skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I don't know about you, or Cook, but where i live, everybody needs. When you don't need they look at you like at an alien. They even teach children in school that there are 2 important things in life: money and power.

Back to Apple: if they start to look at 99 Milions $ maybe you shall search for another supplier. Just saying.
REITs don't cary loans that are leins against the house. If they "miss loan payments" they'll still keep the homes.

They'll just get sold and transferred to another large REIT and the house will never hit the market.

The housing market isn't going to crash. I foresee something like Australia happening: the prices just continue to go up, for decades.
Thanks for the update. Did you get your count from this Wiki page? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Falcon_9_and_Falcon_He...

I'm not sure if that is a reliable source. (Please don't read that comment as a general commentary about Wiki!)
One way to find out is to have all the underpaid employees quit and form an Apple competitor, Pear, and see how well that does.

(This is not an unreasonable suggestion. People quit and start their own companies all the time. Some prove they were underpaid, some prove they were overpaid.)
> Who or what determines what someone needs to earn?

As the song says: "Oh Lord, won't you buy me a Mercedes Benz?
My friends all drive Porsches, I must make amends"
Yes, this. These conversations about weight loss are so rife with spherical cows and people come to ridiculous generalizations because of it. Bodies are complicated and varied. "Michael Phelps eats 12kcal a day and yet he's not fat" is just a correlation, it doesn't mean anything. He's an extreme outlier of a person in many ways.
You might have heard of it by now but I suspect you're exploiting the mechanism that delays the feeling of satiation for roughly 20 minutes after eating. Many people can eat a seemingly unlimited amount of food so long as they do it quickly.

I think your method is cool because it tricks both the hungry and the logical part of your brain into thinking it can totally have all the food so long as it waits, but by the time 20 minutes is up, the satiation chemicals have found their way to your brain and it's no longer hungry.
You work for Facebook?
I'm responding to someone else who mentioned that toxicity is everywhere. Please address the overall topic, instead of making a personal remark about me. Thanks!
In a case like Worms where there are concurrent actions and random reveal choices inside each turn... If some deterministic state and random number is created for each player at the start of the turn, then their inputs can be reproducibly mapped to the results of all the random choices. In that case you can just upload the inputs and let the server work out what happened based on the hash the player was given (i.e., let the server replay each player's inputs against that hash and figure out the result).

But the server is not another player. It's not a player at all. It's the arbiter of truth. So as you said:

>> The problem with this approach is that the latency to obtain the result becomes the roundtrip to the player with the slowest connection and back.

This is what I'm saying above. At some point games will just accept this and allow the player with too slow of a connection to be disadvantaged. To the extent that a server should tolerate slow connections, it is a handicap given by the game to players with slow connections.
"Hopes someday to be"

Not the same as "is".
Too little, too late. The traditional fission industry is being killed by high CAPEX and nothing about the current tokamak based designs suggests they will be any cheaper to build for a given power rating:

- They need large, highly advanced cryocooled superconducting magnets in very close proximity to a hundred million degree plasma. This only makes economic sense in massive, and expensive plants.

- They are a very strong source of fast neutrons useful to transmute cheap depleted uranium into plutonium, so carry massive proliferation risks, need close regulatory scrutiny and will require mounts of paperwork to operate, thus exceptionally inflexible to improvements and rapid iteration. Just like the current fission crop.

- Aneutronic fusion is a currently a purely theoretical concept, in the last 70 years nobody has been able to contain even the much cooler D-T plasma for economically viable durations and temperatures.

- The structure of the reactor becomes radiologically active and cleanup operations must be considered. Highly penetrating neutron radiation means some radiation will escape regardless of containment, requiring a radiological exclusion zone. No Mr. Fusion in your car, sorry.

- They operate and must breed sensitive nuclear materials - Tritium, a well known component of boosted thermonuclear weapons. The limited efficiency of tritium production from lithium-6 might require obtaining some from fission reactors to top up the fuel cycle and keep fusion reactors operating.

So when you draw the line, a life time of magnetic containment research has produced a speculative design that even if it were to work, which it doesn't, would be, in the best case scenario, comparable to existing fission designs that are being phased out for cost and risk issues.

