skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Sure, but there's no real way of knowing whether that is "healthy" or "unhealthy" or neutral for you.

That is, is it perhaps promoting some state in your body that helps with longevity and long life? Or is it eating up precious resources and making you less healthy overall? Or is it totally irrelevant to your general health levels ?

Any of these could be true while still being in line with the evolutionary claim. And, of course, ALL of them may be true for different people with different body mass, other health issues, age.

For example, your body has evolved such that you can walk or run even with a broken toe. Still, that doesn't mean it's a good idea to run after breaking a toe (if you can at all help it).
The author is talking about the way browsers render graphics. Unfortunately, there's no way to correct that without modifying the browser itself.
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/04/15/twitter-board-adopts-poison-...
With this example:

cbmc --bounds-check test.c

test.c function main
[main.array_bounds.1] line 6 array 'a' upper bound in a[(signed long int)i]: SUCCESS
[main.array_bounds.2] line 8 array 'a' upper bound in a[(signed long int)i]: FAILURE

** 1 of 2 failed (2 iterations)
VERIFICATION FAILED

gcc and clang both failed to find anything at compile-time.
You can celebrate SpaceX correcting their issue quickly, without also inventing a reality where the same issue wasn't fixable in a timely manner due to some worst-case-scenario government contract hell.
This seems to be a (very typical) misuse of NHST. All we want to know in this case is which of the following statements is the more probable:

(1) Intermittent fasting has benefits.

(2) Intermittent fasting does not have benefits.

Instead, what we're being told is that we can't reject (2) with a high degree of confidence. When you look at the sizes of the groups in the study, this is pretty obviously going to be the case. With so few participants there'd have to be an enormous difference between groups in order to be sure that (2) is false. They need hardly have bothered doing the study at all.
Well, if you print it out then it's all kind of embedded on a piece of paper.
So there are 3 ways the government could influence Big Tech:

1. Infiltration. An agent or asset could be in a position of power to enact desired policies and changes, provide a backdoor or whatever;

2. Jurisdiction. The platform falls under US jurisdiction so is subject to various forms of law enforcement, secret or otherwise. National Security Letters, FISA warrants, pen registers, that sort of thing; and

3. Propaganda. US companies reflect the cultural and political values of their founders, board and management as will as the will of stockholders. For some issues there is a political divide but for many issues there isn't, most notably when it comes to US foreign policy where Democrats and Republicans are basically indistinguishable.

The prevailing foreign policy view is that the US is good and a benign hegemony and a civilizing and democratizing force. The current foreign policy bent also favours interventionism and has since World War Two.

You see this at the huge backlash you get, even here among relatively educated and informed commenters, when you dare to suggest that the US bears some responsibility for Ukraine's predicament even though Russia is of course wholly responsible for an unjustifiable invasion.

It's a real lesson in the power of US propaganda and how ingrained the benign hegemony meme (and it is a meme) is.

My theory is the first 2 points I listed above don't matter. They're of almost no importance. What really matters is the ability of the US media (and I include social media companies in this umbrella) to project US propaganda and to normalize the US-centric view of the world.
The issue is threatening the freedoms of a group by treating their sexual orientation pathologically. Even referring to homosexual "outbreaks" is pretty troubling to me. Humans are capable of some awful things with very little perturbation.
>Whirlpool

Whirlpool is a major US brand of appliances.
Also I think just his openness in admitting a mistake he could hide in shame is a sign that he understands his job.

While this is more psychology than technology, that's very important in social engineering.
Amazon has traded sideways for a year and a half.

F, N are cratering, Amzn is sideways, Aapl is still way up yoy (seems vulnerable this earnings season though), MSFT has been good historically but worse this year and seems vulnerable. Google has had a good run recently but is weak this year, however P/E is already in a better place than its competitors so it has room to run I'd say.
Because the people who wrote those letters don't trust you to pay up if stonks go down by 100x your net worth. They trust Elon, though, because he has more net worth.

I'm taking a broad definition of "trust" that includes "we can sue you and recover the money."
> The respectful thing to do is to permanently erase the previous owners files without reading them.

We're not talking about accidentally getting someone's old hard drive: this is a public-facing website, the kind of thing people generally create because they want the public to be able to read what they've written.
Do you think it's reasonable Elon could secure the funding if he wants to? I'm quite confident he can and I think most reasonable people would agree.

however, I'm not confident "anyone" could secure the funding, so they can't "do this"
Besides, those laws are typically selectively enforced precisely because they can, they're ideal for the purpose. Don't like someone, tough. Don't like someone and their gay? Nailed and no recourse because ahhh gay person.

