skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yes, You Can Be More Than Your Job Title
So that'd make Tesla account for 13.8% of ~9% of global vehicle sales. The 50% number comes from Tesla being worth as much as every other car manufacturer combined. Definitely respectable, but 0.13*0.09 = 0.012. If my numbers are correct that'd mean 1.2% of worldwide cars are Tesla but they're valued as if 50% of all cars were Teslas.

Correct me if I'm wrong somewhere, but having 20% of a market vs 1% is a significant difference.

It's also quite more approachable for people to spend on a premium phone than a premium car, since a premium car costs more than what many "westerners" make in a year while an iPhone is less than a "westerners" monthly salary.
I don't understand why it is stressed that all of this is connected to marriage (or absense of). Parents walking away from responsibility is a cause for problems in children, no matter whether you are married or not. Also, I doubt that the degree of married parents is connected to class. We have both a PhD, a child, and live together for 15 years, failing both to see a reason for marriage.
As I was cursing the high price of fast charging my electric car during a trip yesterday, 5 NOK/min or $0.56/min, I glanced over at the pump price board and was quite glad I had an EV: 22.80 NOK/liter or $9.63/gallon for regular 95 octane.

Most days I charge at home, and even with the relatively insane electricity prices we've got these days it's less than half the cost of what it would cost if we had an ICE in terms of fuel/energy cost.
> You put a guy in a chaotic and impoverished circumstances. And then you decide not to expect anything of him.

How about not put them in chaotic and impoverished circumstances? Sweden does not have these problems at the scale the US has.

Also after World War II, a working class guy could get a job at a factory in Detroit, and be able to afford his wife staying home to raise kids in a house he owned, commuting in a car he owned. Maybe going to school on the GI Bill at some point. All of this is gone. People like Charles Murray spent decades attacking the US working class, and now he bemoans that wage slaves are not interested in pursuing the Sisyphean tasks he has laid out.

All of this is concurrent with the material destruction of working class life in the US, which is why the first thing Henderson has to try to knock out is it has anything to do with material conditions.

It was a hell of a lot better to be a working class man in 1960 then 2005. Two thirds of union jobs are now nonunionized etc.
The state first needs to be informed of the theft, by the victim, to be able to seize the thief's assets. Moreover, there is a significant possibility that the state will fail in its attempt to seize the thief's assets. Both of these qualities of these respective situations are significantly different than a case of a virtual good held by a large trusted third party custodian. The latter means the state by default can easily discover who owns what, and is guaranteed to be able seize whatever it sets out to seize, at minimal enforcement and political cost.

In other words, it's not a simple binary proposition, between the state being able to seize assets and not being able to. The power of the state to seize assets exists on a spectrum, with less power in the context of blockchains. I contend that this spot on the spectrum, that the blockchain places the state's power to confiscate and surveil on, is better for society at large.
> I think you don't have a good understanding of those times if you think women could be beaten around without repercussions

Or, you don’t.

It is definitely true that domestic violence was in the realm of “basically normal”, I’d guesstimate 20% of households had an abusive person in them: and if you were married and your partner was not physically violent it was considered that they were a “good person”.

This swings both ways more than you think, my grandfather (mothers father) was very physically abusive, a point which he was mocked for (derisively) openly in the pub (but that’s about the only repercussion). My great grand mother (mothers-mothers mother) was abusive towards my great grandfather. Which he was mocked for (jovially) openly by the whole family.
By nature? Really? What are women, by nature?

:popcorn:
True. But people also just give up if they're constantly told that all the opportunities are gone, whether or not it's true. If you combine "there are no opportunities for me" with "there are no expectations for me", you get "I'll do nothing".
Glade will likely be replaced by drafting: https://gitlab.gnome.org/chergert/drafting
I was born in the Sixties, and my parents married in the Fifties. The idea that everyone lived in the same area they were born in was already not the norm. I think between the Great Depression and WW2, the difficulty of moving to new places became much lower. So there were many families that didn't have multiple generations under one roof. And even so, that didn't prevent abuse from happening.
How many civilizations have lasted since time immemorial? You could have said this in Rome and you would have been right. You could have said this as a slave to the pharos and you would have been right.

It never lasts forever.
> To protect my mental wellbeing, I find that carefully selecting who to follow on some of these services improves considerably my experience.
For Instagram and Twitter, my rule of thumb

This. These services aren't toxic if you don't follow toxic accounts.

