skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
[Disclaimer] I'm the founder of farther finance (https://www.farther.com) - the first digital family office.

We offer this to our clients at farther - set a minimum amount to keep in your bank account, everything over set minimum gets swept to your investment accounts and invested based on how you set them up and any relevant regulatory stuff (like max IRA contribution amounts) or goal amounts.

Quick note - We focus on holistic management for pretty significant wealth (compared to the target client for most offerings) and all of the stuff that comes with that - more intricate planning around events, alts, families, collabs with CPAs, attorneys etc. That's best achieved with a hybrid approach - an advisory team boosted by tech - so advisors are part of the deal! If you're interested, feel free to PM me and I'll connect you with one of our advisors.
This is not a 'real' law, searching for it turns up this article and this HN posting of it. Or rather it's one known in a small circle--I assume referring to Gunnar Hellekson (Red Hat).

In any case, it's an interesting idea:

> [...] Hellekson’s Law, which states that more specific policy can be improved for the general case by removing delimiters that narrow the policy scope.
Laundering a pre-arranged plan, aka "brainwashing"
Just in time for the end of jan Docker Desktop grace period (https://www.docker.com/blog/the-grace-period-for-the-docker-...).

I played with this when first announced, and then now and all the things I wanted when i first tried it out are now fixed (mainly transparent networking..) and the option for dockerd container engine makes migrating pretty simple.
The funny thing is IP laws are by definition monopolies protected by government. Every one of the big tech "quasi-monopolies" are sitting on a mountain of it.
Rogan listeners listen for hours on end, how long to Neil Young listeners listen for? You can't compare them 1 to 1. Rogan is better for metrics.
What I find fascinating is I’ve seen a small, but increasing, subset of results where:

- the result title is clearly not original, usually derived from content on the page

- the original title is known to be generated

- the original generated title is as close to harmless as any web content could be

- the result title is actively harmful and misleading

- the original title is demonstrably better

- this idiosyncrasy is applied to very high trust hosts (eg GitHub)

- it’s not applied to the same content from obvious scraped content/spam/scam sites with obvious tells
This is by defintion suboptimal, as you'd ignore information gain from each guess.

Only the first guess is "unbounded"
Tell me about it.

My last three MacBooks, including the new 16” M1, have inexplicably had issues syncing to iCloud for several days (sometimes weeks) until magically everything seems to just work as expected and I forget all about it.

It’s all part of the magic of owning Apple devices. They’re annoyances, but minor and usually easy enough to fix.
I'm not sure what you're driving at, because she clearly doesn't think that "masks" as such are ineffective - just the cloth/surgical masks -- she advocates N95/KN95. Which of course are what everyone should be wearing now (in close public settings), by this point.

Also, the discussion in that podcast is a bit strange (for a bunch of reasons). For one thing, it seems to reduce the "mask question" to one of individual (or close family) risk -- "If I'm comfortable with the risk level (as affects me and my family), I should be able to decide whether to wear a mask or not (paraphrasing)" -- and completely sidesteps the community risk issue (especially in crowded public settings). Which is very different, and is of course what mask mandates (whether you agree with them or not) are designed to address.

For another, it dwells a lot on the "shame" and (what they think of) as quasi-religious aspects of mask wearing - this idea that people expect others to wear masks because those who do not are "unclean". Which may be what some people think, but to suggest that this is what most people think or that this should be part of the policy debate is just ... werid.
I found it to be about repeated patterns that we find to have suboptimal outcomes. It is noting that we should notice what patterns (distributed between ourselves and our environment, inclusive of people) we engage in and evaluate whether we like them or would prefer them to be altered. When we would, it suggests, we should.
I'm interested in following along with your progress!
Classic "American culture" (of the old-school variety) straight from the middle of Tennessee, where in the same document they also choose to disclose they only want "like-minded folks" involved in the process.

I think you nailed it on the head, they are desperate to shelter their children until they turn 18 and head off to college. I hope they don't let their kids near an Internet-connected computer or smartphone, otherwise it's all for show- oh, wait.. doesn't pretty much every kid get a phone in middle school or sooner these days?

