skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> People tend to forget, so, that Marx actually was a pretty good, and respected, economist.

He was working with flawed economic concepts, like the labor theory of value. He tried and failed to relate "value" derived from labor to actual market prices. (We now know that the problem he set up was even logically not solvable.) The "economics" you find in Das Kapital is essentially a zeroth-order approximation to what would be considered economic reasoning today, a bit like Aristotle's physics compared to Einstein's GR. It is of some very niche interest for things like input/output analysis, which is important to computable simulations of the economy. But for anything else, it's just not useful.
very very good principle. i have favorited. in case next time i feel like im drinking the koolaid.

also applies to the whole blockchain space.
> with context switching between user and kernel space.

This is an issue only because today CPUs are optimized for legacy monolith kernels which rarely switch and not for microkernels.

Microkernels are very important because they allow to reduce privileged code size and move most things out of kernel. Legacy kernels like Linux or Windows are just an endless source of vulnerabilities, use legacy programming languages and have zero security. Linux doesn't even use static code analysis.

For example, in Linux a network card driver runs at kernel with maximum privileges. In a microkernel it would be a separate process without access to anything in the system (even to a file system) so exploiting it wouldn't give much to attacker.
I think the charitable way to read their comment is that they're aware the AV is a problem but can't do anything about it because it is a work machine and thus likely administrated by a whole other team.
Do they expect a 20% tip on top of it?
The thing is that you DO train it to do that. Not everyone’s feed is like that. It just depends on what TikTok infers from your usage.

So in a way, saying that TikTok is outrageous is a bit hypocritical: it shows what you seem to like, and surely you calling it outrageous can only be a posture.
I find constraints are good. Limitations inspire creativity. It might be easier because the problem is obvious, difficult but obvious. Modern day programming with 1k nodejs module dependencies is a nightmare.
"here is this fun simple game called Rocket League, its about playing something like soccer but with cars, a few years ago I paid around 20 dollars for it, back then you were able to earn all the garments (hats, wheels, et al) for your cars just by playing the game, 30 minutes per day were more than enough to get all the wardrobe"

Not true. It had crates that dropped and you had to buy keys to unlock them for randomized drops. At least now you know what you're buying if you choose to unlock an item.

"a game I spend more than 2000 hours is now a game I hate -and don’t play, of course-."

This seems ridiculous to me. The game is the same, if you love the game, why would you stop playing because of cosmetics? Just don't buy them, use the free ones they give out. Or, rid yourself of the notion you must have every cosmetic, and kick a game you love that is also a live service a few bucks now and again for something you particularly like.

There's so many terrible free to play games out there with dark patterns and predatory tactics, Rocket League is hardly the enemy here.
The illustrations are really well done!
add another ssd, or create new partition, and disable all antivirus on it, and put your code there.
Don't make your infrastructure relaying on single domain then.

You probably don't need all infrastructure to be built on same domain as you build your marketing part (the domain exposed to customers). Have it built around another domain.

You can have all your endpoints to be served from several subdomains, so you can do that as well.

If one domain crumbles, you can switch to use of another one in mere minutes.
I know this branch in the thread is purely speculative - but it sounds awfully familiar to me as well.

Dated a woman in college who fits that profile in every including being sent off to firms like TFA - it was rooted in a decade of rape by her older brother. Her mother fell into that “we don’t talk about such things” type of profile and so it was left to fester despite being addressed.
Lolll read my message above again!

Most of us get exactly zero Asian girls on our TikTok. You just basically told everyone that TikTok detected that you probably have a (maybe subconscious) attraction to Asian girls.
I played apex legends for free for nearly a year before buying any silly cosmetics. Granted, now that i do i am hooked and have overall paid more than if i had paid 60 for apex to begin with, but i think its a good volontary subscription model. And since there isn't any pay to win aspect, i'm totally fine with this business model.
> Browsers need to follow ever changing standards, do all that in a super performant way

You don't have to beat Chrome at it's own game. I think the best course of action would be a drastic course change and building a browser that focuses heavily on the creation and publish of content, not just on the consumption. Focus on the Web as document storage instead of as App runtime. That's an area that is still in serious need of work and isn't really covered with Chrome. Also somebody really needs to reinvent bookmarks, they haven't fundamentally changed in 25 years and are in dire need of an upgrade.

