skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It is no insult to call what is childish childish. It is merely accurate.
Andy (Andrew?),
> Apple will not always charge to 100% via some mysterious schedule
We prefer to think that "mysterious schedule" and "machine learning" have the same
> energy
Have you tried `Al Dente` on Mac?

> an older Dell Latitude... setting in the BIOS
So we've engaged with American Megatrends to license the BIOS directly... a cross function of business and legal folks at Lambda are currently figuring that out, but I'm excited to report that we know we can version control the BIOS!

> I've bought 4... 3 different... a fifth...
Oof; that's a reputation. I do really admire and respect the approach Frame.work has taken towards modular, user-servicable systems with components. A mindset of sustainability from the outset is something I think we all here strive for.

From someone here who has a background in chemical engineering, can you ELI5 lithium ion battery degradation?

Andy, the director of product (Dan) has been/will be reaching out to you.

Vinay
Amazing how terrified they are of elon and even-handed truth.
> where war is less common.

This particular refrain is one that's worth examining from the lens you're dismissing. Under what frame is "war less common" in Europe (or even "East Europe")? An extremely narrow one at best, IMO. A large proportion of pro-Ukrainian propaganda also outright contradicts this notion by referencing historical acts of Russian aggression.
I would not. Antinatalism and childfree movements aren’t based solely on genetic arguments. Corinne Maier, for example, outlines 39 non-genetic arguments. One of these arguments is based on genetics alone.
Thanks for posting, this is nicely presented.
The article mentioned what to do during the "inhale" but didn't mention "exhale", so I wasn't sure if one still does the restricted breathing during exhale or not.
Price is what you pay, value is what you get.
Thankfully there are exceptions to this, notably aviation. Having all accidents investigated by an independent board with a systems approach has proven to be an extremely successful model. It's a shame it isn't replicated elsewhere.
You call it checkbox compliance, but it does at least make vendors think about pretty much the bare minimum in all-around security posture, and then have an external audit - as someone who has to approve SaaS vendors it makes my life much easier.
This is a great concept. I've often wished I could just pay someone to call me and make me get out of bed when my sleep schedule falls off the charts. Even if people can't physically force you to do something, I think most of us are intrinsically motivated to show up for people when they expect it, especially if we develop respect for them. This is how managers get people to get things done, even when it's hard to hold them to account or pay isn't tied to particular deliverables.
> If you knew the Moskva could engage (say) 12 incoming missiles at a time, you fire 24 all at the same time.

That's the sort of thing that's a classified secret.

None of us know how many missiles the Moskva could handle. But the Ukrainians knew, and fired (at least) +1 missile over its capacity.

Ukrainians are savvy, but they don't have enough missiles to really be throwing "eeeh, maybe 20 at the same time is enough??". Whatever battle plan they did here and implemented was surely based on their intelligence... stuff even USA wouldn't be privy to.
I mean, offering your own API gateway is pretty effective.
Germany has a considerable interest in the concept of not changing any international borders by force, as has any other civilized nation.
That "something" was integrating a Bing search into the process, just in case you were trying to find "how is babby made?" on your filesystem search.
The next billion programmers – Excel for Everything
Powerbreathe seems like an unnecessary uni-tasking gadget conforming to western sensibilities.

Zen and the Brain by James Austin details his study of Zen monks brains which revealed this breathing-stress connection scientifically decades ago.

If I remember correctly, the exhale is especially important to triggering certain relaxation states; brains of monks who were especially focused on long exhales were appreciably different from other monks.
On one hand you have millions of users who each are obliged to walk on eggshells.

On the other, you have a few Microsoft hacks who could easily do the right thing on behalf of those millions of users.
Lest we forget how Joseph Stalin's military treated Russians who refused to fight (poorly armed and equipped, no less).

Just like many of the sportspeople who aren't in the country, even those who have left since the invasion, the majority of people who disagree with it are too afraid of the consequences for saying too much or saying anything against the Kremlin narrative.

