skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
That may be, but I suspect most users expect a browser, a way to message friends (whatsapp or telegram in most western countries) and a maps app. Games are popular too. Being able to call and send SMS is secondary. I think not having a good maps is a big issue, hopefully they'll be able to patch that eventually. Until then, maybe google maps is not too bad on the mobile browser?
There is a universal aspect to attraction but is culturally mediated by institutions and technologies of the body and telecommunications.

In online dating for instance the sheer volume of persons sampled requires the participant to make a quick cut based on looks, creates an illusion that there is more choice than there is which causes people to delay making a decision.
I wouldn't call it good. But better than nothing, I guess.
That's not a common usage of "corrupt", I think?
It's funny, before I knew about React (this was ~2014), I wrote a ~7ksloc webapp with jquery and underscore that also just used memory for state and triggered a re-render of things when inputs changed. I haven't dug into how React works at a deep level lately, but at the time, for my relatively simple thing (basically did a few pivot tables worth of calculations for some financial stuff), it wasn't really that complex. I'm sure that enough engineers working on a framework for a decade can make it very complex, just wondering, as I do with many mature pieces of software, if a ground-up rewrite based on the same concept but knowing what they all know now would look drastically different from the latest dev build.
Honestly why can't browsers just implement a option in there settings?
Let the users decide in one place if the want to consent to extra none essential cookies.
And add a extra field to exclude certain sites in case you have a domain that you want to grant permission.
It's very doable, but we only know what a small amount of the genome is actually doing. Whole Exome testing hits the majority of the points people are interested in and is way less computationally expensive, since it's a fraction of the genome.
Based on what I'm seeing in mainstream Western press and especially memes that people share, yes.

For starters, Russia lost ~10% of its forces so far - but so did Ukraine (side note: if seriously believe the figures that Ukrainian Ministry of Defense publishes for Russian casualties, I have a bridge to sell you). The difference is that Ukraine is already fully engaged - it's not like had a choice! - while Russia has used only a part of its forces for the invasion. Now it's true that the forces that spearheaded the invasion were supposed to be the best trained and equipped ones, and other units that they'd have to bring would have more conscripts and be otherwise less effective. But a conscript is still better than no soldier at all!

Then there's the "missing" Russian Air Force. And it's not just strategic bombing, but also ground support. The notion that they're incapable of any of this is just plain ridiculous, given what we've seen before in Syria. Now, Ukrainians do have much better AA than Syrian rebels, so Russian losses in the air would be high - but if they go all-in, it won't matter.

So, the people who are dying defending Ukraine right now are basically buying time for the West to get over its fears and hesitations and truly help them. But, ironically, the ferocity of the defense led to the popular misconception that Ukraine can basically do it through grit alone. So I hope they do get help before it's too late, but I'm also pessimistic about it.
Do you think Russia has invaded a NATO nation?
Very on point. It's bizarre some fail to draw these clear historic parallels.

To put it simply - Putin will never stop until he is stopped.

Also note his recent speech - it's basically Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Führer.
"Microservices" is just a tool that can help a technology company scale. Like any tool, when used improperly or with the wrong architecture, can be very bad for those involved.

Given how many fail to implement it right, it would help if we had a paradigm that caused less failure, but I don't see the author recommending anything except for going back to monoliths. I understand their perspective but I'm not sure this is an either or scenario.

The solution is probably some new paradigm we haven't figured out yet.
We’ve only scratched the surface of the full potential for the data warehouse
It's a Linux container, so no emulation there - but it's still a fully separate user space that communicates with the rest of the system via a bridge in the same way a virtual machine does.

There's also Waydroid, which works by implementing things like Wayland/PulseAudio clients directly inside Android compositor/sound system, but I haven't ran it on the Librem 5 yet (I know that some people are using it on the PinePhone).
I wouldn't say any of the SVPs I met at Google during my era (probably 6-7 SVPs) that I thought any of them were dumb. And several were some of the smartest people I've met. But that's the problem with Google: INT 18, WIS 3.
A lot of the law depends on narrow specificity. I know that as an individual I want "all the badness" uncovered, but the same rules around discovery apply to corporate entities as individuals. If you want to change this, be wary of the (law of) unintended consequences. A charge should be narrow and specific. If you get a wide warrant, then sure: all the words should be open to view. But if the problem is financial then the IPR mails are not relevant, its the finance mails you need to be shown. Hiding finance mails in IPR mails would be a crime probably. The warrant to finance probably includes these, by implication. Once you are required to present, its fair to incur a cost outcome of "how narrowly can we respond and not be in the wrong" Because we don't punish people for as-yet unknown crimes, in this process.

Attorney-Client privilege goes to asking your Attorney about how narrow the responses can be, and still be legal.

Sort-of, the underlying question is "why did we allow corporate entities to become legal 'persons' in the first place" ?

