skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I agree with you.

Now it seems that he is going to be downvoted to oblivion but I think he shouldn’t. Why? It’s exactly this kind of opposite and constructed opinion (right or wrong really it doesn’t matter) that help us to be better critical thinkers and get a better view of the world. If he is wrong then we will know even more why about the subject. If he is right then our views have now dramatically changed! Now of course we have to take time ourselves to go to his material, in the rabbit hole of infos, fact check, check the sources etc… Or else we are no better than the other person we disagree with! Just lucky to be on the right side. Or! Not even knowing that we are in the wrong one and never being able to know it without putting the effort!

Thanks to his comment and going down to the rabbit hole of infos and fact checking etc… I now know a lot more about what’s going there, Ukraine, the geopolitical states, Russia… and also why people may think like OP. Doesn’t mean I agree. But I have now a lot better and wider understanding than before. And that’s too bad to not respect people that just help ourselves to achieve that even if we disagree with them.
Thanks, at the time I didn't think about youtube-dl but of course it has args for that :)

youtube-dl --write-sub --sub-lang en --skip-download

I translated the subtitles with deepl, it made for a fascinating read!
Person B ("that guy") doesn't have a valid trademark and would indeed risk it begin invalidated if he sued. Farmer A can, and should, ignore this shit and continue to make his shirts, should in fact file for his own trademark and start proceeding to invalidate the fraudulent one.

Or stop griping.
I don't really think it's Wikipedia's job to litigate the truthfulness of such claims -- it's about consensus, not about "truth." Assigning Wikipedia the job of deciding what is true and what is not beyond just summarizing mainstream consensus and Wikipedia ends up having to take many more political stances and the project could quickly break down.
This is FUD.

Thermocouple-based gas valves immediately extinguish the flow of gas when a pilot goes out in e.g. a pilot fed hot water heater. This has been standard for decades.

Pilot lights have not been used in gas furnaces in decades. Everything has been electronic ignition since the 80s at the latest. In fact they have been outlawed in some locales for close to 40 years.
I remember reading about Arc forever ago. I thought it never went anywhere. A quick look at the tutorial and it isn't clear how it deviates from vanilla lisp/scheme. (I kinda expected a description of how it is different on the first page of the site.)
Many high officials have strong financial interest against this. In Xi's eyes they are corrupted. But there are too many of them and Xi need some of their support. That's why anti-corruption campaign is crucial to achieve party's (Xi's) political goals.
Bias I've seen in politically charged articles:

- Only allowing "reliable sources", and defining that based on criteria which essentially excludes any right wing publication, even when the unreliable source has irrefutable evidence of the claim (video, etc). Similarly, citing claims from 'reliable' sources that are misleading, or slightly incorrect (you don't need to look at many news articles to find an example of this)

- Using social academic sources, like gender studies, to cite things that are literally just opinions. Social sciences have a lot of these publications putting forth claims, that are basically citing each other in a circle, with the root claim being someone's opinion (usually grievance studies).

- Citing lack of 'relevance' to stifle any claim that doesn't fall under the above two. Who decides what's relevant? Well that's the trick; there's no objective criteria, so the power mods decide it.
The divide is clearly between people who watch Tv and people who don’t. It happens that younger people watch less TV, and this is the only reason.

You may be surprised how strong propaganda is. I spoke with quite a few people recently and it is mind boggling. Propaganda victims cannot answer some basic questions such as - “If Ukrainians are nazis why we don’t see millions of refugees?” The problem is they are not ready to get the answer. Instead they became emotional and stressed and start yelling at you for no good reason. I guess this is uncontrolled reaction to prevent their imaginary world from collapsing.
Even the most reasonable people can't make the argument when the direction is so wildly independent of reality. For example, water usage limits on dishwashers that make people run the cycle twice and end up using more water and more electricity than the old ones.
I hope we live to see the conditions that make it plausible go away.
Russia waltzed into the Black Sea with it's navy without a hitch.
> even if your processor tells you otherwise and quotes some fraud-related bullshit.

