skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
First, since you used a throwaway for this, kudos for asking this in a way that is respectful and seemingly genuinely curious.

I think at some point it becomes a little bit semantics. If you transition for reasons other than your dissonance or because you suffer from dysphoria then you’re probably gonna have a bad time. And if you’re forced to transition by abusive parents or government you’re gonna cause dissonance or dysphoria.

Detransitioners are an interesting case because while it’s absolutely possible for people to be wrong the majority of cases of people doing it are because of external factors like violence, discrimination, and unsupportive friends and family. However, there are lots of safeguards to keep people from making mistakes. You need the sign off from a doctor, two psychologists, and have to be living as your post-transition gender for at least a year to get reassignment surgery, HRT is broadly speaking reversible, nobody is giving HRT at all to kids, teens only get puberty blockers until they and their doctors are sure, and adults still have to go through an interview. This process is supposed to catch autogynephiliacs (although this terminology is really really dated) and I suppose someone could lie their way into getting reassignment but that’s on them then.

So yeah, I think we’re basically in agreement. I think a better way to say it so it’s universal is “transitioning doesn’t change your gender.” A gay woman forced to transition against her will is still a woman, a man who detransitions because it doesn’t alleviate problems misidentified as dysphoria is still a man, and a trans woman is and always has been a woman.
Perhaps, that sounds like more expense and red tape. Another barrier/wall that demonstrates my point exactly. Just to build homes? The people with these skills can't use them because of all the administrative, tax, and obscure compliance munitia hamstringing the process. The market is already distorted to hell.
50% are below the median.
Thompson vs. Clark (U.S. Supreme Court)
I was thinking more that the industrial production has increased 10x in 70 years. Private companies can now build rockets that go to space...
I bought the lifetime pass way back, when the price was lower than it currently is. No regrets, Plex serves me well at home and when we go out. Paw Patrol can follow us so my son is happy.
One might say it means they had issues keeping the Fifth Precept (abstaining from alcohol, or sometimes interpreted to mean all intoxicants), which some Buddhist laypersons adhere to. But no one ever (or did they?) claimed these men were enlightened beings.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_precepts
There should be a "make me lucky" button - to tell you what you ought to be searching for, since it's got enough data to know you better than you know yourself :)
He became man to die for our sins, according to the dogma. Man is sinful. Salvation is the path to "becoming like God", and that comes with death.
I agree; choices and tinkering add complexity to a search engine, and search engines need to be simple.

That aside, a search engine needs to be really focused on privacy. Customising it implies that the user needs to log in and remain logged in. I'd much rather no do that with a search engine, and I don't want its behaviour to react to my identity either.
I think it's correct to say that a lot of people are relatively passive and will eventually go along with whatever a government desires, but the crux of the 'banality of evil' argument was that Nazis at the highest level were also that kind of passive, bureaucratic evil, as opposed to being very explicit and knowledgeable in their plans. The critique of Arendt wasn't that there was no banality of evil, just that it didn't exist at the levels she claimed (Nazi leadership). They knew full well what they were doing. It's important to recognise this since otherwise you might say that the people in power aren't important as they're purely products of societal values etc.
I love kagi, I use it myself, but this won't be ''the next google'' for the simple reason that kagi isn't a free service.
My data point: I've been on Paroxetine for 20 years for really bad OCD and associated depression. Yea, the side effects suck, but they're a cake walk compared to the OCD and the depression.
Do what others in here have said though, talk to a professional.
Rippling and the Return of Ambition
5 countries have developed Uranium enrichment facilities.
The issue is that modern heat pumps are way more efficient than just a resistor. Not something that was obvious in Nakamoto’s day. Even gas furnaces are more efficient due to transmission losses.

If your house is one of the few that have an electric furnace, there’s no difference. For most people, though, there’s a huge difference. Running an appliance such as a computer to heat a house will cost more and be worse for the environment.
Yes, being able to politely but clearly say "no" when people ask you to do something is an important skill. I struggle with it myself.

People who are experts at imposing on other people's time will latch on to any crack you leave open. Don't give reasons. You might think "I'm sorry, but I don't have time to get involved in that" is clear, but they will counter with "it won't take much time at all." Just say "no, thank you, but I must decline" or something that doesn't leave any room for further discussion.
Given that using 0.1 ISO copy film wouldn't be an issue (unlike when shooting live action), you could probably write high bitrate 8k on it.
That’s what I would say when I just stole an idea from a Musk poll./s

I could swear we heard something about editing or edit buttons since 2009-2011 and it was always just 6-12 months away. If someone working in design at twitter reads this: Wtf is your startpage about either it’s a 5 year old picture with login or a searchbar that doesn’t really work when not logged in. Does it really perform better than showing trending tweets or something useful for new users?
There's no way to know if Musk will seek to impose his own brand of ideology or make it less ideological overall (I'm hoping for the latter).

