skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Maybe if people did not open the discussion with virtue signaling their sexuality, things wouldn't be so bad. I'm not straight, yet I hate on the rainbow crowd, and I never mention it because it's fucking cringe to bring these things up outside of personal discussions in person. You give everyone a bad name because of this. Just like how most women I know shun and find feminists cringe.
Ask HN: Recommendation for open source ticketing system other than osTicket?
Twint is an amazing piece of software. It seems to be primarily for technical users who are able to use git, pip, Python, command line, and Docker. TweetFeast is for a different type of user who just wants a user interface to get the Twitter data they want.
I never asked for a white identity, but it is being applied to me by other people.

Any way you spin it, it is not ok. The color of my skin is my immutable characteristic, any derogatory statement about the whole white race will always be wrong.
I think if you review the biographies of those three individuals, you will find that the stories of their persecutions are a lot more complex than that they were attacked for their novel ideas (though that is certainly an aspect). In most cases it wasn't their scientific ideas that were shocking or banned, but their political affiliations or religious stances. I think all three would have a platform today, because they provided evidence based and extensively reasoned positions. I see Rogan in rather the opposite way: he is contributing noise to the larger discussion by intentionally amplifying particular voices, without regard for whether or not they are in good faith, because they resonate with him or his perception of his audience. If Rogan were finding and amplifying voices that had evidence based arguments that contributed to overall understanding, I would be much more positively inclined.

Though all that said, I'm against deplatforming him.
Desktop CT and 3D Scanner with Arduino (2018?)
Cluefinders
Correct. I wanted to spend 26 days on my bootstrapping hobby, not actually crunching data. I did that and this app is the result.
That's the reality in India. You are safe as long as you don't innovate
Probably a bunch of people got promoted for making the new URL and nobody was going to get promoted for maintaining the old one
I've started receiving spam from @gmail.com addresses recently. Each containing an attachment with PDF. Marking as spam did not help to stop new ones from arriving.
Who would target their own voters lol
Also we don't know that if they are still having sex or already are past that phase of their lives.
Is this just a form builder for D3?
Yes, the account has been suspended. I have lodged an appeal as I do not understand which of their terms has been violated.
MIT uses NDAs and non-disparage agreements to cover up research fraud. It's not uncommon.
High-order Virtual Machine (HVM): Massively parallel, optimal functional runtime
FYI I changed the title to "Rails and its Ruby dialect". Thanks for all the comments.

https://solnic.codes/2022/02/02/rails-and-its-ruby-dialect/
Absolutely agree. For a manager to say "Hey work on this feature and get back to me when you're ready" simply isn't managing.

Any project no matter how big or small needs to start with an end in mind. Even if it's an open-ended task or you are building a prototype where everything is an unknown. It's not difficult to draw lines in the sand before you even start.
> Are we talking about Ruby?

I wasn't thinking specifically of Ruby (and indeed I don't know Ruby, nor was I aware that it has this kind of support).

Rather, I was thinking about programming languages in general, since the top-level comment seemed to be talking about the general principle.

Out of 5 languages I use on a regular basis, only one of them has _some_ support for function composition. But even then, not as flexible as what you're demonstrating here. So my point is that across programming languages, the chaining approach is generally more readable than the composition approach. And that in turn favours methods over global functions.

If I ever start using Ruby, I would probably be on the fence about which approach is better though.
One imagines he could solve this problem by doing what Fox News did and becoming his own platform.

As a US publisher, the First Amendment protects his right to do so.
Sending "genuinely threatening" communications such as a threat to rape, kill or cause financial harm, would become a criminal offence.

Is threatening to kill someone not currently illegal in the UK, or is the BBC whitewashing this law, making it seem more narrow and reasonable than it is? Again:

This offence would cover "false communications deliberately sent to inflict harm", such as a hoax bomb threat.

So sending hoax bomb threats is currently legal in the UK? This article is filled with red flags for deceptive reporting. So it's no surprise how vague it is about seems to be the main thrust of the law:

If passed, the government's online safety bill could see social networks fined 10% of their global turnover if they fail to remove harmful content. The latest changes mean social networks will also have to proactively find and block harmful content.

What does this mean? If a harmful (as defined by this bill) message is left up for more than 24 hours, it could mean a 10% global revenue fine? 'Proactively' implies they'd have to do it without being ordered to by the courts. Although 'courts', 'judicial', and 'warrant' are conspicuously absent from the text.

It already stated that websites, such as Facebook and Twitter, hosting user-generated content would have to swiftly remove illegal content once it was reported to them.

Reported by who? Random users? Government officials? Does a judge have to sign off on it? Are there any safeguards to prevent legal content from being removed by false reports?