I think your five years sounds about right, if I were in that position I might add another five or just simply never spend a minute longer in a place like that than I had to.
Does Twitter even made money? The Wikipedia article claims they went from losing several hundred million in 2017 to making a billion in 2018, but I'm not seeing what change led to that huge turnaround.
Material wise? Sure if you do it yourself. Paying someone else to do the work though? Definitely not.
Really impressive feature set! I just wish it could run on windows too.
> However, the same military has been unable to complete its stated objectives in Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan

the military is under civilian control. The US military is very very good at killing people and breaking things. I have no doubt, given the orders, the US military could kill everyone and break everything they've been ordered to kill and break. Politicians direct the military, if objectives were failed to be met then politicians determined those objectives were no longer politically viable.
Which goes to underline Musk's point that the board doesn't have the interests of shareholders in mind.

Clearly, the cabal is not interested in losing control of the public narrative.
Lego Manual 5-Speed Gearbox
There's not a rule against deliberately crashing a plane because it's not anticipated that anyone would. Of course there are a whole host of rules that would be inevitably violated by doing so in almost all circumstances.
Likewise! And if you've yet to try a Vanishing Point or a Decimo, you've got a pleasant surprise in store, I think - I've found them nearly perfect for work notes in particular thanks to their speed and ease of one-handed operation.

(The Vanishing Point was admittedly a little too big and heavy for comfort, but a Decimo has the same nib and mechanism in a lighter, narrower body. Looks a lot more elegant, too, with the smoother rounding of the shoulder.)
I don't recall that I hated cursive, but by the late 1960s (no consumer electronic keyboards anywhere) I switched to printing for all my middle-school homework. I also started omitting uppercase letters most of the time, especially at the beginning of sentences. I dont' recall any of my public school teachers trying to force me back to cursive, surprisingly. Nowadays, all-lower-case printed proper names of various advertised products is quite common, which was not the case at all fifty years ago.
I am not confident, no.
Good, I hope he buys it and shakes things up. Twitter needs a revamp
maybe because the vesting happens during a trading blackout, and by the time the window opens there have been gains which would be short term if sold immediately.
"citation needed" is an overused debating point that makes the opponent look better, regardless he's obviously talking about 16 CFR § 20.1 specifically subsection (a).

Note that its trivial to work around. I purchased a bluetooth earpiece on Monday on amazon and its trivial to control-F around looking for the word "new". You will NOT find that word on any marketing. I don't believe any part of it is reused or recycled, however they're not dumb enough to use the word "new" in writing anywhere.
Exhibit D looks like he's borrowing some money (12.5B USD) with TSLA as collateral, unless I'm misreading it.
That's literally what people do when they buy a house, except in that case, that debt is probably backed by Elon's Tesla stock.
You presume incorrectly. Any coordination would make Elon and his allies a “group” which would mean they are collectively treated as an individual.
Great idea!

https://onemilliontweetmap.com/?center=48.1367666796927,33.4...

I found the site above. Is there a better map?
I don't think so, but to indulge my own cranky theories: Perhaps Elon Musk's takeover attempt was done at the behest of the US government to take control of the platform under the cover of "censorship". Musk himself indicated he wanted to make the platform more miserable for the "extremes" on both the left and right (both perceived as being anti-government) - leaving you with the establishment consensus unharmed in the middle.
I'm well aware of the (lack of true) financial implications but I still get the urgency and need to speed up because of the violation and shock that someone is impersonating me RIGHT NOW! It feels similar to a physical threat, or enough so that our bodies react the same way. It is really hard to develop control unless you're exposed to this situation, so I like your strict yet general rule to (a) classify the situation, (b) slow down. Even enough time for 10 deep breaths is likely enough to get you centered and thinking clearly.
Frances Haugen, the supposed Facebook whistleblower, slipped up in her 60 minutes interview and revealed that she works for US intelligence. The effort she was employed to advance is acceptance of more censorship of Meta and the like. Conspicuously absent from the publicly promoted discussion was any mention of the free alternatives such as the fediverse. 'The Social Dilemma' movie had similar objectives and narrative framing.

I anticipate that self-hosters, linux users, and people who are not Facebooked will be further castigated as radicals and worse in the future.

Also note the irony that Substack contains Google and Amazon trackers.
Github is working on this for a while now. It's still in beta :(

https://github.blog/changelog/2021-10-27-pull-request-merge-...
This is the second very similar report on HN where the end-goal was ApplePay. There must be something poorly done in their card linking/payment process that hackers are targetting. I don't use it, so I'm not familiar.

Collectively, we software engineers that have security focus, have done a piss-poor job with 2FA. Users should've been trained from day-one that 2FA codes sent to their email or SMS should never, EVER, be repeated back to a human. All the additional text sent with the code should clearly and emphatically state that this number is between you and a website that you are reasonably certain represents a secured entity and that you explicitly requested during a login flow. It's like the combination to a safe: that code is between you and the dial on the safe, if it ever verbally leaves your mouth, you're doing something wrong.

