skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
That is my understanding.

https://www.avweb.com/insider/faa-do-your-damn-job/

> To scrub the playhead forward, last summer at Oshkosh, to great fanfare, the STC approving G100UL was announced. It applied to a limited number of engines and GAMI was tasked with additional testing and data work to expand the engine list. This it did. The Wichita Aircraft Certification Office duly sent a letter to FAA HQ reporting that GAMI met all the test requirements—best-run program they had ever seen, or words to that effect—and was entitled to an STC-AML with every single spark ignition engine in the FAA database approved to use G100UL.

...

> At a press conference, Lawrence said he thought PAFI had been “a great success.” I simply cannot agree. I don’t know how anyone in the industry could think this. PAFI was supposed to yield an unleaded drop-in replacement for 100LL. It did not. It was an abject failure and now, even though the FAA has an STC in hand awaiting approval for a fuel that has been proven, ad nauseum, to work in all engines, it wants more money for more testing. While the PAFI program—that was Piston Aviation Fuels Initiative—supposedly produced data, accessing it is all but impossible.
Maybe you're a very high profile individual that this matters beyond paranoia? I've always used my name for signups, and I have a very unique name, probably the only one on the whole planet. It has affected my life in no meaningful / noticeably negative way.
Just as Russia is complex, so is Ukraine. The blame-throwing game can go on for quite some time by cherry-picking memes.

I hope the war ends soon.
You likely do have people or organizations on the loan to your house though, and they don't really get a say most of the time as long as they can be paid off.

What if instead of a house we were talking about a small business that serves people. Can that business not sell itself to someone else?

Property rights and the government stepping in to force changes don't interact well, and goes against a free market type system. The government does step in sometimes, but usually when they see what's being done as being anti-competitive and hurting people through reducing market effectiveness, not just because they've made some moral judgement. Personally I'm happy they're not doing the latter, I suspect quite a lot of people would not agree with the judgements they were making at any specific time, depending on the specific groups in power.
"Special military operation"
> Japanese bombing of Pearl Harbor was spurred by America oil embargo on Japan

...and the embargo on Japan was due to it's continuing invasion of China...
Economic freedom is like free speech (and any other freedom, really). It can not be absolute unless everyone behaves in good faith, once you assume you have rogue players who exploit the good faith behavior of others you have to have rules.

So you will find literally no place where absolute freedom is practiced, and for good reasons.

Sadly, in case of economic freedom a rogue player who has billions can also have political power to lobby against inconvenient to them rules, and ah everyone wants to be on their good side.
>I've had a hard time with this one as for weeks it was "Russia is not advancing, yada yada"

Same here. I consider myself a big consumer of news from a variety of sources, and it's hard to get nearly any perspective except "Ukraine is dominating the battlefield". It's strange times, but this is the information war.
Rust is precise with what it guarantees, but don’t take “not an absolute guarantee in every case” as “no guarantee at all”.

Leaking in Rust requires either explicit leaking function call, leaking in C/FFI code, or a type that is 1. recursive 2. refcounted 3. with interior mutability, and 4. a programming error in use of such type. If any of these four conditions aren’t met, it can’t leak.
Some charities spend lots of money on things other than their main mission. Whereas if food is donated, you can be quite sure that isn't funding a yacht for the CEO.
It's because kids are effed by the media. They have been fed a whole bunch of lies and propaganda one way or another in order to get them to support or denounce some cause or other so they don't know what to believe. So they throw their hands up and give up and "let them sort it out"

The media and establishment want it both ways. in the '80s imperialism was BAD. Now, rebranded as globalism, this imperialism is good, but that one over there by them is BAD! and so on it goes.

Can't blame them after the Iraq war and everyone getting on a bandwagon of lies including the left, right and center with the exception of Libertarians.
I've read this 3 times and I still don't understand what you're trying to say.
">Gen Z is also more diverse and broadly anti-American (or “anti-imperialist”)
An irony, considering that Russian imperialism is the one that actually performs land grabs and ethnic cleansing without even trying to cover it up."

