skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Why is it more absurd?

Get back to me when you have literally done it. Animal or plant, flesh is subject to entropy.

> Is it because the equation then means: (O || 1) || infinity?

Are you high or mentally ill?
What element in a battery is destroyed during its lifetime that cannot be recycled?
I'm not sure what support level you've dealt with but I've always been very impressed with AWS support (granted, my org has enterprise support). They've been able to answer some really obscure technical questions without having to escalate.
This headline is going to put bad information in the minds of those who don’t read articles and comments.
My reading was not that it must be entirely numeric, but that there is no rule that it won't be. As in, an attacker cannot make any assumptions about the characters in the randomly chosen password, such as "well it won't be all numbers, so lets rule out all those possibilities The 6 character limit only seems to apply to randomly assigned ones, not to ones the user picks, which is where a strategy like "what about all the number combinations" is more useful.
>> But if the repo was GPL then their contributions would automatically be GPL also

Because the GPL requires all (conveyed) derivative works to be GPL licensed. If they intended it to be anything else they would be in violation of the GPL.
You aren't entitled to cheaper video cards just because you don't like what other people are doing with them
If you don't move aside when ordered to by a man with a gun, you might get shot.
>At this point it's possible to fingerprint with CSS alone, no javascript: https://css-tricks.com/css-based-fing

Fingerprinting isn't a boolean state. The more fingerprinting vectors you have the more reliably you can identify users. Therefore having CSS fingerprinting (or any other fingerprinting vector) doesn't really make canvas fingerprinting less bad.
Nah. They just want control of the power. It's a lot of leverage, and they want to take over the country, so they will need it.

The Ukrainians are fighting for their own land. I don't think that there's a single one of them that would deliberately cause another Chernobyl (remember that they have some experience with what happens when reactors go kablooey).

But they seem to be quite persistent, in not just just rolling over and letting the Russians have their way. I suspect that they've got plenty of other nasty little surprises in store.

One of the things that the last 50 years' worth of guerrilla wars has been, is an object lesson on how to do asymmetric warfare against technologically-advanced, and overwhelming armies.

I suspect that every military in the world has been taking notes.
Because the hardware already does all of those things whether you paid for them or not. I don't care what the company thinks, if I pay for hardware I want the ability to use it to its fullest extent and without any question about my intentions. That is what it means to have computing freedom: I shouldn't have to answer to some bullshit corporate concerns over what I'm doing with my property.

It's one thing to test your chip and turn off defective parts so that you can sell a downgraded but still viable version and increase yields. Selling the exact same chips to everyone with software that locks out features just to segment the market is unacceptable and frankly quite offensive. It's the sort of thing that makes everyone wish they get cracked on principle, just to make things sane again.
Palestine scenario (permanent military deployment, apartheid, settlements). The population ratio of Russia vs Ukraine is not that far off from Israel vs Palestine...
Fable was the first thing that came to my mind as well. Not for how well it was executed but for how ridiculously oversold this aspect of it was pre-release. I think it was Fable that really solidified for me to take everything Peter Molyneux says with a Dead-Sea-load of salt.
There are certainly science fiction and religious traditions where people are born twice. (A James Bond book/ movie has the fun title "You Only Live Twice") One recent thought experiment is the idea that we are in a ancestor simulator and will be born again in a heaven simulator.

A popular genre of anime involves high school students dying by chance and being reborn in fantasy world's where they can have the fun of living out RPG type adventures.

The problem is there isn't a shred of evidence for people being reborn. It seems like wishful thinking or just a fun fantasy.
It would cost trillions of dollars to rebuild our cities in a way that car driving isn't necessary.
Looking for Senior Developer roles. Most recently did frontend, open to full stack roles also. ~14 year experience.

Location: Toronto, Canada

Remote: flexible

Willing to relocate: No

Technologies: React, Next.js, Typescript, Javascript, Electron, Docker, Python

Email: sarath[dot]ms<@GMail>

Github: https://github.com/sarathms
Of course I despise the Russians for invading, but that doesn't free you from the obligation to plan for the worst.

Now the only An-225 article is gone forever, and we won't ever see another one built. I doubt they even have the engineering drawings to do so. Those were probably also lost during the bombings.
They're not, they're 'just' letting employees use real customer PII when training.

They screwed up by allowing that.
The employee screwed up by committing it to git and then pushing to a public repo.

The employee wouldn't have been able to do that if they'd enforced using fake customer data for testing/training.
I would say not just why are you committing it to git, but why are you using it for "employee training"?

You should not be using real data with PII for training exersizes.

Hopefully that's what they mean by:

> We are additionally putting in place more protocols and access controls to avoid any possible future data exposure and limiting access for employee training use.
You are right, I can't give you an example as I don't own a Tesla. Yet I find it hard to believe that when someone is purchasing 45K+ of hardware and 10K+ of beta software they can't be arsed to read the support page for any of it.

