skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
If you're an oppressed freedom fighter you have to self-host everything. No aaS will ever pass your risk management and they especially can't afford to do so on the free plan.

In this case check out headscale.
It sounds like you are very confused about types and values. Static type checking does not incur any extra allocations at runtime.
That's horrible, my sympathy. Personally, I think Obamacare fixed more than it broke, even immediately. In particular, it was a huge relief to get rid of the possibility you could be permanently uninsurable after even a tiny gap if you have a "pre-existing condition".

I wanted Medicare for everyone (still do), but politics...and lies about "government death panels"...
AWS doesn't support U2F / FIDO / Yubikey for Safari users
Have tried various support channels over the past three years to no avail so submitting to HN, the ultimate technical support channel
> if the new place you were applying called, and asked me, "Do you have any feedback about X candidate?" You better believe I had things to say about the people who were negative.

> And bosses are petty, they'll get revenge if they can. And odds are you'll need them to say something nice about you at some point.

You're opening yourself and your company up to getting sued. An employee uses the exit interview for the purposes the company claims they're for and you take 'revenge' on them? That's pretty unprofessional. You should be trying to change the fact that the exit interview unfairly impacts your perf review, if anything.
AMD Epyc is (AFAIK) what popularized the term. Their current design has a memory controller (PCIe controller, 8 x 64 bit channels of ram, etc) and 8 chiplets which are pretty much just 8 cores and a infinity fabric connection for a cache coherent connection to other CPUs (in the same or other sockets) and dram.

So generally Epyc come with some multiple of 8 CPUs enabled (1 per chiplet) and the latency between cores on the same chiplet is lower than the latency to other chiplets.

This allows AMD to target high end servers (up to 64 cores), low end (down to 16), workstations with threadripper (4 chiplets instead of 8), and high end desktops (2 chiplets instead of 8) with the same silicon. This allows them to spend less on fabs, R&D, etc because they can amortize the silicon over more products/volume. It also lets them bin them so chiplets with bad cores can still be sold. It's one of the things that lets AMD compete with the much larger volume Intel has, and do pretty well against numerous silicon designs Intel chips.
That sounds vaguely familiar...then again, there are many things from the late 90s/early 2000s web development that i wish to forget. ;-)
I am convinced that the game has either a second ending or a secret area, but I couldn't find any way to reach either.

Maybe there's a "good" ending, but no one has managed to find it yet. One can only hope...
Right. Thank your for the correction.
> would you stay for 2% more salary

Wut? I hope you responded with something like "Hell no, but make it 60% and we can talk". Typically when I have jumped ship I got something like 20%-40% more with my new employer.
Yes, but not every query should be a view (materialized or not) because the ORM doesnt support things like lateral join, cross join, etc.
Watch FSD Beta 10.11.1 handle a roundabout in Canada
For many years if I googled myself, on the first page of results was an archived post of Archimedes Plutonium calling me out in sci.math.

Ahhhhh, those were the days.
I thank you for your kind words.
I was referring to this: https://join-monster.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
What are you looking to get out of it? This might help in getting you pointed in the right direction.
> ...misinformed by Quantum Pseudoscience Grifters. Physics (and medicine) seem to suffer particularly from this sort of thing.

Quiet a few of the misinformed are HN commenters.

Generally, the pattern appears to be "Foo is complex. Conspiracy theorist asserts there is a conspiracy making Foo complex. We cannot trust the mainstream experts because they are lying. Gishgallop with endless bad faith questions which take an enormous amount of time to answer properly but ultimately do not convince the question asker".

The general takeaway, for me at least, is that even the most intelligent person can be sucked into crackpot conspiracy. The problem is "I'm an expert in this field, this means I'm smarter than most" and then thinking that intelligence in one area grants you insights into others.

