skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I wouldn't be surprised if Googles consent form intentionally broke every GDPR rule. First time I saw it it didn't bombard me with dark patterns, it sent me down a rabbit hole of near infinite options where I couldn't even tell if any of them where relevant for Google search. They don't want to give users a quick and easy way to opt out, especially not while they are still working on replacement APIs that use sleight of hand, confusing technobabble and a decent amount of hand waving to not only avoid GDPR restrictions but make your browser track you for them. This isn't just Google, Mozilla seems to have sold out to Meta and is working on its own tracking API.
Reminds me of how FRACTINT would put the fractal formulae into GIFs.

You can load a GIF in it that it has previously saved and re-render the Fractal.
> leak of voting-system BIOS passwords

Why would this be needed for analysing the software? This sound more like encouraging others to hack them.

> Knisley had an IT employee shut off the surveillance cameras in the election offices.

Actually, this sound like they first tried to tamper with the machines themselves

> Peters introduced them to a man she called Gerald Wood. ... But the real Gerald Wood apparently wasn't there.

Or bring in some unknown hacker to do it?

>But Wood testified ... that he never received a YubiKey that was assigned to him, ...

Sounds like this was much more than leaking proprietary information. They actually planned to hack these machines and blame it on Wood if detected.
Reading this helped me a lot:

https://www.crockford.com/pwl.html
Intel Bitcoin Bonanza Chips to Double Giant Mining Farm's Hashrate
Even at 1850 calories (a deficit which should result in about 1 pound loss a week for me), I find myself getting really hungry all the time. My body knows it's starving itself, and tells me to eat. This makes it hard to stick with calorie deficits over the long term. 1400 is extreme and would be pretty difficult for most people.
Yes it is.

You're not going to get the same level of protein from kale as you would from a chicken breast. You'd eat so much kale you'd be sick.

Secondly, plant proteins have incomplete amino acid profiles and won't stimulate mtor the say protein from meat and dairy will.
The vibe I get is anguish, shame, and regret as someone is trying desperately to salvage their reputation and finding that they can't. I can definitely picture someone writing that; if it was forged (which I have no reason to believe) it felt convincing to me.
Clicking a checkbox that says "accept all tracking/cookies purpose from any website" and having the browser accept for you absolutely is informed consent.

A court would look at this and a person who mindlessly clicked "accept all" on every website as equivalent.

Browsers could propose an API for this functionality and no doubt some websites would implement it. They havent but they could.

Whether there's any point is another question. Websites would probably rather use dark patterns to get us to click accept all, so any API that went beyond accept all and allowed a standardized user policy on data collection would have a limited uptake.
I think OP objected to the use of the word “genocide”.

Regarding Russian government’s attitude, to my ears the rhetoric does not seem to be compatible with genocide (rather the opposite—they can’t do this to their own people, which they claim Ukrainians are), but it is compatible with extensive political persecution of those Ukrainians who don’t agree with this position, which is also pretty bad.
Most of my family are lawyers! My intuition is that the quality of writing in the texts that lawyers read is far higher than the average scientific paper, which is after all not valued for its prose, but for its findings. On the other hand, I get the feeling that in some jurisdictions the standard of evidence in courts is far lower than er... than what it's supposed to be in the sciences (but it really isn't). Anyway for me it makes sense that more persuasive language is used in your occupation than in mine.

It's not that researchers don't need to structure arguments carefully, it's just that we got formulae and experiments and formal proofs, so we don't really need to argue so much. In any case, most people start reading a paper by looking for the figures...

I should say that I spent my childhood thinking I would grow up to be a professional writer. I kind of did, I just didn't think I'd be writing research papers. The errors of imprecision I committed in my rejected papers (mentioned in my OP above) were the result of my habbit of thinking about writing in the way that a creative writer thinks, where the goal is beauty, not precision. I really saw a huge difference in the way my papers were received when I corrected for that. I went from having my papers rejected with angry notes, to being complimented for their clarity and my first published paper even got a Best Student Paper award. The change I made was literally just consistent use of terminology. It was like throwing a switch! I was so surprised. Hence my disagreement with McCarthy on that one particular point.

I think his other points are fair, btw.
DDL transactions should be committed orders of magnitude less frequently than data transactions, so it’s reasonable to separate their logging.
What if you had massive amounts of virtually free energy just falling out of the sky in one or a few isolated locations, but only for a few hours every day, and your consumption patterns required an available-24-by-7 safely transportable consumer-safety-level supply?

Carbon-hydrogen bonds are an relatively efficient and safe way of storing energy and we have well-developed technology and infrastructure in place to take advantage of that.
I believe the poster didn't mean this as "denigrating", and were rather referring to the caloric contents, where "hot water" implies minimal amount of calories.

