skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Hmm... using blend is actually a good suggestion. You can pre-shuffle elements [1 3 5 7] [2 4 6 8], do a comparison against the search key, and then blend the low 16 bits of the first register with the high 16 bits of the second. Will add that to the article, thanks!
It's also using a current media darling to help promote awareness of privacy/surveillance issues (at least incidentally).
> Unlike Florida, the Brazilian creeks don’t have any local predators for zebrafish, and Magalhães believes they are now thriving.
That’s the weight of the tank not the helium inside it. They should advertise it as filling ~30 helium balloons. Which obviously weigh far less than 10kg or they wouldn’t float.

The ~300 cubic foot tanks are 9 inches in diameter, 55 inches tall, with about 130 pounds and contain about 1.5kg of helium.
It’s not like memoisation and thunks are new features. What has this language added in this space I can’t do in say Haskell?

>written by a bunch of html/js developers

Ah so because they have rediscovered something it’s meant to be revolutionary?
The drive controller is internally parallel. The write is just a job queue submission, so the next write hits while it's still processing previous requests.
I’ve been able to make larger image montages in less time with gm compared to im with my MacBook, so I switched. I was surprised by this and could be doing something wrong, but others around me had the same experience for my situation.
The Worst DRM Systems in Modern Times [video]
I think it was someone in an HN comment who put it best:

> exercise determines shape, diet determines size
I think you missed my point. You can just create a new address in the Monero GUI with the click of a button. You don't need to transfer the funds to a new wallet.

It's like putting a sanction on a burner phone or throwaway account, don't you think?
It's nice to be able to see what a new language is able to express easily. Have you ever browsed Rosetta Code? I find syntax interesting because it shapes how a language is used.

https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Rosetta_Code
Makes me want to skip the language entirely.
140 isn't much more than 100. Nor is Delta 2's 153 flights. At least not compared to Soyuz's 755.
Once authoritarian abilities are in place, the easiest approaches get used

You can bet your last dollar that these abilities won't even be applied evenly. Look at the difference in the way the Canadian police have handled these truckers vs how they handle protests by indigenous people.

If the cops aren't willing to use existing powers and laws, what is the point in giving them more powers? Doesn't make sense
There aren't; you'd have to hack that in. It should be possible, though, since I think the entire system is powered from a single primary 12V rail internally.
Of course they are tracking you. You pay with your data. That’s the deal with free stuff (most of the time).

If it bothers you use an ad blocker or host your own copy of Wordle or use one of the many copies out there.
What's that link?
Some thoughts about technological sustainability
Some of that is just being in your twenties. :). Pretty sure just thinking of a hike lost weight back then.
Yeah, that's a very good point. This is kinda getting off into the weeds from the original point, but interesting weeds nonetheless :).

This study[0] says that measuring CO2 is not enough, and that indirect calorimetry is the gold standard for measuring energy expenditure (EE).

"Calculated EE based on CO2 measurement was not sufficiently accurate to consider the results as an alternative to measured EE by indirect calorimetry. Therefore, EE measured by indirect calorimetry remains as the gold standard to guide nutrition therapy."

Google says "Indirect calorimetry is the method by which measurements of respiratory gas exchange (oxygen consumption, V O 2 and carbon dioxide production, V CO 2 ) are used to estimate the type and amount of substrate oxidized and the amount of energy produced by biological oxidation."

So getting back to your point, if bacteria are feasting on part of the calories and producing CO2, it seems that it would throw off the results even using indirect calorimetry. At that point though are we kinda arguing semantics? While our microbiome isn't composed of human cells, you can still argue it's a part of our functioning organism. It seems it would be nearly impossible to measure human digested calories vs bacteria digested calories, so maybe the results are close enough. Also, many beneficial bacteria release calories that we can consume, like butyric acid, which further complicates things.

