skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Similarly, a serverless function that is "warm" already has all the logic needed to inject the static template into memory

Sure, I accept this.

> It simply needs to call out to the database, which is physically closer to the server, and always quicker, without the need for an additional HTTP handshake

I contest all three parts of this.

* physically closer

How can this be guaranteed? You have no control over the closest Edge function vs Cloud Server to the user. It's just as likely your Edge function is farther away from the Cloud Server than the user is, from my view. Perhaps your cloud provider is offering you routing services you claim are superior, but given the nature of my questioning is anti-vendor-lock-in you'll understand I mostly disregard that.

* always quicker

How can this be true? The user's machine is quite nicely guaranteed to be somewhat available for the compute here - they issued the request themselves after all. Your machine, on the other hand, has a good chance of cold starting for this request or being hot because a bunch of other requests are being issued to it simultaneously. Given we have async steps in what the SSR is doing, backpressure from sharing resources with other users sounds worse than what we risk with a client machine.

* without the need for an additional HTTP handshake

Again, your Edge function seems likely to either be cold or busy, so this is only something you can speak about probabilistically

> The bundle still needs to be loaded into memory on the client to create the Document Object Model that powers every webpage

HTML still needs to render a DOM, not sure you're hitting on the right points of the parsing... Plus if this page is meant to be interactive still, you've not gained anything with the initial SSR phase

> Depending on how your client-side bundle is structured, it may be 100ms or 1s to fill in the necessary data

It's just not a big deal, and it's laughable you'd make the example a BI dashboard because you rendered something nice for them initially in maybe 0.5s faster on a median request, in exchange for literally enormous complexity. But a BI user is probably going to be in there for a long time, interacting heavily with client-side JS you shipped and they had to parse and render and then also reconcile/hydrate

> easier to satisfy on SSR with multiple database hits having less impact to performance).

How is this easier to satisfy on SSR? You have minimal advantage on your Edge worker being closer to your database than the user, unless your Edge function is actually just sitting beside your database server. It has to make the same requests and transfer the same data the client would be transferring in order to perform this SSR, there are only savings here if your Cloud provider is offering you big vendor lock-in promotions.

> Better user experience, and it might cost you pennies more per month vs. static + round-trip.

> Cloudflare loss-leader pricing

Unconvincing.
I've got to agree. I used to like seeing some old favorites and some big screen classics. The made-for-streaming shows take so long to binge watch and they're often turning up the dial on creepiness just to get attention. I start tuning out when I feel icky and that's often pretty early.
Netflix moves towards ADs as subscription base shrinks
As nuclearnice1 has noted... "Catholics seem almost the same as the US population overall to believe in evolution." I am a practicing Catholic, happily formed and informed. There is nothing in Church teaching that prevents the faithful from studying and defending evolution(1) (or any of the natural sciences, for that matter--contrary to popular belief, the Church does not condemn science that is true to its discipline). Some will reject it (often out of ignorance of what evolution actually teaches(2) or simply as a matter of choice) while others will prayerfully accept it. Myself, I am fascinated by science and always in appreciation to those who genuinely "stick to the science."

(1) But there is an important provision to be considered by the faithful: the teaching of evolution cannot patently claim that there is no God. It is outside the scope of any science to disprove (or prove) the existence of God. And thus it is a misrepresentation of the science for any of the faithful to claim otherwise. The Church respects science in its endeavor to sincerely discover truth; Pope John Paul II once put it as such in his writings (I am paraphrasing here): "Faith forms reason, reason informs faith."

(2) Darwin's work was in fact not motivated by a sense of atheism [1]. In fact, I believe that I once discovered that in the Forward to On the Origin of Species, he references God in a positive note. The exact comment escapes me--perhaps someone with the actual text can verify this.

[1] https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/DCP-LETT-12041.xml
I’ve worked at companies with similar attitudes, but they dealt with insanely sensitive information.

There strict firewalls about who could talk to who. We were given lists of things we could talk about socially (the weather, etc).

But the effect was more of an information clean room, rather than a dictatorship. There were always numerous ways to report wrongdoing.
First, "generic corporate employees" seems like a pretty disrespectful way to describe the Coca-Cola employees classified as "professionals".

Second, it's not like non-FAANG tech companies, despite lower standards for engineering positions, have higher numbers in the Black, Hispanic, or female demographics.

Third, if you look at the data for Coca Cola's "Exec/Sr Officials & Managers" where the "standards" without question are comparable to those at tech companies, the percentages aren't as high but they're still way better than you see in tech leadership:

> 3.37% - Black or African American Male

> 4.31% - Black or African American Female
Why subtract inflation from cash but not earnings? You have to subtract from both.

