skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Correct. You can't use these protocols outside of the same broadcast segment[0]. That segment can be stretched though with some frame encapsulation protocol like VXLAN or VPNs with bridged TAP devices.

[0] Broadcast segment would be the more accurate term here, given that subnet generally refers to layer 3 addressing mechanics. Technically a broadcast segment can contain more than one operational IP subnet, but this is uncommon on most user networks.
Do you play computer games? What are some good blind accessible ones?
Seconding this. One of my good friends served as an NFB chapter president. They do excellent work. The national convention is educational and entertaining too.

I’m not going to lie though, I do get a bit of a Monty Python vibe from the “rivalry” with the AFB.
> implies that its essentially the norm to be expected which is not the case.

I deliberately chose words which do not draw a conclusion about "the norm" because I, just like you, don't know what that is. There is no such dataset, all anyone can do is assemble anecdotes.
And then writing the book on Go.
this thing does a better job than all of the new developments here
Continuously restoring from a copy of the data you sent to cold storage provides an additional layer of protection.

If an attacker get root they can theoretically disable the continuous restoration, but the more moving parts they have to tweak the more likely that they'll be noticed while the org still has access to decent backups.
I'm trying to get a startup off the ground that tackles this.

Would love to chat more with you about this.
The polio vaccine was mandated five years after it was invented, and that was in the early days of the field.

Mass vaccination is the only way to stop transmission, of course, you just can’t have some people vaccinated and others not, vaccines don’t work like that. The exemptions have never been very deep (very few takers each year), but if they exceed something like 5%, then an adjustment must be made. Washington state for example, revoked personal and philosophical exemptions for MMR vaccines after an outbreak. Religious exemptions are still allowed, but those have a much higher bar than a philosophical exemption. Medical exemptions are always allowed, they are one major reason why most everyone else needs to get vaccinated in the first place (because people who can’t get the vaccine are at risk from transmission).

I guess one could argue that everyone that wants to should get vaccinated to better protect those who don’t want to be vaccinated. That makes sense, but hardly seems fair.
I feel like you're seizing too literally on that phrase. Let's get on the same page before we continue...

>These are the best jobs these people can get. If the "sweatshop" closes down, they're be doing somewhere worse.

The implication that I read here is that you're saying "these people" should be grateful for having to work under the conditions they're working under because life could always be worse and this is the best they will have it.

Is that an accurate read of your comment?
Like most of these ridiculous intergenerational conflict articles lately, it doesn't even get the generations right! The rants about 'Millennials' are really about 'Gen Z' who are the current 25 and younger generation. Millennials are actually between about 26 and 41 at the moment.
Have you seen whereisgeorge.com? Also it is worth bringing up that US banks do this regularly.
>Did they formally update your performance rating? Did you end up getting the raise you were expecting, or did they give an excuse like "well all the raises have been allocated at this point"? The immediate situation sounds like it sucked enough, but if it had continuing ramifications, I'd be beside myself.

Precisely what happened. Incidentally I reported the harassment and I got fired the day after I reported the harassment.
Yes, one cound imagine an alternate world where strong controls meant data was never abused and government had a history of honestly protecting people. And then I could see an argument for why you would voluntarily (or even by compliance) give info to the government, like with contract tracing or even reporting a horrible personal crime like this. But the reality is, your information will be abused, and there is no good reason to help any government I'm aware of out, given how systematically uncaring they all are.
The Hitchhiker's Guide Project: Characters, Planets, Hoopy Froods (2006)
The SR-71 refused to give its exact altitude, the concord seems to vary its altitude within a 5000 ft band as tempretures changed, but still well above other aircraft. The traffic controller simply wanted to ensure the SR-71 stayed well away from the concord.
Because otherwise there is approximately nothing the federal government can do to end the blockade if the protestor don't leave by themselves. No matter if most of the population want it to end.

This allows the federal government to send the army if necessary (although Trudeau said they wouldn't), allows the police to fine and detain protestor that do not want to leave the blockade. And allows the federal government to require private companies to provide services, in this case towing companies to tow the rigs.

It also allows for freezing bank accounts of e.g. companies that have trucks participating in the blockade without a court mandate.

I think, but I am not sure, that this only applies to "strategic sites", in this case the border and maybe highways. Protester blocking a random street in Ottawa may not be concerned.

