skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
yup, infact recently MATLAB applied a fix to this for their software [1]

[1] https://www.extremetech.com/computing/308501-crippled-no-lon...
I like the concept, a lot, because I've always thought that money should be redistributed equitably. But can we maybe think of a better way of doing it? Like just giving everybody credit or smth?
True, who could possibly know they were dealing with an incredibly malicious, manipulative and unreliable dictator before Bucha? /s

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_war_crimes

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_web_brigades

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Research_Agency

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_interference_in_the_20...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_interference_in_the_20...
I think you might have misunderstood the blog post. It is server-side rendering on the edge, shipping nothing more than plain HTML/CSS to the browser. There is no client side JS *at all* here.
Perhaps known as Gray's Law:

“Any sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice.”

In particular this interpretation [1] may be best applicable

"In other words: If you find someone acting so stupid that you can’t believe she’s doing it without the slightest chance of knowing that it’s stupid, then she might act out of malice."

[1] https://agiletrail.com/2011/12/20/hanlons-razor-comfort-in-t...
Users no longer have public dislike counts to express their concerns, and as a consequence of that, there will be more concerning comments on videos.
It should be possible to create open source versions, researchers will find a way if something is cool enough
> UDP connection

Small nitpick: "UDP is considered a connectionless protocol because it doesn't require a virtual circuit to be established before any data transfer occurs."

https://www.techtarget.com/searchnetworking/definition/UDP-U....
Things we did not do while reaching $2M ARR
Yes, it's only available to download in the UK at the moment I'm afraid.
Alas, controversy and debate do not always go hand-in-hand. Highly controversial comments and posts often contain a lot of comments, but many of them end up being people yelling past each other, rather than engaging with each other.

They have the surface form of a debate, but it's very low-quality, consisting of people trying to talk to the audience by scoring points off each other, rather than organically engaging with each other.

JM2C.
> It's not all that unique, it's just that "daily car rentals" are pretty amorphous

It’s also tough to verify an actual transaction happened. With most e-commerce, the equivalent would involve shipping around boxes of rocks to generate tracking numbers.
Honestly, I don't think it can. Public perception cannot tolerate failure/issues - even if there are huge efficiency gains by not requiring _everything_ to be put through the process.
Page 16 is quite clear: the vast majority of missing generation capacity was natural gas. The lost wind capacity was comparable to lost coal capacity. Whether the cause is categorized as equipment failure, weather, or fuel availability, the most affected generation category was natural gas.
Thanks, the landing page is pretty old now, I'm working on a mobile app right now that is like a time tracker integrated with your to do list items, and eventually it'll integrate with your calendar, it'll cost some X dollars a month, where X < 20, not sure on pricing just yet.

But to be honest, I don't think consumers will pay much for subscription software, while businesses will. I'm thinking of pivoting to B2B, a calendar API product that other companies can integrate into, something like that.
I know, but I've been told that Spain has the most underused installed capacity.
> It is entirely possible that this ant hijacking is entirely done though a few very simple manipulations

It is entirely possible that human motivations and reasoning are driven by similarly simple mechanisms. The best example I can think of is how much of an asshole I can be to my family when I'm hangry.
>And if the basketball background has wind blowing leaves in one direction the Kuala fur won't match, it will look like the training set fur. The puddle won't reflect it.

If you read the article, it gives examples that do exactly this. For example, adding a flamingo shows the flamingo reflected in a pool. Adding a corgi at different locations in a photo of an art gallery shows it in picture style when it's added to a picture, then in photorealistic style when it's on the ground.
I'd guess, it's easier with art than any of the other options listed. IF, they are caught and audited, it would be hard to justify paying $10,000 to install a TV mount. On the other hand, who can question (or prove in court) that a $100,000 painting isn't worth $100,000.
who is Scott Ritter?
The problem is that some countries offer vastly better ROI on taxes than others.