For example, if he stopped banning users who "misgendered" people on Twitter, but instead started banning those who "took God's name in vain", I would qualify that has imposing his own brand of ideology (just for the sake of argument I have no idea if he is religious or what his stance is on "gendering").

If, on the other hand, he stopped banning of users who "misgendered" people, and didn't replace that behavior with a ban on something he frowned upon, I would qualify that as "less ideological". Obviously in this day and age many authoritarians will argue that the absence of censorship is an ideology in itself, but I think most reasonable people can agree that overall, less censorship = less ideology.
Thats a good question. In the end Warp programs/scripts will be written in just yet another interpreted language.
House Votes to Decriminalize Cannabis
Twitter Blue still has ads and still constantly fights you to try and show you their algorithmic timeline.

It also doesn't cover multiple accounts - and my side account, when it switches to the algorithmic timeline every other day, is convinced I want to know about pop musicians and inserts 1000 "suggested topics" about the Grammys and BTS I have to dismiss individually.
> Also you'd be surprised at the number of software engineers that really don't care how many sentry logging calls their apps make. I completely agree with the sentiment, and I personally just disable the Warp application's internet access to address this, but it's worth recognizing that we're in the minority of people that care.

I'm in this boat. I never understood why I should care if some website interacts with google apis or logs everything I do and sells it to marketers so they can sell me ads. I'll block them anyway so it'll never make a difference to me one way or the other.
BBC is made for britons first, RT is for foreigners.
Thanks for that clarification. My point was mainly that I was being led down paths that were talking about home manager which was something I didn’t want in my system. Nix, nixos, home manager, flakes, shell.nix … they all do different things and blog articles and documentation mix and march them to create a very confusing ecosystem to navigate.
I don't think this is a big city thing. I live in a medium sized city in the states and I hate going to the airport. 20-30m commute there, parking, walk, wait in line, go through the scanner, inevitable pat downs, cinch back up the belt, etc. Not what I look forward to. On our long term feature list is adding commute time and time to get through the airport to the timeline view as an optional setting, as well as potentially factoring that into our pain algorithm. This is really handy when you're flying to/from a big city like London or NYC, where airport choice my matter at a particular day/time. A similar long term add is factoring in having to go through customs on a layover. This is another awful part of the flight experience we can track and influence decision making through.
Twitter Spaces is good. Twitter is also very popular in Japan and Spaces isn't only a Clubhouse competitor, it's also a Twitcasting competitor over there.

Though, twitcasting has more monetization options and Twitter only has super followers which nobody actually uses yet.
Just because seekers lose their sight doesn't mean there's no value in their seeking, or what they learned along the way. The reality for many, including myself, is that religion, including Buddhism, is a (sometimes desperate) attempt to make sense of this confusing reality we all collectively woke up in the same way.

To be dismissive of what these folks went through, and what they taught, would be a shameful discounting of real human experience. Watts was genius, but as you note, he struggled. So, obviously, did Kerouac. No human who has found (really found) religion has avoided that same struggle. Some handle it better than others, but then again, some have life circumstances which make that more possible to digest.
Honest question, and not snark: We have 4chan and 8chan. Those are absolute free speech. Don't we already know how "absolute free speech" works out on digital platforms? Why do we need another one?

Or am I missing something major here?
I’m thinking of getting on twitter. What would be a good hashtag for finding and defeating panic rooms?
> The problem with bootstrapping is that eventually you'll hit an inflection point where the viability of the business model starts becoming visible. At that point you'll most likely start attracting competition. Unless it's a niche a business with a small TAM, your competitors will most likely raise VC funding to throw cash at hyper growth in a way you can't while staying cash flow disciplined.

You can choose to take investment then, but it will be on much better terms than your competitors get. It's likely that you'll be able to raise more with less dilution.

Or, you can sell.
There's the Mono version that supports C#, which is also faster than GDScript already, if it's at all a (real) sticking point. And you can use C/C++ or Rust if you really want.
Just in this thread I have one person saying that I should avoid flakes and you are telling me it will save me. I think we proved my point.
My email is in my profile information, and I'd be glad to give more detail if you write me.
Dolby Surround aka ProLogic, was later enhanced with Prologic II which provided a higher bandwidth and rear left+right matrix.
I get the Twitter "hmm... this page does not exist" error as of 5:35 PM
PDT.
Fuck, I don't know! Ask someone liberated, not me.
How people actually lived seems relevant as long as they're giving us advice about how to live.
Have you given WikiVoyage a shot? It has been quite helpful in some occasions.

