skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yeah no.

Your argument falls apart because when everyone in the room has a megaphone screaming at each other the signal to noise ratio drops so far that it's no longer worth being in the room.

You will have to mute or kickout some people from the room just to have any kind of coherent understanding of what's going on in there.
Reader mode works just fine here.
Reader mode on mobile Firefox works fine for me on LWN. From my experience LWN has always been a very readable website that works pretty well on mobile too.

Do you mind sharing what exactly you disapprove about how the content is structured without reader mode?
I understand you, but you picked a strange hill to fight on.

Lwn is such a simple website, and the article is just one paragraph.

Also what is reader mode to you? Because in Firefox I clicked the little reader view icon in the url bar and it showed me a reader view with just the main content.
It is very close to the truth unfortunately. Maybe it won't break down but the vast majority of health care spending is there to undo the effects of a bad diet more than anything else.
Anybody you reach out to, no matter hiring responsibility or not, has the interest of getting good people into the company, irrespective of how happy they themselves are at the workplace.

Really good people are hard to come by in this market (need to be not just smart but also easy to work with, communicate etc), so you better don't express dissatisfaction, otherwise they go to a competitor.

It's really hard to get honest opinions before accepting an offer. You have mostly gut feeling to go by, maybe join a team for a coffee break, this kind of thing. A direct question "what do you like least about your job?" could work too (it's kinda "what's your biggest weakness?" in reverse), but often times that's also just used to upsell or BS you, e.g. "the food here is too good, I'm getting fat". But you can try to read between the lines of course.
Sometimes people are not "advocating" anything just saying what we think and sometimes what we think is complex and nuanced requires effort to understand.

And that's another argument against such social media "carpet blocking" features, people will just block whatever is "too difficult to understand" because they'll probably identify it as "malicious" and lock themselves into simplified "cartoon reality" bubbles where everything is simplified and ADHD-friendly and easy-to-digest.

Then people outside the bubble trying to transmit complex messages would just give up communicating, then you get two groups of people not communicating and this sooner or later leads to violent conflict.
MIT Researchers Create a Tool for Predicting the Future
How much is that going to cost to develop, manufacture, deploy, train, maintain etc? Shipping is a VERY price conscious industry.
That was a rollercoaster ride.

Tragically I recognized a few things in it from a recent story about a place in Tennessee that was arresting young black girls (age 8 and 9) and one single judge was responsible for hundreds of kids locked up.

https://www.propublica.org/article/black-children-were-jaile...
dupe, please check before submitting https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30838037
JNI requires you to write your own C code to call into. I generally want to do that as little as possible, for many reasons (I’d have to build it and ship it myself.)
No, it literally doesn't. I've done exactly this - 3 times, in two different countries. It's no different than saying "here's the number at my desk in work".
MPKs fix that. They can be switched more or less instantly because they don't require a TLB flush, and (recent) Intel CPUs don't speculate through MPK boundary violations.
I think scum is a bit harsh, but some people lack empathy.
What kind of hardware was used there? I need a little farm for registration accounts on different websites which give bonuses for it, maybe 50-100 sims would be enough for me.
Power delivery could be an issue. I guess it depends on how many ships a day you're serving. If there's just one or two a day, your infrastructure needs to handle short bursts at high capacity but then sits idle 90+ % of the time. If you're serving a hundred ships a day, it sort of just averages out and you can be at close to maximum capacity most of the time. I'd imagine most power utilities would love to have customers that consistent.

Delivering power to the ships would be interesting. I suppose it would have to come in at high voltage (either AC or DC) and be stepped down to a suitable pack voltage. That means each ship would have the equivalent of an electrical substation on board.
>That makes sense -- fewer than 50% of authors in history were from that demographic

In which culture? In Asia or Africa sure, less that 1% where "white" (not so sure if less or equal than 50% were male).

In the US, however, I'd expect most authors to be white for most of its history, and most male, up into early 20th century at least.

