skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> She pretends to be some women's rights activist when she's really just a purveyor of some weird type of titillation

There are 1000s of videos of young women doing Yoga in such tight clothes you would know exactly what the nether regions look like and even without clothes with no age restriction on there.

If people wanna watch such content that is their business. It is none of my business however maybe have a age restriction for over 18s.
I would add one more thing: K8s is complex because oci containers are complex.

Running a process in isolation in Linux means dealing with many different, resource specific APIs. Unfortunately, any Linux container orchestrator will inherit the resulting complexity.
The single core power for ADL at 5Ghz will probably be closer to 25-30W (based on the desktop ADL tests), otherwise couldn't agree more.
>she figured out how to set off US missiles from a phone booth

Uhuh, yeah, ok
It's just a pragmatic desire to transfer your memory and knowledge to a digital form. Current digital access interfaces are very primitive in comparison to what we can do in our mind.
I agree with you on the moral part. But it seems odd to me that you're ignoring the fact that we are talking about a faceless amoral corporation here.

Most likely, a prudish approach to breasts is simply good for business. That's why advertisers like it. And that's why Google has a hard time selling ads for this video. And that's why Google's algorithms demonetized it.

Also, a lot of people in the US were upset about US companies bending to Chinese demands. But China is a huge market. Sacrificing your morals to gain 1.4 bio potential consumers is the correct decision if you're a die-hard capitalist.

We live in a culture that allows the profit margin alone to dictate almost all moral decisions. I'm not surprised that this has led to questionable morals ...
According to Wikipedia [1], the term was coined by American white nationalist Richard B. Spencer and shortened to "alt-right" and popularised by far-right participants of /pol/, the politics board of web forum 4chan.

So more a label that they slapped on themselves.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alt-right
Hellaphone: Replacing the Java in Android with Inferno OS (2015)
The homeless issue is in the name. It's people without a home. The solution is to provide people with a place they can call home, like a house or an apartment.

Why focus on drugs? Do you believe that some people deserve to have no home if they have a drug problem?

With the security and comfort of having a home, becoming a productive member of society becomes much easier if that's what you care about.
It starts with a letter that basically says "we know what you're doing, we're keeping an eye on you, please stop or you'll end up in jail". I don't know what happens afterwards; I know one person who got such a letter and stopped their illicid activities.

If you were serious about piracy and wanted to release books en masse, you'd probably use stolen credit cards, stolen accounts or something of that sort. I don't think that's the goal here, though, those watermarks are mostly for deterring casual piracy, sharing books with friends and so on.
For me it's a combination of two factors. I recognize that well-written notes is a really valuable thing to have because there's a ton of things I need to know about and I won't remember it all, and I know that it's a lot of work to codify things well because I've tried and failed. I strongly suspect that, for me, "taking notes" is the problem. I want to believe I'll remember things, so note taking actually represents a failure on my part rather than the virtuous thing that I know I should do.

I think the answer for me is actually to share what I write with my team more. I'm quite good at documenting things, and the reason for that is because I'm writing docs for other people. If people mention seeing something in the docs then I tend to write more docs. If no one mentions them for a while my documenting dies off until I need to write more. If I could easily apply that mechanism to notes I might be more inclined to write things down.
> Wear whatever you want, but don't be surprised when you get sexual attention

(Lack of) Self control much?
I fully agree that the utilitarian dimension is probably not the full picture. I really just find it a useful (ha!) idea, and I hope it’s given someone some difficult questions to think about. shrug
Let's not forget the hiper expensive player that came together, the Pono. How the Hell was you suposed to put that thing in your pocket with that triangular shape?
Gob
>"Censorship is the suppression of speech, public communication, or other information."[1]

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship
No, that was explicitly not the goal. That is after the goal has massively shifted when new realities surfaced. Our hospitals are optimized to work at 100% load in normal operation. If any external even increases that load it is expected that there will be problems.

> The thread will never subside

Threat from diseases? No, probably not. But the threat from this virus will be manageable without us changing much.
I met a couple of argentinian teachers in the southern Mexico with two small kids, that lived in a hostel and drove from Argentina in a 1960s Ford. It took them 4 years. One kid was born on the road, in Costa Rica. The other was about 6. When they needed money, they would stop in a hostel for 6 months and teach.
Our local library will loan out the consoles too.
Breasts are not genitalia. At least where I live in the US, there is no law against women being topless.
The most important thing for me about Kubernetes is that it makes things fun again. (YMMV) The Kubernetes Slack is super friendly and helpful! (also YMMV ;) )

The article is factually accurate and the mental model is consistent with other K8s docs, but I'm not sure I've seen it put so concisely from an outside perspective before.