you should learn about this thing called the 2003 invasion of Iraq, then the Vietnam war, etc.
Has Russia formally declared War on Ukraine, or is it still a Special Military Operation?
What a lazy comment.
Add to the "choose your therapist" idea, the idea that maybe talky therapy alone might not work. Practical activities as a means of therapy recently helped me with my mental illness; specifically, doing outdoor crafts alongside other mental health sufferers, with day-long sessions led by professionals. I learned to whittle and to prune trees, and met new people, and conformed my life to a weekly routine. I felt a great sense of community, and satisfaction from the immediacy of working with wood. The therapy lasted eight weeks, with promise to do more in the future. It was very informal, with a little structured discussion at the start and end of each day, but no pressure to talk in depth about problems. The course has helped me more than talking with a doctor or trying CBT (cognitive behavioural therapy). It was a proper, medically referred course of therapy. I was told it's quite new. I'm in my late 30s, in case you're wondering. I live in the UK. I had been suffering depressive symptoms on top of my existing schizophrenia, feeling very lonely and like life had ended for me. The course reversed that. I recommend trying something practical and creative, with an immediately perceptible result (like whittling), and joining that community; if you haven't already tried. If you can access this through your doctor, then great.
I am the editor of a newsletter called bulletpitch (http://bulletpitch.xyz) We help founders like you get recognized! We have an awesome subscriber network of founders, vc analysts, and angel investors. We pride ourselves in helping founders get noticed (especially those who have great ideas but might not have great visibility.) Feel free to shoot me an email team@bulletpitch.com . Maybe there are some synergies! Hope this helps! -Brett
"If I may, my impression is also that the younger generations don't "get" war. Why would I, ever shoot someone just like me because his/her/xyr government has forced them to point a rifle at me?"

I got that part...
The reporting on the war has been fairly consistent: that Russia initially captured a lot of territory in a rapid advance, but overextended themselves and bogged down. Now they're retreating from much of this territory and are trying to reinforce their forces in Donbas. That narrative seems to be well-supported by reporting, and it also perfectly explains what you observed. Don't think anyone is misleading you.
Thanks for rudely correcting me. It was my understanding that most fracking in the US just doesn't happen or slows down until the barrel reaches a certain price because new wells just don't get drilled.
Being a lawmaker in the current capitalist society doesn’t make you the ruler (see lobbying). I’d say the few that rule are those with large amount of capital and influence, so oligarch is well applied here

Edit: also one of the perks for rulers on the worse regimes (authoritarian regimes, monarchies) is that law is not the same for the few that tule than for the rest, law is definitely not the same from the point of view of this wealth maxers
>People who find this a shocking and objectionable sign of bugs are generally people who have not build software at such large scales.

This leaves such a poor taste in my mouth. Perhaps the proper UX is to then _not display comment counts_ if your performance/cost tradeoff has determined that you can't display comment counts accurately. For higher comment counts it might be fine where a user isn't expected to read all 5000 replies(ignoring the edge case where its 5000 private/blocked accounts replying), but if a tweet has 2 replies then the user who clicks it expects to see those.

Other large platforms have been able to solve this issue either in UX or implementation, so "web scale" isn't a good excuse.
>Honestly, I'd love to hear/read some thoughts as to why dropping sanctions on North Korea would be beneficial to /anyone/ in a real way.

The most obvious benefit would be to the 25 million North Korean people. Lifting of sanctions would allow economic activity alleviating poverty and malnutrition.
This system has a long track record of working pretty well in the real world.

I don't deny there are many unrealistic dreamers on "my" side. But that's endemic across all ideological sides.
Oh, please. Sadhguru is a politician who talk pseudoscience and a tool of current Indian Government.

https://scroll.in/article/927625/opinion-the-disturbing-irra...
The title is backwards. There is a striking generational divide, and it extends into views of war.
What if Twitter employees threaten to leave en-masse? I'd seen some reports that people quit when he became the largest shareholder. It's not outside the realm of possibility.
Eh that's a bit of a different mechanism. If you bootstrap a platform from 0 users with the core concept being a lack of moderation, then you're likely to attract those who have been banned, excluded, or otherwise ostracized from existing platforms. This happens because those who support lack of moderation but still have a choice to remain are likely to remain on the existing platforms due to network effects.

Whereas if you start with the popular platform and progressively remove moderation, you end up with different effects, because you still have the core, non-bad-actor population. That is, if your signal-to-noise ratio goes down, but the absolute amount of interaction with your platform increases, it may still be worth it.
Arizona will sell you as many cans as you want, and as many as they can supply, at their asking price.

Their overhead costs per unit decrease as a company grows.

The increase as you travel right on a supply curve represents the entry of more participants offering supply. You can think of a supply demand curve like a bunch of dots, representing different suppliers asking prices.

Imagine you’re graphing a bid/offer spread chart for a stock. Arizona’s product offering is a single “offer”.
I think the heatsink and platform it is on are moving horizontally and the blade only moves vertically.
https://www.thepostil.com/the-military-situation-in-the-ukra...

The dramatic developments we are witnessing today have causes that we knew about but refused to see:

on the strategic level, the expansion of NATO (which we have not dealt with here);
on the political level, the Western refusal to implement the Minsk Agreements;
and operationally, the continuous and repeated attacks on the civilian population of the Donbass over the past years and the dramatic increase in late February 2022.
Start a VC fund. Raise a 100mil fund and pay yourself 2 percent.
You can likely just ask them, but either way I saw their methods plainly advertised when I went looking for an online therapist in early 2021.
I read this differently. It sounds like Amazon is saying that they consider recent inflation of >=5% to be permanent.

