skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I would definitely consider these phones, but I'm a digital nomad, so having multiple sims (e-sims) is a must, it doesn't look like either support it yet.

It's hard to break free of Android/iOS as well. I can almost guarantee that one or more apps, for example 2FA auth apps like Duo or Okta, wouldn't be usable on the GNU/Linux (I don't really know enough about them to be certain about this statement).
Yes but movies are not interactive, and have real motion blur and perfect frame pacing.
> retail arbitrage is just leaks by the resellers themselves

Anecdotal, but IMO lots... just depends on the industry.

It's a good situation for someone to come along and buy up some or all of your risk - especially for stuff like ticket sales. Many corporations like Ticketmaster design around this, and bake this part of the supply chain into their pricing/experience.
No this is not true at all. Procedural documentation in the US is exquisitely detailed both for medical-legal reasons and billing. Any polyp in the colon will be grossly described, it’s approximate position and if any intervention or send out testing is being performed.

And as an internist - no colon polyp is medically unremarkable.
It's outright naked ageism.

I have been studying a different trade, completely unrelated to software engineering or tech, and by far the weirdest thing is reading books or watching seminars from 20 or 30 years ago that are still relevant. How much of technology writing has that honor? Very little.

Like I have been obsessed with tech and computers my whole life, I studied computer stuff when all the other kids were outside playing football or chasing girls or whatever, I self-taught to a very high level of expertise and that knowledge has just been getting systematically ripped away. Which is fine, to an extent, gotta embrace change and yada yada yada. But I no longer have the patience to grind to expertise-level on something over a period of years only to find out the industry has moved on to something completely different to do the exact same thing! All because some starry-eyed shit somewhere in FAANG doesn't like something!
I miss Grooveshark to this day. Thanks for building such an excellent product!
i see, thanks for explaining

i think i agree, populist messaging can be a dangerous weapon in the wrong hands... on the other hand, i wonder how else politics of change can work without it?

it seems very hard to get a message through when theres such a huge low-pass filter... maybe there are other ways?
Exactly my thoughts when the pitchforks come out over advances in browser tech. Arguments denouncing such progress eventually leave me feeling like banning personal computers and only allow communication via physical paper would be the only way to satisfy the nay-sayers.
It doesn't mean to me either, I was only making a point for the typical Oracle bashers that still haven't got the memo that OpenJDK is anyway mostly done by Oracle employees, while using the same style from the parent post.
Mid-price movies disappeared when streaming became a thing.

We either get low-budget stuff (10-20 million), mostly horror. Or movies that are huge gigantic blockbusters that MUST succeed.

The mid-price stuff is gone. The ones that have enough budget to make a director's vision come true, but not so much that it brings in people from The Company suggesting their pet things to be added.
People alone in their rooms strapped screen into their face, just to be "together with other people" sounds more like dystopian nightmare to me
I have SMS setup, but it still asks me to verify the code being sent to the same email.
What do you think of the argument that the nature of boycotting has changed? In your example, people might boycott a restaurant they didn't like, but there were a ton of small restaurants, no one restaurant was very big. Now, we have a handful of websites that like 90% of all written human communication goes through, and people aren't boycotting a Twitter handle, they're boycotting Twitter itself (so to speak) to force it to deplatform someone.

I guess it's somewhat related to the other argument of proportionality of punishment. Is it right to boycott someone to an unlimited extent if they're bigoted? What is the limit? would be the questions along that line.
Point of order on 2:

Companies do not account for this as "good will".

Accounting "goodwill" is the price an acquiring company pays above the accounting value of the business being bought, which is a notional number usually (much) lower than the economic value of a successful business.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goodwill_(accounting)
Could not agree more. Time and time again I've seen people broach taboo topics on various media and walk away unscathed, often lauded if anything for their tact. Likewise, I've seen many people do the same with an air of arrogance and superiority, get lambasted by the general public, and go on to preach about how they're a victim of some new, alt-left system of oppression.

Guile and wit get you just as far in today's 21st century "cancel culture" as they did in a 1800's gentleman's club, a 1400's king's court, or a BCE Roman senate. What you say is much less important to most people than how you say it.
Dell subreddit and forums are absolutely full with problems. Personally I would stay away from Dell anything, maybe only their Latitude line with a good on-site warranty.
Are 4k cameras actually that much better than film from the 80s? (other than convenience)
No kidding. I was a bit worried when Unreal was dropping demo after demo and Unity just remained silent for what felt like almost 3 years now.
I don’t know if tolerance of speech is always a net gain of speech. Communities can enter death spirals where only extreme speech exists because everyone reasonable is so turned off by the extreme speech that they leave. (Edit: I’m not saying that tolerance of speech is always a net negative either. I’m just saying it might be too complex to say.)
First, the USA has socialized medicine, but in the most expensive yet most ineffective way, and that is in the ER. American ERs can not legally turn patients away for inability to pay. Anyone that tries to argue against socialized healthcare in the USA is making a pointless argument, we already have it. They are just arguing against "effective" socialized medicine.

