skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> The problem is by the time the message is deemed to be spam it's too late to reject the mail.

That is incorrect. After the last DATA command from the spammer, your mail server can look at the mail and, if it’s spam, just say

558 5.7.1 That mail is ugly and you are ugly

This rejects the mail and makes it bounce to the sender.
funny I was thinking this would demonstrate that Xcode and Interface Builder were easier to grok for a beginner than they are today, but it seems it was just as particular then as it is today.
So your judgement on the content of their character is a negative one because they choose to outwardly identify themselves as the race they belong to, and incorporate it into their character?

Ok. I guess instead they should suppress that and just act “white” (or whatever the majority race is)?
Yeah maybe, but in my opinion it's better than the alternative (having loads of operator precedence rules that can change subtly between languages and never really being sure of anything).
Can't wait for them to ruin it!
This is similar in aim to FSharp.Formatting[1], which has been used for a while to generate syntax highlighting and hover tooltips for code samples and API docs in the F# ecosystem. Very cool to see!

[1]: https://github.com/fsprojects/FSharp.Formatting
Or, follow Tom Clancy and just let Russia join.
Is there a fork of viz.js that’s still maintained? The original was abandoned in 2018.
I completely agree with you on the value of curation.

But why not have a setting deep in the menu to allow sideloading unapproved apps? If Joe Block is able to opt in to the uncurated minefield, does that harm you or take away from you ability to enjoy curation?
You could use a different YouTube client perhaps. I use newpipe. It doesn't really do those recommendations.

But in general I really hate video sites too so I don't use it much at all. Too many harebrained "influencers" now trying to sell stuff
There really isn't one. 802.1x is the wired security standard, and almost never worth the hassle for home or small business networks unless you are really interested in learning the ins and outs.
Concentration is a loaded word. It is not black and white, but feels like you're talking about a value that goes from zero to one possibly? How do you think about it?

I came to think of it in terms of attention. In a model where your awareness of time, or of change is conditional on shifting your spotlight of attention it can be defined usefully, I think.

So, in such a model your concentration is conditional on your paying attention to where your awareness is not pointed. To the interplay of things outside your spotlight of awareness.

The processes that are you but outside of the seat of your awareness already have workable models for all of that. They have good guesses. Your sensory will enrich those guesses and flow them into your reality as givens.

If you think of it like that there is a clear difference between paying attention to something, and expanding your perception of the present moment by concentration.

Sometimes I hear people use the c-word to describe uninterrupted time dedicated to a task. That is to say focus. Exclusionary attention.

How do you think about it?
You mean for the machine's labour - progressively more and more as more and more is automated, and where people with their UBI are paying into the system (consumers aren't a fuel leak, they're the largest cog in the wheel) and workers will be getting paid adequately on top of the UBI they'll be getting too?

A concept missed by most is that the buying power of "$1,000"/month grows exponentially as more and more gets automated.
> SQLite-as-the-store pattern

I remain consistently amazed at what one can do with lowly little SQLite. I can't count the number of times I struggled with some scripts performance issues when handling a large amount of data that came through as a CSV or text file, which immediately evaporated when i realized "why am I asking the program to handle a million tuples at a time via internal data structures when an indexed database would do it so much faster?"

An in-memory (or even SSD-resident) SQLite database can be ridiculously fast for handling in-process data and not just the stuff you want to keep when you're done.
"We paid him a good salary for his resume and work, but he has somehow convinced himself that he can make double somewhere else and still work 32 hours a week with an extremely relaxed working environment."

You sound like a reasonable human but the quoted is a huge red flag for me. Whenever someone said 'we pay him a good salary' it was far from the truth.
The radius of the sphere, assuming the cube has side length 1, is (sqrt(D)-1)/2. It seems worthy of note that this radius becomes arbitrarily large.
Major U.S. airline CEOs warn 5G could ground some planes, wreak havoc
What I dislike about these studies is that what they are measuring maps badly to real-world experiences. There was another study before, not long ago, where participants were asked what they would do if they had this and this much UBI. And from that they drew their conclusion. I don't know how and whether they corrected for obvious biases (who would honestly say that they would sit on their ass? People deceive themselves all the time!), but doing a study on imaginary situations just looks pointless to me. You want to do a study, you randomly select people from different walks of life and give them their money for a long enough time for them to feel secure and plan long-term. That's how you know. Yeah, you'd need to get money from somewhere, but who says it's gonna be easy?

I would certainly spend at least a month goofing around. Maybe two. Maybe I'd become a freaking train driver, who knows. Take up a shitty job, blog about it without fear of being fired. Or maybe I'd decide that I should spend the rest of my life goofing around. How should I know? Give me my money and see what I do, not what I say I'd do.
TIL there's an actual 'botched' library with the same name; I actually came up with it independently on a lazy office afternoon :^)
Which car washes are we talking about? Self service manual washes, or something more akin to a light detail that includes a hand wash?

