skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Your post is being downvoted because blocking cookies does not solve the problem. It is blocking cookies that causes the issue. When cookies are blocked (in my case, third-party cookies are blocked), an overlay appears over the video explaining the website that hosts the video will not allow the video to be played without a targeting cookie. FWIW, removing the overlay was not enough to get the video to play on the website; but I haven't looked any further into it—easier to just go to YouTube to play the video.
It's circular because we do not know how many Black Americans commit murder.

We only know how many Black Americans are charged with and then convicted of murder.
> DisplayPort isn't some obsolete technology here...DisplayPort would be nice.

Type C is one of the standard interfaces for the Displayport standard, and Displayport is the standard video transport on a thunderbolt cable.
> In my case I had a recovery email set for my account and knew the password.

Same here, the only thing I did wrong was use Linux + Firefox + change country

edit: it was a great lesson though got me out of google products after that, everything bar Android itself and very rare niche searches (hoping linux phones get good enough for daily drivers)
There a many ways to ration scarce resources. Each method serves different goals so different methods are appropriate in different contexts.

Here's an incomplete list of common tools:

0) fitness judgement (e.g. grants, scholarships etc)

1) First come first serve (e.g. most product launches)

2) lottery (e.g. grand canyon rafting permits)

3) auction (e.g. broadband spectrum)

4) third party speculators (e.g. scalping)

You can often use several of these methods simulatenously, but if your goals include prioritizing egalitarian access to the scarce resource then #4 can significantly interfere with that goal. There's a reason you aren't allowed to resell grand canyon rafting permits.
This claim really requires a citation of some sort. In particular,

> don't experience it

is reckless, given that we know the vast majority of heart disease is undiagnosed until there are symptoms.
Jevons Paradox: Applied economics in pricing. Nice!
OH NO! where will i get TOP 100 CELEBRITY DOGS THAT LOOK LIKE POISONOUS FROGS lists in the future?
It's the "Hello, World" of Python.
I never said they weren't. I am saying that Adafruit is not playing economics. They're kicking bulls out of their china shop.
Buzzfeed news is the only part of the organization providing any value to society
Unfortunately there are no monitors sold by any company other than Apple (and LG for that one 5K display they made specifically _for_ apple) that have a “retina” pixel density, which I would define as >200 PPI. (The Studio Display’s is 218.)

Every ginormous “4k2k” or whatever display is just that: ginormous, so the actual pixel density is much lower, and is comparable to a typical (smaller, 1440p, etc) display.

I suspect this is because the fabrication of the LCDs is tuned to a particular pixel size, so if a company wants to make a 4K monitor, they scale existing LCD production up to a large enough size that they can get it 2160 pixels tall (by however wide), and that’s the size of the display. They can advertise having both a large display (which people like) and 4K (which people like), so there’s no downside to the manufacturers.

But if you want actual high pixel density, 200+PPI, your options are basically an Apple monitor (LG’s apple-sold display notwithstanding), or a smartphone.

(I’d love to be proven wrong on this! My holy grail monitor is 200+ppi, 120+Hz, large (27”+), and ideally ultrawide, but alas, such a thing doesn’t exist.)
It's still a monitor that has the same PPI.
That's a more specific and coherent definition of cancel culture, but it's certainly not the current consensus definition: many "cancel culture" debates --- probably most of them --- are about speech or opinions that the individual stands resolutely behind.

And, of course, "for offenses that are minor in comparison" or "speculative" is almost always subjective; it just shifts the debate to a different set of words, but it doesn't narrow it or offer us any guidance. People think all sorts of things are minor, or world-ending; proven, or fabricated.
You use that account for adsense revenue, but you did not add a secondary recovery email, nor a recovery phone number ?

When you do not have any other recovery, google tries a recovery method based on questions ("when did you register the account", "what's an email address you often contact", ...) where the answer do not need to be strictly exact, have you tried that ? And you failed it ?

