skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Containers were implemented properly from the beginning, SMF is (still) much superior to SystemD, things like resource limits and so on could be applied in a much nicer manner.

This! Shame they didn’t make it free sooner—it might have lived longer.
Yes, Land Value Taxers would exempt improvements. Notably, "The Greening of the California Desert" was financed with Land Value Taxes and "A significant amendment to the Wright Act also embodies the ideas of Henry George. The revised act exempted "all trees, vines, alfalfa, growing crops and all the structures of whatever class or description," from taxation. The full cost of the irrigation systems to be built would fall on the land, not the improvements. Small farmers could take control of their destiny and bring water to their farms." https://www.henrygeorge.org/caldes.htm
I get far more nervous at my area's predilection for putting the left-turn arrow and the pedestrian crosswalk cycle at the same time.

You seem to be incentivizing drivers to run over pedestrians.
You don't have the right of way on a red light.
Are you seriously comparing Putin to an animal and Russia to a zoo?
I'm confused on the arguments presented. Is it that the out-of-box functionality isn't as good as other GUI based editors, or that certain things are off by default?

I agree that certain settings shipped with neovim could be expanded. There should really be a process to elect plugins and settings that are generally accepted as "good" for neovim.

Plugins like Gruvbox, vim-surround, coc.nvim, vim-plug, nerdtree etc. have been continuously maintained for years, why not make it easy for new users to install and use them without having to go on the path of wonder?
Just a person who enjoys controlling other people's lives sulking.

I'll gladly take a billionaire controlled public square. Why? Because I can walk away form it. I'm far more worried about: when your "public square" is government controlled, they can do things like, I dunno, invade Ukraine. Have a different opinion? Too bad. Government also has all of the guns.
My qualm isn't about whether it introduces bias, but why it does. The example he gave implies that the only possible reason is a _religious_ one, and that's not fair.
It's worth it to study these things from a behavoral or functional perspective but that is also very hard. If only because, ultimately, people seek treatment or don't based on subjective feelings.

I think there's unavoidably an element of subjectivity here. You can attempt to minimize it but it's always there.
See Forrester's insider criticism of cycling culture

https://www.bicycling.com/culture/a32257789/vehicular-cyclin...
The part where you blame the west for Putin’s power crazed dream of enslaving neighboring countries
It was really just one trick, which was to immediately sticky select new posts. Those posts would garner large amounts of upvotes immediately by virtue of being stickied at the top of a subreddit where most users did not browse reddit overall but rather just browsed the sub. Reddit's algorithm favors posts that really take off with lots of votes right away, so as a consequence The_Donald's posts were constantly making r/all.
> Yes, _technically_, a landlord, can delegate all services. In practice, there's no single "tenant" who would do anything remotely capital-intensive, like fixing a roof.

That's missing the point.

Removing landlords from the equation removes neither the need for such services, nor the ability to provide them collectively, for the (admittedly more common) case of apartment buildings and other dense living spaces.

Thus, providing those services is not inherent to being a landlord, and making changes to our regulations, laws, or tax structure that effectively removes landlording as an economically viable option would not stop those services from being provided.

Furthermore, I'm sure pretty much everyone has heard (whether first-, second-, or third-hand) stories of landlords who do not meaningfully provide these services: apartment buildings where maintenance just doesn't happen, where the pipes leak and the roof drips and plugging something into an outlet carries a constant risk of electric shock. Landlords who only care about the inherently extractive rent they get.
Trouble for workers who turn cameras off
-Ofast can replace some functions with more vectorizable versions (in Julia terms, tanh to tanh_fast) which can then let the compiler optimization passes add SIMD where they see fit. The issue that we've seen though is that the compiler optimization passes really do not perform as well as you'd hope.
But they don't have to remain at the stop light if it's clear, so it does change the circumstances. Now a cyclist can get through the intersection without having to wait for the signal to change if it's safe (a judgement call they make based on what they can see and know). This means they will be gone before the circumstance described in the part of the quote that you dropped:

> For example, if you are a cyclist who has to stop at a red light and a car comes up that is turning right I know that sometimes creates a hairy situation if there is not a dedicated turn lane and the car might try to turn in front of you. [emphasis added]

This will help to create or maintain separation between cars and bicycles at intersections (in theory).
How are libraries a profitable venture? And why is setting up my own library the only reliable answer? I'm speaking to the lack of posterity.
I have needed this for years! Thank you for this site/tool!
Has it occurred to you that the use of such symbols might be a bit different when supporting change vs. supporting the status quo? No symbol already supports the status quo, so how many days have the tech corps not changed their logos etc.? Don't reject the data point just because it fails to support your preferred (which is not to say realistic) narrative.
> However, it's now easy to see that the optimization replacing `xaddr` with `y2addr` causes undefined behavior since it changes `ptr` to be derived from `y`.

Yeah this article is great and the framing is pretty perfect. It really shows that optimization passes can't remove information, else they run the risk of tricking later passes. I definitely agree with OP that "the incorrect optimization is the one that removed xaddr"; that optimization seems wild to me. You only know y is x + 1 because of the way it's constructed in the calling function (main). So the compiler... inlines an optimized version of the function that removes most use of x? Isn't that optimizer fundamentally broken? Especially in a language with `volatile` and `restrict`?
Because that's how she preferred (prefers?) writing her name.
If I can read Putin's mind, if you're a respected leader, your citizens will probably be ready to let you stay in power, and in the event of an attack, to die for you, but if you're a corrupt grifting piece of shit, then, first the walls to your bedroom better be thick, next would be the walls to the Kremlin, and finally the walls around your country's borders, and then even beyond.

My guess is why Putin hates the "NATO sphere of influence" is that he doesn't like democracy, because democracy means his head will end up on a noose, or in the best case scenario, in prison with his wealth taken from him. But on the flip side, it's not like American or EU democracy is free of thieves and nepotism either. Special greetings to Jean-Claude Juncker and Ursula von der Leyen!
The problem that the article is pointing out at least is that the free speech idealists don’t actually seem to have a vision to realize their ideals, and in many cases behave in ways that are counter to the absolutist rhetoric that they’re using to rally popular support for their new platforms or takeover bids.

But yes, ultimately the (U.S.) government is not able to tell businesses what content to moderate (or not moderate) because that would be a first amendment violation, so the only solution for people unhappy with current platforms is to migrate to new ones.
I supposed that such behind-the-lines operations would be covert sabotage, drones or missiles - not air attacks or invasions.
Psychedelic enthusiasts can be even worse in this regard. When someone does have a bad trip, they tend to reach for every possible excuse to avoid blaming the drug. This ranges from criticizing their "set and setting" to blaming "triggering an underlying mental health issue". The latter is particularly concerning in the context of treating mental health issues, because by definition everyone in that category has some level of underlying mental health issues.

Research is particularly difficult in this area because the study volunteers are self-selecting for psychedelic research. Basically, anyone ending up in a psychedelic research study is doing so because they think psychedelics are promising for mental health and they want to try it out. This creates a huge risk of placebo effect when your patients are arriving with huge enthusiasm and preconceived notions of efficacy. Combine that with the weirdness of a psychedelic trip and it's a recipe for a sort of super-placebo.

However, that's doubly interesting in that maybe the real reason psychedelics show efficacy in depression is that they are a sort of super-placebo. Put someone through a weird, confusing psychedelic experience and tell them that it their life will be radically different afterward and maybe they'll believe it so much that it becomes their new reality. Weirdly enough, we have the opposite problem with SSRIs right now because so many patients will start googling side effects and become convinced that they're not going to work before they even take the first dose.

