skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Where should I comment my code? Predicting locations needing comments
Their phones.
It's basically shadow knowledge imo.
First up, that's a completely rational/understandable position to have on this topic. Business papers constantly involve jargon to get themselves published.

Given the context of this particular article I wanted to share somewhat of a counter point to this that I learnt a few years ago. From my readings and experience, what's happening here is that we are creating a shared vocabulary, or, pedagogy, to describe shared experiences. I used to think it was bunkum until I read some books including pedagogy of the oppressed. The truth is, when we have these terms that we can share and discuss, it gives a lot of power for affected people to express what they are feeling more clearly.

In the example of this article, one could read it as tackling the topic of individual ethical compasses. Ethics has fuzzy edges all over. Sometimes, business needs will cross those fuzzy edges but it's not necessarily unethical. An example will be asking people to temporarily set aside the discomfort they are feeling with a a local situation (eg: politics) that affects their personal life in a long term manner. It sucks. Work also needs to get done. There's a good chance you hurt an individual's ethics along the way. An individual can feel ashamed of themselves sometimes when they feel they are doing work that ignores the plight of people around them. If you go about this the wrong way (completely innocently) you end up causing... what?

Describing these moments is much easier when you have the right words to use it. And the thing is, it's really hard to understand how it's useful until you've experienced it yourself (i.e., suddenly having the right words to express yourself). Hence, lived experiences.

Finally it's worth noting that these terms don't get invented out of thin air. Moral injury has a history dating back to 1984 for example(wikipedia page on moral injury). These terms are born out of iteration as people strive together to find ways to describe how they are feel. And personally, I think that the language enables that is actually something to embrace and celebrate.
It'll hardly be the fuzziest line that the courts have to draw. They'll come up with a set of general principles to help decide which side of the line cases lie on, and then mediate the ambiguous cases. Some examples might be, is is the action communicative?, is this a specific expression of the author's beliefs or just a specific sale of that expression to a disfavoured party?, is there a specific conflict between the providers' action and that providers' beliefs?

Laws are not programs and you should not expect them to be written precisely over the full generality of possible inputs. A good suggestion can be one that merely makes the right outcomes clearer, not just one that makes law a matter of rote. Pretty much every law ever written can be dismissed if you count there being some ambiguity as a reason for dismissal.
The existence of a solution like that isn’t stopping these people from going to court. The gay couples could easily find someone else to do the work for them. The designer and baker could easily just do a crappy job whenever they find out the order is for a gay couple. But they are going to court because both sides have a point they want to prove.
You really would not want to compare it to Skyrim/Fallout either. The atmosphere ... is just not there.
It was developed by House House, Panic was the publisher.
Any reasonable person would not consider the suspension of due process in response to peaceable protests “a measured approach”. Due process, along with equal protections of the law, are about as fundamental to a lawful society as any rights afforded by a representative government.
If I’m an auto journalist and can’t get a press car, and all of the other manufacturers from Rolls Royce and Porsche on down give me press cars, I’m gonna have some natural bias. This is human nature, not racketeering.
You might have misread me. Nothing I said was contrary to this. There certainly may be billionaires, Russian money, etc. in the mix; those indeed helped to fund American right-wing groups, whose members in turn contributed to the Canadian truckers. I'm just making the point that even though it's not American policy this time, US secret services and US corporations have a long history of funding right-wing groups all over the Americas; and that this isn't the first time it's provoked left-leaning governments to respond with overt financial controls and seizures.
When you are writing a library, you don't know what the program that calls you might have set up to handle failures, but you know exactly how to get to it: throw, and you are there, and it is now for the caller to decide what to do, thus not your problem. A library that exits has stolen control away from its rightful owner.

Very few languages are as finely tuned to the needs of libraries and users of libraries as C++. Exceptions are an essential part of that compact. Failing to abide by it makes your library a bad citizen.
Those aren't really comparable. This lady isn't against working with a certain class of people, just creating a certain type of content. That's drastically different than denying all service based on the client (and in your example, displaying a terrible sign to insult them).
Even without the tax havens, the jurisdictional issues seem killer -- if I pay for software in Kansas and download blocks from Texas, California, Puerto Rico and Canada, who all do I owe sales tax to?
Unfortunately without switching often, it does not appear that one can maximize their total compensation, simply because companies will often reward new employees more than existing ones.
This headline is a ridiculous caricature of the content of the bill as I understand it.

The bill as I understand it is largely about adding a modifier to a sentence for an actual crime committed that might be motivated by hate. So the folks quoting 1984 need to maybe reconsider..

