skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It still falls under the general free market principles. Distribution runs on a very thin profit margin, and if it wasn't Amazon in the lead, it would be Walmart, or others.
Yeah yeah we get it, republicans hate planned parenthood. What everyone in these replies is trying to tell you, is that this DOESN'T mean democrats/the left/however you want to group {everyone else}, gives a crap about the details of that specific organization / who runs it, even if they are pro-choice in ideology. And your constant choice of saying "but the left!" is problematic at its core.
There are a few in the call with the analysts [1].

- Multiple references to the FSD. Promised FSD to be ready this year again.

- Dojo may not be ready and not faster than a cluster of GPUs

- Solar installations are dawn

In general very positive results.

[1] https://seekingalpha.com/article/4481919-tesla-inc-tsla-ceo-...
Engineers have specialty interests. I'd just as soon have it taught by a home economics department, or at worst an MBA. Things everyone should be able to do: read a bill, allocate a budget, estimate how much food to buy for 2 people versus 10 people, plan for retirement, maybe convert a recipe from metric to imperial units. Perhaps get a shop teacher.

Let the future STEM majors learn the rest in their classes. It takes a long time for a lot of that stuff to pay off, and much of it remains irrelevant.
Id rather have a little large size with a palm rest, and a little more power.
> Double ouch. That's a huge gap [6 vs. 17 hours of "offline video playback"], and 6 is low even in absolute terms.

That test is measuring backlight consumption, not SOC efficiency. It's a huge display tuned for gaming vs. Apple's famous system power optimization on a panel about half the size. All CPUs on both systems are effectively at idle here, it says nothing beyond the fact that MSI isn't going to (or capable of, frankly) spend their time optimizing idle power draw on a gaming rig.
That DoD is willing to address the need to leverage OSS and set a policy that balances and mitigates risk-benefit is a really positive step. I left the military almost 4yrs ago and even at the most advanced organizations there was a huge under-appreciation for the need to invest in software capabilities across the board. I’m glad to see this.
It's not so much that the problem is being a dog walker, it's that she's a dog walker who only works 20-25 hours a week and believes people should work even less. And that her response to Fox News's question about whether they were being lazy was "Laziness is a virtue". This mod made previous posts about how she literally sleeps on the job[1], so this isn't about a noble career choice, it's just about laziness. She was unprepared, wouldn't look at the camera, showed up disheveled, and didn't even make her bed before the interview. Multiple times the mods had polled the community about who should give interviews, and the response was overwhelmingly that no one should. The mods thought they knew better, and this was the result.

Essentially the issue here is that the subreddit started years ago not as a discussion of worker rights reforms, but of people wanting to figure out how to work as little as possible, period. The meaning was literally on the tin. As the pandemic wore on redditors joined the sub to complain about their jobs, their burnout, and advocate for worker rights and reforms. But a look at the sub's about section or the sub's mods made it clear those posts weren't what the sub was originally about. And all it took was an interview with the longest standing mod to make that clear.

Now the sub is private, and /r/WorkReform will hopefully actually stand for something.

1. https://i.imgur.com/XsHDFFN.jpg
I assumed that all human lives had the same value, regardless of age, gender or physical fitness. Like many people, I settled on a small set of rules and didn't deviate from it based on any personal characteristic. I'm not sure if this is a moral decision or not, but I generally prefer to avoid evaluating the relative merit of any person when it comes to life or death decisions.
> i won't do a startup is i don't want to deal with customers

I know..I know..god forbid you have to communicate with those dreaded customers who pay for your existence. It’s not like it’s easy using one of several mailing list, social media, etc., tools these days. I guess my ask is too difficult, next time I will only expect a hand-written letter and mailed with a proper 58-cent current-year stamp for my collection.
I agree with what you are saying, but I'd say that it's specifically the progressive side that benefits the most from the censorship, even if it may be bad for society as a whole. Plenty of people out there aren't really actually devoted to free speech, they are moreso dedicated to this new totalitarian ideology, and would be happy to throw free speech out the window if it means nobody can rebut their claims. I'd guess that they think it benefits their political goals more than it hurts society. I'd also guess that they are the same people downvoting your comment.
>Selling a program to taxpayers as a 500 million dollar endeavor and then extracting ten billion dollars from them is the kind of thing that should put people in prison for life.

