skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The money illusion got you.

With demurrage currencies, everything works like TIPS. Yields may be negative but they are free from inflation and deflation.

It's kind of weird that people are choosing the money illusion over a negative yield/interest rate. I would rather have no inflation and see that the yield is negative than unpredictable inflation where the yield could be absolutely anything and I simply won't know.
Ben Eater did it with breadboards: https://youtu.be/l7rce6IQDWs
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abl5865
I have it installed and it's 105 gb, like there are plenty of sources on google that claims. You picked the only one saying higher.

https://gamerant.com/ps5-biggest-game-file-sizes-gb/

Here's the offical site also saying 105 gb:

https://direct.playstation.com/en-us/games/game/marvels-spid...

Also it's two games, Miles Morales and the remake of the PS4 version of Spider-Man.
Fudge.ai – Diagnose and fix any bug in under 5 minutes
Can you provide a source for this claim that Putin or 'top brass' has ordered the systematic rape, torture, and murder of Ukrainian civilians?
I fixed a broken $3,500 EV in my driveway
Canada us always a safe bet for extraordinarily bad internet speed, connection reliability and price. In my experience, our ISPs would make Comcast look like saints. (I'm looking at you, Bell)
I think something missing here is return on investment and opportunity cost.

People here are using survivor bias to indicate what has went from a hobby to a full time career. While nice - not relevant for most young people these days. Truth is - very few can turn a hobby into a real profitable profession. This isn’t because they lack talent, dedication, or smarts. It’s because they lack timing (being born when a house in SV wasn’t $2.5m), lack the right hobby to monetize (e.g. dancing - a notoriously poorly paying job unless you’re in the top 0.01%), or lack the social capital necessary (again - many reasons for why this might not be possible for you. Your race, gender, orientation, class, and looks really could be holding you back here. In the case of dancing - you often need to be good looking too).

If you’re working in SF as a software eng making $400k/yr - just enjoy your hobbies and stop trying to monetize them. If you’re struggling for money - leetcode, system design, and being a rule following brown noser will do you 200x on your time investment.

Personally - I have no interest in trying to monetize my hobbies. There’s no chance they will ever have any return on investment that will make it worthwhile compared to what I get paid at my job. They are for pleasure and for enrichment of the mind.
Ulcerative colitis: 'I was going to the toilet up to 30 times a day'
Just think of it as future proofing, like installing higher rated cabling in a house than you'll use initially. The cost isn't any more for you to have 10Gbit in this case, so for you it's just knowing that you could buy more equipment for your end at any time to use it if you needed, and not have to wait for a service change. :)
This is admittedly secondhand knowledge, but my understanding is that the EVM was written with 128 bit words, and consequently cannot be implemented using any common general purpose computer hardware. All of its operations have to be implemented in software, making it significantly slower than it could be as a result.
Public school libraries are usually the size of a single room. Does this mean public school libraries ban 99.999999% of books?
Right, and I don't think I misrepresented what they are doing:

> In the sense of school boards removing books from the curriculum

The word "banned" is used in many different senses, this sense is used a lot about part of what's happening in Texas. That's not the only thing they are doing though.

I know about at least two school libraries, and one rural public library (Llano County) removing books from the shelves (some supposedly "temporarily"). There's so much propaganda around this that figuring out the exact extent of what's happening is beyond my patience.
I think this is a strange take, sure the $34M is in the ethereum account but it is not in someone's bank account, but the people that sent money to that contract do have an NFT right? or have a claim for an NFT that can still be sent to them manually right? I think those NFTs don't have to be worthless, there is just a temporary blip in confidence until the project proves they are still able to perform with less revenue/capital and also still motivated to do so.
what's stopping a new version of C from defining a better declaration syntax? (better = easier to read, write and understand)
Consider buying stock in companies that produce real products that everyone needs. Food, cleaning supplies, toilet paper, hygiene, etc. It's hard to go wrong doing that.
Not a gamer but when I swapped my Ryzen 3700X out for an M1 Mac mini the temperature difference on my legs was the best feature.
> do you feel that the Russians have started to detest "West" more?

