skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I personally don't think even that is true.

- Culturally, the 90's were ripe with moral panics over satanism, gender expression, obscenity, etc... That could be a longer conversation, but the short version is that there was a ton of speech suppression happening in the 90's and early 2000's.

- Technologically, our mediums today (as problematic as they are) still allow for a greater ease of communication with a wider audience than they did in the 90's. There are developments online since the 90's that I don't like, and I worry about centralization online. But the earlier decentralized Internet was also very insular and inaccessible to a lot of people, and I think that gets lost from conversations about Internet freedom. More people have access to the Internet today and more people have access to publishing platforms today.

- In terms of mass media, there is again worrying consolidation happening, but it is nevertheless still the case that getting your message out to a wide audience in 2022 is easier than it was in 1990. Podcasts, video streaming, site deployment, etc... is all easier to do today than it was in the past.

Stuff like game development, music production, and so on are also easier today than they were in 1990. That's not to say that they're perfect or can't be improved, but I think back to the Flash boom, and that didn't really start until the early 2000's and it really was a different level of accessibility for making games, including games about political and social topics. In the same vein, a quick reminder that Youtube as a site was not founded until 2005 and until 2010 the max video length was only 10 minutes. Podcasts didn't really start to catch on among the public until the late 2000's. Patreon was launched in 2013, providing a very simple, mainstream way for at least some creators to self-fund their own work by directly interacting with fans.

----

I think people forget sometimes how new all of this stuff is. And again, that ignores how much straight-up censorship and how many moral panics were happening during that time period, but even just from a technological perspective, if I have a message I need to get out, I would rather do it in the 2020's than the 1990's.

I could maybe see an argument that we're on a technological downtick from the 2010's, but honestly I don't even believe that. Even with all of the platform problems we have online (and it is a problem for our online communication to be so centralized and there are problems about where some platforms are headed), I still feel like almost everything today about media production and dissemination is just so much easier than it used to be. About the only thing I really miss is Flash, and I don't even really think that's a tech problem, I think many of those developers have just moved over to programs like Unity.

Not to say everything is perfect or everything has gotten better, just... I think people have rose-colored glasses that they wear when looking back at those times.
See also Motel of the Mysteries -- a YA-level book, lavishly illustrated -- about a far-future society uncovering an early-80s motel and interpreting it as a burial complex, dedicated to the tiling-god Mica and dating from the height of the now-vanished Empire of Usa.
Nushell 0.60 Released
Not universally true, Putin and Xi Jinping have more power than tech companies in their countries.

America decided 231 years ago that private actors would have more power over speech than the government.
So, obviously, I think formatting (even if we talk about plaintext that isn't modified) is important and I do think a screenshot and maybe a short screencast - those are all important things. But suppose you couldn't display images or even link to them. How does one find the right words? I guess that's my question, yes. Words.
I love the question and the sibling reply by tgflynn. Yes, this
happens, it's normal, especially in your 30s. Great isn't it!?
Stopping "living out other people's dreams" (the ones you were told
you should have) is a major milestone of maturity. And once past it on
the path, it keeps getting better. Add a sprinkle of daily gratitude,
an inner revolution of lowered expectations, some celebration of the
ordinary miracles around us. Find something to move towards, but not
so unambitious that you'll ever get there. And one or two people to
love.
The "Nazi" accusations are flying both ways in this conflict
> It's a common argument but I've never really found it a compelling one.

You can literally make your own twitter any time you want. My charitable view is that people are actually complaining about a monopoly on attention. It's an interesting subject but doesn't have anything to do with speech.
Do you have an attorney? You mention a settlement but nothing about any legal representation. You should NOT be communicating with the company AT ALL EXCEPT THROUGH A LAWYER. Anything you say to the company will be noted and used against you. And as you already realized, they don't care about your situation.

I'm not a lawyer, but from what I'm reading it sounds like you have a case with a death of a minor, evidence of negligence, and potentially a company history of similar lawsuits. This is ALL in your favor.

Please get yourself a lawyer if you haven't. Find out your legal deadlines, etc. Once you know your timeframe, get a therapist and possibly a psychiatrist. The former works through your grief through discussion, the second can prescribe medication if the first deems that discussion and cognitive techniques aren't enough. (I don't recommend medication until you have tried regular therapy for a while and not been successful with it at all.)
> The DOJ also said, "it is well settled that copying an attorney does not confer privilege" on its own.

One of my financial success goals was to have the lawyers that would be able to cite the case law supporting a statement like that.

I have that for some industries (and its a fools errand to have it for all industries all the time), and have learned a lot along the way. Its interesting to see organizations employ the utility of lawyers to this degree.