20 PE in 8% inflation environment implies -3% return, ignoring growth.

However people tend to refer to the 10y breakeven rate for forward inflation expectations as CPI is backwards looking. Forward long term inflation expectations are around 3% atm, per the bond market.

And the reason -3% is preferable sometimes, is because you would have lost 70% buying NFLX a few months ago. Overvalued companies aren't a very good inflation hedge when discount rates increase dramatically, despite the common narrative
it's insane to me that so many people still seem to have never heard of land value taxation...
Will BIOS support PCIe network card (with PCIe extender) connected to PCIe port? How many lines is it?
The idea of using a "framework" in a language that gets completely reloaded on every new request doesn't make sense - at least I thought a framework was something that wrapped your own code and presented an event loop, etc. You'd want a "library" if you just wanted to improve on the original low quality PHP database connectors and such.

But PHP developers always did seem to have inappropriate jealousy over unrelated languages like Java where there is persistence over requests.
Calling into question a new Google Docs feature isn't some massively time consuming process. Suggesting that the time saved by ignoring the feature could lead to some real human improvement is about as stupid as suggesting that the time saved by ignoring the criticism of the feature could lead to some real human improvement.

I find it funny OP did not question if the time spent implementing the feature could have been better directed elsewhere. Only the much shorter time spent criticizing it. And now on a meta level it is okay to spend time questioning the criticism apparently. Makes it seem like the underlying concern has nothing to do with "directing energy elsewhere".
> Note from the future: At the time of writing, the term “x86” was used exclusively to refer to what later became known as “x86-32”. The name “x86-64” wouldn’t be invented until 2006.

Notes from the future are always a risky business. Now we're in the future and we call them x86 and x64 - which makes far less sense than x86-32 and x86-64, but I guess is shorter and doesn't require you to learn a new name for an old concept.

I guess the actual future always turns out a bit more messy than the science fiction version of it.
It's really sad that we got so low that something so trivial gets to the front page.
Where are schematics, board layouts, BOM?
I am not even mentioning "Theory of operation" sections and "Calibration" which was quite common decades ago.
The Bar actually has the neighbor "scary letter" thing called out in their rules that you cannot file a complaint with them if you get one of those.

Which tells you what a crappy (hehe) hustle these letters must be.
It means “trust, but verify”.
I'm not following you. I didn't take "Companies 101."

Nobody has zero interest in society, unless they are a rogue AI that isn't programmed to believe in physical reality at all.

Also, nobody owns 51% of Twitter stock.
Because if the thing I'm doing is, for instance, making artisan screwdrivers, I don't spend my whole day making money. I spend my whole day making screwdrivers. If I love making screwdrivers, then I love making screwdrivers.

Now that I have all these real nice screwdrivers lying around, I can sell them to other people who might want a really nice screwdriver. Not only did I get to do the thing I enjoyed doing: making screwdrivers, but I also made some money off of it. Some of that money can be used to cover cost of materials on the screwdriver I made, the rest of it can be used to enrich my personal life, or maybe grant me access to stronger tools to do the thing I enjoy doing.

Making something and selling something are two different tasks. I can love making things and still sell those things for a profit, and my love for making things can have absolutely nothing to do with the fact that I get money out of it. Where do you get the presumption that you can't possibly do something good that you like and still make money off of it?
Good Science Project
It depends on what the remaining space is used for. If you have some hidden menu which can be expanded into a sidebar, some vertically stacked content which can be moved to the side etc. then restricting the main text to around 80 chars is great. But I would always prefer an extremely long text line over just seeing the background color in 70% of my screen. If the line gets too long to be read comfortably then the user can just resize the window.
Political views might be a factor but emigration is primarily limited by logistical challenges. You are assuming people can just leave everything and everyone behind and just fly into the unknown. Well, many do (and I didn't... yet), but without an EU visa, a new job, and/or a stash of money people often arrange to continue working for Russian IT employers remotely.
Mozilla's biggest source of revenue? Google. By about a factor of 5.
> taxes in the US are much better

This is complicated. Taxes in the US are different. For example, a lot of higher earners are concentrated in California and New York, which have fairly high taxes; in New York or San Francisco a single person making $105k would take home about $75k (slightly less in SF, slightly more in NY) or about £3k more. I would suspect (but do not know) that the UK government pension and health-care is at least slightly better than the US version.

On top of that, people of a given income level spend more in the US (either because things are actually more expensive, or people in the US are more spendthrift; probably a bit of both), so if you come to spend like a typical American[1] your savings won't necessarily be higher in the US. Bay area rent, in particular is insane (rent alone would be more than the £2k a month you proposed for expenses, though $105k/year in the bay area would be a very low salary for a bay-area tech worker).

