skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
If we have to call it "Gen-Z" mode to get back some personality in software and interface design I'm all for it. I grew up with theme options on websites and software and desperately want it back. Windows Classic, Winamp, message boards with multiple theme options.

I'm so tired of every interface being just floating text on a white background with excessive whitespace. A border differentiating parts of an interface seems to terrify modern designers.
not the first but definitely the largest, probably by two orders of magnitude
The article complains about the low hurdles which xvideos has for creating a new account (they only require an email).

I can’t think of anything else than phone numbers and IDs which they could require for uploaders. Do you have any other ideas?
As someone employing a lot of engineers right now, one of the problems is that engineering will just keep requesting resources ad infinitum if there’s no budgetary limit. The constraints of the business are actually always financial, and without proper financial modeling you’ll cease to have a business.

This is true in process scaling no matter the process.
> In a letter to shareholders in February, Sud spells the shift out in black and white: “Today we are a technology platform, not a viewing destination. We are a B2B solution, not the indie version of YouTube.” Vimeo did not respond to The Verge’s request for comment.

Yup, that's pretty black and white.

I plan to send that to everyone I know currently using Vimeo and advise them to jump off the sinking ship.
This is a nice time to point out Firefox for Android allows you to install uBlock Origin.
I would point out, as an aside, that Opera itself is basically "an open-source community of musical-play development" — i.e. performances where the source material is in the public domain such that anyone can put on a performance of them without paying royalties.

This is unlike "musicals", which are protected by copyright, and are thus only run by the musical's rights-holder's licensed troupe(s), in a particular place (usually Broadway), with a particular interpretation of the material (the rights-holder's); where the revenues are due to high ticket prices that can be charged often only due to the artificially-created scarcity of performances of said musical due to IP law. (I.e. for many musical, nobody is going because they're fans of the particular actors/director/etc; they just wanted to see a performance of musical X, akin to what you'd get from seeing opera X. But there's only one available performance of a given musical X. Musical producers have a monopoly on performances of their musical.)

Musicals make money, by design. Opera does not make money, by design. Instead, opera houses take donations, in much the same way that you might imagine a "local open-source software development collective" might take donations.

When the people of a municipality get together and decide that they consider their local opera house a "local cultural institution" worth supporting with their tax money (usually only to prop it up in bad donation years), this does certainly make the opera house into a "government-backed" project. But in this case, the "government" here is just the mob-action of the people of the city. It's the atheist version of a church congregation agreeing that their tithes should be partly directed to some local needy cause.
One could even argue that "here's" is now an accepted conjugation of "here are".
Wow. Now that was hard to read.

The people who can do these things need to be locked away for the good of mankind. Start from the top.
> If your organization puts all its code, and all assets that go along with that code into a single repository; you’ve got yourself a monorepo.

I'm not sure I agree with this. I suppose in the most technical sense, sure, but it's not really true.

We have a single repo with a bunch of microservices in it. Builds/tests are localized to a single microservice though. The beauty of git is that two people can work on two parts of the repo pretty much independently. So while technically there is only one repo, I feel like calling it a monorepo would just confuse people.
Federal money is a different beast than city owned/funded sports stadiums. Otherwise why keep up the National Mall or Smithsonian?
> [..] <marquee> in production. It turned out to be a toy.

Screens were tiny low res, mice had no wheels and people where not used to scrolling. I don't think <marquee> was originally intended as a toy, even though it was mostly used like one.
I'm not sure it's so black and white. We have bazel targets that invoke the Serverless framework (for deploying to lambda), or invoke kubectl (rules_k8s), and we `bazel run` these targets in our GitHub workflows. Through dependency resolution, running the deploy targets will rebuild artifacts as necessary (a lambda archive, a docker image, rendered kubernetes yaml) as needed.
I think most interesting construct would be, allowing someone to torture someone, only with condition that in the end torturer is killed, while torturer decides with totally free will.
What if by detaining and torturing an individual or a few key individuals you could prevent the death of many of your citizens and widespread destruction - through a bloody civil war. It would be for the good of the people. <--- most Autocrats
> 2. Substitute "Palestinian" for ANY other nationality, ethnicity, race, sexual orientation, or other adjective describing a group to which YOU belong.