Now, for systemic reasons women/blacks/etc were discouraged from being authors, which is an injustice. But it also means most good books up and into the 20th century where written by white males in the USA (let's include Jewish people here). Not because they're better or have some unique perspective, but because they were the majority doing the writing and being published.

So, if one has to pick e.g. the best american writers of all time, they'll predominantly pick their works, just because they were the majority of those writing and being published.

There's nothing wrong with that picking from what's available and finding out you've mostly picked white males - the injustice was that they were being the majority at their time, not in the after-the-fact picking of the best.

It's like with science: it's a disgrace that more women weren't encouraged to do science in the past, but it's not some prejudice to say that most major scientists in the 19th century were male (that was because of an injustice, but it's a historical injustice. It can't be retroactively corrected by picking more 19th century women scientists, if there weren't many to begin with then).

Of course, after some time point, e.g. the 1970s, curators can pick more equally women, blacks, asian, latinos Americans writers, simple because more of them were writing and publishing.
Agreed, it isn't a great solution at all. I've been dealing with winding up my dad's estate recently and in the last couple of months I've taken more calls than I have in the last 10 years, all legitimate too.
But that 12 litres of water doesn't "disappear". It sits in the ground, it persperates in to the air, it becomes a part of the water cycle.

Its not like we are destroying 12 litres of water per almond (or I hope not).
> it's no longer worth being in the room

That's perfectly OK too: some rooms don't serve their purpose anymore and need to be disbanded and replaced with other sets of rooms.

But imo Twitter still has a very good signal to noise ration if you use it for keeping up with things (NOT for friendly networking, it was never intended for that) and/or disseminating content that you find harder to spread on other channels.
The legitimacy was questioned by a single person, so far all replies indicate that said person was simply mistaken on multiple counts, and in the meantime, said person no longer sees a problem.

Reasons against secret voting were expressed in ballot option C:

https://www.debian.org/vote/2022/vote_001#textc
I don’t call a GPS tracker installed in a car without the owner’s knowledge or permission, and where it’s still unknown if it is now or ever has been or could later be activated (again perhaps without the owner’s knowledge) to send the car’s location to a third party “entirely benign”.

I call that extremely worrying! I’d want to remove any such device from my car immediately.
I don't understand, does this lead to privilege escalation by parsing a crafted netfilter rule? I am under the impression that I need NET_CAP_ADMIN or root privs to do this on my machines to load said rule anyway, right? So this affects deployments where regular users are able to do send netfilter rules to the kernel, right?
This is what I gathered from looking around:

1016 comes from an uninitialized value. 1015 is an int8 overflow and out-of-bounds access. Both are C footguns (though not exclusive to C). The latter arguably might not have happened under a stable/specified ABI.

1015:

Introduced in 5.12
Fixed in 6e1acfa387b9, 2022-03-17
In LTS, fixed in 5.10.109 and 5.15.32
Also, in 5.16.18 and 5.17.1

1016:

Introduced in v3.13-rc1
Fixed in 4c905f6740a3, 2022-03-17
Fixed in same point releases as above, plus 5.10.109
Doesn't look fixed in older LTSes yet
I'm surprised, that dealership and this SkyLink companies had gave away this information to strangers.
Just open tickets for those things then. "Read Xyz book", "catch up on C++17", "brush up on advanced git concepts", "have coffee with Jim from product management", "play pingpong this week with Jack and Julia from my team". Tons of ticket opportunities, and soon enough you'll be underpaid in the pay-per-ticket metric.
Exactly how did they prosper? Caltech seriously mishandled its endowment between 1999-2008 despite getting some of the largest individual donations in history.
IntelliJ for Mainframe Powered by Zowe
I'm simply unable to follow the flow of logic that gets you from my comment, which reflected the statement of an admissions officer, to your conclusion about how "people who think like me" would dismiss Asian kids.

The admission officer was describing someone who shows no passion towards anything, and only does it because they're supposed to - which often includes why they're applying to college, because they're supposed to. Is it an idiotic bias to think that someone without passion in a subject area will be less successful than someone with passion and direction?

