skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> the Fed's increasing of the interest rate is causing a stock market crash

You think this is a crash?!
>In most cases they are a way to purchase bonds and alike for people who don't want (or don't know how) to deal with that, and the bank pocketing the difference for their services.

Yeah and banks basically gave up on buying corporate bonds and only want treasuries or reserves. QE is basically a way to let banks use your savings account to buy treasuries. The commercial bank is making the decision on what to invest in, not the Fed. The Fed is actually just giving commercial banks as many reserves as they request.
The new gen of Intel chips is somewhat notable because despite AMD fanboys (that's what they are) saying hurr-durr TDP they are very efficient gaming chips (i.e. realistic workloads), so yes it will be a win. They are absolute monsters on a single-thread. Might be worth waiting for Zen4 / raptor lake, at very least for a price drop.
> I suspect Varoufakis would be more amenable to labour markets regulated so that labour without ownership is not legal, which would not be capitalism

He pretty much stated it in one of his answers: he'd want to get rid of tradable shares and replace ownership with 1 job = 1 share. The same open job market that's used today can remain in place, just with labor - not capital - owning the shares.
Not necessarily: EACA VideoGenie EG 3003 for approximately $1400 (in Germany).
Note that the tax-free educational expenses apply only to higher education and have an AGI cut-off, though. Read the fine print!
That is a more transparent answer and direct answer, yes. Maybe if you had lead with that sentence, I wouldn't have been inclined to respond. But it also fails to address what I point out below. (as an aside, this answer is also not one that I find satisfactory on the actual topic.)

Dllthomas correctly pointed out that given the two premises that (from the frame of the observer) (1) [matter takes infinite time to transit the horizon] and (2) [due to hawking radiation, black holes have a finite time span], then (2) resolves (1) when the black hole disappears.

To recap, Instead of acknowledging that (2) resolves (1) you proceed to question the existence of hawking radiation and black hole evaporation, which compared to consensus is a radical view and is not warranted. Also the pivot was done in a way that seems to complicate and obfuscate rather than address the point directly (this is a common debate tactic; however I'm not sure if you were conscious of the behavior or if it was more subconscious/rationalization (more likely); you may not have even been aware you were doing it).

It seems like you chose to reject consensus instead of simply accepting that (2) resolves (1), maybe because you seem to have a fixation on not ever conceding a point in a conversation. Sometimes it's ok just so say, "yeah, that's a good point".

(btw if you're rejecting hawking radiation why say anything about black hole theory at all this point because it could all be wrong, no reason to speculate about it)
The same can be said for feudalism, yet powerful monarchs are largely gone.

The innovations that help people live longer aren't private property, they're medical science and city planning.

They don't depend on private property to continue existing
Yes, but knowing assembly language won't help you through complicated C declarations of the sort used to demonstrate cdecl.
I believe the transfer will simply be bottlenecked, like running a raspberry pi from an sd card.

To fully utilize the connection you can use storage backed by memory. For example ESXi allows you to back a vm by a "virtual pmem" disk that uses a chunk of your host system dram
Is this compiled from one source or (say) from individual anandtech bnenchmark results? I just say this to ask if there is repeated readings.
> How does the contract know when it has been completed?

Escrow, or an oracle (checking, say, FedEx delivery.)
I really doubt you will experience any improvement.
At least here in Argentina, the official exchange rate is US$1=AR$100.

But if you want to buy US$1 you must pay from AR$150[1] to AR$200[2] or even more. There are a few methods and each one has different maximal amounts, delays, technical problem and level of legality.

[1] It's a very optimistic number, discounting a rebate that will get paid in may 2023, up to US$200 per month per person.

[2] Or even more, probably AR$215 or something.
Since there are several questions about Encrypted Client Hello (ECH), and I kind of hand waved that section, I thought an example might be useful.

