skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Are you in the eng side or non-eng? My experience of FAANG life has been 40 hour weeks, with weekends worked on the rarest of rare occasions (none so far this year). But I'm aware that non-eng units have a more brutal time of it.
So, a simple RSA or any asymetric key encryption works too?
A digital picture frame is a physical device that lets you look at preconfigured digital pictures. There is typically a mechanism for changing them, you purchased the device though.

A digital digital picture frame is a set of classes that lets you look at preconfigured digital pictures. There is typically a mechanism for changing the image, you purchased the set of classes, typically following one of the NFT standards.

Those are the ways at which they are similar.
It's telling that email is the last popular, useful protocol. Almost every application (chat, video conferencing, file sharing etc.,) since then have been proprietary and closed wall gardens. It is as if big corporations clearly saw open protocols being a big threat to their monopoly and either didn't bother building apps that adhere to existing protocols or were openly hostile to them.
I've had them, also hybrids (boosted), compared to full hydraulics there is an enormous difference and I would definitely use a cable actuated system over rimbrakes if there was no alternative but only after exhausting every avenue of getting hydraulics to work. I like the option suggested by the other commenter of using an automotive flex hose for the folding part.
Depends on the type of hack. Haveibeenpwned is a classic, but i don't think it covers cases like this, it's more for username/password/PII breaches.
Giving priority to the first guy is just a convention, isn't it?
The army and the police force. "Legal authority" is not a constraint on you, its what constraints the state's https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monopoly_on_violence
NFTs are not semi-centralized because Web3 or blockchain. They are like this because our current notions of 'ownership' are intrinsically centralized. Social reality beats tech, so the tech will end up either emulating it regardless of underlying 'decentralized' technology, or the tech ends up withering away due to non-use.

Do a random sketch on your computer. Now put it on some Web0 site. What does 'ownership' mean? You still have the sketch after all, no matter what people do with the sketch. Inasmuch as you 'own' it, you may want attribution (people giving you credit), copyright (both limits on copying and copyright fees), warranty protection (if someone looks at the sketch and gets an epileptic attack, it's not your fault), ability to transfer ownership, etc. In short, the current notion of 'ownership' mostly related to relations with other humans*.

All these are provided by the law, and can only be provided by the law. 'Code is law' simply changes the entities making decisions, it's still law. If a single chain is a law, than it must have only one record for 'owned' stuff. If you had multiple chains, this strongly affects the value of ownership. Imagine multiple records of ownership - does one pay copyright fees to all the different records? Split them? Recognize only one? Any solution ends up devaluing or centralizing.

This is a poor match for NFT tech, since nothing really stops you from forking (a cryptocurrency fork has serious roadblocks. A NFT fork has a much easier time fighting the regular NFT using the NFT's own assets), but to have value one needs to approach a single source. So NFT will either fork to nothingness or end up de facto centralized.

* In a physical asset, there are a range of decisions regarding the physical asset, but again the question of who makes these decisions is a question of relations between humans, and inherently pushes towards centralization.
In general, I'm pretty skeptical of imperative guides like this.
Such statements only focus on one side of the coin. So while it may have an element of truth as long as you are absorbed only on that one side, you risk completely missing the other side.

For example:
> Deprecate yourself. ... Don't own the code.

On one hand, this is true: ultimately, you want the code to be independent of you.
But on the other hand, I've witnessed bad code quality proliferate in a repo many times because no one is taking ownership of the code they write: they just write enough to finish the task and move on.
And it rarely gets caught in code reviews either because all the other members are operating in the same mindset too.
His principle misses this side of the coin.

Over the years, I came to realize that at least for me, there is one root force behind almost everything for me, including how I code, how I interact with members, etc.
It is: responsibility.
I am simply trying my best to write responsible code, create a responsible product, be responsible to my team members and colleagues, etc.
The rest of the stuff (like what you might call 'principles') are just specific manifestations of this feeling.
e.g. code ownership: I need to own my code to the extent that I need to be responsible for my work, but on the other hand, it is also my responsibility to ensure the code does not depend on me forever.
Albeit this probably may be too abstract to call a principle. In that case, I'd rather not have any.
I'm not a game dev and wanted to have a look at Unity so take my opinion for what it is but when I installed Unity the first thing I wanted was to change the size of the tiny fonts of the IDE in my 4k monitor. Well, it seems you cannot change the fonts. My mind exploded.
Right now no - the unit of subdivision for MIG is too coarse. Everyone gets the same proportion of each function
> They don't even have an on-chain hash of the digital asset. It's like selling a sign pointing to houses for the price of the house, and claiming you own the house, hoping that the sign will increase in value the way the house does, and bragging about it.

