skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
At the same power level and general availability with OK support, you're looking at the MyriadX/NCS2. Even then I think the Coral beats it on performance. Next step up is the Jetson Nano (10-15 W) which is a lot more beefy, but power hungry. There are also a bunch of chip companies that make accelerators, like the RK3399Pro from Rockchip and some other OEMs from China, but I have no idea how good the docs and availability are if you're not a big partner. The RK3399 has mainline kernel support which is attractive, but again there aren't many reliable board vendors. Khadas make some nice looking SBCs.

I was also faintly surprised to learn that the Paralella still exists! I always wanted one to play with and I thought they discontinued them.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/bypass-paywal...

Works for a lot of sites like these.
All fair points. In this example I was suggesting what this might look like at the border of the application where you need to talk to some (standard) library which doesn't use the same convention.
Some reports that there were DNSSEC validation issues w/ proxy.safebrowsing.apple which CNAMEs to aaplimg.com.
I kind of agree. I'm not an absolute kind of person.

For day to day photos, where there is no set up, sure, the camera phones are great because you can quickly take that photo. As they say, the best camera is the one you have with you.

As a complete amateur, trying to take a photo of my kid at soccer, I have a Sony A6000 and I bought a used Sigma 100-400mm F5-6.3 DG DN OS. The camera phone is simply useless. Also, good luck trying to take a photo of that bird and showing it to your kids!
nslookup
> server a.ns.apple.com
Default server: a.ns.apple.com
Address: 2620:149:ae0::53#53
Default server: a.ns.apple.com
Address: 17.253.200.1#53
> developer.apple.com
Server: a.ns.apple.com
Address: 2620:149:ae0::53#53

developer.apple.com canonical name = developer-cdn.apple.com.akadns.net.
** server can't find developer-cdn.apple.com.akadns.net: REFUSED

Ah. So Apple's own DNS servers are redirecting developer.apple.com to something on "akadns.net",
which is operated by Akamai. But Apple's own DNS servers refuse to resolve that, probably because it's not in the apple.com zone.

More:

nslookup
> developer-cdn.apple.com.akadns.net
Server: 127.0.0.53
Address: 127.0.0.53#53

Non-authoritative answer:
developer-cdn.apple.com.akadns.net canonical name = world-gen.g.aaplimg.com.
world-gen.g.aaplimg.com canonical name = apple-c.g.aaplimg.com.
apple-c.g.aaplimg.com canonical name = apple-cf.g.aaplimg.com.
apple-cf.g.aaplimg.com canonical name = apple-lr.g.aaplimg.com.
> server a.ns.apple.com
Default server: a.ns.apple.com
Address: 2620:149:ae0::53#53
Default server: a.ns.apple.com
Address: 17.253.200.1#53
> developer-cdn.apple.com.akadns.net
Server: a.ns.apple.com
Address: 2620:149:ae0::53#53

** server can't find developer-cdn.apple.com.akadns.net: REFUSED

It's clearly a botched DNS configuration. Not clear what the intent was. Did they really want to point
"developer.apple.com", a web site, to "developer-cdn.apple.com.akadns.net", which is a DNS server? Or am I misreading that?

It's generally considered bad form to have all the DNS servers for "example.com" under "example.com", by the way. If you mess up "example.com", or it goes down, getting to it to fix it can be difficult.

Anyway, this looks like an attempt to outsource something to Akamai that went badly wrong.
A look at a low-code feature I'm building in my open-source project
Search being broken for local files is infuriating. I've tried to do registry modifications to fix it and remove Cortana and it STILL won't find a file searched for by name in the root C: directory! But it'll give you random web results!
IMHO, Germans are betting on not getting bashed by the workers unions only.
When the whole anti-nuclear frenzy from the 90s came in.. coal workers seized the opportunity.. and they couldn’t get rid of them until the EU pressure was too much .. so they turned to the next cheapest option.. which at the time was gas… and until the EU realizes gas is also not green.. gas is the new coal.
This essentially mirrors my experience however the codebase is more around 50-50 split AppKit / SwiftUI, most controls we tend to use AppKit and layout and display SwiftUI. I don't actually think the integration is too painful, layout can be a little weird sometimes where the two worlds awkwardly join but you can work around most issues there.
Same.

echo 'set -g status-bg brightmagenta' >> ~/.tmux.conf && tmux source-file ~/.tmux.conf
I fail to see the problem. What content does the form of a sequence of tweets exclude? Run-on sentences? Does that sentence really need to be a hundred words long?
I think it's a welcome effect for many average people on the street. As a hobbyist photographer who likes nature and astrophotograpy with quite serious gear (5D Mark IV, Sigma 14 f1.8, Canon 50mm f/1.2 etc) I find iPhone camera really impressive and is actually the primary reason of upgrading every year.

