skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
He hinted at this obliquely, but the PowerPC family of bit rotate instructions (ridicl, rlwinm, rlwimi, etc.), although intimidating in the general case, allows shifting, rotation, insertion, masking and more. There are many alternative mnemonics to try to reduce the cognitive complexity but all of these just assemble to them with particular parameters.
Anyone can set up a "tribunal" to come to whatever predetermined conclusion they want. This "tribunal" was set up by a literal US-government-backed Uyghur separatist group (the US government is very good at setting up of these sorts of "government-in-exile" groups for countries it doesn't like, like the former "Iraqi National Council"). The chair of the "tribunal" was previously chair of the Falun Gong cult's "tribunal" on organ harvesting. The tribunal admitted that it couldn't find evidence of mass killing, but still decided that it was a genocide, as absurd as that is, because that was the predetermined conclusion the "tribunal" was created to affirm.

This is how the propaganda game is played.

Nobody is being killed, and killing people is pretty much the some qua non of genocide. Anyone can throw around "genocide" as a rhetorical trick. The US killed hundreds of thousands of people in Iraq - genocide? US sanctions against Afghanistan are causing widespread hunger - genocide? Of course not, because genocide actually means something, and we shouldn't hollow out the word to score geopolitical points.

What's happening in Xinjiang? The Chinese government is using police-state methods to destroy the Uyghur separatist movement and to go after religious extremism that it thinks endangers the state and society. The government is certainly violating a great many people's civil rights and dragging up people with only vague connections to the separatist movement or religious extremism. At the same time, the government is pouring money into the region in order to try to raise living standards, on the theory that that will dry up support for separatism and religious extremism in the Uyghur population. As a result, incomes and life expectancy among Uyghurs are increasing. The Uyghur population is also increasing.

There's a real "there" there, but it has nothing to do with genocide, and calling it "genocide" is frankly just propaganda.

To those claiming that this somehow meets the technical UN definition of "genocide," this is simply untrue: the definition requires a deliberate attempt to physically annihilate (not culturally assimilate) an ethnic group. Historically, this has always been through mass killing. The definition says that attempting to annihilate a population by completely stopping any member of the group from giving birth would be genocide, but nothing of the sort is being alleged. The Chinese government has a 3-child policy, and the Uyghur population continues to grow, in fact.
I recently inherited a Vue/Nuxt headless website. It is grossly over-architected and a nightmare to manage. Things that are simple in html, like an <a> tag, are implemented in complex and inconsistent ways across the site. This site doesn't have any real interactivity and headless GraphQL and Vue are a giant waste of time and hurt site performance. In this case it wasn't hatred of the complex but I think just chasing shiny things and maybe project complexity for the sake of bill padding.
I agree with both of you
I agree with some of this. But also, my mostly complete Ice Planet set has been my singularly most cherished toy ever. I still have it today.

There’s absolutely nothing wrong with well structured sets with instructions. As long as they use enough standard pieces to be able to mutate.
The assumption is that popularity is rarer than goodness.
> Each of those characters can be broken down further into their radicals. And, those radicals tell you a lot about the meaning. When I lived in Japan I could identify anything botanical by the tree radical even if I didn't know the character.

This is only partially true and only for some words. In some words characters were chosen almost at random to match a loan word's sound from some other language than chinese (before katakana began to be used extensively). In other words the meaning has heavily drifted from the originally chosen characters and the current meaning bears little resemblence to it's original meaning. In other cases yes you can determine the origin of the word but it's not helpful to determine it's modern uses (for example the over use of the 女 (woman) radical in many words that were thought to be "related to women" with a sexist meaning). Also in some words the kanji were dropped and replaced with other kanji of a similar sound so as to simplify the number of kanji down to the current "2000" core kanji used in all official documents. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_script_reform
I was thinking more like "Hey discord, please delete all my old data from your databases, everything" not doing it after every "sensitive" conversation.
not providing an opinion on your suggestion but there is no such a thing as "government and Insurance companies paying" though, It's taxpayers.
> no defense.

