skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
So you punch someone in the street, should you be banned from walking on any street anywhere in the country?

Why are aircrafts so special that they need such special rules about banning people who commit a minor crime one time? Remember these crimes are minor crimes. Yet people are honestly thinking the correct level of response for an assualt is the inability to use an entire industry.

Of course Airlines want the power to banish people from the industry and give their hosts and hostesses power that people will be afraid of them and just comply with everything and anything. These people already have a lot of power in the fact not complying is a crime.

But to be fair, this is coming from a country where there freedoms are so limited it's a crime to cross the street in the wrong area.
Example photos with these lenses here: https://formlabs.com/blog/photos-from-a-3d-printed-camera/
>They are the only company still serving up the classic experience, though.

Heh, I actually disagree again here, but not quite as strongly. PlayStation have absolutely hit it out of the park on "classic experience" over the past few years. their remakes/remasters have been absolutely stellar (Tony hawk's Pro skater/spyro/crash bandicoot) and really hold up well in modern terms. Their single player games in the last few years (god of war, uncharted, sekiro) are nothing short of outstanding. They may not all be your cup of tea but I think it's fair you can say that about some of the Nintendo family of games too.

Xbox has a few home runs in the same category. The Ori games are absolutely incredible, and having recently come away from Metroid Dread _very_ disappointed (really poor story pacing, overly predictable plot, and horrific instadeath mechanics) I would choose ori and the blind forest/will of the wisps over the more recent Metroid games.
Interesting question… But on the top of my head I can’t really come to think of any.
I've been using kagi for a while. I was using google+ublacklist, and (mostly) searx prior to that. I only care about search, every other feature (maps, listicles, etc) is worthless to me.

So far I've been quite pleasantly surprised. I didn't need to de-prioritize anything yet, and most of my queries are technical. I would pay for it, but like you say, I'm not sure how much.

5$ for unlimited searches is something I'd go for without even thinking. For 10$, I already question whether is it actually better than using searx where I get comparable results. I can get a VPS cheaper than than and run my own customizable searx instance for that cost.

I'm not doing anything fancy, but I don't want to think about the query count. You can stack-up hundreds of searches per day sometimes, just because you're looking up something interesting, then do next to nothing for days.

I'm not saying I wouldn't pay for more, but I don't see the gain.

I definitely see the problem with the API cost of the underlying calls though. That feels like a huge argument that having your own index is important to compete in the market.
The other comments hit some spots (although today with the use of bundling, I'm not sure caching matters as much as people make it out to), but something that is currently missing from the conversation: parsing performance. Not the speed that the browser fetches the .js file (which depends on network quality) but rather the speed the browser parses the actual code, which can sometimes become the bottleneck. Larger projects adds more code for the browser to parse, and that will make the initial page-load performance worse. Smaller scripts === faster page-load, which improves user-experience and all metrics related to that.
It was quite interesting interview to follow, all the best in you endevours.
I have none of them but I can give you my phone number if that matters.
I watched the same videos, and ended up purchasing a small number of 1990s romplers in rackmount format, as well as a Yamaha FM module. It turned out to be a good investment—the patches often don’t sound realistic but they sound good, they’re very easy to use, and it’s easy to find a patch that I like. More modern synthesizers, softsynths, and DAWs seem like they have a ton of garbage, unusable patches with a million effects on them to show off how powerful their sound processing engine is.

The Yamaha FM module was actually my first hardware purchsae, and I thought I would love it a lot more—it’s pretty limited.
For learning and fun :^)
Sorry to say, but your friends sound like nuffies.
For example, I'm curious what could happen if many of the platforms that distribute information become more narrow in what they distribute.
How about you turn ON all ad personalization and just search for cat food, funny jokes websites and a bunch of random noise.

I think there is a chrome extension that will do this, i.e search random shit to poison all trackers. Maybe it will help you defeat it.

Learned this in school, it far easier to turn a F into E, I to T, etc by overwriting it with a pen and making complete nonsense of things than trying to erase it completely, which is harder and leaves more traces.
I think it's more about the level of interactivity that is "needed". The seller part of the platform would do a lot of customization and changing settings, some of those probably have live previews as well, whereas the seller part of the platform is pretty static, no need for the same level of interactivity, so doing it by manually manipulating the DOM is manageable.
I see a lot of speculating like this and if you know these people you know they wouldn't have requested it.

Michael Malice had 2 of his episodes pulled and just did a YouTube about it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A-1MHKIRUow. He did not request them to be removed and Joe did not either.

It's likely given that the episodes with Robert Malone (the controversial MRNA Vaccine creator) is still up that these recent take-downs are the result of some new algorithmic reviewer.