Taxes aren’t a problem, shit ROI on taxes is.
Why? Cheap renewables and gas is a perfectly good route to zero carbon being used around the world.

I could think of ways to further minimize gas but there's politics involved too.

It also is a big carrot for Putin (or somebody who takes his place) to rejoin the peaceful world.

Build a golden bridge for your enemies to retreat over -- Sun Tzu
I didn't receive any important phone calls today, does that mean phone system reliability isn't important?
The shown page could be served on 0.01 seconds if it was...html. Or, if you MUST lob complexity at it, use a static site generator... that generates...HTML
"Fewer bugs" needs to produce 2x productivity over the productivity of the two developers independently in order to actually be a benefit. Code review and using typesafe languages can also catch nearly 100% of those bugs as well, without the 50% performance penalty.

"Keeps people on task" seems like management-think adjacent to "butts in chairs in an office" requirements: There's a fear that someone might be "wasting" time by being distracted, when you seriously need to contemplate problems sometimes.

I'd need to see that "actual evidence" that we're allegedly discarding. Two programmers with two computers clearly could produce twice the productivity if they're both strong programmers. When I've been pairing with people I simply do all the work. I might get 1-2 comments per hour about a missing semicolon that I would have discovered the moment I tried to build. The claims of the pairing advocates are pretty hard to believe, and I don't see extraordinary evidence to back their extraordinary claims.

As I intimated above, the only way it would work is if the developers are junior (or mediocre) enough to be prone to contributing 0.5x or less productivity left to their own devices, so that the two developers' inadequacies at programming complement each others' and you get a 1.5x productivity out of them combined or something. And I do suspect that companies use that fact to hire less competent developers and make them at least reasonably productive; Pivotal does 100% pairing, and sells it hard, but note that they're paid per developer hour and so actual productivity per-developer isn't what they're necessarily what they wanted to optimize.

As to your Edit: The exact thing I'm objecting to is 100% pairing, which is practiced at some companies like Pivotal. Or worse, 100% mobbing, which is more than two people at one screen.
No, I don't think the next step is passing laws to enslave children in coal mines. I am not advocating for child labor at all - just discussing the topic at hand, which in GP's comment was saying this link provided an example of children being made to work in coal mines. It was explicitly not.

I do not advocate for children's labor, but I also do not advocate for taking things to extremes in order to make a point. If you feel it's problematic for children to be allowed (not forced - allowed) to work in fast food, we can have that discussion. But talking about it as the missing link for returning to 19th century slave labor conditions, or the conditions currently in China is misleading and not worthy of a conversation.
I found this article hard to read. I was trying to understand what the current state of affairs is, and how these new abstractions improve the matter. E.g. the consistency properties, the weakenings, and when they help.

Instead it read more like an exasperated rant, that links to rust toolchain improvements. It does have an account of how to use the new features, which was good. But I couldn't glean when and how that would help me as a user
600+mil is a lot. But realistically how hard is it to bridge it over to Monero/Zcash/other privacy preserving coins, then slowly funnelling them back in to ethereum for an exchange?

Unless all swap contracts are updated to somehow keep track of any funds associated with the hackers original address, washing up those funds it's just a matter of time, no?
I will admit that needing to build mobile apps in CI is one particular challenge I have never needed to deal with.

But I can see that specific use case being a good one for an opinionated CI environment.

I largely work with Docker containers and Serverless. 2 areas that I don't see any advantages going outside of Jenkins (and see many downsides)
To go against all the negative comments here - I love Turo and use it all the time. The comment regarding money laundering doesn't even make sense - Turo charges for insurance and fees, it would be an expensive way to launder money. The fact that you don't see the final price right away is annoying but not uncommon. It's usually way cheaper than traditional car rental companies, anyway.
It would be interesting to see more attempts to “reverse engineer” ML models like in https://distill.pub/2020/circuits/curve-circuits - maybe even with a ML model of its own?
A classic example is when you're writing a custom allocator and need to align the address.

