skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Actually all of those crates could potentially be implemented in the kernel and be useful. The current implementations wouldn't work as-is, in many cases, but the APIs make sense and the crate could use conditional compilation to work in the kernel.

The most far-fetched crate there would be pin-project I think, because a lot of other work would have to be done to make Rust async code work in the kernel.
> Won’t actual fans be right back using and contributing?

Yes, but if "actual" fans are <1% of your existing user base then your reach and ranking is still far below what it used to be. I'm sure most people on GH don't even remember what repos they've starred, and httpie may be one of just thousands, of which many will disappear from their starred repos overnight without them even noticing.
It's a heavily modified derivative.
It does not have an air-launch capability.
My takeaway from that is very early startups should be in person, but beyond that very early stage remote will make sense especially as devs can be picky and want to work remote.
It's not about whether human can make a mistake or not. It's about how much effort should be made to prevent a certain type of human mistakes.

If every system we're interacting daily should be fool-proof, it will requires enormous time and effort. Naturally, we invests more time and effort when it's about life and death situation. If we only lose 2 cents by our mistake, we just don't care.

Of course, I'd like to have more fool-proof design in all the destructive interactions from all websites. But, the question is, does it worth it?
It seems quite possible for someone with a different background might have an insight missed by hundreds of people with very similar academic backgrounds.

In particular when the test population is so different from the expected living population and experts have no explanation, some kind of non-linear thinking is likely going to be needed.
Starting an article with an emotional war picture makes me sceptical of the authors intentions.

IMHO he shrugs of the main issues without discussing in on the technical level you would expect for the risks involved here. He basically argues politics should trump engineering realities to cut corners. While this is usually fine in a startup environment, it's a bad idea for environments like space, healthcare, aviation or nuclear. We all know how it worked out for Boeing recently.

I would really like to see the numbers if you remove some of the heavy industry we don't need to keep running in Europe. This load removed, how much of the remaining base load throughout the hole year is really provided by gas, as this is the true load that could possibly be replaced by nuclear, from 2023 onwards if I may believe other comments.

I'm curious, but I find it hard to believe this would do anything for our friends in Ukraine NOW, so if this is our concern we should probably talk about other levers instead of recycling the nuclear debate.
Didn’t read it but a smart
tv not connected to wifi with an hdmi port should do the trick?
You wouldn't pay $1/year, you'd instead spend hours trying to find another way?
Tackling 'Bad Hair Days' in Human Image Synthesis
There are more than just ICE and IC trains in Germany. These other trains are not powered by green energy. So yes it seems reasonable that there are some coal power plants that are providing power for trains.
Water, Oxygen, Hydrogen, possibly aluminium. Not to send back to Earth, but into Earth orbit to use as consumables and fuel. And these bulk materials aren’t going to be bothered by G forces.
What about prolonged weather crises that may affect supply for weeks on end? And how would that affect working hours in factories? How much of a GDP hit are we going to take by using "flexible consumption"?

There is no way to run a modern economy with intermittent energy supply.
> well over a hundred packages

Tad understated. Popular rust http frameworks with basic functionality are hitting 300+ deps straight off the bat easily.

For the security conscious, move to vendoring or alias cargo to always run in offline mode.
If you need foreign gas to keep people warm during the winter you're not doing ok
Big teams and big companies like static languages. That's lots of people in favour and lots of people saying it's better. I'm not sure this is a new trend.
> (of which there is near infinite amounts of because of the semi-constant sunlight)

Unless you want to launch on the night side of the moon, then you have to wait up to 14 days. But yeah the moon with its lower atmosphere makes a lot of sense.
How much cost do the extra electronics impose?
Distributed was always an alternative. The pandemic just made it popular among people who never tried it before. These kinds of arguments in favor of office culture seem like a reflex action resisting any change.
Given it was born at Mozilla, is getting traction at WebAssembly and WebGPU efforts, WGSL is loosely based on its syntax, and some Cloud Native projects are migrating from Go to Rust, I am quite sure there is some overlapping.

Not that I agree with Rust's adoption at that level, as I think languages with automatic memory management make more sense, but that's me.
I like remote work, I like meeting my colleagues in the meatspace (irregularly).

Don't force me into the office for a majority of the time, and give everyone a travel budget to meet once a quarter.

IMHO this is a great balance, moreso that the "hybrid" of 3 days a week.
I'm pretty sure GDPR doesn't say everything must be wiped instantly but instead within a reasonable time period. One that's certainly enough to undo such actions.
Worth noting that if you automate too much with this API, you'd be smart to not do it with a Google account you care about, or it'll get banned.