See [1] for Vegas, for example.

[1]: https://en.wikivoyage.org/wiki/Las_Vegas
AFAIK he had no such platform that could be described as "public forum" (his own words) until now
Hollis met a Canadian artist (Chombo) in Hollywood that made a giant squid (Architeuthis) that could be seen with a visor rig... in Spook Country. They love and discuss the internet plenty.. since none of this matches what you remember, perhaps it's a reoccurring theme.
There's no need to imagine anything, here's the discussion Engels was having: https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1888/letters/88_...

He's replying to an aspiring author who sees Engels as an authority on the matter, and he's giving an account of the structure of a new genre of literature (realism) and using its greatest representative (Balzac) to do so. Presumably she takes Engels to be an authority for the same reason many do today: he's one of the best read people to have lived and he was on the frontier of every domain of science for which he had utility. (See the lasting impact of his Anti-Dühring.)

My intent was to provide an entry point into the rich domain of Marxist literary theory by the authority of two of its most important progenitors. Engels and Lenin were crucial in developing an apparently important way of studying and creating history. I figured this is a relevant addition to the conversation because I am gesturing to a positive answer to the gaping question that you opened: what is it that makes a historical interpretation "correct"? Unless perhaps your intent was to leave it agape, which is fit for the postmodernist ideological realm in which Downton Abbey and Bridgerton were written in the first place.
I saw that and thought it was a succinct, highly distilled extract showing the result of 'if I'd had more time I'd have written you a shorter letter'. While there's obviously a myriad variations on the theme and actions crossing those lines, the message and call to action is very clear — either identify and address the problems with the directive, or execute it. Punting, dithering, or ignoring it are not options.

That said, the twitter nonsense is getting a bit much. When he wanders into anything outside his zones of expertise, he's a disaster.
Looks like he deleted the tweet. Might not be the best idea to repost screenshots from right wing political accounts.
Good q. Totally feasible imho, and I used to help build the goog search engine! :)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Size_of_Wikipedia

20GB, which is tiny these days. Fits on a $10 USB key.

I think with some of that AI magic we'll soon be in a situation where most of the traditional (non-proprietary) human knowledge you ever need (text, images, 3d models of machines, anatomy, etc.) will be immediately accessible for free via an open-source knowledge engine.

With a commodity network connection, that knowledge engine can keep itself apprised of the post-traditional/proprietary knowledge by doing all the drudgerous work of reading through the world of Ads to get to today's news, etc..

Mate that with more AI magic to make it easy to conversationally interact with the engine and you get an agent who can represent you online and provide a distilled interface of online for you. Your digital twin or avatar.
> Futhermore, foundational health must-haves such as nutritional meals and quality sleep are consistently bad. How can you get well if these "essential services" are out of step with current science?

Fix these for society in general and the results will permeate to the hospitals. Hospital meals are shit as bulk low cost meals in general that comply with allergy needs and do not spoil are shit.
There is actually a reason to do this - and people do. For long term archival film is king - it's store and forget, unlike hard drives that require migration every few years. So people write digital data to film, either in the form of text documents as images, or some digtal encoding of the data, and then it's put into long term storage.

GitHub did this with its Archive Program https://archiveprogram.github.com/, and Piql https://www.piql.com/ is a company that specialise in doing this. They're the company that created the Cinevator, a high speed data to film transfer machine that was originally used for creating film prints, but since film is kinda dead these days, they've pivoted to archival storage.
I don't know which is the biggest, there are a lot of known unknowns still floating around. Will we run out of money before we monetize? Will we have to deal with constant lawsuits? Will other innovators in the space attempt to move in our direction? Are there enough travelers willing to install an extension? Will google be google and shut us down? The ever present bus factor. All of these are legit concerns that are going into our crowdfunding risks disclosures. All are things to manage.
Sorry, you are very very wrong about this. Have you ever talked to a _medical_ professional about depression or any mental health issue? They generally don't know what they're doing. Medical professionals only have one tool in their arsenal for depression: antidepressants. So a medical doctor will likely prescribe them, whether that's appropriate or not. Antidepressants are no joke. Sometimes they can help, but they can also cause really strange side effects, like increasing the possibility of suicide. And does the average doctor monitor all their patients regularly to make sure they're not having suicidal thoughts? Nope. And doctors generally won't know anything about the difficulty of getting _off_ the antidepressant if it didn't work.