The worst part is conspiracies like to hide under the motto of "I'm just being a good skeptic". However, a good skeptic needs to actually dig deeper than just surface level assertions. A good skeptic needs to look into the counter claims to their conspiracy. What are the sources? Do the actually point to data or are they just naked assertions? Do the sources reference only other conspiracy websites? Do they have references? If this claim is actually true, why is it rejected by the mainstream? Who is actually benefiting from hiding the truth?
I once read that Facebook was opening 2 or 3 massive new data-centers in the US for the purpose of hosting stale content.

You may have posted a photo 7 years ago, and statistics show that basically nobody ever revisits it. However, in case you do, it needs to be there. So these enormous buildings do basically nothing, but still need to be there.

It makes me wonder how it can go on like this. Users only keep adding content and never remove it. The income per user cannot grow forever, storage cannot get infinitely cheap, the model has to break one day?
It'd help to know what your UI will do.

For most applications, I'd suggest SwiftUI. That's because most UIs are for straightforward CRUD apps. Because everyone else here makes great points. There are lots of reasons to avoid SwiftUI at the moment.

However, I've made a handful of SwiftUI apps for macOS that were more than simple. It works well.
My sonne will too!
Is this likely to support SSR?
Last time I checked most the best human rights had to be fought for and defended at some point. Stop taking for granted what was paid for in blood by your predecessors and being all sanctimonious about what are "basic human rights" it makes you sound like a spoiled child.

Your healthcare isn't a human right, is is a benefit you collectively decided to pay for. Others can make different decisions.
This one is unfortunately quite common:

"You look unhappy. You must be expecting me to do something, and now [ I'm frustrated because I don't know what you want from me | I'm anxious about meeting the possible expectations I imagine you might have ]."

If someone looks unhappy, it might not be because of you. Even if they do have a need that you could meet, they might not expect you to meet it. Instead of guessing, you could simply gently ask.
Back in the '70's when I was studying EECS at Cal I remember one of my professors saying that his mnemonic for distinguishing the Hanning filter from the Hamming filter was that Hamming is in Monterey. Now that I think of it, since the guy who invented the Hanning window had the name of Von Hann, the "ing" at the end of Hanning must have been some kind of accommodation to Hamming.
But if we're talking about offloading to a NIC, that can often be accessed directly from userspace, with a lot less kernel complexity.

Pushing complexity into the kernel only makes sense when it's not immediately thereafter offloaded to easily-isolated hardware.
My error. I should have said 18 USC 1001 and the following entries all under Chapter 47. There's quite a few examples there. There are also a bunch under Chapter 63.
>For example calling isNullOrBlank() on a nullable string changes to the type to nullable if the answer is false

For anyone confused like I was, that's a typo, it changes the type to not nullable. Likewise, isNullOrBlank() is an extension of the listed isNullOrEmpty().

https://kotlinlang.org/api/latest/jvm/stdlib/kotlin.text/is-...

https://kotlinlang.org/api/latest/jvm/stdlib/kotlin.text/is-...
I think physicists have done a poor job explaining that what they do is model building. The models are not reality.

They can be considered approximations of reality. To say they are not reality seems dismissive. Newtonian physics is as close to 'real' as anyone is going to find.
I'm sorry but serious question, why would you need a high-speed for a keyboard? A usb packet for a keystroke is roughly 180 bits (I'm estimating from glancing at https://youtu.be/wdgULBpRoXk?t=1390). So 1.5 Mbit/s low speed could roughtly handle over 8,000 keystrokes per second. Do you really need more keystrokes or finer resolution than that?
That's typically how I go. Desktops for heavy lifting, something smaller for occasional portability when needed. In fairness, my current laptop wasn't cheap at around $950 for a then-current i7 processor, 16GB RAM, and nVidia GPU, but it's also 8 years old and still perfectly useful for what I need a laptop to do.

