skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Jurisdictions can issue evacuation orders and curfews. Police can in many cases remove you for trespassing.

The United incident was a total disaster for United, they were incompetent and doubled down on that incompetence because of policies driven by their bottom line. The “police” that removed the trespasser were no trained and were also incompetent.

None of that changes the fact that if the captain of the airline thinks it’s a safety problem he can remove the passenger.
> First

Hiding behind a seemingly literal interpretation (I'm not qualified to judge as I'm no expert in the Constitution). But it's awful to not consider the context, or the consequences of that action.

> Second

Wildly inappropriate to try to use your own personal reactions to impose your will upon another to restrict their freedom.

I don't think you really have a problem using Nazi history analogically as criticism.

I think you just don't like that it's criticism directed at something you don't want to see exposed as evil.

Because maybe you like the power that you imagine it brings to silence people who say annoying things, rather than to deal with your own emotions. Perhaps you prefer controlling others to controlling yourself?

Whatever the motivation, supporting the imposition of one's will on others and restricting their freedoms is terrible.

To then abuse the sacred protection afforded by invoking a defense of victims of Nazis, as cover for this behavior, is an abomination.
Well he's interviewed Elon Musk and John Carmack. How do you rate yourself in comparison?
If you have a blog, can you give me login details to publish whatever I like on there?
> Our $10 plan is likely going to give the user 1,000 searches.

Do you intend to make the search limit a daily thing, or will it only apply over the whole month?

For me at least, I have spikes in my search behavior, like when I'm working on some difficult project, while on other days there's not much going on. While having a search budget would maybe get some getting used to, I could see myself working with it if I had a way to plan ahead.

It would help if there was UI support for this, similar to what mobile phones have in the "Mobile Data" settings (data used/remaining, usage graphs and so on). I'm also on the beta right now, but haven't seen anything like that when looking just now.
Increasingly, yes. Unfortunately. However, there are different cash cultures in different countries. Not every country is like Sweden where physical cash is practically unheard of.

In Germany there is an online service called barzahlen/viacash (they are renaming) https://www.barzahlen.de that allows people to pay cash for online shopping. After checkout, the buyer gets a code that can be scanned by cashiers in certain drugstores and supermarkets, so buyer can pay in cash.

I use cash where possible in order to avoid leaving a massive data trail that inevitably will get exploited. It is a method of self-defense for me.
Doing things is the easy part. Getting anyone to notice is the hard part.

I've been pushing https://concise-encoding.org/ for awhile now, and it's a LOT harder to attract people than it has been with my other projects.

Probably the nature of it is part of the issue. After all, who gets excited over a data format? The big security scandals recently have helped somewhat since people are starting to take security more seriously, and this format is all about security. But still, it's fighting against inertia, and the going is slow...
This may be politically motivated. Russia has been cracking down on self proclaimed anarchists for a while now, and there have been signs of evidence falsification.

There was a case a few years ago where random anarchists were taken off the street and beaten, electrocuted and burned with intent to extract a false confession. I seriously doubt that the kids were making explosives, in light of how these cases are handled by the FSB.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/feb/10/russian-anti-f...
> Ongoing controversies [...] occurs at scale for comparable child separation and cultural erasure

Native American population jumps to largest size in modern history [0]

Tribal sovereignty in the United States [1]

Native American Day – September 23, 2022 [2]

Whatever the crime is you're referring to, it's not comparable, are Uighurs given autonomous zones, allowed to celebrate custom holidays and are at their historical population peak?

When you say Native American are undergoing a cultural erasure comparable to the one in China, where Uighurs are in concentration camps to force them lose their culture and identity, I think you'll have to bring more proof than some "ongoing controversies".

[0] https://www.axios.com/census-native-american-alaska-populati...

[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tribal_sovereignty_in_the_Un...

[2] https://nationaltoday.com/native-american-day/
From the movie Contact. This is probably the sentence which I will never forget and I very often think of if I need to justify buying a backup of anything.
Yep, this is called feeding your narcissistic ego and making other people feel bad by inflating your stories ala instagramification of Linkedin :)
I'd say that we have much bigger issues to worry about than censoring Joe Rogan if you truly believe the world is so far gone that majority of the population is not capable of listening to multiple opposing viewpoints, weighing them accordingly, and coming to their own conclusions.

> but free speech idealism is dangerous and is actively harming the world - [...] antivaxx crap resulting in resurgence of once eradicated diseases

Similarly, free speech denialism is resulting in resurgence of censorship and propaganda.

We're actively handing the only real power we have in a democratic society back into the hands of the establishment, and for what?

