skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Is it that wild? This isn't a dinky little laptop chip, it has almost 150(!) Billion transistors on a very efficient process.
This is actually a very nice static site generator. Because just like with middleman or nanoc it let you extend functionality with pure Ruby. Big difference this project is certainly not a sleeper and well maintained and progressively enhanced/developed. It is highly recommended to try out if you want to build a great (product/company/etc) website. Bonus: It also supports esbuild out of the box.
Look, I've a PhD in algebraic geometry, and a healthy dose of research level physics. I'm fully aware of the math side of such claims. I don't see this thread having any understanding of physics here, which is what this paper is about. When you write "when they should be" as if this naive (mis) understanding of the issues is somehow the correct formulation of the problem, it's not relevant. They address this in the paper. They take a standard set of rules for QM, replace a complex Hilbert space with a real Hilbert space, and ask can it reproduce QM. This includes any real valued structure underlying that space, including any of the field isomorphisms. They derive an experiment that can detect in our particular reality which case we live in. So far experiments rule out real valued QM, just like Bell's inequality allowed experimenters to rule out all possible hidden variable theories.

So apparently there is more to the physics than this naive representation you claim is equivalent.

So please stop with the "mathematically isomorphic as fields" argument. It's ruled out experimentally. This is much deeper, and appears fundamentally interwoven in reality, which is much cooler.
Manufacturers license generic Paxlovid for supply to lower income countries
Likening pro-BLM messages in readmes to terrorism is a little bit of a stretch.
On the last part, does this mean it would orbit around the Lagrange point?
There's definitely some issues, but since lots of normal people already use different keyboards for language reasons, this isn't as bad as you make out.

The built in Dvorak on the Mac has an option to let the keys go back to normal for CMD usage, though I prefer learning them as typable letters than physically located chords.
> For example, how did they deal with boredom?

I'm not sure if boredom was that much of problem. Days were filled with work, much of it requiring focus, mastery, improvised solutions to unexpected circumstances etc. Also, since the work wasn't "alienated", it didn't feel dull or pointless like much of the work today.
This tool takes care of multiple page PDF. You edit one page at a time but you can edit multiple pages of a PDF just fine and save it altogether.

Essentially, the only difference from a purpose built tool is that you jump around between Inkscape and the main window for each page editing.
Ask HN: I'm changing my job after a 15-year tenure. How should I proceed?
Hello HN, I've been at my current company for the past 15 years. I've taken on different roles where I started as a software engineer, before being promoted to lead, and then to staff engineer. I know my current company by heart. I know how to get things done. I know who to talk to and how to talk to the right people. I know the processes of my company in and out.

I decided to get out of my comfort zone. Try something new, I told myself on and on for the past 3 years. And I finally did it. I'm changing jobs.

I'm going to a new company, where I'll be doing something slightly similar to my previous role, but in a totally new field. I don't know anyone there. The people seem extremely friendly and fun to work with. This is what I felt in the hiring process.

It feels like I forgot how I got good at this. Technically, I have no doubts to get things done. However, on the people level, I have no clue how to get started. How do I make "new friends" at work?

What do you usually do when you switch to a new company? How do you go from the "new clueless person at work" to "oh hey Mike, I'll need your help this afternoon"?
Moreover, picking an existing popular open source license is important because a and b being opensource licenses does not mean that they are compatible, i.e. they could still have mutually-incompatible requirements that prevent anyone from releasing a combination of a-licensed and b-licensed code.
I'm happy we have options now. Personally I prefer 75% as I missed the function row from different boards, but others have differing tastes. Even if I hate numpads, and especially refuse to buy an off-centered laptop with one, others do prefer it. I find it very common in the country I'm in as the QWERTY equivalent here is also bad and puts letters over the number row with no Arabic numerals on any layer (despite being the default number style) so it's quicker to pop over to a number pad than it is to switch to an English layouts for Arabic numerals (though arguable the standard layout should change).
This is really madness, I wonder if future generations will judge such policies as harshly as we judge policies of the 1930s (such as numerus clausus on Jewish students) today.
It probably wouldn't help you, but others in Europe should consider the British/Irish layout: it retains the tall Enter key and the extra key between Shift and Z.

