skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Some do it far more than others. The US was the first to have a Bill of Rights. It's a big deal. Although the BoR is constantly under attack. I'm amazed at the people who want to throw it away.

I know people who would happily replace it with the 10 Commandments, for example.
> The night terrors tho.

i feel you -_-
I have 2FA for my npm account, does 2FA prevent this kind of attack?
This seems to be very much in line with one of the things to do when writing software: Whatever you're building, think about what would disrupt/break it and deal with it somehow.
Totally agree. I think the shift came for me cause of feeling lonely and wanting someone to be happy when I open a door. A dog or something. At some point I realized, having a relationship with a woman can truly be deep and a kid is a kings crown. This is called growing up I think :)
Used to use this cheat sheet

https://scikit-learn.org/stable/tutorial/machine_learning_ma...
No backup and ‘all the eggs in one basket’. Seems to me like a high risk to take.
‘Backup being too expensive’ surely there can’t be that many videos (a $business$ should be able to afford a few ~10TB usb disks for a few hundred $/€).

I have no trust in services like YT (where I am the product) so I host my own data on my own server and roll my own backups - on/off-site - (thus have only myself to blame if it goes bad).

I have actually been thinking if I should yt-dl the good videos I have found on YT for exactly the incident you have been exposed to!

I really feel for your loss - and really hope that a human contact will be made so the content can be retrieved. Hopefully HN attention might help!

It’s a sad world where so-called AI makes the decisions and it’s almost impossible to get in touch with a real live human being. I fear for the future (your experience being a good example of how bad it can go).
Just think about when those methodologies get applied to the legal-system or health-system. ‘Appeal - not possible the AI knows better and have decided…’
Hmm - I think I read it already started in the police-domain with face-detection…
Such 'objective reference time' doesn't really exist at the precisions we are talking about (both in terms of the precision to which you can define them and effects like relativity). And the difference between 'objective time' and 'keeping time with another copy of yourself' is basically just a scaling factor, which is irrelevant a lot of the time, when the far more relevant parameters for high-precision clocks in actual applications are stability, noise, and bandwidth.
If you're on Linux, GNOME Document viewer (aka evince) does this when you hover over a link. It doesn't work for non-linked references afaik though.
> So, is C good or not? We're talking about memory safety, C provides literally none. Is this not objectively inferior? Now, I would argue that it's not, it's an engineering trade-off that one can make, trading safety for an abstract machine that's similar to the underlying metal, manual control over memory, etc.

One might make the argument that Oberon, with its System module, provides the same memory control abilities but few of the disabilities of C.

> so claiming C is only good for 60-line prototypes is just weird.

That seems like a misrepresentation of the claim above?

> Um, most computer languages are "about characters". There are some visual languages, but I don't think you're comparing C to Scratch here... You can misplace a parentheses with Lisp or make any number of errors that are syntactically correct yet semantically wrong and you'll have errors too, just like in C.

Well, not really. Lisp is actually about trees of objects. The evaluator doesn't even understand sequences of characters. That you can enter it as a sequence of characters is purely coincidental, but there have been structured syntactic tree editors (sadly they went down for being proprietary and expensive at the time).
This is a Phd thesis. I think this is a great read, to see so many algorithms discussed that are not really GPU friendly.
I also build muscles in VR training and I've done a lot of stronglift so I know what progression is like. Pistol Whip is great for building leg muscles. Imagine doing that one more squat you didn't think you had in you when in the squat rack. In Pistol Whip you do that 20 times without noticing.

You don't need progressive overload to build muscles. High rep sets should not be underestimated.
Yeah, me too. Mainly D&D character generators.
Can Quantum Physics Explain Consciousness? (2018)
Colour Science for Python 0.4.0 is available
None of this matters if you find exercise and training of this sort so mind-numbingly boring that you active avoid the it due to hate of activity. You might try your best to convince me that it is fun, but I whole-heartedly disagree. It is repetitive boredom, about as fun as housework and maybe worse (which is why I keep a messy house).

