skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
What do you mean by "better free market?" Are you using terms like "efficient" and "free market" in their technical sense or are you just saying that you don't like regulations?

Definitionally regulations are a divergence from an ideal free market. Provably, under some conditions (which don't exist in the real world) a market will converge to some definition of efficiency. Practically, no politician cares about this.

Politicians aren't trying to make the market more efficient with regulations -- good politicians are trying to protect their constituents, bad ones are mostly trying to protect their donors.
Is there a kit that adds all the stuff needed to make an rPi into a battery powered hand-held device?
Can it be used to run Docker Compose workloads? As I understand, the tool is launched because at the end of January the Docker Desktop grace period elapses and it becomes paid for large business.
Well, I heard Mr. Young sing about her.

Well, I heard old Neil put her down.

Well, I hope Neil Young will remember.

A southern man don't need him around anyhow.

Edit: Downvoted for singing a classic, smh
What does Trump have to do with this?
What Hobbes appears to want is Free Speech, but only for the greatest denominator. That is not Free Speech. Free Speech is the open forum, where we trust in our fellow men and women to observe the voices of others, make up their minds, come to their own conclusions in good faith, and contribute where they can. If certain voices are louder than others, that is something we have to live with. It is not Free Speech to shut them up.
One night I tuned into the most beautiful-sounding AM signal I ever heard in a two-ham QSO (on 80 or 40?). One of the guys was a gear-fanatic using pro gear and a top-grade mike. I'd never heard such AM voice quality. The other guy had a much newer, commercial ham rig, and the difference was so obvious.
It's because this environment manipulation occurs after ld.so sanitized the environment, and there are opportunities to then trigger behavior based on the environment before pkexec re-sanitizes it. The GCONV_PATH variable in particular makes it load shared code when attempting to log an error.
Those two things are not opposed. It’s not cancel culture because the cancellers paid taxes? It’s a non sequitur
He famously does not call out anything lmao. All he does is ask them to talk more.
> Previous struggles for rights, for example by women, blacks, and gays, as well as pushing back against "the man" - conformity with the establishment, were important causes

Ironically your attitude itself is not new. During the Civil Rights era it was a common meme among the "center" that emancipation was a worthy and noble cause but that ending segregation and Jim Crow was a bridge too far. Hindsight is 20/20...
Even companies who are innocent, and don't have any damning evidence because they did nothing wrong, need policies like this. You can be innocent and someone can still sue you, find the suspicious-sounding messages, and use them against you. Proving your innocence may cost money and reputation, not to mention that since the justice system is imperfect, there's always a chance that you can still lose the lawsuit.

This is just the corporate equivalent of "if you're not guilty, you have nothing to hide". You damn well do have something to hide even if you're not guilty, and that's why companies train their employees this way.
We’ve been doing it that way for over a century, why stop now?

Sources: Zinn; Loewen
What are you going to do with your Bitcoin if it’s illegal?

Alcohol you can drink
This has interesting parallels to religion, or at least the arguments that evangelicals like to use in the main stream these days.
I don't understand. What problem does it solve? Why fracture pervasive, compatible ecosystems with emperor's new clothes? It throws away decades of infrastructure interop and support. If you want to "take privacy seriously", there's onion hidden sites and tor browsers.

It appears to mix together too many concerns, but best of luck.
This isn't specifically about Rufo. It is about the people who have embraced him and how those are often the same people who yell "cancel culture" when a comedian's Netflix special is criticized.
I agree with you. There are enough people in the world who play games to make others suffer that I'm not going to spend much energy resenting people who play games to make others feel good.

I do think the author's final point about psychological safety is a good one.
I got your point, but what is the hill we should die on? I'd say censorship is the one.
What 'free speech advocates' are you talking to??? Both are and should be alarming.
>Given the rapid and profound spread of Omicron against all efforts, I also question the effectiveness of masks and other containment measures being used. Should I be blocked for typing these words on HN?

Which words? Just what you posted? No. Now, if you want to make up lies and misinformation, sure. Masks are effective. Youtube has a policy on lying on that subject. If you don't like that, don't use Youtube.

>Is this really the world we want, in which everything held up by one side is sacred and anything said by the other is heresy?

You can still find plenty of whatever right wing misinformation you want on Facebook/Instagram/Nextdoor/Youtube. Do you really think your statement is the realm of reality at all?
I would like to think this is because Spotify grew a spine and is defending free speech. But I doubt it, given they've removed many of Joe Rogan's episodes. This is probably just a cold hard business decision, since the number of people seeking Neil Young content is likely very low by comparison.
If he's just minding his own business and putting out content, and you throw a "me or him" fit, I'm probably going to keep him and lose you, just because you're higher maintenance.

