skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Not OP, but the simplest ways to do the deeper stuff:

#2 - custom GA events implemented via Google Tag Manager triggers. only takes a few hours to learn.

#3 - once you identify a few particular funnels you want to dive deep into, just skip GA altogether and use an all-purpose recording tool like Hotjar that'll let you automatically record entire user journeys starting or ending at some page. go through those with your UX team/person and look for potentially confusing interactions. takes like 5 min to set up, several days to collect data, and then a good UX person to interpret likely pain points that your users are running into. it's really hard to do a good funnel analysis in Google Analytics. Hotjar, or to some degree Facebook Insights, make that analysis a lot easier because they're GUI-driven and monitor the DOM visually, not code-and-config based like GA
Perhaps the commenter you are replying to hasn't, but I've looked into this extensively, listening to the lived experiences of transgender-identifying people, reading their forums, poring over the scientific research into gender dysphoria, and listening to the arguments on the gender critical side too.

From this, I can only conclude that transwomen, being of the male sex, are not actually women, but are simply men who want to be women, to the extent that they attempt to masquerade as such in everyday life.

Most of them will wear attire more typical of women, and many seem to be driven by a deep-seated sexual desire of themselves as a woman. So while it was put rather crassly, I don't see how what this commenter said was particularly inaccurate.
Is it crazy to not want saltpeter in your food
Yahoo Answers is what gave rise to communities like StackOverflow, Quora and StackExchange and other *Exchanges out there. They were the first Q & A site out there.
> I sometimes wonder if UI/UX passes on open-source tools would be better with very explicit "experimental forks" that keep with upstream when they can. Over time, the successful fork starts to get more traffic from regular users and re-merges.

Probably the best example of this approach is the Firefox (originally Phoenix, then Firebird) origin story:

https://www.wired.com/2005/02/firefox/
If you've seen Wall-E, you might be able to imagine a world where Buy-n-Large is Amazon.
> but still caring about the direction that it takes since they are a media and devices company, and the decisions made there impact them.

Agreed, but with a sinister connotation.

While I am absolutely not accusing Apple of it, let's not forget that all companies want the inside track on any tech that could threaten profits, and may join these organizations to guide them away from decisions that are not in the companies' interests.
> Police is very strongly biased the world over, even if it’s not PC to admit it.

Do you mean that the PC view is that 1. the police are not strongly biased (which doesn’t fit the view of political correctness at least in the countries where I’ve lived) or that 2. the police are only strongly biased in certain countries but not the world over? Or something else?
I keep my personal dev folder in Dropbox so I don't have to worry about lost work since it always syncs to the cloud. My work dev folder uses syncthing to a remote server for the same purpose.

I make my own branch and then do checkins when I get to good stopping points. Then I do git squash merges to staging or the group branch when I have nice small updates. Keeps the public history clean and also lets me revert back to the previous stopping point, while not being worried about lost work.
I cannot reach the article (paywall) but I found another source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EBay_stalking_scandal

It seems only the small fishes are caught, the big ones that give directions are not aware of what happens under their direction...
Pull this thread far enough and it turns out the Y-combinator is a lambda encoding of Russell’s paradox.
> I decided to look into this. And there's some interesting facts on the op-ed [1]. Up until 1921 op-eds didn't exist. In 1921 they were invented by an editor who remarked...

Oh, interesting. I was interpreting "op-ed" to be the backronym "opinions and editorials page" rather than the more trade-jagon "opposite the editorial page," and as meaning a place for opinion content (which the OP was broadly complaining about) rather than news. Opinion content, in the form of editorials, has a much longer history, according to the bio of the editor you mentioned:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herbert_Bayard_Swope: "Although standard editorial pages have been printed by newspapers for many centuries, Swope established the first modern op-ed page in 1921."

> ...thereon I decided to print opinions, ignoring facts."

> Oh the times when we were more honest.