I'll be physically weak and happy instead and continue to put concepts into my mind and enjoy the activity I do get, thank you.
That's too bad. Out of curiosity, do you have meaningful progress on Stronglifts? Can you tell me what your starting lifts were and what you're at now?
What is the best option for buying a fully functioning Amiga clone? I know there are various boards and accelerators out there. What should I buy?
+1 to The Magic Mountain by Thomas Mann.
Unfortunately, my truth is reality. It is not really my problem that you have yet to realise this.
Faces are extremely densely packed with information about the subjects genetic makeup, wellbeing, average and current emotions.

Humans are very well adapted to process such visual information and can produce statistically significant(although nowhere near perfact) predictions of some 'hidden' qualities including trustworthiness in a real sample of humans.

People in 2022 are perfectly rational to think this. Even if this wasn't possible and criminals could perfectly signal trustworthiness (sometimes they don't even bother or intentionally try to look scary), the face-> trust instinct would still be a real world phenomenon worth studying.

Calling into question the decision to publish something(or the reputation of the publisher) based on simplified and incorrect expectations about how the world should be needs to stop if we want too keep calling ourselves an enlightened society.
Well, I'm not sure if this is about differences in definitions .... I don't know what adaptation means. All I can tell you is it had a significant impact on the actual physical bulk of my upper arms.

The main driver of that was SynthRiders, where you get points for punching targets as hard as you can. To get to the top of the leader board you have to pretty much hit targets with all your strength for 3-4 mins. 30 mins of that a day over several months was enough to make a significant difference.
Please note that Google are perfectly happy to ban all of your accounts simultaneously. And your neighbors' accounts, apparently.

https://www.reddit.com/r/androiddev/comments/ckoej1/googles_...
The article is the opposite of what markdown strives for - waffling on and awful formatting.

Markdown is good because its simple, and has all the required formatting tags required to communicate information succinctly, and is not desirable for people who prefer formatting over content.
can you share the link to Hindi BBC podcasts please
Same way that if you make 2 "normal" GETs simultaneously to the same server the responses don't get mixed up, i.e. they'll be separate HTTP Connections which are separate TCP connections:

> Each HTTP connection maps to one underlying transport connection.

-- https://httpwg.org/http-core/draft-ietf-httpbis-messaging-la...

TCP uses "port numbers" to identify different connections. 2 different connections from your PC to the same web server will use 2 different "source" ports. A port is just a number in the TCP header. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transmission_Control_Protocol#...

HTTP/1.1 added pipelining, so you can make several requests on the same TCP connection before receiving a response. But the (complete) responses must arrive in the same order of the requests so it doesn't work for SSE.

HTTP/2 added request & response multiplexing on the same TCP connection. But (according to the OP) there are some limitations that affect SSE.
Many, many years ago I had a...fun(?) interview with an Apple recruiter. As part of the call they quizzed me about what hardware I owned

"So what phone do you use now?"

"Aha, uh. I'm currently using a...Galaxy S2 from Samsung"

(Samsung was in the middle of the legal battle with Apple at tha time, which may date the story)

"What about a tablet?"

"I have a Google Nexus 7"

"Computer?"

"I use Linux on a custom-built desktop"

"...Laptop?"

"...Google Chromebook"

Mercifully they continued interviewing me beyond that, but it was a very awkward back and forth
Yes, it's a fork from the project of Prof. Jserv.
Then I'm adding some other features, like comment system, photo storage, etc.
Since it's under BSD license.
Like you would enjoy added needle noise in your music? or pixelation in your games?
> (And, before anyone mentions it, since this isn't some low-level/hardware related thing, you don't need to use unsafe Rust).

That only makes sense if all your code is in Rust, but I suspect this is not true for foreign libraries, even bulletproof ones. It was my understanding that to convince Rust of their safety, you need blocks of "unsafe" code...or not? For example, if I want to embed Chez Scheme into a Rust program, even safely, I apparently can't do that without "unsafe" code. And that's by no means exclusively a "low-level/hardware related thing".
Very interesting. I've implemented something similar. It evolved out of the co-browsing solution I developed for the company I work for.