The specific "hate talk in homes" talking point seems to just be related to an amendment that wanted to make a exception so you could incite violence against particular groups in your own home without concern of prosecution. I feel like inciting violence is bad, even at home?
One more factor in Wordle's popularity that I haven't yet seen commentators identify much. The game's word roster tilts heavily toward words with neutral or cheerful connotations.

So your brain conjures up something happy at the end. You don't slog through the puzzle solving to end up with VIRUS, ENNUI, GRIEF, SLAVE, INANE or other such morose words.

Instead, we get the likes of AWAKE, BLUSH, FOCAL, etc. That helps make the game a mood-stabilizer or even brightener. We're usually clever enough to find a solution most days. When we're slow and need all six turns, we get a cheery "Whew!" to console us. It's a simple, barely noticeable bit of gamification at its nicest.
In USSR the children who told on their anti-Soviet parents were celebrated. Piercing the family wall is the key feature and enabler of the brave new world.
It seems stupidly arbitrary to include (in the group characteristics that, if you offend against someone and are partly motivated by ill-will against that characteristic, you get extra time for) 'age' (so "ok, boomer" is extra jail time) but not say marital status or lack thereof, height, attractiveness. All of those things have been shown to be biased against to make you less likely to get hired etc. It also doesn't include economic status. "Hang the rich"? ... that's fine
Lumen: Wireless RGB LED Breast Implants
I updated the blog with the reference. Basically it crashes to compile the model with https://github.com/NodLabs/shark-samples/blob/main/examples/.... The coremltools converter is very version specific (like all vendor conversion kits) and still on a version of TF I couldn't get on conda. Also it doesn't allow for training and only FP16 for inference with ANE. All our tests were with FP32.

//part of nod.ai/shark team.
I’m with you in the “Intel Only” but not the “Windows only”. Windows is the only one you have to pay for, so it’s the only one with an option. If you don’t want Windows, then choose the “bring your own” option and download your Linux distribution.
Change the sign to "No interracial couples" and their point still stands. People, including business owners and judges[1], would cite their religious belief that races were not meant to mix and would refuse service to interracial couples.

[1] https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=55...
Coming soon to a supermarket pharmacy near you. Free small french fry while supplies last!
>This headline is a ridiculous caricature of the content of the bill as I understand it.

Of course it is. At this point these types of claims can just be assumed to be detached from reality and instead serving the goal of chilling speech/action.
Amended a fair amount and passed parliament last spring, here's the bill text:

https://www.parliament.scot/-/media/files/legislation/bills/...

It's more focused on aggravating offenses if they were motivated by hatred of what they define as protected classes (age / disability / race / religion / sexual orientation / trans identity). It removes the 'blasphemy' laws from the books and adds a "stirring up hatred" component.

The 'stirring up hatred' section requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt and enshrines a few fairly broad free speech categories that wouldn't be included as 'illegal';

> For the purposes of subsection (4), in determining whether behaviour or communication was reasonable, particular regard must be had to the importance of the right to freedom 25 of expression by virtue of Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, including the general principle that the right applies to the expression of information or ideas that offend, shock or disturb.

and

> For the purposes of section 3(2), behaviour or material is not to be taken to be threatening or abusive solely on the basis that it involves or includes—

(a) discussion or criticism of matters relating to-

(i) age,

(ii) disability,

(iii) sexual orientation,

(iv) transgender identity,

(v) variations in sex characteristics,

(b) discussion or criticism relating to, or expressions of antipathy, dislike, ridicule or
insult towards—
(i) religion, whether religions generally or a particular religion,

(ii) religious beliefs or practices, whether religious beliefs or practices generally or a particular religious belief or practice,

(iii) the position of not holding religious beliefs, whether religious beliefs generally or a particular religious belief,

(c) proselytising, or

(d) urging of persons to cease practising their religions.
Some games (not all) allow you to select a beta that is an older version of the game. https://imgur.com/a/ieZdqxc
So the natural progression is for any “hateful” thing said by daddy to be society’s business?
inodes & small files
They could ban those donors from ever entering Canada but that's about it. If they successfully pull off equating the truckers with terrorists, then they could request the US extradite them but that's pretty far fetched. Then again, pretty much everything they've done has been far fetched so who knows what they'll try next.
> it turns out bigotry is wildly unpopular and hard to defend, so without a First Amendment, free speech tends to become circumscribed.

So is being a jerk. Want to criminalize it? Oh, and I get to define what 'jerk' means, and against which groups acting as one is not allowed. We'll call them 'protected groups', for brevity.
I find it rather astonishing works like the Bible and Quran are allowed to exist in places with such stringent hate speech laws.
I think that if your family members are avowed violent criminals committed to attacking people based on their being a member of a group that is clearly discernible in society their confession to you of that fact should be admissible in court.
Where in the Canadian Bill of Rights is the suspension of due process sanctioned?

