skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You for practical purposes can't easily immunize yourself to bad milk by exposure. The problem is two fold. In the first place there are over 2500 types of salmonella identified and surely more extant and as a product of metabolism they produce toxins that are deleterious to your health Salmonella being only one culprit as well. You are probably as safe as you ever were.

Your idyllic view of the past may have other challenges in terms of perspective. Firstly we tend to remember the good things and forget the bad especially since food poisoning can have an incubation of 1-2 days we may blame one sort of food stuff instead of another or forget that we were incautious with raw foods in the kitchen the night before and blame a restaurateur without good cause. We also may not differentiate between an illness brought on by food and one from a bug. This rose colored view is especially easy to adopt if we remember pleasant consumption and the costs were borne by another. Even with education and standards we have 48 million cases of food borne illness in the US and 3000 deaths annually.

This brings is to scale. Pasteurization can be trivially adopted at scale and has been shown to be effective. Maybe your dairy was highly sanitary had excellent practices that enabled a very much above average performance. Replicating it all over creation may not be tenable but universal pasteurization is.

If you want to see an interesting account of the real "good old days" before either of us were born you may peruse this.

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/19th-century-f...

To maximize profits milk was thinned with water then recolored with dyes, chalk, or plaster dust with formaldehyde added to preserve freshness. Pureed cow brains stood in for rich cream and in addition to all the current maladies like listeria and salmonella consumers had to worry about bovine tuberculosis, undulant fever, scarlet fever, typhoid, and diphtheria.

> Those were the days my friend
We thought they'd never end
We'd sing and dance forever and a day
We'd live the life we choose
We'd fight and never lose
For we were young and sure to have our way
No need for such superstition actions on FreeBSD Jails containers :)
I am commenting on GMOs and GMOs only, I am not commenting about the safety of chemicals. GMO products themselves are biosimilar/essentially-equivalent to non-GMOs.

I think being opposed to the spraying of fields by whatever herbicide or pesticide is a legitimate position, but it's a distinct problem. Yes, I realize that they often come together, but that is not necessarily the case.

You can easily have a GMO that has nothing to do with pesticide or herbicide resistance, in fact there are plenty of those, and they unfortunately all get lumped into the same category in public discourse.

And even in the worst case, where a GMO's purpose is to be used alongside a herbicide such as glyphosate... It's not clear that the alternative is any better. In fact most other categories of herbicides are way more hazardous (note that I am not a herbicide expert, but I do know a thing or two about them). I don't want to defend any bad companies, and I don't know what the solution is, but one thing I know for sure: feeding everyone is actually super complicated.
2750 Euros average salary seems pretty high for Portugal. Did they only survey those with great corporate jobs?
If you don’t mean ‘average’ maybe use some other measure.
Nintendo Switch has sold 100m+ units - over 20m of which were in the last year. It's by no means obsolete, it just serves a different market than the one you're interested in.
That's a bit simplistic. Do you really think that there aren't at least a couple of things that your competitor has done better than you? Don't you want to know about them? You don't have to copy them slavishly but maybe you can be inspired by them for one of your own upcoming features.
Does anyone care to explain what immediate mode means?
Your average consumer won't want to run commands in there terminal to get a usable experience, regardless of how easy it is for you and me and everyone here.
IMVHO the main issue in file transfer today is that in 2022 most people still do not have a public ip (like an IPv6 global ones) so most people still have NAT traversal issues and need to relay on third parties or not-so-performant more or less distributed networks...

The second main issue is that most do not own a personal domain name with a subdomain per personal host (like {desktop,craphone,laptop}.mydomain.tld etc).

