skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
No matter if you're correct or not, we (society) should really push that narrative.

"HIGHSUN: Your way to personal success through highly skilled, non-naive good faith communication"

also sounds like a great title for a self-help bestseller ;)
I think there is also an extra scope embedded in the `for`. So enclosing it would be closer:

{
int i = 0;
while(i < 10)
i++;
}
> Must be in the air

Ha. The famous E6B flight computer is a circular slide rule.

Edit: it's mentioned in the video.
There's mention of the possibility to self host 1password sync, but I can only find a current survey by agilebits to determine if they should implement it.
Anyone know if this is already possible or can provide more info on the status?
> Attacking him for going on Tucker Carlson is a typical bad faith smear used against him and many others. CNN and MSNBC won't have him on despite him being willing to interview. Why must people only go on shows that are on "their side"? That's propaganda, not journalism.

Hold on, I did not say he shouldn't be going on Fox news or TC. However going to Fox news and calling NYT biased left wing media of the "rich elite", without any criticism towards Fox news, their ownership and agenda is not engaging in a good faith debate.

> Every journalist has a particular topic and audience that they focus on. His topic and audience is around waking up left wingers to the bad behavior of the "their own side". This topic is almost completely unaddressed amongst the left.

So do you believe that going to Fox news and essentially repeating their talking points is a good way of "waking up the left"? I mean the audience he is trying to address is not really listening there is it? Also why not take the opportunity to also engage critically with Fox?

>To attack the right would be singing to the choir, and also be part of the choir, because 99% of the rest of left wing media already focus all their effort on "the other side". Do you not think it's a waste of time to convince the left that trump and fox are bad?

I find the notion that any media in the US is left completely alien. I mean the NYT would maybe considered centre right in most of Europe.

> The fact is that most media are just cheerleaders for team red or team blue. Glenn is not a cheerleader, and thus not an establishment mouthpiece, and so he gets smeared by people like you.

I find it ironic that in a discussion about bad faith communication, you call my criticising Glenn as smearing? Where did I attack his character? I think what he is doing is not constructive, and I explained why I think that is the case.
Pebble failed because the big players seen this massive market, came in and made much better products. End of story.
Nice up-to-date collection. I'm tired of finding old lists like this
but filled with legacy, unmaintained programs.

> "Be careful when installing unfamiliar browser add-ons, since some
can compromise your security and privacy."

I like these little interjections to explain things for beginners.

In this case though, I wonder what code auditing/verification is in
place to support such a statement:

> "At the time of writing, the above list were all open source,
verified and 'safe'"
> Where there is enough population density and 'right of way' for trains, trains almost always make sense.

You will come really close to that if you build a road that has the same level of right of way, and drive buses. The benefit of (expensive) bridges and tunnels are not unique for trains. Some of the subway trains in Paris run on rubber tires.
Now how can we get the all-buying eye of the Garmin acquisition strategy team to look in that direction?

If Memfault ever want to end the standalone external tool supplier gambit and return to being in-house expertise, sounds like they could be very useful there. Not because Garmin's BT is so terrible (it has improved a lot but still far from perfect), but because Garmin seems to be the smallest living company that still builds their own stack down to the lower levels instead of hitching a ride on something like an Android fork.
My first Mac was the first Intel iMac. OSX Tiger was better than Windows XP. Expose felt better than the alt tab of xp- and more fun. And Tiger pushed to have windows take up the space of their contents rather than the whole screen, so most windows were visible on screen all the time making switching between them easier.

In the time since, I brought another iMac and had 2 work MBPs.

In that time, MacOS got worse. It now wants to make windows full screen. Mission control is awkward if you use an ordinary mouse.

My workflow has changed. I'm more likely to have 2 windows of every app- 2 vscode windows, 2 terminal windows and 2 browser windows. As stated many times over, MacOS handles switching between those configuration of windows badly (and I gave it plenty of time to become intuitive).

I now use the Gnome desktop. I have windows that snap. I have alt tab that cycles through windows (it needs configuring). And it has an Expose like effect (gnome overview).

I feel like I have the best of all worlds.
Great window management.
Great hardware support (none of the MBPs supported daisy chaining my displays).
The Linux command line.
The same apps I'd be using on any other OS.
It probably has a cheap camera with transmitter so that operator can se where the drone is flying and a dslr to capture high quality photos for further intelligence gathering.
It is, but sometimes it's difficult even when you're trying; and of course, not everybody is reasonable.
I tried getting high on binaural beats so you don’t have to
Modern stupidity at its finest, a point of no return was achieved
I wouldn't say I'd rather anything. But it's an odd phrasing that I didn't see people using very often until a couple of years ago. I see it on Twitter bios too.
hm.. I wonder which clip model they'll use. A big part of what makes DALLE-2 so good is the unreleased huge clip model. To train the diffusion prior they may need to first replicate this clip model.
It's an obvious bad faith question. Parent poster has a well-rehearsed little shpiel to unload on "why Russia wants Crimea", it's in their comment history multiple times. They're not curious in the slightest, they're prompting a bogus talking point.
They are not showing how the rest of the thing works ...
I don't understand why all these people want to disable price signals.

