skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
On STS, exactly zero of the tiles were the same as any other. Many but far from all had a (1) mirror image piece, on the other side, which was really no help. The SS tiles can be, and so are, much thinner than STS tiles because of the steel backing. But losing a tile might, too, not be fatal.

The issue is not the shapes or even how to keep them attached during hypersonic flight. The immediate problem is that they require personal attention to each and every tile, after each flight, before they are ready to be re-used.

SpaceX engineers are strongly motivated to come up with a system that does not require such treatment, but that does not mean they will get it soon. Or ever. Probably they will be trying to come up with a ceramic-fiber fabric covering that could be peeled off and replaced quickly. It would still need babying, but the vehicle would not need to be there all the while, as with the tiles.
You’ll get bullied for anything, really.

If they can’t find anything to bully you about that you actually are or are not doing, they’ll invent something for you to be blamed for doing or not doing.

Bullies are bullies and they need to be kicked in the balls or have their jaws broken repeatedly, until such time as they stop being bullies.
Warning, page vseems to hijack the back button
Please stay home forever and never get out because some people cannot get vaccinated. No exceptions. I hope those unvaccinated prove scientists right some day. It would take decades.
> it emits an electron and an antineutrino. If the neutrino were massless, the electron could carry away the entire energy of the decay.

Photon are also massless but they are still able to carry energy? Why would neutrinos be different here?
> does doppler effect or relativistic stretching affect the photon wave packet?

Yes.

> aren't photons immune to relativistic effects since they travel at v = c?

No. Lorentz transformations still affect photons; they just affect them by dilation (they change all of the components of the photon's wave vector by the same factor, without changing the direction the wave vector points) rather than by hyperbolic rotation.
Strong survivorship bias here. Not all science 200 years ago was good :)
When a coworker asked me for my recommended method of creating and publicly sharing redacted copies of documents which (in their unredacted forms) contained PII for children, I told them to do this, in no uncertain terms.
On mobile and desktop, I'm getting a message saying that when you search for ["kitchen boss" "g320" "disassembly"] that we have no results. And there's not much we can do if there are no pages we find that match all those words you required be present. There just aren't the pages.

What we can do is try searching for all of the words, so perhaps you'll find something useful that way. But even we can tell when doing this that the results might not be what you want, which is why that automatic warning about maybe these aren't great matches.

IE: we can't show you what we've got for a query where there are no exact matches. It's impossible. We can show you what we got if we don't require all the word be present. And we can tell you what we're doing. And you always have the choice to restart the query in another way if you don't like that.

Now here's something else. You probably used the quotes because I'm guessing you figured it was better to tell us exactly what to do than trust us to look at all the words and analyze the context and so on and see if we could make matches generally. If you had done that, just searched for [kitchen boss g320 disassembly], then the first web page result is the instruction manual for your sous vide machine. It has cleaning steps, which I'm guessing also might be what you're after? (It looks like it's just take off the outer casing).

Those results, doing it directly like that, are different than when we gave them to you after your quoted search failed. and that's probably because when you gave us quotes, and there were no matches, we might have tried some stricter matching to keep closer to the original requirements rather than use our general ranking.

To wrap up: maybe don't try the quotes at first. It's totally fine to type in a long natural language query like [how do I take apart a kitchen boss g320] and if you do that, the instruction manual is right there.
Does the product not received work better? From the merchant side those seem to be easier to win since tracking is sufficient proof, and the case review probably doesn’t spend too much time looking into used versus new item.
And the harm like what I'm saying was that her father was informed of her medical condition through that mechanism rather than from her.
Samsung shits out something like 50 different phones every year. That’s about one a week. They don’t have time to be maintaining anything, they have to be totally focused on shitting out the next phone.
I used to strongly support the mission of Mozilla. When I first read about the practices of upper management I felt like a fool for ever having donated in the past.

That is not going to happen again and I don't even like Firefox so much anymore because of it.
It was just rhetorical. As the sibling comment alluded to, it can come off as quite anglocentric. There is some historical relevance to this point - much of the technology we use today was created with such biases baked in. I apologize if this came off as snarky.
"There's a section in PiHKAL where Shulgin talks about a researcher measuring properties of psychedelics using the twitches of a sheep's stomach. That's because it contains serotonin receptors, and psychedelics induce muscle contraction. This is a common way to measure binding affinity to 5-HT receptors today, but it was quite exotic back then."

Not all psychedelics affect serotonin receptors. For example, muscimol[1], the psychedelic constituent of amanita muscaria mushrooms affects GABA receptors, not serotonin receptors.

So the absence of muscle contractions caused by serotonin activation in sheep stomachs would miss the psychedelic activity of muscimol and other psychedelics which don't affect serotonin receptors.

