skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Hes very much pro free speech why would he be the wrong person? He doesn't have to become the CEO anything if he has enough influence trough his shares he can push twitter to be more open about how it make stuff trending and prevents other stuff from trending etc.

There is no doubt hes not happy with the current way Twitter restricts speech which is heavily biased and so he wants to change that.
I would like to have more buttons like this. For example, a half-cost version of the car which can be started only once a day, why not?
There are also DMA based crypto accelerators (quite common, almost all computers in my home have one). Even those cheap $10 Orange Pi's.
Why would he want Twitter private?
DeSo / Bitclout is a company that had rebuild Twitter on top of a blockchain and its just not that good. The whole Twitter UI paradigm is so 15 years ago.
This is so cool!!! Props to author for the work, and also to ESA for allowing this kind of 'experimenting' :) .

Aside, it blew my mind that these cubesats are using sdcards for storage, is this intended for production or only now during the development phase?
Is sdcard storage safe from electromagnetic interference in space, including solar wind?
Do you know as from which date?
Ukraine thankfully haven’t had to defend themselves against Russian nuclear weapons though. But if you go down that road, it would’ve made no difference whether the EU gave them absolutely nothing, or even twice the amount of military aid they have already given. Use of nuclear weapons would have been catastrophic against Ukraine circa 2014 (poorly equipped), Ukraine circa 2022 (well equipped) and basically any non-nuclear country whether they're rich or poor.
Twitter usually doesn't "censor". Its system seems automated, so a certain amount of reports can lead to deletion.
Happy Monzo customer here with it as my primary account for the last 2 years. Haven’t had any issues, and neither have any of my friends. It’s the best possible banking experience imo. I’m happy they are proactive about suspicious activity.
There is so much good work here, good job. Just curious, what pushed you to make this aside from the obvious usefulness of it? Was there something specific? Also, while making it, did you perhaps also use it to collab with others during the process? Thanks again
That's quite a cynical take, and plainly incorrect.

He is still actively pursuing those goals, they are just very difficult projects. Objectively he has done more for promoting space travel than most any other individual today.

He has his flaws sure, but people generally admire his willingness to pursue bold aspirations with extreme tenacity.
Happiness is a "skill", not simply a "decision". A skill has to be learnt from the very basics, practiced day to day, and ultimately perfected to the point where the behaviour becomes second nature. Playing the mind skillfully is perhaps as difficult as playing multiple musical instruments simultaneously :) Which also means we all have large room for training and improvement throughout our lives.
> When the mongols did setup shop and administration, it sound like their focus was China. And not the backwater of Western Europe.

Not really. Genghis Khan's grandsons split the empire apart; only the part of it that was in China was focused in China. Everyone focused on the territory they controlled, for the obvious reasons.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Division_of_the_Mongol_Empire

The reason they paid no attention to Western Europe is very straightforward; the Mongols never reached Western Europe. But they reached Eastern Europe and they stayed there for centuries.
I just leave this here.
https://www.businessinsider.com/free-speech-absolutist-elon-...
The only example I can think of is water. While it's not gone, the quality and cleanliness has decreased over time. There are many areas where you can no longer consume seafood due to high pollution levels. Same with swimming or drinking (boiling used to be sufficient to clean water, but it certainly isn't anymore).

Even "safe" seafood is only recommended to be consumed 2 times a week now due to the build up of heavy metals.

It's also true that we'll always been able to purify water for consumption/use, but there is a cost to that and I don't see that cost decreasing.
Blockchain Gaming Promises Passive Income, but Barriers to Entry Are High
Yes, that too, but GP isn't talking about virtual environments.
Evil users of emacs have an equivalent service here: https://emacsthemes.com/
Does it requires too beefy hardware?
*couldn't care less. Unless you mean that he could care less, implying that he cares somewhat. Perhaps even a great deal.
> If you broke it into quartiles i bet the top quartile college graduate does much better than the top quartile plumber.

Yes, as long as college here means that one has a professional degree (MD, JD, etc.), where access is granted to a career with an artificially constrained labour supply, thereby producing artificially high incomes. Of course, it's the supply management that boosts incomes, not some mystical power of the degree itself.

Interestingly, having only a bachelor degree seems to put you in a worse position than without, based on what we see in the makeup of high income earners. Which probably isn't too surprising. Graduating from college, save striving for a professional degree to gain access to an artificial market, is where you end up if you weren't already found to be useful in the economy. It's a sign of someone failing economically.
And how many "war things" originated from non-military R&D?

After all every country's GDP is much higher than its military spending and for sure non-military research dwarfs military research.

