skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Because it was a comment written without having any context into how NYT handles their games. They assume something about massive monetization that would happen in the future, when the daily wordle will likely remain free forever, just like most other daily games that NYT has.
Last code commit in December 2020: https://github.com/subhra74/xdm/commit/953765940ae63107e8cfb...

Apparently it is being rewritten from Java to .Net: https://github.com/subhra74/xdm/discussions/768
You can also find salaries for NL and soon EU: https://techpays.eu/
There are downsides. First, it's an advanced technique not recommended for novices (too easy to destroy one OS or the other). Second, Windows will want to install updates every time you boot into it. I generally recommend... just having to computers.
> This is a really strange take. Deno isn't significantly easier to work with than Node, so it shouldn't matter much for a React code camp graduate which of those two to ride into full stack.

It appears you've received this as some sort of afront. Everyone looks for a wave to ride toward the future and riding a wave is not undesirable. The Node wave has broken and is coming to a rest, slowly over time. Deno is a motion to create another. That's the natural order of things and it's okay.

> Deno is more appealing to seasoned web developers, who appreciate its conformity to modern web standards, the absence of Node quirks, and a better security.

It's interesting isn't it, because I offered my thoughts as someone who could be described as a seasoned web developer - they were just not the same as yours today.
As if people weren't critical enough of NPM and JS packages in the first place. Doesn't really speak for vue.js.
I think it depends a bit on the real intention. If the author intends to grow their project to a business and is upfront about it, there is nothing wrong with that. After all a sustainable business would imply sustainable project.
The misfortune happens when the concealed and public intentions are not aligned.
Exactly on the same level as Yahoo Groups or Yahoo Answers, wonder what happened - oh wait, yahoo bought flickr and the internet changed.

I don't know, I still feel saddened about alot of yahoo changing for the worst. Geocities, Search and the groups and group rings were some of the best features of it.

But guess that's what happens with social media companies. Community changed forever and what remains has to be super generic and bleak to survive.
> After energy is applied, CO2 is desorbed from the substrate for downstream treatment and compression.

Is this the most energy intensive part of the process? What kind of energy do you apply? (heat?)
The bias in this is whatever belief system one might have to say "ASCII is good enough". Or whatever level of ignorance to believe that ASCII is good enough without understanding that it cannot be. Etc.
There is already "work" being done to detect the user's eye focus. If the user looks away from the ad, the ad pauses, until the user refocuses on their garbage.
Granted, for now, it's 20 mins of ads for free tickets, and it makes sense.
We also know humans don't understand the word, "enough" when it comes to profits.

https://futurism.com/moviepass-eye-tracking-ads
That's only true if acclaim scales with population. Or more specifically, if the "number of acclaimed scientists..." would scale with the total number of scientists in the absence of a falloff in rate of their creation. That's the point: I don't think it does. I think it's reasonable to assume that in a larger population, a given level of acclaim is harder to achieve for any given individual. Same fish, bigger pond.
Lots of commits. Squash merge the PR (github feature) to clean up the commit history.
FWIW, while I agree with the general sentiment of your post, I understand that there is some debate about whether or not OSI - strictly speaking - coined the term "Open Source" or not. That is, I've seen reference to citations of people showing use of the phrase "open source" that predate OSI by a decade or more. I never dug deeply into the issue because I don't consider it terribly important. I consider the OSD to be the effective, de facto (but not de jure) definition of Open Source regardless of this particular minor quibble.

Still, it could matter it it ever came down to legal proceedings. But in everyday, colloquial terms, I think the OSD just "is" the definition of Open Source.

