skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Turing didn't prove the halting problem was undecidable. The halting problem was defined after Turing's death by Martin Davis.

Really? I did not include a reference link here but I grabbed the dates from Wikipedia, which states:

Alan Turing proved in 1936 that a general algorithm to solve the halting problem for all possible program-input pairs cannot exist.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halting_problem

Obviously Wikipedia is not the end-all be-all of mathematical sources, but I'd be curious to see a source that contradicts it here.
What did you do different to get the 2.5 hours of uninterrupted work done?
CIA's final report: No WMD found in Iraq (2007)
not until they can successfully, secretly, launder money and hide money in shell companies and other fraudulent activities that a very large portion of the money flow in the world relies on.

Also. at a level above "money" what do the ultra wealthy (Rothschild, Rockefeller, etc) deal in as currency at their level. I believe they have another currency. These families have FAR greater wealth than Bezos and Zuck (Bill Gates is essentially family to the Rothschilds. through his father/grandfather)
"Entry level" needs to be better defined. Is it for somebody with just a short boot-camp education or somebody who has completed a college degree and some internships?

The 99% of employers who are not FAANG are always trying to pay as little as they can get away with.
I’m sure the US and allies will make that happen. This isn’t Afghanistan - even if the Russians occupy the Ukraine we will be supplying the insurgent forces with technology that will make the Russians feel like they’re fighting the Martians.
If you watch how a Russian armored vehicle went out of it's easy to trample an unarmed civilian car I'd say they do not care about having excuses

Sometimes the only defense is to shoot back however you can
I recently achieved B2 Hungarian in 24 months. It usually takes English speakers 5+ years to learn. This article is pretty good advice and mostly what I do when learning a language. The main thing I'd emphasize is to use, use, use the language, as soon as possible, and as much as possible. People spend years in a classroom studying languages and making no progress. But if you use a language, your brain will start to soak it up like a sponge. Common barriers to using a new language are that people don't feel they know enough to start using it, and that people are afraid to sound like an idiot. You only need 5-10 words to start using a language. Pick a scenario you do every day (for me, ordering coffee), learn the words for it in your target language, and then start doing that every day. Each time you do it, your language abilities will strengthen. As far as sounding like an idiot, I struggle with that more. First, I'd say, get comfortable with the fact that you're going to make mistakes, and stop giving a fuck. Then, surround yourself with people who are friendly and will encourage you when you make mistakes instead of judging you. If you're using a language daily, I think you can cut time estimates for learning it in school in half.
Also have a look at --numeric-ids, otherwise it translates UIDs back and forth according to real user names - which will end up in a terrible mess, especially when you are restoring the backup from a live "CD" (which has different UID ←→ username mapping than the target system).
OK, so there are two pathways here:

A) USD in American bank => hryvnia in Ukrainian bank

B) USD in American bank => Bitcoin in Coinbase => hryvnia in Ukrainian bank

What regulations does that get around? Who could stop pathway A but not pathway B? If Russia has control of Ukrainian banks (which they don't yet), then they can stop both transactions.

As usual with this kind of bullshit, the article doesn't explain:

- where the censorship is coming from

- how Bitcoin evades it
you know it's all a comedy when you hear declarations like this

there is a global agenda behind all this tragic story
Not suitable for HN. Lacks curiosity, primarily promotes corporation.
I have no compassion for the Russians invading Ukraine, it wouldn't be a terrible at all if they all keeled over dead in an instant due to Big Daddy In The Sky doing something right for once.
No, just that an adversary character might create a type `date` in a schema that's on your path, so that any data goes through that type's input and output functions / the semantics of the query change.

It's quite similar to why you fully qualify table names and column names.
OK not to be funny, but that is so close to being haiku.

You mean like what we saw in Iraq against US armor, etc.?
I never knew self plagiarism was a thing until recently. Is it a formality, or is there some kind of reason it's dishonest in the way normal plagiarism is?