Of course, making a proper broth takes time and does put some nutritional value into said "hot water" (as do onions fried on oil/butter, sauces you add and potentially sugar), but that doesn't really change the fact that the will be minimal amount of calories in that.
I've worked with Unicode and ASCII conversion directly before in Python, and even then I didn't need these two. There is `str.translate` which requires ordinals aka Unicode codepoints integers, which you would use `ord(str)` for. But then there's also `str.maketrans` which does this 'low-level' fiddling for you: https://docs.python.org/3/library/stdtypes.html#str.maketran... . So even then, arguably a prime use case for `ord` and `chr`, I was able to forego them and work a 'level higher'.
Permanent Weight Loss – Douglas Crockford
what about when being hungry makes you distracted?
Elon Musk once pointed to the low energi state of CO2 as a problem meaning it doesn't react with other things without additional energy added. This makes carbon capture fundamentally hard and anyone claiming otherwise is either in possession of some infinite power supply or we live in a post scarcity society.

Either way, planting trees appears to be a good mechanism for carbon capture. So go do that instead!
Weight loss follows the 80/20 rule, so 80% diet, 20% exercise.

Unfortunately, humans are terrible at eating less, since you've been well trained by both evolution and society to eat as much as possible. So then there are things like, eat mostly fruits and vegetables, which aren't very efficient at giving you calories (since you're not a cow, that can extract the full set of calories from vegetables using its 4x stomach). Or become a vegetarian or choose a no-carb diet, maybe that makes it easier by just deciding ahead of time you won't eat anything calorie-efficient. Or exercising and living a more healthy lifestyle, can also help you not feel as hungry as often. Or keep a food diary. Or count calories. Or track your weight. Or train your self-control. But ultimately all just psychological tricks to just eat less calories, and which one works is different for everyone, since everyone's mental makeup is different.

If you can't make it happen psychologically, then you can also make it happen physically, by getting a gastric band or gastric bypass surgery.
Primary energy assessment follows certain rules[note 1] to ease measurement of different kinds of energy. These rules are controversial. Water and air flow energy that drives hydro and wind turbines, and sunlight that powers solar panels, are not taken as PE, which is set at the electric energy produced. But fossil and nuclear energy are set at the reaction heat which is about 3 times the electric energy. This measurement difference can lead to underestimating the economic contribution of renewable energy.[7]

Seems relevant
You do not deserve the shower, you must earn the shower.

Motivation taps discipline on the shower.
Yes, the chance of success does seem inversely proportional to the size:

https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.43...
> This whole thing would only make sense if we had abundant source of elemental hydrogen. But then why burn fuel in the first place.

water is an easy elemental source of hydrogen. If it is possible to fuel this electrolysis via cheaply obtained renewable energy, then it makes a lot of sense to produce fossil fuels using this method - it will allow the existing infrastructure to consume such produced fuels, so you save capital and energy on replacing them.
I personally see a lot more for Django than Rails, but then again I know Django and don't know Rails (been meaning to learn it for a long time) so that could be biasing me
I find it beyond crazy that you'd go through all this complicated decision state machine when you could just keep the tests and mark them as friends of the class.

Why would you ever remove a test ? You don't know when your platform will change things from under your feet, for instance going from x86 to arm, which may break them in subtle ways without you changing anything to your code. And then you're losing hours searching in your 10k commit history the code that had been removed.
In an ideal world, a class would be all public fulfilling some abstract interface which is pertinent to the logical substance of the solution, and those methods would perform their operation using other components which are private final and supplied as constructor arguments.

This is called “over-engineering” by some, but really it is the most testable and refactorable approach to creating programs (other than being a team of PhD Haskell programmers).

The problem is simply that programming hours are expensive and we don’t got time for this methodology, in general, just as we don’t have time for Ada or formal methods, in general.

AI co-programming will change all of this.

Edit: this approach is different from Option 1 in the article because it’s about refactoring and not just flipping method visibilities even where it makes no sense for the interface.
Yes, that was when I was mostly fasting at the same time. I couldn't last that long, especially when all I could think about all day was food.

... weird when you start having vivid dreams about eating food.
Finder.app and Preview.app are surprisingly decent format conversion tools
Usually you make heavy use of SELECT DISTINCT ON (…) FROM … ORDER BY ts DESC and you can use WHERE ts < ts_0 to recreate until ts_0. Liberal use of MATERIALIZED VIEWs.
I agree with your premise, but there are so many bigger fish to fry than some rando who cheated on a marathon.
Not to argue against the ultimate conclusion, but I think you've oversimplified the situation. To make a stronger argument, I think you would need to factor in the fact that dollars can be exchanged for almost anything, whereas cheeseburgers can only be exchanged for dollars. And perhaps other facts, like the fact that cheeseburgers have a much lower value being left in long-term storage than cash.
For anyone wanting more details on stainless steel and teflon there's a short video on this from nutrition facts (so references the relevant research):

https://nutritionfacts.org/video/stainless-steel-or-cast-iro...

