skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
React is not only introducing layers and layers of abstractions/ concepts that are hard to grasp for a newcomer, they are also reclaiming well-established terms.

> A transition is a new concept in React to distinguish between urgent and non-urgent updates.

> Urgent updates reflect direct interaction, like typing, clicking, pressing, and so on.
> Transition updates transition the UI from one view to another.
Yeah, banks dont let you move this money without multiple levels of identity verification by both parties.
"Smart" in this sense should be understood as being akin to the archaic term that one is a "smart dresser" -- it's all about style, not about electronic engineering achievements that are leaving anyone in the dust.
>“The only way to clean it up would be to have the FBI act as the sole identity provider for all state and local law enforcement,” Weaver said. “But even that won’t necessarily work because how does the FBI vet in real time that some request is really from some podunk police department?”

There are already preexisting systems for solving this sort of problem. For example the FBI could set up a PGP based certificate authority[1] for email. Then the FBI signs the identities of the podunk police departments ahead of time. All the service providers would need would be the FBI identity (PGP public key) which they would sign once to authorize it and then they would be able to verify emails coming from any of the podunk police departments with no extra work on their part. This example comes with a revocation system that actually would work in this case.

All secret key material would remain under the control of the specific FBI department acting as the certificate authority. No third party involvement would be required.

[1] https://sequoia-pgp.org/blog/2021/05/12/202105-hello-openpgp...
If I was betting, I'd put my money on VC pressure.
You are doing the polynomial evaluation wrong for Taylor Series. First of all you should be using Horner's Method to reduce the number of multiplications needed and then you should be using FMA to increase precision of the solution. https://momentsingraphics.de/FMA.html
I was responding to the request in the top comment for something simpler that can be used for weekend projects. In this case, Bottle.py is "better" in that it is more simple than Flask; not that Bottle.py as a web framework is objectively better than Flask.

For the record, I've used both, and Bottle is much faster to get started with. The docs are also much leaner.
Try the uBlacklist plugin mentioned in other comments.
Ah, I misunderstood what you were saying. I thought you were advocating that we should do that, and I was wondering why that would be better than the status quo.
Neat, Andrei. Good luck with this venture!
I've only used HTMX for a tiny project along with FastAPI, it was basically just a single form page that would send the response in JSON to the server.

Things I liked were that it felt really lightweight, easy to setup, and basically just worked how the docs described.

However one thing I'm still trying to wrap my head around is how to better handle "intermediate" pieces of HTML i.e. partials. In SPAs you create a component that renders the template on the fly and is reused, but in HTMX you would need to hit an endpoint to get something like a partial.

This sort of had me pause because I'm so used to keeping my backend routes very "RESTy" (in the loose sense). But when using HTMX I was wondering if I need to make some routes like `/contact-form/modal` just to retrieve something like a success modal.

The article kinda displays what I mean with how all of the book routes return the buttons for the form. Also the `/get-book-row/<int:id>` and `/update/<int:id>` routes both return the same type of buttons. Those buttons seem prime candidates to be extracted into a common template of sorts.

Does that make sense? If so does anyone have a good example of a larger HTMX app which handles these scenarios?
Well no, in the way I described its primarily inflated because of your tornado cash notes being withdrawn (by you to virgin addresses) and you directing those addresses to buy the token

While you simultaneously get to pretend to be one of the fomo users who also bought the token, from different addresses that are linked to your identity and exchange account

The way Uniswap works is that prior buyers are the exit liquidity (look at how liquidity pools work, its different than posted order exchanges so you dont have to wait for people to show up with an order to sell into), and the majority of the prior buyers (because you are those prior buyers) would be the capital withdrawn from tornado cash (the dirty money from the big hack), the other fomo users can sell at a premium too depending on the price they buy

So your only goal here is for you and your clean money to blend in with the rest of the clean money crowd by having it promoted on these “degen gambles” channels, just because you don't want a future wiser investigator to suspect this token was created solely for you to cash out your tornado cash money.

(Also, dont use someone else’s node over clearnet to do this. Connect to infura over a tor OS (not just the browser) or run your own node.)
Or just use "cat -v" -- it prints characters in slightly different format, but is already installed on every Unix system. ("cat -A" variant will explicitly show newline and tabs as well)
Or replacing small houses with bigger ones...
Disagree. When the FBI comes to them asking for a list of everyone who's done a search for "pipe bomb", your anonymity would have been welcome.
What’s the rationale behind bundling a fuzzing library in the language instead of as a separate library?
The point is that this yes/no datum is going to be interpreted as a black stain, regardless of what it means.

A landlord reviewing 50 applications for a place isn't going to go into the particulars. Depending on the landlord's approach, anything with a yes won't make the short list.