Is it because it messes up the ability to figure out what analysis was done when, and what you had access to at the time, and makes it look like older work has the same trustworthiness as newer work that might be done with different equipment or access to sources or new experience?
Toward a stronger defense of personal data
I want to preface this by saying that I 100% disagree with the war in Ukraine and the Russian infiltration and my heart goes out to the Ukrainian people. Also, please feel free to correct me or argue these points!
A few ways:
1. NATO is largely an anti-Russian coalition. With many of its boarder neighboring countries being part of it. You can google the map and you will see the strategic position of those countries. In the West, only Belarus and Ukraine have not been added to this list of Russian neighboring countries. The USA & EU has been running military drills at those locations for many decades in an act of intimidation.
2. Sanctions are effecting mostly the everyday people of Russia. This is gathering more support internally for Putin’s aggression.
3. The Ukraine has a major movement toward the west in the last decade. Making Ukraine NATO would be another enemy at the boarder and this would be unfavorable for the Russian’s. Again provoking conflict in the region.
4. There has been no attempt by the USA to work with Putin or the Russian officials. Even using Russia as a scapegoat for the Wikileaks dump in 2016. And of course so, so much more anti Russian sentiment in our media ahead of this.
5. Biden and his sons involvement in the Ukraine (as reported on in 2020 by some of the US media) shows the constant strain that the Ukrainians are under. A pawn between the USA and Russia.
Open to thoughts and opinions by everyone!
WWII infantry training on anti-tank warfare.

Some is obviously dated. Some still applies.

https://yewtu.be/watch?v=taHFUKKKmJM
Great question! I think this approach (and DDSP more generally) could work well for most instruments if you make some adjustments to the synthesis architecture.

The current architecture imposes some strong assumptions on the source (such as harmonicity) which does not necessarily apply to all instruments (bells for instance). The harmonic + noise model is not that good with transients either (which is a key ingredient in piano sounds) but of course you could solve that through different means.
> I'm not even sure communication itself is that closely tied to complex thought.

I think it does in some respect; our language's grammar and vocabulary litteraly govern the way we see the world, after all[1]. As a personal anecdote, I'm ESL and write as a hobby, both in my native language and English, and I do feel the differences (and limitations) in the way my mind works depending on language.

I know that my inadequacies in English mean that my style is different. Descriptions and reasonings are simpler. In my native language, I can easily use word plays, ambiguities, be bolder and "more clever" (or less stupid :p). In English, I unconsciously keep things less complex. I'm a different author, and so the worlds I describe in my texts are simpler, too.

English is also far more "pragmatic" than my birth language. I can't word things the same way. Thus, my thinking as an "English writer" is far more rational and cause-to-effect-ish.

It's like any tool: you can absolutely use a programming language through tutorial and google searches, but you have to truly master it to really understand its concepts, to really use it to do something cleverly and intelligently -- and you won't plan a complex task the very same way in two different programming languages.

[1] https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/03/110314132531.h...
Open-source patient model tops industry standard
The term "tech people" seems antiquated in 2022.
Lithium in lithium batteries are recyclable, and because of microstrutures formed during the use of the batteries actually make better material for new batteries. There's a company already recycling lithium batteries, though they have to fight against the perception that recycled lithium is not as good as newly mined lithium.

There are also emerging technologies for extracting lithium from brine as a byproduct of geothermal power plants. American Public Media had produced a podcast series ("This is How We Survive") that included several episodes about this technology, and some of the patent drama that had gone with trying to control the tech.
> They should diversify into turning used furniture into chopsticks.

I think the issue is we couldn't guarantee that the resulting chopstick would be food safe.
Measuring Up: Coming Out from the Cold – NIST
That book is where I first learned about Gödel's incompleteness theorem. Definitely a good book!

