skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You should really relax your moral rigidity. You believe your intuition is correct, but there's nothing saying it is. Our intuition comes from culture, which is the result of centuries of Judeo-Christian influence, which I hazard to guess most of HN is not OK with taking as a source of knowledge, even an implicit, squishy kind of knowledge.

Instead we should be foundational about this. "Every economist" doesn't believe anything, as there is widespread disagreement about almost every topic in science, and furthermore every economist believing something doesn't make it true, as economists are subject to groupthink same as the rest of us.

To the extent that employees are being taken advantage of by for-profit corporations, employees are accepting of this situation, because alternatives are available. There is nothing that says you must work for a for-profit corporation. There is also nothing that says you can't join a co-op. There are distinct benefits to working for a for-profit corporation; those are what I am choosing when I choose to allow myself to be "fucked over" as you say. In reality, what is happening is I am allowing some of my value to be captured by the organization and invested into its long-term stability, productivity, and desirability. If I wished for none of this, there is nothing stopping me from starting my own company of one person, correct?
Got it upstairs and it's a treasure. Such a beautiful attitude and joyful playfulness shared with real generosity.
Radically 'dumb' nuclear distillation that has Uranium pebbles just 'boil' water and then capture the condensation. Those pebbles could sit there for 50 years before reconstitution. It might even be designed so that left unmanned, it just kept working or wouldn't overheat i.e. using 'heavy water' like CANDU reactors. Designed not so much for efficiency but for simplicity, safety, longevity.
A bunch of the comments here seem to be talking about what's in the headline (a game being realistic + feeling like work) without really noticing some of the broader social commentary in the article (the workaholic — and sort of toxic — culture of tech in China).

Seems like a potentially good game to train oneself in figuring out how to spend investor money though lol.
You can't control what other people think, so let go of the anxiety.
Without numbers both you and I are just grasping at our feelings. That said, the technology to make music "cheap and accessible" enough to displace live music "thus allowing people to have unlimited music" has been around since at least the early 1900s with the creation and maturation of the record player/phonograph. I don't think this is a new phenomenon. This "killing of live music" would have happened long before the Beatles were even born.

Further improvements in portable audio like the cassette tape, the CD, and eventually digital music only improved the portability of music for individuals but commercial settings have had the ability to replace live music at venues for a century. I don't think the root cause for the decline of live music was technical. I think cultural attitudes toward music changed, that's all.
Your son quite frankly should have expected this. I'm always wary of parents sharing "horror" stories of college application for multiple reasons. #1 Admissions are a crap shoot and you can't just apply to very selective schools and expect to walk maybe one of those schools is safety rest are reaches for any student in the country, his acceptances are most likely par for his skill level, Congrats on the test scores but north of almost 50000 students achieve scores in that range yearly. The quality of his admissions essay's are no doubt a factor. #2 if you're son is truly that talented and didn't get accepted to his dream schools than there must be some other red flags or issues you are not mentioning.
He's talking about white aristocrats, so called blue-blood because they were fair enough to see their veins, according to legend.
Can I use Signal to prove the authenticity of authorship on documents?
> The notion of a “well rounded student” who does music, art, and extra curricular activities, is a legacy of blue blood WASP culture.

More precisely it was first invented by Yale to limit the number of Jewish students admitted, and was later repurposed to limit the number of Asian students admitted.
Not sure I'd call myself highly creative. But maybe this explains how I get to similar conclusions but with different reasoning/implementation (and of course other conclusions that are completely different).
> Are you asking about the historical facts?

Yes, because that's what's relevant to the question of whether watching the news is or is not a good way to get advance warnings of the kind of danger you might need to take drastic action to avoid. My understanding of the historical fact is that Jews who left Germany to escape the Nazis did not do so based on anything they read in the news; they did so based on word of mouth about where things were heading and based on the declared intentions of the Nazis, which anyone who had read Mein Kampf could have predicted.

> their persecution was not a bolt from the blue

That's correct, it most definitely was not. There were warning signs years in advance. My understanding is that the biggest obstacle to Jews fleeing from Germany was not lack of information but the simple fact that it's very, very difficult to uproot your entire life and flee to a foreign country you've never seen where almost nobody speaks your language, so convincing yourself that it really, truly is necessary to do that is something people will have a very difficult time doing even if they already have all the information they need to see the necessity.

> with Ukraine I had a good 5 monthish heads-up

Based on what you read in the news? Or based on information you got other ways, that you would have gotten whether you read the news or not? Putin's intentions towards the Ukraine have been clear for years, certainly since the annexation of the Crimea. I don't think this was a bolt from the blue any more than the Nazi persecution of Jews was.
>It really seems to come down to individual freedom vs. reduced freedom for the collective good.

