skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
In the same way you shouldn’t claim to speak for all homeless.
It's because photoresist is sensitive to deep blue out to UV so you want to avoid that kind of light as wafers with photoresist applied but not-yet-exposed are running around in their robotic FOUPs through the facility.

It's exactly analogous to red safe lights used for film print photography.
It sounds like you want [nvAlt](https://brettterpstra.com/projects/nvalt/) pointed at a synced directory of text files.
Actually, the idea that I so can easily launch a full browser in context is what has me wanting to give this a shot.

I would love a less cluttered and less resource intensive web experience. I also know is unrealistic in 2022 to have a normal day of browser activity without needing JavaScript and / or CSS.

If I can use a text browser much of the time and easily switch to a full browser only when I need it, that sounds like the best of both worlds. Lots of what I browse would likely be even nicer text only. This very site comes to mind.
Especially since Amtrak (aside from the NE regional line) doesn't provide any service that Greyhound or Megabus don't already provide.
Exactly! And the fact that I found GP comment, which is discussing this in good faith flagged and dead, proves the point being made.
I would guess that nuclear power plants are one of the first pieces of infrastructure to be targeted in the event of a NATO-Russia nuclear war. The reasons why nuclear power plants are less likely to be attacked in a conventional war don't really apply in that case. And you wouldn't even need to waste a nuke on it; a conventional warhead would do the job just as well.

Solar, yeah, I suppose losing ~50% of your output capacity is not awesome. But better to be operating at 50% than to be destroyed completely.
The best swipe-typing I've ever used was on my Windows phone of five or six years ago. GBoard is so-so, Apple's is terrible, and--what's really odd to my mind--SwiftKey is pretty bad, too, despite belonging to the same company behind Windows Phone.
If such a thing was possible we'd be the first to roll it out. DDoS is a scourge which is why we made DDoS mitigation unmetered on all plans including free: https://blog.cloudflare.com/unmetered-mitigation/
The problem is that he has way more influence in the world than you or I due to his status, money, connections, etc. The amount of harm resulting from him being in an echo chamber is much larger, especially since he actively posts in order to influence large amounts of people.

People judging you for your blocking is one of the prices you're socially expected to pay in return for those privileges.
Same with my cat as well! I am not sure she gets the mirror exactly; but Shem sometimes will watch us through it, otherwise just ignores it. She is never troubled by them.
I find these "the same people who argue for/against X are the same people who argue for/against Y" comments odd. Do you have a specific example of this outside of politicians*, or are you lumping everyone in camps X and Y together without proof of significant overlap?

*Politicians don't start from "I believe X/Y, let's do something about it." They start from "How do I get my voters agitated and eager to vote for me, and what position should I take on controversial issues X/Y during an election year to achieve this goal?" Politics/electioneering is showmanship first. Silly things like real personal political beliefs only get in the way of politicians' end goal of power.
We’re giving people those spaces in Europe and it’s a massive improvement for both city people and the addicted. Please open your mind.
I think what's missed is that most of the extreme, even if common, cases of people demanding heretics be punished, are really just trolling. Trolls are continually pushing the boundaries, and institutions are afraid to stand up to them for fear or being labeled heretical (ironically) so we have this feedback of more and more ridiculous stuff that nobody actually believes becoming mainstream. By fighting it the way PG is, it (trolling) gets legitimized. Feeding the trolls doesn't work, we need to to better to collectively tune them out, picking a fight with them puts you in their territory and you've already lost.
Those two stations are 215 miles apart by car, and the trip takes 4 hours by train. The train is only averaging 53mph.

I don't think its popularity is a reasonable predictor of demand for a modern train that would be 3-4 times faster.

I'd wager if all the other competitors were also running with tech typical of the 1920's, the train would be more popular.
> The HN ethos has one rule: Each level of comments shall disagree with the level before it, with the article counting as level 0.

this doesn't sound right.
Tell HN: Startups harvesting GitHub commit emails for marketing purposes
I recently received an starting like this:

> Hi fouric,

> I found your email from one of your GitHub repository while checking for a solution.

> Being in the software engineering industry, I am reaching out for your valuable inputs on our product called "Language Lens" [...]

The email attached to my GitHub account isn't exposed in my profile - the only way this individual would have gotten my email from GitHub would have been too scrape my commit messages.

Needless to say, I didn't request or consent to this.

All y'all might want to make sure that the email attached to your commits is something you're not afraid to receive spam like this at.
I don’t know anything about their company, but I imagine there’s a team of developers out there having one of their worst weeks ever, with customers screaming in the managers ears and managers throwing it back at the technical crew. A summary later on of why a multi day outage happened would be interesting.
All of this to say, if Russia hadn’t invaded, Germany and Europe would be moving right along with buying Russian gas.

