skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
There is a way to tackle part of this challenge by using distributed generic resources ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vehicle-to-grid ), especially thanks to a smart grid ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smart_grid ).

Gas plants can burn hydrogen (or methane...) produced thanks to electricity overproduced (produced when the grid doesn't need it) by renewables.

There are many ways to store energy ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_storage#Methods ).
>The fact is your household lost $500,000 in earnings and gained essentially nothing in supposed "cost savings

I assume 'you' in this piece isn't addressing the people in this circle[1]. I mean even the extremely wrong basis for that quoted claim aside (anyone who has visited an electronics store and compares quality and price to pre-globalization can verify that for themselves), I always find it funny how anyone can think globalization hasn't drastically improved the world we live in. It's somewhat bizarre to me that support for globalisation is being attributed to shills and some financialied elite. I don't know which 70s the author grew up in but I don't think a minimum wage worker had a pristine supercomputer in their pocket and a big flatscreen tv on the wall.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valeriepieris_circle#/media/Fi...
Research has largely shown this theory to be false.

Recent one: https://penntoday.upenn.edu/news/money-matters-to-happiness-...
I will have done anything I want to within one second of you logging in. There is no need for later attacks
No XSS is another class of vulnerabilities
This year they'll make $20M. That's after expenses
I feel like Musk's actual work will still be useful for getting robots to Mars if we go that way.
> Instead he claims to have never read a balance sheet,

It's pretty clear from the context that he means that he has never read the balance sheet of a company applying for VC funding as the information there is irrelevant at that time.

It's highly unlikely, as the founder of several businesses, and long term investor in others, that he could have never read any balance sheet ever.
Sorry, not associated with them!
According to the negative Amazon reviews, no, the book never finds typical Americans committing felonies. However, if you're a doctor, or a farmer, or a politician, then surprise! There are special laws to follow that most people don't think about.

One case involves somebody "out in the woods gathering shell casings from federal land", a very normal activity.
I can only repeat: this [filter] «works only on good health». (Which is not, incidentally, restored by a pill.)

Returning towards the substantive topic: you die of certain lack of sleep, not of any lack of sleep - the mentioned acquaintance has not properly slept for years, and it was incidentally because of internal noise that he had to listen to instead of sleeping because it was too loud, and he survived, though not really happy about the fact.

That billions of people gladly live in cities, under constant background noise, does not prove that the constant specific noise from a wind turbine can be bearable in general or for individuals.

For your apparent position, you would have to argue that the said «filter» works for all noises. But mind you: you should also defend the position that it works so for people in general in all relevant situations (e.g. industrial noises at sleep time), and that such situation is a healthy situation, not just tolerated or simply unfelt.

Do not miss anyway the point about the location: wind turbines are not located in cities, the latter being entities that some avoid slightly less than strip malls... There is an issue when you or I or Jack live that moment in which "I have enough, I will fling off for today, purge time", and we go to the countryside and it's engines all around, go to the hills and it's dogs all around, go to the mountains and it's wind turbines all around, so we go to the caves because mass is soundproof and it is dark and damp and cold and the buzzing of insects... It's about preservation of properly liveable places.

And about your last statement specifically, "background noise [being or] not the same as pain": if your body-mind system fights it with an effort, if it bothers your conscience, background noise is the same as pain - otherwise, not even pain is the same as pain. So, it must depend on the specifics.
> CORS is an implementation in the browser and is designed to protect the user from malicious applications by ensuring that the resource in the browser is only allowed to access specific endpoints.

> This browser implementation can be bypassed at any time. First, it is up to the browser itself: if CORS is not integrated, or not integrated cleanly, then it will not work.

> An attacker can access the API key via the source code of the web app and use it, for example, via a cURL request to directly access the API resources of the backend. With cURL, no CORS takes effect, so the attacker has direct access with the full rights of the user.

All of this is completely wrong.

CORS does not protect anything from anyone. The same-origin policy stops code from one site reading resources from another site. CORS selectively removes that protection – it decreases security.

If CORS is not integrated, the same-origin policy is in full effect and code from one site cannot read resources from your site. It starts off as secure, and stays secure.

If you use cURL, then the same-origin policy doesn’t apply, and you can of course read any resource.

The same-origin policy is not a generic access barrier, and shouldn’t be used as such. It stops one site from abusing the user’s authenticated state with other sites, and that’s it.
This does not agree with my experience of the world. Where is this research?

--edit-- Ok, you edited in a link. Do you have like a metanalysis or something? Individual studies, especially in psychology with its myriad quality problems[1], are hard to take at face value without context.