Aside from having reality shaping counsel, I like that it raises the cost of investigation by orders of magnitude. Makes the government think twice, or thrice, before inconveniencing anyone.
I don't recommend it.

It is incredibly intense-- even traumatic. And there is no precise "dosing".

Stay away from all drugs. Drugs do not lead to enlightenment. They do not lead to some hidden knowledge. They throw your neuro-chemicals out of balance-- potentially forever if you're misfortunate.

Hallucinogens can affect you forever, negatievely, and never stop-- and there is no cure if they do, for example: "Hallucinogen-persisting perception disorder (HPPD) is a long-lasting and potentially permanent syndrome characterized by a spontaneous recurrence of perceptual/visual disturbances".

It is not worth the risk. You have only one brain-- don't tamper with its health and safety. Again-- there's no hidden knowledge there, no enlightenment. It's not worth it: put your focus on something valuable, productive, and safe.
They have more mediums that they can publish to, it is easier than ever before for them to get support and to connect with communities, and legal protections have literally never been better.

Yes. Now everybody has a megaphone and it's too noisy to hear anything. This leads to heavy self-selection of inputs. The real battle today is not over who can say what. It's what people should be listening to.

For the current war, not much is being censored after the source. You can read all the positions: Russia Today, China Daily, South China Morning Post, One America News Network, CNN, Fox, the Voice of America, the BBC, Reuters, the office of the President of Ukraine... Plus vast amounts of stuff on Twitter. Few people do that. They tend to obtain info from one source they more or less agree with.
“The Apple Studio Display Is a Bad Deal” [video]
Fast food is significantly automated, though. Depending on the chain, you get various different parts of the process centrally automated, and standardized food components and ingredients are shipped out to restaurant locations or franchisees. Only prep and assembly are deferred to the very end, from the various standard components. The reason fast food works, and is consistent enough that you can expect the same Chalupa in California and New York City, is absolutely automation and centralization.

I think the bigger likelihood here is that JIT assembly of a few components into many distinct products with differences in technique or ratio is still cheaper to do with manual labor.
Is it actually worth buying from that company? Arent they the ones with incredibly delayed crowdfunding projects? It looks like a great monitor spec wise, but what kind of company are you buying from?
I'm an American physician. I've practiced in a couple of specialties and know the insurance billing drill (or should I say game) pretty well.

Medical record systems, as other comments point out, have been constructed for the benefit of administrators, recording clinical data is mainly to support administrative needs.

In reality manifestations of a given illness vary continuously across a wide spectrum. It means patients with the same diagnosis have differing sets of symptoms and course of illness. As I like to say it, "no two patients have exactly the same disease."

Official disease classification schemes embody the "splitter" model which attempts to fit continuous data into discrete categories. Of course sharp-edged distinctions suit purposes like billing and other management operations.

However diagnosis is often ambiguous, mixed or multiple, but no matter what categorical diagnoses must be assigned. Unsurprisingly doctors are biased to select the choices with the greatest reimbursement, and "stretching" criteria to cover the patient's condition (or vice versa) is not at all uncommon. (Also, there's not assigning diagnoses where it might negatively impact payment.)

EHR clinical data follows the discrete assumptions of the system design. This can create an impedance mismatch between clinician observations and data input. This may be troublesome, for example, in specialties (behavioral health) where data is complex with many overlapping subtle but meaningful variations.

I've often received records after a patient has been hospitalized. More than not it's difficult to understand the course of treatment as there's no coherent summary or narrative description provided. The "pile of data" literally transcribed from the EHR isn't very useful to human readers. To be sure information like lab reports, etc., are good to have, but the marginalized human-to-human element is troublesome.

EHR clinical data failing to serve ML purposes could only point to problematic EHR system design. Though I've been aware of EHR limitations, I wouldn't have guessed about ML issues. The article taught me something about the problem that exists. Now it remains to be seen what can or will be done about it.
Researcher Guidelines
I don't think you'll get uni students to use something like that. Really just a filterable calendar that can somehow scrape info from the fbook groups and give me contact information would be wonderful.

But I've heard scraping facebook isn't a good idea, so... here we are.
I think it is part of an effort of the democratic party to move back to the centre ahead of the midterm elections. A lot of the progressive agenda is toxic electorally.
> How do you want Google to solve this?

The current way Google is asking me to verify makes no sense. I don't know the password for the email, how do they expect me to go into that email and verify the code when I don't know the password.

> And how can they be certain you’re the owner?

I am already verifying the code from the SMS that Google is sending to the phone number on the account.

I know that there's no way to actually get this done, but I can verify that's it's my account.

I can verify that I'm the owner of the account Google has been sending the payments for AdSense.

I can verify by signing in from the usual devices that the account was previously signed in from.

