skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Indeed. Notice the last author.

Halide has had transparent autodiff for some time now. I am guessing, this is follow-on work in the usual academic style. (Not trivializing at all.)

I've been watching Halide for a while as I really like it, intuitively. Also it wasn't that hard to bring up on FreeBSD with a few patches, where it performs more or less exactly as on Linux when configured cpu only. That's solid generic programming, to say the least.

However... I have no recent decades experience with HPC but I would be surprised if dense tensor operations were a significant component of current workloads. Could be though!
.mjs has no typescript equivalent to my knowledge. The alternative is to set type: module in my package.json. doing this broke my Vue.js default projet (no idea why)
therefore browser/webpack has better support for import in typescript than ts-node (what is missing, commonjs support? no idea but the user experience was atrocious)
There is no field in which the prevailing language is more rigid and robotic.
Ask HN: Best examples of programming by example in products?
What are the best examples of programming by example in actual products that you’ve used? Not academic papers. Worst examples?

What possible domains do you think PbE could successfully be applied?
All your proposals ignore the fact that someone with electronic design skills can whip up a GPS tracker that is outside of this system.

You would have to regulate this at the integrated circuit supplier level.

Oops, China; good luck.

Note that a tracking device does not have to transmit any information in real time. Suppose someone wants to find out where you live. If they know that they will run into you again somewhere they could stick a device onto you that just records your movements into flash storage. Then next time they run into you, they retrieve it somehow over some close range wireless or maybe physically. Such a device won't be detected by the presence of signals: it doesn't connect to any mobile network or Wi-Fi or anything.

Or, such a device could just sporadically connect to a network to send a small packet of information, e.g. once every few days.
This is the greatest folly of people getting into programming. When I was in school for CS the dropout rate was precipitous basically until your junior year. This is a good thing in my opinion.

The truth is computer science is the science of computation not how to perform specific computation. General CS education follows the line of most STEM degrees, minus the degree for more advanced math like PDEs except when you're in a specialized scientific computing sub-degree. We all had to take 3 semesters of calculus, 2 semester of discrete math, and one semester of probability. ALL of these are important to various fields of CS.

Programming is rarely discussed. Most ABET programs give you one to two semesters warm up and that's the last time you see programming except for a few elective courses. Programming is a means to an end for a CS major. Once your algorithm is verified mathematically on paper you head over to the terminal to implement it and play around. Programming first then designing is like a mechanical engineer building a car and then drawing the blueprints.

The vast, vast majority of computer science even today can be done on paper (with enough paper, of course). programming is a means to an end. If you want to be a programmer get a job out of high school because it takes virtually nothing except drive to succeed. Getting a CS degree for the purpose of being a programmer is like getting a mechanical engineering degree to be a machinist. Sure, you can do machining. Just like you can do programming as a CS major. But the CS degree is so, so, so much more than programming.

Everything your daughter is learning w.r.t. math, logic, proofing, etc is CRITICAL to the generalization of ideas into algorithms that are language and implementation dependent. A mathematically verified pure algorithm can be implemented anywhere, by anyone, at any time not unlike a complicated math formula. This is why the weed out is a good thing. People who just want to be programmers leave the program and become programmers. No sense in wasting time in a CS degree if your aspirations are to become <language> expert.
Ha! Says the anon account with not even two pages of comments in 4 years

Why not use your real identity if you're so confident your claim is good?

That's pretty creepy and a bit disgusting to post that on someone's Show HN. Be a nicer human!

Tho.. Yeah... Sadly it does say something about how much HN can still improve it's response to Shows that people get so suspicious if there's too many positive comments and not enough negative ones--that they go looking for 'proof'.
I'm not saying you're duty bound to do it but rather giving an example of something which in my experience is encouraged by C since it's the path of least friction.

Try writing a type that can automatically switch layout from AOS to SOA in C, you just can't do it.
I understand that it happens, my question is the prevalence. When I looked into banking cord blood I found a lot of ‘possible’ and one-off cases, but no actual statistics about how likely it was to be useful. That made it unpalatable, especially compared to the known benefits of delayed clamping.
"How Much Are Games Like Factorio And EVE Online Sapping Away The Intellectual Potential Of Humanity?"

https://www.reddit.com/r/slatestarcodex/comments/ml00ac/how_...

>I often wonder if these specific types of games are redirecting a nontrivial amount of human intellectual output into a deadend. They're explicitly geared to lure in the kind of obsessive tinkerer types who've historically driven scientific and engineering progress. Only now, there's little to no payoff for the rest of humanity if they spend thousands of hours consumed by one of these games. What's Newton's modern equivalent doing right now? Probably perfecting a build order in Stellaris.
And like Emacs core, eglot is missing important usability features. lsp-mode may not be pretty, but it fulfills the needs of its user-developers.

