skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I think you're the one who is confused here. The paradox of tolerance was not conceived to describe people who merely hold opinions.

To quote Popper (this is also quoted in the wiki link you posted):

> In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be most unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant.

Which is fair. If someone is going to respond to you by beating and shooting you, you shouldn't have to tolerate them. The justification for the intolerance of the intolerant is that the intolerant use violence to get their way.

But rounding up a mob because someone holds an opinion is not what Popper is describing. It is much closer to hunting down heretics.
Did Plex just kill the streaming media box?
Even with high ping, application layer is probably the wrong place to solve this problem. We'll likely get email working as one of the first problems and be back to correspondence chess and the like. Even Civilization 5/6 works over email.
> When people bring up posts like this they never say what the "heresies" are. People aren't getting "cancelled" for their takes on taxes.

There are plenty of examples of stuff that is way less clearcut "that's bad" than your example. See e.g. David Schor getting fired for retweeting a black professor's paper arguing riots are bad for black political movements.

See also, e.g. a friend ending our friendship because I gently challenged her fat acceptance rhetoric, "Anti-fatness is more toxic to women's bodies than fatness has ever been." At best it's not falsifiable, but really it is just not a realistic statement.

I don't personally spend a lot of time talking to my social milieu - left/liberal about the right, because there's not a lot to say. Watching my immediate vicinity devolve into... whatever you want to call the current moment, is frustrating as hell. The left has a lot of cultural power that the right simply doesn't, and watching it be wielded by fanatics towards ever morphing, questionable goals makes me want to push back.
He was not a bully.

He was short tempered, self-assured and way too aggressive, but not a bully.
Has anyone considered this whole phenomenon from a materialist analysis? Global society is more interconnected than before. The public discourse on social media platforms is huge. It’s also hugely polarized for multitudes of reasons. People (on the Internet) are getting into arguments with more people than ever before, usually with strangers.

From that perspective, canceling/labeling heresy could potentially be thought of simply an act of automation. People identify reoccurring patterns of arguments, classify their adversary, and use a cached response. Thus, instead of spending the costly time and energy to respond to every argument in detail, you tag, use the appropriate function, and move on. And because modern society is so polarized, those functions tend to be fairly absolute- who wants to get dragged into another argument they’ve had before?

The problem is that modern discourse just can’t scale.
Why not have a monitored space to inject drugs right next to the OD meds and counseling services to get people off of drugs?
Similarly, people making a living in "AI" will keep redefining AI to whatever is the capability or around the corner of current "SOTA" systems (which is never quite AI or autonomous driving). Hence the invention of terms such as _full_ autonomous driving and artificial _general_ intelligence.
This guy would have had a field day with python, if he were alive right now
Tweets are speech. They're not some special category of thing separate from human communication. "Person said something inflammatory and people are inflamed" is just how human communication works.
I think you missed the the context here. The "think of the children" line is a cliché used in the West as a backdoor to justify the introduction of oppressive and invasive surveillance measures by governments, and if you try to oppose these measures, you can then be accused of being ok with children being harmed, so in the end there's no way you can win the argument and the surveillance measures are successfully pushed through.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Think_of_the_children
This excuse doesn't hold forever. How many wars must we be lied into, before we start recognizing the lies ahead of time?
strawmen
One example: When I open this page here, in eww all comments have the same left margin and I have no idea what is a reply to what, but with emacs-w3m the nesting structure is visible.
It very likely is well planned genocide. They are actually quite open about it https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/kremlin-editorial-ukraine-iden...

This article is just tip of the iceberg. Genocide mongering as been going on by state controlled media for years.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8RRE2rDw4k
It’s important to read all the parts of the law. The concerning parts are 1/the vagueness of it, and 2/enforceability though a private right of action (instead of having the state enforce it, parents get to sue the schools). It’s a minefield that educators must now trepidatiously tiptoe through. It makes their jobs significantly harder and more stressful.

And for what real benefit, exactly? How is this improving our society in any real way?
You should probably go look at the current state of diagnosis and treatment of gender dysphoria before giving your hot take. If caught and treated early, gender reassignment surgery can work miracles on a child's quality of life. It really shouldn't be seen any differently than other treatable birth defects.
Yes, but the commeter is saying that he's read the bill -- and it actually says nothing about whether you can tell children that men can be married. I personally dont see where it prevents this at all.

As far as I can see, the explicit wording of the bill is just to delay "social sex education" till c. 8/9 years old -- right?
I used Evernote 5-6 years ago. It was a decent product but somehow I lost a note once. I deleted the app and never tried it again. A few months later my wife went through the same experience.

