skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Flutter, because it's using canvas, doesn't play well with text input for non E-FIGS languages. Even when it does work it's a 2nd class experience. Open a flutter demo, switch your OS to a Chinese, Japanese, Korean, type some CJK, watch as it shows placeholders while it goes and downloads fonts. Now try to select the text and use the OS's reconversion features (something you might not be aware of if you don't regularly use non-roman character languages) Install some language or accessibility helper extension. Go run a Flutter demo. Watch as the extension has no way to find the text because there is no text to find, just pixels.

That flutter even got this far strongly suggests the people making it are monocultural. That they are thinking "maybe someday there will be a solution" is not the right way to approach building an inclusive GUI framework in this day and age.
This is interesting. Can you elaborate more on what had you learned?

BTW, there's a Canon Cat emulator that runs on the browser at: https://archive.org/details/canoncat
having a sun tan, was associated with field laborers, so rich people of the time did every thing they could to retain the whitest of skin to demonstrate their richness. When you have very pale skin the veins are more easily seen which carry un-oxygenated blood back to the heart, giving a blueish hue.

Of course, now the term blue blood, just means wealth that has established generational history.
The definitive map of the world’s extraordinary sights
If by "regular diet" you mean a typical American diet including large portions of foods with high glycemic index then no. If you want to keep the disease in remission then it has to be a permanent lifestyle change.
As suggested in a sister comment, a nuclear reactor is such a highly sought piece of tech that you need an aircraft carrier built around it to protect it from snatching by somebody who wants to start building nukes.

You can, of course, use nuclear energy to run your ships, and even trucks and planes.

Use the nuclear energy (both the electricity and heat) to produce fuel from CO₂ and H₂O. Use this fuel in your jet engines and colossal diesel motors. Burning it is carbon-neutral.

Oil should become much more expensive though, and building of nuclear facilities, much more cost-efficient, for this to become economically viable.
My company has blackout periods for certain parts of the company, such as finance. But not the whole company. And it does light grants for most all employees. But it gets pretty fuzzy fast as to who has MNPI vs who doesn't. Did someone mention a contract not getting renewed? Well now you might have MNPI and not be allowed to trade. Best to keep out of the blackout windows, and be extremely careful.
Seems spam. HN is not an advertising forum. If you have to demo something, mention it please.
Most containers are going to block unshare() via seccomp, no?
It's creating your own bubble. Not really a good thing for anyone who values a broad perspective of the world.
>There is never going to be a civilian-controlled ship with a nuclear reactor

Not only they exist for decades, but as recently as January 2022, you could have bought tickets for a nuclear ship cruise: https://poseidonexpeditions.com/northpole/north-pole-icebrea...

Also, the nuclear container ship (the old one, but still in service): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sevmorput

The link I shared is about a Chinese nuclear icebreaker that is supposed to lead container ships behind. Then there's no difference in terms of security if there's just one nuclear ship in a caravan or all of them.

As for Chinese specifically planning for nuclear powered container ships, I can offer this speculation: https://www.neimagazine.com/opinion/opinionpropelling-decarb...
Check this out:

https://thepihut.com/products/inky-impression-4-7-colour-epa...
Hopefully not. I have seen that when for example compiling shellcheck from source or doing a rust compile.
> In the second sentence, you proved his point.

I'm not sure how I did that.

> FYI

pops a pill

Indeed
No, schizoposters are people who make wild claims online and refuse to support them. Rational folks don't usually get called that.
Someone who is poor at communicating blames people for not understanding their bad communication; claiming labels are bad whilst labeling and being utterly dull.

If it's a troll its a boring schtick.
This is a valid point and should be managed for those specific areas.
That said, costal areas suffer intrusion mainly from groundwater pumping. It is far better to reduce pumping and use imported water, than import water and put it in the ground
Agree with the general principle, but it is important to identify what aspects of a current product's design is shaped specifically by fossil fuel dependency and what evolved independent of it.

