skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
So you're against any limits on speech whatsoever, including the proverbial "shouting Fire! in a crowded theater" and inciting an angry mob to lynch their victim?
Some valid points here, some FUD.

It might be a hobby decision, or it might be self-protection against censorship; I'd like to know.

As an owner, he wouldn't have to be the person running the shop. Unlike Tesla and SpaceX, I'm sure Twitter can be managed by someone other than himself.
It’s possible that the OP holds stock for reasons beyond the financial investment, and wants to see Twitter add value to society in some way.

Telling someone what criteria they should use to make their own decisions is quite arrogant, and out of line.

If you want to use the stock price as your sole metric for deciding on accepting an offer, that’s up to you.
So the governments would pay Twitter for moderation and for subsidizing the platform, if advertisers leave in response?

I think that the governments should treat social media platforms similarly to other addictive/harmful substances, such as junk food, sugary drinks or tobacco... with a focus on prevention and education.

And using these platforms for official communication (from elected officials and public services) should be either prohibited or heavily discouraged.
We must stop free speech! I am against Musk's actions - he will end up letting people speak. Saying what you want is too dangerous! When guests speak at colleges scream and yell! We must fight for no free speech!!! I beg you our democracy[1] is at stake! Ban all free thinking discussions!

[1] democracy is a system that only works if everyone thinks the same.
I assume this will mean that if you post the picture of him with Ghislane Maxwell you get instantly banned
That bring me memories! I was an avid Doom/Heretic/DukeNukem3D map builder, I'd spend an amazing amount of hours building huge maps while listening to Queen (some queen songs, "Made in Heaven" Album specifically, bring those memories immediately).
It was really tons of fun, glad to see there is a community still alive doing that.
Yes...they are located in your brain.
This is circular. “All speech is legal because illegal speech isn’t speech”.
A web scraper for PII data. You have no idea how much information about yourself is out there
does anyone know if they ship to Nauru?
But, let's say I'd like to parse this stored state and send an email (as HTML) on the server?

My best guess is to use a NodeJS/V8 instance on the server to somehow transform JSON to HTML using Lexical's serializer (if something like that exists). Even this is tricky because it might depend on browser DOM apis for the conversion.

A better solution would be support language specific bindings to get HTML from JSON with zero dependecies.

Any chance you thought along these lines?
> It could get most of the same practical upside of symbols from interned strings

I don't think so - unless you mean always interning all strings. The point of symbols is you can do a single address comparison. How can you do that if you could have two strings that are the same but have different addresses?

There is also a down-side of symbols - they by definition always escape the compilation unit since they're interned!
This meme about first world countries not valuing freedom and freespeach while people from formerly authoritarian place understand it better if common on HN.

But meanwhile, first world countries are significantly less likely to slip into full on authoritarianism and generally do better in that regards.
I don’t know what I worry about more, sinkholes swallowing my car whole on the way to work or needing to register on Gettr when it replaces Twitter.
That sounds like the opposite of liberal ideals, where the system treats everybody the same.
The game mechanics aren't copyrightable, but this word-for-word copy of the game rules is copyrightable.

The HTML, CSS and JavaScript layout out the page is also copyrightable, and the taken-down site is a direct copy of this
"That's why you build another instrument that is demonstrably a factor of two more sensitive"

This is not possible
You can still enjoy hacking with a consumer FPGA card. For ML one major problem would be memory (for a FPGA that costs the same as a GPU), there's no free lunch. But there are applications where FPGAs of the same price work better.
I would guess the parent intended to convey that Russia weaponizes free speech in the US via troll farms/etc for foreign influence, not that they have it domestically?
And you can copyright the digital font file in the US, but you can't keep someone from tracing the letters and making their own identical version.
You are implying that advertisers would boycott a free speech platform, and this might be true for some advertisers, when Facebook was boycotted by some activist businesses it didn't dent their bottom line.

Also - Twitter is more of a networking and influence tool in my opinion for "important people". These people are MUCH more likely to pay for Twitter, it's not like facebook where 99% of people would never pay for it. Which I think is what Musk was hinting at with blue badges for $2.

If he does that, boycotting advertisers will matter much less.
Which totally makes sense. u8 means 256 bytes of addressable memory. You might design chips with such limited memory, but maybe high level (read non assembly) languages are not the right tool for targetting them.
Governments don’t control these massively influential communications platforms (Maybe they should?)

In some ways, huge tech companies are more powerful than governments. So why should they have the power to essentially remove ideas from public discussion?
We Can Get Clean Energy–Fuel and Human Progress
My first thought on hearing this was, "What a low-ball offer. This isn't really serious."
I’d say it is that it is Microsoft’s faults that their answers sucks.