The solution uses mqtt. Clients subscribe to a topic on the server, and the server publishes patches to update the view. Patches can be incremental (patch against the last frame), cumulative (patch agains the last keyframe) or a new keyframe. It allows for server side rendered views. Multiple clients can subscribe to the same view and keep in sync. See: https://github.com/mmzeeman/zotonic_mod_teleview
How can I make a http request
No, this is explicitly incorrect. If you try to write a clone of Tetris and word gets around to Pajitnov and Henk, you'll be sued. Copyrights and trademarks protect all aspects of Tetris's design, including the dimensions of the playboard, the tetromino shapes, the next piece indicator, the fall rate and animations, and the overall look and feel of the game. (See Tetris Holdings v. Xio, YES THIS IS COPYRIGHTABLE.) The Tetris Company applied for, and vigorously defends, ALL of these copyrights and trademarks.

If you are not a licensee of Tetris Holdings, DO NOT, EVER, develop a Tetris clone. You face legal liability if you do.
two problems:
1. GPT3 is used to generate text, if the input is what you say it isn't your dog's reply, is it?
2. your dog still lacks understanding of human language, or concepts of politics, it will not be able to interact with your questions in a meaningful way in the first place to give any input to such AI.

what you could do is try to translate dog behavior, but the dog will have to learn this language as well, so there's no magic "stick this chip to your dog's head and discuss about the meaning of life" kind of solution.
> In principle there is nothing wrong with loans.

Interest free loans, yes. Interest bearing loans? They're immoral and parasitic.

> The problem is that people can simply hold cash for free.

Islam solved this with Zakat.
> A senior member of Ethiopia's media accused Facebook of “just standing by and watching this country fall apart”.

Why the hell does one company get hold so much power in the world? More to the point, why does Mark Zuckerberg, an apparently immoral man-boy, get to make decisions like this?

Remember when Myanmar used Facebook to coordinate/incite genocide? https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/15/technology/myanmar-facebo...

Or when Facebook was being used in Kenya to orchestrate vigilante murders? https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-47805113

Or how about when Zuckerberg refused to introduce any controls to livestreaming after the New Zealand mosque massacre was livestreamed? https://www.thewrap.com/mark-zuckerberg-defends-facebook-liv...

Facebook only reluctantly banned white supremacists groups. https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/facebook-bans-white-n...

Or how about in 2016 when a young man's murder was livestreamed and Facebook refused to take down the stream "because it doesn't violate the company's community standards." https://money.cnn.com/2016/06/17/technology/facebook-live-sh...

How the hell did we get into such a dystopian hellscape where one company so brazenly, openly, supports evil? Cyberpunk as a genre is dead because it's no longer fiction.
Ah shit I screwed up the copy paste on my phone. No matter, on this thread someone else one posted the same "der8auer" video again.
I'm sure the 'why' this happened doesn't matter much to you now, but noticed in just searching for channel name "tranresearchtraining" google would auto-correct and search for "trans research training". Maybe that flagged the review algo to be extra sensitive to certain phrases, etc. Also, where you're dealing with multiple nationalities, wouldn't be surprised if it included non-native english speakers and/or words outside the standard english dicts... so their auto speech-to-txt may have taken creative liberties, and a mistranslation triggered other flags. So, basic edge case nightmare. Their automated support is the worst too. Probably worth trying to spread this story on twitter and linkedin as well to increase the chances of it reaching someone who might be able to help or create enough negative PR to get on the radar. good luck.
Okay, when you have a reality you can put into words please feel free bring it to the table.
The reason we decided against it, is that tech fatigue is a super real thing and it gets sobering fest when you deal with non-technical folks who actually just want to get a completely unrelated job done.

They are just not enthusiastic about new organisational tools. They just want something simple and familiar.

