skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You can find interesting people saying things, but most of them will be appealing to their audience by complaining when their ingroup gets any negative commentary, and quote retweeting shade at their outgroup. It's like some weird version of British Parliament where the stakes are as low as which obscure philosopher is actually more like this philosopher than that one.
>> But you should blame the correct actor for that call, and it certainly is not the individual soldier.

He joined while that war was ongoing (2007). I think it's perfectly fair to judge him in that case when the choice to take part was 100% his.
Not a day goes by without a post on how crappy Google is at support or fixing problems or ignoring the public at large. "Don't Be Evil" (if that was ever a thing) is now "Don't Give A Shit (At Scale)".

If Google is so large that it cannot manage even something as basic as spam, perhaps it is too big to exist?
So does he own it? I'm leaning no. The trailer sounds like he's preemptively telling people who ask him about it to can it.
Nearly half of crypto owners first bought digital assets in 2021
I bought a Garmin watch for the body battery feature. I track my usual body battery throughout the day. If it's low, then I could use a break.

At 3 PM, it's normally 50. If it's 60, I push myself. At 30, I take a nap.

Naps are good way to reenergize and they keep you from dumping more energy on other stuff (e.g. HN, Facebook). Otherwise, I like just watching music videos. Some would say meditation, but paying attention to music is a form of meditation for me.
Wasn't McAfee personally trading though? I'm not as up on his more recent insanity.

+1 agreed on the rest. It's an interesting thought problem. Capital was less formal during the late 19th century monopoly era in the US, but it makes me wonder if there were schemes where Morgan or Rockefeller publicly circulated market moves.
Emacs 28.1 is out
Seems a bit self-contradictory. They admit that choice does cause the belief in having more control as long as the person believes their choices are different. The only thing they're really disproving here is that "if people believe their choices are identical, they don't feel in more control", which I'm not sure anyone ever denied? There's an important distinction between "someone's choices are identical" and "someone believes their choices are identical".

I think any good D&D dungeon master knows this very well. Your goal as a DM is to make your players feel they can do anything, that they have full agency to make any choice they want, and that every choice is different. But it's also your job to keep the story going, so while you may vary the details -- a different encounter here, a different city description there -- in the end the player's choices don't change the outcome of the story much. Finding that balance where they believe their choices matter more than they do is what makes a great DM, and that entirely depends upon people feeling more in control when they believe their options are not identical.
>Those same stats are true for EVERY social media platform.

Not on Facebook, for one.

>You can get off your soap box now.

Why the uncalled for tone?
Why would being largest shareholder of a company not give you any special privileges in a company? Also, it guarantees him at least one seat on the board, and probably enough clout to help dictate the future direction of the company.

If your largest shareholder says the current methodology used for content manipulation and account banning is bad for business, then there will be systemic changes as a result.
This isn't the same thing: A person using they/them - when they do not know the other person's pronoun - is someone trying to be nice and not misgender someone. In other words, using neutral language unless confirmation of gender. Pointing isn't polite in all company and repeatedly using a name isn't natural speech.

It isn't taking someone's choice. All someone has to do is speak up.

Additionally: I use they/them when I'm speaking about friends that are not mutual friends. Usually, gender doesn't enhance the story. Same when talking about my spouse in situations where I'm talking about myself being bisexual. People do not need to know what sort of genitals my spouse has, especially when it is because they want to see "how queer I am".
More information can be found in the book "The Dead Hand: The Untold Story of the Cold War Arms Race and its Dangerous Legacy" by David E. Hoffman. It really is a Dr. Strangelove inspired "Doomsday Device".
As far as I know Redwood has no server-side rendering solution. You can do both client-side rendering and static generation (although not as sophisticated as Next.js'), but not server-side rendering.

Next.js also has a pretty small API surface and is generally quite unopinionated when it comes to your apps structure, while Redwood chooses more of the stack for you and what tools you should use (Storybook, Jest, Prisma, GraphQL).