Well they're not just any other "nationality, ethnicity, race, sexual orientation, or other adjective". They started their movement and created their identity for a specific reason. I kinda feel like we should look into the reason for their identity and factor that into how we look at this law.
Also there's the saying "good fences make good neighbors" and "locks keep honest people honest", both of which I agree with.
Anyone got references to how a monorepo would work for Infrastructure as Code?
As I have mentioned before on other threads, crypto has no usecase other than to speculate on the token price, scam people and to embolden ransomware in the case with Zcash and other privacy tokens. On top of it all they all are unregulated and fluctuate too much to even act as proper currencies which they are not.

Other voices such as Luke [0] explain in vastly more than a HN thread.

[0] https://lukeplant.me.uk/blog/posts/the-technological-case-ag...
Sounds like Stack Overflow's early growth strategy, minus the wiki aspect
The US is not a friend of the country as it made a law saying they would invade the Netherlands if required.

"The new law authorizes the use of military force to liberate any American or citizen of a U.S.-allied country being held by the court, which is located in The Hague. This provision, dubbed the "Hague invasion clause," has caused a strong reaction from U.S. allies around the world, particularly in the Netherlands. "

"U.S.: 'Hague Invasion Act' Becomes Law"

https://www.hrw.org/news/2002/08/03/us-hague-invasion-act-be...
RPG Maker MV and MZ Find New Successor in Unite Based on Unity
yes it feels a bit like today, the society increasingly became complex due to ever-changing norms and social morality.
I can get a 5600x for $210. There is no way the 5500 will be anywhere near close to $199.
Intel's European Investment Plans
Strype, a Python frame-based editor
Oh, it will definitely be extraordinarily painful.

But the thing is, it's inevitable. And the longer we put off the day of reckoning, the more painful it will be.

The rest of the world should have de-dollarized and moved to floating reserve baskets and flexible settlements in 1971 after Nixon told everyone that if they expected their dollars to be backed by anything other than unicorn farts, they can go eat a dick.

Bretton Woods II was apparently too convenient for the world to discard. My personal tinfoil hat opinion is that certain very-low-time-preference East Asian powers encouraged adoption of Bretton Woods II specifically to make us soft and easy to topple a century later.

But now, it's too late. We can either start producing actual goods and services for export again and get our trade deficit down to a reasonable level, in anticipation of the inevitability of de-dollarization, or we could pretend it's not a problem, and experience a colossal currency crisis in 40 years ANYWAY.

I prefer the former.
I got some good pointers the last time I asked, but I'd love some more in depth information:

Does anyone have a good Bazel recipe for making a Rust + Typescipt + protos monorepo that atomically and hermetically builds only the changed portions of the DAG?

Are there any samples of this to refer to? (Any that run on Github workers?)

I'd massively appreciate it. I'm sure I'll get to this naturally someday, but I've got too many other things going on and it's not quite a "life or death" pain point just yet. But it sure would help to have now.

Conversely, if someone wants some contract (possibly to hire) work to help me get to this, my email is in my profile. :)
Very nice. I looked before for some kind of graphics support in Emacs, but didn't find anything. I didn't know that Emacs could render and (I assume) interact with SVG. Apparently it's been in there for some time.

Great, another distraction to tap my time.
Monorepo is just one small part of the puzzle. If you want to actually achieve the dream state that is alluded to when someone says "monorepo", you have to be willing to endure a super-deep and honest evaluation of your tech stack and processes.

