skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Oh yeah, love this site. I was looking for small android tablets and there are woefully few of those as well.

Curiously though there's something that sort-of fits both small-phone/small-tablet.

Surface Duo

8.1 inches (2700 x 1800, 2x 1350x1800)
6 GB RAM (128GB or 256GB storage)
145 x 93 x 9.9 mm (folded)
8.8 ounces (250g)

Surface Duo 2

8.3 inches (2688x1892, 2x 1344x1892)
8 GB RAM (256GB storage)
145 x 92 x 11 mm (folded)
10.02 ounces (284g)

There's also the Samsung Z phones, but the Surface Duo with 3:2 display seems more suited as a portable terminal.
You'll really only get authenticity if you've exchanged certificates in some offline manner first, and eschew the whole CA infrastructure
> Economic and environmental devastation and lots of otherwise preventable suffering.

Still sounds a lot like the US
$1.7M in NFTs stolen in apparent phishing attack on OpenSea users
How does a crustacean become a crab? (2021)
Does anyone feel their chair at all helps?
Of course it's some four-page Avi Loeb homework problem, er, I mean, "paper".
It’s been a minute but parsing with decent performance is what caused all the parser generator stuff. It is a historically hard problem.

PEGs allow the generator input to more closely match the mental model programmers have, *LR require the language to be structured just a little differently than how most people think it.
1950's Graphic Studies from a Gujarati Designer (2020)
There is a YouTuber, STÖK, who makes videos explaining how he discovers some vulnerabilities. He actually has a video where he relied on an xxe vulnerability in an PDF file to snag passwd/shadow.[0]

0. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aSiIHKeN3ys
<<buy something you can not buy without crypto.>>
Such as?
"I don't trust any government agency" is where you should stop.

Government should be inherently distrusted.
As one who has set up skunkworks git boxes before, I think OP is probably referring to the fact that there is not a no-brainer out-of-the-box way for git repos on different dev machines to autodiscover each other, even on a local network.

You can have everyone manually set up a git hosting env on their dev machine, then have everyone manually add a remote for every other developer's box, but it sure isn't convenient.

And if you settle on sharing one central box as the canonical node (which IMO is the right answer), you're no longer truly using a distributed system - it's a de facto centralized system.
I keep hearing that argument, but I also dropped Evernote for Apple notes because Evernote was too slow, even on my M1 mac. So there is definitely such a thing as optimizing your programs.
> added needle noise in your music

The entire “Lo-Fi Beats” niche-genre and it’s popularity would indicate that people do in fact enjoy that.
Why would they want to run CGNAT on ipv6?
No, everything is not a pointer in C; C is based on value types that are passed around by copy (with the exception of arrays and functions). An variable of a given type designates a piece of storage which contains that value, rather than a pointer to it.

C is not significantly different from Algol or Pascal. The difference between C and Algol is a lot smaller than between either of those and Lisp or ML.

What's missing in some Algol-like languages compared to C is the loose pointer arithmetic, and possibly type punning via pointer conversions. Those features allow C programmers to do things like write their own memory allocator, which is incredibly useful in embedded systems. A C project can produce a self-contained image that boots on bare metal, with minimum assembly language. Or on almost bare metal, where there is a boot loader program that provides no services to the C program other than jumping to its entry point and maybe some console printing routines or something.
> You want a human being, not code, to look at the autoscaler and make the decision.

Should this decision happen at 2am? Can it wait until 10am?
It's an interesting idea but that would mean giving up colored webtoons and visual novels which I also want to read though less frequently. My manga app tachiyomi only exists on Android.

I have an ipad for apps and stuff, this device would be exclusively for media consumption. It's a consideration... hmm esp the weight is really appealing.

Though of the 15 apps I use they're all available on android, and of them 5 are android exclusives. Android tablets are the way to go for me I think.
> IMHO, space is big + satellites are hard to track, if they're highly-maneuverable or designed to be stealthy = possibility of launching untracked microsatellites that couple with space assets and wait for activation

From what I've read, I understand it to be more of the opposite: there's nothing to hide behind in space, and NORAD and NASA track nearly every piece of debris in orbit, not to mention satellites. So it would be hard for an adversary to do anything like that sneakily, even if there might not be any countermeasures (unclassified ones, anyway). I'm no expert, of course.
I think you're referring to McLaren lining their engine bay with a thin layer of gold? The use case here was very good heat transfer with low weight, since you only need a very thin layer to do it. "Aerospace" is unfortunately a word that is overused by PR departments because it sounds flash. "Aircraft-grade aluminum" is the main one. It's a meaningless word because it just means some particular alloy of the metal.