Suggest me another sensible way, I'll do it because I'm the owner.
I'm sure it's technically possible, but things were starting to feel hackier and hackier and already the latency was a no-go, so the value proposition was becoming less convincing. I'm still using it for user auth though, that seems to work well so far.
As an aside, used thin clients and industrial PCs are a good x86 alternative to the Pi if you require similar performance and don't need GPIO. They are quite plentiful on ebay, include a housing, and consume little power.
I watched that podcast and didn't see it. Given that it was a prosecution over a difference of opinion over what constitutes discussion of "sanctions" in a call they had a recording of, with only an FD-302 for evidence of what was said, where the only copy was from months after the fact.

I don't know that I listened to every podcast, so you an point out a quote if there was one, but I sure don't remember anything like the word "chickensh-t" coming up. Instead, there were a lot of longwinded debates over who had the better substantive argument for how long a prosecution that was dismissed could be maintained by the court.

Which seems patently absurd given that they are violating separation of powers there. But it's political, so concerns about a judge playing prosecutor were simply tossed out the window? What was the end result of that supposed to be, anyway? A criminal referral... to the people dropping the case?

Those seem like awfully big concerns to sweep away in a mealy-mouthed discussion of substantive factors where he honestly didn't sound like he was taking a side.

And I'm pretty sure we've both been listening to him for a long time, since I sorta think it was one of your comments a really long time ago that made me start reading his stuff. Do you really not see any changes?

I'd say his tone started changing about the time he had that feud and split with his former friend Clark.
Pretty sure they want to break out of the core userbase. I once interviewed there and they really stressed that they were a 3D platform and not just a game engine.

In that context it would make sense to make demos for the capabilities that people don't know that you have.
Edit: Lol, I was looking at my previous submissions to HN and I noticed that I'd submitted[3] LavaMoat just a few weeks ago! Maybe with this recent Protestware stuff going on, that project can get a few more contributors wanting to help out.

------

Nice! Thanks for sharing that link. I've done a bit of digging into that project before and it's definitely a very promising idea.

It has a lot of the same pitfalls as Dyno, imo, in that it would require somebody to define a "security policy" for every module to whitelist permissions.

But, it's also something that could maybe be attached similarly to how TypeScript types are "retroactively" added for existing vanilla JS NPM packages. Ie, packages that have never added their own type declarations (like `express`) can have their types added to DefinitelyTyped[0] and published as a separate NPM package (`@types/express`).

It works fairly well and something like `@endo-policies/express` wouldn't be crazy to add in later. Obviously it's going to be super painful, but fixing tech debt is always going to hurt.

vm2[1] is another Node project with some semi-similar goals that's worth mentioning. It's not designed to be "applied" in the same way as Endo, but it does give you a way to "sandbox" dependencies.

As a security person, I am weary to trust something like vm2 because it is much harder to "get right" than a "sandboxed-by-default" approach like Endo or Dyno. Look at this[2] CVE on vm2 from a few months ago for some evidence about _why_ this approach isn't ideal.

I'm optimistic for the future but we still have a long way to go before we get to it!

0: https://github.com/DefinitelyTyped/DefinitelyTyped

1: https://www.npmjs.com/package/vm2

2: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-6pw2-5hjv-9pf7

3: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30280642
> For people to stop calling it "cancel culture" whenever they face reasonable consequences for actions they take that harm others would be a good start.

the article is about free speech, but you sneak in the word actions, and then you label the damage (of free speech) as harm to others, and the consequences as reasonable. Therefore, I'd say you fit what this editorial is about, "many on the left refuse to acknowledge that cancel culture exists at all, believing that those who complain about it are offering cover for bigots to peddle hate speech."
aka "enhance": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vxq9yj2pVWk
You are equating government imprisonment with public cancellation here because they both have a chilling effect, but we very quickly run into the paradox of tolerance: do you restrict the expression of "cancelling" to protect other speech?

Those Nazis you use an example of abhorrent speech that must be allowed were calling for communists to be rounded up and killed for their views. Surely that is partaking in cancellation?

Who cancels the cancellers?
Scalping happens when the list price is lower than the market price.

Nobody scalps shares of Alphabet, because the price floats. Merchants don't want to increase list prices, because they'll get yelled at, so instead they run out of stock and middlemen collect the arbitrage price. If you don't like it, tell stores to increase prices, and tell CNN to stop running stories about how awful greedy businessmen are causing inflation purely out of spite.
It is a race to the bottom nevertheless. While on one side minimum wage is pushed higher, on the other technology gets cheaper. Eventually even burger flippers will find themselves out of a job.
I don’t know of any definition of cancel culture that would fit. That’s moderation.

