skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Some cars unlock when you're close, no button presses required. Relay attacks let the thieves use the keyfob inside your house by relaying the signal. A faraday pouch prevents this. It's not related to replay attacks on a traditional push-to-unlock keyfob.
I feel very grateful that I read this. It is very helpful and very informative and I really learned a lot from it. We also have one gaming software with help of it you also learn something new,so for this kindly click here https://www.producthunt.com/@nicholas_mellor
Technically, at least vomit, really is a self protection mechanism of the body.
I once thought I would like to have kids, based on the incredible diversity and splendor of the experiences and people and places the world had to offer. It seemed right, to create new lives to share in that.

Now that the texture of being a person in the world is mainly to be on Zoom calls, I think it would be cruel. Zoom school, Zoom friends, Zoom job, Zoom dates, only to produce yet another human who can attend Zoom school. What kind of life is that to being a child into?

We’ll still have books! That might be worth it on its own. And places take a while to decay. Maybe we can wander the remnants of places, from back when places were a thing. Maybe there will still be enough weirdos to sustain some kind of live performance tradition in unusual and expensive places. Maybe some especially backwards communities, after they have sold the school buildings, will retain the athletic fields. But I dunno. A world where the default condition is to sit alone on the internet from your nowhere-sprawl house, cradle to grave, is pretty fucking bleak.
Not necessarily. In all likelihood, the market punishes bad software quality, but with a longer and more complicated feedback loop.

It is easy to see the increased traction due to building new features. It is difficult to understand the slow, grinding attrition that happens due to bad quality.
I live in Arizona, so maybe - but I'm not sure! All the above examples (except the RC thing, that was not me) were co-workers. For the smoker I overheard a guy on a team across the aisle from mine talking about rubs for smoking ribs, and I chimed in - when he found out I use an electric smoker he scoffed and shifted the conversation to explaining to me what models he considered "real smokers." I was not left alone until someone else started mocking him for using a store bought and not having welded his own barrel smoker like player three. I took the opportunity to fade into the background at that point.

I should also mention it's not always aggressive, it seems to be I meet a lot of other guys where the hobby for them is all about the gear. Don't get me wrong, I love bells and whistles, but at some point I learned it's more about what works for me and gives the results I want.
On the contrary; it's comparable, it's just not identical. The point is that public health recommendations are made to serve the greater good, not serve the preferences of an individual. Please wash your hands.

Regarding the policy aspects: when a substance is potentially harmful then we already have frameworks to regulate sale and possession, as used for things like radioactives and poisons. If an activity is harmful but only to the individual, then education and normalization of behaviour offers the best possible public health outcome, such as the wearing of bicycle helmets (everyone should wear a helmet, but criminalising noncompliance is the worst possible means to achieve it). Only when an activity is harmful to others (such as smoking, or not wearing a facemask during a pandemic) should criminalisation be considered, in my view. In general, exposing younger citizens to hazardous substances (like people feeding their kids raw milk) shouldn't need specific treatment since it's already covered by child endangerment laws and duty of care towards minors, although I suppose carve-outs can be considered when some echobubble loses their collective minds.

By such a policy position, the legislature in the original story did half the job, in my opinion; the sale and possession of raw milk should be regulated like a poison, and the consumption of it strongly deterred through education of the risks. The stunt of drinking it was the height of idiocy, but stupidity is hardly in short supply amongst legislators.
May I ask, if you are not Caucasian, which I don't know if you are not, how watching movies, with a non diverse cast, affected you in your life and thinking?
More discussed conversation in https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30809314
I am not a big fan of idea of GMO beef ether, not because I fear it will be dangerous but because I fear it will taste like crap and be unhealthy for the cows. Today they will make the cows hair shorter so they stay cooler for when they edit them tomorrow to grow an extra couple of hundred pounds of rapidly grown muscle.
And now we have furrys.
Genuinely curious: why would you want to pasteurize your own milk? I get the “homemade cake” reasoning for desserts but I see very little benefit to pasteurizing milk yourself.
If your gyno won't prescribe BC without a pap smear, look to get a new doctor. Insurance isn't mandating it; it's just the doc deciding they know better than you.

Current medical advice does NOT stipulate the two should be related - https://www.acog.org/womens-health/experts-and-stories/ask-a...

If you can't find a doc who won't decouple the two, try Planned Parenthood.
This was the racist maps episode, right?
This reminds me of the printer cat character from left-handed toons.

http://www.lefthandedtoons.com/series/printercat
Depends on how long the ground beef is left out. If you grind the steak right before you eat it there's not much time for bacteria to multiply.
> Its too early!