High prices tell you, you have a lack of gas and should consume less and produce more. If you just force them down people will consume more but the incentive to produce more doesn't increase.
Another lesson from Munich etc. is that it might be a good idea to go to violence pre-emptively when it becomes clear someone is communicating in bad faith.
I think we're talking past each other because containerization solutions aren't designed to solve the problem you're talking about. It's just not the target problem domain. That isn't a shortcoming of containerization. If you need zero downtime, there are ways to make that work using additional tooling. I think we may actually agree on that point.
The west has now had time to create a pipeline, so as long as Ukraine doesn't have to accept a ceasefire it can keep all of Russias troops in a hopeless defense of whatever part of the east they can cover. But at least they won't need as much fuel, right?

The Russians should be more concerned that the longer this goes on the more handheld weapons are going to stockpile in Ukraine. What portion will end up traded or given to groups that want a rematch in Syria, Belarus, Chechnya, ..., even if the Ukraine doesn't decide a policy of destabilizing Russia is the easiest road to short term security?
re: Brexit, the "argument" has been poisoned by high level bad actors who pay money to have people and bots go on Twitter to defend their point, who pay for advertising / propaganda campaigns, etc. That goes far beyond some bad faith actors on twitter.

This extends to a lot of politics these days. There are well-financed parties out there whose goal is to destabilize, mainly targeting the US and Europe but I'm sure it happens everywhere. These are the ones behind Trump getting elected, Brexit proceeding even though only 28% of eligible voters voted in favor of it, the referendum being bad for only having two options, and the referendum only being advisory, and countries like Hungary and Poland shifting hard to authoritarian right, breaking with the separation of state and justice.

These forces have the destabilization of post-ww2 unions in mind on the one hand, and people focusing on each other internally instead of internationally on the other. Think things like JK Rowling's trolling, Trump coming out with something that all of twitter and the media pounce on, Reddit brigades.
I’m the opposite, I only work in full screen mode for everything. It’s like a zen mode for every app.
How is this a helpful comment?
CRT are the best displays to this day. Change my mind. I wish there still was more development on that. Yes they were noisy and heavy, but the picture quality! <3
I can’t tell and I’m genuinely asking: are you suggesting we empower government to dispatch force against a private corporation? As in, the imaginary paperwork construct we all agree upon being an actual thing and accordingly empower with agency and a noun and a stock symbol? You want to park an Abrams in front of that thing and aim?

(On reflection, what’s interesting about my question here is how it’s simultaneously metaphorical and literal through absolutely no effort of mine. The idea itself made that happen, rather oddly.)
Because self-driving cars don't get distracted or tired, and they don't get angry either.
It's not foolish. Aldous Huxley explained why in his Ends and Means, more than eighty years ago.

Ends don't justify means. On the contrary, if the only way to achieve some end are nefarious means, it's a very strong signal that the end itself is not as desirable as it seems.

Most times, people sell their souls only to find later that they can't get what they paid for.
There might be only one Pareto Optimal solution, but there can be many Nash Equilibrium solutions.

Also, humans are not 100% rational agents.
Given that the war was meant to capture the capital on day three. By now putin would have expected most of the ruling class to have been disappeared by now and a puppet government almost fully formed, I think yes, its been a cockup.

On paper Russia is supposed to have a massive, effective, overwhelmingly strong army/airforce capable of overrunning any small country on its border.

In this instance, russia chose to invade a country at a time of its choosing, using tactics of its choosing, and has failed to take _all_ of its key objectives.

to put it in perspective, russia has lost ~3x as many tanks as the UK has in _total_ for almost no progress.

So yes, this war, so far, has been botched.
> barring a specific agreement between those two nations.

If every country in the EU agreed that every other country in the EU could impose tariffs on flights between them, then this should work.
Yes, all these "bad faiths" and "good faiths" just add confusion. As is using the word "communication" for unidirectional propagation of information.

The article should go deeper with that MAD line of thought. A step forward is a strategic arms limitation treaty, where all the sides agree to ban the most effective forms of propagation.

The goal would be to put back the steer of our ship into the water, bit by bit.
“Implausible:” Zero deaths in Shanghai’s Covid spike spurs skepticism
How does the operator control the camera? There has to be some sort of on-board computer and an interface between that and the camera.
What's the purpose behind having ctrl, alt and win buttons ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
"Dog pole dancing"
https://imgur.com/a/xht8aPi
> Print-on-demand sellers are selling pure intellectual property.