It's an interesting area of research, but I think right now there's too much crossover between the research and the pop-culture phenomenon of "psychedelics cure everything". It's also strange that so few people are questioning why all of the previous psychedelic users didn't notice that the drugs were treating depression. In fact, the common wisdom among psychedelic enthusiasts years ago was that psychedelics were to be avoided if someone was not in a good mental state, largely due to all of the negative reactions they noticed. It seems that telling someone "this will cure your depression" provides a different set and setting than just giving them the psychedelics without context.
I suspect Nim has a good shot at getting popular, by piggybacking on Python syntax, the same way several other languages (e.g. Java, JavaScript) got popular by piggybacking on C syntax. Python just became number 1 on TIOBE index. Once part of the generation of developers just starting now, Python-first, needs to learn a systems programming language, Nim provides a path of least resistance for migration, close to the syntax they will be already used to.
Watch/read that guy Steli.
It's not even new in America. If people think it is, I'd like to introduce you to William Randolph Hearst:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Randolph_Hearst

Media is far more open and diverse today than at any time in human history. Historically it was impossible to publish anything without approval by an editor or publisher, a lot of money, or political power. Publishing was capital intensive and more regulated than it is today.
Trigger an Algolia Crawler to Reindex on GitHub Repository Releases
A lot of smaller sites based on wiki-technology do that already. The only reason wikipedia can stay (semi) open is because it has enough people to do regular patrols.

As usual it's a small misbehaving minority in the world who make it difficult to Have Nice Things.
2022 is officially the Year of Linux Gaming
This sounds crazy, but try hearing aids. That worked for me. Initially I used the white noise masking feature of them, but switched to using just amplification. I stop noticing my tinnitus a few minutes after I put them in, and it starts again a few minutes after I take them out.

In the spirit of "there's a forum for everything," you can get help programming them yourself here:

https://forum.hearingtracker.com/
Not the same but I've gotten tickets in NYC for running red lights on a bike. I bet there are a lot of laws in place where bikes are treated exactly the same as automobiles.
"Is there anything good about men?"

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/8765372-is-there-anythin...

Podcast: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4YHdl4FXYpU

Lecture text: https://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/wp-content/uploads/Is-There-Any...

Therein you'll find this argument applied to humans, as well. It's fairly informative and rigorous (mostly). Good read, even if you disagree with the whole premise.

> "I’m certainly not denying that culture has exploited women. But
rather than seeing culture as patriarchy, which is to say a conspiracy by men to exploit women, I
think it’s more accurate to understand culture (e.g., a country, a religion) as an abstract system that
competes against rival systems — and that uses both men and women, often in different ways, to
advance its cause."
> other than reactively blocking each account individually.

That doesn't seem all that unviable, at least specifically for Apple Private Relay IP ranges, is my point.
I think a lot of people might be confused by the term "car activists" because the car, as well as the attitude permitting its dominance, is so pervasive in the status quo, and passive/active support for the status quo doesn't register as activism in everyone's mind.

So to be clear: The U.S. is a country where, in many many places, the "car activists" won and successfully channeled untold billions and billions of dollars into imposing their ideology. The U.S. has built incredible amounts of roads, highways, parking lots, and interchanges exclusively for cars, which it has done at great expense by taking on debt and bulldozing existing neighborhoods. It has lax police enforcement and penalties for injuries and fatalities caused by motorists. It has tons of laws requiring businesses and housing to make accommodations for cars. And society passively tolerates the environmental, noise, and visual pollution cars cause, as well as the congestion they create and the people that they kill.
When making a response it helps to actually read the comment and engage in good faith.

>One is that you mainly punish honest users who have to install and run this PoW crapware just to make a small but legit edit.

I covered this. It's trivial in such a system to still have no-cost be the default, and ramp up only for certain criteria or during hot spells. Which is what I wrote. Also, an RSA cracker can run fine as javascript, no need to install anything. And legitimate users can build up over long periods. Further, how do IP bans, the existing default, line up with your "honest users" thing hmmmmm? You did at least read the title of this comment section right? You are aware that this is all in the context of something that is also a broad sledgehammer right?