If you have any moral principles, it seems naive to think that your opinions will always align with the popular narrative.
By delegitimizing the fundamental right to free speech, you are ensuring that you will be silenced, cancelled, or deplatformed yourself if you ever attempt to speak out about something you don't agree with.
You don't. For profit propaganda is part of free speech
Data is still controlled by code and is just as easily affected by bugs.
Keep in mind consultants don't get 401K plans or many other things, AND they have to save about 15-20% of their income as "in between jobs" money, in case they don't line work up.

If you earn 30% more than a salaried employee you are barely breaking even most of the time.
TIL: Swaziland was officially renamed Eswatini [1] in 2018. The country has always been eSwatini (“land of the Swazis”) in the Swazi language, and now its English name matches.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eswatini
IMO: you have to look at how OSes and window systems were designed and evolved to get a great answer here. Those processes resulted in systems where the OS or compositor or window system itself can’t really know when the user is pasting something or not. It could be changed, but it would have lots of implications globally, from rewriting framework code, to changing JS APIs.

Edge cases would be handled worse, like non-standard paste gestures or VM integration.
No, this is when you notice there's a problem, that you're being tracked.

The problem is the tracking itself, whether you notice it or not. At least that's my opinion.
Perhaps all convicted violent criminals should be placed on the no-fly list automatically.
Your link is literally a very large list which argues against you entirely:

> The business practice of bumping is not illegal. Airlines oversell their scheduled flights to a certain extent in order to compensate for “no-shows.” Most of the time, airlines correctly predict the “no shows” and everything goes smoothly. But sometimes, passengers are bumped as a result of oversales practices.

...

> it is legal for airlines to involuntarily bump passengers from an oversold flight when there are not enough volunteers

> If there are not enough passengers who are willing to give up their seats voluntarily, an airline may deny you a seat on an aircraft based on criteria that it establishes

Not to mention:

> Other Reasons You May Be Removed From a Flight

...

* Attempting to interfere with the duties of a flight crew member.

* Disrupting flight operations or engaging in unruly behavior.

As well as: FAA regulations state that “no person may assault, threaten, intimidate, or interfere with a crewmember in the performance of the crewmember’s duties aboard an aircraft being operated.”
Many Americans are injured while resisting police every year, just because it happened on a plane does not make it particularly noteworthy.
> What are you saying, exactly? We just fine them increasing amounts of money until they agree with the “generally accepted opinions

Maybe? Alex Jones still hasn't accepted reality regarding the Sandy Hook massacre, even after losing a trial. Éric Zemmour still peddles blatantly racist and false information after being fined multiple times for it. Is there a way to even stop that kind of person? Anyone listening to them ( and Trump, and Nigel Farage, and Boris Johnson) obviously isn't interested in facts, because everything out of their mouths is easily debunkable with a few minutes online

> If you want to end climate change denialism or anti-vaccine sentiment, discuss the facts with people who sympathize with those viewpoints. Convince them on the evidence. Find better evidence if you can’t.

That doesn't work and hasn't for years. You can't reason someone out of a position they didn't reason themselves into.

> The people like yourself who want to engage in censorship never have the truth on their side. There’d be no reason to censor anything if you did: just lead with the truth instead. Let the facts speak for themselves. The fact that you can’t convince people of your “facts” is proof that you your ideas are garbage.

That's an entirely useless personal attack. I never claimed any facts, I'm claiming that people peddling easily debunked bullshit they pass as fact can't be allowed to do this constantly without repercussions. Because they are causing real life harm and using "it's just my opinion, I'm just asking questions" as a shitty excuse.
I have an opinion that medical industry is so lame like Physics in Antique Greece or maybe even Astronomy in Middle-Age Europe. Lots of stupid regulations, war on drugs, lots of quasi-sciences like Psy*, crysis of reproduction the researches etc. These money will be evaporating into different types of scam, way better for governments is just doing nothing.
While I generally agree with the article I think a bit of nuance it could use is that sometimes not looping in other people, even if it causes problems now, can be the right move for your overall career growth. A key component of growth is being allowed to make your own mistakes. If you always let stronger engineers come in and handle the tough bits you might never obtain the sort of knowledge and experience that let you advance and frankly, your company doesn't want you learning those lessons on their dime if they can avoid it. Going off on your own can be one way to gain that experience even if it irks the people you work with.
I went with Gnome boxes and installed windows xp. After 20 minutes of trying to get sound working I found out that the automatic configuration select ‘none’ for audio backend.

Worked fine after selecting ‘spice’, pulse audio didn’t work tho but also didn’t result in an error. Apart from sound everything worked out of the box, tho.

