skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I do: mathjax is served via HTTP, the website is served via HTTPS, so it's blocked (by desktop FF, at least) as mixed content. *.github.io websites used to be HTTP-only back when it was written, IIRC, but now it's HTTPS-only. Apparently in the desktop FF that blocking can be disabled in the connection information menu, though it still blocks that for me after disabling.
I think the point that OP is making is that this site’s guidelines say to use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait; don't editorialize.
I could be wrong, but there seems to be a good amount of content regarding projects releasing AGPL to prevent commercial competitors from using the source code against the creator.

Maybe Amazon is too big to fight?

Some reading in case it's of interest:

https://www.google.com/search?q=using+agpl+to+protect+agains...
Are there really any microwave ovens that use klystrons? I thought most if not all commercial microwave ovens used magnetrons.
That seems like an expected outcome if you consider support requirements a relatively rare event though.
A few episodes of The Outer Limits come to mind.
"Do one thing" is too short to mean anything.

Originally it's about avoiding the quadratic explosion of the number of things that must be implemented. The method is to replace M * N separate pieces of code with

- a single extra X thing

- M + N pieces of code

- a way to compose these M + N pieces of code to get the M * N you wanted in the first place
They did of course not wire the money directly to North Korea. It was a multi-step process of money laundering, involving currency exchanges, cash and casinos, in several jurisdictions.

Every authority along the way must be on board with the reversal. When the chain is broken, as when cash is laundered at a casino, somebody will be left holding the bag. You can't reverse the cash back out of thin air.

Had all the money been found still sitting pretty in an account, I assume things would have eventually been all settled.
I think it's likely that SpaceX recognized that FAA approval could take a while, so they started putting more polish into the launch infrastructure, booster, and ship, rather than just trying to iterate on launches as quickly as possible. But that's just a hypothesis from an armchair observer, I'm not sure if they could have rushed launch pad readiness any further. I've also heard rumblings that there may be regulatory issues with the ground storage tanks for fuel/oxidizer that may require changes.
On Experiencing Joe Rogan
From the article:
>>> Joe Rogan seems like an affable guy. He reminds me of many men I have met in the gym: cheerful bros who are open-minded to an alarming degree, meaning to the point where no idea is so insane that one can be sure they won’t find it persuasive. They could vote for Bernie, they could go Nazi, they could start believing in alien abductions or QAnon or chemtrails. They are not deep thinkers, so they can be excessively impressed by the fact “a study found” something, or “a doctor says” it. They are sincere in wanting to know the truth, they are not outright malicious, they change their minds (sometimes daily), but they are not trained in the research and critical thinking skills that are vital in sorting science from pseudoscience (or the loopy conspiracies from the true ones). >>>

Admission, I've listened to Rogan here and there for a few years, rarely getting to the end of a podcast. I happened to pick one randomly last month, after not listening to any for awhile, and it was the one with the doctor who claims to have invented mRNA vaccines.

I listened with an open mind, but my alarms went off as the guy started injecting more and more hyperbole and FUD into the conversation. There were a lot of things he said that made me go, "well, what about this?" E.g. my gf and my ex both missed their periods the month after the vax. But they came back, and there hasn't been some mass sterilization event that we'd surely be aware of if, as this guy claimed, the vaccine produced spike proteins in sufficient quantities and that those were attracted to and decimating womens' eggs and ovaries. What I heard was a guy trying to use his science degrees and a vague history in immunology to push a long-running antivax fearmongering tactic about women being sterilized, which as a conspiracy theory goes back to the old "great replacement" and antisemitic theory. And I was kinda angry listening to it, because my question to him would be, if it sterilizes people then how come Israel gave it to everyone? I'm pretty sure that Israel is in the business of keeping Jews alive and having (us) reproduce, and avoiding another genocide.

