skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Maybe context plays a role here?

What Spotify and Youtube does isn't denying to publish work, they remove content that was already published.
It’s just another instance of cancel culture leaking into the real world. We have learned nothing from the ‘turrist no fly list’ fiasco.
television does that way more than joe rogan.
> But it still requires developers to use a new API. So why get them to used a half arsed security enclave when you can design a proper secrets store instead?

Because the entire point of this is NOT to store something but to transfer something from one application to another without both applications explicitly knowing about each other (so they can't just communicate in a P2P fashion). The rest of your message is about storing data, which is not what the clipboard use is all about. Which is why i wrote it is irrelevant - you refer to something else.

E.g.

> clipboards are temporary which means you need to copy data into them. This creates an extra step for users to follow as opposed to applications querying the secrets store directly

The API i mention is not about permanently storing data, it is explicitly about having a secure temporary store with the same(ish) UX as a clipboard but for secure data.

Applications can also use a secure store for that and the data that is being copied to the secure clipboard could also come from an application that stores its own data to it from there, but again this is a separate issue, this is orthogonal to what a discuss here.

> secrets managers are encrypted, clipboard isn’t

This is irrelevant as the data isn't stored elsewhere outside the memory of the process that would manage the secure clipboard's functionality (and of course you could encrypt that if you'd like but IMO that'd be pointless since it'd need to be decrypted at some point anyway and these would be meant for temporary storage - regardless of you do or not encrypt it though it'd be again orthogonal to the rest of what i describe).

> secrets managers can store multiple secrets, a clipboard cannot. Thus you then still need to have a secrets manager to copy your password into the clipboard anyway. So why not do away with that middleman entirely?

Because this isn't about storage.

> if you’re going to introduce a new API for secrets then you might as well do it properly from the outset.

That'd be a "proper" solution for a different problem, hence barely a solution at all.
Ive gotta say, I think the first comment on the actual blog post nails it.

Remember, kids, growth for the sake of growth is the ideology of the cancer cell.
I mean there is absolutely no incentive to offer any of those to anyone. The sole reason for allowing workers is to collect taxes and not have them leech off your social programs.
I seriously doubt it can compete with Azure PlayFab or Amazon GameLift, I won't give it more than one extra year to fully ramp down.
I used it at the start for Destiny 2 and had a lot of fun with it.

Then I tried streaming D2 from my home PC to my work PC across town, and my latency was definitely better than Stadia's. After all their talk about how much work they put into lowering latency, I was very disappointed... And I discovered that I could stream better and cheaper with Parsec and Steam/Epic/Uplay/etc that with Stadia.

For a while, I thought the free monthly games were going to save them, but then those went downhill.

Since they never implemented any of the amazing features they advertised, like continuing from where a streamer was playing, it's hard to support Stadia unless you're in very particular situations.
Just a few quotes to add some context to the clickbait:

> The study says closing nonessential businesses appears to have had some positive effect and cut mortality rates 10.6%, probably because bars were closed

> They looked at mortality rates but didn’t consider how lockdowns might have affected the number of infections or virus-related hospitalizations. They also didn’t use studies that forecast deaths.

> The findings conflict with previous studies that found lockdowns worked.
The problems with comments like this is that you assume that your right to be exposed to objectionable content usurps the rights of people who don’t and the company itself. Even though people like you are an insignificant minority.

Spotify is not abusing anything. They are simply exercising their freedom to choose what content they want to host and be liable for.
I fail to see how anyone can seriously listen to Joe Rogan. He has a circus of quacks and conspiracy theorists on the show and when he does occasionally have a legitimate scientist he can barely muster any response beyond “wow that blows my mind”
What is this, Nazi Germany!?
Definitely. Would tapping a selected letter deselect it? I thought it might be a bit confusing if you deselect a letter that's not the latest one. Maybe a 'Clear' button would help.
Aren’t those recommended posts from your instagram feed?