Let's say the system is running two web server daemons: a multi-tenant blog hosting platform listening on 2001:db8::1, and a multi-tenant bug tracker listening on 2001:db8::2. snid is on 192.0.2.1. Your DNS records would look like this:

blogs.example.com. A 192.0.2.1
blogs.example.com. AAAA 2001:db8::1
bugs.example.com. A 192.0.2.1
bugs.example.com. AAAA 2001:db8::2

The various tenants would be CNAMEd to one of these hostnames like:

blog.domain1.example. CNAME blogs.example.com.
bugs.domain2.example. CNAME bugs.example.com.

The "decoy" hostnames (the "public_name" in ECH parlance) would be blogs.example.com or bugs.example.com. Thus, ECH would hide which tenant the client is connecting to, but would not hide the service. Note that if the client were connecting over IPv6, an eavesdropper would be able to determine the service anyways by looking at the destination IP address, which is unencrypted.
Personally this just isn't the hill I'd die on. We've seen decades of wage stagnation, reductions in benefits, the gutting of retirement plans, hours-worked manipulation and so on and the thing we collectively rise to defend is... remote/hybrid work?

I guess it might be because all the items in the list generally impact the poor and working class, while we bourgeoisie don't really face _those_ problems. So we tilt at windmills.
Must be more on this thread (and what led up to the 'Just called btw this is Elon'. So someone texts Larry Page and claims they are Elon Musk and they are believed to be that person? (By Larry Page I mean)
I mean it isn't killing people, but it is admittedly strange. How about if instead you use Dominatrix and Sub? Or Officer and Prisoner?

Would those not be inappropriate because it's just borrowing terminology?

There are only a few of these progressive changes I find really valid, but this is one I can understand. It's not that it's killing people, it's just if we can change it then why not. It is kind of weird to use, given the history of slavery in the majority of the world. Can't we just not have references to slavery in the BIOS of my computer?
Installed or download size? IDK about PS5, but many Steam games seem to do some decompressing during installation.
Massachusetts’ business environment favours business while California’s is more favourable to workers. This was a major reason behin moving the magic from east to west coastal. Mass is still one of the key sectors of biotech/pharma.
I think, it’s just another intellectuel and speculative game to play. Fun as well with some interactive products.

But I think it’s more rigged than the stock market, insider trading and rug pull are too many
The librarians I know think that even deliberate misinformation should be properly archived rather than disappeared. If you're experiencing cognitive dissonance here, please examine how the Twitterati and Librarians are different populations with different motivations and value systems.
ECH can't hide which backend the client wants, but if a particular backend handles multiple hostnames, it can hide which of those hostnames the client wants. I went into further detail here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31136335
Nice list! Bookmarked. How comes not any board or open hardware design platform like Arduino or any sparkfun/nodemcu/etc are listed? Not even based on the platform they are based?
I never said otherwise, and neither did the author.

Although now that you mention it, that’s not always true… which is exactly why the AGPL was written.
There are various ways to modify a pushup. The absolute easiest that I know of being a standing push up -- stand, plant your hands on a wall, and do the push up motion. Horizontal pushups can also be made easier.

Feels dissatisfying to not even do a "real" pushup, but on the other hand, shoulder injuries are hell.
It's a counterexample, not an attempt to prove equivalence. Banks-as-middlemen allow reversing just about anything on the basis of firm handshakes, with little regard to the wishes of the parties they stand in for. Taking "reverse" to mean "do it again in the other direction" and "reversible" to mean "untrusted parties delegate control to intermediaries who trust each other", both of which are true here, means it's perfectly compatible with crypto. It does render any advantages moot, but avoiding the latter is typically the goal, and this linguistic sleight of hand obscures it.