You gain £ and ¬ with the extra key (and € with AltGr), although a few symbols are moved round: # and ~ end up easier to type, ¬ is kicked into the corner, and @ and " are switched compared to the US layout.
You might have an android device wider than 575px, this is the media query that's causing it:

```
@media (max-width: 575px)
h2 {
position: relative;
overflow-x: hidden;
}
```

overflow-x:hidden makes overflow-y:auto, which is scroll
Why? There are ~8 billion humans to get stuff done — it’s not all on your shoulders. Even if only 1% of the world both can and will fix it, it’s still in the realm of stuff that can be fixed.
Vast majority of people tend to stick to the default theme. And of course, those also tend to be the most vulnerable to phishing attacks
> Firefox is dead. It's time to move past denial. It doesn't stand for anything you think it does. I'm sad, too. Time to bury the putrid, rotting corpse.

I don't disagree, it's just that I need a browser, and there's no real alternatives.

Looking a lot at Librewolf. Have there been any independent audits of it?
Member of the IEEE Siberia section shares his perceptions of the war in Ukraine
Alternative keyboard layouts are fascinating, but always raise a couple of questions for me and I wonder if anyone here can come up with actual experiences regarding the following topics:

- I have been using standard german QWERTZ for about 42 years now, in average certainly not less than 3 hours every day. I was originally educated in proper 10 finger blind typing in a dedicated typing school as part of my typesetter apprenticeship. I am typing really fast. Today I am even using "daskeyboard ultimate" - a completely unlabeled keyboard. Is it really possible to improve 42 years typing practice with a new layout?

- Is it possible to be proficient in two keyboard layouts at the same time? I have a partial answer myself. For one, I managed to learn standard Emacs shortcuts (a lot of them!) some of which contradict common OS shortcuts (like copy/paste etc) and I have both sets in muscle memory and I can seamlessly switch between both sets as I switch applications (most of the time that is). And I use three computers with three OSs (Linux, Win, Mac) with one keyboard per Synergy software. Same layout for the standard characters, but different OS specific layouts for special characters like "@", "€" etc. I can seamlessly switch between them as well and that is the reason for the unlabeled keyboard. A labeled keyboard would show only one layout and puzzle me if I had to enter special characters for another. So, while I know I can handle some number of characters in alternate layouts in muscle memory - will this be possible for the entire character set as well?

- If you get accustomed to a non-standard keyboard layout, isn't it a problem if you have to use some other computer (where you cannot change the layout) for whatever reason, for example in an Internet cafe?
Yes, Mac OS has this built in as one of their Dvorak options.
How is this comment useful? It resembles what children comment about popular online games when they don't like them.

If you don't use MySQL, it doesn't mean you're aware of who does, how they use it and what's the revenue produced.

It'd be great if you could expand your post and add details, perhaps even some (anecdotal) evidence that sheds more light into your point of view.
You missed the golden age of F1 in late 80's and the early 90's. Today's version is like watching a computer simulation where the team with the most money is almost guaranteed to win.
Can someone, who uses one of those tiny keyboards, elaborate how to work at all (let alone effectivly) without the Home/End/Page up/Page down block or arrow keys? How do you mark a word? How do you jump between lines or beginning and end of the line?

(And I don't even want to think about having no F-keys - which would require even weirder key-combinations in many cases.)
Goodbye HTML. Hello Canvas
I hope this works for them, but it seems a little bit contrived to me.

If they just took a fundraising approach like how public radio and Wikipedia do, I would gladly contribute a few times per year when a big banner shows up asking for donations. That would be a nice direct value proposition -- "please contribute so we can keep this awesome resource free and high quality"

But paying for customizations? This seems like a distraction for all parties involved. It will take away product resources, it will make their code more complex and harder to work with, and worst of all I don't think anyone will really want it in the first place.