Hovering over those and examining and studying them in anger/fear/horror is still engaging with the ad. Won’t the algo serve more similar content if you are spending time looking at it?
This is America wheres my freedom to believe in lies and falsehoods that harm other people?

Wheres my freedom to endorse hateful people and give them a platform spout lies?
Induction, while great in many ways, has plenty of disadvantages:

- potential incompatibility with existing cookware

- many induction stoves achieve lower levels of heat through TDM (turning on and off at max heat) which is horrible

- incompatibility with curved bottom cookware like a wok

- lack of knobs

- annoying beeping
Under no circumstances should the Department of Homeland Insecurity should be co-opted into blacklisting U.S. Citizens on behalf private commercial corporations over disputes that it has with its customers. The CEO of Delta should be fired over such an abject failure in leadership.

And.... what keeps on getting lost is airlines like Delta and United would never find the space to get this bad if future customers would vote with their dollars and simply choose not to purchase their product. Then change would happen.

https://www.flyertalk.com/articles/john-oliver-how-airlines-...
>, about how podcasts would need to be more decentralised, self hosted and directly payed for (instead of sponsored).

That proposal isn't appealing to someone like JRE because he can't get $100 million per year from decentralized self-hosted podcasts with your suggestion of Bitcoin micropayments.
He's mostly mainstream with a few controversial topics. This (mostly acceptable) mix allows him to be on a popular platform like Spotify with the commensurate multi-million dollar contract.

Your decentralized podcast distribution would be more attractive (or simply a last resort) for people who are mostly controversial and de-platformed like Milo Yiannopoulos and Alex Jones.

The above analysis is about comparing strategies & tradeoffs of well-known personalities who are trying to reach big audiences. It's not relevant to other types of podcasters who may prioritize decentralized ideology over audience numbers or lucrative contracts.
Google just cant do anything right at this point.

Every non core product is chopped/changed/rebranded/reintegrated until it dies.

I feel behind it the minds of frenetic people with no empathy for their customers desperately scrambling to meet meaningless performance targets through the continual churn in each business area. People who wouldn't survive on their own merits for 5 minutes without vast budgets to throw into the abyss.

I've used this product and I bet not one voice involved even has a clue why its failing. They will, as in the past, invent their own reasons, pivot, which in turn will fail again
The GP’s comment is that “This is the latest attack in an ongoing war on free speech. We are losing our freedoms.”

What freedoms can possible be referred to other than the First Amendment? This is the standard language of someone applying the First Amendment to private citizens and companies.
There are not enough similarities between protocols and businesses for that analogy to work or have any explanatory value.
Spotify deletes over 100 'Joe Rogan Experience' episodes
I think if you zoom in whilst showing a corner of the viewport it works because the hdr videos are still in play but if you zoom so the corners are not visible it will fade out
I wonder when Jax joins this list. 2023?
Unfortunately you cannot simply HODL IPv4 because authorities can come over and take you blocks back if they are not used.

I can see an incentive to form a small time ISP as an investment though but that is also quite a hands on investment unlike NFT or some coins where you buy and keep.
Use FutureTask and Callable with Multithreading to Boost Your Java Application
As I mentioned in the other comment, I was replying to someone explicitly stating that “we are losing out freedoms.” That is not a censorship argument. Censorship can happen without your individual liberties being attacked.
How far down the thread are the comments regarding this? TL;DR as there are 249+ Comments and top ones were about ratings and reviews of books and podcasts being corrupted.

There are plenty of places Podcasts are hosted that are decentralized, maybe this is a rightwing phenom as after the great purge of 2020 many rightwing media creators saw the writing on the wall and found new outlets for their products.

