skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
No..

Re-read the part about accidents. Accidents aren’t Darwin awards. Accidents happen in Level 4 Bio facilities by some of the most highly trained individuals in the world. I’m guessing the accident rate for kids would be much higher than 1 in a million.

And you can still buy an adult chemistry set for your kid and supervise them to the extent you feel is appropriate.

Maybe you personally have never had an accident but to err is human and kid’s products do need to be designed for the masses and accounting for the fact that their bodies, moral compass and decision making is still in flux.
That's why I created https://megatorium.com/

YouTube is too random and uncontrollable.
Poverty is just a Darwinian sort of culling. Those with drive and intelligence will improve their position, and the rest will just not make it. The best way to deal with poverty is to stop funding so many benefits, and to simply let the failures fail. That's how humanity has functioned and evolved for thousands of years.
Yes, there is significant legal precedent for the practice. Sony v. Connectix, Inc. comes to mind. Team A directly reversed Sony's PS1 BIOS and gave the resulting specifications to team B, which then implemented those in source code form.
Pacifiers not good, not necessary, many downsides. We never used them for these reasons.

https://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/infant-and-todd...
> The American political class is guilty of not regulating this industry, which came about as a result of the influence of the libertarian right, not the left.

How do you interpret this belief specifically with regards to the genesis of Facebook and Google and Apple, the biggest direct collectors of end-user data in the industry?

Are you talking about the military history of the development of SV, or the sources of initial capital for these ventures?
Very interesting visualization approach. I think I'll try to do this with NOAA's bathymetric data and NASA's Lunar LOLA DEM.
I feel less like "we" have decided that self driving is worth it and more that Tesla is pushing it on everyone and no one has stopped them yet.
You are getting downvoted because your reasoning is flawed. Smart contract exploiting has nothing to do with whether formal reasoning works or not. It’s as incorrect as saying that cars doesn’t work because your car doesn’t work.
Even a single breast feeding session provides some benefits. According to my med school notes a single meal reduces the risk of SIDS by x36 compared to no breast feeding.
https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/sudden-infant...
That because you don’t understand the law. What Clinton did was make it practically impossible to discharge the debt. You can still discharge the debt today but it’s incredibly difficult and very rare. What Bill Clinton did was turn it practically impossible which is the problem.
>> A group of protestors has occupied a city and created a massive public disturbance in the process for those that live and work there.

Yes, that is the point of protesting. Which is a fundamental right in free society. As long as they are not rioting, destroying property, or using violence they should be free to protest.

Protesting is not standing to the side quietly holding a sign not getting in the way of anyone, relegated to a "free speech zone"

>>When you look back at history, you see leaders of real movements like MLK getting arrested because they lived under actual tyranny, and they weren't afraid of it.

He also "created a massive public disturbance" and was justified in doing so. The fact that some or even all of the "organizers" of this protest did not have the same moral conviction does not change anything.

That is a very very weak argument, it is also a weak argument that because racial discrimination was an objective moral wrong that we both agree with, so we both support those protests, but since you view body autonomy to be lessor, and violation of body autonomy to be less of a moral wrong then those people lose their right to protest.

That is a very dangerous position to hold, and one that highly doubt you would like to be used for something you think is very important, but maybe I don't. The difference is I would still defend your right to protest and assemble even if I disagree with your cause. Remember in politics, you must always, always, always invert.
What you describe is neither cruel nor oppressive I think "tyranny" misses the mark.
https://www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding/about-breastfeeding/why-it...

There's quite a lot of evidence that breastfeeding improves health outcomes for newborns. Reduces the rate of gastrointestinal infections, etc. Regarding the probable mechanism of action for that, breast milk provides an ongoing source of antibodies from the mother to baby. You won't find that in formula.

That said, evidence about the benefits of exclusive breastfeeding, is much weaker. And a fixation on breastfeeding exclusively can easily result in underfeeding if formula isn't used when all signs suggest it should be. A hungry baby is the worst outcome here, of course.
That's potentially true with respect to dynamic linking, but if it's statically linked then you are literally distributing somebody else's code alongside your own so I can't imagine how that could be anything but a derived work.
> which the scientific consensus couldn't possibly agree was effective

Yeah, and I'm wondering if you have any evidence to back up this belief of yours that masks don't work.