I think most critics of crypto come into the conversation with a "crypto is bad, and so I must find ways to reinforce this belief", and it's relatively obvious that the critic doesn't have the perquisite knowledge to craft a critique that can be responded to easily.

Specifically, a critic might say "the set A is bad". The critic is under the assumption that the set A is small, perhaps a few items, and they've seen the majority of them. But the "defender" knows that the set is hundreds of thousands of items, but still has only seen a few of them.

The critic operates under the assumption of maybe 4/5 items are bad, and the defender is operating under the assumption that 4/100,000,000 are bad.

So when a critic asks you to link to projects, there's a problem: even if the defender shows 100 projects, and the critic rejects all of them, then it doesn't change the defender's position, because 104/100,000,000 is still a small survey.

Sane "defenders" don't need to disagree with the critics on their points. They can differ primarily in seeing a much, much larger, unexplored search space.

If you assume the space has been fully searched, then its safe to stand back and critique. However, many folks conducting the search see much farther than you do, and see the entirely unexplored space as quite large. And so, it’s reasonable for the defender to not want to engage in your risky position, that assumes snake eyes for the next 100,000 dice rolls.

If you see how large the unexplored search space is, then it sounds ridiculous to declare the entire thing “done and bad”. It’s the same reason why you may choose not to engage with the flat earther. It’s hard to engage with a position so disconnected from rationality.

That said, there’s plenty of people in crypto who are equally disconnected from reality, either because they too only see a small search space, and have declared the contents “good” with little examination, or because they see the large search space and assume all dice rolls will come up as 6’s.

Those folks tend to create a cycle. Folks with no opinion see crazy crypto person, and develop into their own crazy anti crypto person. Neither party is acting rational, because both have claimed certainty with extremely little working information.

That said, there's other projects that are worth while, here's some to add to your N:

- https://strangemood.org (decentralized competitor to steam; this is what I work on)

- https://www.helium.com (incentive layer for the LoRaWAN network)

- https://tea.xyz (new homebrew)

- https://handshake.org/ ("really" decentralized DNS)

- (Compound / Aave / Solend) (decentralized loans)

> still makes no sense from a product-market fit (storage has 3 metrics to judge by: price, retrieval latency, reliability. Filecoin is order of magnitudes worse than competitiors on all metrics)

We use Filecoin and IPFS and have found solutions to these issues typically, and are happy "customers". It's also worth noting that we _can't_ use S3, or traditional cloud hosting, which therefore adds a new metric for us to judge storage on: decentralization.
IMO that’s a similar tradeoff as condoms, though probably more cost-effective.
>The two vaccines were created by researchers at;

the Doherty Institute and Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences (MIPS).

The Doherty Institute : https://www.doherty.edu.au

Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences (MIPS) :

<https://www.monash.edu/pharm/about/news/news-listing/2022/re...>
Why not run your existing predictable script in a single RUN command? What need to be converted?

The mistake many do is seeing dockerfiles as a 1:1 mapping of a shell script with RUN prefixed on every line. It’s not, you should only split a run if you have a good reason to add a new COPY in between for layer caching reasons or switching user.

With the --bind options from buildkit you can ensure the apt cache does not get layered and you can mount any big temporary files needed from host instead of copying them first.
r/gripstrength
I want to know what exactly was changed to help them "endure climate change" because to me it sounds like bullshit designed to create a proprietary cow genome with a pretty story to sell it.
> My risk tolerance is much less than that of many people

If you mean you can tolerate more risk than others, that would be a higher risk tolerance.
Not exactly the same, but in the 80s a woman without a vagina got pregnant by a stab in the abdomen shortly after having oral sex with her boyfriend.
"sure you might get pretty sick, but if you power through the diarrhea and cramps you can enjoy the benefits of getting some serious food poisoning"

I can't believe you're giving away this advice for free
What about just eating simple things that don’t require much cooking? Like eggs - I eat so many poached eggs per year on salad. And I know this is a privilege for you to eat out etc, but I also think it’s not a good environmentally friendly plan either to have every meal brought by one person! I’m not judging you but overall it’s so wasteful; invest like 2000 a month more and cook simple simple food!
I don't care if it's pasteurized by me or someone else, I just don't want it homogenized. It's more fun that way.
If you understand the danger then is a hospital still required to treat you?

That’s private benefit and socialized risk.

If you’re going to be taking communal resources then you should need to uphold some community standards.
Or hire a personal chef! This would actually cover the cost
Self hosting has lot of issues but unless we discuss we will never move in that direction.
This might be an unpopular opinion here but if this puts more beef on the table or at a lesser price, bring it on. I love beef. I want more people to have access to good quality beef at a competitive price. The pandemic for me saw meat in general double in price on average. I can't in good faith consume corn, tomatoes, tobacco, or even broccoli while saying I don't support GMO. It is not the same but it also is not an entirely unrelated concept. As an engineer we are taught to analyze and overcome and to me this is nothing different.
I was just reading the wiki on steak tartare b/c of this thread and was surprised to find its original name was steak à l'Americaine
The OP is now deleted, however it states there is XX and XY chromosome. How is this behavior? How is this negotiable?