I am not a lawyer, but I suspect prior art is a defense.
Oh Thank you!
TLDR: automation saves you time; here's a $30,000/year tool that you can use for it. If you only need 10 automations.
Yeah, it varies pretty wildly. Most early startups that have good options for VC or angels don't really benefit from Reg CF, since they don't necessarily have a "crowd" to invest from in the first place. So you end up seeing struggling companies with at least some fan base doing it as a last ditch attempt, which doesn't always work out. However, I do know some of the platforms are lot more selective than others for exactly that reason. But all said, at least the opportunity is there and the financials are legally vetted.
Have a closer look at what quality you are getting. It's most likely 480p max, depending on the streaming platform and the licensing deals at play for your region.
In practice it makes no difference, because digital logic designers haven't used schematic capture in a very long time. They most commonly write Verilog (or SystemVerilog, which is a superset), and it looks a lot like C:

logic [31:0] a, b, average;
assign average = (a >> 1) + (b >> 1) + (a & b & 32'd1);
Jimmy Wales on Section 230 (Twitter)
If membership is necessary for you or your family to get ahead, for your kids to get a good education, etc., it might not signal support of the CCP.
That's very interesting. I felt like Retro Bowl was well made but almost too easy. As long as I had a mid-term QB and a top tier WR the games were a breeze.
Your Sentry JS script is brutalizing your first contentful paint times, which directly impacts bounce rate. Death to blocking external resources. If you inline, it will reduce what is likely your median FCP by nearly a full second and probably get you passing Core Web Vitals.

Before (FCP 2.1s): https://www.webpagetest.org/video/view.php?tests=220208_AiDc...

After (FCP 1.3s): https://www.webpagetest.org/video/view.php?tests=220208_AiDc...

(Also, you're loading a Google Fonts CSS file and then not using Open Sans. Also also, your fonts.gstatic.com preconnect wouldn't work even if you did use the font – you'll need `crossorigin`. See: https://www.w3.org/TR/css-fonts-3/#font-fetching-requirement...)
No no, I'm saying something slightly different. I'm saying there is a skill set that some human(s) at each of these places have. It's a real thing. It's almost like you are asking how to build rockets. The answer is: some people know how. Learn from them (or what they write in books).

Now their existing donors may also be helpful, but you seem to be jumping a step.
23 ^ 21 = 2
No, it definitely isn't.

Every time a major org claims to be open to OSS it rapidly reverts to old tools and ecosystems. The new CIO can claim all he wants, it's not going to happen. DoD is run by entrenched civil servants. I've seen it happen time and time again in MDA, Army, and Navy work.
The XOR cursor was patented.
Similarity or Difference of Meaning Between Words
Say you have two random words ('yellow' and 'ambient' or 'goose' and 'kettle'). What tech could be used to rate how similar or different they are in meaning as informed by popular usage? For example, from 0 to 1 where antonyms are 0 and synonyms are 1, 'yellow' and 'ambient' might be 0.65 similar.
James Webb Space Telescope Spies Its First Star
Ooooooh, that's what that is. I always thought something was dripping from a shelf above and forming an icy stalagmite, but I could never figure it out.
The average of 23 and 21 is indeed 22.
Likewise launches from Vandenburg AFB, where prograde orbits are disallowed for safety reasons. (Most Vandenburg launches are actually more polar than retrograde however.)
Seconding the recommendation to check the linked supplementary materials if you’re curious. It’s not perfect but I definitely got a solid idea of how it all works just from the info contained in that PDF.

It’s a clever design that reminds me a lot of the work done on optical computing designed for acceleration of inference after you have a trained model. The same sort of “what if we didn’t base it all on transistors and logic gates” type of thinking seems to be in play.

