skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I really liked the typography for your site! Wish I could take a look at the source code.
Bitcoin Magazine YouTube channel shutdown without warning
I sometimes call Gen Z the troll generation. I feel like they never knew life without Internet and so they naturally choose the most inflammatory answer as default. I heard a survey of Gen Zers that something like half reported themselves as gender non binary. I think it’s more protest than anything
OS 10.15 goes out of support in October anyway
Except for movies and TV shows I watch almost everything at 2x speed and skim when it's too verbose or when I know the subject decently well.

None of that is possible with streams, so I don't. From time to time, I will just explore the stream to see if everyone is working on something interesting (I am trying to get a feel for Rust at the moment)
The capital of Canada (Ottawa) is well within your red zone and I've never heard of any concerns about difficulty building houses.

I think you're just ascribing cause when in fact northern Alberta is just as empty but has no Canadian Shield.
> Given that the AGPL itself uses qualifiers to be a different license from the GPL arguably adding the “with commons clause” is a different name.

Copyright holders aren’t bound by license conditions they impose on others.
From the domain name I confused this with the Zed editor[0] for a second. Despite both being editors written in Rust with zed* domain names, they are different. Really interested in both projects though.

[0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29566960
EDIT:

The website now states:

> Can I use one license on two computers?
> Yes.

What great turn of events, thank you for reconsidering! You have my money. :)

——-

Old post (now incorrect):

> Can I use one license on two computers?
> No. It sucks, but that is the only way to prevent abuse.

The editor looks great, but this sucks to the extent that this won't work for me at all, unfortunately. Parallels' old-school licensing theme meant I'm dropping them as well. This is not about the value of the product or the price itself, $25 seems more than fair if this meets my needs, regardless of open-source alternatives.

I, and I suspect many others, develop on multiple computers, sometimes on a single day. If you worry about "enterprise abuse", perhaps consider a commercial license. Or add a higher priced tier that is per user, not per device. I think (i.e I don't actually know) there's a reason editors such as Sublime Text have per-user licenses (to be fair its price tag is also four times that of Zas Editor).

Are people actually abusing per-user, "honor" licenses that much nowadays? And here I'm thinking about difficult-to-verify customers who are willing to pay in the first place.
> The very things that make Linux powerful and controllable like shared library all over the place, package managers, and more make it more fragile and time consuming to administer.

How is

apt update
apt upgrade

to make ones whole system is up-to-date fragile or cumbersome?

Upgrading to a whole new major version means basically the same, just change repository sources and use apt full-upgrade, one can even continue to work while that's happening - try that on windows..

> did feel like I was in control up until distro maintainers decide things for me and my only choice is to beg and plead and be told to fork it if I disagreed.

Assuming that begging and pleading actually happened for a legitimate reason (sometimes some maintainers can indeed be a bit of an arse, iow., humans are humans); how does that compare to Windows/Microsoft where you cannot even get close to anybody of the team to voice your needs or complaints, at least if you're not friend with one by accident (and seemingly even working there may not even give you the chance)?

IMO that complaint really reads like "it's not 100% perfect, so it's way worse than on the other side, where I cannot even do the same, nor have _any_ power over my system, at all". I'm still just baffled about the different standards that Windows and Linux is held up against.
>The problem isn't guests using your house's network. The problem is that if there's a way for you to network-level block DoH at your own house, then nothing is stopping Comcast or China from implementing the same network-level block.

Fair enough.

But I'd posit that you can't prevent a bad actor who controls your network access from doing whatever the hell they please with/on your traffic, whether you use DoH or not[0].

[0] cf. Transparent TLS proxies ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TLS_termination_proxy )

Edit: Changed prose to actually make sense.
You mean like this?

https://www.shodan.io/search?query=raspberrypi
Haha, though for accuracy the website is named after the Y-combinator which is a combinator in Haskell Curry's system of combinatory logic (not to be confused with combinatorial [digital] logic).
This Harvard course has a pretty good list : https://canvas.harvard.edu/courses/34992/assignments/syllabu...

Links to the papers: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1wS6O7-ZoFL7Cfjgt-kdh...

I've been slowly reading through them - some easier than others. (Some I've pretty much skipped - way too long for my interests).
Yet there are millions of us chugging along just fine every day with linux.
There are a number of things like this that I don't think will move the needle on housing prices, but because of the massive seller's market we're in, are politically expedient to do now:

- Make home inspections an unwaivable right.

- Eliminate blind bidding

- Fully open MLS data

- Heavily regulate (specifically buyers') real estate agents to eliminate much of the corrupt practices.
Near the end of Speed Racer is maybe the best use of CGI I've ever seen, and it has nothing to do with trying to be realistic.

The movie is worth it just for that part, which I rewatch every couple of months on its own.
Unlike Windows, you CAN turn that off. Ultimately it's a service you can either configure or remove or even replace with another.

