skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You never take ubers on the grounds of safety? Because that is, on average, an average human.

Either way, I'm not too impressed. I wouldn't purchase Autopilot personally for similar safety reasons. But let's not twist the stats to suggest they're actually much worse than they are.
I never seen a designer, even in a small company, with out multiple high-end monitors.

Even if they start without expensive setup they will see their peers in office and will match their setup pretty soon.
Student drivers (with an instructor in the car, and secondary controls) have very few accidents, if any, not because of their safety record but because every mistake is saved by the instructor. A car can be considered as driving "safer than a human" when it can match the average human in any conditions the average human drives. Everything else is just squinting at the data and choosing an interpretation that fits your personal opinion.

A Tesla can relatively safely cover traffic like divided or controlled access highways. That's a very narrow slice of all possible driving situations and not one responsible for most accidents.
That's a very specific application.

Isn't there a bound on the efficacy of a helmet based on its size / thickness? I.e. your head's initial velocity and the thickness of the helmet constrain the distance over which your head's velocity must drop to zero, so there's some minimum force that must be applied to your head no matter what the helmet's material is?
Expo 2020 Dubai
Or for one car to crash in to many cars.
Sorry for any offense. I meant it in a lighthearted and speculative sense, not a close minded or divisive one but I understand why it might be taken that way. I do think my speculation lighthearted or not, is at least somewhat plausible. If others disagree and think the FBI wouldn’t use such software to keep tabs on… whomever it is that they keep tabs on, well I’d love to hear why.
Reading the paper my first thought was, could this be scaled up for a a tactile touch screen display?
Alert templating. Grafana is fussy about configuring alerts on dashboards that have variables.
What this means is if you have 30 clusters and want to use a single dashboard with a drop-down variable seefting your cluster you cannot define alerts on it. It will refuse to do it.

Alerts are also integrated tightly in dashboards. Forces alerts to be saved/backedup/imported as single json blob. We want separate management of alerts so they can be defined as code and not in the dashboard blob of json!

What makes me chagrined is because of the above issues we have to use prometheus alert manager instead while our colleagues absolutely LOVE grafana itself! We can't duplicate alerts tens of tens times. We don't want that management nor do we want to teach our colleagues jsonnet/ksonnet to generate it. We also don't want permission problems.
I haven't seen any One Punch Man, but I don't doubt good writers can make any character interesting. Doctor Manhatten in Watchmen was basically a deity and didn't ruin the film with the snap of his fingers. Dr Who never loses and can still have good stories.

I was more going for: with Tobey Macguire's Spiderman, Doctor Octopus was holding Aunt May from a building and taunting Spiderman with dropping her; the world was not at stake, the city was not at stake, almost nobody else in the city knows or cares who she is. I didn't think Spiderman would lose, but I felt like it mattered and that it was in some way difficult for Peter Parker to deal with, he had to take a chance, risk something, "only just" caught her. CGI tentacles didn't look realistic because they aren't a real thing, and that wasn't a dealbreaker. Nowadays a cloud opens up into an interdimensional portal and a flood of metal-living-skeleton-alien invasion spaceships fly through and it couldn't matter less if it tried; they are a swarm of whocares for the Avengers to punch through, which they do easily and uninterestingly and they didn't miss out on anything happening really. CGI isn't ruining it, bad plot is ruining it. Building turns to dust as thing crashes and explodes, is so overdone that's not even interesting by itself.

Compare to early Hulk who was on his knees in a field against two(!) sonic beam tanks owned by the US Army, with only Banner's love of Liv Tyler to make him stand up and fight. Small scale and he was never going to lose, but this was the US Army against the unknown, Banner and the General's daughter, and it mattered. When Hulk threw the tanks, they were CGI and a bit unrealistic, but so what, that isn't immersion breaking. Watching Hulk fight now is like seeing Star Trek's Lt Worf punch a Romulan spaceship while it explodes over The Fonz jumping a shark on a surfboard. It's not the CGI which makes it bad.

On the YouTube Pitch Meetings channel, one of the recurring jokes critiquing films is the 'writer' describing the plot of a film and getting to a point where a character dies, and the 'executive' does a "who was that? Should I care, because I don't feel anything right now" reply. I don't need the hero to lose, or the CGI to be unnoticable. I want to feel like something is at stake which matters. CGI punchups may as well be watching a 2 hr demo of Street Fighter II.
Henry Ford was a jackass. Edison: jackass. The guys in Led Zeppelin: child-molesting jackasses (well, Paige is, at least). Musk is but the latest in a long line of people who can be admired for what they have brought to the world, and...then you're better off stopping right there while enjoying your electric lightbulb, rock music, and reusable rocket ships.
I approach it like this. As you go through the next week, try and see if you can identify something that you do every day, almost like a habit, and think if automation could remove that task from your life. A few of my favorite examples:

1. Checking front/backdoor is locked every single night, now I have an automation that turns on the front hall light and sends my phone a notification that the door is unlocked.

2. The "did I close the garage thoughts", just being able to check your phone from the airport or wherever you are and see "yep its closed" is "nice" but not necessary of course

3. Everytime I open the garage door, the light turns on with a timer and some logic so that I never touch that light switch

4. auto turn off air purifier in bedroom in the morning (and on at night too)

5. Anytime the doorbell rings and I am not home, I get a phone notification with a picture of who is at the door. Helpful when worried about missing packages, deliveries, etc. Doesn't necessarily "help" solve the problem, but does do something mentally

6. Recently I added one that nudges the volume on the tv up a few clicks and down a few clicks based on the HVAC turning on/off, it was something I found myself doing habitually and now that it works it is extremely seamless and has been great

I have way more complicated scenarios of course, all of which I find compelling, but I really like the automations where you dont know they are doing something necessarily, your brain just forgets they are even automations.
WWF Is Selling NFTs
I've never owned a car with BSM but have rented for extended periods of time. I would expect that after a year or two of using the system while also actively checking my blind spot the conventional way, I would become comfortable with understanding its reliability and limitations (if any) and would adjust my behavior.

Some Hondas pipe through a camera feed from the side of the vehicle when you turn on your blinker, which wouldn't have the same potential weakness for cyclists that you mention with the binary sensor-based systems.
Math doesn’t have a replication crisis at all it has a comprehension crisis.

Since proofs are programs one can basically say that mathematical theorems are incredibly detailed software that is completely open source and invites people to identify programs that don’t work and or fix issues.

A famous one is Fermats last theorem which needed a fix but was largely right.

Others have said that it takes 6 months to a year to get published. The other thing with math is the fact that you can get completely scooped and your work is worthless.

Edit:
I am using "proofs are programs" very loosely and yes Theorems are much more than programs as other commenters have pointed out.
I'm a 13 year old who loves to code. I decided to make a online agenda as a project, and it's grown a lot. At the beginning, it was a simple list with set subjects.

It now supports customizable subjects, multiple assignment views including a todo list and calendar. It also includes support for importing from Google Classroom. I'm very proud of this, as it's my first big project. I've been working on it for a few months, and I wanted to see what you guys think!
I think the problem is trying to present an abstraction layer to management, because we have those same features of todo lists, and recording information, in Jira and ServiceNow and like a dozen other pieces that's purpose is to coordinate and track work, and often they are unpopular with developers because they end up trying to provide an abstraction layer to the Execs to replace their management by spreadsheets, but unfortunately as anyone who has worked in software for long enough can tell you, abstractions are leaky.

Hence the dissatisfaction with a lot of these tools.
> Right now the big problem as I see it is that there is great content being created

Is that so? Where?

We'd have to define 'great'.

If you mean Tik Tok dance videos and instagram photos/art, then yes. If you mean anything related to philosophy, sociology or explaining how the world works at large - no.

You don't need any tools. You just need to pay people, who have a working brain they've accomplished something with.

It's not an algorithm problem, it's a 'fuck you money' problem. Until people with a brain have fuck you money, they aren't going to waste their life fighting braindead Karens and corporate/political interests who don't want people with a brain to explain how the real world works.

Look at the amount of shit Joe Rogan is getting for having accomplished scientists on to talk about their work. He has fuck you money. Do you know how many other people have fuck you money and don't say shit? A lot. You need to spread that fuck you money around thick, so that one in ten thousand will have the guts to put up with braindead Karens of the world.
> The second one is definitely not "the right idea". It tries to do it with string manipulations, which (regardless of the fact that it does so incorrectly) is completely the wrong approach. This one is actually "better" than the other in the paradoxical sense I mentioned above, because I could reject it the moment I saw it convert the number to a string.

In this case string ops are a worse idea, but as I said before, this is not generally true of Python, at least when using CPython. Eg. the string method is significantly the faster in this example:

# https://stackoverflow.com/a/20918545/1763356
def reverse_mask(x):
x = ((x & 0x55555555) << 1) | ((x & 0xAAAAAAAA) >> 1)
x = ((x & 0x33333333) << 2) | ((x & 0xCCCCCCCC) >> 2)
x = ((x & 0x0F0F0F0F) << 4) | ((x & 0xF0F0F0F0) >> 4)
x = ((x & 0x00FF00FF) << 8) | ((x & 0xFF00FF00) >> 8)
x = ((x & 0x0000FFFF) << 16) | ((x & 0xFFFF0000) >> 16)
return x

# My ver
def reverse_format(x):
return int(f"{x:032b}"[::-1], 2)

Python's dynamic object overhead (and to a lesser extent, interpreter overhead) makes a lot of seemingly-expensive operations not matter very much.
Luckily we don't have to take his word for it, we can just watch his video with our own eyes.
Personally, I want a wind-up EV! ;-)
This is true! A leave of absence and a break could help a lot to reset their headspace. Some companies offer a mental health leave with documentation from a psychologist and it remains confidential.

I also think OP could use some change at work so that they're not coming back to the same intense workload or routine that is boring them. Maybe the things they used to be excited about aren't the same anywhere and changing up responsibilities or projects might help.
I'm trying to solve this for fun, but I'm stuck! I've got a recursive definition that solves the problem by building a result string. I think it's a dynamic programming problem, but right now I can't see the shared sub-problems so :). Some real sour cherries being experienced from not getting this one!
I read the article.

The tweet was not a comic, just a tweet. I don't see how that connects to the comic. If they were already known to the hate group, then I think they're using that as an excuse. If it predates the notoriety, then that's different.
> and that shit is slow with no real storage interface

We were talking about using it for a home automation system, which is just a very low traffic web server with some odds and ends. We are not talking about competing in the TOP500 or something. It's easily doable with a newer Pi.
In the Materials they mention that screen and paper were of same size and (!) weight.
On the other hand, as the value of an hour of programming increases, the quantity demanded may also increase.
Tell what?
Alert templating. Grafana is fussy about configuring alerts on dashboards that have variables. What this means is if you have 30 clusters and want to use a single dashboard with a drop-down variable seefting your cluster you cannot define alerts on it. It will refuse to do it.

Alerts are also integrated tightly in dashboards. Forces alerts to be saved/backedup/imported as single json blob. We want separate management of alerts so they can be defined as code and not in the dashboard blob of json!

What makes me chagrined is because of the above issues we have to use prometheus alert manager instead while our colleagues absolutely LOVE grafana itself! We can't duplicate alerts tens of tens times. We don't want that management nor do we want to teach our colleagues jsonnet/ksonnet to generate it. We also don't want permission problems.
Here's a birds eye view of the protest for anyone trying to compute convoy length based the parents figure.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FKT2vVvXMAQODLX?format=jpg&name=...
> Programming is about algorithms and math.

You've simply restated your opinion without providing any supporting arguments, and as I already said, I disagree. The vast majority of programming I see (and as a consultant, I see a fairly wide variety) is not about algorithms and math, but instead gluing together systems and expressing domain logic.

Now, I suppose you could argue that domain logic is "algorithms and math," but in my experience, it's less about the specific algorithms and more about precisely describing fuzzy human behavior.

It's that "precisely describing" and "easy to change in the future" parts that makes what programmers do different than what any good employee does.

(I do agree that there is some programming that is focused on algorithms and math, but it's in the minority, in my experience. Perhaps the type of work you do is focused on algorithms and math, but I believe that's a relatively small part of the software development ecosystem.)
Literally any distribution of hard miles and easy miles will produce the same outcome in this thought experiment, to varying effects, if your premise of Tesla hiding the AI's incompetence with passing off to humans when driving is challenging is accurate.

If your premise is to be believed as a significant effect, you must also accept that this outcome should be visible in the data
Weird— I haven't worked for a big software development organization in some time but I've never heard of that. That's a positive thing if the company has good corporate culture and uses the information well instead of just calling your boss and asking them to consider being more ethical because you complained.
Though US government claims standing in UK court to take Assange.
Bristle (YC W21) is hiring a front-end engineer to improve oral health care
Adding my own raycasting implementation, in... what else... React/JavaScript -> https://huth.me/raycast/
A friend of mine (miles van dorssen) built one of these and flew it in the park. I’d possibly been a little dubious until he found the old 80s handicam he filmed on, and I got to watch the tape through the viewfinder. In that tiny window I saw miles in a bike helmet hovering two feet in the on a violently shaking lawnmower quadcopter. I don’t know how google able miles is but he builds great things
>There must be lots of legacy software from 60s/70s/80s that runs on mainframes for gov't/military/banks/insurance. It won't be replaced, but it would great to add tests when making changes to code.

Vernor Vinge's A Deepness in the Sky describes in some detail the job position of programmer archaeologist (<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_archaeology>). Set thousands of years in the future, such archaeologists search archives going back to the early days of Unix for useful code.
Obviously, I was referring to the people in power--it doesn't make sense otherwise. Note, however, that that leaves two choices:

1) They're responsible for their government. The plight of the people is the result of their action.

2) They are being oppressed by *their* government. Blame that government for their plight, not Israel.

In neither case is Israel responsible for cratering the Palestinian economy.
Actually, I would really want something like that to happen sometime. There was a really fun April Fool's experiment on Reddit a few years ago called Robin. Gathered bunch of people in small groups, active groups would then merge if people in there were active. Conversations there were much more spontaneous then on typical IRC/discord groups in know. I hope someone will manage to do something similar at scale, ideally on HN.
Heritage Type | Frontend, Backend, Data Engineer | BERLIN, Germany | Onsite/Remote | Full time | home.heritagedesigner.com

We're building a tool that automates complex design processes to create beautiful graphics. Preparing for a mass launch at the moment we are looking for several engineering roles. More info here: https://hrtgtype.com/jobs

- Fast interview process - technical call or assignment (your choice)

- We can propose a contract within 10 days

- Competitive compensation and equity package possible

- You’ll work on an exciting new product with a 100% HN team

- Very structured but hackathon work environment

Please send a mail to nh(at)heritagetype.com or get in touch via the link - more roles coming soon: https://hrtgtype.com/jobs
This is the wrong context to go with an appeal to authority. I know what the transformer is doing, I've also developed neural networks before (though not professionally). Your experience is working against you in developing your intuition. There's another common fallacy that because we're somehow "inside" the system, that we understand exactly what is going on, or in this case what isn't going on. Language models are composed of variations of matrix multiplications, but that isn't a complete description of their behavior. It's like saying because we've looked inside the brain and there's just electrical and chemical signals, the mind must reside somewhere else. It's just a specious argument.
> Crash rates can be adjusted to account for differences in environment and demographics in different data sets. A sample dataset with acrash rateris exposed to some variableiat a different proportion p than the comparison dataset. In the case study, for example, vehicles running Autopilot were driven on freeways (i) 93% of the time, resulting in pi= 0.93. In the SHRP 2 NDS, only 28% ofvehicle mileage was recorded on freeways, i.e pi= 0.28. In the SHRP 2 NDS data, vehicles on non-freeways crashed 2.01 times more often per mile than vehicles on freeways. The observed Autopilot crash rate can be adjusted to reflect national driving ratesto reflect the crash rate that might be observed if 28% of Autopilot mileage was on freeways and 72% were on non-freeways, assuming that the 2.01 ratio holds for Autopilot.

So if humans are 2 times more likely to crash on non-highways than highways, the argument presented here is that the added danger of non-freeways affects autopilot in the same way, degrading its performance. Seems like a far reaching assumption.

If there is no data on autopilot performance on rural roads, then you cannot make a claim either way.
https://www.experimentalmath.info/ would beg to differ, I think.
Sorry I misunderstood your comment. It seemed like you weren't sure if the vitriol was due to the tweet itself or some other notoriety. I don't have any more information than you do, but I'm sure you can figure it out based on the date of the tweet
Keep in mind that men drive 16,500 miles per year on average, while women drive 10,100 miles. There is a noticeable gender gap in "accidents per year", but not in "accidents per mile". The paper compares accidents per mile, so there should be little gender effect in the results.

https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ohim/onh00/bar8.htm
And EB Garamond[0] if you want a free font.

[0] - https://fonts.adobe.com/fonts/eb-garamond
It happened probably 6-7 months ago and worse yet, services I had downstream actually were sensitive to the geolocation of the caller. Fortunately I caught it quickly enough when someone I was working with tried to SSH into the host and couldn't.

Surely the account was being paid via cryptocurrency however it was already verified through the linking of an actual traditional credit card like they required.
This is a 150 lines of Java, compiled to native binaries: https://github.com/ludovicianul/word-guess
;)
I saw some post from a news magazine who actually called back people who had left threatening messages on electoral helpers phones. None of them felt like they did anything wrong. So I'm not sure if people would not do this without being anonymous.
That's... surprising to me.

I own a 200 year old cottage. It has a LOT of mass. The walls are a meter of stone, and the mortar is lime. The thatched roof is about 1.5 meters of straw.

It's REALLY COLD. Keeping it warm takes a huge amount of energy. I've removed some of the modern Portland-cement based render and replaced with lime mortaer and that at least helped with damp (it breathes a bit) but it's still really cold.

Once you _do_ get it warm, though, it does take a while to cool down. Similarly, it can be quite warm outside and still take a couple days for the cottage to properly warm up - there's a lot of thermal inertia.

The extension to it, built last year, uses 70x200mm (about 3"x8" in inches) studs, and has 200mm thick Rockwool insulation throughout the walls and in the roof. The windows are triple glaze. I heat the extension with less energy than the cottage, and it's 3 times as big and 5-6 times as much volume, due to the higher ceilings.
For your specific question, actuarial tables for car accidents/deaths are available publicly, and the profile for the typical Tesla owner (middle aged, high income, driving expensive sedan/SUV) is considered much safer than average.

Moreover it is true in general that most people driving aren't drunk or high, aren't reckless etc., and so most Tesla drivers aren't either. The number of accidents isn't uniformly distributed among the public.

More broadly though, I never said that zero Tesla owners (or any other specific car drivers) do any of these things, but that using autopilot with an above average safety record can still mean that the personal safety of an individual or group of individuals goes down. For the system to be a net benefit it has to be pushed to the below average drivers.