skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I’m not surprised. I used Android devoutly, had a Galaxy S4, then an S8 when that started showing its age. I upgraded to an iPhone 12 when AT&T ran the promotion to get a free one.

I wanted to keep liking Android. The amount of time I spent arguing vehemently that Android was superior made the switch hard, but several factors came into play for me:
- Extremely slow and fragmented upgrade of OS. This resulted in substantially older features and security patches.
- Privacy. iMessage’s encryption (though I stand by that it is gimmicky to only offer for iPhones, and I despise that) has a serious network effect. Apple is also far more transparent in what data they use, how they use it, etc.
- Ironically, price. At the time, the iPhone was cheaper than the equivalent Android phone.

The big downside is slower upgrades to the latest hardware features. Specifically, I am envious of the people who have 120 FPS phones, they’re beautiful. There is also a loss of customization, but truthfully I thought I’d miss it much more than I did. The fact that the iPhone “just works” is worth it to me.
What's so bad about it? If someone says they are against banning books, asking "what do you mean by that?" may not get you an honest response due to the claimant not necessarily considering their position thoroughly. Checking for the Turner Diaries seems like a good quick and dirty test to see what they really mean.
To your points:

1) Newton's Law of Gravity is not wrong, it is just incomplete. Newton's Law of Gravity is a critical formula used for calculating rocket trajectories and behaviors. It is correct but has 'boundaries' where Einstein's General Theory of Relativity takes over.

2) I'm not sure what this means.

3) I'm not sure what this means.
>hundreds of ways the internet mob steamrolls over people.

There's lots of names that have acquired negative stereotypes before. In my lifetime the name "Mike" at one point basically meant asshole (not so much anymore) and "Bob" basically meant boring, and "Patel" was a catchall negative for anyone from India.

There's even research on some of the nuances of the phenomenon. [1]

This isn't an aspect of internet mobs, it's an aspect of human nature, or at least society in general.

The Internet may shine a light on our flaws, and provide some new outlets for them, but it doesn't really create new ones, we brought them with us, like settlers from Europe going to the "New World" to escape the plague only to find they brought it with them.

[1] https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00224545.1996.97...
It's banned from being sold on all major bookstores / platforms
Twitter needs to stop or be stopped. Censorship belongs to the government, not private institutions. Let the government pass legislation instructing Twitter about which speech is allowed. The government, at least in the US, is accountable to the people, but Twitter like other authoritarian regimes is accountable only to themselves.
Oops, draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-08 has expired.
There are a few things wrong, or at least only partially right, in this post.

> JSX stands for JavaScript XML

This is a decent mental model for the syntax, but I’m not sure if this has ever explicitly been the case. It’s not used in the JSX specification or on the React page dedicated to JSX. It is, oddly, used on the Wikipedia page. The specification describes it as “an XML-like syntax extension to ECMAScript without any defined semantics”.

> JSX is syntactic sugar for React.createElement

This has been a common default, although it’s increasingly common to use the new JSX transform which is syntactic sugar for `jsx`. But, as quoted from the spec, it has “no defined semantics”, and it’s often used in other ways. Sometimes as syntactic sugar for another library’s function with similar semantics (eg with Preact’s `h`/`jsx`), and even sometimes not directly analogous to a function at all (as with SolidJS/dom-expressions).

> This is why JSX expressions must have only one parent.

It’s a perfectly reasonable explanation, possibly one others will find more helpful. But it’s incomplete, and its completeness would require far less detail. The answer, again, can be found in the spec:

> JSX extends the PrimaryExpression in the ECMAScript (ECMA-262) grammar:

> Syntax

> PrimaryExpression :

> JSXElement

> JSXFragment

That’s it. JSX is an expression, which is either a JSXElement or a JSXFragment. Any two expressions in a return statement is a syntax error, e.g.

return (
1
2
);

React produces a different error, probably more helpful than the default because it guides the developer towards a solution. But this is still the answer.

