skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I’ve seen even this fail once, although it was unusual circumstances. Black box on what turned out to be slightly off-black text using a PDF highlighting tool. Not the ideal way to do it. When printed and scanned you could just barely read it if you had a monitor with a bad viewing angle or adjusted the contrast. A paralegal caught it before it went out.
So much is in the domain of Captain Obvious.
It's also true that both sides must want war for war to occur at all.
I don’t know CSS. I agree even I don’t understand TailwindCSS advantage. It’s like writing inline styles which we are told is a bad practice. Plus to get create a button rounded I end up adding so many classes in my html. My html is now is hard to read. Again I have to know all possible combinations to style something in my html. Now tailwind css guys come up with ui components and we might need to pay for it. I’m definitely missing something here or some ignorance
Use Tridactyl?
Twitter did a similar thing to combat misinformation IIRC, that's why i mentioned Jack.
Tbh I think there needs to be some dedicated tool for censoring images. Even with this method there is a small chance that it isn’t 100% opaque. I have seen several images where you can pull them in to gimp and adjust the color levels until even the slightest color difference becomes blown out and you can read the censored text.

It’s just too easy to mess this stuff up.
"In a libertarian view, you aren't allowed to use anyone else's property, including to dump toxic chemicals. With strong property rights, they would be forced by the courts to completely make people whole."

Having to go to the courts for everything will always favor people and institutions with money. The little guy simply can't afford lawyers, expert witnesses and so on to challenge players with deep pockets.

We need institutions like the EPA who enforce the rules and we need them to actually do that and not be captured by industry or underfunded by politics.
> With strong property rights, they would be forced by the courts to completely make people whole.

We HAVE strong property rights in the US. If you can prove harm from a company you can make a lot of money from them. The issue is that proving harm is a very costly and time consuming endeavor.

How do you make everyone whole when the damage done by a company exceeds it's ability to repair? What about the irreparable like toxic waste in a water supply?

Even if we granted the premise that this is a better system, how is what we have today made better by installing cronies into the EPA which systematically gum up and deregulate as much as possible before having stronger property rights in place?
How did that work in 2008?

Every area will be slightly different, but I don't think it's realistic to say prices will never go down. Over the long term it will continue to increase, but there will be periods of volatility.
One thing that still leaks is the exact spacing between words adjacent to the black boxes. This is a particular concern one only one or two words are blacked out -- for example a name. With a known font (with known character widths and kerning tables) and a known text engine applying those kerning rules, there's often very few combinations of letters that give the exact pixel (or subpixel) width blank space.
There's nothing quite like a calibrated P22 phosphor display in a dark room.
At least in part this seems to be due to the profiles that Google has built. Whenever I try to use Google in anonymous mode, the results become noticeably worse.

Which, of course, means that it is yet another barrier to entry for any would-be competitors.
I always change the text and _then_ pixelate it. So if someone goes through the exercise of reversing the pixelization, they'll get the wrong text.
Your comment about people with "more organizational power" may be an accurate reflection of things, but I don't think it's necessary to explain this increase in people using rust at work. It could be that more and more people are using rust for small ad-hoc scripts, which might have been written in python or java before. These small things might not require any organizational approval, but people might be more comfortable now using rust (either because their own skills in the language have improved, or because they feel more comfortable justifying the use of rust, even if they don't need to).
+1 to this. I only recently learned that concrete/cement production is major factor of co2 emission that significantly bigger than a meat production for example. Sounds like modifying this production method is more effective way to fight global warming than me start to be vegetarian.
The first question is--if I understand what you're proposing--(relatively) easy. The second is much harder, perhaps impossible.

The reason the first question is relatively easy is because of syntax (sentence order, but also the order of words in phrases). If it's a real language, that order is not random; the English word "the" shows up before "man" much more often than it does before "listens", and so for other words. This is true even in so-called free word order languages, which are really free phrase order languages.

The other thing that could make the first question relatively easy is morphology. If you've decided to make a language that has inflectional morphology (in English, suffixes like -ed and -ing), that also helps determine whether the language is "real", because in a real language not all words will take the same affixes--you can't say 'theseing' (these-ing) in English. In other words, the affixes that you find on a given word are not random.

Of course if you decide not to give your language inflectional morphology, this won't help--but if you do that, then your language's syntax will have to be more rigid: in a language with case marking affixes, like Latin, you don't need word order to tell which noun is subject and which (if any) is object; but you need a more or less fixed word order in English, because (apart from pronouns) we don't have any case marking.
Netflix is not recommending what they think you'll like, they are recommending what they want you to watch. Once you're a subscriber, they want to keep you there as cheaply as possible.

This is exactly what their data analytics has told them to do.