Legit curious.
Sounds like a bad run through the Oregon Trail
Fun with font rendering consistency in Python
First, it assumes that a prior false positive does not increase the likelihood of a false positive on testing again (that is, a retest's result is independent from the first test's result).

Given that, from the first test, we have 100 people who were false positives, and 1 person who is truly positive. We would expect that 1 truly positive person to be positive again (we have a 99% chance of it from the test, after all), and 1 of the 100 who were false positive before to also test positive this second time (that 1% inaccuracy rate). Given 1 true positive, and 1 false positive, in that sample, you would expect a positive rate to mean you have a 50% chance of being the true positive.

If we did not have information from the first test, yes, it would be ~1% chance of a false positive. We have nearly a 0% chance of having a true positive, so of the 101 people, and a 99% accurate test, we would expect one to come out positive, despite not having the disease. But, because we have that first test, from a much larger sample size, we likely have one person who is a true positive, and so could expect two people to test positive, one with the disease, and one without (the 1/100 of the remaining), giving us a 50% chance a positive result = has the disease.
Even if we were to accept that fact as stated (I don't, but let's assume we do..)

What are you proposing, exactly? It sounds like "address the real problem" here means you are suggesting killing people off. That definitely doesn't seem like a good answer.

China tried the one child policy, and it didn't turn out very well. The second order effects were pretty awful, and will be felt for generations.

What would you suggest the path forward to less population is?
Didn't know "Fractal of Bad Design" even existed. I like aspects of PHP. Sorry.
I've actually seen a (Sales) executive, without a seconds worth of technical experience, bad mouth Ruby / Rails in meetings. He would say that it was a competitive disadvantage to use it. He would say that if our customers found out we used Ruby on Rails that they'd leave us. He had a few other things he would repeatedly say about it. It was all so bizarre.

FWIW, he was fired after about 18 months on the job (for reasons unknown to me).
Report about space weather causing reentry of Starlink satellites in February
Back in the early 90s, my mom took me and my sisters shopping for winter clothes. After we were done (and us kids had stressed her out), she opened up the car, parked in the mall car park, put us in the back of the car, checked we put on the seat belts, and then started to reverse out of the parking space, when all of a sudden she stopped, looked visibly confused for some moments, drove back in and took us out of the car again.

Turns out it wasn't our car, just the same new VW Golf model in the same color, and her key worked for it for whatever reason. She only noticed because the actual owner had put some stuff on the rear window, which she only noticed when looking back to reverse out of the parking space.

I have no clue if VW had the same keys for all/many cars back then, or if it was a huge coincidence that the key fit well enough.

The story of "how mom almost stole a car" is still treasured family folklore :P
> they're only $6k

They probably have a 90% margin on those...
Yanis Varoufakis: The West Is “Playing with Fire” If It Pushes Regime Change
I like to see success stories of this kind personally. “It’s never too late” makes me feel better about a life so far squandered.

I think if he needs encouragement in order to do it, he probably isn’t going to do it. The only way it’ll work at that age is if he’s overwhelmingly passionate about it.

Sounds like he’d be better suited to starting his own company in which he can code and do whatever he wants. Doesn’t have to worry about anyone giving him a job, meanwhile hopefully all those business skills will come in useful.
I'm unable to use Google applications, however that does sound very useful. The mapping application I have access to works however I am limited to what I can plan ahead of time as I don't have a device that does that type of thing.
You would buy books like this one,

https://www.amazon.com/PC-Intern-Encyclopedia-Programming-De...

Borland debuggers were quite good.
Jq doesn't seem to need contributors, it needs maintainership. Contributions are a cost to maintainers, as they add more work for them. In the best case they "just" need to review the contribution and handle release management, plus triage incoming issues related to the contribution and maintain the code in perpetuity. In the worst case they need to first do a long back and forth review process to get the contribution into a reasonable state of quality, possibly even having to take over the PR that the original author abandoned.

I'm curious about others experience with handing over maintainership to an organization (one created for the project, not a generic one like the Apache foundation). It comes up as a suggested solution to these things, but to me it doesn't make sense that you would magically find a group of trusted maintainers with the time and energy to spend, if the original problem is that you couldn't find _one_. Seems like a chicken and egg problem where in order to have an org you can hand over maintainership to, you first need to build a working relationship with a group of people that are capable of maintaining the project.
They are perfectly functional, and no one has to use them.

