skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
They are a bit all over the place - I started this years ago so I don't really have anything solid, but searching gives a few results that looks pretty solid ([1] [2]). If you temporarily tried doom [3], I think you could see how it would work for you. You need to install something like isync as well so you have a mailbox index locally. I would start with just one account - multiple accounts is a bit more effort.

In general, be prepared to spend some time getting this to work. I wrote a bunch of elisp, but you don't have to write much. For me it was worth it, but this is not a plug-and-play solution unfortunately (nor is notmuch).

[1]: https://jherrlin.github.io/posts/emacs-mu4e/

[2]: http://cachestocaches.com/2017/3/complete-guide-email-emacs-...

[3]: https://github.com/hlissner/doom-emacs/blob/master/modules/e...
Latest Ubuntu is 2021.10 :-).

If instead we consider actual releases, there are a few open source projects that are still in 0.xxx but for which each point release could be considered a an actual release. A sibling comment mentioned ClamAV, but there is also MAME (currently ad 0.240).
Like when Epic dangerously breached Apple’s security by allowing users to pay them directly for Fortnite skins.
There are also some some hybrid SOCs, like TI's Sitara chips that the Beagleboard is built around, that have a ARM core for linux, then a couple MCU cores for doing fast-ish realtime stuff. (TI's FAQ says a four instruction busyloop that just toggles a pin can run at about 50MHz on a PRU)
To clarify, it's $99/year, not a one-time fee. With developer mode sideloaded apps expire after a year; without it only 7 days.

Why isn't it free, or a nominal one-time $20 fee like the Microsoft Xbox developer program? Very good question.
Similar experience here. I've worked for a British company, and I thought the amount of politics and backstabbing was insane.
A few questions I've been asked by interviewees that I really liked:

* What's your favorite thing that you've accomplished so far in your current role?

* What's a recent challenge that you personally faced? What challenges are you/your team/division/company/industry facing in the next few years?

* How does your team make big decisions (the article goes into this a bit, but I think it can be helpful to be explicit about whether engineering/PM/sales are on the same page)

* What time did you start work today? (Corollary to "what's a typical day like?", and a good segue to culture type questions)
Yes, the algorithm is a poor algorithm that overfits. It is not a good algorithm by any reasonable measure, unless the intent specifically is to commit users to such a funnel.

Whether the content is stupid cat videos or a DIY isn't relevant to my original point: it's short-form video content developed by people attempting to cash in on some meme (or niche), and very much in the vein of showing off for one's peers. Some like to think that if it's not an audio meme, but rather an undergrad waxing poetic about just learning Schrodinger's Equation or some handy person displaying his DIY skills that it's not about cashing in/showing off. But it is.
Fauci disagrees with you, he considered serial passage in a lab a plausible explanation:

> Fauci wrote: “?? Serial passage in ACE2-transgenic mice.”

https://theintercept.com/2022/01/12/covid-origins-fauci-reda...
Software and hardware patents on absurd things. Lethal legal bullying of any potential competition. The walls of the garden are ruthlessly defended and expanded as far as the law can stretch.
People went with the content. Windows had the apps, so people went there. Mac kept a fraction because they wouldn’t give up certain apps that Mac was superior with.

And then that whole market had huge disruptions when most people stopped using Mac and Windows most of the time in favour of IOS or Android. Again - because of the app experiences.

Exclusives are why Nintendo continues to thrive with the Switch.

I just don’t see his “open always wins” coming to pass. Google said that with Android and still make more money from iOS. Oops.
You do realise not everyone has $500 to spare? For some people the distinction matters a lot.

It’s the same reason some people with high end phones pay a larger monthly phone bill. They want a phone they cannot afford to buy so they pay in instalments as part of their mobile contract.

So yes, it absolutely does matter to a lot of people.
There's a difference between "toxic masculinity" and "asynchronous functions". Asynchronous functions are still functions, but there's nothing masculine about "toxic masculinity".
I would naively claim that unions have power because they are physically localized, and represent similar people (income, standard of living, laws, etc), and create a very physically localized skill vacuum when they strike, that applies immediate and significant pressure.

App Store developers are sprinkled all over the world, so not too much is consistent between them. Getting enough of these varied people to collectively pause their income, and allow their competitors to flourish, long enough for Apple to even notice/care, is probably much harder. I think it would be even harder to present the applications failure in a way that an average consumer would sympathize with or even understand.
screen time directly subtracts from useful relationship forming, for partners IMHO .. your profile implies massive screen time now
Many globally operating software companies have offices full of people in China, but presumably they have access controls in place to minimize the risk of data exfiltration.

On the other hand, many of the same companies have been involved in scandals where employees abused their position to stalk people or whatever, so maybe their access controls aren't actually that strict.

