetime needs of the cohort reconciled? Contributions could be curtailed in response to excess accumulation or increased to cope with unexpected needs. Like any insurance scheme, the risk management has complexity around managing liquidity in the face of time-varying needs, contributions, and investment/economic performance.

But what skeptics see is an ugly reality unfolding further down that spectrum. Population growth and the long delay between contribution and withdrawal is (either naively or willfully) misinterpreted as excess accumulation. This is used to justify either insufficient contribution or "theft" of assets to fund other initiatives than the insurance pool. This leaves a hollowed out pension systems with defined benefits that cannot be satisfied with their meager holdings. As with a Ponzi scheme, they appear to work while the incoming contributions from an ever growing cohort are used to pay outgoing benefits to an earlier, smaller subset of participants. They collapse when the participation rate fails to grow fast enough to meet the ever growing needs of the aging cohort.
It worked for Bill Gates temporarily. Has Warren Buffet been canc^H^H^Honsequenced yet?
I'm pretty sure he's a different and, er, briefly infamous HN personality.
One might argue that enforcement of traditional property rights is inhumane in many cases too.
If you watch it, you'll notice:

- Most of the kids live in quiet country towns or rural areas
- Most of the errands avoid crossing roads, or:
- If they do, then the assistants are checking for and controlling traffic
- It shows kids doing their first ever errand, it's not their everyday life
I was surprised when I saw his name attached to this project too. But goodness, having followed it for some time, are you ever wrong. If anything Qwik has reminded me professionally that people really can learn from their experiences and surprise you. Angular was in fact terrible. Qwik is not Angular or like it in any way.
It's not always assumed to be exponential. It was assumed exponential by Paul Romer because long-term economic growth is pretty exponential. Much subsequent work has followed that model, but not all of it.