skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
For me, note taking is about creating pointers to practical knowledge I don't use very often, but it's very hard to find in a way useful for me.

i.e. I don't want to try to remember all the peculiarities of a system I implemented or installed or encountered during my life and get stressed about it. So, I write it all down with pointers on the web, or with all the documents I can find and, store it somewhere like Evernote in the relevant notebook with correct tags. When I need to re-use that information I just open the note and look up what I need.

I also take notes while learning something which starts as a simple and single entry point to the all knowledge and resources around it, allowing me to resume or improve much faster with less effort.

OTOH, if I'm going to transfer responsibilities, I make a copy of the notes and hand it over. Rarely any questions come after that, if any.

Lastly, organized knowledge allows me to see what I know and where can I go from there. I find this property immensely useful over the years.
Actually running the container is a small part of kubernetes.
> Journalists have been serving the interests of moneyed elites since well over a hundred years. It's good that they finally have some competition, even if it means that flat earthers also get a voice.

Well, I wouldn't agree with you, as journalists (and here I mean real journalists) are often members of professional organisation and they have code of conduct. Random people on Facebook or influencers doesn't have that.

Thanks to investigative journalists, you have things like Pandora papers.

You have to ask yourself where is the line for critical thinking, for example flat earthers - where do we draw the line and when it become apsurd? What we have is that people will now believe in anything, something that we proved and live with for centuries.

What we will have, oxygen deniers? They don't recognize oxygen?
Yes, it went where it was supposed to. :)

WH40k is a little bit obscure, but the gist of it is that JWST is designed as an instrument of cosmic revelation. The knowledge it will bring us will shape the future of thought.

If you don't have any spiritual life this might seem meaningless...
Previous HN discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30082286
Every discipline needs to evolve and Crafting is how you evolve it. The fact that the software industry evolves too fast is because the domain it's applied to is very large and thus we are constantly finding out problems that need crafting.

> And yet, those people do not get paid hundreds of thousands of dollars a year, believe their work to be at the height of economic efficiency, or think themselves generally more intelligent than the average person.

Designers can be payed more than a software engineer. And we don't know what they really think but there are plenty who think that they are better than anyone and are doing the society a big favor but people simply don't understand. (You don't have to go to far away from some software industry to find the most egregious examples of those :D)
> There has to be a deliberate process of modeling and collecting structured data so it can be queried and transformed into something that facilitates specific decisions. At that point, it's no longer called note taking.

This is one of those aspirational things that should exist, like automated testing. In practice, many places are just reliant on people knowing stuff.
China conditionally approves AMD's $35 bln deal for Xilinx
> an operator can rebalance

So, you're not talking about the same thing as OP, because one of the points being made here is that Kubernetes intentionally tries to get rid of human operators for day-to-day decision making. If you have a machine making operations decisions instead of humans, then a "bash-like shell" is worse than watch/subscribe mechanisms with full type safety, plus standard conventions for reporting events and communicating status.
IBM sold computers in cheesy clone-looking cases, with turbo buttons? Do you have a source to support that? And you know for a fact they're only sold with 5.25" drives, because you say they were all upgraded? Sounds like overconfident and incorrect speculation, unless you can provide a link to these IBM models.

Also, supporting more than one modem at a time is literally the definition of multitasking. You can't do it without multitasking. Are you talking about not needing a multitasking OS, because the software does its own multitasking?
Makes me wonder if Spotify could have created a DMZ between their music and podcasting revenue streams to protect them from one another. Podify for podcasts and Spotify for music. Just a thought....
You can see the Snoopy phone mentioned in the article.
I like the idea of note taking, but my brain really doesn’t sit still enough to ever put the current contents down on the page.

That’s a problem I’ll have to solve before I ever get around to trying any new note taking software.
Yellow pages were ubiquitous, unlikely they were unknown to those at Sun.
Timeline looks really great!

I'm a fan of this approach to users owning their data: it enables things that are interesting and valuable for the user, rather than making it something that necessarily requires an audience.

I hadn't previously considered incorporating notes into a personal archive as I often see them as being of a fundamentally different class to journaling, but I'm starting to reconsider my biases in that regard.
Apparently? You're just guessing, or do you have evidence of this?
Plan 9 was made for this.
There's two types of notes for me. One is stored procedures for things that are tedious but I know I will need to do again, a lot of programming snippets might fall into this one but procedures of any kind.

Second is writing my current thought processes as I'm working on stuff, once a task is complete these are rarely if ever references again but they're very handy for if you're working on something, get interrupted and need to get back on task.

I use Roam Research for both.