A PhD money pit with zero chance of ever building anything useful. I know it, you know it, I'm ready for the proverbial downvote protecting one's paycheck from their own knowledge.
In my (extensive) experience, losing weight is predicated on accurate calorie counting. The trick is to use exercise to lighten the perceived difficulty of your caloric deficit. For example if you're trying to lose a pound a week, it's a lot easier to eat 250 cal below your TDEE and walk for 2.5 miles than it is to eat 500 cal below your TDEE.
BSBY and Term SOFR Swap Volumes
He can have $100m only when he figures out how to take 30% of the income of all the iPhone users... and he gets them to thank him for it.
Theoretically, no. But look what a beautiful thread is on HN. Religion has thought mere mortals to be interested in the life of gods.
I dream the day all Electron garbage is either a Web widget or a PWA.
Why? His?
This misses the point of the article, it isn't that you unconsciouly eat more when you exercise, it's that moderate exercise simply doesn't burn that many calories (if any) once your body is accustomed to it.
Launching your startup's waitlist in a matter of seconds
Lancero is the fastest way to validate your next unicorn. We've timed it, and .... 10 seconds! 10 seconds to create a shareable waitlist with our portal that comes right out of the box, insane! As we've looked at all founder profiles we've also included a no-code widget that you could import into your favorite web builder. Or a developer-friendly API that gives you the power to customize everything. And even an option to import people into your waitlist, if you're stepping over from an overpriced competitor. Lancero has it all.
Yes, according to his recent comments

> I was in jail with a guy...
Intel CEO Gelsinger spells out five-year renewal plan inspired by iconic leaders
> We don't have evidence that this is a cause for concern,

You do not? I have concern how "science" is practiced here. The conclusion is very likely wrong too or at least it is detrimentally opposed to several other studies. Especially with the effect lingering, but the protection waning pretty quickly. Perhaps in 5 month you are much more vulnerable to Covid like others have predicted? Would make sense because the immune system doesn't seem to react anymore.
Yes there is a difference and despite that difference it's still a dictatorship. The thing is, whatever Dang says goes. That's the definition of dictatorship.

I think you just agree with him. Dang is a dictator whose policies you agree with, but ultimately you have no say in anything.
I use it few times a year to fix websites sending ISO-8859-2 (or Windows-1250) and the guess mode worked. As an user affected by this change, it is an improvement (less need to click around trying 5 different encodings)
I was eating similarly in my 20s and 30s and in 20s I kept about 80kg but in 30s I got to 130kg :/

BTW there are diseases that reduce calories absorbed, you might want to get checked for colitis ulcerosa and crohn's disease. They have nasty side effects so better to know earlier even if you don't have the worst symptoms.
Waiting for ISP customer service, I imagine.
> You are overthinking it. “spot flaw” here would be “point out flaw”.

You could be correct, but you are assuming something that's not in the text. I don't think this is "overthinking": to spot (to perceive, notice, become aware of) _does not mean_ to "point out" (to show, to tell people)

I checked the dictionary: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/spot

"Spot: to see or notice someone or something, usually because you are looking hard." e.g.

"If you _spot_ any mistakes in the article just _mark_ them with a pencil."

If we're talking about "things that the word doesn't mean" then there's a lot of options.
> the consent process shouldn’t annoy or trick the users into opting in. Pre-ticked checkboxes or making the opt-in button more prominent than the decline button aren’t allowed.

I wish that was true but the GDPR doesn't actually say that as far as I know. There's official advice to that effect, but it's not written in the law. IIRC it just says it must be a "fee choice" which is way more open to interpretation.
There are different kinds of articles out there. Some are about getting the information across, some give the context and the story behind it. Some aren't even about the science at all. I wouldn't compare John McPhee to a Geology textbook. And I wouldn't say it's correct that this article was "ostensibly and nominally" about just calories. The headline is "Scientists bust myths about calories". It's about the scientists as much as it is about the calories.

Anyways, that's all to say, I do enjoy articles like this that give context and explain not just the research but the people behind it. Let people enjoy things.
Well that's what the article says. The Hazda who walk 8-12 km a day burn the less calories as an average American (or the same after adjusting for body weight).

Also that Phelps thing is highly questionable. He says he "probably" burns 8-10k, not 12k. Not the type of statement you want to rely on to dismiss all this work.
I'm a bit confused by this point in the article, because it also states:

> There seems to be a hard limit on how many calories our bodies can burn per day, set by how fast we can digest food and turn it into energy. He calculates that the ceiling for an 85-kilogram man would be about 4650 calories per day.

Given that "regular" people clearly do not burn 4650 calories per day, and it is possible to burn 4650 calories per day, there must be a point at which exercise _does_ increase energy expenditure. I'm guessing it just doesn't happen for regular doses of exercise (including, evidently, walking 14km per day).

Perhaps the body down regulates calorie-consuming processes to a point where it's just the bare minimum, and calorie expenditure increases from there. Or perhaps we should take the opposite view and say that our bodies up regulate unwanted processes (like inflammation) to use the energy of an engine designed to keep running at a certain level?

Either way I find this incredibly interesting. And either way I'm probably also going to keep stuffing my face on a day I run 30km :).
Empathy applies in two ways.

Firstly in realizing that saying 'you are wrong' is hurtful and can be damaging to relationships.

Secondly in realizing that other people might already know your objection, but had reasons for proceeding this way anyway.
Data Localisation Row: It's Big Tech vs. Reliance Industries and Paytm in India
Lots of different points in that thread but I focus on what I think it boils down to, the perception that a lot of the measures taken by Canada are not being 'procedural' or part of the proper constitutional/democratic system.

