skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I don't know. I went to the theatre last week with some friends. One of them bought the tickets and I didn't have her bank details. We organised everything over messenger.

With this Facebook Pay, I could probably just have paid her from within messenger. Instead I had to open my bank app and have it generate a link, copy that and paste it into messenger. The end result is the same; and with the link it would go straight into her account, but its just a bit more clumsy - using two apps, when with Facebook Pay one will do.
For now, I have discovered Doxygen. It generates dependency graphs for all classes and I can browse them. It is compatible with c # and mac os. Unfortunately it doesn't generate a complete graph which include my all classes but it seems like the best fit for mac os.
Perl rocks.
But you can only have one Windows Sandbox running at once...
Something like that?

https://github.com/myspaghetti/macos-virtualbox
Where is Panduit?!?
Don't know about RHEL and I'm not aware of Linux distros that come with Ruby pre-installed. Perl/Python are usually available by default.
Usually we fix that with trains, and in some of our last games we started working on pull (or Toyota) model of resource management, with smelting blocks colocated with metal patches, and various sub-factories pulling resources in by signal-triggered trains
In the tech sphere, what you are saying does not seem to bear out. Tech mergers or buyouts often reduce the value of the combined companies from what it was when they were separate, and usually don't create economies of scale. Tech buyouts seem to fall into three categories: (1) reducing competition (e.g. facebook buying whatsapp and instagram), (2) acquihiring and sunsetting the acquired products (e.g. most purchases apple has made), and (3) hold and sell at markup without having created any of the added value (e.g. softbank's acquisition of ARM). I find it hard to think of tech mergers and buyouts which actually work the way you say these things work.
I didn’t know people consider him a “genius”. Wow, I always consider him a good businessman.
> anyone can pay their way in those journals and publish (sometimes sub par) papers.

This is not true and comments like this are damaging to science.

Open Access papers are still peer-reviewed and by far not all of them make it into the journal. You can't pay your way into those journals.

Of course there are shady pseudo-journals which just cash in on the fee, do not carry out peer review and just dump the paper on the internet. But any scientist should be able to tell such scam journals from serious ones.

True, some journals, like many of the Frontiers series or PLOS One, make it very hard to be rejected in peer review. As long as your paper is reasonably well written and doesn't contain falsehoods it will almost certainly make it to publication. Still, you don't "pay your way into those journals".

Granted, many of papers in those journals report mere incremental progress. But these journals are still attractive for scientists to publish in, for obvious reasons. Publishers like PLOS use those journals as cash cows to fund their higher-tier offerings.

It is fair that the author pays for publication in those journals, since the most benefit is often for the author, not the reader. For the progress of science these offerings are not so useful, unfortunately.
A nice idea, though without the 'must be a word' thing which changes it a lot. On my mobile the colours need to be a bit more visible to earn its name.
LiveView is amazingly productive, and it allows you to make highly interactive webapps much faster than if you make a REST/front-end split, just using regular Elixir.
Almost all the answers I can see at time of replying are assuming a web application. Web applications will require at a minimum HTML, CSS a server side language and probably Javascript.

To meet your criteria for:

no: >multiple programming/scripting languages to learn

You could look at building a Java FX or Java Swing desktop application with a Java server (SOAP or RPC).

Quite a few exploits (CORS, XSS) are not possible in a desktop app or are less likely to cause problems as your users aren't loading web pages.

The Java ecosystem is large and there are many stable libraries and frameworks out there that can help with CRUD application development.

The difficulty with desktop apps is updating the client on users machines. If you can get a Long Term Support (LTS) version of OpenJDK installed on your users machines, updates could be as simple as getting the users to copy paste a JAR file from a network share. There are probably nifty ways to get the client to ask the server for any updates, download the new JAR then tell the user to restart.
>> It's all about what you've done so far and where you believe you could be when you exit.