Ie, last that I looked, eglot had no equivalent to lsp-install-server.
The Galaxy Tab S8 is so popular Samsung is pausing pre-orders in the US
"More than 200 such games have since been developed for the VCS—helping to spawn the sprawling US $170 billion global video game industry today."

Wow, are my 2600 game carts worth that much? I need to dig those out :-)
US says Russian attack on Ukraine’s capital Kyiv could begin in days [video]
Ashamed to admit this happened to me once. The job output files did have unique jobid-based names, but I didn't account for the poorly-documented fact that multiple clusters shared a filesystem (and I was running jobs on a few) so multiple jobs ended up with the same jobid. Thankfully, I had some sentinel start/stop output that allowed me to automatically detect when multiple processes had overlapping output, and I was able to re-run fractional jobs and only wasted about 5% of my compute time.

On one hand, I hated that there wasn't some fancy framework (like, a database?) to hide the footguns behind... on the other hand, the learning curve was very low and I'm happier about that on the balance.
I'm thinking that the de-globalization we're already experiencing is at least partly responsible for some of the inflation we're seeing (the pandemic itself is the big cause, but I suspect we would've started seeing inflation increase even if the pandemic hadn't happened). Inflation is already leading to some decreases in quality of life.
Has anyone created some sort of Core War Zero?
While on this topic, this is worth listeing to: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlRkLtKqSrY

But as with many things the side of truth that doesn't bring profits to the industry is always suppressed.
"...Microsoft is using React Native for Windows to deliver the Your Microsoft Account page in Windows 11 Settings." (Because they want to expose natively styled website functionality through the app.)

I was worried. Not that I like the ridiculous Windows 10 Settings app, but I do like UWP+Xamarin.
I love Factorio. One of my top 10 best games ever. I am currently playing Satisfactory as well. It is equally good and share a lot of things with Factorio but also has a nice exploratory feel to it.
> 'adult cell' (which I'd assume analogous to differentiated cell)

That's correct.

> I'd guess the transfer process is why she arrived with shorter telomeres at birth?

Also spot on. The donor somatic cell likely had shortened telomeres, resulting in shorter length in the embryo. It's kind of an interesting research question, because telomere length gets "restored" for germ cells (otherwise every time an organism produced sperm/eggs the telomeres would shorten), and these types of experiments demonstrate that there is a limit to that restorative process.
Can't you sue them for massive damages in civil court?
You always have the power to try to not do what somebody tells you to, regardless of their authority.

The actual question is “or what?” Well if you really were there and really did try to disobey that order, you’d definitely be putting your job at risk, unlikely to be breaking any laws, probably risking a physical convention with whoever kept the keys… but it comes down to why… if you really wanted to leave and had a good reason, would someone have let you? I’m guessing probably, but i really doubt you would have that reason or even tried to test the legal authority of people giving that order. Your whole job is to be in that room and something terrible happened, what circumstances would make you want to leave or test the “ you can’t make me” theory.
The main thing I want mapping for is navigating to place X in my car with voice prompts. Osmand is way too slow to notice that I've missed a turn or something like that. So it thinks I'm somewhere that I'm not, and persists in that belief until I'm off course for maybe some minutes. Google Maps is much better in that regard. But both of them really need a user control (pushbutton, maybe even a bluetooth pushbutton on the dashboard so you don't have to look at your phone) that says "mapping app, you are confused! I am not where you think I am. Update location to current GPS reading and recalculate route right now". Also, Osmand is ridiculously slow at route calculation. Idk how it can be so slow. Garmin automotive GPS of 10+ years ago were far faster at it despite having 1/100th the processing power of a modern phone.

The map data itself also isn't that great, but at least you can hunt around for the location you want while the car is parked or pulled over. The route recalculation issue is massively frustrating because it nabs you while you are actually driving, dodging other cars, etc.