Most commonly asked questions you will be getting one of the three responses:
1. assume the user is at fault
2. it’s a “feature”, get over it
3. the official helper doesn’t know anyway so he/she just pasted a link to some random tutorial they found online which doesn’t work anyway

There really isn’t much that Google unless they kinda remove Microsoft at all.
Your personal story might colour your preference here. I still think the Western European model of "Free Speech with consequences" is the best one around.

If you have a huge following and use Twitter to say without evidence "restaurant xyz uses rat meat don't go eat there, or 'Tim Cook has AIDS and will die in 3 months'", then that would be protected by free speech like the right-wingers want it.

But in the Western European model, you could be sued for making those claims and effectively hurting the restaurant, Tim Cook, and the Apple stock price.

I'd rather live in a society where that's not possible without dire consequences for the fraudulent "free speech" abuser.
The brilliance of the strategy is that there's a "today's word". Like how a newspaper has a daily crossword. You feel like you completed today's challenge, and can compare like for like with your friends and family. Having the archive doesn't affect that.

I used the wordle archive so that I could go back to days I missed. That way I can still share the experience with my family even if I've had a really busy day. It's undeniably a positive and I'm upset that I can't do this anymore.

Several of the variants e.g. Quordle have an unlimited play variant, but I've never felt a desire to use it.
At this point, given the ease of duplication and the number of variants, it is almost as if Wordle has become a modern folk game.
I think that's alright. They lie, get sued, pay fines. That's why we have regulations for food and drugs.

I don't advocate that speech shouldn't have consequences. I advocate that speech shouldn't be blocked. Twitter, or any platform, shouldn't be doing the police work. They should be indifferent to the speech like a telephone company is indifferent on what people speak on the phone and those who create problems should be dealt with appropriately through relevant channels.

If J&J claims that their talc powder is good for you, their false claim shouldn't be deleted by Twitter. Instead, the appropriate authority should take care of it and victims should collect damages. Their tweet should stay there as a relic.
Not OP, but probably Russia. Not that there are no other examples in the last 20 years, it's just that some are more controversial to call out.
The AGX GPU MMU (variously called "GART" and "UAT", no relation to AGP GART) uses the ARM64 page table format (the GPU coprocessor literally uses it as an ARM page table among other things), so I'd expect it to support huge pages just fine since ARM64 does too. I don't know if macOS supports them, though.

The page size is indeed 16K. I don't know if 4K is supported at all in the GPU.

I agree though, the article reads like a rambly piece that doesn't follow and really just boils down to "my code runs slow on this machine and I'm going to blame the architecture" without going into proper details.
I get what you're trying to say, but a) I just don't see a strong case for why the fundamental proposition that it all must be allowed is something we should all hold; b) I don't think, even given/assuming the desirability of allowing all speech, the tension you allude to is resolvable.
Twitter never issued supervoting shares like most tech other companies did to the founders.
not with building.
Or Hungary, tho less messy I guess.
sounds like it. Or maybe he (and others like him) just lack the ability to think it through.
What the fuck are you talking about a cult for.. Nano is a real and functioning product, that works. There's no religion or sacrifice or anything like that, you can literally download an app or go to a website and see it work for yourself.

Access to the world's knowledge and people defend their ignorance like this, smh.
I expect that many of the people who used to say private companies can set policies and ban at their pleasure will begin to realize this is a bad policy and only serves to establish an echo chamber rather than a free exchange of ideas.

Of course that whole argument was a ruse and I believe that was hypocrisy that will get naturally exposed.

We'll see.
They can not.
>Moot, who ran one of the most popular social websites in the world and ended up with absolutely nothing to show for it.

4chan? not really a 'social media' website. I think he did a good thing making it and we need more spaces like this in a more restrictive internet space
Yup, Twitter is just another “locality” no different than a town, state, or region. It has pockets of subgroups with different beliefs and has an overarching majority opinion. It is different only in the speed that communication travels peer to peer (and maybe in its size) but otherwise it is indeed the same shit that humanity does and has done for millennia.
That actually makes it make sense. Thank you.
> Free speech absolutism is possible and is beneficial once you ensure that someone is not gaming the system, i.e. someone pretending to be more than one person.

And how is one supposed to do that, especially against nation-state actors such as Russia and China, both of which have been caught or implicated multiple times now, or against ordinary criminals?

> Filter bubbles? Doesn't have to be a thing, you have all the data to detect bubbles and pop them by introducing them to each other.

Great idea, expose LGBT people to Christian fundamentalists, it's not like harassment from these groups and their ideology isn't one of the leading causes of suicide of LGBT people.

"Filter bubbles" are the self-organized "social mechanisms that we organically use in our daily lives to combat bad actors" you were talking about.
What? I am not aware of a single company that is at least as powerful as the smallest government. What do you mean?
BBC Good Food is worth proselytizing to. No spam, great recipes, and often easy/simple (depends on what you're going for, of course).
This is the best way
Updated list of rich/html text editors: https://gist.github.com/manigandham/65543a0bc2bf7006a487
That sounds like an argument against monopolies, not and argument against moderation.
If it weren't stored in the JS, the twitter bots could have just played the game quickly and found the answer. Making is slightly more annoying wouldn't deter them.
You can trash talk all you want - though some outlets may not let you because they care about their other users.