Those two issues are so big IMVHO that push all others aside...
A partnership like agreeing on prices for the same kind of service? I skipped my last mandatory compliance training, but something tells me that this might not be a good idea.
Really? Making it difficult to view images by original URL is more common on modern sites than old ones :)
There's a book Improv Wisdom written by a former leader of Stanford's improv club that I found deeply insightful. I was looking into improv to address my social anxiety a while ago, sadly this was at the start of pandemic when everything shut down. Maybe I should go for it again.
Thanks. Assuming we have a ToS which forbids this, is there anything even worth doing when it's violated?
You're young and just starting out, and its not easy coming out of CoViD and all the other stuff that's going on.

But your arguments don't match actual data, your situation is an outlier as of 2022.

https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php...

The Median or Average income in Portugal can afford an M1 Mac mini, and it is far less than 1 months wages. It also lasts for 5+ years.
This is great. Ties together a lot of ideas that I've had but either can't properly express or lack the knowledge to execute on.
I would actually recommend dropping this line of questioning. It's perfectionist. And treating it as a problem that needs to be solved (in effect treating you as a problem to be solved) just puts extra scrutiny/attention/pressure on it that will make it worse. It's just a habit that you will grow out of naturally with more experience around people. And that will happen faster if you forgive yourself, accept yourself as you are, and accept each situation as it is and each person as they are. A lot of situations are inherently awkward, will be less than perfect, and will bear no resemblance to the snappy scripted dialog in TV/movies. Wishing things were different from how they are, is 9 times out of 10 where the problem itself comes from - in your case being in an awkward situation, and being hyper-aware that it's awkward. Younger children are awkward but don't know it, and most of them seem happy enough. Forget about it. Everybody is at some level of gracefulness. Is everybody "awkward" who isn't perfect? Even Olympic figure skaters probably stub their toes on their coffee-table legs.

The other thing to realize is that the awkwardness is an inward-looking and (to apply a sort of judgmental slant on it) ultimately kind of self-indulgent habit. People around you are probably just as nervous and awkward as you, and seeking signs that it's okay and safe to be themselves. What signals are you giving them? You could be a leader to them, showing them the way. Be curious about them, reach out and ask them how they're doing, take an interest in them and what they have to say. That's the best way to forget about you, i.e. literally lose your self-consciousness. If nothing else it will at least take the spotlight off of you for a few seconds while they talk, which might be a relief. But people really appreciate when you take an interest in them, and they also appreciate (this will sound a touch cynical) the opportunity to talk about themselves. You will be well-liked. Although in the long run just don't give too much slack to people who latch onto you as a "good listener" and never give you a chance to talk! They should be willing to let you talk sometimes. And by the same token you should be ready and willing to share about yourself, not just asking questions about others like an interrogator. But in general, start with asking about and caring about others; that's the foundation of every meaningful relationship anyway.
It seems like 2P Milan would be the suitable comparison, based on core count, wattage, CXL link, and so on.
It is possible to write maintainable modern Fortran without gotos with small functions and subroutines. OOP with inheritance and dynamic polymorphism is possible since the Fortran 2003 standard.
PS4: ~117M sold in 9 years
Switch: ~104M sold in 5 years

Switch is averaging 20M units/year and PS4 is averaging 13M units/year.
Legal Scholars Are Shocked by Ginni Thomas’s “Stop the Steal” Texts
> I expect in a couple of generations corporations will be a thing of the past, or something so far removed from society, that it will no longer exist as a social norm.

Alternatively, in a couple of generations, people who have too much heart/soul and can't stomach being part of a corporate machine will be bred out of the gene pool and/or thrust into the powerless underclass, while the psychopaths that have no problem with them will acquire the most resources and reproduce the most, passing on their genes and their way of thinking to their children.

Some might argue this already happened generations ago.
>Why are there no icons in my tray for my background apps (steam, slack, etc)?