This whole hypothesis seems unsound. It would mean that all civilian research is somehow much, much worse per dollar than military research. I highly doubt that.
I call BS on this one. What does free speech even mean in this day and age?
Do you mean "he literally couldn't care less"?
Go to libera.chat and join #libera

Then ask for channels while stating your interests. Probably the fastest way.
If he takes it private then maybe he could just turn it off and walk away. That would be a huge contribution to society.
Comment from my 87yo father in law, a retired attorney: "Years ago I represented Yasser Seirawan, then the U.S. chess champ. He was interested in the Washington Square scene so I took him downtown. Of course, the hustlers were after him: he looked like a reasonably prosperous guy. He accepted after playing a little hard to get. The shock was obvious when he played much faster than the clock and won easily. He wouldn't take their money and when he told them his name they loved having played against him especially since he didn't complete the hustle by taking their money."
Crispy Doom is not Boom compatible. Chocolate also builds for Hexen, Heretic and Strife. "Vanilla" usually doesn't imply Boom (Boom isn't even backwards compatible with Doom) but perhaps limit removing.

It also seems like you are missing GP's point. "Better" is a loaded word because it implies a quality by which to measure, but Chocolate is better than Crispy for the exact purpose GP suggests it; it's more accurate in terms of the presentation and limitations of the original. Chocolate looks, sounds and plays like the original, with few compromises.
> The `download` Attribute For The <a> Element

This can also be done by the webserver with Content-Disposition. [1]

But it's cool, I didn't know this could be done with HTML, it offers a lot of possibilities.

[1] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Co...
Thanks !
Yeah, I really enjoyed working with the ESA.
I think they mention the usage of a shield around the SEPP.
But yeah, this architecture is pretty crazy for a satellite.

It's actually in production, but it's an experimental satellite, so not built to drive crazy missions for now.
I would recommend considering using NanoBind, the follow up of PyBind11 by the same author (Wensel Jakob), and move as much performance critical code to C or C++. https://github.com/wjakob/nanobind

If you really care about performance called from Python, consider something like NVIDIA Warp (Preview). Warp jits and runs your code on CUDA or CPU. Although Warp targets physics simulation, geometry processing, and procedural animation, it can be used for other tasks as well. https://github.com/NVIDIA/warp

Google Jax is another option, jitting and vectorizing code for TPU, GPU or CPU. https://github.com/google/jax
> Evil users of emacs

That's it buddy you just made the list! You'll never work in this town again you hear me!!! Neverrrrr!!
I was at first guessing this this might have had as a (partial) data source the hsts static preload list[1]. But, a domain I know we never submitted to it was on there while one which was submitted (but has since aged out) is not. Also these lists are so absurdly large

[1] https://cs.chromium.org/chromium/src/net/http/transport_secu...
I don't remember that but a lot of his antics seemed to be planned and part of his way of keeping people awake and paying attention. If it is part of his routine I wonder when he added it. I took his courses in 2006-2007.
Fairly sure it's the card processors dictating that, not Square.
That doesn't mean the brain is spared. Covid does get into the brain, and CNS positivity is correlated with olfactory mucosa positivity. Something we've known since autopsy report after autopsy report since 2020. Two years now.

Fig 1b, 1c.
Fig 5.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41593-020-00758-5

"Presence of intact CoV particles together with SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the olfactory mucosa, as well as in neuroanatomical areas receiving olfactory tract projections"
I also had those by just doing my work and talking with colleagues about work. At home.

People love (my company included) to say office promotes those low-stake spontaneous conversations that result in something positive. Because these spontaneous conversations don't happen remotely, the argument is that then that something positive wouldn't have happened either. That's a false argument though.

Besides, if a company has responsible employees they will think about work, about their tasks. These types of brainstorming and thinking would come up anyway. And if not exactly this specific brainstorm that came from a lunch-topic, another one.

At the end of the day, right now most arguments are emotional arguments to force people into the office. Those findings that something didn't make sense, would happen anyway if people just think about work and do their job, in the comfort of their home, in the Bahamas, or wherever they choose to work.
Having goals that can not be reached in time doesn't mean his goals are fake or that he doesn't mean to achieve them.

There is zero sign that his support for free speech is a spontaneous idea that he will lose interest about in a few month. And there is also no way to achieve it but certainly there is plenty room to improve with Twitter.
Worth noting that the date of buying these shares is March 14th, and the date he started rather unsubtly tweeting about Twitter's approach to free speech is March 25th. So to be clear, anyone who thought that Musk's actions are the result of the twitter poll he ran has clearly been misled.
> For that you need to have the idea for a differentiator that will hook people, and unlike engineering talent you can't buy this!

