skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You don't have to test it against anti-Putin memes to see if it would work for anti-Putin memes. Algoritm would be something like:

1. Have image

2. Get hash of image

3. Get another hash from another similar image

4. Compare hashes

The images themselves can be of whatever to see if it works as expected, they don't have to contain anti-Putin memes.
Your opinion feels a lot like "I don't have anything to hide" kind of argument. We should just not be spying on people without express probable cause. We already have built in tracking for cells phones that people don't seem to realize or care. The other point is that we've seen nothing but continued confirmation that absolute power corrupts absolutely. The police (et al) have shown that they can't be trusted with this power.
That's a fair point. In my mind I was immediately transported to the CSAM/NeuralHash debate from last year. I will slow down.
Thanks for the more concrete example—the pizza situation in the article seemed really contrived and unintuitive to me! One question this leaves me with and I don’t think the article addresses is what happens when losses are sustained when collaborating. Your stock example provides a good basis for an exploration of this question.

Say A puts $4000 in and B puts $2000 in with the expectation that they will double their money, but instead they lose it all. By the procedure outlined in article, the “pie” worth -$6000 would be evenly distributed, meaning both A and B would have to pay $3000. So A ends up with $1000 and B ends up with -$1000. This seems especially punitive to B, and they end up in a worse place than they would have with what the article calls the “power” arrangement, under which they would have $0 after losing only $2000 instead of $3000.

I’m curious about how many weaker parties continue to favor the “pie” method when losses are divided the same way as gains—-my intuition is that a “pie”-style deal is typically reached only when there is an almost-certain probability of gain, but I’m curious about how negotiators actually behave!
> Covid was not primarily a breakdown in our ability to allocate goods. It looked like it was going to be, but that Governments did what this post suggests and injected money directly to people who lost their fiscal ability to consume.

Lockdowns was most expensive thing that ever happened to economy. No mention about sponsoring of big pharma and then donating massive advertisement of vaccines, masks, antibacterial gels, etc.

- https://sites.krieger.jhu.edu/iae/files/2022/01/A-Literature...
What's it called when you make an analogy for convenience and someone stretches it way past its breaking point as if it still applies to the original point?
A giant pizza cut so that each slice is a full meal (maybe two if very hungry) is optimal.Eating a slice of pizza should be enough.
whoa- a reference to Church, and then say "These people are above the law" without caveat.. what an awful lead up to complete compliance without complaining.. count me out
Possibly all of it. As best as I can tell, there may have been a few milquetoast rudenesses, of the usual sort for language models, but the actual quotes everyone cites with detailed statements about the Holocaust or Hitler seem to have all been repeat-after-mes then ripped out of context. It's hard to say given how most of the relevant material has been deleted, and what survives is the usual endless echo chamber of miscitation and simplification and 'everyone knows' which you rapidly become familiar with if you ever try to factcheck anything down to the original sources. (This is why lots of people still 'know' Cambridge Analytica swung the election, or they 'know' the Twitter facecropping algorithm was hugely biased, or that 'Amazon's HR software would only hire you if you played lacrosse', or 'this guy was falsely arrested because face recognition picked him' etc.) If you look at the very earliest reporting, they mostly say it was repeat-after-me functionality, hedging a bit (because who can prove every inflammatory Tay statement was a repeat-after-me?), and then that rapidly gets dropped in favor of narratives about Tay 'learning'. (Even though if you look at the chatbot code MS released later, it's not obvious at all how exactly Tay would 'learn' in the day or so it had before shutdown.)

Anyway, long story short, the Tay incident is either entirely or mostly bogus in the way people want to use it (as an AI safety parable). The real story, of an `echo` gone wrong, is vastly less interesting, and is about as important as typing '8008' into your calculator and showing it to your teacher.
I have also noticed lately, whenever I try to see the comments on the laptop it overheats. I suspect there is something going on to moderate the bot comments in the front-end, which somehow removes them as they load.
The file contents two-way diff/merge visualization reminds me of NetBeans’ [0].

[0] e.g. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/10594653/is-there-any-wa...
There are 2 things to consider when comparing them: 2 panel diffs and 3 panel merging.

P4Merge is very good at the second but not so much at the first.

Also, to this date it doesn't have an OS-X version for M1 CPUs.
an alternative is Amazon Video Direct where content providers receive 50% of net revenue. seems like a worse deal than Apple & Google.

https://videodirect.amazon.com/home/help?topicId=G202037410&...
> In America, many kids today cannot go longer in a sentence without uttering 'like' and 'um'.

You seem to be comparing children to professional speakers. Why?
They almost certainly do. Every major provider does, and even some enterprises.

