skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Thus the damage appears to not be to receptors or support cells in the epithalia / nose but to axons in bulb / brain.

No. From the paper:

> Consistent with findings reported by other groups,16,19 this study also did not find evidence of viral infection in olfactory bulb from most patients with COVID-19. Therefore, the axon and microvascular pathology in olfactory bulb and olfactory tract were most likely not caused by direct viral injury.

Moreover:

> this study did not find a strong association between olfactory endothelial injury and disease severity, suggesting that local inflammation in the upper respiratory tract may be sufficient to cause endothelial and axonal damage in the olfactory pathway.

I'm not an expert in the microanatomy of the olfactory pathway so I'm not going to debate the location of the samples, but the authors are explicit that your interpretation is incorrect. It's not the neurons themselves, it's some inflammatory process external to the neurons that is causing damage.

This has clear implications for the level of panic people are bringing to this conversation. A virus that can infect neurons (e.g. rabies, herpes) can cause damage by moving within the nerves themselves. This virus does not appear to do that, and instead causes local inflammation that indirectly influences the neurons.

Debating whether or not this is "brain damage" is academic; most people in this conversation are leaping to wild conclusions about the virus "infecting the brain". This is not supported.
A lot of the decisions in OCaml seem related to the French language, which adds a space before the : (unlike in english).

There's the "Thing of int" weirdness also
> They do but the cardinal directionality has been down and to the right.

You expected that to last forever?

> driven by supply and demand of housing, not supply of money.

Yes, it's driven by supply and demand, but easy money means more demand than there would be with higher interest rates and tighter monetary policy.

> We should federalize zoning rules yesterday. The federal government has the right to do this, for instance Chicago residents ability to install satellite dishes

I suspect this Chicago instance has more to do with FCC than anything else. Federalizing zoning would likely be an uphill battle that would go to the SCOTUS and I'm going to guess with the current composition they won't look favorably on that.
Isn't their specific taste the only thing of value the critic is adding.
I wonder if it's accidental behavior because of not knowing better (children crawling into water or streets etc) combined with accidental behavior because of being teenagers crossing over.
Basically 'store brand' of music platforms. Where is the problem?
Agreed, but I'll also add that this seems to be happening on every store. Miles upon miles of junk you have to sift through to get to something worthwhile. Apple, Google, Steam, Amazon... I'm presented with the worst choices. I don't know if these stores are all being gamed, but they all need to have better standards. At this point I just see them all as disorganized cash grabs.
Oooff.. these are hard-hitting stories for me. I can relate similar anecdotal evidence though; my parents called just today to vent about the cost of a carton of eggs at the discount grocer. We've not noticed it too much yet, save the cost of some meats locally. I expect it will catch up here when it's not our growing season.
A programming language implementation is either a compiler or interpreter. Title says "write your own programming language..." which implies an implementation. But that's not the case. As other commenters point out parser is a tiny, usually inconsequential part of a lang implementation.
Matt Damon talks and laments about this. What killed the mid-budget movie was the collapse of DVD sales. Without DVD sales, there is no extended "second bite" that allows word of mouth to build up. So, instead, your marketing is $30-$50 million and you need to make that back.

Getting a second bite is also responsible for the recycled pablum with China pandering--if you say something that the Chinese government deems unacceptable you lose your shot at that market.

As for "episodic", I suspect that's less a "deep dive" and more ADHD background watching on a phone. "Encanto" was an absolute poster child for this--"HEY! LOOK UP NOW! HEEEEEEEEY!" "Okay, volume back down. You can go back to your text messaging for a while." "HEY! LOOK UP AGAIN! TIME TO PAY ATTENTION! HEEEEEEY!" ad nauseam.
https://github.com/microsoft/VFSForGit

Which seems to have been superseded by https://github.com/microsoft/scalar according to the README.
> I think Apple has done more than anyone to turn software into a rental business where every calendar and to-do app now needs its own subscription.

All part of the plan:

https://appleinsider.com/articles/18/08/14/apple-met-with-de...
Why City Pigeons Are Worth Watching
> How do you define "open source"? It typically simply means the source code is available.

that is not what that means. "source is available" and "open source" are very different.
I don't think it necessitates pathological, though I am sure there are higher rates of it among the wealthy. I don't think someone worth $100 million keeps working because they're incentivized by the money as much as they're incentivized by "success". They enjoy the power and prestige and reputation and having people work for them. They enjoy getting to make big, powerful decisions. They like having their big ego.

Of course many do genuinely just want that $400 million yacht and won't get there unless they make a few billion first.
Probably they meant Ukraine and Nickel.
>> You have indeed! I asked if there was any specific part of the post you responded to, which which you disagreed. Since you did not provide any though....