Yet, I'd love to see an "off" switch when needed. But at least we've got RAW shooting which doesn't apply much effects (but still overprocesses a little too much for "raw", agreed.)
Heh heh! Too clever by half.

In Kannada, wordalla can be parsed in 2 ways -

wordalla => "word alla" == "not the word"

wordalla => "wordle uh?" == "Isn't this Wordle ?"
Looks like their DNS servers are responsive, but refuse to serve records:

$ dig -t NS developer.apple.com
[...]
apple-lr.g.aaplimg.com. 14400 IN NS b.gslb.aaplimg.com.
apple-lr.g.aaplimg.com. 14400 IN NS a.gslb.aaplimg.com.

$ dig @a.gslb.aaplimg.com developer.apple.com
[...]
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: REFUSED
;; flags: qr rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
;; WARNING: recursion requested but not available
;; WARNING: recursion requested but not available

Most likely a configuration mistake that'll be undone as soon as they figured out how to re-deploy their DNS servers while DNS is down.

Unlikely to be BGP shenanigans as some people on Twitter claim. My network has direct peerings to Apple's AS714.
> an attack could overtake Moscow

No it can't. Ukraine doesn't and can't have nukes. Russia has thousands of nukes. This doesn't even begin to make sense. Nobody can invade a nuclear power, let alone one with as many nukes as Russia.

> From Moscow's perspective Ukraine could have a Nazi party take over at some point in the future.

This is their propaganda. It's that logical fallacy; anything could happen, therefore this. Far-right gets very little support in Ukrainian elections, and neo-nazism is a bigger problem in Russia, Poland and Hungary than in Ukraine. Maybe Russia should be scared of Hungary; fair enough. But Ukraine? Azov is a large problem that needs to be dealt with, but it has nothing to do with neo-Nazis inside Ukrainian politics or leadership or broader society. If they wanted Ukraine to deal with Azov, they would stop threatening Ukraine, and then Ukraine wouldn't have the need for Azov. If you create an intense need for defence, then of course Azov isn't going to be dealt with. Azov is purely the fault of Russia.
Well yes, they simply can't cut the Gas.

I don't know where people get the illusion from that you could "just get it from somewhere else" in matter of days/weeks. That's simply not the case at all. Even
if we speaking about month and accepting Gas prices doubling or more it close to impossible.

But the EU can't accept Gas prices exploding to that degree.

While this article loves to blame Germany they kinda forget that part of this Gas is resold in to neighboring countries.

Also in all of Germany (through slightly more so in east Germany) most houses heat with Gas, warm Water with Gas and especially on cheaper (longer not renovated) apartments also have a Gas oven and Stove. Until ~20 or so years ago central gas heating + gas stoves where the most common way to build apartment houses, in recent years its central gas heating + electronic stoves/ovens.

Due to disagreements with Russia in recent years gas imports also have been limit to long term contracts, hence there are no (in this context relevant) gas reserves.

Also while people love to say Germany is unnecessary switching of atomar power plants the truth is what they did wasn't building new ones. All the still running power plants are already operating well beyond the time they where build for. With the Ukraine conflict Germany "suspended" the shutdown of them, but they still need to shut down. Germany has space wise not much space. It can't afford a single reactor failure at all (like Germany might literally collapse if there is a reactor meltdown with some of the more central power plants).

When the conflict started Germany did fast line some projects to become more/faster able to switch off or massive reduce Russian gas (like started building LNG ship terminals). But all of this takes time. Luckily spring is coming so it might be possible.

But if you now would stop Gas you would practically derive millions of EU citizens of an affordable way to cook, heat and wash. And with affordable I don't mean cheap, but like affordable at all.

With existing instabilities from COVID and a word wide re-emergence of facism you can guess twice if the EU would to so. Their main priority is to protect their citizens and constitution/democracy. Switching of Russian Gas now (like in a week) would likely fail both.

So it's not an option at all, at least not _yet_.

If their would be a doable way to switch of Russian Gas it would have been done. Similar if Russia could no longer send Gas they also would have done so to create massive internal instabilities in the EU.

So the Gas sells are currently something neither party (Germany/Russia) likes but neither can stop either.
A nice UI on top of GDB might be all you need. I've used this with some success in the past: https://www.gdbgui.com/
Spectacle used to fix that, until it went EOL.
https://www.spectacleapp.com/

So I switched to Rectangle, which has optional Spectacle-compatible keybindings.
https://github.com/rxhanson/Rectangle

I also add RightZoom:
https://www.blazingtools.com/right_zoom_mac.html

With them, window management becomes basically as good as any other desktop I use, and delivers most of what I like from tiling WMs.
I think they’re about as useful as any anecdotal data out there. Unusually high numbers of reports when you’re seeing issues yourself is about as good as it gets until a status page is updated (which it thankfully has been finally).
Apple confirms outages for multiple services
I like plain text. But this site is not plain text. It is HTML and css.