And they ban any accounts with matching recovery or verification phone numbers and email addresses too, or part of the same gsuite domain.
we use opsgeneie. we impacted
This is also a great idea when traveling!
>Normally, I don't like this kind of "source please" reply.

Why not? We are allowed to ask for the sources to claims that are not obvious or easily verifiable, like the ones regarding weapons systems of a secretive country.
>If the repository had been deleted

For which to happen you've to do the same thing: type out its name. So I wonder if people ask for privatize to be presented with number of stars, should when deleting a repo GitHub present you with number of commits, issues, releases, etc as well?
For context I have been programming for 40 years, professionally for 30.

In my experience programmers have to travel through 3 stages (not all get to stage 3).

1. You code to prove to yourself that you can

2. You code to prove to others that you can

3. You don't need to prove anything anymore, so now you code for utility (ie earning a living etc.) At this point the code is not the goal, the goal is something else -the code is a way to achieve that goal.

It's important to work through these steps - it's hard to jump to step 3 without "earning your chops" along the way. Those foundations are what make step 3 effective.

I say this for you to set the context of where you are at. You are not your code. your code is not perfect. You will always look back on "old" code (like from 6 months ago) and feel you can do better. That's called growth and it's a good thing. If you look back and your code from 5 years ago is "perfect" then either you're not growing, or you've peaked :)

Interestingly I also say this so you can understand what "level 3" feedback you'll get. Mostly people don't care about your code, they care about utility. So in that sense you can expect utility-based feedback, not code-based feedback. It may be hard to hear about something you've worked so hard on, but for most of us the "code" is not the goal - utility is. It's like looking at the Mona Lisa, the painting is great, but I really don't care how many nights you spent painting it. Which can be tough to hear based on your doubtless effort and hard work.

So skipping over the code part, you've presumably got some project that's offering some utility. You want to build an audience for that utility. Welcome to your next job. Turns out "build it and they will come" is a myth. "Selling" something to an audience is staggeringly hard. Ironically even more so when said offering is free. Ideally you have the audience before the product, but that's not how experience works.

So, hopefully you can determine what kind of person would use your project. then you hang out where they hang out. You help them as much as you can. You build a reputation for helping them. You point to your project when it's truly the best fit. It takes time, and effort, to build reputation in this way. And along the way you try and keep the product itself as something people want to use, something they latch onto.

So yeah, keep your expectations low, then drop them some more. It's a tough place to get started in, and I can predict that you'll almost certainly fail. But in failure you can learn, and that's important. The thing I'd say you might learn is that you need to build an audience before you build the tool. That's what I learned. But your experience will be your experience.

I say all this not to discourage you, but to encourage you. You are on a journey, and you are seeing others already at their destination. That didn't happen overnight, and they likely walked a very hard road to get to where they are. Try and get satisfaction along the road - figure out what worked, and where you went wrong. Learn as much as you can from failure. Then do it all again :)

Good Luck!
That's true when running `cargo install` to install an application directly from crates.io, but not when running `cargo build` in an already checked-out repository.
Ist Boldenone mit einem Äther von undecylenate befestigt zu ihm Equipoise. Insbesondere ist Undecylenate eine undezylenische Säure, aber, nachdem man an Boldenone gebunden hat, wird es richtig in der Chemie als Esterbindung erwähnt. Der Zusatz dieses Esters erhöht die Rate der Freisetzung von dem Hormon und die Halbwertszeit zugunsten eines längeren Freigabefensters. Der Hauptgrund für die Zunahme seiner Halbwertszeit und Freigabe ist, dass, wenn Boldenone Undecylenate den Blutstrom kommt, die Enzyme arbeiten, um die Verbindung zwischen dem Äther und dem Hormon zu brechen, das eine andere Dauer nimmt.

Das Endergebnis ist die Tatsache, dass Ester vom Hormon durch diese Enzyme entfernt werden, und das Ergebnis nachher, das reines Boldenone ist, das von seiner Arbeit im Körper frei ist. Wenn der Undecylenate-Ester Boldenone verbindet, Boldenone Undecylenate schaffend, erhöht sich die Halbwertszeit von Boldenone jetzt auf 14 Tage und stellt eine langsamere Freisetzung und eine Tätigkeit von dem Hormon als das Hormon andernfalls ohne diesen Äther zur Verfügung.
Palm: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways (540B parameter transformer)
Is reproducability achiveable?

