skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Thanks! Where possible, we integrate with brokerages' public APIs (we refer to these as "sanctioned integrations"). Brokerages like TD and Alpaca implement OAuth such that we can get delegated access to user accounts, but that's not the case for other brokerages (ex: Robinhood, Webull, etc.). In the latter case, we'll reverse engineer brokerage APIs, which we refer to as "direct integrations" since they use the same endpoints that the brokerage's official clients use - this has some advantages over screen-scraping, specifically in regards to auth success rates and reliability.
I'm with you, and I was right about the apple watch. This(vr in general) feels like a one-off of the next big thing, like the pda was to the smartphone.
Alternatively, you can use exponential notation to compare numbers of very different sizes while writing them similarly and using the same unit.
>I don't think it was a pedantic argument or a misunderstanding. I think Lascaille understood your position and disagreed with you, not just pedantically but over the substance.

Yes, I was a bit disappointed with the reddity response. The sites admin has an incentive to have their site appear first. The quality of their content may not suffer but they will additionally try to identify how the algorithm works and 'game' it.
I would guess you're right but I'm not 100% sure! This channel is pretty responsive, you ask on the video.

This one is fascinating too - it's just intonation vs 12edo comparison. You can really hear all the beating in the harmonics in the EDO one.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AgB4TrV57AU
And if people are writing actual product reviews, where do they publish them now, given that blogs are dead and social networks are a black hole?
No, it is unethical to charge the user a fee then sell their data. For free products it is a different story.
Most people can't separate their sense of self from their genetic traits.

If you're smart or tall, for example, that's deeply tied to how people perceive you and your identity.

In some cases, like intelligence, it's easier to justify the pride by saying you worked hard to get it -- even if it's more a function of genes, upbringing, etc.

In other cases, people are happy to have a good quality, and perhaps the unearned "pride" is a flaw that we are all susceptible to.
That's odd. I'm running MacOS so perhaps the leak is in the OS layer somewhere.

Oh well. Looks like I'll just have to give Firefox another chance _again_ at some point :)
What sort of metadata are you extracting with machine learning? Doing more than simple keyword indexing? I'll admit, I don't know very much about the particulars of building a large search engine.

How large is the ML model that you're using to extract the metadata? If that can be done in a distributed way, then it might let people pre-process their own feeds and share them with others -- either on-demand, like you mentioned -- or caching them centrally so that your servers are still the authoritative repository.

Anyways, everything you've built here is wonderful, and I definitely want to keep tabs on your progress and support you however I can! Thank you for sharing!
Just to be clear - the Japanese factories where in the cities. The Japanese pulled apart their factories and ran forges in people's backyards.

Japanese civilians in battle zones routinely walked up to Allied soldiers with grenades to blow them up. They threw themselves off cliffs rather then surrender.

We still have this concept that somehow the German and Japanese citizens where not involved in the actions of their governments. It's as much of a myth as the myth of a "Clean Wehrmacht"
Fair enough, thanks for explaining.
I wasn't aware. The examples given here are all cases where the monad doesn't commute, hence my question.

If two monads commute you can show that the composition of the two is (trivially) a new monad, but I'm not sure if the converse also holds.
Yes to all for me as well. Though to be fair on actions v. words, even if the two don't match up, I wouldn't say it invalidates the words. It'd just make the person uttering them a hypocrite or a liar. Or maybe just someone who can't live up to some idea they have, who knows.

You're inferring me being upset though and ignoring what I'm pointing out specifically; the language. It isn't the drift, it's how the drift.
> unless you're passing a parameter that introduces an additional effect F into the function

This definitely is overkill, I just wanted to illustrate that it was possible. You're correct: usually, a generic effect indicates you're passing a closure to the function that may execute additional effects:

fn filter_users<F>(
cond: fn<F>(User) ->{F} Bool,
users: List<User>
) ->{F} List<User>

If filter_users calls the closure cond, effect F will be performed, so filter_users must perform F as well.