[1] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muscimol
This is... basically what I'm saying? How will you make a translation without knowing what the words mean in the real world? You can get a vector that says 'oiufd' is to 'flarewq' as 'rye8poq' is to 'nmjrewq'. I don't really think that counts as anything like deciphering the mysteries of Harrappa.
The extreme hacktivist group Anonymous hacked and doxxed them. [0]

[0] https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/feb/14/foreign-money-...
That doesn't mean the quoted words weren't present in the content. It just means our system didn't think creating a snippet around those words was the most relevant snippet. Which I get, in some cases, actually would be better. It's something we're looking at.
Also looks to be a significant MAOI from the data table at the end. MAOIs are known to be antidepressants; I'm not sure if they addressed this in the paper as a confounding factor.
Perhaps this could be accomplished by making them front or insure the cost of the expected liability — being at least the cost of removing unsupported devices.
/r/all sorted by hot is items roughly sorted by popularity. Only if you sort by new, would it be a flood of contents by time.

We can take a quick survey of /r/all sorted by "hot" as of this moment. The very first post I see with AoC is literally this:

"""AOC tells Joe Biden: Cancel more student loans to have "any chance" in 2022"""

The top posts? All in support. Where is the dominant conservative force that warps conversation around it.

HermanCainAward, literally a subreddit celebrating the deaths of the unvaccinated tops all regularly. How the hell is that "covid skeptic right dominant"?

Is your idea of "reddit is conservative" that reddit hosts conservative communities at all? Even if they're smaller than the left-aligned communities there?

EDIT:

Some other quick statistics:

Size of /r/conservative: 923k

Size of /r/lgbt: 864k

Size of /r/hermancainaward: 500k

The "lol antivaxxers died" community is literally half the size of the largest conservative subreddit. The LGBT subreddit is the same size as OP's bugbear /r/conservative. The very much Dem supporting /r/politics is an order of magnitude larger than either of those, at 8 MILLION subscribers.
We already know that “personalized ads” aren't much netter than context one: https://techcrunch.com/2019/05/31/targeted-ads-offer-little-...

Also: https://www.forbes.com/sites/augustinefou/2020/06/03/those-b...

I can't understand why every company want me offer “personalized” service. It never works, and if I can't manually set preferences, then it's not personalized (because “personalization” means exactly that).
This is genuinely how California/SV tech culture feels to people looking in, me included.
I'd argue that muscimol, salvia, ketamine etc. are hallucinogens, and reserve the label of psychedelic for serotonin agonists. But others argue they deserve the label, so perhaps we could compromise on "classical psychedelic."
McCabe wanted to write an exposé and at some level he did: the sheer amount of beer the belgian monks were drinking would do my liver in completely. But, putting that to one side, he writes well, and he writes interestingly of what the monastic life really meant in those days. McCabe is probably available as an E-book, he was published by the rationalist press.

Hebblethwaite wasn't trying to undermine the church, he really believed. He wanted to help people understand the complexity of the back-story behind the positions they saw at the front, but also to see the machine at work. So he does a lot of writing about how things really get done. An Amazon reviewer is not as kind as me and said he writes well but its just no longer applicable. I can't say, but I still think I enjoyed reading it and would recommend. This one isn't an epub, you have to find secondhand copies.
>Please correct me if I’m overreacting but I feel like Unicode in most cases is just a giant security flaw

well ok, it seems to me that it is more likely that in most cases Unicode probably has no effect on security one way or another, but there are a few edge cases where it does. Here is one case where using a particular character in a filename led to problems 8 years ago in an operating system historically known for not having the greatest security.

We can see here also a clear example of the edge case theory, almost every character in every language supported by Windows would not have caused any sort of problem when used in a filename. But there are a few characters where they would, this
is probably an example of things programmers think they know about unicode or language or whatever, because we go around thinking that each unicode code point just represents a character in a language but some encodings have ways to represent little weird behaviors of particular languages, for example interlinear annotation characters https://www.unicode.org/charts/nameslist/n_FFF0.html and it is generally weird behaviors that end up being security hazards (not sure if there is any security hazard in interlinear annotation characters but wouldn't be surprised)
12.2.1, latest everything.
> Am I the only one who redacts info, prints it out, then scans it back in?

if you have the source document, redacting from the source (by actually removing and replacing with an appropriate placeholder, not obscuring, the content) and regenerate the static (e.g., PDF) version.

If you are working from print, I think scan and redact by digital replacement (not overlay or otherwise obscure) would be sufficient. Redact->print->scan probably helps somewhat (especially if the scan is low quality) if you are using a bad redaction method to start with, but why do that?
Does anyone really investigate any cyber attacks? It seems like it is pretty much the wild west out there.
Sort-of related things:

- GreenPAK

- Programmable Array Logic (PAL)
May I suggest Hematite?
`Mostro son io': a Galilean Riddle and its Solution
He didn't equate those things. His argument is not that both parties are equally bad. It's that neither party is one he feels he can support. He writes:

"This is about the point where some (most likely some in my own business) will scream: 'Both sidesism!' That’s the now-cliche argument that any criticism of Democrats whatsoever must be some kind of journalistic reflex to equate the parties, when clearly one is worse than the other."