See https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-12.3/FullText.htm...

“Recognition and declaration of rights and freedoms

1 It is hereby recognized and declared that in Canada there have existed and shall continue to exist without discrimination by reason of race, national origin, colour, religion or sex, the following human rights and fundamental freedoms, namely,

(a) the right of the individual to life, liberty, security of the person and enjoyment of property, and the right not to be deprived thereof except by due process of law;

(b) the right of the individual to equality before the law and the protection of the law;

(c) freedom of religion;

(d) freedom of speech;

(e) freedom of assembly and association; and

(f) freedom of the press.”
Totally understand the sentiment. If you are in Austin and want to meet and try to get plugged in, email me! (email in bio)
They arrested a man for teaching his dog to imitate the Nazi salute.
No, again, it's not refusing all service, it's refusing to create certain content.
I have been playing Quordle as well, and now find Wordle very slow and dull. I'll persist as long as my streak is active (60+ or whatever) but bail if it breaks. I play 10-20 games of Quordle a day and find it more interesting, challenging with IMO more difficult words, etc.

But I can appreciate that one shared round was key to Wordle being noticed.
Abstracting away the specifics of the case (religion, sexual orientation), the true debate at hand is whether a human being should have the right to get an exemption from a law based on beliefs (perhaps provided that these beliefs are strongly held, and commonly found within a particular community).
Accepting that exemptions to laws are OK based on beliefs leads to an asymmetry between individuals, whereby those with beliefs gain an advantage that is not readily available to all. Here, playing the free speech card makes no sense, since the purpose of that card is to eliminate power asymmetries, not create them.

In my view, the only way to conciliate laws and exemptions is to make exemptions sufficiently costly to eliminate built in advantages to selected groups, whichever they may be. I don't know what a fair way to do so would be.
Perhaps an alternative exit that doesn't require an exemption is an even better solution.

In the specifics of this case, couldn't the web designer hire a third party to take care of the job, providing the service as requested, but not executing it themselves?
> Progressive wing of the Democrats

Actually the Supreme Court that decided Roe vs Wade was mostly appointed by republicans.
Some merchants have influence over both revenue and cost. Some merchants understand the economic value of transaction data ("data about money is more valuable than money") and prefer to utilize their transaction data directly, instead of blindly surrendering it to random observers in the payment supply chain. Some customers, when given a choice, prefer those merchants.
No the natural progression is that if Daddy attacks a disabled person in the street and the kids affirm that daddy was always on about how disabled people should be culled from society that daddy gets a much longer sentence for the crime.
Of course it's bad. The question is what's worse: that, or an overbearing government that's in the business of thought control, telling people what they are and aren't allowed to say and think in their own homes.

I have my opinions on the matter, and it's clear that Scotland has other opinions: it neither has freedom of speech and of conscience, nor wants it, and neither, it seems, do you.

And if you are upset at this "caricature" of the law and its intent, maybe you should tell Justice Secretary Humza Yousaf, who proposed it, that he ought have shut up about its explicit intent. He has been abundantly clear that it must be enforced against all utterances in the home, not just a few extreme cases where some deranged madman happens to be inciting violence from his home. The Justice Secretary specifically identified that a child’s report to a teacher of what a parent said at home should be sufficient to prosecute.
Interesting, albeit a bit lightweight as compared to the similar document from 1Password: https://support.1password.com/cs/opvault-design/ (yes, I recognize it's a tiny bit apples-to-oranges since 1P has now gone whole hog toward their b2 API)

Speaking of which, I presume Huy doesn't work for Bitwarden, so it's unfortunate they needed some independent blogger to write up their auth scheme. I do realize there's an independent implementation in Vaultwarden, so that's almost better than a spec -- just as long as Vaultwarden was a clean-room impl and thus reading that code is "legally safe."
Downvotes are more appropriate than 7 years of prison.
This really is not that anyway and it is disingenuous that it keeps being argued that way. It is ridiculous that the person is claiming their 1st Amendment rights as an artist are being impinged on. This person is representing themselves as a business. As a business, you cannot discriminate against certain classes. What you do in your own home is your business; what you do when trying to make money off it, is another. Attempting to make these the same is an attack on civil rights.