YC was never about an exit. It's about building something people want. Only after that can you decide what to do with it. Continue running a business was a serious consideration before it got overrun by VCs.
Fair enough. I really wanted to say that even with a tiny amount of instruments, it's still possible to great music but couldn't figure out how to put it nicely. Mega Man did have some impressive tunes, that's true.
agreed. rails.
You need a conflict resolution mechanic. There are games which just don't bother providing one of those at all, and I feel like they're not really games. I don't hate them but I rarely will choose to play one and I can't remember anything from such games I have played, it's just too flimsy.

I've had a good time in games with a fairly lightweight conflict resolution, like certain classes of action are going to involve drawing cards from a (conventional) card deck, but I most enjoy playing something where it's about an even split between tactical combat (which yes, a computer game could do) and full roleplaying. I enjoy 4th edition D&D, apparently enough people didn't that 5e undoes many of the changes I liked.

One of the big problems older games often have is their resolution mechanic traps the GM by allowing for conflicts to end in a way that destroys the story. There should be a chance that our bullshit "merchants" cover story doesn't work and we get arrested, or our weapons are confiscated, or something else interesting happens. But a chance that we're just dropped into a pit of acid and die instantly is rubbish. If we're trying to open the Space Tomb it's OK if a bad roll means all the sentries inside are alerted, or the Galactic Archaeology Police are on their way to investigate tomb robbers, but it's not OK if now the door can't be opened and so the entire adventure is impossible.
‘The Brad Pitt of mountain lions’: how P22 became Los Angeles’ wildest celebrity
A Formal Model of Checked C
>Others have stated that nowadays everybody has a supercomputer in their pocket (implying things got better through globalization) while others pointed out that the average worker cannot afford a home for themselves and their family (implying globalization wasn't so great - at least not for everyone).

I've yet to hear any of the former group actually say that they'd rather live on the street with an iPhone than in a house they owned in the 1960s with a rotary in spite of that being the implication.
In retrospect I should have been more careful the order, as well as context, although I expect those commenting to have read the article too, and the full quote would have be far too long to be included, imho.

(edit)
Freeways is also an excellent sandbox where you can try your prowess in highway design.

https://captaingames.itch.io/freeways

(not affiliated, I just had a good time playing)
Oh, the ethos is old indeed, much older than that.

Paul Lafargue's "The Right To Be Lazy" was written in 1883 and, if we're to make an abstraction of the formulations ever so typical for that time and the historical context, as well as the strong ideology that underpins the work, it makes for an entirely interesting read: https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/paul-lafargue-the-ri...
You might be looking for jsmn.
I find it a little disappointing that everyone (including the OP) assumes a CRUD app must be a web-application.

In a web-application you are NECESSARILY breaking, in all but the most exotic cases, the "multiple programming/scripting languages to learn" AND "external dependencies" requirement. Almost always, the "simple and resilient, can last for a long time" requirement goes out the window as well.

If the requirements given by the OP are intended to be strict, then they need to go desktop. A few things come to mind...

* java swing -- OK, it's not simple, but it is "one language" and quite self-contained, ORM is extensive. Many teams still work on 20 year old codebases in this stuff.

* .net desktop UI's -- .net, especially lately, is a great choice if you want to remain in a "large-enough" walled-garden. For UI, there's a lot to choose from, winforms would keep the OP very strictly in the "one language" zone. If they're willing to go XAML based, then options open up a lot with the trade off that there's a lot more complexity/learning-curve to deal with.