>I replied addressing that. If you are unsatisfied with my reply, please quote the text of the specific question you asked that you believe I did not answer.

and I replied to that reply, concluding from it that you had no substantive material disagreements. If you're unsatisfied with this conclusion, please reply with, for each disagreement, a quote of the claim, what you believe to be wrong about that claim, and your evidence for your assertion that the claim is wrong, and I'll evaluate your evidence to see whether it convincingly supports your doubts.

>perception and reality are similar but different, and that this is extremely important

Indeed, and, this is extremely important: isn't it possible that you only perceive yourself to be in disagreement with what the original poster said, but in reality, you are in total agreement, and have no complaints or criticisms whatsoever? Furthermore, isn't it possible that you only _perceived_ yourself asking the questions you think you asked, and in reality, you did not ask them? Is this a possibility?
This is not an inherent problem with unions tho
1. cloned buddy tracker for yourself and friends

2. added a "get your own" link

3. ????

4. pay off your student loans!!!

what was your step 3, the monetization?
One very counterintuitive truth of large scale software development is that as you scale to multiple services, you are gravitationally pulled into a monorepo. There are different forces at work but the strongest at this scale are your data models and API definitions.
And while i think about it, the more it annoys me.

I think the only way we can get away with using it is because noone has any choice, if anyone launched an app using native in our field, any qt app is at an instant disadvantage. The qt team worries that an new ios release happened while i’m looking at the release notes and docs looking for things to use to our advantage
I mean there absolutely is truth to it. When you get to the size of Facebook, you are going to be pissing people off with almost any decision you make.
This is not a fair characterization of React. The tech lead of the project doesn't even work at FB anymore.
I can't seem to respond simulate-me because our comments are too deeply nested.

Pion doesn't have a way to exactly implement your business logic. You have two choices (and they both can be implemented with Pion)

* Store everything since the last keyframe and RTX to the user. You have access to PLIs and NACKs so you can do that.

* Request a new keyframe from the encoder.

I would love to ship something that exactly meets your need, but I don't think I can.
So, due to political pressure, only the rich will be able to earn interest on their crypto. Thanks for protecting the little guy, you progressive regulators you.
I was super disappointed when pebble failed, it had so much potential and I loved where they were going with it.
There was not-great stuff then too. Wolf Blitzer, for example, seemed to rise quickly and get a lot of air time mostly because he happened to be the one doing the remote reports from Baghdad in Desert Storm.
Monorepo (on git) has been awesome for us the last 5 years or so.
If you're actually copying the files then no; this removes the ability for a file ID to be able to exist in two places at once, but if you're copying drive->another medium->drive a new file ID is being created on the user's drive. This is regardless of whether or not the file is being de-duped behind the scenes.
I frequently enjoy "weird" movies that audiences tend not to like. But there have been plenty of movies that audiences and critics both enjoy despite a lack of high-brow or polarizing content. I'm thinking of (e.g.) The Godfather, E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial, The Sound of Music, Contact, Disney's animated Beauty and the Beast, Jurassic Park, Terminator 2, Alien, the original Ghostbusters, most Pixar movies...

I feel like there is something pretty blah about most big-budget movies today, but I don't think that it can be explained by saying that filmmakers are progressively removing polarizing elements. Now that I consider it, most big-budget action movies in the past were blah too. The action movies that first come to mind are the ones that I have enjoyed enough to re-watch, but the 1990s had plenty of blah action movies. Maybe the problem is just too many big-budget action movies.
dude, opsec is really really hard, the slightest mistake and it's over.
Same for me, the sidebar nor the account menu do not load, it also looks like the website is stuck in the mobile mode even though I'm on desktop.
I logged in for the first time in many months via my browser. I have messages but can’t check them without having to download messenger. This seems to me the height of brokenness.
It seems that magnets have some truly remarkable properties as applied within electric/energy applications. Do we have evidence that it is not possible to essentially bypass certain laws of thermodynamics in the presence of magnetic fields?
Noted, that makes sense. Thanks!
Maximizing employment is one goal. The other is to keep inflation in check.
Exactly! They were pulled off the street hours before the major marches/protests/actions, and released the next day when it was too late to participate on the ground.

So someone would post an event on Facebook, get 1000 people to show up at the Brooklyn Bridge or what have you, and then all 1000 of them would stand around saying "who's in charge here?" because the actual organizer was in police custody! Occupy was dismantled in the public eye very effectively using this tactic.
You probably need to do some data cleaning and validation before drawing any conclusions. A fair number of critical darlings are somewhat topical movies about current relevant social issues and they can be subject to review bombing by audiences, often audiences that don't even see the film. I'm not sure if IMDB really does much about that. Rotten Tomatoes at least stopped letting you review a movie before it was possible to see it after Captain Marvel had thousands of bad reviews before it even came out, but they still don't verify you saw the movie. They surface verified reviews closer to the top, but the ratings from unverified raters still count.