I truly hope I'm wrong, but so far this seems a questionable move.
+1 to suggestion of VoIP type service. Also look at Callcentric and voip.ms (which are traditional sip based providers) as well as others such as Skype (which does offer a pstn number option) and google voice (even though the parent post didn’t like it)
Hmm, I never used the numpad, so losing it is no sacrifice.

Now I just have a separate calculator for whatever I’d do with the numpad.
Does anyone know how to contribute to the list? I am aware of at least 3 works that fit the criteria, but I could not find any contact/"how to contribute" info on the website.
The 12000 series has already bought intel a lot of breathing room. It's outperforming AMD on gaming workloads at a lower price point, AMD have recognized this and lowered their prices.
Yeah, I've always been pretty skeptical of the "Intel just sat doing nothing" narrative. The impression I got back in the day is that they went quite hard on their 10nm process with a reasonably ambitious set of changes, then failed to scale it to production. That had substantial knock-on effects including delays to the associated microarchitectures as well as subsequent nodes and backports.

Regardless of the reasons I hope they recover; multiple providers of cutting-edge fabrication technology will be essential.
Over the lockdown period I went on a bit of a general keyboard adventure myself. I read and saw a lot about optimum keyboards and wondered if I was missing out on amazing typing experiences. After all, typing was my job right (programming) so it made sense that I spend some time and money finding the best possible tools.

I went through various full-sized mechanical keyboards, ergonomic keyboards, split keyboards (like the moonlander from this article, but different) and gave them a few months each. I would regularly check in with typingtest.com to try and get some real stats and see if my speed and accuracy was improving without me noticing. For reference/context I was originally trained with proper touch typing skills but have "evolved" into my own style (mainly using index middle ring for most typing with little & thumb reserved for shift, space, alt, ctrl, enter etc) ... average typing speed is about 75wpm with 99+% accuracy.

After a load of money and time, it turns out that for me, a simple low profile chiclet keyboard (e.g. like this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_keyboards#/media/File:Ap...) is by far the best option for me:

- mechanical keyboards are just too "tall" for me. It was fatiguing having to raise my fingers so much only then to push them down so much. The clickyness was a nice gimmick (initially), but I don't think it improved my typing at all, and just pissed off my wife. Yes I know you can get silent switches. Mine weren't. Returning to a non-mechnical keyboard definitely felt "bad" afterwards, but the adjustment takes a couple of minutes.

- ergonomic keyboards were cool - I really enjoyed them and I kinda had this mental image in my head where I was kinda typing on a beachball. I really liked it, but it seems you cannot get a decent quality ergonomic keyboard with low-profile keys so you ended up with the same finger fatigue you get form a mechanical keyboard.

- the split layout keyboard was a mind fuck - somehow just separating out the two halves seemed to reduce my brain down into something akin to a never-used-a-computer-before level of ineptitude. I was genuinely having to look for keys "Where is P?!" it just totally undid decades of keyboard layout knowledge and it was like it was the first time I was ever using a computer! Even when the two halves were approximately about the same position and spacing as the ergo keyboard, it was a real challenge. The whole time using the split keyboard (even with a conventional layout) was torture for me.

With a chiclet keyboard, I just find them so much more pleasant to use - your fingers can just float around over the top with minimal fatigue and you can genuinely "flow" over they keys, moving your hands fluidly as you make tiny movements to activate the keys, and the keyboard itself is like 1cm thick so you do not need to raise your hands above the desk that much. I would like to find one with mechanical switches, but it seems that all mechanical switches are huge monsters that themselves are like 15mm high before you add the base of the keyboard.
You mean that we should take into account how actually complicated is to get software that fully support the hardware into account for HW comparisons where a type of HW can only run with a specific OS?
Wow where has this been all my life?!? So much wasted product thrown away in bottles
One click in … two to get out
Am I the only person who is pissed off by clicking on a link to read a story and then having to click twice or get out because of a sneaky redirect?

