skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> there are no approved alternatives yet

Not exactly, you can get STC approval to use mogas in most piston engines, it's just a hassle and expense so most people don't do it: https://www.autofuelstc.com/
Displays using MST to achieve higher resolutions than a single link allowed worked out more or less fine. The problem there is MacOS doesn't support MST.
It’s a tinder for bananas. A great way to meet single bananas.
Are both cases compiling to the same target architecture? If not, you may well be comparing the relative performance of different compiler backends instead of comparing the performance of your CPUs.

(+ now I see it's rust: how parallel is your build, really?)
We do not believe Poland’s proposal is a tenable one
Why buy a Pro display when you can buy and use 3 of 27" at the same time for the same price.
I struggle a bit to understand what Substrait wants to accomplish. They want to create a representation of data transformations (eg group by…) and relational algebra at what level? So it’s like a BLAS for relational algebra?
If I’m reading this correctly, file blocks in ipfs are individually addressable

https://docs.ipfs.io/concepts/how-ipfs-works/#directed-acycl...
Realistically, I'd like to see the government develop software and tooling to mitigate these concerns. They already do at a low level for cryptographic primitives (like SHA and RSA). Maybe they do the next couple abstraction layers up, a secure OS image that's regularly patched, a web server, a programming framework, etc.

Currently those layers are roughly provided by the big tech companies, and the government's involvement in making those more secure is PhD students and curious professors from (public) universities. It would be nice if that was a more directly employed org in the government.
I'm not sure the Thunderbolt Display is a useful anecdote, here. It's from 11 years ago.
Demilitarisation is an absolute non-starter, I don't see how any sovereign nation could ever agree to that. I assume Russia are putting it on the table so it can be traded away for something else.

If what you say is true about Ukraine being willing to trade away Crimea and the eastern territories, then I don't think an agreement is necessarily that far away. Your initial demands in a negotiation are rarely your red lines.

The most contentious point (again, assuming you are correct that Ukraine is willing to cede the above-mentioned territories) will be bloc membership. Zelensky could possibly give some informal guarantee that he has no interest in NATO membership, but having your own foreign policy is a fundamental part of being a sovereign state, so being coerced into promising they will never join this or that bloc is kind of incompatible with Ukrainian statehood. And down the line they will definitely be eyeing EU membership.

Personally I would be sad to see territory ceded to Russia as it would reward their brutal and criminal tactics. I am also highly sceptical of Russia's willingness to abide by its obligations under any peace agreement. However, I appreciate that for Ukrainians especially, ending the bloodshed is the most important thing.
The comparison to Hitler is inevitable not because of death camps or body count, but because the foreign policy of Russia today seems to be on the same trajectory as the foreign policy of Nazi Germany prior to WW2.

Germany took Sudetenland from Czechoslovakia on the grounds that it was populated mostly by Germans, who were being oppressed by Slav-dominated government. Russia took Crimea from Ukraine on the grounds that it is populated mostly by Russians, who are being oppressed by the Ukrainian-dominated government.

Germany subsidized a Slovak separatist movement in Czechoslovakia, culminating in the declaration of independent Slovakia, which promptly became a German puppet state. Russia tried to do something similar with Donbas separatist, although it wasn't particularly successful.

Then, at last, Germany invaded what was left of Czechoslovakia, with intent to fully annex and absorb it. We're now watching Russia do the same to Ukraine.
Not at all. You could buy 32GB of RAM and a 512GB NVMe drive for a couple hundred dollars.
Investing in Space Unicorns: Interview with Sunil Nagaraj of Ubiquity Ventures
They're better than Gust. Many investors I know are technical and I'm surprised at the lack of BPA in the Angel/VC space.