People on Reddit for instance have noted that many of these episodes talked about race and may have used racial epithets or alluded to race-based issues somehow and may have gotten automatically flagged or some such.
> However, the vaccines were not 90% effective at preventing transmission of the original variant, more like 60-80% IIRC. And Omicron has mutated significantly, so effectiveness is further reduced. And of course there is a significant percentage of unvaccinated (partly due to "the vaccines don't work misinformation, sigh!), and the virus has a much easier time going from unvaccinated → vaccinated or vaccinated → unvaccinated than it does going from vaccinated → vaccinated.

Now Omicron is dominant and these earlier strains are not relevant anymore.
It is reasonable to expect that the virus will mutate more and faster, maybe even with many different strains that are relevant at the same time.

> And of course there is a significant percentage of unvaccinated (partly due to "the vaccines don't work misinformation, sigh!)

Most of Africa is unvaccinated, because they don't have the vaccine, while some countries are trying to enforce the third injection.

> Transmission rates would be a lot higher without vaccines.

That is not an argument for mandating vaccines when they only prevent the spread of the currently dominant strains with a very low probability or maybe even not at all. Actually I haven't heard of any good argument for that yet.
Heh. That would have been the case 30 years ago, but nobody can hold info an entire stdlib in their head anymore.

Advanced users just move their searches from Google to the reference docs page.
Great podcast, thanks so much for this!

What's the best way to look at the beginnings of the project?

There's a first git commit saying

"Import all this stuff into a single repo called Serenity."

but maybe there's earlier version or earlier descriptions?
It makes it less likely for you to catch it in the first place a necessary prerequisite for transmission. Also your bodies ability to fight the virus is liable to reduce your viral load and ergo chance of transmission.

It beggars belief to imagine that your body is both more adept at fighting it and also somehow just as good at transmitting it.

COVID-19 Cases, Hospitalizations, and Deaths by Vaccination Status
February 02, 2022

https://www.doh.wa.gov/Portals/1/Documents/1600/coronavirus/...

Summary

Unvaccinated 12-34 year-olds in Washington are

• 3 times more likely to get COVID-19 compared with fully vaccinated 12-34 year-olds.

• 5 times more likely to be hospitalized with COVID-19 compared with fully vaccinated 12-34 year-
olds.

Unvaccinated 35-64 year-olds are

• 4 times more likely to get COVID-19 compared with fully vaccinated 35-64 year-olds.

• 7 times more likely to be hospitalized with COVID-19 compared with fully vaccinated 35-64 year-
olds.

Unvaccinated 65+ year-olds are

• 5 times more likely to get COVID-19 compared with fully vaccinated 65+ year-olds.

• 8 times more likely to be hospitalized with COVID-19 compared with fully vaccinated 65+ year-olds.

• 9 times more likely to die of COVID-19 compared with fully vaccinated 65+ year-olds.
You seem to be assuming that what the airline did was lawful and what he did was unlawful. There is plenty of evidence that shows that this was not the case. Regardless though, something being lawful or unlawful does not imply that it is also moral or immoral. What is an authority for someone is a criminal for another (see certain regimes). Regardless, I am sure that we can agree that the airline is not an authority under the law.

Anyway, you have made 25 flamewar comments in this thread. Posters that do that are usually banned so I would advice you to stop. (just a friendly advice)
I’m itching to try Crystal, since it has goroutines aka. greenthreads aka. fibers for easy concurrency, static types, automatic null checking, and performance on par with Golang.

But Crystal has around 468 open bugs at the time of writing :(

https://github.com/crystal-lang/crystal/labels/kind%3Abug

Issues are well over 1k…
There are some really interesting removals on this list. Michael Malice, who is a very reasonable and interesting commentator if unorthadox, stands out to me. This is a long, long way from the days when the debate was about whether Alex Jones was in our out of the boundary of polite society.

I'm glad that Joe Rogan got vast amounts of money out of this; it makes the situation a bit more tolerable. But Spotify are not behaving like a responsible editor.
He didn't interfere or disrupt the flight operations through unruly behaviour. He didn't assault, threaten, intimidate or interfere with anyone. This was all on video...United were in the wrong.

That is why they settled the suit - and why the rules were changed!

