skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
While accurate, it isn't a full answer. Substack does provide profits for venture capitalists, but it does so by fulfilling a particular market demand - demand for a censorhsip-free (or censorship-lite) platform. It is a somewhat niche demand, obviously - but it is the only aspect that differentiates them from facebooks of the world.
But if you ban profit-seeking speech that is also a kind of censorship, and a rather open-ended one. Plus you’ve now banned speech on the wrong kind of platform. I mean, if you think that’s a solution fine, but then don’t claim to be against censorship.
Coincidentally that very strategy (a small menu of great meals that are efficient) is the strategy Gordon Ramsay often recommends to turn around struggling restaurants that have good kitchens and bad businessmen.
It must be useful to know how much credibility doctors and scientists deserve so that you can criticize them when they overstep.
It doesn’t hide anything. If the price is too high then something is wrong. In your case it’s restraint on supply and in labor the problem is people who don’t know the value of what they have and never put any consideration into making themselves difficult to push around. They jump into precarious financial circumstances, but expensive things and pump out babies and when it comes time to negotiate they have zero leverage. The behavior of the average American is retarded and spoiled. That’s why people from Asia come here and shoot straight to the top — because their parents actually make deliberate decisions to advance their socioeconomic position.
at least the alder lake option (+RTX) do offer some option to be used as a slow cooking pad
I really don’t understand why people think it is censorship which is the problem — writer’s of famous utopias didn’t see into the future, they talk about their present, extrapolating from it. I really don’t think the Orwellian world-view would have much to do with our present - the problem is not censorship, but misinformation, based on lack of knowledge, and indeed, trust.

Even though the internet is more centralized than we would like to, it is practically impossible to censor it even today. There is no way to e.g. remove every antivaxx, anti-intellectual bullshit article, “”study””, whatever no matter what, the most any big platform can do is deplatform/tweak their algorithms to prefer different content (which they gladly do for anti-science, unfortunately, because people shouting stupidly at each other drives up their views, quite a disgusting metric). So all in all, if you want to make something disappear from the internet, you just have to spam it with misinformation.
Counterpoint:

Corporations as a legal fiction have no expectation of privacy and as such all business records are free game.

Like it or not; if you're playing these word games out of necessity, it's time for a reckoning.
Discover and optimize your Google ads performance issues by running a free audit
>We know some things are wrong, we have evidence that they're wrong, and believing in some of those things can cause people to take actions which endanger and even kill others.

That concerns you as well. Thats the whole issue. There is no "reasonable default" to fall back on. That you have identified some rather obnoxious idiots doesnt mean you are suddenly smart enough to tell the rest of the world what to do. Especially since chances are you have fallen for sock puppets aimed at creating a reaction in you to get you to accept and call for authoritarian solutions.

Authoritarian solutions dont work. Just wanting them to work doesnt work, a short look into history shows that. Reality in the end is really complex. Too complex to just force other people around no matter how smart somebody feels on the topic. Because thats how stupid people always think of themselves, "smart enough" to understand the implications of forced actions just this one time.

edit: All of this not to mention that it always create a reaction in people. Which leaves us with conflict on topics we should be able to find a consensus.
Ignoring the fact that basing ones opinion on an entire industry based on two "fiascos" seems drastic at best, who can we trust if we suddenly can't trust organizations like Apache? Do you trust the Linux Foundation?

It's almost like the issue is not that code is available, but how people use the code that's available, and no one seemingly likes funding open source code.
Recently, I spent around 3 hours building a regex to check if a string is a valid date... Usually this shouldn't take more than 30 minutes, but the environment in which it was to run used some form of incomplete postgres with basically no documentation, so it was a long trial-and-error process of figuring out what to do. Now, equipped with this knowledge, it would potentially be great for me to be able to document my process, so that others won't have the same problem, but a) I already wasted way too much time on this and b) there is no good place to document it. The best thing I could think of would be a medium blog post, which is a band-aid.

All that said, I feel like documentation is getting better in newer technologies.
I think the problem is that everyone wants to make a name in the industry to get some of the fame.
Fiduiciary responsibility does not mean operating like you are bankrupt tomorrow.
I think 5 years is too short. It assumes the creation[tm] will work out of the box and get immediate momentum. Whereas for music and literature it may well take a decade before the thing bubbles up to someone's consciousness.

I'd say 20-25 years from first publication would be a good time window. If your creation has not become worth anything in that time, it wasn't timely or of real interest. On the other hand, if a creation[tm] does become part of cultural background, 25 years is more than enough to reap the benefits. And at the end of the term, if something is part of the cultural scenery, it needs to be in public domain no matter what.