So it would've been interesting to hear about TikTok's internal security culture.

I'm not sure whether I'd call what moderators get "access to customer data", since it's not like they're in control, right? And aren't the posts they're moderating usually public anyway?
This isn't how it is on Android. Why would it be different on iPhone?
Can a gun commit murder? Same answer. HAL killed people in the course of following its human written program. It would make as much sense to charge autopilot software with homicide.
> The current Netflix is irritating by comparison. I can hardly find anything to watch, especially the stuff I search for.

This is my experience exactly. Netflix has mostly retreated into an "originals"-heavy strategy with an extremely low batting average. Because they have a weak editorial POV, they abruptly and unceremoniously cancel quality content that doesn't perform well, to the point that you're a fool if you start watching a promising-looking series before it completes. If we didn't get such a good deal via T-Mobile, we'd have canceled already.
Do you monitor her web browser usage to prevent her from going to phishing sites that can steal her life savings? Or do you use features to block such sites?

No one says iOS can't implement similar parental controls for sideloading; they already have parental controls to prevent installing any new apps. Or add a similar phishing prevention systems like Google and Firefox has.
Women generally report more job satisfaction than men do; you'd expect a higher proportion of men preferring homemaking to their jobs if that was the dominant factor.
You could probably get the free version with ads constantly showing up in your brain.
Is "novel" the right criteria here? If Covid didn't have asymptomatic/pre-symptomatic infectiousness, it'd still be novel but may not have become a pandemic. Therefor may not have even been noticed, no tests developed for it, etc...
Imagine being so ignorant and self-centered you think that men not showing the same interest in something that doesn't interest them is them lacking style.

I guess women and girls not liking programming and cars as much as men is proof they're technically illiterate and have no appreciation for science or engineering.
And in the jump bar (^6, which is then filterable by typing) long before Xcode had the minimap!
Global death is 1% in a year. And you won’t hear about it, because it’s rounding error.
I don't know, the vast majority of teens are users of TikTok, and attention spans are undoubtedly decreasing across the board. Everyone. Yet I don't think the majority of the population had ADHD previously. If the incidence of ADHD was really like the 4-8% in the medical literature, then we would see 4-8% of teens hooked to TikTok, but no, it's a majority (>50%) of teens that are hooked to Tiktok/youtube/instagram.
Obviously taller people, on average, have longer guts.
"Jokingly"?

The current issue aside, racists and xenophobes basically always attempt to evade responsibility by claiming they were "only joking". Such claims should be tossed in the trash bin where they belong. First, it's not a joke, and it's not funny. Second, they're lying...they didn't intend it as a "joke" and don't really even understand what a "joke" actually is, for the most part. And third, it's not relevant whether it was a joke or not.
A lot of these questions touch on important topics, but I think there are too many of them and they are far too specific - to the point where you might be inadvertently signaling some kind of unreasonable inflexibility ("you better be using a particular bug tracking system or else I'm out!"). I'd suggest generalizing and combining many of these. Asking the interviewer to walk you through the development process can be more revealing and is less adversarial than a rapid-fire of 30 questions.

Also, the likelihood that a candidate will be informed of any non-public plans to sell the company are slim...
You can view the source of each node in Blender, but that’s not the point. Writing a script is not fundamentally different form connecting nodes in geometry nodes and entering attributes.

What I’m asking is how do the output and performance differ.
Most people do not care about their jobs. And they have jobs, not careers. They work because they get paid. Occasionally they get a brief flicker of satisfaction. More often they enjoy the company of their co-workers. Occasionally they hate their jobs so much that they engage in unhealthy behaviors s as a coping mechanism, like alcoholism, or they quit.

Basically everyone who doesn’t stay heavily involved in their professional field after retirement was doing it almost solely for money. There are better and worse jobs, more and less enjoyable ones. But a huge majority of people have jobs, not careers.
Yea but those 53 days I probably can't chew anything worth cooking on any stove anyway. You can pry my gas stove from my 53 day old cold dead hands.
> The "Lump of Labor" fallacy is just that, a fallacy. Economic gains are not zero-sum.

Frankly, I'm very tired of debunking the zero-sum trope.

Not only are many things in the economy zero-sum, in the case of labor, even if the economy is humming at 150%, it's trivial to imagine a scenario where the man and the woman are both earning 75% of what they would have without the other sex in the labor force. Both are worse off, yet the capital owners are better off and it gives the illusion that everything is going great.

The illusion is so good that we've divorced productivity from wage for 50 years, made tons of women miserable and no one so much as batted an eye.

And in many places, housing has effectively become zero-sum, due to pressure from large capital investors and zoning restrictions on building new housing. In these scenarios, even modest increases in demand can skyrocket the housing/rental prices beyond what is sustainable by the young population.