So, why require the mandate: To prevent the slim minority of truckers participating in the blockade from impacting everyone else for months.
Cool cool cool. So can jobs (say schools), some of which require fingerprinting now, require a DNA sample too?

Think of the children this might save from vile criminals! And think of the control this would gives employers over the health and genetic make-up of their prospective employees!

There Is No Gene For The Human Spirit.
Is solving a few cold cases really worth the wholesale surrender of everyone's privacy?
I'm sure Trump could have come up with reason BLM protesters were doing something illegal, and needed to shut down their bank accounts.
"Support for Eugenics in Canada

In the early 20th century, eugenic policies were considered progressive among many Canadians, including some socialists, feminists, farmers and psychiatrists. Their assumption was that Canadian society could be improved by encouraging reproduction among certain groups — particularly Anglo-Saxon Protestants — and discouraging or limiting reproduction among other groups, including Eastern European immigrants and, increasingly, Indigenous people. (Similarly, immigration policies like the Chinese head tax were aimed at limiting the population of Asian Canadians.)

Many prominent Canadians of that era were advocates of eugenics philosophy and eugenic sterilization, including Dr. E.W. McBride, Professor Carrie Derick and Dr. Helen MacMurchy. Support for eugenic sterilization was also expressed in the 1920s by many prominent Alberta women, including Emily Murphy and Nellie McClung. Maternal feminists like McClung, for example, argued that women were the mothers and guardians of their “race.” They therefore championed legislation, including sterilization, which aimed to curtail prostitution, alcoholism and “mental defectiveness.”"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compulsory_sterilization_in_Ca...

Jun 3, 2021 "Indigenous women still forced, coerced into sterilization" https://globalnews.ca/news/7920118/indigenous-women-steriliz...
This is a huge pain point for so many companies! I haven't seen a solution that does this well until now.

And not limited to customer support - think about partnerships and sales (while perhaps a smaller opportunity).... shared Slack channels can be such a pain.

Anyways. Andrei and team are really smart, great people. Very exciting!
Worth noting that in addition to the ability of defenders to see every part of the wall, star forts have the advantage of making artillery fire more likely to hit the wall at an oblique angle, reducing the odds of a direct hit and (probabilistically) reducing the energy imparted to destroying the wall.
Because the few who don’t comply to public health recommendations/orders are responsible for the greater share of the economic burden of disease, and this burden was totally preventable.
Braille hardware seems pretty expensive for what you get. Last time I looked most of the devices costed $800+ USD for a single row of 24 letters.
I think I'd like to see a node-based "communications design & rendering environment" where you could use an HTML node if you want, use JS or CSS or other stuff if you want. Or you could drop in some text into a plaintext node and there's your output.

I'd expect that you could also create nodes of nodes, in other words distribute a bunch of nodes as a single node. Here's a "typical website" node, here's an "asm.js person" node. And here's a "discussion site" node.

But then, you could connect those nodes together, or to other things, and make nodes of _those_. Let's say you connect a "podcast bot" node to your "discussion site" and it defines a new endpoint that hosts a pretty good podcast out of what it finds on the discussion site.

The concept would focus more on what's going where, in what form, and try to abstract out the connection types a bit more, similar to how a networking stack already has made a good start at being invisible. If my connection between HTML and JS can be less of "which CDN do I use, sigh, here's another link element to maintain over time" and more of like, a line or visual connector, that's the kind of invisibility that would be really helpful.

The browser could then be more of a generic design & rendering platform aimed more squarely at users--ideally even giving users/visitors node editing access. Imagine if "View Source" looked more like a design environment, with full code access for those who want it. But in the meantime, start arranging and editing, and see what happens.

That could be pretty amazing for opening the web up again, and providing really exceptional accessibility. To gauge how well a browser can compete, we could ask how open the experience is, what node-level freedoms it gives to users, etc. Or we could ask what level it provides--at a basic level maybe a browser only renders text and HTML nodes, but it's easily expanded by specification. Or maybe by specification it shows you the full node network, highlighting only the parts it can work with.

It would also ask more of a "how much tech does a publisher really need" question which I think is important given the lumbering stacks many publishers are forced to maintain these days. For example, last year I had to let a science fiction author know that Laravel was displaying their DB credentials for about 500ms until it was covered by their article div. This isn't anybody's fault necessarily, but we are talking about a website with text, links, images.

Just some thoughts though. I'm sure it's also broken in some ways but it could be pretty cool...good q.