Both of these options have the ability to "launch" from a website (java webstart and .net clickonce), and both could talk through native remote procedure calls, use a REST API or even through gRPC to a service written by the OP in the same language. So it's not like they're inflexible.
So does the RISC-V Haiku port.
Paul Graham is Wrong (2005)
Came here to say I've had success on a number of now older routers purchased from ebay. I mostly own routers from the AC section here but none from the AX section.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Asus_routers
Bluetooth tethering of Symbian S60v3 phones in Debian 11
To be fair, I once heard Richard Branson on the radio telling a story that he was pretty far along in building his empire when he had to be taught the difference between gross revenue and operating profit. I found it hard to believe but there’s other interesting facts out there, like David Boies is dyslexic and prefers not to read.
I agree he makes his point sharply, but I suspect he's probably asked weekly where he got his MBA, so mentioning that he can't even read a balance sheet is a fun way to show that boards aren't always a bunch of soulless accountants with MBAs; that in the case of YC, those aren't the critical skills; but instead being able to quickly assess an idea and the people around it is what matters.
But the window of opportunity is dramatically reduced if you can only launch your attack while the user is actively using the victim's site.

It's the same reason OAuth uses expiring tokens. If you think that doesn't help and you're surely smarter than the whole security community who has been developing these standards for decades, please write a specification yourself and let us review it to see how great that is.
Isn’t it because a lot of people no longer consider stealing morally wrong? There’s an outside voice saying “you deserve this, they’ve got insurance, it’s ok” and the inner voice no longer reponds with “that’s not ok”. Might that be the consequence of too much focus on all sorts of external moral factors telling us what is and is not offensive, perimissible?
> If you have a lock with no keys, it is secure, since it can't be opened. As soon as you have one key, the lock is less secure, because now the lock can be opened.

No, not really. Your simplistic example fails to acknowledge that your same-site "lock with no keys" model rendered same-origin-policy completely unusable in projects that fall beyond the scope of a personal hobby project, which left the whole world with no alternative to turn it off. CORS recognizes the absurdity of implicitly assuming that the same origin is the only possible and conceivable safe origin, or even that a site has a single origin.

Therefore, your comparison would actually be between an old lock which was no longer usable and thus forced everyone to go around with no locks, or a lock designed around one of the world's most basic requirements and thus made it possible for the old lock concept to be applicable.
One thing that really annoys me is "elephant racing" where trucks battle to overtake at very small relative speeds (probably because they're both on their limiters but one has a slight calibration advantage). Especially on 2 lane roads where they block everyone while doing so.

Say a truck has a length of 16m, and starts the overtake 10m behind another one, and merges back in 10m in front. So that's an overtake distance of 36m. At 1mph relative speed, this takes 80 seconds.

Meanwhile, the cars behind the truck have all had to drop out of cruise and are now doing 10mph under their preferred speed (car speed limit is 70, lorries are 60). So that 80 seconds and 10mph under is 10 seconds of overall journey time. Not enormous, but it multiplies across all the cars in the queue, and across the number of lorries making this move in a journey.

However, the point is that if the overtaken lorry could just ease off the throttle by a single mph, he'd halve the overtake time, at a cost to himself of 1mph less for 40 seconds, which is less than a second of journey time.

So, when overtaken, a very minor "altruistic" gesture on the part of the shower lorry pays back dozens or hundreds of times over to other road users. And that's without considering the travelling waves that linger after dozens of cars slow down from a rolling roadblock and can make the whole road slower for everyone for a long time.
>So if anything that proves that being smart does not make you happy

That’s because one anecdote doesn’t “prove” anything regardless if one says the word “prove” or not. You got one datapoint and you extrapolated negatively from that—all I am saying is there is an equally valid conclusion that can be drawn from the anecdote. I.e I could also say that since children seem happier, that “proves” that it’s being short and loud makes you happier.
The European equivalent is "Executive Director". (That is, someone at Goldman who was promoted to VP from Associate in the US would have been promoted to ED in Europe.) That's even worse title abuse, if you ask me.
>while it's asleep it'll stop receiving messages via XMPP