I now use the iOS Notes app. It’s good enough, including the sharing feature.
Everyone demands positive affirmation... that's a nothing burger comment mate.
I feel like 45min to 60min high intensity interval training (HIIT) cardiovascular exercise (e.g. swimming, running, rowing, bicycling, stairs, elliptical, etc) would be cheaper and address a host of other health issues also. Include some compound weight lifting like pull ups, deadlift, squat, bench press, lunges, and core workouts like planks, and I bet outcomes greatly exceed whatever an app can provide.
comment = "This is written in Haxe. " + comment;
This post and all the comments made me realize that in the past I was a bit too hard on juniors, I was always helping and reaching to them but I gave them tasks that may have taken some after-hour work for research.

I think it's because I've also had a rough start and no help from the toxic senior on the team (until that guy left) and now me a junior with ~6 months experience was leading the project but I was overworked and underpaid for some time.

The most important thing that I want from anyone is transparency, I would totally make that one of the pillars of any big organization.
The only “consequences” as I see them with Elon doing what you’ve described is that I’ve had to deal with are people around me kvetching about the dude. Which is a consequence that’s very easy for me to ignore. As easy as it is for me to ignore the dude himself.

I suspect you probably mean more severe “consequences” though.

Would you mind sharing some? Maybe seeing outside my own bubble here will lessen my cynicism
Is the reason it's sexist because it can be interpreted as "women are less capable than men"? You would say this other statement is false and sexist, correct?
Is it true ROM or some kind of EEPROM? A lot of the time what people call ROM is actually writable if you jump through enough hoops.
There is a certain joy in seeing that this submission is presently titled:

[flagged] Heresy
flagged.... lmao
Trolling can be extremely influential if the target holds some logically inconsistent view (which describes much of the urban California politics.)
"aren't worthy of" is distinct from realized actions of the state. If you recall the impulse of the mob during me too was to burn without trial any accused--this sentiment is what I'm talking about.
He blends serious with not serious. He can test ideas and write them off as jokes if he faces a backlash. It's a somewhat interesting strategy.
Indistinguishable from Magic: Manufacturing Modern Computer Chips [video]
It's heretical
So we’ve gone from proof by contradiction to guess on top of guess.

No agenda, right?
Articles that speak in absolutes are opinion pieces that can be safely ignored. So are comments :-). There are good meetings and bad. There are good managers and bad. There are good developers and bad…

Try to do things that advance projects. Try to avoid doing things that hinder projects. Other than the head shed, the role of managers should be enabling their people to get their work done and keep an eye that the correct work is being done.
How many DL people are familiar with dot products and reshapes, and how many are familiar with einsum?
it happens all the time to people of color who get busted for weed in a non-legal state. it’s actually been this way for years in america, a lot of these overextending started from the red scare, terrorism but yeah a large part was based on the war on drugs which largely has been an expensive failure
a species so smart that it manufactured it's own extinction ... it's a bit chilling knowing that the possibility of this happening is not zero.
Unfortunately that problem space is so large (every new line of fibre has how many stakeholders?) that a single individual or organisation might not be able to have any impact here. Which I think is the root of this question.
What would it look like if the US didn't fire back?
Minus the hyperbole/sarcasm with the dollar amounts and time period, yeah - pretty much. Opportunity cost is the primary driver of these moderately profitable but high risk crimes, and the amount you earn from a regular job will steadily shrink when compared to the amount you could earn by stealing 10 miles of chain-link fencing.

I also think that "multi million dollar theft" is a great exaggeration here - the amount stolen appears to be about 500 tonnes. Assuming that 80% of that is pure Iron, the price would actually be about $36,000. It would certainly not be worth doing for someone born in the U.K. with the skills of a tradesman, but it's worth it in India and may be worth it in the future for people over here too.
When I practiced mindfulness meditation, I was incredibly in the moment. Zero distractions.
I think it's ridiculous to think the left has hold of corporate culture. I think a lot of different companies have a lot of different cultures, and I think for the majority of companies the right holds power. I think that tech companies are a major exception to this, in part because it seems that a much larger percentage of queer people are in tech (both directly and indirectly, via companies that support tech)- but if you pick any random company in the US you're going to find a fairly conservative culture.

The only reason I brought up left versus right was because that's the reductionism PG resorted to here. I also think it's a bit more nuanced. I also think focusing on this being a free speech issue, as PG does, is a red herring for other cultural issues.
I don’t think people want to say bad things without consequence. They want to be able to discuss a topic without the rabid tone police descending on it.

Like, I say I cannot understand trans people at all, and people will jump on me because I’m rejecting them and making them feel bad, when I’m just stating a fact.

