skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Much of the time decisions to break backwards compatibility are made to remove roadblocks in the OS development process. Keeping old software for the platform running forever has a high cost, and so I think that OS vendors wanting to limit how far back that compatibility goes is entirely reasonable.

If the argument is that OS vendors should include virtualized old OS environments for compatibility with old binaries to make sure OS development remains unencumbered, I could get behind that, but in that situation App Store listings of seldom updated apps should include a highly visible indicator that it’s been many years since the last update and as such expectations of significant bug fixes and support should be tempered.
Reducing taxes is a pretty big one. Even the most editorialized and anti-Trump articles[1] admit that "the bill helped average families". These articles usually go on at length complaining that the tax cuts also help the rich.

But this is the kind of thing that directly and immediately helps the middle / working class. Reducing their tax burden puts money back in their pocket.

[1] https://www.usatoday.com/in-depth/news/politics/elections/20...
How would you actuate that piston? Drill through the hydrogen tank to run hydraulic lines? That's a nice place for hydrogen leaks. Electric? In a hydrogen tank?
You're correct, it was a typo.
I didn't try it with the CSS theme branch, the main version used 10-20mb for the example scripts.
The UK had to implement EU decisions and laws, including those the government and voters directly disagreed with. That is what subservient means, in this context.

The fish debacle ( the UK refusing to license EU-based ships).

There are lots of licensed EU fishing vessels. Note that Jersey isn't actually a part of the UK, technically it's a Crown Dependency. Anyway. The full story of the dispute is much more complicated than that:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2021_Jersey_dispute

Summary:

- After Brexit an amnesty period was agreed before the new fishing permissions were enforced on UK/Jersey territorial waters.

- French fishermen reacted by adopting unsustainable fishing techniques like aggressive trawling. Basically trying to extract as much marine wealth as possible before they were restricted. "Young accused French trawlers of "breaking the spirit of the amnesty" and that due to recent dredging by French trawlers that Jersey's marine ecology "won’t take this for much longer and, if it goes on, we will have to close the area off for years". This hadn't been anticipated in the agreement and appears to have poisoned relations from the get-go.

- The agreement involved granting licenses to fishermen who had been fishing there previously and could evidence that. The French authorities weren't submitting valid evidence to the Jersey authorities (blaming bureaucratic screwups like lost documents).

- Because the evidence wasn't meeting the requirements, licenses weren't always being issued quickly.

So far, ordinary bureaucracy. It should have never really reached public attention at all, as it could have been sorted out between the local authorities. Unfortunately what followed was this:

1. Blockades of Jersey harbor by the French fishermen, with the French government doing nothing.

2. French boats were repeatedly caught illegally fishing, claiming they'd been told by the French government they could fish wherever they wanted. See the trawling problems above.

3. Shortly after, the French government banned Jersey fishermen from landing fish in France. No justification was given. This was in violation of the agreement and Jersey thus said it'd appeal to the EU Commission. That was not only ignored but the French simply escalated the ban to include all freight movements, again, in plain violation of the agreements.

4. The French government then escalated again and threatened multiple times to cut off Jersey's electricity supply in retaliation.

From the UK's perspective this was all well out of proportion to the scale of the problem. Also it involved unilateral violations of the agreement by France, no workable suggestions for how to do things better and after that an MEP argued that it should be escalated to full blown trade sanctions. Without passing judgement on which side was "right" in this dispute it's obvious why the UK would want to diversity energy supplies away from the EU.
How long does an image format need to be around before it becomes un-controversial, I wonder?
Yes. They also use telephones, eat fast food, watch sports, drive cars and do all they other thing that 90+% of heterosexual males do. Blaming video games is just the latest intergenerational boogieman. 30 years ago it was too much television. 50 years ago it was too many comic books. In every generation there is a new media technology that the old blame for corrupting the young.
> “We will not declare her dead until she is warm and dead.”

More cases of kids than adults surviving very low body temperatures, but the saying is true, as long as you're not warm and dead there is some hope.
Ask HN: Rust embedded testing frameworks
Hey HN, I've been developing hardware products with stm32's using Rust.
I'm starting to look at tests to prevent regression issues and stabilize firmware releases but integration testing with embedded seems quite difficult.

What is currently available for embedded testing, both in the C/++ and Rust worlds? What are current industry standards surrounding this?

In the past I've seen proprietary simulators built (obviously with their own shortcomings), this would allow integration tests on simulated hardware. Are there any initiatives happening to standardize this in the Rust world?

