skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It's not a good idea to mix work done on employer devices with work done on your home devices, for the employer there's a security problem and for the employee a bad employer may lay claim to everything you do on your home computer.

So you should solve this by only working on work stuff using work devices, or, eg, ssh into your work box to do stuff from home.
Some people have enough money that they don't care about the money. But other people become addicted and end up spending money they don't have.

Just like some people dropping 100k in Vegas in a weekend are paying for the experience and VIP treatment and others just need one more bet to replenish Johnnys college fund.
Yeah no. There are still plenty of games, both indie and non-indie, which millions of players who don't whale can play, containing at most DLC which is effectively an expansion on top of an otherwise complete base game. If you don't want to play these games, there are still plenty of options. Enough developers haven't sold their souls yet, either.

Reality is, the market meets a demand where there is a demand. The developers are not the sole responsible people for choosing to put in gambling gimmicks, incomplete games for 25-60 bucks, DLC which should've been base, P2W, etc. There is just as much of a responsibility on customers to vote with their money, or vote for laws to ban this shit if it becomes evident people can't control themselves as a whole. We haven't reached the critical mass where you don't have other options yet, and it looks like we won't for quite some time.

Meanwhile almost every indie trying to fit in the market and come with their passionate solution is met with a dire reality that selling games takes a tremendous amount of effort for anyone who doesn't have a giant brand behind them.
The compile times are part of the reason why scripting languages like Lua are popular in games. In engine code it's fine, but you don't want to wait minutes to see a change while working on higher-level parts of the game.

The data thing though, that sounds like your engine is poorly optimized for development time. There should be a way to work with data without repacking everything.
It's interesting to reflect that these human delusions are all masks and costumes for power structures to exist.

How about sub-cultures in programming and technology?
Call it trial version then. ; )
> One thing a competitor needs is a new and innovative technical algorithm.

Not really, because Google can do algorithms. For a new competitor to really succeed they have to start with something Google can't do. Perhaps:

- device/platform related. Google owns chrome & android but a competitor could emerge somewhere out of their reach, like only on iPhone, only on airpods, alexa, oculus, etc.

- being worthless to 99% of the market to make it 10X better to a 1% audience (e.g. developers, nurses, or even more niche like college athletes, jewish moms, etc)

- privacy/ad related
Previous milestones:

1: https://brutal.smnx.sh/articles/milestone-1

2: https://brutal.smnx.sh/articles/milestone-2

3: https://brutal.smnx.sh/articles/milestone-3
Greek here, mobile phones are non-geographic but used to be service provider specific, but even this practice isn't applicable due to number portability.

Landlines used to be geographic but this isn't relevant any more again new to number portability.
I'm pretty sure the "myth" of barter is really just an educational/explanatory crutch that economists have used to introduce laypersons to the idea of money without overwhelming them with caveats and nuances. Kind of like how schoolchildren learn that the American Revolution was a revolt against unjust "taxation without representation".

You can tell that Graeber isn't an economist because he mistakes the oversimplified educational narrative for what monetary economists actually believe about the history of money and credit. But you have a fair point--even economists often fool themselves about this, possibly because the field has grown to the point where many aren't as familiar with this topic as they should be (I don't think that was the case 100 years ago).
It's true by definition. The savers will never give up their savings, the savings which are necessary to pay off the debt as public sector debt is private sector savings. It is quite simple.
Definitely, I remember from reading the documentation that they could also target HTML5/css (https://docs.flutter.dev/development/tools/web-renderer) instead of canvas but I'm not sure how complete / coherent the output is.
> some students thought it was abusive to require skiing and mountain biking two days per week (I disagree)

The question of whether this is abusive or not depends on the consequences for refusing to go.

Do kids lose TV privileges for a day if they refuse to go? Then I'd say it's not abusive.

Are kids locked in a room if they refuse to go? Definitely abusive.
Because he can't be found within the deep Finish forests anyway :)
“What is life?” By Schroedinger. Mostly because it is such a short book and describes the underlying questions very well.
Is it? "Fuchsia" and derivatives are the names of a colour in romance languages - that covers a big chunk of that.
You mean the real value of debt. By the way, it can't be paid off because negative interest rates, which represent the power of the debtor to refuse additional debt, are either ignored or people are trying to make them illegal. Germany has negative interest rates on its public debt and debt is going down.
Yeah I'm pretty skeptical to be honest. The rags-to-richest story is heartwarming, but it's a bit odd for an unknown security professional (I can't find anything else about him online) to announce that they have 1% of all bitcoin.
Ahah. As opposed to token ring.
I'd be very happy with a LibreOffice style replacement for AutoCAD LT.
It's not ever likely to happen though.
A by now 50 year old hacker who finally decides to make his story public has lots of reasons to brag. The reason why I could never become a blackhat is my need for affirmation. People who can do great intellectual work in the dark without anyone around them understanding or fully appreciating the effort involved have a different psychological profile, but they're still human. I really don't consider his bragging a bad side.

