skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You don't shoot yourself in the foot in the same way one does in C. With carelessness, you more... suffocate yourself with your own towers of (probably useless) abstractions. It's like having a power drill when all you knew was a screw driver... and then drilling holes and driving screws every chance you get without regard to a larger structure.

Unlike C, the powerful (and safe) language features are a boon to software engineering projects, as long as you're doing was dreamcompiler said: software engineering and not "just programming".

I disagree with the thesis that the more restrictive one is, the better it is for software engineering. We've empirically disproved this time and time again with every supposedly "simple" language evolving way, way past its original design goals. Python, Go, and even Scheme are great examples.
You'd also have to build that well made house not in a local trendy development on some private land that is away from everything.
Gotta put raw info into digestible formats for the masses.
CGI should be a tool to tell a well crafted and well narrated story. Unfortunately, CGI has become the driver for how a movie should be made. Once it becomes the only tool for telling the story, everything else falters. CGI should absolutely be used to support making a good movie but a movie should not be defining the scenes and the movie.
a good alternative to heroku that i use for all my personal or side projects is dokku. Think of it as an open source on-prem heroku

https://dokku.com/
I don't know if Arcane should be included in a list supporting the advancements of 3D animation. While the characters are animated, and I do mean that in the technical sense (i.e. actually moving the bodies), in 3D as meshes of polygons, a vast percentage of the effects are 2D vector/bitmap animations and all of the backgrounds are traditional static digital paintings.

I am in no way saying Arcane does not 'look good' to me or in any objective way, in fact, I really enjoy the over all look of the show. But I think it is a bit disingenuous to use Arcane to prop up the advancements in 3D animation compared to 2D.
The article does complain about it. The author says today's films have an overall level of unreality. Even when the CGI is good enough that you don't actively notice it, every scene emits a subconscious level of fakeness that pervades the whole film.
Interesting. Perhaps they fixed the driver/hardware since I last looked at this a couple years ago. At the time, no one had got it working successfully (the special device was there; it just didn't seem to do anything).
>> updating cars should invalidate previous approvals

> Seems reasonable to me

Year 2026: autonomous drivers have 80% fewer accidents per million miles than human drivers.

Bug fix to improve that to 90% and prevent an additional 500,000 casualties per year must wait until 2028 for NHTSA certification.
The experience you have is part of the broken system that discriminates against qualified candidates because of their race and gender. I'm not surprised you and everyone you know conducts yourself in this discriminatory way, it's all too common in the industry.

You have to proactively attempt to break this cycle in order to make any real progress, and a few ways to do that include being intentional about how you find qualified candidates (growing your recruitment pipeline to source from non-traditional groups), and changing your interview process in ways that allow for candidates who are qualified to move forward together, rather than do some kind of false stack ranking of your candidates, creating this incorrect notion that "only one" person for any given role is qualified, which is objectively untrue.

Stack ranking is bullshit when applied to employee performance, why would it be anything but bullshit when applied to the interview process?
Every country has its unusual and unique histories, but most countries make progress in key cultural areas through the democratic process. Singapore has basically had just one family in power for its entire existence, which makes such progress much more unlikely, or at best, very difficult.
This is almost certainly a path they could go.

For example, given the compute in the tractor I wouldn't be surprised if they licensed the code rather than sold you it under a first sale doctrine with a right of resale. Almost all software is sold that way already. So even with this bill it's hard for me to see them opening that up, in particular if it makes it easier for other countries to copy things.

Basically only ever lease the machines etc.
I read it and wondered if "recently" really still included 2.8? That was quite a while ago now.
Sure, but you're talking to someone who doesn't believe in "true" FSD inside the next 10 years. I suspect Tesla will be forced to stick with an ever improving FSD-lite that still needs to be monitored. Which (in my own use case) is actually less than pointless ... you lose the joy of actual driving, to become a supervisor of your car.

There is still value in lane assist on motorways and cruise control, but we have that anyway.

