skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Since, for some reason there's no Reply button under your second answer, I'm replying to it here.

> I am not judging or insulting you

I believe you are the wrong one to evaluate that. Not after you abstract-ify this into "conspiracy theory" and all sorts of things I didn't say.

I didn't "obliquely claim that doctors do not get training on prescribing prednisone." Of course they do. I'm not anti-vax, either.

I'm sure this vet did "get training" but I cut her some slack: it's the 27th most prescribed drug in the formulary, and she sees hundreds of pets per week, and probably most of the ones she gives it to, get well. Yet: another vet at the same clinic had no issues with my objection, and gave me a different drug instead. The dog's not licking his paws constantly and has no other symptoms, so I count that a successful objection.

So find some other outlet for your passions today.
To be clear, I was not comparing factories to software engineering. I was merely responding to the claim about factories not being silo’d.

Software engineering looks nothing like a factory. At least not at the point of coding. Maybe at the deployment side.
Right, I did have to learn this the hard way back in 2014.
In my opinion, UIs back then where created with the expectation that users would learn them. Good designers made learning and discovery easy (bad ones failed, of course), but either way, learning was expected to happen.

Nowadays, UIs are designed with the expectation that users don’t learn them. This limits what software can do, but (I don’t mean this cynically) was probably necessary to bring those apps to the majority.
> The liberals do this all the time saying that conservative bills are “anti voter rights” when in reality they just require ID to vote which is standard in many places that are more civilized than the US.

This issue in particular is very interesting. I saw an article [1] which seems to indicate voter ID laws have little effect in either direction on fraud or turnout. Does that mean Democrats should "give it away" to the Republicans in exchange for something else? Or would that be dishonest?

Well, I guess this whole contest is about trading political blows, not anything to do with the real world. Even if a policy has no or positive effect, giving a win to your opponents is bad.

1: https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/2/21/18230009/v...
The PeTA argument of kindness rarely works because most people are meat addicts and fine with unkindness so long as they don't have to see it.

Also, rational self-preservation doesn't work because it's not a freight train about to run them over and most people don't make decisions rationally. There are plenty of existential risks involved in meat ag:

1. Pandemic evolution through a combination of antibiotic resistances (to speed meat production), wildlife-domestic animal interactions, animal crowding (Petri dish like dorm overcrowding spreading meningococcal meningitis), and human-animal interactions.

2. Climate change - 12% of anthropogenic GHGs and growing. Already at 417 ppm CO2 and climbing.

3. Irreparable rainforest loses due to clear-cutting for CAFOs and feed grain farms affecting the local climate of other equatorial ecosystems.

Accelerating intensity of storms, variability of weather, and rising sea levels will lead to famines, resource wars, and retrofitting vs. relocation of major coastal cities. But because something hasn't happened yet, it's "crying wolf."

They will bicker, complain, take potshots, and rationalize kicking-and-screaming until told they can't have it anymore because they're addicts. The sooner there are sustainable alternatives, widespread lifestyle changes, and externality luxury taxes, the better.
You are missing out on some truly excellent steaks: the hanger is like a cross between the ribeye and the skirt; the skirt is no slouch either! and if you've got some Activa RM handy, you can make a triple-thickness skirt, which is incredibly good; the spider steak (compare to the "oyster" of a chicken leg) is maybe the world's greatest sandwich steak; the tri-tip, which takes a marinade far better than any of the expensive steaks, and which the circulator will make just as tender as a fillet; and the picanha, which is the single greatest grill steak --- I would trade 2 ribeyes for 1 picanha if I was planning to grill.
I look at it from the perspective of having a successful React blog, having started writing consistently in 2020.

I have different experiences to others on the market, thus I resonate with some more than others.
Over the years I've seen a lot of presentations from a lot of companies for all sorts of automation tools, especially identity management. Think "new user onboarding" for large enterprise.

To be honest, I can't remember the names of any of the products. If it wasn't obvious from my rant, we didn't call any of them back and I promptly forgot about the specific vendors and their products.

Most such products are utterly worthless, typically with net negative value. They can't handle even moderately complex cases like name changes or users moving from one department from another. The more complex cases like staff holding multiple positions at once, or filling in temporarily for someone are just out of the question.

Conversely, they're power tools and can wipe out your entire staff directory if you make the tiniest mistake. Few such tools have common sense "safety nets" built in by default.

Last but not least, all such tools these days carefully block any form of end-user extensibility. That way they can charge for product-specific plugins. Most such plugins are trivial to write, so you could do it yourself. Hence the vendors have to block all APIs or script-based interfaces lest you take their profit margin away from them by spending an afternoon whipping up some PowerShell scripts.
You could try the compression options for 7z, not sure if they would help in your case since I don't know the defaults off hand. Here's an example from the man page.