What a window like that would ensure is that creators can earn royalties over time, but it would prevent the inter-generational rent seeking dynasties. Copyright is supposed to encourage creation, by handing over a strictly temporary monopoly, but also guaranteeing that the monopoly remains short enough to enable culture to evolve.
Some people (like me) apparently block too much JS for it to become interactive. I just read long paragraphs of text, as it should be. There were huge gaps between the text and I tried enabling cloudflare to see if there were images there but I wasn't that interested to make the gaps appear.
...or fools everyone into thinking he invented his life story, when it was actually true.
I feel like "literally any URL supplied by anyone capable of visiting your website" and "some random guy from the Internet, with no connection to you or your company whatsoever, who was recently arrested for trying to burn his own house down" are both fairly obvious examples of sources from which you should not download and run random code without checking it first.

But maybe that's the part that this industry is incapable of learning.
Software engineering isn't equivalent to carpentry, it is equivalent to CAD. So you can ask if designing new tables in Solidworks is a waste of time. And to this, I'd say the answer is not so clear-cut.
Actually "western civilization" if you just count it as having begun in ancient Rome (if not earlier) didn't really have such a problem with nudity intrinsically.
Rendering a Paper Figure with Blender
Restaurants can have the ID check done by the waiter when taking the order. There is very little overhead, certainly no need to employ an extra person to check papers at the door. I doubt any law enforcement is running random stings. They would probably wait for members of the public to report this first.

I don't think checking IDs is gross, and obviously if you do, there is nothing I could say to change your mind. But it doesn't change the fact that Covid passports are easily implementable with paper, there is no need for the to be "holographic picture ID".
Interactive? Perhaps it' just me, but I can tell you that to me the page was a series of sections with a lot of empty space between them and it was rather hard to read. There were some extracts on some neat ribbon-looking things as if they were lifted from newspapers, but 90% of the article was just... white.

In a way, if it is supposed to be interactive, this is a great success from my point of view. Despite being interactive, it's not an article as an application type deal where no content will load without 10 XHRs and 15 JS scripts. It's a fully working article, whether you look at it on a macbook screen or telex paper.

EDIT: Just went and printed it out.

elinks -dump <url> | lpr.

12 sheets A4 with a reference list for visible links and all. Looks good and reads better.
You may not be completely wrong, but this is her answer:

> YouTube's criteria are patriarchal, and male gaze focused- if men like it, it's bad and women need to change

I think she's right. The kind of puritanism enforced by Youtube (or Facebook) is based on, and obsessed by, male gaze, and therefore patriarchal and retrograde.

I would agree that there's a limit, and that limit is porn (yet Twitter doesn't censor porn, with no ill consequence to their business). What she's doing isn't porn.
>Merit and authority and trust are build up slowly and are hard won. When everyone can be defamed, when lie and insult comes at no cost, and if everyone can spread competing versions of reality for free you are in an environment in which trust is impossible. Not because there isn't enough criticism, but because there's too much.

This has been the war cry of despots, kings, and dictators since before recorded history. There are very few examples of it working out well for anyone. "I am preventing you from criticising me for your own good." Isn't quite as noble or virtuous as you think it is.
In the context of my post, the meaning of "government" is basically Hobbes' Leviathan, or a more modern version of it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leviathan_(Hobbes_book)#Part_I...
Bird Flu Is Back in the US. No One Knows What Comes Next
Please no. This “operator” turns everything into an unreadable mess. Where can one vote against it?
It doesn't seem to work on mobile (maybe a limitation of snarkjs)—I've been testing only on macOS Chrome.
Tying market participation to conditions within said market is just doing business, almost prototypical even.

I haven't seen NY saying the spotify CEO won't see their kid again unless Rogan disappears from the platform - that would be blackmail.
The host was clearly contemptuous.
Hey, send me an email to linh at anvere.net. Or twitter dm @linh_at_anvere
edit: anvere is a Search as a Service that I am currently building
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41592-021-01317-x
The "savers" don't stop saving just because the money supply stays the same. They will actually save more until there is mass unemployment and they are structurally unable to save because of the aforementioned unemployment.

We got at least two world wars out of "deflationary spirals" and every single gold standard that was attempted failed during deflation.

Also, liquidity preference is a systemic redistribution from the bottom 90% to the top 10%.

The people that benefit from inflation are the savers and bankers in the top 10% because they can live off the interest or capital yields which must be higher than interest.

Bankers and savers benefit because governments, people and companies pay debts first before they pay anyone else. If the cantillon effect exists it exists in the boring form of those who own the most get paid the most. The proximity argument is nonsense because there are banks in every city. You can "print" money yourself by getting a mortgage to buy a house and many people do.
The Linux hacker's guide to giant Internet monopoly dominance (2019)
No calculator needed assuming you can remember multiple intermediate variables or have the conversions memorized.

It's a great "power user" system for skilled professionals in the pre computer age who practiced with it regularly, and it works well in things like woodworking where you still have a lot of things done on paper or just in someone's head.