BPA=Business Process Automation
Glad to know I'm not the only anti-ad person who was incensed.
What about by products, do some varieties lend themselves better to different petrochemicals? (or petrochecmicals that require a specific variety?)
There is comparatively 0 demand for purism. Phones are a product of an economy of scale.
The author of this tool has another article on the frontpage of HN (the webGPU without canvas one). Commonly when this happens, visitors will visit other not quite as relevant pages on an author's site and submit them to HN and they will sometimes bubble up.
Remember last time Apple put out these weird relative performance charts, and we all thought they were hiding something?

The M1 announcement. They turned out to be pretty accurate.

So I’ll wait and see real benchmarks, but it wouldn’t surprise me if this does have incredible performance.
Even on the macro level there are lots of tricky questions.

A bar magnet is surrounded by magnetic flux lines. Apparently it takes no energy to maintain that magnetic field.

If I heat the bar in boiling water for long enough, it becomes demagnetized. On the macro level there's no visible/measureable change in the bar. We need a lot of magnification to see that the 'particles are no longer aligned'.

On the other hand, I move the bar magnet over a pile of iron filings, some of the filings will fly up against gravity to the bar, against the force of gravity. It takes energy to lift these filings. Where does that energy come from? (It never seems to be exhausted.)
FSVO: For Some Value Of

(I've been accused of overuse of acronyms, but that one's rare!)
FWIW Taliban actually offered to put Osama on trial. But they insisted that it be an international tribunal, and that it should be held in some Muslim country.
> Regardless of that it is incredibly stupid to do any kind of fighting around a nuclear plant.

That goes both ways.

I saw the video from the start of the fighting and that was UA forces who started to fire upon oncoming forces from the building to the right on the video.

If you mount defenses for something vital for the civilians of your country you should always question how exactly to do that to minimize the damage from the fighting.

Given they took positions in the building, started the fight first, had a prerecorded video for Twitter of how they are under attack[0]...

Sure, I'm just an arm-chair general, but for me it looks what the Ukrainian force decided to fight on the NPP territory and buildings.

[0] go find it you if you didn't saw it. I doubt the first thing what would come to my mind as an operator of a NPP is to fire up a video for a social network.
Color contrast checker (WCAG formula)
I can't tell it apart from the real thing. This is actually my experience when I used tinder. Which is why I gave up and don't use it anymore.
Because there won't be 3G anymore in US/CAN/Scandinavia
https://northernbi.com/3g-sunset-update-for-us-and-canadian-...
Boy oh boy wowee.
But there is no decline.
except for a 5-generations-newer chip, 5G, double the storage, display improvements, and 5+ years of software support

i'm not saying it's much of an improvement. but some of those old iphones are around the stagnation point of phone progress for the average user. the 5 year difference translates to ~half the launch price, with modernizations and future support.

it's a pretty good deal and upgrade for someone coming from an older iphone 7, who doesn't need a $1k "flagship". doesn't seem like a fault at all that it's not even more better. this isn't the spec phone
Do you implement transactions/ACID?
There’s a lightning to 1/8” dongle for that
But the person saying something outrageous would undermine the point of the study--to determine if deep fakes were indistinguishable from actual footage. If it's given away by something unrelated to the deepfake method, then you're adding in an external bias unrelated to the realism of the deepfake.

Unless I misunderstood the goals of the study of course.
No. This thing puts the user first (forgive my corpspeak): it gives us a powerful tool for free. Web3, on the other hand, puts the advertisers first. If this was web3, it would have some useless microtransactions attached to it. I bet that someone behind web3 is thinking hard right now how to stop this torrent thing.
It is what people have been referring to as "Web3", yes: https://ipfs.io/#how
And yet somehow the technology to do 8k @ 120hz does exist... ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDUnSsx62j8 )
Ah. I didn't see the context, however I was referring to the Brexit debate later on.
Seems interesting. Not sure I see it taking off.
> I hate it when people say that to dismiss things.