Well they're selling properly licensed products that use their images that are protected by copyright (and potentially trademark).

The supposedly appropriate response would be to have the ability to sue those that rip them off in exactly the same way that Nike or Chanel or any other manufacturer would.

There may be some liability to the print companies (and perhaps the other companies in the pipeline) for producing product that doesn't have a properly validated copyright on the image. Especially if they are producing in bulk/for general sale to the public.

So it should be in Etsy's interest (and yours, and the print companies) to ensure that what a seller is asking you to produce is not ripped off.
CSIKit: WiFi-based human activity recognition using Raspberry Pi (2020) [pdf]
I have 3 monitors connected to my Windows machine and I have to switch all 3 of them on before logging in or weird things happen. It's only a little bit better on Linux and I don't have a mac to try. I'm actually blaming the modern connectors and how digital inputs are handled, this was never a problem with D-SUB (i.e. you could move the mouse to the empty space where the switched off screen is, but it won't move your icons or your taskbar around...). If there was a global "ignore plug and play for monitors, just assume they are there" I'd use it...
Sure, but this seems more of an observation at the micro level. At the macro level, general positives (intelligence, strength, health) would generally mean more selection in their favor _overall_ wouldn’t it?
‘I was enjoying a life that was ruining the world’
You don’t even have to use the green zoom button. Just double click the top of the window like in every other OS. The difference is that zooming a window is not the same as maximising. It makes the window as big as the content it contains.

Also you can double click the edge of any window to extend it to the edge of the screen.

I really don’t get the obsession for tiling windows personally. It’s not part of my workflow.
You can ignore the "four" and just say "more than one". And that's absolutely not uncommon in work environments.
Good point, worth elaborating on.

That's one of the reasons I started using the word 'dignity' in place
of saying 'privacy' without thinking more. In particular I've found
the phrase "digital dignity" stands in more comfortably in some
conversations with people who are jaded and cynical about privacy [1].

Privacy does not always equate to security nor mean that the user
isn't abused in other ways (indeed many abusers leverage privacy or
shame as a way to hide their abuse)

[1] https://digitalvegan.net
Because giving individuals money, targeted or otherwise, is given/spent to enhance an individual or families life in some way. It is a direct benefit to them.

And yes, SS is absolutely welfare and it is extremely effective. It reduces the poverty rate of the elderly by nearly 30%. It also reduces, directly and indirectly, child and young adult poverty by meaningful amounts as well, 1.5% and 3% respectively.
> We were the first company to work on smartwatches.

A bit of history rewriting going on there...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timex_Datalink
That's just going to lead to blanket allowances, sadly. Path of least resistance and all.
Side by side view, eg. terminal + code editor. Or when I want two finder windows in sort of a total commander fashion, so I can copy/move hundreds of files around and visually inspect the results so I don't accidentally lose anything.
So, how much of this is hardware, and how much software? What’s the minimal hardware you would need, and how powerful a CPU would you need with it? Is this thing close?
Social media companies encourage manufactured outrage by providing controversial and divisive 'extreme' content for "engagement metrics". We know this from the Facebook leaks, court cases and common sense.

The solution to this suggested in this article is to give them more power over individual information by making giving your name and address to the company mandatory. No thank you. I don't think expanding one of the core parts of the problem while annihilating the capability for people in repressive countries to shield themselves is any solution at all.
I'm a decently young person who spends a lot of time on the internet and I don't recognize virtually any of these terms. I would certainly raise an eyebrow if someone used any of these in conversation with me.

Is this actually affecting how any people outside the tiny demographic of "some popular content creators on some social media networks" speak?

People finding creative ways to get around censorship is nothing new, people talked like this to get around chat filters all the time in multiplayer games I played as a kid. I feel like people only think it's interesting now because mystical "algorithms" speak to the imagination
Taiwan Military Issues Civil Defense Handbook [pdf]
Wow that is still a thing? I was there more than 10 years a go. Good old breakcore times.
Static blogs don't have a drawback. Websites should be static unless the content changes more frequently than it takes to build the site. Just go with static.
Ukraine was morally indefensible from the start, as was the Nazi invasion of Europe; with the latter though, they had captured the "hearts and minds" of their own people thanks to over a decade of increasing propaganda. Hitler pulled Germany from an economic downturn post-WW2, and the showy militaristic theming really got people excited. And it still does, but for a much smaller demographic - current-day nazis like the combat boots and flags too.
You can use Chocolatey until WinGet gets some traction. You have everything there and no more clicking around. I haven't started MSI by hand in last 5 years.
The government could have paid the farmer to do no till agriculture instead and mandate that he improve the quality of the land to specified criteria.