The problem with this theory is this idea that somehow an EU-aligned Ukraine represents a threat to Russia or Russian energy. It doesn’t. All the foreign interference in the world is irrelevant.

The truth of the matter is that Putin thought that gas supplies to Europe were a sufficient bargaining chip to prevent the EU and an in-fighting United States (thanks China/Russia/Iran, appreciate the taste of our own medicine) from acting while he took over a resource rich and to Putin, historically important Ukraine. Putin tells you this. He wrote about it and has talked about it endlessly. There is no mystery here. No grand “foreign interference” conspiracy. The US has no reason to care if Russia supplies energy to Europe except to the extent that Russia then goes on to cause chaos and trouble elsewhere. This is evident by the actions of the US which have been appeasement after appeasement.
https://edbrowse.org/ does support js and is 100% command line - but it's really closer to ed than it is vim in terms of user experience...
> Really? He can’t think of a statement that is racist when a white person says it and not a black person?

He can't think of a statement that is false when a white person says it and true when a black person says it (or vice versa).
> I also am not aware of any that doesn’t.

Can you give an example of CPython, or GCC/clang autocorrecting a parse error?
This.

If a job description says “must have custom designed resume”, that’s a hint not to apply. If I submit a standard resume and get rejected because “must have custom designed resume” is an undisclosed bar I was expected to clear, I just dodged a bullet.

I prefer jobs where the hiring focus is on hiring people who are good at the job, and using weird side challenges like “is your resume formatted uniquely enough” is a new variant of “not a culture fit” that I hadn’t heard before.
+1 Confirmed. I'm Latino and "bad name" came to mind when I saw the HN entry. Good luck with your project.
How do you even reconcile time between locations that far apart? Syncing your system clock with an off-planet NTP server will be.. problematic.
She's a professor and aims to be a public intellectual; she's written a book. I really think this in and of itself is invitation for dialogue. Also, our relationship was been fine talking about politics when I agreed with her, but any disagreement was treated as hostile/moral failure on my part. I'm really pretty good at listening and being respectful; these sorts of failure modes in communication in my life have come exclusively with dedicated self-identified activists.
Cheap reliable last mile internet. The core and edge is solved.

Around 37 percent of the world's population (2.9 billion people) have never used the Internet (1 in 3 people), per the UN’s 2021 report on the topic.

https://www.itu.int/en/mediacentre/Pages/PR-2021-11-29-Facts...
Interesting how he chose to name nothing except anti-vaxxing.

Body autonomy is incredibly important.

But when people start ranting about anti-vaxxers that concept doesn't even enter their little heads. It's never I understand their rights and how important that is, but...

Because any complex thoughts on the issue are heresy.
I have taken to referring to everyone as "they". It's much easier than trying to remember individual pronouns for everyone. It doesn't really seem reasonable to me for people to be bothered by this. Your view is that people must refer to your gender when speaking about you?
> That's the obvious violation of First Amendment: government cannot use force to dictate what you say.

Laws around hate speech and defamation seem to contradict you.
I don't read that as saying a teacher can't say "men can be married" -- that isn't a discussion of sexual orientation. If I prohibit talking about atoms, I am not prohibiting talking about every physical object. I am prohibiting talk about the explicit concept of atoms.

Likewise here, how I read this is straightforward: explicit discussion of sexual orientation, ie., which genders/sexes people are sexually attracted to; must only occur from c. 8/9yo+.

Ditto for gender identity. That a person's born physical sex may deviate from their perceived sexual identity -- discussions about that don't seem all that urgent below 9yo.

The issue the bill seems to be addressing isn't mentioning that people are gay, are married as gay etc -- the issue is in having discussions about anyone's sexual preference "too early" with children. I think even saying "X person is trans" in classroom isn't forbidden -- rather just making "trans" or "gay" (or "straight") a topic of discussion.

The bill is a direct response to rare, but noted occurrences of teachers giving very young children lessons from highly controversial books on gender and sexuality at ages where those children are not being taught these subjects -- but necessarily, rather, being encouraged to accept (controversial) conclusions about them.

We arent talking about educating 5yos on the nature of sexuality. They don't have enough experiences and development to discuss this.
> In short, there's no need to conjure up an illuminati when you have all of the various standard fallacies of human thinking to work with.

You definitely don't need an Illuminati-esque mastermind when the participants in the system have similar goals, motivations, and capabilities. In retrospect an event might look coordinated but really it's just an aggregate of every participant acting entirely independently but according to similar constraints.
Maybe you could you make it so people can add a place. I guess upload to youtube, geo-tag it. It would be fun to get to add your place to the game.

