skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Right. We instruct Kernel to reserve 8 CPU cores exclusively for our user space application that is responsible for traffic forwarding.

Here's performance results. Max latency is 0.31 msec.

####################################################

min_latency_ns: 708

avg_latency_ns: 63723

max_latency_ns: 310795

jitter_ns: 30940

####################################################

Regarding L3 PFC support.
In my understanding it's a ROCE requirement. I view RoCE as east-west traffic, since its not leaving the boundaries of the switch fabric, I think non-blocking leaf/spine fabric should be sufficient there. Please correct me if'm missing something.

SoftGate, the Linux router where we use DPDK, is designed for North/South traffic, sitting on the border of the data center, so we don't expect RoCE traffic there, but again, please let me know if you see it differently.
Keep writing! Congrats on the cause of the parental leave! :)
I love clamAV version right now 0.104.2. But I remember see 0.96.19
few seconds after a corporet backed project two year old go to version 3.0
Perhaps it should just follow the Android way. It’ll just require a simple toggle under System Settings to allow sideloading.
It also took me a few seconds to focus on something else, but not because it sounded egregiously wrong but because it sounded quite cool.

Like something you'd find in a bit-sized "fun fact"...

"Did you know that data is the plural form of datum and [...]?" and so on :)
Eh? There are plenty of other parents and nannies at the park taking their kids out, if you want to talk to someone.
Almost everyone I know has multiple TV platforms for specific shows, particularly Disney+ and HBO, more recently Prime. It’s very common.

Only reason I keep Netflix is for specific shows.
Maybe if it was titled any way other than `vs.` it could have had a less polarizing effect. Clickbait has its costs. And of course there's differences. The real question is when/how much do they matter.
I will not be surprised if lobbying around this issue is actually supported by malware, spyware folks.
> ...politics is in everything...

I don't know your intent, but this seems like a disingenuous setup.

If someone were to say: Drinking a glass of water. You could abstract the concept into fluoride, costs, access, etc; None of that applies to the action of me consuming the water. The same goes for sitting, standing, breathing, blinking, scratching an itch, waving to my neighbor, etc.
SARS-CoV-1 leaked out of [edit](three separate labs (one in China, one in Singapore and one in Taiwan))

It is of course very misleading present to these "leaks" as evidence of "lab origin". Especially given that these were all incidents of, not surprisingly, lab workers contracting the virus after it had been brought into the lab for study, and fully a year after SARS-CoV-1 started infecting the public at large.

The overwhelming consensus is that SARS-Cov-1 has zoonotic origin with a number of intermediary hosts suspected, including civets, bats and cats.

This isn't some fringe crackpot theory

Well... let's just leave the terms "fringe" and "crackpot" to the side for a minute. Being as we're both open-minded, curious individuals at all.

The bigger point here the quality of one's reasoning -- and the argument you're presenting here -- "Lab workers infected by a virus 2 years after a public outbreak evidence lab origin" (my paraphrase) -- is patently specious.

Such that I'm not sure you even believe what you're saying, actually. Not that I'm saying you're lying to us. But seriously -- did you stop to think at all basic chain of cause and effect here?

Did you?
As a molecular biologist. I would say it‘s probably contamination of the samples. The confidence comes from the other contaminating sequences found in the same samples; the hamster DNA (and monkey was the other one I think). Both are routinely used as cells lines in biology labs for viral research (not 100% on the viral research bit, but makes sense). The author‘s conclusion that it was COVID grown in a cell line and it contaminated the samples next to them on the sequencing chip is plausible. This kind of contamination is rare, but not very rare. As the author points out, there are multiple points of failure that could have caused it. Each unlikely but plausible.
And pointing to the decline of religion isn't very helpful for us atheists.

I can't really buy into a religion I don't believe in for the sake of making society better. I'd rather try to make society better directly, I don't want to do a "noble lie".

I'll gesture vaguely at "the suburbs". Low trust and alienation describes my childhood in a place where you needed a car to do anything and even when my parents let me wander, there was almost nowhere fun to wander _to_.

I don't have data to back this up, though. Maybe it's just resentment at how my childhood turned out.
I think GP is fair when they don't want to support crazy sideloaded app land. We all live by the same rules, and I also would like to be able to install anything, but supporting my family is super hard as it is. It's about removing land mines, not trying to prevent people from doing what they want. I've had three separate relatives get their accounts hacked in the last month. Think of what an unbridled app store full of scammy apps is capable of, and then think about trying to support non-technical people through that.
So the author predicts the rise of a cable like on-demand service... which is exactly what Netflix was before the major content providers all started yanking their content.

We're quickly getting to the point where I'm paying almost as much for VOD subscriptions as I was for cable.
There's some wishful thinking here.