I spent a while when I first read it trying to understand Gödel numbering, all the stuff where you multiply prime numbers together, 11 stands for (, that sort of thing. It wasn't until far later that I realized all of that was just a mathematician in the 1930's trying to explain how a string of characters could be encoded as a binary number, something that modern computer programmers more or less take for granted.
>But most scientists trust the peer review process

We really don't. There's so much stupid stuff that gets published on the daily.

And then, you publish a paper refuting a lot of the nonsense, and people start citing your paper as evidence of the opposite of what you wrote, just because you had a keyword in your abstract and they didn't read it, just needed a citation. It's mind boggling that we aren't going backwards in science.
Okay, you’re using that word in an unconventional sense. In your usage, the US Congress would be an “offshoot” of the British Crown. Movements that stand in opposition to a prior established manner of thought are usually referred to as something like a backlash or a reaction or a breakaway.
FWIW, Twitter does fall back to OpenGraph tags:

https://developer.twitter.com/en/docs/twitter-for-websites/c... (scroll to bottom)

For example, maybe you want to specify a Twitter username for your Twitter card but for all other OpenGraph consumers you want different attribution. You may also want to serve a specialized crop of the image to Twitter vs other consumers since they all display differently (Facebook doesn't crop the preview iirc but Twitter does, so you may want to specialize the image for Twitter).

It's not completely braindead that they let you specialize for Twitter.
Yep, and actually I worked on the US Federal Financial Aid system and the transactions between the DOE and schools work the same way (called SAIG Mailbox)

Look up ISO 20022 and “store and forward”
It's the similar differentiation with Svix. They're both largely SaaS based as of today.

Convoy is largely OSS based. With a simple brew install you can publish events with Convoy from your local machine. :)
FWIW When I say “The general idea” I am back to talking about contemporary Marxism again, not post-modernism.
Hey, thanks for asking. I'm an open book - can you explain why those questions sprang to mind? All I intend to provide is observations.
> UN not empowered to sanction war crimes by a veto-power state

The UN has had a structure for dealing with veto-power obstructionism since 1950.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_General_Assem...
I sincerely hope it doesn’t come to that.
Yup, you're very right about the doctype avoiding quirks mode. That's the primary reason for it.
Yes I'm suggesting mass protests against the invasion and demand for his resignation.
For further clarification this is NOT a war to stop NATO expansion as Ukraine was no where near that and it could have been stopped diplomatically. This is a war started by a dictator who has aims to restore the USSR before he kills over or is deposed in the next 10 to 15 years. This war is about nothing more than Putin's ego. Just for clarification.
>What does it mean to win a war?

It means to live in peace and stability, free of foreign control. I think that Ukraine does not have the military strength to achieve this through conflict with Russia, therefore it is militarily unwinnable.

>Russia can conquer a Ukrainian army but people simply won't accept a Russian government that easily.

I completely agree! I don't think Russia wants to govern all of Ukraine. They want to destroy it's military, make it promise to stay away from NATO, and grant independence to Crimea and the Russian puppet states in the east.
Putin should go on Rogan. The censors at Spotify's brains will break.
> And no, usual Internet advice of “MSVC sucks, use Clang”

Given that this talks about a problem in the Microsoft standard library, wouldn't the usual internet advice be "use clang, and also llvm's libc++"? If clang just compiles the same slow code as msvc, it won't magically make it fast.
Haha funny joke.
Turkey would be a better example due to recent events but Spain is a more appropriate historic example as it wasn’t allowed to join until 1982.
"Perfect grammar usage" is only a negative when you have "perfect grammar knowledge", whatever that means. I'm actually knowledgeable enough to to be more spontaneous if I want. In reality I only use Grammarly on the desktop, which is only a tiny fraction of my usage of the English language. Things are not as black and white as they seem. I'm neither a child nor a robot.
> They can only keep up that pace for so long.

Sorry, do you mean the protestors can only keep it up for so long, or the police can only keep arresting for so long?
> I write that line 1 time max in a project and then never think about it again.