In other words. If you get thrown out of hn, you can try reddit, but you may end up enjoing 4chan. If you go to jail, it will be because of something you did, not something you said.

In other words: It is all free speech, and we, the other people, have an equal right not to listen to you.
I don’t believe I have ever once seen a “debate on really important topics” on Twitter. And that’s even including the unusually large number of professors I follow.
I hope he shuts it down.

Literally the only people that care about any of that, are the ones deep lost in the Twitter funnel. Here's the truth: Whatever happens on Twitter, it's going to have zero effect on your personal life. All these 140 character blurps about politics, the virtue signaling, the constant anger, outrage and cancel culture, it has melted people brains. It's all just an echo chamber, tightly kept in within bounds, and people will sell their soul, define their inner being, say whatever it takes, for bogus dopamine hits. Nobody has morals or ideology on Twitter, they are all just optimizing for likes.
>This is the government silencing speech!

Which they can do, once you get over a very high bar indeed.

We have literally seen the Supreme Court protect speech advocating for violence against the Government.

>Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court interpreting the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The Court held that the government cannot punish inflammatory speech unless that speech is "directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action".

Specifically, the Court struck down Ohio's criminal syndicalism statute, because that statute broadly prohibited the mere advocacy of violence.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandenburg_v._Ohio

I much prefer the rule of law to the rule of Twitter mob.
This is my favourite passtime. So so many little scripts. Some fun ones:

* cli tool to diff changes to a branch since the last revision you looked at when it has been rebased (only if you haven’t git gc’d!!)

* use fzf to choose from pulseaudio sinks/sources, changing the default and applying it to all current audio streams (ex.change mic or to headphones)

* change the default linux webcam by renaming devices, runs as a udev hook.

* various arch tools. Automatically download mirrorlist and enable the fastest 5 sources. Download/extract a package from the aur. Fzf multiselect all of the .pacnew files, vimdiff them, and delete the .pacnew files for files that changed. Also my own install script with choices for ext4 or zfs.

* use mplayer to play a video as the background on all monitors. I downloaded several 10hrs of ocean/forest sounds and alternate between them.

* tool to convert restructured text to html email in mutt

* using xargs to parallelize updating my most common config repos

* index all git repos on disk, then either fzf choose from or choose best match and cd into it. Not my idea, but I love it so much!

* makefile for my i3 config that looks at avail displays and gives me 10 monitors per display with the same hotkeys (like dwm).

* choose from several presets and recompile st with a different colourscheme.

* categorize all of my bank transactions to monitor my spending over time.

* a cli DM with different Xorg configurations and window managers (music keeps playing, fuse mounts retained). Useful for multimonitor games that require different setups.

* wine, proton scripts to manage prefixes and cd to common windows directories within them.

So,so many more.
> So why should they have the power to essentially remove ideas from public discussion?

They don't. They never have. You're ascribing way more power to tech companies than they've ever had.

That being said, the combined power of tech companies and media companies -- of which there are many -- does have the ability you're talking about. (For example, Fox, Warner, Google, Nytimes, etc.) The lines certainly have become a bit blurred, with Comcast and Verizon buying media companies though.
Reminds me of the transformational question:

«Do you want to be right, or do you want to have a relationship?»
Write it down: Why this ex-Google employee co-founded a notetaking startup
Do you expect the same problems with GPON, which also has a shared medium? At least with fibre you don’t get reflection problems from other people’s dodgy terminations, but you are relying on them obeying the TDMA for upstream.
CAFE might be overcomplicated, but it isn't like GW Bush or others in his party (or members of Congress from Michigan of either party) were proposing alternative laws like you suggest.

Their goal was and to weaken whatever efficiency requirements there are, full stop.

Even the Biden administration has taken a pretty gentle regulatory hand with the auto and fossil fuel industries considering their own goals on climate change, for presumably electoral reasons.
Republicans control a minority of Congress right now but will likely control a majority by 2022. Maybe both branches and the Presidency in 2024. Ordinarily we like to pretend that political action doesn't affect your business, but Trump made it pretty clear that he's willing to retaliate against political enemies using the power of the state [1]. This feeling may not be broadly shared, but currently Trump is the most influential person in the GOP and a leading candidate for 2024.

[1] https://slate.com/business/2018/03/donald-trump-wants-to-get...
Russia has free speech in that, until very recently, they were allowed to spew their fake news propaganda in Western countries through outlets like RT, Sputnik, Zero Hedge (that one's still on), etc. etc.