I am not a lawyer. Find a lawyer to tear this line of reasoning apart, it is probably a low-bar goal.
> "Google has explicitly and repeatedly instructed its employees to shield important business communications from discovery by using false requests for legal advice"

Considering the DoJ is expecting to use these documents for their own case against Google, I don't see how they can argue that it was improper for the employees to get lawyers involved.
An entire article on the subject without mentioning black swans or Nassim Taleb's other work on 'fat tails' gives the impression of a fresh absence of derivativity but also makes me wonder if it is missing something.
> It suffices to simply provide some way to pass this class from a parent to a child, for example, and let the child component decide what to do with it.

Again, the child component can't decide what to do with a class, as it can't know specifics about the parent. It would break the modularity.

I checked the most commented issue, it's about the reactivity system doing only one round of checking in topological ordering, which could be fixed, but could cause infinite loop, and again the problem is not implementation, but deciding on the best design:

https://github.com/sveltejs/svelte/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3A...
I rented a flat with the help of calculus
1914 is especially relevant. The world pushed itself into world War for the same reason some people are now advocating for military action against Russia; we have to save the underdog european country of Serbia/Ukraine or else the Austrians/Russians will gain a hegemony over the rest of the Balkans/Eastern europe, plus they wouldn't dare actually going to war against us and they are just bluffing.

It's a bit maddening that a NFZ has even been proposed by actually serious people and repeatedly normalized as a harsh but possible choice by journalists and the media. To me, that's so much more dangerous than any "dangerous misinformation" or call for violence that we were so obsessed about suppressing in the past 2 years.

The normalization is working, because that there's even a discussion on enforcing a no fly zone over the military of a nuclear power would've been unthinkable even in the depths of the cold war. And the comparisons to ww2/hitler are not helping at all.
Curious as to the age of the author. I think this might be impacting their observations.
I think that supports the argument that Windows is the de facto durable ABI for games on Linux.
Or even, "we've just upgraded to a new version of our health system and it has effectively shut us down"
The problems one will run into with literate programming:

1. Lack of tooling.

2. Refactoring becomes nontrivial

3. How one would write a program in literate style will vary widely from person to person. If you write your code in literate style, it may be easy for you to follow it years later and modify it, but it likely will not be the case for a coworker. If they have to modify the code, the cognitive load will not be too different from that of just dealing with well written code.

Disclaimer: I've written two nontrivial programs literate style that I continue to rely on and occasionally modify years after writing them. It works as advertised.
I dunno, I think "We are doing this" because it solves a ton of problems related to running an application at scale. He doesn't mention any of the difficulties that using monoliths have caused "us" over the years.

Packing multiple concerns into a single instance/VM seems particularly cavalier. What if one of the services crashes the OS based on novel user input that is being sent over and over? I think it's naive to say that perfect testing and strongly/statically typed languages make this problem go away.

A large team iterating on a set of monoliths runs into other problems as well. Ready to deploy, but wait, you need to rebase for someone else's changes, oh wait, now your tests don't pass, etc...

A set of monoliths certainly simplifies things for some projects, but many of "us" have battle scars from managing large cloud-based projects in that way, and find the deployment complexity of having a proliferation of independent entities that can have their own life cycle to be crucial for velocity and availability. At least that is why some "us" do it this way.
Anbox is similar to Docker, not a VM. It uses the host Linux kernel, just running the Android userspace in a namespace.
I hate that the general conversation around !important is simply:
"Important is bad. You should never use it".

Its more of a belief rather than knowledge at this point.

I'd be interested to hearing a good answer as to why one wouldn't use !important on a modifier class such as ".padding-20" or even something like ".full-width".

Surely the problem lies with your html composition if either of these classes are being used on an element that does not need them?
Apparently not, guy got swatted. [1]

And there are levels of warfare between "nothing" and "nuclear", in case you hadn't noticed. And North Korea and China are doing state-sponsored attacks against US targets, commercial and government and military. It's not clear to me that NoPetya was state sponsored, it's ransomware. The RF is not a bastion of law enforcement and justice; I agree that they do a terrible job of controlling organized crime activities, both cyber and non-cyber.

[1] https://www.vice.com/en/article/dypeek/open-source-sabotage-...
In fact, unless their landlord resides in the same governing region, the renters are the only ones allowed to vote, on a housing unit by housing unit basis. This is more or less what I was arguing. 70% of residents in NYC are renters. The renters have it within their power to vote in their own interests, but they do not. Instead, more often than not, they support politicians who oppose policies that would produce more housing, and favor homeowners and the lucky few renters who already rent housing that is ideal for them.