Cancel culture would be if they put your profile or picture on the front page as an example of being a terrible person who has done things every right thinking person should not, and no one should think of employing or working with you - because they didn’t like your comments.
China wins in all cases; everybody else is a loser.
Zero is sometimes a natural number and sometimes not. N is written as N_+ or N_0 sometimes to indicate which one is being used.
> “Though BuzzFeed is a profitable company, we don’t have the resources to support another two years of losses,” [Peretti said]

This part confuses me. The newsroom is a loss, but buzzfeed as a whole is profitable, got it. But if buzzfeed as a whole is profitable even with the news division in the red, what does it mean to say you "don't have the resources to support another two years of losses"?
If memory serves, there was less than 1 game per PS3 sold at launch.
> The reason seems to be: kids are cheaper than machines

I'd rephrase that as kids are cheaper to fix than machines. A burger flipper machine is almost definitely more efficient and cheaper per burger, but when it breaks its probably a lot more expensive to fix or replace than a kid.

It's the same idea, but I think that you need to separate the "cost per burger per hour per hour" and the "cost per burger per hour per year" since only one of those will consider the cost of unexpected costs.
Not saying that their process is right, but I searched for 3 small companies that I know are running with Okta and found them in this list.
I for one did. Or at least that it was going to make the argument that "automation creates more jobs than it destroys" that you sometimes hear.
No - JRR Tolkien was already dead by 1980.
I think there was definitely a potential balance.

To retain culture, and to forge a national identity without appearing weak and establishing a Roman policy of "buying off enemies", and, "using citizenship as part of the buy".

This set up precedent for military service (auxiliaries to citizen). I guess we could call it the flawed path to citizenship......
Not just a Blu-ray player, but one that is guaranteed to be able to play practically all blu-ray discs as long as Blu ray discs are made or the console hardware fails.

Sony pushed updates to the firmware. Most commodity Blu ray players don't have an (easy) way to update.
Sounds like a vague political harm, not a focused individual one - which seems to be the complaint around cancel culture abuses?
What's the difference? If they are perpetually sold out, then they cannot be purchased.
Considerations for African American Volunteers in Ukraine (Peace Corps)
I am still not convinced that readability comes before functionality.

Imagine a developer building a PR for 2 weeks, then reviews back and forth for 2 more weeks. Now 4 weeks have passed and only now the reviewer reviews the functionality - only to find that the entire implementation is wrong/could be done in a better way.

What a waste of 4 weeks of both the author and the reviewer! This could have been short-circuited very early in the process.

On my team, we default to early feedback on functionality and let the CI enforce what it can. Everything else is debatable.
Asus Rog Stryx G17 is awesome gaming laptop with 17'' monitor and only 2.4kg

https://rog.asus.com/laptops/rog-strix/2021-rog-strix-g17-se...)

I use it for development, devops and gaming and can't be happier.
Consumer boycotts are not new. They have a long history including the Boston Tea Party that kicked off America.
What does the pipefail part do?
Is your conclusion here not something that is already established? (Outside of Marxist theory, which would quite emphatically affirm the point, with the addendum that it is a fundamental "contradiction" within capitalism).

I think it seems obvious though, not only the fact that profit seeking would override productivity when they are at odds, but also that the economy needs to sustain unskilled worker reserves.

Also, I bet even teenagers still do a better job than robots for kitchen work, but your point still stands.
My point is cancel culture is not very chilling if you're a competent speaker/writer, and it ought to be even less chilling than it is (possibly not chilling at all).

If you believe you're entering a conversation with positive intent, a genuine point of view, and empathy for others, you are more or less immune to being cancelled.
Then you better pray to whatever deity you hold dear that the judge presiding over this case, and the attorney litigating against you are both absolute idiots, who won't see what you are trying to do.

Generally speaking, judges don't like it when you try to hack the law.
Is this true of the OOTB GKE nginx ingress? Hard to tell by 'load balancer' do they mean nginx ingress reverse proxy?

I can imagine the delay between updating the GCP global load balancer service from GKE would be much higher than nginx-ingress reacting to changes in pod health/endpoints.

Either way I guess the takeaway is there is a race there between endpoints being updated and those updates propagating, and seems like that isn't handled as perfectly as people assume, and this likely gets worse with node contention and Kube API performance problems.
If you say something and someone calls you an idiot it's free speech but if hundreds do it at the same time it's bullying.
Seems like it's bordering on push-scooter levels of top speed and stability...what's the benefit of such a small bike compared to a scooter?
Every time something like this comes up I am reminded of The Toxoplasma Of Rage:

https://slatestarcodex.com/2014/12/17/the-toxoplasma-of-rage...

YOU KNOW WHAT NOBODY HATES EACH OTHER ABOUT YET? FREE SPEECH.