Also: the supply of new users is much faster to replenish for streaming services than it was for all of the cited analogies.
Ehhhh... I don't know that capitalism can be blamed for personal irresponsibility. I'd say it's more of a motivation / knowledge thing. You don't have to live in the gym to get in shape. I spend about 4.5 hours per week total. Even when I've been in the very rare 70-80 hour/week death march, I could take an hour out of my day to go to the gym and lift.

Similarly, dieting is not an activity, more so the absence of one (shoving food in your mouth). When I'm cutting weight, I have more time because I'm not cooking eating food all the damn time. Eat a carrot rather than a Pizza to lose weight is not super rare knowledge. It IS uncomfortable, though.
Everyone's lives are different and hindsight is always 20/20. If you're comparing yourself to others and feeling like you're falling behind in some way, think about what it is that you want to achieve, understand why you want to achieve it, and go after it sensibly.
Makes sense, thanks for clarification. But there could be people who are some where in between you and not-qualified, whom this site might be helpful, it's connecting people for specific purpose.

The site says you can request somebody from FAANG for mock interview, without knowing quality of these interviews, I assume that would require this company pay for their time.
They hadn't written the ending of Die Hard when they started filming - the Movies that Made us episode about it is pretty wild & illuminating.
I just watched The Deer Hunter (1978) for the first time, which Walken described as kicking off his fame.

If you haven't seen it before, it's long but worth a watch. Left me longing for more older films, like the original Rambo, Empire of the Sun, or The Razor's Edge. They don't make movies like that anymore.
Thank you for the clarification. My grandmother had dementia and died recently. I didn't really understand the nuances to these diseases.
NSA works against infrastructure providers to breech their security guards so they can continue to hoover up data, and backdoors products/algorithms.

TikTok shows you 80s commercials and clips from industrial films after figuring out that you want to see 80s commercials and clips from industrial films.

Based on the ads that I get, which are pretty unintrusive, easily identifiable and always skippable, it doesn't seem like their analytics are that advanced. Besides random major brands, who are essentially broadcasting ads, I get ads for diesel mechanic tech schools and random wish products.
It did have a first mover advantage, years and years ago. They realized their position and have already transitioned to producing.

I'd say they're continuing the fight and thank God as a viewer some of their productions have been amazing
Obviously. To educated, generally egaliatarian people like you and I that makes sense. However the ignorant uneducated sorts out there on the edge looking for a reason to hate Asians (and others) even more and to attack them for imagined "reasons". That's why people say hold up and wait for some proof. The far right and other racist groups love this stuff and we can see that in the 3-5x increase in violence towards Asians in cities all over the country.
Also this headline coincidentally showed up today

Netflix dominates 2022 Oscar nominations with 27: See studio-by-studio breakdown

https://www.goldderby.com/article/2022/netflix-oscar-nominat...
I am a trans but seeing the attack on cis-hetero men in the last few years is jaw dropping.
You give an example of what kind of thing you will consider?
I love that the media has gone bear on Netflix. I'll take the position that it doesn't matter if they start failing, because there won't ever be a reason to completely fail. The people that own Netflix can just buy into the competitors, too, maybe encouraging them to weave together their offerings through a unified delivery system disguised as an independent company. Ultimately, Netflix is just a brand name - a brand name that started off associated with a completely different thing, rare films delivered by mail, and is now associated with mass-market stuff delivered like everything else. A shrunken, rump Netflix is nothing lost.

I do like all the non-English series content, although HBO does a lot of that, too. Maybe Netflix will ultimately just be a brand that co-produces and distributes a ton of the world's TV series, and a few prestige films every year.
Part of the challenge is that transformers for individual homes are at risk. Throw a significant DC voltage across a transformer designed to handle 60 Hz AC, and the results are not going to be pretty.
> But in this case we do have hard evidence the feds did plant bombs and tried to blame it on the FLQ.

We likewise have evidence that the FBI created fake terror plots. You also ignored or failed to connect the dots to the rest of my post - the parts where I mentioned that the FLQ and FLQ terrorists publicly took responsibility for the kidnapping and death.

> Typically for murder you want to rule out accidental death and have a murdered. At least, in a real court with due process. I don’t know how much of that they were given considering the people were living under martial law at the time.

No, they were not living under martial law at the time - the relevant trials (and even arrests) were conducted after the War Measures Act was no longer in force. The fact that some people have disputed the findings of the court, years later, means little - especially in a situation as politically fraught as this, it's almost to be expected. It's certainly not reason alone to accuse the Crown of running a sham trial, as you seem to be implying.

> Isn't the point of a constitution to have everyone endorse it and sign it? That's how it was done in America.

Again, "how it was done in America" isn't relevant at all, because Canada is not America, and the legal relationship that the provinces have with the federal government in Canada is not the same legal relationship that the states have with the American federal government. Indeed, Canadian Confederation happened directly in the wake of the American Civil War, and many of the choices the architects of it made were deliberately different than the choices the American Founding Fathers made so as to prevent something similar from occurring here.