I'm sure it's ultimately the Kochs' fault, or whoever. But at some point I really feel like there should be an element of personal responsibility to educate yourself about the forces that affect your economic wellbeing, and of those whose interests you nominally have at heart. If such a large share of renters can't do that . . . well, ideally we should still build more housing, but it's tough as a homeowner to feel too bad about it.
Around 8-10 hours is what I usually see myself as well. Up to 16 hours with everything off and idling (but without suspend, as that's not enabled yet).

[edit] I've been listening to music via Bluetooth on it for past three hours and it's at 75% right now.
I was just pedantically correcting the person I was replying to.
Hmm, I wonder if it's possible to add GPS to the iPod touch separately or if it's integrated into the cellular chipset.
You can't just CC legal on pretty much everything to subvert regulatory action. If legal's openly ignoring these CCs, I don't see why attorney/client privilege should necessarily apply.
This is just revisionism. The US had better optics and narratives, but they sure did not shy of destroying urban areas to save their soldiers. Just look at fallujah.
> Some of them might be, but SOO many people are in their spots due to the accident of their birth and other random processes that happened afterwards.

Disagree. If you are not smart, you wouldn't last long in those positions.
Is this project still maintained?
How can you compare two wars 80 years apart given the advancements in nearly every area. Polish soldiers couldn't watch German soldiers moving around from the safety of a bunker via a phone screen. The available, basic intelligence alone could keep a war like this going for months.

It's why I don't understand how it's happened. Wars like this - between modern countries - just should not exist as a matter of common sense (e.g. Mutual destruction theory).
What implementation advantages are there to liquid vs solid?
There is no right way to design a GUI library, so ignore the people that insist you read a book and follow the paradigms it mentions to a T. In fact, we really need less of those OOP GUI libraries right now. Definitely try poke around with reactive, etc.
I've come to the conclusion that writing CSS is an anti pattern

I don't think this is true. The biggest problem is people who write CSS do it as if they want CSS to be something else and are trying to force it to be that.

Writing CSS using ITCSS (Inverted Triangle CSS) [1]
solves so many of the issues devs complain about it. It's simple: create layers in specificity order. Don't fight the cascade; make it work for you.

Writing good CSS isn't about getting the syntax right; it's about getting the architecture right [2].

Harry Robert's video does a great job of describing all the pain points ITCSS solves [3].

[1]: https://dev.to/carlillo/understanding-itcss-real-case-using-...

[2]: https://www.xfive.co/blog/itcss-scalable-maintainable-css-ar...

[3]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1OKZOV-iLj4
Also, historically the word tyrant didn't solely mean "evil" so much as someone who subverted the existing power structures.

Nonetheless, i'm sure the people who had their property redistributed were pretty unammused.
The US still hasn't declassified documents about the Kennedy Assassination and that was in 1963. We only know what has been declassified. I suppose we could just trust the US government, but what reason would we have to do that? Trust is earned, is it not?
This X 100!!
This is happening at a pretty large scale in China with NIO brand vehicles.

For it to work, as you said it is a subscription model for the battery.

It requires a very large fleet of vehicles that all use a standardized battery size. That means not offering lower priced vehicles with smaller battery packs, since you're just able to swap it anyway. And it means not having higher-end larger vehicles with larger packs, since now they aren't standardized.

That also means you are using more battery cells than needed for some customers, and you need more total battery packs in circulation as well.

So it can work, but there are definitely tradeoffs to vehicle design, and I doubt the US market could come together to create a standard used by a large enough percentage of the fleet to be worthwhile. We have some brand segmentation in DC fast chargers, but imagine if Chevy and Ford and Honda all had different battery swap stations. And within brands, can an F-150 use the same battery pack as a Ford Escape?
I decided it made more sense to move my scientific correspondence to personal gmail (I've not deleted any emails since I signed up in ~2005 or so) and decided not to give a fuck about my google email. if the company lost something useful because it aged it my email, that's google's problem, not mine.
GNOME Maps definitely needs and has a pending redesign to make it fit better on a phone screen. Meanwhile, Pure Maps has worked really well for me that one time I needed navigation during the past year :) https://flathub.org/apps/details/io.github.rinigus.PureMaps
It's really not though. Unless we're pretending zoonotic transmission is easily predictable, which is laughable.
I believe this was disputed by a former employee elsewhere ITT.
Because they are literally a client of the lawyers. We can argue about corporate personhood, but the definition of “attorney client privilege” is very clear. It’s not “attorney human privilege.”
> What a time to start an alternative to college! The world really needs it.

Not that I disagree with many things that were said, but I'm wondering is this the prelude to him, or a YC startup, announcing an alternative to college?
I use StarDust[0] extension in FireFox that clicks on cookie banners for you. Seems to be working but it's not a 'recommended' extension.

[0]https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/stardust-cook...
"Startup founders do not care about providing careers for engineers, and usually want to stop being a "startup founder" as soon as they possibly can - they are chasing huge exits and being a founder is incredibly stressful."