You may be right 99.9% of the time. But if your site starts being used by someone automatically testing stolen credit card to see if they work you will be thankful for the automated script detection this gives. Every chargeback cost the vendor $20, now imagine 1k of those in a sort period of time, not pretty.

So far I have fortunately not been a victim of this but have read about people who have and it gives me enough fear to stick that script on all pages.
> I am empathetic to your situation, but if you lived in Russia and paid taxes in Russia, you did support Putin. You also supported him just by living there, which was a statement that Russia is a place worth living in. Also if you didn't protest, you did support him passively.

If you're an American you don't get to criticize Russian citizens for this. It would be the very definition of glass houses and throwing stones.

How many of your government's injustices and war crimes have you protested? And don't try to brush off my comment as "whataboutism", you're talking tough so back it up.
I had a relative involved with a study on pesticide removal. Unfortunately, unless you're using a wire brush, the pesticide isn't coming off your fruit.
Good for them, with many others forcing employees into dead offices, twitter should be able to easily poach a lot of unhappy talent.
AFAIK the SOS system is mandatory in any new car sold in EU since 31.3.2018.
It's been mind boggling to see anti 2A people in my social circle cheer for normal Ukrainian citizens arming themselves with "weapons of war" that "wouldn't do anything against a country with drones and nukes." I hope a silver lining of this conflict is remembering that protecting your life and your family's lives with firearms is an inalienable right.
Surely you are not using neural networks ! They are quite magical too !
Ask HN: How do subscription companies handle analytics with BTC and CC payments?
They aren't comparable, not really. In the same way that an 8x10" camera and a full-frame camera aren't.

But they are excellent.

Good phone cameras have a value proposition all of their own, and they are utterly changing what we expect from photography.

My mobile has taught me that a lot of what I relied on or worked with in a DSLR or mirrorless is a crutch.

Mobile phone cameras force you, for example, to really think about composition, because you can't simply blur out the bits you don't like (portrait mode still sucks). They force you to think of other ways to isolate subjects, other ways to make use of light and contrast.

I've owned a lot of kit over 20 years or so, though I still own a lot of it -- I'm using a 14-year-old full frame DSLR and a seven year old full-frame mirrorless.

In the last two years, when studio portrait photography has been complicated or impossible, I have used my phone a lot, when out walking by myself. What I thought was just a way to not-totally-give-up photography has turned into a work of its own.

It will anger a lot of photographers who like to whine about how mobile phone cameras can't do X, Y and Z, but here's the truth: if you don't understand what a mobile phone camera can teach you as a photographer, you're probably not really trying.
EU countries generally aren't authoritarian regimes, and it's easier to argue that it wouldn't be as likely to be abused in the EU. The countries also have legislation and other controls to curb abuses of powers granted to the authorities. It may not be 100% but it's different than in an authoritarian regime where curtailing dissent seems like an obvious goal, not just a potential and somewhat unlikely side effect.

With that said, it still always seems shortsighted to me to abandon fundamental principles for circumstantial or narrow gains.
> If simply bleaching one's skin or straightening hair allowed one to hide their racial phenotype

Lots of people do do this. Aren't you aware of skin creams to whiten the skin, hair straightening products, eye lid surgeries, etc. The list goes on and on.

> then millions would be doing it and we wouldn't have all these problems

But those alone aren't enough. You need massive amounts of plastic surgery.

Financial cost is one but also the cost to one's identity.

But more importantly, millions of people wouldn't just throw away their identity. For this same reason, telling someone they can just change their last name is makes no sense.

> Race is immutable in most parts of the world.

Identity is just as immutable. You can tell someone to change their last name but that is about as effective as wearing different clothes. You cannot change a person's upbringing, how they were socialized, their memories, how they view the world. All of that is more or less set in stone from childhood.