The board members are so antiquated and dusty, it's triggering my asthma even from thousands of miles away.

Seriously though, it is sad that how the US public education system curriculum is now basically 100% controlled by the government. When the locals don't like the rules, they find a way around them. Then the rest of us rule-followers suffer through this standardized nonsense.

Teachers in the USA nowadays don't get to decide much about the classes they teach, which certainly kills the unique magic I felt some teachers added to their classes and made for awesome experiences growing up. Sad.
FWIW podman does not work as a driver for minikube on Apple Silicon. Really hoping it gets sorted out because that’s probably what I would use.
I don't think it's the IP that set it off, it's probably "accesses to the page with this cookie in the link". That is, everyone on HN accessing it contributed regardless of their IP.

And, to confirm this, I also got this email (because the product looked interesting a few months ago) and I can still use the link in my email but the one on the HN post doesn't work.

Don't really get why the mods haven't changed the link to the twitter URL yet?
I have been using Rancher Desktop since the day Docker announced they would charge corporations for Docker Desktop. I don't really need it much, but I genuinely could not have had a cleaner transition. I uninstalled Docker Desktop, and hit install on Rancher Desktop. Everything 'just worked' and I started using nerdctl. This was on Windows, and a few months ago now.

I tried to install it on my personal M1 Max Macbook, and it was annoying enough (the vm stuff, which was annoying with Docker Desktop) that I just used Multipass and installed docker. I would 100% recommend anyone dependent on Docker Desktop on Windows give it a shot.
Thanks for the valuable suggestion! Could you please explain a bit more?
> Pretending that the current brand of "activism" is the same as previous ones is disingenuous, and disrespectful.

Young recognizes who is hurting us & is standing apart.

Youcre trivializing what is happening, trying to make it look unimportant. Saying that this malignance isnt as toxic as past ones so we should just quietly hold our noses.

Personally i disagree with your assessment of scale about whats happening. But as important to me is whether society quietly suffers it's toxic, harmful, animosity-based elements, or whether we have a society that actively thinks/cares/promotes goodness & cooperation. It is outrageous that small-minded anti-societal reactionary-ism has winded us so bad, that anti-activism has such a huge banner, garners such animosity against doing good. Rogan is a head wolf, one of the main profiteers selling hardened uncaring individualism & trading misinformation to boost his popularity.

No side here is free from claims of attention seeking or outrage-generation. But one side pretends it's doing something else, one side gets offended when the other side is activist, & it's not the side that seems to be very interested in dealing in peace & coexistence.
Making the title essentially click-bait.
Of course Octagon would not want you visiting the damn inferior Pentagon!
Ok, we can leave it like this for now, but if people end up reacting in the way I described, we're going to end up enforcing the policy. I've learned that it's much better to deal with these things earlier than later, but this is a borderline case so we can kick the can down the road.
Joe Rogan is a useful idiot for grifters who know that he won't seriously challenge them for what they're saying under the guise of "hey it's just fun" and "hey I'm just letting them say their piece." He is a perhaps a good conversationalist for engaging with and listening to his guests, but he is a poor interviewer and, unless he's in on the con, a poor judge of character.
I wonder if you can side load the Aurora Store or F-Droid
I believe I've gotten lucky, but I moved all my money from Fidelity (making, 7% I think?, in a money market? I couldn't understand their UI so I don't recall) to Wealthfront. It currently shows and it's made 15% - 35% over 2 years.
Some of the prohibited episodes were obvious candidates for suppression like Alex Jones but I remember seeing the list and finding a few real headscratchers. Going to guess there were some specific comments in those episodes that an employee didn't like rather than a general opposition to the guest overall. It's unfortunate that Spotify wasn't more transparent about their review process but tech companies seem to be really fond of the notion that rules cannot be made clear because then people the hate might follow them, denying the opportunity to silence them.
I cant hear this over the sound of my
While that is true about Joe and the show that doesn't completely paint the whole picture either. Actually it really leaves out the key part of the whole picture.

