skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
ADHD has certain symptoms that can lead your significant other to believe you're a (socio?)psychopath:

- First, folks with ADHD tend to lack empathy. It's ironic because we also tend to be very sensitive to others' emotions, leading us to think that we are feeling empathy. It's not.

- Second, we have an absentmindedness that leads non-ADHD spouses to tear their hair. They often feel you're deliberately ignoring them. We often cover up for ourselves with pointless, white lies. Spouses can come to believe that you are perpetually dishonest.

- Third, we're impulsive. That leads us to do things we shouldn't. We also can't help ourselves from doing many things our sig others ask us not to do.

Besides that, our impaired executive function means we have extremely poor awareness time. On a short time frame, folks with ADHD are almost always late to every type of event. On a long time frame, we can be very poor savers and bad at planning for far-in-the-future events like retirement. Untreated, someone with ADHD will unfairly burden their spouse with all the planning in the household.

I found that a combination of medication, practicing mindfulness, and even having a mere awareness of your tendencies wins you 90% of the battle.

I've been in a relationship and now marriage for almost 15 years now – I cannot imagine what it would be like maintaining this thing without acknowledging the gravity of ADHD on many aspects of the relationship.
Artists are paid by exposition I guess!

I'm not sure why using the archive for stealing has become the norm here.
Its basically like writing code. Aladdin was prototyped, Proof of concept, then put into production. So if anything needed a complete re-write, it wouldn't affect final production.

Hayao seems to doing continuous refactoring, so as long as you don't need to edit too many scenes already drawn you can potentially come out with a good final product while giving production as much time as possible.
> According to Simha’s estimates, humans produce enough urine to replace about one-quarter of current nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers worldwide

They have got to be taking the piss.

So worth the downvotes.
>> Why is my USB stick (a physical thing I can hold) part of a Linux partition of my hard disk?

It is not part of the partition. It is just an arbitrary path that is mapped to your USB stick. You can choose where you want it to be mapped depending on your needs and what you are trying to do. There are conventions about where most Linux distributions will map removable media (/mnt or /media), but conventions do not have to be followed if you do not want to.

The "one filesystem" design of Unix / Linux is all about abstraction. Anything that follows file-like conventions can be mapped into the filesystem. For example, on Linux there is a virtual filesystem under /proc.

"/proc is very special in that it is also a virtual filesystem. It's sometimes referred to as a process information pseudo-file system. It doesn't contain 'real' files but runtime system information (e.g. system memory, devices mounted, hardware configuration, etc). For this reason it can be regarded as a control and information centre for the kernel. In fact, quite a lot of system utilities are simply calls to files in this directory. For example, 'lsmod' is the same as 'cat /proc/modules' while 'lspci' is a synonym for 'cat /proc/pci'. By altering files located in this directory you can even read/change kernel parameters (sysctl) while the system is running."

Source: https://tldp.org/LDP/Linux-Filesystem-Hierarchy/html/proc.ht...
You just resolve the domain to a private IP on your internal network, Let's Encrypt can see it as whatever you want, for all they care it's 1.1.1.1.
The only problem I see there is a missing market, or as explained in the article, "2. Status can’t pay the rent". But I disagree with the premise that you need a direct intermediary.

Sooner or later, I think companies like twitter or reddit will want to "lock in with golden handcuffs" their most valuable writers, those who result in precious ad money eyeballs.

Otherwise, these writers may go to those who'll pay them. Some may decry that, but I think it will incentivize both to behave.

If you need fresh examples, I find Rogan tone regarding the whole Spotify thing very telling: he's as nice to them as someone who's received a $100M cheque :)

And on the other side, how Spotify handled that despite the various pressures exerted, is also very telling: they're as nice to him as any pro-sports manager would be to a highly paid star player, who in the course of the contract is expected to generate way more revenue for the team that what they pay him (or... they would not pay him that much in the first place!)

Both parties benefit tremendously from the deal, which gives a strong incentive for everyone to behave.

