skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I don't know of any great resources, but from my personal experience and understanding of the landscape is that Fusion360 is the most common real CAD program used by hobbyists, and small shops (especially those that are basically "hobbyist bought a bigger mill and moved into a larger garage"). Some of the bigger places will use SolidWorks (which is what 95% of my CAD experience is in), but the price there is way out of the range of someone just trying to learn.

In general, the aspect you're asking about is called an "assembly" - where you can bring in multiple parts that you have designed (and even design new parts "in place") to see how they go together and, to a minor extend, interact. I say "minor extent" there because most assembly systems aren't running full physics simulations or collision detection, at least most of the time - SolidWorks will happily let you design and assemble a model that is physically impossible to put together, while letting you rotate bodies through each other.

So yeah, I'd recommend starting with Fusion360. There are plenty of resources out there for learning it, but I do know that Grimsmo Knives and NYC CNC have videos showing how they specifically use it.

Here's what seems like a very in-depth video from Grimsmo on 5-axis machining (so definitely not applicable to just starting to learn, but this is the first I found - I know plenty of their other videos have details about fixturing and setup): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XqhctiVZtRU

NYC CNC has an entire playlist called "Fusion 360 for Beginners": https://www.youtube.com/nyccnc/playlists ; I haven't watched any of that, but I've watched plenty of their videos and enjoyed them, so think that playlist should be at least a bit helpful.

There's plenty more detail here, but I don't have the time at the moment to dig deeper - if you have any questions, feel free to leave them here and I'll see what I can dig up.
Leaving aside the question of sports, do you really not see how banning someone who looks feminine from women's restrooms would cause awkwardness or discomfort for that person? If a transgender women is being abused by her male partner, you think that she should be barred from any women's resources or support groups even though she is going through the very situation that these resources were designed for?

Also, what about trans men. Do you feel comfortable with a bunch of bearded men with deep voices in the women's facilities? Or, do you instead think by some sort of double standard that trans men are men but trans women are not women?

I'm sorry, but unless you can answer these questions reasonably then your claim that you have no intention of harming anyone doesn't hold up.
In the west we simply don't recognize that system as democracy. For your officials to not take bribes means their relatives get offended that the office doesn't get them special treatment. That is feudalism. It means you built nothing together and have nothing to be proud of.
> While the actions go afoul of US law

LMAO, surely you jest! The US is one of the most corrupt societies in the world. Where else is it not only accepted practice, but enshrined in law with "money is speech".

Please see https://www.fec.gov/ (BWAWAAHAHAHHAH, this is an government website listing bribes... they don't even have to hide it!). See also, https://opensecrets.org/.
Why should other companies do that?
Does the QA team comprise domain experts? What is your domain?
Rather than “that won’t work because of X”, I may say “here are some potential problems to watch out for”, or just ask a question like “OK, and how will you handle X?”. That message seems to get through better, and at least helps people recognize the mistake earlier.
That's some serious mental gymnastic you have going there just to avoid paying musicians a few bucks to listen to their music.

Don't worry, pirates have gone through these mental gymnastics to feel better about their entitlement since the time Napster appeared.

Still doesn't change the fact that the author of that post refuses to pay a shitty 12 bucks per months to get access to all the music he wants and pay both the infrastructure provider and the musician performing the tracks. They could easily pay for Spotify, Deezer, Tidal, iTunes or any of the other services if "YouTube is such an evil monster monopoly". But it's not about that is it?

I wonder if you're so lenient when someone refuses to pay for your own companys services and just wants them for free.
> actually commonmark has enough problems (already pointed out by others - see [1] and indirectly the flourishing of sub versions) and in good substance is unambiguous, it seems to me that they are not known by the author given the choice

Not entirely sure what you're intending here. The document you link to shows flaws in Gruber's OG Markdown specification as examples of what CommonMark intends to fix and are therefore examples of why I say KyuWeb documents are written in CommonMark instead of Markdown.