[0] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC5251283/
I believe FreeBSD intentionally truncates provided ioctls to the low 32-bit space because of exactly this kind of bogus assumption in userspace:

https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-src/blob/main/sys/kern/sy...

It's a relatively recent change (2020). Here's the corresponding place OpenBSD doesn't do that:

https://github.com/openbsd/src/blob/master/sys/kern/sys_gene...
The browser extensions still work for me with 1Password 7 and iCloud vault.

I would ensure you have the correct version installed, because they have released newer extensions that only work with the hosted version.
> I'm working on a ticket that should take me a day to finish but it has taken me almost a week

Check with your TL or Manager for the expectations.
> This from her seemed dangerously like fraud

Pretty heavy statement. Which part is the fraud? The timeline or the ability?

I think it's fair to say far-fetched, but the label fraud or even "sounding like fraud" sounds too heavy.
Hey quantified! Thank you for your comment. I saw I couldn't respond to your comment on my post (nypost.com) becuase the post was flagged--I predicted that may happen. It's not really on-topic here, but I think we could have had a good discussion about morals and ethics based on that article. Anyway, I spent like 20 minutes making a reply and then to see: "you can't comment here", so please excuse me that I posted a reply to your comment as an edit to my first one. Here: https://news.ycombinator.com/edit?id=30381749
40km/wk is only 3.4 miles/day. It's only a half hour of moderate exercise a day. It sounds like the study didn't actually measure a significant exercise workload.
There seems to be another bot that tags them invalid and closes them.

These bots are doing 90% of my job ;)
But, even less is being spent on that than on other aneutronic designs, which themselves are on shoestring budgets. Theoretical reasons make it seem like an unpromising avenue.
Agree that returning user information can be delicate. I would think journalists dealing with such a sensitive contact would be more careful, but that's a dangerous assumption. Sure, I can use Tails and Tor, but for someone without a tech background it may be difficult or impossible to use those tools properly. Making privacy-preserving tools and practices the default is way. I appreciate the various guides the EFF puts out on privacy and digital hygiene.
I didn't phrase it correctly. What I meant was, I want to continue an old comment thread, but then I wonder if its worth doing since the other party probably isn't going to respond or even know that I replied.
> Now, to lose weight simple subtract 500 calories per day from what you eat

I appreciate you are trying to be helpful. But most of what you said assumes a certain level or privilege (resources time/money/ableness) that the vast majority of people don't have. People working long hour jobs, or double jobs, or balancing kids/parent responsibilities. Often fast food is the only obvious option, and people aren't buying it until well into the throws of a low blood sugar event.

This coupled with metabolic/genetic differences can really muck up any given diet. What works of you doesn't just not work for everyone, it isn't even possible for everyone to follow.

That said, I know you are being helpful - my words or more to help those that might read them and be saying: "I did all that and it didn't work!"
This doesn't fit my observations entirely. I have a friend who runs several miles every morning. He says he does this so he can eat an extra 300-500 calories a day ... which he does. He's thin.

I certainly get that less eating is more effective than exercise but in my head I think as long as you burn more calories than you take in you should lose weight. So if you eat 1800 calories a day, assuming you need 2000 a day, you'll lose weight (-200). If you do some exercise that uses 500 calories and eat 2300 calories you're still at (-200)
Running isn’t much less efficient at higher speeds. It’s harder because the calorie burn per unit time is higher, but the calorie burn per unit distance doesn’t vary that much.
There is no PLP. If you yank power you lose up to 5-10 seconds of disk cache (fsynced files that weren't F_FULLFSYNCed). I tested this. On macOS.
You're like my wife and her siblings. They can eat just about anything without putting on any significant weight. The running theory is that the food is not absorbed as efficiently, possibly due to it moving through the bowels too quickly, as some of them have IBS.
I am surprised no one has mentioned it because it's actually very important internationally speaking. Basically what happened was oil demand dropped substantially in China which is one of the biggest and growing consumers of oil. OPEC had an agreement to reduce oil sales and raise prices in response to the sudden decrease in demand.

