skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
have been intentional about not falling into the same behaviors with my kids

Some behaviour is just plain borked, but other behaviour is just more nuanced.

An example, some kids are extroverted, others intro. What works for one, may not be the same for another.

You may need to constantly work with an extrovert, so they are eventually, as an adult, be in control of their own exuberance. And with an introvert, work with them, trying to help them expand thier ability to interact.

An ability for both to live in a shared society.

But imagine a parent who was an extrovert, was constantly upset at, as a child, being told to calm down, or stop asking 1000 questions per second. Or even, just "give another a moment to talk".

So they, with an extrovert, do not do such things. And the extrovert does not learn control, and dicipline, and to give others some space sometimes, and becomes less capable of interacting with others as an adult.

Of course, this is a poor example, and poorly phrased, but I hope my point comes across.

We should focus more strongly on what is correct for the child, not how a parent may have misapplied childhood lessons to ourselves. For those lessons may be right for your child, even if not for oneself.
I find ambushing another country and killing thousands rather concerning and in some ways quite petty.
Because their purpose includes countering bioweapons
Hi, article author here. Cloud Armor will drop requests without regard to the size of the request body for HTTP PUT or PATCH request (i.e., the payload won't have to padded with 8192 bytes, like in the case of POST requests.) Of course, for an attacker to successfully exploit this, the underlying application would have to be configured to accept and process PUT/PATCH requests.

As for query parameters in GET requests, I'm not entirely sure about Cloud Armor's limits there. I'll check and get back to you.
These are pretty much all automated.

They take market movements and append the most relevant piece of news to that movement. If you track any stock closely you'll find your daily Motleyfool article "Why is XYZ stock is moving because of [most recent relevant news for that company]"

The article is usually one paragraph stating the stock movement and a summary of the most recent news. You can get the same summary for different movements due to the automation here.
I don't think it's fallen apart at all.

Out of curiosity yesterday, I launched open Truth Social, and the top post on there was "Russian State Media Announces Finding US Run Biolabs In Ukraine"

All of the replies, we're eating this up with things like "get ready guys", "here it is" fomenting that finally the evidence for bidens corruption (and Obama's of course) was going to be on display and how Trump was going to clean it up
Cookie.AI | Remote | Full-time

Cookie.AI is a well funded startup headquartered in the Silicon Valley, operating with a remote-first mindset - we have teams across US continental states and in Europe. We are building a market-category-defining cloud data security company for the dynamic world of the data and app ecosystem. We are backed by top-tier VCs, and angel investors as CEOs and security leaders from Google, Stripe, Facebook, etc. The founding team consists of serial entrepreneurs and early engineers from startups and cloud scale companies. We are looking for product managers (customer obsessed PMs), system engineers (Golang), product and platform security engineers, fullstack developers (React), and DevOps engineers (CI/CD, Grafana, K8s, etc.) with hands-on experiences with cloud-native and SaaS products. Open for summer interns (PhD and MS only). You will play a critical role in building products working closely with our early customers, founders, and collaborating with senior engineers who have built and shipped $1B+ products (alumni from Google, Facebook, Nutanix, Rubrik, ZScaler, Netskope, AWS, IBM Research). You will gain hands-on experience with cutting-edge technologies (Kafka, Docker, K8s, etc.) and many others from the open-source world. We are looking for characteristics such as ambition and agility, commitment to build an enduring product and an enduring company, self-driven and self-motivated, diverse and growth mindsets, and intellectual curiosity to innovate! Location is open to anywhere in the world where you are at your best. Please reach out: hello AT cookie.ai.
Kudos for recognizing your own mistake, owning up to it and ultimately correcting it. That is no minor feat.