Brave (IPFS and Crypto integration) and Project Gemini (focus on text content) are going a little into that direction, but there is still a lot more that could be done.

> Firefox because Chrome "feels snappier"?

It was less because "feels snappier" and more because "complete browser freezes when using multiple tabs". It has gotten better since then, but when Chrome started Firefox was in dire need of some rework.
It's even worse if you have opened tabs in private mode...
I think this is one of those cases where my internal model of the world doesn't match many other people's.

The statement "Mental dysfunction" in my mind has absolutely no negative connotations. As far as I'm concerned, most people on the planet have some form of mental dysfunction. And in this case, I am genuinely and totally agreeing that this outlook on life is not necessarily the product of a fully healthy mind - and that's ok.

What I did take exception to was the idea that every Open Source Software developer has access (via money, time, social skills... whatever) to a therapist, and that it is acceptable for the rest of the community to offload the blame onto those developers. In other words, I do not accept the false dichotomy of "Be exploited" vs "Get a grip".

> I wish more OSS developers would take steps to make their relationship with their work healthier. There's no shame in falling back on these unhealthy reactions to entitled demands, but it's certainly not a good thing.

Couldn't put it better myself!
>It's kind of amazing to think that the system that underpins an awful lot of human activity is a collective delusion.

It not a delusion it's an agreement. Dollars are a form of ledger. They just keep track of who owns how much of a big liquidity pool. We had to pick something or we'd have to manage liquidity for a cartesian product of commodities(e.g. "Whats the price ratio of Chickens to Ford Taurus's today? Is anyone even in a position to exchange?"). Crypto is just an extension of this idea. Its has value because it facilitates exchange. I can turn dollars into bitcoin, bitcoin into ETH, ETH into yen, and yen into sushi. As long as those currencies are liquid they have utility.
By writing more code in this case, I think you're just referring to using a type system.

Yes, you type a little more, and your code is easier to refactor and change in the mid/long term. So you save time, and sanity.

Not mentioning the cost of using a slower runtime with Python... I've seen serverless bills of 100k+ a month with NodeJS. If something twice as slow was used, and Python is more than twice as slow on average, then we'd be talking 200k+...
Why not just put the UV lights in the air ducts instead of point them at people?
Shulgin was a gateway into psychedelics and the study of consciousness for me, however my overconfident use of psychoactive drugs ended up giving me PTSD. I'd advise anyone interested in this area to be cautious, and only work with experienced people you'd trust with your life.
I tend to not wholly agree. While I have spent insane amounts of money on both computer games and movies, some of us pirate simply to get rid of obnoxious DRM crap. As an example, I find it infuriating that my multimedia setup involves two separate but identical DVD players, just to get around DVD region crap.
I regularly play minecraft together with my daughter on our LAN,
but recently I've had to configure two extra dummy accounts just to be able to continue playing with her, to get around Microsoft now requiring all mojang accounts be 'migrated' to microsoft accounts. Including their dark pattern, where your initial account is locked and flagged for 'suspicious activity' (), so they can try to squeeze your mobile phone number out of you, if you want to play the game you BOUGHT, after 7 days have passed.
() There IS no 'suspicious activity', their activity log indicated 5 logins FROM MY HOME ADDRESS, which by the way reveals that they are continously tracking the lat/lon coordinates of me playing the minecraft game I PAID FOR.

