skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It depends on what you mean by 'XHTML.'

One of the possible definitions is a mode of HTML that was forced to be strictly validating by an XML parser. Adoption of this was hurt by the fact that XHTML-delivered-as-XHTML didn't work correctly in the dominant browser of the time. But HTML5 also delivered a fully-specified parser that explained how to handle tag soup correctly, which meant the problem trying to be solved here (having to parse HTML files into a DOM) was solved in a different way.

Another possible definition is the XHTML 2.0 definition, which tried to rip out a lot of HTML features and replace them with more semantic definitions and was largely an effort that was entirely divorced from reality (to the point of driving out the web browser implementors entirely from the working group).
I would hope so. Always shocking to see the lack of recognition for disasters caused by the USSR regime, such as the Holodomor. The details of the event are just pure horror.
I working on something like this.

https://widgetterminal.carrd.co/

My contact info is in my HN profile. Reach out if you want a demo.
How exactly do lockdowns impact hospital services?
Sure it does.

Cold storage hold %

diversity of holders
I find I don't need the DRF one because it's flatter, DRF DestroyAPIView has 4 ancestors compared to 8 in Django DeleteView.
> I'm not sure if this is supposed to cause outrage or not.

I agree with you, but for different reasons. A ""sweatshop"" is much better that the agricultural and industrial protectionism used by the US and the EU to prevent African crops from reaching their markets.

If you think about it on a systemic level, these subsidies are quite evil: we subsidize agriculture so that we don't need to buy their crops, then even worse: we dump the leftovers under names like "international aid" which limits the opportunity for a local industry to grow (same with clothes "donations": the local industry can't compete with a price of 0)

In an ideal world, we would not do such things, crops would be grown where the weather and the labor market provide a cost advantage (Africa is warmer than Europe!), the consumers would benefit from cheaper prices, and other countries would industrialize, grow their middle class and GDP.
You also have clear negative examples for the recommender, because not watching something is an active choice (you have to swipe away).
I was interested in ManyPixels, but wow, that is an expensive service!

From what you said though, it sounds like they might have a free plan, only I can't see anything about that on their site?
Not sure about the studies that are listed below. Honestly I just kind of try to understand the patterns / feelings and try to see whether its really intrinsic or something else.

But here is a good tip, people who want to stay in touch, will be in touch.

People who want to stay in touch and are busy will respond, are happy that you reached out and will suggest a catch-up

Rest is well, not worth your effort.

You can easily feel the vibe and if you would be a person I knew or met at some point I would be: "Wow so great to hear from you!"

I had this case last year when I reached out to an acquaintance, whom I helped back in the days and suggested a "catch-up over a zoom". To which he said he can't allocate time right now as he is busy. Had the same happened on Twitter. It felt a bit painful at first but then people are just living a busy life these days. Its a weird world that nobody experienced before...

So don't worry about these feelings, just do it anyways and worst case scenario you have a great catch-up and happy memories.
There is lot of evidence out there.
Modi loses state elections even after vigorous campaigning - Bengal 2021 is a great example. So Modi is not infallible. Not only that, he doesn't even get 50% of national votes, but wins on the basis of first past the post system. The farmers protests and the subsequent about face from him on implementing farm laws again shows the limits to his powers.

Is India a flawed democracy which is backsliding? Absolutely yes. But it's a democracy as much as the US is one.
MusicSrch – The Music Search Engine
My company is hiring. I'm a firm believer that folks shouldn't be punished by the US justice system, but instead reformed.

I can't speak to your circumstances, but my team is hiring for folks like you and barring any policies I'm unaware of I'd be happy to help you make a connection. Details in my profile if you're interested.

On a more general note, there's currently a high, steady-state demand for AppSec, CloudSec, NetSec, and generalist technical security specialists with software backgrounds. There is work out there and I don't believe you'd have to accept an entry-level position to get it.
> Note that this article spends more time bemoaning the mere deplatforming of the (at best, bimbo level) podcast the Joe Rogan Experience (which hasn't even happened!)

Not only he hasn't been censored, but the controversy actually comes from the fact Joe Rogan was promoted by Spotify who've signed a huge deal (we're talking about dozens of million dollar here) with Rogan!
Not OP but glad you mentioned this. We're starting to look at internal tooling libraries and this looks really interesting.
The content you like might not be very available on tik tok. From personal experience, it’s able to hone down on niches you like pretty quickly.

Most impressively, without having an account or liking specific videos, it can narrow down the information. Especially since they have to use some kind of algo to contextually understand videos without hashtags or subtitles.
Yeah, totally. I spend a lot more of my time writing Python for anything that isn't data exploration/analysis, for exactly that reason.