Credit reports should not have suspicious stains whose meaning could be that there is in fact nothing wrong (there was a dispute which was caused by someone else, and resolved in the applicant's favor).
And that's where you see the man behind the curtain.
> What if you find that your lawn is on fire because there is a burning cross on it and your neighbor standing next to it in a hood and robe?

Jokingly: Then I would want to know that to get them to fix the rest of my lawn.
(Seriously: I would definitely prefer to know who might want to stab me in the back or face: keep your enemies close. I prefer life that ignorance; keeps you alive longer.)

I 10^10% agree with you about the paradox of tolerance; my 2c is that mass banning ends up causing more damage. Please read below.

> What to you is a dialogue, and democratic expression of freedom of speech, is to another person a threat on their very life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness.

Unfortunately, history has shown that not listening to dissenting opinions damages a society by forcing the dissenters to clique together leading to more extreme views and peer pressuring rational out of the window. Essentially, if you want to stay apart of the community and you want as they are the only that listened you on A, you have to agree on B and C. That is what keeps e.g. flat earthers or e.g. political extremist movements alive and growing. You just force them underground and trying harder and in violent ways to be heard.

Showing that you are ignoring some opinion can be more powerful tool, as you are broadcasting a message. (Of course you could try to de-escalate actively, but that is a whole science and needs energy.)

To sum up, the biggest disservice to yourself only is simply escalating on the anger that is now hidden away from you.

#harassment: I understand that is why I added the per case clause.

P.S. We are a large world and by the pigeonhole principle we are going to disagree on some stuff. Also we have a pretty pretty bleak historical record, that makes twitter trolling and bullying sound like paradise.
This sounds like an argument for why companies should be allowed to sell unregulated drugs and use asbestos and lead paint.

Individual consumers, who we all know are extremely knowledgeable and informed on all topics interacting with their lives, should weigh the increased risk of total loss against generally lower prices. And then in the event they unluck into in the total loss case, they should just shrug their shoulders and accept that they were lucky.
They meant anonymously
Not certain, but should be easy to make a new folder, fire up the django tutorial, and drop in htmx and shoelace from their cdn links into the main template to start experimenting. Looks feasible.
I think it would work, but backprop would be computed in a different way every time. I'm not an expert, so there may be sneaky ways around it, but I'm pretty sure you'd lose out on a long history of little efficiency improvements when you could just make it more recurrent instead.
It should obviously be illegal - preferably criminal - to check a credit score for a place to live, anyway - because a credit score, probably at least half the time - has little to no impact on how reliable of an individual you are financially.

I live in Canada, where health care is covered, but dental isn’t. I had an injury several years ago which effectively destroyed many of my teeth, and ended up more than $15,000 into debt over it. I couldn’t make my payments on time for probably a couple years, and even though I finally managed to pay it off, it’s a black spot on my credit history for years to come - through absolutely no fault of my own.

This is infinitely worse in the USA, where the pathetic government that promises ‘freedom’ somehow doesn’t get that universal health care is a huge part of that.

I have family in the USA who got cancer.

Due to the absolutely bullshit health care system there, they are completely, utterly, financially devastated.

This family member had to be stopped from committing suicide when they found out just how much it would cost to save their life. That they would have to declare bankruptcy. That their credit score, and anything they'd ever need to do with money in the rest of their life - was completely gone.

It’s literally why I don’t live in the USA anymore. Scared me shitless.

You know what’s way - way worse than getting cancer?

Having to pay more than you could ever possibly afford for getting cancer.

Good luck getting a house after that, thanks to this bullshit.

According to credit scores - you should be held personally responsible for the fact that you got that disease.

Literally - how dare you get cancer. Enjoy having a shit credit score for the rest of however long you have to live.

The fact is - people need places to live, and if people have poor credit - especially if it’s of no fault of their own, but due to the bullshit system we live in that has no room for genuine accidents - how the hell are these people ever supposed to find a place to live?

I had to go out of my way - and pretty much pay extra - to find a landlady here in Toronto even willing to give me enough understanding to rent a place - and I make about $100k CDN a year.

I had to explain the whole situation, come up with documents to prove that’s what actually happened, and even then I was lucky to get a place to rent. I can’t imagine what it’s like for people who might have half or less of my income and poor credit through no fault of their own but are looking for a place to live.

Fuck the credit score system. It is an abhorrent human rights issue - is simply disgusting and disturbing - and only serves the rich.

A credit score does not take into account for humanness.

It’s the nuke of weaponized capitalism, yet another tool to keep the rich more rich and the poor more poor.