>And your idea doesn’t stop you from having to implement moderation anyways.

I never suggested it did? Quite the contrary? Hello?

>You have to do the same work.

No, you don't have to the same work if attackers cannot attack as quickly and cheaply. Duh.
Are you suggesting that devices connected to a network that has blocked their MAC can still make DNS requests?
Are you thinking that private companies & individuals are more moral than governments, or just happy that private companies don't generally have the ability to wage war?

I'm having trouble interpreting what you mean
Oh no. We have some early career devs that put up patches to the kernel recently. They were super excited about getting to do that work, and it was a big day for them - as it should be it's awesome.

I guess I need to go let them know they are Nobodies. oxff said so.
Anyone wanting to dig deeper into the design side of this should check out Triadic Semiotics— it's the philosophy of signs.
For four decades Idaho was the only state that allowed bicyclists to treat stop signs as yields and stop lights as a stop-and-then-yield, so it was the easiest way to refer to the concept.

We're finally seeing some sanity, but most of the states have refused to adopt the "stop light is a stop and then yield."
> If you become known for producing highly biased research that can't be replicated this is surely going to impact your career so there's a strong incentive to keep this in check?

I would strongly say no.

If the vast majority of studies in the “soft” sciences are already not reproducible, the risk to a person’s career is minimal.

This is before accounting for the pattern of prioritizing short term gains over mitigating long-term risk, especially if that risk is considered to be low.
you may be interested to know: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31041616
Physicists devise precise laser-based method to measure a baseball’s drag
Then you're not looking very far outside your own bubble, because as someone like OP who doesn't have the pleasure of working in top tech companies in silicon valley, I never had free coffee at any place I had to show up at.

Heck, even being paid decently at those places was far fetch let alone all those perks.
Leaf PHP v3 Release
My sqlite-utils CLI tool and Python library includes a workaround for SQLite's ALTER TABLE limitations.

The transform CLI command (and Python method) automates the process of starting a transaction, creating a new table with the required changes, copying across the data from the old table, then dropping the old and renaming the new before committing the transaction.

Documentation here:

- Python library: https://sqlite-utils.datasette.io/en/stable/python-api.html#...

- CLI command: https://sqlite-utils.datasette.io/en/stable/cli.html#transfo...

- Blog entry: https://simonwillison.net/2020/Sep/23/sqlite-advanced-alter-...
> Characterising your enemy as a mad fool is a standard propaganda technique

I don’t know about a mad fool. But I think it is pretty clear that the invasion of Ukraine is a bit of catastrophic buffoonery on par with the US invasion of Iraq by Bush jr and his neocon cronies.

If the past is prelude to the present we can predict that Putin’s political coalition is going to be thrown out, in a manner similar to what we saw in the 2016 US presidential primaries / election, which was more a rejection and overthrow of the political establishment than an endorsement of the orange Cheeto man.
To add to that, there's also a Nim <-> Julia bridge: https://github.com/clonkk/nimjl
So being a no caste foreigner is better or worse than a low caste? :S
I guess it depends on a lot of factors but...
My strong suspicion is that the blocking is done at a different layer.

Much easier to simply block posts/puts to certain paths from ip ranges in the ingress layer, before they ever reach the application and are authenticated.
Please do! It's a choice to yield at stop sign, stop at lights - you shouldn't feel any pressure to do so.
I am very compassionate towards their loss. It must suck to have mistakenly destroyed their community. However I draw the line when they falsely blame others for their own mistake.

You can be compassionate for a mistake and still insist someone take ownership over this own careless error instead of blaming others. You mistake compassion for “let them do or say whatever they want because they are a victim”.
I assume you mean "bicycle specific stop signs" and not all stop signs?

