skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
That is not my favorite one about the NYT.

It was also the NYT's Walter Duranty [1] that covered up Stalin's mass murder of millions in the Ukrainian Holodomor [2], and also, Stalin's purges and show trials. He didn't just cover up the Holodomor, or the Russian starvation, he actually fake fact-checked it in true Facebook fashion, writing the following "Any report of a famine in Russia is today an exaggeration or malignant propaganda. The food shortage, however, which has affected the whole population in the last year and particularly in the grain-producing provinces – the Ukraine, North Caucasus [i.e. Kuban Region], and the Lower Volga – has, however, caused heavy loss of life", and in doing so, refuted the reporting of Gareth Jones.

And Walter got a Pulitzer for his misinformation.

[1] https://www.amazon.com/Stalins-Apologist-Walter-Duranty-Time...

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holodomor
not even necessarily in web servers. If one writes a frontend proxy server which needs to work on > 10k concurrent connections it's likely the way to go. But for an application server which sees much less concurrency it might not matter that much.
As an Australian, I insist that anything named "Cassowary" should try to disembowel you if you have anything to do with it.
What about all this? https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/10/08/states-have...
Now I understand how Joe Rogan feels.
He interviews people with controversial opinions because there are other sides to stories that deserve to be highlighted.

People like him because he appears to genuinely mean that.

It is clear that if arguments like how often he said "cunt" or "nigger" on air get tossed into the debate of censoring his podcasts on covid-related matters, the pitchfork brigade is just out to get him. Not much coherency here.
There might be a bit more of an rush then it seems,
as for many causal players the Steam Deck (and alternatives to it) are quite a viable alternative for playing many of the games on the Switch which are not exclusives.

In the end we will need to see how the Steam Deck plays out.

But for 2022 the power of the Switch is just very very low. It was still acceptable when the switch came out but by now it's starting to hurt.

This won't matter for targeting children.

But children don't buy consoles their parents do.

And a lot of young adults and adults did buy it too without it involving children.

So if they take to long, they may permanently lose marked share due to the Switch less being an option for (successfully) Indy games in the future.

Due to switching the Games I causally play I'm now kinda regretting not to have per-ordered a Steam Deck. The Switch has the games I wanna play and they run, but not always fully fluent.
While I hate ads, it's impossible to live in a world without it.

Because even at the most extreme, where there are no ads, even the most minimal difference like location or appearance has value. Consider the simple example of a grocery store - what products do they place at eye level? What products do they place closer to the entrance? What color does P&G make their detergent bottle? What do they call it?

It's all "advertising", and there's no practical way to prevent it.

The alternative is that everything is packaged in the same sized gray box and described in perfectly utilitarian terms.

So advertising will always exist. We just need to know where to draw the line.
I don't see many people signing up with the pricing plans they have in mind.
Personally I like the idea of hiring a prospective employee as a contractor to do a small but real task. That will give you a more reliable read than any interview. I don’t understand why this is not a more common practice.
Making (software) stuff seems easy. I do post about it on social media, but honestly it gets 0 traction since I have almost no audience.

> If you you don't have any marketable skills, learn some.

This seems like "rest of the owl" where it leaves out a ton of critical steps. Become good at marketing is a lucrative career if you are good at it. So excuse me for being jaded when "learn marketing" seems as helpful to me as "sell profitable services". Sure, but how?

The post recommends Khan Academy, Wikipedia, and Code Academy. Only Wikipedia has info on marketing, but reading it is not the same as learning how to do marketing.
There is no telling whether anything exists in vacuo or merely as excitations in a lattice we're living inside unaware. :)
I'm building two things:

1. A project to help people start businesses. The idea is to give founders the structure they typically lack. https://cxo.industries.

2. An automated crypto trader based on technical analysis. https://tradecast.one

Both are built on Flutter/Nim/Postgres. I actually also want to build an NLP project too, which I started on, but it's such a huge endeavor that I can't figure out an MVP which won't take 10 years! Plus I can't do too much at once.
> disappointing to see people still framing it as a purely individual decision.

Unless you live a in cave on the side of the mountain surviving off berries and forgoing all human contact, nothing in life in a purely individual decision.

Dog owners are more likely to have their pet physically hurt a small child than people who choose hamsters.
Owners of Dodge Charger Hellcats emit more CO2 to the environment than Prius owners.
Nobody _needs_ to make six figures a year to survive, they could all perfectly well donate everything above their 'need' to a local soup kitchen... but I don't know anyone who does.

The last I checked, all of these things are still considered perfectly acceptable decisions in polite society. Nobody is out shaming those choices. Except maybe the Prius owners.
They’re just begging the government for power they won’t be granted. If they were actually independent like Greyhound or Uber, this wouldn’t be a story, the passengers would already be banned.
Pretty serious crime: https://www.criminaldefenselawyer.com/resources/interfering-...
Being put on a no-fly list is probably the least of your problems.