I still refuse to learn pandas enough to replace dplyr though, as it's just so painful to use the API compared to how easy this stuff is in R.
For sure. There has been a lot of pushback in the community from both sides of that issue. They wanted to reduce the boilerplate and make it cleaner to make simpler projects (with the goal of enabling microservice scenarios). But that moved some people's cheese from the standpoint of what the recommended path is. The problem is that there's a huge amount of very good documentation on the microsoft documentation site, but it's not organized in a way that makes it easy to find.
US halts avocado imports from Mexico after threat to American inspector
(I'm the guy he refers to in that post.)

If anyone reading this builds software like this, and releases it publicly, whether free or for sale, please let me know. I'd be happy to send people your way.

Because of https://sive.rs/dbt I get a few emails a week from strangers, asking if my software is public yet, or if not, what else I would recommend. (And I might never make my software public. It's too tied-in to my now-complex PostgreSQL system of everything.)

I'm definitely going to send people to Jakob's post here now. But if interested in this subject, please email me here:

https://sive.rs/contact
>Just ask the Chinese. (general populace, not the government)

and what do they say?
In Sonic Spinball it was!
Librarian's lament: Digital books are not fireproof
> IMHO, code should be written so that there is no visible personal style

This seems reasonable at first but depending what you mean by visible personal style can get you into the weeds so fast. You can end up creating a process where no minor, specific improvements or experiments are tolerated unless they can be justified as generalizable improvements for the whole org.

> , so that newcomers and new engineers are able to follow what's going on regardless of who wrote it

This isn't actually related to the first thing? There's some overlap sure but for the most part whether it's in camel case or snake doesn't affect my ability to comprehend it.
https://archive.is/1iOva
That gives me hope that things may calm down in the USA.
Something tells me your model of how git works is completely incorrect.
Siege of Melos
From videos of US protests in recent years, it's pretty clear that certain factions are teaching protesters to abuse these "rules".

Same as if these red cross helicopters were to be armed and attack while still painted with a red cross. The enemy would quickly start disregarding any labels. Same for 'medics' at a protest.
The pharmacy will buy the drug from a distributor, not the PBM. The PBM manages the insurance.

These may all be standalone operations, or one corp with its hands in each pocket: PBM, pharmacy, insurer and distributor.
Kill Kubernetes Pods by Playing Id's Doom
LPOTL is now off spotify and available normally again.
Yeah, once someone makes a mistake they should absolutely be barred from gainful employment forever! That will teach them... that they should remain criminals. Yeah!
It's also conceivable (theoretically) to just decouple teaching from examination. Anyone may participate in any class (no entry requirements), but there's a certain bar for passing exams and getting a degree.

To a certain extent, this possibility already exists with textbooks, openly accessible video lectures, etc., but there's also a lot of people who would still benefit from in-person teaching even if they'd never get to the same level of understanding as people who are going to earn a degree.
So you can use the stuff from the gallery for free! No attribution is even required. I'm going to update my earlier comment to make that clear.
Yes and this actually matters.

Not allowing the creation of repos of historical data with correct timestamps is a bad design decision, not an inevitability.
Such as? The burden of proof is on you to corroborate your statements.
I hadn't seen sso.tax before, thank you thank you thank you, it is so true!

Glad to see Github there, it is so egregious in its treatment of SSO. First, I would gladly pay additional for SSO integration in Github. But a 425% increase!! It's absurd and insane, and given how there are limitations in other security features I can require (I can't, for example, require hardware token authentication, only generic 2FA), this is borderline criminal.

Pay for additional, enterprise-specific features, I totally understand. But as this site you posted so eloquently describes, when the option is "have shittier security" unless you pay an obscene, bundled markup. This is an area where I do think regulation should be required, not so much at features or pricing but that additional security features shouldn't be permitted to be bundled in, or that SaaS product should have some amount of liability when they don't provide unbundled, table-stakes security features.
plebs have no say in political matters. You will be getting #3, plus a full cavity search annually, guaranteed.
> Difficult case because that would also implicate judges and public prosecutors

I don't think judges would be implicated here. the court relies on expert witnesses to explain what to do with a piece of evidence.

For example, if someone is convicted based on DNA evidence, you would have an expert in DNA matching explain the probability of this happening by chance.