Bikes don't have blind spots while vehicles generally do
Elon Musk Also Threatened to Buy My Company. Here’s How We Handled It
how does netlify even go down, isn't it just an abstraction around an object store + CDN.
It's not sufficient to say "there's an int2ptr cast, so stop optimization." You can break the code up across several function calls, which means the code doing the optimization can't tell that there's an int2ptr cast around to shut down the optimization. (Most optimizations are intraprocedural, and even if they could look interprocedurally, there's no guarantee that the function body is even available for inspection--they could be in different C source files).

Instead, you'd have to instead prove that there's no possible int2ptr cast around everywhere, which is generally an impossible analysis.
It's easy to claim people don't take enough risks when it's not your money. VCs are not gambling agencies, nor "foster" innovation, they're here to maximize investment.
"(which would be realized in actual moneys upon sale of their property), and hence, should be taxed more."

If it were taxed only when realized, that would make sense.

"It's the poor use of land right now that I believe is the main driver of poor affordability of housing."

It's the preference of a large number of people to live in a small area. You could fix this by capping the number of jobs so that increases in population would be forced to distribute more evenly through the country. This would also address issues like retrofitting existing infrastructure. Otherwise, prices/salaries will increase to make the scheme moot for the upper working class. That's basically how the mess got here in the first place, otherwise competition and property tax would have made a dent. It's all futile if you have FAANG paying absurd money with the capability and will to pay even more.
You can't stop a Javelin. Its too sophisticated. If a Javelin is launched your tank is dead.

> and of course RPG has no top-attack (unless you're firing from a building, which as we've seen is tricky to get it to arm in time)

These tanks were planning to assault Kyiv. The assumption was that cheaper RPGs (such as the AT4) would be used against these tanks. The AT4 isn't designed to be used vs main-battle-tanks (AT4 has penetration of 450mm), the frontal-armor is too thick (500mm to 700mm effective frontal armor, depending on the tank, depending on the angle the attack hits from... Largely due to geometry, not physical thickness). But the "cope-cage" might be strong enough to deflect an attack against the turret (especially if the AT4 is "top down", because it was fired from an urban building).

There's many, many, many weapons of war. There are many different types of "anti-armor" weapons.

The Russians also know that the turret has the critical weakpoint of the tank: the autoloader. If the autoloader is hit, the entire tank's munitions blow up simultaneously (aka: cooks off), and everyone inside the tank dies. Protecting the turret with a "cope cage" (even if ineffective vs Javelins) to try and mitigate damage from other RPGs (AT4, RPG7, Panzerfaust 3) just makes sense.

----------

Javelins are the most expensive man-portable anti-tank weapon. There's relatively few of them (yes, I know USA sent thousands of Javelins, but we also sent far more simpler anti-tank weapons as well). Javelins are $170,000 per shot, and the AT4 is $1500.

The other man-portable weapon discussed, NLAWs, are like $40,000, much cheaper than a Javelin but still an incredibly sophisticated and expensive weapon.

Media ignores the cheap stuff (AT4, RPG7) because they're not really interesting. But those are probably the workhorses and the more common weapon in the battlefield.
It's not solely a redistribution scheme. It's based on the fundamental principle that the government is the ultimate owner of all land, and private individuals are simply renters. If you accept this to be true and good, then it makes perfect sense. If you are the type that wants to be non dependent on the government, it is deeply grating.
The only time I've ever not wanted a stop sign was because the intersection was so dangerous it should have had a stop light.
You'd probably have to start by banning unsafe code in general, but then whitelisting/allowlisting specific versions of specific crates that are allowed to use it, so that at least the most popular dependencies don't break.
omnios and solaris11 works nicely on libvirt/qemu.
there are even vagrant images available, see:

https://app.vagrantup.com/rbrunckhorst/boxes/solaris11.4
"Lots of people used LSD in the 60s and 70s"

That's an overblown stereotype. The vast, vast majority of people did not use any drugs in that era.