Bragging about how much money he has, however, seems both stupid and dangerous. I cringed when I heard about his wealth, on account of his own safety. If you own more than a few million bucks worth of Bitcoin, you better not say this.
Well, they say it's not intended to be an Android replacement, but I'm persuaded it's intended to be an Android replacement.

The main advantages over Linux are a clean room design, better security-by-design (having a microkernel means the attack surface is way smaller, capabilities means sandboxing-as-a-security-mechanism becomes possible), and more control over the project.

Honestly, I think the other commenters are being way too cynical about this. If this project gains traction, even if Google goes evil with it, forks and community distributions could still happen like they do for Linux, and be immensely beneficial. The sandboxing alone is a huge benefit.
Actually, pretty much the same.

Ambush: you kill, then assault through with a covering element.

In an ambush: return fire, assault through with an element.

Fixed position: true, you are not manuevering, but technique is to have interlocking fields of fire from different elements. This also gives you flexibility in a retreat... (And you have secondary and tertiary fallback positions to which to manuever too.)

Retreat: bound back under cover (eg, with covering element.)

Combat jump: jump on at 400 feet to get to the ground quickly. Find your nearest paratroopers and form fire teams.. (was in the 82nd).
I think it's more about moving on from Android.
Think of it less as a performance trying to get someone else's approval and more as a discussion of a few peers just getting to know each other. Sure, the scenario is different, but your approach to it will make all the difference when it comes to anxiety.

Specific to your concerns - the people are still just people no matter how senior they are. Just talk to them. If you get stuck or create something laughable... go ahead and laugh. If you get rejected, so what? Your life goes on and you do something else. You may want this job... but you don't need it. Give it a shot, have some fun.

I know that is easier said than done, but at the same time you've likely had some therapy (CBT / DBT) if you are diagnosed with anxiety, so apply the coping skills you've learned. Pull out old notes on what those skills are, use them, and walk in with a fresh perspective.
The name is perfectly fine from the perspective of a german-native speaker, just like the color Fuchsia.
Libfive does something similar but uses lisp instead of rust.

https://libfive.com/studio/
War with Russia? Finland has a plan for that
To be fair, I didn't think anyone would be able to spell 'kubernetes' correctly. But life found a way - thank goodness for numeronyms!
I am using restic and thinking about switching to Kopia... Mainly because Kopia has compression and seems to have more activity in development. It also has gui. And from what i've seen is faster.
Kudos for whoever came up with that "What is BonsaiDb?" banner. A quick, direct answer, with a link to more in depth information. Something like that should be at the start of every post of a product blog.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but IIRC Redox has nobody working on it full time as part of their job? Fuchsia has whole teams.
I don't get it. What you are describing isn't even close to MMT because MMT is not a policy. Secondly, MMT predicts that inflation happens the moment your economy is running at full capacity and that deflation happens when you pay off debt to make the economy run below capacity. Those two things aren't disputed at all and no government has adopted policies based on MMT.
I wonder what system allows a 4GB string to be passed as a command. A brief look at https://www.in-ulm.de/~mascheck/various/argmax/ makes me think none by far? It seems this limit is at most 2MB which is nowhere near 4GB. Am I misunderstanding something?
> I'm against VSCode because it's a Microsoft product.

Note that there is also VSCodium [1], an OSS fork of VSCode with the M$ telemetry removed. I'm a heavy vim user but for cross-platform development with .NET SDK or Node.js VSCodium has pretty good support with the huge number of available extensions. If I want to tweak the editor's behavior, it's not harder, or even easier, than with vim. I find writing an extension for VSCodium in JS more approachable than doing the equivalent with vimscript.

[1] https://vscodium.com
That sounds like an enjoyable read. Could you share the ISBN or link? Thanks
> Parametricity comes essentially built-in, the way variables and functions are built-in to a programming language.

That is a common misconception, but in reality that's not how it shakes out. Realworld CAD software uses a geometric constraint solver because real world design problems have geometric constraints.

If you want to draw a rectangle with width X and height Y, sure you can handle that with variables.

