skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> I'm not moving the goalposts; all practical revocation schemes fail open. OCSP Must-Staple isn't actually a form of revocation; it is just expiry with a fancy name.

Of course it is revocation, it allows you to revoke a certificate before its normal expiration (90 days for LE).

I could make this argument in reverse: "very short lifetimes are functionally equivalent to OCSP Must-Staple, and thus is a form of revocation". Of course, this is ridiculous both ways: being similar or even 'functionally equivalent' does not make two things the same.
Public schools and libraries are socialistic tools now? They were a thing before Marx has even dreamt about socialism. Since you are from one of more developed ex EU member state, you could surely afford to travel to an ex communist EU member state to see for yourself (go outside of capitals) what poverty in EU looks like.
It actually appears to go the other way. Explicitly referencing an ambiguous column causes the error while using select * avoids it, at least with duckdb (which is a very standard sort of SQL). This suggests to me that using select * in views is a very good practice.

D create table a (amb integer, a1 integer, a2 integer);
D create table b (amb varchar, b1 integer, b2 integer);
D insert into a values (1,1,1);
D insert into b values ('b',2,2);
D insert into b values ('b',1,3);
D select * from a, b where a.a1 = b.b1;
┌─────┬────┬────┬─────┬────┬────┐
│ amb │ a1 │ a2 │ amb │ b1 │ b2 │
├─────┼────┼────┼─────┼────┼────┤
│ 1 │ 1 │ 1 │ b │ 1 │ 3 │
└─────┴────┴────┴─────┴────┴────┘
D select amb from a, b where a.a1 = b.b1;
Error: Binder Error: Ambiguous reference to column name "amb" (use: "b.amb" or "a.amb")
FWIW, you're already motivated - your post is evidence enough of that. Keep asking yourself why you feel like you want to do something and see where that leads.

Perhaps that exercise reveals some deep set intention. Congratulations, that is yours to nurture and grow. Put a definition of a milestone that will move you towards satisfying that intention. Write it down and say it out loud. Repeat that daily, indefinitely. Identify the difference in state between where you are today and your desired outcome. Break the journey down into discrete action steps, then do a step forward. As you go forward, take inventory of all of the actions you've taken so far and admire your growing wealth of progress. Don't interrogate your intention too often or judge it too harshly, if it came from a good place, it will lead you somewhere good.

Perhaps the exercise revealed nothing at all. There is nothing that you want, nothing pulling you any particular direction. Congratulations, you've arrived! You're free from striving and have achieved the pinnacle of human longing. Enjoy the level of contentment, leisure, and freedom that has been the aim of so many, for so long, and enjoy it well.

“Nothing to do is itself a great doing.”
― Ehsan Sehgal

“I sat in my backyard all afternoon and did nothing. Whenever I do nothing I feel I've accomplished a lot.”
― Marty Rubin

Perhaps you have nothing you want, but nothing doesn't satisfy you. Go help somebody who needs it. There is plenty to do, and helping people does quite a lot of good for you. Even if you got nothing out of it, at least someone did.

Don't be too hard on yourself. Hibernation and seasonality is perfectly mammalian. Spring is coming.
> What if your car broke down on the way to the polling place, and by the time you got alternate transportation they were closed?

You do realize that's one of the reasons why the two major political parties set up call lines where you can get a ride to the polling station, right?

Because that scenario happens.

Doesn't happen to me - my polling station is within walking distance.

> Lots of people get caught

Where is the evidence that the existing non-state-issued-photo-id system is insufficiently strict?

How much stricter does the system need to be? Should we also check blood types? Should we also have genetic testing?

As I've pointed out, double voting appears more common than the types of fraud that can be detected with an id check.

Why aren't people pushing for a nation-wide registry of where each person lives, with a legal obligation to keep it up to date, would reduce more fraud?

That's what some other countries do.
"Politicians who want to require open access journals for govt funded work?"

