skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Alternative hypothetical perspective, stated factually as my brain reasons about it, but potentially subtly/grossly incorrect:

The pinpoint of the boundary between the buildup and the punchline was the point you said "split". This is hilarious to whoever has adequate mental development/laterally orthogonal context for there to be so-called "benign violation", *but*, the elements of societal inclusion and social/conversational flow that were also present and framed the temporal boundary of "this is fun!" were (apparently) developmentally much more accessible around 3-4, and picked up on and cued off of - this was a novel new point of social engagement connection! However the only bits of extrapolable context (in the sense of "n bits of information") available was only the word "split", and since this word did not gel with any currently known contextually-local reference points, it was thus considered "new" and given a sort of independent standing in much the same way we encode brand names and taglines without questioning or parsing them, and also similar to how the radiation symbol was strategically designed so as to be meaningless (dissimilar to any existing and widely known symbols) so "this is dangerous" could be given a globally unique mnemonic. *However* what's really cool is that this sense of "this is its own thing with this additional meaning" was not set in stone in the same way information tends to be later in life, and was likely completely backed out and deleted over the following few days after empirical testing/experimentation found no further correlation (and the whole thing consciously surfaced as boring). Bonus points would be achieved if this event was consciously remembered later on in life and properly recalibrated, but the chances are the info was just subconsciously archived (if that's actually a thing that happens) and disassociated.

TL;DR, associative learning go brrrrt

My potentially-incorrect conclusion is that the classification process you were seeing was filtering information based on an already dizzyingly complex and amazing set of pre-existing intelligent processing and catalyzation, as opposed to an arbitrary fuzzy process that "figured it out".

Source: high-functioning autism + late development that's left me with a stick-shift brain instead of an automatic one :P - I'm still figuring out where my biases and misunderstandings are, hence the repeated caveats above
> What YC cares about is how much money they could make is everything goes right, and whether the team is capable of making everything go (close enough to) right over the long term.

Isn't that what a business plan is? In some sense, it's a description of what your cash flow looks like in a couple of years.
Urban vs. Rural Sustainability
> Yes, it's very much the expectation that I need to somehow be immediately available that makes it rude.

I pretty much agree with the other comments against people just saying 'hi' and nothing else. But this made it click to me.

I think many of the people who do this are the same who drop by your desk and ask for a random thing, without taking the time to ask whether you're available or not. This is the same thing, just moved online.

Also, bonus points for people who just say 'hi', you say hi back, and they never reply anything. Reminds me of people in person who would come up to your desk, say hi, while at the same time frantically typing on their phones and making you wait.
would you expect any less from the Atlantic....
> all ongoing issurance goes to existing tokenholders

David Rosenthal also raised this issue in his recent blog entry [1]:

"It isn't just that the Gini coefficients of cryptocurrencies are extremely high[4], but that Proof-of-Stake makes this a self-reinforcing problem. Because the rewards for mining new blocks, and the fees for including transactions in blocks, flow to the HODL-ers in proportion to their HODL-ings, whatever Gini coefficient the systems starts out with will always increase. Proof-of-Stake isn't effective at decentralization."

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30310317
It is on the standard, update yourself.

Naturally not every compiler is yet fully C++20 compliant but they will get there, VC++ is there, next release of GCC is looking quite good, clang well lots of issues anyway now that Apple and Google resources went away and not everyone has the same love for upstream.

As for the hack, go dive into D forums from like five years ago thereabouts, since import statements in D fully parse the source of the respective modules, the hack to speed compilation time was to move import statements into the function bodies so that they are only processed if that code is actually parsed.

If I am not mistaken, Andrei was one of the persons suggesting this.
Yes that's the one.

And damn near every application is "broken" according to the ext4 documentation.
If you don’t get the weather you want, try a different app
>> You could now take your workplace with you wherever you go.

The capitalists dream - the workers nightmare.
> A good chunk of the people arguing to throw them all in prison are probably one good car accident away from getting hooked on opiates to get through the chronic back pain and winding up like them. Might be you.