But Rogan didn't ask anything, and I had to turn it off after about an hour and a half, because Rogan kept just saying "oh, wow." and "oh, no really?" Like... give the guy room to talk, sure, but the whole incredulous act and like, really, doctor, you don't say thing... it just struck me as BS. As insincere.

And that episode I randomly listened to turned out to be the one that Neil Young went nuts about, and all that. So I listened to Rogan's apology and thought I'd try one more time tonight; and his newest is with a climate scientist from BP who talks like my dentist and is about as convincing, while Joe keeps going "oh no, really? And they're suppressing you? Omigod!"

At some point you have to just accept that he isn't the openminded bro with no agenda that you want him to be, and he's actually just trolling and platforming trolls. OTOH maybe this is the point where a lot of gullible people kind of realize that (myself included).
I've written an API Fuzzer that (among other things) tests specifically for things like this: https://github.com/Endava/cats (with a lot more other unicode special chars). People many times forget how big the Unicode standard is and that a lot of Control Characters are used by different processors for specific logic not-very-obvious logic.
I'm targeting desktop, but your point is good to know, thanks. I will keep it in mind.
Musk is more of a great entrepreneur. His track record is quite impressive.
Totally agree with you with the gatekeeping. This is an informal conversation, and you’re just a random person from the internet. There’s no standard you must be held to, and people shouldn’t take what you say to be some statement of empirical fact.
May be. But think not about the utilization or optimization for a moment and focus on the maintainability and buildability aspects. Something that looks this regular probably be both built and maintained through pure automation. I mean self driving is super simple in this layout (as they mention their transport is automated). Compare the same to the ever expanding cities that quickly run out of central space and end up having a premium center and poor suburbs.

Obviously line is not the only thing that can provide these benefits. How about a large square or circle with the center purely reserved for green space. Anything beats the shitty cities we have today where people stay outside because they cant afford the rent and have to travel towards the center for work.
Same here. Safari, Intel Mac Pro, Monterey 12.2 .
> If anything, the GP feels unpleasant for trying to present its parent comment in the worst possible light, in an overly snarky tone.

Pointing factually and patently wrong assertions is not a personal attack nor being toxic.

A comment or article does not have first-move advantage for making false claims free from negative opinions or corrections. If you make a blatantly false claim and you're called on it then that's the Hallmark of a healthy community having healthy discussions.
Newegg RMA'd the board to Gigabyte, didn't pay the repair fee, got the broken board back and then put it back to sale. That's either a big fuck up, or fraud.

Gamers Nexus sent the board back without even opening it, Newegg didn't inspect the return to see that there was a giant RMA sticker between Newegg and Gigabyte where they clearly marked the board as broken, complete with inspection date. Again, that's a really big fuck up on Newegg's part, or just outright fraud.

Newegg also sent Gamers Nexus an email detailing how the board had "thermal pate" on it, "meaning that it was installed". And when Gamers Nexus got the board back, no thermal paste was found on the item, which was sold as an open box anyways. That sounds like outright fraud to me if they make false claims about the board's condition.
Akamai has edge workers?
I would love to know which subreddits the author was frequenting. My experience is completely different. I'm not saying there aren't kids just trolling or bashing, but they are a minority. 5.8k karma points in 12 months despite the occasional "downvote storm" on some of my comments.
A similar problem exists in modern video codecs. You want to update the decoder with diffs based on some shared state. The problem is you don't really have "actions" you can do. You can say "start with this key frame" and then "this macroblock moved to here" but the fine detail of the change is likely unique and you need to send that diff explicitly.
Qt for WebAssembly: soffice
Application exit (TypeError: Cannot convert "undefined" to int)

Safari (current) on MacOS (current) on a Apple M1
I spoof my UA anyway because of the sites that don't like my browser and insist on Chrome.
And Hey explicitly doesn't support IMAP
Don't you get blacklisted with prejudice at the vendor if you chargeback?
Yes and no. Things were different, for sure. Hell end 80's I hung around a random polytechnic school at age 14, where I played to my hearts content with their professional CAD stations and programed their robotic arm. I had no reason being there, where it not that we visited once because my mom knew someone there, and the IT lab guy took a liking to me.