It think the risk is in transparency. If I piss off an airline employee in some way and they decide to punish me in this way with no recourse it's a problem.
Yes it is, he paid for the seat and has every right to be there. If he was unruly, sure. But he wasn’t - he held up his end of the bargain, and had every right to expect the airline to hold up their end.
The First Amendment protects us from the government censoring speech. It is not a prohibition on private companies removing content or private citizens demanding the removal of speech they disapprove of.

The fact that this discourse can happen in the open is proof that free speech exists and is in force.

If the Biden administration could control speech they could ban anyone suggesting anything other than the official position of the government. Clearly this is not happening.

Likewise, if the government could control speech they could choose to force Neil Young to place his music back on Spotify for the sake of trade. This is not happening.
Wonder how easy it'd be to unlock the speed on NEVs.
This is straight out of blade runner 2049.
> Predictably, people break out the C-word.

Censorship is now a taboo word? That's pretty ironic.
Say what you want, the smartest people I know as a professional are on LinkedIn, however they, like me, never post anything, it's just a profile to point people at for a quick overview of your professional experience. However the people that post on there all the time, okay I'll agree with you just don't throw everyone in the same dumpster fire please.
For how long should society punish mental illness? Because this proposal is essentially punishment for mental issues.

Not the first time airlines have attacked the mentally ill, they especially like to target children. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]

[1] https://www.washingtonpost.com/travel/2019/08/22/flight-crew...

[2] https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-56428231

[3] https://www.clickorlando.com/news/2021/05/04/family-barred-f...

[4] https://www.news.com.au/travel/travel-updates/incidents/air-...

[5] https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10168687/Man-cerebr...

[6] https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10037077/Quadripleg...

[7] https://www.marketwatch.com/story/american-airlines-responds...
Not for violent offenders.
>and so the probability must be different from P.

Not if they interfere in just the right way to keep the probability the same as in P.

I see a second problem with this experiment - in the double slit experiment, there is one electron interfering with itself. If you released two protons at the same time, they'd interact with each other and change the probabilities, even classically.
Ah yes. The familiar “blame the educated liberals” argument. That’s been going around since 60’s. Why won’t those hippies grow up!?
How hard is it to convert a golf cart to a NEV?
I don't know. It's easy to criticize after the fact on an online forum, especially by many who have never been in physical confrontations and seem to have an expectation that they'll never be harmed no matter how they behave.

The security staff is charged with removing someone from an aircraft, without knowing their intentions, who's already acting strange by refusing to leave in the first place, and acting in limited space with lots of other people around. They could've done a better job, but it also could've been much worse.
sounds like conjecture
I'd pay to see that
Tesla asks you to pay $200 to enable to heated seats that are already installed in the back of your car
Regarding 1, science makes zero progress on an entertainment show. The correct way to scientific redress is through publication of peer-reviewed literature. That's how you get mainstream acceptance in science. Science is not the consensus of opinions in the general public. Quite the contrary.

Come back to me when Nature censors something for ideological reasons.
This is definitely true. I had a SNES, but skipped the N64 and also for some reason never played Pokemon as a kid. It's still reflected in what Nintendo games I like. Zelda a Link to the Past was my favorite game. So I loved A Link Between Worlds. However, I really struggled getting into any of the 3D Zeldas because of lack of Ocarina of Time nostalgia. Same with 3D Mario games. I bought Pokemon for 3DS during a lot g layover on my first trip to Japan. I thought this would be the perfect drosetup to get into the series but without nostalgia it's too easy, to repetitive and I honestly saw no reason to get more than a handful of Pokemon.

Planting the seed early and reaping rewards for the entire life is definitely what works for them.
It does on a superficial level ("here's a list of five people with buttons next to their names"), but it doesn't do it effectively. You're more likely to end up befriending a stranger using Tinder, or playing video games, or trying to pick up a new hobby, but Facebook doesn't enable those interactions very well.
This is a good point. I don't need to see the same GoDaddy or St. Jude's ad 200+ times a week.
The above article explains the experiment but I didn't get the point of it until reading this: https://blogs.mtu.edu/improvement/2015/06/18/the-red-bead-ex...

It seems to be that is a demonstration of the following:

1) Take a task that can only be minimally affected by skill or effort (drawing random beads)

2) Pretend it's a task that can be affected by skill or effort, leading to natural interventions like worker incentives, praise, etc.

And together you get that 2) doesn't affect 1) at all. And maybe people feel bad about it afterwards. This illustrates the point that you can't just use worker incentives to optimize the system, you might need to change the system (e.g. suggest new tools). (Please correct me if this interpretation is way off).

I can see why this is an important point: many managers do think it's all about employee skill and effort, and don't look at the system.