There’s a lot of this stuff.
Maybe a better analogy would be Russia overtly supporting some popular movement in Mexico.
Hi. After 6 months at a FAANG company during my first performance review my manager said to me “after the first 3 quarters I was going to give you a needs improvement, but since this new projected you’ve completely turned it around”. Several years later I am a senior software engineer at a large respected firm.

Take a deep breath. Treat each project as a clean slate. Ask questions sooner rather then later. Find the parts of the technology stack you enjoy working on. Take notes and write documentation for the next person when someone helps you. Be nice and courteous to people who take the time to share knowledge with you.

And if this doesn’t work out, there’s lot of other places that might be a better fit culturally. You’ll be fine
Here is the code: https://github.com/alexandremcosta/alexandremcosta.github.io...
TOR is slow and unpopular, stuff like that and content addressable protocols like IPFS are probably where the next problems are.
When liberalism, conservatism, and libertarianism have all failed you, perhaps the only path left is communitarianism.
It's not "leave this stuff to family".

It's "you're going to jail if you dare to talk about it".

That's the obvious violation of First Amendment: government cannot use force to dictate what you say.

And this topic is not on the short list of exceptions (threats of violence etc.).

And stepping back: realize you're being played by politicians.

Republicans know well this bill is unconstitutional.

They know there are topics way more important to spend their very limited legislative time on.

But DeSantis is going to run for the president so Republicans are picking fights with stupid bills to whip up their base to vote for them.

Those stupid fights are also distracting you from things that actually matter i.e. how to maintain and increase prosperity of the people.
It's possible to set up a daily reminder system for helping yourself with ah, 'behavioral modification' etc. using Linux and cron:

> "Cron is one of Linux’s most useful tools and a developer favorite because it allows you to run automated commands at specific periods, dates, and intervals using both general-purpose and task-specific scripts. Given that description, you can imagine how system admins use it to automate backup tasks, directory cleaning, notifications, etc."

For example, one could get a cheap Raspberry Pi, set it up as a server on your local network, and use cron to have it send your phone daily email alerts about taking care of yourself on a particular schedule. Hmmm FOSS project?

[Edit re OP question: I wouldn't use pre-packaged apps for this because of the motivation issue. If I build something myself I'm far more likely to use it, because I want some kind of payoff for that original input of effort.]
These kind of "x-ist" statements are fine for things that are overtly x-ist. The problems happen when things are more murky; for example when you start exploring the reasons why there are few women running Fortune-500 companies. If you start shutting down things with "it's x-ist!" then you may never find out the reasons (and by extension, how to do something about them!)

"It's x-ist" is an assertion, as well as an accusations, and not an argument. It's usually much better replaced with "I think this will be bad for group x, because reason y". It has the same effect, and is actually constructive.
Don't imply the Americans in Ukraine are committing war crimes unless you have solid evidence. That's an extremely serious claim to make.
Not even single day, single hour ! (Violent water sloshing mixing marine, freshwater and land life caused by seismic waves rather than the "direct" tsunami.)
My most recent one never bothered with that - intuiting when he wished to play and fulfilling the resulting obligation was my job, and it doesn't do to get too indiscriminately familiar with the help - but he did learn not just what the laser pointer was and looked like, but what the tactile switch under its "on" button sounded like. I liked to sneak the dot up on him when I could, but it very soon became a game of "how quietly can I actuate the switch?" versus "how faint a click can he hear?" - a game I rarely won, especially once he further learned to recognize the distinctive rattle of the batteries moving in the laser pointer case! There are probably bombs easier to defuse than it eventually became to retrieve and activate the laser stealthily enough for the dot to come as a surprise - if nothing else, it was a great opportunity to find out how much I've really learned from a lifetime spent mostly in company with cats.

The thing about tact switches, though, is that they all generally sound quite alike, and he was used to not immediately seeing the dot when he heard one. So, through the latter decade or so of this cat's life, it was quite common for the following sequence of events to play out several times a day:

- I adjust the volume on my phone;

- the cat glances excitedly around the floor, then expectantly at me;

- I hold up the phone for him to see;

- the cat and I simultaneously settle back to what we were doing before.

Confused the hell out of a boyfriend one time.
My cat is the smarter cat ever. It managed to train me very well.
This is actually specified in ISO 8601; they call it the ordinal date.
He's sort of thinking of a phase transition. I imagine it's included as a symptom of how he's visualizing the situation. The idea of a phase transition here makes sense, and I suspect is a fair description of some social phenomenon.
Steinhaus Longimeter Review / How to [video]
I suppose a command line browser could support JavaScript. Of course non trivial to do.
It depends. Science doesn't occur in a vacuum. Change occurs overtime with the experiences of others. No one can do anything independent from the world. In several instances in the world the most meaningful leaps and changes in scientific theory have been when individuals have gone and seen real experiences. Such as nightingale and her contribution to sanitation.