I always avoid ever saying anything like "that's [just] semantics", and I try to discourage others to, too, but in many of the situations where it shows up (including this one), there's nothing wrong with the complaint itself. When you hear someone swipe, "I'm not going to argue semantics with you", it generally carries an implicit accusation of an attempted change in subject. Consider:

Sara: "Nathan ate the clementines I bought from Oliver this morning!"

Oliver, Nate's friend: "I didn't sell her any clementines. The only fruit I've even touched today are these. They're not clementines. They're small mandarin oranges."

Does it matter that Sara can't distinguish clementines from ordinary mandarins? If there's a law that punishes you differently depending on whether you stole true clementines or not, then sure, what they actually are is materially relevant. Absent that, though, does Sara care what the definition is right now? No, and neither should anyone else. To even bring it up just distracts from Sara's actual complaint.

That is to say: if the argument starts as a semantic one, then semantic quibbles are relevant. ("The law says this about subcategory Y. Does what's at issue satisfy the definition of Y, or is it merely Z?") If it's not, though, then it's appropriate to call someone out on DOSing the conversation with a semantic rabbit hole (instead of being able to concede, "You say 'photocopier', while I say 'Xerox'", and then moving the fuck on).
We need to go back to the 1920s and start again. As the article explains, modern QM has hit a dead end, and it's little more than mathematical games that have not helped us understand reality.
I'm confident the marketing oversells it, but it's likely very good in comparison. 3090 is about 28B transistors on Samsung 8nm, with some budgeted for raytracing. This is on TSMC 5nm, a process with 3-4x the density, and the 114B transistor count could potentially allow for similar GPU size - although I'd wait for Locuza or someone to analyze it. It should be very competitive in performance, and the winner by far in perf/watt, at least until RDNA3 and Lovelace GPUs release towards the end of the year.
Having worked with Apple on games, I can tell you that as an engineer they work fine. Metal isn't bad. The problem isn't technical. The problem is how Apple approves apps and thinks about the gaming experience. For example, a game I worked on got rejected from the App AND Mac store because (in Apple's opinion) the texture download was too large. There's no analogue for this in other game ecosystems. As a developer, if your secondary ecosystem is demanding a lot of changes your primary ecosystem don't require you'll decide it isn't worth the effort.

It's why the games on apple products are fundamentally different. Apple may say it's about protecting the integrity of the user experience, but the best and the brightest would rather learn directly from users themselves and not use Apple as a go-between.
>These attitudes SEEM like they are non-judgemental and egalitarian, but they tend to miss all the implicit ways in which the dominant society does NOT treat people equally in these circumstances.

So, what would you have us do?

I treat each individual as an individual and interact with them based on their individual actions, not based on any immutable characteristics.

I fully support inclusion, diversity, honesty and good citizenship and speak out when I see bigotry, hatred and abuse.

It seems like you're implying that doing so is somehow disingenuous or posturing and that I need to do more. Do I understand you correctly?

Should I, as a middle-aged, heterosexual, "white" male, carry around lots of cash so I can give every woman, POC, differently-abled and LGBTQ+ person I encounter US$20? As "reparations" for the white male privilege that I never asked for, don't want and actively argue against?

This may seem like some sort of anti-progressive rant, but it's not.

So, other than trying hard to be a decent human being and interacting with and about others based on their actions rather than some immutable characteristics, calling out hatred and bigotry when I see it and supporting political candidates who do the same, what exactly do you propose that I do?
He would have been -more- likely to invade Ukraine as Putin knows that Trump barely cares about the NATO countries, he certainly wouldn't have cared about Putin razing Ukraine to the ground. I will agree that nuclear war is certainly less likely if you let Putin do whatever he wants.
They used to have a Proton port for Mac, and discontinued it.
Chemical etching, perfluorocarbons, and massive water consumption is cheaper where pollution regulations are weak. Most of the lines are automated, so labor costs of a running line aren't the big cost issue. Environment and human health have few protections over there.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1566445/
> The M1 Ultra claims already look suspicious since the GPU graph tops out at ~120W & the CPU graph tops out at ~60W yet the M1 Studio is rated for 370W continuous power draw.