And if he's driving more traffic than you, and you say "me or him", you're definitely gone and he stays. (I don't have traffic numbers to confirm, but I strongly suspect that Neil Young overplayed his hand here.)

[Edit: Oh, Spotify has a $100 million contract with Joe Rogan? And Neil Young thought that they were going to pick him over Joe Rogan? Good luck; let me know how that works out for you.

Or was this just performative theater, and Neil Young knew he'd lose?]
> So $10 billion on Web vs $10 billion split between 5 other missions that didn't happen

This is a false dichotomy based on the premise that the NASA budget couldn't just be changed, with an added assumption that the Gulf War 2 was either pay all the money we did or not do anything at all. Neither of those are true, which is exactly the point of the comparison.
Is the title deliberately trying to mislead? It's written to make it sound like he was punished for complaining, instead of leaving voluntarily in protest.
Fanhouse introduces “coins” to avoid Apple's exploitative tax
The average person is not stupid, but the average person is irrational about some topic that has high visibility, usually due to tense emotions. I find that this is usually what people are referring to when they say people are "stupid" - not that they aren't clever or don't have good instincts or are low IQ.
> How many other books in their library do you think contain the phrase "God damn"?

Did you read the minutes or are you assuming these are just dumb, racist, country-bumpkins? They literally address exactly this point.

From the minutes (regarding removing this book):

> My bigger concern is that this is probably the tip of the iceberg of what is out there.
It's honestly been hard to find news sources from the beginning of the pandemic...
That's a skills and lack of software (CMS) problem, not a blame-the-tools problem.

Dumbing-down the web is a dumb idea. It's dumb enough already and shouldn't be any dumber.
You've convinced me. We need to open up. It's critical for people's mental health that people need to see marvel movies in theatre unmasked. dead bodies be damned.
Gotta ban that stuff. It may make kids feel guilty or sad.

Of course I explicitly remember listening to Limbaugh in the 90s or so as he made fun of the “liberal fad” of listening to kids feelings and “protecting them from harm” or having to deal with anything that might be hard or painful. Can’t punish Bobby it might hurt his self esteem.

Isn’t that where the term liberal snowflake came from? That they were so fragile they had to be coddled and couldn’t handle the real world?

And here we are now. What’s good for the goose, I guess.
> Companies can never be surveillance resistant, they'll get court orders and follow them.

There’s a range on this - ask Apple about the FBI – and there are still several levels of usefulness: designing systems which don’t store data unnecessarily, forcing things to follow the legal process rather than quietly turning data over, and notifying the user when this happens. Obviously not all of this is possible to varying degrees but not all authoritarian states are the same, either.
Companies tell employees to delete emails after 18 months because there are two alternatives: 1) delete emails after 18 months (or some similar time period), or 2) never delete emails, ever. If your policy is "delete emails based on personal preference", someone can sue you in court and claim that the selective deletions of email is evidence of wrongdoing even if you just happened to have a full hard drive that day. And you don't actually need to be a wrongdoer for someone to claim this.
Honesty is better than hypocrisy although the two are not mutually exclusive. More often one has to choose between being honest and hypocritical or being dishonest and consistent.

What evidence do you have that this move by Neil Young is anything other than his honest feelings on the subject? A lot of people are sick of Rogan spreading BS. It's not suprising someone like Young would choose to use what little leverage they have to push for him to be removed.
The problem is that most people claiming they're free speech advocates are nothing of the sort. Their goal is compelled publication of their opinions, not free speech. They've just made the observation that they can work up a good mob when they claim it's about free speech. It's much harder to get that sort of self-righteous mob when they admit their real complaint is that some community won't let them come in and yell through a megaphone until everyone else goes deaf.
This is something I find exciting! I was looking at our infrastructure and between all the various services, we basically have recreated k8s only more expensive and fragmented and tied explicitly to AWS.

On top of that, our local test env is based on docker-compose so it often has issues matching exactly to the deployed env in the cloud once you add all the networking.

I've wanted to start moving us to Kubernetes so we can have a much closer env across the board. In order to do this, we would need to support both osx and Linux development, and for this I was investigating minikube but my previous XP with minikube left me not liking that solution long term.

I look forward to investigating this tool and seeing the potential in a local development workflow.
Any mistake breaking up companies ruins people’s careers and harms the economy needlessly. A perverse incentive to do so is stupidity.

It may be necessary sometimes, but it should be very carefully considered.
And people deciding which businesses they want to shop at is the free market. And businesses deciding which products they want to carry is freedom of association. And people ganging up on other people on Twitter is technically free speech and public debate.

If you don't think there's a problem with the government banning books from school curriculum for political reasons -- if you don't think that has anything to do with freedom of speech, then I don't see how you have a free speech problem with anything at all. None of the cancel culture that people complain about is illegal or unconstitutional. That doesn't mean it can't be harmful to free expression, but in contrast, "representation with taxation" can actually be unconstitutional if the "representation" people ask for is suppression of political speech.