I thought the BBC did real journalism, but this reads little better than a government press release.
A New Database Reveals How Much Humans Are Messing with Evolution
Yeah it is, and I can already dual boot, but not having native pro graphics application on Linux is what stops me from complete switching over. Affinity Photo (and Designer and Publisher) and Photoshop are the only real options here.
what for this os? it can't be used for iot, for desktop or server so i can't understand the main idea why i need to use it or became a sponsor for this project...
Sure, the terseness is nice, and it is possible to learn this interface and make sense of it, but to me it still seems like abusing OOP paradigm in a way that conflicts with reality.

Abstract of any programming language, the concept of "2" has the properties that it is an integer, that it is a natural number, that it follows "1", that it is prime, etc. But it doesn't have a property "years".

From another perspective, back to programming, if "years" and "step" make sense as properties of "2" then does _any noun_ make sense? Is it cool for every library to monkey patch its own domain's worth of nouns to be properties of every number? 2.centimeters, 2.users, 2.widgets?

I can get with natural expressions for date math, but how about something more like

Time("2 years from now")

Then I can read that to mean we are constructing a time, described by the parameter.
didn't the rewrite take 8 whopping years? if that is true id argue no one's lunch got eaten.
So less of a VM name and more of a chainsaw brand?
Non-paywall: https://web.archive.org/web/20220205013803/https://www.wired...
Exactly!

Also, take away a person's license for life if they assault someone while driving!

If they're rude in a restaurant/grocery store/etc., just ban them from society forever!

Make one mistake, and you're fucked for life!
I find it amazing as well; It's like watching the two americas fighting each other.

The one to whom society means to be free from the violence imposed upon citizens by any authority, against the one to whom society means the enforcement of a set of rules protecting it against chaos (I reckon my phrasing may be biased, can't help it I guess).

I was actually very surprised by the many different (seemingly legit) posters who interjected in favor of the right for a corporation to expel anyone for any reason, not withstanding that this right might actually not be legal, or added in small print in a contract designed to be misleading, or that the plane might actually not be their property, or that, more importantly, "rights" are ultimately just an evolving bag of conventions that probably benefit in the long term from being periodically challenged...

I went as far as counting those posters, and according to my current census there are eleven different persons, all legitimate users with lots of karma, for whom apparently it's acceptable to use violence against a paying customer. I would have expected this opinion to be quite marginal and unpopular (I would have expected the more libertarian stance that the company should have bought the seats back from those customers instead, at whatever price was the "market price" in that situation).

When I look into myself, I think I can find some traces of what makes the "rule over everything else" appealing.

Of course as a software engineer by trade this is partly a professional bias: I like predictable systems, therefore I like simple rules easy to interpret. I like leaving assertions in production, getting a nice core dump whenever the slightest precondition does not hold, even when an invisible work-around would have benefited the customer more.

But there is also something stronger and deeper than that, an almost unconscious fear that if we start to bend the rules, mayhem will follow.

I do not own much, so chaos is not that frightening to me, but if you happen to own a lot of things, to care for a family, in a place fraught with poverty induced unruly behaviors, then the faint desire of simple hard rules (esp around trespassing) can grow into the strong desire for unchallenged laws and the consecration of property, I presume.

Or maybe that's just some natural feeling that's in all social apes in varying proportions.
The thing you want is the lorentz attractor and it's such an icon of chaos theory you've likely seen it already.
Would also like to know why!

The old AngularJS was pretty horrible in my experience, but Angular 2+ was leaps and bounds better! As a "batteries included" framework i prefer it to the alternatives that one would typically consider for front end development instead: React, Vue, Svelte etc. (though i would pick Vue/Svelte for more lightweight sites and maybe React because of its ecosystem)

That said, it still is pretty heavyweight which can certainly be a drawback, but not too much so unless you get into the reactive programming libraries and such, at least when compared with the alternatives: https://medium.com/dailyjs/a-realworld-comparison-of-front-e... (this appears to be from 2020 though, someone should do a newer writeup)

For the enterprise'y projects that i've seen, Angular seems like a reasonably stable and dependable solution to use. That's in contrast to React, which has needed way more updates in packages that it needs for the typical web project, due to its more fragmented nature. Of course, this might be viewed as a nitpick, but GitHub dependabot seems to page me more for React projects.

Also, if you want to use TypeScript (which i might go for, but only in some projects), then in my eyes it integrates with it way better than, say, React or Vue. To me, using TypeScript in React just felt needlessly cumbersome, especially with functional/hook based components.

When using React, i'd almost prefer to go for just JavaScript and enjoy the incredible productivity of being able to introduce and compose components very easily, way better than Vue seemed to let me. Of course, i'm probably in the minority here, because i'd go for functional view components and class based parent/container/logic components, but maybe that's just my antiquated way of thinking.

Also to conclude my subjective post of sharing my views and experiences, MobX > Redux. It's just wonderfully simple and easy to use for state management.
That's a classical-world blunder: single photons can and do interfere with themselves.