Even at it's worst, the worst distro with the worst default behavior, it's still nothing close to as inconsiderate as Windows.

I don't understand the complaint.
I mean it's a few percent in some cities. Is it a factor? Sure. Is the fact that housing debt is higher than it's ever been for Canadians themselves more important? Yes.

I hear about people pulling out equity in the form of HELOC's to put a downpayment on another home. That's a pretty big chunk of Canadian "investors". And that should scare the shit out of anyone considering that was a major problem in 2008 in the US. People vastly over-leveraging themselves under the assumption that housing only goes up.
I've seen some suggestions that humans have already over fished the sea's and fish stocks are close to collapse.
Hope they find another piece or fragment to (dis)prove whether they used some mechanical assisted method by superimposing the details.
> 300 managers

Uhm... Sales, marketing, finance, HR, legal, designers, QA, etc. Companies aren't just made up of engineers and people to manage those engineers.
Yeah, and people still keep moving to the Phoenix metro area. The housing market is now closed for median income families as a result of the constant growth and the housing inventory here being dried up.

I want to emphasize that: if you're a median household income, middle class family moving to Phoenix, you can no longer afford homes here. There's zero inventory. ARMLS listings will produce nothing.

That's not an exaggeration. After breaking down the cost of a mortgage, insurance, property tax, cost of food based on USDA Cost of Food reports, median car payments, bills and utilities, and additional monthly expenditures, there's no way the math works out.

Phoenix is now Los Angeles. Look somewhere else. Phoenicians are.
As a researcher at the University in Belgium I made 2k per month.
Well then,talk about free market. It looks like the world is just circling back
We realized how big of a mistake that was. We updated the server and the website. It is now possible to use one license on multiple computers.

edit: We would appreciate if you could mention that your comment in case someones reads your's without reading this one.
I would checkout Render and DO App Platform. Heroku has actual competition now.
How to Find Focus as a Solo Founder
>For devices that aren't fully under your control despite you owning them, couldn't they still do whatever they want by hardcoding the IPs of whatever services they want to talk to, instead of using DNS or anything like it at all? Blocking DoH doesn't fix that problem.

That's absolutely correct. And if any of my devices were doing that (and I've checked, for just that reason), egress filtering can handle blocking such connections just fine.
Okay but there are a lot of grocery stores including ones where they didn't get on anyone's bad side, so it would seem to me as though if a power like say India or China wants to trade with them they would easily ignore the default as unusual circumstances
You can pin the kernel version if you like. Still things might get wonky and you'll have to log out of the DE and back in again after an update.
So Elon Musk then? Any day now a car will fully self drive across the country, as was promised to happen 4+ years ago.
Sperm counts have been dropping for decades with no end in sight.
Donations Strategy?
What's the best strategy to collect donations for a long-term tech project? Has anyone done this successfully?
OK, I just don't trust "the world's most".
Proof-of-concept: node-inspector 2-Click RCE
I think it's interpreted as the licensor can add whatever clause they want and it has to be followed, and those terms say that a licensee cannot add additional clauses to that of the licensor when it redistributes the licensor's work or derivative work.

Basically, I wrote the code, I decide. I give it to you under my terms. You cannot go give the code to someone else under new terms, because I prohibited you from doing so when I gave you the code.
That server better be well fenced off from general internet access and have a couple of layers in between. It is prime pickings for a root kit.
So much fighting over how best to draw the UI that will launch various instances of the Chrome engine.

Want to know why everything is written in Electron or as a web app? Because literally every desktop platform over the last decade has decided to play design and engineering games instead of just make a really solid stable base to write apps on top of.
Presumably there's a reason that you give these devices Internet access in the first place. Can't they just use the same host for their nefarious activity that they do for their legitimate activity?
That was Amazon's innovation. One click buy, easy undo. Previous systems usually used the "we have your money now, muahahahahaha!" approach, with difficult order cancellation. Too many still do. It's obvious in retrospect, but not obvious until seen.
Tell us about the last time a corporation ordered you to do anything?
This is a SaaS.
Yes we are; I thought you were advocating for larger commits since they're too difficult to break apart into logically independent pieces, but it seems I just misunderstood what you wrote the first time I read it.
What will change?
> it's unreasonable to conclude that they went out of their way to add a restriction that they intended everyone to be able to remove.

They added a restriction, but did not remove the portions of the original license that are in conflict with that restriction. So their actions paint at best a murky picture of what their intentions were; either their intentions were strange, or they were remarkably incompetent in crafting their license to fit their intentions. It seems to be a bit of a stretch to say the courts must interpret it as if it's the license they should have written, rather than the license they actually wrote.
Running a TLS termination proxy would break everything unless they convinced the users to accept their root certificate, so even the most evil ISPs generally don't do that.
Trumps nomines were good pick from his party point of view, because they decide based of their politics. It had nothing to do with qualifications, despite people pontificating about it now.
Where do you possibly get that idea? Do you not know that Bucha is part of the region north of Kyiv?

