skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I bought 10 of these[1] about 4 years ago for the kids, and several more times since. The USB-A side is reversible, and the other side combines lightning and micro-usb into a single connector that'll work in either one. And I can't recall if it's this cord or another I have, but the micro-usb side may be reversible as well.

When the kids were getting to the age where they had their own devices, the learning phase was painful (for me more so than them). They kept getting confused between the lightning cable used for their iPad and the micro-usb cables used for everything else (like their battery pack and the random kid gadgets they had that used micro-usb for power supply). Their learning phase was painful (for me) as they'd try whatever cord they came across first in whatever device they needed it for, and continue that cycle until they got a match. And with no sense of how easy it is to break charging ports, they'd be pretty aggressive about it. Same with trying the USB-A side of the cord in the charger/battery, aggressively trying one direction before finally flipping it to try the other (and flipping it again because third try's the charm).

The kids love them because they Just Work for everything with no fuss (at least until recently when USB-C started popping up in some stuff like their Bluetooth headphones). The durability is a bit mixed, as some of the cords started having issues after just a few months while others are still going strong after years of daily use. But between how handy they are and the price, it's worth just treating them as expected consumables and getting enough at once to stockpile.

[1] https://www.aliexpress.com/item/32847997542.html
No solid information on that third generation https://www.notebookcheck.net/Intel-12th-gen-Alder-Lake-S-wi...

I just bought a 12400 mostly because it was 15% cheaper than the 5600x and it comes with an iGPU. You're right that it's unclear whether 13th or 14th gen will be an upgrade or possible, respectively.
https://archive.ph/M2F3j
According to some napkin math, the average American household would need to buy ~$20k in bonds over the QT period. This is on the order of the average amount of savings/investments per household.
India taxes petroleum that much not to generate more revenue -- for they can always raise the sales tax rates -- but to reduce consumption and keep the balance of payments in check.
Since GitLab for Open Source isn't affected, who will actually be affected by this in practice?
I subscribe to Spotify and I agree it is a travesty - hopefully some day we get a platform that is as easy to use and is not so unfriendly to artists.
I certainly agree that the author of an automation deserves credit/copyright for its output.

But imagine I build something that spits out as many binary sequences as possible. Do I then have a copyright to all the "works" that can be interpreted from it in various data formats I may have accidentally met?

This question is about intention, not authorship.
You lose the non-git history (discussions, PR context, issues, etc) as well as CI. If it was just commits, git is easily installed.
The article doesn't provide any details, but a "subscription" would imply that you lease the device monthly from Apple, which owns it.

iPhone Upgrade Program involves you buying a phone outright, financed via a loan from Citizens Bank. The loan is written so that you have certain rights to turn in the phone, buy a new one, and that clears out the remaining original loan balance regardless of the phone's value.
Unrelated blog post: For a web app I recently designed a "favoriting/bookmarking" system that was requested by several people.

Only like two to three people used it for a while, before they left for other jobs.

Now no one uses it.
Nestor notes that nasal surgery has its own risks of complications. Before surgery, it sounds like fat reduction (through not snacking, and increasing the time between meals, and starting meals with above-ground vegetables and fats and proteins, and reducing sugars significantly [0]) and breathing through the nose as much as possible (even going so far as to tape shut the mouth--worked for me; after less than a year of applying vertically a 1cm-wide strip of medical tape to my lips I habitually breathe through my nose at night) are important steps.

There's another book about breath that you might be interested in, which includes a chapter on breathing for healing [1].

[0] Life in the Fasting Lane (public library) https://www.worldcat.org/title/life-in-the-fasting-lane-how-...

[1] Breath Taking (public library) https://www.worldcat.org/title/breath-taking-the-power-fragi...
Exactly, indeed. One of the links I gave shows how to use a 6BK4B rectifier tube for the purpose. No special X-ray tube or glasswork required. Most of the high voltage parts can be scavenged from old color tvs or monitors. Remember, though, only bad things will happen and the inside of a color tv is not a place of honor, no great deed is commemorated there, nothing of value is stored there...

Edit: that might sound tongue-in-cheek but please take it as hahah, only serious. You can hurt yourself with these things, you probably don't have a good reason to be experimenting with them, and if you do need to learn how to work with high voltage or ionizing radiation safely, this is not the place and I am not teaching you.
an oldie but a goodie: https://www.quirksmode.org/blog/archives/2009/09/the_html5_d...
Httrack?
Managing Rejection Crisis: Letter to Us(men)
JEP 422: Linux/RISC-V Port
I think laziness would be a distraction here. The idea of encoding effects as "action values" is relevant and interesting, even under eager evaluation.

