skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Personally I think the picture display is not user friendly (requiring a HTTP endpoint with a 800x480 monochrome bmp image).

I like the calendar display, but concerned about the limitations and the price.

Who is the customer? Decide that and then go out and show it to them. I also recommend Just Enough Research from Erika Hall, it's about studying your potential customers, market and product.

This product needs to be attractive and easy to use. A smartphone app the customer can use to change the display would be helpful, and it could justify the price.
The author re-worded iterative development where you start with a skeleton and slowly build out. Their example was to build out a simple build pipeline with stub projects that are replaced over time.

The Practice of Programming(Kernighan and Pike 1999) https://www.cs.princeton.edu/~bwk/tpop.webpage/ goes into much better details of the iterative development that is actually being done by the author. If you know the overall design of your program, you build out the skeleton with everything stubbed out. As you iterate through development, those stubs are fleshed out into fully working components.

The analogy of mise-in-enplace works if you have a ready for reusable components (COTS, FOSS, or personal) that you quickly pull off the shelf and combine into the larger product. Mise means having everything ready to go; you have your set of reusable components and subsystems that you can quickly pull together to make a new product.
i doubt that most of my chat partners have the capabilities to do that. and yes, it would be smart to make archives, but let the chat destroy itself after 7 days.
Why does the cables trace the Iberian and French coastlines rather than a taking a more direct route?
China's interest in a relationship with Russia is solely predicated on what it can do for China. Same for everyone else, I guess.

But it leads to the question, what _can_ more trading with Russia do, that China can't get elsewhere?
Numerical relativity is not just or even mostly linear algebra. Even in the weak-field limit, where linearized GR is qualitatively correct, you still have to actually solve the resulting PDE.
> What I'd like to see is a site-wide css-only toggle to switch between dark and light mode.

Isn't it what `prefers-color-scheme` [0] is for ?

[0]: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/@media/pref...
Gallop: 81% of black Americans want police to spend same amount or more time in their area https://news.gallup.com/poll/316571/black-americans-police-r...

Defund the police is popular with nobody except rich liberals living in privilege bubbles. People in crime ridden areas especially don’t want it.
I think we probably would have just moved on and the individual would have been offended

That's the gap between you and others in this thread. What we've experienced is not that one individual is genuinely offended and everyone just moves on, it's that they immediately run the HR/management with crocodile tears in their eyes, and then demand you be fired. They conclude that the only reason to refuse their request is because you're an ideological enemy and don't care about anything else.

And that's why it's bad. It's not about genuinely taking offence, and never was. It is about establishing dominance over powerful institutions so they can turn them all into Twitter - weapons in a never-ending dystopian culture war that can never be won because the victory conditions change every day.
/r/femaledatingstrategy has an interesting option that may have similar levels of insularity and cultural integrity.
Not saying it doesn't have an effect, just that it's vastly overstated and the real picture is more complex. As usual, the nature of things is difficult to convey in a tweet.
What do you use as an After Effects equivalent?
But do women have to do things to get sex? Not high-quality, eligible-bachelor sex, but just sex in general?
It’s a camouflaged variant of No True Scotsman.
What about immediate proxies for those things? I can determine your culture, gender, etc based on things like your shopping characteristics. Maybe i just deny loans to people who don't ever buy sunscreen? Or people who prefer menthol cigarettes? Or people who donate to the wrong charities?

Saying that private businesses can just do whatever they want is basically incompatible with Western society as we know it. It only works at small scale precisely because little shops don't have access to data about their customers and they are legally barred from using the obvious clues like "wears a turban" or "has short hair and cargo pants"
Please don’t do this. It’s really sad every time I want to reach out to an old friend and I can’t because they deleted their fb :(

I mean, if you don’t have such connections then who cares, but if you do think about that
I believe that’s better news for DC-X, VentureStar, and Skylon spaceplanes than it is to passenger transport.

OTOH, if we manage to make SSTO practical, we can think of single-stage suborbital passenger carriers, which are much more interesting than using Starship for that.
I guess it doesn't help when there's footage of mass graves in Ukraine. (I'm aware that they've been publicised via Ukrainian PR, so the truth may be blurry, but given that the French just published footage of soldiers burying bodies in Mali, that they claim are Russian mercenaries trying to carry out a false flag attack, I'm inclined to believe that the Ukrainians didn't kill a bunch of their own citizens to make Russia look bad).
Which is why Intel is an also-ran in mobile computing and IoT despite all the ressources it poured into it, I suppose?

