skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
My spouse is a nurse and at her work, they are required to do "double verification" of narcotics where a 2nd nurses recounts and also signs off on the drugs being taken out. They also don't use any electronic or automated systems. Is the fancy cart a cost saving measure or a safety measure? Seems like its being used to reduce headcount and let nurses work alone.

There is a certain level of cognitive offloading happening with the machine that is uncomfortable to me. Its like the Tesla autopilot giving drivers a false sense of security. One could easily fall to assuming what came out of the cart is the right thing. People are much less trusting with each other.
Question regarding Fedora : I tried it in a docker environment. During some googling to troubleshoot issues, several results were found on the Red Hat commercial support website (so, not accessible). I'm afraid that a good part of advanced/niche documentations and knowledge base for troubleshooting is behind Red Hat commercial support. Is that the case in practice?
Hopping aboard the praise train.. my two interactions with @dang include:

1. I made my first submission to HN many years ago. I got an email helpfully suggesting edits to better present the content. It ended with a "Thanks for posting good things to Hacker News" - that part stuck with me, I thought it was nice.

2. I had a later submission that I thought would be an instant hit, but it didn't get traction. I emailed HN to see if it's okay to resubmit. @dang responded with tips on how to get traction, then ended the email with: "Good luck! It's hard to predict what HN will find interesting, and so few posts end up 'making it' with this audience that I hope you don't feel bad either way."

@dang is a good person that cares about HN content and the people that use it.
Mostly some app that allows you to organize your own knowledge or helps you to remember. If artificial intelligence (AI) is used on those tasks, then it's "powered by" it.
I did a tiny amount of searching to verify this but came up empty handed. Guest additions (what I think you meant) is GPLv2, so it should be free for use.
The OLPC had a reflective screen designed for outdoors use.
> a demographic crisis as boomers retire and need more service workers

America is blessed as far as this crisis goes. Virtually everyone else will hit it first. That creates a policy testbed. It also means others must violently re-gear for the necessary automation (or reduction in lifestyle expectations for the bulging generation).

> heard worries that the government will run into budgetary issues if bond rates climb too high

To the extent the future U.S. budget is constrained, it's by inflation. (More pointedly: the politics of inflation.) If the Congress wants to spend, it can spend. Rates be damned.
Yeah well Paris is much less bike-friendly than you would think reading all the English-speaking articles about it. There are more and more bike lanes but very few dedicated parking spaces for bikes, and almost zero secured ones. There was an attempt to build some near train stations, but they are always out of order (and you need a valid subway card to access them!)

Paris is also not flat, so unless you're super in shape it's difficult to use a non-electric bikes (depending on the journey, of course), and ebikes tend to be stolen much more than regular ones.

In other French cities, I don't know enough to have an opinion; I think Strasbourg is a little bit better.
In the us you don’t multiply hours worked by 40. Minimum wage workers have few protections and are assigned less then full time hours to Avoid paying benefits. They can also end up with shifts like 2 on 2 off 2 on where employers don’t pay for gaps between peak hrs
An aside: This site has a horizontal scroll bar (which I assume is unwanted) in Firefox and Chrome on Windows. Might want to have your frontend person take a peak at the CSS.
> Until now we're been in quantitative easing (QE), which has driven up stock prices and pushed bonds down. Does transitioning into QT imply the reverse?

Yes.
> But in this case the barrier is predicated on the execution of some cache manipulation instruction, so I suspect things are more complicated.

Why do you think so? The explanation given seem reasonable to me…
Because that will kill someone in an urgent emergency?

Those folks are generally busy somewhere else, and there are few benign drugs in these situations. There are also a lot of legitimate urgent situations where an extra minute or two can get someone killed who otherwise would not be.
Hello, I´m trying to connect with you on Linkedin. Can you send me a message? Ronald.
Yes, that's the joke, it's from http://james-iry.blogspot.com/2009/05/brief-incomplete-and-m... - but the joke is that advanced users of any concept have a tendency to explain it in terms of concepts that the audience also doesn't understand.
How about native controls?
Avoid high-throughput devices is even in their list of known USB issues, so they must have some idea: https://www.raspberrypi.com/documentation/computers/raspberr...
I don't think C programmers care whether or not C is technically a programming language
There's plenty of solid, non-conspiracy-theory-based argument in favor of decentralized systems...for many things. I don't think currency/banking will ever be one of them.
There are already thousands of concerts doing that. And yet Woodstock is still there with their prices.

Why do you think that is?
I've used this. It's not everything I want but it's something I can show to the cable internet techs.

https://loggger.com
Which one did the creator use? That's the one that has legitimacy and value.