Isn't there any API (? or something) for apps to run in "minimal" mode, to wake up the phone when needed? Does this also mean that it's not possible to have the phone notify you when you receive an email in sleep mode?
Not all AC routers support DD-WRT / OpenWRT (even similar ones). It's not a problem from Asus though, it's just that some variants are less common and thus a build doesn't exist.
A lock with no keys can still be opened with a lockpick or just brute force.
It is, however, interesting to note that Fastmail’s webmail doesn’t use EventSource, but instead implements it atop fetch or XMLHttpRequest. An implementation atop XMLHttpRequest was required in the past because IE lacked EventSource, but had that been the only reason, it’d just have been done polyfill style; but it’s not. My foggy recollection from 4–5 years ago (in casual discussion while I worked for Fastmail) is that it had to do with getting (better?) control over timeout/disconnect/reconnect, probably handling Last-Event-ID, plus maybe skipping browser bugs in some older (now positively ancient and definitely unsupported) browsers. The source for that stuff is the three *EventSource.js files in https://github.com/fastmail/overture/tree/master/source/io.
> The shape of a hammer is more about inertia and leverage than the geometry of your grip, while the shape of a pencil is more about your hand than about the properties of graphite.

While that's illustrative for the real point, its not especially true, is it? Go look at the many shapes of hammer available at a hardware store, "how it is held" is a major factor in the design of the tool. You'll see the same head with 3 or more handle variations because people are not all the same shape.

A pencil isn't designed for the hand that holds it, but for the machines that make them by the million. Tools designed for hands tend to have flanges and bumps to grip and curves to meet the palm: look at the variety of pistol handles, for example.
Pardon my hard italics, I thought you were just being sassy :)
Yes, the difference is that mesh networks and MANETs attempt to build end-to-end packet paths. This approach (opportunistic networking, or Delay-Tolerant Networking) relies purely on infrequent peer-wise contacts to forward messages.

The protocol stack in the Liberouter system is the DTN stack, ie., the Bundle Protocol (RFC 5050, 9171).
> Not unexpectedly, Nvidia this week pulled the plug on its bid to buy RISC-V competitor Arm after the $66 million deal was scuppered by regulators in multiple jurisdictions.

Million, really? Off by a factor of 1,000?
> but security research of this kind seems like such a gray area legally speaking.

Security research in general is a grey area. “Security research” of this kind is like spotting that the entire database is on file in a public library, with confidential data “encrypted” using Pig Latin, then reporting it to the librarian.
If you have a lock with no keys, it's a non-starter; the door has no purpose. You'd be better off sealing the entrance with bricks.

If you offer a website with an API then CORS is an enhancement in that you're helping protect users from getting owned or hijacked. Alternatively if you can't stomach the risk, you could take down your API, which is about as useful as solving a math equation by multiplying both sides by zero.
Agreed. My “note-taking app” is an ASCII text file with a bunch of URLs and command names in it, each with a description. Totally free-form, even the super simple markdown syntax would be too much to bother with.
There are nice Gtk bindings for Go, give it a try. Feels quite native.
What better way to understand the flaws in the system than understand the gripes of those who were driven truly to the edge? He didn't exist in a vacuum. Most "deranged terrorists" you have to really read between the lines of what they're saying to see how the system failed them, because it's easy to place blame in the wrong places, but he was smart and eloquent (which deranged people can be). Looking at what he got right, what he got wrong, and how he fails at a solution is important - if ignored then people coming to it will see nothing to refute it, just a lot of people avoiding looking at it. In a sense the Unabomber manifesto is a visible symptom of some invisible systemic problems.
You don't have to agree with the conclusions to see value in something - heck, I see Marx discussed in republican think tank pieces occasionally because they agree with some parts of his analysis, even if they disagree fundamentally with his proposed solutions.
Then you have people becoming daddies at the ripe old age of ... 5.
Sci-hub is sometimes the last resort to obtain a resource that is otherwise unobtainable. But what has become of the old way of obtaining unaccessible papers: Ask the authors for a copy?

Sites like ResearchGate make this very easy. And often a simple email does the job, too.

Advantages:

* It is legal

* The author gets feedback that someone out there reads their research

* Making direct contact to your peers is a good thing.
It's a completely different project. From the user perspective:

- DD-WRT contains a lot of features that are exposed on the UI, but the project is almost dead, with the last stable release being in 2020, but activity died probably a decade ago.