I understand the other ones but I don't understand this one. The Android tray does exactly this, background icons on the bar are a mobile feature. If you consider the Windows taskbar to be the ideal desktop experience, it doesn't do that, it hides the icons in a menu.
Marijuana. I stopped drinking and started using edibles, tinctures, and now a vaporizer. My social awkwardness came from social anxiety. The marijuana, more than any of the dozens of prescriptions I had, helped me overcome and deal with my anxiety.
PS4 has sold 117m units (around 1m in the past year) and Switch has sold 104m so far (around 20m in the past year). You can bet Switch will overtake it very soon...
It's (more or less) just a different approach to describe a UI through code which does away with objects, event handlers or data binding. Very convenient for purely code driven UI development.
> Would you say more about this? If I were a self-respecting therapist and I read this I would feel defensive

My background: for 8 years, I was married to a doctoral-level clinical psychologist with an active practice. I learned a lot about the industry from her. I've also seen many different therapists over my lifetime. Finally, I've the great fortune to have discovered a wonderful therapist almost a year ago. This was not my first wonderful therapist. But I've also had a number of poor matches over the years.

> it’s obvious they have an ethical responsibility to catch bad therapist/client fits

I can't really answer why they never come out and say, "I don't think I can help you as effectively as someone else." I don't really know. They just don't. I'm sure if you ask enough therapists, you'll get the odd exception here and there, like a therapist not comfortable with a client's erotic transference who then lets the client go. I don't know.

> Why should we not expect the therapist to catch scenarios of bad fit?

Perhaps they don't have the perspective. Perhaps they are trained to think they can help everyone, to some degree or another, and perhaps that's generally true. I don't know. But like finding a teacher who resonates with you, you won't learn the material as well or progress as fast unless the two of your resonate.

> Is the reason that I perceive a market for lemons simply that therapists’ profit motive is a moral hazard?

I don't think the majority of therapists go into their field for the money. I think there are lemons because of lack of experience and the highly-personalized experience; one person's lemon is another person's diamond.

I can't answer your other questions. I just want to emphasize that you need to advocate for yourself. If you don't feel like the therapist is helping you after 3 sessions, move on. Yes, you should have some progress after 3 sessions in my opinion. Doesn't have to be earth-shattering but should be something.

Re-read my above comment because I edited it several times after your post, adding more info (e.g. info about insurance)

Try not to Zoom your appointments. Go in-person!
> 1. Put phone on 2.4ghz wifi (5GHZ WILL NOT WORK!)

Might be nice to expand on "will not work". Wouldn't 5 GHz Wi-Fi failing to connect show that it's even better at blocking, and would easily block 2.45 GHz too? And I'd think that they should block 5 GHz too, since those meshes look quite fine, and they probably try to be extra-safe.
I remain convinced that weed helped me a lot here. I also basically apprenticed myself to a couple of very charming extroverted people and learned what I could from them.
archive.org: https://web.archive.org/web/20220326040214/https://www.newyo...
Thank you, yes indeed, that's the one.
RIP Pete

I didn't know you, but you were a person and it's sad you're not among us anymore.

Our line of business is seriously f*ked up if we don't take care of people like you.

Thanks for sharing this story, it's important that we all remember that connecting with people is so much more than having a video chat to talk about features, deadlines and whatnot.

At the cost of being rethoric I wish we've all learned to be better, let's put people over deliverables again.

It won't cost us a dime, it will repay us with a lifetime of stories to tell and memories to share.
I never did. I’m 30
You're in the wrong thread. :-)

The main benefit of most immediate mode guis I've seen is that it's trivial to expose internal values to a ui in one line of code. No callbacks, no looking for the right place in any XML file or similar. Instead you add these lines when you need them and they show up in a ui:

checkbox(&godmode, "Activate Godmode")
slider(&enemy_aggro, "Enemy aggression", 0, 100)
It runs them separately if you end the exec with ";", it appends as many as possible to the same command if you end it with "+"
Matlab works fine for anything purely "numerical" but fails hard as soon as you need to do more "general computing". Just string handling for example. Or, as far as I know, it's still not possible to implement a custom CLI interface in a matlab script, like you would with argparse in python.