In case you missed the earlier part of the comment, kids with high GPAs, test scores, etc. - the "grinder" you describe, regardless of race - fit into a different category of a likely successful student that they also look for. To elaborate though, there are lots of "grinders" and differentiation still matters. Are they grinding in math and CS, and also have a Github and contribute to OSS and are applying to the college of engineering? That's better than someone with super high scores but nothing else, because there are probably lots of other applicants with even higher scores. Competing on only one axis is hard.

Like it or not, in a limited resource like seats at a competitive school, admissions officers are looking for small signals. It may seem unfair, but it's what I was told.

And as for the evidence, I'm merely passing on the information I was told by the people making the decisions. They hold the evidence (if it's even an evidence-based decision) not me. Feel free to have your own discussions with them if you'd like, I've generally found admission officers to be extremely friendly and open about their criteria.
> I wanted to see if I could, I hadn't done any NLP before :)

Yep, that sounds awesome to me. After seing your post I actually thought that this would be a great exercise for learning ML. I'll definitely keep my list of regexes for my personal recipe app, but now I'm inclined to try the ingredient parser with ML myself.
A brief summary because I had to re-read this a few times to figure out what was going on.

Debian had a vote with 4 options:

Option 1 "Hide identities of Developers casting a particular vote"

Option 2 "Hide identities of Developers casting a particular vote and allow verification"

Option 3 "Reaffirm public voting"

Option 4 "None of the above" (NOTA)

The objection raised here is that Option 3 and Option 4 can be considered to be the same depending on how you interpret them (ie; "None of the above" vs "Keep public ballots" which can be said to implicitly suggest none of the above at the same time). If those two were represented as a single "NOTA" option, that option would have won the ballot in terms of votes.
I'm not saying that "trans people who block exterminationists" is not a legitimate use case for such a feature.

Just that you can't engineer it so that only such use cases can be enabled by it, and most people using it will be "muh, stop advocating vaccines to me, wanna keep my blood pure" or equivalent types :| I probably have less faith in humanity than you do :)
And the billionaire they sold it to is the one who funded it to begin with. Money laundering complete.
As somebody who doesn't use Twitter actively, I don't understand why you would ever want to block someone. If you're sick of someone, why not just mute them? Blocking seems to be kind of a childish option because you want the other person to know that they are blocked. The idea that you want to actively disable someone from reading your tweets seems absolutely bananas to me.
It's apparent that Kotlin's forward progress on many projects was derailed by the need to rewrite the compiler, which apparently sucked up far more resources than they expected. I also worry that now it'll be even more derailed by the shutdown of the JB Russian offices - a mad decision IMO that is hard to understand (perhaps customers were threatening to boycott them).

I don't perceive interop as being a particularly big drain on their time, in contrast. It has boiled down to a few annotations or compiler flags here and there. If anything the biggest overhead comes from the demand to use the new JVM features, even when it's not entirely clear why.

The sprawling, highly abstract and often experimental/opt-in nature of the coroutines API is one of the reasons I try to avoid it indeed. The tiny extension to the threading API Loom provides feels far more right, to me. I already understand threads. I don't want to have to grapple with the large set of new concepts and APIs coros have introduced to Kotlin. Value types are another area where they shouldn't have bothered, IMO, it's not something you can do properly independent of the runtime and Java's approach is superior there. But then there are also many counter-examples where Java's approach has massively slowed them down. How many years are Loom, Valhalla and Panama running now?
Indeed! My purpose to follow someone is to get their insights into a specific topic. If they go off topic beyond my acceptable threshold (which is set to very low) I just unfollow them; the noise isn't worth it. However once in a while stuff like slap gate happens to mess up with my timeline. So sabbatical it is.
Professional Benefits of Getting Your AWS Certification
> If you want to give it a go, grab a ratpack parser in the language of your choice, pick a dozen recipes, write rules to extract the ingredients, and then apply them to other recipes. I'm fairly sure you'll be surprised.