> very debatable, I could as an example rebut that in a lot of keyboards literally lack the characters for some tag, but the point is that once again here we're trying to merge a content with its representation and it's an outdated approach (heck, even on html5 there's css that would serve to separate text from layout) and potentially a can of worms!

CommonMark is a markup specification, just like HTML. Heck, in most of its implementations, it "compiles to" HTML. Styling would be up to the browser.

> (beyond the tone used and the slight arrogance in assuming that i don't know what an http connection is - but maybe it's just my interpretation due to the language barrier),

My apologies if I came off insulting. It was not my intention. I just merely intended to indicate that KyuWeb networking is basically just HTTP, so any questions about "Does/How does KyuWeb implement X?" with regards to networking can be answered by referring to the HTTP specification.

> in practice this "kyuweb" is reduced to be an additional layer on top of what is already there? but shouldn't it be simple?

I don't think "layer" is the right word, but you can look at it that way if you wish. In reality it's just a handful of additional HTTP headers, and rules for using existing headers, allowing clients and servers to communicate with each other about KyuWeb-specific things.

> in order to have a kyuweb browser do i have to have first a classic working browser that also sends custom header tags?

No. A proper KyuWeb browser could use the same HTTP networking code as a "normal" browser but wouldn't have HTML, JS, or CSS parsers/VMs/renderers (at least not necessarily - I suppose a hybrid KyuWeb and normal web browser would be possible).

> and on the other side do i have to have custom classic web servers that also respond in this subformat?

Yes. Existing web servers can serve as KyuWeb servers. The server I'm currently building is simply a PHP app which would integrate with Nginx/Apache/what-have-you with FastCGI, just like Drupal or WordPress or Magento (but in practice much simpler than any of those).

> but at this point why not use HTTP/1.0 and serve plain markdown, without building additional layers?

Because normal web browsers don't render Markdown, and, to a lesser extent, because old resource-limited computers can't run normal web browsers.
There's a great I Think You Should Leave skit about why it might taste so bad.
If everything you do goes in and out over a wire, some day your job will be either automated or offshored.
I guess we have very different definitions of "semantics" then. Rspec is wild but it's still plain Ruby. I'll give you that it's not idiomatic and it comes with some unusual restrictions on its use but libraries have been doing forever, I guess I'm just used to "you have to call this function to init the lib", "this function has to come after this", "you must call the cleanup macro here", "importing this lib monkey-patches these classes."
My understanding is that artifacts from Starlink are trivial to remove from ground based astronomy datasets. We know what they look like, where they are, and when they transit.

do you have other information?
Decades? Any examples of this? Material Design has only been around since 2014, so that's not really a good example to cite.
It doesn't need to consider false-negatives. The premise is that you received a positive test.

The math is, given the test shows a positive, what is the probability that you actually have the disease?
Not sure of the point of your comment...What I said holds true.
Fridays are the days most interesting news lands because it’s easiest to sweep it under the rug with the weekend.

I wish news organizations where more courageous and held on to this stuff to Monday/Tuesday.
Countries are walled gardens. The only thing stopping them from being immoral is democracy and respect for individual rights, neither of which exists in tech giants' walled gardens.
> The global Metaverse revenue opportunity could approach $800 billion in 2024 vs. about $500 billion in 2020

So whatever they are counting is mostly just online interaction, and predates any of Facebook's recent stuff. It sounds a lot less exciting when framed realistically as online interaction software, including gaming, will grow 13% yoy
What is considered as "fail"?
You mean there’s a contingent within Google that further compromises their moral integrity.