In the case where there are no external effects, F will be inferred to be the union of the empty set and whatever effects are used in the body of the function. Some languages are actually pretty strict about this, and explicitly declaring an empty effect set may mark the function as pure, which may not be what you want!
I have seen this in real life, my sister cut off contact with my family as we differed with her over a couple social issues. Not even differed, we just did not take them as seriously as she did. Have not spoken to her in over 3 years. Pretty strange.
Ummm, no.

No need for even more in-between software prompting for passwords.

I’m sticking with certificate+publickey SSH
This is awesome. Reminds me of Plaid. Congratulations on launching and good luck.
I get it, because the similarity is that it is a weakened version of the virus, just like how our non-mRNA vaccines have been structured
Gods of the Copybook Headers. (edit: Head ings, of course)

They may be old fuddy-duddies, but damned if they aren't right more often than not. Even when we'd rather they weren't.
This looks so cool. I've always wanted something like this, especially being able to write the policies in Rego. I can't work out if it supports delegation though, i.e. service A temporarily allows service B to access a resource which normally only A has access to.
All charity done by big companies smells shitty to me... you're a multimillion $$$ company, and you want me to donate 20$ to feed the poor?
You'd have to do more than "speak as a historian" to convince me. You'd have to convince me (with references of supporting and opposing works) that this is the mainstream view for historians outside the US.

"Non-populist" historians is a weasel word that will let you discard any historian's opinion that doesn't fit your thesis. I propose we simply divide between "American" and "not American", which is more objective.

> It's also not that the United States opinion diverges from much of the world.

That's wrong, most of the world disagrees with the "terrible necessity" narrative which is so popular in the US. Of course Japan disagrees with it, being on the receiving end (and having their own blind spots to their crimes), but the rest of the world disagrees as well.

It's normal, the US is fixated on a single narrative that lets them cling to the belief they are always the good guys. Any other country would do the same, agreed -- everyone is the hero of their own story. But only one country dropped two atomic bombs on civilian populations.
As pointed out many times - under any definition at the time, Tokyo, Hiroshima and Nagasaki where military targets.

On the other other Kyoto was not - and was removed because of that.
And? If Japan could have, they would have done what they had at their disposal to neutralize us as their enemy.

War is not fine. Dropping bombs is not fine. But they would have. They had plans to build bombs for exactly that, to drop on US cities. they also had plans to engage in biological warfare on US soil. So, yes, they would have. Japan was indiscriminate when they attacked China. If they had had the ability to reach US soil, they would have waged the same here, no doubt about it at all.

Germany would have done the same too. I mean, those guys were not fooling around. Do you think the US, the UK and the SU should have taken it easy with Germany because eventually we would have won a "kinder" (no pun intended) war?
I agree with most, if not all, the points raised in the post. I'm curious how people deal with:

1. Organizing knowledge. Too often I've seen a lot of well-written and well-intended information thrown into a shared cloud drive or wiki to rot and grow stale. You end up with multiple, sometimes contradicting documents about the same topic, finding what you're looking for is difficult, and before you know it people revert to tribal knowledge and slack DMs to find out what they need.

2. A writing culture can penalize and demoralize non-native speakers whose writing skills may not be as strong as their peers. I've worked with brilliant individuals who felt like they're perceived as "stupid" because their language skills weren't as polished.
DigitalOcean API is not working, in my experience 4th time in last 2 weeks
I'm trying to walk a fine line. On the one hand the 12 note equal tempered scale has almost surely a societal component to it. That is, it was one that won out for weird cultural reasons that don't have a lot to do with some idea of correctness or utility (like why 'qwerty' won out over Dvorak keyboards).