We had a Notion test run. It would have taken additional energy to convince people to get accustomed and actually use it, more than we were willing to expend on this matter at the time.

Each new tool adds a burden. While the exact opposite is true for a lot of tech folks (to an unhealthy degree), just the idea of "yet another tool" is draining to a lot of normies and something I have come to strongly consider.
At 400 your own comments stop counting, only up votes. At 500 you can down vote. In my experience.
I don't understand this mindset.
HTTP was a protocol designed for transferring text files. It literally means 'HyperText Transfer Protocol'. Its use case has been getting broader and broader over time. Why does everyone want it to be a silver bullet? There are no silver bullets. Jack of all trades, master of none. WebSockets is great because it's a separate protocol and can be dealt independently by browser and server vendors as security and functional requirement change.

HTTP was never designed for pub/sub... How does the additional layer of complexity provided by HTTP for file transfers (e.g. request headers with each request, response headers, cookies sent in each request, mime types, etc...) benefit us for the pub/sub use case? It just adds overhead and makes it harder for vendors to fully implement HTTP. What used to be a simple protocol is becoming prohibitively complicated.
When you’re at your most emotionally vulnerable due to a seething mixture of hormones AND having primary responsibility for a tiny, helpless human, it’s a bit harder to do that.

Oh, and everyone feeling entitled to, nay, obliged to tell you how to do your job.
I have nothing against Algol. Turbo Pascal was my first language (i agree with you about Turbo C). I loved it at the time. But C is different. The same way Lisp is different. It is just one of those languages which have a very simple core idea which is also very powerful at the same time.

Lisp has the code-data duality (everything is a list) going for it and C has everything is pointer to a block of memory and that's it. That block can be a device register, data structure, array of sth. or just about anything you can imagine. This idea enables you some kind of proto-polymorphism without the verbosity and chains of higher level languages (at the cost of safety of course). That is the beauty of C and unlike Lisp it is also lot closer to the metal, which helped a lot with performance.

I think it's normal to be jaded when something objectively superior is being replaced with something simpler. But that doesn't mean the simpler thing is without merit. The world has more dimensions, the technical aspect is just one of it.
Continued habits are not formed by discipline, they are formed by finding something you enjoy in the habit; at least some component of the habit itself must become compelling.

You keep applying this to exercise, though, and obviously you have gotten enjoyment from it that others don't - but then you are putting down what other people manage to do. I don't care how much I could lift, nor do I think that I need more strength than what I need in everyday life - and realistically, that's just generally carrying groceries home from the grocery store and things like that (I'm in a walkable location and just walk 15 minutes each way).
I can't really tell you if using a dumbbell would have done more - probably you are right. But there's no way I would persist with dumbbells, I find them excruciatingly boring.

> Similarly, running will exercise parts of your body that VR won't touch right?

Perhaps but not nearly as many as VR hits that running doesn't touch. It certainly forces you to do squats.
How is this called a Buffer Overflow and not a logic error? you are not overflowing the buffer and rewriting the registers, but taking the user input in the same buffer that holds the password and writing the user input from beginning of the buffer. It is not overflowing anything, only wrong bound check for user input. You can't write past the buffer, Rust will halt the program and throw an error.

It could be more interesting to have another buffer holding user input and then overflow it and corrupt the password buffer.

I am curious if that is possible without using unsafe?
> If positive news comes out about bitcoin, the price can immediately move without any trading

I mean, it can't? The "price" is literally defined as the price of the latest trade.

The mistake you are making here is the assumption that there is a "value" in a bitcoin that can change. This is true for a stock - it represent a fraction of ownership of a company, and a company has real value. That value can go up and down for a number of reasons. The price of the stock may not be the same as its actual value for various reasons, but that value exists independently of the stock price.

This is not true for bitcoins. They do not represent anything, there is no ownership of anything but the bitcoin itself. It only has value inasmuch as it can be traded. Bitcoiners like to claim that the technology represented by bitcoin has "value", but a bitcoin itself does not represent a share of that value.