But here is my criticism: I would say it's not an experiment, but instead a demonstration or even illustration. I (and many people) can easily predict the outcome of this illustration if it was just verbally described.

Also, 2) not working in situation 1) dangerously should not be read to mean 2) will never work. There can be many situations where the opposite of 1) applies: where the only thing that matters is worker skill and effort, like moving bricks from one pile to another without tools (presuming that is a necessary and irreducible task). In that case 2) can be the largest lever possible.
I wouldn't expect that "r&b" would help the query.

and DDG, first result

https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffcm&q=like+you+didn%27t+care+I+do...
I like the idea some of those might be the guests themselves asking to be removed due to the controversy.
> He was not "beaten" or "physically attacked".

> Dao was taken to the hospital with non-life-threatening injuries including a broken nose, loss of two front teeth, sinus injuries and "a significant concussion"

What phrasing would you prefer be used instead to describe the sustaining of said injuries?
People can sue for whatever they want, and settlements from large juries are always a risk assessment, not an admission of wrongdoing.
I don’t think it’s that simple though. Airlines are almost a public conveyance; they sold him a ticket and he would have gone to some lengths based on that reasonable expectation. People coming to your house don’t have that expectation.
I mean, the dude created more havoc and United’s disproportionate response netted him a few million dollars instead of a $250 voucher, so I think I’d say it worked out ok.
It's interesting that for a lot of more hardcore gamers these innovations are often seem as a deterrent.
Great story thanks for sharing. I am from India, and having heard your story, I may try that in the future. Which specific place did you do this in? Near some town or village in Rajasthan? AFAIK that's the only Indian state that has desert (the Thar desert), except for maybe bordering Gujarat state.
I first learned about Andreas from seeing one of his videos about TempleOS [1][2] when I was first playing with TempleOS and learning (Holy)C. There are a few forks of TempleOS around, I made a post about one a couple months back. [3]

1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wr3xN52QYtA

2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VkF7pQpgm50

3. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29513856
Your argument seems to be that the topic is relevant, active, and frequent—-ergo, newsworthy. And because the content of the article is newsworthy, the headline for it is not clickbait.

My definition of clickbait is a little different than that. It’s not so much the newsworthiness of the item behind the headline (one man’s old news is another man’s new insight), but rather the form of the headline itself. The more the headline plays on my emotions to pull me in, to try and push its relevancy ahead of an otherwise objective cataloging of information, the more clickbaity it is (to me at least).

This particular headline is far from the worst, but the air of mystery it elicits seems to waft “psst, you gotta check this out.” So imho, it is slightly clickbaity.

(I was going to use an analogy, but a previous HN article today taught me it’s better to use those in non-debate contexts).
Photons of different polarizations are nonidentical, but if this argument is true, it would also prove that horizontally and vertically polarized photons were identical... in an experiment insensitive to polarization. I do not believe this answers the original question.
Noticed that yesterday with Endeavour OS, I switched over to vmware player for now for windows. Everything just seems to work on qemu on linux though, but I never had much luck with it on windows.
> I/O is covered by Turing completeness.

Not really. A plain turing machine only has one input and one output over the lifetime of the execution.

> certainly any TC system has the capacity to keep track of time if the pieces are manipulated at a constant rate.

Only if the turing-equivalent machine is iterating at a specific rate and can pause. Lots of these systems run through the entire machine in a single shot and can't manage timing.
Is it punishment, or reduction of harm?

The vast majority of the traveling public would never even think about assaulting a flight attendant. Presumably most flight attendants would not like to fly with someone who has assaulted a flight attendant.
Who is their SEO marketer?

The main page’s headline “Your Connecticut Personal Injury & Immigration Lawyers” so I guess we’re looking at some pretty upper funnel content.

Kudos for at least making it interesting.
What utter non-logic
Generally, you solve this problem by using different (randomized) wavelengths, modulation (e.g. pulsed in a pattern), or if interference is inevitable, do something like WiFi or BLE does. It's not a big problem in practice.

I can only suggest you think harder about the 'all cameras' approach. Imagine say a snowstorm. Hail. Rain. Ice sheets. Sun in your 'eyes'. Cameras, basically, suck. Elon's game is to use suck-tech and make it un-suck with computons. Bad Choice.
Racism was not the factor discouraging 1800s immigration (which largely was from Scots-Irish and other European backgrounds similar to the original settlers of the South) -- it was the climate, agricultural economy, and the fact that its elites preferred slaves over hired labor. The elite plantation owner class notoriously looked down on lower class whites, and the origins of anti-black American racism in part came from the animosity of workers who felt that they were forced to compete with slave labor. Not everyone hated though, some of the non-owner trades class at the time felt more kinship with the slaves than they did with the owners because that was who they were more commonly interacting with on a day-to-day basis when doing business and trading goods.