P.S. this is thinking in visual terms, but I'd expect full & logical accessibility for screen readers, etc.
I would argue that most use of column alignment in source code hampers readability and maintainability.

There are some exceptions, of course. If you are writing out hard coded matrices, you may want to line up the numbers.

But how many of us really do that day to day?

Many modern formatters such as Black for Python and rustfmt for Rust avoid column alignment and prefer indentation instead. Then the code is equally easy to read and navigate in any font of choice, proportional or monospaced.
> "Earning a living" is only an issue in certain occupations such as healthcare.

And, relevant for this discussion, also trucking across borders.
The point is that they don't need to require a DNA sample. They can just take one.
Their core demand up until two days ago was to depose our current federal government and replace it with a their own government. When is a cat not a cat? How clear must it be for you to understand?
All we know is she was ARRESTED, not CONVICTED.

Let me explain why that difference matters. Now, on top of the frustrating fact that there are many, many backlogs in rape kit testing across the country, women know that cooperating with authorities and reporting your rape exposes a victim to lifetime granular surveillance at the DNA level. Now, the imperfections of DNA testing expose every rape victim who submits a test to the false positives, and people who know nothing about the strength of the case will assume that being suspect or being arrested is the same as being convicted: https://gizmodo.com/when-bad-dna-tests-lead-to-false-convict...
Intel's plan to license x86 cores for chips with Arm, RISC-V and more inside
Spot on.

Then again, when he was a student, it didn't help even later in that regard having family give a huge shush payout to some underage girl's parent's for an undisclosed bad act.
Actually if you want to get technical during the campaign trump did threaten to send Hillary to prison. Then after Trump won and probably even now democratic operatives threatened to impeach and or imprison Trump on unsubstantial grounds. So it does appear that politically motivated prosecutions exist in America too on both sides. This arguably goes back to Monica Lewinsky if not Nixon.

The media frames minor or non existent crimes to go after politicians to meet the obscure agendas of the elite that funds the media...
I guess I could have been more clear. My question is about the lab side of things. Indefinite and indiscriminate data retention is definitely a problem although a different one.
https://web.archive.org/web/20220214231643/https://www.sfchr...
Perhaps you read that with a different meaning than it was written with. As I've repeatedly said, it's about the bias in reporting. You seem to not be accepting this. Might I remind you that one of the guidelines of this site is to interpret comments charitably.

You misinterpreted my comment and attacked it as being a fallacy. I explained myself and you attacked further, in the process stating a fallacy of your own. Now you are calling this pedantry. Yet you have not responded to the majority of my comments.

Why would I not correct you when you are saying that I'm saying things I'm not?
Enemy within vs enemy outside. If it was found that china was behind covid all along, you can bet that all hesitation would evaporate.
The emergency act is not the same as calling the military.
Did you let them Google while doing your test?

Did you ask questions about their CV projects that dove into the implementation of the project?
The polar extremes of fully asynchronous and fully synchronous work are unlikely to work in all circumstances and with all possible team compositions. Design work requires more collaboration than executing well defined tasks. Introverts and extroverts have different preferences.

The development of Linux is an example of large scale work that is successfully performed mostly asynchronously.
Question: How are labs doing the exploratory work without a clear hypothesis? Are they essentially doing some version of brute force?
(1) Was the charge for the ride apparent before hailing the not-technically-a-taxi?

(2) If not, what app was this?
It doesn’t matter. They can now quickly join in a Signal group and use a private, untraceable cryptocurrency called MobileCoin to send money to each other without the government knowing since it is all E2EE.

After all, extremists either left or right, terrorists and criminals have been doing that for years on Signal.
>You go out to a bar before dinner?

Does it matter? Maybe they wanna look for a bar after dinner then? In which case, you know, the phone is still useful.

>I've always thought of dinner as starting an evening out, or at the very least being part of a plan (eg, Show X followed by dinner at Y)

I'd suggest you look into the idea of spontaneity. It can be pretty great.
On the contrary. Dealing with bullshitters is much more difficult than writing code.
In my experience, it's way harder to find good managers than it is finding good developers. Maybe I've just seen a bunch of talented devs and outright terrible managers, but that's my data point.
As mentioned below: why not have a way to raise money on a proposed film (or any digital consumable)?