> ... | 7z a -si -m0=lzma -mx=9 -mfb=64 -md=32m

https://linux.die.net/man/1/7za
>The animals don't like it.

as opposed to the plant that longs for death?

there are plenty of nervous-system-like responses from plants that are undergoing destruction, why not just admit that the reason behind these complaints is a selfish human-empowering reason rather than the emotional appeal of "what about the animals?" ?

Won't anyone think of the plants?

"...you are denying others the right to live."

Isn't this basically just a condition of humanity? If it isn't a base principal can you point to a human that doesn't live that way?
Supermarket steaks sure, but a good (dry aged) steak is expensive and they don't often dry age filets. Check the price differential for Pat's dry aged vs prime:

https://shop.lafrieda.com/collections/dry-aged-beef
Yep yep yep. And I’ll also echo don’t use much smoke - I went way overboard with some mesquite to see what it would be like, and it was fine but definitely detracted. A light smoke then a char is chef’s kiss though.
What does the software industry look like for this stuff? I've got two decades of embedded c++ experience, some of which is safety critical. How much of automotive is offshored these days? Is it still mostly C and a bsp and a text editor, or is it gitlab and pipelines now?
I am sorry, it is not name calling, but specific term that describes specific people. When I say Nazis, it is not name calling when I mean Nazis and not somebody who I may think is like them. Or should I use another term when I speak about Germans belonging to German Nationalist Party?

I am not talking about people who prefer to not wear a mask when possible or who are afraid to vaccinate because they have heard too many fear stories about vaccines. I am talking about specific people who spread FUD about masks or vaccines. How should we call them?

I think these are precise enough terms and are well understood and widely accepted.

I have personally seen enough evidence that this kind of behavior is shared by the same people. I have also seen enough evidence to deduce that they will do exactly what I told that they will do.

Shall I not write about this prediction? Even when this is based on very specific observations about said people over longer period of time? I just do not want to put too many details about myself into public so that I could not be easily identified. I know that this does reduce my credibility though. I am sorry.

I understand that these are perhaps not a kind kind of terms and perhaps they do not like to be called like that but so did Nazis. I think it is not enough to stop using this term for them.

I tried to be terse because I tend to write too much. As we can see, in the end it did lead to even more words. I try to be more explanatory in the future such that there is less misunderstanding in my writing.
Not a chef but I also found sous vide to cause more problems than it solves for cooking steaks. The biggest problem I have with it is that the fatty marbling does not render to the extent it does on a grill, because I can't afford to sear it as long as on the grill to avoid overcooking it. So I end up with a nice brown sear only on the surface, but then as soon as you bite into it you're met with almost raw fat. It's gross :)
As I stated before, the receptor binding profile of CBD has not been fully characterized. That means that its binding to other proteins and we don't know what they are yet

While its possible that its a downstream effect of CBR 1/2 we can't jump to that conclusion, the pharmacology of CBD is absurdly complex and biochemical inflammation pathways may be tangential to IRE1α which is part of the ER stress response

>Mounting evidence suggests that there are novel cannabinoid receptors[10] that is, non-CB1 and non-CB2, which are expressed in endothelial cells and in the CNS. In 2007, the binding of several cannabinoids to the G protein-coupled receptor GPR55 in the brain was described.[11]

>The existence of additional cannabinoid receptors has long been suspected, due to the actions of compounds such as abnormal cannabidiol that produce cannabinoid-like effects on blood pressure and inflammation, yet do not activate either CB1 or CB2.[25][26]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannabinoid_receptor

>Cannabidiol may be an antagonist of GPR55, a G protein-coupled receptor and putative cannabinoid receptor that is expressed in the caudate nucleus and putamen in the brain.[70][71] It also may act as an inverse agonist of GPR3, GPR6, and GPR12.[72] CBD has been shown to act as a serotonin 5-HT1A receptor partial agonist.[73] At higher concentrations, CBD acts as an inverse agonist of 5-HT1A receptors.[74] It is an allosteric modulator of the μ- and δ-opioid receptors as well.[75] The pharmacological effects of CBD may involve PPARγ agonism, inhibition of voltage-gated cation channels, and intracellular calcium release.[14]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannabidiol

On a discussion of ~65 possible protein targets for CBD:

>Some CBD effects at these targets in in vitro assays only manifest at high concentrations, which may be difficult to achieve in vivo, particularly given CBD’s relatively poor bioavailability.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC4604182/?r...

Here's an alternative receptor for your inflammation theory: A2

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC2588644/?r...
> Why buy an expensive and tasty meat and put some sugary sauce on it?

Why does anyone combine flavours and use sauces and different elements of taste?