Whether the federal government had a right to pass it or not (it went to the Supreme Court), Quebec's refusal to endorse the Canada Act was and for many years (maybe still) remained a point of contention. If you're interested, you're free to read on Wikipedia and elsewhere all about the history of Confederation, the British North America act, the Canada Act, the Constitution Act, the Patriation Reference, the Meech Lake and Charlottetown Accords, and so on.
Navigate to the "old-school" device properties screen (not the shiny new Windows 10/11 version). Untick the checkbox "Allow applications to take exclusive control of this device" under the Advanced tab.

Exclusive mode is a bit like full-screen for GPUs. DirectX games can do things like override the output color management, gamma ramps, brightness, HDR mode, and even set the "white point" on some displays! Similarly, audio applications can take control of your audio devices in all sorts of ways if permitted.

While "full control" of a GPU is still useful, because we're not living in a utopia where all displays are 12-bit HDR all the time, audio has long ago passed the point where direct control delivers tangible benefits. Software mixing is more than capable of "keeping up" even with an absurd number of simultaneous streams at a quality level that vastly exceeds what the human ear can perceive.

I found that with Teams, it's more important to turn off direct control of the microphone than the speakers, but I do both just to be on the safe side...
I'm amazed people are so reluctant to pick up a subscription for 1 month to watch a show. $15 to watch a season of a show. It's not a life decision, it's a whim.
I think the author of the article has absolutely no credential in the discussion given that he barely watches content (despite paying for 6 subscriptions, go figure?), however I think the conclusion isn't exactly wrong.

I think Spotify, Deezer, Netflix, HBO, etc. are all doomed to fail. They're doomed to fail because the competition is Amazon, Apple, Google, etc. which all have virtually infinite money to inject in those services, while the others only have a single income source.

Nobody cares if PrimeVideo runs at a loss for years or even decades, and the stock price of Amazon won't move an inch if PrimeVideo looses watchers. But at some point investors will stop lending money to one-trick monkeys like Spotify and Netflix.
So many good solutions to this: require a physical switch to be toggled to enable developer mode. Only allow for this if you provision a developer profile onto the device. Register your account with Apple as a developer and manage which devices allow side loading from their web dashboard. Go to an Apple Store and enable this mode there. Buy a developer edition phone that has this feature enabled.

Bad solution: disallow this entirely.
RATG13 was brought back to the lab in 2015. Sars-CoV-2 was more or less stable when it emerged into human populations, indicating it was already adapted to humans or humanized animals, and none of hundreds of millions of wild animals that could have brought this about have been found.

We can handwave all this away, but it makes me uncomfortable.
> I wonder if the WaPo would be interested in publishing any critiques of social media effects on children, given their ties to Big Tech... Let's see... "New report: Most teens say social media makes them feel better, not worse, about themselves (2018)"

Oh come on. You're either being misleading, or have been mislead. What you wrote doesn't make any sense:

1. Why would the existence of an example of one type of article show the absence of a different type? It's not like the Washington Post cannot report on multiple sides of an issue.

2. A single article from five years ago? How is that supposed to support such a sweeping statement?

3. It's not hard, at all, to find examples of the WaPo "publishing any critiques of social media effects on children": "Instagram is even worse than we thought for kids. What do we do about it? (2021)" (https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/2021/09/17/instagra...), probably all the articles in this search https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Awashingtonpost.com+%2..., etc.

> Corporate media claims... remember this one? "NAFTA and China WTO will raise the standard of living for all Americans!"

As far as I can tell, you just made that up. Literally no Google hits: https://www.google.com/search?q="NAFTA+and+China+WTO+will+ra... (at the time of this writing, it looks like your comment hasn't been indexed yet). So, no, no one "remembers" that one.

And even if if the WaPo did publish an article claiming exactly that (most likely some kind of advocacy on the op-ed page), what's the big deal? Do you think they should censor articles like that? Perhaps by using their precognitive abilities to know who the future will prove wrong?

It's kind of ironic that many people's who criticize the media for being some kind of propaganda rag issue critiques that implicitly advocate for it to be a propaganda rag.
Modern x86 CPUs integrate the DRAM controller directly (e.g. with Intel ever since Nehalem, ~2008) and not over a bus through the northbridge. From that point on I wouldn't count it if you insist on a strict definition, no - it's roughly the same as if you put a socket between a current higher-end ARM chip with external memory and the connected DRAM chips. Chipset is relegated to dealing with I/O to peripherals mostly - and nowadays the CPUs also provide PCIe lanes directly, with the chipset often adding a few more, often slower ones.