If that's true, I'd like someone to explain Craigslist.
The cascade is awesome! See my post further up: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30761462
Is light pollution a real problem?
I'm not for or against microservices, but that seems like quite the cherry-picked list. There are arguments on the other side too, such as...

If we think about the easiest way to swap out pieces of functionality, that is by using well-defined interfaces, low coupling, and separation of concerns.

If we think about the easiest way to scale parts of the whole independently, that is by similar mechanisms.

If we think about the easiest way to build in fault-tolerance, that is by distributing work across failure points.

And so on...
But you had almost exactly the same cost as they did? As a quick bit of maths you'd have paid about $28 for 46 minutes (given $14 for 23 minutes) compared to their $30.
How about if it was to do with high angle of attack mode of speed trim system on 737 800? Don't think anyone trained on that, mind you they never was told about MCAS either... Either catastrophic failure which is highly unlikely, or something pushed nose down rapidly like on the Max, ie nose down trim. Actually come to think of it, look into the similarities with the Fly Dubai crash! They said the pilot held the trim forwards... yeah right!
I wonder if you could fix this with some extra casing around the card slot to make it friction fit. Or an even filthier hack - hot glue/solder it in place, and use a wifi enabled micro sd so you can still access it when the rocket comes back down (and reuse your stuck together sd card monstrosity on multiple launches) .
False dichotomy. “No profits ever” and “unicorn IPO” are not the only two options and if the latter isn’t on the cards, “fat executive compensation and cocktail lunches while pretending you’re on the way to the latter” looks pretty good.
Thanks for the link. Most of those points are still true, except for the middle three about SMS/MMS.

If your distro ships the latest version of Chatty alongside mmsd-tng[0], SMS as well as MMS (both bidirectional) work supremely well, I trialed it as a daily driver for all of last month and didn't drop a single SMS/MMS. MMS attachments (images, didn't try video), group chats, everything was fine.

I still had to configure APN settings manually, but there was no faffing about on the command line, it just worked. All the other points, though, yeah... those are still accurate.

[0] https://gitlab.com/kop316/mmsd

Edit for clarity: this comment (and the link in the parent) references the PinePhone, not the Librem 5, though they're roughly comparable devices
Except in my experience most attempts at microservices scale extremely poorly because they have nowhere near enough precision in their APIs to get just the information you need and so most applications end up fetching way, way more data than they need and whittling it down manually - and often having to stitch together the results from multiple calls.

That of course leads you down the path of creating an "oddly specific" API that caters exactly to the needs of the clients, down to the point that small changes in the client's needs require changes in the upstream service(s) - so your "separation of concerns" has become a joke.
> That's a nice way of saying "Deliberate hardware incompatibility"

As others have noted, that doesn't necessarily mean "incompatible primarily for the sake of breaking third-party upgrades."

It may very well be that there are advantages (such as better or more predictable performance, lower component cost, better power or heat dissipation, or higher reliability) to using raw modules with a custom controller rather than going through an SSD interface. Perhaps (for example) there are advantages to having the SSD's cache in the Mac's uniform memory and controlling when writes are performed.

(As an interesting aside, Steve Jobs famously convinced Shugart to make a stripped-down "SA390" floppy drive for the Disk II to save money. With Woz's controller and improved encoding they also managed to squeeze more data onto the floppy disks, so it saved [Apple] money while improving density and read rate - though possibly increasing the likelihood of bad sectors and data loss.)
Sometimes yesterday's failed idea can be today's genius idea.

For example, if you tried to launch Squarespace in 1993, most people wouldn't care; they'd wonder who would want it and why. (The World Wide Web was a niche thing at that time.)
It's absurd to claim that the Russians are "focusing" on killing civilians. They seem strongly aware of the propaganda potential of civilian deaths, and they are frustrated to be drawn into urban warfare instead of the easy victory they envisioned out in the agricultural fields.

To put it in perspective, the civilian deaths resulting from the Iraq war are in the hundreds of thousands:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_the_Iraq_War
Usually when evaluating a new technology, one of the important things to do is look at the public support channels and see the kinds of problems people are having and the solutions.

If you are looking in there and keep seeing someone who is very often right but also very condescending about it, you can tell they tolerate brilliant jerks.

I've worked with a lot of brilliant jerks in my life so it doesn't bother me, but it bothers a lot of other people, so I still try to avoid it.
It makes sense to ask your lawyer legal questions, but I think this complaint is more about CCing lawyers on sensitive communications so you can write "Attorney Client Privileged" despite not actually wanting to discuss the matter with your attorneys.

I'm almost surprised they didn't just put a lawyer on every mailing list and put the magic words in a mandatory footer.
what do you know about it, either the war in iraq or the war in ukraine?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nisour_Square_massacre

oh, doea that not count because they were contractors?

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/apr/05/wikileaks-us-a...

surely these are isolated incidents.