It's not just about saving money either. I just can't really get the performance in a laptop, but I occasionally need to be portable. Not too often, but sometimes. Desktop tends to get the budget and laptop gets the rest.
I don't mind the lack of change. Iterating a design with small changes is cool. Less phone cases, tooling and other waists.
Show HN: Procedurally-generated tile maps using Wave Function Collapse
It trades off utility for managing scope creep. Keeping this code base tiny necessarily means that anything that uses it would need to write more code. If the point is a demonstration instead of a usable library, then that is good because it is much easier to follow without excess complexity.
"Assume positive intent" doesn't mean to never update your priors; that would be ridiculous, as your examples illustrate. It just means to start out with an initially charitable view of someone's behavior that can shift over time as you get to know them better.
Wow, thank you for that great reply! PTSD flashbacks of Mrs. Davis hurling pieces of chalk at relativistic speeds at us in the back of the room, though...

It is amazing how massively complex rules such as this are subconscious when you learn them as a child. I speak a little French and German (and a few phrases of Yupik), but those are mainly wrote memorisation of the words and only the barest understanding of the underlying mechanics.
> But consider also that you can stick chiplets on top of each other vertically.

The problem there is heat dissipation. Already the performance constraint on consumer chips like the Apple M1 is how well it can dissipate heat in the product it's placed in (see Macbook Air vs Mac Mini). Stacking the chips just makes it worse.
The Collected Works of Francis Perey on Probability Theory
In the absence of larger issues, maybe. What if you're one of very few minorities or women working at the company, and the issues seems to stem from issues that shouldn't be issues? That seems more like a company problem and not a personal or cultural problem (given that the culture in question has laws to try to prevent it).

I agree it's probably best to start from a position that it's just a cultural mismatch. I imagine sometimes it gets entangled with a lot of other issues though, whether rightfully so or in perception only.
It's how you get commits like these, though https://github.com/geohot/tinygrad/commit/050636bcb1068beff6...

Subject: here's two extra lines of precious code (#307)

diff --git a/tinygrad/__init__.py b/tinygrad/__init__.py
index 0deab3e9..31ac75d5 100644
--- a/tinygrad/__init__.py
+++ b/tinygrad/__init__.py
@@ -1,3 +1 @@
-import tinygrad.optim
-import tinygrad.tensor
-import tinygrad.nn
+from tinygrad import optim, tensor, nn

There's a difference between "I will refuse features like X/Y/Z" and "I want the length of the code file to be N lines at most". The former tells you both explicitly and implicitly which features not to bother contributing. The latter is just nonsense.
Discussed elsewhere in this thread:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30909134
This is how I do it, can't work without the external mouse, keyboard, and laptop stand. Haven't owned a desktop since 7 years.
While there is always room for better, is this even a problem that is solvable?

To a certain extent, fundamental background knowledge, in particular mathematical, is needed. So to present something to a general audience will necessarily involve a simplified model of some kind. This can be a bad analogy, but even a "good models" are flawed at the edges and seem likely to be the simpler the model becomes in relation to a more complex topic.
For some context: https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/11/science-...
There's no meaningful benefit to dedicating any amount of DC equipment just to stale content. Those are spindles (and networks) that could be taking meaningful hot reads and writes, and colocating stale and hot data is generally a better use of capacity than concentrating hot data in fewer locations.
Among other things, the Dean of the university handed out flyers reading "This is a RACIST establishment with a LONG ACCOUNT of RACIAL PROFILING and DISCRIMINATION". University officials encouraged people to boycott the bakery on account of this false allegation of racism. In reality, the bakery had no history of racial profiling and discrimination. These false accusations were made in retaliation for refusing to let underage Oberlin students obtain alcohol from the bakery.

Making false accusations against someone, and encouraging people to boycott their business on account of that false accusation is definitely malicious. The purpose of the law is to disincentivize, or "chill" illegal activities like this. This isn't chilling support for any particular candidate or policy, this is chilling people from making false accusations of racism and encouraging people to boycott businesses on account of those false accusations.
Mercedes-Benz puts 5,600 workers on vacation in Brazil due to chips shortage
That's not the "whole idea" of SR. What he said in his 1905 paper was,

"The introduction of a “luminiferous ether” will prove to be /superfluous/ inasmuch as the view here to be developed will not require an “absolutely stationary space” provided with special properties, nor assign a velocity-vector to a point of the empty space in which electromagnetic processes take place."