I think for people who heavily link and organise notes by subject, they're more about getting back within a specific context area and getting the brain firing on that context area than necessarily finding specific answers.
The killer feature over Docker for Mac would be memory ballooning. With this, there would be no need to specify a specific amount of memory, and the Linux VM would live happily alongside Mac OS. I know this is a limitation of Virtualisation/Hypervisor Framework apparently, but still.

It works wonder on WSL2, for instance.

Assigning all CPUs shouldn't do anything impactful really.
> currently accepts antivax

What is antivax? Some things which EU governments accept as law is deemed antivax in Canada (recognizing immunity from past infections)... M-W dictionary recently updated antivax to include those opposed to vaccine mandates. But now entire governments are dropping vaccine passports and not implementing mandates at all...

So what exactly does antivax mean and why should Substack not allow debate on the matter?
The norm? GM sold, in total, 26 EV in the US last quarter... Toyota still does not commercialize any EV.
Not defending YouTube, but I think that the letter said that some advertisers won't accept "sexual" content and thus her income would go down? The big question here, as I see it, is whether it's fair to call that "sexual" content.
Apple will let small businesses accept payments directly on iPhone
As I see it, you "cannot do it right". Here is what I mean by this:

Some people in the comments here have noted, that wearing anything that is more revealing than people are used to, might be seen as "fighting for the right to display yourself in whatever way you want" for women in general and see it as a positive thing. Whether that is interpreting too much into the action, I cannot say. On the other hand there are other people, who interpret it as means to attract more viewers, and does not add to the technical content.

So there are at least 2 contrary interpretations. Perhaps it could be named "polarizing". I would not say that this is "your fault" in any way. It is simply the state of our society currently and how we are being socialized. It can be improved. The human body is in itself nothing criminal. It is our interpretations of expression, that gives meaning. There will always be critics, who see it one way or another.

I did not know your channel before. I congratulate you for making some GPL happen. Good job on that! One thing I personally would value is, if you put emphasis on free (libre) software, when doing GPL and not name it merely open source. I think your content is interesting. I also like to see how it looks in Shenzhen, besides the technical aspects of the channel.
Yeah, even AMD with their 5800X3D can't keep up.
Fear of death and fear of the flow of time. We want to capture every feeling, every emotion, every thought that we have. Even in written from it feels like gaining immortality.
Radix UI Colors
> members of professional organisation and they have code of conduct

Laws exist, so there are no crimes?

> Thanks to investigative journalists, you have things like Pandora papers.

Yes, but that’s their point - not everyone is exposing things, because the elites control the media. Do remember that the Panama Papers whistleblower got mysteriously car-bombed.

Here’s a viral modern-day example: https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/4/2/17189302/si...
"The mainstream media push against podcasting is really a fight to hold for their power."

So Neil Young represents mainstream media?

As far as I can tell, this was a personal initiative from Neil Young, so your points against the arrogance of mainstream media people might be legit, but with no connection to this case.
Have found DMs on Twitter to be high ROI. Recruiters in the UK can be hit or miss as it's such a low barrier of entry job. Some out there that really are worth their weight in gold and others out there that give them all a bad name.
Yeah, I like my AirPods Pro precisely because I don't need to disconnect them from the previous device to connect to them from the next device. Bose NC 700s and Sony XM4s both have the problem where I need to disconnect from them on an old device before I can connect to them on a new device.
Honest question: is blatant disinformation freedom of expression?
> Also you don't have to use NAT even with IPv4, it's just that most CNIs implement Kubernetes networking with non-addressable pod addresses. It's perfectly possible to make service and pod addresses routable from outside the cluster.

This is the default on Google Cloud now. Also an option on Azure.

At first I found it to be a strange decision, but then I realized the beauty of it, having pod as first class citizens of the cloud.
> This is part of why if you're overclocking your computer, you end up experiencing errors or unexpected crashes even when temperature doesn't go too high. Past reasonable tolerances, you can't just cool it more and expect it to work.

People push CPUs to absurd limits with LN2 cooling so they’d just not true.
I expressed myself poorly because my wording gives room to implied causality.The historical figures did not make revolutionary insights or reshaped human history >because< they were going against the scientific consensus (let's say accepted narrative,thought,etc).Their own brilliance,insights [often gained through isolation by not adhering to a consensus] are the reason they were right, not because of their arrogance.That arrogance comes as a second nature due to the assumed knowledge one has about the domain to make contradictory statements against the consensus.

And quantifying my statement is hard if you assume causality and you don't make distinction between levels of "radical thinking".Because i can give you 5-10 well-known historical figures who fit my description and make me look right, and you can say "here are 10000 conspiracy nuts from YT who make you look wrong".What I meant by 'are the ones who, on average, turned out to be right[...]' is that the more radical/higher level your thinking is, the better chances you are to be right if you made your case for them(again, I mentioned that those people do not change their stance with time,social status,environment).