Another is storing pointers in a hash table - you need to do arithmetic on the pointer bits to compute the hash.
I agree that that service should be considered in the price of the rental, but I disagree that it should be separate from the rest of the rental fee. It's required, and it's only separated out to make the rental look cheaper, right up until you get hit with that fee.
Chomsky is frustrating because he sometimes omits context and nuance and lumps wildly heterogeneous groups of people together and implies they are acting in concert. For example, a couple of his books give the clear impression that George Kennan was a warmongering villain (but as a kind of throwaway aside without evidence or analysis). He also has a tendency to anthropomorphize institutions instead of treating them as complex systems, e.g. see his many criticisms of the NY Times.

Of course, plenty of Chomsky’s opponents have their own rhetorical and moral problems. As an undergraduate I watched Chomsky debate Alan Dershowitz, and Dershowitz put on one of the most disrespectful (of Chomsky and the audience) and academically dishonest performances I have ever seen.

It is unfortunate that many outspoken US detractors lose their voices once Russia or others commit clear atrocities, or just keep repeating non sequiturs about the US. It makes it harder to trust their earlier arguments and disentangle principle from reflexive anti-Americanism.

(It is likewise very damaging when the American president/military/intelligence undertakes aggressive wars, arms/trains paramilitaries in authoritarian countries, supplies weapons to murderous dictators, etc., first because those are bad in themselves, but also because they undermine American international legitimacy in cases where projection of American power can actually defend freedom and peace.)
A possible non-Rust example: SpiderMonkey uses a trick we call NaN-boxing to represent JS values, which takes advantage of the fact that doubles have 2^52 different bit patterns for NaN to store 48-bit pointers with 4 bits leftover for a type tag. Provenance for the ptr->int->double->int->ptr loop might still be manageable using a "base of the GC heap" pointer and with_addr(), but there are also cases where built-in objects store arbitrary non-GC pointers in private slots (for example, a Map object has a raw pointer to its heap-allocated backing array). In that case, there isn't an obvious way to reestablish provenance (although we could hack it for e.g. Cheri by adding a layer of indirection through a GC allocation that stores the real pointer).
Car wash flow is slightly different right? Because it is a cash heavy business - in that case the "laundering" happens through cooking the books to make the business seem more successful (with more cash inflows) than it actually has. That cash comes from some illicit activity with different parties than the car wash and slowly supplements the main income from running the legitimate business. In the turo example, unless I am misunderstanding, the drug dealer or whoever is providing an illicit service asks for payment through a car rental? And so now your customers have knowledge and participation in the laundering scheme.
I (try to) use spacemacs. I heard they're similar. Is Doom Emacs better for an IDE type experience compared to spacemacs? I'm mostly on Ubuntu if that matters
Someone thought about this before you, and made it true

https://mobile.twitter.com/roelven/status/145229070354816614...
Getting analysis of Ukraine from Mark Ames is like getting analysis of Sandy Hook from Alex Jones. There are credible people with a skeptical take on the Ukraine situation --- Mearsheimer is a good example. TrueAnon is not.
Sybil resistance/proof of personhood is a serious problem and interesting challenge to work on, not just in the cryptocurrency ecosystem but for the internet in general. I'm really surprised reading this thread and seeing that so many HN users apparently have never even heard or thought of this.

The very website we use can be and probably is gamed by Sybil attacks. The problem is even greater on sites like Facebook and Twitter. There are regular news of them shutting down thousands of bot accounts.

I am very skeptical of Worldcoin myself but you shouldn't simply dismiss the idea.

As for minting an NFT based on your passport: Sure, that's absolutely possible. Sounds like a better idea than what worldcoin is doing. The hashing would also be a lot simply since all you'd have to do is check the validity of the passport and base the hash on the passport number which is unique. My guess is there are legal reasons to them not taking this more sensible approach.