Have a few popular, quality tv shows with star-studded casts as loss-leaders to bring in new viewers. Otherwise the model is to produce and recommend the shows that get them the most eyeballs per dollar; the bare-minimum to keep their subscribers there:

- Stand up specials are dirt-cheap, quite popular, and provide never-ending variety.

- Ditto with 'reality' shows, bake-offs, make-offs, expose documentaries, etc.

- Old sitcoms and b-movies that have a proven re-watch-rate.

Throw in a handful of first seasons to keep the FOMO up, and you've got a captive audience on the cheap. Maybe one or two will catch on and become the next loss-leaders.

They may not have the quality shows that are 'running laps around' HBO and AMC, but by any of the metrics Netflix cares about they are simply running laps around HBO, AMC and everyone else.
> Giant black boxes everywhere is quite the distraction

Opaque gray boxes then?
The CPU core/cache uses its physical addresses to route loads and stores, but they don't have to go to the memory controller on the chip. They could go to the SMP unit if the memory controller for the data is on another chip. Or a PCI host bridge on the chip. Either directly to its register space, or to the register space or memory that belongs to a device behind it. These addresses are called "MMIO" memory mapped IO and are the way configuration is done. They are also slow, low bandwidth, synchronous.

x86 has "ports". I don't know about modern implementations but I would guess they are done with MMIO out the back end of the core (e.g., the CPU turns inb/outb instructions into accesses to special memory ranges).

Either way MMIO is the way to configure devices.

DMA is how to move data between device and CPU or devices. But nowadays with high performance devices, you don't set up a request and then send a MMIO command to process that request, and then get an interrupt and do a MMIO to get completion status of the command. The commands and completions themselves are DMA'ed. So you have ring buffers (multiple for a multi queue or virtualized device) for commands and completions which get DMAed. You do the MMIOs and interrupts only to manage starting and stopping (fill, empty, etc) conditions of the queues.

DMAs can go direct to caches in some architectures, but as I said L3 caches are only so large, and data volumes so large that it can be hard to arrange. You would hope your queues are mostly cached at least, but in reality I don't know if that actually happens well.
It's occasionally pretty frothing at the mouth worthy:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23988056
As well as many people of any gender and/or unspecified age.
From https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html Otherwise please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait; don't editorialize.
I'm definitely in the camp that worry about the feature/complexity creep. I saw it with Haskell. Haskell 98 is a pretty nice and simple language. GHC Haskell is a monster. This matters when you try to read other people code and the overuse of experimental cool new features becomes a major burden for comprehension.

Rust is already a very large language and for intrinsic reasons pile on a load more complexity than Haskell (just look at the iterators).

I write this as a fan and advocate of Rust.
The article is about thermal printers, not laser printers.
Concrete Reinforced with Basalt Fiber Tested for Use in Roadways
Glad you enjoy it! Dark mode is coming :D It's high up on our list and we're setup for it.
Anagram for team meats.

edit: Welcome to the Meatverse
This seems counter to every libertarian I've encountered in the wild. I've not met a libertarian that thinks any regulation is OK. An agency like the EPA, in particular, enforcing a large host of regulations is a ripe target for libertarian rage.

Most libertarians will say we shouldn't have publicly funded police, schools, or fire departments (and plenty a libertarian city is going without fire departments). How then could you envision a publicly funded environmental protection agency?

"Taxation is theft" is the credo of the libertarian.
See https://computingwithinlimits.org/2021/ , https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.10597
Heh, I rememeber the last time I bought from Newegg, I bought a Motherboard + RAM combo, and when I went to assemble my PC, it would not boot. After a long time searching, it turned out the RAM + Motherboard combo I had was the reason.

When I brought this up to Newegg, they actually told me they do not test their Motherboard + RAM combos to make sure they actually work. I think it took me two months to get my money back as well.
Has someone made a demo of that?
I hear that g search uses humans to quality check search results. How can I sign up to do this? From what I have read, it is invite only
This reflects how I often deploy Airflow as well (usually on GCP as Composer)

We use DBT to manage the DAG for the BQ transformations, put this in a container and deploy it into the kubernetes cluster that airflow is running on as a single node.

Airflow can then handle the scheduling and DAG nodes for non DWH dependencies such as loading/checking for files, kicking off tasks that need to run after the DWH refresh and the like.