I find that almost every podcast is available from multiple hosting sites now as many podcasters learned a hard lesson when the oligarchs running the major sites colluded to influence the US election by blocking and banning in an effort(successful) to kill the Hunter Biden story among others.
Also on a human level, Spotify is not some abstract system - it is a company run by real people that feel the real effects of vaccine misinformation, and would probably rather it not cause any more harm if they can avoid it.
Podcasts without RSS feeds are not podcasts. That is a strict technical requirement.
Sounds like Blade. Wheels Up is usually more than $2k for that route.
Yes. The success of the DS is basically that it was a smartphone (wrt games) before smartphones (and without a phone ;)). The brain games (Brain Age, Big Brain Academy - 3 of those games are in the top20 best selling ds games[1]) were a big reason why it was so succesful. Also tamagotchi with dogs/cats (nintendogs). But 150 million could only have been reached with a) longevity, b) weak competition (PSP, sold enough to be seen as a threat, but didn't hinder the DS) and great software support (once a hardware is successful the third party support basically reinforces itself due to good sales). Also, quite a few hardware revisions helped also (the first DS was clunky).

[1]https://nintendo.fandom.com/wiki/List_of_best-selling_Ninten...
Yes, there are occasional episodes with quacks. But using those to dismiss the whole show is blatantly ignorant.
Ask HN: Favorite web development discord server?
Did you read the definition at all? I don't think you did. Because the definition doesn't say that.

"a system in which an authority limits the ideas that people are allowed to express and prevents books, films, works of art, documents, or other kinds of communication from being seen or made available to the public, because they include or support certain ideas"

>By your logic any academic paper or book that a publisher turns down is being "censored"

This does not match that definition. Please read the definition.
You are correct that nothing illegal happened, no legal rights were violated (except possibly Rogan's contract, which is irrelevant to a discussion about principles). You may even be correct that it has always been like this - yes, media are far more consolidated than in the past*, but new entrants to the media landscape (Google, Twitter, Facebook, etc..), while even more consolidated, don't control their platforms as strictly as traditional media, so it's hard to judge if dissenting speech is more or less suppressed than in the past.

But that doesn't make it not censorship, or morally justify concealing it.

*In 1983, 50 corporations controlled the vast majority of all news media in the U.S. At the time, Ben Bagdikian was called "alarmist" for pointing this out [..] In 2004, Bagdikian's revised and expanded book, The New Media Monopoly, shows that only 5 huge corporations -- Time Warner, Disney, Murdoch's News Corporation, Bertelsmann of Germany, and Viacom (formerly CBS) -- now control most of the media industry in the U.S. General Electric's NBC is a close sixth. - https://www.corporations.org/media/
Inside Argentina, if someone ask me where I'm from I', expected to specify the province where I'm from. (And in some cases, the part of the province, like "Santa Fe" and "Rosario".) My guess is that it happens in all countries. But if I talk with people that lives abroad, usually "Argentina" is enough. The US is not special in this.
Eh? There have been private repositories for ages. I don't see how licenses have anything to do with it either. You don't need to have an FOSS license just to host on GitHub.

Also, this still doesn't address the EEE angle.
This is massive.
I can't imagine how often we guess at what's going on today, where knowing for real will result in better outcomes.

As an amateur wine maker, this would be magic, it's very difficult to measure alcohol concentration, ratios of acids etc.
This is totally and completely wrong, legally.

They may deny boarding. This is the legal term even ("Denied boarding").
That is why they do it prior to boarding the aircraft.
You will get "Denied Boarding compensation" (https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/14/part-250)

Once they have taken your ticket, you have boarded, and have sat down, you may no longer be denied boarding due to oversale.

Heck, once they have taken your ticket and told you you can proceed to board, they can't remove you whether you've gotten on the plane or not.

They may only remove you "due to a safety, security, or health risk, or due to a behavior that is considered obscene, disruptive, or otherwise unlawful"

See, e.g.,
https://www.transportation.gov/individuals/aviation-consumer...