What do you do if you want a triangle where one side is tangential with an arc, the other two sides have an angle Z between them and the intersection between that two sides is straight down from the center of the arc (that is they have the same x coordinate)? Is this description well-defined or do we need to give one more measure/constraint before it becomes so? Or maybe even over-defined and we can't possibly satisfy all these constraints?

This is the kind of question a geometric solver can answer, realtime as you are editing the sketch. You can try to cook up an ad-hoc solver every time you need one (with variables and functions) but then you are not in the business of designing stuff, but in the business of ad-hoc CAD development.
Just so you know, 'bite' in french means 'dick'...
Even the central bank can't originate money without creating debt. That's what money is, an exchangeable claim to resources, or assets. With base money, and the physical currency people hold in their wallet, the claim is notionally against the central bank's assets, that "back" the money and underly its value.
"A former blackhat hacker who goes by the name Gummo online claims to have amassed around $7 billion worth of Bitcoin (BTC).

(...)

The latest comments came as part of a follow-up interview published on Saturday after the initial discussion occurred in late 2020. During the first video, Gummo stated that he built four supercomputers to mine Bitcoin when it was priced at around $200-300 back in 2013, and generated more than 80,000 BTC within a year and a half. According to his claims, he has now amassed roughly 179,000 BTC."

https://cointelegraph.com/news/truth-or-fiction-popular-form...
> Does it matter?

I mean... yeah, it does?

There's good reason to be suspicious in general, but if any time they do something non-evil the immediate reaction is "okay but this is probably actually evil in some convoluted way", then that suspicion becomes paranoia.

Even if they put out closed-source modules like they do with Chrome, having an open-source microkernel with a focus on sandboxing and security, with the resources of a major corporation behind it, is incredibly beneficial for the ecosystem.
Meh, if anything voting systems accelerate the ride to echo chamber.
any algorithm will be gamed so it doesnt make a lot of sense. Why do we have algorithms again? My feed is chronological, which forces me to only include the right amount of people, and the right people. When twitter randomly resets it to algorithmic, it is noticed, and it's always a downgrade
You are better off with anything Proudhon or Silvio Gesell wrote. The problem with Silvio Gesell is that some of the Marxist criticism only applies to the brain dead ideas and people forget that there are four volumes of Das Kapital which means some of it is actually not complete garbage. The problem is that nobody has time to read the books.

Ironically, the first volume is the most popular and yet the worst of them all.
I am yet to find a single use case where AWS step functions look appealing.

Am I right to think that if you don't want to do some "no code" weirdness, they're just not for you?

Because deploying a thing I can't store in source control looks like insanity to me.
I'd argue that the legacy of CSMA/CD still alive in ethernet is what makes it harder to implement efficient networks, as the switched network kinda tries to emulate the shared bus behaviour.
It's now throwing a permissions error, guessing they don't want you to know their standards ;)

You do not have permission to access this page
If you have found this page in error, please contact support
Reference:1096925678761587964184320227559749541820034968299102359
I have a far shorter and simpler definition: money are a unit of measure a certain cohort of people agree to accept. They measure "valuables" things to trade, from goods to human work.

Private money so money == debt is a popular not-that-modern and widespread scam to keep a strong grip on the society by a small number of people. In the past we have had a bit of power subdivisions:

- army power, represented by the State

- religion power, represented by the clergy

- economy power, represented by merchants

Army need religion to keep people obeisant and economy to have natural resources and means to transform them for war and life. Religion need army to be protected, to crush enemy religions and economy to remain in power. Economy need army to protect it's own interests and religion to justify it's own crimes. After the French revolution economy became the State and a religion. And that's why economy now is ruled by dictatorial thieves and being those just "economist" they can't rule well. As clergy they have learnt very well how to pasture the masses, but as State they both do not really know how to fight a war nor how to rule a country and that's the reason of our deep crisis. The rest is noise.

Any dictatorship to remain in power need a vast majority of loyal and obedient subjects, to elicit them they need to give something, not just rhetoric, the classic panem et circense. Since there are oppositions they need to give much while they earn much, much more, and so resources get depleted quickly, that a war arrive to justify the disaster, sometimes suffice if there are a ready resourceful and fable enemy, sometimes not and dictators end up badly. Some try to ride the revolt sacrificing some puppets to be substituted by other, again sometimes work, sometimes no. Since we need a society to live well money remain anyway a unit of measure and people keep accepting it at different weight depending on the current situation and the game keep going.