You've so far provided a LOT of evidence that masks work. I'm puzzled why you would assume that others don't work, like that is your base assumption.
In most cases where I've been able to hit a dual-stack server from a dual-stack client, the IPv6 has been at best the same speed as IPv4, and often slower for unknown reasons somewhere in the pipeline.
Interesting, I was so focused on the super AI theory that I missed the point of the article. His warning is about the dumb bots and how they are being used/misused.
I think they should have made better cups to retain the heat longer.
I think it is unfair to describe “using Youtube features for their stated purpose” as “exploitation”.
As a corpus for ML training, I'd be interested in whether there are linguistic predictors for court victories in opening statements and whether optimizing for them could yield an advantage.
Opensea exploit in migration contract allowing users to grab any NFT from others
Python is a nightmare, just like javascript and the like. Too many idiosyncrasies, edge cases and features that creeped into the language without fitting into the larger picture.
I would choose Rust, or even Haskell as the first language if I'm introducing someone to programing.
This article links to some studies. https://www.vox.com/2016/1/11/10729946/breastfeeding-truth

Edit: this one somebody else linked is better. https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/everybody-calm-down-abo...
I think unsafe rust is a lot more awkward to work with and easier to cause UB with compared to c and especially c++. This is just my opinion though!

&mut aliasing is a good example of running into instant UB in unsafe rust, but there are many more that you have to be aware of.

I would check out the unsafe rust "book" for yourself and see what you think. There is a section where you implement Vec and some other data structures from scratch!

https://doc.rust-lang.org/nomicon/intro.html
I did something similar. Searching for verify and verification are good for those cases where you signed up with a Gmail email.

You can also navigate to Settings > Security > Signing in with Google to see everywhere that you've used Google Sign in (oAuth).
That's the weirdest thing about the post though. They're using an http server as a Thread Pool/ExecutorService? To avoid using Runable and Callable?

It doesn't seem like they we're writing an HTTP Service.
Seems . has only NS records and no A or MX, too bad: .@. probably won't receive email.
No, this is just "metadata" more or less - who was sued by whom over what and what were the individual events in the case. PACER has the individual filings - the complaints, briefs and orders and so on.
To echo the other commenters on this article, all babies are different and there are fairly few universal truths to soothing newborns. For example neither a pacifier nor driving worked for mine.

My only advice is to try everything until you find something that sticks.
It is illegal for anyone who is not a Canadian citizen or permanent resident to contribute to a Canadian political party or campaign. This is also true in the United States.
I'm not too bothered by the reaction, but I don't know if it's actually useful.

My childhood gave me great things. I have a worldview that is highly unusual in my peer group, and was directly useful in my career, as I'm a xenophile. I'm not sorry I went through what I went through, but I had to add some loc-tite, later in life, to tighten a few loose screws, from my childhood experiences.

But I am serious. Because of the extracurricular work I do, I am in daily contact with many parents of deceased children (and relatives of other deceased people). Many of the deceased got there through misadventure, suicide, or even murder.

It's really hard to encounter these folks, and not understand that there are depths of feeling, that we can't understand. I would submit that dismissing these feelings that others experience; simply because they don't fit our own worldview, makes our own lives (and the lives around us) darker. It certainly doesn't help us to become better people.
I know plenty of people who say, "Well, it's on YouTube, it's not gonna shut down any time soon" so they delete their local copies, unfortunately
It's a digital life equivalent of a motorcycle accident I think. The risk is catastrophic, so any incidence rate is enough to require being prepared for it.
Lol this post hits close to home.
Reddit ipv6 was enabled before Christmas but got disabled because of issues with the Android app and square’s okhttp lib I think. Namely that it didn’t support happy eyeballs.
If you have the oculus quest, put on the silicon/rubber piece over the foam. I’m pretty sure that’s how they intended people to use it.

I just had the foam for a while as well and it was disgusting.
cantillion effect rather
This provides a perverse incentive for cities like SF to not work to allow efficient high-speed rail commutes into them, as it would harm their tax base ...

Annoying.
This cross-connection of services scares me as well. I once happily ordered a Pixel phone using my gmail account. The phone was stolen before delivery (the delivery guy handed me an empty box with a hole in it!).

I reported the situation to Google and they could confirm with the parcel company the delivery was not completed successfully (plus some additional background checks they did after requesting access to my account) and they refunded the order.

The thing is I was not brave enough to place a second order of a Pixel because of fear of risking closure of my gmail account if the phone in the second order was also stolen before delivery, so I ended up ordering a Nokia instead.
> The people who can’t deal with CGNAT or have other problems are a tiny minority

If you ever made a call online your latency has been impacted because we can't reliably establish connections between end users and have to proxy the calls through the (hopefully close) DC. The services are also more expensive for you, because they have to account for that traffic.

This impacts you whether you are behind a NAT or not.