That's one way to frame it, if you want to use the word "freedom" a lot. Another way is "cooperation vs anarchy". Our ability to pull ourselves out of the mud and position ourselves as the Rising Hope of Earth, is predicated entirely on our ability to cooperate. The philosophy of "individual freedom" is the quasi-religious conviction that we can simply sit back and let everyone do as they will, pushing and shoving and vying for money and status and power and all the rest of it, and without having to make any difficult choices, somehow it will all Just Work Out. It would be so convenient, wouldn't it? To have the moral and the pragmatic highground? But alas it's incompatible with having any opinions about what the future should look like. We need to be able to collectively decide on goals, and then collectively pursue those goals, and unfortunately that means Rules. And as surely as Newton's Laws, no matter how reasonable the rule, always there will be someone to publicly decry it, and someone else to even attack the very concept of having rules.

This could very well be The Great Filter. Like yeast in a carboy of wine we will consume all available resources or poison ourselves with our own excrement, unless find a way to act as more than a collection of cells.
Smartphone-based Covid-19 detection shows high accuracy
You're not wrong -- Caddy has a PKI app built-in, which is basically a wrapper around Smallstep's CA libs. That could be used to issue SSH certs as well, probably.
Conversely, you could follow the news, buy a home because you think you'd be permanently priced out due to investors, and end up underwater in a few years. Because you read the news, you'll choose to make financial decisions, some might be wins, but not all are guaranteed to be wins.
To be frank IQ research is getting less and less relevant, and I suspect it has less to do with politics, and more to do with the fact that it has failed to further our understanding of human behavior and the human mind for the past 80 years.

Much more interesting research has come from other fields of psychology, including (in order of peak popularity) behaviorism, cognitive psychology, social psychology, neuro-psychology. Unlike IQ works from these fields have made predictions in unrelated fields and inspired lasting paradigm shifts inside psychology. For example social psychology has provided very useful constructs used in economy, behaviorism in criminology, neuro-psychology in medicine, cognitive psychology in computer science etc.

Scientifically IQ is a dead end. It only makes predictions inside the field of psychometrics, it correlates only with related constructs, the only place where it is used in an unrelated field is when racists are trying to excuse ludicrous statements.

Note: This is not entirely true. IQ was (is?) used to assess cognitive disability in individuals, but today we have a lot better tools for that (thanks to cognitive and neuro-psychology), so it’s usefulness has been surpassed by other fields.
Water draw on groundwater aquifers is so high that the ground is sinking by meters. https://www.hcn.org/articles/south-water-the-central-califor...
Yeah, the continuity of institutions like chattel slavery and the divine right of kings applied to global expansion including but not limited to the brutal subjugation of India for 200 years.

I'm genuinely curious as to how you can come to the conclusion that British expansion promoted democracy. I did a Google search and was able to find reference to a body of literature that seems to suppose that there is correlation between long term survival for post-colonial democracies and the time a colony had spent being rule over by the British. One paper (below) seems to tie democratic elections as being a necessary qualifier for post-colonial independence but that makes sense from a Pinko standpoint-- former colonies which formerly could be dominated through sheer political and military force may be freed from a, "formal" perspective but, "free elections" and the liberalization of the real economy (globalization) creates a new opportunity for global centers of wealth and influence to dominate developing nations without the need to mobilize the political system or military thereby side-stepping the need to garner or manufacturer consent from the public.

Now where exactly do we get a historical pretext for global exceptionality? This is the promotion of, "democracy?" It seems like this is basis of all the nasty things in the world that stifle real self-determination. I now that it's fun to play edge-lord when you feel like no one else has done the reading (believe me I get it) but these simple, "good guy vs bad guy but plot twist the bad guy is actually good" and its reversal amongst people on the left just reeks of a kind of intellectual snobbery which typifies those that are insecure about what they actually know. As an insecure jackass myself I would know. Cheers.

rochester.edu/college/faculty/alexander_lee/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Lee-and-Paine-Britain-and-democracy.pdf
To wit:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n3LMSflEN54
Does this method allow you to pass-through USB ports?

How is it different from running an XPRA server on the remote machine?
But think of them
> In the United States, prescriptions to 18- to 49-year-olds with type 2 diabetes grew from fewer than 2200 in 2000 to 768,000 in 2015.

What the hell… that has to be a mistake? What is going on? Can poor lifestyle really cause this massive increase in young people with diabetes??
The problem to me, and I’m no expert, is that it’s not one thing. It’s a term that encompasses all water that’s treated, but not potable.

So without digging down and talking to each individual water provider you can’t say anything definitively.