Part of a series of three which includes aluminium:

http://nutritionfacts.org/video/are-aluminum-pots-bottles-an...

and Melamine dishes and Polymide utensils:

http://nutritionfacts.org/video/are-melamine-dishes-and-poly...

Referencing what others have said, it also mentions the Dupont cover up over Teflon, so personally I'm always sceptical of whatever the current advice is, because how long will it be before something surfaces to contadict it etc.???
I lost 30kg in the past and the only thing that worked was lots and lots of exercise. The Internet meme is that exercise is useless for weight loss and you should diet: well, I like food, and exercise allows me a more free diet.
This is my experience to counter the inevitable: "It's 99% diet, don"t bother woth exercise".
Was that included in the potential side-effects list you received? That sounds horrible.
ThAt … mutual part, yes, of Client-side TLS.
Best advice I’ve seen.

Some weird tips that helped me lose 50lbs, but are related to the above:

- chewing gum

- replace soda with seltzer

- Long bike rides with consistent cadence. Can be on a machine too.

- drink lots of water, it’ll help with the hunger

- replace full meals with veggies, no dressing
Because once you exercise enough to lose weight he reclassifies you as an athlete
You can checkout this too from Monterey, https://support.apple.com/en-in/guide/preview/prvw625a5b2c/m... very handy when dealing with screenshots & random pics with text that need to be extracted.
Any API changes to this would have bigger drawbacks than just making the tests friends of this class.
The outdated mess of buying music aside… no? I don’t think so. It’s pretty much never once happened that I thought “I wish I had bought that” aside from literal investments which is a different beast entirely. Most unowned things have less appeal to you when they’re no longer new and shiny.
If your diet is sufficiently arranged to contain as little carbs as possible, this disappears. I went from a heavy lunch person to forgetting to have lunch.
Ask HN: Whats the best way for me to support Ukraine? e.g. Where donate?
If you are looking for more selfhosted apps, checkout

1. https://old.reddit.com/r/selfhosted

2. https://github.com/awesome-selfhosted/awesome-selfhosted
As a single additional anecdotal data point, my body is the same way.
With similar height, if I am at 150lb (around 68kg) then I have visible fat. 140 is much better.
No competent chemist could have ever thought that BPA is a safe substance.

Some chemists have believed that the risks of depolymerization for the plastics that are made with BPA, e.g. polycarbonate, are low, so the risk of BPA leaching into food is low. However there have always been many chemists who have believed that the risks are too high for any such plastic to be considered as safe for food contact.

The problem is that the relevant true experts are almost never consulted for decisions regarding the use of materials for various purposes. Those who are consulted have usually very narrow specializations and can have informed opinions only about a part of the relevant criteria. The final decision about the use of materials is usually done strictly by financial criteria.

Some chemists have found a method to make polycarbonate, a plastic that combined useful properties, like high transparency and high impact resistance. They did not think about which are good uses for it and which are bad uses for it, it was not their job. Then someone else has developed a cheap method to make bottles out of it, also without giving much thought about what is suitable to be stored in such bottles or not, it was not their job. Eventually someone else has decided to fill PC bottles with some beverage and sell them.

The error has been at the end, because any material used for food-contact should be scrutinized much more than for almost any other purposes. There already are laws and regulations about materials for food-contact, but they are neither strict enough, nor applied correctly most of the time.

While there have been many problems with plastics used for inappropriate purposes, there are a lot of similar examples with all kinds of materials, crystal glass with lead used for many centuries (fortunately only the rich could afford it), silver-mercury amalgam used in dentistry for more than a century, uranium glazes and many others.

We can only learn from past mistakes and improve the existing legislation.

In my opinion, the most important would be a law forcing any manufacturer to publish the exact chemical composition of any material that is used for food-contact in their products.

This actually does not leak any valuable trade secret. Anyone with enough money can make a precise chemical elemental analysis of any object, only individual customers cannot afford it.

The valuable trade secrets are in the details of the manufacturing process, not in the final product, which can be analyzed by any competitor.
How to Create a Truly Immersive Metaverse Experience
In this article, learn how to create an immersive metaverse experience using the Web Audio API provided by web browsers to implement the spatial audio effect.
Go ask random people on the street 'do you think slavery is morally right'.

Then go out on the street and ask 'do you think it's morally wrong that India does not respect our medical patents so that they can produce cheap generic treatments from cancer accesible to their people'

You will find that the number of people that believe these two situations are morally comparable is roughly ~0%
Everybody would just leave that enabled and advertisers would find a different way to make money from tracking our browsing.
I love food. I never want to sit down to eat and have to worry, restrict, or wonder about what I am eating. I am also not exactly great at staying disciplined in the face of a complex plan. I'd much rather a strategy that is easy to understand and remember, and has a clear path to achieving my goal.