If you are behind CGNAT, you're going to get more captchas and likely get occasionally ratelimited, because someone is bound to misbehave, or the aggregate of that traffic from a small IP range will look like an attack at some point.
In the category of “no universal truths for babies”… my partner and I were hesitant to use pacifiers due to some of the negatives around jaw and mouth development (zero judgement for people who do use them). We agonized over whether we were overthinking it, whether it would help him sleep… but eventually we broke down and gave our kid one. To our surprise, he hated it. Wouldn’t keep it in his mouth at all, and all our thinking was for nothing.
Emily Oyster wrote good books about how a lot of the popular claims around giving birth / raising children have quite a severe lack of data that supports those claims. For breastfeeding in particular there isn't much data to separate whether breastfeeding is actually helpful at all vs being in an economical position that would allow someone to breasfeed.

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/everybody-calm-down-abo...
Never give away your negotiating power before you start!
> We might have to rethink the sexual revolution, but I don't expect there will be much enthusiasm for that.

This is hardly the issue... If the upper class part not being as affected by this didn't make it obvious - it's money that is the issue. And - trust me - the upper class are not prudes.
I think you present some excellent ideas. And I would guess some of them depend on the reason for termination (although often the reason selected by some automated processes makes no sense).

In the OP's scenario, for instance, YouTube could have at least allowed his partner to export all the videos.

There are some definite easy wins to be made by players in this space that don't even involve them having to hire more humans.
jj split?
Page 1 of 2,970 total cases for: donald trump
> driving. Driving your kid around will often soothe them.

Same here. Doing a walk with the stroller and I'd be looking at 45 minutes before the kid would fall asleep. Taking the car and driving once around the block and my kid was sleeping. I don't know if it's the movement, the fact that it's faster than walking, the vibrations, the engine noise (I wonder if parents with electric cars use that trick too) or something else: but for me and for many others the car trick simply works. Not the most ecological thing to do but, well, I was lucky in that mine would fall asleep in the car nearly instantly.
How did she create the videos in the first place? Are the original videos used to upload to youtube accessible or archived somewhere?
When I was in China for a few months, the hardness of the bed surprised me. The mattress, such as it was, was just a plywood box covered in a thin layer of ticking.

I found it extremely difficult.to find a comfortable sleeping position. Never got used to it.
The slides I attached are from a talk which mentioned one example. I remember seeing some version of this talk at some FOSDEM, likely https://archive.fosdem.org/2015/schedule/event/samba/
Countries with socialised healthcare all have seatbelt laws.
> CICO is what bodybuilders and athletes and models use, among many others, people mostly fine-tuning.

To nitpick, bodybuilders and athletes usually control their diet at a level where calorie counting is not relevant.

An example of that: https://youtu.be/PBfDWstg3Hc
It’s interesting that the overlays always show calorie intake, but you hear the guy and at no point he mentions calories, ever.

He specifically mentions fat, proteins, vitamins, minerals, nutrients and overall quantity. He weights his food at each meal and he probably adjust all of these try and error style, looking at the results. I think calorie estimates are probably meaningless at this point.
IANAL

This is the difference between patents and copyright.

A mechanism that is patented can not be implemented by anyone. It doesn't matter if they did or did not read your source, they cannot implement it. It doesn't even matter if they knew the patent existed or that even that it had been done before.

Copyright is a lot more forgiving. It only covers the exact implementation. Doing a clean room implemation means you will write different code that does the exact or very similar thing.
I think I don't completely understand from the blog your aversion to using standard concurrency tools like Executors.
good ol bear sector.

It doesn't surprise me that small mining towns have strip clubs. Lots of people temporarily move to work there and are lacking in human comforts of all types.
For write and store content would m-disc work better?

It's not cheap but passive.
The public has always had the ability to search them, it's just been more difficult to do in the past.

Lowering the barriers to this is not necessarily a good thing. For example: if I have to drive to the county clerk's office to get records, I am unlikely to do so. This means that if I need the information, I will go get it, but if I do not need it, I won't bother.

The patent section being so easily searched is very useful and I see no downsides there.
That hypothesis makes no sense. Who would they sue?

FYI, you can opt out of these alerts: https://weather.com/news/news/2021-03-25-how-to-get-wireless...

Realistically the reason for "excessive" alerts is probably just scope creep. The system almost definitely began as a mechanism to send alerts for really serious weather, but over time that definition's shifted, or they decided that sending more alerts was a good way to justify a bigger budget, or something similar.
Pacifiers worked great for us. Kids had no dental issues and no issue giving them up when the time came.
Voting for taxes doesn't imply you now own the people who benefit from those taxes.
which is great and actually works if you're in a rich area. What happens if you're not, and the gas station is out, or it's one of the ones without an attached little convenience store? If you've run out of gas and need a gas can, going to the next station over may be miles to walk!
There are also pvc caps made that fit perfectly on most spouts and work much better for spout caps, but iirc they aren't standard sch40.