I hope that people that pay these sums are responsible adults that don't go out there putting everyone in danger because "autopilot" is right there in the name, and of course it's a totally different thing than when the word is used for airplanes.
More so than the seasoned ones for sure, but they'd actually find more success omitting any game details so I question how many.
I have a very mechanistic view of this. Inside a body is an army of cpus just constantly running programs to create or repair components of the body. At a certain level, the cpus and programs look the same, because they are both realized by complex molecular chains and collections.

When an ova is fertilized, the mother's cpus get to work on the program (DNA) soon creating an embryo. This is aided by cpus in the embryo DNA too. This process requires a lot of energy. After some period of time the embryos brain is sufficiently developed and has sufficient input channels to develop sensory awareness and some self awareness. But self awareness is not fully formed until sometime after birth.

All notions of "self" come from the workings of the brain. This too requires a lot of energy. When the brain is no longer supplied with energy, it shuts down and "self" no longer exists.
I've not experienced this on a motorway as of yet.
This is pure propaganda. Ukrainian forces would never do that, which I cannot say about those who oppose them.
The undo function is in the works.. to clear all you can refresh the page (or click the logo). There is an effect when a tile is filled but perhaps it needs to be more dramatic.
The entire western section of Ukraine was Polish before WW2.
A practical calculator for the risk of nuclear war
You can, but the setting is a bit hidden and when you're dealing with GenPop you have to assume they won't read anything, and find anything beyond basic features too complex. I mainly use the setting for sharing my timezone. The nice thing about discord is the server admin can precisely say what a server should look like, so people don't need to find and join channels. It's just there.
I hope OP is rewarding the customer that noticed and notified OP about the issue.
You were an extreme outlier if you bothered to memorize dozens of ten digit phone numbers in the era before everyone had a cellphone.

The average person doesn't even have ten good friends, much less a need to memorize dozens of phone numbers. They would buy address books / contact books to write down dozens of numbers, not memorize numbers they very rarely use.
> We are standing by as a bully dominates another country, its culture and people.

What signal do all these wars send, i wonder. Why dont we see a hysteria in the news about them? Questions, questions..
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ongoing_armed_conflict...
"Except that's exactly sane in Europe"

This is up to debate. I am a european resident and I think it is insane, that the reason I am not free to donate my work into the public domain is supposed to be "moral rights".
I've seen cars at a complete standstill on the highway more than once. It's fair to say it is unusual but it should be fully expected, IMO.

I don't understand the scare quotes around safe distance here. Maintaining safe distance (and the implied safe speed and open eyes) absolutely would help in these situations.
With PWAs the idea is that if the user explicitly "installs" them they get exceptions and better integration, yes. I don't have a reference at hand and don't know the details on iOS, but hopefully "PWA safari support" finds some clearer things.
Yes, and the latest Zero-Trust guidance is actually legitimately good - it enforces a security practice on all gov agencies that will be better than 99% of the private sector. The password policy is just one line, but still a welcomed slap on the face of all Old Guard folks (who are overrepresented in infosec policy-making). The rule is clear: MFA or GTFO.
What mechanisms are in place to prevent an employee from doing so? We have so many people in the industry now that it's hard to keep up with this stuff. To be fair, Github has all the ingredients necessary to be a giant, gaping security liability. It's a "secure" platform built around software designed for sharing. That sentence alone has a ton of baggage in it. I'm not even trying to diss Github either.
I accept the possibility that I could return to a bunch of rubble, but I would very much like to return home if/after the war stops and Putin's regime collapses, and rebuild and create with renewed vigor. Most of the things we left behind aren't critical and could be reacquired elsewhere. The most important thing is that my wife and kids are safe and by my side.
On the other hand, if you have too many password requirements and the user can’t remember it, they often lean on bad password hygiene, and the password ends up being reused (and inevitably leaked) or written down somewhere.
I remember 2 out of the 3 landline numbers (one is my parents, still using that) I used to know, my 2 ICQ numbers, and my mobile phone number (which is still the same now, 20 years later). I never felt the need to remember a ton of numbers, that’s what phone books (digital or analog) are for and why I now use a password manager ;)
Google for Jobs. It's the job board killer.

I've been operating niche job boards for a decade, starting with angularjobs.com (for Angular developers).

Before this, the job ad aggregators (Indeed, Zip recruiter, Talent, Talroo, and LinkedIn) were probably* the best bet.

IMO, Google expects a return to business websites posting their jobs on their own domain[1]. This way, they can take all the job-ad $$$, too.

*99.99% of jobs on most job boards come from these sources, as "backfill". The ones that don't use the job ads (and often brag about it) are just paying other companies to scrape the same jobs from the company webpages so that the "job board" outranks them in SEO, and use that "advantage" to sell premium listings. When I was working on ETL with these sources, combined there were ~10MM unique job postings in the US (late 2020).