I would also like to point out that while there are a lot of people rooting for Redwood's success and they seem to have some active core contributors, there is actual financial backing for Next.js and they have large enterprise users.

There are some startups that use Redwood listed on the 1.0 update website, but at least I do not know any of them.
I would posit the difference in our viewpoint largely comes down to the fact I've spent a considerable amount of time on a racetrack. On a track, speed is kind of the point, so reducing speed is not an appropriate way to reduce your risk profile and increase safety. Instead we focus heavily on ensuring that drivers on track are educated and practice safe driving behaviors, like appropriate signalling, maintaining their line, looking ahead and committing, and being predictable.

By your logic, when taken to the extreme, you should never exceed the speed by which the safety technology in your vehicle can completely prevent injury (which is about 35-40mph in most modern vehicles). By my logic, when taken to the extreme, you should never take any action that you haven't planned ahead and signaled clearly to other drivers.

Neither is unreasonable, but they come from a different place. I keep reiterating my main point, because I think we should agree to disagree. Speed does not cause accidents, erratic behavior and not looking ahead causes accidents, speed makes the accidents that do happen worse, but if we had less accidents we would still be safer overall. Since I'm not concerned with myself causing an accident, I am most concerned with others causing an accident with me, speed is not what concerns me. In actuality, I see speed on the roadway as a tool to avoid other people who are likely to cause an accident. I almost always drive faster than surrounding traffic to try to get out of being in a position of having cars all around me, because I don't trust other drivers to not do something stupid and dangerous. I've been proven right time and time again, by being able to avoid accidents using speed as a tool.

It's somewhat ironic that I feel safer on a race track than I do on a public highway, because of the skill differential of the drivers.
> Our Jackal vehicles are lightly armoured so that we can see more and use our weapons more freely.

Armour is a trade-off. More armour means less manoeuvrability and less ability to fight. You could completely encase yourself in a foot of steel if you wanted and just sit there on the battlefield, but you wouldn't be able to achieve anything.
> Anticipation brings excitement and a certain taste of happiness.

It does bring excitement and joy, but this feeling is rather - you constantly have to chase it.

> If I wanted to maximize someone's happiness over time, I'd try to keep them in state where they are almost achieving their set goals for as long as possible.

There's a risk of burning out, so I'd be careful with that.
It's not that HVAC limited by energy availability - it's that what people want is to regulate the temperature of their environment, and you can get most of the way there with good architectural design. This means people can get what they want in a more energy efficient way.
A std:advance Implementation with C++98, C++17, and C++20
> along with massively appreciated stock options ofcourse

Give someone a massive retention bonus (in this case structured as an RSU) to get them to stay doesn't seem like unique genius to me
Windows specifications currently require that AMD64 computers have the ability to disable secure boot. Are there any counter examples?
> Strokes and drop shadows (aka blurs) are all things that GPUs aren't great particularly great at.

They can handle those just fine. Blurs are just inherently very expensive, but GPUs are no worse at them than CPUs. In fact GPUs are way faster at blurs than CPUs.

Same with filled shapes. It's not really a challenge. You have a fragment shader that knows how to essentially 'clip' to a round rect, which isn't hard, and then filling it any which way with anything is trivial.
I know I'm just whining, but it's ridiculous this is still the case.
I only ever used a laptop once.

It was a company issued device, high quality, good brand, powerful enough.
I hated it.

I only took it home once.
The small screen, the cramped keyboard, the noise, painful downward angle when looking at the screen without a support.

Everything was a downgrade from my habits of using good old chunky desktop computers. I like comfort, silence, lot of interfaces, large screens, ergonomics.

I need a workstation, not a toy I can use in bed.

And to be honest, I can't help but look down on young coders using their shiny macs in coffee shops, I think they are delusional if they think they can be 100% productive with a toy computer.
> I do not think they are so great as you make them out to be

There's a dynamic with ecosystem problems I believe applies to all languages. You only need one missing or bad library that's critical to your project to make the whole language useless.