I find once it is set up it is extremely easy for small teams to follow the pattern, and the single view of all the pipelines running is a great benefit - as well as handling the logic around last successful runs etc., that would need to be implemented manually if using simple cron jobs.
I love this! However, I wonder what your growth/sustainability plan is. One of the first things in a 2 sided information marketplace is to nail the growth and retention model.
Appreciate the warning for those of us on non-wired connections!
Sidebery – Firefox extension for managing tabs and bookmarks in sidebar
Actually, you can get a readout on lexical semantics (the meaning of words) if you have a large enough corpus (much larger than we have for any extinct language). The method uses a vector space of word cooccurrence (look up word2vec). It will tell you what words are semantically similar. What it won't tell you is what those words mean in the real world (unless possibly you have pictures with captions). It's like being able to see mountains in one direction and a lake in another and a valley in another direction; you can say you're going towards one or the other of these features, but (ignoring the sun and stars) you don't know whether that's north, south, east or west.
maybe because its easier to persuade car owner to buy self-driving car.
I wonder if there is a compendium of what different companies call their own workers internally. Do all companies do this? Also kinda interesting how it doesn't seem Googlers ever became Alphabeters or whatever
Hey we don't assume everyone uses Gmail. There are advantages to focusing on Gmail to start - it's got a really large market and it was the fastest way to validate our idea. We have plans to integrate with other email providers and eventually be our own provider as well.
From what I've heard people install browsers with ad-blockers pre-configured to get around Apple's limitations?

I just wanted uBlock Origin that I already know and like.

It's a shame Google doesn't do extensions for Chrome on Android.
Look up "square-cube law". It governs everything about animal size. But not vehicles, so much.

The principle is that 2x size, i.e. 2x length, 2x width, 2x height, gives you 8x volume and, for animals, mass. All that mass has to be kept fed and aerated, and produces heat. But the surface area didn't go up by 8x. It only went up 4x unless you changed the shape a lot. You probably can't get skin to shed heat 2x as well, so you have to be careful not to produce 8x as much heat, instead.

This is all fine up to, say, the size of a giraffe or elephant. But an elephant that runs for five minutes is in for a bad time.

Vehicles are mostly empty space and skin, so they have different sorts of scaling problems.
Ukraine defense ministry, banks hit by cyberattacks
I think it's more likely the JPEG blocks which straddle the box edges simply don't cover any meaningful part of the text. 12 pt font at 96 DPI is 16 pixels tall, meaning 50% of the vertical height of a line simply wouldn't fall into the blocks straddling the edges of a line-height box. You'd get ascenders and descenders but not much else. Tops of numbers or all-caps I think is best case.

Though, web images now are being served in higher resolutions (200+ DPI) for "retina" displays, and scanned images are generally 300 DPI, in which case you'd be lucky even to get ascenders and descenders.

I'd be curious to give it a try though. If Facebook memes are any indication, many humans are totally oblivious to near-unreadable levels of artifacting.
It is almost as if they want to hasten their inevitable irrelevance in the eyes of anyone under 40.
Wow, things have come full circle. I built and launched a browser-based office suite in about 1998 called Office Wherever that used a Java Applet.

VCs laughed us out of every meeting.. "No-one will put their private documents on the Internet! You're mad!"

WHO'S MAD NOW, HUH? Huh? Huh...
Clever. Monospaced fonts improve things, with the tradeoff of making it trivial to know the number of characters redacted.
If more platforms supported JMAP we would totally start with that (it's similar-ish to Gmail's API for what we need). Eventually we will support IMAP/SMTP integrations (maybe by wrapping IMAP in a JMAP proxy).
Let's wait and watch. If Google makes this as feature-full as the ChromeOS on chrome devices then it will be a nice thing to have but then wouldn't that hamper the sales of chromeos devices?
Yes, I agree for this case.

I was only elaborating the more general point that in practice merely being faster can let you do new things.
Ignoring full page replacements ('Showing results for "eggzactly that", to see results for "eggzackly that"...) I think this is all just punctuation related.

For instances, on the ["quotes don't give"] example, the first result I get is

https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/tag/never-give-up

If I do a find-in-page for "quotes don't give", I get zero results. Oh no! Perfidy!

... but, if you look more closely, you'll find this string waaaaay down at the bottom:

> tags: don-t-give-up, don-t-give-up-on-your-dreams, don-t-give-up-on-yourself, don-t-give-up-quotes, don-t-give-up-the-fight, encouragement, ...

Thanks to the wonders of tokenization, that "don-t-give-up-quotes, don-t-give-up-the-fight" gives you the string of tokens, "don t give up quotes don t give up the fight", which contains the exact phrase "quotes don t give", which is the tokenization of the phrase "quotes don't give".
All this talk of RTMP without a mention of RTSP feels a little strange.

I have seen RTSP scale quite well, is widely supported and in the form of an open and clear standard.
“Ah! Well. Nevertheless,”
Here's a video of Matthew Liao, the Director of Center for Bioethics at NYU, speaking to an audience about deliberately infecting the populace with a genetically engineered disease to make them allergic to meat:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pxGlE9knOf0

His position carries a great deal of power and influence, and from the reception of his talk, it is clear that his ideas are popular on the Left.

This isn't a "PR problem".
If a webpage doesn't show up on Google, it might as well not exist for most practical purposes.