I did all that to run some old music training software that only came in 16 and 32 bit versions.
I'm not talking about how regulations happened; only that they increase the tension in the environment and procedures involved.

I'm not talking about how effective the security practices are; only that they exist and result in much faster and more forceful action.

I didn't excuse their behavior; I agree that it was poorly chosen and should be criticized.

What I'm explaining is that they can lawfully (at that time ) cancel a ticket and remove a passenger at their will; regardless of how they were chosen or whether it was a good idea. What happened after is a series of escalations that is standard procedure with countless other examples where force was proportional and effective without ending in a scandal.
> techies, who are usually good at the “do things” ...

But since they don't tell people, they often end up building useless shit. I've experienced this a few times when I spent weeks or even months working on a feature, then showing it to customers, and realising that they don't get it, or that it doesn't fix their problems, etc. I try not to get too attached to my ideas, so if something doesn't work, I throw it away and try a different approach.

So I think doing things and telling people after the fact when you are done is not going to lead to success. You need to tell people early, so you can adjust what you're doing to make sure it's actually something interesting.
I would be interested in reading something more in-depth. Especially how the algorithms behind the alignment work.
airlines may remove you from a flight if the removal is due to a behavior that is considered disruptive
Defeat Ganon. Load saved game. Keep exploring. It is amazing that I still keep coming back to it after ‘finishing’ so many times. Wanting to complete all the shrines not just so I have that satisfaction, but because they are fun and interesting and the journey is too.

Then there is master mode, which is mainly just harder, but when you’re getting good at fighting it ensures you are challenged to get /really/ good and not rely on power / armour / buffs, especially in the challenges where you start with nothing.
Oh, man, Game Closure! I keep seeing their tiny little office space in the back of a Korean hot-pot restaurant just up the street. It's some sort of... game engine middleware company?
In substance, it goes back to the original philosophers of the modern state: Jean Bodin and Thomas Hobbes. That was in the 16th and 17th century.

Also important is that the state has a monopoly on legitimate violence. It has social license by virtue of exercising violence to uphold social order. In the case of the economy that means its macroeconomic management to ensure stability and the public good. Clearly crypto woefully fails by that standard.
There seems to be a bug specific to safari, that's why it doesn't "work" on anything else.
Oh, so you're just trying to be edgy for the sake of it? Thanks, i was just reading your comments as if there's supposed to be sense in them.

You should know that in France antisemitism, overt public racism, Holocaust denial and the like are crimes. Liberté doesn't stops where it impacts other people.
"I have long been opted out of search history or ad personalization on G/FB/AMZN/Twitter/Instagram/Verizon, and have repeatedly clicked "hide ad - irrelevant or not interested". "Why am I seeing this ad?" says "(wide age group) in your area", yet I've asked and my peers don't get ads like this."

I think this could actually explain your situation, if you give ad feedback like that too much you might run out of things for "the algorithm" to reasonably show you and you're getting fallen back to some sort of odd pool of low quality or new account test ads of some sort that are pre mainstream since you give feedback often or hitting some sort of weird bug after a point where it tries to find something to show you and then grabs for these weird ones somehow less shown and therefor less reported by other people?

I don't know the right answer, but I feel like something in this area could totally explain what you are experiencing. If you want to test the theory maybe make a new account on a service and don't give feedback on anything and see if you end up with mostly normal stuff?
1.day.ago is idiomatic Ruby code because

1.class.methods

will give a long list of methods supported by `1`

This is because in Ruby everything* is an object. I agree that from outside Ruby this might look weird, but knowing Ruby this is very simple to understand.

Knowing this you can also expect the following things to work in Rails I think:

1.day.ago + 2.hours

This is because:

+ is an instance method defined on the Integer class. See Integer.instance_methods. So it is more like `1.day.ago.+(2.hours)`

and I expect then that in Rails (or some gem) they added `hours` as a method to the Integer or a compatible object

so in the end this operation is just normal:

object.instance_method.instance_method(object.instance_method)

nothing magic here happening because this is all valid OOP code where an instance method could return a self object let's say.

Knowing this then before writing in a Ruby Interpreter one can find out if that code is in the standard library (see https://ruby-doc.org/core-3.1.0/Integer.html) or in a Gem
Let me guess who you want to do the fact checking... someone who thinks the way you do, no?
> Same to apple. They want to control things they shouldn't have this much control over.

I think that’s their right as a platform owner. They have no responsibility to sellers setting up shop in their walled garden. If the App Store was the busiest shopping mall in the world, they’re not obligated to make rent cheap; if your business model doesn’t work, apples rules are not new and you knew them before rolling the dice on an iOS app.