You're better off getting plastic surgery. At least that will be effective.
Isn't the primary reason that the picture has to be projected on a flat plane?
Eating meat affects the environment, but cows are not killing the climate (2018)
I gotta know now...what make and model?
How much does Microsoft actually contribute to Blink's core really? The benefit for Microsoft of Chromium Edge is they get to outsource development. Their interest is in making it run well, and so far they've largely left the web features to Google. If Firefox became a Chromium fork they'd be just another junior partner in name only; Google would still be running the show on policy. In fact, possibly worse, because of their poor negotiating position.

WebKit only matters because of iOS, and Blink and WebKit still share a lot of DNA. It's not a credible competitor otherwise.

I do agree killing Servo was a shortsighted move, but, speaking as a long-time Mozilla community member, that's hardly the only shortsighted move MoCo has ever made (see also: dumping embedding for Fx4).
Enough of his advisors and generals are already afraid of him

They just don’t know how much support they have

The default penalty for a slightly different perspective is 15 years in prison

The expected penalty is falling out of a first floor window

Everyone is surrounded by people vying for power that will double cross anyone to imprison their direct competitors

Its a prisoners dilemma that allows Putin to use his consolidated power unabated
Intel fab blocking AMD may impact AMD but it will impact Intel’s margins. I really hope Intel gets back on track with EUV, but 10nm was a major blunder and setback. TSM has the leading edge monopoly right now. There is a chance it stays that way beyond 2023.

FWIW: I want competition for the sake of progress, but I am bullish AMD for the next few years, and may be bullish Intel once they demonstrate their ability to shrink their process and execute IDM 2. Then they compete with AMD again… and TSM.
I’d rather let those 2 problems play out than prematurely killing off huge numbers of humans. Was this a joke?
I found that James has recorded a series of 22 TDD sessions that demonstrate the techniques outlined in the blog post in JS: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nlGSDUuK7C4&list=PLD-LK0HSm0...
Stock valuations are driven primarily by present and future profits. Given that their profits are primarily coming from extremely similar markets, you absolutely can and should compare their numbers, especially their earnings.
I just saw Boeing C-32 (e.g. the Air Force Two) fly from Poland to Moldova. I wonder what that is about.
Yeah. Just look at the performance per dollar ratio on mobile Intel chips right around Cherry Trail. Bay Trail and Cherry Trail lines were very good deals, and then core-m threw all that right out the window.
This seems like something the Commons Volunteer Response Team (VRT, previously OTRS) can help with. You can send them the documents and they can vouch that they say what was claimed, but without having to publish the material against the licence.

I have used this for license confirmations, not for fact checking, but they do Biographies of Living Persons work so they might be able to help.
There are still people who believe that today. It all depends on what you want to believe. People believe that Russia was forced into this, people believe that Ukranians secretly long to be liberated and saved. People will believe the most crazy stuff.
Nothing in the parent comment said anything about economic opportunity.

It referenced escaping a totalitarian state. Is Mexico a totalitarian state that people need to escape?

I live in a city where there's a lot less economic opportunity than there used to be, a lot of manufacturing work here that used to pay good wages moved to Mexico.

I'm pissed off about it to tell you the truth. Economic opportunity? Really?

Had about enough of "The Economist".
>>The Biden–Ukraine conspiracy theory is ...

> This is not a statement of fact, but an opinion

Actually the way Wikipedia articles work, this is a definition. They are taking various articles about similar topics (in the citation link at the end), and coming up with a single topic name and its definition. Sometimes it's hard to accomplish this and you have to settle for a vague definition, e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_number is defined to allow starting at 0 or at 1.

As far as the $1,000,00/yr salary, that's mentioned on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunter_Biden#Burisma_Holdings. But it's not relevant to the conspiracy theory so it's not mentioned there. I think you could add it, just copy the source.
Besides telephoto and real macro, the results of the iPhone 12 made the idea of gear renewal almost absurd for me, it’s just incredible and I’m not talking about the 12 pro.