"One is worse than the other. But that doesn’t mean we have to feel jazzed about supporting a party that would grade our worthiness as people on a sliding scale of identity. It doesn’t change the fact that the broad center of the American electorate — traditional conservatives and liberals both — no longer has a political home."
> In these years, Cherry recalls, the potential of the computer had barely been tapped, and if asked what she did for a living, she would say that her job was to “see what kind of neat new things I can make the computer do, and in those days the computer wasn’t doing a lot, but it was super interesting and there was a lot more stuff you could make it do.”

It would have been so different. What we have now must feel like an Eternal September to anyone who was around back then.
The favorable reading is that friending a celebrity on Twitter is a historically low effort way to make contact, even if it is correspondingly low value. Everyone is “close”. This means there are more opportunities for connection.

It smells like a natural progression from the “old” internet of newsgroups and email.

Is friending a celebrity on Twitter the same as getting an email or phone call from Ken Thompson on how to fix your old Bell hardware just because Lorinda Cherry put him up to it? No, of course not. But that connection could happen over Twitter.
i think the laypersons definition of solve is getting their stolen things back. That's what i would expect. How much, if at all, jail time or fine or whatever the person gets is between them and the state, i need no revenge
I coded out during an operation to repair a ruptured intestine that was a complication of Crohns. I was also told if I had waited even a day more that the sepsis from the rupture could have killed me. It's definitely possible.
Lorinda Cherry earned a Masters degree in 1969, so guessing she was born around 1948, meaning she'd be about 74 now. Steve Wozniak is 71, Stroustrup is 71, Larry Wall is 67, Bill Gates is 66, van Rossum is 66.

Torvalds at 52 is the most clearly "next generation" of those people.
There are various drugs that alter consciousness. That shouldn't be possible if the brain were only a receptor.
Lesson 1: don’t build your mansion on someone else’s property.

Lesson 2: don’t use gmail. At least, don’t use it for anything you actually care about.
I think the problem with the PLT space is that it's not monetizable the same way that e.g. ML is. If you get a Ph.D in ML, you have an easy shot at a high paying industry job. Not so with a Ph.D in PLT. That alone provides some force for research.

It's hard getting enough investment in the PLT space because the costs that are borne can't be easily recouped. It's a classic problem with research. And we know how much the world runs around money right now.
Redaction can be needed for a document, but redaction can also be needed for a video (car's license plate, credit card number, etc.). As far as I know, there's no video editing software that recommends black bars and, for example, the official Adobe documentation at https://helpx.adobe.com/premiere-pro/using/masking-tracking.... seems to recommend their Masking and Mask Tracking features.

Black bars may look very ugly in a video. Still, are video editing products recommending a process that has a high risk of leaking sensitive data? There might be reasons that attacking redaction in a video is harder than attacking redaction in a PDF. However, maybe it's actually easier in some cases, e.g., with several similar frames, the attack could take advantage of averaging across frames.

Unfortunately I don't see anything at https://hackerone.com/adobe that could get someone a bug bounty for researching this.
Not sure if anyone will appreciate this sketch but it's too relevant to pass up:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=owI7DOeO_yg
Their policy[1] clearly states that it can take up to 10 business days to process a return, and then an additional 3-5 business days to process the refund. If you mailed it on the 24th of last month, it arrived on Friday the 28th, and you received the refund today, that would be 12 total business days, which means they actually outperformed their policy maximum. And if they received it after the 28th, then they actually went above and beyond for you.

But instead of acknowledging the policy, you decided to harass some poor CSR every other day, who didn't have any power to make anything go faster than it already does. I really think you ought to take a moment to reflect on why you had such a visceral reaction to a completely innocuous situation.

[1] https://www.newegg.com/promotions/nepro/20-2902/index.html
I think the culture in my team has evolved to be camera off. Part of that is fuelled by poor bandwidth for certain people. We turn it on for certain events, as it adds an awkwardness when everyone is both cam off and muted, and you can't tell if they're laughing at your jokes.
Congrats Linode. Been a happy customer for more than a decade. Cheers
My take was that it was a racist comment, its as if OP was implying that non-whites are less likely to do something about it. Either way, I also hated it. Why do people always, always have to bring race into everything lately?
I'm not trying to gaslight anyone. And what would be the point? To say something works if it demonstrably doesn't work?

Yes, I tried this for some of the presets before I replied. It worked. It still works.

My sincere apologies for not specifically testing custom date range option as well. I should have; you are correct. That won't work. I'll pass it on to see if there's a way it can. My apologies again.