If your metaphor is correct, it remains correct even with a hash being stored on-chain. Frankly, most NFT critiques seem just as thinly thought through as yours.

The NFT is a ledger entry that says you own an edition of a piece of digital art.
People coalesce around this believe, because the edition was released by whoever owns the actual copyright (ideally the artist).

The link is conceptually irrelevant. Cryptopunks never had one. As long as the community of collectors remembers and agrees on what each ledger entry represents, there is no problem. A hash can help with this, which is why almost all high-value fine art NFTs have one (in their IPFS-url). No, moxie could not be more wrong when he thinks IPFS should be enforced; the NFT never represents a set of bytes, it always represents an idea. The NFT may link to a 4K render of the artist's 3D scene, but it also represents the 8K render.

The first tweet will always be the first tweet, in the same way as the first transatlantic flight has no physical presence. If Jack sells the first tweet as an NFT, it is no requirement that Twitter stay online for ever. It is merely strongly preferred that someone will archive it so it doesn't disappear from our collective memory, but that need not be the job of the NFT. The job of the NFT is simply to record your ownership of the concept. And you need a blockchain for this, to give it the credible neutrality needed for it to be considered something equivalent to real ownership; you can't have it be at the mercy of a single entity.

If you think paying money for database entries is stupid now, imagine how stupdi it would be if they were in Google Art, a product that will shut down in 3 years, and where Google will delete all your art when your country attacks a neighbour.
The stipulations of the book are enforceable by law. If you have the "mindshare" of the governing body and their means to create and enforce laws you are generally better off.
A bicycle is not a car, in the same way that a tablet is not a PC. If you want the former, the comparative price of the latter isn't relevant.

If you want to talk about why they're expensive compared to cars, IDK... cars are mass produced by robots in Japan and the bikes are small-scale assembled in Canada by people.
By using the provided system tools that report power usage of the GPU cluster? Also, I am telling you the system diagnostics output if an actual physical machine. What are you quoting Wikipedia for? You can literally go measure these things. Should I go edit Wikipedia so that you get correct information?

Anyway, power usage of M1 variants has been studied in detail. It’s 5 watts peak for a single performance core, 20W peak for a CPU cluster of four cores, 10W for a 8-core GPU (128 FP32 ALUs per core). Bigger M1 variants have respectively higher power consumption because of the larger interconnects/caches etc. DRAM is also a factor. Running at full bandwidth is can consume over 10W of power.
I missed Bloom County and The Far Side when they shut down.

They sort of defined an era.

(with bananawrite bananadraw bananafile and bananamanager!)
https://gist.github.com/plutooo/2aadbd4a718e269df474079dd2e5...
Yes, that's how any pro or aspiring bike store will size your bike.
> Unfortunately, vanishingly few desktop gaming PCs have any Thunderbolt support. And even if your machine happens to include a Thunderbolt port, it’s unlikely to be able to route frames from your discrete graphics card, which would defeat the purpose of connecting it to your Studio Display to play games.

I solved this problem with https://www.delock.com/produkt/89582/merkmale.html?g=1112 . By a problem I mean connecting my monitor (DELL) via "thunderbolt" (it's actually usb-c dp alt) to desktop. I use my monitor as USB hub and I wanted to connect it with just a single cable (usb-c dp alt transfers both video and usb utils).
Knowing the Tegra chip in question, I'd bet it's probably not ARM's fault. Tegra X1, unlike pretty much every other SoC, did big.LITTLE via cluster migration with a custom cache coherence system, instead of just having a bunch of heterogenous cores. It turns out that their custom cache coherence was unfixably broken and would randomly corrupt memory when doing migration between the big and little cores, so everyone was forced to just entirely disable one set of cores. At least NVIDIA managed to fix this one in software?
Eh, if I stab a guy every time you touch a tomato it is literally true that "touching tomatoes causes death", but the sentence does leave out a crucial part of the mechanism - that it's less the tomato, and more me and my stabby knife.
Tickets to a concert in the NFT world if you want so are a step back on what we had.

Back in my days, a Ticket was just a piece of paper. Without any name on it. The only information it had for what concert it was and what seat you had if there was the option. I could give it to anybody and he/she could go to the concert without any extra fee or a middleman.
Belt drive would need a bunch of frame changes though (mostly rear fork). Actually, looking at the design a bit more, it might work without modification.
I am PowerShell user for decade+ and this is the first time I am actually excited about Nushell. This release is awesome.
Most OS vendors will just put a full barrier there and be done with it. Switch doesn't for some reason (and still doesn't, for some reason…not entirely sure why, maybe their context switch is ridiculously fast and the extra barrier would be very expensive?) but when you don't do that you run into problems like these. What's harder is processors storing microarchitectural state that you don't know about, but (post Spectre and Meltdown) CPU vendors have realized that this is not a great idea and started fixing it in microcode and/or hardware.
Agreed. It's obvious that lawyers are deeply involved already at this point.