Edit: Yeah, see @CogitoCogito's post for more on the "Open Source predates OSI" argument. The counter-argument, I suppose, is that they didn't "coin" the phrase in the strictest sense, but were possibly the first to rigorously define it and give it meaning within a specific context. Whether or not one accepts that argument, or a similar argument, is obviously open to debate.
This is the part of the decision I don't understand. The AGPL seems pretty clear:

> All other non-permissive additional terms are considered "further restrictions" within the meaning of section 10. If the Program as you received it, or any part of it, contains a notice stating that it is governed by this License along with a term that is a further restriction, you may remove that term.
To quote Wikipedia: “Lepton flavor is only approximately conserved, and is notably not conserved in neutrino oscillation.[6] However, total lepton number is still conserved in the Standard Model.“

The beta decay gives rise to e.g. a positron and a neutrino (or an electron and an anti-neutrino).
I recommend Linux Mint over Ubuntu.
This is my biggest concern with anybody (not just Amazon) trying to extend Stargate SG-1. I want more Stargate. Not a sudden dystopian nightmare, or dour bleak exploration of this or that, or gutting Stargate to write some other show wearing Stargate on the outside (e.g., "It's Game of Thrones, but Stargate!").

It's not even that those things are bad. I've watched and enjoyed some of them. It's just that I know where to get them and I've got enough of them right now.
Wait, but then web developers would need to actually learn their standard tools like HTML and CSS and how to achieve the goal with a minimalist approach. They might need to invest an hour or two, instead of downloading an NPM package and slapping everything with a meg of JS.

Not sure how realistic this is. When I look at most websites these days, I can see clear signs of bad engineering (and lack of ethics) everywhere.

I am totally on board with the idea to use CSS for things, where we do not need JS. But then again I am not a "modern style" web developer.

In my opinion knowing one or two hip and trendy web frameworks (I will intentionally not say their names now.) doesn't make anyone a good web developer. Real basics are lacking these days. When you only have a hammer, everything starts looking like the head of a nail. Websites with zero requirement of dynamic pages are rendered in JS frameworks, even taking longer than static server side rendering of some template, which could have been used, given the character of the websites. All done under the guise of "This is how websites are developed these days." No, not all websites need to be a SPA.

Anyone, who learned a framework can call themselves web developer these days. I am sure there are good web developers out there, who know their stuff and the basics as well. Even good ones working on the websites I criticize, but they may be forced to use inappropriate tooling by their environment. One does not simply come into an existing project and decide oneself to change a whole stack. Basically many projects are already locked into their inappropriate use of tools.
I try to commit whenever I have enough to write a coherent message. I branch out to provide me with an objective and I merge back into main when I accomplish it.

I think I'm going to start using rebase to get those clean commit histories though.
Flickr lost my trust when they did not deliver on their promist to store my photographs forever even if I stop paying. That what they were promising paid members back then. I understand there was the change of ownership, but the obligations to users should have been transfered to the purchasing company. Whoevever uses this domain now not gonna get my business. And this posts shows me that I was right. Now they telling their users that they are allowed to store only 50-non public photos!
I saw something pretty similar over a field in rural central Virginia once.
I suspect the writer of this blog post wrote it on a machine with a track pad or a magic mouse.
If it's unlicensed (in the quote) and source is available, then what restrictions are there?
As soon as someone gets a better product than MS excel for the finance community they are in tough waters for relevancy. Gaming is the other one you pointed out.
git rebase -i HEAD~5

Where 5 is some number of commits (or origin tags)

Is your best best friend! Write great messages, squash things, or fix ups. Force push over your branch after you clean up… and send out a great PR!
Where did he call or consider his fans "monsters"? He specifically lashed out against some very rude fans who made an offensive mention of Robert Jordan's death, a personal friend of GRRM. I 100% support him on this. Fandom can be very toxic.

As for the rest: I don't think GRRM is trying to mislead anyone on purpose. I honestly think he's lost the energy to focus on ASoIaF and cannot find a way to solve this conundrum and finish the damn thing. I think he would if he could. If he's deceiving anyone, it's himself.

Writing literature isn't like writing CRUD code, is not just a matter of sitting your ass down and typing words. Sometimes that helps, sometimes it doesn't.