I have an entire bookshelf of books about how to do this, but I’ve never been asked about it during a coding interview. I think it's less of "you can't buy it" and more of that no one values it.
I worked for Burroughs from the early 80s; at first on B80s, latterly on B20s.

I never heard of one of these things. I would have been intrigued.
Given the significance to some politicians I can imagine that they would intervene if it came to that.

Musk has to take care to not overplay his hand.
> Everybody knows that building a competitor is not the hard part.

Everybody knows this? Truth Social needs to be told. The app can barely launch, and got a head start forking Mastadon as far as we know. They have hundreds of millions (a few billion?) in capitalization.

Everyone knows people who haven’t actually tried tend to underestimate the difficulty in other’s work.

To be clear, nowhere did I say the engineering is the hardest part.
The characteristic of being unable to be deactivated. Google has an interest in you not knowing this term, like asking about jury nullification during jury duty.
Can you explain how being public pushes Twitter to extremes ?
> Professional feudal armies would have crushed Roman armies of equivalent sizes.

Really? Why?

The other thing is that a feudal state wouldn't be able to field an army that was of an equivalent size to a Roman army. The Romans fielded eight legions at Cannae, which was like 80,000 guys. Agincourt, in comparison, involved about a quarter of that number if you combine both sides.

Even if the roman legionnaire was worse than a feudal soldier, which I see no reason to believe, it's obvious that there was a precipitous decline in organizational and logistical capacity. In a battle, that would count more than the quality of the soldiers involved.
The search function in Apple and in the Google photos apps are good. Text searches for “Turkey” or other terms is surprisingly good.
But a new Twitter would pop up within a month.

It would be called something else that would be easily to remember like Tikker or Woobly.
I really enjoyed this read, disappointed that I haven’t been able to find a digital copy of the western electric handbook.
Suggestion: pick up one of your projects and dedicate your self entirely to it until it shows whether it is worth your efforts or not.
Truth Social launched with a real differentiating message compared to Twitter that appeals to a lot of people, had massive media coverage and is fronted by one of the most prolific and famous Twitter users in history. Yet by all accounts it has effectively zero traction.
>The usual route is to buy a magazine or newspaper

Or a TV channel/network, let's not forget those!

I think you're on point.
> I don't believe the Mongols ever dominated Tibet.

Then again... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongol_conquest_of_Tibet
The web standards are large and complex. I still discover new parts of the standards almost every month, even if I have made websites since the stoneage, in 1995. The title attribute of stylesheets was new to me.
Unable to turn off (sorry for my bad English, it is not my mother language). If AI can be shut down by any set of humans then it is just a property, not a citizen.
> Do they still have a haywire fraud detection system that randomly freezes innocent people's accounts? I

As others have pointed out already, AML/KYC laws are strict. They are strict in general for financial services, but for banks, because of their privileged position in the financial system, its even stricter.

But there is a second aspect which is that challenger banks such as Monzo take an even more cookie-cutter approach. If you don't fit their definition of what a "client" is then you will be in for a hard time. Normal banks do this too (to a degree) but challenger banks are much more hard-core about it because if you fall outside the cookie-cutter then you mess up their fragile business model.

Case in point, I know of a well-known, well-established, UK VoIP operator. They moved their business over to one of these challenger banks (might have been Monzo !) because the challenger bank provided APIs to enable integration to their internal systems, which is something that the old-school high-street bank did not offer - and the banking fees were lower too, always a bonus !

TL;DR: $challenger_bank had a definition of a client that did not include provision of VoIP services. So after about a year as a client, said VoIP provider found their account frozen (in this instance they were explicitly told, it wasn't a silent freeze). VoIP provider attempted to constructively engage with $challenger_bank but it was like talking to a brick wall "computer says no".

(N.B. I have oversimplified the story a bit, so please don't nitpick !)
Datasets should behave like Git repositories (2021)
The Elon Market Hypothesis is alive and well

https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2021-02-10/elon-m...
Trump’s Truth Social is worth over $10B and it’s basically a mastodon instance
Now, if Richard Stallman becomes a shareholder at Twitter, we might start to see some changes in that arena.
What is a "professional feudal army"?

No seriously, that is a conceptual oxymoron, or at least I understand it to be.
I'm tired of these kinds of titles. They are like news headlines and nothing but a way that maybe it worked for someone. as the adage states: "there is no royal way for learning."
Last man standing
The result you want from gymnastic coaching is well aligned with what the test measures because, well, the test and the desired result are the same thing.

This is not the case with standardized testing in education, is it? It's a lot like these tech interviews people keep complaining about that test a knowledge bunch of bullshit you have to cram for but have nothing to do with the actual job.
I’m not arguing that this system is not better than what you/OP compare it to. I’m only responding to “level playing field”. The Philly mom is just an example to show how obviously absurd that statement is.
...what are you talking about?