The ¹ footnote should have been in-line, because "front-loading" complexity is a great explanation: distributed systems are hard, and require a whole bunch of decisions. It's intimidating to be faced will all of those decisions up front, but at least they're all visible, and it forces you to be very clear on what you want, or you get nothing. I'd rather be surprised and confused (which is to say, have to think) now rather than in 6 months when I realize I had not accounted for some something.

Finally ... I would be lost without k9s: https://k9scli.io/
Just want to point out that many Western countries and cultures don't share this hysteria and shaming around nakedness or female empowerment. Which doesn't mean that gendered power structures don't exist or that you see naked boobs everywhere in the summer city.

Showing naked bodies in various contexts on public television is not controversial in many Western countries.
I don't see a reasonable compromise to make here, here's why:

There is nothing wrong with what Rogan has been criticized by Young for; other than many people including Young being ideologically possessed in the opposite direction.

Disagreement is not grounds for censorship.

In any case, it was Young who issued an ultimatum. His music or Joe's podcast, off the platform. There is no room for a compromise there - this is a rude and violent threat.
Why does a simple date picker demo require using SQLite ???
> guessing it's geo-locked.

It is because you turned off sending a referrer in Firefox (network.http.referer.XOriginPolicy in about:config).

The video is domain blocked, meaning it can only be played when you are on a specific domain. Because you disabled referrers, vimeo doesn't know you are on hackcur.io so it thinks you are opening it through a direct link.
Their choice was not between Neil Young and Joe Rogan, but between enabling the freedom of expression or backing down in the face of an outward pressure. If anything, it makes Spotify as a platform more credible.
> Naked

Here we are again, click bait HN comments distracting me from work. How is this allowed? Maybe we should stop paying people who are naked under their clothes. /s
> if you took two women on youtube with equal talents and content - the one that "dressed up a little" would be more successful. I don't think that's the case with men

Of course it's also the case with men. The dude in a suit will absolutely garner more attention than the one looking like an unwashed hobo. Although some people may rally behind the hobo-look as challenging the norms.
Why do we have more than one fork of Linux? Why don't we all just admit that Ubuntu won and call it a day?
I agreed with you, i am just pointing out that you missed a perspective. When you say that the problems is idiots that would just need to be told what to do its a fetching argument. The problem is to identify actual smart people to do the telling. Being smart would entails understanding not just the facts but the consequences of actions. If you would understand them, and could communicate them, you wouldnt need to force people. If you need to force people chances are very good you are just overlooking a perspective that they see and you dont. Which doesnt make them right or smart, but a working solution never the less likely requires all the perspectives.
Which means you understood the problem but missunderstood that that stupid person might be you. Thats why that doesnt work. Seeing as nobody thinks they are the stupid one. Figuring that out is the hard part and it doesnt seem to be solvable through force to me. Force doesnt select for stupidity but for power. Which just means chances are high you end up giving power to stupid people since they are more willing to boss others around.

Differently put, you are looking for somebody smart to fix the situation for you. I looked around and there dont seem to be any to spare so we will have to do with us idiots. And once idiots start forcing other idiots around, those idiots push back. Which leaves us with a lot of pushing and pulling in a worse situation all together.

>Do you have any ideas in that direction?

Most idiots seem to mean well so lets see if we cant agree on a consensus about the state of reality and our criteria for acceptable solutions till some smart aliens show up to run this shitshow for us. We wont find a solution for everything but i am confident we could get really far by just agreeing on a reasonable minimum.

I think the problem stems from the lofty goal of finding actual solutions that arent horrible and applicable everywhere. Which we dont have now. Best we can do is look at existing solutions for specific problems and see if we cant agree on improvements. Being motivated by understanding the cost and risk of authoritarian solutions. Which we can communicate. Which just requires a willingness to communicate which goes out of the window once you create a conflict.

tldr: Trying to dictate what people think was tried and failed multiple times before. Its a really really bad idea. Wanting it to work doesnt change that, since you can explain why it fails reliably. Its the same reason that makes the idea so tempting in the first place.
Can you site claims of 100% effectiveness? Did they come from medical authorities?

As far as I'm aware, even early on in the cycle, realistic claims of effectiveness were being made, with some quibbling over data transparency that were resolved.

As we now have variants to contend with, that effectiveness in preventing infection has dropped precipitously. However the effectiveness at preventing hospitalisation and death is still pretty high.

If it was sold to you as 100% effective you were lied to. But if you were told that there were claims of 100% effectiveness which were clearly a lie, by someone trying to put you off vaccination, then you've been given false information there too.
I love note taking. The act of writing something down gives me so much insight and clarity. It's similar to trying to explain something to other people, it requires a much deeper understanding.