I think he's lost his inspiration and cannot get it back, but I don't buy he's being cynical about this or purposefully cheating his fans.
I think the issue is that adding stickers to images is second nature to anyone who uses Instagram.
Listen friend, I'm using it as a concrete example of a technology in every case.

Today I'm using it as a concrete example of H.265 (BPG) as an astonishingly good alternative to JPEG in applications where you control the encoder and decoder.
That's what most carbon capture tech seeks to do, this would be direct carbon capture from the air. You are completely correct in assuming this is highly inefficient. As long as we are still blasting new CO2 into the atmosphere, it will always be easier to capture it at the source.
Direct air capture only becomes significant when we get access to enough clean energy to power the absurdly inefficient technology. Thermodynamically, even if you are capturing at max efficiency, it still sucks (something like 250kwh+ minimum to extract 1ton of CO2, not even close to reality). We need either abundant renewables or fusion/fission energy to make it viable.
taking a geostationary satellite and measuring the delay it takes from two positions and assuming a perfectly round earth should get you there
MPEG-2 and JPEG are very similar in philosophy as well.

JPEG in particular is still my favorite image encoding technique. Mostly because of how fast it is relative to the competition.
> To me, it looks ugly

In the eye of the beholder. I think it looks like a space car from the future.
Not trying to be a rude but why even make this comment? Just saying something is bad and inferring people are amateurs without offering any insight yourself is just as useless as the opinions you think are uninformed
I would take "VC advice" with a big grain of salt...
At 10% the speed of light it would take 45 years to get here and slow down from Alpha Centauri, and it goes way up from there:

https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/7Gdct9VzQFHUYf8Ec8GXmY.jpg

Again that's exponentially beyond anything we could do and why would they even bother buzzing around inside the atmosphere if they can do that?

Unless you are saying they are popping in from other dimensions/universes and that's way beyond even FTL theory.

Earth would be a huge yawn to them. They'd catalog it and move on. Unless earth-like planets are so incredibly rare to find even with those abilities.
From the perspective of popularizing and bringing it into mainstream usage, they surely did.

Digging further is for extreme nitpickers.

Gutenberg didn't "invent" the printing press either. Movable type dates back to 11th century China if you really want accurate attribution. Except for the purposes of the history of the modern world, Gutenberg's invention is most relevant/accurate.

My internet usage started on university systems back in the 80s, along with BBS and usenet and I had never heard the term Open Source even once until 1998.
Hacking Breakthrough Ideas
All the docs remain open as usual (which they had emphasized), so I will consider a subscription (donation?) to fund the development of the documentation to the open web.
Mr. Yuck is green, Mr. Yuck is mean, Mr. Yuck also has the shape of a face absolutely filled with disgust at having put something terrible in his mouth. In short, Mr. Yuck communicates something purely by expression rather than association.

The hamburger menu looks like decoration, or a portion of the I Ching. Nothing about three horizontal lines says "I contain options for navigation."

Now, were six lines used, with every other line being indented, and then a \ or a / here and there, it would look like something folded up, and I would think, "Oh, unfold this thing." But three horizontal lines just ... no, I got nothin'.
Yeah, it's probably wrong to assume much about a lack of support for Chinese-character names on an English-language website, so I removed that. (But if you don't have a good reason not to, you should support it.)

Accents and punctuation are different. There are a lot of English-speaking people whose names don't fit in ASCII. A system that doesn't support them is at the "95% for no effort" stage, if even that.
Not sure why you say "definitely not" here when it's not clear we're disagreeing. How does the purported power shift you mention even relate to a rationalization that Google decision makers could have used at any time to convince themselves that they're still living the motto? Are you suggesting that "don't be evil" was only for engineers, not management? I can kinda-sorta see how your comment makes sense in that context, but it's still a bit orthogonal.
> Carla Rodriguez y Calderón (both Rodriguez and Calderón are last names)

I was not aware of this form until I moved to New Mexico several years ago. I had a hyphenated name earlier in life, and have come to think of this as a (roughly) Spanish equivalent of that.