But there is an explanation that does try and get at it a bit more analytically and that's in the paper I linked to. With the above caveats about the cultural momentum, the 12 not equal tempered scale provides a happy compromise between the number of notes to provide a basic building block for music (characters or digits would be an analogy to notes in an octave) vs the number of "good" note pair combinations (where "good" is if the frequencies have a small/simple fraction approximation).

Some of it is hand-waivey, to be sure, but at least it provides a potential reason and a starting point.
Top Chinese uni report concluded China would suffer more from decoupling with US
full title: US-China tech war: Top Chinese university pulls report that concluded China would suffer more from tech decoupling with US

Origin of report is purportedly U of Peking's wechat.
> "You're not the only one, but most of the people who believe like you are Americans."

Conveniently forgetting about the enormous population of China and the rest of Asia subject to the depredations of the Imperial Japanese Army, who also overwhelmingly approve of the atomic bombings. I have relatives who lived during the war or its aftermath and, needless to say, they do not share your concerns in the slightest.

IMO, it's more accurate to say that the handwringing over the bombings is a small minority of Westerners advocating fringe theories that try to paint Japan as a victim rather than an aggressor.
Because that's an ARM MacBook and this is an x86 OS.

Don't take the mickey [UK] / don't come the raw prawn [AU] (I don't know a US version).

If anyone has a Mac new enough to run the current macOS, whatever that is, then this is not for them.

But, as an example, I own a Core 2 Duo MacBook Pro and a 2011 Core i5 Mac Mini, both of which aren't supported any more. They both run MacOS 10.13 and they're perfectly fine, but they can't be updated any more. That makes some people very nervous.

I also had a 2008 MacBook that's stuck on Lion.

This is perfect for such old kit.
1Password cloud product is kinda expensive. $19.99 per month. I didn't see a free option for personal use.

Is there a way I could use this on my devices with my own cloud setup (eg. dropbox/google drive/ etc.,)?
You don't have your facts correct because the vaccine does not inhibit transmission. Some argue it reduces the risk but the data is inconclusive.

It is militancy like yours that is elevating opposition.

I am vaccinated but support anyone that stands up to a mandate, vaccination passes or emergency powers. I don't really have to justify that any further.
We see ourselves as somewhat of a spiritual successor to TradeIt - we're trying to provide high-quality access to brokerage accounts so that people can build better investing apps on top of existing brokerages.

In terms of pricing: we charge a $300/mo base fee for your first 300 linked brokerage accounts, then $1/linked account/mo thereafter, with reduced pricing at various levels of scale.
Hello Dang,

Out of curiosity, what rule did I break? I had a fairly long post.

I had people responding to me but I guess I can't respond to anymore?: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30361631

Mikeyouse said:

>And that idiotic CNN chyron was clipped to be troll bait for the credulous. If you honestly believe that's how the protests were covered, you should spend some time reflecting on where you get your news and who you trust.

This was in response to me posting: https://twitter.com/JoeConchaTV/status/1298863702272344064 and making comment.

This was in the context of my post explaining how non-violence similar to MLKjr and Ghandi is an absolute rule. That saying 'peaceful protest' while standing in front of cars on fire is a violation of the rule.

I feel this is a reasonable and fair discussion.
Europe uses 50Hz AC power, so that anxiety would geographically differ
I'm currently reading "No More Mr. Nice Guy" by Robert Glover. I'm most of the way through, and it has been a real paradigm shift in the way I view myself and my interactions with other people. I've actually owned it for years, but kept putting off reading it because the title convinced me it was some pro-"alpha bro" mentality. But it has been nothing of the sort. So far I haven't done any of the exercises, I've just been reading it and processing it. I'll probably reread it after the first read through and do the exercises.
Just want to add to this thread: Walking. Just take a walk no need for something special! If we are talking a workout routine then that's different, but if it's just a mental reset after a challenging couple hours of work then go on a 15 min walk!
Putin to all: "For the descalation and Normandy Format[0]"

Woman [unknown]: "Yes, for the descalation!"

Putin to all: "I'm tired of this wriggling."