But I'm reasonably sure that if today I bumped into some random kid that was obsessed with anything 'geeky' that makes me fondly remember when I was that age, I'd jump on the opportunity. Wouldn't we all?
Being remote only decreases the human aspect of work a lot and makes your perception of your colleagues as unidimensional (they are whatever you make out of the text they write in a PR or a document) and not having camera on makes all this even worse. It depersonalizes work relationships.
This looks terrific, thank you! I just browsed the PDF, every single page that I looked at is useful content. Just for example, the page with the graphs of position, speed, and acceleration. I'll be honest with you, though. I understand the need to market and be edgy, but the profanity is completely out of place and is a factor in me not buying the book for my teenage daughters. I teach them to present themselves with dignity, and I would be undermining that education by introducing a profane book.
In a video, a bar with a color matching the rest of the object would be less noticeable; it would just appear as if it was blank.
Well, a man gotta do what man gotta do. If you like the perks of working from home, no commuting, better time management etc.. you have to have some obligations.

For me, that obligation is to see your face on the meeting, because I would see your face on a real life meeting in person.

Why is that important, well, we can't substitute facial non verbal expressions by :) :( :/ etc...

I often present and give lectures, now remotely, and it's difficult to just watch your screen and slides, and you don't see reaction of the people who listens to you, not only audio reaction, but non-verbal, facial reaction.

So, for me it's a basic thing, if you seat at home, work, remotely, the bare minimum is to turn on your camera, especially if you work in fully remote international company where you have never meet your colleagues.
Thanks for everything, I love bc, use it relentlessly. Rest in peace.
I always wondered how people get these funny Twitter names, thx!
I think this story is both right and wrong. I take a lot of notes. But mine are a bit more like descriptions to myself. To me they are invaluable because I forget too easily.

As a software developer there are too many technologies, libraries and tools to master. I cannot keep it all in my head.

But I find that that writing articles around what I have learned is most effective. I put those online and I can later use Google to relocate them. I actually do this quite a lot.

I also found Ulysses and iA writer very useful as they let you categorize notes in a hierarchy and store in markdown. I have most so much notes from using obscure formates.

Sticking to markdown has been my best choice for note taking for many years.

Another habit I have found useful is to begin highlighting and scribbling in the margins of books.

It allows me to reopen a book later and more easily recall important stuff. I avoided this most of my life as I wanted to keep books in pristine conditions, but all you get is this perfectly nice looking book which you read at some point but which no longer hold value because you will never bother reading the whole thing over again.
Wouldn't an algorithm just like this one also be able to work on really blurry (i.e. far away zommed in) photos too? Especially with a huge corpus of trained content?
Verbatim mode means we search for exactly the terms you put into the box. Quoting terms means we search for exactly the quoted terms. That's what I meant by them being them same.

So if you did this search in verbatim:
[search for this]

It's the same as:
["search" "for" "this"]

in terms of the instructions we're getting on what to retrieve -- look for content that has all of those words and only those words. No spell check. No synonyms. Just those words.

The ranking of the results might differ, because we probably use slightly different ranking systems when using verbatim versus quoted words. But in either case, the retrieval requirement is the same. Results should have all the required words.

I don't really see what the link above is saying to somehow refute all this. That link is about a quoted search for ["eggzackly this"] and nothing to do with verbatim mode. And it says that it found those two words in that order with punctuation...

Which is what I explained elsewhere in this (now huge) thread. But to give it again:

Typically the reasons people believe quotes are not working when they are is because:

1) text appears in ALT text
2) text is not readily visible on a page (maybe in a menu bar or small text)
3) there's punctuation ("dog cat" will match "dog, cat"
4) page has changed after we've indexed it (so view the cached copy, if available)

In the [eggzackly this] example, that's what was happening as the poster saw -- we found those words separated by punctuation, which we interpret as a space, so the phrase is matched.