If you threw away all preconceived notions of how a car should look and feel and spent an unlimited amount of time and money to design a new perfect one based around electric power, it would...still look very similar to any other car on the market today. The reason is that the design of a passenger car (and all of the infrastructure around it) has evolved over many centuries independent of its power source – from a horse drawn carriage to a Ford Model T to a Tesla.
Lot of people in the comments are recommending the Economist for a monthly/weekly digest. Any complimentary journals or magazines that can provide a slightly different perspective?
Snapseed|Photo Editing Application
Snapseed is an iOS and Android photo-editing tool that allows users to enhance photographs and apply digital filters. Nik Software created it, and it is now owned by Google.
I don't know if this is the case, but presumably the questions themselves could advantage or disadvantage people from a particular background.
I filed an issue to suggest caddysshack.
If these colleges don't value what you bring, why apply to those colleges? For many areas of study, we have amazing and relatively inexpensive access to instruction/training/knowledge - if that is one's goal. If ones goal is simply to get trained for a job/industry - then colleges are probably not a good fit either.
Electric is the future. But I am worried about EMPs and the single reliance on electric. Is my worry non-existant?
One thing I find annoying about the argument for heat pumps helping to reduce global warming is no one considers if the refrigerant leaks. R-410A, R-13A, etc. refrigerants have a pretty high global warming potential (GWP) and it seems like likelihood of a leak is decently high, especially if there is a car crash.
You can keep scrolling, but the other side keeps posting, and that gets put into your feed nevertheless.
The concern I'd have is that a launch failure could deposit all of the mercury on board in a small area near the launch site. Even if the amount involved isn't significant on a global scale, it would still be enough to have a dramatic and lasting local effect, e.g. on fisheries under the flight path.
Then how do these nuclear ships operate for decades?

Nuclear container ship Sevmorput: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sevmorput

Civilian nuclear icebreakers: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear-powered_icebreaker

Floating nuclear power plant: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_floating_nuclear_power...
Putnam is a collegiate event, on which most students in the math department of elite colleges (except MIT) score approximately 0.
These guys deleted their LinkedIn.what a shame.
TECO isn't actually that bad, and I'd argue that it's roughly on the level of vi in complexity. I learned it just for fun, and found it more powerful than vi. I was using videoteco when I learned it, and I recommend it to anyone that also wants to play around with this.

I definitely would never want to go back to configuring sendmail though. Unlike TECO it doesn't provide anything compared to a modern mail product.
>I've been struggling a lot with an online course from MIT but at least I'm enjoying learning a lot of stuff as I'm employed now.

MIT OCW is absolutely amazing, I've learned a lot from there as well.
They’re probably bragging on social media. Sucks for them.
> What do you suppose environmentalists are going to say when you start covering all that "unused land" (which they call "wilderness") with solar plants?

Probably "wow, thanks for using all that desert?" The environmental argument against solar is by far the weakest out there given that literally every other alternative has substantially worse externalities (whether you think the risks of nuclear waste are worth it or not--I'd imagine most of us do--they obviously exist!). I'd actually go so far as to say that the vast majority of people who claim they are against large solar deployments for environmental reasons are arguing in bad faith.

I do not understand what you're saying as far as "scalability" required of solar farms. What challenges of scale do you think will exist? Solar does not have economies of scale in terms of deployment, only construction (and it is already cheap enough, without subsidies, to undercut fossil fuels in many countries). Deploying a large or small farm scales basically linearly in the number of solar panels, until it becomes such a large fraction of the grid that storage becomes a concern (which we are nowhere close to). This is not comparable to the obvious challenges of mining and processing enormous amounts of seawater (which takes a long time to mix thoroughly and for which we still don't have a good way of actually isolating the uranium) compared to small amounts.

Again, many informed people have issues with solar, but none of their issue is that it couldn't provide the power required. The reason there are not larger solar deployments is that people have not invested in larger solar farms, not that there is some scalability or economic limit; a large farm being a fraction of the size of some nuclear plants is pretty meaningless, considering that it costs proportionally less than the same nuclear plant (which is why I bought up square footage--because that's the only metric by which trying to argue that a single nuclear plant generating more electricity than a large solar farm actually means anything). There is absolutely no technical hurdle there, and frankly I can't really imagine what you think the technical hurdle would be.
>> Sites already have to offer exports to be GDPR compliant

> Not necessarily. There are limitations in Article 20 of the GDPR.

I'm AOK with restricting user-rights to save-the-things-that-are-about-to-be-deleted to sites that meet a GDPR style minimum bar for engagement. Minor minor minor sidebar, I think sites should have to have advertised machine-to-machine accessible metadata on what their site's terms of service are.

It's dead now, not a good implementation, & probably not a good fit in the particulars, but the vague wide-scale idea of P3P (Platform for Privacy Preferences, a terrible name for a spec exposing what was more usually data-rights to the content than privacy concerns) kind of has some illumination for what a future path here might look like. It should be known. We should entail ourselves knowingly. This is one place GDPR doesn't really seem to address, that it misses the mark: I believe fully in small scale operators, in letting them do their thing, but as a user we should know what compacts we're entering into. Without having to read elaborate/complex human-authored terms: the machines should be able to tell us what minimum bars are met.
Yes, this. It reflects my experience of playing pokemon with friends, too.
> Based on what you read in the news

Yes, there have been continuous coverage about Russia’s preparation leading up to the invasion, such as this article:

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/43371/russia-bolsters-...