And that is expected, a lot has to be reserved for USB devices.
I have a number of his pieces, I guess you'd call them, on VHS and laserdisc. They're not all conceptually accessible and some are just plain weird. But he was a pioneer and he did things no one else was doing, and I have no doubt that the technology usage he pioneered greatly advanced the state of the art.
Incendiary topics draw more attention, thus more likes / reshares. Feed algorithms can amplify this effect, but it's always there, unfortunately:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rE3j_RHkqJc
Hugged to death.
Was it too difficult to revert to using a normal passcode? Genuine question; I too am a fan of touch ID. I’d get annoyed to have to update it constantly.
What religion disallows the COVID vaccine but not all the others you get when you're in the military?

I know Leviticus is curiously specific about some things, but I don't remember that bit.
> You're telling me that to remove my info I have to essentially give (through your service) all these companies & data brokers my info

How can you index into a hashmap, an array, or a DB table without a key? Answer: you cannot.

There's no way for data-broker opt-outs to work without uniquely identifying the individual who wishes to be removed.

Sure, I agree that "GDPR-like regulation and actually enforcing it" is the proper solution - but how long will that take? Five years? Ten?

What if I want my personal data removed from these brokers now?

Edit: now that I think about it - you could build some scheme where you give the data-brokers a cryptographic hash of some personally-identifying information, so if they don't already have you in their database, then they can't get your information. But, in order to do that, you'd need regulation equivalent to the GDPR (otherwise they'd never do it), in which case the above argument still applied.
Not sure about European cities or if they directly compare to US. Most major metropolitan areas in the Midwest and East coast region are seeing people leave for suburbs or even small town America.

older article but still applies (I think)
https://www.chicagoreporter.com/chicago-is-the-fastest-shrin...
Standard US politics, lots of talking and hoping someone else will do your dirty work. Good thing Poland already learned how to deal with US as an ally after all previous broken promises.
To be fair here, there is more to it than just assembly.

You have to spec out the parts, ensuring compatibility. Manage multiple orders and deliveries. Assemble it. Install drivers/configuration specific packages.

All of these things are easier today than ten or twenty years ago - but assigning it to a random mid-level engineer and I'd set my project management gamble on half a day for the busiest, most focused engineers least likely to take the time to fuss over specs, or one day for the majority.

ofc. to get to $1000 for that they'd still have to be on $230k to $460k.
I was in the 'war room' backstage for a keynote (I think?) iCloud demo (or at least, something that touched iCloud, if only briefly).

After our successful 2.5 seconds, they wheeled in a trolley of champagne. I never found out what would be on the other trolley...
Attacking other users, as you've done here, and https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30580008, and
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30577434, is not allowed, regardless of how right you are or feel you are.

If you continue to break the site guidelines we are going to have to ban you. I had to warn you about this just recently. No more of this, please.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
I got a friend who was forced to take the anthrax vaccine as an enlisted going into Iraq.

Anthrax vaccine is well known for pretty severe side effects too. It's not like the COVID-19 vaccine at all. But the military has a long tradition of force protection measures like this.

Honestly, this comes off more like some entitled officer thinking they have more sway than they actually do.
Thanks for trying it out. One thing to clarify is that we list out each data broker we cover, regardless of whether or not your profile was found or not. We do this partly to support our Free Basic users that use the data broker links in the dashboard to QA and verify their own opt out work (or the opt out work of other services).

So just because you see a data broker in your dashboard, does not mean we are implying that your profile is there. In fact, if you click on any of the links, you’ll see we spawn a modal that says “External links help with self-service opt outs and provide visibility into where your info is posted online, but are not always perfect.”

My guess is that if you click through any of the links, it will lead to pages that say something like “profile not found” because it’s a name that does not exisit.

We also have an article on our Help Desk that explains what’s happening, and further below is a snippet that most likely explains what you are experiencing:

https://help.optery.com/en/article/what-if-a-view-leads-to-a...