>You actually do have to maintain the machines that you aren't using.

Oh no! The dreaded capital depreciation on underutilized capital. Thank god we have created a money system that cannot represent this capital depreciation so we must utilize all capital at 100% (read we must grow the economy at the rate productivity grows).
Why is this? (I'm used to European 'socialized' healthcare). Is it just the amount and type of cover offered by different policies is wide and opaque, the age/health of the employees effects the price/cover?

Aren't there insurance brokers that provide tools to compare simply. Would a system that allowed employees to vote/order the cover they would like in the plan and then you to adjust the price point until you get matching policies that provides an acceptable level of cover.
Try the combination of the article - it is what you want.
Looks like very old news. Although I would say that mailchimp as a company never looked employee friendly so at least for me it's no surprise. Intuit is definitely not an employee friendly company.

My advice is if you're still working for them find a new job.
Apple calls the green button “zoom” in their documentation, but its default function is fullscreen, not zoom.

I've always found that a bit disorienting. I guess Apple just decided that "zoom" is better as a name because it's one short word instead of two.
I really like the effort gov.uk puts on it. IIRC there's a similar thing getting traction in Italy. Why can't we have anything similar in Spain? Some regional governments already have with more or less success but central state services are a complete mess. No consistence at all, and some websites are so badly made that if feels like it was the intent.

AFAIK there isn't a lowest bid system anymore, so why is everything so difficult?

Just imagine being able to worry because some stuff doesn't work with screenreaders...
I think the parent poster meant that if X.509 Name Constraints were widely deployed, Visas CA could be limited to Visa's TLD+1s.
In the same way, government affiliated CAs could be limited to their own country TLDs, or a development CA could be limited to localhost.
>consumers by and large have difficulty discerning whether their croissant sucked because it wasn't stored properly, or because it was just a crappy croissant.

Which is why I said that as long as your name is not on the product, it is just some croissant that the app is selling. I get that this may not be ideal, but what is someone to do to bootstrap a business ? The app maker won't get the "official" deals and contracts until they prove something. This is them proving out their potential.
how do you invent something by seeing it somewhere else? doesnt seeing it somewhere else mean it was invented somewhere else?
I feel bad because I have a crappy job, mostly because they keep me really busy because of the “supply chain crisis” and I can’t slack off as much as I want.
Also probably excusable because 2010, but from that same part of the article:

void swap(int& x, int& y);

void swap(float& x, float& y) {
swap((int&)x, (int&)y);
}

This is UB and may explode. Probably the only portable way to do it is a memcpy() [1].

[1] https://blog.regehr.org/archives/959
No I agree again on a personal level. But on a "global" level I can still be worried about the implications of bad faith communication.

Thanks a lot for the book recommendations. I read the intro you linked and it really piqued my interest.
Usocial: The podcast client and feed reader for your personal server
I pay more than 100% in petrol taxes when I fill my car at $2.50/liter.

Also, CDG-MAD flight isn't really between Paris and Madrid but between CDG and MAD, which have some additional costs associated with transfers (assuming you are actually going beteween the city centers). So to be competitive a train ride might not need to have the flight price exactly, but can be a bot more expensive.

But a sensible policy would be that when trains are more expensive, taxes should be put on flying until they aren't (taxes directed to trains through subsidies, infrastructure investment and so on).
It only makes sense to swap elements of an arrays (lists).
Swapping variable is super rare. I can't recall the same time I had to swap two integers/floats or even object references.
Another problem with `type="number"`, that this blog post does not mention - although for good reason (it's British) - is that different versions of Android will provide either "." or "," decimal pointer, depending on locale or not at all. Some phones - regardless of how much you insist on a comma-locale - would still provide "." as the only option. Eventually, we had to switch to `type="text" inputmode="numeric"` and interpret both "." and "," as a decimal separator. Most people won't bother to enter thousand separators anyway.

These numbers were amounts, i.e. actual numbers, and not text fields with only digits, so `type="number"` doesn't even work for actual numbers, as soon as you move beyond English.
Oh, let me know when I can select text in a photo and copy/paste it (exists by default in macos) or when I can open a PDF and sign it via my touchpad (by default in macos). Or being able to do pretty advanced video editing in iMovie or record a song in GarageBand (not installed by default, but free and one click away). Or that I can force touch a word and a dictionary dialog pops up explaining what it means without me having to select the word and search for it in google.

On the other hand I can't shit+click select multiple files in icon view or reverse the scroll direction of my mouse without a 3rd party app. In general, though, macos offers more out of the box for the enthusiast than windows.