[1] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1182327/
Substack sparked its early community of writers
Http2 Explained
Social media is part of society, and not a small part either, in my opinion. It’s ubiquitous and cross feeding.
Http3 Explained
CORS does allow to share, not disallow! The default under SOP is not to share.
It wouldn't surprise me if this is just filler added by the HR rep handling the upload to the job site. What a load of nonsense.
Paw Paw and Atemoya are in the same family as the Cherimoya. All share a rich mix of tropical flavors in a soft mousse texture.

Not to be eaten in very big amounts in any case by their Annonacins (linked with Parkinson disease)
We would have to compare that with how much crime there would be if there was no jails.

We might also look at things like how you can come back from jail and get a normal life, and looking into how we house people who are not suitable to get out again.
and he also did the similar "http2 explained" https://daniel.haxx.se/http2/
If somebody under questioning, in a situation where people often request and have rights to lawyers, mentions a lawyer, what's the correct action?

A) consider whether the person might be requesting a lawyer and help them exercise their constitutional right.

B) find some way, any way, to interpret their request as something else. Apparently the police thought he wanted a "lawyer dog"? Come off it.

Rights are only real if people can exercise them. This court decision decimated the right to a defense in every meaningful sense.
This is a pretty ignorant comment. They people who work at Walmart are not there people stealing from Walmart. Retail workers are not desperate theifs bro
Probably the most recent one https://www.pnas.org/content/118/4/e2016976118

In my experience this is obviously true.
Using a selfhosted version behind a subdomain of one of my TLDs. Something to be aware of - it can't be hosted behind a specific URI if you plan to have other stuff hosted on the same web root path (like example.com/wallabag), it always needs it's own (sub)domain (wallabag.example.com).

Other than that, it works pretty well with most text-based content. I'm using it through the Android app occasionally, and while the app won't win any design awards, it serves it's purpose.
If the API key has some certain permissions I don't see any exploitation risk. In the end, Vue.js or any other HTML is basically a GUI for REST API. You should always limit your REST API operations on server-side and don't trust frontend validations. Power users are always able to access your sessions,cookies,tokens and can use them freely with API.
Geniuses in the party of Davos, not original people.
The ancient secrets revealed by deciphered cuneiform tablets [video]
Whatever method you're using to send touchtones is likely not working then. You might want to try using something else to send it.
The thing that makes CORS annoying for me is when trying to get a local development environment up and running, or trying to get a standalone web page (e.g. game) running locally. For the latter, you can run a simple web server but its another added impedance that reduces usability in favour of security, like not being able to render an XML file with an xsl preprocessing statement to a local XSLT file.
Sets for Mathematics
That's the silliest argument I've ever heard. If this is not helpful, then clearly it's a bad idea for low income families to spend 3k on it. They could spend it on something that actually helps. If it's quackery, the false hope it provides is evil in itself. And if they are paying kickbacks to doctors, then clearly it harms the patients' trust in doctors, as mentioned.

As to 10%, the average returns from S&P 500, since 1957 when it was formed, is 10.5%, so 10% is pretty much what you'd expect if you put the money in stocks. Especially over a longer term like 20 years.
Revolut is pretty big in Europe but I guess not that ubiquitous yet
It’s not clear to me what colima[0] adds to lima[1]. Does anyone know?

[0] https://github.com/abiosoft/colima

[1] https://github.com/lima-vm/lima
How to skate a 10k
I love this seeing is believing in tech.

DPI independence was already supported, because each X Windows terminal was different beast, hence layout managers and multiple coordinate systems.

"Common Desktop Environment: Internationalization Programmer's Guide"

https://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/references/unix/digital/COSEPR...

"Developing Applications for the Display PostScript System"

https://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/references/unix/digital/AQ15WB...

Coordinate handling chapters.

"Common Desktop Environment: Application Builder User's Guide"

Attaching objects chapter for layouts

https://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/references/unix/digital/APPBLD...

"Common Desktop Environment: Programmer's Overview"

https://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/references/unix/digital/PROG_O...

"Common Desktop Environment: Style Guide and Certification Checklist"

Access and the Style Guide chapter

https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19683-01/816-0284/6m6phpvqa/inde...

And here is some of the stuff being done back in the day, https://park.org/Guests/Trace/pavilion/unixshar.htm
TLDR don't share a private api key on the client side and also, don't conflate CORS with keeping secure information secure.
Corrected identification of object about to hit the moon
Would their definition forbid it, or would it just label such behavior as "manipulative" and you happen to have a negative association with that word? I do personally view many (but not all) "aggressive" negotiations as manipulative. And yes, withholding pertinent information is deceitful as far as I'm concerned.
Carved is probably not a good way to express it. Cut from forked carrots more probably so there is not need to replicate the skin or size. You have it already.

Real baby carrots are very nice, but tender roots from forked carrots (that would be otherwise discarded when are perfectly ok to eat), is a tradeoff solution and decent replacement
I think the second line should start with

1,/^--/ g...