Irregardless of what Joe says about himself and the show being nothing more than a bunch of idiotic guys talking, the truth of the matter is he does have credible and subject matter experts come on his show and talk and give their viewpoint on their area of expertise.

However when those experts come on and they go against the MSM narrative then the focus becomes about Joe and his silly tactics as a way to dismiss or downplay the counter views for some.
Android Play Integrity API
It's all fine. I could barely hear the music over my vaginas steamer.
Now it is YYYY-MM-DD.
Completely agree, you pretty much nailed it that pedestrians are the textbook example on externalities. I don't unfortunately see them getting a lobby group anytime soon though.
Ironic because Fox News has zero credibility. Their prime time anchor Tucker Carlson won against slander charges in court by arguing that he does not state actual facts and instead engages in exaggeration and non-literal commentary. They are clearly a mouthpiece for one of two sides, like other “news” organizations.

And since the beginning of Covid Joe Rogan has stopped being just a dude who hangs out and smokes with his buddies, something I used to love about the show. He is constantly and consistently political, making medical claims and other kinds of claims that are nonsensical. He’s started favoring certain types of guests, and avoiding the friends who call him out.

I used to argue vehemently that free speech can be infringed upon under no circumstance. I still will. But now I see the “other side” more clearly, that is, where is the line when someone has one of the largest platforms in the world and uses it to spread dangerous misinformation? He’s way past just some dude. I have friends who take what he says as gospel, because they want to learn how to be men and Joe is a man’s man. At the same time, he does make good arguments in favor of discourse, hearing different viewpoints, etc. so how do we handle this?
Thinking for future instances, it seems the best response. Why should an artist on a platform control the platform?
> So they diversify his retirement with stocks in the companies they worked for.

It's better to have stock in 4-5 companies than in 1 (talk to Enron employees about that) but it is far better yet to have stock in 4000-5000 companies, if you are looking for diversification.

So, when you get the stock at below market prices, you should immediately be thinking how to diversify it.

I am not a financial planner, but I do manage my own portfolio.
I mean you have to. Things like antitrust aren’t exactly clear laws you can avoid breaking at a certain size. So it becomes a word game.

Source: have played word games to maintain standing in society
I like to listen to people and make up my mind on my own.

Why should you or anyone else decide who should not have a voice for me to listen to?

Do I get to tell you who is to provocative to listen to?
Google's successor for the Safetynet Orwellian horror.
Does the Bible or your other straw man religious books contain content that violates board policies? They don't contain illustrations.
Facebook’s Cryptocurrency Venture to Wind Down, Sell Assets
We’re having less sex because we’re too busy, not because of social media
every now and then I forget the order of `where` and `group by`, SQL syntax certainly has it's counter-intutive quirks.
> Haven't 11 Oath Keepers been charged with "seditious conspiracy"[1]? Does that not come under the definition of "insurrection" - "a violent uprising against an authority or government"?

How many of these Oath Keeper individuals were directly led into this activity by FBI agents, CIs, "cutouts"/contractors, such as Ray Epps [1] and Stewart Rhodes[2]?

It appears that the recent charges of seditious conspiracy were in direct response to Darren Beattie's reporting of the coverup of Epps involvement, and Darren's drumbeat around Stewart Rhodes. This, after Darren uncovered FBI removing Ray Epps from the most-wanted list, hiding his name, and appearing to cover for their relationship with him during senate testimony.

[1] https://www.revolver.news/2021/10/meet-ray-epps-the-fed-prot...

[2] https://www.revolver.news/2021/06/stewart-rhodes-oath-keeper...
I thought Office Space (1999) was an exaggeration. Maybe back in its day it was but apparently today it is an understatement.