If you can't/don't handle Ortiz y Pino in New Mexico, several fairly powerful people are going to be pretty pissed off! And that's still within the borders of the USA.
HackBrowserData – Decrypt passwords/cookies and more
Two days they have been down now. Github has, by far, the worst uptime of any critical service I've seen going on multiple years now.
Andrew Carnegie drowned half a town before he started building libraries. Drowned as in a lot of people died. For a country club for his rich friends. This still ranks among the top civil engineering disasters in history, over a century later. Don't scrimp on earthen dams, folks.

(the Carnegie library in my old neighborhood is a bar. I don't know if the town lowered the main roads or they built the library on a hill in town on purpose, but it sticks out like a pretentious, sore thumb now.)
No, as there is usually no proper indication that you can scroll.

Even if, it's annoying one missclick and you might land somewhere else.
I was contracted to make a legal document generation service for a client. I looked at all of these tools and decided to just use HTML/CSS and then print to PDF via puppeteer on a serverless cloud function.
The list I posted is certainly not exhaustive. Many companies offer them for the exact reason I stated above -- so they don't come to rely on a single worker.
That's not an EEPROM. That's an EPROM. The first E in EEPROM is ELECTRONIC - i.e. you use a voltage (or a control word) to indicate that you would like to erase the device.

Also, EPROMs are extremely vintage. They were replaced by EEPROMs - the first of which came out in 1977. That's an... extremely vintage example.
"Flickr has been a home for all photographers, no matter their subject." as long as you're a paying photographer moving forward.

Imagine if Reddit said NSFW content will stay, but you need to have Reddit premium to access it.
Yep! This is why solar panels typically have another diode wired in series with them, so they don't draw/waste power and emit light at night!

In the solar world they call it a blocking diode.
Other types such as unions, enums, and bits also have properties that allow for evolution: https://fuchsia.dev/fuchsia-src/development/languages/fidl/g...
In fact all the docs are on github. You don't even need to get to MDN site to access them.
https://github.com/mdn/content/tree/main/files/en-us
That was before Apple became hostile to game developers by inventing Metal and refusing to support OpenGL past v4.3 or something. Actually they tried in the 2000s with Quicktime 3D also. And Apple always had last-gen GPUs in their machines. And let's not forget that they made it difficult to write games in C++, as ever since OS X the core APIs have required an Objective-C wrapper. Ah well.
I think the remaining 'killer apps' that Windows has are basically creative software (Adobe, Ableton, etc.), games, and Microsoft Office.
If anyone at Flickr is reading: Please update your Apple TV app (slideshow doesn't work and many links still point to Yahoo domains). You regularly update your iOS app so this shouldn't be too difficult.

Regarding this announcement, I think it's perfectly reasonable. But I may be biased since I've been a paying Flickr user since 2005.
At some point they have to be able to do things by themselves.

Sure from a pedagogical POV you don't want them stuck forever trying to make a leap they can't yet make, but being hand fed answers doesn't really work at making the underlying heuristics and cognitive habits (and sometimes info) stick.
Because regardless of that, the naming of the organization and repositories strongly implies that it is managed be a combination of AWS and Hashicorp.

At a first glance, "transitions to non-free license" implies that you now have to pay for it. The default isn't "Well I guess non-free means it's still free but not the OSI definition".

People very often do not read beyond the title.

"Community maintained terraform-aws-modules transition to non-OSI-approved license" would probably be more accurate, but not nearly as click-bait.
How did they fail you?
Congrats on the launch and good luck!

Whenever you're past the secrecy stage, I'd love to see a blog post or video to learn more about your approach.
Or you subconsciously were able to hear him subtlety wheezing or squealing or thumping his tail.
At least one good thing about GH is that while things break, the status page is updated relatively fast compared to other companies, when all HN knows about outage for 1h+ until it's acknowledged.
that they strongly suggest you get your wisdom teeth taken out. The guy I know did so a few weeks before leaving.