If yes to both of those, how do you expect google to differentiate between you and someone else who make the same claims ? Do you want google to give a new password to anyone who makes that claim ("it's my account but i don't remember it's password, nor have its recovery method, nor remember enough to answer questions about it") about your account ?

I believe google's account locking is sometime too hard, and them locking the whole google environnement with it is wrong, but in your case google is doing the right thing in not granting access to someone who cannot in any way prove he should have it.
>achieve this level of fidelity using a deep learning-based compression

what does that mean? To me, they might have just as well said middle out compression.
cool. we can fix it now.
Thank you. This is extremely useful information.
You're misreading, you have to "verify" your account first as well as set up MFA.

Verifying just consists of confirming your email via a one-time token. Setting up MFA presumably just makes sure there's no impetus to hack a bunch of old accounts.
I think it's broadly considered acceptable because insulting your boss is an aggresive behavior directed at a colleague. Simply stating an opinion is not.
This works well if you know you're building it all yourself regardless. I think the calculus does change a bit though if you have frameworks available in your problem domain.

Like, there's no point in scratching away at your own web CMS just to prove to yourself that you really do need Rails or Django. Especially when part of the purpose of a framework is to guide your design toward patterns which will fit with the common, preexisting building blocks that you are likely to end up needing. If you do the design separately, you risk ending up in a place where what you've built isn't really suited to being adapted to other stuff later.

For a humble example of this from myself, I built an installer system for Linux computers— initially very simple, just a USB boot, perform partitioning, unpack a rootfs tarball, and set up the bootloader. Then we added the ability to do the install remotely using kexec. Then we added an A/B partition scheme so there would always be fallback. It got more and more complicated and fragile, and the market around us matured so that various commercial and OSS solutions existed that hadn't when we first embarked on this effort. But the bigger and less-maintainable the homegrown system became, the more features and capabilities it had which it made it difficult to imagine ditching it in favour of something off the shelf. There isn't really a moral to this story other than it would be even worse if we'd built the in-house thing without doing a thorough evaluation of what was indeed already out there at the time.
To your second question, yes, heart inflammation doesn’t mean they can’t participate, participate at a high level, or that the athlete even notices any issue. It means they have heart inflammation which carries associated risks both long term and acute. If you are looking for anecdotal evidence, there are plenty of athletes that talk about post covid struggles that include a range of issues impacting performance (i.e. reduced cardio, more labored breathing, brain fog).
Hi, when are Supabase Functions expected to be released?

I'm quickly reaching a point in my project where direct DB calls don't cut it and I don't want to muck about with PG functions especially since I'm familiar with other programming languages. :(

Some suggestions:
Using Supabase took me 5x the amount of time it should have taken me, honestly.
1. There needs to be more official snippets, PG especially. Create view, modify table, change constraints, and so on.
If I'm your target demographic, it pays to watch issues raised/FAQs and integrate it in the UI.
For example, I'm not very familiar with SQL and PG features. I had to learn the hard way that RLS does not apply to views.
Basic for someone who knows DBs? Maybe. But I'm someone who wants to ship my product and my expertise is elsewhere.
Would have loved to see this info in the UI.

2. Some things are just so hard to find! I spent a lot of time looking for something so simple. I think it was views? And also something under user authentication, I don't remember.
Maybe you would benefit from user research - get a dev who hasn't used Supabase before, watch them build something with this and then address pain points.
Gaslighting captchas are so evil.
My parents weren't just released from prison after having been locked away from society since the 80s. Nor have they just awoken from 35 year comas. Sure, they'll have a different perspective than someone who doesn't remember the 80s but they'll surely also have a different perspective from someone with a more abrupt and recent introduction to the latest modernity.
Popehat did, I think, an excellent job of it, even though he doesn't believe this is synonymous with cancel culture:

> some responses to speech are disproportionate and outside norms of decency
I agree about the hair. It looked great when it didn't move. I thought the eyes were great; to the extent that they were intense, she's an intense looking lady; and they may have done so to amplify the effects.