If I ever start stealing from people to get drugs, please do throw me in prison too with the rest of them all, even if the root cause was legitimately prescribed painkillers.
All fun and games until you start to blow up people
Can the provers in this blockchain also get away with not storing any of the underlying chain data?
It's like this guy is out to prove to everyone that he's an idiot. Which is honestly pretty convenient since it means a lot more coming from him.
I think perhaps the thing with PG is that people think the advice/wisdom he shares should be far more profound and complicated than it is.

As someone who has frequently made the mistake of overcomplicating things, I don't see anything wrong with repeatedly telling early stage founders, in all kinds of different ways, to just focus on building a product that people want.
Like this?

https://www.pgroup.com/blogs/posts/f03-oop-part3.htm
I not saying you are entirely wrong, but we did spend months playing things like Fire in the East, 2 m2 map and 2500 pieces. I have most of that series waiting for me to retire. :)

https://boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/8993/fire-east
Thanks for the tip. I need to try this one out.

I really despise this pattern, as described by OP.
Ran Prieur, not George Hotz
Hmmm, this could be interesting for high-voltage/current isolation applications, eg generator or battery bank control/monitoring.

Would be really cool if there were prefabricated Ethernet-to-<this> boards out there.

A quick check of Amazon finds 100Mbps Ethernet to fiber adapters for around the $20-40 range, but that doesn't cover the cost of the (mainstream) fiber cable they use.
Even if prison were completely ineffective as a deterrent, that wouldn't be a reason to not use it, because criminals can't rob any more stores while they're imprisoned.
Instagram failed to act on identity theft, says novelist
> Python core library development is filled with asshats who like to deprecate naming conventions in later versions rather than just improving the existing libraries and keeping the method names the same.

I think this is a gross misrepresentation of both technologies, to the point that it goes well beyond a normal apples-to-oranges comparison.

A shell script runs well on any standard-compliant implementation, just like python3.4 scripts will run exactly like they always did when running on a python3.4 interpreter.

Python's libraries break when asshats "deprecate naming conventions" only when you somehow assume that, say, your python3.10 script would run on python2.7, or just like your shell script breaks when the program it calls happens to break it's cli.

Also, is versioning still a problem given the pervasiveness of package managers with support for version pinning?
Embrace Remote Work. Its hard to detect age if you color your hair or wear toupee and its illegal to ask age during interviews. Covid has been a blessing. I am also betting on video software's to remove wrinkles in my skin.
No, not everything. "When will this bullshit die" isn't answered.
You might need 2x for that one
People who seem guilty absolutely should have a harder time in the legal system. That is the group of people who are more likely to be guilty. Police have quite a lot of discretion in who they arrest and that is already a fairly strong "looks guilty" signal.

What is important is there must be minimum standards to try and remove individual bias and push the system towards evidence based outcomes. If there is no evidence someone did something, they should not be punished. But if there is overwhelming evidence from the get go that they've committed a crime then the police can go through the motions and interpret the procedures unhelpfully.

It isn't perfect (in fact, the system is terrifyingly arbitrary) but it must be acknowledged that a case looking to be open-and-shut is suggestive of guilt and should influence how procedures are applied.
And really, would we want that? I’m not saying that it’s a perfect system on every dimension, but it makes for insanely high quality work on average. And it’s easy to get used to it and take it as granted. Being married to a Hungarian wife and seeing the quality of work in the trades in Hungary first hand really made me appreciate the German system.

As stupid as “am deutschen Wesen soll die Welt genesen” is in general – for the trades it might actually make sense.
> It’s like asking if 2022-01-01 is an orange.

This is way overstated. It's more like asking if the integer `1L` is between the float `1.0D` and `2.0D`. It requires an implicit cast. Decide whether operations involving LocalDate[0] and LocalDateTime should use the former or the latter as the working type (the latter, IMO), do the cast (LocalDate becomes a LocalDateTime with time component 00:00:00, or LocalDateTime becomes a LocalDate by dropping its time component), then do the operation.