Personally, I wish we'd fix the situation with punctuation. I get that's confusing. But that's not a new change; quotes have operated that way for ages.

Most important -- quotes SHOULD work as you and others are expecting. We WANT them to work that way. That's why we spend time looking at these reports saying they're not. I have spent lots of time doing just that. We find the matches. But if anyone believes they aren't working, and the reasons involved above aren't happening, let me know. We'll get on it. We want them to work as expected, and we want everyone to feel they're working that way.
Would a life-saving device qualify as essential?
Same on iPad. Maybe it has issues with ARM?
This isn’t Reddit. Doxxing is scummy.
Disagree. As a science, Psychology is largely based on self-reporting.
The difference that sticks with me is this:

Linode: "We're really sorry, there's a kernel bug and we absolutely have to patch it. See here for the CVE. We're scheduling it for time X but you can do it in advance on the web panel at a better time for you."

Digital Ocean: "Isn't it great? We're rebooting your machine at time X and you'll get new better stuff! No, there's no way to change the time or delay it."
The motivations of adults are, usually, not the same as those of younger people, so that some people may be more skeptical to respond, too. Obviously, I'm generalizing here. But there are logical reasons behind that.
I have a big heavy 20 year old Trinitron monitor which I still drag out and use from time to time for the simple reason that it continues to outlast every modern screen I've bought to replace it.

It can do 1600x1200, though I run it at 1280x1024 as my eyes aren't what they were when I acquired it second-hand for $50 so many years ago - yet I can still hear the mosquito buzz when its not plugged into anything so maybe I'm not completely old yet?

Its days are numbered now, not because of the electrics but because the plastic casing is getting very brittle and cracked. I can see there will come a day it won't survive the short walk back to my storeroom.
IBM revenue was $54.1 billion in 2021. Mozilla around ~0.5 billion - a ratio of ~100. Thus, Mozilla CEO should get only 0.2 million not 2 million.
Oh man.. Incredible. eBPF, WebAssembly are going to change the software landscape significantly.

Question - if whole office suite can be loaded, I suppose Figma would already be doing WebAssembly?
Largely the negative prices are a side-effect of feed-in tariffs, where (some) renewable projects get paid a fixed price/kWh regardless of what the actual spot market price is. So when there's an oversupply of these subsidized renewables it pushes the spot price to negative.

I think newer renewable support schemes have been designed to avoid this problem, either by cutting off the feed-in tariff when the spot price goes to zero, or then by restructuring the subsidies as some kind of investment support (state guaranteed very low interest loans or such) rather than paying for the generated electricity.

That of course doesn't change the fundamental issue, in that in a grid with increasing amounts of variable production renewables and the price determined by marginal cost of the most expensive producer, the price swings will be larger than what we previously were used to.
Shockingly, I found the same study, and you are correct.

Factoid: the second richest kind of heterosexual household in the US, on average, is Asian woman, white man. Interestingly, Asian-Asian and White-White lag significantly behind both.

Almost paradoxically, from a purely financial outcome perspective a white man is expected to be better off marrying an asian woman, while an asian man is expected to be better off marrying a white woman.

I didn't realize there was a pair like that where both male and female are statistically better off financially marrying the complement, but it seems white/asian pair is the winning combination for maximum expected income?
I tried it out. It still leaves a lot of the original information in the redact. Is it enough to reverse? I can't say it definitely is, but I would not be willing to risk something important with it.
I have personally experienced managers who say one thing to my face, and then put something else in my records.