Every browser you use is forced by App Store policy to run off of the system WebView, which is Safari...other features being part of the browser doesn't change being forced into using that engine.
I disagree. I think we should definitely try to remake not just our galaxy but the universe for our comfort and desires
Despite the messiness of biology it is, has always been, and always will be a reasonable statement to say that "boys have a penis and girls have a vagina". That really shouldn't need saying. Of course, the meaning of the statement depends on the meaning you assign to "boy", "girl", as well as "penis" and "vagina". But in the semantic/communication environment in which we operate, the statement is reasonable because most people define those words such that the statement evaluates to usually-true. And usually-true is what we work with in biology and language; it's not computer science, it's messy, so approximate language is appropriate.
How LCEVC works – A new approach to video compression
You do remember the hell that was the font tag, don’t you?

I think a lot of confusion from HTML being used for UIs vs hypertext documents. It’s a natural evolved mess still balancing the two.

But style should apply to the applied representation, while HTML should represent the intent of the content. The line is fuzzy, and HTML/CSS has a bad history of what falls where.

The cool thing with browsers is that we can bake in style to support multiple representations at once: monitor, mobile, printer, etc. Using the style attribute directly is mostly a side effect of only targeting the browser. Although your example of relative units is more ambiguous. Using a proper tag to represent the intent or falling back to a class where HTML lacks one would be preferable.

I think the separation makes more sense if you’ve used other document systems. SGML or XML DocBook, LaTeX, ROFF, etc.

For the last, if I use the man or mandoc module, all the man page norms are there for me and I’m just plugging in the content with the right macros.

W/o, I’m manually flipping registers all over the place.

But I’ve never hear of a roff or LaTeX UI, so…
Try any sport and see how some new people come in and start at a level that others won’t achieve even after years. This makes you believe in talent quickly.

With physical abilities this is more accepted but I don’t see a reason why mental capabilities would be any different. Some people just have more powerful brains by birth. You can achieve a lot by exercise and discipline but some people can achieve higher levels than others.
I like the approach, even though in practice I would not necessarily follow the suggested presentation.

From my experience, most math courses start with the "dead" book definitions.
Which is not the way mathematics are built: people start with intuitive but incorrect ideas, the idea is proven to be useful, and only then made correct. The definitions end up coming from refinements to avoid contradictions arising from edge-cases.
This was a common reproach to the Bourbaki group who wanted to formalize mathematics into an almost computer-digestible form; I think it was Grothendieck who said they were "embalming mathematics".
This is absolutely not a good way to learn mathematics, although it is the lowest effort to come up with.
I generally think it is much better to go through what do we want to achieve, how it came to be, etc.
Which you can generally find with presentation of the Seven Bridges of Königsberg problem, some game mathematics (Rubik's cube, etc), or "You could have invented..." type articles (the famous one being for "spectral sequences").

Although there should be different approaches for different learning types. But this is another problem, which is more linked to the (bad) educational structure.
Do you have any examples of Twitter arresting or imprisoning people for speech, or acquiescing to government censorship? Perhaps you are instead to moderating their private platform and enforcing community guidelines? I understand the latter can be annoying, but it is a mistake to conflate the two, as free speech is something very special and important and in the US is in fact codified into the Bill of Rights.

TL;DR free speech is between you and the government, not between you and someone else or some other company.
Emacs 28.1 released
Do you really believe that "style" requires entire new syntax, as opposed to "data" and "behavior", vague as these categories are? In a markup language based on SGML already chock full of syntactical constructs for managing/inheriting item-value pairs? In SGML, attributes are exactly there for things that aren't to be displayed to the user; the idea that attributes are for "behaviour" or whatever is entirely made-up after the fact to justify CSS' existence.
Maybe this one? https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=ch.want.imagec...
You might wanna look up the The Babylon Bee (Satire) twitter incident.
"Allowed" doesn't mean anything on Twitter. People get punished for thing that do not break the rules including obvious satire.

Elon is completely right Twitter has lost common sense when in comes to enforcing their own rules.
Some folks seem to be taken back by the word "feel" in the title, but it rings true to me.

I work at a place with lots of super smart people. Almost everything is automated, but a lot of that automation breaks and you have to constantly get the creator involved to turn that "one little knob" to get it working for your job. That's fine for the creator because he/she knows exactly what to do when the problem occurs. However, if you're an internal customer trying to use that system, its infuriating.

If you're going to create IaC tooling for a team of 50 people, it needs to work without contacting the author. If not, you've just taken a 5 minute job and turned it into a 2 hour search for the bug event.