Edit: I wanted to add, be wary of job boards that pop up to fill this void. Anyone can create a job board in 2 minutes with Jobboard.io. However, building an audience, especially one that is worth advertising to, doesn't happen as quickly.

[1] https://developers.google.com/search/docs/advanced/structure...

Thanks for the down votes. Would love to know which part of my anecdote was so offensive to you, though!
Sadly probably nothing it's just the natural cycle of things.

fextralife became popular as the go to wiki for soul-type game by copy pasting data from the original wikis and using aggressive marketing oriented tricks to get put above on google while using various autoplay to get views on twitch. Now they are here to stay and look like they made lot on effort on Elden including a nice map.

But now the cycle continue, extremely efficient scrapper are copying their data and putting them on oddly similar website, all saying the exact same thing. The most impressive whoever made these also make it auto translate into many localized websites.
And the most annoying is if any of the original pages have mistakes then in a less than a week the web is covered with this false data.
No, they're not. Fextralife especially is filled with information that's often wrong or misleading.
Too many extra steps, especially on mobile. And very suspectable to phishing and social engineering. Also makes it impossible to login if you lose email access (and what if you need to change your address because of it?)
What about an undetected data breach leaking username and passwords? Periodic password replacement reduces the window where someone's stolen password is used a long time after breach. This may not be the threat scenario for every type of accounts, but in some type it would one among the most important ones.
No complaining about NATO threatening Russia's agency from me. I'm saying that these fine words about agency and values are BS. I am advocating for a realistic world view, which requires that you actually understand what matters to your opponent. Especially if your opponent can destroy you.
> He said the car in front of him almost hit the car so they swerved barely missing him and then there was the Tesla right there .

This is how my friend lost all 4 wheels on his car. Following too close to react to stuff that the vehicle in front of him could. Hit the raised island for a slip lane when someone swerved out of the right turn lane at the last minute.
>You know, the one where a single mom with children to feed pays the same percentage of her income as the single billionaire that wants to buy a 3rd yacht.

I guess you have never read anything about the various flat-tax proposals. There have been several, and they have all accounted for those with lower income levels.

One of the fundamental tenets of the flat tax is 14th Amendment "equal protection." Is it constitutionally acceptable to treat a rich person differently from a poor person? The flat-tax people say no. Progressives say yes. I do agree that a progressive tax system has merits with which I agree, but I also think it's perfectly reasonable to assert that falls afoul of equal protection, and therefore should either be rejected or an Amendment should be presented and passed to account for it.

Progressives tend to turn this distinction into a moral argument about fairness, which is not how a government that is bound by law is supposed to work. If you want the government to work on a moral basis, don't be too surprised if a later government with different moral frameworks do things you don't care for.

>Look up Grover Nordquist

Somebody else brought him up in a comment. Taking your assertion at face value, you have one data point suggesting the right doesn't want to simplify the tax code. Good job, but I've got a competing data point of Paul Ryan, who was an actual Congressional leader in the Ways and Means Committee talking about the flat tax, and not an activist gadfly. I think my singular data point carries more weight than your data point.
Lots of data scientists, ex-statisticians, analysts, etc. are pressured with "you should use git". It's generally a noble thing, and the right one -- these folks often otherwise don't use git enough for their code.

It does however come with this risk, that they let data, or Jupyter notebook output or etc. get committed.

I'm not saying what happened here is excusable -- it's not, it's ridiculously bad. But I can see a few ways how it'd happen.

To me the equal or better question is why does this person have PII in the first place? It's not necessary to do analysis. Someone should have masked or removed it before this person ever got their hands on it. There's no way a PII dataset is needed for training.
It's not hard to maintain a safe following distance.

So if a car swerves into your lane 10 meters in front of you, then slams on the brakes, you're at fault because it should have been so easy to maintain a safe following distance? (This isn't hypothetical, I've had this exact scenario happen multiple times -- on/off ramps seem to bring out the worst in some drivers).
If the driver of car 3 could not see past car 2, and car 2 hadn't realised the Tesla had stopped, and instead swerved out the say 1 second / 90 feet (assume 60mph) before collision, that would give car 2 traveling at a reasonable gap no more than 3 seconds / 270 feet to recognise what was going on and stop.

Should have recognised something odd (a broken down car) within 1.5 seconds, leaving 1.5 seconds to slow down.

Applying brakes from 60mph would mean you'd still be traveling over 40mph when you hit the back of the car.

Thus you need to give more than 2 seconds if you can't see beyond the car in front
Speaking as someone who's gone to hundreds of meetups for various groups and was an admin for a 1400 member (~200 active at its peak) meetup for a while, I don't necessarily think the problem is they didn't improve enough. I still find it functionally useful enough.