As an example, a Nobel-winning journalist was assaulted by pro-Putin Russians in public, when he has even abided by the new laws.
I think given that humans evolved to make trade-offs in order to have large brains is a sign that humans generally having large brains is useful, but the usual idea that a large brain is strictly necessary for human intelligence doesn't necessarily follow from that. It could be that what we think of as human intelligence doesn't need all that much brain matter to exist inside of, but having more brain matter increases redundancy and the chance of survival if you starve or get some brain damage, adds potential capacity that isn't always necessary, or it increases the chance of usual human thought processes developing somewhere within the brain to begin with. Maybe having more brain matter is more important as a very young child in order to help the brain bootstrap itself, but then after that most brain matter is redundant.
And I can murder someone in the forest and nobody will have a problem with it, because those that would care would not know. That shirt company would almost certainly be sued if interesting parties knew, as has happened before [1], just as if someone saw an obvious derivative work coming from an AI.

For a real world example, I've had real company logos appear on my GAN generated images. I used labels that included terms specific to a single companies rendering technology/pipeline, and the vast majority of images that had those labels had the company logo on it. They were somewhat distorted, but it was very obvious which company it was.

1. https://www.thefashionlaw.com/ralph-lauren-files-suit-agains...
My understanding with respect to the oil industry is that they have relatively high capital costs, and lower marginal costs. If prices drop so that they become unprofitable, it still makes sense to drill because the fixed costs are already sunk. It could also make sense if you expect the low prices to be a temporary situation, and shutting down and restarting would be expensive. Either way, producing at a loss is not sustainable in the long run, so without costs falling or prices increasing, they would eventually go out of business.

This isn't really a factor for Arizona, since as a brand, not a commodity, they can set their price, and since they're cheaper than many of their competitors, they have room to work with here, too. If their unit cost is higher than their unit price, they don't expect costs to decrease, and they don't intend to raise their price, they would simply make more money by not making the product.
I don't see anything in "superdisk"'s profile or in the comments that backs this up.
Usually the attempt at draining accounts is done well before the divorce.
Location: Santa Ana, CA (willing to relocate)
Remote: Yes
Willing to relocate: Yes
Technologies: JavaScript, React, NodeJs, Express, MongoDB, GraphSQL, Docker, Python, AWS
Resume: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bzyvYfAfSl1Fnd3EEJJohmL8Q_M...
Email: tennguye95@gmail.com
Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/tuan-nguyen-75774a146/
I wonder if you can stack the breathing exercises (9pt reduction) with grip strength exercises (10% reduction) for even more benefit.

Edit: People are disagreeing with this? Why?
That's a disadvantage. Radiative heating using radiators or floor heating actually enables you to have a lower temperature because it feels warmer. That said you can run heatpumps with radiative heaters, still moving to heatpumps from on day to the other is completely unrealistic, that's sort of like saying we should switch over all cars to electric immediately to get rid of the dependency on Russian oil.
Looks like the ones used in the study are an order of magnitude more expensive than the ones on amazon.

Amazon (Plus model), $70: https://www.amazon.com/POWERbreathe-Fitness-Breathing-Traine...

From manufacturer (K3 model), $500: https://www.powerbreathe.com/product/k3/
Twitter has this kind of problem with likes (or maybe they fixed this since I haven't been on there in a while).

When someone deactivates their account, you can see that you have X additional likes, but you can't access them. If that user reactivates their account, those likes suddenly show back up.

This could be a privacy issue if you've decided to remove likes for a certain categories of posts for whatever reason.