If I take the opinion of McDonalds customers, they will tell me McDonalds has much better food than if I include the opinion of McDonalds customers AND the people that don't go there. There is what the USA numbers show, outcome for people for whom the USA medical system works. The US numbers are self selecting, because many poorer people in bad health don't make it to the starting point to even be included in the numbers for "Cancer Survivor", they just don't receive any treatment and are invisible to you syshum. When you have a whole section of society (the section that happens to be less healthy, exposed to more chemicals, harsher working conditions, poorer diet on average) excluded from the numbers you use you can't really use your statistics for any valid comparison. My grandfather who had VA benefits had great healthcare. My grandmother, well, she was just invisible in your statistics because she had no healthcare.

For lower wait times, are you conflating elective surgery with non-elective? Please show me the USA vs other countries statistics that you are using broken out by elective and non-elective. I would say a better measure of healthcare would be wait time for non-elective treatment, while elective wait time is more a quality of life measurement, two different things. Kind of like medications versus vitamins, they are booth pills, but you don't die if you don't have access to vitamins. Take out elective (and highly profitable in USA but lower priority than saving lives under other forms of healthcare) and I think your statistics are going to show no advantage for USA healthcare.

Yes, the USA healthcare system is best in the world for rushing people into high profit surgery/treatment. But is that truely a healthcare metric, or is that more a quality of life metric?

Your last argument where you state the prior poster is moronic is purely opinion with no attempt at persuasion or presentation of reasons for the opinion.
There is a bug in GKE causing 502 when using CNI network.

The big is triggered by port names in ingresses. Use port numbers and you should be good to go.
Sufficiently talented communicators more or less only have these "cancel culture" problems through choice, not through inability to express themselves.

Which is honestly why I have little sympathy for the "cancelled", in many cases.

Occasionally, I do feel a pang of empathy for people like Gina Carano, for example, who genuinely don't seem to know how to say what they want to, and may not have intentionally wanted to harm others, but through ego end up refusing to reword their expression or to account for how their words might hurt others.

It's a small pang, and not a long lasting one.

I can see how the confusion might happen, but even for the least articulate among us there are clean off-ramps that get ignored.
People choose their chain by choosing the software they run on their standard (non-mining, non-staking) nodes. Dishonesty requires custom-made software.

Regarding "stealing a token": remember that even in the case a block gets replaced by another, both have to be valid blocks, containing valid transactions. This is why the most famous attack is a just a "double spend attack" and not any kind of money steal. Problems with tokens, that is, transactions that run arbitrary code, happen due to bugs in such code, not because of fundamental issues with the protocol.
Can you elaborate on "multiple areas"? Do you mean each node inside a db "cluster" should run in a different area? And how does one achieve that?
Having a large number of theories is embarrassing! That means you have no idea. Gravity and QM are so great because they are clear winners – they are not easy to modify a little bit and nothing approaches them in terms of practical power.

Falsifiability comes from having specific predictions, which means one theory that's an island, not a bunch of approximations.
How to avoid getting pwned when your SSO is hacked
Why do you feel politicians and tech executives like to say automation threatens to do all these things? How do they benefit from this narrative that has zero evidence to support itself?
I am a time-traveler from the 80s - It just took me 40 years to travel to here.

I am way more disappointed on our societal progress than I am on our technological progress.

But to be completely honest, I was expecting at least a moonbase by now.
Check out

https://kubernetes.github.io/ingress-nginx/user-guide/nginx-...

if you're running nginx. Consider setting it to true instead of the default (false)

---

By default the NGINX ingress controller uses a list of all endpoints (Pod IP/port) in the NGINX upstream configuration.

The nginx.ingress.kubernetes.io/service-upstream annotation disables that behavior and instead uses a single upstream in NGINX, the service's Cluster IP and port.

This can be desirable for things like zero-downtime deployments .
I see your "move the goalposts" and raise a "mote and bailey".

I'm describing cancel culture as it is, which is different from "calling your boss a fatty" (or a Nazi for that matter).

We might well decide that the "right thing" in these situations is different.

Which reminds me - does someone have an obligation to hire me after I call them a fatty?
So what if you added an email header that said "P&C, any risks here?" to every email and had a lawyer who set up an auto reply that said "everything looking legal here"?
>The problem with the debate on "cancel culture" is a lack of specificity. The fact is that there are certain occasions where "canceling" seems fine, and others, where it does not. And I think a problem with the progressive argument is the refusal to acknowledge that there can ever be any excesses.