Scroll to "Can airlines involuntarily bump me after I have boarded the flight?"
I agree, but not necessarily in the permanent no-fly list (unless their behavior warrants it). There should be a process to get off of the list after a period of time.
What Is a Python Package?
TL;DR; here are the contents:

What’s the Difference Between a Python Package and a Module?
How do I use the Import Statement in Python?
Understanding ModuleNotFoundError
How to Install Python Packages
Making Sure Your Pip Version Is Correct
How to Install Packages (The Right Way)
1. Creating the Virtual Environment:
2. Activating the Virtual Environment:
3. Using the Virtual Environment:
4. Deactivating the Virtual Environment:
Dependency Hell — Why We Set Up Virtual Environments
How Python Finds Packages
Changing the Python Path and Controlling Where Pip Installs Packages (Case Study)
How Do I Publish a Package in Python?
Final Thoughts and Source Code
How bout airlines and government stop making everything about the flying experience worse and worse every year. It doesn't need to be like this. And in other countries it's not. We are making this a stressful experience.
I wanted to watch this video for a minute or so (very shallow of me) but ended up being stuck in it for the whole 29 minutes. Very interesting and hard story to tell but also extremely inspiring to see what hell have you been through and was able to mature to the point to where you became an inspiration for many others. Well done.

Now more technical questions ... for my own sake of understanding and learning.

What would you say that were most important aspects of re-implementing (subset of?) C++ runtime that must be appropriate for in-kernel usage?

Where would I look in the source code to learn about SerenityOS paging algorithms, and virtual memory management in general?
That's one of the best things I've read recently.

This is also the kind of articles the HN should be used for.

What the author wrote just works and it transcends technology world. Works in almost all contexts.
Here's a point-by-point critique for those interested in the controversial podcast.

https://twitter.com/grahamwalker/status/1489429245520580608
I must be about your age and damn, I played so much Wii. I must have >200h on several games: both Mario Galaxy's (one of my favourite games), Wii Sports Resort, Smash, etc.

On the contrary my Switch is almost exclusively a BotW machine x) bar a few indie games here and there. I must be getting old
Before someone gets into the "they can deny you boarding" argument - they cannot.

Legally, they may not remove you for oversale once they have taken your ticket, let you board, and you have taken your seat.
> But the data clearly shows that spread and 2nd order effects are reduced in a heavily vaccinated population.

For the world's most dominant strain B.1.1.529 after 10-20 weeks there is no effective difference. Your church has some doctrines which you clearly don't full understand
That's not being dismissive one bit. It's a fact that the project's description isn't very good.
Multiple studies agree that mask wearing is highly effective, and even moreso in confined spaces/close quarters. In a study done onboard Navy ships it reduced transmission by 70%.

See below for many studies:

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/science/science-br...
> Claiming that they do not prevent transmission is misinformation.

If this is true, then following statement is equally true, since there are cases of "breakthrough" transmission:

> Claiming that they do prevent transmission is misinformation.

If the efficacy against transmission is below 50%, then Statement 2 has more weight than statement 1, because they fail in more than 50% of cases.
There’s something deeply funny to me about the world’s largest vendor of unregistered securities claiming to base their decisions on the rule of law.
When did it end?

The Danish authorities said, put briefly, that it ended when the vaccination share grew high enough. I have a feeling that you think there's a different reason?
Thanks. How about topics? How do you choose which topics to cover? Or is this mostly led by clients?
Isn't that his appeal though? He lets the guests speak without much interjection beyond "wow" and "really". Unlike many other media hosts, he doesn't have his thumb on the scale trying to steer conversations towards his own political leanings.

And while he's featured a few conspiracy theorists, they're a minority and are balanced out by credentialed 'serious' scientists.

That's all beside the point though - purging conversations from the internet is bad, and the culture that cheers this on is worse.
Why Google is more dangerous than Microsoft
Is all censorship violation of freedom of speech? Is being intolerant of intolerant people an example of intolerance?
I'm white. I have been subjected to racism from blacks in the south much more than from blacks up north. Its a different culture down there for everyone.
For me it's a different results bubble, but still a mess: Dodge Viper, a brand of booze, a tattoo parlor, two different video-game characters called "viper", a "tactical clothing" store, a Go library, a bar, a TV series, an iOS design pattern. To get actual snakes I have to search for "vipers".
You should be banned from that particular supermarket. But that's up to the owner.
I mainly use LinkedIn to see how much better my former colleagues are now doing, compared to my career progress. When not stalking former colleagues I A/B test[1] my spam posts about my canvas library[2] to see which variants generate more views of my profile.

