skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
https://i.imgur.com/6QQTaOJ.png

This is from 1-dose - I couldn't find the supplementary data for that study on 2dose/3dose

but needless to say that no this study does not in any shape or form suggest that it's exceedingly likely that a young no-comorbidity person is more likely to get severe disease with 2dose vs 3dose.

edit: found the data for 2/3 dose comparison - which again does not support the claim, because this is not age stratified data - and we know covid had significant age preference

https://i.imgur.com/Aek6eIm.png
Does it matter?

I’d assume the penalty for funding felony arson and murder aren’t that different from funding terrorism.
This logic equates to:
“Whelp, I can’t stop my kid from getting struck by lightning, so I shouldn't try to stop them from touching the stove. I can’t see all ends after all”

Just because you can’t see all ends should not stop you from trying to do good.
If you want a free society you have to live like you're in one.

Closing debate on any topic is not a free society.
But does it have 7000 pages’ worth of deep and powerful ideas? That’s something I wonder about frequently as a consumer of applied mathematics.
But that can’t hold files of more than X mb no?
Yes, popular opinion can cancel you via forking the blockchain or software.
Interesting that the artwork (1491) was being created at about the same time as the (Latin) Nuremberg Chronicle. It included a lot of artwork, and many copies of NC were colorized at some point.

Also in Nuremberg at the time of the NC was native-born Albrecht Dürer, who probably helped create it. He first spent a year in Venice in 1494.

(Side note: Book-coloring was rare until recently. Dunno about EU but e.g. most US school textbooks I've seen had little or no color up until color TV came along.)
i've seen similar performance deltas from run to run for both jmh and non-jmh benchmarks, though i don't remember any of them being a 100% delta. very annoying because it means you need to wrap the benchmark in a bash script and average over a dozen+ invocations of java to get semi-meaningful results
> And it's interesting how exactly the same group of people lamenting the paying of bail for BLM protesters are falling in line with rights for this trucker group to harass and occupy Canadian cities.

The inverse is also true, and at least in the more recent case people can point to the earlier BLM precedent. I.e., “if the platform can be used to fund BLM protests, then it can be used to fund trucker protests”. If GoFundMe didn’t want their platform to be used for this kind of thing, they should be mindful of the precedents they set.
Honestly, WSL2.
This largely is not true. While privacy on LN is still being evaluated, it is also extremely complicated. There's no easy "privacy on LN" guide that's industry standard, for example. Monero comparatively is much older and much better understood on the privacy side (eg: see Breaking Monero).
If it's too early to criticize it's too early to evangelize
Yes, but if you shut down the most "free" information platform, and make it only free to those who are rich enough to pay for anonymity then you are doing aggregious harm to democracy and freedom. Perhaps moreso that anyone has ever done in human history. Look no further than China to see the wrong way of doing things and that is precisely what this bill seeks to do. It is not to "protect the children" it is to protect the elite power centers from criticism and transparency by forcing you to open up all your secrets and communications to them to judge and eliminate the challenges and criticisms of their power under the guise of "law and order".
You realize the Civil Rights movements in the US had substantial fundraising? The March to Selma? How do you think people were fed? Where did they sleep?

So by your logic the Civil Rights movement was not legitimate?
> the new larger and prettier padding between UI elements

You say that almost as if "larger" and "prettier" were more or less synonymous.

Microsoft's designers sure seem to think they are.

They aren't.
I found eggs hatching in my printer
I agree. He's said similar things before on his podcast, and I have little reason to not believe him.

People seem to forget that he had an ownership stake in the UFC, which sold for over 4 billion dollars. Also, an ownership stake in Onnit (cofounder), which sold for untold millions to Unilever. $100MM is a lot of money, but he was very, very wealthy before that deal. It's not like he was scraping by on Ramen noodles before Spotify came along.
As of Windows 11, the situation is exactly the same.
Ok, so switch my words around.

Does society have a burden to ensure children are protected from dangers, including manipulation from disinformation and suicide inducing social media?

You can’t yell ‘fire’ in a theater, now we are just arguing over where the line of acceptable speech lies.
All governments spread misinformation on purpose? I suppose it's too much to ask for proof on that?

Maybe you mean the initial mask conundrum? That was evolving guidance based on realities ( not enough masks) and current understanding of a changing situation. It was pretty much everyone, led by the WHO, though, but it was only kind of wrong ( I don't know about the whole world, but in France the official line was that "masks don't help you not get infected by much, there aren't enough of them and most people wouldn't know how to use them properly, so there's no need for everyone to wear a mask", which evolved to "masks stop you spreading, so everyone wear a mask").
So everyone has the same preferences as to what's annoying and what's desirable???
I wonder how partisan this anti-mandate resistance is. My gut tells me it enjoys a lot of support from conservatives but also a healthy amount of support from a lot of moderates and a huge swath of the working class regardless of party affiliation.
> It takes me only a few seconds to scan a month of blocks.