Actually, many progressives do acknowledge that. Plenty of people on the left feel that cancel culture sometimes goes too far, including marginalized groups who feel it appropriates their struggle and does more harm than good, primarily serving as a way for outsiders to virtue signal allyship in ways that don't really threaten their privilege, or require skin in the game as it were.

On the other hand, given a corrupt system which often protects and insulates powerful people from the consequences of their vile actions, cancel culture is sometimes the only lever people have to effect progressive change in that system. I mean, cancellation, protest and collective action are the only reason certain issues are even part of the greater cultural conversation at all.
Thanks for the shout out Jemaclus! What other challenges would you like to see?
> exact code to open a file, read each of the lines, and then close everything

var lines = Files.lines(Paths.get("file.txt"));

or if you want to be extremely cautious:

try (var lines = Files.lines(Paths.get("file.txt"))) {

}

I agree about IOException though. It's the bane of my existence :) The amount of times I have to rethrow UncheckedIOException is far too high.
900 teams? That's a lot, are you sure you don't mean 900 channels (or whatever Teams calls them) instead?
>Eschew flamebait. Avoid unrelated controversies and generic tangents.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
Yup I look back at the insanity of driving two hours a day to sit in a stupid office that’s downtown for random reasons apart from “I’m required to”

I hated it before the pandemic. But now I never ever want to go back to it.

It is amazing to see my kids and family for longer.

It isn’t perfect. The weaker boundaries can take their toll. But overall I can’t imagine what circumstance would make me want to commute ever again.

And I’m the CEO so I can’t imagine any client demanding such. And I will never demand it of my employees.
This chip is capable of 2000 INT8 Tensor TOPS, or 1000 F16 Tensor TFLOPS. In other words, it is capable of performing over a quadrillion operations per second. Absolutely insane... I still have fond memories of installing my first NVidia gaming GPU, with just 512MB of RAM, probably capable of much less than a single teraflop of compute.
I'm kinda confused why Unity keeps doing this - they keep putting out high-end demo after high-end demo, but that's not where there core userbase is. Their main users are people who build games for phones and indies, with basically zero usage in the AAA space. And Unity's performance/stability is still not that great afaik.

It seems to me that they are trying to prove that they are a serious 'AAA' engine, but these demos aren't that convincing to me - AAA is a lot more than putting fancy shaders on high-poly models, it's about handling huge amounts of objects in a dynamics situation, displaying large worlds via streaming, having a workflow that accommodates every creative professional, and offering great performance and visuals even on very complex scenes.

I've hear that even these highly impressive demos are fake - they built a ton of custom code for each one they rebuild core Unity features, meaning if you wanted to replicate this for yourself, you'd be in for a ton of development.

Comparatively UE5's Nanite demo showed off a tech that's ready to go for production.
this is unreal engine. I was curious if unity has something similar?
There's just no way to look into this and not think they are doing an absolute shit job. A raspberry pi 4 costs the equivalent of 200 US Dollars in Brazil, more than some brand new laptops. Most of our population do not have computers, RPi avaliability would be awesome for us.

Allowing some people in some countries to get it for $35 is just the lazy solution. I'd be glad to pay $50, because I'm able to. Put in some effort so the ones who really need it can get it cheap. Sell it at real market value for the rest of us. Doing good things require effort.
> Why should "whoever has the most money" or "whoever is willing to pay the highest price" be the fairest way to ration scarce resources?

It's not the fairest, but it is definitely better than arbitrary. If Alice is willing to pay $5 for a widget, and Bob is willing to pay $50, it's likely that Bob values the item more than Alice does.

It's also possible that Alice is simply poor, of course, but I can't imagine how a practical system could take this into account without also destroying incentive structures.

>I think "whoever gets through the website order form the fastest" is a perfectly reasonable (if often frustrating) way to ration scarce resources. You get in line, as a person, and get to buy some limited quantity for your own personal use.

This is arbitrary, IMO. Might as well hand them out to whomever can win a race in Mario Kart.
Screenshots are a great start.

Close second is formatting: I really like projects that start with the hook (usually an image of the software in use or an "elevator pitch" of what it's trying to solve), follows up with a list of features, capabilities or FAQ, and then finishes with the less salient info like contribution instructions, build instructions, and general how-tos.

I think upfront it's worth noting that you probably don't need people to "keep on reading" your entire README, in an ideal world you're able to convey the important details first and address more granular issues in a structured and easy-to-parse way. YMMV, but that's my two cents.
Nobody is getting cancelled for having a different opinion on tax rates or foreign policy.