Edit: downvotes won’t help you sleep at night!
Is there any evidence that an asteroid like this would have been detected earlier without Starlink satellites?
no matter the transportation mechanism it still takes time. Unless someone can invent a star trek'esque transporter the commute will always suck.
Your examples have a level of granularity that borders on absurdity. We all know that what it comes down to is this: Company makes an offer, i.e. "One of the perks of this job is you receive a 2 hour daily commute stipend". Employee accepts or rejects that offer.
Kind of tangential, but I think it could be a lot of fun to make a "boardgame" computer that has a thermal printer, some number displays, and some buttons. It wouldn't try to run the whole game, but would only assist. It could print out scoresheets or special tokens, roll dice, keep track of a few numbers, that sort of thing. Maybe a barcode/QR scanner so you could round trip, like scan a printout and then choose an option as described on that printout.

The printer in particular could open up all kinds of generative and variable interactions or play pieces in a game while still preserving the physical tracking of the game. Maybe with some plastic holders you could even turn the printouts into rough cards...
No, we're not back at the start. The argument was

> supporting 4 platforms is harder than supporting 1

and

> It’s easier to point them all to a URL in a browser than to debug issues on an end user PC

...except that neither of those are valid, because (1) companies already support more than a single platform and (2) they already implement non-web clients for iOS and Android, so the debugging ease argument doesn't apply either.

Companies already shown that they're willing to invest in n+1 platforms to get more profit - that is, they've already decided that 3 is better than 1, so why would 7 (or 4) not be better than 3?
If you keep an eye out, you can snag one for much cheaper on eBay! The one I used back in college was great, and I picked it up for around $40.
"Hypothetically speaking which customer offered a car?" "And again entirely hypothetically speaking how could one move forward to accept such offer?"
> If there's only developers who test their own code then they're not incentivized for finding the ways their code breaks.

It totally depends. In many cases it will come back to the original developer if their code breaks in production. That is a lot of incentive to test as thoroughly as possible before releasing.
The serendipity point is interesting.

A few years ago I had my team's desks moved to be next to our sales team. I wanted to overhear their conversations and phone calls to get a deeper understanding of client feedback and how clients used our product. It worked out well, and we got into a much better place in terms of feedback and requests.

During covid I've also had a very strong indicator of how clients view our product - the entire sales team quit over time.
I started with Talk - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk_(software)
But I guess that's because I'm Gen-X
"I think he feels inspired by seeing me thrive as a contractor, with access to a global marketplace and seemingly endless working opportunities."

Well there you go, teach him to code and then get some contracts that you can give him some work from so he can get his feet wet and some experience under his belt to increase his chances if he decides to look for a job or go out on his own.
Beautifully articulated. This is exactly what’s going on. Incentives are simply misaligned with expectations. In all likelihood, the market doesn’t reward quality software as much as it rewards robust feature sets.
Why not now? From what I've seen, Bitwarden is just as good, if not better, in every single way.
Waiting several days to publish news is not courageous -- it's just late.

The public expects news organizations to publish the news as soon as it's known.
If those three platforms are "tiny screen", "medium screen", and "desktop-width screen", who loses?
That's... a bit extreme even for my experience, but I guess 4 legs and bad luck can do this to you, max I've ever done was 3 (and they lost my big luggage for a week without any info about it but that's another topic).

But yes that's exactly why we buy directly. Compare it to our trip to Bolivia via Miami few years ago. Come to the airport, do you have US ESTA visa? Nope what is that? We dont' travel to US so don't know its policies, just want to fly to Bolivia. Yeah but you go via Miami, its not secured airport unlike most airports anywhere, you need full tourist US ESTA visa. OK we go to airlines helpdesk (British airways) by their recommendation, they do quick ESTA for us based on our passports.

All good, we fly to London, but then flight to Miami is a no-go at the gate, can't find our ESTA code. Some US personnel on the airport in Heathrow found out the person who made ESTA selected incorrect country in our application. 30 minutes to departure. Sorry no-go. Straight on the airport within 20 minutes we got free tickets for same flight next day and other remaining leg and did ESTA correctly ourselves.