A bitcoin is a game token, that can be used to play a game where you win or lose money. The game is negative sum, because the only value you can gain is value being put in by other players, and there are cuts being taken by various parties for playing the game.
Adam Smith Institute report calling to privatise the Moon prompts angry response
Why? People are doing it all the time, and you are rejecting them outright. Why should I bother to do the same when the last hundred times, you would not listen?
It’s infuriating how little anyone cares about the Tigray. It’s genuinely a horrific human rights crisis - far more than most today - and yet there’s sparse MSM coverage as well as a lack of general awareness or care about it in the Western world. It’s a genocide with a death toll and impact far exceeding that of the Uyghurs, Palestine, or any media spectacle du jour.

It’s partly driven by social media and the inability of platforms to crack down on hate speech where it causes harm. Despite this, they (in particular Twitter) seem much more vociferous in pursuing more trivial things like suspending people for misgendering or swearing...
Oh come on!
Maybe ClojureScript is an alternative.
Usually the reason for including the atomic clock is reliability: the atomic clock can keep good enough time for a short period if the GPS signal is lost. Their time cards still primarily run off of GPS (in fact there are 3 nested clocks in the standard design of these systems: an oven-controlled crystal oscillator which is already quite stable by itself, but more importantly gives a very clean sine wave output, then an atomic clock (usually rubidium) which is more stable but higher noise which is used to tune the crystal oscillator, then the GPS signal which is even more stable with even higher noise used to tune the atomic clock. You can often just skip the atomic clock in the arrangement and you'll get the same performance while you have a GPS signal.)
I'm just saying that it won't compare to even the minimum of using dumbbells.

Using dumbbells is the main thing here: It doesn't matter if dumbbells do better if it simply isn't an activity you keep up long term. Daily VR is going to be more meaningful and develop more muscle over time than sporadic dumbbell use. And lets be honest, realistically this is what we are comparing. Fun activity with side effects to an exercise in boredom that has better side effects.
I’d say so. You can’t reset an account’s password without the second factor. There’d be very little point to it otherwise.
All I know is that in the years since Mondelez bought Cadbury the quality of their chocolate has gone down the tubes. Despite public pronouncements that they haven't altered their recipes.
I find this an interesting article,it makes me see a few things in a new light.

One thing that stood out was: is there any difference between natural wasp nest and a human house.

For me, the answer is yes. Humans learn from previous humans. There must exist something like a genius wasp, building better nests than any wasp before it. When it dies, wasp nest quality will revert to what it was before. Not with humans, where other humans learn from the genius. You get a kind of compound interest effect, providing humans with a shortcut to evolution for learning, based on our ability to communicate.

This means the defining characteristic of humans, the part that moves us away from our natural state, is not our intelligence but our ability to communicate and store knowledge. Intelligence is a means for this, not an end.

As a corolary, the genius hiding in a back room designing genius contraptions is worth less for humanity than the less smart person sitting in the center of our relationship graph, sharing knowledge.
I hope people do not mind me taking this opportunity to ask HN people what their all time favorite podcasts are, in any topic.

So, what are your all-time favorite podcasts in any topic?
For those looking for powerful async coroutines in the browser: The combination of typescript+redux+redux-saga is also quite powerful.

Redux-saga uses generator coroutines to handle all sorts of asynchronous tasks.
Black People of Yarmouk Basin
Worth a try but I’ve tried doing this before and they said it’s outside the scope of paid support.
I use it on my amp when setting up my hifi. Just to check both sides are plugged in correctly. I go all left channel, then all right, then back to middle for the rest of eternity. It can be difficult to tell if both sides are working correctly especially if you are closer to one side when listening.
wow... WOW!!!! thank you so much!!
once I've switched layer to "conventional" it was like a child's dream come true
Truly awesome. This might be a game-changer for laptops. If I were actively using a laptop, I would definitely be using this.