If you preserved an immutable tag of the source code and all its dependencies, a copy of the compiler version used and all build flags, then you’ve still got some big holes in your ability to reproduce a binary:

1. OS version & patches installed
2. OS configuration
3. Hardware used (processors can have weird subtle bugs, microcode can affect execution behaviour, etc etc)
4. Transient issues - the golden copy to be reproduced for some post event investigation might have contained a bit flip leading to impossible to reproduce verification signatures

Etc etc

Or is reproducability just a spectrum and you try to get further along it with some careful attention to detail, rather than an absolute to be achieved?

If the latter are you not cheaper just archiving binaries and tagging them with the source + deps + compiler + arch used to build them? Thats a 5 minute job to setup in your CI process and costs comparatively little to maintain vs wasting expensive human brains chasing down a futile goal.
And you can then stick that on a network drive or scp it on internal airgapped networks without direct internet access.
Projector? I think they are typically dumb. Last I checked anyway. And have a few other advantages too.
In software often the cost is paid by other people (your users) and you don't (want to) see them. How much did the Atlassian outage cost it's clients altogether? How much thereof will they need to compensate?
My guess is that they query a service that does file operations for no good reason, and then busy wait for it.
There is no proof of this ever happening or being a feature though.
He had access to use the actual POTUS twitter account. Wasn’t his personal account banned?
Fair, though you might want to make some exceptions at some point. Or prevent it from randomly connecting to an unsecured wifi.
I learnt a lot from the previous discussion
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24666968

Sigh. I am stuck on a 40" 1080p Dumb tv :(
>they desperately needed US equipment/supplies to even do that

US material aid helped a ton but the push to inflate it's importance to the end result of the war seems never ending.

Only less than 15% of lend lease supplies had arrived a year after the last axis attempt at and advance on the eastern front. The vast majority whilst incredibly helpful arrived when the axis was already rapidly retreating.

I agree that they were incredibly brutal and rapey tho. How much of that was revenge/progression of the horrors of the eastern front idk.
I'm inclined to say it was a fragment of the time but there was a ton of rape by them in the Chechnyan and Georgian conflicts as well.
I went to grad school. I never, ever claim to be an expert in the field I studied, because I have virtually no real-world industry experience in it. Two more years of school does not make one an expert; it prepares one to become an expert.
Rust’s cavalier attitude to language and compiler stability, their absurd bootstrapping situation and limited platform support, not to mention their belief that “curl something|bash” is acceptable procedure are all reasons why I’ve avoided it despite the many good qualities of the language.
> where every library has a bespoke build process doesn't work across OSes

cargo sounds pretty much like a new bespoke build process that doesn't even work across different languages on the same OS
Do paper linux magazines actually exist any more?

10-15 years ago I'd agree with you, now... that would actually surprise me.
There are some estimates that 25% (500 of 2000) of all tanks involved in the invasion were destroyed. That's certainly a fraction but a rather large one.
I guess it's not easily done but if people were to send blatantly messed up data back to the servers that were listening to the creepy TVs it would undermine that value and maybe the manufacturers would reconsider.
_just_ verifiy identity.

you're are not presenting a feasible solution.

you can easily verify who this account belongs to, you cannot verify easily that this is the only account I have.

which is the problem.

further complicated by irrational attitudes to official identity such as you see in america. have a fraud resistant national ID system? fuck no! we want to use an unsafe mechanism never built for this purpose and impossible to safe guard!

good luck with that
The north western part of the Black Sea is pretty shallow, actually.
Moskva is 50m deep at most.
you have a cd reader...?
What about using it to cheaply send fuel from earth up into LEO? that is, take a fuel tank with some minimal set of RCS, compute and radio for remote control / locator beacon, and some fuel transfer / docking arrangement, and wrap it all in a disposable fairing for launch.

You'd still need to send spacecraft and larger cargo up the old fashioned way, but this would allow you to neatly work around the "your only fuel is what you carry to orbit with you" problem (as long as you carry enough fuel to rendezvous with one of the fuel pods to begin with).
As a SpaceX customer, this makes me sad. I want that money to go into his existing businesses. Not some ego trip for silly idealogical reasons.

$43B could go some way for more satellites, more ground stations. Investing in businesses already making him money.
It sounds like you are out of touch with the average consumer. They absolutely love smart TVs and would consider a TV without apps and streaming to be broken.

In fact, even the ideal HN approved setup is just a smart TV where the online bit is a removable stick on the back. The average consumer just doesn’t care about being able to swap it out.
And if there is no wind or sun for an extended period of time, I guess we just shut down our factories then?