The North arguably was more racist towards those Irish immigrants at the time, because the North was dominated by English Protestants (WASPs) while the South had roots in being from the poorer parts of the British Isles, which is the origin of the Southern accent.
Thank you for the kind words.

It's really the cancerous tissue that has to be sampled. Part of what makes cancer so hard to fight is its ability to mutate quickly. Someone with enough means would likely have a tumor sampled multiple times (for instance, sample again after the treatment stops working).
> The infamous thought experiment, flawed as it is, does demonstrate one thing: physics alone can’t explain consciousness

Neither can math by the way and by extension, computation. There is no such thing as a computational theory of consciousness unless consciousness is redefined to be whatever is done by a Turing machine.
It's not so much about punishment as it is about keeping people safe. If you can't behave in a safe manner in the air, you shouldn't be there regardless of your mental health.
Low-effort dunks are not a good look.

That same 'horse deworming paste' is showing promise in fighting cancer as well:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7505114/

https://mdanderson.elsevierpure.com/en/publications/ivermect...

https://www.embopress.org/doi/full/10.15252/emmm.201404084

https://jeccr.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13046-019-...

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41523-021-00229-5

https://journals.lww.com/oncology-times/fulltext/2021/05050/...

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S104366182...

How does a deworming paste kill an entire organism without harming the host? Do you have a grasp of the mechanism of action? Why is it unlikely that it would have anti-viral effects? My intuition is you have absolutely no idea.

Do some searching and dig in. If you spent a few days reading articles about how this works you might see a possibility of it having some benefit in this case. It's ok to read, you're not going to hurt anyone because nobody is going to ask you (or me) for your opinion on the matter, but you would at least have a basis for why you think the way you do.
> If a hotel denies your booking for whatever reason, would you just stay in the lobby anyway?

The equivalent analogy would be: you paid for and were situated in your hotel room, when you receive notice from the hotel that they have overbooked their hotel and that hotel staff from another hotel need to stay in your room and you must evacuate your room immediately. When you refuse to do so, they have security slam your head into the bedframe, resulting in you breaking your teeth, and then leave you outside on the curb.
Gmail Actions (2011) [pdf]
I fail to see the point of a study that can't be replicated. Assuming the replication is performed correctly, failure to replicate pretty much means either deliberate fraud (unlikely) or an honest "mistake" (or whatever word you prefer to use to describe a situation where you thought you measured and described a real-world effect in a manner that's in any way useful, but in fact you did not).
Why do you think this would force that lawsuit that would make things more transparent? There are already thousands of people on the no-fly list. I don't think the unruly passengers are in any way special such that they'd have more success challenging this sort of thing.
I disagree with the parent comment. It contains a thread of logic that appears to hold at first glance, but actual social dynamics are more complex and you ought to consider the full context before applying strict logic. The detailed description of the incident (Wikipedia link from GP) suggests that the airline mishandled the situation from the start:

> Several passengers stated that the situation escalated quickly and was inflamed by the demeanor of a United employee. According to passenger Tyler Bridges, "An airline supervisor walked onto the plane and brusquely announced, 'We have United employees that need to fly to Louisville tonight. ... This flight's not leaving until four people get off.' That rubbed some people the wrong way." Passenger John Fuller described the employee's behavior and said, "She was very terse. ... She said, 'Four people need to get off this plane, or we're not going anywhere.'” Passenger Jason Powell corroborated this account and said that he did not understand why the employee had spoken with such a belligerent tone: "The tone immediately turned me off ... She accelerated the situation. It was poor leadership."

No one on the plane accepted the initial offer of $400 in travel vouchers to take the next available flight, nor the follow-up offer of $800 in travel vouchers.
Well, the article specifically says people convicted of assaulting or other disruption should be placed on the no-fly list. Which is a fairly high bar, we don't really hand out unfounded criminal convictions for assault.
You made some good points before, even if i generally disagree with you, but this comparison is wildly inappropriate. You get that people were targeted based on their ethnicity/religion, their property and churches were trashed, many were beaten and killed, and tens of thousands were sent to concentration camps, right? Comparing it to this bullshit is an insult to all the victims of Nazi atrocities and you are a terrible human being.
I always like crossover back in the days when I absolutely had to have photoshop and office. I've managed in the pass few years to get away from that work though so now 100% linux/bsd with a splash of office365 on the web
The classic every-other-generation flip-flop.
In the US at least, the method for seizing crypto is the same as for seizing money in a bank account. The only difference is that the warrant is served on the person who owns the crypto wallet instead of a bank.

That’s what I meant when I said the cost to seize your money goes up if you’re willing to defy a warrant.

However, if using crypto as a currency becomes mainstream, governments will crack down.

Crypto might be decentralized, but governments could easily require registering wallets, and force businesses to only transact with people who are registered.