In 1920, after developing GR, his views were considerably more nuanced, as expressed in his 1920 lecture at the Leyden University, "Ether and the Theory of Relativity":

"Recapitulating, we may say that according to the general theory of relativity space is endowed with physical qualities; in this sense, therefore, there exists an ether. According to the general theory of relativity space without ether is unthinkable; for in such space there not only would be no propagation of light, but also no possibility of existence for standards of space and time (measuring-rods and clocks), nor therefore any space-time intervals in the physical sense. But this ether may not be thought of as endowed with the quality characteristic of ponderable media, as consisting of parts which may be tracked through time. The idea of motion may not be applied to it."

Einstein, Albert. Sidelights on Relativity . Public Domain Books. Kindle Edition. (0.99$ on Amazon)

That lecture, by the way, is a superb example of presenting the frontier of 1920 physics - before Schrodinger, Dirac, and modern field theory - without using any mathematical notation whatsoever.
I don't think the person you're responding to is suggesting a deep meditation on the unlimited ramifications of one's feelings at every moment. They are talking about avoidance coping, which is pretty well-documented (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avoidance_coping). The admonition is to avoid that, more often than not. It's not the same as excessive navel gazing.
> It’s sacrosanct that I tell the people in my Squadron what I want them to achieve, and not how to achieve it. They take a goal from me and then use their own initiative to make it happen. This is ‘mission command’ and violating it and micromanaging my Yeomen is a real taboo. If you try to tell a Yeoman how to cross a piece of ground in their vehicle rather than telling them where to get to they’ll certainly let you know what their job is and what your job is. I feel like tech could really learn something from this.

This is huge. "Commander's Intent" is something all team leads should set; trust your team to make decisions on the ground, because they all know the mission and understand they 'why.'

This is pure Extreme Ownership in action - allow ownership over decisions by informing and providing direction.
None of the feedback OP has given to HR has any substance. If you throw around heavy words like this, you better know how to back your words up.

- passive aggressive: This is a personal judgment. He was passive aggressive in what way?
- excluded you from the team: How was he excluded? Was he not invited to events? Or did he not get good projects? If you are a temp with potential performance problems, it's normal that you don't get the cool projects.
- code was awful: Again, is this a sentiment shared by other members of the team or is it just one junior engineer being super opinionated about something
- long term maintainability: I don't think he was there for long
- missing roadmap because poor design decisions: Again a junior opinion, running projects are complex with many different variables, you fail meeting deadlines for various reasons, there's never a single reason, and that reason is never "we had a bad piece of code written by one guy". I don't think OP has the historical context of that led to the that code.

When I hear all this feedback coming from a temp, all I hear is they weren't a team player, they don't know how to be diplomatic and most of the things they are saying are coming out of frustration and have no substance and is not actionable.
Okay so bear with me. My local carwash has a legitimate crazy person there who tries to sell his flat-earth pamphlets. The carwash tries to chase him away, not because they're the street's "baby sitter", but because he's bad for business. People could go get a car wash elsewhere. People could store their files elsewhere.
Postgraphile turns postgres schema into GraphQL schema, can do, filtering, aggregates, computed columns, filtering on computer columns etc
I hope somebody with relevant knowledge can answer this question, please: what % of the costs is "physical cost per unit" and what % is maintaining the I+D, factories, channels...?

In other words, if a chip with 100x size (100x gates, etc.) made sense, would it cost 100x to produce or just 10x or just 2x?

Edit: providing there wouldn't be additional design costs, just stacking current tech.
Not to nitpick, but I think the term you're looking for is "Doxxing".
Nah man, exit interviews aren't to express opinions or talk shit, it's a data source for HR to identify problems emerging as patterns and improve their org/company.