In the US, you can drive up and pay $1~/min and spray your car yourself w/ soap and water. You can also do the drive-thru option for about $10. On the upper end, you can pay $50~ for what might start as a drive-thru, but then someone comes out and does a manual touch up where the machine might have missed a spot, and then they will vacuum and wipe down the interior.

At $100+, you're looking at a hand wash and detail, potentially going up to hundreds of dollars for different aftercare options. Detailing can be very lucrative if you get a good referral network established.
There is nothing fundamental about ownership-based resource management, memory-safety can be achieved in other ways. Zig is C, it's not meant to abstract away memory management. You can do whatever in Zig, write a specialized allocator that's verified to be correct, even for a microcontroller with 2 KiB memory. Zig is a machine-oriented language, which means no hidden control flow, no hidden allocation. You can write a garbage collector or a compiler like Rust has too if that's what you need.
i'm talking about hoarding the entirety, specifically.
Inflation more than negated any increase in wages.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LES1252881600Q

Fewer workers means fewer goods and services. If demand remains constant or increases, you get inflation. The pandemic caused supply chain issues, but this wouldn't have been as big of an issue had demand been artificially pumped with the stimulus. In many places, such as the ports, productivity is at an all-time high, but they're still bottlenecking consumers.
Only on a MacBook Pro or PowerBook. Not accounting for 3rd party accessories: iBooks, MacBooks, Apple’s Mice & Pro Mice, Mighty Mice, Apple’s Pro Keyboards, Apple Keyboards and Apple Remotes were all plastic at the time, and mostly white or translucent plastic with a couple of exceptions.

The aluminum stuff all came about just immediately prior to (about one or two month’s prior) or after Leopard’s release, but Tiger’s era (and Brushed Metal didn’t start on Tiger) was dominated by plastic input devices.
I'd assumed some familiarity with common CI systems (and assumed the commands would be tailored to your use case). Let me walk it into some more depth.

First:

> git clone --recursive --branch "$commitid" "$repourl" "$repodir"

The `git clone` will take your git repository URL as the $repourl variable. It will also take your commit id (commit hash or tagged version which a pull request points to) as the $commitid variable (`--branch $commitid`). It will also take a $repodir variable which points to the directory that will contain the contents of the cloned git repository and already checked out at the commit id specified. It will do so recursively (`--recursive`): if there are submodules then they will also automatically be cloned.

This of course assumes that you're cloning a public repository and/or that any credentials required have already been set up (see `man git-config`).

Then:

> img="$(docker build --network=none -f "$dockerfile" "$repodir")"

Okay so this is sort've broken: you'd need a few more parameters to `docker build` to get it to work "right". But as-is, `docker build` usually has network access so `--network=none` will specify that the build process will not have access to the network. I hope your build system doesn't automatically download dependencies because that will fail (and also suggests that the build system may be susceptible to attack). You specify a dockerfile to build using `-f "$dockerfile"`. Finally, you specify the build context using "$repodir" -- and that assumes that your whole git repository should be available to the dockerfile.

However, `docker build` will write a lot more than just the image name to standard output and so this is where some customization would need to occur. Suffice to say that you can use `--quiet` if that's all you want; I do prefer to see the output because it normally contains intermediate image names useful for debugging the dockerfile.

Finally:

> docker run --rm -ti --network=none "$img"

Finally, it runs the built image in a new container with an auto-generated name. `-ti` here is wrong: it will attach a standard input/output terminal and so if it drops you into an interactive program (such as bash) then it could hang the CI process. But you can remove that. It also assumes that your dockerfile correctly specifies ENTRYPOINT and/or CMD. When the container has exited then the container will automatically be removed (--rm) -- usually they linger around and pollute your docker host. Finally, the --network=none also ensures that your container does not have network access so your unit tests should also be capable of running without the network or else they will fail. You could use `--volume` to specify a volume with data files if you need them. You might also want to look at `--user` if you don't want your container to have root privileges...

And of course if you want integration tests with other containers then you should create a dedicated docker network and specify its alias with `--network`: see `man docker-network-create`; you can use `docker network create -d internal` to create a network which shouldn't let containers out.

Does that answer your question?
Actually, when redis changed their license to get paid by cloud services like Amazon, there was a huge uproar. The people behind redis didn’t purposely break anything, had a lot of people talking about it, and had a clearer way towards getting paid. There are better ways to bring attention to an important issue.
This is a short term advantage that is quickly evaporating.

There are crypto credit cards now that allow you to achieve the same effect.