That part of the quote seems like something that's very easy to misinterpret if one was so inclined. Opinions themselves aren't facts, but I'm sure some would be tempted to interpret "ignoring facts" as meaning an embrace of falsehood or lies, in order to take a swipe at the media. That's almost certainly a misinterpretation.
Still, there are conceptualists and there are problems solvers. E.g. Bohr and Bohr. While father was conceptualist, son was clearly problem solver. Both got nobel prize
Both Pfizer doses and boosted. Got what I assume was the Omicron variant in mid-December 2021. They only way I knew I had it was that I tested positive. Ran my fastest mile time as an adult two days later. I was one of three in my family that tested positive during that time (multiple times) but none of us showed anything more than mild symptoms. Nothing out of the "oh it's winter" kind of thing. I'm grateful for the vaccines.
>It seems like maybe you just wanted to tee off on the idea of anybody, anywhere, implementing any sort of community standards?

No, but thanks for the talking down to. I have no problem with them having limits, it's - at the very least - a practical necessity to running their business. Furthermore, for what their business and product are I don't much care what level of control they want to exert.

I mean uncomfortable art. The kind of things that don't fall into their existing categories of "safe to hang in an office", "MPAA R risque" or "fucking".
This is the first "falsehoods programmers believe about X" article I read and what I think kicked off the trend. In fact this GitHub page references the same as "the article that started it all".

https://www.kalzumeus.com/2010/06/17/falsehoods-programmers-...
To be fair, you have no idea how you fared since you

1) haven't been to a medical professional

2) haven't gotten tested
Reasons Not to Join Replit
Believe me, i'd love to use ocaml but the ecosystem isn't just "a bit more patchy" compared to go, unfortunately.
I have everything aliased and use few commands:

gb feature/Foo // make a branch called foo from the current (usually develop) and switch to it

// make edits

gac I did a thing // add all files and commit with this message

mduc // Merge current remote develop into this branch

git push

mkpr // Create a draft PR from this branch on github and open my browser to it
The untyped lambda calculus is inconsistent as a logic, hence you need some notion of types.

Type theory is indeed building mathematics from lambdas, though.
So, what are YOU doing for biodiversity ganzuul?
> We're still a long way from pulling off the sequestration that's actually needed at the scale that's needed.

How so? The simple fact that natural gas and oil still exists, when it comes from 100 million year old biomass, proves beyond a shadow of doubt that geological sequestration holds its integrity at geological timescales.

We have also been injecting CO2 at a rate of 1 million tonnes per year at the Sleipner field in the North Sea since 1996, and extensive 3D timelapse seismography shows the CO2 is permanently trapped.

Think about that - we have been demonstrating CO2 storage at scale since before the launch of the first Palm Pilot.
Right now we're focused on getting our capture/removal process working at scale, but we are keeping a close eye on the use cases since that is a big part of the conversation. There are many great teams working on the usage problem right now & are excited to see where they take things.
A lot of great art is free what you mean is the art perceived as "expensive" by the art industry. Cisco vs OpenSource...
True. I was there. So were you, I assume. The previous poster was most likely speculating.
Not paranormal, but unexplained:

When I was a kid I was very sick with some kind of very severe immune reaction. While trying to figure out what was wrong with me, the doctors discovered that I have tachycardia. After the immune reaction went down and things became less critical, my mom took me to another hospital to get a followup EKG. This hospital had just gotten a new EKG machine (these were the types of machines that printed the results out on a very long strip of paper).

When they hooked me up to it, the machine did not work. Not sure exactly how this manifested, but basically they could not get any measurements. They thought the new machine was just faulty, and to confirm they tried to use it on the child in line after me while we waited. It worked just fine on him, so they hooked me up again, and again it suddenly "broke". They checked me for metal or any other items that might interfere with the machine, and tried having a few other kids go before me as well, but the machine worked for all of them. I never did end up getting an EKG to get my heat checked, until years later as an adult.
Show HN: Fin TCP Proxy – A fan in TCP proxy using Vert.x
Might be worth throwing in an "I didn't get covid" option so you can get an idea of your total sample size and how it compares to the wider population.
Picard s1 wasn't like that.