I'd like to see an Office Space remake where the main character's job isn't the 2000 switch but building a bloated frontend with React.js + Vue.js + Soy.js with blockchain, machine learning, dependency injection, inversion of control and scrum+agile as well as the revolutionary framework buzzword.js weighing just under a 100 megs.
There are a few reasons for this. Some languages arent Context Free Grammars (the classic example for this is "A * B;" is this multiplication of the A and B variables or is it a declaration of the B variable with the type being a pointer to an A) which make writing the grammar much harder in the first place. Some solutions to this are using a GLR parser instead, but that has the downside of super high execution time in the worst case. Lastly, even if you overcome all of these with the proper structure and hints, you run into pretty bad error cases. I.e. handing an invalid input is hard and giving an error to the user that makes sense is even more difficult. (which of the possible branches in the grammar rules is the one thats wrong? in simpler grammars you can probably give a good error, but a C grammar is going to have a much harder time) This is why gcc moved away from using a grammar to a custom parser IIRC.
It's about the consumer, price fixing removes the competition and consumer have to pay more than they would in a competitive market.
It's sort of a cartel.
> SEO: if your content exists at two (or more!) distinct URL endpoints, it is a SEO no-no. […] You need redirects.

Or you could just only serve it from one of the two URLs and let the other 404. (Yeah, static file servers don’t tend to be fond of working this way, but it’s not an unreasonable option if you’re forming a matrix of fundamental possibilities. And indeed, in the analysis, it’s what half the servers do at least some of the time; and it’s what all standard static file serving software that I know does out of the box.)

> Vercel, Render, and Azure Static Web Apps: slashless /resource returns content [from resource/index.html] but without redirects, resulting in multiple endpoints for the same content.

This is obviously Wrong with a capital W because of how it breaks relative URLs in the file. Surely it should just be considered a bug and fixed (probably to redirect to /resource/)?

> Almost everyone agrees that /resource should return content from resource.html

This is a biased view because you’re only considering mildly-opinionated static file servers and their configuration. If you’re serving it yourself with things like nginx or Apache httpd, you won’t get this out of the box and must opt into it. (No idea about others like Caddy.)

> (When both resource.html and resource/index.html are present and /resource/ is requested.) Netlify redirects to /resource instead.

I say of this too that it is obviously a bug. Netlify isn’t just taking an opinionated stance, it’s doing what is fairly unequivocally the Wrong Thing.
Germany Needs Immigration of 400k Workers per Year, FDP Says
More anti-user computing, oh boy! Our devices are being turned into thin client terminals to the corporate mainframes.
I love that keyboard, that is how I want the keyboard in my laptop to be: track pad in the center .. with split keyboard on the sides.
17 inch laptop
They had little choice. If you let someone anyone dictate your decisions, others will leverage their power too. Soon, it would descend into who has more clout than whom and the parties shoot at each other in a cross-fire as they race to the bottom. It would be a no-win for Spotify.
I’ve seen popular/powerful people being de-platformed, after much rumble, I once was on the side of those questioning platforms for giving “them” the opportunity to build a strong voice I didn’t want to exist.

It only made things worse, the guys moved underground but their communities kept growing and felt validation in martyrdom, and soon enough they found a new, even stronger voice, and they always find ways to circumvent censorship.

It should not be done because it simply does not work in the long run.

Unless you prefer totalitarian regimes of course…
This is so far off base it strains credulity. Charitibly I'll ask for citations.
Young's 2006 album "Living With War" was specifically critical of the Bush administration and the Iraq war.
Group brainstorming is useful for creating a domain set of ideas to test and kill, especially if a simple-ish or vague problem needs to be solved immediately when optimal soon isn't required. Multiple people together can sometimes create better ideas through on-the-fly refinement. But, people who are less assertive aren't able to make their voices heard or convince others about alternative ideas.

Independent contributors have the potential of submitting better ideas privately utilizing individual creativities not biased or pressured by group dynamics.
Tangent, but Clemmy sounds too close to clammy for an ice cream brand (example cited in article of company that went out of business due to fact that shelf space was too expensive).
> It's mainly just him hanging out with his buddies smoke'n (sometimes literally) and joke'n.