Would you say the same about LIGO, for example? Originally thought to be easy, it turned out to be a 40 years long endeavor.
> What gives people the perception of apple being expensive is that other OEMs play tricks to boost numbers on a spec sheet that the common person checks while cheeping out massively on parts that don’t show on the spec sheet.

Yep! Like with dell: non-standard power supply size, non-standard motherboard size. And with most of the companies: a motherboard that uses whatever the cheapest USB, sound, SATA chipsets were in the bin that week.

The boards are designed and reworked constantly by the factories...as opposed to Apple who pour enormous engineering effort into refining, testing, etc each revision.
I believe they are somewhere between equal to and a quantum leap over what Apple was shipping before depending on the task/machine.

But as we all know what Apple is/was shipping and the best you can get in a PC laptop are very different things.
Also, for every Android commentator talking about ARM, consider that Apple even named the company "Advanced RISC Machines," because they opposed having the name of a former competitor in there (because it was originally going to be "Acorn RISC Machine"). Apple also provided almost all the funding and initial leadership for the venture, while Acorn supplied most of the engineers and VLSI the silicon tooling.
Yeah; this is...not helpful. Nothing about the ergonomics at all. In fact, the most common thing they talk about is the surroundings of the desk, not even the desk itself.

In fact, for an architect, I would think one that is also tiltable ( https://youtu.be/_SonAjxraoo for instance) would be the 'dream' desk (though I guess maybe they treat desks separate from drafting table? I dunno)
I don't know the degree of editing that Spotify does. If they are only removing episodes, that's different from constraining Joe Rogan in his creative direction.

Note: I may have been wrong about the reasons for Dave Chapelle leaving. If I'm recalling correctly, that was the reason he originally cited when leaving. But more info came out in later interviews. Seems like he just needed a break from the spotlight.
https://twitter.com/WordleStats gathers and tweets the aggregates daily
Silicon Carbide
Google has a survey out for Legacy G Suite users facing shut down
So you think Fauci, Berx, they deserve more credibility than the original inventor? I trust the inventor more than the followers.
> It's a reddit. My favorite reddit, and the only reason I go to Reddit anymore.

I have never been to that subreddit, what's the regular content about?
It any good? Have never heard of the podcast.
PayPal still sucks. And projects, especially pre-orders, should communicate their current status and challenges. It’s amazing how communicative this project is about PayPal holding their funds up though. Hmm?
When your enemy is making a mistake, don't interrupt them. If the mod had coherent sensible arguments, I'm sure the host would've done the usual Fox News tactics of talking over them, misstating their points, etc. But he didn't need to. All he had to do was reel out enough rope for her to make a noose.
2048 could be defeated with a simple repeated key sequence. Not so this. No comparison.
So one thing to keep in mind is there is a lot of “leakage” out of genuine products manufacturer in China and SE Asia.

Workers will “divert” product from factories (or almost) finished product and sell on the side.

I’ve heard this is a big issue with clothing manufacturers.

Of course determining whether it’s actually counterfeit or just diverted product is likely impossible at the point of purchase.
> They're benchmarking the CPU, but measuring the power draw of a whole laptop - including a dedicated 3080ti GPU which will still be drawing a decent amount of power even at idle

The charts in the PCWorld article show the idle power draw at 20W, so couldn't you just subtract that?
My alma mater (Portland State) also used xv6 for its OS class, and it was excellent.
When's the last time Rogan has eaten anyone alive though? No matter how incredulous or inconsistent their views, he seems quite satisfied to have a good time chatting them up about nothing in particular.
The latest version 2.6 has an issue where it can lose track of the cluster state, rendering it useless. (You had one job Rancher).
Thanks for sharing.