The whole point of the CSAM stuff was that it would allow for end to end encryption while not turning Apple’s ecosystem into preferred tool of child pornographers.

Apple poorly communicated the feature, then the EFF put out a deliberately misguided written hitpiece that conflated parental controls with CSAM, and started an online freak out. The “privacy activists” won, and your data is sitting on Apple servers with Apple’s managed encryption keys outside of your control today.
You're trivializing read-after-write consistency. It's actually quite a challenging problem for most applications, especially for anything web-based.

Let's say you add a comment to a piece of content and then refresh the page. With a naively-implemented CRUD app, your comment disappears if your request's read query was routed to a lagging replica.

This gets even trickier when multiple datacenters in different geographic regions are involved.
Swiss system also allows people to pass any law that they like. For example, the infamous law banning construction of minarets.

I'm also not sure how this is supposed to help minorities (motivated or otherwise), since the referendum is country-wide.
1.35 million deaths per year caused by car accidents. That doesn't even account for the people who survive, but are maimed.
Not sure I like where this is going, now I'm imagining dogs patrolling public areas and tagging random people for mandatory Covid quarantine.

Not being able to smoke a joint before crossing a border without risking harassment was bad enough.
Amazing thing. I hope that it will be appreciated as it should.
I think the major integrations of pieces of servo have been done, but that new projects and rewrites of existing components will continue to evaluate Rust as an option going forwards.
>I don’t need to run compute-intensive Deep Learning load while I am at the coffee shop.

Well they're putting it in a desktop and claiming desktop performance...

If Apple is going to put up graphs saying they beat i9 and 3090RTX machines, it's worth investigating even if I plan to put Linux on it.

In this instance it seems like the reality doesn't match the hype as well as in the laptop space, but if it had I would surly consider the option.
Sometimes I think about what it were like if land rights were structured as limited-term exclusive-use licenses. The licences are offered in recognition of the fact that it takes time and money to develop the land, so the licensee, by taking on this risk, should be allowed to try to earn back that value and then some. But after a certain point exclusive use seems to be an excessive reward, so the term should be limited somehow -- I haven't been able to think up a good way this part should work. In many cases, there's a natural limit to land ownership (we only live so long), but corporate land ownership is able to extend normally limited licenses into perpetuity...
so what precisely is the problem? if you listen to what noc s are saying, its quite hard actually to not know where to go.
furthermore, there is not much dialogue. and its also not that you have 30 quests at the same time open.
heck, snes game havent gotten quest logs either. just use a notepad?
A clear pivot. Yet it will definitely anger plenty of people. Like... a lot of people. Still, I don't appreciate the apparently short notice they gave. That's a significant change in their terms I'd be wary of in future. Something happened and there was a knee-jerk reaction or decision made. Not sure if I read that right however.
Very interesting! Looking forward to hearing more from you guys.
What distinguishes you from other differential privacy companies such as Privitar or Leapyear?
Come up with something like:

X51!P%@AP[4\PZX54(P^)7CC)7}$EICAR-STANDARD-CHILD-ABUSE-CONTENT-TEST-FILE!$H+H*

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/EICAR_test_file
The point is that the person who owns the land gets to set the pay of the workers. So somebody who doesn't really have to do any labour themselves gets to choose the fraction of the reward (in reality, a set fee ie a salary) that goes to the people who are actually doing the work. If they're the ones producing all the value by mixing their labour with the land (which the land owner didn't create), then they should be the ones who divide the profits.
Kaleidoscope on macOS isn’t cheap but has a great DX.
Yup. And back then upload sites were fairly uncommon... MegaUpload was 2 years after G-Mail, but IIRC you had to pay to do a whole lot without time/bandwidth limits.

And as an idea of scale, no, you can't fit a DVD in 1GB. but you could definitely hold a CD, or something between VHS and DVD quality of a movie.

Me? I just used it to hold on to base drivers for my systems and pictures I wanted to not lose. It worked great for a few years.
…A very different approach to the dating scene?
They also had a “gimmick” where you could literally watch your storage increase down to the billionth percentile or something like that. I seem to remember a counter at the bottom saying my free space available was “1.053746843GB” and it would be moving.
Depends...

Pro version gives you 3 panel merging. If you use that a lot then it might be worth it. Or, instead, use P4Merge for it.
Not to me. East German reporting was about controlling the citizenry to support the regime in power. This is about protecting the health and comfort of one's neighbors and oneself. That is very much my business.
> Rational arithmetic satisfies (a+b)+c=a+(b+c); floating point arithmetic does not. Therefore floats are not a subset of rationals.