Our actual YoY inflation is significantly higher than 5%, so this does not sound like an excuse to pass off a temporary increase to my ears.
> YT and Google video search are too focused on who creates the content

Correct - YouTube's feature roadmap is driven by monetization, which is in turn driven by monetizing attention through advertising. How often do you search directly for videos? I just looked through my recent YouTube search queries; 70% of the searches are for channels/content producers. Compounding that, most of my time in YouTube is spent consuming their recommendations rather than directly seeking content. So even during the rare times when I use YouTube search, it's usually not for specific video content.

The types of queries you're describing are better served by text. Perhaps a mix of both text and video content.
A can of Arizona is about twice the volume of a normal can (680ml vs 355ml)
Holding a volatile and risky asset implies that the holder thinks there is a significant win available to offset the costs of the risks. It's reasonable to assume that projected price is far above market.
Perversely, the government doesn't need to spend the tax money. The government can create money for whatever it wants. It can also simply destroy money, to fight inflation and/or the yawning wealth gap.
I just want a good column based gnome file browser like MacOS' finder.

Although sometimes it feels like I'm one of very few who use column view.
Why does everyone think Elon Musk wants zero moderation? He always talks about free speech, not zero moderation. There’s an important difference.
GGP said the price is only determined by how much people are willing to pay. This is obviously false. If the cost of producing a product rises above the current price, even if the price people are willing to pay doesn't change, the price has to increase or else the business will start losing money.
Like I said, the discussions you're referring to are still out there. They're still happening — right now, as we speak. You're free to go join in on them. Nothing is stopping the vast majority of people who are talking about these things. Most such users, turns out, do not violate the terms of service.
You're probably right, and it's strange to me that Russia's utter intolerance of anything LGBT is not a factor in people deciding who to support.
Pretty sure it is human judges that enforce the licenses, not computers.
Just a guess but probably saw lots of friends abuse special-k ( as did I ) and saw what it did to them while they were on it.

I think therapeutic ketamine is a different beast.

This is all speculation.
This is a very condescending view of Young Americans. I think any analysis that does not start with an economic analysis of Americans today vs Americans 40 years ago is bound to end up on these soft attributes of "ideals and generosity".

It's abundantly clear for any Young American, that there is no upside to war. If American maintains her dominance, then they are still suffering under a gerontocracy and growing wealth inequality. What person would risk nuclear war for the privilege to struggle to pay rent every month? Likewise, the risk of a Sino-Russian alliance only effects those who stand to extract rent from "democratic" countries (in the form of foreign ownership). If capital is increasingly owned by a small few, why should Young Americans care if their oligarchs are American or Chinese?

I think most Young Americans don't have the luxury of wondering about power competition especially since so many of them don't have a stake in the game. It's hard to convince people the effects of what Russian oil dominance will have where they deal with much more pressing survival issues that are a lot closer to them.
follow what you love...the rest will come
Year of the Grind (2021 Retrospective)
> Peace is the natural human condition in small groups.

I don’t think this is true. I read Sapiens by Harari and he presents lots of info on how early man, living in small groups was very violent. With gravesites from the time showing violent deaths at young ages.

I romantically would like to think this but believe the reality is that humans are violent and it’s large civilizations with complicated rule of law and interdependency is the reason for peace. Sort of the Leviathan argument that humans are evil and it’s a struggle to overcome and improve on that nature.

Although I hope that one day this changes and we eventually evolve to be more peaceful.

Evolutionarily speaking I think violence was too much of a shortcut to survival so mammals evolved against peace.
The difference isn't that many more are supporting Russia. The difference is that many more don't have clear-cut sympathy for any side.

I personally are much more sympathetic to Ukraine on different principles than most, but I definitely understand why many are not willing to trust the main media line on this. We went from hearing about how Ukraine was a deeply corrupt country, barely a democracy, to immediately hearing about how they are only being attacked because of how democratic and amazing it is and that Putin is scared Russians will want to live like Ukrainians. Media started glossing over Nazi imagery on the very pictures of soldiers they spread, not even mentioning it. There were many more narrative flips that I won't get into as a matter of time.