I have few similar stories, but they all point to the same conclusion - its not worth the extra risk, especially if there are more legs and multiple airlines are involved. It all looks nice till first cancellation happens. The amount of frustration and stress can easily ruin any mental benefits of (usually quite costly due to 4 of us) vacations.
Rmarkdown indeed makes sane diffs, it's just a nice text-based format. You can use python or julia as well (see quarto.org for the latest version of this). Getting collaborators on board... yeah, that varies.
> NATO were not the instigators there, not by a long shot. It was overreach, sure, but I fail to see the equivelancy. NATO didn't invade any country and didn't seize any territories.

That's not the point. It was an attack and civilians died. Don't pretend that some civilians deaths are better than others just because we, the good guys from the NATO, were just "saving the world" another time.
Also, we can say Russia is not the instigator here as well, and they are just addressing Ukraine's lack of compliance with the Minks agreements and attacks to the Russian communities in eastern Ukraine.

> Please, anyone reading the comments of the person above, don't be fooled, this is Russian propaganda, whether the person above is acting in good faith is irrelevant.

I know, everything other that the official "free world" statements is propaganda. You may suggest the HN admins to ban my account, just to get a community with more plurality where only the official statements from the western countries are allowed.
Ofcourse, it was a response to why I dont just use a 200$ Chromebook. Latest AMD or Intel is definetly as fast, albeit at a higher TDP.
> elimination of most of the conscription-related bureaucracy

I was just thinking of that as an entrenched bureaucracy example but decided to focus things on an entitlement program. Despite having zero purpose for 49 years, Selective Service still manages to spend $26m/year [0].

> often a desire to have an estimated advance mechanism, to avoid a delay of potentially more than a year

The model for advance payments on an upcoming year's tax credits already exists [1]. I can see how this doesn't address downward change in income, but also don't see how that couldn't be added.

0. https://www.sss.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Annual-Report...

1. https://www.irs.gov/credits-deductions/advance-child-tax-cre...
More Lillipythonian flame baiting. Summoning the great dang.
> By enforcing anti corruption on the parent company in the US

https://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/microsoft-corp/summary?id=D...

Ooops.
ex-attorneys !!
Yeah, but P(Valid Critique | Source) is low. For instance, behold as I use it illegitimately against you: "Would you mind linking to where you've seen this use of 'Source?'?"

Besides, legibility is about the argument - it doesn't make sense to talk about a "Source". The source is me. I am the one making the argument.

Statements of fact aren't arguments. "There is a giant octopus besieging NYC right now". There's no argument there. It is merely a statement.

An example legible argument is:

- There is likely a lot of squid ink covering NYC

- This is likely because there is a positively colossal squid creature floating above NYC at the moment

- Squid creatures (colossal or otherwise) discharge ink when attacked

- We are attacking this humongous monstrosity

In fact, "Source?" works better against a legible argument since you can identify which part needs the extra stuff. This argument is fairly legible and is practically just syllogisms. It's merely the case that a premise is wrong - something which you can conclude by asking for the source for a crucial premise.

With an illegible argument, you could debunk the source of one of the claims and still be unable to trace its impact on the conclusion.

For instance:

It's probably raining in NYC right now because it's kind of the conditions that would cause rain if you know what I mean. But there's also this squid creature in the air. It rains when there's squids. Here, read this article about colossal squid ink rain. We all know that squid rain is a thing.
Found the article I was thinking of:

>at the time I did these measurements, my 4.2 GHz kaby lake had the fastest single-threaded performance of any machine you could buy but had worse latency than a quick machine from the 70s (roughly 6x worse than an Apple 2), which seems a bit curious.