It's not the best for CAD first workflows, when you're trying to model everything down to where to clamp the edge guide blocks for the saw, and changing something without changing the model and confirming it will all fit isn't a thing.

In 3D printing you get down to 0.4mm or occasionally even 0.2mm gaps between things, although none of it is really an exact science, and you assume some sanding may be needed to make things fit unless you have an amazing tuned printer.

But I suppose woodworking is less of an issue, because you're probably not going to get even 1/16th precision by hand unless you're really skilled, in which case you probably have fractions memorized.
OK, yes there's often correlation but that's it. A longer pipeline doesn't affect max circuit frequency.

The other sibling comment regarding distance isn't true. regardless of how insane your feedbacks are. Physical placement tools have always handled this in my experience (as a chip designer for 10+ years).
"My channel got demonetised but my videos shows ads."

https://support.google.com/youtube/thread/105920334/my-chann...
Cool article! And, as the eternal nitpicker, I only found one inaccuracy:

> Back then, everyone had a landline, but people in the public eye kept their phone numbers out of the Yellow Pages.

The Yellow Pages were for company/business numbers, the phonebook (or part of the phonebook) with the personal phone numbers was plain white. Makes me feel old (and wonder how young the author is). Or is "keeping your number out of the Yellow Pages" a commonly-used expression I'm not familiar with?
> I don't answer yes. I think a lot of charity work has pretty dismal results in improving society at a large scale to be honest, but that's another story. In any case it's quite possible to do both. Most political offices come with a salary.

I find it unlikely that attempting to optimize somewhat for both effective charitable contributions and climbing the political ladder is likely to result in better outcomes than focusing your full attention on either goal individually. (Also r.e. charity work frequently having dismal results, that is why I specified "givewell's top picks" not "The Foundation for Curing Rare Cancers in Cute Puppies").

I do think that there probably are cases where your best bet for causing the change you want to see is going into politics, but I don't think that politics are high enough value that just being a generically ethical person trying to climb the ladder will have a sufficient positive impact to make it a better course of action than the alternatives.

Maybe I'm overestimating the difficulty of climbing that ladder though, or underestimating the potential for change.
In Iran a French tourist was sentenced to 8 years prison for taking drone photos
...Unless you are aware fundamentally that the nature of litigation is not set ahead of time, and highly dependent on the receptiveness of a judge/jury at the time of litigation.

The Judiciary is completely free to "interpret statute however it wants in the presence of a reasonable and convincing explanation of why previous case law doesn't fit the bill". This is why even a lawyer's take should be taken with a grain of salt.
> Not all work is created equal.

> And in any case, it's very likely you could just shove more voltage through the chip and get it to clock higher,

Yes.

> since the current 3.2GHz is very far from what we know TSMC N7/5 can do.

N7/N5 can "do" 200GHz. 90nm could do 100GHz. The limit a device can do depends most highly on the logic.

> I don't think you'd need a rework unless Apple wanted to target 4.5+GHz.

3.2->4.4? I doubt it with any reasonable voltage that could actually ship in a device. Very hard to predict these things unless you've at least got basic shmoo plots and things like that in front of you.
In my youth there was no internet and no one was complaining that they couldn't use it.

Now propaganda and conspiracy theories spread like wildfire. There's no need to censor anything because few can tell fact from fiction anyhow.
I totally support being able to express yourself.

All power to Wu, but I could not care less about this channel. It feels very misplaced and fake. Feels like going half naked to a childrens party.
Gov.uk Platform as a Service
A sturdy laptop with replaceable batteries running emacs. I can see that lasting for 50 years.
Zim is SO close to perfect. It just needs better Android support.
Potatoes are healthy, so I’m guessing just January is not enough for you to see the mess in your body from eating only potatoes. Moreover each person is different, it doesn’t make sense for you to be skeptical from nutrition based on an anecdotal case (you!)

But I mean, there are so many delicious things in this world, why would you do this to yourself? Please diversify, it can be good for you and super enjoyable!
Why would I want some app I just downloaded to have access to my files?
When in doubt, check the spec.

In this case it is in RFC 2396 "Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI): Generic Syntax" [1].

In Section 3 you find this. The forward stroke ("slash") is a separator:

URI that are hierarchical in nature use the slash "/" character for separating hierarchical components.

[1] http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt
I completely disagree with you, but that was a very well put argument.

I agree that the censorship/trust connection is misplaced. America has been high trust, now it’s low trust, it’s always had the second amendment. So you can’t explain a change by a constant.

I think the best argument for freedom of speech is the one put forward by Mill: there is no other way to find out the truth but by letting all arguments be heard.
The grocery store probably has less incentive to abuse the relationship since the shelf space both products take up in the store is limited and valuable.
I just read the first half, and gave up. No offence, I agree that we should rebuild more than we add. But this just smells of naivety:

> Library that does something horrible that all your software depends on? Turn off the horrible behavior and remove your dependency on it!