I ended up using the clock to manage my intake. I started by having a hard stop at 7pm. I could eat whatever I wanted until then, but then it had to stop. A side effect of this has been an incredible improvement in my sleep. Having slept well often means I am able to manage my cravings better, it seems.

I then started reducing the hours in the morning when I could eat. First I just eliminated breakfast, then I also eliminated the mid morning snack. This took some discipline at first but I did get it.

I eat an early (11:30 usually) and massive lunch. That gives me time to do some digesting and have a productive afternoon. A big lunch also means I don't really crave sugary or other indulgent stuff mid afternoon. Dinner, I eat whatever I want. ANYTHING. I just try to make sure I drink a lot of water.

Pick your vector of optimization. For me it was time. So easy and you can't argue with or wonder about the clock. It's right there in front of you. I lost 25lbs without thinking about it. I could lose more if I wasn't a bit of a pig at lunch and dinner :)
Have you tried out all added sugar? If you're looking for some kind of trick I'd say that might qualify. Really the main thing is to eat well, exercise, and get adequate sleep, but everyone knows that. From what I understand, some people still don't realize how toxic sugar (specifically fructose) is.

So, my weird tip (not so weird) is to completely avoid added sugar. Start looking at labels. If sugar is an ingredient, do not consume. Simple as that. This implies that if there is no ingredient list (not packaged / processed food) then that item is acceptable. I'd further add that such an item is preferable.

Regarding your O2 hack, we don't use all of the oxygen we breathe in, we exhale a lot back into the atmosphere, so no, the lungs do not need to be saturated. But the hack here is to force the body to do work it doesn't really need to do for survival, that way it requires more O2. Exercise is the hack.
Where do you draw the line for the fish ?
They might have been using it in the Italian American sense (also called Sunday Sauce): https://cooking.nytimes.com/recipes/1022972-sunday-sauce
IF works well. Been doing it for years too. 2 meals on most days and one meal sometimes. Just avoid eating too much for those remaining meals.
I looked at this but I didn't install it.

It does have a bunch of useful characteristics.

(e.g. while I have exactly the kind of deep jQuery past that the CadQuery devs are trying to evoke, I'm not super-sold on that syntax; I happily gave up jQuery once there were better things!)

But unless something has changed since I read about it, it is limited to STL export.

While there are more and more ways to get STLs printed in novel materials, for some of the things I would like to make, a more traditional CNC route seems likely, and I'd rather start as I mean to go on.
The issue is presenteeism. You might not be expected to work but you will be expected to keep your seat warm. The problem with this is it is mind numbingly dull, you will soon become sick of it.
To be a success you'd need to create some kind of yubikey specifically for DNA sequences.

Hell I'd imagine you'd need something like that just to meet people at a bar.
Yes, it doesn't make sense. Where would the CO2 come from? Capturing CO2 is not a proven technology.

Or maybe cars would be equipped with a tank that compresses CO2, but even then.

It's funny how the solution is all about stopping to use fossil fuels, but people still find ways to CREATE fossil fuels.
Is armhf / raspberry Pi support ever coming back?
The word gravy is sometimes used to refer to other sauces. In (American?) Italian cuisine it specifically refers to a very slowly cooked tomato sauce that is traditionally made on Sunday. In Indian cuisine it refers to the sauce made from spices and vegetables. In Southern US cuisine it's more like a béchamel. The etymology of the word is unclear but there is a suspected link to old French words for spice and stew.
Absolutely, the stock is just the base models and that won’t work.
"we found 276 instances of interference that occurred due to faulty assumptions originating from knowledge about a different language"

Saying learning a new programming language is hard because of that is like saying that English is hard to learn specifically because some verbs have exceptions for past tenses. I see no reason why that would be a predictor for how learning English is hard in general.

Same can be said for programming languages, I see no reason why how someone deals with peculiarities of a language says anything about that language being hard to learn, in general.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33197913/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6612215/

Its pretty well know mtor/igf-1 stimulates growth. All growth. This is great for youth. Not so much for aging.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=AjSl4n_KdOY
And? If a big part of enjoying being alive is eating freely without worry then do that and be happy with whatever body shape you end up with. That doesn't seem where OP is coming from though.
part 3 was not written...
Weird: alter your gut microbiome.

I don't know how you could do this yet safely or effectively, but studies increasingly show that from birth onwards, the gut microbiome affects numerous health aspects significantly, including obesity.

Example: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7333005/
People are assuming that they did not die because the report of US citizens who died outside of the US did not mention them. IMO this is kind of a weak justification, bureaucratic mistakes are not that uncommon. I that people are missing the point with the whole situation, they important thing is that they were heavily harassed for years, so much that now the free software and emulation communities ended up losing one of their brightest members.