How many transactions is that, however?
We really don't have the ray-budget for translucency with RTX. We basically only have the ray budget for a handful of rays per final screen pixel, and good translucency requires dozens for every interacting surface. There's a reason most engines using RTX only use it backed with a deferred style implementation.
It's true that the company might dilute your shares, but that also dilutes everybody else's shares too.

The greatest risk is the company won't be successful and your shares will be worthless.
You have to use "name:<filename>" to disable searching file contents. It boggles the mind why they eliminated the XP style search in favor of this undiscoverable version and then never improved it.
The same can be true of dollar bills. A bag full of dollar bills from a drug deal is fungible with a bag full of dollars from your salary. But you can be arrested for the former, and not the latter.
Dollars are fungible with dollars ($1+$1=2$), NFTs are not fungible with NFTs (1NFT+1NFT=1NFT+1NFT).
Same here: mild muscle ache for the Pfizer booster. If I didn't know I'd had the booster the previous day, I would have attributed it to falling asleep on a lumpy part of my comforter or something, assuming I'd even noticed it at all.

My understanding is the Moderna booster, being a 1.5x dose, often results in stronger side effects that knock a person out more often.
As a general rule it's unwise to hope for some unintended side effect of bad legislation to solve unrelated problems. The goal of this legislation is surveillance and control. If passed, it will achieve that goal. If it has a side effect of significant number of people starting to use encrypted P2P communication (doubtful imo), they will pass more legislation to make that illegal too, since "child abusers are obviously using P2P encryption now", and most "normal people" don't. And that time it will be even easier than passing the original EARN IT act.

Government overreach must be fought every step of the way, otherwise by the time it finally gets you personally, it will be too late.

Let's not get blinded by our dislike for centralized platforms. This is not the way to solve their problems, this way only creates more problems for people.
the creds are preview and preview. so this in another post
Wagtail CMS https://wagtail.org/ is the answer to this, and doesn't technically 'replace' the existing Django dashboard, new admin interface is being sponsored by Google, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qD6reQ7T8fQ
Like it or not terminology from the man-o-sphere is going to get normalized. It's astonishing how the term "simp" has exploded since 2019 (e.g. "Don't be a simp for Aella")

If the culture can confront the challenge of the incel it will develop the tools that can really face problems like systemic racism, women getting paid less in the workplace where it is easy to say people have "rights" but it is another thing to mobilize resources to realize them.

Barring that we will spend the next 30 years going in circles, George Floyd will be forgotten just like people forgot Rodney King, the Watts Riots, how prominent black men such as Booker T. Washington felt mistreated by the cops, etc. A new generation will come across the same problems, look at it ahistorically, and despair about the possibility for change.
I have a 100TB+ ZFS based NAS and have poor understanding of this.

I'm yet to see anyone make a really good set of resources to either watch or read that are not much too technically deep.
If you want people to characterize something as a “protest” you’re going to need a lot more arson and looting. :)
This is pretty good. However, there was another one that's been around a bit longer that's also really nice. See here: https://github.com/farridav/django-jazzmin
Pixel Shader Interlock (or Raster Ordered Views in D3D12 terminology) is effectively the same thing but without a resolve step, but the overhead is massive and basically too slow in practice.

To be honest, the game developer way of solving this is to just not use transparency. Too many things rely on the G-buffer / depth buffer these days, and transparency is usually limited to a lower quality render anyway.
It could be that something else is contending for L1/L2 cache.

As others have mentioned, take JMH for a spin. Benchmark after a few hundred thousand iterations warmup.

Also as mentioned here, thermal throttling could have a big impact. Maybe you have access to a desktop Xeon or similar?
All reasons why you might lose a lawsuit. However, a lawsuit, or even a cease and desist letter is still a nuisance for whoever you sue. Enough that their legal department might ask their ops department to stop blocking the emails. Since that's probably the cheapest route to make you go away.
> I don't think making political viewpoints a protected characteristic is a good way to achieve that, and would cause as many problems as it would solve.

By this logic, civil rights for race, etc. was not a good way to solve the discrimination issue. The real solution would have been to break up large companies since if there are no large companies then different races and sexes could just open up their own businesses to serve their own communities without the need to force other small business owners to serve people they do not want to serve.

But that is obviously not the problem civil rights aim to solve. Allowing companies to discriminate by any identity characteristic promotes the Balkanization of society which is something we do not want. Democrat and republican enclaves are just as fractious to the nation as white and black enclaves.