Is it overly pedantic to correct this? Maybe, but I think it might be valuable for some. If nothing else, it might help folks encountering JSX used in less conventional ways.
First. I don’t want to deny the genius of Socrates, but we came a long way since Antiquity. Umberto Eco was a philosopher, a scholar. We should expect better from him than from Socrates.

Second. We know there are cars and it makes sense to talk about cars, to study them, to make legalization and regulations about cars. We also know there are vehicles that include cars, lorries, carts, etc. The same thing with them. We can also talk about means of transportation that would also include planes, ships and so on. The same thing with them. But what if we talk about dogs, cars, oaks and planes? Let’s call the totality of those things foobars. Does it make sense to talk about foobars in general? To study foobars? Does it make sense to get a degree that is concerned with the study of dogs, oaks and cars? To make legalization particular to foobars? Are foobars a real thing in the same way vehicles are? Umberto Eco doesn’t provide a convincing argument that ur-fascism he is talking about is a sensible thing like bees or vehicles and not foobars. To be clear, I don’t deny that it is a real thing, I am just saying that Umberto Eco doesn’t show it in any convincing way.
I want to downvote the article itself but upvote the act of surfacing it for discussion.
no. this is ridiculous. you've demonstrated a total lack of understanding of how a bank manages its balance sheet.

Banks are awash in reserves and in the basel3 regime these reserves fulfill a similar role to cash in fulfilling bank balance sheet construction requirements. so the banks are not constrained from a lending perspective by a lack of cash and therefore have no incentive to raise rates to attract new deposits to create a base to lend off of.

so from the perspective of why rates are low, it's absolutely because banks are sitting on a lot of cash.
If you think music and art are entirely about skill that's fine, but I personally am not interested in hearing anything further about your opinions in that case.
Oof that's right up there with

"The person in the driver's seat is only there for legal reasons"

from the 5+ year old marketing video still featured on https://www.tesla.com/autopilot
Liberals/left side is significantly different from the establishment of the democractic party or neo-liberals. neo-liberals are supporting the current system, in a "nicer" way. Leftist, lets say Sanders or Warren wants taxes on the rich less war and more healthcare for everyone for example. A more equal society.

The same can of course be said for the GOP, Mitch McConnel is very much for the continuation of what is now with perhaps slightly harsher rhetoric while the flank is very counter-revolutionary.
Turn-Key Liquid Immersion Cooling Data Center
It isn't a geographical denomination, but rather socioeconomic and political.
Most of the countries in the global south denomination are actually in the northern hemisphere.
Very interesting and Quantbase looks neat (as well as the other investing strategies you link to: Pelosi Tracker, leveraged long run investing, etc).

Is there a case for this as an actual investment or primarily novelty?
Same goes for pointers.

int *foo = &bar;
*foo = 1;

As far as syntax goes, tying the pointer to the identifier doesn't make sense to me, at least. Pointers associated with types makes much more sense:

int* foo = &bar;

C++ thinks so too.
There are degrees in software engineering, they just aren't as popular as computer science degrees.
Is the Huawei situation involved in this drop?
It's called Repressive Tolerance: good when they do it, bad when you do it.
> So if you buy into this then the stock is justified.

Tesla was not incorporated yesterday, they are a 20 years old company, still they are in the making promises phase.

In the same timeframe Amazon completely disrupted the way we buy things, Microsoft put a PC on every desk, Google became the way the world searches for information and Facebook revolutionized the way we communicate.

I think it's time to admit to ourselves that this guy is just a wannabe influencer/politician.

Among the 500 companies in the S&P500 if Tesla disappeared tomorrow it would be the one whose demise would be felt the least by the American consumer, that shouldn't come as a surprise because frankly speaking the target demographic of Tesla and its CEO aren't consumers who buy products to improve the quality of their own lives.

It's a weird mix of financial speculators, cryptobros, people who feel the need to be part of something bigger than themselves, and virtue signalers.