The author has noticed part of the trend in journalism: the "extreme upper who’s public standing achieved escape velocity, allowing them to go independent via Substack and earn vastly higher incomes".

The only reason it's currently limited to the upper tail is due to frictions and transaction costs / legal issues etc. making it easier to pay $100M to 1 person vs $1 to 100M people. However, that's not set in stone.

With the financial upheaval that crypto will unleash onto the world, I believe that status WILL end up paying the rent: reddit could certainly spin some coin to pay the people they value. Writers will moonlight under a nom-de-plume, until it starts paying more than their daily job. If it's not reddit, then some other company will.
Does anyone know how the BTC were stolen in the first place? Was the vulnerability found?
I'm less worried about somebody attacking more radio and more annoyed that radio stations have taken to using an information mechanism designed to tell me what I'm listening to and used it to serve ads.

Unless we are calling serving unwanted ads as an attack.

But in a broader sense, I am absolutely unsurprised that there is terrible security on automotive hardware and software. Things like this are one of my major personal concerns about self driving cars.
Splitting app binaries that can be easily redownloaded from configs and user data makes a lot of sense. Also caches that can be deleted and rebuilt.
I wish I had 50Mbps uplink. My web server (https://timshome.page) runs on a ~15Mbps uplink. The hardware is still overpowered for it's usage, though, with a Ryzen 9 3900x (the server gets my gaming rig hand-me-downs) and 16GB of ram.

In my case, the limited bandwidth probably protects my server in some respect.
I would argue this is the exact opposite of what we want to do.

The primary cause of this problem is the conventional desktop OS which has no meaningful security model.

IOS and Android have the correct approach to mitigate this, strong sandboxing and mandatory access control.

GNU/Linux phones bring these problems to mobile, which considering how much of our lives are on these devices, is an absolute disaster.
You can, but you might not want employeerecords.example.com leaking its IP address, even if it is an inaccessible 192.168.10.10. Defense in depth. You can use hosts or internal resolution.
> "journalists often can't find another job based on their english-adjacent degree; and the barrier to entry for journalism is very low"

Y'know, maybe journalists should learn to code. Tim Apple said that learning to code is important.
I’ve got a ton of certs from LE where the IP resolves to an RFC 1918 IP
The Definitive Guide to Understanding Web3
Doesn't deep geothermal generally require fracking? At least the geothermal plants that I've seen being implemented right now do. Is there any fancy new tech breaking through there currently?

I think both fusion and geothermal are very exciting, crazy thing is although geothermal sounds simpler, I have no idea what's holding it back technology-wise, yet I have a pretty good understanding of the state of fusion research right now.

Why couldn't we get geothermal without fracking? Is it so hard to establish a more controlled heat exchange channel down there? Harder than developing nuclear fusion?
There's a constellation of reasons to go outside for a walk
The barrier is extremely low; now anyone with a wordpress can call themself a “journalist” and there isn’t anything anyone can do to stop them. They really don’t even need the English degree although sometimes it can be evident when they do not.
> The problem is they also came up against vile, populist hate about Syrian immigrants, Romanian neighbours, people not speaking english on buses, fake news about pillow regulations;

Except there is some truth/validity in all of these - they are proxies. The pillow/banana stuff was about over-regulation by the EU. People not speaking the native language on buses is an indication of a a loss of British culture (people will be generally protective of their own culture). Romanian neighbours is about a fear of losing one's low-paying job to an immigrant.

These are all valid worries of many people in the UK.

Calling them "vile", "populist" is what I'm talking about with regard to remain arrogance. Ignore voter's fears at your peril.
If journalism is similar to art, this seems obvious. When we consider the many classical periods of art, we see that the majority of the artists lived in the same location, knew each other, and had the same circle of funders for their work. It is essential to be able to compete with someone on your level.
A lot of journalists and would-be journalists end up doing corporate stuff like tech writing, content marketing, PR, etc.
If you are into sci-fi with a tinge of horror you might like the Night's Dawn trilogy by Peter F Hamilton [0].