> Whatever the cause I fully reject the lazy conclusion this is somehow women's fault.

You're right to reject it, but the zero-sum argument is absolutely orthogonal to the issue. It's also completely incorrect and trivially debunked by anyone with a shred of economic common sense.
I disagree with the author's conclusions, mainly for reasons already stated: the examples given are of companies that provide fungible services, whereas Netflix offers unique programming; it's amassed a war chest of IP at this point; the cost of entry into this market is extremely high; the UX failures of Paramount+ and Amazon Prime, among others, only goes to show that Netflix's core competency isn't so simple to replicate. Imagine someone arguing that the Disney theme parks will falter because there Sea World, Cedar Fair, Six Flags and Dollywood could easily get together and replicate their success.

But aside from all of that, I find it irksome when columnists self-identify as "honest brokers," straight-shooters, true patriots, etc. Don't tell me you're trustworthy. Truth-tellers and liars make the exact same assertion. (Hasn't this man ever visited any two-tribe islands?) Just make your points, and respect your readers to determine that you can be trusted.
To drive home the enormous scale of the local solar system, and by extension the universe, I'm fond of this: https://joshworth.com/dev/pixelspace/pixelspace_solarsystem....
I suspect it’s a sliding scale—working is probably relatively more compelling if you’re a cancer researcher than if you’re writing up the paperwork for home mortgages. But way more people do the latter than the former, right? And most people doing the latter aren’t qualified to do the former (and that’s okay).

I think that often people with remunerative, intellectually stimulating jobs overlook the perspective of women who have (and are realistically only qualified to have) jobs we would probably regard as more mundane.
The issue (or benefit depending on how you see it) is that Apple is very conservative and try to limit as much as possible their security risks.

Sideloading is part of it, and I can also mention JIT compilation.
> My observation is that we are going to have a radical rebalancing of who reproduces and who doesn’t.

I think the idea that everyone has the option to settle down and have kids is a relatively recent phenomenon. It used to be that most men never had kids. Nowadays most men do have kids. That said - 25%+ of men will never have children. Kinda wild when you think about that. 1/4 of all men will never have children. Whether this is a choice or not isn't clear (I'm going to go with - not a choice overwhelmingly). The interesting part though is that the number is less than 15% for women. That means that there are ~70% more men than women who will never have children. These stats are usually taken for men who are age 45+ - where the gender balance is more equal.
I once met a woman that actually believed that the moon constantly changes in shape and luminosity.

Mind you, a fully functioning adult with a good job.

I'm not posting this to make fun of it, rather to say that in general people have absolutely no idea how anything in the world works. They know what they need to know.
You call the Cartesian coordinate system a Gaussian plane?
As expected.

I'm not interested into turning conversations into competitions, especially when you're ignoring most of the list to focus on a single thing you can lean into to be right.

Enjoy being right, I don't care to waste my time with dishonest discourse.
US health experts (Fauci, Collins) and UK ones (Jeremy Farrar) were also trying to suppress the lab leak hypothesis, as evidenced by the FOIA emails.
It captures neutrons and breeds tritium, which will be separated out and used to fuel the fusion reaction.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/breeding-bl...
Right. It’s our fault, that is, men’s. We live in a society in which we we have disproportionately had the power. And this is the result.

But I don’t think it’s really a gender thing, I think it’s a power and money thing. That is, I don’t think mainly white, rich and powerful men set out to disadvantage other men. I think they were more focused on advantaging themselves to the exclusion of everyone else.

What I find interesting isn’t so much why men are doing poorly. Why are women doing better in certain areas? Although progress has been made towards institutional equity, men still have the advantage in most places. Why are women succeeding despite that?
I run a consulting business and have found people have started to request in-person meetings. I tell them Zoom is more efficient (which it is) and they agree.
Nearly every government on the planet under every governing system has experienced some dishonesty and information suppression over the pandemic, its hard to say which place would have been better

“But at least people would be able to talk about it” thats the goto() rebuttal amirite?
Depends on interpretation: one infers possible security embarrassment (or exposure of a secret), the other potentially total incompetence at failure to ID/notice/contain (or otherwise manage). Depending on which members of the Politburo care more about what perception, may in fact mold towards which one they feel more "comfortable admitting to" if the evidence is ambiguous.
You nailed it!

First guarantee is that nobody is manually going in and poking around your account details since the process you've described happens entirely programmatically.

Now, we could program our system to do things other than what's mentioned. However, we're quite disinterested in (actually, emphatically against) ruining our trust/reputation with customers (plus the general public) given our dependence on such relationships and desire to succeed as a company. All that's to say, the second guarantee is that we won't be touching such sensitive data unless given permission to do so by the user.