Not this one. The open access requirements tend to be a year's delay and then it's open access at no cost.
Video games actually helped me a lot. It is a nice simple distraction and depending on the game, I got a small sense of achievement from it. One of my all time favorites is the portal series. A documentary on netflix that challenged how I think was very nice in helping me use my brain without having to worry about getting charged emotions. HN is the most useful social media sites I use and helps me stay in touch with the current state of technology.

Making screen time a boogeyman is not a useful way to help yourself address underlying issues. People escape using screen time, and in moderation it's healthy. Taking a break isn't bad. Mental health issue cause a drive to escape using technology. It's not the other way around.

Most people in school are young enough where deficiencies aren't a major issue unless they are also restricting their diet due to finances or other issues. Restricting can cause malnutrition but it's far from common. Just having an, on average, well balanced diet is more than enough. If there's a reason to suspect an underlying health condition, talk with a doctor.

I agree that cardio is amazing but other from of sports and activity is great too. Resistance training and yoga are exceptional as well. Archery is one of my favorites. The important thing is time and consistency, so finding and doing a physical activity you like is all that matters.

Getting checked out with a mental healthcare specialist pre-emptively is important. People have a yearly physical, I'd argue a yearly mental health check should be strongly encouraged too.
Shouldn't lookups be where cdb shines? Hold my beer:

$ shard="$(echo "${sha1}" | cut -c 1)"
$ cdb -q pwned-passwords-v8-sha1-${shard}.cdb "${sha1}"

But as a cloud evangelist at Microsoft, you may sing the corporate IT gospel anyway.
¹https://mro.name/agakdfa
Oil isn't renewable and the rich tend to be the ones in control...
When I was at University I tried to finish smaller tasks first and then move to bigger ones. Why? The sense of completing something small gave me an impuls and motivation to focus on bigger things.
Google’s Topics API: Rebranding FLoC Without Addressing Key Privacy Issues
If it's so comically easy, how would you carry it out?

How would showing id fix the problem?
In these cases the miners and the orgs who run the blockchains are the vulnerable parties hosting the content. I suspect it flies below the radar for enforcement mostly because offending material is basically there as a stunt rather than a place used for active proliferation. In the same way Roblox is full of IP infringement.
Meta Works with Nvidia to Build AI Research Supercomputer
I wouldn't be able to rent - or buy - in Amsterdam either even though I was born there and lived there for half my life. The prices there are simply insane. It's ok with me because I wouldn't want to either but between AirBNB, businesses using residential real estate as fancy offices (half the inner circle of the canals is like that now), the crime and the tourists you probably would have to pay me to live in Amsterdam.
So, all C/C++ code on {Linux,} but not {OpenBSD,} that handles argc/argv needs to at least just exit() on the conditions added by the like 8 lines in main() in the patch for this issue?: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/polkit/polkit/-/commit/a2bf5c...

if (argc < 1) {
exit(126);
}

if (argv[n] == NULL) {
exit(128)
}

// But this could never ever happen?
if (argv == NULL)
Yeah, those street markets where there is a "small" deviation between western and eastern numerals if prices happen to be shown.
I don't think this kind of solution works to be honest. This creates a right to pollute or generate waste more than focusing on solving the original problem.
Ashish Kumar's StackyPi Puts an RP2040 into the Raspberry Pi Zero Form Factor
I’ve noticed that in India, it’s cheaper for a foreigner to book an Uber car than hail an auto rickshaw, because the former can’t discriminate
As my Traefik setup is affected, I cleared the `acme.json` and let Traefik get new certificates for all services.

Seems LE is pretty busy right now, got time outs flying around every where.
There is usually a small infrared proximity sensor right next to the front camera. If you're deliberately covering your camera, you just need to locate the sensor and trim your tape around it.
That sort of fraud isn't fixable by photo id.