The most likely reason they dont wanna use the common sense term "breached" is because it implies legally a breach of contract, which means liability and getting sued and having to show up in front of congress.

Very sad to see their response be so intransparent and flawed. I wish technical people would be more involved in writing these responses, not lawyers.
HK is definitely not a Chinese charter city, that doesn't even make sense. China is not 'foreign' to China.

>HK folks weren't 'Chinese' nationals for over 150 years until 1997.

Yes until they were no longer inside of a charter city.

>They also have their own passports (HKSAR passports), speak their own language (Cantonese vs. Mandarin)

Does that make American Samoa a charter city?

> and their governance did not change

Lol
Screams for -join operater.
But an NFT doesn't let me look at a picture. It doesn't have a display for one. The whole point of a digital picture frame is that it has a display. Is a browser a digital digital picture frame?

I have as much need for a specialised digital digital picture frame as I have for a digital paperweight.
I got a DS with an R4. But if there hadn't been an R4, I don't think I would have bothered getting a DS to begin with.
Their name makes me think they work on asus laptops all the time, probably just me. :)
Unreal is a game company which also sell their engine. Unity is just in the business of selling their Engine.

The difference is Unreal is eating their own dog food.
Again, how is an NFT a picture frame? Is a URL a picture frame?
Is 32 pomodoros equal to 32*25 = 800 minutes (13h 20m)?
What a stupid cookie popup. So a cookie from 'livecasinocomparer.com' is a Strictly Necessary Cookie. WTH
You would have him subvert his motivation away the source of his contentment for something as abstract as benefiting the quality of the network of relationships?

Quite literally arguing against the individual in support of a network: hivemind. It seems like you’re forgetting you’re talking to an individual.
I wonder why in HN you usually find comments of excepcional quality except when it comes to crypto. A NFT doesn't enforce property, humans do. A NFT it's only a token that can have an arbitrary meaning, but with the warranty that all transactions done with that token are legitimate. So no, you can't steal a digital asset merely being the first to mint its NFT, because if no one recognizes your property no one is going to buy it from you.
This is true, but the flaw in your reasoning, and in the raison d'etre of NFT's in general, is that social consensus is the be all, end all.

There isn't really the problem of acquiring a 100% perfect copy of an asset in the real world. You can approximate an item, but you can't literally get the same exact thing down to the molecular composition. On the internet, this is absolutely possible (replace molecules with bytecode), and is I'd argue, one of the defining features of it.

The true secret sauce behind modern property rights is the enforcement through legal authority. In the event of a dispute, courts have potentially a few hundred years' worth of precedence. Following that, there are proven legal procedures to remove a person from unlawful possession of another's property, which hold penalties ranging from monetary fines to loss of freedom.

And the driving force behind that is social consensus, but on a case by case basis. There will be no such thing with NFT's. It's simply impossible to build it in.
> If someone on my team chose to work 80 hours a week because they loved what they do then I would actively discourage them, and remove them from the team if they continued.

So you don’t value this behavior - you view it as a liability to your team, for the reasons you outlined. None of what you have stated contradicts my point.
They dont wanna use the word "breached" because lawyers write these things - and legally breach has a different meaning than security wise. Very sad that they already prepare on the legal front rather then being open and transparent.
> Prove it. :)

You have yet to explain why a single comment, heard second- or third-hand, about a putative 650 MHz CPU in the 1960s, is so believable that you would rather believe there's a secret project a least a decade ahead of the rest of the world, than believe it was misheard or falsified.

The only people I know who do that are conspiracy theorists.

> The classified story could be different.

Yes, and you could be living inside a Truman-like artificial environment, where everything around you is a carefully constructed zoo of what humans used to be like.

Now prove you aren't.

Or, Richard Dolan could be a cockamamie conspiracy theorist.

Prove he isn't.

> How do you know what's impossible?

Because I have an idea of how much work it takes to make something like a Cray and what materials technology was like.

Integrated chips were still new. The Apollo Guidance Computer famously was the first computer based on silicon ICs, and it was about the level of an Apple ][.

The earlier discrete systems would be speed of light limited. 650 MHz means light travels 46 cm in vacuum. Which is roughly the size of the Apollo Guidance Computer. And we have many stories about how hard it was to build the AGC, and how much work it took to program it.