I don't put ketchup on my steak either, but let's not pretend that the idea of sauces or combining sweet and savoury is somehow unfathomable.
Perhaps unintended but it comes across pretty condescending; in my opinion you make it sound like they asked a stupid question.
The 'flip once' rule is to NOT get an even cook.

For steak at least, it's nice to have a slightly crispy outer and tender pink inside.
You could use readwise.io (a paid service) to import your highlights from Google play books and many other services. Readwise offers an API which would help you process those annotations easier than parsing the google doc
I once maintained a web browser widget for a 3D multimedia engine. Zombocom* was the perfect smoke test for it, since it has both a large animation and pleasant looping audio, and it never ever goes down.

*: at the time it was still flash, so we used html5zombo.com
Strips and ribeyes are much more forgiving than filets because filets have very little intramuscular fat. Strips are ribeyes also taste much better than filets because filets have very little intramuscular fat. Don't buy filets. :)
No, but at least I didn't give consent to it through my silence or was on the wrong side of history, nearly as important as slavery, since it's an existential threat to all of us.

Qui tacet consentire videtur.
I too would like a demo. The more I watch less technical or impaired users use computers, the less I take for granted what is “obvious” or “fool-proof”. Dragging and dropping is not intuitive for everyone and is hard if someone doesn’t have good motor control or even if their mousepad is too small.

Another example would be the App Store’s “GET” (download button). My dad was tripped up because he didn’t recognize the icon denoting you already downloaded the app, but that it is not currently on your device (it’s a cloud icon with an arrow in it that is pointing down). It doesn’t help that the cloud icon is just an outline and loses all affordances that it is a button other than the colour blue.
That's great! These mobos have 100Mb.
American Airlines suing The Points Guy over app that syncs frequent flyer data
Not sure if this is what OP had in mind, but beef has a considerably larger carbon footprint than any other common protein source.
He's tested this, as have other people. You don't get a crispier sear by limiting flips.
The moment you release this you’ll get a feature request to pin items in place, and after releasing that everyone will pin everything rather than varying the constraints at their natural conceptual level, and this is how clever software degrades into crap.

I’ve seen this happen with a diverse range of systems, from firewall policy to music notation to workforce management.

Ensuring the algorithmic level continues to be more attractive than the explicit override remains one of the hardest problems of UX affordances. Step 1 is obtaining a deep affinity with domain-expert users, we must make it easy for the cynical to trust our algorithmic automation.
> My Linux laptop doesn't need to be optimized to the hilt the way Google's server farms do. Using the same scheduling algo or whatever in my laptop imposes real costs on my ability to understand my computer, without giving me the benefits Google gets from the algo.

Perhaps I don't fully understand what you're arguing. But here's a scenario, involving a hypothetical developer using similar logic, that often makes me worry. Suppose a developer reasons that the GUI for their application doesn't need to have all of the complexity of, say, a web rendering engine. So they develop their own GUI toolkit that meets their needs and aesthetic. This toolkit lacks some features that are important to some users, but not to this developer, such as accessibility with a screen reader. An application developed using this toolkit becomes popular, and companies start integrating it into their workflows, perhaps even requiring other companies that they work with to use it. Oops, now these companies can't hire an otherwise qualified blind person, or perhaps a formerly productive blind person loses their job [1]. If the original developer had accepted the current division of labor inherent in building high atop the web stack, and yes, the complexity and bloat that come with it, their application might have been fully accessible without them having to deeply understand accessibility.

[1]: This actually happened, though I'm not sure why the application was inaccessible. https://blindaccessjournal.com/2006/02/my-job-lost-due-to-in... https://blindaccessjournal.com/2006/02/torn-from-the-collect... https://blindaccessjournal.com/2006/02/the-cold-equations/
Bernoulli's Principle explains the force which is (wrongly) called 'lift'. The force is perpendicular to the aerofoil, whether the aerofoil is top-towards-ground (plane flying upside down) or top-towards-sky (plane flying right way up).

The angle of attack is always measured relative to the airflow, whether that relative airflow is upwards or downwards or sideways.

Note that at zero degrees of angle of attack, the wing still provides 'lift' due to the Bernoulli Principle. At negative degrees angle of attack, the wing moves 'downwards' relative to the airflow, when the angle of attack is positive the wing moves 'upwards' relative to the airflow. NOTE: the terms 'upwards' and 'downwards' here are directions relative to the aerofoil/wing and have nothing at all with the orientation of the wing to the ground. (If a plane is flying upside-down, 'downwards relative to the wing' would lead to an increase in the plane's altitude.)

