skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> At least in English, the word "race" does not apply to animals, the word we use for them is "breed". Race is used exclusively for human beings.

And in french "race" is direct traduction to "breed".

The thing is mixing skin colors, physical features, cultures and possibly religious choices/origins to form a blob named race do not work at all.

For example my girlfriend is mexican, her skin is maybe a little more brownish than the average mexican, thus she has been suffering from racism in her own country, hearing her mother saying she wished she had been more white, suffering discrimination during her studies, getting systematically refused entry in places such as dance clubs and generally being dismissed by "white mexicans".

Now she lives in europe and whenever she meet another mexican, it doesn't really matter if he/she is whiter or browner than her. Being all away from their roots are all happy to see and share their common culture, talk about what they are missing (mostly about food ha ha) and they feel much more united than inside their own country.

What about people with parents with white and brown skin colors. I often have a laugh when people mention someone looking no more brownish than the average south spanish being called black because he has a black father or mother. There are so many body characteristics, so many gradients. At which point of brownishness are you sliding from being white to black?

So in a way they are part of a same whole but they can be destinguished at times. And some people having exact same skin color do not necessarily face the same kind of racism depending on where they live and what is the current culture. Racism suffured by black people in the US of A do not have the same characteristics as the racism suffured by black people in other parts of the world. Racism suffured by asian people has different charistics but then again is not the same depending on the country they live. A lot of people from Portugal, Romania, balkanic country suffer from a lot of discrimination and mockery here in europe even when they can't be mistaken physically, just because people figure out their origin another way.

Racism is about creating groups based on arbitrary, unscientific, often fluid and tenous differences. Using the concept of race within a country, even with the idea to fight its effects such as running statistics, positive discrimination can only promote more racism.
First it all depends on your latency requirements and TP, if you need your TimeSeries DB to support high ingest TP and low query latency a RAM based is almost the only way you can go.

Second, many Gigas is what you get from any small size server...
And, on top of that Redis/TimeSeries supports an almost linear scale out which allows your memory to increase dynamically according to your needs.
Last, Redis Enterprise (& Cloud) add Redis on Flash support extending your RAM to your local Flash storage.
Me also.

And because of the insanely corrupt way it awarded. Bidding for a summer World Cup then deciding (after it awarding!) that it's far too hot in the summer to play football in a desert.
> Preventing that requires whole new system of governance, but it is not invented yet.

The system has nothing to do with it. It is the people.
Hey — I am part of this journey and currently support the Bunch team in the role of the CTO. If anyone has questions, I am happy to answer them. :)
> Are there any compatibility concerns that make it necessary to keep faulting on addresses outside the valid address range?

As a sibling comment points out, forward compatibility is the whole reason why this "faulting on non-canonical addresses" was introduced. We used to have systems with 32-bit addresses and "upper byte ignore", leaving 24-bits of actual address space.

Applications that took advantage of that "ignore" feature by issuing non-normalized load or store operations broke on "32-bit clean" versions of the same architectures, even when limited to the same 24-bit address space. If they had stuck to issuing loads and stores with canonicalized addresses and treated "tagging" as a pure memory-saving thing, they could've been supported.
And road infrastructure isn’t? It takes up more land and needs more maintenance than rail
> I'm shocked this manager didn't have you fired. I would never tolerate someone doing what they want instead of what I instructed them to do. When the leader says follow, you don't choose a different path, even if the leader is wrong. Eventually, if they genuinely are incorrect, they'll be dismissed due to poor decisions and performance.

All of the worst organizations I’ve worked in have been chock full of people who had this mindset. It’s good for job stability, not so good for actually doing good work. Maybe that doesn’t matter. Personally I hate having my fate assigned to the whims of incompetent management. I think the culture of treading the line between making bad leaders feel like they’re being listened to and doing what is actually effective for getting work done is actually much more common than you’d expect.
" When the leader says follow, you don't choose a different path, even if the leader is wrong. Eventually, if they genuinely are incorrect, they'll be dismissed due to poor decisions and performance. "

Disobedience is one of the most important civil and moral duties. Maybe it should even be regularly trained...
The people you call for, the Yes-Men, are superb for demonstrating the Milgram experiment and what it stands for.

So NO.
How to Choose Between React and Angular for a Project?
Since you mention it, 3b1b has a splendid video juxtaposing two attitudes to problem solving via an example here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltLUadnCyi0 . I highly recommend watching it, I think it is one of his best.
> When democracy regresses to essentially a 2-party system, then accountability is pretty limited.