Even if I don't share it with anyone it helps me figure stuff out. I don't read back 90% of what I write, the writing itself is what provides most value to me. Although it can be handy to dig into the archives to understand my thinking of months back.

Tooling wise; I like handwriting, as I can draw arrows and quick sketches. I used to always carry an A5 notebook around, now I use an iPad with Apple Pencil (recently upgraded to the new mini which is perfect A5'ish size).

Apps I use on the iPad are; GoodNotes for actual notes and Concepts for more visual sketching and such.

If I need to take notes that I need to share I generally use https://nota.md which is imo by far the best markdown note taking experience available. Think of it as a markdown editor with code editor features (e.g. multi cursor). It also works with normal markdown files so no lock in.

When on my phone I use the Notes app on.

Yes, lots of tools, but I find different tools are best for different things. It does means everything is spread around, but it works for me, it's sort of an organized chaos, I can find stuff when I need to.

I think the joy comes from the idea of maintaining all information, of "getting your shit together" in a way. I think most humans truly enjoy collecting and organizing things. Notes, similarly to todos, bookmarks, lists etc are just tools to scratch that itch, the more the better!
Yep, I’ve got plenty of ideas ready to go. But if I just start implementing them in a silo without the rest of my team, that’s not good for my job or the company. Brainstorming sessions are to get buy-in and validate that things I’ve already thought of are viable and will be considered a group effort.
> No one’s said anything like that.

Seen lots of comments implying that.
We are discussing a conspiracy that requires the cooporation of hundreds of worldwide governments. The process to gain the power of your "congress" is fairly insignificant within this discussion. There are many governments with varying paths to power.
Rush is a good way of putting it. I remember my heart beating faster once the modem finished handshaking
Ain’t No Party Like a Third Party
I'm not arguing otherwise. All i'm saying is you can't compare apple to oranges: it's fine if you can't walk on the moon. Except when every one else is doing it because it's become trivial and you're denied it because of your caste/class or social status.

That many Americans die due to illnesses we know how to treat for cheap for decades is unbelievable. And don't even get me started on long-term conditions, like insulin or HIV-medication prices skyrocketing for zero reason (well, there's one: profit) decades after their first commercialization.

In much of the world, the USA is (rightfully) derided for being so backwards when it comes to health care. I would even go so far as to argue that some traditional medicines (plants, kine/ostheo, acupuncture...) are/were far more advanced than the medical treatments available to poorer US citizens (i.e. none), but i'm not versed in medical sciences so don't take my word for it.
But it is still sensible with the replacement.

In an environment where it's normal, there are no problems. I experienced such an environment myself, I was (surprisingly?) not bothered by this in such a setting and women there neither.

Women may complain that they have no wish to see male genitalia in a setting where it is not normal / can be seen as / is an assault. Intents matter, too.

If you point your middle finger, the finger is still a body part but you are doing something offensive because you intend to insult someone.
I would actually agree with this— it’s how I personally use the word, but in as abstract as sense as possible.

For eg.: copyright is a form of censorship.
I've used Django for a long time. Django defaults to adding trailing slashes to make relative URLs easier to implement correctly. I've always found that sensible and useful. I've recently been putting some APIs behind GCP's API Gateway and discovered that their OpenAPI implementation strips trailing slashes: https://cloud.google.com/endpoints/docs/openapi/openapi-limi...

So... I guess no more trailing slashes for me.
> the female figure induces a instinctual physiological and psychological responses in men.

No. We are not all that shallow. In order to cause such a reaction there has to be some context, some hint of availability. I like her. I enjoy her videos. I'd like to have a coffee or beer with her. I'd love to be her friend. I'd like to ask her a ton of questions (political, technical, social), but I am not sexually attracted to her. Even if I were, I know I'm not what she likes and that she's not single.

> force an onus onto men to suppress visceral urges.

The universe has no obligation to make it easy for a person not to behave like an animal. That's what the sizeable lump of tissue inside your head is for. It's not a space heater.
> Valgrind, ASsan, Intel Inspector, etc.

So where is the problem? Why I have to download ~2gb security updates that tries to fix memory issues. Not one but ~10. Every update is full of them. It still seems the new updates will have them too. My OS is so vulnerable. When it will be finally fixed?

Like with electron apps. Convenience for developers but who is concerned about the user?
In Netherland they were separate books. The phone book came from the phone company and just listed all non-secret phone numbers. The "Gouden Gids" (it did have yellow pages) was from a separate organisation and listed all businesses in the area.
I think there must still be some restrictions. Topless nudity is on the verge for me. The only reason why I think there is a case to be made is that so many people around the world DO find it offensive. But that's still a weak argument.