It helps to go back to Carl Schmitt for this one who pointed out that any government that sustains itself purely on the basis of formalisms (in his view the biggest problem of liberal constitutional democracies) is going to erode because it cannot handle what he called the state of exception. When a country is in crisis, by definition some entity must be able to go 'past the law', because the law only deals with what can be anticipated and is ordinary, and government must be able to deal with existential unknowns.

In modern democracies this is martial law, state of emergency, presidential decree and so on. Covid responses overall are an example of this. Most of the measures taken by Western democracies were not 'constitutional' or orderly democratic in any genuine sense. Business loans, eviction protection, vaccination campaigns, mandates, etc. Regardless of which political side any measure appealed to, they were implemented ad hoc, legally justified at best after the fact.

So to talk about constitutional systems requires to understand that informal authority is not a threat or even bad in any sense. It's also not surprising to see this kind of criticism from someone in the 'crypto community'. Because the fetishization of contracts is what renders most of these communities ungovernable when something goes wrong.
24 on the main quiz, 27 including the bonus questions. It helped that the full moon was last night, the sun only just set, and I live almost directly on top of a fault line to the point that the park down the road has a prominent ridge with a sign on it indicating it as such.

The latitude question had me stumped since there's basically nothing latitudinally or longditudinally projecting out from here. Eastern Russia, Middle Argentina, the top of Tasmania.
Let's consider a specific example: Lactose intolerance. The Wiki page for it is pretty good. So, despite the name, lactose intolerance refers to lacking the enzyme lactase, which is used to break down lactose. If you have lactase, then your human cells can use the calories from lactose; if you don't, then the bacteria get the lactose. Wiki says "Symptoms may include abdominal pain, bloating, diarrhea, gas, and nausea", which sounds like the bacteria do indeed eat it; if the bacteria couldn't extract calories from it either, then I assume it would just pass through and there would be no symptoms.

Thus, if Bob and Joe eat the exact same diet that has some milk products, and Bob is lactose intolerant while Joe isn't, then Bob's cells get fewer calories from that diet than Joe's. If Bob and Joe's bodies are otherwise identical and follow identical exercise routines, then I would assume that, like, if the diet is exactly enough to maintain Joe's weight, then Bob would lose weight; and if it's exactly enough to maintain Bob's weight, then Joe would gain weight. (Right? For sake of illustration, we could imagine that most of the diet's calories are from milk, and assume Bob can tolerate the nausea.) Yet "calories in" (measured as food entering stomach) are identical, and "calories out" (measured as CO2) might also be identical.

Lactose is a specific, well-understood example of some people absorbing nutrients much better than others. I think there are other examples, and I expect there's a lot of variation in absorption efficiency that's less known. When you hear about people who eat lots of food and remain thin, I suspect this is part of the explanation. And whether their bacteria get the calories instead, or whether it passes through untouched, might show up in CO2 measurements but I don't think it would be related to body fat accumulation.

In a conservation-of-energy sense, "calories in" certainly gives you an upper bound on how many observed "calories out" you can produce without losing weight. But I don't think there's a lower bound on how inefficient someone's digestive system can be (except "zero"), or a practical upper bound on how much their cells might burn energy without us noticing (without close observation). I think, if you wanted a complete accounting of calories-out that would actually match the input, you'd need to add up (a) the heat a person puts out (via contact with air and surfaces, also infrared emissions), (b) the work they do in a physics sense (e.g. lifting heavy objects), and (c) the amount of un-burned calories in their stool (or any other excreted substances).
You have a fundamental scientific misunderstanding of the difference in difficulty of landing a rocket that goes straight up and down and landing a rocket that has just put something into an orbital trajectory.

If it's so easy why doesn't everyone do it?
Because with a programming language, you can learn how something works and implement it yourself without copying the implementation. Your implementation will have a similar underlying algorithm but enough differences that it wouldn't be a copy. Algorithm (that is probably not copyrightable) and implementation (that is) are separate. You can use the implementation or you can learn the algorithm and implement it yourself.

With CLI tools, however, there is only one way of doing most things. There is no OOP vs functional, no loop vs comprehension, no choice of data structure, nothing. So commands being copyrightable implies no one can do certain actions with the CLI without a license. Because the only way to do those actions are with the exact command that was copyrighted.
.NET 7 Preview 1 is now available
> I think the second example is probably meant more as ‘point out flaws’.

OK, that seems likely, but why use a word "spot" that does not mean "to point out" ?

The distinction is clear here: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/spot

Spot: "to see or notice someone or something, usually because you are looking hard" e.g.

"If you _spot_ any mistakes in the article just _mark_ them with a pencil."
>Maybe, but it sounds like your comment was written from a place where you've never had to actually implement one of those existing solutions.