Under US law there is no guarantee it’s possible to craft a law that would stand up in court anyway.
And the us military also gave their soldiers Benzedrine (Amphetamine) during ww2. Your point?
That wouldn't be gta 5 either, but best-selling means copies sold, not profit.

https://vgsales.fandom.com/wiki/List_of_highest-grossing_vid...
For interference the light needs to be able to take two separate paths with different length, which is the case in the oil film example or with two slits. In a telescope, each photon can only take a single path. So what would it interfere with? If it's a different photon then coherence seems to be required
You are quoting an opinion letter to the Lancet, not peer reviewed research (see the "CORRESPONDENCE" in the top left corner). Passing opinions/letters off as peer reviewed research can legitimately be classified as "fake news"

The authors of the study that this letter referenced responded to the letter:

"Although our findings support Franco-Peredes’ conclusion that vaccination status should not replace social and physical public health mitigation practices, the above clarifications explain why our findings do not support his assertion that mandatory vaccination of health-care workers would not reduce nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 transmission."

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3...
Doesn't that make them really inefficient? I couldn't imagine efficiently coding on a phone or even tablet without adding a keyboard, mouse and larger screen (eg Samsung DeX) which will basically make it a laptop or desktop.
Weirdly the problem is "r&b". If you take that off you get the song immediately...
It’s a nice reading device. I would mainly use it to read news articles, documentation, maybe some books.

You can also install an SSH client such as Prompt by Panic. Then you can connect it to a VPS or whatever.

https://panic.com/prompt/
I personally expect it to be left to exist.
Oh no. You can call people that, in large groups, exhibit traits similar to Nazis ( blaming all that is not well on some foreign element living among us for instance, nationalism, fair amounts of racism) because they resemble Nazis. That doesn't mean anything and everything also doesm
Wow that case seems to have a rather extreme reaction from posters. It’s like I walked into a YouTube comment section on a 5g causes covid video.
This is part of the reason I don't set Vim to automatically fill the system clipboard and only do so on demand.

I think a few other geeky apps let you cut and paste internally as a separate thing from the global clipboard, which seems wise as a mitigation.
Came here for the comments section and stayed for it too. Thanks for the laughs guys!
They are not.

You are quoting an opinion letter to the Lancet, not peer reviewed research (see the "CORRESPONDENCE" in the top left corner). Passing opinions/letters off as peer reviewed research can legitimately be classified as "fake news"

The authors of the study that this letter referenced responded to the letter:

"Although our findings support Franco-Peredes’ conclusion that vaccination status should not replace social and physical public health mitigation practices, the above clarifications explain why our findings do not support his assertion that mandatory vaccination of health-care workers would not reduce nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 transmission."

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3...
Oh, yes, totally. You stand corrected. Your comment did not age well. There's stays my comment... 'tis not too late to seek a newer world.
Yeah same here. I have big screens around me everywhere. Why poke at a tiny 6.5" even I have 24" 4K glory and support efficient keyboard input?
There's a relatively new video on YouTube by Launch Pad Astronomy named "How James Webb Orbits 'Nothing'" [0] which left me baffled on how they are capable of orbiting "around" L2, which I had been thinking about for some weeks now and never could find a solution to it.

I think Webb is not the first one to do this, but the video makes it clear how crazy the planning of the orbit insertion and staying in orbit must be.

I hope that the NASA could release some details on this.

[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ybn8-_QV8Tg
"What's that? I can't hear you over how much money I'm making"

I pretty much only look at messages or invites once per week and don't use it for anything else anymore. The constant self-congratulation is indeed exhausting. Whether it's people graduating from something, or finding their "dream job" (watch them change dream jobs a year later). The main feed is very facebook-like as well, its gotten very low quality. I suppose LinkedIn likes it that way, but for me its kind of lost its shine.
Imagine if we were writing our laws like this, or court rulings would go like this.

“We can’t tell you what evidence we used to convict you because that would mean criminals can adjust their operations accordingly”

And then you hear someone say “people don’t get convicted for no reason”

I have no idea if the OP did or did not act fraudulently and I’m aware that we are talking about a private and not a government entity here.
Extremist treatises and manifestos by definition don't sell well so they are a bad example.
The bit that would be hard is the "all for one" thing with cars. People don't drive a massive SUV to the store because they can only afford 1 car. It's because they can only park 1 car.

When I lived in the city a small car like this would have been great, but as I had 1 parking spot for my apartment, I wouldn't have been able to have both a Gas and an EV.