I also thought the lips were great. It was the interplay between lips and teeth that really threw me off.
0. Don’t use notebooks. Neither RStudio nor Jupyter. They prevent people from developing good programming skills and good version control skills, and they encourage making a huge mess.
In spite of your comments about Apple, I’d still recommend a MacBook.
The top reason is that it just works, day in and day out.

I love Linux and run it in everything that is not work related, but for work I need a machine that behaves exactly the same as it did yesterday and will keep doing so for the foreseeable future.

Also, tools used at work (Slack, Zoom, etc.) also just work. I used to use Linux for work but Slack was limited (I couldn’t use screen sharing, etc.), zoom was choppy and some Linux update would brake it.

With things like brew.sh it’s possible to run a lot on Unix tools and MacOS being Unix based (as opposed to the patch work that WLS is).

Also, the 20 hours battery, no fans going up (MacBook M1) and not heat are very nice and super useful when working away from the dock in my office.

I’ve owned Lenovo ThinkPads and Dell XPSs but nothing has beaten the reliability of a MacBook.

I still have my Linux machines and use them for everything else, but it’s been quite annoying to start a day only to find that the zoom/slack binaries are not compatible with some libXX.so that is now missing from my Linux system.

Good luck on your search!
Leaf by Niggle is one of my favorite Tolkien short stories.

It is a short 30 minute read about an artist's dedication to his craft.
But... but... I thought best practice was to use autocomplete or Copilot and let the IDE remember things for me!
Well, respectfully (while not disagreeing with you), I have to say that you seem to live in some idealistic utopia of software crafting. Between the crazy world of gazillion lines of shitty Python or Javascript, and some incredible proof assistants, I think Clojure finds itself in a quite pragmatic, practical, and cozy niche.

Notably, Clojure "speaks money". Money necessitates reliability and requires defect-free software. At the same time, modern, digitized money management desires flexibility and efficiency in fixing bugs and adding new features; Clojure very often fits perfectly for it.

That is why it is so prevalent within fintech startups. If someone pays you to play around with advanced type systems, and you love that, what can I say? You are a lucky one. I get paid to build something that works. I'm not a zealot; I use Clojure because it makes sense (for me). But some people prefer Python and Javascript. And that's fine.
After 2 years my company, a recent acquisition of a "large bank", has begun the RTO transition.

The CEO of our parent has been leading the charge to "get back in the office, where face to face gatherings foster great ideas, spread our great culture, train our young associates!" etc.

Looking around today in the office, still largely empty, I know the truth is: very little is done 100% onsite in the same building. Hell, we've been working with mixed teams comprised of offshore and nearshore members, and departments in other offices for years prior to the pandemic, and, of course, for the last 2 years under the pandemic in a 100% WFH regime, and have in this distributed team model actually grown assets under management by over 100%. Business has been good if not outstanding.

So it rings very hollow to hear all this cheerleading about how good we had it. How, all of a sudden after, finally, some respite from pandemic numbers, our senior company leaders are "excited" to dive back into long commutes and rub elbows with their employees around the water cooler - not that a lot of elbow rubbing ever really occured.

I swear an HR manager said in an all hands Zoom call, "The one thing I miss most was that Ferry commute!

Yeah. The one parked for hours in a car line, both ways, then getting on a boat trip, if you were lucky a breakdown hadn't occured. All this 3 hours a day on top of at least an 8 hour work day. This claim sounded so forced and desperate it was completely, obviously, an attempt to shill the whole idea.