In my experience, wanting to know why things work the way they do (instead of just accepting that things work a certain way) is a very desirable quality in candidates. Sure, the candidate might have figured out why it worked a certain way and then forgotten about it (which I think is totally fine in this context), but then the interviewer gets to see how candidates approach unknowns.
I use getfacl to save permissions correctly, in case the backup server uses different user/group mappings. And setfacl after restoring.

(I wish this was handled by rsync.)
You might look at the M5paper?

Esp32 based, so wifi, 4.7" eInk. I haven't used one, but it looks neat.

https://docs.m5stack.com/en/core/m5paper
You can pretty much assume that all social platforms are being manipulated by both sides to some extent.

The first casualty of war is the truth. This is at least as old as De Bellum Gallicum.
Your wish is my command. (Haikus don't have to have exact syllable counts) This will be my last post on hn ever.
Heh, now it's just emojis and memes for communication.
Theanine and caffeine are a magical pair.

https://examine.com/supplements/theanine/
I don't know if handing out AK-47's necessarily translates to desire to fight the Russians. People can be getting those to protect their families.
You'd likely need shaped charges or thermite (on a flat surface) instead of dynamite.
> This isn’t Afghanistan

Afghanistan was the USSR’s Vietnam, so I don't know why you'd say this isn’t Afghanistan in this context.
As demonstrated in the motion picture “saving private Ryan”
https://www.steinberg.net/fr/spectralayers/

This might help you?
Computer chip industry begins halting deliveries to Russia due to US sanctions
Hello! I think you accidentally mistook the first citation link for a link to the work we are presenting.

Here is the link I think you are looking for:

https://erlj.notion.site/Neural-Instrument-Cloning-from-very...

Thank you!
I feel bad about all the attention this is getting. It happened because I asked myself "what can I do to help Ukrainians", and frankly it's costing me peanuts -- Tarsnap doesn't have a huge number of Ukrainian users. (As far as I'm aware, at least, hence my emailing the tarsnap-announce list to encourage other Ukrainians to identify themselves to me.) I didn't mean for this to turn into a publicity stunt!

But while I'm writing -- if you're looking for something you can do to help: Please contact your elected representatives and encourage them to allow visa-free travel to Ukrainian citizens. Ireland has already done this (https://www.gov.ie/en/press-release/00aef-minister-mcentee-a...) and I wrote to my MP yesterday to encourage Canada to follow suit. This war is going to displace millions of civilians and while Putin's threats of nuclear war may prevent NATO from defending Ukraine, at least we can step up to help the refugees.
Best Practices for Managing Celery at Scale
well the entire front page of Reddit is basically pro-Ukraine material. I haven’t checked Facebook or Twitter but i would expect the situation there is very similar.

I think the simple answer is that there is some subtle propaganda and maybe government agencies are posting on anonymous accounts, but also there’s already a lot of natural anti-war sentiment so amplification isn’t necessary.
These are just falsehoods as well. America opposes Cuba and Venezuela because of socalism, not because they care about the people of those countries. The reasons for Iraq should be obvious by now.
> I worry that handing out arms to civilians means Russia is going to have excuses for any civilian casualties from now on. Sprinkle an ak47 on the body take a picture and call it justified.

Why it that the thing you worry about? The Russians have demonstrated they'll blatantly lie to justify their actions, no connection to reality needed.
As an Eastern European I can guarantee you it will be way worse for them than Afghanistan. There are no good endings for Russia here.
Exactly! I guess it was hugged to death by HN.
I don't think any countries will end up untainted in your view. Maybe Costa Rica?
There’s 0% chance this is accurate. While Russia is an aging and rusted military power their elite forces are still equipped exceedingly well.
After a quick look at the schematic it appears the current in the off state is somewhere around 3uA.
Sure. The nice thing with these particles is that they do not cause any health concern. Luckily, because we are constantly bombarded with billions of them.