I hadn't heard of Organic Maps. I'll look for it. Thanks.
Talk to China about any race other than Chinese for that matter
A collaboration.. and even the article says 8 years of hard work and missteps and still we stick to the "Einstein's genius" narrative. I think the genius narrative is disingenuous to the person and discounts all the effort and furthermore putting everyone else in the position of "are you a genius? No right? So don't hope to do Einstein level work."
This kind of product market segmentation is something that isn't done by technical people. The sales folks think they can extract more revenue from their products by doing this. Once technical decisions are being made by marketing, that's a clear sign that a tech company is in decline. It's no longer about what is best for the product, which means that Intel has lost the focus needed to create technically excellent products. It's definitely a sign of decline.
Red Pocket has their cheapest plan at $30/year ($2.50/month) on T-Mobile. 200 min, 1000 txt, 200 MB per month. Real SIM card. Available only on eBay. No affliation, just a satisfied customer.
Is this in any book? Would love to read about it and learn.
Is it even symmetric? Or is it the coaxial cable “high speed” internet that is 500mbps burst download for a few seconds while they lower everyone else and 10mbps upload capacity spread across a few hundred houses.
If you’re an astronaut, it’s your responsibility to make sure you’re adequately informed, and you are sure to be able to do that, nobody needs to protect you.
Speech input with something like Vosk is a great idea too.
I went to Princeton and took linear algebra - at that time taught by none other than John Conway - of game of life fame. It was by far the best math class I've ever taken. This author's experience is likely valid, but I suspect the professor teaching the course had a large responsibility for its low rating.
> Given my situation, how would you try to convince me that I should learn math and how would I teach myself the actually interesting parts without getting bogged down by doing lengthy calculations that a computer could do.

I don't think I have enough information about you to answer this, but I'll make a suggestion anyway. Since you did 30 years in tech, try Donald Knuth's Art of Computer Programming. Despite the name, it really is a book for the math-oriented. He has thousands of exercises with complete solutions for each, and every exercise has a "rating" (estimated number of minutes to complete), and exercises that require more math are marked as such.

The first volume covers fundamental stuff, the second numerical analysis (with a nice discussion of random number generators), the third sorting algorithms, and the fourth combinatorics problems. You can jump into any volume without a strong background in math.

You can get them used and in great condition for a good price. Lots of people just buy them and let them sit on their shelf for years.
CAD files for the external shell (surface topology) of Steam Deck
It doesn't matter how much money they have - if they don't have butts in the seats, schools won't (generally) offer the course. If you want a huge course catalog to choose from, with appropriate courses for every at least semi-serious level of academic interest, go to a school with tens of thousands of undergraduates. I'd bet Princeton doesn't have astronomy-for-actually-quite-smart-poets either.
Many noble efforts fail this way. You are not alone. This is one of those lessons you learn in regards to keeping your audience narrow, and executing on one thing at a time.

It's embittering, hardens the heart, and makes you want to give up, but you've gotta redouble and bust through it.

And by all means, shame the provider if they didn't live up to their end of the bargain.
I'm pro-lsp, but comparing Emacs unfavorably to other tools "out-of-the-box" is like complaining that your LEGO set doesn't come pre-assembled.
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.125...

http://borax.polux-hosting.com/madchat/coding/corewars/corew...

https://ailab.ijs.si/nenad_tomasev/files/2012/07/Tomashev_di...
Excellent! The expected future value of the comment thread thanks you for that sterling effort.

It was a pretty wonderful homepage right? I don't have any need for it now whatsoever, but this project looks like a useful debugging tool if you need to reverse engineer undocumented APIs. And the author's write up is comprehensive informative and well written. And their site looks good so this is an awesome Show HN I think.
I will give it a try. It looks really promising! Greats Job.
I don't use his service, but he probably runs as many spindles in production as anyone on HN. See rsync.net. Also he's right.
Everything is contextual, and I think you may be missing a bit EQ bit?

You can drive a meeting while still deferring to experts by driving the meeting, and then bringing them in for their expertise when you know it is in their area - which you know when that is and who they are, because you would be an expert in knowing that.

You seem to be sitting back in the meeting and waiting for something to add, which… yeah doesn’t add much? That’s inherently passive.

And if they ask you to be candid, and then recoil when you are, that is potentially because you’re not wrapping up what you’re saying in a way they can process/handle - it could be overly abrasive, or verbose, or whatever.

The reason you may not be getting any actionable advice is they are giving you why they see as actionable advice. But you’re missing a connection here because you’re missing the EQ piece?
Well, I think it could also be disingenuous to presume that anyone could do what he did if you just put in the hard work. If hard work was all you need, we would have a lot more Einstein level discoveries than we do.
It totally doesn't, which is why it's baffling that (either!) author goes into so much detail about "diversity words."

I can put a chart of lexical similarity over a chart of the number of employed airplane mechanics and probably pontificate that by golly, we need to stop fixing airplanes for the sake of intellectual diversity!