There are many other projects working on solving the problem. Check out Idena for a non-creepy idea, but that too comes with its own drawbacks imo.
And I refuted them with my citations. And you did copy paste, don't deny it. A google search will reveal the websites that have the same text you copy pasted.

You didn't even bother to mention who were those supposed scholars who "recorded with glee and pride" the supposed slaughters that took place. I'm still waiting for names.

More citations that destroy false narratives: https://miro.medium.com/max/1400/1*6CdqfPkDcULn5lJjofJMlQ.jp...
He made a similar framework for Janet lang in Joy Framework[1] and it's unironically a joy to work with. Joy is one of those tools that is almost enough to make you use a different language imo. Got it where it counts, but still minimal and low mental overhead.

[1]: https://joy.swlkr.com/
Devil's advocate: I think the point is not to solve a problem the users have, but rather a problem the company dabbling in crypto has, e.g. that no user benefits twice from one-time offers, this kind of things.
That's a nice theory, but there's little reason to believe it will work like that instead of working like it does basically everywhere else that tries such laws. "Don't discuss" turns into "tacitly ignore it for the 'norm' because it's impossible to not acknowledge it, single out 'deviations'". See also things like content filters treating any LGBT content as "adult", regardless of it being explicit in any way or not.

That's the obvious concern with the law, especially if you add such a "parents can sue" mechanism and with the political environment around. Any parent that sues over discussing families with one mom and one dad will look like a nutjob and loose, but parents suing over two dads appearing in a childrens book will have very legitimate concerns that have to be taken seriously.

Time will tell if that concern is wrong, but I'm not giving that scenario much chance.
You clearly didn't read the article, that's what the whole thing discusses
This is similar to the Canarsie Approach to JFK airport in New York.

Here's a brief article on the topic https://wingmag.com/en/the-canarsie-approach.
When someone says they will ‘pay’ me, that doesn’t make me think that I’ll get money in a few days time.

Maybe if Apple called it ‘Apple cheque is in the mail’ I might understand their definition.
Bob has the same problem as Beth in showing the sources of his funds as being legitimate to justify his lavish spending on car rentals.
Co-founder here, I'm sure there are many things I forgot to include in this list, still, a nice summary of the many things we haven't done.

Were we successful because or despite of all of these did-nots?

There are presumably many things there that would have made us more successful. And obviously many things we might do soon.

The takeaway? Don't stress over all the things you are not doing but focus on the few you are doing right.
Why is this interesting to HN?
This seems to me like an improvement for systems that don't have blockquotes in their embedding source (previously the behavior was that if there was no HTML inside the embedding element there was no fallback at all and it was just an empty element) that was an accidental regression.

I hope they add a simple check if the element has children or not to fix the regression, but I work on an app where some sort of fallback UI for deleted Tweets is a welcome change, even if "blank Tweet card" isn't a huge improvement, it's still a small win to get some hard-to-fix-on-our-side UI complaints off the backlog.
These same arguments can be applied to other activities, like driving a car. I do support treating teenagers with more agency than children, so while I don't support letting 5 years olds work in McDonalds, I honestly don't see a problem with 16 year olds doing it.

Yes, the risk is higher than for a 25 y.o., but as someone who started working at age 15 - there are also rewards in experience, money, and figuring your own shit out. Nothing taught me about life like working.
The problem is it is not quite so simple as you make it out. Kids are often told when a mommy and a daddy really love each other their love creates a baby. What happens if Johnny, a 5 year old, asks what happens if there is a daddy and a daddy. How far should the teacher go? No matter how the teacher answers it is going to cause issues.

Why not let the parents who know the child better explain these things?

In terms of a parent's profession there is nothing age inappropriate about an architect. There is certain age inappropriate things about sex. A teacher does not know if a kid has hit puberty, how mature they are, etc. This is why a parent should be involved with this not teachers.