“What is often confusing is that we display the “View” links for every data broker, regardless of whether we find your profile at the data broker or not. The "View" links are not intended to be perfect matches for your profile. Results will vary for each user, depending on your circumstances. Sometimes the "View" links are not perfect, and other people may be listed, or you might not be there at all, but in most cases, they allow you to quickly view a snapshot of where your personal details are exposed online.”

This question has come up before, so we really need to do a better job of ironing out the confusion in the product. Thanks so much for the feedback.
I worked at an MIT research lab for about 2 years after college. Thought I had landed my dream job, turned out to be one of the most disappointing experiences of my life.
what is the reality then?
when you get down to those scales, there really does seem to be uncertainty when you try to localize parameters. on one hand it's troubling but it's also lovely because we get stuff like the casimir effect, and who knows what other futuristic technology we might end up making, which we all want
Please don't comment on whether someone read an article. "Did you even read the article? It mentions that" can be shortened to "The article mentions that." https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
To be fair, that exact criticism has been leveled against them multiple times before and been proven wrong.
I'd like to think this is only an issue during peacetime.

During wartime, I would assume the violation would either be ignored or the officer would be immediately court martialed and next in command would take over.
Of course it's considered acceptable, lead doesn't just dissolve when you touch it and it's not like the paint is 100% lead. Our bodies are pretty resilient and you shouldn't be scared of super tiny trace things in the environment. Your baby probably receives much more lead exposure by breathing.
Thank you. To be honest, I haven't really asked them much, because they (senior devs) have their own plate full, and I'm only trying to ask project-specific questions not things that I would find on Google.

Also, I'm feeling like I may get too obsessed with syntax. I author multiple anki cards throughout the day. Some are things like "difference between concurrency and parallelism", while others are like "3 ways to add a new item in a list", "docker command to run a container detached".
Nope. It was a bad idea not to build in transaction support up front. It gets harder to build in later.
> HDMI 2.1 does support 5K@120Hz@10bpc but requires DSC as you say, which is not very commonly found either.

Not very commonly found on what? Nvidia & AMD have been shipping DSC for ~2 generations now (so almost anything within the last 4 years has it)
Unfortunately this is still killable. Someone needs to periodically publish up to date databases using some outside protocol. Also if you participate in the public DHT, then your participation is public and can have consequences on your real-life legal entity.

If you want to use TOR and onion sites, I don't think this really adds anything to those.

I think this just helps you optionaly crowdsource bandwidth.
In my experience, it is not really the money in the corporate job market that drives these people away from research:

Not USA, but I know some really highly talented physicists who now work as rather badly paid software developers. Lesson: outstanding skills in and passion for physics not necessarily tranfer into high pay in the corporate job market.

It is rather the politicization and lack of perspective in academia that makes these people leave academia: doing your PhD/doctorial degree in physics already bears a high opportunity cost, so you really do that because you have a deep passion for physics and not because you expect a high pay.
>It seems like you're implying that doing so is somehow disingenuous or posturing and that I need to do more. Do I understand you correctly?

I don't see anything in the OP's post to suggest that. I think their point is that being merely indifferent to (e.g.) gay people isn't actually a neutral stance in the context of a homophobic society. But you state in your post that you're not merely indifferent, so I don't think anything OP says applies to you.
Wolfram has a proposal, by that very name.

Hasn't yet made useful predictions though.
They already suffer, and the benefit is to free the poor and middle class from personal income tax. The rich already escaped as generally their money is not personal income for purpose of income tax.

When the king takes a portion of my labor 'because he can', then I am a slave. The rich generally understand how to escape the income tax slavery. Let's free the poor.
We've banned this account for breaking the site guidelines. This was bad enough, but https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30541975 is completely not ok. Please don't create accounts to break HN's rules with.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
One can easily train/bus into Finland or Poland.