But I do wonder if you're not extrapolating too much from this single case. Just because you made the mistake once doesn't necessarily mean it is very common per se.
Thanks for sharing, that is an incredible video. Seems like he even nailed the details. Much more impressive than Mearsheimers self-fulfilling prophecies
Agreed. It's not just AWS, however. Azure, Cloudflare, and other WAF providers have a similar trade-off.
I give credit to this site for attempting to put a high level of effort into this article, but I'd argue that at least some of the things they highlight as misinformation-bugs are arguably accurate-information features. Don't forget that "misinformation" is just one side of the Bad-Information Coin: the other side is censorship and propaganda.

Take the first 2 points.

> 1. On Tiktok, anyone can publish and republish any video, and stolen or reposted clips are displayed alongside original content.

This is arguably a great thing when you consider that misinformation and censorship/propaganda lead to the same outcome and features that make it harder to repost "stolen" clips can lead to idea censorship. If we can't critically examine and provide commentary on a news clip, for example, then if the original poster gets anything important wrong (either through willing lies or unwilling errors), you're screwed.

> 2. Pseudonyms are popular on TikTok, making it harder to discern who a poster is, where they are, and whether their video content is original or real.

TikTok's approach seems better for avoiding censorship than approaches like Twitter that has verification checkmarks in place. Every user is effectively standing on equal ground and only the quality of their content matters. In practice, Twitter's approach functions more like a marketing badge than anything: where opinions get amplified simply because the original poster has an attention-getting blue-checkmark
Encode it using HLS or DASH before you do that.
Despite differences, not despite wars.
> the Information Age might for the first time in history enable true democracy

We’ve had true democracy. It doesn’t work. It careens into majoritarianism while hyperpartisanship tears it apart. The American system balances democracy against oligarchic and monarchic stabilisers. One could argue that our present situation results from forgetting the need for that balance.
Figuring out who to pay the tax to could get complicated, but you will never legally owe double taxes for the same income to different states. Whatever agreements or laws these states have do not change this.
I've noticed that the word "could" in the title is usually a giveaway that the idea is at the hypothesis level.
I'm not him, so just speculating here, but maybe he's making sauce and pasta together all-in-one? And perhaps uses thick pastas or doesn't want al dente?
There are worse ways to go. You'd lose consciousness in just a few seconds from a sudden drop in blood pressure.
I think one of the biggest questions we are facing is how do geography-based governments make rules for interactions that transcend geographical boundaries?

Whose laws apply when people from multiple jurisdictions interact with each other in a digital space? Which law takes precedence? I think we see this with property rights, privacy rights, workers' rights, business law, tax law, and so much more.

I think web3 may partially be driven by a desire to have a shared global system of currency, business registration, property registration, and more. For example, registering a DAO is global whereas registering a company, in the US, is at a state level.

I feel both afraid and excited at how we will start to more collectively govern global spaces.
Because there is a world wide oil market and a major reduction of the worlds supply of oil via Russian sanctions, while the demand stays roughly the same resulting in higher price everywhere that has sanctions against Russia.
What do you think would be the cost of depending on Russia for energy?
I was also hoping to get some insight from WebExtension developers here! Two main questions:

1. How do you handle developing a cross browser extension these days? Firefox only supports manifest v2, Chrome only supports manifest v3. I was just running webext.

2. Have people had experience posting somewhat controversial extensions such as this to the Chrome Web Store? I'm afraid to post this using my main account, since so much of my digital life is currently tied to my gmail address.
If you put millions of cars on local networks with significant range you'll get tons of untargeted hacking.

If they don't have significant range then they don't solve the problem.
It's a BWR, the worst case failure mode looks something like Fukishima. Certainly a mess, but "set on fire" makes me think you're imagining another Chernobyl. BWRs don't catch fire like that. If something went very wrong, the reactor and containment buildings might pop and make a big mess, but it's not as though there's a thousand tons of graphite there to catch fire. It's not an RBMK.

Edit: Actually it's a PWR, the other two reactors at this plant are BWRs. Still, similar worst-case scenarios.
Their entire business model is just underpaying their employees.
There is no neutral, bias-free position. Acting like there is already displays bias.