An anecdotal example: I remember many years ago trying to give Python a go and within 15 minutes ran into a problem parsing XML. A search revealed this was a known issue that was being worked on with the foremost tool in Python for this job. You couldn't have credibly argued that Python had an ecosystem problem even at the time, but for me in that particular scenario Python had a show-stopping ecosystem problem. There were ways around this, but the most convenient way around it at the time was switching back to a more familiar language.

My greater point is that, we can definitely make generalizations about a language's ecosystem health, but keep in mind there is a very context-sensitive, practical dimension to that type of language assessment.
Avoiding copies is useful, but AFAIK, this isn't jamimg the whole hokey-pokey into kernelspace. Only the bulk encryption (and probably? packetizing too), user space negotiates the session and just tells the kernel what it is. If there's anything that's not just application data, the kernel leaves it for userland.

Bulk ciphering isn't hairy, and it's the same approach as IPSEC; userland negotiates sessions, kernel does the bulk ciphers.
How are you not better off? You obviously had the means to sustain yourself for 7 years somehow without working.

They had to spend 14,000+ hours in order to earn those wages. Also depends on what their expenses are and if they are saving anything.
We already pay for most of those services, it's just that right now, we often get to pay twice for them, in both the upfront dollar cost, and all the non-dollar suffering that untreated medical issues, chronic homelessness, and generational crime cause.
> In a sense federal jobs is socialistic I suppose, which is why you should want limited government.

Before one spends a trillion that could be going to the welfare of the citizens themselves, yeah probably.

>But you do need a military force in the country

Obviously, not sure why this is said here.

>It's not genuine to say military service is a welfare program, it's more of a jobs program.

It's not genuine to say it's a jobs program either - my healthcare money is being strapped to rockets and shipped across the ocean. Are those rockets filing taxes?
I'm not addressing the rest of your post, but pacifism is absurd and pacifists should be dismissed. Pacifism allows those who are not pacifist to impose their will on others.
> a bit of invading.

The world doesn't work the way you wish it did. Atrocities are prevented and security is maintained through action and credible deterrence. This requires men and women willing or conscripted into service. Would be great if none of this were necessary, but it's simply not how the world works and there is ample historical evidence of what happens when a country lowers its guard. As I type this Germany is coming to grips with its own wishful thinking regarding Russia and its energy and food supplies.
Friendly reminder that getting out of all those pesky nuclear arms control treaties meant a greatly reduced reaction time on both sides. And having 15 instead of 45 minutes to react to a detected launch makes errors naturally a lot more likely.

Nuclear war doesnt need crazy people on both sides ready to ride the bomb to end human civilization. It only needs sufficiently brainwashed bureaucrats who are stuck in the process of an apparatus that believes they have their hands forced to retaliate.

edit: And just in case somebody still has any delusions of efficiency left, most of those past cases of "almost ended the world" were down to one men who had the power and accompanying backbone to overrule and /or block a strike decision. With Vasily Arkhipov it was 2 to 1 for the "retaliatory" nuclear strike against depth charges aimed at getting them to surface.
...or we just keep moving to http/2 which avoids this limit.
The justification for the cost is lower volume. There are big fixed costs associated with bringing hardware to market.

If you sell 100x as many units as your competitors, you can spend more on R&D, under cut your competitors prices, and make more money.

Products targeted at niche markets are at a cost disadvantage inherently.
But it's hard to 'abuse' reading a blog post...
How many people are experiencing day-to-day anxiety /because/ they were enabled to avoid social interactions for so many years through apps and services like this?

If the plastic widget for holding books open is occasionally lopping off fingers so you need to use it more, it might be worth decrying.
When I retired I returned the work MBP. Now I have a M1 Ultra Mac Studio and I miss nothing about that sad 16GB Intel laptop. The MBP roared like a freight train all the time. Now the loudest sound is the ceiling fan.
Are you sure? I have both an Intel Macbook Pro (work) and a Lenovo Thinkpad and I love my Thinkpad. I hate the Macbook so much.