The difference is all other car manufacturers haven't been selling FSD and robotaxis as "right around the corner" for the last few years. I understand the development problems and overambitious deadlines ... but if you took away the ebullient narrative and put just the facts on paper, I wouldn't be able to distinguish what's gone one from fraud.
I think it's only externally exposed as local-only HTTP server, presumably via service worker, so you can open the website you are developing.

The IP network is entirely virtual.
So far, not really. You need some basic AWS experience for security/scaling/setting up alerts purposes, but beyond that the only "ops" I've done in two years has been manually triggering some upgrades (paranoia on my part) and we ran out of disk space at one point as I forgot to set up an alert but this was very easily fixed.
What was AI Dungeon's downfall? Can't find much about it.
Sure, I didn't go far into detail, but it's actually worse than either of us has said because once B surrenders anything ($1 or $1,000,000,000), they are at even greater disadvantage and "logically" should surrender more money. In fact, they should surrender the entire country, as once they are at a disadvantage A can keep coming back forever.

Effectively, the idea that war would not happen with perfect information suggests that the logical thing to do is for all countries to surrender control to the strongest country immediately.
I find the oh-so-witty replies of "I didn't know Vice was journalism nyuknyuknyuk" to be about as much of a distraction from the issue as when cable news stations retort that they're "entertainment, not news" when in the hot seat for a false claim.

Say what you will of the quality of their journalism, but at the end of the day, a journalistic organization is openly courting a regime that lured a journalist to his death under false pretenses, and then hacked his body into pieces, cooked the pieces of his body in a firepit, and forced his family to attend kangaroo court to witness pawns being scapegoated for Mohammed bin Salman.

Vice, US legislators, and most importantly, Mohammed bin Salman himself need to realize that we're not going to forget the despicable and disgusting human-being that Mohammed bin Salman is, and that any institutions that deal with him are guilty by association.
FYI, this uses the Hacker News API which I didn't know existed until researching this: https://github.com/HackerNews/API
I am not an expert in SDEs (my background is machine learning) but if I wanted to dig more into the subject, this is where I personally would start. Code [1] and pdf [2] for the book are available.

Simo Särkkä and Arno Solin (2019). Applied Stochastic Differential Equations. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK.

[1] https://github.com/AaltoML/SDE

[2] https://users.aalto.fi/~asolin/sde-book/sde-book.pdf
I'm into it. I see that a lot of content is either relevant to US/English speaking dads, or hard to understand to "those other" dads, but still see some nice content I can relate to. There is definitely a room for it and I love the attempt to create community. Would love to see such thing in my native tongue.

I fully agree on that "a blog and a forum, but in an app" opinion, but I still like that. It's hard to find sites that provides a lot of resources in clear form, even if paid. Sites with clickbaity titles with barely any content and ads on 70% of the page is becoming a on my local sites. I miss old school forums and simple web pages. I browse on mobile a lot and haven't seen more then 3-4 mobile friendly sites that were actually mobile friendly, so an app suits me.

I absolutely hate navigation and all negatives I found are UI related.

- Swipe left on every paragraph? A big no!

- It's not comfortable (physically) to do that all the time. I haven't really used an app that requires that, ever.

- It's hard to grasp larger context (especially when using second language)

- There is no way of copying text - oh come on, how am I supposed to use a dictionary, or send part of text (the app sends the whole screen)?

- Many places requires using the "x" button at the very top. Sorry, it's around 7 years since a had a phone where I could do that with one hand.

- It displays "full screen", hiding my system-native navigation buttons, so I can't get out of settings easily.

- It's even worse when reading an article - system navigation "back" button does nothing. That is just too aggressive for me.

- There is a "like"/heart button on every page, but it's hard to tell what it does. I found it eventually, but by accident. It also doesn't say where is the "card" I liked - what article was that from?

Also I find it a bit too expensive, as this will not be anything I'm relying on. I would prefer it to be one time payment, not a subscription. I know, I know, "it's just $3" (or whatever it is, I see my local currency), but to be honest I have way to many "just $3" apps and services already and am not going to invest in any more of them. It's slightly more expensive then lowest google drive/one subscription. For me a one time payment is easier to control and accept, as it feels more like buying a newspaper or book.
On the contrary. Having multiple independent services running on a single physical machine will likely give you full performance. The easiest way is probably just splitting the physical machine into the number of VMs/pods equal or larger than CCX count.
Livebook, which is an elixir code notebook built with LiveView includes collaborative editing with presence, so it absolutely can be used in that domain. LiveView is built on phoenix channels, so it's all bidirectional communication. The client can send events from JavaScript. We use js hooks for the pings in LiveBeats for example:

//js
Hooks.Ping = {
mounted(){
this.handleEvent("pong", () => {
let rtt = Date.now() - this.nowMs
this.el.innerText = `ping: ${rtt}ms`
this.timer = setTimeout(() => this.ping(rtt), 1000)
})
this.ping(null)
},
destroyed(){ clearTimeout(this.timer) },
ping(rtt){
this.nowMs = Date.now()
this.pushEvent("ping", {rtt: rtt})
}
}

//liveview
defp handle_event("ping", %{"rtt" => rtt}, socket) do
{:halt,
socket
|> rate_limited_ping_broadcast(socket.assigns.current_user, rtt)
|> push_event("pong", %{})}
end
> Whether or not management has approved of or nudged this change it's clear from the rhetoric of journalists discussing journalism that over the last decade or two they have gone from thinking of themselves has having a duty to simply inform the public to having a duty to engage in discretionary inclusion/omission lest the public draw the wrong conclusion.

A few years back, I had a coworker who was working his way though a journalism major express this attitude explicitly and uncritically as authoritative information passed to him in a class.

It was an eye opening moment for me, and had significant impacts for how I consumed media, and regarded higher education.
creare un buon contenuto e fare una buona e costruttiva link building
Sci-fi is a weird genre because there was arguably more interest in it during the space race--Star Trek happened at the same time as early Apollo missions. There was just a lot more content and a lot more imaginative content.
I used to boot my fileserver (not a Pi) like that and it worked fine for a number of years until the USB-SATA adapter died. Not sure if you meant an actual purpose-built external SSD but I don't know that I'd trust a home-brewed solution in the long term.
There isn’t a single language IDE that I know of outside of Lisp that allows you to hoist a sub block of a loop (a sub tree in the AST) and remove the parent of that code and paste the hoisted expression while simultaneously removing the loop construction with a single key. Please show me an IDE like that and I will buy it immediately. Paredit is not about parenthesis editing and matching despite its name.
I don't think I agree. Most people spend more time reading than writing code so programming languages should be optimized to be easier to read whereas tooling should be made to simplify writing code. New syntax or macros sounds like it would make the language harder to read. I agree that an advanced machine learning model for generating boilerplate code isn't the right approach but I also don't think we should extend languages for this. Tooling like code generators and linters are a good middle ground.
I recently left a major part supplier for a good portion of the heavy equipment industry and Deere was one of our biggest customers. They were truly despicable to work with.

On every bid we sent them the #1 requirement was Proprietary Fit. There had to be some sort of IP lockout (always disguised as a valuable design feature, but it never was) to prevent end users from procuring replacement parts anywhere else. In many cases it even made the parts significantly worse, as useless bumps or ridges were added to the industry standard to make them physically incompatible.

The old model was we build a part for $8 and sell it to the end user for $10. Under Deere's new model, we build the part for $8, sell it exclusively to Deere for $11, and they sell it to customer for $16.

My former employer was very complicit in this behavior, but Deere was by far the most aggressive about and a big enough player to squeeze all their suppliers.

Edit: They pay all kinds of lip service to how this is better for the customer ("reliable supply chain", "Deere-guaranteed quality", etc) but that's only in their public PR. Behind the scenes it is 100% about securing a long term revenue source - customers pay out the ass for a piece of equipment, then have to keep coming back to Deere for 50 years for replacement parts.
I'm currently on Heroku (want to get off it!), and the main thing that's keeping me from trying out Render is the lack of point in time recovery for Postgres. Having had to use it once on Heroku it's an absolute life saver, I would be nervous of not having it. Does Render have any plans to implement a Postgress WAL point in time recovery/restore feature?

https://devcenter.heroku.com/articles/heroku-postgres-rollba...

https://render.com/docs/databases#backups
If you think a rolling stop warrants being launched into the sun, well, I will have to question your good judgement, or perhaps whether or not you have actually driven a car before.
Easy, just store your search history in a Blockchain and pull it down every time you log in.
If you want some video explanation
https://youtu.be/Qr_PCqxznB0
> as soon as it starts replacing humans, it will not have enough human generated training data, since all of programming will be done by models like himself.

As a natural born pessimist, I can't help but feel that by the time we get to that point we'll just keep blundering forward and adapting our world around the wild nonsense garbage code the model ends up producing in this scenario.

After all, that's basically what we've done with the entire web stack.
A fools errand indeed. But we currently aren't far from "the one" in three world(view)s: China - Baidu and Sogou; Russia - Yandex; Elsewhere - Google and Bing/syndicates. Korea (Naver) and Czechia/Slovakia (Seznam) are not international but local exceptions.

We choose not to offer the same thing based on our values; no-tracking and infrastructural independence, meaning we aren't captured like other search options:
https://blog.mojeek.com/2021/03/to-track-or-not-to-track.htm...
All This stuff sounds like a modern day Catholic Church sounding the alarm that people aren’t reading the good book the right way.

Whether or not this stuff is misinformation, yelling about it like these people are some kind of religious heretics is …. Kind of funny to watch.
HTTPie founder here. These are valid concerns. There are two parts to this: 1/ What happens with HTTPie for Terminal, and 2/ how HTTPie for Web & Desktop and the overall platform will look like.

1/ HTTPie for Terminal will always be open-source and obviously free. The difference is that now we’re able to pay a talented developer to work on the project full-time (the recent 3.0 release is a result of that).

2/ We’re building a new platform with the same principles that made HTTPie for Terminal successful in mind: uncompromising simplicity, focus on productivity, and delightful user experience. We’re in the same space as Postman, but the idea is to be anything like. We’re striving to become what Linear is to Jira, Vercel to AWS, Figma to Adobe, etc. That is, to offer a much simpler and more focused product.
Premium services for companies will be a natural extension of the single-player mode, and all incentives will be aligned in a way that doesn’t cannibalize the core experience.
Depends upon your interest in burning out your analyst. It all starts with the same data, then downloaded to excel and each sector group classifies and cuts a different way. When you go to update, most of that is lost in excel or to a previous team member, not stored by sector or product group on the cloud. If I categorize Certara as digital health, they should be like that for my team but pharma for the pharma team.
Wow, I had no idea a movie like Wolf of Wall Street had so much CGI. This makes your point perfectly, that it truly is not noticeable and seamless in a lot of movies. CGI is just a tool, and it's not to blame for so many mediocre movies being made. This reminds me so much of the constant "JavaScript ruined the web" arguments I see on HN.
This is true in the sense that NNs offer a convenient way to estimate a distribution of hidden values conditionalized upon visible values. That is an approximation of what is usually understood by "a reconstruction". I would argue that a reconstruction per se would only include parts for which the credible interval could be systematically bounded within a suitable tolerance threshold.
https://people.freebsd.org/~gallatin/talks/euro2019.pdf
Here's a talk about a lot of the NUMA-issues brought up by Netflix + FreeBSD. Its 200 Gb/s (bits), not bytes, but I'd expect you to be running into a lot of the similar problems.

Its 200 Gb/s because they're reading from SSDs. But still, careful attention to NUMA was the only way they could reach full PCIe-bandwidths, which is a similar issue to yours (where NUMA is needed to reach full Memory/DRAM bandwidth).

--------

Did you set your BIOS into NUMA mode? If you're in default BIOS-settings, your RAM is being split up between all 4 nodes (Uniform-memory-access mode). At least, that's how it was for my Threadripper 1950x (I know you've got a totally different model, but who knows?)

I forgot exactly the name of the BIOS setting. But you gotta boot your computer up with 4-nodes-per-socket (or was it 8-nodes per socket for your computer?) or some similar setting. There were some programs on Linux (and Windows) that help you see what the OS is seeing.
> No you're not. You can choose which hospitals you're getting opinions from.

you clearly don't understand how hospitals work. getting opinions costs money. just visiting and taking their time costs money.

you can get a hospital to quote you the cost of a procedure. but to actually get a doctor to diagnose you takes time, resources, and tests. this costs money. and without doing said work you have no idea what procedures to get a quote for.

and frankly the only reason to get multiple opinions is if the current doctor has failed to resolve your problem.

no one jumps doctor to doctor unless there is something wrong with the current one like a lack of progress on resolving the issue.

> You're the one constantly conjuring some vague sense of morality as opposed to discussing which models may work better than others.

without understanding the moral outcomes of an economic system makes any such discussion meaningless. You should checkout Albert Hirschman https://www.ias.edu/press-releases/albert-o-hirschman-1915%E...
I agree - then I think of quality period pieces that use CGI with great artistry ("Zodiac" and "Hail, Caesar!" come to mind) and I think again.

Check out, for example, this VFX before-and-after clip for the show "Babylon Berlin". In my view the CGI recreation of Weimar Berlin added enormously to the reality and presence of the story and characters.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mI88uUw9Hnc
> The SHF have not covered their shorts

What is a "SHF"? What data do you base this on? Last I checked, short interest is around 20%.
Here is the video I'm talking about
https://youtu.be/3RCYs0N5Wsc

If a spacecraft is made out of metal with multiple decks, you'd expect it to bend and warp. Not explode like cardboard, ripping apart.
Thanks for this comment.

Ulysses very much rewards the reader of the classics, you should give it a try sometime!

You might be interested in the Catherine Project.
I think a Pi is great to start with. Then you graduate to a real computer when your HA gets too big and laggy for the Pi to keep up with. I use a NUC. But my brother repurposed an old laptop with good results (built in UPS, and quiet!).
"Sound did, in fact, ruin movies"
"Color did, in fact, ruin movies"

blah blah blah
The CISO Evolution
As a solo developer, running a small instance yourself and just SSH’ing in or writing a few simple scripts to deploy is probably more worthwhile. You have to deal with the “headache” of setup but at least you know what’s going on underneath the hood.
To be fair, you could also look at this as eastern culture being a bunch of exhibits in a museum, and western culture being an active process and also the organizing principle of the exchange taking place at all.
> The wifi is required to do fast start GPS

No, it isn't. A cell phone connection is sufficient for that.
Your comment made the CEO's day. CEO very happy.
The phrase "in practice" doesn't really work when you're referring to highly finicky strategies like RL and adversarial training
> It’s kind of missing the point to focus on the narrow issue of “can you accidentally destroy money in the conventional banking system?”

No it isn't. That's a huge difference. On the contrary, focusing on “Shit happens in the conventional banking system too!”, that's missing the point, IMO.
Yes, I get it. I've used Elementor, DIVI, Beaver Builder, WPBakery , ... And I always hated when I had to switch to a new builder for some new project.
it is a very similar argument to the one for powerful IDEs and underwhelming languages. to be fair, it’s not necessarily fruitless - e.g. with smalltalk. i fail to see the analoguous smalltalk-style empowerment of language using AI but perhaps something is there.

anyway. programming is automation; automation of programming is abstraction. using AI to write your code is just a bad abstraction - we are used to them
Fair enough. It's a balance between experience and business. And we may adjust this in the future.
Question for you: had the first guide been freely readable without a sign-in, what do you think would have been your reaction when starting the second one and being showing a paywall? (even if there would be ways to warn you softly)
Maybe too close? I got 4 with no zooming and just centering the camera on one with the others also in frame.