Legitimacy is basically a coordination game, where you get the best payoff by making the same choice as everyone else. To really dig into this, read this piece by Vitalik:

https://vitalik.ca/general/2021/03/23/legitimacy.html
you don't have to: the code compiles and is valid C++ as-is without issues, unlike when you are using a normal library, say Qt, JUCE or similar.

Each user can then choose what they want to do with it. For instance, the same code can be put on some embedded chip without any UI processing and will be able to be plugged to hardware pretty easily by writing a few lines of simple glue code.
Dum: An NPM scripts runner written in Rust
Many. For a lot of laptop models, you can remove the bezel around the display and unscrew the display from the topcase. That allows you to upgrade/replace panels as-needed. Apple notoriously builds their displays directly into the topcase, which means that when your display malfunctions, or the screen cracks, you generally have to replace the entire top component instead of just the broken part. That's why anything "breaking above the hinge" on a Macbook will run you $600+ to fix no matter who you're paying to replace it.
It's obscene. ResMed includes a SIM in their devices that uploads usage data to them. This isn't disclosed in any meaningful way to patients.
If anyone wants to get into the low-level details of Ethernet, O'Reilly has a good book (a bit old now, so may not have the latest releases):

* https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/ethernet-the-definitive...

A lot of interesting stuff going on with single-pair (two wires):

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethernet_over_twisted_pair#Sin...
It killed someone in a non-urgent non-emergency as it stands

Crash carts and the room in general have all the meds needed to handle urgent issues don't they? You don't often see someone crashing and a nurse running off to grab a script
Mars is, by Earth's standard, tectonically inactive. You should not expect dangerous marsquakes.

Mars is hydrologically impoverished: you should not expect flooding.

Meteorite impacts might be more severe because of the reduced atmosphere, so more small impacts should be expected. Medium and large impacts should be about the same: rare.

The biggest problems on Mars are air, water, and temperature. All of these have scalar efficiencies, so I suspect an optimal arrangement for Mars would be three cities not very far from each other, so as to be able to provide mutual support while avoiding single points of failure.
Jeff, what did you use to measure power consumption?
Factory reset through the Android UI removes the locks and is just like from factory. Factory reset by booting the device to recovery mode does not. That's what FRP is all about.
Have run into this multiple times with them in multiple companies.

For those asking, it's about the "VitualBox 6.1.32 Oracle VM VirtualBox Extension Pack" - it's free to install but phones home and they reach out after a year or two of use and attempt to coerce you into paying for a license. Just ensure everyone has uninstalled it and tell them to go pound sand.
Or if there are responses which would no longer make sense.
MonitorControl is the most native Big Sur UI I've seen from an open source project. Nice.
The NLAW was itself co-developed by Sweden and the UK, and is known in Sweden as the RB-57 [1]. They are manufactured by Thales Air Defence in Belfast, Northern Ireland, using parts supplied by a variety of sub-contractors which include Saab of Sweden.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Next_generation_Light_Anti-tan...
Works for me, but it is a bit slow loading.

Is this a hackernews website hug, thats making it slow to load?
Thanks HN as well. I complain a lot about it, but it's my first read in the morning. There's so much content that satisfies my curiosity.
The GP didn’t mean the cost of the tank… but the cost of the NLAW. Which mentioned elsewhere here is around $40,000.

So, the cost of the anti tank weapon isn’t that far off from the cost of a high-end Camry (XSE V6 $35,820).
> though I also would assume that NASA's life span quotes are probably conservative to avoid the political fallout of "failure."

Isn't that the case with all space agencies? It is usually the best case scenario playing out in most cases, like this one. Even with the JWST, I can safely predict it will last as long as the Hubble, if not longer.
Isn't that a problem worth solving? It had to be solved for banks to work as reliable institutions. Having a single blockchain in the end is probably as bad as having a single bank, although for slightly different reasons.
This is a distorted retelling of history.
Mining pools ultimately did settle on voting in favor of the hard fork, but did so through collusion and lack of transparency.
Most notably, ethermine miners voted against the hard fork, but the pool operators contributed the entire pools votes in favor of the fork any way. There were similar situations with other mining pools, and in general the actual miners were left in the dark. The Ethereum Foundation was communicating with mining pool operators and exchange operators in private chats the entire time all of this was playing out.

Was the hard fork the right move in a pragmatic sense? Probably. But it was not at all the exemplar of decentralized consensus that people seems to remember these days. It was messy and ugly.
I guess so ?
Hi, I've read Voss' "Never Split the Difference". But I do not recommend it. I found it manipulative in a subtle but sleazy way. Also, the FBI bravado was a tad too much for me. At best, my rating of it is: "an okay airport read".