What problems would civil rights for political orientation cause that civil rights for race, sex, etc. do not cause?
Is there a way to use this outside the Chrome browser?
Ask HN: Does targeted advertising work at all?
I'm too lazy to run ad blockers. So I see plenty of advertising on the internet. Here's the thing: all the ads seem to be for things that I already bought. After I placed an order with Select Blinds, I started getting relentless Select Blinds ads on YouTube. After I made some charitable donations to Mercy Ships and Heifer International, their ads started following me around everywhere. My wife recently got on a new immunosuppressant medication, and now I see ads for that all the time. Great job targeting! But I already spent the money? So what is the point of all this?
its pretty telling the grandparent used the word 'product'. that's why we haven't replaced SMTP, because everyone is off building products. and they all want to own the whole world. SMTP isn't a product. its an open protocol standard.

(I certainly agree that we should have a new one, I just can't see how that would happen)
Kind of surprised he missed this considering it's in one of the best books about this history. https://www.amazon.com/Hackers-Computer-Revolution-Steven-Le...
Maybe, but if the popular discourse doesn’t use the word “occupation” for the likes of CHAZ, then I think it’s fair to avoid it here as well. We should strive toward fairness and away from partisan favoritism IMHO.
“you don't know that infection is measured with symptomatic numbers and you don't know that a subsymptomatic viral load isn't transmissible”

That is mentioned in the article, but right now there isn’t really any evidence suggesting the vaccine doesn’t actually stop infection in at least some cases. PCR tests can discover asymptomatic infections for instance and some workplaces had mandatory testing regimes. The initial moderna trial tested everyone even without symptoms on reception of the 2nd dose and found that just one dose of the vaccine had greatly reduced PCR + compared to the placebo group, there seems no evidence that behavior of the vaccines isn’t generalizable.

“ you don't know that it isn't strategically better to have vaccinated, low risk people get breakthrough infections and get immunity to omicron proper”

How do you you see this as an alternative while still suggesting the vaccine wouldn’t work or provide immunity?

If the vaccine makes a specific person immune to Omicron infection, they don’t need breakthrough immunity because they already have it. If it fails to make that person immune to Omicron infection, they’ll still “strategically” get sick by being in the community and being infected.

Unless you are suggesting an alternative of young vaccinated people specifically exposing themselves to Omicron positive cases en masse in an attempt to have a breakthrough case and boost their immunity I don’t see how your comparison makes sense.
> testosterone attacks the spike protein causing inflammation and permanent microscopic scarring of tissue

I'm not an immunologist, but I am curious... even if this were true, how's getting covid and generating lots of the spike protein better than getting vaccinated and generating some of the spike protein?

Because almost everyone on Earth is guaranteed either A or B will happen within a year or two.
I feel you're deliberately being pedantic. There's nothing legally dictating 1 pound of flour = any other 1 pound, but it is fungible, by the definition of them being indistinguishable.

1 NFT isn't the same as any other NFT. They're deliberately non-fungible.

Specific Bitcoin outputs have histories associated with them. While you dismiss this as related to traceability (which is also true), it still stands that one output with a favorable history is preferable to an output that was known to be mined in North Korea.

For these differences, as evidenced by the specific exchange action examples in the linked article, show that different output histories allow companies like Chainalysis, CipherTrace, TRM Labs, and Elliptic to add specific risk scores to outputs. Those with lower risk scores are worth more than those with higher risk scores. This is a breakdown in fungibility.
Actually it's relevant as a reminder of the importance of privacy coins, for they are the only way to avoid wrench attacks.
> sustainable for human habitation

Even the worst outcomes predicted by climate change models leave some inhabitable regions right? Definitely not sustainable for current population levels though...
Does the devil need an advocate?
I was confused by the use of fungibility too. But if bitcoins can be traced they're no longer the same as every other Bitcoin. They're history makes them unique. Therefore they might be valued differently or because workers based on their history.

For example, if someone robs a bank and they know the bank knows every serial number of every dollar bill they got then those dollars aren't worth as much as other dollars since there is risk with using them. So those dollars are non fungible with "clean" dollars. You're probably going to want then covered to clean dollars ASAP and it won't be a 1 to 1 exchange. Therefore it's the traceability that makes them non-fungible.
Worms or bust: The story of Britain’s most tenacious indie games company (2016)
Actually, no one involved in the 1876 US election survived.
This is known as regulatory capture, and yes that’s exactly what has happened in every major industry. Established players help write legislation that favors them and raises the barrier to entry for the entire market.

Disrupters like those you mention find loopholes in the laws and exploit them long enough to litigate their case. In parallel they lobby for laws to make their businesses fully legal. If they fail on either front, they usually have run their gray market operation long enough to have spent all of their investors’ money.
I'm 50. The original risk, while surely a tiny number, looks rather different to me than it likely does to you.
I think this might be it. When I run with the epsilon GC, and run with taskset to force just one CPU core, the performance is consistently bad. When I instruct taskset to use two logical cores, the performance is good. This is a single-threaded test, so why would it need two logical CPU cores? I'm testing with a Ryzen 7 1700.