It is not my job to tell people whether or not they should be concerned with cancel culture. But anyone who is concerned about cancel culture and not concerned with educational book bans, or laws that restrict what topics teachers can talk to students about, or restrictions on conversations about sexual orientations/identities at school or with medical professionals, or any of the other speech laws being floated by Republican governments right now -- that person clearly is not interested in free speech itself, they just have an agenda and are using free speech as a convenient narrative tool in pursuit of that agenda.

People can be legitimately concerned about cancel culture as a free speech issue, but I'm not going to take anyone seriously who says that cancel culture is real and actual government censorship isn't.
I used to listen to the podcast a lot before it went to Spotify. While Rogan is a self-admitted "ignorant", it was that aspect that made his interviews interesting and enjoyable. He always had guests of all types and beliefs.

Unfortunately, it seems that the pandemic has thrown him into a conspiracy hole. I think the whole thing started with one of the Weinstein brothers and the ivermectin push and it just went downhill from there...
It is only strange if you assume their love of free speech is sincere. If you look at it as a cynical strategy, it makes perfect sense.

A very good test of peoples' sincerity in this territory is to first see how well what they claim of others applies to the speaker themselves. You will frequently find that their accusations serve equally well as admissions of guilt.
Thank your for sharing. As a non-American, it always amuses me how the concept of free speech and [1] exists in the same mind. Lol "Son of a Bleep"

[1] "When we see something on television that is a direct quote from an actor or a president,something where it has that inappropriate language, they will blur it out or white out parts of it or they will bleep it"
I’m kind of confused by the literary acclaim bit. If wealthy people produced better content why isn’t the best written content of all, pinnacles of literary acclaim (often acclaimed by the same wealthy population) within this cohort? If it’s because wealthy populations write better then why isn’t the pinnacle of writing within this cohort?

Intuitively this seems non obvious to me. What am I missing?
Like you, I am willing to pay a extra for “Sold by Amazon” for the reliable customer service and return policy. But I do not like Amazon coordinating with other sellers to fix the price and would want them to compete head-on.
It’s only censorship when it’s against things you sympathize with.
The thing is social media, including YouTube, is the new public square. Exercising our fundamental civil liberties like free speech means exercising them on places like social media. Otherwise those rights are simply not as useful. Social media has a massive impact on our society, including on politics. If it doesn't have that impact, then why bother censoring someone at all? I also think platforms above some size simply should not be able to ban people in order to make Democracy work.

Another angle here is that social media companies are ultimately just plain old telecom companies. We regularly regulate private businesses and limit the ways in which they conduct business. Your electrical utility is not allowed to deny you service based on your political opinion. These companies shouldn't be able to do so either, as they are common carriers (https://reason.com/volokh/2021/07/16/conclusion-social-media...).

Additionally, social media is built on network effects (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_effect). The larger the network, the stronger the service, but also the higher the barriers to entry. Businesses built on network effects inherently face limited competition and must be regulated since they do not face competition as much.

Finally, our government is already censoring speech by hiding their influence through these social media companies. Tech companies have an incentive to play nicely with the government, since they might otherwise face difficulties like anti-trust action. Glenn Greenwald had written extensively about this proxy censorship:

https://greenwald.substack.com/p/how-silicon-valley-in-a-sho...

https://greenwald.substack.com/p/congress-in-a-five-hour-hea...

https://greenwald.substack.com/p/democrats-and-media-do-not-...
This is the Spite Store of containers.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6YlA6gtha-w
> Kroger paid money up front for your potato chips

I agree, the Kroger Purchase Order is currently in bulk infrequently (e.g. 100units once a week), but the Amazon Purchase Order is currently not-bulk frequently (e.g. 1 unit 100 times a week).

Meanwhile, "Kroger makes no representation regarding the maintenance of any specific retail price for Products purchased for resale."[0]. As I understand it, that means it can change the price at any time. If in week 2, Kroger prefers a lower price, it can tell the seller "Last week was $22, but now I'll only buy the potato chips for $20 and no more. Do you still want to keep selling to Kroger?".

I don't see how this is materially different from the case about Amazon. Because the reality is no merchant cares about 1 bulk order, they only care about continuous re-orders.

[0] https://www.thekrogerco.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/kro_s...
If there's something in my life that I can turn into a script...

I commit the script to a repo and host it somewhere publicly accessible :)

Then move on to the next interesting thing...
> He lets the interviewed to talk freely and requests explanations when bullshit claims are made.

Rogan has a long history of false vaccine claims on his show, presented both by him and his guests:

https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/covid-misi...