Traditional microprocessors are getting really rare, even though pretty much all the modern architectures started as them, and thus some use the term more widely. Some vendors use the differentiation between microcontrollers and application processors now, which also isn't a 100% clear line and explicit crossover models existing, but more useful today and avoids the fights over "what's a microprocessor today". (where "application processor" ~ "can reasonably run a full OS like Linux"). But that's also often limited to discussion in embedded use cases again, e.g. I don't know if they'd call a standard desktop CPU that or insist on some arbitrary level of "embeddedness"... Not that standard desktop CPUs don't end up embedded, but that's another discussion entirely.
If your goal is money, industry is a nice fallback. If your goal is purity of intellectual pursuit... offerings in industry can be rather dismal.
Infrastructure in This Post-DevOps World?
How PostgreSQL stores rows
Being small means you can integrate it in the CPU die. This is very important for SecureBoot/DRM kind of things, because it means you can't easily manipulate the secure processor entropy.

I know HN doesn't like SecureBoot or DRM, but this kind of stuff guards against maid attacks.

For example with a lava-lamp someone could replace your webcam with a hacked one that manipulates the picture in a subtle way that removes entropy. But you can't replace a SecureBoot CPU, it will be noticed if the TPM lives inside the CPU.
> Why do we pretend that social engineering scams don't exist outside of installing anti-viruses?

Nobody is pretending that.

> The solution to this problem is EDUCATION…

Nope. Educated, tech-savvy people fall prey to scams all the time: https://www.cnbc.com/2021/08/10/tech-savvy-teens-falling-pre...
I don't see any evidence that HN is getting brigaded. This is a divisive issue. There are lots of users on all sides of the question, and it's a topic that's easy to get activated about.
> 3 researchers at the Wuhan lab became sick with flu-like symptoms in November 2019

So 3 out of 300 researchers probably got the flu during flu season? is that low or high for a typical facility of 300 people during flu season? (300 as of 2014 maybe more now? https://www.nature.com/articles/nj0447)

> He said the lab was “very well-run” and the researchers didn’t show evidence of COVID-19 antibodies.

That counters the assertion that it was covid.

Let's pretend that they did in fact have covid and the antibody tests were wrong or they are lying. Is it that surprising that they would get it if it was the ground 0 for covid which spread like wildfire there regardless of original origin?
You're the walled garden now. You say, 'if you do anything I didnt tell you to do, you are on your own' and stick to it. Like children, consistency is key.
To what extent is this just people not liking their current job? That is, what percentage of homemakers would rather be employed, and how would the opinions of employed women change if their choices in the poll were current job/appealing alternative job/homemaker?
I think the author makes some good points. I've been a customer of Netflix way back when it was DVDs-in-envelopes and that was awesome because you could get just about any new movie as soon as it was released. The current Netflix is irritating by comparison. I can hardly find anything to watch, especially the stuff I search for. Instead, I'm railroaded into things Netflix created instead, by the algorithm that suggests similar alternatives, all of which feel like cheap knock-offs. I want to watch Star Wars. I want to watch Back to the Future. I want to watch Donnie Darko. And not just when Netflix happens to have them on the catalog.
These types of articles always frustrate me because the authors never seem to question where and how these apps are getting your data. These APIs and privileges are granted by iOS and Android. If only we had real privacy legislation in the US that could limit what is exposed to apps rather than being at the mercy of Google and Apple to put limits in place. It's not like TikTok is hacking into your phone
...
Young women, give up the vocal fry and reclaim your strong female voice
Not necessarily? I'm talking about constant string literals in source code which can be validated at compile time.
I think you're a little behind the times here. Most of the major streaming services have features to automatically play something else when your video ends, and they have for some time--it's hardly a differentiator for Netflix. Likewise downloading content for trips. Hulu does show ads, but they've had an ad-free tier for years now. At the same time, Netflix's catalog has declined--shows that used to be big draws for them aren't there any more, from Mad Men to The Office. Their market share plunged in 2021, and I doubt that's the end of it.
shoot me a message if you want to sell it :) the top model!
Discussed here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30272622
Hah, fair, it's actually light. I don't know to what degree it would get taken up by plants or other food organisms (chickens etc), but if it were then that could be a concern as it's a common medication and the net concentration could climb without removal.
They were doing exactly what they should to tamp down crazy far right wing propaganda that was aimed at incentivizing the public towards violence against asians. If you had evidence of a lab leak then present it and then you can promote a theory that is likely to result in violence towards individuals otherwise please keep it to yourself until you have proof.
You can look at the elite in society and see an over-representation of men, but it's important to also look at the most downtrodden and worse off in society. The homeless; people who are the victims of violent crime; people who die in wars; people who die working shitty jobs; people who are so hopeless that they commit suicide. Perhaps even looking at things like lifespan.

Men's results are bimodal: if women are forced to break through a glass ceiling to reach the elite, men are similarly forced to walk on a glass floor that might collapse at any moment. And when it does, they're fucked.