Someone please correct me if I’m wrong.
Ok sure, I know what you mean, you can't separate out costs. But imagine we could say -- how much would it cost to produce nuclear power that killed as many people yearly as natural gas plants do, per unit of energy produced? Everything on top of that is extra safety. But really, it wouldn't even be expensive to be much safer than that. When you look at the deaths per unit of energy produced, nuclear is right down there with wind and solar: https://ourworldindata.org/safest-sources-of-energy

The reason we still have to run coal and natural gas plants is to cover the times that wind and solar aren't producing. Nuclear is a substitute for coal and natural gas, not wind and solar. Because we're shutting down old nuclear plants and not building new ones, coal plants are still going up in many parts of the world. Even if nuclear was ten times as dangerous, it would still be a net win on safety compared to natural gas and especially coal.

But also, my understanding is that a whole bunch of these deaths were at Chernobyl. From the article I linked:

The deaths from Chernobyl, 35 years ago, were due to unforgivably bad reactor design that we‘ve advanced far beyond now. There were zero deaths from radiation at Three Mile Island or at Fukushima. (The only deaths from the Fukushima disaster were caused by the unnecessary evacuation of 160,000 people, including seniors in nursing homes.)

Did you check out the article from my original comment? It does explain things much better than I can. And about your last point of the sweet spot of safe efficiency -- Jack Devaney, the author of the book that the article is about, is currently partnering with the government of Indonesia to produce nuclear power that's cheaper than coal: https://thorconpower.com/ The website is pretty generous with info, and doesn't set off my bullshit/vaporware detector. Maybe it's already happening.
Easier to regulate one company than millions of peoples shower habbits.
Because Star Trek have very odd copyright structure.

- Franchise once where split between two legal entities - CBS (Paramount Television) and Viacom (Paramount Pictures).

Exact details where closed, but rumors said, nearly all series where at one company, and films at other, with one exception.
- Because VOY and DS9 created simultaneously, and each need lot of resources, decided to make one of those two series exception, and they created in other company than all other series (as with overall split agreement, also unknown, which exactly series belongs to which entity).

So they have very large troubles (bureaucracy), in sharing 3D models.

Because of this, you may notice, no one series share Enterprise model with any film.
And even in VOY and DS9 created simultaneously, nearly all models are also different, except of Defiant, which appear in few series of both (and now it is legacy problem).

Unfortunately, this also lead to legal troubles in re-render CG with higher resolution, because copyright forbids to make changes without written agreement on every case, where used copyrighted model which belong to other entity, and nobody want to deal with those stables.

And even if use some magic technology, which just enhance resolution without use of any copyrighted sources, will have to prove to the judge, that new video appear magically, without violation of agreement.

Wiki says, that in approx 2019, two studios merged again, but for so large entities, this is not means, that they immediately will behave as one.
- Usually, spend from 6 months to few years to complete merger, and with covid all things done much slower than usual.
On the recommendation (without clicking the video), click the 3 dots, click not interested, click the button to say why, click not interested in this channel.

This usually stops the channel from being recommended?
You can also go into your viewing history and remove videos that you don’t want recommendations based on.
Making the fundamental assumptions that everyone shares the same perspective on success in a career.

Other world-views may take other positions. That doesn't make them wrong, or acting in bad faith.
I asked about the same about a decade ago.

Haven't seen such a thing yet!
Do you drive? You can move to a place where you don't need to.

Do you take airplanes? Why?
Is that so? I thought even different contexts within the same browser context were well isolated. For instance, isn't the reason arbitrary web pages can't access my Lastpass credentials is due to this sandboxing?
I typed in "support vector machine" and got an error. The page was blue and no content loaded. In the console, there was a stack trace:

react-dom.production.min.js:216 Error: Invalid TLD {"parts":["scikit-learn"],"tld_level":-1,"allowUnknownTLD":false}
at o (index.js:39:11)
at e.exports (index.js:9:10)
at t.a (FeedCard.js:53:35)
at sa (react-dom.production.min.js:157:137)
at Ys (react-dom.production.min.js:267:460)
at Cu (react-dom.production.min.js:250:347)
at Au (react-dom.production.min.js:250:278)
at Tu (react-dom.production.min.js:250:138)
at bu (react-dom.production.min.js:243:163)
at react-dom.production.min.js:123:115
Wow, if they aren't suggesting dietary and exercise based solutions first, that's a huge red flag. Find a new doctor.
This is not a single search, in your example the user just made three distinctive searches.

If you have a better business model, that does not involve building yet another ad-supported search engine, we are all ears!
I’m not offended. Not one bit. My response is based on something more fundamental that the person missed: the Indian system enables kids to get jobs. At that, the Indian system is amazing. Period.

Hypothetically, if the Aussie system were better, Indians from the Indian system would never jobs in Australia that satisfied the employment criteria established by Australian firms. It would all be Australians. The truth is far from that statement.