The difference is that here McClaren wants to transfer heat via condution very efficiently. In space you can't do that because everything is in vacuum - condution is very inefficient. So the way you get heat in or out is via radiation, and that means the Sun is a problem. The films around satellites are designed to reflect sunlight. The gold in there is probably kapton, or something very similar. Polyimides were developed by DuPont in the 1950s and in the 60s they came up with Kapton which is now ubiquitous in electronics (flexible PCBs for example). Kapton was used on the Lunar Module (and other bits):

https://apollo11space.com/apollo-11-kapton-foil/

Some of the best-in-class films today are manufactured by a company called Dunmore. They made insulation layers for Hubble, Curiosity, JWST and some other high profile missions. All these companies do defense contracting so they probably make films for spy satellites as well.

https://www.dunmore.com/industries/insulation.html
This sounds pretty smart. It'd sound even better if it was made 50/50.
Let's make your examples actually match the structure I set up. You've created some weird analogies that don't relate.

A: I want to take your purse.

B: If you take my purse, I will kill you.

If A continues to try and take the purse, A is obviously the agitator.

A: I want to leave you.

B: If you leave, I will kill you.

We agree B is a monster here, and this is a police matter, not global politics.

Maybe we can create a better example...

A: Hey B I want to nail your cousin.

B: I will not allow that to happen. Bro I will ruin your world. Literally, armageddon. Don't do it.

If A continues trying to nail the cousin, clearly the agitator.. no?
My favorite part of the SAFe is the image you get right on the homepage:

https://www.scaledagileframework.com/

It has a section "agile release train" which is a literal train! Everybody loves trains. It also has an icon with the text "Built-in quality", so you can sleep soundly knowing that you will not have quality issues anymore.

/s of course, but that image is really something. It's so vague it can be anything you want it to; a middle managers' dream.
I don’t know how the US could possibly have more resources than China.
Have zero trust. Use E2E encryption.
Static linking creates a work that incorporates another work, in a way that does not appear to be mere aggregation and which usually requires at least a modicum of creativity.

I imagine end users might statically link things together all day long without getting in much trouble - 17 USC 117 practically exempts that sort of thing. But it seems like it would be pretty dangerous ground for a vendor to distribute a statically linked executable in violation of the license of one of its components in large part because a valid license is necessary to distribute the component in the first place.
It is as thought browser/javascript is the only thing out there now. Or at least appears to be implied in the comments.

Just wanted to state that in other worlds, like C++, there exist tools like wxWidgets which provide cross platform GUI.
My country is Germany, the party I voted for is in the government and I’m pretty happy with our current foreign policy and the person responsible for it. I fully support the ban on shipping military hardware to the zones of conflict and focus on diplomatic effort.

That said, there is no evidence that this military buildup will result in anything and all those parrot talks about invasion or false flag operations are based only on mind guessing and wild assumptions of Putin’s insanity. There is more plausible explanation of what is going on. To understand it, it is necessary to look at the Russian military doctrine, its history of diplomatic interactions with NATO and the history of Russian-Ukrainian relations. Something that most of American and British media are apparently too lazy to do (German media are trying hard to understand what’s really happening and to present a nuanced picture).
> I mean, it can't? The "price" is literally defined as the price of the latest trade.

Check out how an order book works: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_book. I'm referring to the bid and the ask price. These often do differ substantially from the last trade price, and represent what someone is willing to pay to buy or receive to sell the asset right now. These can move without any trades actually being made. The price you are referring to is the last price.

But the broader point is that the market cap can move much faster or slower than the total traded value. It would not take exactly a 1 billion dollar buy order to move bitcoin price up 1 billion dollars in market cap, it would probably move much more than that. Same thing for stocks. So your assumption that the total cap of something represents exactly that many dollars being put in by investors is wrong, in general it will be far fewer dollars put in.

> The mistake you are making here is the assumption that there is a "value" in a bitcoin that can change.

I'm making the assumption that the value of a bitcoin is the price someone is willing to pay for it, which is supported by the evidence of what a market actually does pay for it. I tend to base my understanding of the world based on things that can actually be measured and that I can verify. You are asserting, may I add without any evidence, that its value is actually zero. I would challenge you to try to give a definition of "value" that is actually measurable, and that can lead to meaningful predictions about the world. Even if you had a perfect god's eye view of the "real value" of every asset, you'd still have to account for human behavior the irrationality of markets.

> This is not true for bitcoins. They do not represent anything, there is no ownership of anything but the bitcoin itself. It only has value inasmuch as it can be traded.