An example of when we might need to is if the user wants to pay their utility bill using stored payment options instead of submitting payment information. Even in this case, there won't be human eyes on this data; only our Python backend will be interacting with it.
When I was picking a name for my startup, I was considering Sidewinder. I liked it because it implied speed/accuracy and indicates lateral movement (my startup makes a speed-reading tool that helps you move your eyes more quickly).

When I asked my girlfriend what she thought, it didn't resonate at all. I asked around further, and it turned out men reliably knew about Sidewinders and thought the name was cool, and women thought about the snake, if anything. I had been concerned about the war-related connotation, but I dropped it from my shortlist because the name didn't work at all with half the population.
Why should they not be? Men and women have widely different interests. Let it be.
If someone swallows more than one, they can pinch together different parts of the intestine or bowl and cause a perforation, which is a serious medical emergency that if untreated will lead to death.

It's dangerous for anyone, but babies and toddlers are most likely to actually swallow them.
More than 90% of crypto trading is wash trading https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S15446...

All ICOs are scams, without question. I don't know why anyone would ever get tricked into an ICO.

Most new coins are pump and dump.

So yes, overwhelmingly it's a scam, or at the very least, overwhelmingly manipulated.

Does that mean the core few who have been tricked into thinking it's a useful technology and truly believe in it are off base? I don't know, I don't know if the majority of crypto being used for fraud invalidates the few potentially useful hypotheses of crypto. I think the real question is can crypto survive at all as a useful system given it's inherently a great platform for fraud?
A lot has happened in the science, and space technology sphere since 2013, should be great to mine that in new Futurama episodes.
Matt Stoller: Exposing the Amazon Prime Scam
Hypothesis: ideologically-aligned people across governmental, media, scientific, and corporate entities sincerely believe totalitarian measures promote common welfare.

Given the propensity for ideologically-aligned people to consume similar information sources, distributed and uncoordinated actions may unwittingly work toward a common, unspoken goal. These people may not need to ever know each other. I recommend reading about memetic warfare [1] for a strategic overview of targeting and infecting a receptive host population with ideas. Remember that ideologies matter, especially to those people with power over the direction of society.

We may also hypothesize that at least some of those ideologically-aligned people do in fact know each other and agree upon plans-of-action. If you don't believe such meetings occur in practice, I encourage you to hold a high-level leadership position in a large organization and attempt to propagate measures such as the imposition of totalitarian measures across society. You simply cannot do it alone.

The reality is likely a combination of both approaches: some people promulgating a totalitarian agenda (though the word "totalitarian" will never be intentionally associated with the agenda), and more people agreeing with and therefore furthering that agenda (even those those people may be opposed to totalitarianism when identified as such).

[1] Brian Hancock, "Military Memetics: The Future of War," https://westernman.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Memetic-Wa...
>But man, there's something really off-putting about downloading from Sourceforge. I can't put my finger on it, but it seems scammy.

They were caught adding malware to installers. As in the installers you downloaded were modified to have an extra "Do you also want to install yahoo toolbar" step when installing.

https://www.infoworld.com/article/2610419/retro-repo-sourcef...

They since stopped. But the reputation damage persists to this day.
Sideloading is actually two separate issues:

1. Should Apple allow iPhone users to build their own software (or third-party open source software) and deploy it to their iPhones? The answer here is a resounding yes; in fact it's already possible! Just register a developer account, and you can sign your own apps and deploy them to your phone.

2. Should Apple allow predatory 3rd party vendors (Google, Meta, TikTok, spyware developers, etc.) to circumvent the AppStore review process and deploy their opaque blobs to other people's iPhones? The answer here should be no in my opinion. (unless iOS gets rewritten in Rust with a capability-based ultrasecure watertight microkernel, where accessing dangerous "private" APIs and thus privacy violations are provably impossible - in this hypothetical utopic vision the AppStore review process would become moot from a security point of view, although there are other aspects of the review process that cannot be formalized that easily, c.f. "I know it when I see it")

(of course, the predatory 3rd party vendors love it when people conflate the two issues)
Flash Joule heating extracts rare earth elements from fly ash, bauxite residue
I had issues with it as well, was following the Tailscale guide for getting userspace running in Azure App Service and I could not get it to work.
And in the same way you can use website blockers to prevent them from accessing phishing sites, or give limited user accounts on a computer, iOS has parental control rules you can setup. It already has a feature to prevent installing (and deleting) apps.

https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT201304
Fusion 360 handles this perfectly. In fact it has thread creation directly built in (both textured and modelled explicitly). I recently needed to make a nut for a specific thread, and did it by subtracting the thread from a volume. If you're careful you can inspect the results and see how to offset the thread slightly to move from a too-tight fit to a simple press fit.