Matlab also historically was really bad for abstraction and code architecture in general. For example, the hard "1 function per file" rule, which encouraged people to not use functions at all, or if you really had to, write 2 or 3 really huge functions (in separate files). Only in recent years (the past 5 or 10 years) did matlab get OOP stuff (classes) and the option for multiple (private) functions in a single script file (still only one public/exported function is possible per file, because the file name is the function name and matlab uses path-based resolution).
For alcohol at least, I don't think that's actually too unpopular an opinion. Drinking is a fairly universal social activity, and it's allowed me to meet and befriend a lot of people I probably wouldn't have otherwise.
agreed. awful.
How would you know if someone you met is a healthy vegan?…
You would need to take your access point and wave it all around various directions in the space around the microwave. The “leak” could occur in a direction that doesn’t have significant signal. Might be a better test to cook a large bowl of water, while testing your phone (outside the oven) on 2.4ghz … holding it on all sides of the oven to see if any areas degrade the signal. This testing approach isn’t that conclusive.
Why are you assuming that Nintendo is stagnating in comparison? Yes, in the meantime new generations of other consoles have come out, but after equally long gaps on their side. (PS4->PS5 was 9 years, and Switch will outsell PS4 over its lifetime easily)

And the Switch users I know generally don't care about PS5 graphics at all. It's not really the same market.
+1 for this!

I've always done this with my teams. And the latest hire becomes the "onboarding buddy" for the next, so they know they need to understand/update the documentation.

Also, it's really useful to keep a backlog of simple "technical debt" type tasks so that the new starters have something real, but manageable, to work on as soon as they arrive.
Actually, this is not as stupid as it seems. I was first baffled by the idea that a website can read the RSSI of the device I'm on, then I realized its probably just measuring the latency by pinging every second.
I didn't improve much over time, really. The big improvement is accepting who I am and being more conscious about pros and cons of various character traits.

Worth reading Rohr's book about the Enneagram; you don't need to care at all about the religious aspect of it but it explains that very often it's the stuff that can help you build up your life is also what makes you suffer, just manifesting in a different way. Learning to love both the darker and the brighter side of your personality helps with living a more harmonious life. (It does not necessarily help with those awkward moments, but you can accept them as a long distance runner accepts that there are hours when you suffer and hours when you enjoy the ride, and these don't exist without each other.)
Think about 2D surfaces. Which ones are the most symmetric? A flat plane is a very nice space: every point is as good as any other (there’s nothing intrinsic to any point to distinguish any point from any other, except arbitrarily), and no direction is particularly special either. A space like that has a lot of symmetries. A sphere also has a lot of symmetries, it also has no directions or points which are distinguished until you declare, “this is my North Pole” arbitrarily. (The earth isn’t a perfect sphere of course and we can use the imperfections as the way we define north and south.) The last type of symmetric space looks like a saddle (like on a horse). It bends one way in one direction and bends the other way in the other direction. An idealized saddle also has no distinguished directions or points.

The analogs of these things in higher dimensions, and where one of the directions is time, are important in general relativity. The analog of the plane is called “flat space” or “Minkowski space”. The analog of the sphere is “de Sitter space”. Finally, the analog of the saddle is “anti-de Sitter space” (usually abbreviated AdS, with a lowercase d). It’s a bit of an odd space in a lot of ways. When you look at what space looks like at any given time, it’s a bit like M.C. Escher’s “Angels and Devils”.

Surprisingly, Anti-de Sitter space is the easiest space to understand quantum aspects of gravity in. That’s because anti-de Sitter space is curved in such a way that the complicated stuff can be neatly separated from the easy stuff. You can start from something you understand well and turn on the complexity piece by piece. Roughly speaking it’s because the gravitational stuff becomes less important as you go farther and farther away from any matter you’re considering, in a way which is even faster than this happens in flat space or de Sitter space. It turns out that we can exactly understand everything in this gravitational theory by mapping the physics one-to-one to a nongravitational model which we understand really well. There’s a lot of evidence that the map works perfectly. This is called the AdS/CFT correspondence. A lot of work goes into testing the correspondence and attempting to prove it, and this is a big research area.

de Sitter space doesn’t have the same desirable properties. Nevertheless there has been great progress in understanding quantum properties of de Sitter in the last year [0]. These results would not have been possible without understanding AdS first.

