skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It'd be ideal to have a very succinct and clear 3 sentence articulation. Followed by maybe a couple of examples.

If we're exploring the mysteries of the Universe, stories help, but our own arbitrary creations? They are just tools. They should be simple, robust, anti-complex and as mundane as we can make them. T
It looks like there are some unused pins, some ADCs, a uart, and i2c unused; are these (plus +v and gnd) exposed as an accessible header/breakout?
Logseq: https://logseq.com/
Lost Ark becomes the 2nd most played game in Steam history after 24h
Rust was first implemented in Ocaml. Given that choice and the influence it has had I would say that it was inevitable that Rust would get compiler writer PL features, self-hosting or not.
I think I would skip trying to do any entity or term extraction initially. That's going well beyond basic linking. Stick with something like TF-IDF similarity or LDA topic modeling to keep things fast and straightforward until you have the UI/UX worked out, which is always more work than it looks like. (The reason I used neural net embeddings was that the OA API had just added them, and it was a fun excuse to try that out.)
Not normally, unless you count the little bit of variation due to different thermal expansion coefficients of rim and spokes but that should not be enough to make a meaningful difference.

But they do lose tension over time, so it doesn't hurt to periodically check. That's also a good way to spot cracks in rims, which and do happen especially on bikes that are built once and then used for years.
I think it speaks to the reality of a development process lead by humans in uncharted territory. Figure it out, audit it, test it for a long time, eventually cross fingers and blow the fuses. After that, either it successfully becomes a permanent public fixture, or maybe there's a small chance it implodes one day, who knows?

Certainly anything that's absolutely mission critical should not live on these L2 networks yet.
Again, this can be done without using a blockchain.

Just like all the other coins, the only use case is burning up the planet by using Ethereum, BTC, etc, racking up high fees and being used by speculators while everyone else who invests in the ponzi scheme lose their money when it all crashes.

Nothing has changed.
If your idea of physical abuse is carpal tunnel from using a mouse + keyboard, don't go into the trades. Seriously. Go to Home Depot, buy a stick of 1" copper pipe, a Ridgid (wheel) pipe cutter, and some sandpaper. Now go to your backyard, in the cold, kneel on some bricks/concrete, and spend 30 minutes cutting off little portions of the copper stick, and then clean the ends with sandpaper. For bonus points, consider reaming the insides too.

Now tell me how your wrists and hands are feeling. How about your knees? Imagine that everyday, plus an array of powertools such as impact drivers + drills, rotary hammers, sawzalls, band saws, and crimping tools that can weigh 20+ lbs.

That mouse & keyboard will start to look very, very comfortable.
And this is why it is so destructive when low effort peanut gallery commentary gains traction in society.
I think describing what I mean (or think people in general often mean) by the terms will help explain this.

The main goal is to find Product-Market fit as a first priority. This is done through prototyping, mockups, user-testing, etc, etc. Often this will be considered/called 'making an MVP'. This is an ongoing iterative process and the phase ends when you know what the core function or value proposition of the product is and who it is for.

At that point you move to the phase of building a higher quality (hopefully still very feature limited) v1.0 product.
Well, no, not really. Sure they used many techniques, but because they branched their laundering, actually only one technique got defeated, which was to tumble the money through AlphaBay. And then, coincidentally, AlphaBay got owned and their servers were seized, and it doesn't seem that those coins were sent through any privacy coin, which is then very easy for the authorities to track, as anyone would have told you.
The problem is that "having a glass of wine every now and then" is okay and doesn't come with many (if any) external costs. Why should I pay through the nose for alcoholics who abuse it? Plus, I happen to be a fairly well-paid software dev who can afford the occasional beer, but if you're a low-income earner then this occasional beer or glass of wine becomes a luxury, which doesn't strike me as entirely fair either.

I don't think "science" can really help all that much here, because a lot aspects surrounding this aren't really scientific questions. Yes, you can be informed by science to answer questions like "how addictive is this?" and "how harmful is this in what dosages?", but that doesn't really answer the question of who should pay for what, what is "fair", or what should or should not be allowed.

(and the answers to these questions aren't always clear either: is cycling a net-negative or net-positive? Health benefits from exercise, but higher risk of injuries – and why should we tax alcohol to account for all external costs but not cycling or other activities where risk is higher than some others?)

> Also work on changing the culture of it being cool to drink till you pass out or even the obligatory social drinking.

Definitely agree with this. If I say "no" then I mean "no", and trying to "oh come, just have a drink"-me is a very quick way to end up on my shit list. I've seen people do this even with people who never drink alcohol even when they know this.
After using Rust a lot, the borrow checker is not that bothersome actually. Exist MANY more things that are far more significant as causes to fear Rust:

- Is actually complex language!

- It has weird, inconsistent inter-mixed between traits, generics, macros, procedural macros, elides, alias, type alias...