If a supposed expert in the software testified that this is impossible to happen unless money actually went missing, and that witness appeared credible, then what can you do?
As the article points out, access is a huge issue. Also a culture that criminalizes rather than treats. Guess we can thank Reagan for that omnibus budget reconciliation that gutted the MHSA
As you say, plus the fact that this is Quillette, a publication founded in part to give a platform to writers on the topic of race and IQ. Their arguments against any sort of deplatforming are pernicious and self-serving.
This is really good, thank you!
The Psychology of Placing EV Chargers Along Roads Less Traveled
Them not crushing Tether right now is exactly what you are describing.
Yeah I've noticed it as well. I suppose it's because the GCHQ can't necessarily pay enough for very talented individuals who are required for certain work, whereas defence companies are somewhat poured with funds. I've heard that a popular path is to start in the government, then to the private sector to earn bank, and then back to public.
Wait... what? The MIT license applies only to the illustrations? The MIT license is specifically a software license and doesn't really work for illustrations, except to the extent that they make up the software's associated documentation. Can you elaborate what this means? I would have expected exactly the opposite: that the code is MIT licensed and the illustrations are under your custom license. The reverse is a very bizarre arrangement.

It seems to me that the MIT license isn't really involved at all here. It can't apply to standalone illustrations, because MIT is a software license, and you're not open sourcing the code. What, specifically, is MIT licensed here?

For illustrations you want something like Creative Commons. Those licenses are not software-specific like MIT is.
I once (briefly) saw a cougar while out on a hike. That was enough to put a big pep in my step.
That's actually a very interesting idea.

What if it changed the game so that instead of exams causing stress and discouraging learning, people were incentivized to learn at their own pace and eventually pass the exam?

This situation already exists with many professional credentials, such as CPA, CFA, FSA, etc. They tell you what will be on the exam, provide practice problems, lots of study materials are available from different sources, and you take it when you're ready.

There's also college exams that have a similar function (CLEP is the acronym I think?) but they're not really highlighted as a preferred path to students.
You can even say this is (among others) the root cause of al evil in computing:

Any wrong in the bottom of the stack "spread" far and wide, and when you UNDERSTAND how bad that was, you are stuck: You can't fix it without break ALL the infected!

This is why C/c++/Js/PHP/etc cause so MUCH damage, and lost of money. Them are at the bottom: Even your fancy Rust must deal with it. Even modern C must deal with it!

That is why is so important that we, as developers, understand we can't expect real progress until this is improved, and why is so important that better tools with better defaults become the norm (ie: invest on them!).
Yes, I'm not sure what "specific sutations" refers to, but I don't think they mean hardware and OS. It remains to be seen if and it what specific form this proposed act will come to pass.
> presumably be exposed to an action for negligence if something went wrong as a result of them employing someone with that record.

That's just the type of bullshit that makes pizza restaurants not wanting to have a person with a criminal record anywhere in the building. It's a form of vigilante punishment that continues to for the life of a felon, way past the point where their debt to society has been supposedly paid.

Employers should be banned to ask or process such information. "Is currently wanted or on parole" - legitimate question, "was ever convicted" - No, you have no right to know that, except very limited cases defined by law: working with children and the vulnerable, large sums of cash, working in the financial sector etc.
Engineers work to deliver business value and commit the code that flawlessly delivers that value the very first time.
When colleagues go to review the code, they are edified in its reading and quickly approve the merge request.
There is no need for feedback because the code was perfect.

I strongly disagree with the premise of this article. I look at code review the exact same way as I would look at the first draft of an email or a blog post. If you look up any piece of writing advice, one of the biggest things people say is "Don't worry about getting everything perfect the first time". Instead, it's really important to focus on getting something working first, and then you can spend your "second draft" refactoring that base of working code so it's more maintainable & readable. From that perspective, find code reviews really valuable as a contributor because it lets me get an outside perspective on the "first draft" of my code, and then it'll make it way way easier to write the code "correctly" the second time. So I really really want to push back on this idea that the "ideal" code review process involves a rubber stamp. That's just entirely foreign to the way I think about code reviews.
I worked on the bid for an earlier version of the Post Office Counter-mechanisation project ("counter-mech"). That effort failed, as did several other efforts. The failure was definitely the result of truly awful Post Office management of the project. FWIW, our bid was doomed - Big Blue had already stitched it up (as in, "Nobody ever got fired for choosing IBM").

As a result of that experience, I am predisposed to conclude that the system failings were not Fujitsu's fault, but the Post Office's. The PO doesn't have a sparkling record in IT procurement.

That the PO went after postmasters, knowing that the system they were required to use was reporting false numbers, is appalling, and I hope some executives get jailed. But I don't hold out much hope; the culprits have probably already retired, and figuring out exactly who (among the many people that must have known) to hold responsible looks like the devil of a task.
That's interesting because the 3 blazor projects that I have done client work for are all WASM not server. Do you have a source for the stats on server vs wasm deployments or just what you've experienced so far?
property missing can not be found on undefined: americanMentalHealthCare
>Keep saying this and watch your peers assets balloon in value. There’s really nothing to argue about, spreading this “I can’t beat the market mantra” is bad for everyone.