If the types you're dealing with are LocalDate and Instant, then you'd need a contextual timezone to perform the conversion in either direction.

I don't think this is a hard problem, it's just one that requires more specificity than one might think at first glance. Users should be encouraged to read the spec of any language that does these sorts of implicit casts, in the same way that C programmers should be aware of the implicit typecasting rules in that language.

0. I'm using the java.time/org.joda.time type names here. Their equivalents should exist in any good time library. However, I think in reality many libraries fall short of the types you really need to express date & time concepts, which is what leads to so much confusion around them. Once you're familiar with LocalDate, LocalTime, LocalDateTime, OffsetDateTime, ZonedDateTime, Instant, Duration, and Period, (whew), it's possible to be clear about what you're doing.
This isn't quite how nextpnr is architected. Yes, there is architecture-specific code for each targeted FPGA such as ECP5, Gowin, Nexus parts, etc. But those architectural components are largely descriptions of the physical components that exist on the chip, and how they're wired together. Each architecture does implement a basic interface for describing logic elements. But it's not like there's a separate placer or router for each architecture that's hand tuned to the primitives. The placer and router have to work in abstract on some basic logical unit for any code reuse to occur at all! Go look at the ECP5-specific code in NextPNR for instance; it's all actually very small and there's nothing too magical about it. It has some device-specific passes, but that's not really unusual (a software compiler might have heavily generic APIs for all machines, and then some machine-specific passes, too.) Most of it is just "This is what a logical element looks like" or "What I/O standards are valid for pin XYZ" and other rote stuff. Some of this is boilerplate or chaff and some of it is actual wheat, but it's not like, earth shattering. Any compiler developer would think it's normal...

In short: each architecture has some code for it, and often a lot of it is boilerplate. Some of it is for specific purposes (some devices might have specific rules about promoting clock lines or global device objects, whatever, and you might put them there.) But the generic descriptions of what the place-and-route algorithms work with, the "Basic Elements of Logic" (BELs), that's exactly what this project aims to solve. It describes how an Artix-7 or an ECP5 device can theoretically be mapped to these basic place-and-route abstractions. All EDA tools work this way... nobody would completely rewrite a placer and router ground up from scratch for every target architecture or PDK for every client they have or whatever. They all work at some level on an abstract description of a physical layout, and the vendor brings the real meat to the table and wires them together. The question of API design and where to draw the line between those two is, well, software engineering. So it's not like there will be effortless magical zero-effort plug-and-play between NextPNR and some random architecture. It just means that the integration work that must happen is now easier. That's it.

So this does not make technology mapping more effective or anything like that more effective. It's just an efficient binary format for describing the FPGA wire layout with enough fidelity to do things like place-and-route effectively. That's all; it doesn't really improve expressiveness, fmax, or anything like that. It's a developer velocity thing so that vendors and tool developers get a little more stuff "for free" than before.

Honestly as long as this lets me use NextPNR for Xilinx devices easily, I'm fine with it. As the maintainer of NextPNR for a package manager there might also be ancillary benefits for me but I don't think those matter much.
> Buggy implementations, releases that constantly break valid source code and make it a pain to work with dependencies along with a poor/unscalable garbage collector.

I had the misfortune to have to use D professionally for a little over a year, and I can confirm all of the above are sadly true. The garbage collector was a headache from day one, and was never not a problem.
Anything using Google, AWS, or load balancers from other major cloud providers will likely end up being early adopters for this stuff. In our case, since we were targeting mobile, we actually used nginx with SPDY support before HTTP/2 was even stabilized. It wasn't that hard. We just had to get a recent build and fiddle with a few lines of configuration. That was 2014. HTTP/2 standardization came later, as I recall.