Unless forward slashes aren't required to indicate a regex based address.

One thing I do to create my ed scripts is to actually read the output of ls with some file pattern and then use a vim macro to edit the output as follows:

ed <<EOF
e file1
commands
w
e file2
commands
w
...
wq
EOF

The gnu info page for ed is a very good reference to determine what commands are available and how addressing works.
It is more complex than that, because certain kinds of cross-site requests has always been allowed. GET and POST requests are allowed, but PUT and DELETE is not. For POST requests you can send the request but not access the result. So CORS can be used to increase protection, by disabling cross-site POST requests, but it can also be used to decrease protection for other requests.
Surely it's even more illegal in Europe?
Agreed. This is a good article, written well for the intended audience—which I would qualify as occupying that ambiguous space between junior and senior developer knowledge. Perhaps the author hasn’t really arrived at the “right” answer for themselves. You hit the nail on the head, the solution is to login (authenticate).

Maybe the author is being careful not to offer an abstract use case as that might ironically be misinterpreted and be counterproductive? I feel security blogging is just one of those subjects where it’s more useful and prudent to express what shouldn’t be done then should. Maybe it’s okay it doesn’t include the solution, that’s left up to the reader to infer.
We spent so much time studying Mesopotamia in elementary school... but essentially NEVER heard of it after that.

So strange.
It even knew people would type number, didn't even bother with strings.
SPDT Switch Debouncing with an SR Latch
If someone else is offering the same service cheaper, then you know it's not a good deal.
He said _he_ is not going to look at it. That's all.

Tax authorities, YC's due diligence team and others will want to look at it. Anyone competent enough to start a company will know this.

Interpreting this as "pg says balance sheets don't matter at all to anyone" is.... weird. Repeatedly pushing this point is weirder. Maybe take a break from the internet for an hour or two
I always like to quote Eisenhower on plans: “In preparing for battle I have always found that plans are useless, but planning is indispensable.”
That's a myth.

Intelligence is correlated with quite a lot of things which promote happiness. There are already sources in the thread, so I'll just mention a couple factors: education/work/money, and late marriage/kids. Believe it or not, but not living close to minimum wage and having children only when married and you can afford them are both huge factors of a happy life. Huge. And both are very correlated with intelligence.

Now, why is this myth so widespread? Tbh, I don't really know. I can guess at availability heuristic - smart people see mostly themselves and smart people around them, see that the happiness level isn't that great, especially when young, imagine everybody else is happier so it's a reasonable conclusion that being smart is bad. The problems with this logic are that less smart/poorer people have it a lot worse, but they don't have contact with them.
And also that extra education will indeed delay your earning years somewhat, so being young, not-yet-earning and smart does feel pretty bad.
Template Haskell and Rust proc macros aren't similar to pervasive CTFE.

TH/procmacros just give you lexical tokens, you then parse them (typically adding a monstrous dependency on haskell-src-exts/syn) and emit AST.

The way D is designed, you don't need such a special facility because CTFE is everywhere. You can run normal functions at compile time. You can have compile-time "static if" and "static foreach" statements, and use various introspection calls (confusingly called "traits") in those.

Zig has similar "comptime" functionality. C++ now has "if constexpr" but not any of the introspection features.
Sorry bit of noob here with all these web security element.

What does it mean to share API key on client side? Is it same as passing the header based authorization for client? API keys are something like JWT?
Oh yeah I remember he brought this up once
I've spent ten years designing electronics for cars. It's very often harness reduction under various motivations. The bundle needs to be small to fit through chassis holes (which are kept small to keep structures strong). Keeping the pin count low increases available connector choices and reduces connector costs (especially where they must be waterproof). Off in the distant corners of minds is weight.

Your drone would probably do the same if the manufacturer had more engineers to spend on optimizing the design. But it's probably also sold in lower volume than car parts. Alternatively, maybe it's using CAT5 in a nonstandard way. For example, maybe two links or non-PoE power or even not Ethernet at all.
"B-b-but wait, didn't we all save a fortune on cheap jeans and TVs? No, you lost on that, too, as every product was crapified by globalization"

Cites no sources other than his own blog post in which he rants about the IRS (and also doesn't cite any sources).
Perhaps they are using an outside firm to do the actual harvesting and storing, and Anja is just handling marketing and financing? I think that would explain a lot of the comments, including this one.
The study I linked references many prior studies. I agree with you regarding the quality problems of psychology, but this is unfortunately what we have to work with.

What do you think is the gold standard study supporting hedonic adaptation over large populations? At least the studies referenced on Wikipedia don’t seem to be particularly supportive of the idea.