And not only poor people pirate, or commit any crime in general.
It works in reverse. Activities by poor people, that rich people don't appreciate, is what our society labels 'crime'. When rich people commit unwanted activities, it is called 'privilege'. There is a reason poor people are incarcerated in prisons, whereas rich people are fined for their transgressions. I have yet to hear of more than a single person (a swiss guy) going to jail for what transpired in 2007 and 2008. If anybody got in prison for that in 2008, it was the victims.
I too hate what modern games have become.
And I hate that I used to be able to buy movies as perpetual DVDs, but that big business privilege in the intervening 20 years have changed the laws into "you have a right to RENT movies from us".
Implementing a good complex UI takes a lot of effort. It requires a clear vision, quite thankless attention to details, tedious iteration and something that open source software projects struggle with: willingness to sacrifice cleanliness of the implementation to improve the UX.

I have fallen into a particular trap before that FreeCAD also seems to walk into: encumbering the user interface with restrictions imposed by the requirement to be modular and extensible. As a result, the user often experiences much increased friction when some functionality needs to span the boundary of separate modules. I'd say that the spread of features across the many FreeCAD workbenches is a symptom of such software design driven UX.
We don't need nation states to maintain ledgers today. A "ledger" can now live entirely on the Internet and be totally trustless and decentralized.
OPNSense Firewall Bypass with Carp
Those are pretty bad examples. Mario Kart and Smash are literally some of the top selling games of all time. If their "wacky ways" are played and enjoyed by 10% of players, that's still millions of sales.
Lol. Assuming you’re not trolling, I’d say yes, you have to be aware that any signal from you (including time spent watching each video) is analyzed by TikTok.
The problem CAD as code doesn't easily solve is how to refer to parts of the generated model for further processing. Consider adding in fillets to parts of your model. You have generated something complex through a series of sketches and extrusions in different orientations. Now you wish to round off some of the sharp edges in the resulting model but not all of them. Using CAD as code you have the problem of trying to select which edges you want.

Some have tried to generate things like CSS selectors for 3D geometry. It's clever but hard to use. In a GUI CAD system you just click on the edge. In a good GUI CAD system the selections are robust against slight changes in the feature tree.
Weinberg's book should be required reading for all scientists and engineers.
Sure, but Swatch have been adding auto movements to watches for 30 years. The Sistem51 is almost good enough to be COSC certified. All cheaper than the MoonSwatch pricepoint.

IMO they could have put an auto movement in, but then it becomes waaaay closer to a Speedy and way more likely that people start going "is the 5k price difference worth it?"
If that's the watch you want, you should get it one day. And when you do, you will value it for the rest of your life. One of the benefits of not being rich enough to just buy one because you can.

I never wanted a particular watch, just a nice mechanical one. I finally got one of my grandmother's inheritance money, an entry level TAG Heuer. It got refurbished twice in the last 14 odd years, I wear it daily. And it is basically my only piece of jewelry. It is also absolutely impractical when compared to a modern Garmin smart watch, the combined refurbishment costs so far could have financed a top-of-the-line Garmin. Which I'd assume is a lot more robust than the fragile mechanics. I'll never get one of those Garmins then, because a good mechanical watch is piece of art.

Getting a nice Omega (lovely watches, especially the Moon one) would feel like betrayal of my TAG.
Validate when you get it, escape when you use it.
I don't think anyone is confusing the blueish plastic case of the moonswatch with the steel original ST105.012.
Chemistry: I have only started it, but knowing the author and from the few pages I could yet read I have good reasons to believe that the following will fit:

Lowe, Derek B. (2016). The Chemistry Book: From Gunpowder to Graphene, 250 Milestones in the History of Chemistry.
Not that it would be a good idea really, but I could put Cloudflare in front of a mostly static site living on cloud run in order to be protected by big cloud run network/transfer bills right?
No the streaming api is always 2% ish of all live tweets. Wish Twitter would share more info on this stuff.
The book “CODE” uses exactly this pattern. It starts with two people talking to each other via cans connected with string, and works its way up to complex networks and processor architecture.
These are "almost Veblen goods" for middle-income people. Veblen good is a type of luxury good for which the demand increases as the price increases,

The price for a brand must be high to create value and quality does not affect demand significantly. It's only the appearance and brand image that sells.