It's true my fans turn on a little more with my Thinkpad but I rather have fans over a sluggish Macbook. Plus with my Airpods Pro on, neither the other person or I will notice any fans. (I also won't get fans during a meeting anyway.)

Plus for half of the price of that Macbook, I get a much lighter laptop with 64 GB of RAM and a beefier CPU, plus a touchscreen that I love for the couch.
Comparison of performance per chip is somewhat meaningless without pricing. A mining rig contains dozens or hundreds of chips, and without pricing info, we don't know if an Intel rig would offer more performance per hardware dollar.

The efficiency is industry leading which is quite impressive considering how many years and generations the competition has been at it.
> How long should they keep data that ... the ... owner of the account agree should be removed?

Has the Internet Archive actually made a statement about that? Some Flickr support person claimed they agreed to it in a support thread, but I can imagine a lot of scenarios where there might be an unacceptable amount of spin going on (e.g. Flickr made some unreasonable ultimatum, and IA chose to delete the account instead of accept).

> If this isn't sufficient rationale to delete data, what is?

That the data is truly unwanted.
The odd part of that is that many of the reservists were active duty, including combat veterans, and then moved into reserves. So it's not like they haven't seen stuff.
>Twitter has a terms of service, and advertisers don't want their adverts next to hate speech

Why? Does an ad get contaminated by association?

Or it's a minority who gets to call what's "hate speech" and what's not, and pushes advertisers to not want to risk this (who wouldn't give a fuck otherwise)?
Eigen is similar to xtensor, but with 1) Eigen being significantly more mature, and used in production in simulation/research environments and 2) Eigen having not just basic operations on arrays, but also a full suite of linear algebra operations comparable to a full BLAS library, including a full test suite. xtensor wins on having better integration with Python and other languages out of the box. There's also some performance limitations due to being inspired by numpy, particularly with respect to memory management.
In Defense of the Em Dash
> then there is a coercive, violent force acting in my name without my consent.

There is. Or really, there are people that believe they are doing what is right in the name of government.

I did not vote for the people who claim to have the right to rule. Even if I did, could they prove they are acting as my agents? They are simply doing what they chose, using their own free will, either for good or for evil. Not once did I delegate any of my authority to them, even if I could.

Here's a thought: let's say that 2/3rds of a group of people decide it would be nice to have a place where the downtrodden can go get free meals, which sounds like an admirable goal. However, instead of using their own effort to build this place, they instead decide to appoint another group of people, they label "the government" to do so. They cast votes anonymously, and select 10 people to act as "the government". These people decided that in order to build their place to feed the downtrodden, they will go and take (by force if necessary), the property of other people, such as money, land goods, etc.

Is there really a government, or are there people that believe there is a government, and act as if they have the right to use force?

Another question, how are you opposing its violence? I ask because with all my talk, I am only taking baby steps to oppose it, and maybe you have come up with a better way.
Well presumably he gets paid at the normal active duty rate when he’s called up, or whatever the UK equivalent is.
The CIA Burglar Who Went Rogue
> "Queen’s enemies."

I can't believe people still fight for royalty. Ants fight their queen's enemies. Free human being should fight for themselves, their families, etc.
Has the Biden team mentioned anything about battery tech research funding? Or are they staying away from it so as not to spook current startups and investors that are making progress?
Yeah... the time to try to help them has gone by then. Nobody will listen because it's much easier to blame the guy that's not there any more, and let the beat go on.
> which effectively prevents you from installing linux

This was going to be the state when Microsoft first proposed secure boot. But the backlash lead to (1) being able to disable it and (2) being able to load customer keys.