That sort of fraud isn't unique to mail-in voting.
I don't think this is an apt analogy either because it still suggests that something was lost, when that's not the case, rather the internet grew in new places that have come to dwarf the places that came before. The overwhelming majority of users on the new internet didn't exist on the old internet.
> believe this threat actor to be a well-resourced group, likely state-backed

> the malware was spread in watering-hole attacks that used both fake and hacked sites appealing to pro-democracy activists in Hong Kong

So in other words, this is the work of the Chinese government.
Back in 2010 or 2011 I was offered a job typesetting similar articles (in the field of physics of chemistry), involving e.g. converting a Word draft into a final Latex document and communicating with the article's authors. The pay was... 40 PLN or 10 USD per article before tax.
It seems that we could increase camera resolution by putting the sensor on a vibrating platform, capturing a stream of frames, and processing them into a single image. The paper mentions Google camera software doing this with hand tremor. Is there any instance of intentionally shaking a camera to increase resolution like this?

I predict that future super high-resolution camera rigs will be whirling contraptions, spinning in 3 dimensions to improve 3D resolution. And the best still camera will be a wand (linear sensor array) on an articulated head that moves like a chicken's head, capturing during movement. The sound of a camera will be whoosh instead of click.
This is a troubling story in so many ways, I don't know what the answer to the problem is but feel something needs to change within the government when people are subjected to what can only be described as a witch trial bordering on McCarthyism.

The fact the state and his own lawyer were pressing him to take a deal is also very troubling as it echoes the plight of many impoverished young men who lost their families, careers, reputations and futures by pleading down trumped up charges laid against them.

These are the stories the RWM doesn't cover as it does not fit their narrative.
I suppose 'know your audience' applies here.

Generally the higher up the food chain the less likely that people will 'get it' if it is not an extremely polished Proof-of-Concept (there are exceptions of course).

If I am going to play amateur psychology, I would say that people who are generally more perfectionist types and are likely get caught up in details are less likely to give a healthy review on work-in-progress.
Foolstackecnomics!! Dude, economics is not a jQuery plugin!!
My first comment here a few years ago was on "A Codebase is an Organism" https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20787848 I repost it because I think catabolism of old concepts and systems is an important part of keeping older codebases alive.

Catabolism is another aspect of thinking about code as an organic entity that I find useful. Anabolic (growth) processes and catabolic (teardown) processes always accompany each other in biological systems. Too often we neglect to continually tear down and remove unused aspects of our systems.
Both anabolism and catabolism are always operating, though at different rates depending on the environment and needs of the organism. The funny thing is that catabolic processes will happily tear down important parts of the system, forcing them to be anabolically rebuilt. Things like bone and muscle mass. This seems wasted, but it has an extremely important purpose: uncontrolled anabolism is cancer.

I think the analogy to code is obvious. We've all seen codebases that have gotten out of hand (gotten cancer), and part of the reason they got that way is because the growth pressures had no countervailing teardown pressure. The market provides selective pressure in nasty ways: codebases and systems with cancer slow and die, and are replaced by younger codebases without uncontrolled growth.

How do we break that cycle? By encouraging catabolic activity culturally within our companies and codebases. Cleanup is incredibly valuable. Functionality that isn't being heavily used and is complicating implementation of new work should absolutely be on the chopping block. We don't have to be quite as aggressive as biological systems, but we shouldn't take their example lightly either.

This also provides insight into when cleanup doesn't matter: when the survival horizon of the organism is sufficiently short that cancer frankly doesn't matter. Startups shouldn't worry too much until they have product market fit. Once it's clear they'll be around for years more though, catabolic work will help ensure future health.
Off topic rant on the date "1-24-22": Please just use YYYY-mm-dd, for the sake of future generations so that they don't have to check if it's 2022 or 2122.
Calculated using 320Mhz and 16x16 MU-MIMO with 4K-QAM. I think it is time we start labelling this as WiFi Capacity instead of speed. There are no devices, now and in the future that will put that many antenna into it. Your phone is still stuck with 2x2 WiFi ( While 5G iPhone is on 4x4 ).

The great thing is that hopefully it will push vendors towards 5Gbps or 10Gps Ethernet.
I've said this before here and got downvoted for it, but bioethicists as a profession are responsible for more death than pretty much anything else I can quickly think of.