> That's the entertaining and appeal of the show.

Facebook's press releases talk just like that. They also pretend to be "neutral".

But Rogan, Facebook and Spotify made choices with repercussions and consequences. They just don't want to bear responsibility/accountability for those consequences.

And, no, I don't use both Facebook or Spotify.
But they do. People defended the show by saying he’ll listen to anyone. The products he endorses and people he has on enjoy gigantic boosts in popularity. Literally nobody is saying, “oh it’s just some dumb show”. A lot of men look to Joe Rogan for guidance. If you don’t see it, you’re not paying attention imo. I used to look to the show for dumb fun, sure, but also to expose me to information about working out, cool activities, cool people to follow like Cameron Hanes and David Goggins, lots of stuff.
So are we now defining and policing what is hate speech?

A poop emoji is now ‘hate speech’? Perhaps, saying ‘Mastercard’ or ‘golden master’ is also possibly hate due to the use of ‘master’ offending someone. Maybe sarcasm is now hate right?

I think this tool is going down a route that is looking to create more problems than actually solve any with a risk of backfiring. Good luck with where you take this tool.
Thanks, I understand. In the meantime can you point me to where the policy is? I don't see it in the Guidelines[1].

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
I had the exact same experience! Had a Nexus 6p, it boot looped and I sweared off Android forever. Ever since then I've been iPhone only and I have no complaints --- went from the 8 plus to a 13 Pro Max recently, but honestly it was a vanity upgrade and was not necessary at all.
It’s curious that you pit Joe Rogan singularly against “the media”. Joe Rogan has owned up to mistakes but the entirety of “the media” never has? Nobody in the media has ever owned up to a mistake? Joe Rogan is not a member of the media? What is the definition of the media here? People you dislike/disagree with?
While I haven’t run rancher desktop, i have been running colima.

https://github.com/abiosoft/colima

Which also is built on top of lima.

It’s been great, some network wonkiness, and works on m1 perfectly.

The rancher devs have been contributing back to the project helping improve both.
Yeah imagine if an alien race that didn’t perceive humans as alive crashed something to earth and had that attitude of “oh well. Stuff happens.”
I think script here is more like in the movie/theatre sense.

> She’s going to give you some feedback. Is your first reaction to be defensive, or to lean into the goodwill that’s being offered?

I really liked this one in reflection to how so many code reviews seem to go down.
Let’s also be clear: it’s almost 100% certain that the county’s 8th graders use words much worse than "god damn" in their every day life out of sight of their parents, and have probably seen far more nudity than whatever is in Maus.

The board and parents are complete numbskulls and outraged right-wing patsies.
This guy's success is proof that connections, timing/being early is more important than content/ability.
Just adding onto this argument. Reddit moderators just don't know how to take criticism.

The lately famous /r/antiwork just had a moment. I tried to find the post where they were banning every dissenting opinion, but the thread got locked. Now the entire subreddit is locked. For reference here's a link to another subreddit locking a thread because the /r/antiwork mod got offended:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Cringetopia/comments/sd5cvd/banned_...

This was all because the mod couldn't handle the criticisms he took for being interviewed here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3yUMIFYBMnc
People stop patronizing bars, restaurants, shops, etc, instead spend their leisure time/money/etc on infinitely more scalable digital services. Beyond imagination?
I think the big example is news sites.

The keyword analysis tends to be completely unrelated to purchase intent (nobody wants to see car ads next to a wreck photo, or "Travel to the Ukraine" next to the current tension)

So you tend to see a lot of fallback to either localized targeting (the $city newspaper can show restaurants and clothiers in $city) or low-value "brand presence" ads. It's overall not going to have the hot targetability of, say, a review website that obviously points to buyables.
Doesn't work like this. Rogan pulls in people for Podcasts. Otherwise even Spotify users are going to go elsewhere for their podcasts (PocketCast, OverCast, Apple, etc..). 34 artists likely aren't going to be deal breakers for most of the customers. Most will just not listen to those 34 artists rather than leave Spotify.