The sheer amount of legacy in x86 is why those CPUs are so inefficient and require so much cooling. ARM would not have emerged if not for its superior efficiency.
Your questions weren't very reasonable, were they? You made lots of claims about what you supposed I thought. I'm under no obligation to answer, for example, what "my company and team are optimizing for", that's an open ended question which is not reasonable to ask in this context, nor would it benefit me to answer it in any way, nor is it related to the question at hand. It looks like cross-examination, something explicitly discouraged by HN guidelines.

I'm not interested in being "educated". In general, you sound very condescending regardless of your claims that you are not snarky.

It's easier to pick on someone's comments than to make a comment of your own, because that would open you to correction and criticism. I think that's what's going on with you in this case.

Regardless, I suggest you stick to commenting about TFA in the future. It will go better for you. You'll be criticized, but that's par for the course.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy
Why not the south of Spain? Just as much sun and more politically stable.
I'd like to believe it is my hardware, but other video editing software, as well as software in general, runs perfectly fine on my GTX1080/i7-4790/32GB Ram system.

I've tried it after every single clean re-install of windows 10 over the past few years, with every major stable and beta version they offered at the time, while never managing to not run into issues.

In the end I've come to accept that there simply must be some combination of effects and other things that I will habitually end up with that are not working properly together.
r/personalfinance is largely fine if you've made it that far.

I read the comment you replied to to be the, follow your passion, university is required, lean-in, girl-boss, live your dream, it takes a village, shitty advice that permeates culture in the US.

The messaging that children out of wedlock is pro-poverty and marriage is anti-poverty is nearly non-existant in the main stream. Same with the negative outcomes of boys raised by single mothers.
> multi threaded c-style programming model from the 1970s, that they learned in their computer science degree.

Yep, most folks learn programming in high level languages, lower level and “glue” scripts feels “not right”. I can attest to this… after using one shitty orm after another, learning sql and bash made me a much better programmer.
I'm guessing it has to do with the EU, but it seems far more sensical if it went straight through and allow others to give/receive as well.
Sounds inefficient
How big are the loss on such a high distance connection ?
Please use email instead, which is a standardized open protocol that does give people some choices.

You can always exchange email addresses before closing down accounts to stay in touch.
There is also Blender Video Sequencer, which has a terrible UI but also a good compositor.
This sounds like brexiteer project. Doubt this will actually happen. 3800 km of undersea HVDC cable just to circumvent the EU. 3800 km is the distance from St.Petersburg to Marocco.
What an amazing article, and bravo to the researchers for this amazing analysis.

Now, I will get onto my down voting.
I have watched generations of men devote himself to video games. They develop amazing skills in these artificial worlds. At the same time, I was reading tons of books, writing a few of my own and generally avoiding TV and video game. Of course, I was the freak. But I cannot wonder if that life in the fantasy land a video game has not left its traces in these men.
> very few people use containers

Not many people use any extensions[1], which is why it should not be an extension, even if it is actually an extension in terms of implementation. Certainly I wouldn't expect my parents to discover and install the extension, but I might expect them to be able to be taught to use a first-class feature.

[1]: As the Firefox base dwindles further to only a hard core of techies, this might not be true, but it's probably true of Chrome: only 13 extensions have over 10 million installs and Chrome is used by over 2 billion people.
Yes, but that's a quality of SPARK, not of the category of "formal methods" by default.

For instance, if you write your own proof and then prove the program meets it, there could still be a logic error in your proof.

Also, "in verified code" is a big loophole enough to leave security issues in - for instance a web browser (probably the thing you'd most like to prove security-issue-free) can still overwrite its own memory through things like OS image and font code, JavaScript JITs generating code to an insecure ABI you don't have a model for, syscalls to kernel code that can write back into your memory, etc.

Believing "formal" makes things magically correct does seem to be a common problem; it also comes up when people say something has a "formal audit" or needs to get one from someone. How do they "formally" audit it? Are they wearing suits?
I work in news and that's common. I don't mind what anyone uses to edit or transcode but for our equipment to broadcast it, at some stage it has to become 1080i50 and its quicker for someone to submit that directly. It's a small feature that Resolve would benefit by having imo.

If they send in xdcamHD 50 or avc intra 100 it'll be ready for us to check and send to playback as soon as the file transfer is done. If they are transcoding it themselves, or expecting us to do it that can cost another 2-3 minutes minimum. Thsg time makes a big difference sometimes.

We accept basically anything though, the current thorn in my side is HDR video from phones. I have an ffmpeg command to make them rec709 but they still look awful and we are really only using phone footage when time is an issue.
Honest questions deserve honest answers. First, I am coming from a US-centric position (the article dealt with that, I am from the US, and the my response deals specifically with that culture... though Canadians likely would benefit from it too). As to education and degrees, there is a HUGE divergence in the types of degrees that are worth the money, and those which act more as institutional pyramid schemes. This distinction is well known on the example advice channel I recommended, but largely absent from mainstream culture.