For example https://www.tomshardware.com/news/apple-m1-ultra-rtx-3090-benchmarks has a more stories before you go page (which at least the are honest about and signal clearly)
I've never been a touch-typist, so my relationship with keyboards has been different from many.

I need to look at the keys, so backlights and illuminated characters are important to me.

I like a "clicky" keyboard, but am prome to "one-off" misrajes. These are magnified by keyboards with smaller surface.
It's needed. When I'm in vim I always open an extra terminal to the left so the text is more centred
> Pushing for negative or positive connotations feel both odd to me if the point is to evaluate a set of practices to apply to specific issues they could efficiently solve.

The point is, it's not just a set of practices" applied to "specific issues". It's a complex system of beliefs that ultimately result in living differently and being less susceptible to today's problems. "Wisdom" sounds like a fitting name for such system of beliefs.
waterfox and librewolf.

then otter, seamonkey, falkon, k-meleon, srware iron, qutebrowser, comodo dragon and comodo icedragon, dooble, midori, epic.

not sure if maxthon and Avant Browser are still a thing
They have "layers" so you can do some shortcuts and the extra keys become active - so e.g. activate a layer and now U, I, O, and P are home, end, insert , delete etc. Change layer back to normal and off you go.
Many (1400) Games on the Steam Deck, Including Doom (2016)
I think he means the same distance between opposite faces, the quantity that was discussed in the article.

The skew dice faces are all identical but none are even parallel.
Hack-Tic (Dutch hacker magazine)
I'm wary of synthetic benchmarks. Are they representative of anything meaningful? Are they gamed? It's why people tend to look for real-world performance. For GPUs this often means games. This system too can be gamed (eg drivers silently optimizing for performance). Some games will also favour a particular architecture. Taken in totality you tend to get a good big picture view.

Such real-world benchmarks are thin on the ground for the M1 Ultra thus far and are clouded by things like programs and drivers not being optimized and/or translation layers. This will improve over time.

But I've seen a couple of game benchmarks for the M1 Ultra that seem to show it's >50% of the FPS of the 3090. That's honestly astounding.

I'm still confused by the power draw of the M1 Ultra. It's claimed to be 60W but the Mac Studio seems to draw >300W so what's the reality?

But if a CPU/GPU combo does in fact draw 60W (compared to the 350W+ for the 3090 alone and another 100W+ for any likely CPU) and gets over 50% of the performance? That is absolutely huge (if true). This is still a first-generation product. Many expect the M2 later this year. That may bring respectable (but definitely not cutting edge) GPU performance to the Mac Mini. Apple still has a lot of headroom here.
How to implement NextAuth credentials provider with external API and login page
This comment looks like an attempt at implying some kind of deep knowledge, but you're demonstrating a terrible ability to convey information. "Global buffer pool mutex that's designed to look smart" does not fall apart if you have a few dozen queries running at the same time. Source: the place I work at has a multiple of several thousand of what you wrote, and surprisingly - nothing falls apart, and we've been using MySQL for decades. Like any software, it has its negatives and positives.

Our job is to be aware of shortcomings and work around it. This rule applies to any software, any language. I'm sorry that using MySQL has made you so mad, but deliberate spreading false knowledge simply because you're angry helps no one.
There are shortcuts for all of those keys that I use even if I’m on a full-sized keyboard that has them.

MacOS has two sets actually, one with command and arrows and one with control using Emacs shortcuts.
I see a lot of people here complain about the misconception that nonstandard layouts on small form factor keyboards require emacs-esque key chording to get rather common keys like ~ or |. This is completely incorrect.