As a general note, how everyone feels installing free apps with no source code on a public repo?
Sumo Fiber in Utah offers 10G for around $200 a month.

https://sumofiber.com/internet/utah/
Joe Rogan is/was a comedian.
Your statement about not listening much to Rogan shows with this comparison. I don’t think the two are alike at all. Channel 5 lets the crazies talk while he stays silent for the most part, which says everything about his subjects. Rogan on the other hand lets his grifter repeat characters talk and then he himself talks and parrots all sorts of insane disinformation and obviously reactionary nonsense and neatly justifies it all away by saying “but don’t listen to me, I’m an idiot” all under the guise of rational dialogue and all the while elevating his guests who all conveniently have something to sell you.
Music is almost always on for me, whether I'm working or not. After so many years, it has faded into background though, unless I'm listening to something new or actively listen when I'm not working.
We can both play this game though:

FROM articles

What fields am I expecting in the resultset? Sure I have some context, I know it'll be about articles, but I have no idea what actual data I care about.

You're arguing that:

FROM articles
SELECT id, name, author

Is substantially superior to:

SELECT id, name, author
FROM articles

I don't see them as markedly different with such a small example.
HOWEVER, where the difference comes in is the "at a glance what am I getting in my resultset" data that is much easier to see in the latter, second easiest in the former, and not at all present in the linked article.

I think what this boils down to is what you (any reader, not you specifically) individually expect to need knowledge of when you're writing SQL. In most cases when sitting down to write a brand new piece of code to pull some data from the database, putting the list of tables involved in the query first matters most to some, whereas putting the list of fields to expect in the resultset matters most to others (I put myself in this camp).

For what it's worth, as I've stated elsewhere while I don't prefer it and would find it annoying to debug personally, I do recognize that the idea of SQL that allows you to list FROM / JOIN / etc. first is very appealing to some. What I think is completely off is the near-obfuscation of the examples in the linked article.
Making something legal does not magically make it morally acceptable. Conversely, there are countless example of things that are currently legal that are morally deplorable.
Which brings it all back to a lack of trust in the vaccine/science. The current science is that the vaccines are safe and provide a greater degree of protection than prior infection alone. Outside of some very rare conditions that would make someone unfit for a vaccine, there's no reason not to get vaccinated. Refusing to get one only increases your chances of ending up in a hospital and for what? There's no advantage to giving yourself a disadvantage no matter how small you think the benefit a free vaccine would give you over the protection a natural infection has already given you.
Luckily for NY there are many more 23/24 year olds than you.
Out of curiosity what jobs need a good CPU but also can't take advantage of a good GPU?

It seems like most of the high performance numerical computing software today is GPU-accelerated. If performance for your job is super important, why isn't your software GPU-accelerated?

I might just be naive but it's honestly hard for me to imagine why anybody would need a good CPU and not also want a good GPU.
Thank you, I wasn't aware it's that easy. I have gotten around the saving issue with the desktop clients, they work decently well. I also love the tree view which many note apps seem to move away from.
Where did he ask for censorship though?

https://www.foxbusiness.com/lifestyle/spotify-remove-neil-yo...

> Young reportedly posted a letter that read: 'They can have Rogan or Young. Not both'

Censorship is saying “You can’t have Rogan, and no one can have Rogan”, but that’s not what he said.

He’s just saying he doesn’t want to be associated with Rogan. They agreed to go their separate ways and everyone’s content is still available for purchase by any willing consumers.
Hah did you go to Berkeley? We're still using Pintos here.
> ... I don't see anyone caring too much about the distinction.

I think you're absolutely right, which is why I'm here banging this drum. People should care about the distinction, because it matters if you want to actually understand the situation.