This reasoning is not sound. The conclusion is only correct by accident.

The reason floats are not a subset of the rationals is because floats distinguish positive and negative zero, and because floats represent non-finite values (NaN and infinity).

The fact that floating-point operations are not commutative is a consequence of the fact that floating-point numbers are not a "subring" of the rational numbers, not a consequence of the fact that the floating-point numbers are not a subset of the rationals. You could easily take a subset of the floating-point numbers that is also a subset of the rationals, it would still not be associative (assuming it contains at least two different elements).

Here is the concept you are looking for:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subring
Or with the first serious storm. I would guess that’s the larger risk most of the time (are there areas with significant snowfall that don have very strong winds?), especially when panels are mounted sloped.
As the blog post points out, this requires coordinating Wireshark's "(Pre-)Master Secret Log filename" / tls.keylog_file preference with you web browser's environment, so a while back I wrote a Wireshark Lua plugin that automates as much of this as possible. It pops up a window that lets you launch Chrome or Firefox with the SSLKEYLOGFILE environment variable set to the correct value: https://gitlab.com/-/snippets/2156054
Or a gas station.

Their margins are outrageous but only if they can get you to come inside - they're only making a cent or two off each gallon of gas they sell.
You're not alone! So many people are being "brought up" in the web/server world only knowing cloud hosting which is super expensive, and not many know about the "old world" of dedicated instances. Prices haven't changed a lot for a long time, for as long as I know, just that people are being steered to use cloud more and more.
That's true of surprisingly many follow-up threads—nearly all of them in fact. Most don't contain significant-enough new information to budge the gravity of the discussion.
Recent and related:

Popular Patreon creators are being hit with Vimeo price hikes - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30686704 - March 2022 (223 comments)
Unfortunately, that guarantees the arc length of the slice to be constant (at pi inches), but not the total area (= d * 1/2 in). I believe this is why larger pizzas make more sense to cut into squares, as long thin pieces are harder to slice and to eat.
He probably meant: "On a real display, the screen is curved, but the text isn't."
This biggest issue is one instruction spanning two cache lines, and even two pages. This means a bunch of tricky cases that is the source of bugs and overheads.

It also means you cannot tell instruction boundaries until you directly fetch instructions, so you cannot do any predecode in the cache that would help you figure out dependencies, branch targets, etc. These things matter when you are trying to fetch 8+ instructions per cycle.
That's gross numbers. How about rate?

Again, tell me you'd rather be exposed to lead or asbestos.
If your point is that you're not seeing my point, I think we agree.
Load site on phone on WiFi just giant white scrollable wall for several seconds. Have to stop wait for content to load hmm.
Developing 3rd party frameworks is a meaningful expense. AOSP means Google made a business decision to incur that expense and sign away rights to it, but Apple hasn't.
No but you would expect price changes like this to be given advanced notice and implemented only after a current contract ends
But what are you performing the "if else" on? Type level information stored at runtime, no?
Flutter menu bar app for Temp Mail a disposable temporary and free email service
Cloudflare stream is 60% of that cost . Vimeo doesn't have CDN network advantage of cloudflare so not it that outrageous.

A lot of tech products are as not that much more complex than you say. There are plenty of open source software you could stick into VPS that people pay SaaS service providers with similar features a lot of money for .

For someone with the skills it is hard to understand the markup, but those skills are really valuable.
But how is Match_failure detected at runtime unless type information is passed around?
Oh, I'm with you on the CSAM. I just wanted clarity about the self-driving cars, its a pet peeve of mine.
> One thing I learned in a class on negotiation was that many people look at negotiation as a one-time thing. Examples like buying a car happen for most buyers once every 5 to 10 years. It is also a negotiation that most often happens with a new sales agent / sales manager combo for every transaction.

You may have been implying this already, but just to reinforce the message: it's an asymmetric event frequency.

For the buyer, it occurs once every few years. For the seller, it's occurring on a weekly or perhaps daily basis.

That means that the seller is fairly likely to know most of the common weaknesses and opportunities for buyers, and the ways in which those buyers communicate (or fail to communicate) them. Sellers can choose to do what they want with that information advantage.

To me the question is a broader one: why are Alice and Bob accepting to enter into some byzantine challenge where they have to co-operate in order to receive a larger amount of pizza? And why is there an entire book for sale on the topic, when at first-glance it seems to closely (~80%) resemble what can be defined as the prisoners' dilemma within a paragraph?

I think Alice and Bob should publish the ridiculous situation they've been faced with at the pizza restaurant and find somewhere else to go to eat, and I don't think they require a book to teach them that.
There is some reprieve by using a good firewall or even an off device firewall.