It amazes me that people think this is ok - and that David Dao was somehow in the wrong here.
The idea that Rogan could "legitimize" anything is hilarious. He brings people like Alex Jones on his show, it's incredibly obvious that you shouldn't take everything you hear on the show seriously.
The problem I am seeing is that yes, someone will write the exact nerdy explanation on how it works - on a private Facebook group, which you will never find in any search engine. I'm a member of several automotive FB groups and the wealth of knowledge there is enormous - but ultimately it all gets swallowed up in Facebook's belly and is not available for easy search like it used to be. It's a real tragedy.
Apple as a platform is not growing in most western countries, steadily declining in some. So yeah, customers made their choice already
Several years ago someone had a bright idea to name a game "N". And then someone decided to call a game console "switch" which made troubleshooting network problems (with this console) hilariously nightmarish.
>Some New Guinea Highlands societies capture cassowary chicks and raise them as semi-tame poultry

emphasis on the semi!
Nice to know, navigating the site to get stuff like the latest NEWP manuals, the new Web interface and other similar stuff, seems to have moved into "talk to sales" kind of stuff, so hence why I was wondering that.

Good that they are helping then.
Type top 50 games on google, and just compare how many are available on Switch.
Breath of the Wild released on the Wii U as well, as did the pre-deluxe version of Mario Kart 8 and what was at the time arguably the best Super Smash Bros game yet (some people prefer Melee, but Brawl was notoriously not great, and Ultimate obviously had not come out in the Wii U's heyday). I'm not sure good first-party games alone can completely carry a console; people need to be hooked in first before they start considering the platform, and the Switch had the most intriguing hook there's been so far.
If your interests don’t involve any of the top latest AAA games
This is what I'm trying to ask about. What will happen if people agree not to have their views published? What effects are there?
No, we are not. Progressivism spread from the US to the whole world long time ago. There is literally a party called Progressive Party where I am from that even adopted the "white male privilege" narrative even though, as I said, my country never had any racial minorities (other than jews, if you consider it ethnoreligion a race) or colonial history. It would be comical if it wasn't tragic.

If you are talking about a whole race of people, but you actually mean only a specific subset, then it is up to you to define the context, not up to the reader.

(And even in that case you will still probably end up with a racist generalisation.)
What happened may or may not have been legal (I would guess all involved parties, including the passive bystanders, did something illegal at some point); I believe the discussion is more about how badly the situation has been handled by the company, and consequently: can we trust those companies to operate an extra-judiciary blacklist of passengers?
Anyone has a guess as to why federated alternatives to youtube like odysee haven't caught on already ? So much content censored in the last years, there should be a lot of reasons to move.

Is it because of the lack of monetization ?
Like a another comment suggested, I would recommend using an adblocker. It might not be the answer you are looking for, but it seems like the fastest, most immediate solution.
But they already came for "us", spotify said they have removed 20k podcasts during pandemic and nobody said anything because it wasn't Joe Rogan.
That wasin't a podcast episode, it was a radio talk show called opie and anthony that ran from 1995 to 2014, this call was likely from around 2005. The whole point of the radio talk show was to bring on funny comedians like burr and rogan, have them talk shit and be funny, do over the top studio stunts, bring in wacky guests off the street, etc. The two hosts were at the top of the "shock jock" business in America for over a decade, and this hilarious 8 minute video is a golden slice of that kind of content. If you take anything in that vid seriously you have a weak sense of humour and are easily missled, rogan killed in the vid and so did burr.
> What is free speech denialism?

Belief that opposing viewpoints don't deserve to be protected under free speech (excluding the obvious, like inciting violence).

> Propaganda hae nothing to do with free speech, and hasn't really moved either way (there's as much as there was before).

I don't have any numbers to back it up, but even if it's not more common, it's certainly more impactful with all of the "wrongthink" being silenced.

> Overt racism, antivax anti-science shouldn't be excused with free speech

Your second claim is more interesting, because I keep seeing people repeat the claims that Joe Rogan is "antivax & anti-science". Keep in mind, I don't follow his podcast, but I watched the full episode with Robert Malone after the social media outcry started.

The conclusion that I came to is that he's not "anti-science" - that would imply that he doesn't believe in the scientific method. What people really mean when they say that he's anti-science is that he came to different conclusions than they did after considering the evidence (or lack thereof), therefore he's wrong, and since his critics view themselves as "pro-science", Joe must be anti-science.

But whether or not he's wrong, it doesn't have anything to do with freedom of speech. If you do believe that he's wrong, call him out publicly, write a blog post detailing why he's wrong, record your own podcast and debunk any claims he or his guests made, with evidence. Be the opposing voice and present rational counter-arguments.

Bad research gets published all the time and "science" is not some singular entity that only consists of homogeneous ideas, and that's not even taking into account all of the conflicts of interest that exist for the pharma industry in publishing research that stands to make them $billions.