I would like to try with a VR headset
"Women are less capable than men" is sexist; "The majority of women are physically and mentally incapable of running a Fortune 500 company" is a neutral hypothesis that can be asserted with anecdotal evidence, sociological studies, and if modern corporate leadership wasn't silent on the issue, there would also likely be firsthand testimony. <--- heresy
But on the other hand, you could likely present evidence to the contrary. The comparison of the opposing evidence, and the careful scrutiny of the facts that provide that evidence, is the most truthful approach to the question.

For the record, the commenter above who casually states that "most women can't run Fortune 500 companies because most men can't either" <---THAT is sexist
I'm not talking about directly ingame. People sell their accounts, items, and gold to others frequently.

You either buy the whole account or you buy it and then they send you the gold/item ingame.

There's a lot of communities, forums, and even businesses that revolve around it. It's a huge market.

Many games it's not technically banned, just not supported due to payment processors not allowing it.

Some games it may be against the rules, but it's hard to enforce.

https://www.g2g.com/

https://mmoauctions.com/

https://www.mmogah.com/

https://www.mmobux.com/

https://odealo.com/

There's hundreds of sites like that, some for niche games, some more general.
Unlike Hitler, Stalin did not use the word "race", but he acted identically against various population groups distinguished by their nationality, which is why I have used the word "race", to emphasize their identical behavior.

Just a couple of examples of the nationalities which were removed from the territories now in Ukraine, sent to remote areas, e.g. in Siberia or Uzbekistan, and replaced with Russians are the Tatars and the Romanians.

> Now you're just repeating Putin's own words — "Ukraine was created by Soviet Russia".

You have either misunderstood or you pretend to have misunderstood what I have said. You said that Ukraine is divided now, I said that this division mentioned by you was created by Stalin, not so long ago.

I have used the word "natives", because the natives are mostly Ukrainians but also many other minorities.

> They are two branches of the same group of people

The fact that one millennium ago their ancestors were a single people means nothing when today they do not treat each other as equals.

During the Soviet Union, those belonging to a minority, either Ukrainian or any other minority, could indeed have similar career advancement opportunities like the Russians, but only with the following conditions: master the official Russian language, never express any doubt about the bullshit history that was taught in the Soviet Union, according to which everything good in the world, in any art, science, technology and even sports, has been discovered or invented by some unknown great Russian, even if the Imperialists claim otherwise (at least this was the version of history that I have seen in the Russian manuals used prior to 1970, I do not know if the later manuals became less fantastic), never say anything that would show lack of agreement with the idea that even if the Soviet Union had a very large number of nationalities, all with equal rights, the Russians deserve to be much more equal and they must always be imitated in everything, as they know better, from political and economical organization to science and technology and even in minor aspects, e.g. the names of the soccer teams.

Basically, in the Soviet Union anyone belonging to a minority could indeed have the same success like a Russian, but by becoming a Russian.

Regarding my understanding of Ukraine's history I can assure you that I know much more correct facts than you presume, and not from secondary sources, but from direct sources, because my mother had many relatives who were deported to Siberia, robbed or murdered by Russians, in territories of the present Ukraine.

Also, I understand very well Russian so I form my opinion about the actions of Russia mainly by looking at what they themselves say, and not by what others say about Russia.
> perceived stability

This is begging the question, though. I'll bet that the average company can't maintain the same uptime as a cloud solution, even with high-profile one-week outages like these.

> as soon as you switch platform

Implying that companies don't switch platforms when they have on-prem installations.

> I have systems in production that nobody touched for half decade

But that's apples and oranges. The comparison isn't Atlassian Cloud vs. your undefined production system, it's Atlassian Cloud vs. Atlassian On-prem (or $PLANNING_SOFTWARE_OF_CHOICE).
Sexual orientation is about sex, it's literally in the name. It's quite pathological to sexualize classroom discussion in early grades, there's no possible educational purpose and the kids cannot be expected to be able to understand and relate to that sort of discussion like an adult would.
Strange article. Another taking an absolute position in a grey world. “Math” is a spectrum for which everybody essentially can be in the centre left. Quantum chemists approximate the hell out of quantum physics as it’s not necessary and simplifies math. Every other type of chemist pretty much ignores as much calculus as possible as it’s not relevant to their work. Etc.

Arithmetic is fundamental and necessary. Algebra is probably fundamental to stem fields. Everything beyond that is quite limited and discipline specific. And I doubt it’s discussed much in the companies HN readers inhabit.
Amtrak has an extensive bus line to extend their reach - and they can't sell you a ticket on it unless it includes a train segment.
My reply was entirely unambiguous, as you only made a single claim in the comment I replied to, which was that Chrome users on iOS do not have the ability to block ads.