Also, I didn't think much about it in the past but now that I split my time between 3 countries and 2 continents, having FB (messenger) is the best way to keep in touch with people without bugging them with my several phone numbers (and charges that may occur, thanks Canadian telecoms).
The UK playing victim is the reason Brexit happened in the first place. No wonder their residents continue being brainwashed in that sense.
Exactly. The ETH PoS FAQ is a good introduction to the problem. In a nutshell, when there are two competing chains,

A) in PoW you

A1) either put all your resources (hash power) behind one chain, and get the block, thus the mining reward, with probability equal to your proportion of the total hash power (as before) assuming that chain ends up the longest chain (so you have a strong incentive to pick the "correct" one), or

A2) distribute your hash power between the two competing chains, but then each of them only gets half the hash power, and you reduce your probability of getting the mining reward to half, thus halving your expected reward.

At any rate, as soon as one of the chains is ahead, there is a very strong incentive to fall in line with the LCR (longest chain rule) and place all your bets on the putative winner, rather than diluting your expensive hash power.

B) In PoS, you can just continue staking on both competing chains, and whichever wins, you got get your mining reward (as usual, with probability equal to your proportion of the total stake). No incentive to settle on a winner early ("nothing at stake"), so just keep your options open by supporting both chains, and thus no incentive to congeal on a winner quickly.

https://eth.wiki/en/concepts/proof-of-stake-faqs
>if you want uptake, you need to support what user's want

Before the iPhone no one knew they wanted a good camera and "apps" on their phone.

See the important point here -> "knew they wanted"
For point #2, we can follow the idea to its logical conclusion. (Note: I have zero issues with gay parents, this is just a thought exercise)

If it stands to reason that if the children of lesbian parents are indistinguishable from those of mixed-sex parents, then men play no particular role in the upbringing of children, no? They can be swapped out by a woman with no change for the child.

And conversely if a child raised by two gay men are indistinguishable from mix-sex parents, then woman play no particular role in the upbringing of children, no? Replace the mother with another man and nothing changes in that child's upbringing?

And therefore, one could argue that a single parent (only a man or woman) are only worse off due to limited parental resources (not to be underestimated), but not because an opposite sex partner would add anything unique to the childrearing.
Link Aggregation
Show HN: Build user dashboards on Supabase with just a config file (open-source)
Alternatively, you could accept what is at root a rather small thing, and adjust you own reaction. That’s what I did when those kind of titles started to become common.
that's one thing i like about riding a bike. i get to look down at people in cars ;-)
I’m from a middle class, conservative family in a poor country. Compared to my richer, status seeking classmates, I can handle myself a lot better socially and emotionally. I’m also disabled, that means the social divide is a lot tougher to crack. In fact, I get shot dirty looks by the same classmates. It’s not because They don’t like the fact I participate in my classes, it’s just that they don’t like the fact that someone who doesn’t have the same status can equal them in a lot of ways.
I've been using Disa.im but every few years FB breaks the API it uses for a few days or weeks at a time.
These young men aren’t getting weekly messages of hope like >80% were 60 years ago. Those that are are more likely flourishing according to all the pew research.
Assuming it's not 100% efficient, what does ammonia emit when burned?
I meant it in the way it's typically used in disabled spaces, where it's a contrast to physical disability because the two experiences are different. Mental illnesses are/ can be disabilities, I wouldn't disagree, but there are differences that make mental illness advocacy well-suited to an intersectional framework in ways that physical/intellectual disabilities aren't. (Since you mention them, intellectual disabilities are their own third, distinct category).

Mental disabilities are frequently easier to hide (much like being bi is easier to hide than being homosexual), which means that people with mental illnesses/disabilities are more likely to know how people treat them before and after finding out they're disabled (as opposed to someone whose disability is physical or intellectual who are more likely to always be seen as disabled and not see that on-off switch to ableism). People with mental illnesses are also more likely to have difficulties stemming from stigma and erasure vs. physical limits (I'm not saying any difficulties are worse than the others; they're just different) and intersectionality/identity politics has a lot of focus on correcting or changing behavior and thoughts to improve society.

Intersectionality/identity politics, in 2022, don't really do a great job at changing physical reality, which tends to be more necessary for physical and intellectual disability activism.

There are also historical reasons for the intertwining of mental illness advocacy and intersectionality (the rise of intersectionality/id politics in the upper-middle class coinciding with the rise of psychiatry/therapy/ the move to destigmatize mental illness, for example, whereas the sensory and physically disabled communities had their own activist movements/organizations for decades/centuries beforehand which made them more likely to have disagreements).

> Yeah, it's luck that I, or anyone, can work, but you wouldn't sneer at someone with an intellectual disability that was bagging groceries, would you?

Of course not, but I'm not a capitalist (or a communist, for that matter). The point is more that a lot of people into intersectional activism claim to also be anti-capitalist, but their embrace of diversity often depends on diverse people being able to work and if they advocated for the disabled, they'd have to confront that they can't use 'disabled people can do anything able bodied people can do' as a reason, which means they'd have to articulate some reason diversity matters other than to let marginalized people/ their pet companies make $$$.