There are very specific and narrow types of speech that lead to 'cancellation,' and it's almost always speech that attacks people's identity, race, and sexuality. Historically that type of speech has been equated with harm.
This is essentially what fly.io does, they unpack the container image into a micro-VM and execute it directly. Calling it worse is subjective, you certainly need to account for things you would never worry about by using traditional Docker. But for some companies it ends up working much better than Docker.

https://fly.io/blog/docker-without-docker/
At a previous job a new slack channel was spun up for every incident, no matter how minor by automation. So yeah a few thousand doesn't sound that weird to me.
> data collection

seems this would be worse in a post-ATT world
“NFT” and “metaverse” sound like two solutions to nonexistant problems. We are in for a ride when this nothingburger collapses.
Tomcat had similar behavior when I was using it except it would bind the listener before it was ready to serve traffic with similar results.
What? They are sold out, not "can't be purchased".
You're getting to Ken White's point, which is that we can't reasonably call for clear norms about "cancel culture" given how poorly defined it is. Without that definition --- and maybe we'll never have it --- "cancel culture" is mostly just an undisciplined tool for shutting down criticism.

White writes at length about the fact that disproportionate responses to objectionable speech happen, and are worth discussing. His take is that you have to talk about those things in their particulars, rather than trying to write staff editorials and open letters about the phenomenon of "cancel culture" (or, in the NYT's case, a [nonexistant!] right to express thoughts without fear of shame or shunning).

White's essay is about the NYT letter. It is not an attempt to end the "cancel culture" debate once and for all. I'd ask you to scroll through this thread and try to pick out the arguments here that recognize that fact, or the ones that are clearly premised on the notion that White believes he's "solved" the cancel culture problem (or doesn't believe it's real).
> Little surprise (though, citation needed) that most Americans disagree the Constitution. That doesn't mean we should burn the document.

I agree! Tell that to the folks this article is talking about, who say stuff like “the Constitution is racist.” (E.g. https://www.newsweek.com/elie-mystal-doubles-down-against-ha.... Author is the former editor of a popular legal news site.)

These folks want to upend the taboo that currently exists in the legal profession over judging other lawyers based on who they choose to represent. My point is that this sort of politicization of the profession doesn’t go down the road they think it does. There is no stable equilibrium where lawyers face social blowback for representing Weinstein or Catholic hospitals or Trump but are lauded for representing suspected terrorists and sex traffickers.
Howdy, I run [Crusoe Cloud](https://crusoecloud.com/) and we just launched an alpha of an A100 and A40 Cloud offering--we've got capacity at a reasonable price!

If you're interested in giving us a shot, feel free to shoot me an email at mike at crusoecloud dot com.
“Only capable of achieving” is likely referring to it being lossy. It is reasonable for some consumers or manufacturers to not settled with lossy.
no chilling effects here..
Thanks for the resources. I have already started moving away from Google because I've read nightmare filled stories about people getting locked out for various reasons.

I never thought it would happen to me in this manner. It makes no sense that it's asking me to verify the code from an email that I'm telling them I don't have the password for. Even when I have a recovery phone number set on the account.
I believe they are Brazil. Also a month or two back there were claims that a member accidentally doxxed themselves a couple times, and they were in Spain.
Ukraine Will Pay Russian Pilots $1M Bounty to Defect
Intel produced good, as in "cheap and always working", integrated GPUs. For great many tasks, they are adequate. I'm not a gamer, and if I needed to run some ML stuff, my laptop's potential discrete GPU won't be much help anyway.
Super admins can set a temporary password. But they can also change a user's email address, disable password and email change notifications, lock out all other admins... They have complete control of the org.

It's pretty clear there is no super admin breach here. None of the screenshots show an admin interface - the app portal shot clearly shows a distinct lack of the "Admin" button. No user directory shots. There is a single image of a password reset confirmation, but those are also in documentation so it's hardly a smoking gun.

It seems far more likely that a support engineer had their laptop compromised and their limited access was used to try and make a mountain out of a molehill. Not like a ransomware group would have reason to over-exaggerate their access and ability, right?
I disagree, I think they make their point fair well. Note that eff wants this piece to reach non-tech crowd as much as tech ones
Really? Because that was the worst part for me. To me it looks absolutely and positively synthetic. I mean, it is better than Terrance and Phillip from South Park, but perhaps because it's "close to reality, but not there yet" it falls into the uncanny valley to me.

Perhaps this is similar to how some people aren't bothered by bad kerning (to which I'm fairly tolerant).
PodcastindexOrg lists 5,122 podcasts that accept Lightning payments
In case you haven't yet done it already, you can ask TrueCaller to unlist your phone number from their System: https://www.truecaller.com/unlisting
data.table also uses OpenMP to parallelize operations, so it tends to be much faster
I don't think GP's comment is particularly unkind or mean-spirited. It could be a cultural thing, though.