skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I think he started March 14th based on trading volume. Goes from ~15M/day to 35M/day for the next few days before settling down. (Made another comment elsewhere on this)

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1418091/000110465922...
The article you linked to disagrees: "Maps, after all, remain crucial for our understanding of conflicts. Even if they are abstractions, they remain immensely useful."

Maps should not be treated as simple visualizations. They can (and should) contain plenty of information, and interpreting them properly often takes a lot of skill and effort.
The US is currently helping Ukraine fight an invasion by a larger country whose soldiers have murdered and raped their way through its civilians. In this particular case, being anti-American is the exact opposite of being anti-imperialist. Either Ukraine gets weapons, or it doesn't.
Yes there is a solid 30% of america that is Trump america (and probably was before Trump even came on the scene and made them bolder). They don't trust the government (but gladly accept donations from the government), don't trust mainstream media, largely support alt-right news like Fox and OAN, tend towards white supremacy, fear "the other" and base most decisions around that fear, and will always vote Republican.
Just never ever cheat on your girlfriend/boyfriend. Break up with them for good first if you need to, but just don't cheat. It never works out for the best.
Being in the crypto industry I know quite a few people in the same financial situation or better.

You’ve exceeded the wealth of the normal man and for your lifetime. So almost all the financial incentives that workers go through no longer exist. The ironic term for this is “rich people problems”.

Waking up, having heavy decades long financial burdens is what 99% of the white collar working population goes through and you are not a part of that lifestyle.

Maybe the awareness that you are this point can help. You don’t work for financial reasons so you need to then find some deeper meaning to work life if you want to continue working.
Gas prices always shoot up on the news but very, very slowly come back down when that reason goes away. I've never seen a gas price drop on news.
I skimmed through all the comments (sorry if I missed it) but I couldn’t see any mention of the grief that comes with knowledge of the anthropocene. The world we have created, the changes we have made, are irrevocable. The hopes of our generation are lost because we are damned to know that the world is lost to us already. The sheer weight of grief at the loss of a world is something that nobody has been prepared to help you and I mourn. This is it. This is where it ends. There is no way through.
Right on! I work with the same stack! Nice product btw!
This already happened with Solar City and share holders [in all three companies] are doing just fine.
This comment is extremely well written and on point.

In fact, I feel like I'm having the opposite of the "HN is turning into Reddit" illusion, where I feel that over the last year or two the quality of discourse on HN has improved (!): more and more, well-reasoned life advice floats to the top of comment threads. The thread about marriage and divorce had similarly good insights yesterday.

Either that, or I've just matured and I can appreciate it all more :)
Excellent point. If the younger generation were not more often "unsure" about a foreign policy question, that would mean either:

1) they have spent a lot of time studying foreign policy questions (unlikely with any generation when young), or

2) they just accept whatever their elders tell them

56% of young people supporting Ukraine, is a result we would consider a crushing victory for either party in modern presidential elections, and that's when there's a lot fewer "unsure". There is a generational difference, sure, but it's a lot less dramatic than most of the posts here are suggesting.
Gab isn't Twitter.

If the two app stores tried to deplatform Twitter there would be a landmark court case which would likely reach the Supreme Court.
First guess: they shouldn't be able to? For life plus 70 years, really?

Second guess: crosswords have sufficient creative work involved. A list of random English words with 5 characters?
Could be both:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depressive_realism
They will never raise the price higher than people are willing to pay or else they won't sell the product at all. Sometimes they will sell at a loss temporarily and sometimes they will just sell off all remaining product at the highest amount people are willing to pay. Even if at a loss because getting something is better than the product sitting on shelves. Some products are sold at a loss permanently as a loss leader. Like hot dogs or roast chicken at Costco.
It's like the opposite of '1984', and yet somehow the same.
Where is the "command" key on my Linux box?
Buying (and holding) reduces the number of outstanding shares, which supports the share price. So when the business needs cash to invest in new car research, they can issue shares at the higher price. This is exactly what happened at Tesla and also Gamestop. Now, they have so much cash, they are pretty much guaranteed to not fail.

Even a single large, stable investor like Warren Buffett can be a huge help for a company for this reason.
If people don't need it, they may simply choose not to buy.
search news.google.com for "oligarch" and see the pattern of how the media has propagandistically twisted this word to only mean a specific kind of person now, conveniently excluding those that control our (Western) societies.
At scales far below what you're talking about people experience grave difficulties making sense of big graphs.

https://cambridge-intelligence.com/how-to-fix-hairballs/

One of my favorite examples is this guy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Lombardi

I saw an art exhibit that showed some of the sketches that he made and it was clear that he worked really hard drawing and redrawing each graph and they went from being hairballish to telling a clear story.