In my opinion, any model that predicts any sort of outcome when doing so accurately is overfitted and lacks the proper contextual knowledge necessary. Should the work of actuarial science be validated as just a series of lists to prove the risk and likely hood of death? Should we all have numbers above our heads dependent on the fate and caste we are born into? These are all things these models ignore and misrepresent. If I was born into a lower middle class black family if no one knew who I was would they care about me? My struggles, my pain? So far all that I've seen are people who would rather choose to mock me. Wearing my clothing, pretending to sing my songs, my struggles. Yet nothing changes, no one cares about me, it's not my problem they say. What my ancestors did is not my fault nor my problem. While some in the scientific community care about these issues, the majority just ignores it. Even today all they care about is what book they need to read in order to follow their identity politics over real system change. Having been forced to live a lie, I can't see how or why others would care without having people who have seen and experienced it themselves. When you exclude more than half the world it really does make you wonder if we are right more than we are wrong.
Big difference between "yes I'll call you Sarah" and "trans women are women".
They say that choice of language doesn't matter, to just pick something you like and dive deep, but one doesn't really know the feel or pitfalls of a language until you dive deep into it for yourself. I think there's something to be said for using the tools that are already with you, like Bash + the Coreutils, BASIC, or C out of necessity, but I've found it easier to become immersed in higher-level and "ideologically opinionated" languages like Python, Ruby, and Lisp.

For me programming was something that started gradually as I became familiar with Bash, until in denial that I was programming at all. Ansible introduced me to Python, Jinja, and YAML, but I still didn't consider what I did to be programming. Scripting, but "I'm no programmer", just in a sysadmin rabbit-hole. I'll have impostor syndrome real bad.

Going back to Bash after working with Python was rough, and I've since delighted in learning new programming languages and paradigms as I solve my problem-of-the-week, gaining a new understanding and appreciation of how people can approach programming each time. The problems are trivial in retrospect, but feel significant at the time- each is an important stepping stone in the broader understanding of computing that I'm developing, as well as an excuse to get sucked into the syntax, ecosystem, and mental model of a new perspective. Perhaps I'll learn to delight in C someday too, but today I've found my stay in Lisp, and look forward to using purer functional languages in the future.

A background, and the perspective it gives a person, is a unique and special thing.
What is the liklihood of the child being confused, mistaken, or later changing their mind? TBH my concern is that liberal parents, excited at the prospect that their little white boy will avoid a lifetime of abuse by transitioning to being a little white girl, will not even preach caution, but will hasten the transition to a better, more protected, identity.
Yes, calling out a group of people an "insane concept" is a form of hostility. The existence of trans people (and children) both at the social and biological (even genetic) level is quite beyond doubt. One might disagree and discuss how to help and live alongside those people, but labeling them an "insane concept" is not a worthy contribution tho this discourse.
> No one had ever considered the juxtaposition of homelessness and wealth in San Francisco until Elon came along.

Yet few of these people have ever considered doing anything about it?
US boomer subs are incredibly stealthy and can operate anywhere in the ocean, including spending much time and effort practicing under arctic ice (see the Ice-X series by SmarterEveryDay). I have no doubt US has the capability to camp subs under the ice, send launch codes via low frequency radio, surface and bring enough hurt to devastate Russia. The ability of Russia to effect a full decapitation first strike is on the order of nil.
Ohhhhhh there's a way! Pure End-To-End SMTP sending and receiving! It involves some pretty interesting tomfoolery using IPSEC tunnels on a pure OpenBSD setup, but even works when you don't have a fixed IP.

https://www.exoticsilicon.com/jay/smtp_via_ipsec_tunnels
The U.S. did not invade Vietnam; it assisted the Republic of Vietnam in its self-defense against the Democratic Republic of Vietnam. North Vietnam was the aggressor.

The U.S. did invade Iraq, using the authority granted in U.N. resolution 678. That was not a crime either, because it was carried out legally.
I've had many cats over the years. They absolutely do understand reflections. I've watched them learning it in real time. Kittens will often try to get behind the mirror, play with the reflection, etc and over time most of them learn it's a reflection or at least not another cat and lose interest. I've frequently seen cats spot movement behind them in a mirror and turn around to investigate further. Makes perfect sense to me considering animals have been seeing their reflections in water for millions of years. It's not like they just recently learned what a reflection is.
Missiles Database
It's a non-crypto company (HyperC) advertising on a crypto organization (Asgardia)'s forum.
https://web.archive.org/web/20220410040030/https://github.co...