(Putin takes gun and pointed under table to Biden)

Putin to Biden: "Are your hear it, Joe!? It was the bumping of my weapon. I'm pointed rockets into your balls."

Biden to Putin: "Vladimir, why you ponited your rockets on me?"

Putin to Biden: "See, Joe, it is an aswer to your sanctions. Becasue I'm cool, like this whiskey!"

Biden to Putin: "Are You know, Vladimir, you are not the only here. I'm pointed my rockets to You even then you did not 'swallow' Lukashenko."

(Biden takes own gun and pointed under table to Putin)

(Johnson immediately takes own gun and leans the gun to Putin's pants)

Johnson to Putin: "And I join each word, and also would provide weapons to Ukraine."

Putin to all: "We have an unpleasant situation."

Biden to Putin: "Yes, your rockets are pointed to where You tells, and our are in opposit direction."

Putin to Biden: "Exactly. You bothered me with your Javelins, and also Erdogan gave Ukrainians f*cking Bayraktars, and Johnson grenade-guns. Peacefully disperse will not work out. Let's disperse as follows: I do not touch your NATO, and you give me Ukraine under control. 'Like it or don't like it'[1]"

Biden to Putin: "To be fair to said, I don't like it. May I drink?.."

Putin to Biden: "Off course, please, Joe."

Biden to Putin: "... Because before what we would do with You its really need to drink 'to the bottom'."

(Biden drinks all whisky left in glass)

Biden to Putin: "Yeah, like this. Would say, its really cool drink, sir. So, about 'unpleasant': there is only on option to exit."

Putin to Biden: "So, what should we do?"

Biden: "Borys"

Johnson to Putin: "Say 'good bye' to you balls."

(Johnson double shoots into Putin's pants)

[The End]

(one more control shoot heard during ending screen)

N.B. Learn more about ongoing Russo-Ukrainian War.[2]

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normandy_Format

[1] https://edition.cnn.com/2022/02/08/europe/putin-coarse-remar...

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russo-Ukrainian_War
Different countries certainly have different biases, but that does not mean that rational analysis of the problem is not possible. Would Japan surrender on August 15 if the bombs were not dropped? Could the US drop the first bomb on the Tokyo Bay instead? etc.

PS: I am European.
This is bizarre advice. If you care enough to redact information in an image which may linger on the internet forever, you probably care enough to want to do it properly. It's often going to be sensitive personal information like an address.

I mean if you don't care, why bother at all?
Hi, this is Omri, co-founder of Aserto.

Your comment is spot on - that's exactly what we've found. Authorization needs to be deployed right next to the application - no one is going to take a dependency on a SaaS developer API that is "the internet away", when authorization is in the critical path of every application request. That's why Aserto is packaged as a sidecar that you deploy right next to your application. The sidecar synchronizes state with the control plane, so authorization decisions are made with data that is locally cached.

It's also the case that authorization has to be done in the context of users that come from an identity provider. Aserto automatically syncs users from identity providers / directories (Okta, Auth0, etc).
RCMP orders FINTRAC-regulated firms to cease crypto transactions with protestors
Humans are excellent sources of entropy. If only economists understood thermodynamics.
I think the flows are different. If I want to open up an account at amalgamatedbank.com, I probably type it in or I come from Google. Unless something is super wrong with my machine and someone's built an incredibly convincing bank website that matches what I would expect, I'm probably fine.

Now think about coming back to that site after I've made an account. I may be coming from an email, a push notification, a text message, a targeted ad, etc. The risk is a lot higher because I'm not initiating the flow by using a trusted search engine or typing it myself.