There is trade offs, none of them justifies carrying heavy gear around most of the time.

edit: it’s a hobby and I just spent a lot of time trying to take pretty pictures, and searching the proper cost tradeoff to do them
I find dryers are particularly bad at this. Mine has 5 levels of dry-ness. Even on "ultra dry" the clothes usually come out damp. So I run "ultra dry" twice. Lol.
Totally get it, huge not-a-fan of the endless JS framework race. _However._

- Constructing a House Using Only Wood Glue

- Removing That Appendix Yourself

- Boiling an Ocean with Two Sticks

- Granting Your Own Wishes Without a Genie

- Hosting Your Own Funeral
Yes, it did. Still using it to this day! But I did not disassemble it all the way. I had to get to the motherboard to fix a broken screen flex cable as well as change the SD card reader, and took the opportunity to explore a bit more.

The general architecture of the device was identical. However, the motherboard of the A1 seems significantly more complex and cluttered. Beyond that, the structural elements are much more intricate in the A1 and are skeletonized, certainly in an effort to save weight. Generally speaking however, it's crazy how the overall designed stayed so similar.

It was a joy to disassemble and put back together. It was clear that it was designed to be serviced.
When I'm writing web stuff "for fun", I try to avoid frameworks. It seems a lot more enjoyable.

When I do, though, I use vanilla Javascript. I'd really love to do framework-less Typescript. In theory, you can, I guess. But it is all wrapped up in NPM. Which, for some reason, I just don't like.

NPM-less Typescript seems like it would be pretty cool.
It isn't so much production as transport. We may have a lot of wheat, but getting it shipped is way more expensive and ship into long beach are only on time about 10% of the time, pre covid, they were 90% on time. And it is a lot easier to get goods into smaller towns and farms etc, than it will be to pick up a bunch of shipments from rural areas.
Something wrong with simply using RNNoise?
Why are the lenses so complex outside of the area that matters? Structural integrity / resistance to dropping?
Finding the forgotten women who programmed the world’s first electronic computer
https://sr.ht/ is faster than most SPAs I know and it refreshes the page a lot
What a loaded question. Are you asserting that Russia hates the Ukrainian people, and is invading because they want them destroyed?
You sounds like me. I’m seasonally suffering of the same problem. And AFAICS it doesn’t correlate with my sleep hygiene.

What’s worse, I feel tired the whole day, but not that much anymore towards night.
It depends on what you're doing and what the photos are for. If you're shooting events, sports, wildlife, or want to do shots with specialty--like ultra-wideangle--lenses, precise aperture control, large blowups, no. But phones can now handle a huge amount of what most people--even relatively serious photographers, need day to day or on a random hike/city visit/etc. need. If you're shooting with a DSLR and whatever kit lens it came with on A you're probably fine using a phone.
A casual non-scientific test of 10 violins, 5 of them worth millions of dollars
There seems to be vauge rumors about them being bad for some reason, but the reviews all seem good. Maybe they're heavy users of fake reviews.

It looks like Huawei has some of the same issues too, but one exec resigned, so maybe things will improve. Xiaomi seems to have slave labor problems too.
I think Sony make the sensors only.
Cars or livestock: which contribute more to climate change? (2018)
Please read all of Neil Postman's work immediately. It's much bigger than the oven. Thank you.
Correct they don’t make sense, but given < and > return a Boolean in the ieee environment they need to produce a deterministic value.

As you say relations with NaN don’t make sense, but given the requirement of a single value NaN != NaN makes the most “sense” mathematically, and a core principle of ieee754 was ensuring the most accurate rendition of true maths with a finite representation (see a bunch of papers by Kahan).

Of course x87’s ieee754 implementation does actually have multiple NaNs, infinities, and representations of the same value. For all its quirks remember x87 was what demonstrated that the ieee754 specification could be made fast and affordably, which non-intel manufacturers were all claiming was impossible. The only real “flaw”* in x87 was the explicit leading 1, which was an artifact of it intel being sufficiently ahead of the curve to predate dropping it.

* the x87 transcendtals are known to be hopelessly inaccurate, but that in theory could have been fixed, whereas the format could not be.
I'm curious about this from a U.S. legal perspective.