I agree with that one hundred percent. I am not arguing that any one implementation of democracy is The Way, but that the concept is generally superior to other known alternatives.

> Omertà

Thanks for the new vocabulary word! That's a great one.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omert%C3%A0
That’s about as accurate as calling Canadians Americans. African-American culture is Southern white culture. West Indian culture is English. Religion, speech, a lot of the food ways came from the white population and just as English people are not American West Indians are not African-American.

They’re closer than Nigerians. They assimilate faster but they’re not the same.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_Horsemen_of_the_Infocal...

E2E encryption that leaks information to the middle device about what data is being encrypted is not E2E encrypted.

It's backdoored.

Any system that can't be used safely by child pornographers for safety from government surveillance cannot be used safely by other groups that the government does not wish to operate. Those groups will (without any convictions) be labeled "violent domestic terrorists" by Apple and the FBI when their in-group memes are added to the clientside scanning signature list.

This is the bright line. It's your computer and data, not theirs.

Companies need to comply with the law. This is not law! Backroom pressure to deny millions due process is not reasonable, democratic, or conducive to preserving human rights. It has no basis in law, it is how dictators operate.

If Apple is breaking current law, charge them. If they are not, stop pressuring them, or maybe try to pass a law to alter their behavior (with associated public debate), like civilized adults do.

"Beautiful company you have there, Tim Apple. Shame if something were to happen to it if you don't help us spy on your billions of users." is about as undemocratic and authoritarian as you can get.

Apple trying to sugarcoat the anti-customer malware they're potentially getting strongarmed into rolling out is just as morally repugnant.

When a judge issues a search warrant, the accused has legal rights that dictate what is and is not probable cause. No such due process will exist with what is or is not added to the content detection signature list, everyone on the platform is deemed worthy of suspicion and is searched. The ML algorithm will declare you guilty based on a list of hashes, the inputs for which you are not allowed to possess or see (but somehow NCMEC is). There is no additional step before guys with machine guns raid your house and steal every phone and computer in it.

This is an end run around human rights to due process.
Here in AU, most commercial hive operators are using very basic wooden hives - many aren't even using (metal) mesh bases, which are a common home-scale defence against things like Small Hive Beetle (SHB) because at scale it's a significant cost, both cap-ex and op-ex.

In 2015, the Flow Hive guys broke all kinds of kickstarter records with their plastic frame / externally-harvestable hive, though we've had plastic frames around for a lot longer than that. The bees don't seem to mind, but the only metric we have are 'do they stick around?'.
Given they're free to leave at any time if they don't like their home, that's a pretty reasonable measure.

Before varroa were identified as one of the key causal factors of colony collapse, there were questions around whether the natural wax foundation, with its regular, and perhaps slightly under-sized cells, were part of the problem. Same question with plastic foundation / frames. Empirical evidence suggests that the kinds of high-quality plastic that's used in beehives isn't, so far as we can tell, part of the problem.
For a lot of people, facing the facts about corruption - even if they’re not involved - is more emotionally painful than “ignore and pretend there’s no real problem”. The payoffs from fighting corruption are almost all large-scale and long-term, which are lesser priorities for most people. Fighting corruption is itself often expensive, in terms of political capital and limited trustworthy people to staff the effort. And those practicing it are usually very socially savvy, to make their activities feel “not so bad” now, vs. facing & stopping those difficult and painful.
I don't understand your comment. What are you responding to, and what am I (or someone else) supposed to do with the information that your comment tries to convey?
Australia's democratic system is vastly superior to first-past-the-post.

And yet, here we are - indefinitely detaining refugees, eye-watering corruption that vanishes from public discourse so quickly you can hear a doppler effect (half a billion dollars given without competitive tender to 6 randos to supposedly save the barrier reef), country is run by a member of a Pentecostal cult who brought an actual lump of coal into parliament (where do you even get one? what sort of logistics were involved in that stunt?)

It's either the people, or the Murdoch-monopolised media (not to mention, the de-clawed ABC), or both. I'm never sure. I don't know if altering the voting system would help; many of the independents and minor parties set to take office in this year's election are worse than the two major parties - which are milquetoast evil vs actual evil. They're a bunch of stooges, religious extremists and anti-vaxers. If anything, I want less of them.
Yep, most of those items baked into framework already, plus practices we've heard about in the list, but not need to know the name "owasp".
Yeah, I call "system of governance" the entirety of rules that are enforced between people. Just people without serious system of governance are called "a mob". People are the hardware for governance, but like computer without operating system, people without governance system don't do much besides being there.
Where does the content in the app come from?
Lovely! I agree with others that this is promising. Thanks for sharing.