0: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Night%27s_Dawn_Trilogy
>they did it because it was profitable

No, they did it because they viewed "others" as less than human, or less deserving of dignity and respect, no different than a beast of burden. Slavery predates capitalism by millennia, so viewing others this way clearly doesn't share a causative relationship with capitalism. To contend that capitalism caused slavery is absurd. It's the only economic system in history that resulted in the enduring abolition of slavery. Modern, alternative economic systems still devolve into utilizing slavery to this very day.

You should read Adam Smith's The Theory of Moral Sentiments, and The Wealth of Nations, which, in great detail, illustrate the economic inefficiency and moral repugnance of slavery in what we now call capitalism. Slavery was definitely not capitalistic, using your definition, purely from a profit motive perspective. It was horrible at maximizing profits.

The economic philosophy of private property, the quintessential foundation of capitalism, is on the basis that everyone has a right to individual liberty and autonomy (again, Adam Smith).

You should also read George Fitzhugh, the most prominent representative of anti abolitionist plantation owners. He was a staunch anti-capitalist specifically because the moral framework it is built on humanized black people and this sentiment was a primary driver in the abolitionist movement. Capitalists and abolitionists were extremely closely associated during the abolitionist movement.

>Maximizing rights and freedoms on the macro scale means limiting some people's edge freedoms on the micro scale.

No it doesn't. It means preventing others from stepping on universal freedoms of others, which is exactly the philosophical foundations of private property. This is categorically different than limiting freedoms. Preserving individual freedoms doesn't mean limiting them for some selectively.
> Simple and straightforward examples struggle to show any benefits that generalizations could/would provide.

Using Haskell you can use do-notation (with lists, Maybe and Either) as a simple example that should show the user the advantage of generic monads. (Just don't show them the problems with composability of monads or 'do-notation considered harmful' ;).
> you hire your friends; which inevitably leads to homogenization.

This is very common, in many industries. Maybe moreso, with journalism (I am not very familiar with that industry).

Also "you hire people that don't make you uncomfortable."

I strongly suspect that this also happens with software development. "Cultural outsiders" (like me), have a very hard time getting in the door. I am quite sure that one reason that many older folks don't get hired, is because CEO <= 30, and doesn't want people around, that make them even slightly uncomfortable. Since they're the boss; what they want, they get. In "classic" corporations, CEOs are generally in their 50s, or older, and don't feel particularly challenged by older folks. They have to hire younger folks; even if it makes them uncomfortable.

I've learned the value of a "heterodyne" workplace. There is definitely friction, caused by clashing cultures, but the product is often wonderful.
While I'm joking, I got a few job postings like that. It was insane. And HR is complaining about not being able to hire people.
News from last week:

Facebook suffers biggest one-day fall in history as shares plunge over 26%

More than $230bn wiped off the value of Meta making stock market history.

Most concerning was a never-before-seen drop in Facebook’s daily user numbers.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2022/02/03/almost-200...

Anyway, I think facebook is too big to fail.
… but seriously, this astonished me. Would love to see the rough calculation behind this. My biochemistry isn’t nearly good enough to begin to replicate this estimate.
Yea, same for GCP.
An Introduction to Deno: Is It Better Than Node.js?
"Disaster capitalism" is a well-established, pretty well known rhetorical term coined by Naomi Klein, a good 15 years ago now. (The book it came from is called The Shock Doctrine)

It refers to a kind of capitalism (and capitalist policy-making) that is poised ready to financially exploit the negatives of any economic shock precisely because the people involved have proximity to the very power structures that are unleashing that economic shock.

It was a prediction that came true.

The Brexit-leaning establishment has made a lot of money out of economic predictions and money movements triggered by Brexit, and the overlap between politicians and hedge funds/investment funds/large non-EU exporters etc. was so close as to suggest the possibility that the legislation has designs for them.