Voss mainly uses ideas from Kahneman's Thinking, Fast and Slow. You're better off reading Kahneman in this case.
Tl;Dr; Fed will continue with Quantitative Tightening -> market interest rates will go up
Writing performant DSP for an FPGA involves using intrinsics/structures specific to the device. A multiply and accumulate for example. Can you easily take advantage of stuff like that in clash? What about using the existing device dependent IP linraries? I agree verilog/vhdl are fairly dated, and not designed for how we use these devices today. An increasing number of people I talk to are generating their designs from hdl coder or model composer type tools.
Or vacuumships? https://www.nasa.gov/directorates/spacetech/niac/2017_Phase_...
Because as you’re growing up you’re supposed to get work on yourself, get more skills hence leading to higher paychecks.
So no, labor isn’t labor.
When i read „may have solved…“, i instantly think: „…but they didn‘t“.
I worked on a project where a device was to be paired to Bluetooth Low Energy device by a non-technical user and send that data somewhere through 3G dongle. It had to be untouched, update its own software, work all the time, recover when there was any problem (lost BLE connection, poor internet coverage, sync data, take a shot at a deliver-once scheme, handle connection errors, handle device swap, and a variety of other issues - I had actual, literal, nightmares related to UTC and time zones -

We used the actor model for that project because it made it easier to deal with exceptions. Even things that usually worked didn't at some point, and to take into account all that could go wrong would have made it much more diffcult because there was always something new that went wrong.
It's an incredible artifact but not very useful as a cooking resource, even the "at home" variants. It is more the kind of thing you have on hand to occasionally reference as you're developing a recipe.

I'm trying to be charitable here but that series is laser-targeted at appealing to people who think science and engineering are virtues, rather than people who actually do cooking. Not that there isn't useful info in it, but it's more of a vanity project than something driven by a real need.
> 2.5% of all customers were accessed by all Sintel employees for the period in question. How many customers did the particular affected Sintel employee access?

Most likely, they don't write it because they may not know themselves. It is not certain that it gets logged perhaps?
> Decentralization is a fantastic idea, and it works great in theory, but it fails to actually consider any of the practical problems that come with decentralization and doesn't consider what people who aren't programmers actually want to do with their time and money.

The fallacy here is most centralized services are implemented on top of the biggest, most successful decentralized system: the web.

> And it's because people don't want to spend time setting up their own shit, they are very happy to pay in either money or data to have someone else do it for them.

I'm not so sure. For really important tasks, I'm routinely amazed by what people cobble together to solve the problem, especially when they can't build software. Perhaps there are just a lot of things that if made easy, provide enough value they are worth buying, but aren't important enough to people to invest a year or two building a product for. Regardless, most modern centralized systems are simply nodes on a decentralized system.
> I care about the bloggers that make these flippant dismissals instead of talking about the impractical things that are possible. I simultaneously observe that the impractical things can be made more practical.

Why, though? What's the sell? What does a decentralized future get me, concretely, that I don't have now? Appeals to user privacy and data ownership aren't concrete things. Concrete things are faster loading times, or new features that are impossible or infeasible in other architectures. In these dimensions -- the only ones that matter -- I can't see how decentralization is anything other than an enormous step backwards?
I did not, I wasn't aware of keepass-diff and certainly it would've been able to solve the problem. But to tell you the truth I don't think I would use it. This is something that I really don't want to have to worry about regardless of what device I'm using.
Google cares about $3000? And how are you going to collect?
Isn't this what a microkernel is supposed to accomplish?
Very nice, thank you for sharing.
Dumb question: for home/hobby type coding, what is the best JDK to install on my Mac?
> How much does Fed actually consider the shape of the yield curve?

Quite a bit. The February MPR cites "yields...across maturities" in the first sentence under financial conditions [1]. (One of the entire novelties of OG QE was the purchase of longer-dated securities.)

[1] https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/2022-02-mpr-su...
During covid, the bond market inverted. To avoid collapse of the bond market the fed was the only one who could step in and print money to buy assets. It's the right thing to do. Nobody is saying they were wrong to do this. Nixon made this possible to do and was inevitable to happen. Though Nixon placed it on manufacturing in the USA. Since his time, manufacturing was shipped out of the borders.

https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/central-bank-bala...

The problem is that they had to do this during the financial crisis and they were clearly unable to exit these 'assets' literally casting shadow on them being labelled assets to begin with. You can even see in 2013-2014 they had to buy more.

They had over 10 years to exit these 'assets' and failed to do so. Even in 2019 there was a temporary dip and then rebuy right before covid.

They say they will be doing $1T/year but that isn't anywhere near where they must go. You can extrapolate where they must go by tracking the line pre-2008. At $1T a year, it will take minimum 7 years to exit.

You'll notice that this 7 years is too long. It's 100% certain that another event will occur before they are complete in which they must buy more. Even ignoring that future prediction, it's 7 years of pain.

So what's about to happen for sure? The bond market will be taking some hits bigtime. We're talking about major negative real yields. The money will come out of retirement funds. Not exactly a prediction given bonds have taken a -2% hit already.