I just think if said grocery bagger had to stop bagging groceries that they don't lose value as a human. Of course everyone should be proud of what they can contribute to society and their communities.
The peaks South of Ruteng are covered with thick impenetrable jungle, one of the few patches of untouched primary rainforest left in Asia.
While an answer in the affirmative would tickle your confirmation bias activations, I'll counter with my anecdote that I play "video games" and have been happily married for 13 years and have two kids.
I think “preach what they practice” would mean publicly speaking (more?) in an effort to nudge behavior more towards how they act (in your example, to speak out in favor of sticking out and improving marriages).
Do the elites really get to choose the degree of social mobility in their societies? Do you have any comparative figures to back this up or further data? All I have is anecdote having grown up in poverty in what would likely be considered a relatively left wing first world economic environment, and to the best of my knowledge, none of the kids I grew up with except me ever escaped poverty.

Maybe it's wrong and I'd love to know if that's the case but from personal experience the only way I've seen out of poverty is interest in an in demand field leading to the building and maintenance of marketable skills that allow you to earn a living sufficient to attain economic escape velocity. That seems to me to be a whole lot do with luck at the ground floor. And fiscal and social policy can be as much of a burden as it is a boon all the way along the pipeline.

That said, that escape velocity was directly mediated by both the tax burden of the jurisdiction coupled with the economic opportunities of the jurisdiction and at the end of the day it meant the correct choice was to leave for greener pastures, both lowering the necessary target for escape velocity as well as reducing economic drag getting there.

In the meantime all those kids I knew back in the old neighbourhood are still there, mostly on subsistence handouts, firmly in poverty, and show no signs of that changing.
WordPress Performance Team Puts Controversial WebP by Default Proposal on Hold
I wonder what it would take to cut say a year off the time line; I realize 5 years isn't huge for a big project, but being pretty desperate for energy I wonder what it would take.
Of course debug builds aren't the prime example of performance, that is to be expected.

Performance problems get sorted out when people actually care to solve them instead of driving their own agenda.
Sorry, for going a bit of topic, but I perked up my ears at this sentence:

>For example, there are many studies on identical twins separated at birth who are adopted by different families.

How the hell are there 'many' studies on this? I'd think this Prince and the Pauper scenario would be so fantastic, that there'd be no more than a dozen cases, owing to the extreme rarity of circumstances which all need to happen for this sensational scenario to come about.

Or do psychiatrists make sure somehow that identical twins in orphanages are adopted with people from different socioeconomic strata?
If that is true, banding large swathes of the American population by melanin content is just as non-nonsensical.
I've found myself between deleting, deactivating, and moderating my use of these apps for many years of my life.

I never found deleting or deactivating to be very helpful. At some time or another you're going to need said account for something.

While deleting is a bit extreme, some of these services will respect the actual deletion and others will not. I suppose the question at the end of the day is...why bother?

I've found it much more easy to "declutter" by following digital minimalism practices of getting rid of apps, only using browsers, practicing mindfulness of said platforms, and only using said platforms with a specific intention.

There's a laundry list of tips you could use to make social media harder to use or even more bearable, but the most effective approach I've used is simple moderation and mindfulness.

Also why is Mozilla writing articles about this? I get the privacy angle, but aren't they also willing to put ads in front of people and other partnerships sacrificing that privacy for users? Like how does Mozilla make money outside of Google search engine being the default? I do know they lay off many of my friends who work on dev tools or even mobile apps there(i.e. browsers).
Good question. I wonder if this type of societal situation has lead to wars of conquest in the past. Is there research or studies on events like this? It seems like something that may be difficult to study historically, but who knows.
>Finally, there was a decent support of policies for the working class.

Please provide actual policy examples. I don't mean like when he put on a hard hat and pretended to dig coal with an imaginary shovel while on stage, I mean actual tangible policy proposals that would have improved the lives of working folks. Tariffs were very likely a net negative. Tax giveaways to build domestic factories almost never resulted in actual factories being built or jobs being created. I can't think of anything else.
You're double-counting. Starting from Newtonian mechanics, gravitational waves are indeed a huge, incredibly novel prediction. So is gravitational lensing. So is any other consequence of a coupling between the metric and the stress-energy tensor - because that's the real novel prediction.

Once you grant that the metric varies smoothly over space and time, gravitational waves are pretty mundane.
And yet (depending on how it is used) "oversight" often refers to an instance of overlooking, rather than of overseeing.

It seems remiss of Grammarist to write an entire page without mentioning that.
Wat.

Are you a teenager?

Web 1.0 had user interaction in the form of forms, which made http get/post requests.
This is rad.

> Alongside the consistent output from its solar panels and wind turbines, an onsite 20GWh/5GW battery facility provide sufficient storage to reliably deliver each and every day

Four hour battery storage for renewables. The way of the future.