But, in classic HN tradition, you choose to put me at fault for your inability to understand how you represented your own train of thought.
Some languages are more redundant than others. I remember at least one Ada compiler that would make an assumption about what you meant, correct the internal representation, and keep going. It would fail with an error, but still allowed one to push further through the compilation process. This was a big help given how slow the compilers were.
Another thing I have found related to heresy is that the strongest accusations of heresy often involve ideas and statements that are the most difficult to argue against.
Recently, I was involved in a workplace conversation about how the org had a certain gender/racial proportional makeup and there was a goal of those diversity numbers being different within a specified timeframe. I suggested that this implied bias, and was warned that what I said might offend people. I think this was because I said something fairly rational and it would have been difficult to argue against in rational terms. Along these lines, the calls to cancel Dave Chappelle for example are largely because he has made some good points.
What about the Benecia-Martinez bridge? Sometimes the capitol corridor train gets stuck there because a container ship has to pass under it.

None of this infrastructure was well planned, it was all adapted to hundred year old rail lines with very low capacity in mind. I ride the Amtrak regularly and it's basically half empty most the time. Nothing to do with covid either.

All that to say, the freight is probably more important.
Issue with creating money "at interest" is the interest is never created. This has facilitated all sorts of exploitation over the last 4, 500 years. Slavery, large wars, exploitive business practices, resource extraction, fossil fuels are all encouraged by this need to grab more than is there.
That's sad, he was highly revered by colleagues and feared by students. Nix originated under his supervision iirc.
Some say it is their way of showing appreciation.
There is an OCEAN of difference between saying what this article is saying and being okay with the recent wave of anti-trans/anti-LGBT conservatism in the US.

Someone saying that "teaching about sexuality is akin to grooming" is clearly telling a lie. If someone gets shit for it, then the hubbub/cancellation is definitely not taking priority over the question of truth or falsity.

Heck, if anything, the anti-trans/anti-LGBT conservatism you're referring to also falls into the same issue: it's also bullshit "Heresy" that people use to punish others over truth.
Markdown format in a SQLite database, and there’s a command line client to script it if you like. Joplin is excellent.
Agreed on the individual side. It's a response to decision fatigue. You cannot effectively understand every individual, their opinions and intentions, while scaling your personal "social network" up to thousands of people. So instead you apply a label and move on.

But "modern discourse just can't scale" is a bit of a defeatist mindset. Surly there is a solution out there for reducing polarization.
New Chinese GPU Maker Moore Threads Unveils the MTT S60 GPU
I think this is largely a social media phenomenon. Twitter flash mobs can destroy people’s lives in a vary offhanded, drive-by fashion simply because people with actual power are scared of them and capitulate to unreasonable demands. But if you talk with people in real life, you’ll find much more nuanced thinking and willingness to engage in open-minded debate. The problem is giving too much attention to extremist views.
For comparison, the Elizabeth line (Crossrail) under London will launch with 12 trains per hour (one every five minutes) and will eventually go to 24 trains per hour during peaks. CSX says 8-10 through trains per day use this route, plus 1-3 "coal and grain" trains and "numerous" local services. The reported scarcity of trains on the stream matches this.

Now of course much of the route Amtrak wants to use is single track, which is especially a problem for freight trains since they're so long that only very long purpose made sidings can possibly allow them to pass. But on the other hand it's also notable that CSX insists daytime is "peak" for freight and that doesn't make much sense. Since passengers mostly want to travel in daytime, it makes sense to shift freight to the night, not schedule all the freight for daytime and then insist that passengers be re-scheduled instead.
One of my cats observed my partner turning a doorknob on the bedroom door and subsequently started jumping and pawing the doorknob when the door was closed and they wanted in. No question that if it was a handle-type knob he’d have gotten in.
We should all strive to keep an open mind, especially to ideas contrary to our own.

But it’s not easy, because every group, in every society, organically develops its own heresies – things you cannot say without consequences.

For example, here are some heresies common in the Silicon Valley startup community:

* Heresy: “Government regulations are, on the whole, a net force for the good of humanity.”

* Heresy: “All entrepreneurs in the US owe much their success to past government spending on infrastructure and education, so they should be personally taxed at high rates to repay their enormous debt to society.”

* Heresy: “High redistribution of wealth via government spending is necessary for sustaining economic growth.”

* Heresy: “Silicon Valley is an exclusionary club, not a meritocracy.”

Proclaiming any of these things, say, at a dinner party with startup CEOs, is socially equivalent to jumping on top of the table, pulling your pants down, and passing gas. In fact, the latter may be more socially acceptable -- it's less threatening to the startup zeitgeist.