Can't fathom why we'd continue to cling to this false notion that everything has to happen 9-5 and in one office. It hasn't been like that for a very long time.
Let's not move the goalposts. If you hurt your boss's feelings, should you lose your livelihood?
Any ssh pubkeys you've entered into your github account are public too, just FYI.
It's ultrawide, 49" is the diagonal size (as always). It's a smaller vertical size than a typical 16:9 1440p monitor.
And his follow-up which is even better: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_CXMb_MO3aw
The lockdowns were not ineffective. They were only less effective because of people who cried "muh freedumbs". Masks have repeatedly shown to be effective, especially the N95/KN95 variety. Vaccines were shown to be very effective, if not 100% preventative. Big Tech is not a publisher and expects you to be skeptical of things you read that don't come from mainstream sources. Mainstream sources, other than Fox, tend to have some bias, but almost always contain facts they are based on. Fox however regularly breaks that trust between media and viewers/readers and has been called out over and over.

----

There are tens of thousands of stories that go out every day without errors. Pulling 8 or 10 stories out of those thousands upon thousands of stories that go out on legit news sources being incorrect or slipping in way too much does not bring into question the other 99.99% legit stories. You aren't making much sense to me here. Almost a million people have died above and beyond what normally would not have died in the USA due to Covid-19. I don't know about you, but that makes me extremely sad with the knowledge that 70-80% of those deaths could have been prevented with vaccines, masking, and observing proper protocols. It breaks my fucking heart to be honest, and I didn't even lose anyone close to me personally.
Hi, at this point the process is not so straight forward and you'll need to use the Admin SDK from Firebase and the Server SDK from Appwrite to manually copy your data over. We do plan on making this easier in the future.
Or "offenses" that are purely imaginary, like suggesting that people should read a book before accusing its author of transphobia (https://laurenhough.substack.com/p/a-question-for-lambda-lit...), or discussing a common Chinese expression whose pronunciation vaguely resembles a slur in English (https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2020/09/08/professor-sus...).
We seem to agree about 'crypto'. What we don't agree on is that you think Bitcoin is 'crypto'. Bitcoin is something else. It isn't pushed by a company selling snake-oil. It doesn't have a CEO. It's marketing budget is entirely provided by its users, and most importantly, nobody can ever inflate the supply of bitcoin beyond the predetermined release schedule. 21M bitcoin were set in stone when it was released. All 'crypto' is inflation, because it is created in a world where bitcoin, the fix, already exists.

> Tell me, how do cryptocurrencies benefit fixed-wage earners over "early recievers of new money"?

Again, not 'crypto', but bitcoin. You won't be able to grasp it until you separate these out.

Bitcoin allows people to save without their savings being deliberately debased.

Wage-workers are the people who need this most. They can't just throw money at stocks and shares to try and outpace inflation. If prices, in dollars are going to double in 9 years, how is a wage-worker supposed to save up to get a deposit for a mortgage when the value of what they've tried to save it is slashed in half?

Bitcoin, on the other hand, has seen a doubling of purchasing power on average over any 4 years of its history, and will likely continue if fiat money continues to devalue (as it certainly will with the current clowns in charge.)

w.r.t volatility, this does not matter if your goal is to save over an extended time. Bitcoin is volatile month to month, and between years, but there is absolutely no question about the way it trends over the long run. It's clear that holding dollars is a fools errand.

https://usdsat.com
Ask HN: Technical or coding projects that offer more than just 'practice?'
Going from a novice to intermediate coder was fairly engaging, and I still find problem solving for problem solving sake an interesting use of time, but its hard to motivate myself to work on a large scale project simply for the sake of practice. I feel I am qualified to be paid to program on at least a junior level, and doing a serious project for no pay which benefits nothing but my resume is not motivating.

It seems common to run into the problem: "If it's useful, it's probably already made by now." What are some projects one can work on worth more than just showing off?
As I was reading this I was like "that's not that different from what I do", and then a paragraph of two later the light bulb went on.
"25% match on the first 1% of base salary" - I'm assuming this is meant to be on up to 100% of base salary?
They also say

> Tension tech for blood flow simulation and wrinkle maps, eliminating the need for a facial rig for fine details

Which sounds like it is not 100% prebaked animation?
> The perception that “cancel culture” is inherently partisan is also driven by the fact that many complained-of “cancelations” are the result of discussions about race, gender, and sexuality — issues on which social mores have changed rapidly, and issues that are often partisan.