I personally use a fullsize cherry keyboard in boring office grey, standard iso layout and the linear switches it came with. It has a navigation block, a numblock and the full function key row. However, due to the layout I'm using I never touched the numblock or the navigation cluster even once. There are four layers I use: The first layer are the normal lowercase letters and digits. The second layer is activated when I press shift, and inputs the same symbols but uppercase. The third layer inputs symbols. It is activated by pressing capslock or #. From there every common symbol I might ever want for programming language weirdness is readily accessible. The fourth layer I use is activated by pressing either '<>|' or right alt (alt gr). It activates the navigation cluster under my left hand and the numblock under my right hand. This way, it is entirely possible to only live in the 60% portion of the keyboard my hands are already on while enjoying all upsides the navigation and numblock areas provide. There is no chording, just like you wouldn't call it chording when you press shift to enter a capital 'A'.
Panics are usually at or close to the root of the bug. Segfaults can be anywhere later in the program
Open APIs are a start, Open Standard is better
Firefox has fixed a lot of issues in their Quantum release. It removed a lot of what you called bloat as well. In tests it uses a lot less memory on average compared to Chrome. The privacy settings have been extended even further in recent years. Chrome’s settings come not even close to it. The extension system is still more flexible than Chrome’s. It has some built-in features such as autoplay stop and audio control that Chrome lacks. I also think you’re vastly overstating the incompatibilities on Firefox.

Finally, isn’t it better if there are multiple browser engines instead of just one? This allows for more innovation and has done so in the past too. The past pretty much proves that Firefox has and still can innovate despite your assertion.

I also wonder why you are stating all this in such a polemic and vulgar fashion. “ suckling on Google teats”, “bloated spamware”. None of this is even remotely accurate. But anyhow, what’s the point?
Do you mean the 1.4 rolling builds? The 1.3 ones require a support contract.
Yeah, I'm kind of wondering if I should read "externalizing costs" between the lines or not.
If the faces are different shapes, their probability would depend on how you quickly you roll them.
I am going to overly simplify the problem to prove a point.

The worker doesn't want to share his job.

The saver doesn't want to share his savings. (primarily the rich)

The tax payer doesn't want to share his income.

The land owner doesn't want to share his land.

I don't think this is an exhaustive list but it is a starting point to understand why our markets don't appear to behave like the theory predicts. By that I mean that a market should obviously allocate jobs, savings and land to those who need them most the same way a market allocates products and services to those who need them most. Okay, I have lied, over the long term, revolutions tend to revert the allocation of these things back to how people perceive they should be allocated. One should now wonder why violence is necessary and what it is trying to overcome.

Marx would argue that private property is the root of all evil but I'm not 100% convinced. Democracy still involves centralized control by authorities. It's not much better than a authoritarian government in practice. The bigger difference is that politicians constantly enter and leave their positions of power. That simply doesn't happen fast enough in our economy, we have to wait for the wealthy and powerful to die and revolutions may just be an ugly way of accelerating deaths that are useful to society by people who don't have decades to spare. One could argue that power and wealth cannot die, so we must kill the bearer instead.
Positioning of telescopes is about "how good is the view from here?" it favours hills, but that is not driven by the hazards.

However the hazards up on hills are more typically those of exposure, altitude and isolation, not incoming gravitationally-propelled objects.
I've been using librewolf for a while after experiencing issue with waterfox.

it is not really a full fork of firefox, it's firefox with a few patches applied and sane default configuration.
Legally untested? Nobody ever contended their speeding ticket because they weren't the ones driving or for any of the other reasons you mentioned?
What happened to performance engineering in the cloud?
You don't really need those keys for that, there are almost always various chords that do that. macOS, in particular, has "Emacs-light" keybindings in most edit fields: Ctrl-A goes to the beginning of a line, Ctrl-E goes to the end, Alt-Backspace erases a word, etc. Of course, if you use Vim-style keys, you use normal mode for all that stuff.

In general though, custom mechanical keyboards have firmware that can be programmed with "layers": hold down a certain key (or toggle) and layers get activated which changes the meanings of keys. This is the way those very minimal keyboards (which doesn't even necessarily have a number row) can work for daily use. If you want the keys badly, just program your firmware appropriately.