One point of feedback: Searching for "C#" seems to bring up C articles and no C# ones, so I suspect perhaps the "#" isn't being included.
An algorithm I keep coming back to
I don't know what kind of accountability do you expect? Presidents who started these wars are no longer presidents. Also, Americans wanted and supported wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Even withdrawal from Afghanistan was politically costful for Biden.
Even if you install 100% new government, it's likely that some of the new people will arrive to same old conclusions sooner or later.

Corruption is just too natural consequence of someone managing resources without being directly affected by outcomes.
You’re correct. People with ADHD have many of the same problems as non-ADHD people have. An open office is difficult for anyone to concentrate in.

The difference is the matter of degree.
What wealthy corporation?
We need much, much more childish things in life, not fewer.
That's cool :-)

What is your tech stack now?

Do you already have ideas on how to evolve your tech stack when introducing the Android version in the future?
nice! I’ve been using this app for a while, feels much smoother now. I’m using it a lot now on M1 mac as well, and pass it to all my team leads that I want to grow into Engineering Managers, super helpful to share mental models and explain how to give feedback
Any idea what’s keeping it from doing a revamp?
That can be a very interesting project :)
I would even consider using RedisAI to run the model...
I take it as a general concept of asg, not just scaling. For example I have all instances in some autoscaling group to enable transparent replacements and make rolling updates easier. (Update the requested image, then just start killing the old ones)
All of those studies are either in rats or mice or are in vitro. A lot of the mice and rat studies can't be translated to humans because they have significantly different metabolisms and researchers use entirely different dosages than humans do in the wild

>MDMA has been administered to approximately 1,700 human subjects with only one serious adverse reaction.

https://maps.org/mdma/

There are currently human studies of MDMA. These would probably not be moving forward if they found "brain frying" although I appreciate your willingness to read abstracts
Unfortunately, gtoolkit has pretty steep learning curve. And it's not different from Pharo gtoolkit is built on.

I think there is a clash of concepts. It took me a lot of time getting used to the smalltalk workflow of experimenting in the playground and jumping into the editor to change things.

It is very different from recompiling and restarting or from running a repl.
I can totally relate with this article.

Peers have not delivered and disappointed me this past year. When even a hint of my disappointment leaks out it's immediately met with suggestions for more relationship building or communications process changes.

No, just no, people didn't do what they said you were going to do. I have genuine affection for some of these people. Somehow "I love you, but you didn't execute" is perceived as hostile and heated.

I also agree with the the authors sentiment about how to fix and I've also learned it's better to steer peers towards constructive ends in a positive way, than confront or express displeasure about performance.
Looks like a lot of unauthentic activity on this post. A lot of green account commenting created just hours before
We are fucked anyways. In my area we just had no rain for more than a month (where usually there should be 12 rainy days) with basically drought coming - nobody even noticed, they were busy with more important things I guess
That's an interesting take.

Let's change names.

What if it's Google, Blizzard / Epic (Battle.net), and something personal? These services use the same flows.

Or worse, what if it's your e-Government app, and you lose all your identifying information and somebody can become "you" with all the information they got?

Will you say "Meh, it's a personal account, and I gave access via MFA, but who cares, it's not my problem?".
They ended up doing a study for their text fields. The result was something anyone with a shred of common sense would've said and has said from the beginning https://medium.com/google-design/the-evolution-of-material-d...
Or how Exim ended up on my system when I wanted to install a command line tool that does not require email sending (even if it required why on earth would anybody build such package dependencies).
Phistomefel’s Theorem (and the more general "set equivalence theory" described in the article) pops out directly from a standard technique known as the "Linear Programming relaxation" for Sudoku.

Essentially, the Linear Programming relaxation of a puzzle is a standard way of approximating the solution space with a system of linear equations and inequalities, replacing discrete yes/no answers to questions like "is the digit inside this box a 7?" with real numbers between 0 and 1 (which can be interpreted as probabilities, if you like). This system of linear inequalities and equations can then be solved efficiently with techniques from convex optimization.