Russia refused to restrict their supply in defiance of OPEC so the Saudis flooded the market with a bunch of super super cheap oil to undercut Russia. That's what led to the negative prices another commenter mentioned.

The problem was is that most of the US oil production is shale oil production. Shale oil is more expensive to produce than raw crude, which is why it didn't really take off in the US until gas was moving towards the $4.00 mark in the mid oughts. The problem that caused now is that the cheap oil all over the market, combined with the decrease in demand priced out shale oil producers who shuttered and now that demand is returning the companies helping supply don't exist anymore.

As for why it didn't drop lower I was seeing low $2.00 and under in places.
Thanks! You can try the version in the site for testing if you want! If you want to build something, let us know!
<quote> Our main findings can be summarized as follows. First, parental income matters for the probability of becoming an inventor, and it does so even after controlling for other background Our main findings can be summarized as follows. First, parental income matters for the probability of becoming an inventor, and it does so even after controlling for other background variables and for IQ. Second, the estimated impact of parental income is greatly diminished once parental socioeconomic status and education, and the indi- vidual’s IQ are controlled for, dropping by 2/3rds. Third, IQ has both a direct effect on the probability of inventing which is almost five times as large as that of having a high-income father, and an indirect effect through education. Finally, the impact of IQ is larger and more convex for inventors than for medical doctors or lawyers variables and for IQ. Second, the estimated impact of parental income is greatly diminished once parental socioeconomic status and education, and the indi- vidual’s IQ are controlled for, dropping by 2/3rds. Third, IQ has both a direct effect on the probability of inventing which is almost five times as large as that of having a high-income father, and an indirect effect through education. Finally, the impact of IQ is larger and more convex for inventors than for medical doctors or lawyers </quote>
Thanks for actually answering my question! I guess no one wants to be a downer, but I'm pretty shocked that no one else in this thread, or that I've talked to about this issue, or anything I've read about fusion, has mentioned that current designs aren't on track to be remotely cost effective, which is what you seem to be saying.
In my experience TDEE calculators are mostly best guesses and the more expensive the bestester the guess. This is mostly showing in various age ranges and pregnancy, you can expect variance compared to what is calculated. (not sure which method was used for this study as the calculated baseline for what was their expected TDEE) The use for this with TDEE is expect variance in age ranges in the graphic, ultimately there is no way to know until you test yourself with a diet for a few weeks.

The biggest thing is showing how much mental stress plays into calorie burning, enough where an average western lifestyle can have the same calorie burned as a hunter gatherer.
Sleeman had a big marketing campaign a few years ago for a beer inspired by the "wild" hops that grow along railroads in Canada.
Red Hat: Moving from a proprietary to an open source culture
Maybe I'm just a techno-optimist, but I suspect big tech companies don't give a hoot about you running "unapproved" software, but rather care about their services being abused and "unapproved" software is just a useful signal that fails on a tiny percentage of total legit users.
> Does it allow for 3x payload?

Mass to LEO (from the SpaceX site): F9: 22,800 kg; FH: 63,800 kg.

So 2.8 times. Both expend the second stage, so if they recover all the boosters then FH possibly has lower cost per kg, but they're not saying.
That requires a web browser to use? No thanks.
It's more exercise than driving a car though, which is why I think people do that.
Similar karma, also post as I think. Often disagree with viewpoints expressed, including many of those of WalterBright's.

But I agree with him here that there's been no general penalty observed.

The only things I've noticed are a couple of people reaching out on account of my being on the leaderboard (no, I can't get your posts approved, yes, I will report your trying to do so), and having corresponded with the mod team for years (occasionally viewpoint issues, mostly boring submission stuff such as titles, disambiguated URLs, and occasional spam), what I think is a fairly good mutual understanding. Not always agreement, but general respect. I'll make my case or argument, and almost always accept the moderation response. I've had numerous submissions entered into the 2nd chance pool.