Certain groups are overrepresented in the prison system in the US. Some people think this means that all members of those groups are bad people. The people who think this are poorly informed, and can only get in the way of solving the actual problems.

And no, I'm not equating the treatment of unvaccinated people to that of minorities in the US. I am equating the structure of the misunderstanding involved (disadvantaged minority + other problems describes a lot of prisoners, but its the other problems that dominate the equation. Just like unvaccinated + seronaive can describe a hospitalized patient, but the seronaive part is what matters).

I tried to explain this better in another comment: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30096072
Shitty compromise: show the date only for people browsing through elinks :)
I have have a couple sites that I have both hosted locally, cloud, static, WordPress.

I think the future is modern tools + old school feel
Why workers are quitting their jobs, after the trauma of the pandemic
I saw an analysis for a four-word blind combination, but I believe it didn't fully determine the word by the 5th guess: http://www.garytay.net/4-words-to-win-wordle-in-less-than-a-...
No, I don’t buy this “pull the heartstrings to protect grandma” fallacy. For it to be true, the vaccines would have to be highly effective at preventing infection and these vaccines are not highly effective at preventing infections. The Covid vaccine protections stop at the vaccinated individual, with perhaps a side benefit of easing some healthcare system stress due to severe disease prevention.

Also, plenty of studies are out that now that show that the infected, whether vaccinated or not have statistically equivalent viral shedding. You are equally contagious whether vaccinated or not.

If you are that immuno-compromised, you need to take whatever precautions you need to do to protect yourself and not place that responsibility on anyone else.
We have always had various false news, conspiracy theorists and outright disbelievers and angry mobs about pandemics, including 1918 [1][2]. None of what we have gone through is new in any meaningful way.

[1] - https://edition.cnn.com/2021/02/16/health/1918-flu-lessons-p...

[2] - https://www.history.com/news/1918-pandemic-spanish-flu-censo...
A related thread from a few months ago:

Rancher Desktop, a Docker Desktop Replacement - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28835690 - Oct 2021 (220 comments)
Of course there isn't! That's why its so preposterous to single out "traditional" media as the sole purveyors of falsehoods. Meanwhile, this other segment of the media is essentially a broken clock of bottomless cynicism and grievance airing, which somehow bears no blame for the erosion of trust.
I think you're drastically overestimating the fear the elites have about unionization. It's relatively easy to outsource jobs or replace with automation/robots.
Unless you're talking about The Young Ones, what "spaaaaace" reference is claimed for 40yo ?
Rejoinder:

Effective treatment is considered a public health intervention if it prevents the spread. Otherwise its medical treatment. This is why vaccination is far superior to post-infection treatment.

Assessment:

I'm deeply suspicious of this website. It uses pooled effects across several studies, which is an improper approach for this type of meta-analysis. For example, it lists hydroxychloroquine as effective. Some initial underpowered studies showed potential, but further research showed it was not effective.[0]

Items:

[1] By forcing a random effects design, you may give inappropriate weighting to under-powered studies showing an effect (low power results in higher effect sizes). 10 studies of 10 people each, with effect averaged via pooled regression, may well show a pooled effect significantly larger than one study with 100 people.

[2] People not deeply familiar with the treatment literature (such as you, me) cannot confirm that the meta-analysis is appropriately comprehensive (they claim to scrape paper sources, but not the inclusion criteria). Since this is a random website presented without context, without bonafides, and so forth, even if the information presented is real it may be cherry picked. Here is the documentation of some of their exclusion protocol -- note if they were intending to be persuasive instead of objective, exclusion of negative meta-analyses would be intentionally phrased objectively: https://hcqmeta.com/#exc

[3] Differing definitions can impact results. "Early treatment" is prophylaxis typically, but why the individual ends ups in a treatment or control group (and what the term means) may be systemically biased depending on the treatment standard of care adopted locally. The differences may not be random, resulting in selection bias (and other forms of bias, but simply put not an apples-to-apples comparison). And because we're dealing with people with will, the uncertainty compounds. By way of example, prophylaxis "treatment" group might be fully self-selected people who are just scared they may have been exposed, and a "control" group (from a matched pair example selected on few if any demographics) that was known to have the disease -- causing immediate positive bias. RCT designs can help with this approach, but again showing solely the pooled effects instead of reporting fixed effects assessments and other regression output is in err.