For the actual topic, I don't have any respect for these ICOs/mints/[newest renaming], they're shameless cash grabs with 98% marketing and 2% upwork-tier code. However, you can burn a million quid; I don't think it's a big deal that you can burn 34 million in digital currency due to extreme negligence.
Here is my first exposure to her. Its an in depth discusson on her own book. She does strike me as very cynical.

https://www.econtalk.org/sabine-hossenfelder-on-physics-real...
Perhaps we would not have to rely on other entities such as Apple/Google/Microsoft/Dropbox/etc to serve our content if we had decent upload bandwidth at home.
That's legendary stuff right there
To address your last sentence: yes, if you can get those five countries to agree on anything, it's probably trustworthy.
Infinitesimal is right.

Since EIP-1559 went live in August 2021, over $6.3 billion worth of Ethereum has been burned since they now burn transaction fees instead of giving them to miners. They burn about $11 million per day!

This $34 million is a drop in the bucket and note that even though all that was ETH burned, the price is still below where it was when they started.

https://watchtheburn.com/
It can if it’s bumped and spills onto fabric, like old rags.
I wrote a web server that uses go http but not http.serve for this reason. I wanted more control over accept and close. Nice thing is the http library is decently composed, so you can take all the parts you want and build up.
Public school library != public library
> For example, we know QM are GR are inconsistent, so if I give you a parsimonious, consistent theory that captures both QM and GR in the appropriate limits, then that's a great reason to prefer it.

Absolutely agree. But BHILP is not the only inconsistency, so if you only solve that one and leave the others, but complicate the math or add other elements that can't be tested, it's not a particularly compelling theory.

So, why not work directly on the other inconsistencies, which might be directly testable, and see if this one disappears that way?

To be clear, when I say other inconsistencies, I am referring to things like making QFTs work in a non-flat spacetime, and/or reconciling the linearity of QM (without Born's rule) and the non-linearity of GR.
Elon is gonna save them. all ads will be welcome!
And Finland may soon be moving from third world to first world.
As noted by another HN user, it's clear that this doesn't do anything interesting on Linux. Also, higher codegen units will produce slower code at times. Overall, on Linux I do not notice any significant improvement in build times (we already use sccache)
I disagree. I think that platforms have some sort of responsibility to vet the ads who run on their platform. Not just for science or politics but in general.

1/2 of the reason I have used an adblocker for 20 years is because of how often straight-up malware has made it onto advertising networks because of a lack of vetting.[1]

There's a discussion to be had about twitter and social media removing posts and posters but I don't feel like this is that discussion. I feel like this is a positive (or at least neutral) development.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malvertising#History
There are other ISPs in the states that are much more competitive (I work at one). Unfortunately, if you're not in a fairly dense area, the chances they can deliver to you is minimal, since building your own network is expensive.

For example, we offer $40 service, and if you're in our historical areas that's 1Gbit symmetrical, and if you're in newer areas we've turned up in the last year that's 10Gbit symmetrical.

We're expanding (as I expect most ISPs that can undercut the major players that much are), but it requires actually stringing fiber through neighborhoods on poles, so it takes a while (but that can be scaled...).

If you don't have telephone poles, it's much harder/more expensive to build out an area, so often those are skipped (at least initially) as areas cheaper to deliver to are prioritized. The is unfortunately a lot of new development, as they'll build neighborhood with underground utilities and pre-wire AT&T and Comcast, making it hard for others to deliver to the area without a lot of cost and work (trenching).
I immediately thought of Uber - widely considered to be a successful market leader, yet not profitable, and funded by VC money which ultimately comes from the central bank money printing.
> What's the value of having a contract, if you have to go to court to find out what it means?

The vast majority of business is performed under implicit or explicit contracts without any disputes whatsoever. We’re talking billions of interactions per day.

Courts are there for the rare occasion when a dispute occurs. There are many kinds of disputes, but one occurs when there is a complex agreement that was drafted either vaguely or incorrectly. This happens because human beings are imperfect; unforeseeable events occur; and because the language in which the contract was drafted might be vague or capable of multiple interpretations. Court hearings give the litigants the opportunity to provide evidence and context so that a judge can decide the fairest outcome.