But their income model isn't that great. I was paying $90 out of pocket every 6 months to keep it going at the end (I think when I started being an admin I was paying around $45, so it doubled in only a few years), and I was having a hard time justifying paying them $180/year to keep our group, which was going through a bit of a rough patch anyway (especially when the pandemic hit and I didn't want to host any in-person meetups anymore). I know the admins of several other local groups and they also killed their groups for the same reason.

I also really don't like how you can't actually close the group, just leave as an admin. Technically our group is still around, just some random person swooped in to take over to only post paid speed dating events (the group was originally for geeky interests, like board games, movies, conventions, role playing, etc). It feels dirty to me the site allows and encourages that behavior (spamming emails to everyone in the group "Don't let this meetup group you're a member of go away! Pay to become an admin now!")

I still use them as a user, but I don't think I'd ever start a group on there ever again. I created a local board game playtester group and used word of mouth at game designer conventions to get to ~10 people and kept that going through a Facebook group chat and posted Facebook events, that seemed good enough.
In a way we do, called Gemeinfrei. But the only way to transfer something to it, is dying and waiting 70 years.
This is now the second, third and fourth time you're arguing with arguments I never actually made. I'm not sure it's worth continuing with this because you don't seem to be accurately reading what I write.

I said (again, quite clearly) that there are probably 100 or fewer climatologists actively producing aggregated temperature datasets, not 100 climatologists in total. There are many climatologists, but they all use the same set of temperature time series produced by a relatively small group. And that makes sense. Collecting all the data is a lot of work. You have to maintain relationships with many different meteorological agencies, potentially spend lots of time typing in numbers read from old log books, etc. It'd be odd if that work were duplicated by every person who wanted to explore climate data.

Then you go off and talk about how there's consensus that CO2 could lead to global warming, which is nothing I've disagreed with at any point. CO2 could cause that, yes, but how much effect it is actually having in practice is definitely not in agreement, as the numerous different estimates for ECS show.

"You're claiming all of that work is discredited because someone reviewed old data and said "this measurement was odd and their notes are bad; they probably left the thermometer in the sun. Let's throw out this data point"."

Argh, no. I am explicitly not claiming that, I'm claiming the opposite. Faced with measurements they believe are erroneous they do not throw out the data. That would be a scientific thing to do. Instead what they do is keep it, but then apply a large range of "fixes" to it, and present the "fixed" data as if it were the original recordings. This is bad news because actually in the original data no warming is visible, and the trend they are claiming is really happening only appears after their model-driven adjustments. In other words, when observed data doesn't match the theory, the theory triumphs and observed data is modified.

"It's simple: you are spreading misinformation. Stop it."

Someone who can't even correctly understand the things I'm writing is in no position to claim other people are spreading misinformation. None of the points I've responded to in this thread were actually rebuttals to anything I've said!
> NATO is a mutual-defense alliance. It's not a defend-everyone-else alliance.

NATO is a regional security alliance that also includes a mutual defense obligation; it is not just a mutual defense alliance. Most NATO operations and missions, including most of those involving active combat, have not been mutual defense missions under Article 5.

> Finland, Sweden, Ireland, Switzerland, Georgia, Moldova, would not send troops to defend Russia attacking a NATO member like Latvia, for example.

That's purely speculative; they absolutely could legally and indeed Ireland, as a fellow EU member, has a mutual defense commitment to Latvia without being a NATO member. The existence of one treaty with mutual defense obligations does not prohibit collective self-defense between nations that aren't members, from o a non-member to a member, or from a member to a non-member without another treaty, nor does it prevent the existence of partially overlapping treaty organizations with mutual defense commitments.

Kosovo’s ethnic Albanian population in 1999 weren't a NATO member state.
> He bought Tesla. He didn't actually create that company.

Are you saying all you need to do is create a company and that equals success and a good product?

Because damn some people in silicon valley want a word, you know something they don't.
> crypto is a cancer.

Proof of Work is a cancer. The two are heavily intertwined, but they are not technically mutual terms. Proof of Work needs to be stopped, irrelevant of what it is used for.
As a matter of policy in this event I agree with the EFF. But given this timeline of modern wars, I can't agree with the literal headline, since war is almost always going on somewhere.

https://www.iwm.org.uk/history/timeline-of-20th-and-21st-cen...

A better heuristic is to not make policy when upset or angry, and the existence of war is a poor proxy of that. And even that rule can be a hindrance to adequately and rapidly responding to novel stimuli.
I'm aware this isn't their primary use case, but the biggest feature missing from GDocs that moves me to notion / etc. is the lack of built in support for codeblocks. If they had that I really feel I would move most of my doc-writing here.
Fair, I should put "legally sane", I lost the nuance there.