It's a pity that such experiment cannot be performed, Walmart sold 600B worth of products last year, Amazon 400B, Berkshire has 800B worth of insurance premiums AUM. Diappear those companies and then let's see if people are still so eager to pay attention to mr. Musk and his absurd claims and social media trolling/bullying.
You're totally right. Any day now we're going to discover the secret to alchemy and then those folks in Flint will have faucets full of gold.
Well, are you advocating crypto for investing, or for the future of money? If the future of money, then you can't ask everyone in society to "well it's going to be more risky! But it's better!". If it's for investing, go ahead, I can also suggest putting all your money on black and have a 50-50 risk of doubling it or going home empty handed.
Efforts to ban "misinformation" are gaining ground pretty much everywhere, with full-throated support by government institutions and at most given token resistance from social media companies, if that. Banning misinformation or heterodox opinions in ads is the initial step; does anyone, in good faith, truly believe that's where it will stop? Facebook and YouTube already warn about videos that mention certain topics, hence some YouTubers saying phrases like "Hope you're staying healthy in these trying times" in case the platform deranked them for saying COVID. Soon, as the ability for algorithms to understand context evolves, discussion and especially disagreement of such things at all will be heavily censored (I'm sorry, "downranked") by algorithms on such sites, until they are essentially invisible.

Also, it's not just about publishing papers. Scientists use Twitter to network and communicate their ideas with other scientists. To learn about what people are working on, interesting ideas in their field, and so on. If heterodoxy is banned from discussion, it becomes that much harder to challenge existing consensus, because they will be unable to communicate effectively with one another on public platforms.
Layman speculation—Using exactly this system (it's quite brilliant!) I bet we could use much higher frequencies due to modern electronics, antenna design, and so forth, giving additional precision, and maybe the ability to measure craft attitude. I could also see additional systems (a laser rangefinder...? or whatever) augmenting it without the mass & energy penalty they would have imposed 50 years ago.
Honesty it's truly amazing that we haven't had a huge surge in house fires, since every single electronic device is holding this kind of energy.
Would anyone care to elaborate on why they downvoted a relevant passage from a link in the OP?
We have similar situation in Poland. I live in rural area, but quite close to bigger city and enjoy 1Gbps for the last 4 or 5 years.

I wonder how the upgrade might look considering that 10Gbps hardware is quite expensive (and house cabling might need upgrading) and 2.5Gbps/5Gbps is quite new and hard to find router or laptop dock/hub supporting it.
Hey, please don't cross into personal attack like this. You started a whole pointless flamewar and it's completely gratuitous.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
Well, I think what's happened, is twenty-something-year-old CEOs.

They may be brilliant, driven, creative, hardworking people, but they Just. Don't. Have. Scars.

They never really had the chance to run face-first into reality, while still in a position where the stakes are low, and there's more experienced folks around, to help them get back on their feet.

Their first mistakes are disasters, because they have it all on the line.

In the past, the older folks had the money and power, but were often locked up by caution, and lack of creativity.

The younger folks had the energy and creativity, but not the sense of mortality. They needed the money and power from the older folks, and the older folks needed that creativity, and, for lack of a better word, recklessness, that could drive their investments forward, so they had to work together.

These days, it's pure recklessness. The first forays into shipping are "bet the company," so failure is an E.L.E.
Not the person you are asking, but in Eastern Europe we also call our countries "third world"; I learned in the middle school about economic development and classification by that, it was nothing to be ashamed of. Even today being in EU we are considered second class citizens, not a problem with me.
I'm having trouble drawing that analogy, because Alpha Go knew what it was to win before it taught itself to play. The equivalent for DALL-E would be to start off knowing what an elephant looks like, what water looks like, what elephants in water look like ...
“The finality of wires is path dependent” is a statement that I would agree with.
mortgage rates have doubled in the last two months, the 20 year has doubled in the last two months, rhe policy rate had doubled in the last two months (admittedly a small nomination amount) and is about to double again in a week.

so although overall rates are still low, I think it's pretty fair to say they have exploded
I've always used Android, thinking that it would improve with age. But eventually I had to face the fact that Android is always going to suck. On top of that every year it gets more and more locked down. Why not buy an iphone instead? At least it works well.
Yes, anything written for these platforms is not likely to be around in the same form for the long term. It's disposable software.
I think you're underrating the liquidity of treasuries. For all practical purposes, a treasury is as liquid as a savings account. Yes, the market will take a little bit in the bid/ask spread.