Suppose I advertise (and sell) a product without clearly informing the buyer of additional requirements they'll face in order to use the product as advertised.
E.g., access functionality via WiFi, accept an EULA, etc.

At what point does that become fraud or illegally deceptive advertising?

I'm assuming that there's some allowance for assuming common knowledge, e.g. that an electric oven will require a 220-240V connection. But if there's a legal line to be crossed, where is it?
It probably isn't so much the spilling of blood that it isn't interested in rather than the chances of wholesale evaporation but otherwise your point stands.
> So to be honest I cannot see how we are not responsible.

I cannot se how you are responsible
Who said it was legal?

Google doesn't seem to care much about false ads unless it causes them unusual trouble. If you pay, you can literally pretend to be whoever you want in a search ad.
Stayed?

Khodorkovsky hasn't stayed after he got out.

And Navalny overplayed his hand. It appears he really thought it was about him, not the movement he had created, otherwise he'd have had his wife run for office, which is what wives of those arrested in Belarus did.
And did you know that Elon Musk's grandfather was a top technocrat in Canada?

https://www.technocracy.news/shock-elon-musks-grandfather-wa...
But what's the math on mpg difference for moving an extra 60 lbs? It's probably pretty negligible but without actual numbers, can't actually say.
Illegality ≠ Enforcement
I'm not saying you should have done it. I'm saying a lot of people have to.
My own country still exists because in the past 500 years it never surrendered when a big army showed up making outrageous demands. I see no reason to change that now.

Nuclear weapons are not a problem if we all hold to the MAD doctrine.
I suspect the reason has to do with nobody being willing to actually sue over this. For example, are you going to contact a lawyer and bring a lawsuit?

Another reason is that laws are difficult to interpret. There are lots of laws, prior rulings, unintuitive concepts, etc. Presumably some lawyers at Washington Post and/or Google have at least signed off on rules that allow this kind of thing. That means there's probably some not obviously insane way to construe this as legal.

Regardless of legality, it's certainly terrible performance from Google.
That reminds me of my Westinghouse Radio hub[1]. They abandoned the product and the domain expired. So naturally, it couldn't play the radio.

[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22083759
Perhaps it's not legal - I presume someone would need to file suit under the Act for it to be determined. That said, the link is highlighted as www.washingtonpost.com and the ad text also mentions The Washington Post so it might be arguable that this ad isn't necessarily misleading since it only mentions CNN in the header and nowhere else.
Unfortunately I don’t have the perfect answer to immediately end this conflict with no collateral damage to anyone as you said.

That doesn’t mean I advocate arbitrarily punishing innocent civilians for the actions of their rulers - especially when those rulers are proven to be authoritarians who can and will ruthlessly crush dissent from their populace.

If you read my other comments on this thread you will see I shared some ideas that I believe would both be more targeted towards Russia’s elite, while also bringing more direct pain to defund Putin’s ability to wage war.

Namely the west should cut off Russia’s supply of money by banning the purchase of Russian oil.

I realize this action will hurt regular Ukrainians and other Innocent Europeans which is why I also advocate for direct subsidies to reduce the cost of energy for these affected populations, paid for by western governments.

TL;DR: One strategy we might try to make it harder for the elites to wage war would be to stop giving them money to wage war while at the same time temporarily subsidizing energy costs for populations affected by the oil sanctions.
"History's written by the victors" seems like a stretch that's only kinda truth-adjacent in some situations, e.g. where one side gets wiped out and there're no third-party observers, etc.. But, it doesn't hold in most cases, e.g. in World War 1 or 2, nor basically any modern war, where most of the losing side survives and tells its stories too. Heck, in the US, some folks complain about how much the loser of the American Civil War got to push its narratives. [From StackExchange's History site](https://history.stackexchange.com/questions/5597/is-history-... ).

Anyway, critique of that quote aside, how's it relevant to Wikipedia?
> food

There have been mentions that they're already short on food for their soldiers. Wonder if that's an actual thing, and if so, then how badly short they are?

Especially with that old phrase "an army marches on it's stomach" coming to mind. :)