Maybe nobody who greenlighted the licenses to those channels could believe that there are enough idiots domestically who would not recognize it as lies and propaganda? As recent history has proven, there are always enough idiots to believe anything.

If you have absolute free speech, you'll have to allow the media of other countries (China, NK, Russia, who have you) to disseminate propaganda to your citizens until something like Jan. 6th happens.
Musk’s involvement in Twitter has absolutely nothing to do with free speech. Like many things he does, it’s a false narrative to push what he wants forwards. He has a clear history of trying to bully and shutdown those that disagree with him in any capacity.
I do not think that social media platforms should be obligated to publish anything any individual wants published on them, and I do not think they should be legislated into a particular attitude toward speech. But a permissive default attitude with limited restrictions seems preferable to me, and such an attitude amounts to a policy of free speech in a facially obvious sense.
HN may be “heavily” as you say, moderated, but you are allowed to discuss things that counter any narrative as long as you make a reasonable effort at presenting your ideas in a reasonable way.

You don’t get banned for criticizing bitcoin, VCs, Hunter Biden, US policies, BLM, the police, inflation, gender, feminism, masculinity, etc., etc, whereas Twitter tends to ban things that go counter to particular narratives even in the face of evidence. You’re a epidemiologist and critique Covid policies? Not allowed!!!
And, I don't want my platform to say anything about this. See https://www.nearlyfreespeech.net/about/terms#tcontent for the proper model.
so there's not a clear "why" on this page, just a "download" digging for it yields the wiki which says:

"Why Linux?
More applications
Linux can run many different types of applicatons. No matter what you're trying to do, an application exists for Linux. ChromeOS is very limited. Sure, NaCl (Native Client) brings the ability to run native code to ChromeOS, but that's a hack at best, and there's still no good software to take advantage of it. With Linux you can install any Linux compatible software, totally natively. Firefox, Transmission (BitTorrent), LibreOffice, Steam, VLC Media Player, Kodi Media Center, the GIMP, VirtualBox, and many more are available on Linux to do things that simply aren't possible on ChromeOS. "

which... isn't true? chromeos can run at least most of those just fine, and has been able to for a while? https://support.google.com/chromebook/answer/9145439?hl=en
I'm worried that something is wrong at Spacex and this is a displacement activity
Ah, I was wondering this - 2000°C graphite in a oxygen rich environment like air doesn't seem to be a good combination !
> This is key for a good user experience

Do you think Twitter optimizes their speech policies for a good user experience? My impression is that things that are very mainstream are disallowed on Twitter while very fringe ideas as allowed
>shouting Fire! in a crowded theater

Please stop using this quote…

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/01/shouting-f...

https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2012/11/its-tim...
Implying that morality is just whatever is popular? Do you think Middle Eastern Twitter should allow people to talk about how they're going to exterminate the Jewish and gay people? And Russian Twitter should allow calling out locations of humanitarian corridors so the military and mine them? And Chinese Twitter should ban all discussion of faults of the CCP? Because those things are often community expectations.

The US is very, very divided. Trump won with basically 50% support, he lost re-election, and then lost even further support when he started making up lies about election fraud. Even if morality was derived from popularity (or just profitability, if that's what you think Twitter did it for), Trump no longer had close to a majority. Maybe his comments were in line with expectations of 60% of Republicans, but the other 70% of the country thought that was what was unacceptable.
So would the predictions be based entirely on the primary structure or assumed primary structure based on nucleotide sequence?

Sounds to me like you're doing some bioinformatics stuff to understand how some virus works, or am I totally off base on that guess?
The US wasn't like this in terms of free speech right off the bat (in both legal and cultural terms), and your historical analogies aren't well-supported. Stalin was able to kill a lot of people due to, inter alia, a lack of what we could term "the rule-of-law", and he did it in part to direct as many resources as possible towards industrialization. Hitler is a demagogue who arguably took advantage of a situation where anyone could say almost anything, and where faith in more standard institutions was low.

Nobody is advocating for actually punishing people based on what they say, let alone in as dire a manner as execution, so the examples of Galileo and Moore are irrelevant.
> f you have a huge following and use Twitter to say without evidence "restaurant xyz uses rat meat don't go eat there, or 'Tim Cook has AIDS and will die in 3 months'", then that would be protected by free speech like the right-wingers want it.

ridiculous strawman. thats called defamation and you will be sued everywhere for it.
I took over IT for a small company six years ago. The previous IT admin was using Hamachi for all the remote workers to access the file server.
The problem is that Musk has legitimately advanced society in a number of ways with each of his adventures. He is a ... very complex person to put it lightly, and even for his legitimate issues and scandals he caused (e.g. blatant ignorance of SEC regulations or calling a rescue diver a pedophile), he still has the achievements on his "good side".
or argument *for* inter-op of those platforms (reducing network effects of monopolies)