Note: I am not suggesting holding long term treasuries as a substitute for a savings account here, though a ladder of short term treasuries could be an alternative when conditions are favorable, like now.
Monopoly as a word isn’t meant to describe any successful company that achieves decent market share. I’m really tired of people throwing that phrase around, iOS and Android are fiercely competing with each other for market share every year so yes there is fierce competition.
Oil soaked rags spontaneously combusting is like cat batteries giving off hydrogen when charging - few know about it but if it happens you remember it.
> It's 2022 and there is still nothing better for federated messaging.

That is untrue. Matrix is undoubtedly much better.
> I'm not sure exactly how it works, in legal terms, but it's great for obscure books.

Does it pay the rights holders (and authors) like other libraries? The Brooklyn library likely does. IIRC, archive.org clashed with authors during lockdown around it’s lending practices, I don’t know if that has been resolved. I’m against excessive IP exploitation, but I’m for authors getting paid.
I think you are ignoring the fact that it made all the large groups proportionately larger. And those groups have militaries, but they don't bother to declare war any more.
“Delisted” and “removed from sale” sound like synonyms to me. How do they differ? Neither necessary means “totally removed from Apple servers.”
This is very bad news for indies, and will help large companies push them out.

I have games in AppStore not updated for many years. They work well on all devices, I also consider them to be a piece of art. And feedback is very positive!

Getting anxious that Apple will pull it.

Releasing a new version sounds easy, but it's a significant time effort (chain of dependencies, build environments and game engines are complex) with 0 value to anyone - because it is perfect and a piece of art.

Why don't they have better options for discovery, rather than saying "old is bad".

I have comments from people saying my game is their favorite childhood game and they have they have fond memories and stuff - and they are happy to play it now once in a while even.

Apple logic makes zero sense, it's like destroying books or paintings and stuff.
It's pick your poison. The only reason I'm still on android is because at least I can (still) have root there. I'm saying still because of safety net. But if apple let me have root, i'd probably prefer an Apple over Google.

Mobile phones and their user hostility is a cancer. I'm seriously considering using a full GNU/Linux handheld for mobile things i can do in a browser, and keep an android phone for app garbage that I only turn on if I need to use a banking app or something.
It's a joke only for wanderers of Mother Earth, Mother Board, who are old hands at this sort of thing.
seems pretty cynical to me
It was why I went to iPhone. Huawei made great phones. I cant use a Samsung. Just cant. Pixel was too expensive.

I used to joke that when I’d loudly state “I support the actions of the Chinese government” I’d get an extra 5% battery life. Sigh.
iOS Safari occasionally brags to me about how many third-party trackers it has blocked, by default.

I suspect that’s gonna impact StatCounter’s data collection.
What’s so open about Arduino? Can’t find any layout for download. Am I doing something wrong?

Edit: it’s popular for sure, but is Arduino really open?
I'm positive that most people who mean the former will backpedal, provide conditions and loopholes, or become outright angry and start calling you a nazi if you make them actually think about it.
And? Does it really matter? Android is the #1 OS of all user devices worldwide. When you're at the top only one direction to go... iOS gained a bit in the developed world but Android enables tons of people all over the world to communicate and do things.
Alcohol is metabolised to ATP and unused ATP will of course be stored as glycogen later. When glycogen storage are full, fat is deposited. Glucose is needed + ATP. High Protein intake will lead to gluconeogensis and create the glucose.
None of which is relevant to a social media company restricting ads.
The motion is cyclic and the camera sensor may introduce further bias.
From my experience if you stay on the Google flagship/Pixel line then everything is great. Pretty much every other vender is garbage and will screw you and you'll have the experience you're talking about.
Honestly man I’m struggling to get on board with “gays were able to organise” being a “new kind of trouble”, unless I absolutely misunderstand you.