We have been successfully running a monorepo for ~5 years now using nothing more than the bare-ass GitHub PR process with some basic checkbuilds sprinkled on top. We intentionally avoided getting our hands dirty with CI automation as much as was feasible. Building our software manually is so simple its not really worth dedicating a team to worrying about.

I would say the biggest key to our success was finding a way to minimize 3rd party dependencies. By making certain strategic technical choices, we were able to achieve this almost by default. Our repository is effectively hermetically sealed against outside changes in all of the ways that matter to the business owners. Github providing issues at the repository grain is also a very powerful synergy for us in terms of process - we started using issue numbers as the primary key for all the things.

With regard to technical choices - consider that some languages & ecosystems provide a lot more "batteries included" than others, which provides a substantially different landscape around how many 3rd parties may need to be involved and how.
I would rather your own country pay for your own defense (and join NATO for a boost) but if the USA has to be a hegemony rather than Russia or China, I can see your point.
Not exactly, as the second statement does not lead entirely to the first.

It's a cult-dwelling means of solving cognitive dissonance. If you look, you will see it in more contexts than this. The first statement is just an unshakeable premise, and needs no justification.
An alternative version for the "clownery" is that, well, it's not actually happening as bad as western press want to tell, and we have to navigate propaganda from both side ? (I'm interested in your sources, though, as usual.)

I know, "Hanlon's razor" and everything. But, still. I'll err on the side of "not underestimating the side that's bringing cities to dust" for a little more.
...with loud happy techno music, dancing disco lights, and a bunch of press people looking at the woman riding that thing with their mouths agape, probably thinking to themselves: "W.T.F.?"

Makes me think we'll see all kinds of weirder and weirder robots around us in the not too distant future.
lol I've been on the receiving end of that pitch too.

Felt a lot like: "Give us your best ideas, then GTFO of the room so we can implement your cool brainchild - with no credit to you!"

There's practically zero reward for the folks with good ideas in that model, yet it's sort of the table stakes innovation model.
Ah, good to know it's finally normalised.
When it comes to the index.js issue, I’m partial to “unwrapping” component directories. For example, if a Post component has a few one off sub-components, they’re placed in Post subdirectory:

src/
components/
Post.jsx
Post/
PostHeader.jsx
PostActions.jsx

Then import as:

import Post from “components/Post.js”

And within the component:

import PostActions from “components/Post/PostAction.js”

I’ve felt this approach eliminates most index.js reexports and aligns closer with a browser’s native import syntax. This all comes at the cost of less encapsulation, but in a private codebase, it’s less of an issue.
I was expecting something more moutain-ish, more goat-ish. This is no mountain goat. Not at all. Disappointing.
Yeah, I think some people are confusing "Monorepo" with "Monolith".

You can have a monorepo without having a monolith.
Running lots of cores at a low speed can be more efficient than one core at turbo speed.
More like: "Hey boss, remember JFK? It would be a real shame if something like that happened to you. Or your family."
I'd argue that you should have thorough unit tests for each service to ensure that they always respect their public API. Additionally, in a monorepo you can share type definitions so regardless of the service, you know for sure that you're using the right API. If all of that is in place then you can test the integration by just mocking out those services rather than testing their API n times.

If you're in an environment where you have limited/absence of type checking then you're right. In my experience, most problems that come from the integration of networked services come from not properly accounting for all possible responses. You're expecting to get a 200 response and a field of `x` but you got a 204 so the response is empty. That sort of thing.
I wonder if there were similar conversations about math coprocessors when they joined the CPU. What did people say about increasing specialization of cores then? The closest recent analogue is GPUs joining the CPU on mobile devices, but it was only recently that those weren't complete garbage.
The real answer is that its copywriting, which means grammar is nearly irrelevant.

He starts with "Hey I'm Chris Sev" because it's a better headline, which is defined as something that is more likely to make people read the rest of the page. (Defined specifically because I see lots of complaints here that headlines should be descriptive of the actual content, which isn't really what matters, functionally. (I get the impulse though, really.))
The post tangentially touches on a pet peeve of mine that I think lots of companies get fundamentally wrong these days: version control, CI, and deployment are separate concerns and shouldn't be jumbled together into an amorphous blob.