One guy saying "my boss sucked" isn't really feedback
If I get two vacation weeks off a year, I probably will use up one week on visiting family, another week on an interesting trip, and then that’s all the vacation for the year. If I want to visit friends as well, I just can’t. But if I can work while visiting friends, it’s strictly superior even if still a bit sad.
Seems like an appropriate punishment for adultery, to be honest.
I have all that at home. And a hot desk can provide the same. 14 years ago at my business school we were hot desking with standardized ThinkPads.
I have also switched to iphone to a better quality of e-life, but you need to avoid using anything google related altogether , at a certain point google services are not something they sell or make business with, their job is to show you advertisement and spam, so the rest is just a side gig to better do their primary thing, so one is better off just avoiding them, these replies in the post are just as pathetic as the company itself, people always report these spam (this is not the first post about it, there was also a guy a while ago who had a fight with his wife because of the sudden spam on google drive), it's just PR
I think the phrase "assume positive intent" does not explicitly say how to address the impact of someone's behavior, and therefore can imply that assuming positive intent means ignoring the impact. I don't think it has to mean that.

The way I try to see it is that I try to assume positive intent while also letting people know of the impact their (in)actions had on me. If a coworker takes credit for my work, I can assume that their intention wasn't to hurt me, however, I can also let people know that what they did hurt me.

So I wish there were a secondary policy of "and say how you feel," but this may be a lot more taboo in corporate environments than assuming positive intent.
Earthlink takes spam way more seriously than google because EarthLink has paying customers. Most people who use google products do not pay. Google is not going to invest millions of stopping spam if there is no financial reason to do so. That is the cold reality of cost-benefit analysis. There would have to be some legislation or legal precedent in which google is forced to do something.
I've only skimmed Godot's documentation. I think at least in a few respects, I'm still waiting for Godot. (I cannot avoid the literary pun that they created for themselves in their naming, I'm sorry.) One of those respects that is particularly relevant here is in "point-and-click adventure"-specific tooling. To my understanding all of the packages for doing "point-and-click adventures" on Godot are still much more nascent/under-developed to their Unity counterparts. But again, I've not been keeping up with Godot that well. In part, because, as I admitted I like C# (even as [ab]used by Unity), Unity seems good enough, and Unity has a lot of experience under its belt that Godot doesn't have yet.
Civil enforcement action by federal agencies does not preclude criminal prosecution, which often takes longer when both occur for similar conduct.

But, especially in cases where civil enforcement is on behalf of and recovers money for harmed individuals, it's often higher priority as well as being faster because their is a lower barrier to initiation.
Why Canadian cities are so popular as test markets
I suppose banning (or cancelling) of books for adults is mostly being done by the left, while banning (or attempted banning) of books for children is mostly being done by the right.
Bogud is mentioned in the article as an African King who died and is often left out of the story. Another interesting bit of trivia - he was King of what the Romans called Mauretania. Ultimately his dynasty died out and was replaced by...the husband of the daughter of Antony and Cleopatra. That king was replaced by his own son, Ptolemy of Mauretania, who is the grandson of Antony and Cleopatra. He reigned until he was killed by Claudius in Rome in 40.
I was invited to answer one of these, at a company with truly the most hateful manager I've ever had. Oh, was I ever ready to offer my jaundiced, embittered opinion...until the survey required I log in with my company email address.

Yes, there was the usual verbiage about anonymizing, blah, blah, but I lost all confidence that my response wouldn't be tracked to me. I never returned the survey.

I still haven't determined whether this was by incompetent or malicious design.
James Altucher has written a lot about generating ideas. I would look for some of his articles to read.

He used to publish them on another domain, so I haven't read this, but it looks like his normal stuff.

https://jamesaltucher.com/blog/the-ultimate-guide-for-becomi...
Re: CDC guidance, we also have the basic cultural problem in the US that for a significant amount of the population, ever publicly changing your mind about any topic is seen as a sign of moral weakness, or even by default perceived as a lie.