>Were you actually unaware of people being married until middle school?

Of course I knew about marriage, but I didn't ask my teachers and none of my fellow students asked. My teachers in elementary school didn't tell us if they were married. Maybe they understood kids don't actually care about the social lives of their teachers so they didn't tell us.

>This sounds incredibly bizarre/dystopian to me.

It is dystopian for teachers to not tell students about their personal life?

>People aren't soulless automatons who don't socialize and parents and teachers would be aware of each others social lives at least at an acquaintance level at every school I attended.

This law has nothing to do with parents and teachers knowing about each others lives, but young kids.

>Even in kindergarten we knew that teachers were married or not simply by whether they were called Ms. or Mrs.

Good for you. Many of my teachers just went by Ms even if they were married. I remember when I was in maybe first or second grade one teacher used Mrs but didn't explain the difference. I just assumed it was for older woman since the teacher was quite a bit older than the previous teachers I had. Kids are quite naive and will just assume things. You don't need to explain everything to them.

Even if a student knew the woman was married they wouldn't have to tell their students if they are gay or straight.

It also doesn't work for men so they wouldn't have a reason to bring it up.

>There's also your own parents or your friends parents.

No clue what you are trying to say here.

>I really can't fathom this concept that we've always wanted children to not know about sexuality in any aspect and need to hide it now other than through the lens that people are willing to accept collateral damage to hide homosexuality.

We need things to be age appropriate. If you had a 5 year old kid and he asked about sex would you show him a gang bang video? I would assume not. I don't think 5 year olds should know about such things regardless if it is straight or gay.

>I literally grew up in a uber conservative, Confederate flag waving farm town in the middle of New England. Everyone was always excited to talk about new marriages and involve actual toddlers as part of the wedding ceremonies whenever people got married. Parents were always pushing their kids to give gifts or sign cards congratulating young teachers when they got married. Unless I see vast information to the contrary, all this looks like is a continuation of modern US conservative culture that will lie to your face about their past actions, as long as it hurts the right people

You are talking about decades ago I assume. Regardless, if a parent wants to have their kid celebrate a marriage they can.

This law is saying teachers shouldn't be teaching this stuff.

The law strictly speaking doesn't even ban a teacher telling their students they are gay so it wouldn't even have an impact.

>If a law is created by a group of law makers with open biases, and then only enforced in a discriminatory way, then the problem _is_ with the law

Which law was made by people without open biases? I am going out on a limb and saying none.

The law has never been enforced so how could it be enforced in a discriminatory way?

>unless you thought poll tests under Jim Crow were fine on their own and the enforcement was the only issue.

Of course not.

>I'll reserve the right to be surprised if this law is enforced uniformly, but I have been given no reason by the Florida state government to expect that

You are jumping to a conclusion probably because you didn't like your childhood you described. You think all conservatives are like the ones you grew up with. You think they are filled with hatred and can't move on. Conservatives appear to have become a boogie man for you, where you think the worst of them.

It is clear you hold deep seated biases and it is not going to be a fruitful dialogue.