Showing primary sexual organs in my opinion is not a question and shouldn't be tolerated in many venues. It is a form of aggression in almost every culture. Even some hunter gatherers who walk around with genitals visible often have some way of making it less offensive. Very rare exceptions...
Valuing "each other", but not "females"?

(Why do people say "females" rather than the more natural English "women" anyway?)
Good point that software "industry" is not new, but I would argue that it is not an industry in a literal sense or at least it is a special industry.
The special thing about software is that it is governed by the social aspects a lot.

And because of this, software has poor standardization practices.

Engineers in other sectors could prove their qualifications by showing certification diplomas, even education and years of experience would count. In software your qualification would be determined by some random dude and how well you fit his CS fetish of the month and that is it. Experience and education is only important while filtering CVs.
If you designed a chip, an aircraft or skyscraper it is immediately impressive. If you built an FX trading platform it means almost nothing if you are a bit skeptical about pair programming.

It also applies the other way round. If project uses microservice architecture, what exactly does that mean? The result would be a wildly different if you compare such projects at FANG and some investment bank.
How software is tested and released will be different in any team. And how that affects the poor developer will vary too.
What is a good software? We can have an opinion, but there is no formal definition.

And because of this fragmentation and fluidity software as and industry is doing very different things. It will learn in some cases in others it will be incredibly ignorant.
Where can one outside from Chime buy these phones (in bulk) ?
> She pretends to be some women's rights activist when she's really just a purveyor of some weird type of titillation.

Naomi Wu was influenced by the cartoon (animate) culture. She designed her character according to the public perception of a girl in animation, it's her persona. And based on how I look at it, her wearing style is a rebellion against the traditional idea of what a woman should be wearing, maybe it's a political statement of some sort.

I do agree that she maybe wearing a little too less. If she were my own sister, I would probably constantly annoying her so she can dress more properly at least for her own safety concern (you don't want to test the dark side of people). However, if it was truly an act of political statement, then maybe it's reasonable that she wants to make it louder.

(Seriously, I would recommend that she remove the "Sexy" reference in her banding to avoid serious legal issues)
> First off, We live in a society not a free for all dystopia.

Well, looking at the past two years, I'm not so sure about that. Locking up the whole world in their apartments, fining people for being on the street, locking up playgrounds, banning outside exercise or limiting your "outside" time to 1 hour or allowing you to go no further than 1-3 miles from your home sounds pretty dystopian to me. My mom died of cancer after being ignored for 1 and a half year (in the EU she couldn't get a CT scan for 6 months because the hospital staff didn't want to disinfect the machine after each use) and I was able to see her only in the last 2 weeks of her life after being forced to stay in quarantine for 10 days, even if I had negative PCR tests before travelling, so yeah, let's all pretend we care about people and health, and not about people like you feeling superior and better than everyone else.
No clue, link/site might be toxic, sorry :-/
Thank you, Constitutional scholar 'yes_really,' the Supreme Court will no doubt be humbled by your brilliant and objectively correct interpretation. Clearly they never needed to bother arguing the point in Heller vs. DC, they could have just read the text of the amendment, it's so obvious.
Ubiquiti’s Wifiman Signal Mapper
Navy to salvage stealth F-35 that crashed on carrier landing in South China Sea
Legal criminal activity is an oxymoron. The legal system defines what is criminal, and that has nothing to do with morality.

And even though I'd tend to agree, I absolutely don't understand why you're making a connection to capitalism. Any other more socialist system was nothing else but much worse, and the social democracies of today have just the same issues with police etc you're talking about.
"Balls" are primary sexual organs, breasts, male or female, are not.

Shoving your genitals in someones face is definitely aggression. Just showing breasts is not.
> For any Westerners here who seem to have a hard time understanding why this is wrong

As opposed to the sexually liberated cultures of Asia, India, or the Middle East?

> The point is that those restrictions on women shouldn't be dictated by the actions or effects they have on men. Instead, men should either change their viewpoints or control their own sexualization so that women don't have to accommodate them.

What is this mirror universe where men recoil at the unclad female form? Please direct your complaints either at puritanism in general, or Google and their advertisers in particular. I certainly don't feel accommodated by this demonetization.
The 32-bit integer bug that took 6 years to fix (2017)
Would you be up for receiving cryptocurrency, either as sponsoring (like your tipeee site) or just as donations?

EDIT: See now that you already accept the main ones <3

Pro tip for when you have the time: Generate a new BTC address (native segwit bech32; starts with "bc1" instead of "1"). It will lower fees significantly, which can be a difference between a smaller donation being meaningful or not when fees are higher)
Spotify didn't choose anything, Neil Young chose to "do justice with his own hands" and punish his listeners. Why didn't he use the 60% lost revenue to fight in Justice to get the misinformation out? Or fund creation of better content for Spotify and else?