If the build fails, you should be able to re-run it without pushing to version control. You can e.g. have builds fail due to issues with your artifact repository that don't require any changes to the code to debug/fix. You can have issues with deployment after the build completes, you don't want to have to rebuild to redeploy. The most shocking of all, though, and I have actually seen this: If you deploy a broken build, a rollback to an earlier version should never, ever, require a rollback on your source control.

As always, it's very much a case of too much of a good idea. People correctly identify that automation is a good thing, but then turn that into "manual operation is a bad thing, and therefore we shouldn't cater to it".
Right, but that's my point, if PICe 3.0 is not a significant bottleneck to an RTX 3090, it can hardly be seen as one for anyone running non-enthusiast builds.
Hmm, i think you are right. That is where I first encountered it though. This is the first instance I could see in the subreddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/NonCredibleDefense/comments/t2tgnw/...
Small ARM Cortex's have taken over the microcontroller market. Billions made each year from every large microcontroller manufacturer. They aren't going anywhere. It's hard to believe ARM wouldn't make enough from licensing fees and from each one sold to make an easy profit. Maybe the license doesn't account for individual sales, IDK?

New secure ARM Cortex's are launching everywhere too, so they are very much alive and well, for the next 20 years minimum.
OpenSSL 3.0.2
How is this even legal? Huh.
> Some folks pronounce it but-ton, others but'n.

This is a distinction in consonants! Different realizations of the /t/ phoneme. The whole claim that started this thread was that English expresses information almost exclusively in consonants, not vowels. Your example directly contradicts that very claim.

Anyway, English is _far_ from the only language where different dialects have a different set of vowels. Quebec French for example has completely different ones from French French.
This is not really true - lots of macroscopic objects have negative temperatures, like lasers in their pumped state.
I didn’t mean it like that. I think it’s more apt for those with more years and experience than aptitude.

Being able to do the work of 2-3 people is over-qualification. They are better utilized in smaller or failing companies that need the advantage of the boost.

Altho it is unlikely that most people will be willing to give up the bargaining power to convert experience to currency. So what do we do?

Who would want to go to a job if you have to struggle and make less than a YouTube influencer. It’s already happening to the youngest adult generation. The struggle is real.
Can you (or anyone) explain how entropy interacts with gravity? A uniformly mixed goop should be the highest entropy state, with stuff partitioned into clumps being a lower entropy state... apart from gravity. But if you add gravity to the mix, then... what?
All the tutorials which I have been following always default export it. Whats the reason to avoid default export ?
Linking to GitHub tagged release in the absence of a blog post or other notification on the OpenSSL site.
It's in the vein of your statements, and it takes too much time to explain why this is wrong. And this has been said many times before by many people far more eloquent and knowledgable than I. Yet this sentiment persists (even if it's driven by emotion on the one hand and relentless Chrome propaganda on the other).
SOMA would have developed regardless, and it is nonsense to suggest tech companies want to locate near baseball stadiums.
It's not a different tutorial. It's a gigantic, messy, incomplete reference card. And yes, it is predatory, just like every other ebook/app/whatever based on the misconception that Vim is hard to learn.
Your explanation of how slat armor works is incorrect; the article's explanation is correct. It is not intended to detonate charges at a suboptimal distance. Indeed, when it does detonate charges, the distance can make the charge even more potent. Instead, it is intended to short the fuse of certain RPGs, preventing detonation.

You can read more about statistical armor here: https://www.tanknology.co.uk/post/statistical-armour
I think you're right--particularly w/ regards to consumer expectations being low. I'm a part of this problem as well--when making purchases, price is almost always the deciding factor.