The undisclosed financial interest is they're in a union? What a joke, as if the existence of other unions suddenly changes their own. And what a joke to bring up California, where Uber and all of these shitty companies lobbied to pass an unconstitutional law to their benefit. Maybe that's the financial conflict of interest I give a fuck about, not whether or not the media and goods I consume are union products.
Upgrading a 2012 11” MacBook Air to 16GB RAM (solder job) [video]
> every word of the assignment creatively misinterpreted

OTOH when I took operating systems I got an assignment that said “implement a job scheduler, using FIFO, LIFO or round-robin job scheduling”. So I picked FIFO, got it working and I had time left over so I thought, “what the hell? I’ll do LIFO too”. So I did, and I still had time so I took a crack at round-robin, but I didn’t have time so I turned it what I had, proud of myself for going above and beyond.

I got back a 66 on the assignment. I asked why and he said, “you didn’t even attempt round robin”. I pulled up the assignment where it VERY CLEARLY said “or” and he said, “well, it should have been obvious I meant ‘and’”.
It is not only the density, but also the purity of Uranium which makes a difference. Weapons grade uranium is 99.3% pure U235 or more by mass. Reactor grade uranium could be between 90-94% at most (the last I had read). It isn't worth economically to enrich further. If the purpose is to reach sustained criticality, this purity is enough to heat the fuel-rods.

Although it may not seem a lot, the 6% impurity is enough to act as a neutron damper (for runaway chain reactions). Consequently, you need an order or two higher density with reactor grade Uranium to make it go supercritical & have uncontrolled fission - something that does not happen in normal circumstances.
The right to strike refers to protections given to employees to collectively act without fear of punishment, which is part of the NLRA[0]. Since these are contractors, they are afforded no such protection.

0: https://www.nlrb.gov/about-nlrb/rights-we-protect/your-right...
One person's war is another hemisphere's developer crunch
> Why does the US invade other countries in name of democracy and freedom?

It doesn't.

It invades countries for other purposes (that is, both the overt and any covert purposes of the invasions are not “democracy and freedom” except occasionally in the sense of addressing a foreign threat to American democracy and freedom or that of an American ally threatened by the country invaded), but sometimes does something notionally aimed at democracy and/or freedom for the people once there, which may notionally be either justified as a moral act given that some governance must be established or as an instrumental means of achieving the invasions overt purpose (often it's sold both ways.)
Maybe that is the case with some small, insular sects of Orthodox Jews? Some of the groups among those often referred to as the "Ultra Orthodox" - I don't know.

It is not aligned with the vast majority of Jewish views about conversion to Judaism.

In general, conversion is possible. As far as I can tell there are even clearly-enough defined requirements.

Jews are not supposed to treat converts any differently than non-converts. People being people, this doesn't always happen, but that is the reasonable principle.

Given that Jews for centuries have not proselytized to non-Jews, many believe you cannot convert to Judaism. You can.
Patrol 36
Cheese is free only in mousetrap.
I think this is the reason umbrella companies exist. You invoice them and they make the appropriate deductions for tax and social security contributions.
Hmm idk. Why specifically do you say this? I currently live in lower Manhattan and have a lot of love for delis and visit them often. But these places are very expensive in a lot of ways that 7 and Lawson isn’t.
I watched the Gods Must Be Crazy recently... I don't recall any long drawn out scenes with no dialogue? But maybe I took a micronap.
HPV viruses are DNA viruses, which means they evolve way slower than Corona viruses. This makes it easier to identify strains that are worth developing a vaccine against. Also, the mRNA technology and/or the production lines are probably not yet capable of producing multivalent vaccines.
_Calculus Made Easy_ by Thompson (now in a new edition revised by Martin Gardner) was a former classic used by all sorts of people, and Feynman learned calculus from _Calculus for the Practical Man_, which was hardly sophisticated by modern standards. As long as you stick to a book some sizeable number of people think is okay, I don't think it matters that much what you learn from; the important thing is that you work through theorems carefully enough that you really understand them. Whether it's Spivak or Velleman or Thompson or OpenStax or Stewart (only for those who are assigned it, since otherwise there's no reason to spend >=$100 on it—it's not worth the premium) or Ross (his _Elementary Analysis_ book), worry about learning the concepts more than worrying about which book you chose. You can always refer to alternative books or youtube videos if a concept isn't clear in the primary book you chose.
The comment was in response to the statement that "the choice was clear" on who should be supported. Except it's not. There is a lot of blame to go around, it's been abundantly clear for 25 years that NATO expansion to Ukraine & Georgia would result in war[1]. So when we have continually pushed for that, we have been pushing for war.