Making a measurement of which path a photon took, is forcing the photon to have taken one path. If you don't make the measurement (read, if you don't interact with the photon somewhere along some path it could take), you can get interference between the paths, despite it being a single photon.
The Reality War – It’s just Gnostics all the way down
Funny enough, when I search for your second query on Google right now, the top result for me is your comment right here.
This week in KDE: Discover redesign has begun
I liked the "shuffle" feature. Shuffling a few times helped me figure out what the word was.
If that part is true. Not saying it isn't, but saying x happened is a good way of justifying selling something and distancing yourself from it.
Kutcher is living the OPM/OPI dream. Other peoples money and other peoples ideas just wink and smile and rake in the cash.
In my experience people making these "freedom stands" are a statistical minority that in no way influences actual mass markets, much like those Greenpeace people chaining themselves to oil & gas equipment to stop it from being used.

I mean, it's nice and noble but the vast majority of people don't follow you and corporations don't care as long as you don't become a social and political landmark. If you go quietly for sure it doesn't matter to their bottom line.

People generally give stuff up for prosaic reasons, instead such as: too many ads, favorite content producers moved to another platform, content they like becomes paid, their social circles don't consider the platform cool anymore, etc.
How do you define censorship vs content editing?
Rogan and Spotify made a deal, he gets lots of money, they rather not host some of the content. Rogan was free to negotiate that, he chose to take the money.
That's completely different. "Enraged" is a strong word, you'd expect someone who is "enraged" to be extremely angry, turning red and almost throwing things around.

It's not normal for a third party to get so upset over other peoples cars. Angry? Sure. Vexed? Why not. Annoyed? Absolutely. Enraged? Probably not. Incandescent? Nah.
Some password management programs (I know for KeePassXC) clear the clipboard automatically after several seconds.
Total Compensation and Work-Life Balance I think.
“Nobody would do that“ Back in the day people did exactly that.
And for the simple reason it is easier and more fun to write code than to read code.
The key did get loose. Thousands of engineers had access to it and it showed up on dark corners of the internet for sale. A bunch of my unlisted videos got more view counts than they ought to have had, so I think abuse of it was pretty widespread.
I'm not trying to disrespect anyone's work. I'm just describing a situation. There are smart pieces of code there that solved the problems that were presented at each time with more/less time to work on them but poorly glued together. Similar problems were solved in completely different ways which makes the application less homogenic and requires to apply an extra effort to understand what's happening on each place. Lack of refactoring and tests left a lot of unused/unstable code that is only noticed when accessing specific areas/features of the application.

I understand the effects of time constraints and respect the years of dedications the developers gave to the application but that doesn't make the situation any more pretty.
Theres an option far easier. Just put a rotary encoder on the wheels axle and read that data in directly. Even lazier, use any common DC motor as the axle and the voltage across the terminals will be proportional to velocity. Using video motion tracking is way Overkill here.
It’s not censorship when you sign over distribution rights for $100 million and they decide not to distribute content.
I don't think this is complete. I think the product also has to fill a need, or an imagined need. An ancient quote from Thoreau, along a similar vein:

“Not long since, a strolling Indian went to sell baskets at the house of a well-known lawyer in my neighborhood. “Do you wish to buy any baskets?” he asked. “No, we do not want any,” was the reply. “What!” exclaimed the Indian as he went out the gate, “do you mean to starve us?” Having seen his industrious white neighbors so well off—that the lawyer had only to weave arguments, and, by some magic, wealth and standing followed—he had said to himself: I will go into business; I will weave baskets; it is a thing which I can do. Thinking that when he had made the baskets he would have done his part, and then it would be the white man’s to buy them. He had not discovered that it was necessary for him to make it worth the other’s while to buy them, or at least make him think that it was so, or to make something else which it would be worth his while to buy."

- "Walden", Thoreau
More insidious than the removal, is how Spotify conceals it. We shouldn't need a 3rd party website - the episode titles should remain in the list, among those not removed, but tagged with a big red CENSORED, along with a specific reason for the removal.

If they want to censor, fine - but don't lie by omission about it.
Good point. I meant that I give feedback to try to hide the weird/creepy ads, though. I've never clicked "stop showing me Ritz crackers or Crossfit ads" just because I'm not interested.
Can we not crowdfund an NFT to save these removed episodes?
These restrictions on speech seem well-intentioned but are of course another step in locking down the narrative.

The government said the bill would not prohibit "misinformation" as long as those spreading it were unaware that what they were saying was false.

Laws like this one extinguish journalism (or what is left of it). Back in the day you could still counter the government narrative and claim Iraq didn't have WMD without legal repercussions (though it could get you killed [1]). With this, they'll arrest you on grounds of spreading harmful deboonked conspiracy theories. It's not hard to see that this is how it's going to play out.