You're also very insightful to be talking about the specific scale you're working at because it matters. Graph workloads can drive you batty because they frequently defeat caches by beating very nonlocal.

For your small data set you are in the range where you can get a "big" computer with say 64GB or 128GB of RAM and be able to work in RAM. You might be a little disappointed with the performance (it takes a while to touch every memory address in a 128GB machine) but it will good enough if you're efficient and disciplined.

As an RDF fanatic I'll share that I have handled data sets on the small end of your scale with

https://virtuoso.openlinksw.com/
Show HN: Fast,Compiled deep-learning based modules for inferencing on CPUs
Hi HN,I am Anubhav from RamanLabs.We have been developing dedicated modules based on deep-learning for purposes like face-detection,object-detection,pose-estimation etc.

We hope to make it easy for developers,hobbyists to integrate such functionalities into their existing app/pipeline at the cost of a few milliseconds.All our modules run end to end in super-realtime even on consumer-grade CPUs[0].
For now we provide only Python based API.

We provide Demo for each of the modules to allow testing for your desired data distribution.We also have a blog[1] where we hope to add more technical details about the framework used to develop these modules.

The framework used to develop these modules is completely written in Nim language.We wrap existing ops implementations from libraries like ONEDNN and write our own code where we cannot find one or existing implementation is not good enough,mainly for preprocessing and postprocessing code.Having full access to framework code and being written in a high level language allows us to port newer architectures and optimize them quickly.

We would love to hear your feedback on our attempt.

[0] Quad-core Cpu with AVX2 instructions.
[1] <https://ramanlabs.in/static/blog/index.html>
Learn how to invest. Start here, for example: https://www.bogleheads.org/wiki/Getting_started .

It's true you'll make far more money starting your own company, if it is successful. Unfortunately, I don't have specific advice on how to do that.

Learning to invest, however, always works.
UPDATE iasql SET source = 'open';
Sorry we, as a society, failed our soldiers so badly. It's trite to say but thanks for serving. You'll carry those scars to the grave.

That said, what does this have to do with the article, which is talking about generational sympathies with either Russia or Ukraine? Is there a serious push to get US troops involved, a move which would surely spark WWIII? We're not talking about sending souls down range. Putin already did that. He is sending Russian souls down range and forcing Ukrainian souls down range.
> ukraine is in europe and ukrainians are europeans so it's different and it makes this war so much worse" which to me sounds extremely... problematic?

It sounds more practical than problematic to me. Afghanistan is 10 times farther away from Western Europe than Ukraine is. If Europe didn't feel a lot more threatened by Russia, they would be insane.
How about fitness? Sex life? How's your diet? Do you have any vices? Do you have close relationships with friends or family? Do you do anything creative?

You're doing great on money, but you spent a whole lot of time talking about that. There's lots of other things to think about
This argument would apply to any tax but the question is not how much the government should tax or spend but rather if an inheritance tax is somehow (1) good in itself or (2) no worse than other taxes.

The case against #1 is that no inheritance tax unless absurdly comprehensive could capture many pre-inheritance benefits. The article explicitly notes how some postpone accepting their inheritance as a form of virtue signaling. The very fact this can be done shows that wealth is being passed down prior to any taxable event.
This comment reminded me of yet another reason to prefer the Bayesian set up for A/B tests: you work with the data you have not some bizarre idea of "sample size".

Especially with proper priors (which again, everyone running an A/B test should have at this point) you don't have to "plan a sample size". You work with the data you have, and assess the risks in the decision give what you know. There is likewise no risk of "early stopping".

If you're doing Bayesian analysis and only have say 100 visitors, and are using priors, the only situation in which you'll have a strong posterior is when the winning variant is notably superior to the current one. All of the ad hoc rules Frequentists put in place are not necessary when you do proper analysis of your posterior probability that A > B.

Again we see where Bayesian vs Frequentist doesn't really matter for a clinical trials but does for running an A/B test. In a clinical trial you are going to have to plan how many people are involved anyway, so doing a test power calculation makes sense since you'll need some number and that's a good way to get one.

For running an A/B test the bigger problem is usually time not numbers (an exception being email campaigns in which both tend to matter). In the Bayesian setup you if your boss says "I need an answer tomorrow morning" you can take the data you've got, show the probabilities of improvement as well as the distribution of the risks if you're wrong. This allows you to make riskier moves when it makes sense, and be more conservative when it does not. This is something that the out-of-the-box NHST does not allow you.
Yes, you have reached the zenith of your career. Congratulations. You are self-sufficient and able to provide for the financial needs of your family. This is a true victory.

Now, it is time to focus on people other than yourself. Most other advice on here is awful; it amounts to different directions to run on the hedonic treadmill.