See: Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States, 379 U.S. 241 (1964), Rolon v. Kulwitzky, 200 Cal. Rptr. 217.
Similarly, to scale depictions of the distance/size of the Earth and the moon were quite surprising to me too.
The Linux Command Line and Adventures with the Linux Command Line, both by William Shotts, are a nice read for beginner linux administartion
http://www.linuxcommand.org/tlcl.php/
Show HN: Interacting with Robots Using Augmented Reality (Augmented Robotality)
Would you be able to share more about your use cases? I’m currently working on some related tech, and your perspective would be helpful.
https://archive.is/KQAkq
Canadian States of Emregency Acts must still comport with due process.

“ Under the Emergencies Act, a declaration of an emergency by the Cabinet must be reviewed by Parliament.[33] Any temporary laws made under the act are subject to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Bill of Rights, and must have regard to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.”
We still cannot bind NGINX to a specific interface.

sad
Developed by House House,
published by Panic
The bill doesn't use the phrase "inciting violence" - it opts for "stirring up hatred".

If you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything at all. Now with the force of law.
>One more factor in Wordle's popularity that I haven't yet seen commentators identify much. The game's word roster tilts heavily toward words with neutral or cheerful connotations.

>So your brain conjures up something happy at the end. You don't slog through the puzzle solving to end up with VIRUS, ENNUI, GRIEF, SLAVE, INANE or other such morose words.

Ironically, SLAVE was actually one of the future solution words in Wordle pre-acquisition. The NYT removed it from the planned solutions.

https://www.theverge.com/2022/2/15/22934587/wordle-solutions...
> I think she should be disallowed from making wedding websites if her policy for that category is “don’t work for gays”.

The issue is that she (reportedly) will happily work for gays, just not in order to produce pro-gay content. So it's not a question of "are you willing to work for <protected class>", it's "are you willing to create whatever content someone might want?"
I hope that in 200 years we are well past the notion that government can't regulate these kinds of things. If not, we might not even be around that long as a civilization.
Valve hired Bram Cohen back in 2004, and AFAIK it is/was core to Steam's distribution system.
Carbide Alpha
Ha, I never knew about man -k - until now, and I've been doing this for 20 years! Thanks for the tip! (whatis is also a synonym for man -f, and apropos a synonym for man -k, apparently)
I tried to pay for a beer in China using cash (Yuan) and they refused. Credit card, no way. They just gave me the beer for free.
Lets Put a Dent on the Universe
Hello HN! My name is Haruna Oseni currently an International student at Houston Community College, also working as a freelance Software Engineer and part time programming tutor @HCC (Javascript , python etc.), I am more of a generalist engineer (front end, now playing around with backend, done some data science and more), I enjoy being uncomfortable and tackling hard projects which I have no idea how to even begin then learning what I need to get the job done, I am currently working on an app (startup), watch, the goal is to basically enable users experience more during a video call. I will be graduating from HCC may 18. Writing software is an obsession at this point, I'm very interested in consumer product, fintech(payment), logistics software etc. After graduation to be honest guys, I want to find like minded individuals/team whose dream is to build an insanely successful company, or looking for a cofounder or a team member, hell, just little help on their startup. If that resonates with you, shoot me an email (harunaoseni23@gmail.com), lets change the world (seriously, I will literally relocate after graduation without seconds thoughts if anyone here resonates with this, note: I could care less about a salary atm)!! sorry for the long text guys.... here's my hub of git, cheers --> https://github.com/harunaOseni
> Yet Trudeau invoked the same act which was renamed in 1980

You seem to be profoundly misinformed.

> When BLM burnt down billions of dollars worth of businesses

BLM burnt down billions of dollars worth of businesses in Canada? Wow, I guess I must have missed that news cycle.

The "whatabout BLM" tactic is so tired.

> I don't know why you care about skin color so much

Right.

> No clue what Qanon has anything to do with vax mandates

You know, I asked myself the same question. I wondered "why does the stage in Ottawa keep talking about WEF, the Rothschilds, poisons in children's cereals, child sex rings, Donald Trump, 5G, the conspiracy that all of the media is lying to you and some guy grifting off your cause is telling you the truth, etc". Why did so many participants keep talking about so many things but vaccine mandates. Why is the entire ecosystem, and so many supporters and supplicants of this movement so caught up in QAnon nonsense among other conspiracies? Glad you share the confusion.

> You are basically spouting corporate media nonsense

Here it is. I literally stated what I directly observed, and have heard (from people like you), and you wave it off as "corporate media". Did you perhaps spit at CBC reporters while you were busy honk honking?
> It's more focused on aggravating offenses

The relevant part is not about aggravating circumstances of other crimes. It's about private speech, and it is quite broadly defined. Broadly defined == it will be abused.