Thanks
> handing your life support to a distant and culturally different country

As horrible as it sounds, Morocco isn't a nuclear power and would be crushed in an afternoon by UK armed forces while western media across the planet creates a hundred different justifications and the world's diplomats send their congratulations for neutralising the energy terrorists because they couldn't care less what happens to them.

This is a completely different situation wrt to Germany <-> Russia
I see only Ukrainian symbols in that video. Only yellow and blue. No extremist symbols.

The extremist elements of Azov have long since been weeded out. And do you know where the word Azov comes from? Sea of Azov, ie. where Mariupol is. Have you seen pictures of what the Russians have done to Mariupol?
I think this comment could be longer, but I think it has an in important point. The article ignores a huge change over that time period: increasing freedom for women from patriarchy.

Any sort of "staying with the mother of their kids" argument has to acknowledge we can't just turn the clock back. The truth then and now is that a lot of men were not and are not good partners. (Anybody who doubts me should spend time reading Am I the Asshole. Not only are bad male parental partners rife, but they are often bad in ways that echo patriarchal beliefs that would have been perfectly acceptable back in the day.) Just as an example, marital rape was not outlawed in all 50 states until 1993, and it was legal everywhere until 1972.

Young men do need plenty more education and pressure on how to do it right. But we must acknowledge it's a new kind of right. And I think we need new kinds of measures. "Family stability" in an unhappy or unsafe home is not something we should be aiming for.
Agreed. real satanic-panic vibes here.

I can’t be the only one who grew up seeing how little is expected of affluent men.

The ideal is someone “brilliant” who gets others to do what’s expected of him. And then you can afford to be divorced and retain respect.
What about people who pee on or in them?
Ah, not so great then. Although a quick trip on the goog indicated it can be burned at lower temps with less noxious output, though it may be a fine line to walk.
This article is failing to see a fundamental distinction in spousal relations between "now" (present era) and "then" (pre-1970s): economic dependency between women and men.

On the whole, if you mothered children in the pre-feminist era, and you didn't have a spouse... you and your children could starve. Because there was very little space carved out in our society for women to work. And under the cover of that asymmetry of power men got away with all sorts of abuses.

Yes, the family may have stuck together. And there was a defined and potentially socially responsible role for men in this context: provider and economic glue and source of authority for the family. But at what cost? Spousal and child abuse rates were sky high, though they may not have even been perceived as such at the time. They were just part of the normal authoritarian structure of the family.

Have young men suffered from the changes that have come along with women obtaining additional powers and the bonds of the nuclear family becoming less strong? Quite possibly. But we also have to accept that what was holding that together was also potentially toxic.

Put another way: In general -- over the last 200 years -- capitalist market relations have severed many traditional bonds and obligations. The primary obligation of an adult individual, in our liberal capitalist society, is as a wage labourer, an economic contributor. On the whole people "are" what they "do" (for $$).

The family structure has always been a mix of authoritarian bonds and genuine warmth, material obligations, etc. I think we're still figuring out what its new form will be. It may be that in our neo-liberal hyper-capitalist present society that there are contradictions here we cannot resolve.

Marx/Engels thought so, anyways, check out this paragraph from the Communist Manifesto:

"On what foundation is the present family, the bourgeois family, based? On capital, on private gain. In its completely developed form, this family exists only among the bourgeoisie. But this state of things finds its complement in the practical absence of the family among the proletarians, and in public prostitution. "
A surprising number of people in the 50% who get extra privileges seem fine with it.
When I was in my twenties, I thought having a family before you were in your thirties meant you were kinda dumb. That’s what people who didn’t have ambitions did.

Fast forward to now and it is one of my very few regrets. I have three kids, but wish I would have started in my twenties and prioritized family more.

When I was in my twenties, the homer Simpsons of the world were idiots. In my thirties, they were the ones who got it right.
Got scammed by using Bing instead of Google
Nope. It was removed from libraries and book stores because some people were offended by the images in the books.

https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-56577725
Great idea. Remind me in 8 years, will you?
Not that I know anything about this, but isn't it the job of "the grid" to make sure all sources of energy combined can provide the necessary power at all times? No individual power source is ever completely reliable.

Please forgive my naive question. I have exactly zero relevant expertise.
Oh, nice, so in case of wars a cheap submarine can just put a small and cheap charge deep in the sea and boom, 10GWp power are out of the UK national grid. How nice.

My fellow humans remember a thing: a national grid is not national because of politics but because a such critical part of a country infra it's better to be self-sufficient under nation borders and hopefully self-sufficient inside those borders even in case of major attacks (translated, not few big power plants, but many small and a distribution network designed to survive significant damages).