So we don’t need courts to do business, but they exist because we need some peaceful way of resolving disputes. The alternative is violence.
The reason why thats an odd take is that it scapegoats poorly run companies when we should be just shaming the specific project team and organization and doing post mortems to make it less likely to occur. Just like we do on this very forum when not talking about the crypto space.
Verification of resumes. After reading the blog post I'm still not entirely sure why this is something anyone would want.

https://www.rezi.ai/posts/blockchain-verified-resume
Without my job, who am I?
I can think immediately of applications:

- bio engineering -- predicting (?) or designing (?) molecules that are large chains to perform some particular function

- coverage path planning -- sort of a "roomba" problem -- find a continuous path, through a space, that covers the space

- 3-D printing -- find the extrusion path that maximally covers some area or areas with high strength with a minimum amount of material
The US has one of the fastest average internet speed in the world. It beats pretty much every other western country, with only Denmark and Monaco being ahead.

https://www.speedtest.net/global-index#fixed
I'm less interested in design than I am in implementation

Anyone want to donate a fab to a poor hn user? lol
> "ipfs://<path>"

I think it should be "/ipfs/<path>" which is more UNIX-friendly, i.e. can be easily mounted in a UNIX filesystem.
Well it's fine with me. I only open Verge links when they're on HN and the title feels interesting. Which is pretty rare.
You can and you’ll thereby have created an environment with significant incentives to cheat, avoid testing, fake certification labels, or similar. If you’re able to exhaustively inspect every corner of every supply chain, that could work; I suspect that’s hard to make happen.
How Computers Really Work
Such an interesting project. A non-trivial amount of my consulting work has been in translating statutory requirements into system architecture features as they relate to requirements for privacy and security, often with cryptography. Along the way, you see how laws are not meant to run on machines or be subject to mere logic, and they are not abstract state machines that yield "legal," under the right conditions.

I'm not a lawyer at all - but I am a technologist who builds systems that people and institutions punt thorny legal and ethical decisions to, and they use the tech as a black box of risk, where they hope they can't be held accountable to understand the conseqeunces of the implementation.

The point of most cryptography and security features is to use math to represent and symbolically transfer liability and risk between transaction counterparties, where, law also determines a balance or flow of symbolic liability and risk between parties.

The idea of modelling laws as concrete logic is appealing, but it presumes the quality of a law is if it is resistant to individual interests, judgment and interpretation. To me, that sets up a conflict where the best possible law is either, one that obviates the need for a judge or litigation - vs. - being the most refined and featureful tool for people (and judges) align things like morals, principles, ethics, and interests.

The author's example of that inconsistent common law definition where you didn't actually have to live together in a relationship is arguably an artifact of Canadian charter and British common law where individuals do not have inalienable rights because ultimate and total authority rests with the crown. It doesn't have to be logical or consistent, but this is just my layman observation.

If the written law is illogical, a judge interprets it, and gives it back to the government to refine, and the government often just ignores it until there is a new patron to appease by changing it, or if it doesn't give them the result they want, they just update the regulations of the law without a requirement for debate. Automating legal analysis in Canada seems like more of a way to find arbitrages and loops than to provide any general efficiency or benefit.

Is that what this formal methods project is doing, or do they think people will accept being subject to automated legal decisions?
I would guess they are from otherwise-normal families whose current houses have appreciated in the same way. This makes them exceptionally rich in a sense, but also not, since homeowners are a majority in most metro areas and all homes are worth close to that much.
You can do that with some brokers. e.g Interactive Brokers passes through a slightly adjusted base rate on both credit and debit balances. So you could technically do a carry trade borrowing USD on a 1.5 margin and exchange that for e.g rubles with a 20% interest rate. If you can stomach the market fluctuations and as a consequence the margin requirements. FX markets are often calmly trending for years with some sudden and sensational shocks. Like Deutschmark/Gbp EUR/CHF or recently the Lira or Ruble implosions.