May the greedy miscreants who developed and enforce this wicked system rot in a special kind of hell.
I'm not too sure what the difference between that and the signature requirement is.

> (i) A physical or electronic signature of a person authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed.
You can fit quite a large LRU cache in the L2 cache of the processor. You never want to go to main memory for a lerp table.
Well, why not? It's a great host with a whole bunch of features you'd have to invent yourself otherwise like feature branch previews. It's a static site/documentation site afterall.
The article compares padded length 15 output for both cases; removing leading zeroes would have cost for both AVX-512 and regular code.
So that is spam; it's nice that it's low-impact and not too awful, but can you understand why I might be a bit put out at someone saying "I won't spam you" and then sending unsolicited marketing emails?
Top Trending Articles of March 2022 – Developer Noon
Ask HN: How do you want to buy technology?
Wondering how folks want to buy? Who's doing a great job fitting that modern buying process and why? Who's unbearable to deal with (but you are somewhat forced to deal with them) and why?

It strikes me that legacy technology sales is pretty dead for the most part. Some big purchase decisions like big ERP are still RFI/RFP driven but most SaaS/IaaS/PaaS seems more easily consumable (less risk). Public pricing and good online documentation are much more common today which makes a big part of the process self serviceable. How much do you want the vendor to feed this info to you vs you doing your own research? How do you get good engagement from the sales team when you want to dig beyond the publicly available info? How do you keep them from bugging you?

At some point you may want a big discount, how comfortable with actual hands on use do you need to be before you want to subject yourself to a big painful sales cycle? How much discount would you give up to avoid a painful sales cycle?

Finally, any general advice you can provide as a technology buyer?
Contacting the state government should be the right choice (but it may not be in practice). In many countries, every public official has the legal duty to direct you to the relevant authority if you contact them with matters outside their duties. That's a sensible requirement, because citizens should not have to be familiar with the internal administrative structures of government agencies.
go test fuzz v1
string("000000000000000000000000000000Ö00000000000000000000000000000")
rune('\u0083')
int(60)

Interesting that the minimization engine wasn't able to shrink this further.
It's also worth thinking about the timeline inclusive of hiring delay. More detailed requirements makes hiring slower.

I know 2 startups both hiring their first set of non-founder engineers.

One startup took 4 months to hire 2 senior engineers who weren't in their stack and then gave both of them about a month to come up to speed on the tech. Literally running tutorials.

So 5 months in, they have two onboarded senior engineers.

The other startup is 6 months in and hasn't made either hire. They see deep experience in their tech stack as required and don't want to wait longer for onboarding.

But in retrospect, they would have gotten to an onboarded team faster if they had hired like the first company.
My Software Estimation Method, Where Every Task Is Estimated at Infinite Time
Hackers Steal $600M from Play-to-Earn Game Axie Infinity’s Ronin Network
4D Toys (2017)
or enough people or someone "influential" start to complain on social media and it gets enough traction.
There is a trend in which policies and actions are more and more being optimized to maximize the apparent empathy of the policy or action. There seems to be more concern with having good intentions than with achieving good outcomes.

This is great for the policy-maker. After all, the goal of appearing empathetic is easily achieved and requires little effort. Just shoot off your blog post (season well with progressive buzz-words), stop grading papers and accept incoming congratulations at your convenience.

Achieving good outcomes, on the other hand, requires actually doing something. It requires an understanding of a real, measurable problem. It requires careful planning, execution, observation of outcomes, and iterative improvement. It requires risk--risk of looking silly, risk of failure, risk of wasted time.

Nobody writes articles about teachers whose methods erase the performance gap between the privileged and underprivileged. Why do the hard, thankless work of actually solve the problems? Why not be an empathy zombie?
You can have user accounts without requiring an email at all. Or, you can look at page hits and use that as a proxy measure.
Be good to have different git merge strategies per file type.

e.g. A merge that knows properties files support the same property added in different places but only once is needed.
And another strategy if order is significant.

Cool to have an HTML merge that recognises the tree structure and supports merging tags and having the indentation follow some rules.

I believe git supports merge strategies, its been on my todo list forever.
Anyone have any ideas on how they're doing text insertion using an auto-regressive model?
The act of filtering still exposes you a little. Using tech to wholesale blackhole "wrongthink" is probably one of the worst aspects of social media. Frankly I think terms like "bubble" dramatically trivialize just how dangerous this kind of myopia is.
I’m pretty sure they’re not claiming to have invented transitions. They maybe should have said “a new concept to React” rather than “a new concept in React”.
My go-to test search term is: "grass-fed beef restaurant in sf"

You do much better than Google (Google will always include "Top 10 Best Grass Fed Organic Steak in San Francisco, CA" from Yelp and then link to places that don't have Grass-fed beef options.)