For GitHub, a couple other options I can think of would be to 1. show stars for private repos but only for the purpose of unstarring or 2. hide stars when a repo goes private and then give users an option to re-enable their star if a repo goes back to public. But these options are relatively complex, and I can see why GitHub would go with deletion.
Presta.js if you want to please the cyclists :D
Here's the thing: If you built something like Quicklaunch instead (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quicklaunch), your g forces would already be an order of magnitude lower. So the question is, why not do that instead?
Just don't show them. Filter out private repos before showing a user's stars, notifying them of issues, etc.
You could try this instead. It has similar benefits.

https://highbloodpressurebegone.com/how-to-do-hand-grip-exer...
I sympathize with you. I think it is best policy they do not give you back the stars, because I can see a wave of potential misuse which could also open up vulnerabilities exploiting this practice. Does anyone use "stars" as some form of credibility to the project in terms of security?

Given your reputation, I find you will get back your stars again and maybe even higher than before. Or, at least, it shouldn't be that hard :).

With that said, I am glad to have come across this site. Sure seems to beat postman :)
If by "tried to shut down" you mean "offered the kid running it $5,000 to stop" then sure.

But the way you spin it is way worse than what actually happened.
Some of the recent pronouns I've seen are barely pronounceable. Getting others to refer to you in an unwieldy way seems more like a power play to me.

We already have some titles that signal achievement, like Doctor. I'd be for introducing more of them. Maybe we can get rid of the hereditary ones, too.
And in return for the price you pay you get the asset. So price == value in the world of stocks
The repo could lead to 404 to everyone, but if someone had starred it they would get a 403. They would be able to see all their stars but not access certain repos because they were made private. Probably less surprising then some of their stars disappearing. They would at least know what happened and it’s not like wouldn’t know the repo was public at some point anyway. Additionally, there could be another button to clear stars and watchers, if the owner of the repo really wants to.
~Aside: Looking through your comment history you seem really cool and like we have quite a bit in common, feel free to hit me up over discord!
this makes alzheimer's disease even more pernicious ..
A few issues:

- The braced hamburger menu — your logo, actually, on your blog home page redirects to bulma.io.

- There’s no way to switch from the "Very Cool" template back to the original.
I know it’s not the same thing but Cloudflare just released a new product for email that’s free. It just forwards any email from your domain in cloudflare. I already use cloudflare and instead of paying google apps for it, I just forward * to my gmail account. Thought it may be of some use if you’re not actively responding from them.
How is it skirting the law to trade based on what he publicly says?
Patrick Lancaster is one of the few people who do journalism on the ground in the Donbass region. He shows clear shell damage to civilian targets and interviews people and they say that they are being shelled by Ukrainians.
I don't quite get your stance. You're free not to use those words. It's not like it is against the law to not use those pronouns. It is a simple and nearly effortless courtesy, that you can ignore if you want, with the consequence that people may think you're a twat and treat you accordingly.

Like, you're not mandated by law to greet someone with "good morning" instead of saying "fuck you". Yet it is widely understood that if you do this and refuse to say good morning, people will be upset and become hostile towards you. It's a perfect analogous situation. I'm not really sure what you want.
Your Wikipedia link includes this: “The plant lost 1.3 GW of capacity which then was compensated by additional 9 power units in the thermal power station nearby.”

From here: https://energo.dtek.com/en/media-center/press/dtek-tpps-comp... * As a result of an armed attack by the invaders on the Zaporozhia NPP, 1.3 GW of capacity generated by nuclear units has been lost.*

If the power plant was I damaged it wouldn’t have lost capacity.
Heating the air is less efficient, by a significant margin (you need a high temperature for the same comfort level). Using US houses as an example is quite laughable, the energy consumptions of US households is much higher than German ones.
8px font size works fine with good hinting. In general, 1080p would be a near-optimal resolution given pixel-perfect rendering. Higher resolutions are useful when the rendering is too fuzzy, they're simply about hiding that imperfection.
The truth remains that if you use "they" as singular you sound like a moron.

"Someone" has indefinite number and is not singular. Implicitly plural antecedents ("anyone", "everyone", "each ...") are not singular either.
Or just, you know, not delete anything until otherwise asked to. None of tha has anything essential to do with making the thing private.
Just to refute one of these as it’s a bit of a misconception.