We, westerners have had the best industry and technology in the world, now for some neoliberals economic devastating ideas we pull it apart outsourcing anything because that's pay back, in thin air, well, and now we see a new world power, China, arise and we see our power wane. How much damage we want to take before annihilating with lifelong court rulings against those economy-driven society? We really want to wait till being completely lost?
I just tend to think of scales in terms of numbers and not letters, so the pain of having an "uneven" naming for the notes is worse for me than any pain from no longer having letters line up perfectly with two specific scales. But I can see why the current naming is useful for piano players.
It’s a status thing and it takes time for public perception to change. The hotels have been careful to explain the environmental and carbon benefits everytime they make a change like this - even ten years ago “pump soap” would be considered something you find in a large public restroom, not a fancy hotel.

Even if the hotels are using it as an excuse to save money; good on them. Senseless waste is silly.
FWIW I do tech at a bank and while I can’t speak to the absolute need for a phone for authorizations, I can say that the blessed platforms are required because the device profiling for transactions is implemented for fraud detection and prevention. Non-standard OSes can’t be trusted, or IDed for trust. Fraud identification and prevention is the driving force for this requirement.
The peppi (sorry, "pepe") le frog meme has become associated with the alt-right generally but the incel community specifically. I doubt he meant that he was literally wearing one as that would be a huge problem in our military. I take his statement to mean that he understands the question and its implication.
I've been using MX Route after the recommendation by a trusted third party. It's been working well for me so far. No regrets and I like their simple annual pricing plan.
It depends on the circumstance. I'm also from a poor background in a third world country (so super poor by Western standards), and although I did work both very hard and very smart, if I had not moved to a first world country there's no way I would have achieved much. Sometimes your environment can make it that hopeless, and I've seen it in many of the younger people back in my home country now. They've essentially just "checked out" of society, which leads to higher crime and unemployment overall.
I don't think the left thinks of privilege solely as racial or gender privilege. Here's an article on "everydayfeminism.com" about the broad view progressives take on it: https://everydayfeminism.com/2014/05/income-vs-wealth/
And commercial food producers make their products more addictive too... How about the tobacco industry? How about illicit drugs? Porn?

At some point you need to talk about personal responsibility...
From what I've seen, there's an entire industry of conservative economists Like Arthur Laffer and Larry Kudlow (to name a mere two, there are entire billionaire funded thinktanks like AEI dedicated to this) to deny the reality of the issues you mention, not unlike scientists paid to deny Climate Change or Tobacco's cancer links. And because of this, conservatives don't even believe that such issues exist.
You’re defending one luxury belief (“defund the police”) with another (“the black experience with police is exclusively one of victimhood”). Notably, your “backlash” includes 81% of black Americans according to Gallup.
I think the engine design has to be changed too. Basically a full engine swap.

I initially saw their comment as meaning adapting the existing engines to use hydrogen. I see now that they might just mean using engines designed for hydrogen, not the jet engines we have today that use jet fuel.

Yeah, the gas turbines would be easy to convert compared to jet engines.
Here's the most important part:

> 3. The upper class, who wants to keep you mired in it

I cannot stress enough how much division and polarization is driven by the wealthy who have a vested interest in sowing discord among the lower classes.

The truth of the matter is that you, as a lower-income white person, have way more in common with a lower-income black person than a wealthy white person. Yet the amount of people who will vehemently oppose the very idea that the likes of Jezz Bezos and 8 other people pay slightly more taxes is mind-boggling.

Republican-controlled state legislatures are busy passing laws to create wedge issues against trans people, gay people, womens' reproductive rights and so on. And it's nothing more than a method of control, of whipping up the base with issues most of the country actually doesn't care about.

I really wish people were better at recognizing this manipulation as we've now progressed to the point where the #1 "news" show in the US is spreading straight up Nazi propaganda [1]. I don't mean that as a perjorative. It is quite literally Nazi propaganda.

[1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DGb748VOcYU
Yes, I can see that, also you're not dead yet, you may still reshape those relationships.

Also you may not have experienced the adversity necessary to forment the desire for a fuller sibling relationship.
Sorry, but debug builds weren't the only builds that leaked. The performance was just never there.
Idea Assembly Part #473
Now do it with ketchup packets.
> This link outright proves there are not 10 million men unemployed in America. https://www.statista.com/statistics/193244/unemployment-leve... So who's statistics are right?