However with many of these services if you try to kill them, they come back. If you delete them sometimes it will literally break your OS.

Example, if you remove the ocsp daemon, you can’t start any program on your computer.
In my university days I used this setup, via the school's then brand-new PBX and the built-in serial port in the phone in my dorm room, to connect to the university VAX. The 9600bps speed was, shall we put it, leisurely, but still a major improvement over the original Minitel's 1200/75. Ethernet was far from widespread in the early 90s, certainly not all the way to the dorms.
This is a good line of questioning. I believe that the difference between the two situations is that the pizza deal is implied to be just for Alice and Bob. If either walks away then the deal is totally sunk, so they both have equal "leverage" over the deal.

When you frame it as an investment question, the implication is that if either person walks away then they can be replaced by a third party who is willing to stake the cash. Since it is easier to replace someone when their stake is lower, the person putting up the $2k has less leverage in this case.

If you explicitly limited the investment to two specific people (imagine a crazy term in a will or something), then I think you'd end up back with a $7k/$5k split.
Breathing air and burning fossil fuels in industrial processes are two different things. Humans are not producing CO2 on those scales that we should worry about attaching costs to the use of such an abundant resource. What are we going do? Incentivise people to hold their breath?
Now, on the metaverse front, which is what what "web3" was about before the NFT crowd came along, it's not clear what happens. What is clear is this:

* Building a good metaverse is very hard technically. You have most of the problems of making an AAA game title, some of the problems of making a web browser, and a set of new problems associated with making a world full of user content. Roblox is working on it, with 90 dev teams and billions of dollars. They're hiring, by the way. Epic is working on it, with a budget of a billion dollars. Linden Lab (Second Life) mostly has it, but their technology took two decades and is dated and sluggish.

* Even after you've done it, is it more than a niche market? So far, no. Except for Roblox, which seems to be able to suck in a sizable fraction of the middle school population.
We already know that a hash collision doesn't get far enough to involve police showing up at your door, so a full test would take something more substantial.
Show HN: A photo sharing app that isn't trying to be a TikTok clone
We launched Pidgeon a few weeks ago, and since then we've had a chance to fix a lot of bugs and upgrade the usability a significant amount.

The app is made just for photo sharing. No videos, no NFTs, just pictures, comments, and chats. Each post is ranked like on reddit - a combination of the user upvote/downvotes and the amount of time passed since the post's creation.

We're also trying to stay away from ads, and instead adopt a freemium model. The main reason for this is because people are a lot more concerned with privacy these days, and if we aren't serving ads, then the user knows that we don't have an incentive to steal their data.

There's already a small community of about 1500 on the app, with a lot of them being professional photographers. So the photos going up look really nice (at least in my opinion). But we don't just want to be a community of people who consider themselves photographers - that's a mistake that other platforms like Flickr and VSCO make. To become widespread, you need to make your platform simple to use for the casual person; only catering to professionals will necessarily keep your community smaller than it otherwise would be.

Users have been asking for a desktop client, and while we don't have one yet, we do plan to add it - and it won't take us as long as IG to do it, and neither will it be an afterthought where the UX is intentionally made poor so that you're pushed to use the app instead. But we want to polish the mobile app first before we get there, and there's still a lot of work to do since it's super early days.

If you want to try it out, here's the link:

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=app.pidgeon.pidgeon

https://apps.apple.com/us/app/pidgeon-simple-photo-sharing/id1605784768

And please do provide any feedback you have on the app! It really does help us make it better.
How would one go about doing this? I've never been able to get it to do that.
Self-driving cars are unproven tech. Just pointing to the harm that humans contribute towards doesn't mean much. Soldiers also accidentally kill innocent civilians - are you in favor of AI-drones and AI-soldiers??
The keyboards on those machines... I loved my dad's kaypro :)
China is a security risk. And they USA firm like apple as one. Not sure why the article not mention that data of apple china is stored in china. Why not USA.

Also given the Russia scenario better selling earlier than later
I hadn't thought before of how recent Ms. is. You've given me some hope now. Not holding my breath but keeping my fingers crossed at the very least.
This article reminded me of how many damn agencies we have spying on us. People regularly talk about the FBI, CIA, and NSA but there are like ten other US intelligence agencies.

The US Intelligence Community contains 17 organizations, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Intelligence_Com... and that's not counting any state or local organizations that Blueleaks showed are doing similar things. Sure Google is making it seem normal to give up our information, but it's also hard to continue being angry when you hear that the DIA and DHS are also spying on us.