S2 on the other hand is very weird right now.

Std is getting unwatchable :-(

And I'm not sure if I will look back in 10 years and feel cringe on how I perceive std right now or if it is way over the top and not fitting.

There are now a lot of scenes which lost all sense of urgency because they have a small happy circle...
Mobile browsers frequently come with gestures that can effectively override any attempts to scroll horizontally, instead taking the user backwards/forwards in browsing history, for example.

This is certainly true of Safari, the default web browser for iOS, to the point where even trying to cycle through a horizontal slideshow of images can bait the user into accidentally going back to the previous page.

Not only that, but on iOS I believe it was/is possible to cycle between open apps with a very similar gesture as going back/forth in browser history -- this already proved pretty dumb for browser usability and would prove worse still for horizontal scrolling elements on websites.

Personally, I like to operate my mobile device one-handed a lot of the time, and at the very least I'm not scrolling websites or switching back/forward with both hands even if I'm holding the device with both hands.

So the last thing I want to do, especially if I'm carrying something in one hand, is to have to try and stretch my thumb to the far side of the phone to scroll through a horizontal menu.

My other argument against this sausage menu idea, which has been around far longer than the date of the linked article, is that on many viewport sizes your links may not be half-occluded by the edge of the screen. Given that mobile browsers tend to hide their scrollbars, since without a cursor the scrollbar is just a progress indicator w.r.t. how far down the page you are.

Thus, on some screen sizes -- and it isn't difficult to encounter, given how many different devices there are out there -- n links will be visible in full before the edge of the screen, and then there may not necessarily be any visual hint that there are more menu items to scroll to. So you don't discover that there are more menu items until you accidentally scroll that region.

Finally, I would argue that even for the technophile the hamburger menu is preferable at this point, simply because they have been conditioned by a good decade's worth of responsive web design UX. The sausage menu, being often an edge case, is less obvious even to the technophile purely because not many sites elected to do it that way.

* * *

It seems to me that the superior alternative to both hamburger and sausage menus would be to adopt the hamburger menu style, but simply replace &equiv; or the menu icon with the word "Menu"

The hamburger style can be done without JS too. If you really want to avoid JS, just use :target selector or other CSS shenanigans.
Yes, that surprised me, too. January 2022 alone accounts for about a quarter of all cases to date in the United States.
That has tracking (like the original) so it's not gripe-free; according to HN it completely ruins the game.
While the Right has weaponized “political correctness” as an attack on the Left specifically, it has also been used more broadly in reference to consistency with the dominant political orthodoxy in any context.
> Or do something wild and have a worldwide monument building contest where captured carbon is used to make incredible sculptures and artworks.

I wondered about the scale here. In 2020 we emitted 34.81 billion tons of CO2 from fossil fuels[1]. Now that's much more than what I can lift, or even imagine. So let's say we want to build Pyramid of Giza sized monuments out of that. The Pyramid of Giza weigh about 5.75 million tons[2].

That means that if we want to soak all the yearly emission into monuments we need to find place for about 6000 Pyramid of Giza sized ones. That's a lot of monuments to go around. And then next year we repeat again. I'm not sure this will scale.

> Injecting it underground is just turning waste into waste, [...]

Yes? That's where the carbon was stored for hundreds of millions of years and it was fine there until one day humans figured out a way to get it out and spread it into the atmosphere. The problem is not that we have a moral objection to CO2 on principle. The problem is that it's screwing up the atmosphere.

1: https://ourworldindata.org/co2-emissions
2: https://weightofstuff.com/how-much-does-the-pyramid-of-giza-...
> The idea is that if you are clear for that long, then you must be rehabilitated or no longer a threat.