My biggest concerns about the practical results from this are limits related to the random cross connections needed for the design to be scaled up to larger sizes on actual chips. The analog aspects of the design probably give them some more wiggle room than purely digital logic designs but I just can’t shake the feeling that the need for a network of lots of randomly interconnected small units will not fabricate well beyond a certain size due to lithography limitations regarding number of layers you can practically create on a chip and the necessary number of traces/paths on the chip as the network size increases. This of course might be covered in. The actual paper but I’m not paying for it just to comment on randomly interesting Internet forum threads.
I had a phone screen at ID.me and then some of the articles came out and I started looking more into them. They tried to have me start doing interviews but I declined. I watched a motivational video from their CEO and his energy was a bit of a turn off as well.
This position is addressed in the audio.
Zoho has been great really happy with their setup
Soldiers are not automatons. In fact, in the US military, its doctrinal to instill some level of leadership and autonomy in all soldiers, so that the death of a leader does not incapacitate the unit.

Not only that, but orders need to align with the morals and ethics of the soldiers that will follow them, and the soldiers must believe the orders were given in good faith. It’s not necessary that the order even makes sense (soldiers don’t have to always understand why) but the action AND the MOTIVATION for the order must comport with the values of the soldier. If you tell me to charge to my death in machine gun fire to win the battle or save my unit, I’m a lot more likely to do so if I trust you than if I believe you just don’t like me and want me gone.

In this case, I think that many soldiers do not believe that their general officers are acting in good faith, and therefore are resistant to blind obedience.
> But people use Vue for ideological reasons

Competition is good. At some point, someone in charge of React might do something stupid (like what happened to AngularJS) and you'll be happy there is a non bullshit alternative to keep the former dev team in check.
Yes, I expected as much: most users who stop using Signal (because, say, their friends use something else) are more likely to either just stop using it or uninstall the app, without explicitly deleting the account.
Yes, on Android - it can replace your SMS app, and uses secure storage so that other apps do not have access to your SMS's.
Oh right, sorry i'll edit this. It works straight up then. Weird it's there with no context.
The site is down…
I can't tell if you're being serious, but the comment to which you replied is a humorous and disturbing Kubrick reference.
I setup Jellyfin recently, and it was pretty quick and easy and has been working well.
Is it worth it to use flexbox now that grid exists? I’m not sure if they solve the same kind of problems.
Sorry, edited the above. This is straight up right then which is weird. It's just there in the middle of the article with no context. In the middle of the SWAR method.
I recall each teacher at high school saying I should expect 2 hours of homework a night and that that was reasonable. It always seemed bizarre, like you know you're not my only class. "2 hours" might be reasonable to you, but what you're all saying is that "10 hours of homework a night is reasonable". Obviously it was never that bad in reality, but sometimes I would have more than 5 hours of homework a night many days in a row. You can't tell me that's helpful for a teenager.

Support annoying were maths homework that had hundreds of questions, where just writing the working took the bulk of the time.
False Flag
Indeed, and last I looked had at least Google analytics/tracking emedded.
There's a great old documentary about soldier training that makes the same point very well. Basically, soldiers are conditioned to do all kinds of arbitrary things on command so that it will override their natural aversion to danger / causing harm in the field. It's on YouTube but I'm not sure if there's a better quality version somewhere else:

War: Anybody's Son Will Do

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=P_G2u1RrLOk

I haven't watched this since high school but it stuck in my mind.
It’s also super handy for preserving parameter names when dealing with rest/spread in both runtime and static type positions, and even for naming new ones in static types for composition.
IMHO it's like your actual desk. Some people like it clean and organized - others have a cluttered mess of objects.

My desk is a tragedy, but I much prefer tiling window managers and rigid, well-organized computing environments. Great to see the variety of options provided by KDE. I'll have to give this a try.
> It's clear that masking young, healthy adults who are tasked with the responsibility of rushing into oncoming bullets and missiles if need be, to mask themselves for going on now well into our third year of covid, which was never a particular threat for young people, is bad for morale. It's absurd and non-sensical.