Edit: Upon further testing, changing the taskset after the process launches has no effect. The JVM seems to be looking at the number of CPU cores available when it starts, and then it uses that for making compilation decisions.
I won't buy their cars then. It's that simple.
It works on my mother-in-law. I have the “I have a great mother in law who loves knitting” T shirts to prove it.
So basically how social media platforms handle messaging.
About 25,000 transactions per day right now. So about 750,000 per month.

Edit: here's a good comparison chart https://moneroj.net/percentage/
This is a fair reflection of my experience.
This makes this post make a lot more sense when you put it in that context.
> If you want to add something that works on all iterables, you don't insert new methods in iterable classes, like you do in Ruby.

You don't in Ruby, either.

If you want something that works on all Enumerables, you normally write an (instance or class/module) method on some other class or module that takes an argument that supports the methods provided by the Enumerable API.

(In Python, you might do this or write a bare function, but Ruby doesn't have bare functions; it's possible to make proc objects in a library which is the nearest equivalent, but you’d almost never do that, because module methods are much more convenient.)

In either Python or Ruby you might also monkey-patch existing classes to add functionality to the., and this is slightly more common in Ruby than Python, but because Python iterable, unlike Ruby Enumerables, don't have a common superclass that isn't shared with non-iterables, you couldn't easily do a “for all iterables” thing in Python [0] by monkey-patching because you don't have a good target to monkey-patch, whereas in Ruby you might do something for (nearly, because duck typing is a thing and it's possible someone could build an enumerable by implementing the whole API without mixing in the module) all enumerables, not by adding methods directly to individual enumerable classes, but by monkey-patching the Enumerable module itself.

The main difference here is that Python (despite having support for mixins because it uses multiple inheritance) tends in it's core to use a mix of OO public APIs and procedural public APIs built on top of OO protocols using (often dunder) methods, rather than either consistently-OO or consistently procedural APIs, whereas Ruby is consistently OO and uses mixins to provide shared functionality building on a narrower protocol where Python would use a suite of functions. (Python tends to be more OO in its stdlib and third party libs than in its core, except specifically when supporting protocols defined in the core and consumed through built-in functions.)

[0] except by monkey-patching object with code that tries to use the dunder methods that underlie the iteration protocol and fails if they don't exist, but while theoretically possible I don't think anyone would do that.
Best way to make a tomato turn to mush faster than it should.
Do you have some GitHub samples to achieve the things you talk about? I had no clue my contacts are accessible usingbmy termux
1. It does have calling, but it's integrated with Gmail.

2. Elaborate? The screen sharing in Meet is what Chrome provides in general and I see the same options when using other web-based tools like jitsi. Zoom has a native app which presumably allows it do other things, but given that Chrome can "share entire desktop," "share a window," and "share a tab w/audio" I haven't actually found myself wanting any other behavior. Also, I consider not needing a native app an advantage and Zoom's web-based offering is trash.

3. Agreed, although to be fair I only find myself wanting this when presenting slides and Google Slides does have them.

4. Zoom supports 1080p while Meet does 720p, but if you're using any video features then Zoom apparently drops to 720p as well?

5. No argument there.

6. I've literally never experienced what you're describing. If more than one person is presenting content then the first presenter might be displaced by the second, which might look like "minimizing the presented content." If you have manually pinned anyone that always takes precedence. No option to overlay in Google Meet is a major annoyance.

7. Google Meet's chat is ephemeral unless you are recording the Meet. I think this goes into a bucket of design decisions that can all be lumped together as "No one is using Google Meet as their only communication tool." I've never needed things like Zoom's DMs that are inside a call. When I'm trying to have side conversations with coworkers I just use our normal chat tools. Google Chat is probably only better than Microsoft Teams among the "real chat apps," but it's definitely better than Zoom's built-in messaging.

Two things that have made it so that I cannot stand every over video calling product is that Google Meet does automatic video brightness adjustment, which helps a lot when you don't have a great set up at home, and the audio noise cancelling is insanely good. It is hard to overemphasize how good it is. You can whistle and clap and play music and type on your obnoxious self-indulgent clackity keyboard and other people will only hear your voice, plucked cleanly out of the mess as if everything had been mic'd separately. It's by far Meet's best feature and so far no one else has come anywhere close.
They were but I'm talking about the display ads.

(Brings me back to that time in high school when I was being harassed by another student and phoned in a free want ad to the paper claiming he had a little of Chihuahua puppies with his home phone number...)