We already have an HTTP/2 and HTTP/3 capable load balancer because we host on GCP these days. Mostly this stuff just happens without intervention. HTTP/1.1 is a fallback for people with crappy network infrastructure.

If you are starting a web project, you should probably use one of the major cloud providers unless you have a good reason not to. You'll use this stuff by default mostly unless you explicitly turn this off. But why would you want to do that?

If you are managing your own load balancers; consider using something modern/up to date that would be able to support this. Also from a security point of view probably not something you should skip. And if you are using something modern, it shouldn't be that hard to turn on the feature.

If you manage some legacy stuff that just doesn't matter; don't bother of course. HTTP 1.1 will continue working just fine. If you have mobile users though, you are not doing them any favors by making things needlessly slow and this would probably be an easy upgrade.
A part of your payments will indeed build equity, but over 30 years of payments, most of it won't (see previous comment).

If the market crashes, your house will not remain yours if you can't afford making payments. If things go south, I see unavoidable payments and illiquid assets as a liability, not an asset.

Selling is indeed tax-advantaged after a few years though. That's a good point.

The main pro for me is that it's a hedge against rent prices and inflation. However that's assuming that housing prices are reasonable, and that there are no better investments.
Goes to show the antiwork ethos long predates the subreddit.
And how many million have they sunk into this to generate $4M?
This question is for the practitioners in the ML field.

Roughly how long would it take for ML models to replace programmers?

Is it possible at all?
Dying Light 2 Has a Star Wars Easter Egg Hidden Inside a Doom Easter Egg
Medical systems here as well, laboratory automation, for example https://www.lab-services.nl
It's free in the sense of being entirely free software. You can read the SQL code that calculates your balance. It's alternative in the sense that they don't take a cut of your donations. (Sites like Patreon take a much bigger cut than any payment provider.) They suggest donating to Liberapay itself, but it's optional.

But yes, it isn't alternative as in "truly micro". In fact they got kicked from of their previous provider, probably for generating too many small transactions. They changed the system, so now you usually pay for a few months in advance.
> Go is terrific for multithreaded apps.

Yes, true. But so is Erlang/Elixir.
Same thing in Germany:

660 million doses for 83 million people.
400 million left with unclear plans how to use them.
That's a safety buffer of about 160% if you assume three full doses for everyone, including babies.
Only 16% have been donated to other countries.

https://www.tagesschau.de/investigativ/report-mainz/impfdose...
> urban planning background

He just said it.

The argument that I usually hear against more lanes is induced demand, but when I looked at some of the data this problem was very overblown. Going from 2 -> 3 or 3 -> 4. This is quite different from increasing 5 lanes to 6 though, then I can imagine it becomes chaotic and other problems such as the ones mentioned start to dominate.
Plans are not for reading but for writing. When you write stuff down you think about it = you plan. For others it should be enough that they know you made a plan. Unless they think they can deduce if it's a good one by reading it.
I struggled to understand LSP in Emacs vs Vim and wanted something short and concise to help me understand. This article did that. Thanks author!
How to write better Django code
The situation is different. The first letter in "photo" is not the "p" but the "ph". They are one. The "h" is a modifier. In "graphics" there is no modifier on the "g".

TL;DR H as modifier was introduced when translating Greek and they were lacking appropriate letters in Latin.

https://linguistics.stackexchange.com/questions/29625/origin...

https://www.theguardian.com/notesandqueries/query/0,5753,-88... -- last answer by Anastasio de la Luna (and a few other answers there too)

> I'm a phoneticist and a general linguist and "PH" and "F" are, indeed, pronounced the same, and are both represented by /f/ in the International Phonetic Alphabet. Greek Phi was once pronounced as a hard "P" in Ancient Greek. So, Latin inscriptions wrote it as "PH" to show that it's a P sound, but with more air with H. As Greek changed, so did the Greek based English words. In Modern Greek, Phi is pronounced as "F", and no longer like "PH"/a hard P.
MPL and LGPL don't make the changes available to the community, only to downstream users. Those users won't necessarily share the changes back upstream. There aren't any open source licenses with this feature, and it is arguable that such a feature wouldn't be open source, because someone on a desert island (or a dissident) can't reasonably comply with them.
How will this impact FTTx?
Depends. Might have been a bit stressful, but this is exactly the kind of "good trouble" a good journalist hopes to be in.