- The ways async/await is introduced, multiply the complexity, is super-infectios, and I can't say you can do "fearless concurrency" anymore.

- Is slow to compile!

A "nicer" Rust is actually easy to grasp:

- Borrow checker, xor mutability stay. Is good

- Structs, Traits, Enum, Pattern matching, iterators

- Add generators, PLS!

- A simpler module system

- One single way to do macros, hopefully like Zig

- Probably everything auto-clone (and maybe the compiler elide it for "copy" types).

- Pick a more ergonomic async/concurrency story like Go or Lua. Whatever that is not the complexity of today

I think this is all...
Reminds me of Frama-C

https://frama-c.com/

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29739456
This is just saying “that’s what you get for playing with crypto you degenerate”.

The fact is wires can also be irreversible and you cannot use the court system as a blunt instrument outside your jurisdiction. The value transmission medium isn’t the problem here.
They didn't say they will rely on an some external services. But an external service from Google. Not using Google or similar can be a requirement. For example if they want to build a CRUD application manipulating personal information in Europe.
The president heads the executive and at the and of the day is responsible for setting industrial policy, economic policy and foreign relations. Of course he is responsible (but we all know that in truth the country is run by appointed civil servants, all of who are under 40 years old).
The goal is to abstract away the borrow checker for the business logic of software I write, not for the borrow checker to be absent from a rust compiler.
The article also mentions this:

> February 10 was the last day Wordle was still available at its old site.

Which doesn't appear to be the case, it is still accessible at the powerlanguage address.
Before I read this I was thinking this exactly!
There's a couple of pico-8 emulators that run on Dingux, the problems they have seem mostly due to incompatibilities rather than computing power

https://github.com/Jakz/retro8

https://0xcafed00d.itch.io/tac08-rg350
You made one of the best decisions of your life.
This is good advice. Django, for example, isn't the hottest tech on the block by far, but that's not necessarily a bad thing. Where some see bloat, others see maturity. There are a lot of QoL features like the ORM, forms etc. etc. that make django a very stress-free option. Also, HN sometimes has a derisive attitude towards turbo-like variants, but still, `htmx` is an objectively good pairing with django as well. It's not quite the same as a framework that has web sockets built in, like say Phoenix+LiveView but I'm not completely sold on that anyway. IMO lingering web sockets have an associated cost that hasn't been fairly considered yet.

All that said, my personal favorite CRUD backend is absolutely servant, but will admit that haskell can be a deterrent to some.

Note since I mentioned Phoenix: It might be suitable to you OP, it doesn't necessarily need things like external static hosting, caches, task queues etc and with LiveView can accomplish plenty without surrendering the front-end to a javascript framework. Look up the emerging PETAL stack, it might be of interest. P(Phoenix) E(Elixir) T(TailwindCSS) A(AlpineJS) L(LiveView).
Yes! I’m rereading this now. That book is an endless wellspring of reminders about what truly matters.
Are you being serious? I only knew one person who did this in real life, and even they said it almost like 'car'.
The era of the soundbite has radically transformed politics, and definitely not for the better.
Brought up over and over again on HN, your point is. Also healthcare in the US is generally not as good as in other developed countries.
The most common criticism in practice tends to be a strong aversion to mutability. Compilers can be thought of as a series of pure functions transforming a large immutable data structure, and given the practical issues of mutability (reasoning about it is legitimately hard), this can give a lot of languages a strong aversion to mutability. However, there are some domains where you can't transform the problem space into consume-and-produce-immutable data structures and expect anything close to performant--databases are a good example here.
What's the incentive for a platform to choose to be a provider?

ISPs block spam emails all the time. Should they be prevented from doing so?
This is what https://darklang is intended to be. I think in fairness it's not there yet (and it's also a service, so not what you want), but it's certainly fully integrated and doesn't need DBs, external SaaSes, devops, cloud expertise, etc.
Cyclone did a similar thing too, iiuc

http://cyclone.thelanguage.org/
What do you mean by "practically have an EE degree?"
If you don't know the details why are you speaking on it? Jimmy Carter increased US military aid to Indonesia as we knew they were committing genocide and selling donated Red Cross supplies. 90% of the weapons Suharto used in the invasion of East Timor were supplied by the United States. And we were responsible for the coup that put Suharto in power.