Regardless of why exactly this is the case, it's not a healthy state of affairs.
You can reach out to support@shortwave.com with more details about the error you're getting. We'll try to figure out what's going on
You still got the source?
I don't think you are missing anything, but allowing DBT to contain all the models that make up your various pipelines and reference each other mean that you can schedule your various pipelines at different cadences and use tags to refresh the relevant DBT models from a single code base.

It sounds like in your approach this would be writing this dependency logic into each DAG you schedule on airflow.

In the same way you would interpolate your jinja SQL before copying it into the database, you would use dbt compile or the output from a dbt run from the target/ folder and copy that SQL into your DB console or to share.

EDIT: This means your T is a single airflow node in each DAG, though I then still use airflow for the E/L tasks around it
I feel like the pace of Rust language evolution slowed down significantly after the 2018 edition and the work on async shortly thereafter. Most of the more recent language changes feel like pretty minor ergonomic improvements, things which always should have worked. I suppose we got const functions (can be evaluated at compile time), and const generics (allow you define fixed-length vectors for size N). But those features are well established in other languages and they don't interact much with anything else. And I'm sure I'm forgetting a few things, but that's sort of my point—subjectively, not a lot has changed for me recently.

What I have seen is a lot of good work in the larger ecosystem. And the tooling continues to improve.
The first link you find, given your search engine choices, localisations, and/or personalisations, today, may not be the first link I find. Or someone reading this in a week, or six months, or six years.

Please for their sake if not mine, post a specific link.

Thanks.

Also, I suspect: s/Literary/Literally/
The only reason they could see in the first place was because of those profiteers...
No worries, Rust has a looong way to go before they reach C++ levels. And the editions system even makes it feasible to pursue some ex-post simplification, though that requires a number of years to complete and cross-linking across editions must be preserved regardless.
https://cryptome.org/cia-decrypt.htm
You could resample the image to a slightly smaller size before saving that would redo the compression bucketing.
Anyone targeting the xbox, playstation, Nintendo, steam deck, etc or are we still pretending that they're different?
Then we can make the reverse argument, substituting "high art" for "the art of the downtrodden," which is sanitized and repackaged for the mainstream. The underlying idea — that the art which inspires popular artists is distinct from the art produced by popular artists — is the same. It's still a simplistic model, but it illustrates the point equally well.
It's still heavily dominated by Libertarians. They want an anarchist revolution, without the effort of actually organizing and sustaining it.
What it proves is that despite all that personalized data they have, it's the naive implementation that gets them the most clicks per dollar.

So the question is this: if they're not (and never were) using that data for what they say they were, what are they doing with it?
Amusingly, I fail to see how such an engine would resolve the problem. Groups of people would just choose the point of view they liked, and label the other as misinformation and... we're back to the original topic.
This also runs in Brave for Android.
Thanks for linking, I struggle to navigate these long Twitter threads without an account so I didn't see that.
https://www.nhtsa.gov/press-releases/nhtsa-allow-adaptive-dr...

I cannot speak for Toyota, but mid 2021 build US Teslas and onward have this hardware that will be activated with a software update (you can test a Tesla for this functionality by running light show from the toy box; if “TESLA” is projected from the headlights, they are hardware capable).
Don’t point out something wrong immediately
Especially as reduced scope might torpedo the entire reason for the game to exist. A buggy game with a large scope may be orders of magnitude more successful than a well made small game.
I was on a phone. It's easy enough to check wikipedia and follow sources from there.
Im not sure that is true, unless you count being dead as unconscious.

Sleep could also be an excited incoherent state.
I'll keep that in mind, but not ready to fund it at this point.
> Do you read left RTL, middle LTR, right RTL; or right RTL, middle LTR, left RTL? (Just curious.)

YES.
Wonder if there is something similar in spanish
ML over historical languages is no different from ML over currently spoken (and written) languages, with one crucial exception: if the language is still in use, you can get a bigger corpus.

About dictionary making: there are several programs "out there" that are already set up for making dictionaries, probably better than going from scratch with YAML. SIL's FLEx is very good; their older Shoebox program is also useable, but like the C programming language, you can shoot yourself in the foot. There's another one out of East Africa, but I can't remember its name.

I don't know much about Australian languages, but I think most of them have a lot of morphology. If yours does, then you'll want to do something about inflected forms of words (think English walk, walks, walked, walking); you probably don't want to store all of those forms in your dictionary, instead you'll want to choose a base form from which the others can be derived. Again, tools like FLEx allow you to create morphological parsers that help with that.

Finally, I'd suggest that if you haven't already done so, you should take some courses in linguistics. It will make it much easier to reason about your lexicon, the language's grammar (syntax and morphology), and so forth.
> ECDSA inside ZK-SNARKs is a starting point that unlocks many other ideas!

Is there a good way of reasoning about what type of ideas this unlocks?