Even if you wanted to quibble over the meaning of words, the article is very clear about it:

> radio traffic from Russian military personnel in the region north of Kyiv, where Bucha is located
It’s really unclear what the goal here is—I guess there is some metric that they hope to improve? If the metric is equity, sure it’s easier to create equity by taking something away from somebody than giving something to people. But what’s the end game for this — keep cutting advanced coursework until you’ve reached some lowest common denominator?
Are the video lectures to the course available by any chance?
There seems to be some improvements in this area. Machine learning papers sometimes provide their data sets and other artifacts on websites like paperswithcode.com.

Have you ever contacted the authors to request their data? I personally have not.
99.999% of C++ developers either don't care about Rust or has never heard of it. There are 5 million+ C++ developers out there. And the number is going up.
Section 7 of AGPLv3 [0] is entirely about augmenting the license, it's certainly not clearly prohibited. What this decision demonstrates is that section 7 is legally problematic as-is.

[0] http://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl-3.0.html
The article touches a little bit about how responses to a 0-27 point depression questionnaire are coded as 0 or 1, 1 being "has moderate to severe depression" and 0 being "does not have moderate to severe depression" at a threshold of 10 points or higher. Similar situation for suicidality. Instead of tracking the actual point changes across the 12 months, they just tracked the pooled percentages of 0 vs. 1.
Yeah. That's an installer.

An installer is a script/program which helps the user install the software, in this case the OS is the software.
ACM used to have full access to the O'Reilly online catalog e.g. "live training", and other things.
I don't remember exactly when but we got a scaled down version of it, limited to books and video.

I dont see myself supporting OReilly at that price especially when they run at least once a year a 50% discount (black friday).

ACM offers other sources for books, not as complete catalogue but skillsoft has Manning Publications and No Starch Press, so from IT point of view, already great. I might miss the conference and some books there and there, but what is available is already great.
Libgen/youtube and the like will cover the remaining.
Company drivers, like the ones discussed in this article, don’t pay for their own fuel. Owner-operators do, but they also get to set their own rates, so they’re in control of how much money they make (subject to what the market will bear, of course).
Probably fine - even if it was in breach of some os license - how would they (the original author of the code) know and lift a burden of proof in a civil court?

Besides that it is good practice if you copy something from somewhere to put that fact in a comment or commit message.

Makes it easier to maintain.
I agree with some of this, though it is perhaps a bit overly harsh at times. Frankly, I’m not terribly impressed by the direction that Qt has taken either, though. This puts the open source desktop in a pretty unfortunate place…
This won't do anything. Dr Andy Yan (https://twitter.com/Ayan604) has a pretty interesting take on all of this: "It still leaks. It may make a bit of a difference, but at the same time it doesn’t deal with the issue at hand, which is foreign capital, not foreign people" https://archive.ph/OcSYX

For those interested in how crazy this is in Canada, journalist Sam Cooper (https://twitter.com/scoopercooper) has done some awesome reporting.
OK bud
Tbh I always direct people who want to read old important papers to lecture notes or textbooks, at least in distributed algorithms or CS theory.

I've found that the original papers are always super dense and the material has usually evolved to be more explainable, especially when someone has put in the time to compile it as part of a course.
Except that it omits the part that Pharo is a version of Smalltalk (and also a fork of Squeak/Smalltalk.)
Not publicly as far as I can tell
That's an interesting solution. Good luck, future Raspberry Pi users! I know this will make it a little more difficult for the less technical to get their Pi units set up.

I can confirm that I have dozens of public Linux servers with SSH exposed and user `pi` is constantly being attempted for login. I ban them all immediately and automatically.
Atlassian cloud outage could take days to resolve
ADHD, High Functioning Autism all have traits which can benefit the hunter-gather lifestyles of the past. Thing is today, some countries like the UK have adopted a stealth war on these traits in some individuals seen with things like transgender promotion or turning a blind eye to more physical forms of abuse often seen in schools. In some case's autistics have been locked up for decades under the guise of mental health reasons which is just prison without trial with forced psych med ingestion and if you dont comply because med staff know best and have the pieces of paper to authorise them, you cant challenge them otherwise you get bullying both mental and physical from NHS staff. Rare cases have been documented in the news, but its just the tip of the iceberg of stuff going on behind closed doors. Society, the legal system is generally complicit when looking at interpretations of law and how little light is shed on these matters.
So Rust is dominating an area that has zero impact on the world. While the world runs on C/C++. OK thanks. Noted.
The nit pick I think is that because every word is a separate link and the link style doesn't show the extent of the underline until you hover over it, it isn't easy to see without hovering on every word individually that it isn't just one link with longer text.
Paul Krugman described the effect memorably in 2005.

https://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/08/opinion/that-hissing-soun...