You either pay for their hardware (Apple) or be okay with some data harvesting (others) and get a free chat service in return. It's a fair game. And no one forces you to use anything: all my friends, literally every single person here uses WhatsApp for primary communication, and I've deleted my WhatsApp account 2 years ago and still communicate with anyone without issues.
If you got a Mac without a battery you can try to write something in pages and just yoink the power cable. Upon the next boot pages should open with your document and not lost anything.
> Boiling has a higher impact in the nutritional value of milk than pasteurization.

What does that mean?
No... the popular race positions rest on a number of postulates which are logically inconsistent.
There are actually very few GMO crops available commercially. Mostly corn and wheat. The "No GMO" label is meaningless for most products that don't use these ingredients
We don't necessarily need it to be certain to hit to prepare. It would just have to be significantly risky.
When I was a kid, we had got our milk direct from the farmer (early 80s, Switzerland). It was our kids job, to go to there and get 2 or 3 liter milk several times a week. I'm not sure, if my mom cooked allways all the milk, I guess I have to ask her. But sometimes I drank, still warm, fresh milk on the way home. I don't think I ever had trouble because of it.
It’s a legal requirement. Or at least used to be, maybe they realized the loophole it opened up. To allow third party shops to issue new keys, preventing official dealers to charge usury fee for giving you back access to your own car if you loose your key.

Right to repair has two sides of the coin.
All titles on our service are available worldwide outside of Japan and we support payments worldwide by Credit Card on the website and Apple/Google on our mobile apps.
I’m baffled to see those in favor of AM/PM notation fail to acknowledge there is a better, less confusing, alternative. Can we call this “technical” debt?

I really like the idea of saying 11:59PM instead. Despite feeling like a duck tape solution.

What bothers me more is that internet companies offer services to the global consumer. These services should work for the customer. Not force some cultural or demographic habit on global population. Instead, use non-ambiguous notation like 24h or express noon/midnight explicitly.
Great perspective. Now if you were to take the place of Management and tell this exact story, how would it sound?
Thank you for providing these links! I read the two articles.

The first one is the closest to what I was looking for. It contains three mostly independent experiments, comparing text, icons and web layout. Text and icon do not seem relevant to this discussion. The third part of the study compares a "traditional" website design to a new, flat one. This is more relevant to the discussion, but this comparison has three huge flaws.

Firstly, according to the pictures in the article, they were comparing two specific arbitrary websites. It is not clear how this comparison can be generalized. Secondly, the study is from 2015 when flat design language was relatively new. It could measure just the difference between any "traditional" and "new" design language due to the familiarity. Thirdly, the confidence intervals are huge. I don't think there is any pair of values that are confidently separated, which would make this a null result even if the experiment itself were totally fair.

The second article is very interesting, but its conclusions are non-committal. I clicked to several of the links from this article. Most of them are opinion pieces, and none that I found makes any judgement call about the comparative advantage of flat design.

I'm sorry but I ignored flatisbad.com since I believe Xisbad.com can't be an unbiased source of knowledge about X and should be ignored as a matter of principle.
You're assuming there's only one satellite to worry about per exposure.
FWIW we have been drinking raw milk for years and have never had any problems. We buy it from the neighboring farm once a week, it holds just fine in the fridge. We make yogurt out of it, eat it with cereals, make milk shakes, and cook with it. Anything left after a week will go to the house animals. It tastes great, has double the fat content (Jersey cows), we also use non pasteurized butter coming from the same farm.
Some proteins break down and loose nutritional value.
That rational actor doesn't need to be a human. In fact, the concept of rational actor makes more sense in the context of corporations. Now, imagine a corporation hoards a trillion dollars worth of a deflationary currency. Will it invest it back to the economy as eagerly as it would an inflationary currency?
This logic if flawed. I think your basic understanding of how retention, businesses and unions work is lacking, to say the least.

Mostly likely during this job market, apple identified key employees who are already well paid and made sure to keep them, by granting stock that vests over (4?) years.
Either way, 1/2" long hair probably isn't a big overheating factor
Do you need all of that for a software run on a Raspberry Pi (as article suggests) or similar embedded devices? I think just one application binary should be enough.
Steam Starts Collecting Feedback from Users on Steam Deck Verified Titles
If food farms or construction companies do something wrong, people can die.

Power companies are being created while there are rules so they know what they're dealing with.

What's happening here is someone created a platform, spent years building things, and now EU is coming and saying oh you HAVE TO open it up. Not even mentioning the mess about having different rules at different places (e.g. I can't send many things to people in the EU in Instagram DM).

This is plain wrong.
It's a stretch to assume that Apple had anything to do with the creation or mailing of this DVD. This stuff is handled by the production company.