> Married people wished they were single to enjoy the freedom and live a simpler life. While single people wished they met a SO to be less lonely.

What single people want is the option to not be single and to not be lonely. When people are married and wish to be single - it’s not that they wish to be lonely, it’s that they wish they could have more freedom. (This has little to do with marriage and more to do with other life choices. I know married people with more freedom than single people)

I think you’re oversimplifying things by ignoring the fact that people want both and not either/or. They want to be young and rich. They want to have their health and their wealth. They want to be single but not fucking lonely.

It’s really not that hard to understand when you don’t make false equivalencies and bullshit narratives.
All this theory is nice, but let's look at actuals. Of all the people I know who have been booted off of twitter (several dozen), none of them are bad actors (except maybe Alex Jones). They were booted off because their political opinion was not liked by left-leaning moderators, who made up laughably incorrect assessments of their tweets.

Twitter is being used as a political weapon in a political war.

Actual bad actors who spam, harass (which requires repeated unrelenting action, not just one-time nastiness), defame or incite violence... nobody cares if their posts get removed. Defending them is not what Musk or the political right is on about.
You can get a 14" 4K ThinkPad (e.g. P14s).
> It's really hard to see how Ukraine will successfully fend off a country 10x its size.

Do what the Taliban did in Afghanistan to defeat US.
> would not be hard at all for a mole on the chip design team to do

But that would put a back door on every chip made from that design, and it would increase the odds of it being discovered.
Interestingly enough, I entered a friend’s clinical research study last year where they’re looking to replace the standard cardiac stress test by proving their hypothesis.

Essentially, they believe that by purposefully engaging in a combination of deep/long/shallow/etc. ("Wim Hoff style breathing techniques" - my friend’s words not mine), and get a patient to hyperventilate basically (in a controlled environment and developed protocol/framework), they could produce similar results and draw similar clinical conclusions as one would after a traditional stress test. They had me do two hours of various breathing techniques while simultaneously imaging my heart and then my brain using fMRI imaging.

* NAD but I managed to get the DICOM files and found some open source software (Horos) and loaded up the slices and it was super cool seeing what was going on during the different breathing *

I recently caught up with the individual and was told the study is in its final stages and so far looks very promising (which I’m sure all researchers say right but I’ll give them the benefit of the doubt).
Web3 is niche and I think social media is outside of that niche and will be for a very long time.
What grip exercises?
I was responding to someone that said: “there are no circumstances”

That’s an unreasonably high bar which invites “fantastic scenario” as such I referred to something I don’t consider reasonable, but it is possible.

> Why would Russia go through the trouble

If you want a more plausible scenario, causing immense harm in a deniable fashion is possible when a attacking a nuclear power plant that isn’t possible with widespread chemical weapons etc. Issue a public apology, have the guy ordering the attack executed, and yet the harm stays.

I am not suggesting it’s likely Russia is going to attack Germany in the next 50 years. All I am saying is nuclear power plants have one more failure mode that should be considered. These things are built tough, Ukraine’s only lost 1.3 GW of capacity after the attack that’s no big deal. That said, considering them as a military not just a terrorist target is no longer a fantasy scenario it’s part of the long term risk calculation.

To be clear, most people will likely run the numbers and say it’s an acceptable risk, which is fine as long as they actually run the numbers.
I imagine someone who was once rich and gives it all away to return to the "world of normal people" might still feel isolated.
The state-level ACLU seems to be more immune, but the national level ACLU is fracturing and advocating speech limits.

https://www.vox.com/platform/amp/2017/8/20/16167870/aclu-hat...
This is just hedonistic nihilism. Works for some folks. Doesn’t for others. Let’s not write it down like it’s the end all be all for everyone.
This Medium post reads like propaganda/promotional material. Algorithms can also do good at burying propaganda. What you want/need or believe you want/need may also be dangerous to you. I am against predatory algorithms but this post makes me recoil with all of the promotion that comes with it. Not sure what to think anymore.