They thought they had just found a mistake in the government's IT system; instead, now that have a story about a mistake in the IT system and an idiot governor who doesn't understand infosec and is too bad a leader to delegate to people who do.
> One indicator of a compromised device is a reduction in perceived performance.

That doesn't work because of the hilariously wide performance swings induced by antivirus software overhead. :(

IMHO the tab-isolation model you describe is the solution for the top-level comment - something something Firecracker...
Show HN: Wordle Without Waiting a Day
I was contaminated by this game. I just love it, it's like a simpler hangman.

But the wait was a pain.

So I downloaded a list of nearly 2500 5 letters words from the english dictionary, and set up a Vue3 app with Pinia instead of VueX (first time I try it).

The code is ugly, it was made in just a couple of jours. But it works just fine.

[0] - https://github.com/linkdd/wordle
[1] - https://linkdd-wordle.netlify.app
Mistake gets lots of clicks and and revenue for a lot of newspapers and journalists.

Correction doesn't cost anything.
"pisses off people with power" is sort of what it says on the résumé for any journalist worth hiring
Good distinction, thanks!
Then why did you bring this up?
> a. No one sees real estate as a sure shot after the excess of the 80s.

That sounds ominous. Are there good comparisons of how excessive the real estate market is in the US today vs. Japan during the 80s?
You don't have enough karma. I think downvote is 500?
The part that bothers me most is that servants must have been killed in order to be buried with the queen.
https://richardwiseman.wordpress.com/psychology-of-humour/
To be fair, that includes an AirTag :)
Latest COD is 140GB
you do not need archive.org, all you need is brave.com and turn on (block scripts)
NFT fixes this
Seems like a lot of people are missing the point of this one.

PG/YC invest at the earliest stages. The information they need is pretty much:

1. What are you doing?

2. Do people like it?

3. How big is the market?

4. What are you/team like?

Could you cover all of those in a formal business plan? Sure, but you can also do so in a short-form application that's 1/20 the length or in a 10-minute back-and-forth conversation.

You don't have to ever view formal documents or financials to do that.

That is PG's broader point, and isn't really that controversial IMO.
On reflection, it's might not fair to even describe this as a violation of the law in the first place, but I am outside post edit time.

In any event, I fully support the journalist.
Yep. The right way to read this is that if a persecutor thinks there's a case, they'll prosecute.

Not prosecuting means they don't think they can possibly win. Anything that comes out of their mouths after is window dressing.
Meetings at my prior place was limited by meeting room scarcity. Ofcourse the amount of meetings explode in such a place!
But this is not what he said. If he said that, it would have been reasonable. Instead he claims to have never read a balance sheet, which doesn't seem likely, and even if it was true, it would not be very smart. Why avoid them until you read them and formed your own opinion?

Saying "I don't read those documents anymore" would have made sense too.
If you email dang using the footer contact link, I imagine he’d appreciate the heads up that this post and your comment exists, so that a reply could be considered. Otherwise there’s every possibility it’ll be missed in the crowd.
> They really act as if there would be an immediate coup if people saw the rulers were flawed.

January 6 was kind of a big deal...
1000BASE-T uses 4 pairs and each pair is simultaneously used in both directions. 250Mbps per pair, 1Gbps total, full duplex.

You could trivially chop the 1000BASE-T standard down to 1 pair and get 250Mbps full duplex. That would be similar to what SPE does. Everything you just described applies to bog standard 1000BASE-T too - PAM, echo cancellation, error correction, scrambling, etc.
I know, I just do it for fun and hope that one will survive (it would mean the tree adapt itself) for more than a year :o