"Further evidence that" is just dry humour from a Brit. We are in absolutely deep, deep **** in this country for the next two years; everything is going to be bad because the Brexit transition has unilaterally, not bilaterally, failed.
I agree and I don't believe you are in conflict with the author.

Travel can be seen as an escape for the mind. It's heroin for a daily life that could be improved.

We often say a vacation "keeps you sane" however in the context of travel as a drug we might rethink that notion.
I'm not certain why crypto is hugely important here. Can reddit not just ask people to link a paypal/some other banal payment provider if they would like to pay content creators?
Pelosi buckles, pushes stock-trading ban
Can't imagine why this, a public link to precisely what the parent comment mentions, is [dead] - unless it's the complete lack of karma on the account.

Vouched in the hope that it'll benefit someone.
Be aware of NUMA when your application needs to run fast
Thanks Hacker News for helping me solve that mystery with performance in my Java program. Now I only have the problem left to solve. (And some of you might learn a thing or two about deployment of programs where performance is of utter importance.)
Launching on what, exactly?

Right now they have 9 launches planned using Atlas 5. That's not going to get them a usable fleet of satellites. If they want to launch anything beyond that, Blue Origin must finish the BE-4: a rocket engine years behind schedule. (Either using them for Vulcan rockets or for the New Glenn).

From Amazon's perspective, those 9 launches are money wasted if BO doesn't come through. I'd be ecstatic if they did, but my money is on yet another delay from them.

If I had to guess, by the time Kuiper is launching enough satellites to matter, SpaceX will be doing the same thing using Starship at an order of magnitude lower cost. And I don't even think Starship will be doing real launches for years.
This is exactly what YouTube does already. In fact I see no reason why Twitter couldn't spill ad money to the content (tweet) creators within the next year or two, creating a similar ecosystem. Maybe the value attributable to individual creators would be too small? Videos are quite a bit bigger than tweets (in terms of what matters most, the eyeball time), after all.
What's kind of crazy is the expected lifespan of an individual satellite in the 'full' 12k constellation is supposed to be 5 years so 6-7 satellites a day will reenter or just go offline and need to be replaced. Unless that 12000 number includes some in longer parking orbits they bring down into the ELEO service orbit that's a dedicated Starlink launch about once every week.
So there's https://fast.ai MOOCs+library which don't require a big theoretical background

I heard about a program that looked great to do data science from just data a while ago, but I can't find it :/ It was on Show HN I think

I found that tho, don't know if it's gonna be helpful:
https://towardsdatascience.com/top-8-no-code-machine-learnin...
https://www.obviously.ai/
Yes- that’s roughly what I’m saying as well - they would shut up more if they were beholden to a corporation that feeds them a lot more. I conclude differently than you in that I take issue with what I interpret to believe would be society bribing them to achieve this outcome. Many of them have a deeply negative impact on society, so it sounds like paying off someone to stop a temper tantrum, which is a hard pill to swallow for me.
Facebook does the same thing.

I won't install the Facebook app, because I can almost watch the battery drain; even when it's in the background.

It's easy for me to prevent any app from listening. I use an external monitor that doesn't have a microphone, and I connect via the DisplayPort, so there's no audio.

The only time I use anything with a mic, it's for Zoom, and I explicitly turn on my AirPods.
I bought an MP3 Springboard module. Friend of mine asked "Where is the 'stop' button on that thing?" "There isn't one. There's nothing to stop."
Big time. I remember hanging out with the AI team here in Toronto before deep learning took off. Then it took off and Microsoft just bought the research team out from under UoT's feet. It was a sky high payout.

Same thing for the government too. I'm civically minded, so I've taken a couple contracts here and there to help out the Government of Canada, but man is it a pay cut. But what are they going to do? Pay more than the Chief Justice of the Canadian Supreme Court?

Sometimes governments try to work around this with contracting companies so that they don't have to see the salaries directly. But this is just padding extra waste and cost.

But this is what exponential tech is going to look like, at least until AI replaces us then who knows.
https://www.lowtechmagazine.com/2010/09/recycling-animal-and...