People are dying from heart disease all the time, very often in predictable conditions. Literally millions every year. Statistically this means we should hear about such failed procedures many many more times than we do now - there is literally no downside from doing this much more often, and a strict upside: a chance to live longer and a definite advance in medicine leading to other lives saved. Sure, it may mean more stress for a dying patient, but quite a few would prefer their death have some meaning. But they can't chose this because it's not "ethical".

Moderna had the mRNA vaccine for Covid ready in about 3 weeks. This means the tech was already there - I'd really like to see an argument where we had three major companies create mRNA vaccines, only one failed (harmlessly!) but we shouldn't have used this technology a few years early. mRNA tech is incredibly versatile - it should have applications from curing cold to curing cancer. But no, we needed a pandemic and 10 months of testing to start using it, because it wasn't "ethical".

We knew from month 1 that the young and healthy are not hit hard by Covid. Mortality in those groups was always comparable to flu, more or less. But we didn't do challenge trials. We wasted ... I have to take a break from typing, tbh, I'm overwhelmed. We wasted almost a year while literal millions died while wondering if Covid is transmitted by touch, aerosols or airborne when we could have fixed this in two weeks with a bunch of 25 year olds. We spent half a year before even realizing masks help, and we still don't know for sure how much and what's the difference between each kind. We had Omicron - we knew it was different, we had good reason to think it's not significantly worse from the start, but we still had a _lot_ of questions. But two years from the start of the pandemic we STILL didn't put a bunch of healthy volunteers through a completely harmless study to find out things early. Because it wouldn't have been "ethical".

This isn't ethics we're talking about. It's pure and unadulterated cowardice. We as a society shy away from doing things which we _know_ would save more lives in the aggregate because we'd have to risk causing much less harm, but harm which we'd be directly responsible for. Joe from the street would be excused from making these decisions, but when you deal with the people directly charged by the society from making these decision, it's just failure to do their job. And in a supermajority of case we're dealing with volunteers anyways.

If you feel like reading more about how stupid the whole system is: https://slatestarcodex.com/2017/08/29/my-irb-nightmare/
> mysql> select 42=42,42=314,42=null,null=null;
> +-------+--------+---------+-----------+
> | 42=42 | 42=314 | 42=null | null=null |
> +-------+--------+---------+-----------+
> | 1 | 0 | NULL | NULL |
> +-------+--------+---------+-----------+

I see, thank you. This behaviour is news to me.
Came here to suggest as much :-)

While you can apparently just strip it from the metadata properly like suggested on twitter, maybe a "low level" approach like comparing the files on a binary level and setting any bytes that differ to 0 would be more robust. It would still work if they move the hash out of the meta data into the document itself. Only downside is that this requires the hash to be fixed size.
Also, they are fundraising mechanisms for the professional societies that put them on. The pandemic killing conference attendance no doubt put a lot of them in a budget crunch.
> Do they pay their editors?

Yes

> Their reviewers?

No, not as far as I’m aware.

> The authors?

No, not as far as I’m aware.

> Do they pay their typesetters?

Yes

> Do they offer their print journal for free?

No, but in most of the world it is pretty cheap.

> Do they have expensive contracts for cloud hosting?

Yes. Well, yes and no. They mostly have a lot of expensive on-premise servers. At least as of 3.5 years ago.

I think partially it’s that they can get away with it, but there’s certainly a lot of work going into this on the Nature side as well (mostly for print publishing). And these articles are never going away. They stay online forever.
I'm exactly like you (I see myself in your post) but there are two big issues with membrane keebs: 1) nkro (none of them support it) 2) can't customize switch resistance (they always feel too hard to push on, or too mushy).
Additionally, after trying QMK I'm never going back and no membrane keeb support it.
I want to try kailh chocs but I cannot afford to shell out hundreds of bucks for every new keyboard that I want to try.
Top Human Rights Watch investigator allegedly hacked with Pegasus spyware
I do feel nostalgic about old days (I got on Internet in mid 90s) but as Internet has grown and matured so have I. I've never played MUD but I've used IRC a lot :)

Internet is now so much more than it used to be. Before you had to have much more knowledge to accomplish some things. It was not hard to learn but it was not accessible to everyone.