Interestingly, I have the exact opposite take. You've joined an organization where you're expected to put yourself in mortal danger. There are a whole host of rules in the military that are basically arbitrary (e.g. aspects of the dress code standards), but are there to show order and to differentiate a professional fighting force from a gang of thugs.

What I find "absurd and nonsensical" is that masks are the hill people are (figuratively, as opposed to the actual literal danger in their jobs) willing to die on. To me it just shows how 100% tribal the entire mask discussion has become - for soldiers it can certainly have nothing to do with any perceived danger or loss of control, as there are already exponentially worse other examples that soldiers have submitted to for years.
I'm using https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/vue@2.6.14 now
I think the 20 arc second deviation is caused by Earth's orbital velocity around the Sun. Did you intend that instead of rotation? The latter causes less than 1 arc second deviation.
> Why would it do that?

If I remember correctly, Signal was first explained to me as a secure SMS app. That is it stores your SMS's more securely than the stock apps did... and if you were messaging somebody who also used Signal, then you'd be upgraded to an end-to-end encrypted message.

That said, now I'm on iOS, it doesn't let me do that, so I only use it for contacts with Signal.
''The Man Without Qualities'' - Robert Musil (Der Mann ohne Eigenschaften)
This is the heckler's veto, and entirely unsustainable.

Someone will always be there to argue your criticism is invalid because the soil you're standing on is soaked in blood, racism, whatever. It would paralyze you to accept any criticism at the cost of having no voice (because you can never prove you aren't the embodiment of said criticism - your standard). We lack a neutral and omniscient arbiter to make the decision that you are or aren't, on balance and otherwise, a bastard or a descendent of bastards.

It's still important to be a critic of the/a state. The fact that most nations on the planet are strongly associated with an ethnicity makes the field a little more tricky, but not that much. Part of success here is convincing a vocal segment of liberal society to focus on actual content of criticism and stop second-guessing/worrying about what other dumber elements of society might think if criticism were viewed the wrong way. That's such a tenuous conditional lever to pull on to justify censorship.

If you're even mildly "in" the Asian community in the US, you know that "Asian Hate" is sadly not a new phenomenon, just one that has received more attention and reporting lately (and arguably quickly set aside once current events failed to substantiate a white supremist angle that could be milked); it's been a tragic staple of the Asian experience for a long, long time.

There are many valid reasons for the Chinese to dismiss criticism (starting with "mind your own business as we develop" to moral equivalency arguments to reparations arguments - I've heard many of them). We also don't have to treat that dismissal as a valid reason to ignore inhumanity. It may even be acceptable to acknowledge grey areas and nuance, but even that doesn't close the door to good faith criticism about castration, sex-trafficking, enabling DPRK, destabilizing territorial grabs, etc.
Well as someone who supports the JR show saying whatever the hell they want to say and thinks free speech is a pillar of democracy, I'm not sure I would call any of this censorship. Who's doing the censoring? Neil Young? Paying subscribers who don't want to pay to support a service they feels amplifies a voice they feel is dangerous?

This is more nuanced than "free speech" vs "dangerous misinformation".
The relevant comparison here wouldn't be mask vs. no mask, but wearing a mask as precisely described (e.g. double-masked, N95, no facial hair, etc) vs wearing some facial covering in a manner which doesn't exactly meet prescriptions. And I'm willing to bet that there's plenty of laxity permitted day-to-day, so long as people are actually wearing a mask.
https://archive.fo/OYyt4
> the IQ for being a soldier is between 84 and 90

That's still quite high enough to perceive simple things like what I described.

> most soldiers need to be told what to do most of the time.

That doesn't contradict what I said. Most soldiers might need to be told what to do most of the time, but they can still be quite capable of seeing when they are in a situation where they need to do exactly what they are told or risk mission failure, and when they are not.
If it is truly self-determination, why not have elections? How do they know what the people want? The people can't even talk about it.