Your argument that value is only real if it represents "real" ownership would seem to imply that cash settled derivatives markets, which are some of the most liquid markets there are, also have zero value because they don't actually represent ownership of anything and are merely trading instruments. Similarly, cash itself, by your own logic, would have zero value, as it does not represent ownership in anything.
Well if most production parsers use hand-written parsers (and aside from SQL databases, they mostly do) I don't think performance would really make sense to be the reason anyone chooses parser generators.

I'd be curious to read any posts/papers you've got that have benchmarks that show performance to be a reason.
Original link (and maybe the submission URL should be changed to this, per HN policy): https://www.dw.com/en/chinese-space-cleaner-spotted-grabbing...
Thanks! For the things that do require human review, I wonder what the best way is to scale that.

It actually might be a potential business opportunity. Gig economy social media moderation. Pay $50 and YouTube contracts out with a company for $40 to pay a subcontractor $30 to spend an hour reviewing your appeal and account history and making a recommendation.

It has an icky protection racket feel to it and would incentivize YouTube to be more aggressive in deactivating accounts. But... maybe it's less icky than advertising, selling your privacy for pennies, and permanently deleting your stuff?
>Especially VS Code.

Why? :c The next best thing is Atom. And, tragically, Atom is way worse. (Believe me, I wanted it to win the hackable-lite-IDE war, but... it didn't.) I don't like Microsoft, but VS Code won. Although, technically, I use "Code - OSS", which is the no-proprietary-code version.
This applies to every role you can have in an organization. The better you get at working on the right thing, the less stressful your job will be.
In .net, mandatory async/await for new API is also making things that were easy harder. Async introduces multithreading where there wasn’t, breaks call stacks (debugging harder), deadlocks in certain conditions but not others (asp or winform vs console), forces you to handle what happens if the user interacts with the UI before your function is done executing, etc.
The *BSDs are nonexistent in the raw data [1].

Of course less code leads to less security holes. But 0/376? Or is project zero excluding BSDs entirely?

[1] https://bugs.chromium.org/p/project-zero/issues/list?sort=id...
Official Response: Request to Freeze Canadian Edge Users’ Accounts
You thought wrong, since nobody in this space actually cares about the technology.

Like all the others, most people are just speculating on the token price, asking if it is a good investment, etc. You would have to be lying to yourself to believe that people care about the technology.

Could you tell me why does this project needs a token attached? Even if we were to look at the price, the painful truth is that most (if not all) people who invested lost most of their money on this shitcoin, and this is excluding the punishing gas fees so it could be even worse. I hope this doesn't include you as well.

As I said, querying blockchains can be done without the need to attach a token to a project. BitQuery is an example of this without trying to burn up the planet with Proof of Waste.

If you are in support of the Graph you are also in support of the ponzi scheme.
Major error within first paragraph: "allowing him to suspend civil liberties and basically do whatever he wants"

I assume the rest of the article is just as bad, being based on a false assumption.

The EMA does not override the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
> ideally, there should be some form of asymmetric encryption be used so that decrypting the data requires the possession of one of three off-site YubiKeys with each having a distinct on-key-generated RSA4096 key and the corresponding password

This last one seems to drastically change the design into a place that hasn't really been developed. It would be quite neat, in addition to adding other properties like a compromise of the backed up server couldn't be used to destroy a backup. But assuming your goal is to pragmatically get it done, I would forgo this and accept that your backed up server is going to have full control over the backups.

FWIW I view online/cloud backups as having the strength of being synced often, and therefore up to date in case physical damage happens to the server. For longer term storage I use offsite drives in a safe deposit box, that take care of things like infrastructure being compromised and deliberately deleted along with online backups. For long term data integrity I use ZFS, borg verify, and ad-hoc sha512sums (for things that don't change much, like music collection).

In general keep in mind that your 8TB to backup likely has a power law distribution where your really important filesets are much smaller and can therefore be inexpensively backed up with more copies.

The best pricing I've seen for block devices is Kimsufi (10 USD / 2TB-mo) and buyvm.net (5 USD / 1TB-mo) although I haven't used the latter.
Strange, Wikipedia thinks it was a part of RSFSR:

> The Crimean Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic[a] was an Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic *of the Russian SFSR* (1921–45) and the Ukrainian SSR (1991–92) located on the Crimean Peninsula. The political unit was succeeded by the Autonomous Republic of Crimea.

[0]

> On April 26, 1954 The decree of the Presidium of the USSR Supreme Soviet transferring the Crimea Oblast *from the Russian SFSR* to the Ukrainian SSR.

> Taking into account the integral character of the economy, the territorial proximity and the close economic and cultural ties between the Crimea Province and the Ukrainian SSR, the Presidium of the USSR Supreme Soviet decrees:

> To approve the joint presentation of the Presidium of the Russian SFSR Supreme Soviet and the Presidium of the Ukrainian SSR Supreme Soviet on the transfer of the Crimea Province *from the Russian SFSR* to the Ukrainian SSR.