A related article from Low-Tech Magazine, published in 2010.
>Then you're routing internal traffic through a public IP?

No, not typically. There's various methods to do the LetsEncrypt challenge/verification that don't require internet connecting the internal host you're generating the certificate for.

The downsides are:

- You can generate a wildcart cert for *.internal.yourdomain.tld. But then, it's a pretty big master key if you lose control of it.

- You can generate a cert-per-server but it exposes your hostnames (at least) in certificate transparency logs, which gives outsiders some view into how big your internal network is, perhaps some detail on what it's like via hostnames, etc. This is worse if you also expose the internal DNS records externally, then everyone sees those records as well, exposing more internal info. You could mitigate these things somewhat with various strategies around hostnames, DNS setup, etc.
I just use unbound where I have a ansible script install it from the arch repos and deploy a handwritten config file with the dns entries. Then it forwards the rest to my DNS provider. I have my router set the address of that unbound host as the DNS server for my devices via DHCP.

I don't use k8s in my home network (though I do have some podman containers), but there's probably something with more k8s integration you can tie into your k8s ingress setup that I'm unaware of.
Startups don't always want the most cost-effective solution.

A lot of startups' intentions is to look "serious". If everyone has an engineering playground full of microservices with 5 different programming languages all hosted on AWS, you have to be the same if you want to join the "big boys" club.

Sometimes startups don't even care about solving the business problem. The objective is instead to get the "startup CEO" lifestyle for the connections and reputation regardless of whether you end up solving your business problem in the end. Same for a lot of engineers - they'll happily join and build the engineering playground while enjoying their salary regardless of whether it's the right option from an engineering point of view. If anything, an engineering playground gives you the opportunity to manage lots of people and solve (self-inflicted) problems that will look good on your resume in a way that a boring solution with a handful of engineers won't.

On the other hand, if you live and die by solving the business problem the most cost-effective way, all the "scalability" goes out the window and a simple stack on top of bare-metal makes much more sense, because the only thing that pays you is solving the business problem (in the cheapest way possible) as opposed to bragging about your self-inflicted technical complexity at AWS conferences.
Thank you! Retries are on the road map.
2000 satellites, each a few hundred kg?

What's the typical daily production of cars in the USA? And how much materials do they use?
Why would crypto be the missing piece to micro-monetization? You had me till that paragraph but there's no reason Reddit can't pay contributors in cents per thousand likes if currency is really the bottleneck. If it can be properly valued, it can already be properly paid.
Thanks for the explanations, that makes sense. It's a bit sad that Algae used the same convention as Haskell instead of going with something clearer.
Ok, so with each kg of kerosene burned emitting 3.6 kg of CO2 about 85% of a launch is due to the kerosene. Whether 15% is significant or not is in the eye of the beholder but I don't think my contention was unreasonable. There are, of course, ground crews and radars and tarmacs and so forth associated with a rocket launch but the same is true with a 777 flight as well. Most 777 flights aren't to the plane's max range, this is more of a Pacific crossing fuel consumption but I still think its broadly comparable.

The big difference, I guess, is that a Falcon 9 might only make it through 10 or 20 flights while a 777 might do thousands. That is a big difference in energy usage but I don't feel competent to try to quantify it.
> Are you reading the deeper lesson though?

The "deeper" (?) lesson and subtext I'm hearing from the OP is that we should get excited like little children about each and every new fad, because, you know, this may just be the 0,01% when it actually matters, and we don't want to miss it.

Well, I don't mind using "lazy heuristics" and waiting around a little to see if something happens. No need to hurry or jump around. Plenty of time.
What does that mean? Sent image files where? How did those image files impact car radios?
Well my kettle is 3kw and takes about 2 minutes to boil so about 200 of my kettles... BUT they don't say how big the kettle is or how much water it contains so it could be 60 BBC kettles. I bet they drink a lot of tea...
Also, set your location to "British Indian Ocean Territory", so that you won't see any trending hashtags.