Now, you can do better. I have a friend who works as a DBA in a very inexpensive part of the country; he makes more than the $105k per year. In fact his yearly salary is higher than what he paid for his house. When remote became normal during COVID a lot of people moved to cheaper parts of the country while keeping their high salaries. Also, everything else being equal, a higher top-line will always provide more opportunities for savings

1: Before you dismiss this completely, there are real social costs to spending less than your peer group. IMO they are worth it, but they should be factored into any planning you do.
Seven States of Randomness
x86 is a hack on top of a chip design that was originally intended as a low-cost calculator CPU that gradually grew up to power big-iron servers. Most of its competitors were designed for medium or large computers from the get-go, so had far less backward-compatibility baggage to deal with.
Except that many applications have public content that you want to be indexed and interactive for the user e.g. forums and ecommerce
Funding secured! Take it private. ;)
>Well, it turns out people are more interested in avoiding upsetting people through gendered language than through non-gendered language.

You mistakenly wrote "people" when you meant to write "Google and those who ascribe to the same ridiculous cultural mores as Google".
Impressive :)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31025183

No experience from the Netlify of old to compare with, though.
Never having been to a Disney establishment (no kids, no interest), what's the chance they'll go "oh, ok, it's old anyway..." and head on their way"?
Or the content costs dropped more than revenue did.
This always seemed like kind of a dubious feature in terms of privacy and security.
Seems like Project Fi predates this; I was just a bit of an idiot at first and didn't realize how common the confusion would be until too late haha. Pronunciation was solid, but readability... not so great.
Interesting, I had heard of PyOxidizer to produce binaries but hadn’t heard of an interpreter. Always interesting to see how different implementations approach a problem space. Thanks for sharing!
> ou shouldn't say "there's no way" etc to people who have experience when you have none.

What makes you think I have no experience?

Also, it's perfectly fine to dismiss claims that seem impossible without supporting evidence. I don't need to believe every psychic until I disprove them. There's no way someone can be as good at taking over randomly from an AI as they are at performing the action in the first place.
What was the exact part DMCA'ed? Was it documentation?

I am curious also here about opensource. What was the license if any?

Also, which license allows you to copy (and modify) for your own use, whether personal or not to reproduce?
"Taste" is just a way to divide personal preferences into arbitrary acceptability categories so that some people can have an excuse to look down on people who don't share their preferences, while giving it a facade of legitimacy.
>Why is it inappropriate for young children to be present for educational discussions about gender identity and sexual orientation?

Because it's creepy and weird for adults, who are supposed to be teaching math and so on, to have conversations with young children about sex. What I don't get is how this became controversial. Probably because of the internet, again, amplifying the worst takes and the worst interpretations of any given event.

>Kids live in modern families! Banning discussions like this is to ban the reality of lived experiences of millions of people.

The overwhelming majority of kids do not, but that's besides the point and saying "we should wait to discuss sex and sexual orientation until kids are old enough" doesn't "ban reality" in any way. It's instructive that you assume the teacher was "clueless or bigoted" and not, ya know, trying to sidestep an awkward conversation about sex in front of five year olds.
> It’ll take longer for a user’s crappy android phone to render your page from source than for a beefy cloud server on the edge to do the same.

Yes, if you pay more money and integrate into cloud vendor systems, you can get more compute. Besides, the person with a crappy android is irrelevant to monetizing your application anyways, so their user experience is pretty irrelevant surely? I don't really understand the idea to spend money to improve the experience for people unlikely to spend money on your thing. And, again, the "beefy cloud server" experiences load from a shared user pool, so I doubt there's just flawless performance waiting for everyone all the time; if there is, surely you see "loss leader" written all over it.
Setting aside much of the necessary context, is this somewhat inherently an anti-union action? (Even if the moderators are not anti-union themselves?) That said, I curiously dove in to find a lot of relevant flavor:

- The sidebar of r/AmazonFC seems to have rather reasonable rules, yet "no pro/anti union discussion" bullet. I consider this to be a poor decision on their part.

- Currently, the mods are now locking and reviewing all posts without sufficiently describing why: https://www.reddit.com/r/AmazonFC/comments/u7ipfn/current_st...

- With a cursory search, I found multiple threads within the past few months with (seemingly) unhindered union discussion. In these threads (which seem to be balanced in terms of pro/against sentiment) some employees express rather unsettling yet somewhat related sentiments, such as not being able to talk with other employees in their roles, even socially. (I am not extremely extroverted but even I can't imagine working in an environment like this.)