This was, of course, much less of a thing in 2000 than in 2019.
A bunch of this boils down to habits- which regulations does CA have on those? (Probably more than one.) We’ll take all the useful ones on default behavior of items that make sense.
Let me take this opportunity to break a lance for randomly choosing either of the two, even throughout a conversation. I do it for maximum confusion, or out of a genuine lack of caring, take your pick.
"we should encourage self doubt" not "Self doubt that is encouraging". I don't see the dissonance.

It's just a less controversial way to say "Let's discourage confidence " which is what I probably would have said, because I'm not a fan of confidence culture.
Did he at least get swatted ?
Already plugged this book elsewhere in the thread, you might be interested in "The Mind is Flat". One chapter of the book explores the concept you're describing. Our brain creates the illusion of a "full picture" when often our imagination and internal representation is quite sparse. I think that's one of the key impressive qualities of our brains and general intelligence. We only do the minimum necessary imagination and computation. As we explore a particular concept or scene, our brains augment the scene with more details. In other words, our mind is making it up as we go along.
>Not that Lews&Clark expedition would make a great comedy.

Speak for yourself, this was Chris Farley's last movie:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almost_Heroes
I actually ran many times into people that I know, in different parts of the world. The weirdest one was running into some French dude I had met skiing in France on a boat in Thailand. It's a small world.
Listening to various DJs has been my primary form of music discovery for the past 10 or more years. The diversity of and access to interesting DJ sets has literally never been better than now.

AM/FM radio is mostly irrelevant to this phenomenon, except as a precedent. Like you said, some small stations may be playing interesting stuff but the vast majority is over-commercialized, repetitive and/or boring. However, the internet has opened up tons of possibilities for DJs to curate and share music. Platforms include internet radio stations, Youtube channels, Twitch channels, and purpose-built sites like soundcloud and mixcloud. There used to also be a huge DJ blogging scene but that was mostly dismantled with DMCA takedowns in the 2010s(?).

For example, one of my favorite resources is NTS radio (https://nts.live/). They are a continuously streaming internet radio station that plays a wide variety of music. Every show they stream is archived for on-demand listening and organized by DJ name and genre tags. They also brilliantly address the demand for Spotify-style "background music" with their Infinite Mixtape feature, with music chosen by resident DJs.
An artist is not real if we can’t follow their life on the tabloits
I thought journals use some software to detect plagiarism by scanning the submitted files and checking for copied text. Of course, it's not as straightforward because of all the symbols and math involved. But I think whether the files are submitted as Latex or Word docs, Regex must help extract pieces of text and reverse search them in previous papers. The problem is that this necessitates scanning previous papers too, which journals might not be able or willing to do.

Anyway, I always thought research in ML is suspiciously fast paced, but most published work is honestly bs. This post says one reason for this might be the fact that most research isn't actually contributing much to the literature, but rather reiterating previous papers.
Fair point, but it wouldn't be banned because of some other unrelated activity. Much more isolated implications that way.
anarchy and libertarian socialism is particularly popular among the American left. Though I think OP is from UK. Either way as a individualist and capitalist, I rolled my eyes.
If that were the case, then he would have invaded while Trump was in office since by this sort of logic, Trump would have let Russia walk right in to Ukraine with no response from the US.

And yet that isn't what happened. Instead, Putin invaded while Biden was VP in 2014 and again while Biden is President now. Very curious that the exact opposite happened. Curious indeed...
Thanks for the recommendation. I’ve used iMovie for years for simple movie editing on my iPad but recently I found myself needing something just a tiny bit more sophisticated.

I just bought Luma Fusion ($40) and so far it feels intuitive but I can already tell it has more controls than iMovie — the ones I wished iMovie had (like quick audio fixes and equalizer). This is super useful because I can’t run Audacity on an iPad and sometimes I just need quick audio fixes done.
None of these defenses work for me. I 100% see Microsoft chasing the puck of the good, engaged, active user communities- the ones from other platforms. That Linux has been doing it for a long time & Microsoft is only just catching up doesnt change the reality, just shows how bad MS is at adapting to & trying to do more. There's little enough demand to push further, get better there!

I cant find any evidence of a predecessor to Synergy on Mac. Synergy was launched in May 2001, initially for for X11.

Good ideas always happen elsewhere. GUIs getting ripped off of of Xerox is no surprise. Overall there is, I'd claim, extremely little genuine innovation in UIs. GNOME seems to be one of the few out there willing to keep re-beginning, doing radical refreshes, but it's still not like boldly vastly different than other things. But Linux users, with their libre attitudes, are out there exploring & finding what is possible & what makes sense, across dozens of window mamagers & thousands of add-on components & endless exploring/reconfiguring... not just consuming. Of course MS is watching & borrowing the emerging stuff.
>Pythagoras absolutely did discover the theorem. Unless you can provide evidence that he was aware or attributed it to other regions or mathematicians?