Assuming this advantage disappears, are there any other bull cases for $USD?
It's very common for a function to have multiple defers ... but defers in a loop are a misuse of the feature.
Safari is switching to chromium just like edge. We all know it, let's just cope with it and move on.
> Material things would become scarce again due to the artificially inflated cost of labour.

A UBI would be more efficient than the extensive patch-work of policies and regulations that we use today to artificially redistribute income. There would be a lot more work happening on material things, not less - especially when adjusted for productivity. Minimum wage work today is some of the least productive.
I never had this feeling. Especially in the first one. You basically have the Balin‘s tomb scene and Amon Hen at the end. It never felt drawn out to me.
You only need 1 show for me to subscribe to your streaming service. It worked the same way during the cable days, I paid for HBO to watch the Sopranos, and canceled it 5 minutes after the series finale.
In terms of safety in systems programming, Zig is hardly better than something like Modula-2 or Object Pascal.

It just happens to have a better syntax for the C crowd.
I say this as someone who still occasionally pulls up a YouTube video of a supercut of 300 up against the song "Tangerine Speedo" to emphasize the accidental homoeroticism of the movie, just for giggles: it's a graphic novel. Art oversimplifies to make its points, and graphic novels are no stranger to that. Perhaps they are even the best example of doing so.

That it doesn't align with your personal politics at the time is not a crime. It's not even interesting. I can imagine fewer things more boring than someone going over a work with a fine-toothed comb looking for violations of their own personal Hays Code. None of them will turn that level of inspection on their ideological pets, only their "problematic faves."

I dare her: do romance novels next, and do it from a men's rights perspective. I've read my fair share of them, they're all a real crapfest if you want to think of men as actual people instead of living props in the Happily Ever After each heroine is owed. But that doesn't sell clicks on Polygon.
I would say it is well known by everyone who has a regular amount of general culture. The view of MLK it is without doubts positive, and the social fight he represents it is seen as it was necessary or inevitable, like universal suffrage, feminism and the like (but particular for the cause).

In Spain it is indirectly studied together with cultural movements of the XX century and the evolution of society. But not too much or specifically, but as it became a Pop Icon (due its martyrdom, appearance in news, documentaries, or even advertisement spots) everyone would know about it as much as people in America might now about Gandhi just to say an example.

Very few people might know specifics of his life, or a very accurate context on how exactly was American society at the time he lived, but undoubtably everyone knows or has heard of MLK, could recognize his face and the first sentence of his speech and the social fight against racial discrimination.

What it is not completely understood from American society, for example, is all the nuances and cultural differences regarding racism and daily interactions. For example, people picture racism as black or white dichotomy (forgetting many other issues or different minorities), and they cannot understand why the word “nigger” is taboo and at the same time used constantly in shows by black people themselves, I remember even a youngster who thought that it was kind of joke/slang thing and repeated it aloud without fully comprehend the social taboo around it or degree of ofende that it would have that implied for an american person. In this regard movies and Netflix shows sort of educate people about these topics in American culture.

I would say, in spite of everyone fully agreeing with the ideals of MLK, racism or how social integration across different racial groups works, is still understood in different ways and totally depends on the local culture of each country; one example which I found myself crazy: in Spain no one could understand blackfacing as a derogatory action as it is part of some cultural celebrations without any intention of mocking or whatsoever, but in Britain I believe the same action would be understood as a large offense against black or people of color. And still in both countries the majority of its population would agree without hesitation on the ideals that MLK represents.

But again, these are cultural differences, the message of MLK is largely accepted and even understood necessary as part of a social society where everyone an be part of and being judged by its personality not by its race.

P.D. I hope not to be misunderstood, as I know in America many people is largely sensible to this topic.
I cancelled Disney+ when they wanted to charge extra for a movie, on top of the subscription. I'll just buy the DVD cheaper than what they asked for on top of the sub.

Admittedly, I'm not automatically entitled to all the things they release but still feels wrong and wanted to vote with my wallet.

The Mandalorian was an amazing series though!
In the US the NIH funds the vast majority of life sciences ($30B/year), but NSF, DOD(IIRC at least a billion a year each), and private institutions also provide life sciences funding (several more billions). NIH definitely is the big gorilla, many young investigators are trying to get established by getting R01s and using them to publish papers at the start of their career.
Thing is, if Zig is C, why bother at all, we already have C for it.
> The phrasing tries to downplay the number, but 1 in 8 people stopping work is very significant.

I agree that seems very significant. Unemployment is considered to be quite high when it's at 8% for instance.

During the pandemic, we've had to pay people monthly cheques because we forced businesses to shut down, and it's been difficult to get people to return to work. Granted, this isn't the same as UBI, and there are conflating factors, but currently, we're in a situation where we have high inflation and a labor shortage. That's not very encouraging.