Asking for advice on the internet is a very valid strategy, given the terrible state of mental health care in the US.
My gut reaction was that as a browser extension, you would have the ability to add airlines that refuse to participate in the current travel sites, e.g., Southwest? But I don't see them in the results...
Don't worry, somehow it will be cheaper and more efficient to build a subway that just has cars driving through it!

Never mind the fact that throughput would be limited to however many cars can fit in one lane of tunnel, that's just details.
Lots of database proxies and caches like ProxySQL or Heimdall Data or IMDG's like Apache Ignite - but it's interesting to see it offered as a cloud service backed with this cache invalidation tech.

Had a similar idea a few years back and it's nice to see it turn real. Congrats on the launch.
Please contribute more elaborative criticism than simply the word "bullshit"
Got to feel bad for Intel
> By your metric, you can't estimate people's attitudes and mindsets at all, you can just eternally say "what they just did was bad but we can't hold that against them".

More hallucinations
I addressed your main point which is that a teacher should be able to talk about another student's home life.

You said:

>A teacher shouldn't have to risk legal action by saying "Timmy's parents are both men who love each other, and that's okay."

If a teacher is telling other students about Timmy's home life that is very much gossip.

The other students have no reason or right to know what Timmy's home situation is. If Timmy wants to tell other students about his situation he can. The teacher should not be doing that.

Would you hold the same standard if a teacher said Timmy only has one parent if one of his parents died? It is gossip and the teacher should not be talking to other students about it.
No offense, but your choice of talking point reads a bit like gatekeeping and ageism. One can just as easily argue that most startups fail therefore "most startup employees aren't suited for startups" either...

I'd certainly say that stagnation/passiveness is going to be a problem for a startup early employee candidate, but there's nothing inherent about being a FAANG dev or being in the startup scene that necessarily equates to drive. I know of "lifers" that have a ton of drive; they just also happen to have incredible alignment with their companies.

Here's an anecdotal story about the meaninglessness of labels: My own brother joined a startup in its early days. He had just come out of a PhD program, and despite having had virtually no prior industry experience (neither startup or corporate), he eventually grew to the position of director of tech. The startup IPOed last year. Its name? Duolingo.
When you frame it like that, the question then becomes "do you actually need the fighter jet?" and "why are all these people suggesting I use a fighter jet?"
I've been capturing a list of GitHub Actions gotchas;

1. If you reference an environment in a build step, this causes an `on: deployment` event trigger. This is not intuitive.

2. Environments with deployment protection rules are just for branches. Using tagged releases for a production environment means we must allow all branches to be deployed to that environment.

3. Workflows are unable to start other workflows to prevent cyclic actions. Understandable, there are exceptions however e.g (1) above.

4. Pull requests raised by Dependabot will not have the `id-token: write` permission needed to create an OIDC ID token that we use to access external systems (the benefit of then not having to manage secrets). Note: Using `on: pull_request_target` will be granted the permission but then you're executing the `main` branch and not building/testing the Dependabot changes.

Then we have secrets, Organisation, Repository, Environment and Dependabot.
Anything in Organisation, Repository or Dependabot should really be at most read only permissions. Environment based secrets may have write permissions but be wary of the malicious PR that then references this environment, what protections are in place? Environment approval? Deployment branch protection?
Agree. But no author captures the sense of euphoria like Kerouac. Reading his prose can sometimes put you into a euphoric frenzy. But he will drag you down with him at times as well.
Someone elsewhere mentioned that this seems to be ring, hiccup, and a DB connection packaged as one. Pinch of salt needed, I’ve not used it :)
I'm honestly not quite sure what you're asking; there were a few (almost literally) stereotyped page layouts, which I was able to fill from a database, setting typefaces and sizes. That way, I got pages with the layout, tune image, and text, and I only had to adjust hyphenation to my liking and slug the text to fit the columns nicely.
1. There are genetic markers that can inform the choice of medication for depression. We are starting to see better effectiveness than just the shotgun try each one until you find an option without too many side effects.

2. I took Prozac for a 3-4 years and felt like it helped a bit, and I had very limited side effects - even good side effects. A close friend is trying Zoloft/Stratera and is having annoying side effects like muscle spasms during the first month, but those are reducing.

3. Therapy even more important than medication. Try a different therapy methodology. If it doesn’t stick for you, try adding SSRI or similar. You can always stop taking the drug.
The "trolley problem" isn't real, cars have brakes.