You can spin it however you want to try and defend poor Jimmy Carter, but I know Americans would not make the same effort for, say, Xi Xinping.
I haven’t played much Tibia, but I’m fascinated by its camera/art style. As far as I’m aware, it was the last game to use the orthographic projection with a shear as popularized by the Ultima series. Folks seem to love it or hate it, but it certainly makes controls convenient as it eliminates odd movement angles typical of isometric games.
Outing the employees involved honestly was pretty petty. The company sending the letter messed up but that’s no reason for a well-known journalist to take a minimum wage worker to town.
OTOH I have a friend who switched from programming to air conditioner repair and is much much happier. they say the number one reason is when they stop for the day the job is over. They don't have their brain running over how they're going to solve/continue/finish the current task at their job
Semicolons aren't a hard requirement for me, it's just an example of signaling asthetics to draw in the greater ruby/python type crowd.
Some of the most haunting things someone said on their deathbed
As others have pointed out (e.g.: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30324567 ), the style in this article is not what I had in mind when I coined the phrase "discovery fiction". It also has nothing to do with spaced repetition or having a "more natural flow".
But here in Norway most supermarkets carry only one or two brands of yoghurt and I never feel any lack even though I am familiar with the ranges to be found in supermarkets in the UK.

So which is the tail and which the dog?
I have a few of these loaded with openipcam software but that seems to have vanished and stopped receiving updates, so I took them offline (they're vulnerable to various wifi-related shenanigans).

It's too bad these open IoT projects never survive, even if you donate to them.
first, I am aware of the stats so the lecture was a waste.

second, the posters name was sharkweek, if you went in the water during sharkweek you probably wouldn't have two arms, this is what is known as a joke based on an eponysterical name.

third, you are also incorrect in your statement that there are no humans with 3 arms https://www.google.com/search?q=baby+born+with+three+arms
For me it’s becoming an electrician, and I actually do a great deal of recreational construction work and enjoy it. But the licensing requirements are insane, and that ultimately is what keeps me writing software.

Although I think that for a lot of people who feel this impulse, the problem might not be the type of work — it might be that the software you’re working on doesn’t do any real good for the world, or have any impact that you can see.

You can change that without having to switch fields — just don’t go to work in ad tech.
Do you think the exchanges will throw up their hands and go "oh well tricked us you clever bastard, you go free now"? I think it is much more likely that, if they can't determine the origin of coins because it has been obfuscated so much, they will just block it just to be sure. Making crypto an unacceptable KYC/AML risk will not convince the banks to allow it anyway; that's just not how banks work.
Ask HN: Hard to find USB C 5 Gbps and 10 Gbps cables?
I was just looking at for a USB C to USB C charging cable for my laptop and noticed that many of them were marked "2.0". Then reading the specs they mostly say "480 Mbps data rate" or "USB 2.0 speed" Even for shorter 1 ft and 3 ft cables there are not many listings for faster cables. Has anyone else noticed this?
That's how I learned it using C in the 80s. Maybe Millennials are redefining it too.
I don't see it, so it does not exist?
There's a bug in democracy, that's being actively exploited: the cheapest votes are the least intelligent
So, let's say you needed to turn 23 million into legit revenue. Well, you might slightly overpay for something that a partner has for sale, the "over" part of that "pay" being money that you are turning into legit revenue. You could even have them overpay for something back from you, if you needed it to end up in your actual bank account, all clean and sparkly fresh.

But, what is "overpay"? Well, something more than what other people are paying for that. What if most of the people are trying to "overpay"? Well, the price of that thing would spiral upwards. If it were something of no intrinsic value, that would actually be a bonus, since it's oddly more difficult to spot the overpayment part if it's a rational thing, for which there is a clear market price.

What I wonder is, how much of the overpayment for non-digital art in the 20th century was like this?
Thank you for the insight on where you draw the line, that explains a lot. Still, a hard terrain to navigate on when you can say something and when you can't, even if you make correct statements backed up by data. Just to be clear we're on the same page: I've made absolutely same observation about other bmw drivers. and we, humans, do exactly that: observe and generalize.

Regarding my personal beliefs, as I've stated above "I personally believe in statistics and I believe you cannot use* them to make derogatory* generalizations"

1. regarding "use": you cannot use specifically statistics/data to justify any *-ist remark. "I hate bmw drivers because most of them are assholes on the road", an example of that (not what you said!)

2. regarding "derogatory": you can(and should!) use statistics to do (just) generalizations, i.e. in a context of talking about group behaviour. "most of bmw drivers are agressive and dangerous drivers, as shown by this data" is a perfectly fine statement.

My problem is that you can say that sort of statements about certain group of drivers, but if you would have pulled up a similar argument and used (for example) PoC and crime rates, you would have been torn to pieces by everyone. And for me, on the surface, the statement and the structure would be absolutely the same (and it is STILL not escalated to exclusion and dehumanization). So whats the difference? And why different treatment? People above are arguing that buying BMW its a choice and using inherent (immutable) properties (i.e. race/gender) is different for the case of stereotyping, but I cannot see the key difference that makes okay to do one and not okay to do another.
Indeed, in the mid 2000s I worked on building tool flows in a multi-vendor environment with EDIF as the common netlist format. It worked fairly OK, with some tweaking.