The Swatch Group is the world’s largest watch company that owns over 10 brands. They sell mass produced brand where the value is almost 95% immaterial and non-functional (it's all in the mind of people). It's all about marketing.
The GP was talking about whole OS, not just the kernel (just as this Fuchsia workstation is too).

A week also seems pretty long for BSD. I'm sure I spun up FreeBSD with Gnome 2 in ~24hours once (it was definitely less than a week because I had a weekend to prepare it for a house party). Though admittedly I didn't compile base. But this was a machine from around 2005 sort of era, maybe even earlier.
Yes, something is off with Google's ranking of Quora pages. On many topics reddit have more relevant content but Quora turns up higher on search results.
Just rechecked because I'm getting down voted.
Kernel is 90 seconds, full toolchain and xfce environment is 6 minutes
The context of the discussion here is about Microsoft Teams. Teams doesn’t have a particularly engaging or enjoyable or usable design, but it does provide the bare minimum chat functionality.
> And also again, you can specify as many wireguard interfaces as you want

I don’t have to do this with a normal data link layer, that’s the entirety of the complaint.
No not really
>The golden age of gaming ended somewhere in 2005-ish.

This kind of statement definitely requires a source.

>They are also less about the art, and more about the money.

There have never been more experimental and indie games released than now.
Ok. But no matter what terminology you want to use, it is still the case that there is plenty of literature that shows we are biased towards conflating correlation with causation. That is fact, not opinion.

If you want to criticise the evidence in the literature, then fair enough I guess...that's beyond me to defend.
I'm vastly oversimplifying the issue (also I'm not a doctor), but didn't studies show that this type of multitasking is bad for our mental health and increases the likelihood of burnout?
have you considered case when developers need to not only clone just AWS infrastructure but storage as pre-requisite? In this scenario you would multiply your storage costs by the total number of developers.

This is a monstrous misassumption by Plain. For instance when I was trying to work with Bitcoin chain data, I would be looking at close to 1TB worth of data that I needed each time to replicate the complete application and the bill was something like $500 just to keep it in EBS.

So with 10 developers, we would be essentially paying somebody's salary and I wonder if the problems listed in this article is so critical that it would be worth that much.
i think we can have physics like discussion for money .
where joule ~ money and joule / sec ~ value , i am making a distinction between money and value where money is more discrete(quantized) and value is continuous .
The second secret ingredient is compute. OP(like FLOP) ~ money and OPS ~ value . putting it together we get , M = OP * E * K where OP -> total no of operations E -> energy spent K -> some constant . Dimensionally money has same SI unit as Joule , Total operation is a dimensionless variable . V = M / T {having same SI unit as Watt} value is money per unit time and Goverments / services / business should be seen as value generators the same way we describe the power of an engine as horsepower or watts .

This model is completely different than market analysis of prices / value . Not to mention that majority of value traded is done outside of open markets .

This model makes the assumption that all players in the value chain (producers and consumers) are agents with repeatable instructions ie put,Get,push,add,mov,etc.

Since there is No SI unit for instructions I propose the Unit for measuring instructions be MOV operator , This is because of my belief taking inspiration from the X86 MOV operator which was proven to be turing complete with the movfuscator(https://github.com/xoreaxeaxeax/movfuscator). What this means IMO all computable operations can be broken down to move operations.

Lastly this system views markets as interaction between agents . And makes the assumption that agents that do not sustainably price their goods / services will fail to operate in the longrun. And views variance / volatility in prices as a outcome of chaotic interaction between agents rather True indicator of value.
I think the key thing to watch is what they will replace Qualcomm's firmware with; if at all. Apple made a move a few years ago to reduce their dependence on Qualcomm. From what I've heard, Apple is rolling out their internal replacement for their 5G modem from year or so.