>We can see that, even with the limited set of keyboards tested, there can be as much as a 45ms difference in latency between keyboards. Moreover, a modern computer with one of the slower keyboards attached can’t possibly be as responsive as a quick machine from the 70s or 80s because the keyboard alone is slower than the entire response pipeline of some older computers.

https://danluu.com/keyboard-latency/
It is not really possible to remove artifacts from images because there is a degree of randomness in which photons arrive, and even if your model is accurate down to the level of QED, you will not be able to exactly subtract the photon counts.
Any comparison with grep.app?
I was going to disagree about the impacts of the starlink constellations because the trails can mostly only be seen during twilight (dusk/dawn) observations. However in this case you're 100% right. The Caltech article below states

"The streaks are most apparent in so-called twilight observations, those taken at dawn or dusk, which are important for finding near-Earth asteroids that appear close to the sun in the sky. ZTF has discovered several asteroids of this nature, including 2020 AV2, the first asteroid spotted with an orbit that fits entirely within the orbit of Venus.

"In 2019, 0.5 percent of twilight images were affected, and now almost 20 percent are affected," says Przemek Mróz, study lead author and a former Caltech postdoctoral scholar who is now at the University of Warsaw in Poland."

We may potentially have a serious problem on our hands unless we really ramp up exterrestrial observation, or maybe we won't have a problem, we might just all be dead on impact.

Link to article
https://www.caltech.edu/about/news/palomar-survey-instrument...
> but when things are this completely broken I think anything goes

Why? If something doesn't help in any way, it shouldn't "go".

Putin's invasion of Urkaine doesn't justify doing other bad things, just because those bad things aren't quite as evil.

Something can be wrong without it beying literally invading another country. Putting malware in software is an example of that.

> but often times the vibe of that one poem holds true, doesn't effect me so I don't care.

The issue is not "not caring". The issue is weighting advantages and disadvantages and be responsible in one's actions.

Politics in tech should be rejected at least in all cases in which it doesn't lead to any advantage. The existence of worse things is irrelevant.
It is Nick Land.
True! VNC is not ideal because it's pretty old by now. Chrome Remote Desktop would've been a better example, and even that is behind what can be done, as I believe it still uses VP8. It's possible even a lossless codec like ffv1 could be plausible in the window of 8 MiB/s, but I'm not sure it's necessary, as even old h264 does a pretty convincing job at very low bitrates.

Here's a snippet of my 2256x1504 screen, uncompressed:

https://files.catbox.moe/9k6cnm.png

Here's a snippet of my 2256x1504 screen from an OBS recording:

https://files.catbox.moe/va46ze.png

This is using x264 at just 0.5 MiB/s. Not even pegging a CPU core.

If you move really fast, then there are some artifacts during motion (same recording):

https://files.catbox.moe/myhnc7.png

...But they are not really noticeable in motion, and it clears up quickly.

I don't have a high framerate, high DPI display to test, but I'm guessing most people will only strongly care about one or the other since displays that do both are pretty expensive.

And yeah, chroma subsampling on subpixel rendering should impact legibility, but in practice it's difficult for me to tell any difference.

I've played around for a bit and I don't go above 1 MiB/s so far. I probably would need to play a video for that.
I don't think that would make a lot of sense financially or professionally, but if he wanted to do this for fun (and money) then I think he probably could.
The future will be/is that entrepreneurs create new cool stuff, and runs it until the valuation is high enough they feel it's pay day. They sell to big corp, who are large code maintenance (and patent accumulation) shops, scales them to bigger users and runs until deprecation.

The entrepreneurs, though, continue on with the next idea.
They almost certainly envision a world similar to now but with the glaring problems fixed. Mark Fisher is writing about the inability to imagine and begin to create entirely new futures (for examples look to the utopianism of early 20th century futurism).
Everyone thinks they want an SLR.

Most of those left in the world need repair or at least CLA.

Both are why there aren't twenty Nikon FE's for sale at KEH right now.

So buy an old rangefinder and spend some of the savings on a decent light meter.

There are billions of working rangefinders on eBay.

They are simpler mechanically so less likely to be broken and are easier to repair yourself.

And by owning a light meter, all-mechanical cameras become an option.
My tendons are cowering in fear. How fast does it do finger tricks? It seems like there'd be a lot of resistance since so much surface-to-surface contact, where speedcubes typically flex on springs so that the shape of the cube changes to cut rotation on different curved planes.