Accepting scientific consensus >because< it is the consensus and upholding it as an orthodoxy is precisely why there's stagnation in many if not all the fields.And yes, the more radical,incorporating,exploratory you are in your thinking, the higher chances you probably have in being "right", assuming you are actually creating a superset of a scientific domain(i.e innovating) and not merely "go against the wave".To take my point home: 5000 flat earthers from YouTube who are undeniable wrong make my average "wrong" because they are going against the current scientific consensus.Is their thinking radical or incorporates existing knowledge into something more profound?Do they change the thinking about world, is it shockingly different?No, they're just saying the negation of a proposition, mostly based on 'loads of bullshit' without substance or regard to the consensus.We used to think the earth was flat.This is different from, say, "Here is a conjecture which lies at the limits of current knowledge about X[say gravity, or anything].You're all wrong at thinking about X/Y/Z in terms of A, my insight (often new) is better and vastly different."

The main issue here is that from a known understanding, a newer,different idea might seem wrong.It's the duty of the "contrarian" to prove his case.If one stays true to his motives and is not a hack it will serve them well.
I was meta-commenting about other comments in this thread that imply the future of desktop is all containers and that this would be a good thing.
My ideal desk is 4x8 feet, deep enough that test equipment can sit to the back, and you'll still have lots of room for the stuff you're working on in front, with lots of light overhead so that you can see all the small details. Ideal height is somewhere around 36" or so. There should be an overabundance of electrical outlets.
> Are we too stupid to have courts?

I have a slightly different opinion from /u/
cf141q5325's. I think the problem isn't stupidity, it's hunger for power.

When you grant someone the authority to decide what other people should do, you can optimize for intelligence all you like, but the ones who will actually _struggle_ to get that position are the ones who want to be able to tell other people what to do.

Separation of powers is a partial remedy to this. You can either make the rules, or enforce the rules, but not both. (Democracy is another remedy, also partial.) We _can_ have courts because becoming a judge isn't quite as attractive as becoming a dictator.

A gigantic issue with the current 'fight against misinformation' is that it features no separation at all. When it comes from the government, it's typically designed, evaluated, and enforced by the executive branch alone. And when it comes from private entities, it's completely arbitrary and tyrannical according to whatever mood the CEO wakes up in that morning.
> Why do you feel the need to "structure thoughts" and "get it out of your system"?

I give you a simple example. If you play Wordle and you stop to think about your next guess, you can make all the possible permutations in your brain. This is possible with the downside that you might start to think in loops and consider the same word-pattern over and over again.

Or you write them down and solve the next guess by doing all permutations on paper (or a text editor).

Note-taking is somewhat similar. Structuring thoughts for me means that I write them down to avoid looping around the same thing all the time. I get it out of my system, because my brain isn't stuck in the same loop. Note-taking helps to speed up the passive brain processing task in some cases. Not always. Not for everything.
Reading this whole thread again, I want to add the following: this whole matter of whether web browsers have become too complex or not is just a tangent. The main debate revolves around the question of whether the web is broken, whatever this means, and this question is not a technical one, but a matter of taste and political attitude. Which is to be expected, because the internet is a social thing. So let's agree to disagree, maybe, but let's stop arguing about tangents the way little internet trolls do.
GPT-3 Fine-Tuning
That event brought down "Make Magazine" a dozen notches permanently in my mind in an instant.

I respect her a ton for doing what she's doing, and if I remember correctly, she had to install a very elaborate and advanced security system at her home to feel safe.

Sad.
Everyone takes notes differently and retains information differently. So every developer thinks there's no app that covers exactly their use case and the others do it wrong. So they build their own app.

It is similar to people chasing endless productivity by reading about it while actually not getting anything done. It feels productive, but you are just busy.
>What's this about?

We're overloaded with BS information, BS demands, and BS business "requirements" non-stop, plus BS aspirations and BS role models (from Ferris to "wake up at 4am founders").

This is an (appropriately BS itself) attempt to cop.
does that actually work though?
Frog regrows amputated leg after drug treatment
She said many of them are friends. The strongest plausible interpretation is she asked them.
I think the crux of the issue is not that Spotify carries Rogan's podcast like they do 1000s others. It's that Spotify is paying mountains of $ to Rogan for exclusivity.

Spotify is not a passive party in this, they are actively promoting and contributing money to the generation and promotion of extremely dubious content on their platform.

I wouldn't mind so much if they were just carrying that particular podcast amongst a sea of others, I do question Spotify's ethics as a company that's made a conscious choice to finance misinformation.