Reddit’s /europe has had megathreads about it well in advance as well.
The VP of Global Operations where I work who has his undergrad in Mechanical Engineering from Harvard and MBA from Dartmouth will tell you, all those schools bought him over a public institutions was a network for after he graduated.
I envy my fellow country people who do not even think about these issues and can live in bliss. There is an issue of knowing too much and being depressed. As someone who is a minority in the US, I am forced to learn about these issues.

I am familiar with China's history with the west, there are plenty of Youtube videos that cover this topic so I think more "online citizens" are informed than you might think.

The US should pressure Britain to apologize to China. These days the US says jump and Britain says "how high?" I'm guessing that there isn't enough political capital that is willing to be spent to make this happen.

You could argue that HK 97 was a first step even though it has caused a lot of trouble looking back.

The US has a history of uniting when under siege and it is amazing what they can accomplish. Whether this will be effective against China's long game remains to be seen.

Climate change could trigger the war. China has a lot to lose (arguable more than the US).
Like I said in another comment, every single such vessel in existence (the container ship you linked and all the ice breakers) is owned and operated by the Russian government and operates in Russian-controlled waters (or has an escort). This is not a model that can be used for global shipping.
And a sliiightly bigger budget, both construction and maintenance.
You need two offers before joining any tech company. Have a good day.
I think there’s value to extract that data and then send drones to kill every single one.

Maybe an enterprise feature where our big data cluster is mined by AI that finds any siblings, offspring etc and based on their score either terminates them or sends them to our re-education island.

An extra revenue stream could be to film the whole thing and sell it to Netflix.
This company seems to think they have a solution:

https://www.theoceanbird.com/
> By not understanding the environment you’re not going to be able to understand the Problem which means your Solution will probably fail.

Yes it boils down to politics. Having built a platform for accelerating routine histocompatibility analysis (providing customers a profit from the start) I got to see this firsthand. Risk aversion across the industry, small armies of established technicians working manually, administrators making purchasing decisions with no understanding of the science or impact, the myopic insular bent of academics, the massive gap between healthcare and modern technology. One could pay labs to save time, improve outcomes while reducing risk and they still wouldn't use your product if it doesn't map onto their political priorities.
Not immoral in the slightest.
also not just a matter of understanding concepts, it's a matter of familiarity with tools, sure a developer, and most other humans, could open documentation and read and figure out how to do something in 5 hours that would have taken a person skilled in devops maybe 3 minutes. Linux alone is a rabbit hole, add cloud, kubernettes, docker, basic database management, cron jobs, permission setting, certification renewal, etc.. the amount of commands and their variations gets quite large.
Los Angeles not allowing a nuclear container ship to dock: this is quite likely, but can be either dealt with (for example, by transferring containers to small battery-powered container ships in international waters close to LA for the last leg) or by continuing emitting megatons of CO2 to appease Emotional Greens (as opposed to Rational Greens) in California.

(Edited to remove an incorrect statement - sorry!)
Part of the point is that pointless trivia is on the curriculum. Math is usually the most immune of all subjects.
A lot of the knowledge is from patents and dev kit leaks. Also, it was built by Silicon Graphics and uses similar tech to their indigo workstations so some knowledge from those apply.

N64 is well understood, and there are low level emulators now available that emulate the RSP and RDP on modern GPUs implemented with compute shaders. https://www.libretro.com/index.php/category/parallel-n64/
Schmidt Futures launches Virtual Institute for Scientific Software
This isn't about free speech. People NEED to hear, read, and see conflicting viewpoints and opinions they don't agree with. They NEED to see the ugly realities of life. The opposite is a culture of censorship, which is absolutely unacceptable.
Gpt3 is a bit of a cult now. Why do people believe there is intelligence in there?
https://archive.ph/frHKn

https://web.archive.org/web/20220326044028/https://www.natio...
The lack of fresh ideas in this thread is discouraging.
I would hesitate to trust a whole brand. This is an area where almost everything is bad. Check for something with OpenWrt support and then get that exact supported model. I do the same with phones and LineageOS support.

The Netgear R6220 has been pretty good to me (I have several), but I will not ever tell someone to just "get a Netgear router".
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-1015

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-1016

https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-1015

https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-1016

https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2022-1015

https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2022-1016

https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2022-1015

https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2022-1016

I just spent the whole weekend patching whatever the last kernel vuln was and had to plan around like 20 people's schedules. I thought Meltdown/Spectre was bad, this year is already feeling like that year in repeat.

15 years as a sysadmin, anyone have suggestions for my next career move? Thanks.
> remember Dreamweaver?