He'll surely challenge a guest when he thinks they're wrong, it's his own mistruths and the ones he ignores that are at issue here.
I wonder if Neil would think about being a guest on Joe's show. I've never listened to Joe Rogan, and I don't know if I've ever heard a Neil Young song, but that seems like it might be the principled thing to do, to explain your position to Joe's audience. And I wonder if Joe would have him on? Would people just expect Joe to talk over Neil or otherwise be rude to him? If that was the expectation, then of course I wouldn't expect Neil to participate.
The article is disingenuous to what happened. The book has contents that violate school board policy. Educators were asked to replace it without changing the purpose of the module.
It probably really depends what sort of problem you're working on, but in my experience it was easier to represent things as mixed integer linear programming, (MIP) rather than a SAT instance. They're both NP-complete representations, but with the MIP representation you can naturally add constraints like "maximize the sum of these various things" as well as the sort of boolean constraints that work naturally with SAT.

And for MIP solving, the Python mip package is quite convenient.

https://python-mip.readthedocs.io/en/latest/quickstart.html
The tone didn't bother me but I'm thick skinned :-)

The answer is that YC is extremely aware of how valuable HN is as a source of revenue. It's probably their biggest marketing channel, so it's worth many billions to them. They're not evil or stupid either, which is why dang is the moderator. If YC appointed an evil idiot, HN users would revolt very quickly and HN would become much less valuable.

YC is as tolerant as they are because 1. there's a good person in charge of moderation that leans this way 2. they're smart enough to realize how precarious their position is. It wouldn't take a lot of missteps to create space for an alternative. See: Digg -> reddit.
> Nutjobs can pay for their own video hosting.

Until the hosting providers throw them out too, like AWS does.
You're still not making any sense. The symptoms you describe wouldn't meet hospital admission criteria unless the patient had serious risk factors other than being unvaccinated. Hospital admission is primarily based on respiratory distress or blood oxygen saturation under 94%. A mild fever and cough can be managed on an outpatient basis. Ageusia is clinically irrelevant.
I'd love to have to switch between music streaming platforms based off of which musicians disagree with the doctors Joe Rogan has on his podcast.
Yeah I don’t think it can do that, unfortunately.
It depends on which modules. Children definitely need to be protected from the power creep of some splatbooks. Plus they teach drow think they should be in charge of other races and that’s obviously critical race theory.
I use Amazon music because I like to stream music over my Alexa while showering. Listened to Old Man in the shower this morning.
You are free to question the initial suspension but the permanent is the topic of discussion here as the result of the ban evasion. Violating Terms of Service is not a partisan issue. Might I direct you to the Paradox of Tolerance[1] in the meantime.

[1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance
I read this book as required reading in an AP Literature course, back when I was in high school (in ATL, if anyone is curious). I remember being absolutely blown away by the it - I forgot everything else we read in that course, but this one stuck with me. The last scene, where the narrator's dad confuses him for his other son, who died, is a punch to the gut. Real shame to see this book censored, students are missing out.
OAuth is trivial because of libraries.

Hashed database secrets are also easy. Rails is mindlessly-simple. Django isn't bad either. There are CMSes that can provide these too.

The problem is people don't want to know anything about anything. They want something (results) for nothing (free, and without skills or effort).
Forget an apology. Did they ever even get unbanned?
So basically, use open-source software as much as you can. But rigorously verify the quality and security when it's used in DoD systems.

Sounds pretty reasonable.
Haven't heard anyone or news mention the fact Young tried to start his own music service a while back. And that his catalogue was a selling point.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pono_(digital_music_service)
Show HN: Stockle – Like Wordle, but with Stocks
Just wait until it’s machining! Wood working at least most of the time tolerances are +- 1/8”. Throwing away a thousand dollar part because you were .003” off is lame.

At least if you have a grinder, welding can sometimes be more forgiving.
These weren't removed by elected officials. But by an angry mob from one side. You're overlooking that little important bit.
"Relative" is trying to apply modern values to historical figures. A standard most of your previous presidents would fail. Might as well remove their statues too.
It is anti-trust suit to divest Instagram/WhatsApp by the DoJ, other actions against them are also by agencies/ officials who are not elected either . Same DoJ does not pursue any monopoly action against Apple, even when customers its hurts consumers pockets directly like with the App Store 30% cut.

I do not see any difference between types of agencies and actions for either company.

Apple makes distinct public steps towards making life harder for the government and do not invite retribution/reaction from the government. Facebook does not publicly do much to oppose government policy and they need a sword hanging over them ?

To me this does not hold water.
People celebrating Spotify don’t realise that they’ve selectively gone through Rogans more spicy episodes historically and removed on edited them.

This is business.
Yeah or Rogan could stop having purveyors of misinformation on his show. That would also work.