<head><meta name="referrer" content="origin"><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0"><link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="news.css?QZejSKY7mNWXnObVdaSN">
<link rel="shortcut icon" href="favicon.ico">
<title>Submissions from plaintextsports.com | Hacker News</title></head>
When scaling down, you don't have blurry output. You won't get pixel-perfect, but you get sharp enough. MacOS does the same for fractional scale.

You get blurry when scaling UP. Xwayland does scale up, from 96 dpi to whatever fractional scale is set, so that's the reason why X apps are blurry. Native wayland app are not.
Ah, I can point out some along those lines, too. Acupressure. Chiropractors. Horoscopes.

Less fringe, but also less magical: the notion that a wild animal will abandon their young if a human touches them. It doesn't really make a lot of sense, but only on a second thought.
The Apple-1's unusual MOS clock driver chip
Empiricism is autoreliable. And is perhaps the only thing that is. It continually reconceptualizes our understandings and produces its own reliability. See how things like the indifference assumption of statistical mechanics is now empirically generated. Empirical science in limited domains can explain its own reliability and justification.

But what you’ve done is none empirically assert numbers are “this”. Cities are “this”. No non-empirical claims have the same weight as empirical science. It’s not that empirical science should talk about things it does not yet know, rather we shouldn’t make claims like yours. We should only go as far empirical science says if you want to match empirical science’s reliability, and it doesn’t say numbers are metaphysical categories.
I find this off-the-wall article is worth reading from Moxie.

"Do whatever — but make it uncomfortable (like leaving prison!) and make it count."

https://moxie.org/2013/01/07/career-advice.html
I agree with this. I own both a mid-range DSLR and an iPhone 12 Mini. In the past six months since I got the iPhone, I've transitioned all my short films to being shot with its tiny sensor over the DSLR's -- it just looks much, much better and saves me a ton of work. I really wish there was someone making the equivalent of an iPhone's computational photography, but used on a full-size sensor. Imagine the capabilities!
So, BOINC before BOINC?
Seems to negate the motivation for using a timespan datatype in the first place.
I remember the time India had to pay for its Iranian oil (which btw. now is currently down to 0)

Surprise, surprise it had to do the payments through German banks, which btw is part of NATO.

It is a bit hypocritical for the west to expect India to act as a client state while NATO states like Germany continue to buy Russian gas.
Yeah and how did the current greedy/evil bastard get in power?

I have no great love for Russia and don't believe at all in the idea that the U.S. or the west in general is the source of all the misery in the world. I think it's pretty clear there are some malignant actors in the world and China and Russia are foremost among them.

But you might want to look into American post-Soviet collapse policy before you get too far over your skis.
I imagine if the secrets are exported, you could import them to any app which would be excellent.
Virgin Orbit can put things into space, although very low payload - you might have enough capacity to put one oneweb satelite into orbit at a time -- wikipedia says 500kg to 500km, Oneweb are 150kg at 1200km.

If 1 Satellite per launch, that would be 220 launched on LauncherOne at a cost of $2.6b (wikipedia costs), if Virgin Orbital could scale quickly enough (and if it can get 150kg to 1200km)
Innovation can come from anywhere, but the authors of this paper chose to submit to a venue that is outside the focus of ML research. From what I understand, this paper would've been a great fit for COLT (or even a general/broad ML conference like ICML) and since it wasn't submitted (or wasn't accepted), i think it makes sense to assume that it was written by authors who either chose to circumvent the community, or were rejected by it. I don't find your comparison to ivy league fitting, because while there are still a significant number of great candidates from non ivy leagues, the number of great ML papers that have not been published at top tier ML venues is in the single digits -- most researchers I know would rather just upload their paper to arxiv and move on, rather than publishing in 2nd tier venues. Which should tell you how much of a bad signal the wrong venue can be in ML research.

Granted, it could also be that this was authored by people outside of the field who.sont know the rules, but given how much research gets published each day, it's impossible not to rely on heuristics, especially since this paper was.posted without context.
Avoids accusations of anti-trust.
Not being in the UK, I was surprised that the referendum was specified as being non-binding, but once the vote happened, politicians spoke as if they had a moral obligation to implement the result. Which seemed ludicrous, given the final result was 52%/48%—and who know what it would have been had the referendum been specified as binding beforehand. I'd certainly vote differently on quite a few measures if I knew the result was supposed to matter.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/adamandrzejewski/2021/10/31/bal...
Harvard tops $55B and Yale over $43B now.