Also, we can't ignore the US-backed Ukrainian coup/revolution in 2014[2] which then resulted in the invasion of Crimea. Nor can we ignore that after the democratically elected government in Ukraine was removed via that coup/revolution, that the US handpicked the post-coup leadership in Ukraine and helped rewrite the Constitution to put NATO membership back on the table, knowing this would antagonize Russia.[3]

Should we not consider all of these things? Russia is clearly being the aggressor now that they have decided to invade Ukraine, but that didn't happen in a vacuum. Our actions in the West are what has led to this, either intentionally or though incompetence. Ignoring everything that happened before February 24th is ignorant.

[1] https://www.armscontrol.org/act/1997-06/arms-control-today/o...

[2] https://apnews.com/article/970e8e54b3df46eab593e9e11beb056d

[3] https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-ukraine-tape/leaked-a...
Yes, those Forms have had a lasting impact on Western Philosophy for a long time. I wouldn't be surprised if some of it hasn't had some impact on the OOP thinking, in general, even though indirectly. If you read on Hume and the British Empiricists from the 18th Century, for example, you'd be surprised how many "modern ideas" you find in there. After all, programming languages at large have a long history of philosophical ideas before them. Before they could come into being, that is.
Applies to most Western democracies, how's Denmark treating Syrian refugees?
For extra context, here is a timeline of when countries have abolished capital punishment:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_punishment_by_country#...

The list is growing at a rate of about 1 country per year, which, if continued, would mean that the 21st century would be the last in which countries formally kill their own citizens.
Study sheds new light on Tutankhamun’s mysterious dagger ‘born’ from meteorite
Good reasons the future of space should be private companies. We need more SpaceXes and not more state-sponsored.
> Does game theory explain why other people do steal?

Yes.

> Should we assume that thieves' circumstances are different enough that stealing is rational?

You don't have to assume it. It's a fact. There's a reason that thieves come mainly from a certain socioeconomic group.

> it's a stretch to say it "explains a lot of it".

No, it is not a stretch at all. If you think it is, then you don't understand game theory. You should read this book:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Evolution_of_Cooperation
"The night before I picked up James, I picked up Adam, at the same West Union Sports Pub. I pick up a lot of these Adams. I suspect most are fiftysomethings who’ve made gobs of money at nearby big-tech campuses, like Intel’s, but I can’t be sure"

Based on the article's title initially I thought most of his clients are broken young men in their early 20s. Apparently not and the fact is quite the opposite with the majority are the wealthy old drunk men. It seems that money cannot buy you happiness.
It hurts to read the prevailing opinion in the western sphere these days, Fukuyama and comments here included. HN was mostly logical and rational in the past, but lately (Cov-19 and Russia) it is outright one sided.

Are you aware that the USA and its "allies" have orchestrated a Coup d'etat in Ukraine? Are you aware of the "F*ck EU" phone call in which Nuland moves people in Ukrainian politics like peons on the chessboard? Are you aware of real Nazis being part of government and security aparatus in Ukraine? Are you aware of Odessa, where dozens of pro-Russian people were burned alive by those same Nazis? Are you aware that Zelensky threatened to make atomic weapons at the Munich Security Conference mid February 2022? Are you aware of the complicity of Biden and his family in this (Hunter and his board seat at Burisma), not to speak of VP Biden blackmailing Ukrainians to fire their attorney general for probing Burisma or they'd get no money from (I think) MMF?