Instead, you have to give back now. What good is there to be done, that only you could do? What will be worse off if you don't lend a hand? This can range from finding better ways to support and mentor your children, to donating time to tutor students in programming, to building a well in Africa. Think hard about what you really care about, and then work hard to bring that into being.
This is a "fault" of almost everyone living in Europe and USA at the moment. Europe for a while neglected military spending because the great evil Soviet Union was gone. In the USA we got to the mode where Russia isn't exactly our friend but they are contained to their vast land and nobody cares. Our focus too was on the Middle East.

But now, I am not really old enough to know what it was like living under the threat from Russia, but I am old enough to know from 1 generation of separation family and friends what it was like. And 2 generations was WWII. So Russian aggression has me worried.

Now Gen Z is another generation forward. I have found that Gen Z as a whole seems to be more empathetic, and very anti violence. The thought of someone coming in and flattening your neighborhood is the last thing they would think of. The things they more empathize with at the moment are the issues in the USA with social justice. And seeing Russian minorities in Ukraine persecuted from Russian sources resonates with them more than the narrative from the USA that Russia is an imperialistic country. They are also deeply skeptical of that narrative from our government as reflections on the USA's own history in the middle east, and central/South America
Yes. Specifically, your shares will just turn into cash in your brokerage account. You don't need to initiate a sale.

Note that this happens even if you're going to lose money on your investment.
Happiness isn't about money, it's about remaining curious and challenged.
This makes me want to make a startup which is a customer service arm for google. It runs a 2-sided marketplace to pay real google employees who can help with users who need their accounts unlocked/etc. It would have different categories for finding a relevant googler, and could even schedule them in shifts, with a chat room and shared note-taking space for the employees to collaborate. It would be a win win.

The next phase is when someone who believes in the startup gets to a exec position within google, and can hire and shield actual CSRs who only work through the startup. That business unit will find more success because of the better customer support, which will put pressure on other business units to do the same.

It would of course be much better if google just had the decency to provide human support.
The unregulated nature of Usenet and spam/malware arguably killed it, not a NY politician. ISPs generally didn't carry a lot of newsgroups anyway, and the best service was always from dedicated Usenet providers.

Sadly these days it's only useful for binary downloads if you also use an NZB indexer. Does anyone still use it for discussion?
YouTube Shorts now allows creators to splice in long-form videos
Yeah I see what you're saying. Again without conceding that I share this view of this person, since I haven't read his works.

But while I don't think that position is correct, I do think it's probably valuable to have some people take that stance. It's similar to the social value in having non-political conservatism that will resist all change no matter what. We'll change anyway, but having to fight for it a little will slow down the changes, hopefully dodge some of the worst consequences, maybe prevent some changes that shouldn't actually happen.

The US should be opposed. Not because we are inherently bad, but because our interests aren't everyone's interests. An always-support, always-oppose, or case-by-case stance will each have different failure modes. I think we want a mix, as unpalatable as that can be sometimes.
I can't recall a time where a tech corp has been significantly burdened by an employee strike.

Netflix employee tantrums over Chapelle was the most recent one that comes to mind.
>So wine is a great equalizer. Rich dumb people are paying a lot of money to be stupider. Literally.

This is hyperbole. There is a wide world of difference between someone who enjoys a 6 pack a week and the alcoholic who downs a fifth of whiskey a day. Alcohol's ill effects are a J-Shaped curve that increase exponentially after 20 drinks a week, but that's a lot of booze. One can consume in moderation with almost no consequence.
Don't don't. At your age you can avoid to burn the candle at both ends and in the middle (joke courtesy of Redd Foxx). Everyone telling you to not do X is just telling you that they had a problem with X.

The only piece of advice I can provide which I think is provably correct is to put as much money as you can spare into an S&P 500 index fund.
I'm pretty sure "natty" means Natural Light and/or Natural Ice at every college. Except maybe some of the rich-kid fallback private schools in the East that most people have never heard of. There, maybe not.
I think you misread my comment. The cheesy part isn't to talk about the events, or what trump did. It's the insane hyperbole, and the never ending exaggeration in the words used to describe what happened.

A good example of that is the death count: we got to the point where some people were so desperate to turn the whole situation into an iconic, unprecedented historical attack that they counted a cop who died the day after from a stroke in the death count. The "insurrection" narrative does not sound credible without deaths or violence, so the fact that the only death was a rioter killed by cops was a pretty inconvenient plot hole.

I assume you are pretty informed and even then, you still had in mind the spurious death count. That goes to show just how much the early hyperbole poisoned the entire discussion around the events and spread disinformation.