Basically Android is OSS linux with a lot of proprietary drivers that are not under the control of Google. And a lot of those are provided by Qualcomm. What they provide is effectively an OS inside an OS. Linux is a somewhat hostile environment for proprietary drivers and it necessitates some technical steps to insulate against the 'viral' nature of the GPL.

Google likes their dependency on Qualcomm just about as much as Apple does. It would not surprise me if they eventually move to their own in house 5G stack and I bet that would be a proprietary fuchsia exclusive. Proprietary ensures you get your software from Google (or Qualcomm). And making it exclusive to Fuchsia ensures they have full control over the combined package.

Chinese manufacturers are also insulating against being dependent on Qualcomm. E.g. Huawei has their own 5G modem and is of course also in the base station market.
That is interesting, Cloud Run does look much closer to what I want out of a "serverless" type service. I had no idea it existed.

I remember once there was a whole discussion point when people decided it was no longer possible for a single human to learn "all of Windows". I feel like we are at that point with cloud services ... it is now beyond the realm of possibility for a mortal human to obtain a comprehensive knowledge of cloud computing.
This was the book I thought of when I saw the title of this post.
> I don’t understand why free software always neglects the UI.

Because most programmers aren’t very good at it and because it’s hard. For example, suppose you add a very simple parameter like setting the diameter of a circle. Internally that code is probably pretty simple. Once you expose it to users, you have an enormous amount of ground to cover. A few examples would include:

* How to handle a cancellation, such as the after pressing escape. Dismiss the dialogue? What if there are other settings in the same dialogue with newly altered values? Cancel the whole thing and lose other input or what?

* Undo, perhaps multilevel. If multilevel undo, do you set the number of levels yourself or do you allow that to be configured via a separate settings dialogue? Limit to memory or some fixed number of steps? Once saved, do you save those values in the user application data space, environment variables, a real database, the local directory, a hidden directory, or some combination of all these?

* Constraining input. You may not be dealing with keyboard input exclusively. Maybe you decide to let dragging the mouse set that value. Or maybe you want the up and down arrow keys to work, in which case you need to set an increment. Maybe that increment needs to be reflected in a Settings dialogue.

* What about units? Should they be integer, big integer, or float? Percentage or pixels or centimeters or inches?

* Accessibility. If voice input, do you come up with a of vocabulary of your commands for your app? If for limited range of motion, how do you design the dialogue to be visually attractive and not too cluttered but still useful for someone who can only move the pointing device a few millimeters at a time? What kind of color themes are accessible for the dialogue and the rest of the app? should these be supplied by the operating system or should you include color configurations as part of your app?

* How does the host OS handle flexible dialogue sizes and responsive screen size, if at all? Who does the UX for the mobile version? iOS only or also include android support?
Even if the lights are effective, I am skeptical enough of LED quality control that I don't exactly jump to trust that the ones I get aren't leaking out the side bands (off-color basically) and sending adjacent more harmful wavelengths into my eyes. Especially if those LEDs start to be sold on Ebay and come from who-knows-what factories (which there already are).
Why?

Probably this makes advertisement more successful.
They turn those weird modes and maps on occasionally - called Limited Time Modes.

The only genuinely new one they've done for years was the NFL mode, which they presumably got paid for and wasn't very good.
Just be open and honest about it. I find if I tell someone that I'm really nervous I stop feeling as nervous.
Send Notifications to Yourself with Curl
So, nobody went to prison for this?
Long live 2015 Macbook Pro!
purchase price of non-indie games have to go up like 3x then (at least), and people have to accept that….

But since gamers are uniquely price sensitive for prices that haven’t changed in 30 years, for an entertainment form that last longer than pretty much all other forms

Then you have micropayments to nickel and dime gamers to reach the same result