Overall calibre of discussion for an open and general-interest website is excellent. Occasional visiting expertise is an added plus.

My own submissions sometimes succeed, are occasionally flagged, and mostly just languish in the "new" page.
> But when it comes to writing tests and designing my code (OO or FP) I still am not sure what the best way to go about it is. There is so much contradictory and sometimes just plain confusing advice.

Well, programming is not a monolith. Different high-level requirements demand different standards and processes, even though for many things a standard solution works. A safety-critical product (or just one that can lose lots of money) demands a different process than a toy app.
Refactoring is, by the classic definition, changing an implementation to another implementation that does the same thing.

Sure, in with bigger refactorings, some unit tests probably change. That's just a (small) part of everyday work, as I do it.
Not at all, and it certainly wasn't relevant to the benchmarking I was doing, as I was focusing on writes to and fsync performance for the same track.
Hehe, spill!
I have also done almost exactly this process, and it worked for years to regulate my weight. But then I hit a plateau (a high plateau, not a low one) where I was unable to drop weight no matter how low I cut my calories. I started at a range that I knew had worked in the past, and lowered it over the course of weeks, well past the point where I was miserable. I even tried more complicated things, like varying my intake, doing on weeks and off weeks, etc. Nothing worked.

I wasn't sure what was causing it, so I hypothesized that I was low on muscle mass, and took up weight training. Then I gained ten pounds.

I'm not sure what the upshot is here, but my guess is that this approach indiscriminately consumes lean muscle mass if you don't pair it with muscle-building exercises.
For years I've heard Gym buffs say

'fitness starts in the gym, weightloss in the kitchen'
Why? There are no minerals available in space that wouldn't be cheaper to mine on Earth. Even with Starship's vastly reduced costs.

https://caseyhandmer.wordpress.com/2019/08/27/there-are-no-k...
Now if only these companies could be encouraged to avoid creating products destined for the landfill needing people to reverse engineer them just to recharge them.

https://github.com/jakebenz/cgm is also related
Kdump truncates to a 32-bit value: https://github.com/openbsd/src/blob/master/usr.bin/kdump/kdu...
It is interesting that the fundamental parts of grammar checking are still driven by rules engines and GOFAI expert systems. Even the gramamarly core is written in common lisp as a GOFAI app. Most of the modern attention/transformer NLPs are used to supplement the front end tasks like dependency parsing.
> Which is laughably ridiculous when you start considering the extremes like Michael Phelps eating 10kcal for breakfast

I think you are missing the fundamental part of the article about the calorie expenditures being adjusted based on non-fat body mass.

So, yes Michael Phelps eats a lot of calories, but him (and other pro athletes) have spent their lives building muscle and keeping fat reserves down. Michael Phelps I think is at a 5% body fat, while the average American is 18%+. He needs more calories for that extra body mass that most people the same height don't have.
I think something is being lost in the reporting. The article itself mentions 2400 kcal for a 75kg woman, and then a paragraph later talks about Race across the USA runners burning 5000+ kcal.

I think the key is in this sentence: " According to Herman, humans who are more active don’t have that much higher TEE as you’d predict". ie, you have a higher Total Energy Expenditure, but it's by less than you would calculate from just adding the energy expenditure of the added exercise.
Well said. Exposes their own bad habits and understandings. Wonder if there are nonprofits that offer training for journalists on this stuff.
My tactic is more trying to get people to either think through or substantiate their claims or positions than simply focusing on "unpopular opinions". Including in some recent exchanges with you. I make a point of challenging what I suspect are viewpoints adopted for conventionality rather than empiricism or reasoning.

That also occasionally seems to unsettle some readers. I think on balance it improves the site. All the more so when people respond or learn things.