Certainly laziness has influenced a lot of things in the world of FP. But it's really helpful to distinguish laziness from FP, especially considering the problems that laziness introduces.
No the "we'll pay for it!" comments were in the context of the staff being let go and departments spun down. We meant, we'll pay to keep this high quality content going.

No one said, sure yeah fire all those folks, flail around for a year, convince people to just give free content for funsies, then we'll slap a price tag on it so the exec bonuses can keep getting higher.

We'd pay for the old Mozilla that cared about a high quality web. That Mozilla appears to be long dead.
I used to drink alone because I was bored. I used to drink socially because everyone, or it seemed like everyone, was doing it. Ones partners drinking habits can have a huge impact on ones own drinking habits.
I really hate this mind set. Every single human being that ever lived is a ridiculously intelligent entity. It isn’t funny or cute to pretend otherwise and just because some people dedicate that intelligence to things you or I don’t agree with, or just because they don’t care about the same things as us, doesn’t make them less self aware than any other person.
Remember Aaron Swartz!
https://bobkonf.de/2019/hsu.html
Do we need Energy Labels for software?
I'm not sure what you're saying. AWS literally has a free tier. They're playing the same game as Gitlab, and part of that is paying for potential customers to get access to a baseline level of service to grow their experience with the product and generate goodwill.

I don't have any inside details, but I'd suspect that AWS also pays for PR, either through an internal team or external vendors. So "customer goodwill" is (probably) something they pay money for. Real dollars. This isn't free; you have to pay for it somehow. Whether it's dollars to fund a PR team (and the whole funnel of marketing/sales/etc.), or through free tiers designed to spread by word of mouth... you can't expect to acquire customers for free.
I feel like lightning cables don't last as long as USB cables, but lightning ports last much longer than micro/mini USB ports. Since I can buy many new cables for the price of a phone, I'm happy with that tradeoff.
This is what I do as well.
I wonder how many Halo infinite players will know the origins of lightish red going back to Halo CE, specifically the RvB web series.
I've been out of the video game trend loop since Halo 2, and am not sure if the modern attention span of a few months at best enables 10+ year old easter eggs like that to be understood.
I certainly appreciate it, but I also will probably never play Infinite.
After further cooling, most of the electrons became bound to nuclei, and all the matter became plasma, like most of the matter in the present universe still is (because most of the matter is inside the stars).

When electrons bind to nuclei, a plasma turns into a neutral gas, this happened in the recombination phase. The neutral gas then collapsed into stars which turned the gas making up the stars back into plasma. Also the energetic photons emitted by stars started turning the remaining gas back into a plasma which is called the reionization phase.
Ok, so the major difference from the current setup is that instead of you owning the phone, Apple will retain ownership. That is a pretty big difference. Especially if they start offering iPads that way too.
Fair, though I wonder if that's indicative of the problem not being as simple as just explain it to a human.
Do you also get confused by free food tastings in grocery stores?
I did this a few years ago too. Turned my website in to static content and hosted it on Github Pages. Made all my sub-site project pages in to repos, moved the blog content to Github wiki pages, pointed my domain at it and done and done. I used to spend less than the author, $5 a month for my small VPS, but at the end of the day I realized less can be more and moved it all on to Github.
Well, it's hard to be happy when it requires you to actually be able to do what you want to do. Social hierarchy, resources and even brain chemistry are not in everyone's favour.

Contentness can be learned, though.

Or just use that brainpower and create medication that tricks the primitive parts of the brain into being happy. Profit!
What if someone views HTML source code there? Did they put that into consideration?
I think that's the point. Schema migration is traditionally a _very_ risky thing but they're trying to make it come off as "safe", if you're a PlanetScale customer.
I'm curious how often people are needing offline access to documentation for web development.
You can grab the full repo with the content here: https://github.com/mdn/content
As others have pointed out, $19/user/month is just not an option for many small teams, especially with non-western costs.

I guess we'll start planning the migration but it's really disappointing not to be able to pay a reasonable fee and then be kicked out on a 3-months notice.

I've seen complaints about this business model for a while on HN but never got the chance to understand Gitlab's reasoning for sticking to this pricing.
You’re missing the point of what the court is saying.

The court is saying “the [typewriter] didn’t write the book, you wrote the book using a [typewriter]”

Replace [typewriter] with any technology.
And force birth control to keep numbers from rising too quick?
I guess it depends on what the definition of a SMR is. A Terrestrial Energy is a 400-500MWe.

I think those kinds of reactors are just much smaller then your PWRs but its not exactly SMRs.

We should focus on GenIV designs.

However I would not be opposed to bulding traditional designs but it must be proven and have people who have done it before available.
It's a spiral as well. Drinking helps with the stress in the moment but increases anxiety so then you drink more to cope with increased stress and anxiety...
I'd say yes. To the point that when I started recovering, I voluntarily went in parks to sit around people. Their lives would re-trigger other, warmer, emotions in me. In a way to counter the probability that I would go back to negative self-talk.

Emotions are a weird thing, people can talk you out of them, or reduce their impact on your reality a lot.
I have some trouble making it work in Chrome and Firefox (Win 10). Your parent's code does work, so maybe you introduced a bug when editing the code?
This is only inspirationally relevant, but a few weeks ago, I saw a crow (or a raven, never quite sure) holding a stick, floating without moving, on top of Twin Peaks in SF, like it was waiting to give a wand to a wizard. When I got home, I wrote this weird little story about it: https://f52.charlieharrington.com/stories/a-great-unkindness...
It’s an intersection of those two things. Hawks can profitably prey on squirrels, while lions could not.

There’s room in the security market for $10/mo/user products and room for <whatever it is that Teleport charges>. If not, they’ll find out in an expensive and painful fashion…

Given that they have paying customers, their price is justified to at least those customers.
GitLab has its share of downtime. I don't use GitHub regularly so I can't really compare the two, but you will occasionally have a few hours where GitLab is down. Maybe 2 or 3 times per year?
I agree, people tend to want to throw babies out with the bathwater. There is a trend of rejecting that which worked for previous generations but which also came with costs or compromises we no longer find acceptable. Rather than find ways to correct, like you say, instead we over-correct.

I do think shame as a tool is a crude one, and people can and should try do better. The trouble is shame is easy and doing better is hard. Many of us literally don't have the tools to do better. It requires higher choices, understanding interpersonal dynamics well enough to behave in un-intuitive ways, and personal sacrifice in order to coexist and connect with people who are suffering. If the average person had these abilities I don't think we'd need to have this conversation.

I don't think shame should be encouraged, but I doubt it makes sense to actively discourage it without an alternative that makes sense to people and is readily practiced. That's a hard problem.

With my kids I encourage them to think of what the other person is experiencing, think about why they'd invoke shameful words about someone or something, and generally try to reframe what they're thinking about. That alone can be helpful in thinking more constructively rather than destructively. Usually shaming something occurs out of discomfort, fear, and/or insecurity. Once you begin to recognize that addiction like alcoholism often stems from bad experiences, a lack of connection, a lack of community, etc - you begin to think of the person as someone burdened with more than most humans can handle, and recognize the necessity for support rather than your own desire to reject them or their habits.

Again, not a trivial thing, but one I believe is typically going to be more helpful than reaching for shame.

Maybe I'm wrong but at least shame indicates that people care. No reaction or concern whatsoever would probably be the worst reaction of all.
I’d love to hear which aspects of the medical system you think work this way. I’m looking for other examples to write the broader essay on understanding averages but I’m not completely sure which particular issue you mean here.
And the remaining 10% of problems? What are they?
I think OP means native app. JS based Electron apps are noticeably less responsive and suck a lot more battery+RAM than native apps, easily a 10x difference.
AFAIR it was there I saw that 50% of mafia members ann. earlings are less than $19500, with extra being assets I’ve mentioned above.
I feel that's because too many people still aren't seeing what their sites look like on mobile devices. I'm sure the perma-banner looked fine on desktop.
You should get meta and list microns.io itself if you haven’t.
Why do musicians hate the "non-classical" concerts?
Crows and ravens continue to amaze me every day. I'm fairly sure that there are a lot of humans that cannot ponder the content of their own mind.

Makes me feel bad for using the insult "bird brain" in the past.
Deployability (or lack thereof.)
Uranium mines are a finite resource
> Real improved search efforts need to somehow change the content that's out there at the same time as they improve they experience

Yes, this is our key takeaway too. However, that doesn't translate to "google has a much deeper moat than most people realize". The current state of search doesn't engender much loyalty. While it would take a lot to ditch Google entirely, it wouldn't take much to start eating away at some small class of queries.
During the 2000s Windows (and probably Mac but I didnt use it back then) made it way more difficult than it should be to quickly write GUI apps and allow them to be ran on multiple platforms. For obvious reasons given the time it was just another way to lock developers and their users on to a platform. Given this environment the market shifted towards the web as a way of handling this and now it just doesn’t make a lot of sense to revert back to OS specific APIs.
Could you send a link? I thought _I_ was cool for just making a thermoform mold of my teeth that I've been documenting at https://www.tiktok.com/@unofficial_denta.istry
I feel like this entire article was written without the ability to conceive of another way of thinking or that there are other people who think differently than you. They are entirely optimizing for their own ability to mouth off an opinion without doing any hard work. For the author, maybe it's great if people go off with half-cocked, poorly-researched, and fundamentally misguided criticisms that stem from complete misunderstandings. But for me, it annoys me when people write long missives about some stuff they barely understand but feel good to them. They usually aren't trying to understand, they aren't trying to help other people understand, and certainly aren't helping out the authors whom they are criticizing.