But it is mainly partisan. The "social mores" around the quoted issues above haven't changed at large -- they've only changed among a minority of loud leftists who bully, shame and cancel anyone who disagrees, leading to people staying silent due to fear of losing their jobs.

The examples he gave of right wing cancellations are laughable. For example, a website with a list of whackjob professors. Just taking one at random: https://professorwatchlist.org/professor/adamkotsko: this guy claimed that white people exist solely to legitimate the subordination and exploitation of other races and that they should "commit mass suicide". Yeah, I'm all for firing his ass for being actually racist and stupid. But cancelling someone who says "biological men are not women"? Give me a break.

I'll leave a link to Pat Condell here, as he's been more eloquent than I can ever be on this topic: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=epozNGNU6Yg
>sent this article to my dad--an immigrant from a Muslim country who has supported Democrats since Carter--and he expressed concerns about "critical race theory."

Not sure how far this is the case in this instance, but immigrants (and many Americans) generally have a blind spot where race and law intersect in US history. Most have only consumed the prevailing narrative of US history promoted by the dominant society which is heavily sanitized to say the least.

After studying what would be considered heterodox US history (much of which can be verified by economic history) and becoming aware of the how gears have really worked in the US, I wonder how much of this "general ignorance" reality that I'm describing applies to your anecdata.
Sounds about right. Here there will be a staff security training symposium that runs everyone through a training course bought in from the lowest bidder that is tangentially related to the issue followed by a self-congratulatory management meeting and that will be the whole issue resolved to satisfaction.
Eh, it depends what you mean by "managed"... It's still one of the most flaunted rules, in some areas people will even "wear" it with the lower part of a full-face helmet on their forehead, ready to "drop" the helmet (if they see police) but otherwise keeping it away from their preciously combed hair. In the "wildest" areas, the rules are still flaunted - although it's definitely less common than 20 years ago, particularly in big cities.

But what I meant is that helmet rules were one of the factors that resulted in the decline of sales that eventually wiped all the local manufacturers except Piaggio (which survives on Vespa and Ape built in cheaper factories offshore). The peak years were the late '80s / early '90s.
That's not the NHS :)
And it's also not a health institute/system.

Maybe you should explain what you think the problem is with PMS, because I don't get it. It seems to me that the scientific consensus is to acknowledge the existence of something called PMS. What it encompasses (e.g. including "mood swings" or not) and whether it's a medical problem is, however, debated.
https://archive.ph/nVEYM

“As the markets opened on December 6th, former BuzzFeed employees contacted their brokerages to initiate trades, but later found out that the type of stock they held, known as Class B, couldn’t be publicly traded yet. That evening, Continental, a stock-transfer company that BuzzFeed had engaged to facilitate the spac merger, sent an e-mail informing former employees that, in order to trade their Class B shares, they would have to convert them into Class A shares. In order to complete the process—which would take three to five business days—former employees were informed, they would need to print the e-mail, sign, scan, and return it.”.

“An e-mail circulating among former employees this past week raised the question of whether they could have a legal case. “This is rotten and definitely slimey, but I have not figured out if it’s illegal,” a person wrote. When asked whether anything illegal had occurred, Matt Mittenthal, a spokesman for BuzzFeed, said ‘of course not.’”.

And this only applies to past employees that exercised their options - paying some money and taxes for their equity.
> A new tool for finding unicorns digs up nothing

:D
Because you make money from something doesn't mean it's your only, primary or a necessary motivation.

Also, they might not earn as much as you imagine: They sold the movie rights in 1969 for £100,000.

https://www.worldcrunch.com/culture-society/my-father039s-qu...
> The anti-anti-vax crowd is just a walking meme at this point.

Not more than the actual anti-vax crowd.