(I've certainly learned from being challenged on my own comments, and make my own fair share of errors.)
The reacts are my biggest pet peeve. Someone just simply wants to register they received my message/instructions and it created 4 additional clicks for me to address.
Very cool! I'll recommend to my friends.
Oh, absolutely. All these numbers are pretty conservative. Real life is full of situations like cars breaking, HVAC systems getting too old to repair and daycare closing down for a week and now I need to fly grandpa in with a day's notice to cover for me so that I can go to work.

My point is that HN is full of young people without families who can't imagine how other people aren't saving money. Meanwhile, the cost of raising two or three kids in a high cost of living area would buy a single person a lifestyle that most people would agree is pretty lavish.
Lifting weights is a poor way to burn calories. It’s a great way to build muscle and be healthier, but lifting weights is less efficient than aerobic exercise in terms of pure calorie burn.

e.g. Moderate intensity aerobic exercise burns 200-300 calories in 30 minutes. Moderate intensity weightlifting is 90-130 in the same time. You need vigorous weightlifting to get up to 250 in 30 minutes. Even taking into consideration post-exercise burn, weight lifting will at best get you too the same efficiency as aerobic exercise.

Example data from:
https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/323922#calculating...

Weightlifting is great but it’s not better for burning calories. It’s much better for retaining muscle while dieting, though.
It probably uses Edge WebView2, which is based on Chromium and can be updated on its own.

ZeroTier uses it for its control panel, and installs it on first launch which caused me some confusing as to why i always had to launch it twice to make it appear after a new install.
It's so nice to see these examples are increasing every now and then. Hope to learn a lot and I also would like to know about the use cases of nslookup dot io. One thing that's coming out of my head would be if I would ought to make a non-targeting crawler of some sort and not implement my own dns crawling infrastructure and just use nslookup.io and just cache the results.
Hah, I must admit the shadow of that question crossed my mind while I was writing my post; for better or for worse I do not work for teams :) I'm currently on the power-query side of the world, and have largely worked in the data/distributed systems space.
It seems the last blogpost was from Aug 2018 [1] and last commit in the repo from June 2021 [2], so it doesn't look very maintained at the moment of writing this comment (Feb 2022)

[1]: http://skiplang.com/blog

[2]: https://github.com/skiplang/skip
> But come on, really. Pretend it was Trump and Fox

Either there is a factual basis or there's not.

And who are you talking about? Do you have any basis for me saying whatever you are implying? Are you saying everyone says it? Do you have any basis for comparing Axios to Fox? And if it's false for Trump and Fox, isn't it just as false here - you therefore know it's false?

> I obviously can't prove it

There's a lot of territory between proof to empty fabrications. You don't provide any evidence or more than two dots of data on a big graph - which you arbitrarily connect and claim the new line is a trend. Does that person even still work at Axios? In what role? Is there reason to believe they were involved in this article? What about others at Axios - including those directly involved in the article - do they have biases and why aren't they just as likely to affect this article? What about the author or their editor? If Axios had that bias, can you point to other similar articles?

It's absurd to reason, 'this article might reflect well on the White House, therefore it's biased'. Isn't some positive news inevitable?
Waku Connect – Decentralized Messaging
What's the alternative to trusting BW? If it's reusing credentials then you just have to trust them more than any other authenticated service. I'd say that's the model that applies to most people, they're not going to self-host or manually sync between devices.

Why trust BW over other providers? Because of third-party audits and signals of good-faith like open source.

Why trust BW over self-hosting? Well, I don't. Or rather I have more confidence in being able to recover from a failure on my part, nevermind that they're probably less likely to suffer from technical issues.
I think the implication is that you don't know how many accounts into HN someone is.

For example, I could make a burner and appear to have 0 karma, but still have however much I've got on this account - much like sveno appears to have done.
Storage Engine Comparison Between TDengine and Prometheus
A 787 holds 127,000 litres of kerosene and a Falcon 9 holds 175,000 litres of kerosene. That 787 will travel 13,500km on that fuel (1/3 the circumference of the Earth), whereas the Falcon 9 can go all the way around the world on its fuel.