I’ll end with this observation from 24-years in the industry. I’ve worked with many incompetent people. They come from all backgrounds. Incompetence has nothing to do with education. If your education system is without sin, i.e. doesn’t produce incompetent people, go ahead and throw the first stone.
I would say it is definitely a contender for the best fps. Especially if you play it in a eSports manner with a dedicated team. Not many games that can compete with what ow is doing. Very excited to see what ow2 brings.
dupe: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30834885 (227 points, 214 comments)
Rituals at Work: Teams That Play Together Stay Together
>You mentioned customer facing roles, do mean like customer service? I'm open to getting AWS cert if thats what you mean by Cloud Solution Architect.

Yes, I was thinking Cloud Solution Architect and similar roles. One of the benefits is that you could try to get a job at a company like Microsoft/AWS/Google etc that is trying to grown their business in the Middle East.

> I suppose your correct about looking for remote work from other countries, which countries do you think tend to hire people from the middle east the most?

TBH I have no idea.
Perhaps, I'm not sure. I guess it depends on what's causing it to stumble.
The tsunami was really horrible. I recommend to check videos if you aware.
Amazing tech that is too expensive to buy…

Reminds me of this: https://www.technologyreview.com/2016/05/04/245988/the-world...
Seeing AT commandes described as the "way that humans and machines can interact with a cellular modem" made me feel old because they didn't just say "remember AT commands from manually driving your Hayes 9600baud dial up modem?"
It's an increase in a particular treatment for a disease, which is only a contingent proxy for the disease itself. A change on that scale could plausibly be explained by a change in the standard approach to treatment or diagnostic criteria. Wouldn't be surprised if insurance played a role somehow.
that doesn't say that diagnoses increased that much, just that this particular drug has become a much more popular way to treat it.
Perhaps I am having a case of the Monday afternoons and some humor flag has been turned off for me, but this just comes across as disrespectful of the GP's comment.
Focusing on mass politics and not individual choices is good but

> We have too many people

is the tagling of rich suburban Malthusians who don't believe in any of that. So if that is not you, best not to tarnish yourself with that phrase.

Population is not that big a deal because if current trends continue and we don't boil the planet first, the population is on track to peak and then decline.

> dramatically reduce the quality of life

I would argue suburban life in fact sucks terribly, and walking + biking + trains is a far superior way of life. So I don't like this "sacrifice" framing at all. Yes, changing the material basis of society will be a culture shock and upsetting to some, but in no way need the replacement be "worse" on the whole.

If we do everything else and then really miss more inter-continental travel, let's build a goddamn multi-track railway across the bearing Bering Strait. There's no reason we cannot afford it!
That's not an argument for putting it back in or even stopping.

It fails to answer the question of "so what?"
Given the rapid depletion of ground water levels, and uncertainty about potential changes in precipitation patterns due to climate change, do we actually have “plenty of water” in the ground, compared to a reasonable desire (well thought out planning) for several-decades worth of buffer for a large number of people?
What level of routing decisions do you expect to be made on a single / dual ethernet drop to a server card with no other ports?

Like this is cute and all, but kind of a weird target market.
It's not really a "too many people" issue, given that a lot of the water is going toward things like grapes and almonds.
I wouldn't call health insurance "extremely expensive" in the context of Google SWE salaries. On average it probably costs on the order of $5-$10k/head/year at most. My very loose upper bound estimate is $50k/year for all aux benefits and bus/campus costs.
Blocking people is a great way to avoid conflict. It's much better than the platform kicking people off.
Metformin is also sometimes used to induce ovulation in non-obese women of childbearing age with polycystic ovarian syndrome.[0] Luckily, this study seems to only show an effect if taken within the 90 day window before conception, so it seems to be doing something to the sperm, and not causing genetic changes. Also, of course, we'd want to see corroborating studies.

[0] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4200666/
So there are three different scenarios wrapped up in this question and they're all interesting.

A. The server is new, and I'm setting it up presumably remotely e.g. in "the cloud". Ideally the autonomous setup should provision keys for me in this case, since they're public it's fine to even publish scripts which do this. However it's true that there are a lot of systems out there which instead give you a password for first login (or worse they have a fixed default!) which is sad.

B. The server has existing users, but not me. If we're not using certificates then I need an existing user to authorise me to use the machine, providing public keys is no different than anything else they might fill out, like my name, they will need a trustworthy source for all of it. For systems I have no other prior relationship to beyond that I am, as you see, tialaramex, I tell them to add the github keys for tialaramex, which are of course published. I will replace those after successfully connecting to their SSH server.

C. I've used this server but not from this machine. FIDO resident keys solve this (you can extract the resident key to a new client from your physical device, the device still needs to be present to actually authenticate) but I will also use SSH to connect to my home bastion and have that authenticate while I do setup once. I can SSH from my phone, so if this can't work then somehow I don't have my phone or access to my home, setting up SSH keys is a low priority in that case.

However it's true that none of this is yet ordinary.
Mathematical Fiction