It's certainly true for me and a few more people that I know. I used to be a cookie-cutter west-loving liberal, and now I'm slowly turning into a bitter vatnik. One of the things that made me change my mind (aside from diving deep into the history of the conflict after which many things started to make sense) is seeing how petty and ridiculous sanctions could be. Ironically, those people who embraced the western values have suffered the most, not only financially, but morally too, seeing how every day new sanctions pushing them towards the world's pariah status. For the average Putin voter nothing has changed really (except McD, that was harsh) - financial instututions work just fine and we are not going to suffer from food or fuel shortages

I still think Putin is a bloody dictator and that the war is a historical mistake and a catastrophe. However, seeing rabid mccartism and imposing collective guilt only makes me feel under siege. And the natural response is to stick to the leader, no matter how bad he is

I don't even want to start on the hypocrisy, this rant would go well beyond HN's allowed comment length
First, accept that people have different goals and predilections and you should begin by asking clarifying questions. But if you advise primarily from your perspective then you aren't advising you are just talking about yourself, which is ok, but make it clear that you know you are doing that and you understand that your POV may not apply to them.

Second understand that many years may pass before someone finally appreciates your advice and/or takes it. Don't give advice if you expect instant gratification and don't get discouraged that if it is immediately rejected since it might be accepted later.
Only to the extent that the code doesn't have bugs and your algorithm has no design flaws. (All code has bugs and you should assume all algorithms have design flaws.)
Neat! Looks like it's very much in its early stages (no concurrent execution/threads yet) but it's so great to see FOSS digital design work in an industry dominated by huge players
They didn’t get their money back. The bank lost money, but they have a lot so they don’t care. In cryptocurrency every sat or Wei is accounted for. You can’t make them up. A loss can never be undone.

People need to look at this as like chartering a 17th century galleon. It sank. Gold was lost at sea, unreachable by todays tech. Maybe in 200 years someone can crack ECDSA and recover it.
The Tao of Q
My career took me to C-like languages and scripting environments like Ruby or Python. And (love it or hate it) most of the world thinks in JS nowadays. Some aspects of Pascal are really strange or awkward to me, like the rules for whether or not a statement in an `if` block needs to be surrounded by `begin`/`end`, or where the semicolons go in a particularly complicated, nested instance of said `if`.

But I am not a master Pascal programmer by any means. You sound like an expert.
The Turner Diaries is, I think, a poor choice of litmus test for this. It was never picked up by a major publisher, and was basically always self-published as far as I know. Wikipedia gives an estimate of 200k-500k copies sold, total, since 1978: that’s not a lot!

Libraries do have to make curatorial choices about what to stock, both physically and digitally. So it’s not surprising a lot of libraries don’t stock a book that was never widely published or sold many copies, regardless of political connotations. And as controversial books go, I don’t think the Turner Diaries is one of the ones that necessarily merits wider availability for “historical interest”. I’ve never read it, maybe you have, but from I understand it’s not even a particularly interesting book it itself, only for it’s connection to some right-wing terrorists like McVeigh. The fact it never sold much sort of indicates not many people want to read it, a good reason not to carry it!

And for ebooks in particular, it’s worth remembering most libraries (including Brooklyn) outsource their digital catalog to a third party provider. So their curatorial choices are potentially limited by that as well. Again, self published book never widely published or sold: not surprising to me that the major ebook providers for libraries might not have it.

As a litmus test against your litmus test, it’s worth noting that the BK library does carry other controversial books like Mein Kampf, physically and digitally.

All of this to say that while politics is always going to influence curatorial choices of “merit”, I think suggesting that the Brooklyn library “banned” The Turner Diaries merely due to its absence from the catalog is a bit of a stretched conclusion.
Somebody put his lectures up on YouTube a long time ago.