Reminds me of Frontpage days. Most of the web pages had marquee (floating text?) and sound those days.
You have a point. Let's wait until China deploys their fleet. Going to be a long wait (15-20 years), but it is my strong belief that they will do it. I might be proven wrong, of course.
Some of the changes necessary were too invasive/breaking to gliderlabs/ssh, such as https://github.com/gliderlabs/ssh/pull/161 so making a copy ended up making more sense, I think. That's my understanding from what Mohammed's told me, anyways.
Most containers run as root inside the container, which means they can access nftables in the container.

One of many reasons running as root inside a container is a bad idea.
I heard its name frequently around the time before nginx came to its fame. Maybe 15 years ago. However, I never heard any major players use it after that.
Its yet another int overflow bug too. Something like a kernel should probably be built with saturating arithmetic rather than the stupid C overflow behavior.
Location data can come from a lot of things that are being pieced together into a really good guess even when parts are missing. GPS and the other satellites like GLONASS. Nearby WiFi hotspots since they are all pretty much known locations. What cell towers you are connected to, which are also known locations, and the signal strength getting you general ranges. Can even be done with bluetooth beacons within building like malls and conference centers I believe. And accelerometer and compass data to fill in gaps too.
Measurement is good. But it would be better if the in-chapter questions had solutions to check.
https://github.com/limesquid/express-putin
Yes. UBI could provide a framwork to work side projects that don't succeed monitarily but provide a learning experience for the next project. Collaboration with other UBI creators from multiple diciplines is key, in my opinion for a succesfull project depending on goals and scope. Create self imvestment with exploration and experiencial education. UBI shouldnt necessarily be a paycheck, I find that the security of a private living and working space as well as in incone of food, healthcare etc. Supplimented monitary standards with increases depending on economics and project success.
Oi.

No.

To say that WASM and JS run in the same VM is utterly misleading the the point of being wrong.

They are not 'The Same VM'. They are 'Different VMs'. That in the case of Chrome and Firefox they happen to executed 'Side By Side' is relevant, but they are not the same vm.

"Because it runs on the same VM, it's as stable as JavaScript, which is extremely stable at this point"

This is a 'double down' on the fallacy that 'They are the same VM'.

"It's effectively instantaneous simply because it's using the same engine as JavaScript, which is already loaded."

First, so you're not going to count the startup time of the 'Engine' in the 'startup time'? But somehow that 'startup time' would be counted for example in JVM startup?

That wouldn't be a useful comparison, wouldn't it?

If you make a WASM-based app, you're going to have to throw in 'net startup time'.

Second, aside form the issue of 'Engine' startup time, you have to consider how quickly the code gets going. It is not 'instantly', nothing is instant in a VM, notably WASM has to 'compile' - not unlike Java bytecode. Java, JS and WASM all have different profiles here. JS is 'very fast' to start, because that's why it's optimized. Java is slower to start but after about 1000 iteratons of a block of code, 'runtime profiling' makes it fast. Often faster than humans could code in C++. WASM is slow to compile, and currently has little in the way of optimization.

Slow to start, slow to compute.

"Because LLVM targets wasm, you've got many many languages that are supported."

I'm guessing you're not a developer, and have never used WASM?

You do realize you can run JS in Java? Or Java in JS? Or Rust on Java? But that would mostly be stupid and pointless in any real world environment, which is why nobody does it?

Which is why nobody runs Java, C#, Python, Elixir in WASM for anything other than a mockup experiment.

So no, my points are all valid.

Today, WASM is the domain of Emscripten and maybe some Rust experiments, and that's that. It's slow, cumbersome, nobody is really invested in it. Maybe someday, but it's not on the horizon just yet.
I don't like but to be fair Safari do the same thing.
My original intent here was to point out an increasingly-common stance that many people -- particularly gen Z -- seem to take, which is essentially, "why should I expose myself to things I don't like?"

The problem is that it creates monocultures, and it helps the ignorant remain in a state of ignorance. We should always be striving to empower people, and we should aspire to building up their minds so that they can encounter expression they don't like without feeling the need to suppress or otherwise entertain it. We need to be showing the ugly realities of war, and we need to be shining light on the ugliest and most brutal expressions of our political enemies.

To say nothing of the fact that guilt-by-association is one of the cruelest punishments that can be inflicted on innocent bystanders, and the fact that allowing individual tools for censhorship suppresses the open exchange of ideas that make us all richer.

I am in favor of individuals suffering through unpleasant experiences because it enhances society overall, and it in line with the true spirit of free speech.

"I may not like what you have to say, but I will fight for your right to say it"
We did lockdowns and mask mandates and rapidly created and distributed a vaccine. I don't think the US response was perfect, but I find it unlikely that politicians' numeracy would reduce the death toll by a further 80% when we've already picked the low-hanging fruit.

Are there specific shortcomings that you think would account for that gap?