It's also worth noting that "as good as possible" and "as good as profitably possible" aren't just two flavors of the same principle w/ regards to quality--they're directly at odds. I'll prove this (with scientific finality) via an anecdote about toys.

My kiddo was gifted a little Fisher-Price school bus that was made in 2005.[0] It's pretty neat! As you roll the bus forward, some internal mechanism causes the driver to turn left and right (making it look like they're turning the steering wheel back and forth), and the passenger seats to move up and down (a dope allusion to the classic kid's song, 'The Wheels on the Bus', in which, as the wheels of the bus go 'round and 'round, the people on the bus go up and down). It's clear that this product was lovingly designed, with playful curves and playful details, like the face of the bus. The wheels not only have hub caps, but the shape of the tires even mimic a pneumatic bulge! The space inside of the bus is even big enough to accommodate human hands!

More recently, she was gifted a newer version of the same toy.[1] It's smaller in every dimension, and flimsier. The slick design is gone, replaced by simple, boxy one. The little things that I loved about the old bus are gone--the wheels are now a single piece of plain molded plastic. While the wheels of the bus still go round and round, the people on the bus, alas, do not go up and down.

It's fine, as far as toys go--the kid probably doesn't notice a difference. But it's clear that the guiding principle in the evolution of this product is not only not quality, but something that is directly in conflict with quality.

[0] https://www.ebay.com/itm/304338207633
[1] https://www.walmart.com/ip/Little-People-Sit-With-Me-School-...
They are socialist, but they should be available as well. Socialism isn't a bad word, and neither is Capitalism, both can be used in moderation. It's just the balance has swung way too far in the USA, and it's mostly controlled by corporations (and therefore is crony capitalism). The only place US citizens still have much power is in social reform and even that is being subjugated by crony appointments to the Supreme court and the Red states which are currently passing acts of oppression against LGBQT and women with nods from the Red supreme court.
I can't think of anything less relevant for gaming workloads than spec. ex. security. In that use case you'd obviously disable all of the mitigations, to get the highest possible speculative performance.
No relation to vim then? I guess it's v for virtual and then "immerse".
I2P should be preferred. IP2D it's a nice daemon.
Counter-take: There's also cultural improvement during layoffs, when you no longer have to interface with someone who doesn't want to do their job and/or is bad at it.
Yea. I think Columbus is unique too because Ohio State football is probably bigger than either of the NFL teams from a market perspective in Ohio so it's sensible that nobody is adding an NFL team here.

Also I think the Columbus population comparison isn't great (omg we're the 15th biggest city !11!) because the city has annexed places that really don't make a lot of sense. Metro population is better to use for a comparison. And then I think for D.C. in particular you have the federal government located there so it's probably just "different".

Indianapolis has a budget of around $1.3 billion [1], Columbus is $1.04 billion [2], and Cleveland has a budget of around $1.8 bn [3]

[1] https://www.indy.gov/activity/city-and-county-budget
[2] https://www.columbus.gov/finance/financial-management-group/...
[3] https://www.cleveland.com/news/2022/02/mayor-bibbs-2022-budg....
I thought the same. But maybe they just do (have) not care. History has shown that the US can do all sorts of horrendous things and nothing ever seems to happen...
Longtermism’s perspective on humanity’s past, present, and future
Fast Interoperability Healthcare Resources (FHIR)
> I'm a 33 year old straight male and you could sum up my design sense as pretty "basic." Err— sorry, "cheugy."

It's a joke. Straight men are stereotypically less sensitive to fashion trends than women or gay men. He's using his age, gender, and orientation to make light of how baffling he finds the design preferences (and language) of other groups.
I'm not sure you need to be specific really about the situation of being 'single'. Any emotional/mental health issues will have an adverse effect in most if not all aspects of your life. Work isn't necessarily an exception to that.
We most certainly did see a president who was willing to give up that power to destroy the CIA, and they killed him in public to make sure everyone got the message.