If "person who's content is available on YouTube" qualifies one as a YouTuber, then yes
The valuation of growth stocks (of any sort, not just tech stocks) is very heavily influenced by interest rates
Perhaps they should a a 4th step were the person fix the text proposed by the AI to match, for example editing the proposed

> Improve code coverage by 23% by writing unit tests, ...

to

> Improve code coverage by 10% by writing unit tests, ...

[Also, 23% is a ver weird number. I don't expect anyone to quote that with that level of precision, I'd prefer 20% or 25%.]
Reading about this strategy reminded me of that question of whether you’d rather fight one horse-sized duck or 100 duck-sized horses. In this case, seems like you get both.
So Twitter, a private company, has to fund speech it doesn't like but a public library can be forbidden from using public money for books people don't like
Burn it to ash, collect info about the ash and reconstruct - no problem.
But if you burn it in a way, that the only remains are "random thermal radiation" all the information is lost and we have a serious paradox to resolve...
There is no such thing as 'contradicting science' - Science is never settled, never certain. If it was, it would be called Mathematics.
Obviously no idea if this is true, but, an object falling into a black hole maybe could emit some radiation containing the key before the majority of the mass "encrypted" into the black hole.
I don't have a problem with a company exercising editorial control over ads. The concern comes from the measure being used (scientific consensus).

1. Twitter is not and ought not be the adjudicator of what has or lacks consensus.

2. Using consensus as a measure implies that it is immutable. We should have learned during COVID that consensus is incredibly variable
US Space Force unit to monitor region beyond Earth's geosynchronous orbit
> The idea that in capitalist countries citizens would be left to die and starve requires a great exercise of imagination

How about dying from rare cancers due for living near superfund sites, or from opioid-related ODs?
i believe you can achieve what you want with embed https://pkg.go.dev/embed
US DOJ probes Google's $5.4b Mandiant acquisition
> Hypothetically they don't care about high interest rates right?

They care, because when interest rates go up, rich savers buy the dip.

That's one of the biggest ironies when it comes to people shouting that low interest rates make housing expensive. Yeah they make it expensive for those who already have enough money to buy a house outright. The amount of money you are paying on your mortgage in an area with a housing shortage is determined by your salary, not the interest rate.
> I disagree

At one time, consensus was bleeding with leeches cured disease, owning humans was normal and legal, sugar was good for you and so on.
I believe that CC is a problem that I am 100% behind but how do we avoid this piggy backing and hijacking of CC initiatives to further some other agenda? Say increase profit margins or green wash people? Just recently I stayed in a Marriott hotel and my entire experience was marred with CC warning labels everywhere from Toiletteries to free breakfast in the morning. You know what would be better for CC? That hotel to not exist in the first place. There is no end in sight and no limit to what can be done for CC. So you have this unlimited power from random authorities masquerading behind CC.

I think the problem with Climate Change movement is sort of like COVID. Restroom closed? Because COVID. Public Park Trail closed? COVID. Wtf!?

No one challenges it. No is allowed to. It has all these side effects.

We ought to double-down where things actually matter for the betterment of the planet and speak up against this other non-sense.
The ITER Research Plan, How to Reach Q=10 [video]
Not too long ago in computing history there was a fascinating
confluence of hackers and lawyers who came together to co-examine
their respective formalisms. It was called Groklaw, run by an
energetic blogger named Pamela Jones [1]. For many years it served to
translate law into code and code into law, as well as being an
experiment in the "many-eyes" idea of picking through legal prose in a
participatory, public way.

Powerful interests did not like this. Jones eventually tired of
defending what can only be described as a first generation optimist's
understanding of the Internet as a tool for social good.

[1] possibly a nom de plume of several law and technology researchers
And if one happens eventually come under the IRS Form 8815 MAGI cutoff, it has a federal income tax exclusion for education [1]. Consistent with what you say, it is exempt from state income taxes, which savings accounts typically aren't.