Here's the real prediciton:

https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/money-supply-m2

M2 says there's 40% inflation coming. At 7.9% that's in the area of 3 years.

BUT that 40% doesn't just stay 40%. How does it increase? It actually requires the Fed to exit that ~$7trillion right this month to keep it at 40%. If they don't and they clearly are not planning to do so. We can look at M1 and see where it might go.

https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/money-supply-m1

So there's about 400% to deliver. In their current plan of 1 trillion/year. The USA is saying they are locking in ~200% over the next 3 years. They are saying inflation is going MUCH higher.

Mid term election won't have any major impact on this. 2024 on the otherhand? The real inflation numbers will be out then. Practically handing the election to the republicans.

Meanwhile those of us who aren't in the USA. What are we about to do? We're going to look at new reserve currencies that are more stable. Hence why biden is talking about the new world order. USA will no longer be top dog.
> it's not the third-party's responsibility to account for your hardware when they do software updates

What you're describing here is markedly different than what the gp is referring to: intent matters (determining intent may be difficult in some cases, granted, but it's crystal clear in these specific examples)
The US has a ton of regional variance in cost of living, not sure it makes sense to talk about average in this case.
> but I also like to know that the others in the game are not cheating. and that is impossible without an inaccessible black box, the Xbox

Ignoring the fact that reverse engineering is just a matter or time and pressure, eventually people will start hooking up image recognition auto-aimers to the input/output of these devices... what then? do we enter some kind of minority report era of gaming where you have to get your eyeballs replaced with "unhackable" ones - hope they don't burn out your retinas in an update. Point is, a black box is actually not a complete solution - as long as you can play the game, there will always be a way to cheat.

There are various online FOSS games that are completely open and hackable, where it's very easy to download the source and literally set a condition in the make file to enable "wallhacks" (because that is in-fact a useful debugging feature - talking about ioq3 specifically)... those communities just deal with it the old fashioned way, new players get treated with more scrutiny, admins get good at recognising cheaters (most cheaters are not good at hiding it, and experienced players who would better conceal wall-hacking behaviour etc are less likely to want to play with hacks way anyway). It's far from bullet proof, but so are so called "black boxes" despite their cost to the user.
> That article is just fud. OpenJDK any version is free to use for whatever reason, period

It literally says that in the very article you claim to be FUD.
Have you even bothered to read it? Because it says everything that you did.
Asking a stupid question here, so nobody knows how little I understand macroeconomics.

Inflation is 8% or more. Interest rates are about 0.25%. How can we possibly tame inflation by (e.g.) raising them to 3% or 4%? At that level, it still makes sense to borrow all you can, buy the basket of goods or gold or anything that holds its value in dollar terms, sell it later on, and pay the loan back.

Put another way: the Taylor rule says that the optimal rate is

r = p + 0.5y + 0.5(p - 2) + 2

where p is inflation and y is the output gap. So for p = 8% we get
r = 13% + 0.5y. Unless we're profoundly convinced that the output gap is absolutely huge, then our interest rate is ridiculously too low. Why does the Taylor rule not apply?
In my opinion, there is a reason it has dug up nothing. Please take a look at this modified gravity proposal. It explains galactic rotation rates and also cosmological expansion without the need for dark matter or dark energy. It also adapts general relativity:

https://vixra.org/pdf/2203.0032v2.pdf
> My understanding is that technologists believe that this authority is founded on centralization, and if this centralization were removed, the authority would disappear. I, and likely you as well, don't agree with this at all.

I'm pretty sure the authority (or power) spawns the centralisation, rather than the other way around.
So the thought here is that particle spins/charges/mass/etc. are all encoded in the gravitational field of the black hole?
It's very likely that QE pushed bonds up. Just not as much as stock. Adding money to the economy does not tend to push anything down.
C is Latin. It's not quite dead yet but something spoken in C has the same meaning in all other languages.
Let´s connect on Linkedin!
Yes. However that tank could also have prevented other families from being killed. These days we are seeing Putin's war on TV, but another war inside Ukraine has been ongoing for 8 years now. We couldn't see it on western media, of course, but families and civilians were also killed by the same army we're now supporting. So I won't celebrate either, because here, there are no good and bad.
Correct. Any sensible judge will lynch the attorney.
Same, I have been using snap to run Firefox and Chromium for about more than a year (personal usage, not professional), and rarely had issues. I had one issue regarding a feature like WebGL or a file picker, but it was solved after 5 minutes of googling, and it was about running a single command line to give more permissions to the snap package. This way of distribution works quite well for big applications with many dependencies that you want to be automatically updated without fear of breaking some shared libraries.

I also feels more confident trying new applications with snap. I know I can easily install different versions and uninstall them without breaking the system.