Even the example from the Cracking the Cryptic video, with the conclusion that those three boxes at the bottom have to be 1, 2, and 3 in some order, would be deduced immediately from the Linear Programming relaxation of Sudoku. You don't need ontological remodeling when you know how to apply convex optimization :)
I want to like it, but am about the same. Even after a walkthrough on youtube to a boss that I just don't have the skills to even come close to beating... not my thing.
I don't think cars will ever remove steering wheels.
That was just Elon's fantasy for a limited use (driving through Boring tunnels). Similarly how you don't have a steering wheel in a driverless metro.
Or perhaps it will be retractable when not in use, like a tow hook.
Yeah, that's why I wrote several points. They are ALL working at once which results in hard to beat corruption. Fixing just one point will not help.
If only they did any research. The moment they actually do it, their fantasies are immediately invalidated: https://medium.com/google-design/the-evolution-of-material-d...
To be fair the article does address the childish criticism: “ One of the major points of criticism is that overusing Claymorphism and going overboard with colors and typography can give off a somewhat childish feel to the UI.”
I've also boycotted sportsball for the same reason.

Its stretched too far. Its about now about the money and power, not playing the game.

Entertainment used to be watching people slaughtered in arenas.

Now the entertainment is watched after people are worked to death building arenas. The death cost for enertainment is still there, just in a different place.

Why is any of this considered entertainment if that's what it costs?
Indeed, my friends wanted to support the launch but they're not HN users.

So I read the rules more carefully...

And realized it's not OK here.

I'm sorry for the confusion, I'll be more careful next time.
I searched Ruby on Rails in San Francisco and got lots of irrelevant results
My experience mirrors yours. It's interesting to me that the details you give about being very familiar with cash handling seem to just get ignored.
At one point in my life I would regularly have two or three hundred dollars in cash on my person at all times, would pay rent in cash, repeated things like 'cash is king'. Now, I haven't touched cash consistently in years. I tap a card to pay for things. It is much more convenient, no coins, no worries that I've exposed money on my person to some one who will act on that knowledge.

I dunno. Feels like an electric kettle. I didn't forget how to boil water on the stove but pressing a button is more convenient and now I cannot forget to turn a heating element off.
It’s a shame they don’t offer first class Ruby support. I could see myself using some this stuff.

Is this something Redis are likely to offer in future does anyone know?
How China’s TikTok, Facebook influencers push propaganda
That's people requesting Edit permissions.

You can disable Edit requests (and avoid "link" sharing) by Publishing the file, which is different from sharing a /view link.

https://support.google.com/docs/thread/28614984/remove-reque...
Things are in fact taken away. Code as a language doesn't tell you why it exists. It only describes a process, not the purpose of that process.

And unless your programs are formally verified this process that you have codified most likely will not meet the requirements to satisfy the intended purpose.

A typical non-technical "assignment" that's given before someone is fluent is to describe in excruciating detail/list of steps how to make a peanut butter and jelly sandwich. The point of the exercise is to show students that you need to remove all ambiguity. Or at least as much as possibly. What the exercise doesn't show is.. why are we making a list of steps to tell someone how to make a sandwich.

“If you give me six lines written by the hand of the best debugging programmers, I will find something in them which will hang his operating system.”
Because I'm 20 years older?
What really floors me is that people can compartmentalise so well that they'll read an article like this, nod, agree and then argue at a dinner party that we should keep centralising more power into government bodies. There is no workable scheme to mix large government and honest government - and no shining examples that I'm aware of where it has ever succeeded. People can look at the system which throws out (in quick succession) Obama, Trump, Biden and seriously claim it should be the major system that controls:

1. ...healthcare

2. ...who gets a bank account, what money gets spent on

3. ...which countries to invade

4. ...a lot of other stuff

I respect the position because I have no choice but how an entity that schizophrenic, over-stretched with responsibilities and mad with power is supposed to resist corruption I do not see. It is going to be a moral and administrative cesspit.
But often times they use inappropriate tools for solving problems.
bad authoritarian leaders are killed all the time. Me personally I'd give up a little of that sweet, ultimate power for a better outcome on the backside. But, like they say no guts, no glory.
Interesting, and thank you for the clarification.

I think it’s probably more of a spectrum and not a binary thing, and so you can have layers of physiological and psychological impediments, and one could also feed the other.
Amazon tries to stave off union drive on two fronts
What is preventing you to contribute and create it?
Elections incentivize governments to prevent errors that result in not being elected any more.

Errors that result in the entire planet warming by a couple of degrees, or that generally just screw the country over on a timescale longer than an election cycle, are collectively shrugged off by wider society and a complicit media apparatus.
“Apple AirPods are so unreliable we don’t allow them at YC demo day”
Are you forgetting Belarus?

At least Russia has rigged elections to pretend Russia is a democratic country.
Starship aims for $10/kg, and a 1U cubesat is about 1kg
Redis Stack is not Open Source, so that wouldn't be possible. AWS would have to reimplement all of the functionality, make their implementation Open Source, and keep adding new features to keep up.