If thyroid cancer is what it took to get me out of what he turned into a hellhole, then I’ll take it.
Termux Apps Vulnerability Disclosures
I really liked Dan's reasoning around SRP

"SRP mandates that you separate the rendering and business logic of the component. As a developer, having these living in different places leads to an administrative chore of chaining identical fields together. The greater risk is that this may be a premature optimisation preventing a more natural separation of concerns emerging as the codebase grows, and as components emerge that “do one thing well” and that are better suited to the domain model of the problem space."
When I tried to get a chargeback from my bank they terminated my account as it was too much trouble.

I bought some electronics, turned out it was a scammy company. After six weeks, nothing shipped, merchant agreed to refund me. Asked card company (Cash/Square/Block) for a chargeback. Week later merchant ships something, FedEx fails to deliver and it gets returned to merchant.

3 months later Square asks me for all documentation. I give it to them. They say I can't have a refund as the package was delivered. I tell them "yes, delivered back to the merchant". They say "sorry, our policy is that if it was delivered somewhere then we won't do a chargeback. I know that's not the outcome you wanted." Then they terminated my account. LOL
> It's like saying the least toxic venom on the planet is the pinnacle of non-toxicity... I mean it's still venom.

If all you see is toxicity, wherever you look around, then perhaps that warrants some introspection and a review of your personal definition of toxicity. Odds are you're picking way too many false positives.
Sounds possible, but wouldn't that defeat the purpose of the yubikey, or at least undermine it?
Or Epic Sr.!

Who doesn't want to be an Epic Senior™?!
I imagine that would be the same as a black fill, just in a different color with noise.

I've used the original image data as a fill, but scaled down, so you get a mosaic effect. Then I randomise the tiles in that mosaic and then I blur. The result is that it seems like the original data was redacted but in reality the original data has been scrambled to such an extent that it can no longer be retrieved.
Love this. I wrote a draft with some of this but thought it wasn't substantive so deleted..

The gist to me is this product has been done before and doesn't seem to solve much or save much time IMHO. Hey.com seems better and does help with some personal email problems (spam, social and marketing emails)

This product seems like it wants to be a business tool without a lot of those core features.

You mention a lot of great inter organizational tools.

Front is awesome I've built plugins for it for our clients currently working on one right now. They have done multi inbox, multi agent/user really well.

But to me the $ would be for business use. If this product can bring in say salesforce data or purchase data as context in an email for example, that's where the money would be IMHO.

Like if you are a web store, someone replies to their receipt email they want a refund/exchange. The UI presents your companies' process to do that in one or two clicks, since it knows the email address & can parse the email for an order #.

Maybe for employee to employee too but seems like not much money there. IDK maybe it can integrate and figure out git integrations as an example of parsing email content and providing context for replying.

P.s. this probably doesn't matter much at all maybe I'm a jerk for writing it but that video voice over recording is awful it sounds like it was done on an employees laptop. Especially for - it sounds like - people with a big exit, connections to capital. Maybe on purpose though! because I also hate the over produced bell xylophone bopping along hippy hoppy modern vector graphic people demo videos too lol
If I needed to go as far as to do a chargeback against a vendor, I probably don't want to use them ever again anyways.
I didn't read the article at all. I got my information from the article's source: The GN videos. The sticker clearly states "DAMAGED BY USER CANNOT REPAIR" and "CPU SOCKET DAMAGED". Just to clarify my previous comment: This isn't a single inspection gone wrong. Given the many cracks this board had to fall through (and the many other complaints) this seems like more of a systemic issue.
I’m going to slightly disagree with some of the other answers here, since I actually did travel and socialize a fair amount myself during the university years. It was fun, but if I could give my younger self advice, it would be: your financial life is starting now, not in 10 years. Travelling is interesting but humans are similar everywhere and people have lived happy lives for thousands of years without yearly international travel.

In terms of career advice: interview your employers just as selectively as they interview you. Take your time making a choice. Don’t hesitate to leave for better opportunities, even if you’ve only worked somewhere a short while. Do side projects. Try to charge by value, not by the hour; get some economic multiplier.