This is just a small selection of past events, not to mention new ones.

All this is not an isolated, Russia/Ukraine (both predominantly Orthodox Christian), issue. The collective West is causing death and destruction in the Muslim world for at least 30 years, as well. Furthermore, Snowden and Wikileaks documents have revealed a part of corruption in the US political and intelligence system. And there was no war waged by the West that wasn't supported by the Western media. Speaking of Fukuyama: He is a neocon, part of the cabal whose ideology has caused millions of dead and displaced people, their property destroyed. Their ideology has immensely weakened the US with meaningless and costly wars. And you still listen to him instead to shun him.

You look ridiculous to the World Outside of the West (~6 billion people) with your "we stand with Ukraine", with how you cancel and sanction everything Russian, how you moralize. Business model of the West for centuries is robbery and enslavement, who rises against it gets bombs on his head (hint: that are those in the World Outside the West). USA is literally built on the genocide of the Natives and the susequent landgrab! That West led by that USA is now condemning Russia for not wanting Nazis with nuclear weapons at her doorstep - imagine that!

Do you really don't get all this or do you act out of pure self interest (Russia is a too rich country to have all those riches/resources only for itself)?
With the success of anti-nuclear rhetoric, we became pretty incompetent at building these things. It's just like the space program.
How is a news article about a "resurfaced interview" from a year ago posted by CNBC as news today?
> Smart...pleasant to work with

Does anyone have tips for having high code standards, but still pleasant to work with? I got feedback that I have high standards, but I also go to the effort of explaining why I think an approach is better in code reviews and don't talk down to people in code reviews (and got feedback saying this), but I'm not sure it's enough.
1. Then you pay more. Someone will eventually set a price at level they are willing to provide this service. Nothing wrong with free markets operating as they are intended.

2. Contracts are inherently complicated. In the end you probably only need to check the total price or ask for such offer.

Drivers absolutely care where they are going. And have all the rights to set price accordingly risk on their lives and livelihoods they perceive. After all there should be risk premium for going to areas where they might have to risk their vehicles or lives.
Cool, have you ever lived under despotic regime?

It is nice to say that if you live in a country where you have freedom.
If you are for "universal healthcare" that is not universal, you're for a socialized healthcare system, not a universal one. It's not really that complicated.
Work on your communication abilities. As I said above, start a blog and start writing about the things you find interesting in tech. Write tutorials, commentary, introductions to new things, etc. within your topics of focus.

For public speaking, if you feel you need some training, find a local Toastmasters and join it for a while. If the first one you try isn't good, try another - different clubs operate differently and so suit different people. But Toastmasters is designed to fit around a work schedule, so I find it better than taking a class.

If you already feel like you have a handle on public speaking, join a local meetup and offer to speak - I have never met a Meetup that isn't scrambling for speakers and usually fills them in with corporate schills like me cough.

Build an audience. Start a newsletter and send them updates every time you publish something new (if you find yourself especially productive, limit your newsletters to once a week or twice a month). Submit your work to places like Hackernoon and here.

If you can't do this on your own, do it for your current employer - that's more or less what I did. Talk to your management team about your interests in developer advocacy and ask them what topics you can talk about. Your marketing team in particular will fawn over you if you do this. Developer advocacy is not ALL marketing, but it part of it is an arm of marketing, so working with them will get you far pretty quickly.

I;d say it takes about six months to build a following if you stick to it and a full year before you really get something resembling a handle on it all. Be patient, though, and stick with it if you enjoy it. If you don't enjoy it, don't push it - I love programming and still do a fair amount if it on the side, but it's not at all my full time job and not something I find I have a lot of mental space to afford proper focus to when I need it like I used to be able to. That may also just be aging, though.

I still think of it as the most fun job you can have in the industry.