- Most abstractly, permitting open discussions about unionization puts the Mods of r/AmazonFC in an extremely awkward place—I imagine that these mods are known to Amazon management (either intentionally or unintentionally disclosed) and probably currently work for the company. I seriously doubt they are paid enough where they can be careless about moderation actions in case it incurs the ire of Amazon, even if Moderating while off the clock in their free time on personal devices. (Unions or not, this is categorically broken in the US employment system, at a level larger than Amazon.)

IMO, either:

- Reddit community management should step in and offer assistance, particularly because the mods are claiming spam and brigading. (I don't know their intervention guidelines.)

- The sub should link to (yet disavow, if the mods desire) a new sub for AmazonFC unionization discussions, as an open platform for fair discussion for or against unionization at Amazon Fullfilment Centers.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

I wouldn't believe a masterfully crafted video of vaccines actually being implanted with microchips unless the video were authenticated by at least one reputable news source. Provenance matters, and just like we don't believe extraordinary things based on single out-of-context photograph, we shouldn't believe extraordinary things based on a single out-of-context video.
The link doesn't make clear why end users can't have access to this.
>may not occur in kindergarten through grade 3 *or* in a manner that is not age appropriate or developmentally appropriate for students in accordance with state standards.

That "or" is pretty crucial, and any lawyer worth their salt will point out that this will not limit it to K-3. It bans ALL discussion of the topics, "age appropriate" or not, from K-3, AS WELL AS opening the way for private litigation for discussion that some parent decides is inappropriate for ANY grade level.

Per the New York Times:

>The impact is clear enough: Instruction on gender and sexuality would be constrained in all grades. But its language is vague and subject to interpretation.

>The language highlights the youngest students, but the “age appropriate or developmentally appropriate” provision affects all ages. Those terms are highly subjective, and parents, school staff and students are likely to clash over the ambiguities.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/23/us/what-does-dont-say-gay...

As to whether the topic "is an appropriate subject for a 3rd grader" I recall kindergarten discussions on students who might have two mommies or two daddies, which would be banned by a reasonable interpretation of the law.
> But the way their UI/UX is built, it is not conducive for exploring. They've taken so much control away from me. I have to rely on what IT thinks I should be watching

I don’t think they want you exploring too much. It would expose how little content they actually have.
This is just not true. Lots of her tweets include extremely bigoted commentary to make sure her audience gets the intended message.

Here's a couple of examples from her page.

> "Any teacher who utters the words 'I came out to my students' should be fired on the spot" - Libs of TikTok, proposing that gay people should be forcibly closeted on penalty of losing their job (https://web.archive.org/web/20220306004129/https://twitter.c...)

> "This is what the left really thinks. Listen when they tell you. They want to take your kids to groom and indoctrinate them behind your back." - Libs of TikTok, calling a lesbian a pedophile for talking about how teaching kids about LGBT+ identities will improve their well-being and prevent internalized homophobia and depression (https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1514340145163513857)

> "Parents who let kids 'choose their gender' are child abusers." - Libs of TikTok, I hope I don't need to explain this one (https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1514279747492229120)
It sucks that some companies start their product creation process by imagining a dystopian panopticon with their client in control.
GitHub is partially responsible here too. It seems the action is remove first ask questions later. Why can’t there be more protection? Innocent until proven guilty, anyone?
I think we should expect SAML providers to be compromised. Given that, we need to design systems around that assumption. Google gets hacked, Azure gets hacked, Okta now. No one is impervious.

Now, that said, Okta should be more open in order to engender trust. I think this is where you are going with the comment and in this I agree.
It's an extension of property rights. I have the right to the security of my house, my yard, my estate, etc, up to my country that I've agreed with my fellow citizens to have represent my interests. You can agree or disagree, but fundamentally, letting anyone (in the sense of not enforcing agreed entry requirements) into a country infringes on the collective property rights of that country's citizens.
It was always moderated speech. The founder recently even mentioned this on Elon Musk's post that 'free speech' on a public platform is unattainable. Even 4chan has moderation and bans.
This is spot on. If Framework offered Zen 3 and 120hz+ display, I would absolutely buy one immediately.
Actually, I think any triangle can tile a plane.
> And good luck trying to find a lot of movies from the 1980s and 1990s!

I tried a bunch and found them all in my iOS TV app. The app gives me an option to stream it “free” due to having been logged into Amazon Prime or HBO Max, or worst case, I can rent it for $3 to $5 I think. I also get the option to subscribe to the streaming service that does offer it.

I can pretty much find all non Netflix content in the TV app in iOS/macOS and be watching it within seconds. And that is only because Netflix has opted to not be included in the TV app’s searches.
Kadyrov stole the agricultural equipment in Ukraine worth 1.5M euros