While I don't doubt that you could beat the market given enough effort, I'm skeptical that you can trivially beat the market with a strategy as simple as "buy tech stocks". I'll invoke the efficient market hypothesis here: if tech stocks are expected to grow 20% but non-tech stocks are only expected to grow 10%, why would anyone buy non-tech stocks? Wouldn't everyone bid up the price of tech stocks so that their returns would only be 10%?
A mixture of envy and cognitive dissonance about billionaires being evil exploitative rich people
I think that an important thing to point out is that the creation of bi-directional links through [[]] structure should not really be the most important part of the roam activity. The main important point of roam activity is to write notes in blocks, with occasional [[ ]] around the key terms, or something that seems important.

Then, if a user decides that a particular topic of interest looks promising the person can go to the [[]] page, review linked and unlinked references and expand on that topic. Focusing on bidirectional links makes no sense in the long run. The point here is to keep writing notes and use the Roam provided serendipity
I found that my initial foryou feed was pretty terrible and I ended up in political content pretty quickly. Once I nudged the algorithm by searching for my own hobbies, my foryou feed has been pretty great. I think probably every now and then it gets stuck in some local optimum, but it's pretty responsive to when you search for a specific niche going forward IME. Ultimately though like other commenters have mentioned, the content can be pretty shallow compared to other media
No, you just failed to understand these terms.
We wondered about that one when we were watching the game last night.

Generally I thought that many of the ads were hermetic, not really speaking to a mass audience, not having a clear message about what exactly was being advertised. For instance, I think most people have no idea what "Salesforce.com" is and even though I've developed applications for it and been to Dreamforce I've got no idea if extensions to their original business to 'catch up' with other cloud providers have materially changed where their revenue comes from. (Thus I don't know if my explanation of Salesforce is current) There was that one where they went to 'Bud Light Land' like the old McDonaldland and had 'Mayor McCheese' announce that a kind of Bud Light that wasn't beer had a 'Loud' flavor.
We don’t communicate via GitHub any more. See my other comments.

Also the assistant doesn’t help with the numerous third party components which were never ported to core, the entire MVC stack internal changes or the changes that took place in NHibernate. So even if it did work it’d break everything in the process.
I just gave up on going for any internal offers. If the effort even approaches applying elsewhere, I'll do that. I'm likely to actually get paid more and a better title instead of more jerking around as managers are won't to do.
> Ah, right, because if you're lucky enough to be making more than your peers, you should shut up and deal with doing so in a horrible environment.

These are the best jobs these people can get. If the "sweatshop" closes down, they're be doing somewhere worse.

Maybe you throw out this shitty provocation as a way to avoid thinking about that fact?
That's not how the MIT license works though. It says: "Permission is hereby granted, [...] without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software"
current blockchain tech (at least mainstream) is hilariously inefficient at storing data. If you can provide me anything to the contrary I'd be very interested in reading about it.
Sorry I might not be understanding. Your suggestion seems more reasonable, but I don't understand how other large companies wouldn't be in the same situation as FB if this would be the case. Is FB just the first one to notice?
A nice practice is to finish all such nitpicky comments with the strength of your opinion / how much you care.

This way, if most of those are "very little" then it's up to the author to decide whether to do it or not, and they don't have to wait for you to circle back about it.
I miss monochrome for programming. I had a 19” portrait monochrome CRT back in the day. Still maybe the best monitor I ever used. Never had a color fringing issue!
Functions and the Future of Design Systems
I assume license plate readers are much less work and expense for everyone than transponders.

I love Canada’s system. I simply got a bill in the mail in the United States based on my license plate they read, and no need to slow down traffic or deal with toll booths, or get a specific transponder for Canada.
92% of Companies Say On-Premises Software Sales Are Growing
One of the things the internet has done is make it so that if you have 1 conservative view (even if it's not really even conservative) you're suspected of having ALL of the views. You suddenly become one of the deplorables. Now the deplorables do exist, but not everyone that has right leaning views ought to be labelled that. This used to not be the case. It feels like each year that goes by there's a gap wider than our inflation pushing the two parties further from each other. That has to stop.
Exactly (thanks never heard that term). Essentially similar to clip art or stock photography.
That comes from copyright, though. Copyright is arguably something different than property rights, and is a very recent invention. That's why no one blamed scribes for copying books.

You could make a case for private communication extending from copyright, but that's not what the parent claimed.
I see your point, and I'm in favor of inclusion in the workplace, but it's not all black and white.

Would you allow a convicted sexual offender who did his time in jail take care of your child in a day care facility to which he got employed and didn't disclose his past conviction?

Things need to be put into perspective, and evaluated carefully.

With that said I don't think immediate termination was the right decision to make in that situation the parent comment described. Inclusion requires consideration and empathy, the company didn't demonstrate that.
TL;DR they're wheel rotation markers :)