Both of them are right, this is a common confusion in unemployment statistics. Unemployment as a technical term refers to people who both don't have a job and are "in the workforce", meaning they gave the right answers for the survey taker to conclude they're looking for a job. People who aren't trying to find a job are "out of the workforce" but not "unemployed".
It's also complete hearsay. Idk why these random opinion blogs are getting so much traction on HN. Actual science exists.
<https://seriot.ch/projects/parsing_json.html>

Much of the implementation divergence is the fault of underspecification (though not all; some of it is just shoddy coding in its own right). The original RFC described only the grammar of JSON, not equivalence of JSON texts or normalization. Later specifications try to paper over that fact by specifying certain interoperability conditions without outright requiring them for conformance.
Me too but I have no idea what large foreign market are using.
> A common answer from the chattering class is money. The conventional view is that a lack of money leads to out-of-wedlock births.

> But broken homes are a fairly recent phenomenon.

I don't get why the author dismisses income, and especially income inequality, so quickly. Since the 1960s the income gap between the affluent and the working class has grown a lot. The quality of "working class" jobs has also declined. Where in 1960, "working class" meant you could afford a house, a car, healthcare, and often had a pension provided by your employer. A 2022 working class job looks more like Amazon warehouse work where you can be fired at any time for failing to meet some algorithmic quota.

It's no wonder then that respect plays a role:

> Money usually becomes an issue because he seems unwilling to keep at a job for any length of time, usually because of issues related to respect. Some of the jobs he can get don’t pay enough to give him the self-respect he feels he needs, and others require him to get along with unpleasant customers and coworkers, and to maintain a submissive attitude toward the boss.

Perhaps the real failing of the upper class is creating jobs that treat the working class like disposable cogs, liable to be discarded at will. And yet the author subtly shifts the blame for onto the working class for not putting up with it.
Recycling was a scam invented to pretend plastic is acceptable.

We should straight up give up on much of recycling and go back to focusing on the recycling that matters and is worthwhile, and begin to heap scorn on plastics the same way we have done on styrofoam (remember when every big Mac came in it’s own styrofoam container?).
Wow the world's manufacturing plant wonders what it can get out of having Russia be an exclusive customer.

No way that can't backfire on the US! I swear a lot of arguments completely ignore how willing China is to put down the West.
iphone and ios evolved a lot over the years, many things changed

i think it is important to require yearly maintenance for apps

- security reasons

- 3rd party APIs updated/unreachable

- using newer compiler optimization to optimize battery usage

- replacing deprecated APIs

and many more benefits
Come on now, you're just being silly. "Yeah the ecosystem collapsed and everything's dying, but GDP is off the charts from all the cleanup work we're paying people to do!"
I thought the part before your second excerpt was insightful as well.

> We’re trying to restore a billion oysters to New York Harbor and to engage a million people in that work by 2035. By setting these goals, we’re basically saying that we must stop thinking of habitat restoration and improving public education as two separate issues. The best way to improve outcomes for both is to combine them and train students to restore the environment. [...]

Environmental impact is all about scaling: either because your process is self-multiplying or because part of your process is training >1 people who will carry on and contribute to the work.

You can be the best, most productive oyster farmer in the world, but there's always going to be a cap to what you can do alone. Physical processes need physical muscle.
No, it still uses triangles. That seems to be a misunderstanding of how they do their clusters: They switched to a software rasterizer for drawing light volumes and decals into the clustered light buffer, meaning it's now a scatter rather than a gather (parallelized over lights, rather than tiles). This is pretty standard, but it's limited to those low res cluster info buffers, and is only rasterizing a handful of triangles per light.
Existing jets have both anti-sloshing baffles and active pumps to redistribute the jet fuel between tanks:

http://www.b737.org.uk/fuel.htm
Why do you think it's more common with conservatives?

You said it yourself, cultural wars are just distraction to keep the elite in power and talk about everything except classes. People in power don't care about conservatives or liberals, they just pick a team and play the game.
Visuals that will change how you see success and productivity
Children raised in a non-dysfunctional two parent household (regardless of parental gender / sexual orientation) witness healthy interdependence, cooperation, negotiation, trust, respect, conflict resolution, love etc. between their primary caregivers during their critical development period. Raising a child with a good partner is about more than resource availability.
The article mentioned nothing about contraception. Is it not easily accessible?
> Germany has just had a hard lesson in having significant energy dependency on Russia.

The UK can't quit Russian oil, coal, and gas any faster than Germany - that should teach you a lesson.
> Norms were loosened around being an absentee father. So more men took the option.

> But nobody wants to admit it because it upsets people.

This is the main thesis of the post sandwiched by loads of data and charts yet completely unsourced and devoid of evidence. Maybe true, maybe not. This is basically a well-reasoned hypothesis but there's no reason to believe it's true.
Do you have any screenshots? That webpage is very bare.