Regarding "...is a direct linear continuation of the entity that was known as the Russian Soviet Federated Socialist Republic, not the USSR":

> The Republic of Byelarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Russian
Federation, and Ukraine, as successor states of the former Union of Soviet
Socialist Republics in connection with the Treaty, shall assume the obligations of
the former Union of Soviet Socialist Republics under the Treaty

[1]

Does USA position on this matters?

Especially considering Russia is still repaying USSR's foreign debt.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1954_transfer_of_Crimea#Decree

[1] https://2009-2017.state.gov/documents/organization/27389.pdf
Why have 500mb of dependencies if they dwarf your app and are too large to have in your source tree?
> So your point that the Lisp evaluator doesn't even understand sequences of characters is true for any compiler, they all operate on the AST.

Lisp does not really operate on an AST. It operates on nested token lists, without syntax representation. For example (postfix 1 2 +) can be legal in Lisp, because it does not (!) parse that code according to a syntax before handing it to the evaluator.

Lisp code consists of nested lists of data. Textual Lisp code uses a data format for these nested lists, which can be read and printed. A lot of Lisp code, though, is generated without being read/printed -> via macros.
Oh nice! In/ounce is awesome... though sadly my S5E is at the top lmao.
The Fingerprint Principle
I have a Unihertz Jelly 2, and I love it
I'm sorry, but I don't understand your comment. Well, I don't understand _why_ you choose to comment. The study itself identifies, acknowledges and presents some major limitations. It does not hide them. It's not like the study was concocted in some content factory in the Balkans, to make a couple of quick bucks on Facebook or whatever. The authors are very serious researchers and the study itself was supported by funds from prestigious organizations (that you can find in the "Acknowledgements" section).

It does my head in why would you choose to cast aspersions on the science method. It's literally an example of science done by the book, published in a peer reviewed magazine. It's not amateur work, it's not fake news. It's ground breaking science: "We found this interesting thing and here we present it to you, with caveats, after some other people in the field did a quick sanity check on it".

I'm sorry for the tone, but I'm quite exasperated by people doing this kind of low key, subtle, disparaging of science under the guise of scepticism. It always happens when studies are posted on HN (or reddit), people seem to find a perverse joy in finding weird gotchas that the study already mentions and then saying: see, science is such a mess.
> Not having to worry about dongles, i.e. connecting USB devices to your machine

The dongles. OMG. It's worse than the parallel printer age. I cannot recall another period in history where I needed a dongle so often. USB-C only on Macbooks was such a huge design mistake. Especially in the era of USB-A! Soooooo many things are still USB-A. All for a little more thinness! It's really grating.
Ask HN: How big is your personal library?
I have been collecting a lot of books about topics that interest me — mainly coffee, technology, and Japanese fiction — for the last two years. I have ended up with about 80-100 books. How many books do you have in your personal library? Do you buy books for reference materials or only recreational reading?
Yes, to all, basically.

I also have known since I was 20 or so that I would eventually get macular degeneration? Is that how thats spelled? (the literal "unbuilding" of the eye...)

I have a floater in my right eye as soon as I turned 47 years old...

but when I close my eyes at night, I can "see" my veins....
Arithmetic coding is a drop-in replacement for Huffman coding that saves binary roundoff. It's less known because it was patented, and the (short) code to implement requires optimizing a tricky 1.0000 versus 0.9999 issue (in binary).

The usual application involves letter frequencies without context. Rather than a trie for deterministic context, one could in far less space compute a hidden Markov chain of small but effective dimension, to generate the probabilities for arithmetic coding.
Also posted a couple days ago - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30367937
> a sovereign nation, can align with who they wish...

Oh wow, that's what I call thinking about the world as you wish the world were, rather than as the world actually is.

At the height of Soviet power, the USA were willing to fight enormous wars on the other side of the planet to stop a country voluntarily aligning with the USSR (dropping more bombs on it than all of WWII countries did combined, killing millions). They helped coups in countless countries and helped even genocidal regimes with the sole purpose of stopping USSR expansion, even when doing so was actually economically detrimental to themselves.

And the USA is far from alone in meddling with other countries' affairs. China, Russia, obviously, even not-so-big powers like Australia (ask New Guinea) and the UK (who loved doing that all over the world when it had the power to do so) will absolutely engage in whatever they can to make sure their interests are not compromised or even threatened.
It is well-known that offense is the best form of defense.
This will be a fun cat and mouse game when sats are rigged to catch one of these and explode.
Golang was created from the same people of C, it's what C++ should have been. It takes lots of background from plan9, the 'Unix++' OS.