Or like, to be more succinct, it's because MITM rarely happens and phishing happens constantly.
DeepMind Has Trained an AI to Control Nuclear Fusion
I'm in the middle of The Ministry For the Future[1] by Kim Stanley Robinson. I keep conflating what I read in the news and what I read in the book. It gets in your head that well.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Ministry_for_the_Future
And yet, some stuff does get blocked, and even manages to get blocked routinely or on a hair trigger. I thereby stand 100% by what I said and whatever moral implications might be inferred... but can now add that those same decisions / priorities--during the time when you were part of that exact team, though accepting some generous room to quibble if you explicitly quit in protest or spent your time on the inside fighting for some kind of change (and with maybe a narrow exemption for "I really really needed the money", as I get that some people are stuck)--also show your true colors (which you likely, or course, already realize, but I think should always be explicitly stated).
That is a pretty rude comment. What is this person foisting on other people?
Realize that the risk of failure does not equal the risk of catastrophe. If your side project fails, in all likelihood you will still have your health, wealth, and sanity. "Catastrophizing" is a psychological term for the irrational belief that any wrong move will be the end of you. Be rational: A side project is not guaranteed to succeed, but if it fails all that happens is you have gained valuable experience and are better equipped for your next venture.
Show HN: HN to E-Book – Read HN on your E-Reader
I read HN on my kindle as I find it useful for reading under sun(while walking in a controlled environment) and taking notes. I was running hntokindle.com to offer this as a service for others.

But Amazon has recently made sending bulk emails to the Kindle impossible by requiring 2FA over registered Amazon email address for each item sent to the Kindle.

Hence I've stripped down HN to Kindle code to enable local transfer to any e-book reader which supports .mobi format and made the project open-source.
But that's not the main point of CDNs, their main advantage is to off-load resource requests to servers close to the user and avoiding serving huge amounts of static data from your own server. They also offer numerous other advantages (DDOS protection, hiding your server IP, etc.), but also come at a privacy cost and risk of data centralization (a good % of internet traffic goes through Cloudflare for example).
> Modifying your core parser at runtime though, who would do such a thing?

Perl? Its numerous language extensions allowed it to stay competitive for such a long time. Every time someone says "language X can do Y but Perl doesn't have that syntax", a new CPAN module is born to amend the shortcoming.
DataSet: Unlocking the Power of Live Data for a Better Tomorrow
You need to experience failure to realize it’s not as bad as you’re making it out to be.
Reading the news is, in my opinion, nearly diametrically opposed to investing in yourself. You will get a better understanding of current events (upon hearing of them from others, the best filter that money can't even buy) by reading history books exploring the past couple hundred years. The news is an entertainment product where personalities are constantly making statements or predictions that never pan out, and they never face any penalty for it. Look at how nearly everyone involved in the media push for the Iraq war still has a career and is seemingly respected by their peers. Look at how half the media lost their heads over the Trump/Russia thing, leading people on for three years straight, never amounting to anything. Someone who completely ignored that entire thing would be massively better off intellectually (and be better informed about the world) than someone who hung onto the daily "the walls are closing in" predictions.

Daily or even weekly, maybe monthly reading of the news is over 95% noise and is a pure negative for personal development.
>algorithms will be smart enough to auto de-rank copycat sites or blatant plagiarism

So... if google creates an algorithm to detect copycatting/plagiarism it's okay for them to deploy it, but it's not okay if they do it by hand?
I often see your "related" comment at the top of these posts and they mostly seem to match what shows up when you click "past". Would it make sense to automatically add a prominent link to the most recent or most commented on post in the header so you wouldn't have to copy & paste the links as comments?
I have been using KeePassXC on Linux for years, it works great.

On Android, you want KeePassDX which can be found on f-droid.

I have multiple keepass databases and keep them in sync with a self-hosted Nextcloud instance.
Ha ha ha.
https://cloud.google.com/citrix
Appreciate all you've done over the years! It's one the sites that I keep going back to hoping it's still up. :)
While you are 100% correct a very simple counter example to the op that a lot of people have likely heard in their life is someone tuning a guitar. It would have saved me a lot of time if people couldn't tell the difference. :D