I have listened to the Feynman lectures before, they are great for sure. But there are thousands of people haven't, and yet they still have benefited from a good college education.

If you want to figure out how to scale an elite Ivy league education, I think you cannot, I think the elite part is what trips you up. But if you want to see how to scale a good college education, you need look no further than the state university system, which for over 100 years has done exactly that. Unfortunately, the costs of that have gone up to the point that many young people are saddled with unmanageable debt. Some progressives, who are themselves the product of said elite education, talk about taxing billionaires and large corporations to pay for universal affordable college but somehow conveniently overlook the pile of money sitting in those endowment funds, far more than what those schools will ever need.

We should have universal affordable college for all that want it, billionaires and large corporations should contribute to that and so should the elite schools with outsized endowments. A good start would be to add a little tax to all those and increase the subsidies to state and community colleges.

And this comes from someone who is a product of said elite schools and was lucky enough to have it paid for. But not everyone is so lucky. I have also been lucky to have worked with young people who served their country and used those benefits to pay for college and, in my view, they are every bit as capable as anyone that attended an elite school.
Everything in the App Store was working for me except actually downloading apps. Seems to be (mostly) resolved now.
No. I think the new age movement generally keeps the supernatural at a safe distance, or at least frames the discussion in very general terms. Further, I think much of the manifestation of success via meditation isn't really supernatural at all, but rather just another life hack. The sort of spirituality described in the article has very specific ideas about the supernatural world, and the entities that reside in it. There is also an understanding of the uncontrolled, dangerous nature of the entities.
Is there a good reason for not mentioning what school Z is? It makes a big difference if we're talking UCLA versus GW.

If you go to MIT, you will be a smaller fish in a more prestigious pond. If you go to UCLA, you would be a bigger fish in a less prestigious pond. If you go to GW, you would be a bigger fish in a not very prestigious pond.

If you excel at a school like UCLA, you should still be able to get into a good grad program, assuming you have taken classes or shown interest in the relevant area. But if we're talking a school like GW (no offense to anyone here who went there!), it would be more difficult. Most people would assume that students who went to GW would not have been admitted to MIT, partly because GW's much lower in the rankings, and partly because it's private (and therefore not cheaper).

I know lots of people who got into great grad programs who went to 'lesser' undergrad schools, especially public schools. It would be easier to get into grad programs if you did awesome and went to MIT. But consider that you might not stand out so much at MIT as you would elsewhere. Recommendation letters from professors will be more glowing if you are at a less competitive institution.

One last thing: realize that different schools calculate financial aid differently when siblings are in the picture. Carleton College, where my older brother went to school, knew that I was going to be attending college soon and gave him an aid package that did not change over the 4 years, including when I was in school. We assumed that Swarthmore College, where I went, would do the same. I was wrong. After my brother graduated, my aid package was cut dramatically. We had to plead with them to keep it steady, which ultimately they did.

You should check with MIT's financial aid office to see how they do things. If you're the oldest, they're probably hoping to suck out some cash before other siblings are in college. You might be able to convince them to give you a package across all 4 years that remains steady, or commit to offering a package when your siblings are in school.
Were you reading another article? The author of this one is not "calling for power to be moved away from people and centralised". Nothing like that argument at all appears in the article.
React is a great way to do progressive enhancement: you can have the same component code run on the server and client. On the server, it will only be used for creating static html. On the client, the component code will bind to the already generated HTML and allow client-side interactivity.

Writing rich UIs with progressive enhancement without this benefit was over-complicated pain before React. All of your UI code would either be based around binding to static HTML generated by the server or be based on locally-generated elements; if you ever had a widget that had been generated by the server that you now want to generate client-side in some context, or vice-versa, then you had to have multiple separate code paths on the client for that in addition to the separate server-side code for the widget. Having the component's code defined once in a way that works for all three contexts (client-side generation, server-side generation, client-side binding to server-generated HTML) is great.

I think people assume that because React is a newer way of doing things that it doesn't work well at the old goals (progressive enhancement) but the opposite is true!
I'm from the Netherlands; I always heard that's because you might get a bit too excited and throw up your food. The 30 minutes are to allow your stomach to settle a bit.
For me it's primarily what their business is.

Apple is in the business to sell me devices (and now services but with those devices). So while they may collect data about me, the value to them is ultimately different.

Where Google's entire business is advertising. So they benefit from getting as much data from me not only directly from my device but from browsing or any other source of data they can find. And then mining that data to sell me to the people paying for ads.

I have gotten to the point that I am... accepting... data collection as something that I can just not get away from. I do what I can to limit it. But there is a limit to what I can realistically do about it. So what I care about is limiting how much of that data is in a single place as well as what those place's business model is and what they might be doing with that data.