No, it does not mean that you are no longer a threat. It means that you are no longer more a significantly greater threat than the general population. Again, particularly with crimes of passion, someone who has never been a threat their entire life becomes a threat in a heart beat.

> The distribution seems to show otherwise. It's much more common from 18-40 than in other age groups.

That is not the age distribution of murders that were crimes of passion. That's the distribution of murders. The cluster with younger folks are no doubt those with a disproportionate propensity for murder/violence in general.

But hey, that's an age distribution that one would expect if there was some base probability for murder based on interpersonal interactions! ;-)
This is a fun little bit of history! As an aside, I was once employed as a systems administrator in the “Open Systems” group at my employer, in roughly 1999. In reality, I worked exclusively on SunOS/Solaris.
What's the actual risk though?

The CDC says "Don’t taste or eat raw (unbaked) dough or batter", but many do anyway because the risk is low enough to not be overly concerned about.
https://usebottles.com

I’ve not tested Microsoft apps personally (I use LibreOffice).
The flow you use will typically depend on the company you are working for. Using regular git (no Github/Gitlab) will often have a different workflow than Github.

My team (and myself) prefer this workflow:

- One commit per PR. This allows for easy reverts and cherry-pick.

- One developer per branch. You can do a few devs per branch, but rebases need to be coordinated and carefully handled, because:

- No merge commits. Only rebase onto latest main. Which means force-pushing PR branches and, thus, rewriting history (other devs working on same branch need to be aware that history has changed).

If you're constantly rebasing onto main, then all of your working commits sit on top of the latest code in main. Which means you do not have to deal with tricky merge conflicts, where your commits may weave in and out of the main branch at various points in time because you were doing "git merge" at random points. In addition, if you squash your commits before doing a rebase this will also make merge conflicts rather trivial, because you're only dealing with one set of merge conflicts on one commit.

That's the big picture, team workflow. For my personal workflow, I rely on "git add -p" and stashes. The only time I do a commit and push up code is: a) when I have a large change and want to make sure I don't lose it or b) others have already reviewed my PR and I want to keep the new changes separate to make their life easier when reviewing a 2nd time. I use "git reset --soft HEAD~<number-of-commits>" to squash instead of "git rebase -i" because I find it easier and quicker.

I must emphasize this point: learn "git add -p". It's extremely useful in the case where you have some changes like debugging code or random unrelated changes that you do not want to commit. It's a filtering mechanism.
I caught it thrice so far. I need some other graphs.
So I looked it up and I was pretty off with the model number... it's a Dell C1760nw.

I don't think they sell it anymore unfortunately but maybe there's some new equivalent?

I found it by just reading threads and articles about Linux compatibility and at the time this was one that kept coming up. Maybe printers have changed in the intervening time though.
What an absolute dumpster fire. These issues will end harming decades old traditions of open source collaboration and hacking.

This is not the way.
No court has as yet ruled that the OSI definition of "open source" is the legal definition of the term. The ruling here does not either. If it had limited its ruling to the term "open source," then this would indeed begin to codify what "open source" means from a legal standpoint.

However, the courts ruled upon the composite term "open source and free". Under the OSI definition, open source implies free. But no court has yet so ruled.
You might serve from a CDN, the CDN might not log at that granularity (at least not visibly to you as an enduser), maybe you want to dedupe refreshes/navigation (sessions), maybe people behind a NAT matter to you (when they share an IP), maybe you want to filter out bot traffic (not trivial), maybe you don't want to have to deal with log rotation and backups or want to install a GUI parser for your marketing people... a whole lot of things that are difficult to implement yourself vs dropping in one 3rd-party script and calling it a day.

Google Analytics or its competitors take a few minutes to set up. Recreating that whole stack to feature parity would take forever.
I guess they really meant "slightly categorized because otherwise the list would be too long".
"This page isnt working" -- Yup that about sums up my Covid isolation experience.
And always run them in a private tab so they have less data to correlate.
Another anecdote, my mom was essentially a lifelong Windows user. I would have to answer basic tech support questions for her several times a month.