[1] https://treasurydirect.gov/indiv/planning/plan_education.htm
I see at least two compilers: zip and cat. :)
Bluetooth vulnerability in smart Covid test patched, the second to do so
If you can get those five countries to agree on anything, the lobbyists/politicians running those countries have found some way to benefit from that message.
Creationism isn't a scientific subject.
I agree that the piece may have been better off if it didn't mention Trump. However, so that other readers can be aware of where the dishonest attacks may be coming from here:

The name "Trump" appears four times in over 7000 words. All four mentions appear within 3 paragraphs. The remainder of the piece contains 124 citations of the history (the time period of which can be seen in the title) of both Democrats and Republicans attacking the integrity of the press.

It's better not to mention recent politics in any sort of serious work simply because hyper-partisan, hyper-sensitive readers are ever watchful.
Can you clarify what you are trying to say with this comment? This distinction has no bearing on what I said. The same concept applies to both equally regardless of the current political battle being specifically about school libraries.
> You’re not missing anything if you don’t those articles.

I love the irony that something is missing in her closing remark. Almost makes me wonder if it was intentional.
I think death sentence for blasphemy is antichristian too, but, when your funny idea to perform in church involved the risk of burning alive, people were indeed far more considerate.
Esperanto Technologies’ RISC-V AI Inferencing Solution Now in Initial Evaluation
I’m so envious.
One problem, as a lazy bastard, I've always had with the Caddy docs is it can sometimes be hard to glance at a page in the documentation and see "ah, that's how I'd do <common thing>".

Take the basicauth portion for example. If you had been reading the docs like a book, started in the references/tutorial sections, understood all there is to know about how request matcher syntax works as a result, and then read the basicauth page you would have a rock solid understanding of how to make basicauth do what you want here. If you land at the basicauth page from a Google search trying to stand up a quick file-server weekend project in a way your friends can access you either are really on top of it and notice "[<matcher>]" (not even mentioned in the Syntax breakdowns of the page) is what's used in the single example below and happens to be a path but might be a lot more or you leave without a hint of how to do basicauth the way you wanted. It'd be great if the syntax section breakouts just mentioned something that triggered more or less a "and hey dumbass, if you haven't learned how matchers work yet you need to go do that to fully utilized this directive".

I realize this is awfully needy, the docs have everything you need if you read them carefully, and I absolutely LOVE using Caddy so it's not an attempt to say it's bad overall by any means. I wanted to point it out though since this exact example is something I ran into a few weekends ago. I think the problem is exacerbated by v2 syntax being new, as well as the competing JSON syntax, making it harder for people to find use case examples outside of what's in the official docs.
> Sabine’s niche seems to be a confident cynicism or learned skepticism and is a much appreciated addition to the space.

While I also appreciate a healthy dose of skepticism, and in weaker moments I can also get very cynical, this is not a very constructive attitude to science or life in general. If we were all doing science like that, we'd not have gotten anywhere.

As mentioned elsewhere in this discussion, a "solution" will not only consist of a theory that "solves" the problem in the sense that Sabine described, but even propose experiments that can actually be executed within a time frame (and budget) in order to validate the theory. Just because her colleagues (and Sabine herself) have failed at that so far should not be a reason to give up. With that attitude, there wouldn't be much science left today.
Scraping web pages from the command line with shot-scraper
Eh, I'm gay and I still agree: those types of shows get a bit boring sometimes. I'm all for representation but it shouldn't be the only point of a show: it shouldn't be "here's Ghostbusters, the exact same film all over again, but with women!", or "here's Ocean's Eleven, the exa"- eh, you get the point.

I'm sure some people will hotly contest that these shows/movies are genuinely works of art, and representation just happens to be a bonus, but that's not how it feels when watching a load of this tedious paint-by-numbers pablum.