Because of this, people that are less informed or that have a more traditional understanding of the morality of conflict will naturally get skeptical and decide that they don't want to sympathize with anyone.
The economic shock hitting the housing market is starting to do some damage
I was one of those people who was hesitant to jump on the cloud bandwagon as a personal user, I didn't trust it. I didn't foresee the random account closings, but I file them under "service interruptions I can't predict". I don't own a business, but if I did I'd strongly question every attempt to give up control. There is nothing worse than having your business threatened by some crazy algorithm that won't stop banning you for who knows what obscure reason, or whatever the next thing will be in a few years. It's obviously an unaccounted for risk and it should be handled as one. If my business depends on it and I can't reposition fast enough, it could be disastrous.

I also distrust "free". If I'm not signing a contract, I have to assume I don't have any real recourse if something random like this happens.
Yeah we need an inheritance tax to subsidize the lifestyles of young folks who want to be artists lol
Maps of territory are a terrible way of showing ANY political conflict.

It's the same as the maps of county-by-county US election results that show a sea of red that equate to a population smaller than LA county.

People are the important unit in political conflicts and Russia is very much struggling to take any meaningfully populated area (See: Chernobyl, a place where sane humans refuse to go, being one of the first trophies)
But fox news is telling them that it's okay for Russia to genocide Ukraine?
I’m curious what you dislike about the macOS Finder.

I like it to the point that if I need to organize a bunch of files, I’ll sometimes just export the folder as a file share so I can organize the files from a Mac over the network.
What he did today is thousand times better than shelling money behind the charity that many billionaires doing. Under Elon twitter can enable true "freedom of expression." Parag's one sided stand to enable woke culture, and board's support to that clearly showing how extreme right mindset they have when running this company. Today we can't hear the voice of other side on this platform, they are either shutdown or suspended even if you are former prez https://twitter.com/jack/status/651003891153108997
> I did at least think war reporting would be rather accurate.

I can't imagine why. There are massive disinformation campaigns and only a psychopath could be an impartial observer while watching two sides kill each other.

The "fog of war" is hard to penetrate for anyone, from reporters to combatants.
Sure, which the US didn't oppose as a matter of principle but as a matter of empire.
I have been a 'serial entrepreneur' for my entire career. The experience has changed many times, with being a principle in a new venture, to being a hire at a more mature startup, to being a consultant at my own company. Back and forth many times.

Its a journey, not a destination. I suggest that the burn-out feeling, the impostor feeling, the whats-it-all-for depression, are symptoms it's time to change. None are 'true' in that they are temporary.

Heck, teach at a junior college for a semester or two, be with young people full of idealism. It's a tonic.

I hope you find a path forward.
>This isn't "let's hear both sides" it's "this will get really nasty if we pull the old so-i-started-blasting strategy."

It already is really nasty. Ask the people of Bucha. I think my overall point here is that the war has already begun, and we in the West are sticking our heads in the sand and praying for it to go away. History shows that evil men will stop at nothing short of a forced hand. And any talk of negotiation with Russia at this point sounds painfully like "peace in our time". There is no "choice" to avoid this conflict anymore. I wish to god that there was. But that choice was made 20 years ago when Ukraine was alienated from NATO. Our only option now is to accept the reality of our state of war with Russia, or to sit by and watch them win.
I can't remember a time in my life when war reporting was accurate.

I do find it interesting, though, that the media is willing to show the civilian casualties of this war, when there was a practical media blackout on the same type of reporting of the wars in Iraq or Afghanistan.
Someone can do a basic quantitative analysis. He started buying March 1 (?) I believe. This date is public in last filing. You can estimate the historical beta, and get TWTR return and market return in March.

My quick analysis was that in the absence of any other news, his buying really had no serious impact.
Oh is it now? I'm so happy for you and your harmonious family.
I have an outsider view actually.

You might think it’s cheesy to warn about autocrats and attacks on democracy but I happen to think that’s very important.

I wasn’t aware that there weren’t actually 4 deaths so my bad. I guess the whole episode is a nothingburger since only one person got actually killed there?

Or would you care to respond to any of the other points?
Depending on how you measure it, the first concerns over global warming and the "greenhouse effect" were penned what is already over 100 years ago (though regarding coal, not gasoline), and scientists have been aware of the growing magnitude of the issue for around half a century.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_climate_change_scie...
The file picker isn't Nautilus; it's GTK. It's all library code, usually running in the same application.

One nice effect of applications moving to FileChooserNative (which they need to do if they want to be sandboxed nicely) is that for newer applications we can have that file chooser in a separate application (with broader permissions).

But even so, right now it's just the GTK file chooser in a separate application. In the future, Nautilus will be able to provide the file chooser, but that future hasn't arrived quite yet. Someone needs to build a file chooser mode for Nautilus, and someone needs to add a little more plumbing to xdg-desktop-portal so it knows how to deal with an application like Nautilus providing a default file chooser. But it will be much better, in part because the preview code will all be in one place :)