As to what qualifies as mainstream culture, before the internet it was a clear delineation (based on broadcast and print), now there are perhaps tiers (and that's a broader conversation). One thing to note is that the more direct influence that institutional power has via gatekeeping (by directly promoting ideas through things like textbook publishers or narrowing discussion via tech censorship policies) the more the area caters to the desires of those in power, rather than those using / consuming the service. I steer clear of reddit myself because several times in the past when areas have become too divergent from "acceptable narrative" they have been closed down.

There's plenty more that could be said on this topic, but that would likely require a book on epistemology. Hope that answered your questions about my intentions and views at least.
There must be psychological studies of giving up somewhere, as it seems to be an increasingly common behavior and not limited just to men and marriage. From the "economic anxiety" of the (especially rural) US right to the "millennial malaise" that's slightly left if anything, it seems like people are giving up on college, good jobs, buying a house, relationships, and most especially all forms of government. Across the political and economic spectrum, you can hear people calling to tear it all down. You don't hear the people just quietly "dropping out" but they definitely exist too.

Note that I'm not criticizing or looking down on people for giving up. It's a rational response when you believe that the standards are being set unrealistically high or you're going to be blamed/condemned no matter what you do. Why expend your energy on a lost cause? Save it for something you can win. I've done it myself, and called it strategic thinking. Everyone who has quit a job or broken off a relationship has given up. What I'm saying is only that it seems more common than it used to be. People turn to it more quickly. So called "deaths of despair" have been trending upward for quite some time. "Lottery or nothing" thinking (ahem crypto) is everywhere. For people at the margins, teetering on the very edge between giving up vs. hoping against hope and soldiering on even though they expect to fail, the balance seems to have shifted more toward giving up.

What I'd like to understand is why. Have circumstances really changed in a way that generates more despair than before? Are there messages we as a society are sending that encourage giving up instead of persevering? I don't have the answer, but it seems like a far more general phenomenon than just absent fathers and it's not limited to one political or economic group.
History of Slavery in the Muslim World
At least it has a track record of creating coherent, functioning civilization the world over since time immemorial.

Can’t say whatever we have today looks all that compelling, and I say this as a “winner” with a high salary, owned home, wife, and children.

I think of a future beyond my ability to retire to Margaritaville. What future lies for my daughters and sons?

A hedonist utopia that denigrates and denies the most basic human imperatives? To build a family? Why would I want that for them?
TestTubeGames: Bringing Science to Life
Do they? I can see the third bullet in practice, although I think it’s more of a fix than a cause for single-parent homes.

On the other hand, my social circle is highly educated and well-off and I’m not sure I know a single person who would agree with the first bullet.

The second point I’m less clear on myself: is there evidence that children of lesbian couples are somehow worse off?
All of those countries have changed their expectations of men and women regardless of traditional values, just check the female labor force participation rates, and have had a similar swell of directionless men.
I don't buy that traditional values with regard to marriage are responsible with lower birth rates. People were married with high birthrates for hundreds of years, back when traditional values were just called values. Birth rates go down when people don't need a lot of children to work their farms or support them in old age, and when women get access to birth control and enter the workforce. This last part is tangentially related to marriage, but marriage (or the lack thereof) is not the cause. There are certainly other factors too, but those are the big ones.
There’s also automations like shellcheck that figure this out for you.
It’s called an analogy.
I didn't think there could be anything worse than Harness. Then I got asked to build and maintain GitHub Actions CI pipelines.

Never again.
Some attackers are not financially motivated (think state actors).

And even if they are, they bait crypto needs to be valuable enough. If the attacker expects to extract $1 mil of value from the hack, you will not deter with a $10k crypto bounty.
Is "you can have a two parent household with two full time jobs" also a luxury belief?
If you do not really know the loss why does it "sound inefficient"? I am pretty sure they've done all the due diligence and if the project is a go then the losses are acceptable.

I am more interested (again if the project is a go) what happens if / when some "friendly" people will mess with the cable.
"Defund the police" is merely an agitational short slogan for "we need some other way of governing the safety of our communities, because this is clearly not working."

Like many short and pithy slogans, it may not be communicating that message effectively at all.