(This isn't to say that there are no instances where I feel the opposition to minority/female casting was driven more by bigotry than by people's finely-honed critical faculties. Of course there are. But I happen to think it cuts both ways in this case: many of those shows/movies are just godawful, and trade on the "you're a bigot if you don't like this!" card to drive sympathy/virtue demand, from people who want to feel like Rosa Parks for going to the cinema.)
Unfortunately, two of those countries aren't allowed to vote so we don't know what they agree on.
A Procrustean view.

The law isn't perfect, and in that sense, it is like software in that it is constantly changing in anger. With the law, however, you're also in the situation of having many different interpreters. Given that the law is imperfect and requires refinement and adaptation in anger, given the imperfect knowledge of law givers, it is expected that there would be multiple interpretations.

Law does not determine justice by virtue of its codification. Morality does. Law is just the determination of general moral principles. A ruled-based system blindly followed by a machine would be a disaster outside very narrow, niche applications.
It's funny how guarantees like this work until broken. You can put whatever you want in a EULA. Once it is broken, you just say oops beyond my contol that hackers got in and did this. No longer need to honor this.
That is easily possible with XMPP and does not really have anything to do with 'MAM supporting E2EE'. For Message Archive all messages are equal, encrypted or not.
In some ways it’s very radical that people are trying to overturn such a fundamental part of being an adult as you have to go to work.

On the other hand the housing and transportation planning in this country are extremely dysfunctional. People live far from where they work and the commutes are brutal. I was hoping for a revolt against car-centric suburban planning orthodoxy, but I guess a revolt against ever having to go places also works.
I mean in 1980 how often did you need 128kb ISDN? A hunter gatherer would have told you they have no use for a spaceship, yet modern society uses them do deploy satellites of all kinds. Just because you dont have a need doesnt mean that needs dont exist.
Why do you suspect that? Do you deny that quantum mechanics is a valid model of the universe?

Or do you believe quantum mechanics is equivalent to relativistic mechanins?

Either would unwrite a century of physics.
LOL I remember watching a conference talk where a speaker said "fabrication is becoming incredibly affordable; you can now get a run for as little as $18k!"

I think us poor HN users are going to be stuck in FPGAs for the foreseeable future
This trait is more about phase fit than role fit
> Quantum mechanics is also something without experiment no one would come up with in a million years.

You may find the book Quantum Computing since Democritus an interesting read. It's motivating them is how the ancient greeks might have deduced the basics of QM.
Pinoygrams as a loss-leader to get into the underseas cabling business. You heard it here first.
But not to individual liberty.

I think the aggressiveness that the EU attacks big tech with is proof enough that the national security point is true.
Morally, I definitely agree.
I am not what's your point. Science is a subject. Creationism should be excluded from science curriculum. Just like history is a subject, and 1619 should be excluded from history curriculum.
No, it's not like that at all. My original point was that most end-users don't care about the license. Implied was that most end-users determine the state of the market, but whatever.

So, here I am, 4 downvotes to my name for stating the obvious. Despite years of membership, I don't have downvote privileges, so I guess I just have to bow to the galaxy-sized minds that have this ability, and deal with the crumbs that do leave a reply, however utterly misguided?
I mean, yes? That seems obvious?

EU law applies to companies which operate in the EU.
i too was scrolling and hoping to see phantom power for at least one input :(
Can I pay for your data? Don't care much about eyeballing but it'd be great to have a daily download feed to my own model.
Thanksfully you've never been sick && live in a populated city in Toronto. Might be better in other places in Canada.
The article and the thread leading comment are both nonsense in many ways, because you only have to look at the Comics Code[0] to determine what made comic books and superhero stories "for kids". They were sanitized to the point where they weren't telling "adult" stories and were stripped of many interesting possibilities.

Over time, the code lost its value and as of ten years ago, no comic company is following it anymore. Good riddance.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comics_Code_Authority
It is not an issue at all. I was just highlighting a nonsense criticism about message archive and e2ee.