Oh great o removed all my dependencies of a horrible library and now my project has 0 lines of code because "all your software depends on".

Now I'm on a multi sprint crusade to, instead or removing, I'm replacing it. And since I had so much energy from this suggestion, I keep making mistake after mistake because I'm blindly removing stuff that I don't understand, costing my team valuable development time.

Maybe a better way to say this is "analyse you dependencies, see what you can improve, draft a plan on the high level changes that need to be done, prioritise the changes according to all the other stuff you need to do".

Seems like the OP just wrote this right after/while being extremely annoyed. No an awful issue, but it clearly shows a bit of lack of planning.
As a gay man, I most certainly do not!

Please stop making such pseudo-intellectual sweeping statements.
Behavior over Time Graphing Tool
> As long as we treat animals well while they're alive (and why wouldn't you, you want high quality low stress organs) then there's really no limit here, morally.

We have a really, really, horrible history of treating animals. It's obvious we wouldn't treat them well.
> For example, "is the OSS project active and/or stable," "when was the last time this OSS project was updated," and "who is contributing to this OSS." Risk mitigations might include consideration of commercial or in-house support for the OSS component, or availability of feasible alternatives (MOSA) if the component should need replacement in the future

Does MOSA includes donations to the mainteners?
USA. that's why.
That is called less features, not less quality.
I'm anti-work in the sense, that there are too many bullshit jobs, income discrepancy is way too high and across the board, jobs require a large amount of in my opinion unreasonable things of their workers, like believing in the vision on the surface, showing up everyday at specific hours etc. Nonetheless, I like working, even in the range of 50+ hours a week, I just also think that our society would be much better if I and others weren't forced to do so to survive. The thing is that lazy people are exactly on of the biggest inhibitors of reforms in that direction.
Well, when you play on YouTube, aside from Google's own interests, you need to play by US puritan rules and foreign policy interests. This channel was rubbing against both (sexuality + China).
Textbook: Introduction to Classical and Quantum Computing
Here's what I don't understand about this argument: Why do slander and libel laws exist?

There's already limitations on free speech in place.

The article's broader point is that trust is low in a lot of institutions (for good reasons and bad) and thus the focus shouldn't be on censorship but on improving that trust. I agree with this approach.

However I think it is also important to recognize that propaganda has only become a more effective tool with the advent of social media. I don't think outright censorship is the correct path but I also don't believe slapping a "misleading" or similar tag on things actually qualifies as censorship.
>She pretends to be some women's rights activist when she's really just a purveyor of some weird type of titillation.

Thankfully men know better than her what she is (as opposed as what she claims to be), and can put her in her place

After all this demonization happens to everybody who claims to be X when they're something else (e.g. a champion of rights vs an opportunist careerist, or a tech reviewer vs a sponsor shill).

/s
+1 for a maker oriented Peertube instance.
PayPal scaled Kubernetes to Over 4k Nodes and 200k Pods
Hint: CO2 is already dissolving in the ocean.

Hint: CO2 does not turn into methane. Methane clathrates on the sea bottom got there by seeping out from bottom mud, and froze there. Sometimes the methane was excreted by microbes in sea-bottom mud; other times it comes from the rocks. Often, methane and other seeped hydrocarbons are oxidized to CO2 by microbes.
It’s the advertisers who should be getting it in the neck for being anti-boob* prudes, right? YouTube are just parroting Nabisco’s requirements that Oreos only appear alongside bosoms in or below the Nth percentile deemed acceptable by focus groups of parents in the 28 to 40 core biscuit buying demographic.

*I know it when I see it.
It's unclear from this website or the landing page of Rancher Desktop, can I use this to just run containers without involving the bloated mess which is Kubernetes? I just want to have something to run the container runtime cross-platform locally, without involving Kubernetes as I already run a different service for container management on my servers.
Inkscape Now Available for Haiku
Yeah, the M1 is fast and does not get loud when doing heavy tasks BUT the whole system needs polishing by Apple. Last night i brew installed haskell-stack (HEAD) which would compile the whole thing. It takes quite some time and while doing so I was watching a show with Quicktime. The sound would skip every now and then like it was in the early 90ies with Linux and Sound. That was quite irritating and annoying. (14'' M1 Pro)
This is the classic “what you really hate is capitalism”

Why wanting so much efficiency? Redirect that productive developer energy, find food you really love or find challenging on learning how to cook it, and enjoy the slow cooking and eating of it, it’s one of the great pleasures of life
That is why i keep mentioning Ada in the hope to balance the "Memory Safe language" selection bias.

I only mention it a few times whenever the topic of memory safe language and Rust came up. And I have already been asked to stop.