Flat space quantum gravity remains challenging, although again some progress has been made recently too [1].

[0] arxiv:2110.14670

[1] arxiv:1905.09809 and many others
There are toothpastes that contain plastic microbeads [1][2] and an FDA ban (for < 5mm size beads) came in effect only in 2015. Some toothpastes also have polyethele "specks" to provide color [3],

[1]: https://www.colgate.com/en-us/oral-health/brushing-and-floss...

[2]: https://www.motherjones.com/environment/2015/05
/microbeads-exfoliators-plastic-face-scrub-toothpaste/

[3]: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/gum-balls/
When people say they move off gmail
because the stakes are too high, I've kind of bought into that line -- the stakes are very high in terms of having e-mail be the main way recover all sorts of other accounts. But then I've tried to get myself to switch email providers and it doesn't actually make any sense to me.

Do I really believe, say, protonmail is less likely to screw me than gmail? Why?

What are the actual odds of gmail screwing me? They're huge, a few horror stories don't indicate much. And protonmail is small, the fact that I haven't heard horror stories doesn't mean much. (Not trying to pick on protonmail specifically, I think this all applies to any other provider I've seen suggested.)

Maybe the alternatives are in fact less likely to screw me due to some bullshit reason, I don't know. But I'm pretty sure with most other providers I'm more likely to get screwed for a technical reason, or because the company goes under, or because the company changes hands, or, if it's a paid service, because I fail to pay for some reason and the service doesn't degrade to free nicely.

I think switching to hotmail might make sense. They're a similar size to gmail, but I haven't heard the horror stories. And they're similar in all the other ways, unlikely to have a major technical problem, unlikely to change hands or go under, and I can't forget to pay them because it's free.

I'm just not convinced there's other better alternatives. If the stakes are too high the solution is probably just to make the stakes less high.
I happen to be a biochemist by training (12 years of postsecondary including cancer research for my MSc) who is completely outside the field. I'm working as a software engineer for non-bio-related companies. I have no intention of going back to pipetting liquids around all day.

So yeah, for what it's worth, zero potential conflict of interest whatsoever.
Yes, but not in _this_ case, which I thought may why this one was less protected.
The canonical UDT implementation does not come with encryption, however there are some older open source GitHub repos that have attempted to add TLS to UDT. The original author of UDT, Yunhong Gu, has a project called Sector/Sphere that adds some application-level encryption to file transfer if you want to check it out: http://sector.sourceforge.net/. We've added encryption for our algorithm though!

With respect to QUIC, I believe it was designed specifically to reduce the latency of HTTP connections by using multiple UDP flows and building the reliability/ordering guarantees at the application layer.

The problem with getting performance increases out of multiple, distinct traffic flows is that you become more and more unfair to other packet traffic as you increase the number of flows you are using. For example, if you use 9 TCP (or any other AIMD) flows to send a file over some link, and a tenth connection is started, you now are taking up to 90% of the available bandwidth (because AIMD flows are designed to be fair amongst themselves).
Some basic transfer based on UDP with forward error correction is a really good solution to tackle packet loss and avoid TCP congestion entirely.
Thanks, and thanks for the practical tips in this and above comment.
It would be nice if every manufacturer adhered to a standard interface specification, like NVME, but for network adapters, video cards, audio, etc. So that one set of drivers would work for any combination of parts. It would greatly democratize OS development.
American Culture Ate the World
Declaring a tool good or bad because it's abused doesn't make sense.