[1] Not proper A/B testing. The variants get posted once a month or so, making the results meaningless to anything beyond my ego.

[2] Link available on request.
> RedHat's virt-manager. It sends your clipboard AND selection content to all virtual machines

Do you know what's the CVE for that one?
> That's a single isolated incident compared to the huge uptick and "proliferation" of unruly behavior

Then you go on to list a load of things didnt didnt happen on airplanes. Grow up
It's their plane which the passenger has paid for a part of, for a duration, and for the transport to a destination. The passenger owns a part of the plane's usage for that time period. Just because tenants merely renting a house doesn't mean the landlord can throw them out of their home.
Today isn’t yesterday; things change. I agree that no one would make the effort today. Money killed (or is in the process of killing) podcasting.
>> > OK. So are you now retracting your previous claim that "vaccines do not prevent transmission of SARS-CoV-2"?

> Why should I?

Because it is false.

> It is true, because I was infected after getting vaccinated by someone who was vaccinated as well.

That does not make your statement true. The vaccines never prevented transmission at 100% effectiveness. Never ever. They were not marketed as doing so, and if anyone did claim they prevent transmission at 100% effectiveness, then that person was spreading misinformation. It was never true.

They didn't even prevent severe outcomes at 100% effectiveness, and they were always much better at preventing severe outcomes than they were at preventing infection. (Initially >90% vs. <~ 80% against Alpha).

The whole idea that one case of transmission proves the vaccines are ineffective at preventing transmission is silly.

> Don't twist my words.

I am not twisting your words. You were making a judgement call, which you are obviously not qualified to make.

> https://www.fiercepharma.com/vaccines/fda-to-require-at-leas...

1. That is a 50% efficacy in preventing the disease, i.e. the severe outcomes, not transmission. All the vaccines pass that bar easily.

2. That was the threshold for approval then. Now is now.

>https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2022/01/19/1071809...

"Two weeks after the shot, the booster cuts the risk by about 70%."

Seems to be greater than 50% to me. Drops after that, but once again, it was always known that the effectiveness of the vaccine would be temporary.

>> So sixth, an airline is very well within its rights to prevent potential harm from its passengers and employees.

> Yes, but not by mandating SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.

By saying who they allow to fly or not. You don't have to get vaccinated. United does not have to fly you.

> I am sure we will see such questions being clarified in courts soon.

Will probably be very short court cases...
perhaps the dictionary website is showing you something different than me

https://i.imgur.com/BdB33fL.png
They should be able to, yes.
Given the list of newly missing episodes, this looks more like comedians escaping association than Spotify removing anything they don't want on the platform.
The airlines need to figure this out on their own. Commuter rail lines deal with much worse, and somehow don’t need a special list; instead, relying on the same criminal trespass laws the rest of us use.

And… to be fair, far more railroad conductors have been hurt or killed by passengers than airline employees.

Railroads solved this problem a number of ways, but one way was having their own law enforcement agencies. The airlines, which are far more profitable, instead get this service mostly subsidized by taxpayers, through local police almost always stationed at airports, air marshals provided by the FAA, and passenger screening by TSA.
I was thinking about it, but to be honest, I'm not sure I'd have anything new to say beyond what's in my comment!
It's surprising that no one in the community takes retaliation, in one form or another. If you don't have the ability to harm others you are sheep in the jungle.
What counts as “not used”? If I set up some minimal websites hosting one ape picture per IP address, is that used? Do the registries have a concept of frivolous use?
Dignity and pizza.
Do you know who Rodney Brooks is?
Typing is a one-person task, but the point of this article is that programming isn’t. The end product is improved by involving others.