The fact that the Greens have been flexible in some elements of their politics doesn't mean they are committed to a realpolitik approach when it comes to energy generation. They absolutely are not. In fact their record when it comes to science is really spotty, as they also oppose transgenics and even animal experimentation to a certain degree. They are clouded by preconceptions that are dangerous to us all.
It might well be cynical; but it is nonetheless true that many doctors suffer from the stress of the job. A very smart schoolfriend of mine studied medicine and became a general practitioner. He stuck to it for about ten years before giving up because the weight of responsibility was too much for him; he moved into bespoke software for medical practices instead.
It's normally taken as binary + transitive dependencies are bitwise identical on multiple builds. Needs a copy of a deterministic compiler along with your source. Whether the build runs the same on different machines is orthogonal to consistently rebuilding it.
"Never" is a long time, just saying. It'll be impossible to beat the "availability" guarantees of a local mirror (like a thumb drive) of a kernel source tarball.

What happens when a crate version has to be removed due to a critical CVE or court order (IP Law violation, perhaps)? There may come a day where crates.io becomes torn between not breaking Linux source and not hosting actively bad source code.

Note that some of those concerns do apply to vendoring source as well, but the additional download step also removes options that the kernel maintainers have as long as they ship all the source for the kernel in one tarball. Like more control over the timing of inevitable decisions.
Kyber key encapsulation mechanism (Post Quantum Cryptography Standardization)
The way it is going, future generations will be left with much worse problems that a few tons of nuclear waste.
Reproducibility is certainly achievable, and an important point for some people.

Look for example at guix, that bootstraps explicitly with what they call "the maxwell equations of software".

Imposing a web-based build system, into the kernel of all places, is a kick to the face to people who care about reproducibility.
> static_assertions

infantile?

i mean, serde in the kernel is overkill, but not every crate is like that. Rust has been designed in the internet era and leverages dependencies for things older languages would ship with (rand!)
Indeed I may confirm the listed companies are sanctioned. Though I don't think there's been a major impact on the companies anyway, git repos are distributed so they still have copies.

Personally I'm concerned that the repos are just deleted instead of just suspending accounts and archiving repositories. Meaning it may impact other users. Moreover at least one personal [1] account has been suspended.

[1]: https://twitter.com/Black2Fan/status/1514856091041116164
Sure, if you don't change any part of the system it has to be that way. But there's no reason a private switch can't just suspend stars/watchers instead of permanently deleting them.
Craigslist Image Processing Service
Here is another hypothesis, maybe humans preferred to hunt males to preserve progeny they can hunt next season. And bones processed and kept by humans might have a higher chance of not being completely destroyed by natural forces.
> The default behavior of cargo is to download stuff from the internet. This may be the least reproducible thing ever.

Wait till you find out about java ecosystems

I know investment bank dev teams pulling whatever they need from maven central with no oversight or introspection.
Nearly all defi loans are overcollateralized. I deposit $100 of eth, borrow $50 of eth, convert to usdc and send to my bank. Six months later if the price of eth has gone up i need to buy more the $50 worth to repay my debt, if the price of eth goes down i can pay back less than $50 of eth.
If it goes up by a lot then i can borrow more against my initial deposit, if it goes down by a lot and i dont close my position then the deposit is liquidated to pay off the debt and i have a smaller position.
It actually works pretty well, add on to this things like Alchemix which builds loans via yearn vaults and you can borrow money against future interest and have self-repaying loans.

If you have initial assets its an easy way to borrow against those assets. e.g. My bank wouldn't give me a loan against my eth as they don\t value the asset, instead I just open a maker vault and borrow against it in dai ($ stablecoin), and then sell that for € and deposit to my bank. problem solved.
The points are essentially:

* ski trips and the like build good rapport

* chance encounters with colleagues are valuable

* steps make you healthier

The world is realizing that these are so much easier to solve for in remote-first work than it is to solve the problems associated to office-first.
Great article, there should be much more common knowledge of statistics and it's problems, it is surely the most abused of all sciences.
That's basically every sailing channel on Youtube.
hm? Reading 'distributed' as 'decentral' ...thinking about: Once there was a time when 'some' try to track 'how informations spread' by using protocols... hu sounds off-topic... (-;
Recently Asus dropped new ROG tablet which looks powerful enough, but I don’t know if linux would work on it.

Edit: it’s ROG Flow Z13
Sometime around the night of the DNC primary in 2015 there was a dramatic shift in the content on Reddit. If you were a frequent visitor of the homepage and /all at the time, you will know exactly what I am referring to.

The product has gone downhill ever since.

Comment search is nice because it enables users to find interesting content directly in the good niche subreddits.
Not a professional, but the way I reason it is that pushing your heart to the limit causes it to grow stronger, and that additional capacity means it doesn't have to work as hard during the rest of the day. You basically bring down your average heart rate by making your heart stronger.