I see it like fetching a water from the creek or turning on the tap in your kitchen. You will get water in both cases. The first one requires more effort.
I think this is simply a false goal. $30 a day is an arbitrary number and is certainly in the realm of "relative poverty" already: a person who lives on $30 a day is relatively poor - that is, in relation to the middle class in rich countries. That life might seem to be a misery, but with the economic development worldwide, today's life of middle class in rich countries will also seem like a misery in 50 years, and the threshold will rise again. So a goal to "eliminate $30 a day poverty" is little but a goal to "establish artificial, Soviet style forced redistributional equality of outcomes" which is hardly beneficial for development, social cohesion, or democracy, and can hardly be morally justified.

The goal of poverty reduction must be that the people don't starve or destroy their health due to poverty, and their children aren't poverty-trapped (but it has limits too - make higher education free for everyone and in the next generation education will simply be irrelevant as elites will find different ways to preserve their hereditary status, and this is a dangerous thing cos non-educated people will get in control of things, so it's better to keep higher education unattainable to the poor so to at least the rich kids educated).
This is a very basic tool. It may work against this particular scheme by Elsevier if it's not too sophisticated. A few years ago I was working for another content provider to mark the PDFs, my job was to make sure the watermarks are everywhere and that removing them is difficult while being practically transparent to the user. We also employed steganography etc. so that rendering the PDFs as images and combining them again into PDF would preserve the watermark. We were very clear to the user the watermarks are there and, as far as I can tell, there was no single copy protected in this way uploaded to the public Internet.
Google Says:

In the phone app, go to menu / Call settings and uncheck "Auto screen off during calls." If this box is checked, the proximity detector senses when you put the phone to your face and blanks the screen so that you don't accidentally activate buttons with your face.
Trailing slashes are terrible in right-to-left contexts. The trailing slash suddenly teleports to the beginning of the URL visually. Take this example:

<div dir="rtl">
http://example.com/example/
</div>

This displays as if it were the string:

/http://example.com/example

It's awful. Much better if everything was configured to leave off the trailing slash.
> Idk, it could just be a claim that the argument can be expressed in a logical system, combined with the normative axiom that rational agents should only trust arguments that can be validly expressed in such a formal system.

The term "valid" has both formal and informal senses. I agree some of its formal senses are non-normative, but I think its informal uses have a strong normative element. The original comment to which I was responding wasn't very clear about in what sense it was intending the term, but when people aren't clear, it is not unfair to assume they mean a term informally rather than in some specific formal sense.

> Regardless this seems to be missing the forest for the trees. Nobody has put forth any arguments for either position that are emperical in nature. Is there really a practical difference between impossible and possible but nobody knows how?

What is the proper role of empiricism in human knowledge, including moral knowledge? You seem to be making some assumptions here which you are not making explicit.

If one accepts moral sense theory – that moral intuitions are a form of empirical knowledge – then we can have direct empirical knowledge of the truth or falsehood of moral propositions.

If one accepts pragmatism – that beliefs can be justified by the pragmatic benefits of believing them, and that pragmatically justified beliefs can constitute genuine cases of knowledge – then empirical evidence can be used to establish the pragmatic benefits of a moral belief, and hence (indirectly) to establish its truth.

One may believe that some axioms are self-evidently true, and that one's knowledge of the truth of those axioms is innate rather than empirical – in which case, if one accepts that for non-moral axioms, how about accepting it for moral axioms as well?
Anyone know if its possible to use a Yubikey for sudo as well?
Steppers make good sense for that application, what a beautiful design. 7 nm step size with a repeat accuracy of 1 nm is insane precision.
You wouldn't unless you knew they're doing that. And you likely wouldn't even have the option because you'd have to pay multiple licences just to diff them with franc's example.
Sweden does however, have a very high wealth Gini coefficient.