Instead, people who do this are just shoveling more confusion, reinforcing tribal lines in some cases, and frankly, muddying the waters.

I'll give an example. Relativity. There is absolutely no doubt in the physics community that Relativity is a.) a thing b.) well-understood mathematically c.) explains physical reality remarkably well, being supported by vast amounts of evidence. And yet general relativity is not yet unified with quantum theory.

Do we need more cranks who a.) do not understand the underlying mathematics and b.) do not understand what the fundamental shortcoming is, in detail, firing off articles "criticizing" it? Hells no. These types of things should be debated by physicists and mathematicians who do actually thoroughly understand these things. Physics journals won't suffer amateur hour, and they shouldn't. Physics journals, and all scientific publishing venues, subject articles to review that try to elevate the level of discourse by checking and re-checking claims.

But the internet is not journals, sure. It's a free-for-all. It has elevated so many random voices to a level of authority that it is not possible to weed through claims at speed; cranks make themselves look like experts. An experts understate their own confidence. The internet is a massive Dunning-Krueger melting pot.

I will absolutely push back on the idea that the problem we have right now is that the expectations are too high. You mean you have to understand what a person is saying, maybe even talking to the person first, before you launch a volley of utter nonsense at them? The humanity.
This actually is a very good product.

Pain points it addresses:
1. Notify when something changes
2. No clear and customizable learning path

Business outcomes:
1. Generate revenue keeping privacy intact

It seems to me this is a good solution. No need to make it about their head of product.
I write mostly desktop and command line tools for my day job.

While there's benefits to writing a web app which can do everything for a user, the main desktop app I develop and share with colleagues sits on top of user permissions that they have to negotiate themselves.

The reason for it: Compliance. Having a self-service tool which just automates work a user can do themselves using their existing permissions, instead of a centrally managed one where there's a service account used for the work is less likely to be killed off because of compliance issues, or identified as "shadow IT", or just outright denied the right to exist because I can't get a corporate sponsor to host it.

My personal projects I also prefer writing the same way, with scripts, commandline tools, or desktop apps. For example: I wanted to download every episode of a podcast in one go recently, and discovered that most podcatchers suck these days and the one I used to use is broken on Win10. So I banged out a script in an hour or so do to the job, rather than use some half-functional bloated mobile or web app.
I think the real question here is when consciousness evolved and where did it evolve from? Researchers have always felt a cerebral cortex is necessary to experience "consciousness" but crows have confirmed that's not necessary which only deepens the mystery:

This research has important consequences for our understanding of the evolution of higher intelligence. First, a cerebral cortex is not needed, and there are other anatomical means to achieve the same outcome. Second, either the evolution of consciousness is very ancient, tracing back to the last common ancestor of mammals and birds about 320 million years ago, or, equally intriguing, consciousness arose at least twice later on, independently in mammals and birds. Both options raise the likelihood, in my view, that higher intelligence on other planets may not necessarily be mammal or human-like, but could very well be birdlike.

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/air-space-magazine/crows-are-...
Then how do you trust the replication-studies? Just keep replicating them, too?

The overall process assumes trustworthiness. The better that assumption holds, the better science performs.
Yup. If you take out social pressure the "benefits" of booze are pretty low. Many people only drink because other people around them are drinking. That is not really a good reason to take a serious drug.
Why are you assuming passive monitoring from one and active from the other?
Do we have enough info to even pinpoint this type of data to him (or her) ? I was under the impression the links were nebulous at best. But I do not know that much about Satoshi
> Neither is invading another country.

Indeed. Except, did I elect this president? No I did not (and elections in Russia are more of an illusion anyway). Can I do something to stop him? No I can't. What's the point of this act then? Putin and his allies don't use npm. This can't affect them by any stretch of imagination.

> Someone didn't delete the files. You deleted them yourself by blindly trusting 3rd party software that you got for free with no guarantees of anything.

Yes, of course, npm is at fault here for downloading untrusted code and running it with no sandboxing whatsoever on behalf of your OS user. This kind of stuff used to be called an RCE vulnerability and used to cause people to issue urgent security patches, but somehow, now it's considered a perfectly normal way of doing things. At the very least, there should be a permission request if this untrusted code tries to access anything outside of the project directory.