That seems to fall under the "If it ain't broke, don't fix it" category -- if he was an adult with no prior issues from his wisdom teeth, he'd have been better off either leaving them alone, or having them removed 6+ months prior. I'm surprised they let him do it just a few weeks ahead.
Where he messed up was not making a blog post announcing the end to an incredible journey.
I commit often (as long as it compiles, pass the linter, and fast unit tests if there exist), then I rewrite the history. If I work alone on the feature (which is most case) I also push quite often on a private branch (mostly for backup, and for running the CI). If needed, I also rewrite the history of my private branch and `push -f` (even though this isn't ideal...).

My PRs are clean, each commit pass the CI and is its own thing.
I enjoyed this post. I hope something good came out of the struggle for you.
Satellites have to account for their clocks moving at a slightly different rate - it is significant at that scale.
I and my current employer consider myself above average. If I one day found out that I made the same as my average coworker I would leave the job and go somewhere that appreciates me.
Funny that the current Apple CEO is more of a "sales" than a creative guy.
The pre-1986 MGM library is owned by Warner Bros. via its purchase of Turner Entertainment, not MGM itself thanks to some interesting financial manoeuvres by Ted Turner in the mid-80s. So old MGM films are probably staying on TCM.

MGM does also hold other libraries like post-1952 United Artists films and Orion pictures films as well though.
Interesting observation, so true.
The thesis of the article is that Russians have a long standing fear from the USSR days that the border would one day be closed, and then they couldn't get out of Russia. That fear followed by the recent airspace closures, has led to significant emigration. And this fear has an even earlier trauma of closed borders from the 1917 revolution, which also saw hundreds of thousands emigrate from Russia.

It goes on to make comparisons between the two emigrations, then and now. But also the different perspectives: those who flee and those who stay. Those who stayed following 1917 were very critical of those who fled, the same is happening already today. The author doesn't question whether history will repeat itself, it shows it is. Including for those who leave.

>That they will be welcomed abroad as "Putin’s people," and not at all as those who fought desperately, although unsuccessfully, against him for 20 years.

>Lenin called intellectuals the "shit" of the nation and did everything in his power to make them leave or disappear. Putin has rid himself of this "shit" just as effectively.
they created a american oligarchy thats as bad as the russian one

justify it how ever you want, same result
I commit and push often, with no sensible commit messages. The git messages aren’t used, except for issue ids and random garbage.

All details regarding code and reasoning is on the issues and pull requests.
I commit anytime the staged code can have a logical commit message. So I go for the smallest possible change per commit. Push when an issue can be closed/new release can be built or I leave my computer for any reason.
Absolutely, Sarus never sees the client's data, because the software runs on their infrastructure.

And indeed, data encryption and privacy-preserving analysis (what Sarus does) is quite orthogonal. You may combine them for some use cases (so that data are protected on the machine, but also cannot be re-identified from queries)
For example, on our infra (used only for demo, not for clients), by default all data are encrypted at rest by the cloud provider. You could even try to add FHE (Fully homomorphic encryption), but that's quite complex (and probably wouldn't support many type of data analysis).
I enjoyed thinking about this. A few thoughts on usability!

The text on these sausage links makes the buttons quite visible and readable, but I find these joined buttons to be most helpful when one is always active and the options are mutually exclusive. For example, at the bottom the zoom buttons (1x, 0.5x, 0.25x) do this very well. One is always highlighted so it's very easy to understand the current state and to pick a different state.

I'd argue this works less well in the top-left buttons (HTML, SCSS) because there is a hidden behavior that collapse and expands the sidebar. It's clever, but I didn't expect the bar to open, nor did I expect it to close when I tapped it a second time. It workes pretty well in this website preview example because html/css feels like good use of the side panel, but I'd argue most hamburger buttons hide much more rarely used views like logout, account and privacy settings, payment options, etc, so not sure the sausage links can replace all these, but an interesting thought experiment.
but with today CPUs this becomes an issue with speeds at least 25gbps