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30320702
Five years. And that was Polio. Coronavirus isn't Polio.
They published documents saying that.
The Power of Talk: Who Gets Heard and Why
Some genes will be considered a security risk or a health hazard for one reason or another, and CRISPR will be available as a tool for modification. In 10, 20, 30 years people who don't want to be treated may have to settle for a limited range of jobs.
> The Schwarzschild radius is the defining boundary of a black hole

In our modern understanding, yes.

> which Schwarzschild first calculated.

He calculated that there was a constant that appeared in his metric, proportional to the mass, and with units of length. But he had no idea that this constant was related to the boundary of a black hole. Of course he didn't have much time to explore his solution further, since he was killed not long after sending his paper to Einstein. It's an interesting what if question to ask what he might have found if he had had years more to do physics.

> why did Schwarzschild beat Einstein in calculating the Schwarzschild radius first?

Einstein wasn't working on the specific solution for the case of a spherically symmetric vacuum surrounding a mass. He already knew that, to a first approximation, this solution would look like Newtonian gravity, and that the next order correction terms would explain the extra precession of Mercury's perihelion (which had been observed in the 19th century) and would predict gravitational redshift and the bending of light by the Sun (neither of which had yet been observed). Einstein was more interested in deriving the general form of the field equation than investigating further the specific properties of that particular solution. Whereas Schwarzschild focused on that solution.
Many (most?) states offer grants to help pay for adaptive hardware. And I’m completely certain any company worth working for will spring for it too.

I’m a sighted person and I’m not going to pretend I know what the right technology for any particular blind person is, but computer braille really is fascinating.

Edit: I’m not a hardware guy, but it feels like an 80x24 or larger computer braille display is well within the capabilities of today’s hardware hackers. Imagine a reverse mechanical keyswitch with 8 dots that can be put on a PCB of arbitrary size in whatever configuration to understand what I have in mind. There’s probably not much money to be made, but someone with a passion and existing financial success could really make a difference.
Could you summarize who the "people in power" are and their agenda, in your opinion?
That’s a fair point. The way I see it is:

1) This is pretty severe by Canadian standards (we don’t have the same kind of protest culture the US does), but more importantly,

2) If nobody was driving their trucks up to Parliament Hill (and if the demands the protestors were initially making weren’t as wild — although obviously there’s room to disagree, as we have here, regarding how serious they are), then I would agree. The mandates and COVID itself have definitely caused a lot of disruption and it’s our right to peacefully protest what the govt does. But the moment you bring commercial vehicles into the mix you are not, imo, a protestor anymore. Especially when you have prominent voices in the US egging it on, sending them money, etc. For what it’s worth I think the blockades on the border are at least as bad if not worse than what’s going on in Ottawa.

I confess to being not overly sympathetic to protest culture generally, but I believe a free society must tolerate protests. However, I think what’s happening now has moved somewhat beyond what we should tolerate.
FWIW, as a sighted person, may I suggest:

Put a blindfold on, and see what works and doesn't work. Take the blindfold off, and try to fix what doesn't work while you can. Rinse, repeat.
Banks can freeze accounts based on suspicion alone with no recourse? That’s how you start a bank run…
My comment was responding to USB in a closet.

Where did I say that I don't test restores? I think you are misunderstanding the S3 object lock feature. With S3 object lock, you write your backup, then can read to verify or do a test recovery, but you cannot modify or delete for the retention period.

In the package I use it's called Veeam Ready-Object with Immutability and there are now a fair number of solutions that meet that target.
This seems overboard and I hope parliament rejects it. The solution to illegal behavior in a democracy is legal arrest. Not extra judicial measures and invoking anti-terror powers.
The problems with hard wrapping email body text (2020)
Some mirrors are available: https://mirrors.alpinelinux.org/
AMD Acquires Xilinx
Yes -- I think historically the power of condition handling was not well understood and algebraic effect handlers were a "rediscovery" coming from well-studied category theory (Plotkin, Power, and Pretnar).

If you want to play with "structurally typed condition handling", then the Koka language has "row-typed algebraic effect handlers" that compile to C: <http://koka-lang.org>
Speculating here, but presumably the victim is willing and able to supply their own DNA as an elimination sample. Whatever DNA is left over gets run through a database, and possibly matched with an identity. If the identity comes with a photo, the victim may well be able to verify whether that photo is that of their attacker.
> Apache has a reputation as the graveyard of open source software.

Interesting. I did not seem to know that. I always thought that Apache was a leader in open source since a lot of the notable tools (i.e. Spark, Airflow, Kafta) are maintained by Apache.

Are there any articles that I can learn more about this?