As I didn't unterstand all of the words in your reply without looking them up, I'll definitely give it a try! Thanks
Back when I was actually using it, this wasn’t possible with the official app or website: if one of the people I followed retweeted or liked something, it would appear on my… what’s the terminology here? Timeline? View?

My memory is a bit hazy but I think I could hide retweets from specific people one at a time, but not everyone all at once, and not favourites at all.

Have these things changed?
> In order for an unprivileged attacker to exploit this issue, unprivileged user- and network namespaces access is required (CLONE_NEWUSER | CLONE_NEWNET)
No more excuses: NASA in line to get funding needed for Artemis plan
Ah makes sense, that indeed makes it less unfunny
That's why you give them a continuous glucose monitor.
> It's easy to demonize fast-food but that's not even the worst of it. High-fructose corn syrup has been added to so many foods that didn't have it 10-20 years ago.

We should just count ready-meals etc. as 'fast-food' too, no good reason that it implicitly refers to 'restaurants' only really.

> The second or third ingredient on a bottle of ketchup, for example, is high-fructose corn syrup.

Interesting, that didn't sound right to me (but it has been a long time since I've had it) - found this: https://www.truthorfiction.com/heinz-ketchup-ingredients-u-s... (tldr just sugar in the UK)
I haven’t read the article, but isn’t debian’s voting orders the options? In which case 3 > 4 vs 4 > 3 wouldn’t really change the outcome.
Ask HN: Why do some websites look identical to DEV
DEV:
https://dev.to/
For example:
https://www.wasm.builders/

I am wondering whether DEV has open sourced their website template?
Good to be skeptical of that idea, courts consider many forms of consent contractual as long as they can be accepted as proof of consent. Periodically, a jurisdiction may explicitly specify that a certain form of consent is necessary, presumably to unbog their court system.

Secondly, a lot of fine print benefits you. missed out on crazy compensation during a minor inconvenience just because you skipped locking in provable consent to the contract? oops
For the average person that information is pretty much useless, it's just another type of entertainment.
As a white, heterosexual male I'm here to read reactions like this one. Thanx for the perspective, my first thought was that this tool can only be bad, and now I changed my mind.
Nutritional science got better at making people fat.
It saddens me that such a great part of US society (as I perceive it from the outside) has basically given up on fixing any systemic problem at all.

Be it small things like robocalls, or bigger things like a broken healthcare system, gun violence, lobbying in politics or things like the housing/opiod crisis — a big part of the US people I talk to have basically given up on any collective way of fixing these issues and just try to shield themselves individually from the consequences and risks. The summed up individual time, nerve and energy spent on this must easily outweigh the time, nerve and energy it would cost to fix these issues collectively.

Sometimes I even have the feeling that some people like hurdles like these because they believe it gives them some kind of "edge" in the competition with others — a bit like in the 30-year-war where at some point people had adapted to the war so much, they didn't want it to end, because they were a little less worse off than their peers — they had forgotten how much better off they could be if there was peace.
You paid $250 to get that device removed? Did you try just unplugging it?!
It's nice to see that some people share some of my fears. When I still played Kerbal Space Program it used to make me anxious, and even something like the landing zone selection in Rimworld can be a bit scary. I used to have nightmares about being in space too. I'm not that scared of the night sky but when looking at it while laying down and seeing nothing else it can be scary.

At least know that in that vast universe you're not alone in your fears!
Well, the claim here is that Option 3 and Option 4 are the same in essence so if they had been reflected on the ballot as a single option, then that option would have won out over Option 2, changing the outcome.

Assuming I understand this anyway. The way the votes are reflected is confusing to me
you have a point, you don't appear to have read that you're a fucking idiot enough
I got a PocketBook e-reader with a 6" 300PPI screen for €100. You can add your own software to it (e.g. KOReader), and with a little bit of software to automatically change the pictures it would do exactly the same as this. You can get larger eReaders with similar quality for not much more. The only difference with this ArtFrame is that the frame around the display doesn't look as nice, but that's also a fixable problem with a minimum of technical chops.