China has a history of running propeganda/promotion campaigns including running them as ads at the beginning of YouTube videos to get the first word in as an attempt to control the narrative.
Don't know for sure but from skimming the paper it looks like it's inhalation only. "Inspiratory muscle strength training (IMST) is an alternative form of physical training that uses the diaphragm and accessory respiratory muscles to repeatedly inhale against resistance." The words "exhale," "expire," and their various inflected forms don't appear anywhere in the paper.
Who needs this, except privacy toxic companies?
On the other hand, almost any keyboard is better than what Apple sells :) their latest mbp is a bit better than the butterfly one but nowhere near the 2015 and earlier models.
That's not the point. The point is that one person should absolutely 100% be capable of paying for a warranty for a third party. That's not transferring a warranty; that's guaranteeing payment.
I think this is a nice example of why the folded surface of our brain matters so much.
Asking GPT3 to draw ASCII images produces the same drawings frequently
I agree it’s impressive, but it’s a funny thing to lead with the number. If they were still around and wanted to contribute to science, an fMRI would be interesting for curiosity’s sake; maybe “stress makes their brain work harder” also means it ages differently too?

Or counting their neurons, but presumably they have to not be around anymore for that one.
Okay, so I have some straight up anecdotal evidence done with a real blood pressure cuff by a trained medical professional for a related phenomenon.

I have to get a buprenorphine injection monthly.

As a part of this, they take my blood pressure.

I was talking to the nurse, animatedly about the silly policies our state government has around electric scooters, as she was taking my blood pressure.

She didn't read out both for me, but I initially had "135" as the result.

The nurse got me to take 5 minutes doing a guided (heavy) breathing and relaxation protocol, and sure enough, on running the blood pressure test again, I got "118"
Youtube in particular sort of famously had content protection code, which took in part the form of a VM implemented in Javascript that probed its runtime to detect non-browser or otherwise headless clients. I think Mike Hearn worked on it.

Found it:

https://moderncrypto.org/mail-archive/messaging/2014/000780....
Could just make them inactive for a while, but still registered.

Stop sending notifications to watchers, and replace the repo in the stargazer's starred list with a "The following starred repos are currently private and cannot be viewed:" and make the stars be remove-only for a while.
> They literally defending their families, no less.

So the Taliban were not defending their families?
One was trying to decide whether to call the first version of something. Revision 0, revision 1, or version 1 followed by revision 1. The users that we were making the application for didn't care one bit what we called it, but the programmers sure had a lively discussion with a lot of eye rolling in the room.
Overcollateralized loans are a real thing, & when used right offer substantial opportunities in risk hedging, leveraging, & limit sells. He'll need to post ~$55B in stocks to make it happen, but it's doable.

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/o/overcollateralization.a...
Razer Tensorbook – The Deep Learning Laptop
Being generous, it might also be a fuckup in implementing SSR... maybe. Still a fuckup though.
I agree that it would be more clear if the visibility-change dialog included some stats about the repo so you can confirm at a glance that it's the right one, but... it asks you to type the full name of the repo before it will allow you to proceed.

If you do a copy-paste of what it tells you to type, that's on you. The entire point of that box is to get you to think about what you are doing, and explicitly type out the name of the thing you want to change.

Perhaps I've interacted with GitHub's UX enough to be familiar, but when OP put up a side-by-side screenshot and asked, "A 54k-star question: Which one of these two dialogs is safe to confirm and which one deletes a 10-year-old community?" ... I looked at the two boxes, saw the repo it was asking to modify in both cases, and immediately knew the correct answer!

I get that the ideal is that every person who takes any kind of action knows what they are doing and never makes a mistake. I don't know if it's realistic to expect that outcome, but certainly that's the ideal. But how far should UX designers bend over backwards to cater to people who perform destructive actions without paying attention to what they're doing?