Any orgs that use 2FA codes to authenticate a user to a CSR are screwing it up for everyone. Don't do that: you should be able to mutually authenticate using shared knowledge that a hacker isn't likely to have (not an address, FFS), like the previous transactions thing the OP requested. 2FA codes are for computers only.
It's been Greenwald's MO for a long time now. Take completely uncontroversial statement -> twist it using just the right amount of slippery slope or change/omit one key detail -> make it seem inflammatory and controversial. There's nothing wrong with criticizing the negatives of Big Tech, but Glenn's turned his "anti-establishment" beat into an obsession with being anti-{whatever the current thing is}.
The debt is banks agreeing to loan Musk $3 billion because they know he's good for it. The second letter is banks agreeing to margin $12.5 billion against an unspecified amount of Musk's stock, and the last is Musk pledging the rest (or something like this).

You can promise all you want, but you have to get the bank to be willing to pony up the money - but what you're describing can and does happen - leveraged buyouts were common in the past. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leveraged_buyout

You find a company with no debt (say, TLSA) and you believe it is undervalued, so you convince banks to loan you enough money to buy TSLA and pledge TLSA itself as the collateral. If the purchase goes through, you now own TLSA and a TLSA sized debt. If it doesn't, nothing much happens.
> "how to do DRM with PDF" technique

Not DRM, but fingerprinting? Sure. This gives me the idea to write a PDF sanitizer that resets glyph rotation and kerning to prevent this.
I'm not at all confident that the real bank will never actually ask for you to verbally read a security code texted to you. This is how little I trust bank's security practices.

Here's a comment from a similar post last month, where the commenter believes the legit bank asked for a verbal confirmation of security code: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30875233

(I suppose it's possible the commenter was actually interacting with a scammer there and still doesn't realize it?)
Yeah, I dont think this is true either. It's a mix of a belief in the intrinsic effectiveness of the frugal protestant work ethic and credulity of the successful founders who hitch themselves to it when they write their origin story.
> No one reporting that apparently.

Just some things that the mainstream media lied about:

- The NIH having funded gain of function research in Wuhan Labs.

- The mortality rate of COVID19 (they ignored obvious issues with data collection and flawed incentives which over-counted deaths and under-counted cases).

- The effectiveness of COVID19 vaccines (several outlets initially said that 1 dose would be enough to get 90% protection, now they're saying we need 4).

- Covering up the 2008 and 2020 bailouts of the stock market - These are considered crimes in the eyes of many people but mainstream media has been silent on the subject.

- The existence of Hunter Biden's laptop containing compromising data.

You can look up all of these things. It's only a tiny fraction of all the lies they told.
Former Intel people are a necessary tool of the current Intel community. I forget which project veritas recording caught this- but a journalist was caught stating that they get their information from former Intel people that talk to current Intel officials to get around rules preventing current Intel officials from leaking information to journalists, we have a problem. And we've had a serious problem as this behavior is not just the activity of rogue officials that only leak true information. I would argue that it's also likely that Intel officials are doing this with the blessing of their organizations in order to shape public opinion. And they aren't always leaking the truth. Remember when 50 Intel officials signed a weasely letter stating that the laptop from hell was simply Russian Disinformation? Or in the case of the Durham investigation, we are seeing an increasingly obvious pattern that Intel agencies were involved in creating fake controversy over Russia and Trump in order to remove him from power?

You call it brand building, I call it destroying democracy.
2FA should never be vague - it should say "Don't give this code to anyone." People are getting scammed all the time this way.
I wonder how much the chord-space would shrink farther if you took out the bridge/intro where people tend to mix it up. And if you could adjust when the song shifts keys in the chorus and verse. (Although I didn't keep up with all the simplifications so maybe that is already in here).
Selling user data to governments?
The lowering of testosterone in the average male due to environmental and other factors definitely seems to correlate with a rise in the amount of LGBTQ. Of course society accepting them more and allowing them to come out is a big part too.

No doubt that eating clean, working out, etc seem to make you feel more masculine as a guy.
The Difference Between Science and the Humanities Is Reading the Classics
That's so unreasonable you should go more into it or just leave it. It's literally the richest man of Earth, banks are falling over themselves to stuff him their money.
Just like his "funding secured" to take Tesla private?
Whirlpool is not "some Aldi-branded Italian make", it's an extremely common American white goods producer. They used to be well-known for the robustness of their machines.
In this case, yes, obviously. But as far as "it's likely easier for them to contribute scraping than write a bunch of code to integrate with your API", that presupposes no existing integration.
Astronomers discover micronovae, a new kind of stellar explosion
Maybe it's an installed color profile thing, and colors from different sources get interpreted against different color spaces? PNGs typically have a well defined color space (implicit sRGB, or explicitly specified otherwise), but the background might get interpreted in device colorspace maybe.
> the only way is to burn more calories than you take in, cannot go wrong.