Conclusion:

So, for these reasons and because the source actually matters in an era of mis-/dis-information, I remain highly suspicious.

Notes
[0] Economics is facing its own replication issues, and the paper is an important read for why statistical power matters: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/ecoj.12461
I agree that it's the right move. It's Spotify telling artists and content creators that it won't be a part of either their political statements or grudges. Imagine a streaming platform where Eminem tells the platform to remove Machine Gun Kelly or else he's removing his content. And once one person pulls it off, a lot of people will try to do the same.
Bonds have defined maturities and bond indexes are made up of a mix of short, medium and long term bonds. So over the course of time, old bonds mature and pay out (taxes due).

Equity indexes have no maturity date and can limit any taxable income to dividend only which get preferential treatment in terms of taxes.
Python Requirements Guesser
I can't find a readily accessible demo, but if I could, the first thing I'd do is check to see if there are two 2:00AM options at the relevant local time DST boundary.
It's touching that you reduce me to "Android commentator", but my point is that Apple has a lot of history to spite with their second-gen chips. Whether or not they're engineering their own cores or decided the name of ARM is irrelevant, they simply haven't proven that they can increase their desktop chip performance without packing more cores onto a die and calling it a day. If they manage to make significant single-core gains with their next-generation chips, I'd be impressed. The odds are against them, and their competitors are starting to wake up.
Interesting, but discards a lot of useful information.
I’d love this system if it meant I could vote against the third of my taxes that goes towards the Military-industrial complex.

Anyway I’m sure most Americans would’ve been happy with the 10 dollars a year or whatever it took over the time that 10 billion was spent
The Commodore 64 was introduced 40 years ago. I’m not sure 50 years is that long or hard for a computer to do? This article is written like 50 years is undicipherable hieroglyphics territory.

I can still remember LOAD “*”,8,1 like it was yesterday. And original Commodore 64s still run today.
> What kind of things does journalism consistently get right, then?

Generally speaking, journalists quote their sources accurately, even when the identity of the source is concealed (eg. "A senior administration official", "sources familiar with the matter", etc.). That doesn't save the reader from the sources being wrong, having an axe to grind, or straight up lying, but journalists try to mitigate those issues with multiple sources and a healthy amount of skepticism.

Keep in mind that the criticism here mostly applies to general-purpose journalists, rather than ones with a specific "beat" they have experience (and even expertise) with. "Science and technology" and "health & medicine" reporters aren't really on a beat, the categories are far too broad, but general interest publications simply can't employ all the people they would need to specialize in every fractal branch on the tree of human knowledge.

So reporters maybe specialize a little, and rely on a roster of experts they can call up for a quote or maybe some background explanation. Except they are always on a deadline, and if an expert doesn't get back to them in fast enough, they just do the best they can, file the story and move on to the next one.

The flip side of this is that "experts" who are super reliable in terms of getting back to reporters with a hot take get quoted a lot even when they don't know what they are talking about. Reporters know this, but they have to quote somebody before their deadline.
The charts show the idle power draw though (20W), couldn't just just subtract that?
> Before I get accused of being a conservative or a Trumpie…I’m not and far far from it.

Your comment history betrays you.
> The lion's share of them will have been unvaccinated.

Most of them died before vaccines were available. So, you aren't wrong but...

> ensure that public discourse around our most potent public health tool is rooted in science.

Fact checking is not aligned with science, which is a continual process of correction. Remember when fact checkers all jumped in about how masks didn't do any good when that was the official CDC and WHO position? We have known since the 1990s with SARS that masks are effective.