How many 5 year olds are paying attention to laws being passed? None. The only reason they would know is if their parents or teachers tell them. I think kids should be kids. You shouldn't be telling kids about cultural / legal things that are going on if you can avoid it. I have no idea why so many people want kids to get involved with legal discussions. Just let kids be unaware of the strife, conflict and other things that don't matter to them in the world.

I don't want to talk to 5 year olds about taxes. Does that mean I want conversations about taxes to be taboo? I just think there is a time and place for things like this and teaching 5 year olds about this stuff is too early.

Also, I would note that the law only bans classroom instruction. If a student asks a teacher outside of that context the teacher could answer.
Or two at once. Bochs + Bochs-debugger.

https://fysnet.net/bochsdbg/index.htm
This starts to make sense when you consider the self-flagellation of a full server-side-rendering production setup that has existed over the past decade, to the point many SPA products completely give up on SSR - or nowadays throw themselves at the walled garden of Vercel/Next.js etc to solve it for them.
No but it follows that cheating is wrong...just like prostitution.

edit - the intense support for prostitution on HN (mostly computer programmers) will never cease to make me smile.
Say I'm a worker working in different homes/buildings on a daily basis like an HVAC tech or plumber and use doordash to deliver food to the job site. How is that fraud?

Or are they discriminating by time thinking no "legit" work happens door to door after 5pm save for people doing unpopular things?
I use a Roku, and yes there is a Roku app. Can't speak for the other Smart TV OSs.
What should they have done instead? Built a compiler with a "cripple Intel" function? So people would have to download the executable that's fastest on their CPU, even though they use the same instruction set?

The issue here is that they used a slower code path even on CPUs that could run the faster one, just because they were made by a competitor.

You say "AMD should have made their own compiler", but why? What else should they have made? An OS? An office suite? Why?
The Guardian's about page seems very appropriate here, if you feel it is not, please do enlighten me as to exactly how you think the Guardian article I posted is "part of a wave of amplification of Western propaganda", as you assert.

Not sure what you mean by 'at "-1"', here, but, if you're implying that I downvoted your comment, this may help :

"Why don't I see down arrows?

There are no down arrows on stories. They appear on comments after users reach a certain karma threshold, but never on direct replies."

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsfaq.html
> The initial statement sounded exactly like the armchair "experts" one so often encounters.

Maybe - but [marginalia_nu](https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=marginalia_nu) isn't an armchair expert - they've actually implemented theor own publically available search engine - which is linked in their profile.
OpenAI's DALL-E AI image generator can now edit pictures, too
Is there a problem?

This is a pretty normal occurrence. Code base knowledge does matter.
The only valuable thing about Worldcoin is the eyeball scans with possible additional geolocation metadata for where the person was scanned. I can see something like Palantir buying the data when the company goes belly up.

The fact that most of these eyeball scans have been collected in developing nations with little/no concern to data privacy laws (imagine doing this in a GDPR EU location) makes it extra-suspicious in my opinion.
Bedrock: The SQLitening (2018)
But Bob will have to deposit this dirty cash at some point. With enough cash, it’ll raise alarm bells unless Beth has A LOT of friends who can deposit $600 each.
2% of a massive number is a very big number, way too big to ignore.
Hardware Raid is Dead and is a Bad Idea in 2022
michaellapan.com
just redid it with vuepress, going to try and commit to blogging... again lol
Oracle did far more bad then good and the can go fuck themselves.
Still not detailed enough and doesn't make any sense.

Does Beth have cash? Is it in a bank account? You can't use cash on Turo from what I understand. If money is in bank account, it won't be "dirty". So, how can Beth pay for a rental on Turo?

As someone already commented, there is nothing special about Turo, you could just set up an ecommerce store and ship rocks around.

Can you please expand?
Yep makes sense. Thanks!
Likely referring to normal people who lose money with coinbase. Trading stocks has at least some amount of protection because stocks have some legal requirements/vetting/etc to get on the major exchanges. Where as there are a whole lot of shitcoins, rugpulling, fraud/etc enabled by coinbase.