Sure, but you don't control how many calories you take in any more than you control how many calories you burn. That is, your brain's decisions to try to make you over-eat are no more under your control than your intestine's decisions to more or less thoroughly digest food.

This is the part that's always over-looked by those who believe CICO is the last word on dieting.
Hopefully he buys it.
It's likely going to come down to what Jack, as the largest remaining individual shareholder, says.
What you shared is quite interesting. But looming/impending fears of doom/dread is one of the tell-tale symptoms of anxiety (which is more plausible than a rare ailment for how common anxiety is. Anxiety also often has physical symptoms).
This breaks down to:

a) $21 billion of Elon's ("Reporting Person"; see item #1) own money

b) $12.5 billion in margin loans arranged by Morgan Stanley

c) $13 billion in debt from Morgan Stanley
GGP said

> We are not sending heavy armament to Ukraine for a reason and the government needs to make sure that their policies also apply to companies like SpaceX.

First, that's wrong (apart from Germany), second, how does this reason (that Western tanks require training and logistics Ukrainians don't have) square with 'mak[ing] sure that their policies also apply to companies like SpaceX'? It's a complete nonsequitur if that's the case.
Because it's one of the best things in life lol
Meh, this wont even survive a xerox :) [0]

[0] http://www.dkriesel.com/en/blog/2013/0802_xerox-workcentres_...

TLDR: xeroxes try to compress documents by replacing _similar_ glyphs with the _same_ glyph.
Many mobile games are built on cross-platform engines (eg Unity)
You keep mentioning the proof of intent. Intent of what? The FAA revoked his license for operating the plane in a "careless or reckless manner". The pilot was judged on the results of his actions, not on coulda/woulda/shoulda intent.
Many years ago, I changed to simply using "Yes, hello?"
The condition that renewables success currently require fossil fuel is the point of contention between those who advocate for renewables vs those that advocate in favor of nuclear.

Take away natural gas and the success metric for renewable goes away.
This would be a disaster for startups and hobby sites hosting user-submitted content without a significant minimum size or revenue threshold.

It would definitely be the end for one of the sites I run (which received only one DMCA request in 22 years of operation).
I spent one year working on an open source “side” project full time. I had savings and my wife continued to have income so I had plenty of safety net (thanks honey), with a goal of seeing whether I could sustain doing it indefinitely. My experience doesn’t help with the social security part of your question (we also were in the US) but maybe can help with the rest.

tldr; it didn’t work out financially but I’m super glad I tried, if only to not regret not trying. The biggest thing I didn’t expect was for capitalist instinct to take over: I liked working on open source because I could work on what I wanted to; but to work on what I wanted to indefinitely, and play the latest video games and go out to eat sometimes or whatever, I needed the thing to make some money.

So an unplanned, surprising amount of time went into revenue generation. I previously had a Patreon page that brought in ~$20 / mo, and during my year I got to ~$500 / mo (Patreon + Stripe). I also picked up some contract work for a few hours a week. No matter what happens the bill comes due, in more ways than one—I grew a new respect for founders, who have more than just themselves riding on this.

Even so, it was freeing to turn my nights-and-weekends fun work into full-time work, to spend stupid irresponsible amounts of time on small things like polish, to be able to drop what I was doing at any time to go hang with friends or walk the dog or go get eggs, and to dip my toes into every trade from design to swag to marketing to customer support to user research. I also used my free nights and weekends to learn a foreign language at a local community college.

Wouldn’t trade it for the world, but probably also won’t be doing it again until retirement.
The American Innovation and Choice Online Act and the Open Markets Act.
This is an unfortunately common, but incredibly naive and overly simplistic conception of what "private v. public" means in the context of utilities and similar services, and as someone who has worked in this area I wish I could do even more to dispel it.

We can do anecdata all day; my city owned electricity is great. But more to the point, the line between "public" and "private" in a lot of these cases is rather thin; given the heavy amount of outsourcing that occurs regardless.

The major difference is this, and only this: If you call the thing public, you get a better view and say of how the proverbial sausage is made. Due to a naive public this ends up cutting both ways. When it works well, you see it. When it doesn't work well, you still see it and other parties take advantage of it based on their own interests.

I assure you, you will find no non-anecdotal relationship between quality of service and public/private status.
Show HN: Get co-author info quickly from GitHub usernames and issue/PR URLs
No equity, but gov't could offer tax free jobs. That's like at least an instant 20% bump in salary.
Does it have referral link included? (as earn when someone signs up). If Binance is even offering it, I'm not sure. But referral spam is very popular, the idea is you to check out the pages.
Bad time to be a whistler blower
I wrote this small script for a quick way to credit the original PR authors while patching a fork.

The combination of using the GitHub REST API along with the no-reply email addresses seems novel in the co-authoring tool space, so I decided it was worth sharing - feel free to steal the idea!