Another example of disingenuous reality bending is the claim that the rioters were "armed so they came here to overthrow the government". When I think they found one or two person with a firearm.
To me it's simple, if the riots were actually that bad, the huge disinformation push and extremely disingenuous rhetoric wouldn't have been needed.
Nautilus I fell in love with in Ubuntu 6.06 was miles better than the current one found in Ubuntu ~20.04.
Get ready for the Pinterestification of videos...
Have you considered the possibility that if everything says one thing, that's because it is true? Maybe the Russians genuinely haven't done very well.

I think there are too many Cartesians sitting in front of their screens going "perhaps an evil demon is trying to fool me about everything!"
A more accurate statement might be: prices are upper bounded by what people are willing to pay.
> on the strategic level, the expansion of NATO (which we have not dealt with here);

This is an Orwellian distortion of language.

Expansion can be interpreted in a literal sense or a metaphorical one. Organizations expand in a metaphorical sense. When we say that a company "expands" by by entering a new market or hiring new talent, we know that this is metaphorical.

NATO is a defensive pact with voluntary membership, but by calling it "expansionist," Russia plays a trick where it evokes the literal sense of expand to transform NATO into the aggressor. It seems fairly plain to me that the real expansionists would be the ones who have literally, physically expanded into a neighboring country by annexing Crimea. The expansionists would be the ones who are currently occupying territory in three foreign nations against the will of those nations' governments.

> and operationally, the continuous and repeated attacks on the civilian population of the Donbass over the past years and the dramatic increase in late February 2022.

By third party estimates, the civillian casualties in the Russian invasion are about two to three orders of magnitude higher than the civilian casualties in Donbass prior to the invasion. This is like slaughtering an entire village because it contains a single murderer. There is absolutely zero ambiguity about where the moral high ground is here.
Hunter Biden laptop story was legit & censoring it across all social media simultaneously was absurd. Considering his financial connections to Ukraine & current events it’s even more fucked up that it was censored.
Why do rich people buy newspapers and media conglomerates? Why did Jeff Bezos "get into journalism" via Washington Post? There is your answer.
If you're loading the model for every prediction, you're doing something really wrong. Pre-processing and post-processing are indeed usually trumping the core computation itself, but as you mentioned it's not done in the NN.
When my machines were doing that on Plasma it was typically the Baloo file indexing or some Akonadi related process that was going crazy on the CPU. This week I switched back to Gnome Shell after a few years of Plasma on my main desktop and I must say it feels a lot more responsive than Plasma.
One of the first questions I ask when discussing issues like this, is to define "big" and "small" for me. Every group has their own set of definitions, and the differences can result in interesting conversations.
Get laid.
To be fair, it is a tiny clip of an off-hand response; hard to compare to focused articles and segments on the topic. I can see the criticism of piecing together an opinion from a bunch of off-hand comments vs fully expressed arguments. It might be better to compare a full discussion on the specific topic from the criticized party to the lauded one.

One problem with many mainstream outlets is that they are often give free passes to organizations like OSCE. For example, the OAS, an organization that serves a similar watchdog position in the Americas, completely bungled their duties in recent Bolivian elections. So much so, that they helped legitimize a violent far-right coup in 2019.
It's hilarious why people care so much about the price of a financial instrument. Even Bitcoin. Do you care what wheat or copper or kerosene trades at? Why not take him at his word.

Plenty of Americans spend 5 to 10% of their worth on stuff. Who cares what your neighbor paid for his boat....maybe dude just likes to drink Coors light on the lake.
That's a less than charitable interpretation. Perhaps he simply isn't interested in art?
> Moderation makes sense when somebody is hijacking your platform and ruining the experience for everyone else.

It makes sense to you. Moderation makes sense to me in very different circumstances.
number one tip: live healthy lifestyle

number two: don’t look at others, don’t try to impress, you have your own path and your own destiny

number three: take risks, later you won’t be able to

number four: live frugally, invest into S&P 500 index

most importantly: be nice to people, you’ll never regret being nice
Look at the payout model I used at finclout.io
There are ways to now ways to reward people for good content that are not ad-based not gifting/tipping.
Seems to be very successful and valuable for something without ‘sufficient creative work involved’? That’s what the courts would look at.
Note however this is only partially true for single user devices, where lack of admin rights does prevent some attacker persistence, and is not at all true for multi user devices e.g. the shared family PC.
All of the above but on the other hand be careful and stingy with what you post on social media about these experiences.
Sure, technically speaking, it’s not an infinitely vertical line, it has an lower and upper terminus, and might begin again at another y value.

But we’re already misusing the model to begin with. The line is intended to represent multiple suppliers participating in a market for a good with a fungible source. It is not and never has been a model for pricing decisions at a single company.
Not very discoverable, but just like on the browser, hit ctrl+l.