> This “first of a kind” project will generate 10.5GW of zero carbon electricity from the sun and wind to deliver 3.6GW of reliable energy for an average of 20+ hours a day.

The classic error, mixing up units: "3.6GW of reliable energy". The writer certainly means power here. [1] I work in energy, and have had teams like legal (and tools like Grammarly) think we're just mixing up words for fun. Regardless, definitely seems like a very sufficient install to supply real power and charge the battery for load shifting at utility scale.

[1]: https://energyeducation.ca/encyclopedia/Energy_vs_power
The War in Ukraine Has Unleashed a New Word: рашизм (Ruscism)
> Watching and hearing about the family instability in these communities is heartbreaking. Half or more of everyone’s parents are divorced. The kids float around seeking stability and the adults can’t provide it.

You seem to be attributing the cause of this to 'Telling men and boys it's cool and fine to divorce'
and not attributing to say... declining material and social capitol in the lower four quintiles of wealth that have created pressure that exacerbates marriage instability and numerous other social ills.

Also, divorce sucks when kids are involved, I don't think anyone on earth, left or right, would dispute that.

> Creating a culture where men can attain dignity and social respect **

We do in fact need a culture where it is possible for people to attain human dignity.
I don't think that the path to gaining this needs to be a rigid and proscriptive 'return to tradition'.

For example, with the advent of no-fault divorce, divorces went up, but female suicide rates dropped by 20%.
It wasn't all streamers and light when the 'guard rails' were on.

And speaking of America specifically, dignity and respect were not equi-distributed if you were a simply a 'married man' in decades past. It was quite a bit stricter: white, middle class or higher, married men were the ones afforded government support and social protection.

> My family’s rigid expectations have been such a blessing.

I won't dwell on this, but not every (or even most) children benefit from this approach to parenting.
Extreme rigidity, in fact, is more associated with negative long-term outcomes.

Finally, historically speaking, decrying the next generation as depraved, lost, and needing traditional discipline has been something the older generations have done since at least the invention of writing (across all cultures too!).
Yet I'm still continually shocked that this argument continues to be unironically employed century after century.
FFmpeg: Add JPEG XL as image2 format
Porting Gnome Builder to GTK 4
Like sibling comment mentioned, Fusion. Was using it to deliver advertising video VFX work on the daily for a couple of years, it's great. We were a mixed group of After Effects and Fusion (and many more apps) users and I would say generally you can accomplish the same things with both and some tasks are easier in one or the other.

I would recommend downloading the standalone Fusion Studio though, it's included with a Resolve Studio license (~$300 one-time). Managing anything but the simplest project within Resolve's Fusion page seems like a nightmare. Being able to use a separate app that saves its own files is a much more straightforward workflow. Then check out VFX Connect if looking for more sync between the apps.
The only problem with DaVinci on Linux was no builin mp4 codec. So you had the convert mp4 videos to some format and only then you could use it in DaVinci. Windows nor macOS version doesn't had this limitation. It was DaVinci 15 or 16. Not sure if this changed already.
It still seems like a moment of temporary stability though, especially as their social structure starts to stress from the old:worker ratio going from >5 to <2.

I.e. unless they accept 30% immigration over the next 50 years, the system will be extremely stressed and may fracture.
Google gives Europe a ‘reject all’ button for tracking cookies
"Securing Britain's energy supply by diversifying from EU interconnectors"

Also, it's kind of funny how you say it has absolutely nothing to do with Brexit and immediately jump into an anti-EU rant, probably not the smoothest transition :D
I noticed yesterday that nine of the top ten shows on US Netflix were squarely aimed at women; Better Call Saul was the exception and it was in last place.

Netflix is slowly turning into a weird mix of "high production quality Lifetime + HGTV" and imported dramas from places with strong media like Korea.
How to Future-Proof Your Leadership (Video and Podcast)
Difference calculated is £570/year (was £403 in 2021).

But this happens because petrol has increased prices more than electricity, according to the example in the article, yearly use of petrol raised £300 while electricity for charging "only" £137.
Show HN: WorkOrPay – Set goals, form contracts, pay a penalty if you fail
The paper you linked to opens its summary of results with the following:

"How do education expenditures vary with alternative district and
community measures? Students in districts enrolling the lowest percentages of students in poverty and the lowest percentages of students in need of special education services received the highest expenditures."
Thank you for sharing. It sounds like this is an unfortunate side effect of the law and not the intention, though. I wonder whether the laws could be updated to prevent these perverse incentives.
It is connected, via France.

There was a fire recently, but it's a strategic connection.

https://ifa1interconnector.com/

Also the UK is connected to Norway

https://northsealink.com/

And Ireland also

https://www.eirgridgroup.com/customer-and-industry/interconn...