I absolutely have implemented the aforementioned solution. Used to be a right of passage for middling UNIX syaadmins.

>Kerberos is great. It's also a holy terror to implement properly, especially cross-platform, and especially if you need to federate identity.

Not really, especially not really if you Active Directory.

>SCIM combined with modern cloud SSO makes life much easier than trying to support Kerberos.

SCIM with Active Directory (AKA Kerberos) works well.
I do think the point is also partly that what most people consider 'a good amount of exercise' isn't really very strenuous. Doing a bit of cardio and weights at the gym 3x a week isn't enough to offset a bad diet. If you run 10k every day, that's a very different ballgame because you meaningfully burn more calories than a regular diet gives you.

It's also incredibly easy, at least in America, to consume way too many calories. To meaningfully lose weight you have to drastically change your diet or drastically up your movement.
So just to get this straight: you argued that Tim Cook only got there via his rich family, even before you knew whether that was true.
I really hate this change. It makes sense to ban offensive words as the actual answers, but usually no one else sees your guesses (unless you share them specifically, but usually it's just the colors) and if you typed the word in, it's hard to justify being offended by it being accepted as a guess.
try bookmark service like pinboard.in they have a search engine when you can search by keyword ...
I've had the "are you drunk" comments a few times while hypoglycemic.

I once walked home from work and apperantly didn't notice it, walked a few busy intersections and finally sat down somewhere where someone noticed me and called an ambulance who game me a glucose iv and everything was back to normal in a few minutes. So everything was still somewhat working and the "go home" signal was set but everything else was broken. Not everyone responds the same though and concerning cars I have at least some dextrose with me at all times and some in the car as well, as well as hidden at work and at home and in all my coats and backpacks and everywhere... OJ works quite well since it is readily available.

They did teach my parents one thing when handeling people with hypoglycemia: never try to stop them from consuming your entire fridge. Motor control is lacking and a young adult can easilly hurt you badly if you try to intervene.
Pity I can only vote once, this is amazing work, thanks for sharing.
There was a conversation on their mailing list contemplating dropping NSS support. https://curl.se/mail/lib-2022-01/0120.html If you have a use case for NSS in curl, you may want to speak up. Perhaps "I want curl to look exactly like a browser" is a significant use case?
Based on your description, I will venture a guess that you are not obese / grossly overweight. There is good evidence from various studies that obese/overweight people are not typically able to achieve this - usually their craving for food is far too powerful to just control simply by falling into a routine; or, the body sometimes finds other ways to adjust (the lipostat model).

This is really the problem with CICO - it is definitely correct in an abstract sense (weight doesn't come from thin air, and neither does food you eat magically disappear), but the factors controlling calories in and calories out are far more complex. Human behavior is far from being entirely rationally determined. Our choices (particularly in regards to food, exercise, and other basic needs) are to a great extent controlled by our metabolism, even though it often doesn't seem that way.

This probably explains why people rarely lose weight on the long term - you can allow yourself to be forced to eat less than your body thinks it needs for a while, and obviously you'll lose weight; but you will go right back up to your "normal" weight as soon as the forcing stops (program ends, willpower exhausted etc).
All comms through manager sounds like a dystopian nightmare worse than slack if you ask me...
When it doesn't say anything about possible deescalation but instead switches topic to iran, then it isn't very coherent.

Such a concentration of russian armed forces never happened before. Are you okay with implied forecast that they will in the end do nothing just memes and fud?
I played around with a GoIP-4 a few years ago.

Btw the old dbladm backdoor still worked IIRC at the end of 2020 but needed some re (I suspect it still does) - you can dump the code from firmware updates.

They mark new challenge types with a letter in front of the numbers when you try to log in. I got the original (no prefix) and S, H, N type challenges working.

Also possible to extract and reassemble custom firmware updates (if you want to run custom code) after you get admin rights - the package is only protected by an md5 in the header. Be sure to have a jtag ready, you'll need it the first few tries.

Here's some old notes on the PKG format: https://gist.github.com/tostercx/3f2f2776736fbdaf9b8fa77c203...

The FS is either cramfs or squashfs.
Add to that, how do you version control, and pull request.
I used to be at the bleeding edge of tech and I refuse to move to a smartphone simply because of the distraction it causes. I have a real problem dealing with distractions as it is and adding such a device would make my life much harder. Tech is here to serve us, not the other way around and in the end what matters is whether or not a given piece of technology improves your life so much that the downsides are more than balanced out. For smartphones in my life that would be a net negative. Of course for others that equation works out differently.
x = bar()
if val {
x = foo()
}

Is both shorter and functionally more equivalent with the ternary example.
Most human systems would rather fail together than succeed.

Most systems are built for nothing but subsequent failure (even if it's 300 years into the future). Think about that.