If you need to do this another way, what I also said works. Do it in the search bar using the before/after command. Just quote all the words, and that's the same as verbatim.
Isn't this kind of thing supported natively with C++ coroutines as of C++20?
My suspicion is that any broadly successful community aggregator will have enough people holding belligerent, incompatible views, that one could never feel truly safe participating there.

Your loathing (for lack of a better term) of the discourse on Reddit has me wondering if the differences I perceive between our political and cultural tolerance stems from being on opposite sides of a few gnostic / agnostic boundaries, or if the difference between our demographic pigeon holes has spared me orders of magnitude of relative grief, allowing me the additional advantage of getting less overwhelmed by ambient asshattery.

I will readily admit that the latter could easily lead to the former; I guess I wonder if the 2 —> 1 causal order holds overwhelmingly in practice, and how to satisfactorily determine that in a way that manages to be honest, systematic, and compassionate.
I wouldn't exactly call this an antagonistic behaviour. If it can provide some immediate relief by virtue of being an MAOI antidepressant, and promote the kind of brain plasticity to help people make better pathways, isn't that actually good?

If you meant "it might be that it helped but not because of neuroplasticity effects" you could be right. But assuming they have good basis to think it does, I don't see being an MAOI as a confounding effect in outcome.
I searched for "eggzackly this" and all 10 results on the first page contain the phrase, although most have punctuation in the middle.

Looking at all 22 results (without opening the "omitted results" section or image results), the phrase became harder to find off the first page, but I tended to find it in the source code, or the DOM, or the cached version of the page, or by disabling JS (sometimes requiring a combination of those techniques). I found it in 21 out of the 22. The one page I couldn't find it in (the dolls one) looks like a frequently updating page, and it was highlighted in the snippet, so it looks like it was there at the time of crawling but not now; the cache isn't there for that page.

Full disclosure I work at Google, but not on Search.
> If those internal sites are so crucial, then maybe they shouldn't build them like a house of cards

They were built by a PhD candidate in 2012 and the source has been lost to the mists of time. It's still critical to the research group's workflow though, so they switch to Edge instead of rewriting it . A month later they encounter an article on HN asking "Why is Firefox losing marketshare and how would you save it?"
I think you're right about paths but aside from that we have website urls, usernames or similar identifiers.. People look at those and assume that they can compare them. If I see `google.com` I assume it consists of certain characters that represent a specific institution. Are we doomed to live with ascii for the forseeable future or is there some form of reduced set of unicode that we can use without these types of impersonation attacks?
Is it me, or are retailers and service providers suddenly getting less and less reasonable about returns and disputes? I’ve had to do more credit card chargebacks in the last three years than I had done in the previous 20 years. Fortunately, AMEX heavily sides with consumers against merchants, so this route has consistently worked for me.

I’ve always considered a CC chargeback the tool of last resort, but companies are more and more slamming doors and dodging responsibility to the point where that tool has to be used all the time now.
Tesla says gas generators “no longer rational”, batteries are smarter, cheaper
Example: search for worldle
https://imgur.com/a/8ZjG9u5

Sure, I can use the instead, but how about I get what I did type?
What is a good email provider, paid or not?
Agreeable. But, wouldn’t it be really difficult to evaluate processes? It’s like evaluating safety systems. You’ll always underestimate the system’s impact on safety because a safe system is usually uneventful and asymptomatic. You wouldn’t know if threat is not so grave anymore, or that the system’s working so fine that you just don’t feel it. Similarly, evaluations of processes would pose a similar problem. If people are naïve enough to blindly apply it from one organization to another, what prevents them from wrongly undermining the impact of the process and yank it off like a knowitall?
As for the quoting, it should work. And if you have an example where it's not, please let me know. Quoting is designed to exact match. It shouldn't produce synonym matches, correct misspellings, find content that's not on the page as we saw it when indexed (I think I did say one confusing part is that if there's punctuation, that gets dropped when matching).
Influence politicians to pass laws that further entrench their position in an every spiraling decent to crony capitalism madness ie oligarchy
Now that you mention it, I don't think I've ever had a negative experience at Micro Center, but I've only been to a couple of them.
Spell check doesn't seem to work. When I manually trigger one, the Dictionary dropdown doesn't have any options to choose from.

Does LibreOffice expect the OS or Desktop to provide a dict?
Hetzner Cloud have recently launched a US location so this shouldn't be a problem.
I am in software (primarily in optimization) and I very much want that law to be true, but I am pretty sure it's not.

We use multiple GPUs at 100% capacity (all cores) for ML training.

When need be, we use parallelization/concurrency to use every core in computer for our application.

Almost no computer application today buffers while processing (thanks to parallelization / concurrency)

Software can improve a lot faster than hardware can (due to low capital required)