And that would be about as well-reasoned.
I very much doubt that is (actually) the case - but that you perceive it that way may be at the root of the problem.
as Bogleheads is for investors
If they don't have one in 2022 it doesn't look like they'll do it for you. Would advise to not take it personally (at least not about you, it's probably personal about Google)
The second time I watched 2049 I thought it was great. First time not so much. Not sure why I didn't like it the first time.
For all we know, Einstein did not “entertain and adopt counterintuitive notions” of time and space at an intuitive level. He just had the right perspective, used the right math, and was just as amazed by the physics that came out of this as everyone else.
> a lot of things makes it into books just because it happened to come to mind while you were writing.

Can’t you ask yourself why this is what came to mind, and why you kept it on in later drafts? It seems like the same question. Said differently, it’s asking why this part works, rather than why you wrote it, right?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_History_of_the_Theories_of_A...

Be careful however, as unfortunately some, for other reasons, historically tried to appropriate this work, and use to try to diminish the contributions of Einstein. Something that of course, is very much incorrect.
> She’d later come to believe he had millions in the bank.

> Over the following six months, Evelyn emptied her 401(k) to loan Wilson $204,000.

I don't know what you do with such people. "He" appealed to her in part by pretending to be rich and then asked her to cash out her life's savings.

She is obviously the victim, but the only way to protect people like her from this kind of thing would be to have a guardian appointed over their finances.
Asana's CEO Has Bought $1B of Company Stock
Though a lot of what say is reasonable, it's of interesting note that NASA has had this issue basically since day 1. Many of these causes boil down to the same issues that caused the devastating Apollo 1 fire.
They'll stand in your way. You will stop. Or, you will push past, in which case they will arrest you for interfering with police, or something along those lines.
Yup, I took CS and had to go through all the rigors that entailed, but I really ended up being a construction worker. I don't mind! Really! But I think if I could do it all over again, I'd take a software engineering BS degree where most of my time was spent engineering solid software.

I did take design patterns classes and such in college, but imagine taking 200,300, and 400 level design patterns classes and learning how to architect scalable systems in the cloud or on-prem.

Of course there would be programming classes too, but I think there's some room for a program that I'm imagining. Boot camps don't cover the engineering and architecture parts so it would be somewhere between a bootcamp and a CS degree where you're writing operating systems and big endean and Big O notation
There's no documentation about that for pretty much any SaaS out there. Any of they could literally disappear with your money and shut the shop down or change its name to continue defrauding others...

Edit: you can downvote, but it's true...
An independent "arm" switch is a reasonable solution. I'd want to be able to bring the crew back if they were incapacitated, sick, etc. Or even just bring the shuttle back so what went wrong can be determined.
If the problem is working from home, then maybe look for a hybrid set-up or a majority office set-up.

Also, what do you think you're missing from the office? Is it the casual conversations? or the camaraderie? Being able to understand the cause might help to form the proper solution.
Nationality != race.
US Congress authorized FCC to fine robocallers. There are now billions of dollars in such fines racked up. But no way was authorized to enforce collecting on the fines, so nobody pays them.
Go on then, give us the info
Does this happen a lot with that specific book? It's what killed my interest in high school literature to the point where I tested out of all the English classes after 9th grade. I actually tried to come up with symbolism for Piggy's glasses, but my theme wasn't the specific teacher approved one, so I got told I was interpretting it wrong.
Maybe IBM, but that's where engineering orgs go to die these days, so I don't really expect it of them.
I don't... the market is so fragmented that the only way for me to have playlist with all my favourite songs is through piracy.
Lawyer should be world-famous for his battle with Chevron, but he’s in jail
> offense

Define offense. Someone suggested it has to be criminal, but does it actually say that somewhere. Does disobeying an order to secure the room constitute an offense against NASA? Depending on the meaning of that word, it could certainly be interpreted that way, in which case arrest is a real possibility.

My guess is they'd arrest anyone who tried, and apologize later if someone proved that they shouldn't have done it. And nobody would actually be punished for the incorrect arrest.
As I read this, the tone and some of the topics started to ring a bell. Fly? Wireguard? I scrolled back up to the top to see who the author was and sure enough it was Thomas from the Security, Cryptography, Whatever podcast that I've been listening to for the last few months. For anyone that enjoyed this kind content you should also definitely check out the podcast he is a part of, the other hosts are great as well.
Not cheaper, no - SpaceX is doing a classical dumping and I'm not sure why the authorities are letting this fly! In general, Elon Musk got a lot of privileges from the government while acting as a Libertarian im words, not deeds! He is no hero!
A tile on the flat bottom of the orbiter had a much lower thermal loading than the carbon-carbon leading surfaces of the wings. That's why they used carbon-carbon there.
Yes there is a community fork: https://github.com/ARM9/bass
"I could have done that, says the crowd, once the work is finished."