This is why it's important to allow an open and free discussion of opposing viewpoints, it's the only way of advancing human knowledge and widespread acceptance of your ideas in an open and free society. Censoring someone because you disagree with them is not going to change their (or their viewers') mind.

> which doesn't in any way impact wether or not and who can criticise what

If I risk getting censored, "cancelled", having my livelihood taken away for voicing my opposing views (which aren't violent nor bigoted, just a simple disagreement on the topic of scientific research), I would argue that very much impacts who can criticize what.
No one can tell you here without passing for either a robot who just agrees with everything the mainstream media says or a nazi who also believes the earth is flat, you should research it yourself, it's honestly not that difficult but you might not find his old content since they removed him from everywhere.
Here's the thing about doing things and telling people.. if the people ghost you then it can seriously take you off balance and if what you did is even slightly hard to explain then they will ghost you.

It takes a lot of patience to do both the things and the telling to people but I think the latter actually takes more patience than the former even though it seems to be the other way around.

Here's what I did recently: https://gateway.pinata.cloud/ipfs/QmeVYAP75GAvY8Q8iSfMoWMGgT...
I like the safety/damage perspective you brought up. Feels like some powers have figured out how to sell seemingly any limit on liberty as an increase in safety. Seen in that way many other trends in US make sense - TSA since 9/11, complete absence of kids from all public spaces, mass surveillance, maybe even COVID restrictions. Too many important things are dangerous to make bubble wrapping the entire world a reasonable strategy.
> They train in school environments where they do classroom projects on their own, or work on long-term intern projects in a silo. They are used to having to figure it all out up front, submit it for review, and then get some sort of result, like a grade or return offer.

This is something I struggle with everyday. PhD students usually come from finishing their master and totally have this mindset. They feel like doing things only by themselves will be more valuable than if they seek collaboration. But we deal with very hard problems and previous experience is one of our best assets, collaboration with other team members is not only very well valued, but essential to get our work done.

A very importnat point, in my opinion, is that the students should not have to figure out all this by themselves. It is our job, as supervisors, to help them to change this mindset. Easier said than done...
What is the rationale for deleting those episodes? One of the deleted episodes is an interview with Mike Ward, a Canadian humorist who got sued over a joke. I don't understand.
Chill. I listen to JR but thought the joke was funny.
It would be great if we could see the voters of our country. I would like to contact thinking alike people from Greece :)
You are certainly right in the short term, but this no-fly list process, like any extraordinary process put in place in extraordinary circumstances, esp. around air flights, will stick forever.
As other pointed out, you don't even need to tab into some app. The security model on desktop OSs is that by default, every app has access to everything owned by the current user, even memory of other apps or hijacking commands by adding scripts in ~/.local/bin.

It is slowly being worked on (on Linux, this is done via control groups (containerization), AppArmor, SELinux, ...) but takes time to carefully tune so legitimate existing apps don't crash because they expect access to something. IIRC, macOS and Windows are also working on this.

There is also Qubes OS, taking a more radical approach of isolating everything by default, like Android or iOS. But it can be painful to use, as apps are not designed to support it.
These could be awesome for something like replacing a hefty 100 HP boat outboard.

Could be really cool on a small jet boat where cooling can come from all of the water you’re already sucking up.
Wow. This looks super smart.

I tried building a break enforcing app once: Locks the screen. Asks you what goal you want to accomplish and how much time you need. Then unlocks the screen for the requested duration. I stopped using it because of the very issues you mentioned. Pure time based solutions just aren’t practical.
GoFundMe is not automatically refunding trucker convoy donations
It’s pretty safe in web browsers. Any app can write to it but the only way to read is if the user hits the paste shortcut.
I think the only way to end up with a successful re-write is to be extremely realistic with the whole organization about the scope.

For a program that took 10 years to develop, a rewrite will probably take around 10 years as well to reach feature parity. Obviously, if you stop development on your successful app for 10 years waiting for the rewrite, you will fail. If you think 10 years worth of work can now be finished in 2 years with the benefit of hindsight, you will fail.

But, if you start your new app by first attacking new markets that the old one couldn't, so that the new app is genuinely valuable in itself, and then you slowly consolidate it by adding features that the old app had, while still maintaining a crew developing the old app as needed to address the existing markets, you can justify the investment and then some. Of course, this should only be done if it has become clear that the old program is really not possible/worth it to extend and continue in the long run, which can happen for various reasons.

There will be times where you will find massive shortcuts you can take, since odds are things you had to develop from scratch 10 years ago exist pre-packaged today. You may also be able to re-use parts of the old app that were actually in good shape and take them whole. But you should never rely on these things making your work shorter - they are nice boons, but the correct estimate is still in the order of magnitude of the old app.