6" is also really small for an art display IMO. Even 13.3" is kinda small. If they would be offering a much larger 40" art display I might consider it for €900, depending on picture quality. But at this price 150/166 ppi display is just bonkers.
It would change the long-term outcome.

If you wanted voting secrecy but were unhappy with the proposed implementations of option 1 and 2, you'd vote 4 > 3, leaving room for future alternative proposals.

If you were against any form of voting secrecy, you'd vote 3 > 4, shutting the door on future proposals.
> that would make the peasant his brother and would make the matter serious with regards to the claim for the trone.

This is not how Roman succession worked. Especially at this time. This is a joke about the first Emperor Augusts. His biological father, whilst being pretty important politically, was not the reason he was able to turn himself into Emperor. A very basic explanation was that he got much of his power base from Julius Ceaser, who had adopted him, when he died.

So his biological father having any other children (which he in fact did have, an elder sister, who's own Son entered politics) would not matter at all. As the relationship with his maternal Uncle was where he drew his power.

This is all simplified, and I am no expert. But it is all much more complicated, and interesting (and always has been) than some simple rule of eldest son gets the throne.
Do note though that „legal fine print“ is similar to „React-Node.js-Mongodb“ boilerplate.

Meaning that it sometimes makes sense to not have to start off at zero.

Also complaining about long contracts is like saying „I don't like this program because the source code is too long“. Depending on the program, this might be a little capricious.

Do you want lawyers to be „code golfing“?
I think that mixins - both template mixins that essentially copy/paste declarations (including functions) and the mixin statement that takes a string to be compiled as source code - can be as weird to follow as macros in C.

Contrived example:

import std.stdio;
mixin template Func(string s, string r)
{
mixin("string " ~ s ~ "()" ~
"{" ~
"return \"" ~ r ~ "\";" ~
"}");
}
mixin template Comb(string name, char c=',')
{
mixin(function string(){
import std.conv;
string r;
enum counter(size_t x=[__traits(allMembers, mixin(__MODULE__))].length)=x;
string suffix = to!string(counter!());
r ~= "mixin Func!(\"Foo" ~ suffix ~ "\", \"Hello\");";
r ~= "mixin Func!(\"Bar" ~ suffix ~ "\", \"World\");";
r ~= "string " ~ name ~ "() {";
r ~= "return Foo" ~ suffix ~ "() ~ \"" ~ c ~ " \" ~ Bar" ~ suffix ~ "();";
r ~= "}";
return r;
}());
}
void main()
{
mixin Comb!("Mixer");
writeln(Mixer());
}

It is just that the language has more features than C so they aren't needed as often. But in my eyes at least the mixin statement is basically C macros on steroids :-P.
Although it's probably taken, but andi.com would definitely be cleaner and easier to type.
If someone is harassing you on Twitter, muting them doesn't stop them from interacting with your tweets. You don't see it anymore, but people looking at your tweets still do, so now people see things attached to your tweets you have no idea about.

Some also argue that its better someone is explicitly told "you can't interact with this person" vs them trying and it getting hidden silently and them having no idea they can't reach you that way, and thus suggest blocking over mute also for people who didn't attack you. (A "don't show this person unless they directly talk to me" would be nice to have instead)
Europe’s top court strikes down flagship EU-US data transfer mechanism (2020)
https://money.cnn.com/2016/05/17/technology/tor-developer-fb... is about Isis Agora Lovecruft, but several other Tor developers have lived in Germany.
I was surprised too. You have to have secret votes to stop intimidation, and also collusion. If people can prove they voted a certain way then they can be bribed.
In what sort of barbaric culture would somebody get slapped because of telling a joke?
>a direct outcome of a person’s intentional choices.

You mean like a politician promoting obesity inducing foods?

If it is really about individuals then obesity shouldn't be going up in African nations that quickly.