When the angle of attack exceeds roughly 15 degrees relative to the airflow the fluid ('air', in other words) becomes turbulent which destroys the 'lift' and the wing is said to be 'stalled'. Being stalled is a dangerous situation and leads to aircraft literally falling out of the sky.
The JVM is actually good, but it is a bit too Java-centric. A VM without GC and with a more economic memory model is needed, and it looks like wasm is that.
Bell Labs Org Chart (1980)
Qwerty is laid out terribly.

The fourth and fifth-least frequent English letters have the first and second-best location on the right hand, and a rarely-used symbol (;) has another.

Of the most frequent letters (ETAOIN), only one (A) is directly under a fingertip at a resting position, and two of them require the longest stretches (T, N).

Dvorak, by comparison, puts the least frequent letters on the bottom row: ;QJKX BMWVZ (PYGF are less frequent than M and W). It has all of ETAOIN on the middle row.
It's like a stock-market bubble/crash, where prices can keep going up/down because [investors are acting following one-anothers' lead](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trend_following ).

In both cases, the social-animals are following their peers, inferring direction from them, ultimately forming a big loop that doesn't actually progress to a desired social-outcome because everyone's following everyone-else.
>In school you do “experiments” and if the answer doesn’t match what is in the book you are marked down. Often you have to memorize a bunch of assertions or even simply names, without any epistemic context.

I don't know what school you went to, but this doesn't match my experience.
There's some concerns about paravirtualized GPU performance, but the equivalent of "sports car" (workstation/server-like workloads) runs in VMs in cloud providers all the time.
Agree completely. Using tools to compare and catch all the changes between dev and live databases is fine, but experience has shown that having a handwritten SQL script is the best way to ensure the correct order of events, naming, transactions, features, etc.

It also saves time in learning and maintaining an entirely separate configuration system.
Thanks again. Using those exact options.

3421498 (7z)
3420832 (xz)

Wild that xz is not the same every time.
> In the book's universe, Kaballah is real and (among many other wild things) corporations automatically generate long lists of Hebrew characters to find names of God that give various powers.

In this universe, we do the same with numbers generated by ASICS or GPU: it mostly gives the power of money.
How about the myth that "eating steaks contributes to one's manliness" and which some like to repeat at every possible opportunity at BBQ events?
Mountain View is Googleville. Nearly all the buildings in the industrial part of the city are owned by them. You have to travel several miles from the Googleplex before you stop seeing Google-owned property. I don't know how any startup could set up there as it feels like there is zero office space left!
There's a very simple fix for this problem, which is just to hold the steak for an hour or so to lower the temp (and give more breathing room for the sear) before you sear it off --- which also dries the exterior of the steak and improves the sear.
Apples and steaks.

Apples don't feel pain or nurse their young.

You're attempting reductionism into absurd, conflated equivocation.
SLYT: How What's Wrong with AI Is Like a Crooked Game Show
Unprecedented does not mean in the recent past though, it means without precedent, i.e. never happened ever before.
LG is trying to control my video – And other YouTubers too (2021) - [video]
And considerably smaller carbon footprint than industrial emission and cars. The vegetables and grains grown 5000 miles away are being brought via land and sea thanks to petrol right to the vegan store one goes to shop at with their SUV.

But yes, let's demonise the food we've evolved to thrive on. It's mental that this has become a controversial idea worth censoring.
Big Endian POWER isn't bug-for-bug compatible with buggy Javascript usage of typed arrays that assumes little endianness, and thus browsers/nodejs/deno on POWER will be exposed to bugs that don't affect little endian x86-64/ARM.

After so many years of endianness bugs in C/C++ code, it's perplexing that the web standards committee voted to put typed arrays in Javascript in such a way that exposes platform byte order to Javascript programmers who can't generally be expected to have low-level C/C++/ASM experience with memory layout issues:

function endianness () {
let u32arr = new Uint32Array([0x11223344]);
let u8arr = new Uint8Array(u32arr.buffer);
if (u8arr[0] === 0x44)
return 'Little Endian';
else if (u8arr[0] === 0x11)
return 'Big Endian';
else
return 'WTF (What a Terrible Failure)';
}

EDIT: my old Power Mac was big endian, but I just read POWER has an endianness toggle. So in little endian mode it ought run endian-buggy JS with bug-for-bug compatibility.
'Principled' and 'non-partisan' described them better.
I worked at an ed-tech startup that allowed teachers to use our bank of questions to create assignments for their students. We found that drag and drop came with a few issues, such has having to implement keyboard accessibility separately from the drag and drop mechanism, moving things when the number of items is big, and some general confusion around certain UX.

The solution we ended up with, which is similar to the OP, is what we affectionately called Pick n Plop. I.e. you select an item, the UI tells you where it can go, and you click again to place it. You get keyboard accessibility for free since it's just buttons.

Demo right here (sorry for the terrible quality): https://giphy.com/gifs/9KgZorKdwdsaolomxS/fullscreen