I synthesized complex modules to EDIF/NGC using Synopsys Design Compiler, Xilinx XST and Mentor Precision and stitched them together via NGDbuild targeting Virtex 4 FPGAs.
+1 for good old Java, rock solid and just works for so many large, mission critical, and high performance (!) systems.

As for vaadin - how far can u get without the pro version? None of the samples include a login, and the LoginView seems to be a PRO feature? It looks full of features.
This sounds very handy for broadcast within a box type of applications.
This is an aside, but is 600k a meaningful bounty compared to the potential payout of all that data?

I suppose I wouldn't know how much that data is worth unless I do have a crack for it, so I guess the point is moot :P
The rust book has a great section about OOP and i think solves alot of the issues discussed in these articles at length.

http://web.mit.edu/rust-lang_v1.25/arch/amd64_ubuntu1404/sha...
Also, Google's infrastructure is so vertically integrated that it's not obvious how to offer it others. E.g. Borg assigns 1 IP to each machine, which means every pod-equivalent has to listen on a dynamically allocated port, so Google eschewed DNS in favor of a system that more easily assigned dynamic IP:port pairs without relying on TTLs (BNS/Chubby). Google also decoupled storage from compute and had a bunch of custom databases to run in that paradigm (GFS/CFS/BigTable).
Ask HN: what does everyone use for ad blocking on mobile?

Fwiw I'm on Android and use Chrome but curious for what people do
> There's something so insidiously, backhandedly condescending about tech workers pining for the simplicity of an honest day's job that drives me nuts.

Agreed. SO recently left a career in academia to get a job in tech as an entry level software developer. Says this is the easiest job they've ever had in their life, and wondered why they didn't start sooner.

Developers have no idea how difficult even other white collar jobs are, let alone blue collar work that involves physical labor and the outdoors.
The article opens "Amazon has another hit game..."

While I definitely consider New World (Amazon's first hit game) to be a success, I don't think it's something to be emulated. The content in that game seriously drops off, there are multiple game-breaking (and economy breaking) bugs and it's obvious that the game had a messy concept that switched tracks multiple times.

Further, I'm sad at the general state of affairs in the RPG gaming space. I remember fondly games like the Witcher and Skyrim, but looking at the trends, it seems that micro-transactions are the future of this space.

I'm cautiously optimistic that this will be an enjoyable game in and of itself, but maybe I'll just replay Morrowind or perhaps Dark Souls instead of picking this up.
Even if that were the case, they clearly don't want to invest any extra time or money in refactor. So much of Kubernetes' design has been problematic, yet they just limp on monkey-patching and bolting on features that take years to go from idea to implementation. If you want any major changes or simplification in K8s, wait 3 years.

A traditional FOSS project is not limited in this way. The developers often just start a new major version and overhaul everything. But they don't have to answer to "the business" or huge institutional users. Commercially driven open source will always be a product beholden to stakeholders, rather than technology designed to operate as well as it can.
I doubt storks care about national borders and this should probably be repeated using birth rates in general areas around stork populations ;)
It reminds me a bit of those recipe sites, where every recipe is preluded with a bunch of mostly irrelevant text. Low information-density.
If you had followed the exact same fitness regimen when you were 25, you would have seen better results: higher speeds, more endurance, shorter recovery times, etc.

That’s why I mentioned sports: even people who have worked out their whole lives, at the top of their sports, see declines in physical performance as they age.

Congrats on getting in shape. Relative improvements in physical fitness are beneficial and possible for many people. But it doesn’t reverse aging.
I'm not certain whether this is what you had in mind, but in the UK we have a green, amber, red (voluntary) labelling system that indicates fairly quickly at-a-glance how a food product fares in various nutritional dimensions: https://www.nutrition.org.uk/putting-it-into-practice/food-l...
I develop firstly for data entry and smallest amount of user inputs then go design SW from there.

The UX/UI is often the hardest in terms of making your SW the easiest or shortest way to get to your functionalities.

When a SW design hits a roadblock based on misordering of UI data entry or missing (or even too extraneous) of a user input, then reconciliation effort is made on SW/UX.
https://github.com/hvf/franchise
If I read this [0] correctly, there is still a hashmap of sorts.

[0] https://flylib.com/books/en/3.475.1.74/1/
The goal is to abstract away the borrow checker for the business logic of software I write, not for the borrow checker to be absent from a rust compiler. I still want everything that is rust, I just want an alternative to php/ruby/python that is natively integrated into rust and the full rust ecosystem.
There's not much about the life of MS-DOS there. It's mostly pre-history.
Yes it's okay to reject a job if you don't like the software they use. It's your life, your decision what you're willing to put up with. End of discussion.
My recommendation is to hire a local vendor...interview a few first, though.

Or to put it another way, instead of trying to roll your own, stick to your core competency and pay someone to exercise their core competency.

Good luck.
There are no humans with three or more arms

Never say never:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymelia