skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Since proofs are programs one can basically say that mathematical theorems are incredibly detailed software that is completely open source and invites people to identify programs that don’t work and or fix issues.

I would say its more like pseudocode. There can be quite a large gap between a normal proof, and a machine checkable proof, which is the computer program version.
Seems like the decade long tech bubble is finally popping
I'm surprised there was no mention of Spielberg's challenges in making Jaws (longer story here - https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/31105/how-steven-spielbe...). For those not familiar with the story, in the 70s, they couldn't make a "realistic" mechanical shark for the film which Spielberg had been relying on. The shark didn't work most of the time, it looked weird, so he couldn't show it. Which meant he used the lack of being able to see the shark as a tool which improved the movie.

There is currently an over-reliance of CGI, it's a cheap trick that the industry is getting used to. They'll eventually learn to use it properly AND the quality of the CGI will improve. These two factors together give me hope that movies will become good again.

Of course, getting excellent writers creating new unique content and getting that content produced instead of more Marvel/DC/rehashes is a bigger issue I think.
Let your imagination fly. We always want more than it's possible, our wishes fill up any volume like an expanding gas. Humans are going to be crucial to orchestrate AI and extract the most utility out of it.
> You can't own a firearm if you consume marijuana [...]

While BATF Form 4473 and the Gun Control Act may lead some to conclude that you cannot be "addicted to marijuana" and simultaneously legally possess a firearm, consider that many laws are on the books that would likely be adjudicated unconstitutional. The second amendment concludes with "shall not be infringed", and denying somebody their right to possess a firearm (for any reason) appears to be an infringement of that right, according to the second amendment.

> The 2nd amendment allows for heavy regulation of arms.

I'd be curious to hear what leads you to believe this. The language of the second amendment is clear, and the founder's intentions even more so. If you're developing your view based on the term "well-regulated", go do a bit of research on what that term meant when the Bill of Rights was authored (hint: it's different than what "regulated" is often interpreted to mean in 2022).
I'd argue that some of the most interesting metamaterials are macroscale. Like radio telescope arrays or the dimples on a golf-ball.
it is not that hard to write an unoptimized sudoku solver using backtracking.
Why does headline say 'shilling'?

Probably because in taking that gig, he provides a perfect illustration of the dictionary definition of the term:

shill (noun): One who poses as a satisfied customer or an enthusiastic gambler to dupe bystanders into participating in a swindle.
I have nothing invested in whether or not any given mathematician is right or wrong. I just picked a random example of a controversial proof -- the point was more that proof-as-computation could settle and any all disputes.

It might not lend more understanding to people not invested in "field X" (or even people who are invested in field X!), but it would be proof.

Proof in the current world of math is quite intangible.
Nyxt browser annotations beat pen and paper
Indeed, Tesla's autopilot behaves a lot more like MCAS than like an airplane autopilot.
What’s annoying about Heroku and AWS is they made it an “either/or” situation that I don’t see a lot of people challenging.

My ideal would be a service like Heroku that makes it easy to evolve. When the team is between 1-5 people iterating rapidly towards PMF, make ‘git push’ deploy.

As the team grows and CI is needed, make it easy to decouple git from the deployment and support multiple envs. This is where Heroku stops.

Finally when the app becomes larger and more complicated, it should be easy to spin up resources in AWS (or whatever cloud) behind a VPC. Migrating the heroku-like PaaS into this VPC should be easy.
On one hand, I agree.

On the other, this does feel a bit whatabouty. Because yeah, you can’t check the kernel code, but you can and should check the code of direct dependencies. Not every time you do anything, but certainly whenever there’s something to be feared. Running code against untrusted inputs from the Internet is one of the few places that would justify “reverse engineer the kernel to make sure it’s safe” levels of concern, in the right conditions.
Impacts of lack of sleep
US has higher diabetes related deaths too.

And much higher accident and violence rates but I think this is not relevant here or maybe it is.
And that "confusion" was created intentionally by Tesla. So that it is easy to pretend it was not deliberately pretending higher capabilities while giving yourself option to pretend you are not.

You know like that claim about human being there just because of pesky regulations and laws. Not because human would be needed.
Using my previous chess analogy, the world's smartest chess bot has played a million games to beat the average grandmaster, who has played less than 10,000 games in her lifetime. So while they both will have the same elo rating, which is a measure of how well they are at the narrow domain of chess, there is clearly something superior about the how the human grandmaster learns from just a few data points i.e. strong generalization vs the AI's weak generalization. Hence the task-specific elo rating does not give enough context to understand how well a model adapts to uncertainty. For instance - a Roomba would beat a human hands down if there was an elo rating for vacuuming floors.
State capture.
Helmets have an interesting correlation with concussion. They can help a lot in cycling, hurling, and f1, but can encourage reckless collision seeking in american football for example. Contact sports are intrinsically dangerous and introducing protection from one type of damage can allow increase in other damage forms.

Avoid collisions

I reckon rugby must change the most, which is a real shame because rugby at the highest level is amazing

Though ice hockey is pretty daft
> In phsyics, there are two well-established paradigms (relativity and quantum mechanics), which establish what counts as ordinary, and what counts as extraordinary.

Actually, I would say that these well-established paradigms establish what counts as extraordinary. In other words, relativity and QM are examples of extraordinary claims that we believe because we have extraordinary evidence for them. Both of these theories say all kinds of extraordinary things, and most people who first encounter the theories start out thinking they can't possibly be true. We believe them not because they are just ordinary, but because we have taken the time and effort to accumulate extraordinary evidence for them.

In that light, the replication crisis in other areas of science is easily explained: they allow extraordinary claims to be published without the extraordinary evidence that those claims would require. So of course many of those claims turn out to be wrong.
> I was not aware CJDNS was unmaintained (or considered archaic).

It seems (for some definition of seem lol) that more mindshare these days is around Ygg. CJDNS's author is working on something else at the moment primarily, and while they're still committed to working on CJDNS, their attention is split. Ygg is getting regular changes. Ygg's codebase being in Go also makes it a bit easier to get contributions in. But keep in mind that this may just be biased based on the circles I'm spending time in.

> Do you have a resource comparing CJDNS, Yggdrasil, Zeronet and maybe other similar protocol?

I wish I did. This would be a great thing to put together. Maybe I should spend some time properly comparing the two.
What you haven't said is why you regret marriage, or why you prefer to be single. What's the problem?

I was in a dishonest marriage for about 6 months, to allow my partner to finish their studies. But, my partner was abusive and I'd withdrawn from the relationship to protect myself and nobody thought we had a perfect relationship. By the time I ended it, there was no surprise, because of how I'd withdrawn. Ultimately, I think I did the right thing by making it a gradual retreat.

We tried counseling. We each did individual counseling, and we did couples counseling together. All of our counselors, except their individual counselor, told us that their behavior was abusive. The relationship didn't improve, and my partner didn't want to put the work in. But I learned a lot about communication, and that has made relationships easier (also, I learned a ton of red flags that I had previously overlooked, and grew a spine to quickly reject/dump people who display those flags).

So, I don't think that it automatically makes you a bad person if you keep pretending. But it's an awful solution, and from where I stand, a couple of years is a really long time. You should really try counseling, at least individual counseling. Figure out what you actually need. It might just be more space, and she might be willing to give you that. Try couples counseling, and check the assumptions that are built into your relationship. It might just be that you need to tweak some stuff, and she'll probably want to play along.

> I am sure I want to break up and be single again - and very likely remain single forever, I can't understand how many men can marry twice.

I don't buy that, unless you're asexual and aromantic. People tend to find love, if they're looking for it or not. And, not just men re-marry. If my experience is at all typical, a second marriage works better than the first because the first was foolish.

> Main problem is that she still depends on me financially.

This sounds quite insensitive, and I wonder if you're considering the emotional aspect of this. I strongly recommend counseling. Many of us here are on the spectrum, and have difficulty processing the emotions of ourselves and others without deliberate study.
> The other thing with math is the fact that you can get completely scooped and your work is worthless

Why math specifically? One would think this applies in virtually all fields.
I did it in '86 using a DSP32 :)

Patience... A couple of hours to render a simple scene at 800x600, and displayed using dithering due to a lack of colors in the palette. But it worked.
Is there any problem whatsoever about users regularly requesting features that the product already has? That doesn't seem distinct from customer support helping you understand how to use the product, which also doesn't seem like a problem. Of course, you could use data about customer service conversations to inform design decisions intended to make certain features more or less prominent in the UI.
The thing is, you don't even need Tesla "self driving" for that.

Adaptive cruise control, tech we've had for what, 20+ years? is more than enough for most highways, it takes out ~80% of the stress/boredom of driving, especially since lane changes are minimal and curves are gentle.

The hard parts of driving (aka not highways) are the real problem, as expected. We solved the easy parts in 2000 and who knows if we'll solve the hard parts by 2050.
Precisely where is the reduction? This just looks like flexible working.
That's unfortunate. This "eating keystrokes" behavior does not happen to me, ever, in any other context on the same machine.
I don't think so—I had tried to leave a comment on the original post and was told I couldn't comment there and the post was gone. Otherwise I might never have noticed.
Thanks for that! Sorry, I was in a bit of a hurry earlier. I should've thought to check the commit authors for the site.
I think that part is clear in the document.

"This is why users who disabled Telemetry would see this problem resolved even though the problem is not related to Telemetry functionality itself and could have been triggered otherwise."
How many other SV VCs joined Draper? FWIW, I heard that Ellison also put in some early money. If that was it, then will you agree that "mostly outside of the usual SV crowd." is accurate

How many rounds did Draper participate in? If Draper stopped after the first round or two, then it "got some early money from SV but everything else came from outsiders."
In CSS, the hand cursor is called a 'pointer' cursor, so I think that's what was intended. For anyone who hasn't internalized this, including the app's users, I imagine this is quite confusing. :)

IIUC 'regular cursor' is just the default mouse cursor. I don't think anyone meant the I-beam/text cursor, but I agree with your selection comment entirely.
> Since proofs are programs one can basically say that mathematical theorems are incredibly detailed software that is completely open source and invites people to identify programs that don’t work and or fix issues.

I don't think it's that straightforward; proofs in papers are a mix between explanation in natural language and mechanical steps. Not every step of deduction can feasibly be written out. That's part of why computer aided proofs are not that popular in math.
> All theorems in mathematics are proven true based off of logic. You can't replicate conflicting results if a result is PROVEN to be true via pure logic.

You can publish a paper in mathematics that claims to prove something, but is mistaken. A paper claiming that a theorem is proven, is not the same thing as the theorem being proven. However, that's not often the case—why that is, is an interesting & meaningful question.
the user you're replying to has delightful previous comments such as "the US media is controlled by people eligible for Israeli citizenship" which is more dog-foghorn than dog-whistle
That's a great question. I've only ever really used Web Outlook on this one machine. I'll have to try it out elsewhere when the problem reappears for me.
Not only does it exist but they recently closed another round of funding: https://blog.meilisearch.com/meilisearch-raised-5meu-seed-fu...
To be fair, the volume looks extremely goofy if you're there. The perspective shifts with the camera, and apparently can be close to nauseating if the camera moves too fast, and doesn't feel like a holodeck but instead a room covered in screens. It's game changing for being able to integrate vfx, but it's arguably more distracting for actors than a green screen.
I wonder how practical it would be to create a Wolfenstein 2D with the same level design, but played in top-down view.
I thought this too.

Then I found Kagi last year who manages to exeed my expectations, proving that my original assumption is correct:

It is still possible to provide good results today, Google just fails at it.

I'm not saying it is easy. But it is possible.

(Extra interesting: Kagi builds on Google and Bing, two engines that drive me crazy, yet Kagi manages to be great!)
If that's true at all (this article itself is in a TNR variant), then it's only because Times has a small x-height, and it is smaller retaliative to other common screen fonts at the same point size.

This is true for Garamond, too. And Baskerville, and virtually EVER classic serif font before Matthew Carter started designing for screens with Charter and Georgia.

TNR is a fantastic font, it's just overused. That can actually be an advantage in many contexts, where you're not trying to be novel, and want your body text to project an orthodox and familiar feeling. I've seen great results with TNR on screens, with just a simple touch of CSS to make letters and line height larger, and the color to be a dark grey rather than pure black. Telling people to "please" boycott a font is more than a bit peremptory.
>Year 2026: autonomous drivers have 80% fewer accidents per million miles than human drivers.

What "autonomous drivers" means in your numbers?
Does it mean autopilot without any driver in the car that intensives like in TFA?
Because this is the shit stats ignore the cases where the autopilot was saved from 5 crashes in 5 minutes by it's driver, in this case you could say the combo of driver+auto-co-plot is safer , also you should compare same cars and same roads , self driving software gives up on harder conditions so this inflates your stats.

TL:DR Tesla should also show the disengagements numbers so we can add those in the stats, some of those would have been crashes if the driver did not intervene.
The author is projecting his assumptions based on 400 people questioned. Is it fair.

Most Cars volvo produced is not as safe simply because Volvo is still making most of the money on Gasoline car, and they are less safe vs electric. Do we need to create a screaming article "Vovlo is deliberately making money on old tech that kills people"? Again volvo is a premium brand, so they don't want to invest more in EV to make your car more safe. They also promote hybrid Cars that has highest chances to catch on fire compares to EV and regular ICE cars.

But yeah, naming of an optional feature is so much more important compares to real tech, crash tests etc. That's a logic media is trying to put in our head. Don't think.
I don't think there is a good way to accurately quantify them. I prefer stable coins that are managed and regulated by US companies (like Gemini) and avoid ones with algorithmic stabilization.
Par for the course, eh?
Since you're probably (or at least often) pipelining this into "less" assuming there is more than one screenful of lines, why not just use the regexp searching/highlighting built into less?
I was hoping it would be called Astrophage...

ref: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Hail_Mary
It doesn't help that most movies (these days? Always?) are not worthy of attention.
It’s called thoughtcrime

https://www.quora.com/Do-thought-crimes-exist-in-U-S-law
"Pursuant to the San Francisco Fair Chance Ordinance, we will consider for employment qualified applicants with arrest and conviction records"

Can't resist puns related to marketing "reduced hours" even for those who've done serious time. /s
Men are championed or derided for their physical appearances.

The #1 predictor in a US Presidential Election is the height of the candidate.

Men who are small, short, effete, high pitched voices, who appear 'chubby' as opposed to 'big boned' are not seen as 'real leaders'.

We are not all like that obviously, it's just a tertiary effect, but it is absolutely real and pervasive.

If Hillary Clinton had the appearance of one of those blonde female lawyer types on Fox News, she might have received more votes (which is arguably sexist),
but if Pete Buttigieg were a little taller, square jawed, not gay, and slipped in a few slightly nationalist statements and could maybe throw a football ... he'd have a real shot at being president. I'm not positing that any of this is good (or bad), I'm just indicating that I believe men and women are judged on their posture and appearance.

I believe it would be harder for women in certain circumstances (male dominated situations, of which there are many) to gain credibility however.
Wait why are the dinosaur actors naked inside the costumes?
I'd recommend starting with an individual therapist, rather than seeking advice from randoms on the internet. Software dev can afford a few sessions, even if U. S. insurance doesn't pay for it (and it probably will). Depending on the advice from the counselor, couples counseling or maybe divorce, who knows? I certainly don't.

But an hour of face time with a professional is going to be loads more helpful than a few paragraphs here and there from strangers.
That's why my current plan is to wait at least until she finishes her studies (she will be done by the end of this year).

I hope 1 year is a long time to differentiate whether it's just an identity crisis or not.

> (and whatever escapism is driving the aforementioned internet / games / porn avoidance)

I didn't feel any crisis or anything like that before starting with the addictions avoidance. It's just that I can spend sooo many hours playing video games or watching one and another youtube video all the day and then end tired and go to sleep. And on and on without ever stopping to think about how I feel, what I like, etc.

I'll definitely start therapy for myself at first, and later with her.
The kind of environment that a car is in (and the kind of monitoring required by the driver) is much more akin to autoland than autopilot.
Lawrence of Arabia is also one of the most expensive and most insanely massively epic films ever shot

Yes, Lawrence of Arabia was one of the most expensive at the time. The budget was $15 million, which adjusted for inflation would be $138 million today. The most expensive movie was released the same year, Mutiny on the Bounty, which had a budget of $17 million.

Cleopatra blew that away the following year, with an estimated cost of $35-44 million. Which goes to show you money doesn't buy you a great looking movie.
There are planets, spaceships, big buildings and so on for creating the atmosphere. CGI is used to create those in these days as well.
I'll definitely start therapy for myself at first, and later with her.
From The Fine Article:

Back when Final Fantasy VI (Final Fantasy III US) was released the game was heavily toned down, censoring graphics and the like. When it was re-released for the Playstation, the graphics were uncensored but toned down script remained. Then came Final Fantasy VI Advance with a newer (though some consider drier) translation, but the color palette and music were altered for the handheld console. Others have made re-translations, such as the great work by RPGOne, Lina Darkstar, and Kwhazit.

Now this is Final Fantasy VI: Ted Woolsey Uncensored Edition. The goal was to make the SNES version uncut and to clean up the script but keep the nuance used by Woolsey in the original game’s release. Using the original Woolsey script as a basis to analyze, the entire game was looked through, line by line, using FFVI Advance, RPGOne, and Lina Darkstar to accomplish this. Recently, the game’s script was also heavily analyzed by Kwhazit and Mato (Legends of Localization). With these newer and more heavily detailed looks into the game, the script was again updated to provide a much more accurate version while still remaining true to the original game’s release.
Problem with Facebook is that they can’t acquire anyone due to their notoriety. They should have been able to use all the cash generated in the past five years to purchase a bunch of assets like Microsoft. At the end of the day, they have a bad branding problem. Need a fresh start with new management which we know is never going to happen.
We have a strong positive relationship with AWS and will be partners with them in the coming months!
It's not "don't poke the mouse", if the target isn't dangerous there's nothing to fear from poking them
Exactly. Marketing: "Self driving!" "The driver is only in the seat for legal purposes. The car is driving itself." Legal: "Maintain control of the vehicle at all times."

Same with Summon. Marketing: "Bring your vehicle to you while dealing with a fussy child!" Legal: "Maintain attention and focus on vehicle at all times. Do not use while distracted."
> My friend bought a BMW in 2019 for similar money, it doesn't have half of that. Maybe you can have them but you have to buy extra packages for extra money.

#1 lesson of buying cars is:

1. Don't buy German cars if you don't have to (or if you buy them, never complain about the price of their optional equipment).

The corollary is:

1". Buy Korean or Japanese cars.
Yes! It’s something we’ve be mulling for a while, and I was just talking to one of the PMs about it this morning. This year for sure I hope.