The best video-tutorial I see is in a small part of a Colombian movie "El Concursante", perhaps some can find subs in various languages https://youtu.be/WpGhcDg7IJ4
As a data scientist, perhaps this is a case of a hammer looking for a nail, but personal finance made a lot more sense when I started treating “money” as: 1) a collection of arbitrary rules invented by humans, 2) probability distributions over the ability to exchange certain assets at different points in time, 3) a giant optimization program.

So, the terms “U.S. dollar”, “fixed rate mortgage”, “401k”, “capital gains”, etc. don’t really have any inherent meaning beyond the set of rules that govern their interactions. This rule system itself can change over time depending on politics and human emotions, so you have to try to model the dynamics of this meta-system as well, even though that’s pretty difficult.

Once you’ve gathered all the different rules into some programmatic representation, then you decide what it is you want out of life and at what points in your life, then you start optimizing. For example, would you rather have a 10% chance of having $1,000 on some future date, or a 1% chance of having $10,000? The expected return is the same in both cases, so your optimization should really consist of targeting a specific shape for the entire distribution of outcomes rather than a single number (or specific assets).

Not surprisingly, the average person (including me) does not have the right combination of 1) detailed knowledge of the global financial system and its rules, 2) how all these rules are likely to change, or 3) the technical background to implement the advanced mathematics required to optimize all of this in an accurate way that actually makes valid predictions.

So most people instead just guess and base their financial plans on their hunches about how “money” works, and large organizations that have the time to do all of this modeling in a more rigorous way come out much further ahead.

I still think simplifying the “rules” of finance would be one of the best things we could do to reduce wealth inequality, as inequality seems to largely be hidden in the highly volatile landscape of the cost function for the optimization problem I described.
How to maximise your chances of being fossilised
Researchers make a quantum storage breakthrough by storing a qubit for 20 ms
Most of the attacks target Windows and Mac, so one is already protected by using Linux.

As regarding effectiveness of firejail, then it relies on Linux container protection which is quite good given that many providers use that to run untrusted code.

However, the problem with firejail or similar tools is that that try to integrate with GUI and that makes the attack surface vastly bigger. To protect against highly sophisticated attacks something like Qubes OS should be used with explicit whitelisting of domains to connect.
Too late for your interview tonight, but talk to your doctor about beta blockers^ for situational anxiety. They dramatically reduce the physical symptoms of anxiety, are generally safe to use, and should be very cheap.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beta_blocker#Anxiety
You have that backwards. The cities economies would collapse without all of us living in sparsely populated areas, using our land to grow your food. The consolidation already occurred, over the last 100 years as the farming was made more efficient, people did move to cities, and what is left in the country is the minimal amount of people needed to support everyone else.

We'd actually get better if more people came back - the small towns would have more customers, their economies would improve, small town main streets would be revitalized, and we'll have to drive less miles because our local shops would have what we need instead of doing weekly/monthly trips to town to stock up on the things we don't grow and make ourselves.
> When did you make this agreement? Did you sign a contract?

All money in the economy is created through debt. Yes, someone signed a contract. Home owners did, students did, corporations did and even the government does it.
Some of these things were buried by Microsoft after already being dead, tbh.
It's interesting to see Mosler quoted here, despite the fact that so much energy is expended trying to define something that Mosler defines very simply:

Money is a tax credit.

Even commodity money is fiat, because without the stamp from the mint it cannot be used to pay taxes.

If you want proof of this, all you have to point to is the fact that coins minted in antiquity still exist, despite the fact that they were alloys.

Money is a tax credit, everything else is a commodity.

It's very simple.
Man arrested for tracking car by attaching Apple Watch to a wheel
> How much does the historical origin of money matter to the understanding economics of today?

A lot? Money is a social construct, so the history of money is something like a record of empirical observations that must be accounted for by any proposed theory of money. The fact that most modern economists don't seem too concerned with this doesn't mean that it's not important.
I had multi-day bugs caused by people not knowing what "0.0.0.0" IP address is, or network address in IPv4 in general, and using that expecting to be connected to localhost (turns out, when you tell system to connect to any address, there's no guarantee you connect to 127.0.0.1)
I would like to analyze the issue of browser security without controversy. The mitigations that Edge puts into practice (I'm talking about "Super Duper Secure" and "Enhanced Security") can prevent the operation of exploits in the V8 engine like this 0-day?

Is this platform dependent or the mitigation in progress works well?
I mean for example some feature on mac and Linux is available out of the box asACG feature.

This analysis is very interesting because I have only read analisys related to privacy and not about security and integrity. (I mean compare between Chorme, Edge, Brave, etc ...)