- Open-WRT is very active, but the UI is an afterthought. The feature set is barebones and you need to install plugins for a lot of things - requiring command-line configuration. The Gargoyle project is a more ui-friendly fork, but it's also not really active, and supports a narrow set of routers.

- Besides Merlin, for Broadcom/ASUS, Tomato (and derivative projects) is an alternative, but newer routers are not really supported it seems.
People Who Hate Docker, Why? What is Alternative?
Second this. I have pulled off some minor miracles singlehandedly using Django. The significant data science ecosystem in python is a real plus if you eventually need to analyze things.

If you want to do something that the ORM isn't designed to do it can be a real pain. But if you have 20-30-100 different business objects you need to model and only a few don't fit in nicely you save so much time in the others that you can absolutely afford to figure out the special cases.
DJB is responsible for so much of today's crypto technology that people have raised fears of a "DJB monoculture". He's that influential. Chacha20, Ed25519, SipHash, and NaCl are all things he's had a hand in, plus tons of ahead-of-its-time software that sadly isn't used much any more (see http://thedjbway.b0llix.net/index.html as thedjbway.org is now domain squatted).
given that bitcoin is no longer a currency and its lack of liquidity, i'd say you're in the red until the moment you exit for more than your original position
As my Grandpa (child of the great depression) said in his typical ineloquent yet wise way: "Back in my day, when we weren't happy we were fine with it!"
ARM also has a good chunk of compatibility issues... There are plenty of times I've had ARM7 vs NEON vs thumb vs big endian/little endian issues...

Even today, getting random debian packages running on a raspberry pi, I've hit issues of SIGILL due to packages being compiled with the wrong compiler for my CPU...
Does this have anything to do with either of the points I'd made in the above posts about the crudeness of conflating financialization and globalization or the author's claims about the superiority of 70s consumer goods? Are you GPT-3?
A similar setup, for those more comfortable with PHP, would be Laravel [0] in conjunction with Livewire [1].

Laravel is basically the “Rails of PHP”, and has an absolutely incredible ecosystem to go with it.

Livewire was directly inspired by Phoenix LiveView. I only just recently started using it in my own projects, but it’s invaluable. Backend has always been my speciality, but now I can make real-time UIs just like the cool JS kids can too :)

[0] https://laravel.com/

[1] https://laravel-livewire.com/
The NFTs They Bought from the Crypto Rapper Disappeared. Now They Want a Refund
Stopped using or even trying DDWRT long ago because buggy firmware. OpenWRT beats it hands down in this department
Forgive my ignorance if there’s an answer, but for x86, those extensions don’t overlap (mainly because Intel and AMD avoid stepping on each other). RISC-V doesn’t have a guarantee of non-overlapping vendor extensions, no?
It's tough to be properly nuanced and specific in a tweet. "I've never read a business plan , but I ask all the big questions that should be answered in a business plan." Just isn't pithy for a tweet.

Honestly Twitter is a terrible idea in most cases that just leads to people shouting at each other - because 140 characters isn't enough to communicate anything in a balanced way.
For the OP:

> Um guys, maybe remove devices without wifi support from the “supported devices” list to make the list an actually useful resource?

Open WRT relies on members of the community to help keep the documentation up to date. You can edit the table of hardware here [1].

I wouldn’t say it’s unsupported hardware though. Some people use these devices as a router and don’t need wifi enabled. In this case I would say it is supported, but in limited functionality.

[1] https://openwrt.org/supported_devices/adding_to_toh#editing_...
Yes, but it didn't change because of the reasons given by the commenter above

https://www.history.com/news/coding-used-to-be-a-womans-job-...

I have female programmer colleagues and I see no difference in intelligence, between them and their male peers.
It's just the number of woman in workforce is low, not that they can't do it successfully