Well, to answer this we have to talk a bit about Pythagoras himself: We have basically zero ability to talk about him in general with any historical certainty. The original historical depictions of him even portray him as more of a mystic than a mathematician.

The historical evidence for Pythagoras studying in Egypt prior to the theorem being created is about as strong as any other evidence we have for things Pythagoras did, in which case, it is as plausible he learned it while there as anything else we know about him.

But then we have other problems: The first mention of the theorem being attributed to him doesn't appear in the historical record until centuries after his death. We have no direct evidence he was responsible for the (re)discovery of this theorem to begin with, so it might be a moot point that he might have studied in Egypt.

He's also written as having studied with the Mesopotamians, the Persians, the Galatians, the Indians, and the Assyrians, as well as multiple others, for years to decades each. These can't all be true.

>How much weight can we attribute to the significance of this discovery to the Egyptians and Babylonians? When its Pythagoras' pupils and followers, benefactors and historians, who put his theorem to practical application and developed it further? Do we value the man who discovered the wheel, or the man who realized he could take that wheel, duplicate it, put a shaft between, and cart more things around? What about the man who taught others to do that?

This all rings of having a very Western-centric view of the world. The Babylonians put it to practical use in land disputes. The Egyptians did as well - it would have been quite handy in building the pyramids. In India, it was originally used for properly spacing things for Vedic rituals, but was later used for architecture and a variety of other things. And this is quite simply a good view of why this is an issue: Your education focused on the Western uses of the theorem, giving you the mistaken idea that the practical application and spread of knowledge was limited to the West, when that simply isn't the case. It's not your fault - we're all products of our education to an extent, and I felt the exact same way for a long time. That's a large part about what Durham U and others are trying to fix with this sort of thing.
> In 2014, you mean when the US openly supported revolution in Ukraine and cherry picked the new administration?

The idea that the US cherry picked the new administration is bonkers. The only "evidence" of this is a phone call where some diplomats talk about how effective they think the opposition are. If there a phone call where US officials say that they think Macron is better than Le Pen is that evidence that the US chose Macron to be the leader of France?

It's an especially silly accusation when you realize that the temporary government just ruled for 6 months until they held an election and made no major changes during that time.
“Can you really reach a larger audience by getting on a background jazz playlist than taking home the most coveted Grammy? I hate to share the bad news, my friends, but the world has changed.”

wow what an amazing insight. some dead awards show for geriatrics where disney child actors always win musician of the year or whatever. it’s truly shocking that nobody cares about that
Why is it scary that people get out from under the boot?
Google already has its own [=
https://stripe.com/docs/api/authentication

Even pure server-to-server applications with "no user involved" are starting to use OAuth authentication which I don't quite understand.

https://www.verygoodsecurity.com/docs/payment-optimization/a...
Dan Luu wrote about monorepo. It's worth a read https://danluu.com/monorepo/
Also my favourite. I have one with a few sensors attached that has been running for months. It runs Tasmota and feeds the data into Home Assistant via MQTT.
I think they care when there's a benefit for them. In most cases though, there probably isn't a benefit for them because you can get more likely to move on to greener pastures.

Is your goal getting more training and educational resources from your employer? You can try and make a case for it by citing the benefits to a project you're working on. You might need to just focus on yourself as best as you can, when you're able to.
Indigenous American Cylinder Recordings and the American Folklife Center (2013)
Secure Compilation – Report from Dagstuhl Seminar [pdf]
Thank you for the clarification. I should have specified I turn on sync through Google Drive once a month and not a direct copy. Going forward if I stay with Google Drive I'll need to switch off sync and just do a direct manual copy.
I would love to see a COE/postmortem on how this script was allowed to delete customer data, seems like a lot of things had to go wrong for this to happen at a larger company.
I've seen lots of complaints and propaganda about unions over the years, but at the end of the day "The only thing worse than a bad union is no union."
Extremely risky and sketchy interest.
I found their web app has greatly improved in the last year or two, especially the mobile version.
The alternative is anyone who knows how to use a screwdriver could do it in 30-seconds.

Talk about waste of resources, fuel, etc., etc.

Oh, Oh, Oh! I know, if they let this one time slip HERE in THIS INSTANCE is where the SLIPPERY SLOPE applies, but, obviously no where else, especially in politics.
EV certificates have no tie to a person. They have a tie to a corporate entity, which especially in Western countries, is basically intractable to an actual person. It takes a few minutes and $100 to create an anonymous LLC in the US.
True.

I always feel like the people who are involved in these illegal forums would have better OpsSec. The fact the feds got all of his electronic devices and within a few hours had plenty of damning information is always kind of shocking to me.

I guess that's the difference between the real criminals who never get caught and others who get greedy or too lazy in covering their tracks.