Probably nothing more than a difference of opinion, but I'm not keen on supporting a company that cannot be considered neutral any more.
This seems like a failure of imagination. Or maybe an expectation of seriousness which can only be associated with certain kinds of people who dress and speak a certain way.

The reality is that anyone can be really smart and make “serious” contributions and they deserve to be taken seriously regardless of how they choose to dress or present themselves. We have chosen a certain definition of normality and we can choose to expand that to be more inclusive.

From what I’ve read about Naomi, she is interested in both the engineering and the social justice aspects of her work. She deserves to be taken seriously and not dismissed simply because of the way she looks.
Writing is faster than remembering. Reading is faster than recalling.
The same way you cope with anything, really: You consciously develop a personality that handles whatever you face in life. Some people call this process "growing up". I think it's more spiritual than that.
Its endemic.
> Recruiters tend to be a poor and expensive solution

Literally 90% job of a recruiter is browsing through LinkedIn and spamming potential candidates.

Easy to do that job yourself, if you invest the time. Also, you'll be able to do the job much better, and will come across as much more genuine to candidates.
> I think I saw an opensource tool like that before, but lost track of it.

TreeSheets?
As usual with stories like this, everyone taking part comes across badly. Fox, the interviewer and the Reddit mod.

The anti-work movement is goodin the sense that it is waking people up to spending all their lives working for terrible bosses and companies. Should peoples lives be hard just so we can make other rich people richer? So they can live in giant houses, by the sea? So they can own multiple vehicles and fly first class everywhere? So they can play golf at fancy clubs when they want?

Why should a worker for a massive e-commerce company not be able to use the toilet? Just so the CEO can go to space as a hobby? FFS.
"The only difference between screwing around and science is writing it down" - if you write down personal experience or observation in the context of time and place and are able to recall it instantly in the right time in the future, it might save your time, health, life, money.
My question is similar but slightly different: is it possible to throw a "lot" of much "worse" hardware at the problem and solve it through a different kind of brute force than just building ever-bigger mirrors (which will only ever get to low double digit metre diameters at least in the foreseeable future without orbital assembly capabilities).

Say for JWST, there are 18 segments. Could you have 1800 mini Webbs and offset the inaccuracies that come from that with the vastly higher total area? Does that eventually reach an asymptote where a adding more units isn't useful? Does it reach a point where the data re-integration becomes the intractable issue? Can it ever be as good as a gigantic monolith even with an arbitrary number of units? Would the cheapness of individual units be outweighed by the number of them needed?
> will claim I'm being biased, even though I view the whole debate as a bit of red herring that distracts from the real issues

This implies you don't think "content moderation" is a "real" problem, which suggests to me you are biased. Also, "moderation" to me suggests mere moderation (consistent with fair, stated guideline) versus moderation "if you say things they don't like".

This kind of fight happens all over the place (e.g. what counts as hate/rape/murder etc), but I feel "moderation" is fairly neutral sounding without the implication of injustice befitting the act of being deprived of a a voice on omnipresent and monopolising platforms. It's also clear to me that some publications use comments sections as a way to manipulate public opinion, so cherry-picking/censoring them is an exercise in PR if (and only if) it isn't clear that result are being manipulated.
Headline literally says

IRS provides tax inflation adjustments

And links to https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/rp-20-45.pdf

"This revenue procedure sets forth inflation-adjusted items for 2021 for various
provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (Code)"

It's states adjusting for inflation for the tax year beginning March 2021. The document came out in October 2020 when inflation was 1.2%, I'm not sure when they adjust it and you may disagree with the measure of inflation

The year before was November 2019

https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/rp-19-44.pdf

Here's the one for 2021/2 (Nov 29th 2021)

https://www.irs.gov/irb/2021-48_IRB

Married Individuals Filing Joint Returns, lowest and highest bands:

Thresholds for tax year 2021/2 goes from 19750 to 19900 (0.7%) at one end, and from 622050 to 628300 at the other (1%)

Thresholds for tax year 2022/3 goes from 19900 to 20550 (3.27%) at one end, and from 628300 to 647850 at the other (3.11%)
> what would you estimate as your rate of reference to prior notes?

For arbitrary links and bookmarks, probably quite low, so I rarely bother with that sort of noting (never managed to make pinboard an essential part of my life).

If I am specifically researching something deeply, like a personal project, I am much more likely to go back to a link I've noted, because I've usually gone to the trouble to describe that link in a searchable way.

For work-related notes, close to always. I _start_ by reopening the note relevant to the job (Apple Notes search is so fast this is easy), and I modify/append to it as I go along; those notes are "workbooks" effectively and they are essential to my process now.
Fck note taking, live the moment and stop care about irrelevant BS.