It's not like police forces are an eternal attribute of all civilizations. Modern policing is actually pretty young.
They also involve addition, but that doesn't make them arithmetic. Knowing linear algebra gets you perhaps 10% of the way to having the math background for a first course in GR.
The US is likely fine because our southern border is porous and anyone can walk right in. I don’t see any indication that this will change. The benefit is even if the US birth rate is declining, we have an influx of younger individuals who can help keep the economy going.
This is why you need two smartphones, so you can use one to take a picture of the screen of the other... helps drive revenue for the industry.
My generation doesn’t use emails basically. I changed emails quite a lot through my younger years as did my friends so it wouldn’t have been useful. We used to ask for people’s facebook shortly after meeting them. It’s the best tool to create and maintain your social graph. I understand that not everybody use it this way, and that’s fine, but if you do please think about that. It’s really heart breaking how I lost contact with old friends due to this
The article cites an anecdote about a young father who sat around the house arguing, fighting and drinking. He ends up getting kicked out of the house.

The 1960s version of this story instead ends with the husband beating his wife behind closed doors without repercussions.

Which is preferable?
I did exactly the same thing a few years ago - now it feels like a pull service that I'm in control of, instead of a push service with an algorithm controlling the content I view.
What a strange mix of important observations about social conditions and mores and stuff verging on culture war bullshit regarding "elites" etc.

For example:

> Those who sit at or near the apex of the social ladder (who decide what behaviors are prestigious) have decided that family stability is unimportant.

The author proceeds to quote an anecdote from a UN conference to supposedly back up this point.

In reality, what is actually going on here has nothing to do with "elites" at all. There is a political ideology (to which I suspect the author at least somewhat subscribes) that puts a high priority on self-reliance, "pulling oneself up by one's own bootstraps" and an avoidance of state intervention in the lives of individuals. There is another political ideology which acknowledges that we all benefit when society offers support and assistance to people in need of help, in part because none of us really know when or if we may find ourselves experiencing bad luck or bad judgement or both.

The latter political ideology wants to try to help and nurture everyone to whatever extent possible, to avoid judgement on the decisions/mistakes that people make and focus on how to get them back on their feet and how to minimize the social cost of those mistakes.

The former ideology opposes these efforts, and uses the tools of both the law and of funding choices to try to limit the extent and availability of a social safety net, in the belief it is an overall negative influence on society and the individuals that comprise it.

So when people who believe in the social safety net try to avoid condemning single parent families, what they are actually saying is not "family stability is unimportant". They are saying "we know that relationships sometimes, even often, do not work out, and we think that as a society we should provide as much support as we can so that the children and parents in such situations suffer the least harm possible."

They are met with responses like Rob Henderson's, that mischaracterize their concern and empathy, and with responses from legislatures that essentially say "We're not spending our money to support poor people who make bad choices, they should get their act together and hold themselves to higher behavioral standards."

I'm not taking a position here on whether either of these views is the correct one. But I do get tied of people like Henderson trying to fold fundamentally different conceptions about the role of government into some snide dig at "elites". There plenty of wealthy highly educated people in positions of economic, political and cultural power who both insist on the value of family stability AND refuse to provide meaningful support in cases where it isn't happening. Those people are "elites" too, just as much as people who suggest we should be more understanding and forgiving of these failures. Instead of taking cheap, meaningless shots in a useless culture war, it would be better to cogently lay out a rational basis for why your preferred political ideology is better for society overall, given the criticisms that already exist of its real world effects.
Inside The New Right, Where Peter Thiel Is Placing His Biggest Bets
I remember doing some back of the envelope calculations, and hydrogen fuel cells offer somewhat better volumetric energy density than current batteries do - and it's no contest with regards to weight.

I'm not super familiar with cargo aviation, so I'm not sure how often are aircraft weight limited, as opposed to volume limited. In the former case, the low density of hydrogen would probably be less of an issue.
It’s not a matter of luck—men in my dad’s village in Bangladesh start families, have kids, and live relatively happy lives in poverty even most poor Americans could not comprehend.

I don’t think it’s fair to call all these guys incels. As the article observes, most just have no expectations placed on them, and also have no way of attaining dignity and social worth through the avenues in life reasonably available to them.
The Red Army raping its way through Germany (not sure if that is the country the comment you're replying to was referring to), is pretty well documented and agreed upon by everyone other than Russian historians.

> Finland joined Nazi Germany as an ally and participated in the invasion of the Soviet Union

When you linked to an article on the Continuation War, did you wonder why it was called the Continuation War? Not the War of Finnish Aggression?
Here's a sample letter for European citizens that would like to make a legally-binding data subject deletion request:

https://www.datarequests.org/blog/sample-letter-gdpr-erasure...

Send this letter by email and my registered snail mail letter to the Data Protection Officer of the company (e.g. Facebook's Dublin Office).

Violating such a request can lead to fines of 4% of annual revenue of any offending company.
Facebook messages are definitely lost. I downloaded backups and lots of messages have disappeared. Maybe not a problem anymore though.