What is relevant here is either alpha (stopped by a couple of cm of air), beta (stopped by a sheet of plastic, heavy clothing, or a couple of micrometers of metal) and gamma radiation. These are the radiations we measure to monitor fallout.
> Do as many problems as you can.

I cannot emphasize this enough. Hour a day on each chapter until the problems are boringly easy.
We never delete comments outright unless the author asks us to*, and even in that case you would have seen [deleted], not a blank page. If you saw a blank page, then there was a bug, either at your end or ours.

Your posts are autokilled because your account is banned. Your account was banned by a software filter that categorized it as a troll account. Either you've had many accounts that have been banned in the past for breaking HN's guidelines, or there is a bug in our software.

When an account has an established history on HN, we tell people we're banning them and why. But when a user responds to that by creating an entire series of accounts and continuing to break HN's rules, eventually we start shadowbanning them.

* There have been a handful of exceptions for legal reasons over the years, perhaps half a dozen or so.
NATO is a red herring. Of course, Ukrainians want protection from Russia but NATO is just the means, not the goal by itself.

It makes all sense for Ukraine to join NATO just like the Baltic countries did. There would be no war if Ukraine was in NATO.

But it is not relevant now. You don't start a war to convince another country to not join NATO. The purpose of war is to conquer another country.
Old Business Proverb:

"Never turn away a paying customer."

If Stripe (and others) can't cut it, go to somewhere who can. If that means using a Japanese/Nigerian/Swiss/Singapore/Brasilian/other bank, so be it.
This disruption actually makes things worse for China, since once/if new supply chain components established outside China, it will be hard for them to get business back.
> Look at every past conflict, every american soldier in iraq knew, that they were going in to get the oil, everything else was just propaganda for the taxpayers.

What do folks exactly mean by "get the oil" because it certainly wasn't for domestic consumption. About 72% of US foreign oil comes from Canada and Mexico - mostly Canada. The rest, a broad smattering of countries without any meaningful concentration. Iraq accounts for only 3%. Considering the cost of the Iraq war was $2T that's a heck of a price to pay for just not that much oil. [1]

If America just wanted oil would it not go for the single largest proven reserves of oil on the entire planet, in Venezeula, and deposit some freedom there? The government there is equally hostile, and particularly unstable. In Civ parlance, the warmonger penalty would be low. [2]

[1] https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/oil-and-petroleum-produc...

[2] https://www.worldometers.info/oil/oil-reserves-by-country/
Note: often you can work in the same problem either visually or with text.
one of the big changes is that we transitioned the code example of the deep learning chapters from TensorFlow to PyTorch

thank god
That’s the same as social security and Medicare “cotisations” except we just call them taxes. There’s also unemployment but I believe it’s by state and comes out of your states income tax, if they have one.
If someone with an account at bank A transfers some funds to someone at bank B, this transfer can occur by bank A decreasing a number and bank B increasing it. That's "just a message". However, it also is only part of the story. The only reason why banks A and B are able to offer this nice service of increasing some number here and decreasing some other number there is that both of them have an account at a central bank, over which they can eventually settle this transfer (together with a lot of other transfers, of course) amongst each other. Otherwise, bank B would suddenly be in debt with bank A, which is a situation that both of them can only tolerate for a very limited amount of time (and money).

That's why I consider the capability to settle the individual transfers to be more important than the capability to negotiate these transfers, and the time of settlement to be the actual time at which wealth is transferred. Before that moment, the transfer is effectively incomplete, which usually doesn't matter much for smaller sums of money, but in case of large amounts that introduce large imbalances between banks you can be pretty sure the banks will want to settle among each other first before the recipient gets full access to the transferred money.

However, all of this is based on the assumption that Swift is used for inter-bank communication as in "non-central-bank to non-central-bank". I always assumed that central banks would have their own communication channels with the non-central-banks and would not have to use some intermediary like Swift, as they themselves are a central entity able to standardize message formats and such.