"Then there are the numbers. Many bubble deniers point to average prices for the country as a whole, which look worrisome but not totally crazy. When it comes to housing, however, the United States is really two countries, Flatland and the Zoned Zone.

In Flatland, which occupies the middle of the country, it's easy to build houses. When the demand for houses rises, Flatland metropolitan areas, which don't really have traditional downtowns, just sprawl some more. As a result, housing prices are basically determined by the cost of construction. In Flatland, a housing bubble can't even get started.

But in the Zoned Zone, which lies along the coasts, a combination of high population density and land-use restrictions -- hence "zoned" -- makes it hard to build new houses. So when people become willing to spend more on houses, say because of a fall in mortgage rates, some houses get built, but the prices of existing houses also go up. And if people think that prices will continue to rise, they become willing to spend even more, driving prices still higher, and so on. In other words, the Zoned Zone is prone to housing bubbles."

Just ignore the first sentence in the article and the prognosis on a bubble popping messily....

Erdmann adds to the thesis in a very valuable way by pointing out that people move out Zoned zone to Phoenix and other US metros.

Just pity the countries that effectively don't have a Flatland, like Australia, the UK and NZ.
Video Diffusion Models
In the US, the legal standard to use entrapment as a defense requires you to show 1) inducement (as opposed to mere solicitation) to commit the crime AND 2) that you were not predisposed to commit the crime. https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm/criminal-resource-manual...

So entrapment basically means you were coaxed into a committing a crime that you weren't predisposed to commit. So if an undercover FBI agent becomes your best friend and begs you, who are not in the business of selling drugs or any contraband, to help them score some cocaine, that's entrapment. But if they just become a business associate of yours and ask you to help them source some stolen goods and you say yes, that's not entrapment because it's probably just solicitation, not inducement. Or say you're out there slinging cocaine on a corner and an undercover cop walks up to you, but you smell something fishy and turn him down, but then he begs you to help him because he really needs his fix and is going nuts, and you give in and sell to him. That sounds like inducement but you were already predisposed to commit that crime, so no entrapment defense for you probably.
Why Fruit Has a Fake Wax Coating (2017)
You seem to presume that this specific technology should scale to quadrupeds.

Other people are already working on quadrupeds. You may have heard of Boston Dynamics.

Not everything needs to do the same thing as everything else.
Good balance of speed (which is definitely an underrated feature!) and intelligent code completion/features here. I like it.
Two language development stack, with the complexity it entails, when the product is mac only.
Stephen Wolfram often comes off as the smartest insane homeless man you've ever met
traction doesn’t matter. or we would have raised. story and team maybe. i think that VCs buy into a certain type of person. maybe a younger version of themselves. somebody they want or wanted to be. that rules out anyone who is nerdy or weird. and they like to go to parties to hear what others are investing in and then do the same.
So, I don't want to use a system like this to generate actual fines.

I want to embarrass people who are speeding through my neighborhood at 2x the local speed limit, just because they can. In some cases, including school buses.

Uploading only the most egregious cases to YouTube on an automated basis would make me happy.
I would reduce "the Commons Clause [...] is antithetical to the values of the ASF" to "_one_ of the values".

As an example of other values untouched by the Common Clause, the Apache License 2.0 includes: "(4.b) You must cause any modified files to carry prominent notices stating that You changed the files;". The values here are correct attribution of work, and protecting consumers by making changes easily spotable.

Please do not collapse all open source licenses into a single point value, it does them no favor. And if you really have to, then at least use the one about open access to the source code. The one in the name.

Yes, the Common Clause violates point 6 of the opensource.org/osd - but there are 10 points on that list. And the OSI is not the be-all-end-all of defining open source, even if it sues people for using the word, it not the one and only source of truth, not some religion of 10 commandments that wants its followers to harass heretics.

And this is important, because this whole discussion is as old as open source. Besides commercial use with negligible own contribution as seen in the Common Clause, there are other well known examples of restrictions people added to their works in spite of point 6, like a "no military use" clause that was quite popular for some time. That prevented good software from being distributed by Debian, because of Debians choice to only include software that complies with all of its ideals.

People first and foremost have the freedom to license their original work however they want. Some restrictions, such as trademarks, may apply. You have a point with trademarks and naming a modified license in a confusing way, but i think you are overreacting when you call the Common Clause "outrageous, offensive" and "to sponge off of the goodwill of FOSS". Yes, the license that is "AGPLv3 + Common Clause" may never become OSI approved, but for the consumer the modification is easy to spot and understand. And that actually does follow an important value of the FOSS community.

Ironically one that is not part of the 10 but included in the Apache License 2.0