The internet can help create communities across the world - that has both the advantage of connecting people, and the risk of reinforcing undesirable behaviour. The ability isn’t inherently good or troubling.
What? Those two things are on complete opposite poles!

When you ban something, you care about it so much that you take a hard stance against it, thus the ban.
That's what this story should link to.
China hold very little US debt…around 1T USD. Americans are far and away the largest holders of US debt.
It isn’t talking down to your audience to relate that mathematical logic to them in understandable ways. A lot of people are curious about physics or astronomy but don’t have the time or energy to learn high level math to do so.
I live in Germany. Enjoying 10 Mbit/s downstrean and 1 Mbit/s upstream. For 30 Euros per month. 80 would be like heaven for me.
Whatever consensus you wish to call it, it was the consensus of those in power in society at the time that believed they knew the truth.

Galileo was a scientist whether scientist was a recognized term at the time or not. He made observations, and developed theories based on those observations. That's science.

George Washington's death was hastened by doctors who bled him, 200 years after 1600.

And how about Darwin's theories, Lysenkoism, Phrenology, etc.?
I can vouch to that but it is my choice. I find it more enjoyable to dive into and research stuff that interests me than to hang out with friends from whom I can not learn anything. Information and knowledge is what drives me although it can become addiction and very unhealthy.
Incredible that Cage managed to provoke riots in his audiences in 1974 and 1976.

Impressionists and modernists famously did so in earlier generations but the mid-70s is astonishingly late for an art riot. Among Buddhists in Boulder, no less!
i also have a nervous breakdown when i see evidence of the HRE
this is totally backwards. negative interest rates cause inflation, not the other way around
Question about that:

What I personally do most on my phone is browsing the web (when not at home, at home I can do that with a regular computer). On Android I can use Firefox with plugins to block ads, kill overlays, etc... and especially it has the reader mode

AFAIK on iPhone you can only run one Apple-approved browser and all others are a skin around that, and it doesn't have plugins.

To me browsing the web is unusable without those plugins in Firefox. How is browsing the web on an iPhone? Do you get overlays, autoplaying videos and ads on websites or can you block them? Do you get a reader mode?
No it doesn't. Consensus is at best irrelevant to science, and if anything it's harmful because it reduces the search space for the truth.
> So climate change deniers are engaging in gaslighting

Sometimes. Oftentimes they have just been lied to by political or cultural institutions that they trust.

> but you don't think we should do anything to stop them

It greatly depends on the context. In the case of ads on Twitter, I have no opinion as I'm not familiar enough with the nuances of this action to make a judgement.

> because maybe one of them stumbles on a scientific breakthrough

That's a misreading of my comment. My point was that a serious climate scientist may be afraid of pushing past the boundaries for fear of going against the very real orthodoxy. The orthodoxy, by the way, is a social thing, not a science thing. Many scientists have gotten 'cancelled' by randos on Twitter for publishing standard research.
Zig Roadmap 2023
Is there any reason to believe that Jim Cramer (or the inverse of Jim Cramer) would do particularly well in the stock market?

I imagine following a cat picking random stocks works about as well.
https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2013/01/14/169326326/hous...
I've heard that even more people believe that a man walked on water.
Laughs – A Metric for Gauging Client Engagement
By publishing their science in academic journals rather than twitter.
I recommend reading the article which has more detail on each point.

That said the point of #3 is to act without consideration. A call to immediate and decisive action with no consideration of consequence.

See also: January 6th, armed occupation of state capitols etc
Android itself doesn't do anything. Samsung Xiaomi Google and others compete seperately and just so happen to use Android. Though this is becoming less and less true