However, currently, your first ranking option is Pinterest spam FYI:
https://www.mojeek.com/search?q=grass+fed+beef+restaurant+in... → https://www.mojeek.com/search?q=grass+fed+beef+restaurant+in...

Your second option is the correct kind of result (a blog from a local that actually answers the question): https://www.grassfedgirl.com/paleo-friendly-restaurants-in-s...

Where most of the results on Google are not correct. They are mostly articles about Steaks (and a few actual restaurants that serve grass-fed beef, so that is good). Actually, FYI your results don't include these restaurants. eg. It would be nice if this Google result showed up in your results:

"SF / SOMA - Belcampo
We source grass-fed and finished, pasture-raised meats directly from our own climate positive CA farms and seasonal vegetables from local farms."
The right has moved further right, and the left has moved further left.

Moreover, the left has moved further left than the right has moved right. https://jabberwocking.com/if-you-hate-the-culture-wars-blame...
Open sourcing PEARL – human-in-the-loop AI for land cover mapping
A huge part of the appeal of Rust and Go tools is that you can just ship a binary, it's frustrating that it's not available here.
Yeah, the size of React still bugs me when Preact shows you can do 90% of the same stuff with a tiny fraction of the code.
Just use what comes with microsoft. If you want another layer of scanning then install Malwarebytes. Those two should be plenty for anybody. Also set their DNS to use something that blocks known malware sites (quad 9 is what I use).
Depends on the transaction type. Checks and debit cards are pretty well protected. Wire transfers aren't protected at all.
I agree with everything right up until "valuable". That grades would be better than outright sortition (lottery) is a very strong statement and I don't think it's true.
tptacek could probably weigh in with a much better explanation.

The tradeoff for having AV is having a giant application in admin land which increases the surface area available for an attack. Combine this with the that fact you don't get much protection because a virus can just be modified until the AV doesn't detect it and AV's just aren't worth it. This trade off made sense 20 years ago because OS's were less secure so you were increasing your surface area by relatively less than you are now.
IIRC this comes up in the derivation of the boltzmann distribution. I also recall stirlings approximation for x!.
It is worth pointing out that the American penal system is already distressingly close to the scope of the gulag system in Stalinist Russia. The gulag system hit a high of 1.5m prisoners in the 1940s out of a population of 168m (pre war), or about 0.89%. America’s prison population peaked in 2009 at an estimated 0.754%. If you include parole that shoots up to 3.1%, but I’m not sure how to compare that to the gulag system

Wildly different death tolls though.
Our best estimate is that the gulag system had an 8.88% death rate, with that varying wildly on a year by year basis. Meanwhile the US prison system as of 2018 kills 344 per 100,000, or .344%. But unfortunately those numbers are getting worse, not better. I think the difference here is less about our system being more humane, and more the fact that food and antibiotics are cheap. Heck, just look at how the prison system responded to covid.

I honestly think we’re a lot closer to a gulag system than people think. We’ve already built the majority of the machinery to actually implement such a system, and politically making the system harsher and less humane is very popular. There is also a bipartisan consensus that what we need is to fund the system even more. All that we’re missing is the jump to directly imprisoning political opponents, and we’ve already seen some calls for that although it isn’t quite mainstream yet.
This is hilarious. That email with Vinny Troia, and fast-flux... I received that email at my previous employer. We had a good laugh about it with our security team at the time.
The college typically requires a bunch of classes. You can't test out of them.

This was a pain for me when I started college at 23; I'd been programming as a hobby since I was 16, but was shoved into intro-level classes anyway. I spent the classes learning tooling, so it wasn't a complete waste of time, but it wasn't very productive.
wouldn't this just shift the trust from the police email address to the police email PGP signer? wouldn't hackers then just target that part of the infrastructure?
This is really wise advice.
My default address bar search is DDG, but need to fallback to google at times, and I keep my iPhone relatively google-free (Other than google voice).
Sure maybe. But that only really works if few (if not all) entities have control over the consensus mechanism.

On a regular PoW blockchain you will have to recalculate all the hashes according to the difficulty which will up to the miners.

But even if you could, it's an absolute technical nightmare.

To build an analogy that somehow fits. If you have git repo and you find out that a particular commit that you want to undo, what do you do?

- Rebase all changes to an earlier commit, remove the faulty commit and recalculate all commit hashes that follow it.

or?

- Create a new commit that reverts the old commit.

In reality you opt for option 2 99.99% of the time. The only reason you would ever want to remove a commit from history is if you accidentally exposed information to an audience that is not supposed to see it.