Overall very interesting but way over the risk tolerance of people who deposit their money
in CDs
What'll you do for enjoyment then?
It doesn't really matter. You are talking about a thing that severely distorts light and gravity. There is no real human-visible picture of it.
Hacksaws and Dinosaurs
Seems like it would need a consensus mechanism on how results can be filtered from some base algo (i.e. anyone could pay [how? tradfi or defi] to weight a site or page on a it down on an index, but if people still click it more than other sources, it could make down weight more expensive to hide it), centralized from a single corporate entity vs decentralized among more actors, and where the indexes are stored/shared/updated and how can the costs of such be sustainable.
How is your internet provisioned? Is the no-name ISP building their own infrastructure or are they using the network of a larger one?
A 2.7" Memory LCD is the largest I can get anymore... thank you Playdate engineers for keeping this part manufacturable!
Good news for you. Here's a direct quote from their post, which I believe their blog is currently down so don't blame you for not finding it:

> To better serve these conversations, misleading advertisements on Twitter that contradict the scientific consensus on climate change are prohibited, in line with our inappropriate content policy.
Umberto Eco on common features of fascism (2016)
The people that sent money to this contract still received the NFT right? Or can still receive the NFT

Its more about the project not having the operating capital (99% margin lol) and also loosing some confidence which they can recreate by performing parts of the roadmap and getting the community their NFTs? (the verified person is already saying they will airdrop NFTs and reimburse some participants when banks open so they wire dollars, convert that to ether, and send to some participants)
Do you think we get a vote on what which flavor of capitalism we get next, or if capitalism decides to change into something else as Yanis sees it?
>"Literary value" is a hard thing to define.

Which is why it should be decided by the people who run the libraries and not politicians. That is the difference between banning a book and a library choosing not to buy a book. Is the Turner Diaries banned or have libraries simply decided not to buy a copy?
Amazing how much better the M1 is relative to Intel's offerings. I notice that this list doesn't include Intel's latest core (Golden Cove). Do you have those benchmarks?
Operating AI: Bridging the Gap Between Technology and Business
(Perfetto developer here)

The Perfetto UI already supports flamegraphs btw (we use it for memory profiling and CPU stack sampling). We've never bothered to implement it for userspace slices because we've never had high frequency data there to make that a worthwhile view of the data.

Contributions for this upstream are very welcome :)
These are people you and everyone else should be familiar with. Their beliefs are well documented. No need for “perhaps.” They’ve written eloquently about their beliefs and an intellectually curious, or merely open minded person, can benefit from exploring those thoughts and ideas. It’s not something to cower in fear of. When people who are more intelligent espouse strongly held beliefs that you don’t understand, that’s a good time to ask more questions rather than close your mind and stop reading.
So these are the two claimed benefits of proprietary software (everything else listed is either the same as or worse than FOSS):

> the seller guarantees the software will work as documented, won’t be infected with malware, won’t be riddled with security holes, won’t contain plagiarized code

> the seller provides support and maintenance via e-mail, with a response-time service-level agreement

But there's nothing inherent to proprietary software about either of those things. There's nothing stopping you from using a FOSS license for your software itself, and selling a separate contract that gives those two things.
Good. This is twitter doing what it should in the public good.
I am not sure what you mean "censored". It's so wrong that it should be excluded from school curriculum, does this mean it is censored? Like how creationism is censored from science curriculum?
LOL the longest music piece on earth is pioneered by Schumann. Not the composer, Earth's Schumann resonance. Good luck beating that. And whoever dares arguing it is not music, in the context of Cage brain farts, is a hypocrite.

N00B Cage can name his 639yo piece "Hello I'm new here".

Outside the earth there is that cosmic background radiation that is hard to beat.
Plus, the mostly own houses, so they can pull money out with home equity credit lines