In my mind, if we want to implement something like UBI, we need a way to control the inflation it might generate. It might also not be realistic to do this until we have something like general purpose robots to counter the labor shortage. Another problem is just how we finance something like this. Increasing taxes on the general population seems like a pretty bad idea. We'd have to fund it through money printing, but again, how do we control the resulting inflation? High sales taxes? Increasing income taxes in the higher brackets would create a situation where it's less worthwhile to work hard.
This advantage for $USD is already beginning to vanish. Assuming it does, are there any other reasons to be bullish $USD?
2.0 is already supported by Logic and I suspect that Midi 2.0 support will be a good marketing item for midi controllers. So we’ll see but I think its prospects better than IPv6
Owners of capital think people aren't happy unless they are working making money, because capital owners are made happy by having money. It's hard for them to understand that there are other, better sources of happiness. There are tons of examples of people forgoing money for something more satisfying.
Hmm, thanks - going to look
Oh jheeze thanks! Will fix that
And I'm not totally sure my visualization in my head is correct, but if everyone is getting $1,000 per month with a high quality of life provided with that, an additional $1,000 per month is weighted much more purchase power wise than in today's model.
The problem with modern cars is not obvious until you have to repair one
Don’t forget share buybacks, which have become more popular as of late. Dell being the prime example in the tech industry by leveraged buyout and making it private.
Another "yup", with personal anecdata from this weekend. Was feeling seriously underpowered on Saturday, so it was a good day to make some drudge changes to code, nothing that could be automated easily (mostly one offs and edge cases, sadly). It was very mechanical and needed doing. Perfect for Saturday Zombie Me.

Had something similar during my biweekly management and product meetings today; updates to not-quite-every syslog call where there was a tiny bit of judgement in deciding whether to make the update and a tiny bit of judgement in the making itself (a few vim macros could have sped that last part up a little, but that would almost have been too effortful).

Perfect drudge work I could do with 1/2 to 3/4 of an ear tuned in to what others were saying, not so difficult/deep that I couldn't rouse myself and comment when necessary.
Basic income provides people the basics needed to be able to look for and apply and interview for work without having to worry about how are they going to pay for food, transportation to/from interviews etc...

Its crippling knowing that you only have a little bit of money and you need to determine how much a sunk-cost-opportunity is worth -- meaning:

"I have $100, and I do have expenses - but in order to interview for [JOBS] - I need to be able to get to and from, put gas in car/pay for transport, and know that I can still feed myself/dependents && be able to absorb the cost of the interview if I dont get it -- AND have money to make it to the next interviews"

---

Everyone focuses on the lowest bar "these ghetto people wont work if we give them money"

FUCK YOU i you think that the only people who NEED such assistance are ghetto poor people who want to milk the system.

---

What about having employers cover the costs of actually interviewing with your company? If it costs one $50+ just to get-to-and-from an interview inclusive of time -- then some people will struggle to do so.
Duh. Working is fun. Working is progress, pride, a social place, sparks your mind, etc.etc.
I think it depends on what level of devotion is expected from me, under the terms of "work". After spending 20+ years working like a trouper and genuinely enjoying the crazy pressure, I quit my job last year and took 6 months to do very little. I'm amazed at how much I've enjoyed not working. I'm about to return to work, but what I've taken away from my break is:

1. I want to work on interesting problems

2. I will not give my life to a company, ever again.

In other words, I'm waiting for companies to start offering 30-hour weeks, 4 day weeks, 60 days unpaid time off per year etc.

For now, I'm returning to "regular" work. However, whereas in the past I worked through months of stressful bullshit caused by bad management, toxic colleagues and unpaid technical debt, my future willingness to work will be based on job satisfaction. If my job isn't making me happy, I'll try to fix things for a while, but if things don't get better quickly, I'm gone.
So you don't think it is feasible?
It depends on how you define "concaveness". A cube is concaver than a square in a sense. The travel from the center of a unit square to its side takes 0.5, and to its vertex ~0.7. For a cube, 0.5 and ~0.87. For a 100d cube, 0.5 and 5. (For completeness, for 1d cube it's 0.5, 0.5). Of course that is not a true concaveness, but it gives a nice sense of inside distances, especially with spheres, which are defined as equidistant.

We are just used to project a cube in a way that prevents to see its linearly-spatial configuration (a projection messes up lengths), but if you preserve these lengths and "flatten" them instead, a cube will flatten out to a sort of a shuriken.
Not OP but Good question! a big part of NIMBY is driven by how much people's net worth is tied into their residence. So IMO you need to reduce this. It starts with convincing people that real estate is on average not a great investment. There is no way for primary residences to universally (1) be a good investment by beating inflation rate and (2) be more affordable.

This is more of a "cultural" thing, and I think most important.

Following that, in practice there are supply side and demand side methods of driving down the cost of living. The big ones are probably maximum height requirements, minimum parking requirements, and minimum size requirements.