It was surprising to me that such crappy quality manufacturing manages to have such a standard cap dimension.
The author later on in the essay actually explicitly calls out seatbelt and helmet laws as similarly spurious.
NFT holders panic as wallets are drained; some blame smart contract from OpenSea
Page 1 of 2,685 total cases for: william jefferson clinton
There are a few oddly shaped lakes in the inconceivably large northern part of Quebec.

One of my favorites is lake mistassini[1], an immense lake shaped like claw marks

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_Mistassini
Google has an agenda but also SEO is an big industry that is at war with Google. Between Google's ideological bent and the war with SEO, it's not simply about indexing and ranking anymore.
It seems quite good at 7 days, all you got to do is revisit to elongate the period. I don't really want trash on my laptop from all sorts of website for ever.

I understand the point of view you're looking at but its great for once in a very long time the browser favoured the user vs the developer.

The solution you're proposing isn't very helpful since it introduces variability. If you can have 1 user with a 7 day window and one with a 90 day window it makes it impossible to offer a consistent product (other than one that encourages you to stay on a website for longer). If you're making an app and have to have 2 different time periods for how long data can live, then you have to tell the customer about that it's just a nightmare.
I’m not a doctor, but these stats sound completely ridiculous. Would love to see the source material.
I wonder if Google Takeout would have the content? Definitely try that. Also try a GDPR request. Not sure if that will work but that might get you a backup copy if they have it. If people have watched the videos recently there might be some local cache on their computers you can grab.
Awesome insight, and site. Thanks
I can't edit my post for correctness but my point stands, you are mentioning _German_ nationals detained and we (or at least I) were talking about American citizens (Japanese- and German-Americans), who's moving the posts.
>Is there an effort to build a solution to problems like this that don't rely on a friend of a friend from Google 'fixing' things.

I know It is easy to say to own your own things / Video. In reality a reliable storage system is not easy nor cheap. A BTRFS / ZFS system that is Turn Key solution with drive redundancy and error correction by default. And that is ignoring other things like security.

My dream solution would be something like an Apple TimeCapsule that also works for iOS. And may be a bundled subscription that give you offsite backup and snapshots.
Not only that, Fortnite has full cross platform support for PC, PS4/PS5, Xbox One/Series S/X, some Android phones/tablets, Nintendo Switch, and of course iOS and iPadOS when Apple and Epic weren't fighting. Fortnite definitley has a stigma around it for the younger demographic and toxicity, but from an engineering perspective it's pretty amazing.
You cannot assume "airgap" for any reason--that will eventually fail.

Systems need to work assuming that they are bathed in a hostile environment at all times.
Is these approaches sustainable?
> For example, their techniques that "always work" definitely do not always work.

Among parenting social media influencers, this is a gamble for building rapport among an audience:

Make some extreme claim that may or may not work for some portion of people who hear it. People who hear it, try it, and find that it works will vividly remember the influencer as being correct. People who try it with no results will quickly forget it about it.

Repeat across several claims and eventually some percentage of them will be correct for the audience.
This somehow reminds me of Yahoo. The fall of Yahoo starts with people stopped using Yahoo Mail and went to Gmail.
Back when I was in the approximate equivalent of junior high school, one of the classic experiments done in chemistry was making ammonium chloride, which is used as flavouring in sweets [1] here.

It was tasted.

As the teachers were responsible and I'm sure they didn't want to take safety risks, I'm inclined to believe it was safe to do. (I can't remember how it was made but I suppose the only risks would be from unclean glassware or contamination by some other substance.)

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salty_liquorice
QAnon founder may have been identified thanks to machine learning
Legal research services (access to dockets, case text, etc.) tend to be extremely expensive. I think making that more widely available is a good thing for people with limited resources. It's kind of nuts how impenetrable the legal system is if you don't have any resources.
The history graph not presented as a list but as a collapsible tree, sounds good! Might need a change in merge commit message culture though, or more: in the workflows I have experienced, the best time for writing the message you'd see on the collapsed presentation would be branch time, not merge.

Ideally you'd have a data model that keeps a "what is this" description for branches that can be updated as long as the branch lives and that gets moved to the commit message on merge. Could this be done with some combination of convention and hooks? I guess a file in the root that is always kept on target/into branch state, with the lost file content of the source/from branch moved to the commit message would be all that's needed?
you are creating more confusion by selectively quoting me out of context. You left out "from the perspective of the eventual users"

You are saying that from the perspective of developers, taking open source software and not permitting users to see the source is... permissive. It's like the right to put people in jail is extra freedom, because you get the freedom to do that! I can't believe that's not in the bill of rights! I find that to be confusing.

I did not create the confusion that surrounds licensing, I'm trying to clarify it.
Very true, I was going to make a similar statement but you said it perfectly. Infants do follow some common patterns, but what works for YOUR infant might be completely different that what you’ve read, been told, or even experienced with prior children. I don’t think there is any shame in doing what works as long as it is safe.