In parts of China that do and did have free expression, Taiwan and Hong Kong, the people strongly support democracy and freedom and strongly oppose the CCP.

It is the oppression of the CCP that I oppose. I wish the people of China were free and could choose their government - that would be - will be - a great moment in history.

> In reality, the government of China is made of... normal Chinese people with leadership/bureaucracy skills.

And an absolute dictator who will remain in office for life.
There are a lot of modalities being integrated, things like spatial/temporal, ADT/protein, etc. Integrating all of this data is a computational challenge, and of course there are lots of methods for analyzing it that vary in computational demands. It's not simulation, but still a lot of processing.
> ... I don't think kind words are called for when a scientist knowingly publishes claims that they don't have the expertise to evaluate for themselves.

But, until you can establish beyond all reasonable doubt that that is what happened, you should be polite because there is a chance you are the one who is wrong. Then, after you have established it beyond reasonable doubt, you should be polite because trying to destroy someone will only make them dig in and fight you til the bitter end. And, because it's the right thing to do.

You can be kind and tenacious, and forceful, and not take no for an answer. I think that's what the original commenter was implying.
i wasn't claiming thiel was dumb, just that in his case, luck overwhelmed, and that he's not as smart and talented as he'd want the world to believe (that everything he's achieved is solely due to his own brilliance only).

trump is, in a way, a good analogue. he also claims rare intelligence, but it's pretty clear he's not smart at all. he happened to be propelled by daddy's wealth, and translated that into infamy via a second-tier reality show that saved him just as he was floundering in real estate, another stroke of luck. along the way, he was bailed out time and again for billions of dollars, something almost no american has the luck to have access to. trump is decidedly not smart, just extremely lucky. sheer statistics say we're bound to have a few trumps; people with extraordinarily dumb luck but little talent otherwise.
Discord has your full chat history in a conveniently searchable server side database. When new people join a channel in your discord server, they call see the full chat history so they can get fully caught up.

You can use discord on multiple devices at the same time without the devices needing to directly sync with each other (because the state is stored on the server).
> interchangeable assets

Can someone point me to a proposal for how this is even supposed to work, by someone who is familiar with game development? There is no standard for 3D asset development between game studios. Even games made within the same studio don't have interchangeable assets.
I essentially use it for health-things. I listen to podcasts/music off of it when I run or row so I don't have to carry a phone around. Today, for example, I was at 40%-ish at around noon after putting in on around 6am and exercising for roughly 90 minutes.
There are conventions, but no standard set in stone. For instance, mathematicians like to use m, n to stand for integers, r - for reals and rationals and f, g, h - for functions. However, you can use any symbol to denote any object or idea.

For another example, one of my Measure Theory textbooks denotes outer measure of a set A as |A| whereas another one uses m*(A).

Consider the following partial list of symbols that occurs at the beginning of Dummit&Foote's Abstract Algebra[0]. This tells you nothing unless you know the underlying ideas these symbols represent. This list is there to tell you what kind of conventions they would be following because different symbols might be used in other books.

[0] https://ibb.co/JCz1V4s
Why Is Windows Called Windows?
> You missed having to go through interchange gates or, more commonly, exit and re-enter when you're changing lines.

But that's as fast as walking through them so it's not an issue. Thus it's "integrated" even though it's not fully integrated in the normal sense. In other words the lack of "integration" disappears.
Did I say that?

Not sure what you're getting at anyways. So we agree the trucker convoy is a nuisance that needs to be gotten rid of? Or are you celebrating troll behaviour?
I think because these statements come across as transparent mea culpas. There's no sincerity, no feeling, no remorse...no apology, if you will. But I do tend to agree with the sentiment that nothing is good enough for some nebulous group of outraged people. They just want to tar and feather until the person is humiliated out of the public eye. You know, cancelled. So I see why the other side just goes through the apology motions and promptly returns to business as usual. It's all quite funny and meaningless.