I suspect that this is a comforting idea that people like to believe, but not actually something supported by data.
You don't want to share security credentials in source code on a web page, that is effectively sharing the credentials with the rest of the world.
Care to explain? Xonsh is a python shell. From a cursory look at the very corporate Ansible website and wikipedia it's

"an open-source software provisioning, configuration management, and application-deployment tool enabling infrastructure as code"

Whatever that means. They seem to do very different things as far as I can tell.
Snagit got me into trouble twice at my last job, by phoning home even when I'd ticked off the preference for sending usage information (which appears you have to opt out of, rather than opt in to, which is a dark pattern in my book anyway). My employers monitored for all data leakage and my machine got flagged for this twice. So I uninstalled it and have never used it since. ShareX is my go-to now.
They keep blabbering about “future technology” in the article. Can someone give a real example, since I have no idea about quantum physics.
This really is just arguing semantics on the internet, one of the least interesting activities, usually.

I can almost guarantee that Paul Graham has read material produced by companies, which contain information on a business' plans and current status, including financial.

If you don't want to call that reading a business plan, that's fine. But it's really besides the point.

Further, he's denied that other people have read business plans or balance sheets for him. That's also very likely false. Reviewing a balance sheet is an elementary part of due diligence, I'm sure that many startups have been funded based on a conversation over coffee, but at the scale of PG's investments I don't believe he's never been involved in a transaction where his side has had someone due the most elementary due diligence to confirm founders' statements, e.g. by reviewing a balance sheet / income statement, which he has denied.

I mean hell, he's been director of various companies, typically you're required to co-sign at least annual financial statements as a regulatory obligation, sometimes audited, which always include balance sheets. Come on. Just restate your point: I don't focus investment decisions on traditional balance sheets at all, but rather on conversations with founders.
Yes, your first example is correct (by definition). Bad faith is misrepresenting your motivations or the relevant facts in some way, including by omission.

> But there are people who would disagree, because <reasons>

That is an example of mental gymnastics to avoid classifying the thing they want to do as bad in their own view. They want to do something but they don't want to think of themselves as behaving in bad faith because they're a good person doing the right thing.
It's a good question. There are a couple of ways to do it:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scrambler#Types_of_scramblers
It is a snappy quote, but it's from a pretty unsavory source and isn't something I could ever repeat in good conscience as a person opposed to racism and nationalism of all kinds: https://nationalvanguard.org/2017/01/voltaire-didnt-say-it/

Not trying to imply anything about you since it's so frequently misattributed :)
Doesn’t really matter what you call it, the end result is about the same: polite thoughtful conversation on whether Chinese Americans should be interned or whether Eastern Europe should be invaded by NATO or even just whether exploiting workers is acceptable. It used to be about whether my Serbian neighbours should be bombed, but on previous forums.

Swipes at Americans are useful, it can make them wonder why their country is so hated across the world. It can also be useful as part of a wider polemic to re-focus on the real contradiction: imperialists versus the rest of us.

Your rules as enforced absolutely reinforce imperialism, regardless of your intentions. Again, it’s your website. I’m not going to convince you, just trying to explain to you what you’re doing.
You need a certain level of charisma to run a business. At least at the start up phase when all you’re doing is trying to convince people to use you.
It's official in Copenhagen (possibly more of Denmark), although it will have been unofficial for much longer.

> Residents of Copenhagen can recycle their waste at a recycling station or a collection point. A collection point is smaller, only accepts certain types of recyclable waste and is accessible by foot only. Both types are staffed and most have a “swap stand” where you can donate or collect items which are still usable. [1]

In addition, most apartment blocks have a small e-waste bin. That's big enough for something like a computer screen or laptop; larger things should be taken to the recycling station.

I fished a MacBook Air out of my block's bin, and sold it online for €150 or so. I kept a Kindle I repaired, and gave an old iPad to a friend. This was a couple of years ago, I think there's either now someone else looking in the bin for good stuff, or a wasteful neighbour has moved away.

(A typical apartment block has bins for cardboard, paper, metal, mixed plastic, electronics, batteries, glass, hazardous waste, food (for compost) and non-recyclable waste.)

[1] https://international.kk.dk/live/housing/settling-into-your-...
File-Driven Testing in Go
Hmm. Nice rant against the meta financial products with which i kind of agree.

But his appliance example... let's put $500 from 1975 into an inflation calculator. Oops, they're worth $2600 ish 2022 dollars. Versus the $400 cheap option.

Edit: also globalization will stay no matter how protectionist the state is. In the black market.
I this basically sums it up, most posts you see are not written literally.
I've used this for years on my Windows PC until they introduced their new Win+Shift+S screenshot tool. It does everything I'd ever want except for the automatic uploading and copying the URL. But in fairness, I never need it. I just paste the screenshot directly into whichever editor, e-mail or instant messaging client I'm using to communicate.