Are any motherboards actually locked down to where you can't install another OS? My older Gigabyte motherboard, my Thinkpad laptop, and my HP business line desktop all support both of these.

UEFI was definitely a pain point for booting Linux when it was first available. The same Gigabyte motherboard mentioned ended up having it all turned off and just used legacy boot for years. But everything works great with UEFI USB boot installers and the OS. I'd recommend giving it a try again.

I personally use secure boot for Linux through custom keys and a kernel install hook that resigns the EFI+kernel+initramfs+cmdline blob. It's quite nice in combination with LUKS unlocked by TPM2 (similar to Bitlocker). Secure boot actually lets you be more selective in which PCRs to verify for LUKS unlocking, meaning it's much less fragile during updates.
The article didn't use the blockquote cite attribute in the blockquote that explains why it's not used much.

This is perhaps internally consistent.
It's amazing how long people have had performant productive systems with Ivy Bridge CPUs and Pascal based GPUs (NVidia 10xx parts)... If it wasn't for many of these older boards not having a TPM for Windows 11 support I'd have probably gotten years more still out of similar systems I own too. My similar Pascal equipped build has to have been one of the best value systems I've ever owned - I've bought two Macs in the same timeframe this box served as my gaming rig/desktop PC. Granted these were MacBooks so not fairest fight, but I've never had any computer last me as long as this PC build has.

My 1080ti has been one of best PC part investments I've made; if you ignore lack of Ray Tracing its still able to knock 60fps/1440p in just about anything, a god-send during these chip/GPU shortage times.
s/value_uri/object/, which may be a URI:

{named_graph_uri, subject_uri, predicate_uri, object, [datatype_uri, language_uri]}

{g, s, p, o, [d], [l]}

A mindmap, where e.g. g=example.org/mind-maps/2022#our-mind-map and "a" is "xsd:type":

@base <_#> .
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix schema: <https://schema.org/> .

:Node, a, rdfs:Class .
:linksTo, a, rdfs:Property .

:Shapes, a, :Node .

:Shapes, :linksTo, :Rectangle .
:Rectangle, a, :Node .

:Rectangle, :linksTo, :Square .
:Square, a, :Node .

:Square, rdfs:label, "Square" .
:Square, schema:name, "Square" .

:Rectangle, rdfs:subClassOf, :Shape .
:Square, rdfs:subClassOf, :Rectangle .

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Notation3#Comparison_of_Notati...

https://www.w3.org/TR/turtle/#sec-intro
Universal healthcare or free college education would lower Army recruitment for sure.
My Mum had two hip repacements and was given lots of rehab therapy regarding to walking, and she could walk more or less OK. But there was none regarding to falling over, which was her real problem.
Auth for Web3 Onboarding
> Much easier to get out of poverty with universal healthcare and subsidized education

Isn't that the case though? Medicaid provides great healthcare for those in the lower income brackets (my family used it for the majority of my childhood years) and most colleges are basically free (community college and some state schools will actually pay you).

I don't think the ability to pay for education or healthcare is really the reason for poverty here.
A new Twitter cannot pop up in a month. A site with all of twitters functionality could. But the value is not in the site, it's in the adoption.
i still use this feature in firefox, and it's still one of my favorite little tricks to add to personal projects for a little flair. i'd only wish safari would support it as well (i don't care for chrome or google in general).
The man who did my job back in the 80s was a literal billionaire, putting on the same uniform as me for the same pay.
> You only need one missing or bad library that's critical to your project to make the whole language useless

...no? If there is functionality I need, and no library implements it, I will implement it myself. That goes for any language. Otherwise, the job of a programmer would simply be to string together existing libraries, not writing anything meaningful.
Are direct calls really all that much faster than indirect calls on current x86 archs? I was under the impression that it’s more or less the same on the current generation of CPUs. Those CPUs do a decent job of branch predicting indirect calls, especially in a micro benchmark loop. The BTB generally works well.
It applies to any vehicle that participates in traffic.