Your conspiracy theory requires a system which is about 300x more powerful than the Apollo program could develop, despite access to the world's public resources.

It seems you would rather make up a fake history about the secret world than enjoy the amazing work that actually did happen.

> Manhattan Project's Fat Man

The Manhattan Project is quite instructive about how hard it is to keep things a secret. Quoting http://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/2013/03/29/narratives-of-manh...

] There were leaks about the Manhattan Project (and atomic bombs and energy in general) printed in major press outlets in the United States and abroad. It was considered an “open secret” among Washington politicos and journalists that the Army was working on a new super-weapon that involved atomic energy just prior to its use.

Don't forget the Soviets knew about it too.

> many experts more clever than Cray in their niche

In the niche field of high performance computing, there was no one better than Cray. Again, 'How do you talk to God?'

That's one of the more annoying things about conspiracy experts. They demean the history we know about by presuming there must be a secret history so much better that brilliant people like Cray are but shadows of these unnamed people who never boast about themselves, never write memoirs, and whose works are never de-classified, even now when 1GHz laptops are passé.

And they don't care to learn more about actual history to understand when something doesn't have the ring of truth.
A beefy Linux server can handles a million threads fine. Of course, most of them need to be idle or you're going to be maxing out some other resource.

The number of threads should only become a bottleneck if you have less than 0.01% of them idle.
How is this relevant? Presumably the reason we’re discussing bc in this thread for working longer hours isn’t job security, but job satisfaction. I don’t see how this connects, frankly.
I use sandboxes instead of containers.

If you can stick to using Java the JVM can hot-deploy code in real-time without any downtime. It leaks memory but if your systems are minimalist you don't need anything else than one JVM process per machine for everything!
In a proper market, it is impossible to resell because the sales price is the production price. So if the free-market price of the ticket is higher than the sales price, people should be producing additional Woodstocks until the prices match. At which point there is no point in being a scalper anymore.

Scalping is only an issue if the sales price of products is artificially depressed.
> And how do you even find / debug a bug like this?

As someone who has worked on cache code, I suspect it's quite possible they were just reviewing this code again and realised the potential hole. Or they were trying to track down some horrific bug and fixed this along the way (whether or not it caused it), reviewing anything to do with caching is probably worth doing because it's notoriously difficult to get right, especially with context switching involved.

Another possibility is that the bug is more deterministic than it looks, under the right conditions, and they managed to replicate it and analyse it in a debugger.
Yikes. Not to mention there’s a public record of every ticket you’ve ever purchased. In many ways a blockchain is adtech done worst.
I have sleep paralysis every night when I try going to sleep, and in the mornings when I try to wake up.

Normally a few times in a row. I don’t sleep much because of it.
I actually didn't realize that the Attorney General for the District of Columbia had this power. It's explicitly delegated by Congress here: https://code.dccouncil.us/us/dc/council/code/sections/1-301....
> but now it’s in an open-access telegram with thousands of benign citizens waiting for the next treasure trove of data to be dropped.

The extortion model is interesting because you can flip-the-script and just extort the company and if they don't pay, you leak it. The upshot to this approach is that for LAPSUS$, it increases their reputation and credibility for future attacks. In the "old model" where you try to sell the data leak itself, you still have to find a willing buyer and negotiate a price. The nice thing about the new model is that it eliminates the search for a buyer and a price, and leaking the data is free marketing. It's kind of a win/win. Either they get paid in cash or they get paid in clout.

There have been high profile uber-public data leaks before LAPSUS$, but I don't think many have been married to a "business model" like this. E.g., Epik got hacked, but that was ideological. Same with Hacking Team, Equation Group, arguably all of Snowden's stuff. LulzSec was infamous for just doing things for fun, not for cash.
`exec {myvar}>file` will open a file descriptor that can write to `file`, and then store that file descriptor in the variable `$myvar`, so you can then redirect additional commands to it with `>$myvar` or `>>$myvar`.

From the bash man page:

> Each redirection that may be preceded by a file descriptor number may instead be preceded by a word of the form {varname}. In this case, for each redirection operator except >&- and <&-, the shell will allocate a file descriptor greater than or equal to 10 and assign it to varname. If &- or <&- is preceded by {varname}, the value of varname defines the file descriptor to close. If {varname} is supplied, the redirection persists beyond the scope of the command, allowing the shell programmer to manage the file descriptor himself.
> A person who should not have had access to the system gained near full admin access for five whole days.

"This is an application built with least privilege in mind to ensure that support engineers are granted only the specific access they require to perform their roles. They are unable to create or delete users. They cannot download customer databases."

not being able to create or delete users seems a far cry from "near full admin access."