She's switched 80% of her use to an iPad and the rest to a Mac laptop, and I get a question about once a year.

YMMV.
RDA and Michael Shanks had insanely good chemistry. Both comedic and dramatic.
For those of you having issues with the slides on mobile, the github repo (including a pdf of the slides) can be found here:

https://github.com/wrongbaud/sf-cabinet/

Feel free to ping me with any questions or comments!
> I generally wouldn't define algorithm as such, although I can see where the lines between them can become blurry.

Its pretty clear cut tbh. An algorithm is a set of steps to follow to produce some output. A trained model is, 'hey do these matrix multiplications with these coefficients to get an output'. The fact that the exact coefficients were arrived at via backprop, doesn't make it not an algorithm.
"If you were to design a source-available nonfree product, and call it 'open source', this court would find you guilty of false advertising."

It's not really about any of that. If you read the court opinion, it's basically copyright protection infringement on the basis that someone copied a product and changed the licensing in violation of the original license. The false advertising claim is on the basis that the duplicate software is free and open source, because it can't be free and open source if the original license forbade that.
There's a world of difference between "Which of these two options defines your gender identity and sex organs?" and "Which grammatical gender form should we use for words when we talk about you?". The former is a deeply personal question with unclear benefit; the latter is a specific question about how you want the site to do a specific thing it needs to do. (Does it really need to do that? Why exactly are you asking about gender?)
> but thanks to licensing fees we've been forced to re-invent that wheel over and over.

The fact that licensing fees are even an obstacle here for adoption of a font designed over half a century ago highlights how broken the current intellectual property laws are. At some point of near-universal adoption, a functioning society should just release such a thing into the public domain and provide the original author a pension for his troubles, instead of worrying about rent-seeker from every amateur designer.
I wish that OSI would stop acting like the courts have ruled that "open source" means what OSI says it means. They have not.
Up to 65 British Dark Age kings' resting places located
Or as the Independent puts it "Final resting place of up to 65 British kings revealed as discovery sheds light on King Arthur era".
You’re welcome, Travis.
All my features are part of 1 PR, the PR contains no code to avoid bugs, the features are in my head.
N + 1 for N at the time of evaluation.

It has to be particularly gregarious, or involve the EU, to get knocked down in this day and age.
As someone who spent quite a few year freelancing before getting employed, I had a hard time dealing with mentors and adjusting to the corporate world. Especially when those mentors were themselves still a bit inexperienced in their role.

I believe that a mentor relationship should be a two way street as I find that I learn best by teaching others but most people just want to have their ego stroked and feel attacked if you bring your own experience. The fact that I was able to solve most of my problems myself drove them mad.

So I had to learn bite my tongue and never argue or let them feel that I might know anything they don't.
If you want to delay the impact of climate change by 1 year by sequestering one year of of CO2 added to the environment through saline sequestration, that's about 40 billion 10K water trucks worth of storage, or about 40 Lake Tahoes turned into saline storage ponds, and you need to add that much storage capacity every year just to keep atmospheric CO2 from getting worse than it is (you're not yet to the scale of reducing atmospheric CO2 at this rate). The oceans have enough volume for this, but most other containers are too small to be meaningful.
Uber A/B tests everything extensively before it gets rolled out to everyone. They would not have switched away from the hamburger menu unless it drove better metrics. I used to work there.
No, but thanks for the talking down to

Apologies. You're right. That was unnecessary, and I actually edited my post to remove the snark right before I'd even seen your reply. Probably at the same time you were typing.
We are exploring a number of conversion pathways, but our right now our focus is on capture, removal, and sequestration underground.

The process could potentially use waste heat & that is something we are thinking about as we think about plant design, potential locations, and partners.
Ha! And can we please stop calling curve fitting a "statistical regression"?