With "misinformation" laws getting implemented amidst a wider trend of sanitizing the narrative, investigative journalism has now not merely fallen out of fashion, it has become illegal.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Kelly_(weapons_expert)
Why do you think Rogan cares? He found a nice niche where he could make money from, he hit the mother lode. He's happy ..
Waydroid https://waydro.id/
> bill back resource usage in a multi-tenant kubernetes cluster

I feel a bit dumb for asking, but what about process accounting? I'm not sure if it can deal with RAM and I/O, but it's better than nothing. (https://linux.die.net/man/8/sa)
The likelihood of anyone having React in their browser cache is lower than it ever was with jQuery.

(and it was low with jQuery)
2nd this. I’m not expert on this, it seems it is something like even if you’re approved, you still need to wait in another line to get the green card, and the back log is especially long for Indian. The Biden admin somewhat recently has tried to accelerate this (because corporates are urging him to do something before quota was expired.)
If it is sufficiently necessary for people to wear a mask then it makes absolutely zero sense to make an exception for eating. Most flights are short enough that you do not actually need to eat during the flight unless for example you have a medical reason for which obviously an exception ought to be made. The obvious example being diabetes.
TBH, i hate mindsets like yours...nothing personal.
Some would say Oprah is. She gained popularity initially hosting a "Jerry Springer" lite type of talk show in the 80s/90s. She's since given platforms to people like Dr Oz who's hawked pseudo-medicine, Marianne Williamson (former presidential candidate) who tries to sell alternative medicine and pseudo-spirituality.

It doesn't have to be a 1 to 1 comparison but there's plenty of people out there that would say along one or more dimensions that Oprah is no better, better, or the same as Rogan.
Your articles are very negative. Basically everything involving Rails is bad and wrong by them. That's what i mean.

I want Ruby ecosystem, where everybody is free to do their things the way they want, by the rules they want, for whatever motivations they have. I want to have my special Rails snowflake and i don't want it to ever change because it constantly enables me to build amazing things AND enjoy the process also. And i'm willing to let you have your way and i will respect it but only if you can do the same without being negative about it in every other statement.

If somebody chooses to support Rails and Rails only in their library i think it's very fine and i think the same if there is a library doing the same thing for only Hanami. Or a library supporting both. Or a library not really supporting anything in a special way. I also think it's fine when there is a library which sole function is to monkey patch Object with #forty_two method. And fine it is because there are no rules from you or anybody else forcing me to actually use this thing. So, i will just not use it, right?

So for me this open and free "we" is the only "we" there is and also the only one i want to evolve anyhow.
Clipboard should be a private and secure enclave (encrypted) in the first place. Only the OS should store and retrieve data from it.
Virtualbox already has seemless mode.
Oh no, I'm not concerned about smt88. I'm just making a friendly observation.

It's normal to be annoyed by something like this, but not to be put into a rage.
He never confirmed it and the contract only goes for 3 out 4 years I think.
What doesn't have a social network, these days?
> “If I replace all of this Python code with Go it’ll be SO much faster!”

I write a lot of python, and the irony of this comment is that it’s probably true.

Worth the cost and time and effort? /shrug

Easier and faster to keep implementing features in? /shrug

…but out and out faster to build, deploy and run?

Yep, probably.

Im my experience python applications are slow it’s usually because your user logic is heavily implemented in python, and despite alllll the hand waving, that is, in general still slow. The package manger is slow and broken. It’s painful to deploy.

You can probably solve the problem in other ways, by picking parts to move to another language that provides an easy way to expose python bindings… but you know.

Make it faster by rewriting in go will probably work, if you only goal is “runs faster”.
Note: This article is from April, 2020.
What do you mean with “your circles“?
1. Pure Ukrainian, no relatives abroad.
2. I know people who can confirm that and do not know anybody who can deny except for some buddies who has moved to Russia several years ago.
3. North of Ukraine, very close to the Russian and Belarus border and pretty far to the Black Sea. Our border is steady BTW, maybe because there is nothing worth of attacking, unlike some mining and metal industry in ОРДЛО (abbreviation means literally Some Places of Donetsk and Luhansk Region but in usually speaking we call that area Donbas which means a Don river basin).
4. I have a family business, it is a grocery store which has been worked 20+ years with no computers. Now, almost all businessmen like me need to buy some computers, and to connect to the Internet in order to get a program registar of settlement transaction (we call it ПРРО). Of course it is closed source, expensive, it longers service time for my customer because of ping and right now the ПРРО in my store is glitching as hell so there is some risk that I will be fined if I will not manage it to work correctly ASAP. BTW it is hard to find any fan of Zelensky's politics even among employed in other areas, maybe because he is not really the one who can and who does rule the country.
Wicker baskets aren't something worth talking about so this isn't really a counterpoint
And obviously, talking to classmates. Let's not forget the social aspects of learning.