skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Wait for dv 3.0 ;)

This is just a framework around ETL processing that highlight the usage of table via name in the data warehouse layer.

When you implement it the big problem is that everybody may have a different definition of what the names mean (Ask WhatsApp a satellite is to 10 people and you will get 10 different answer).

Also as it adds a layer of abstraction, you will spend a lot of time searching where the data comes from.

Technically, you should be able to delete all the data as it's processed but practically you always ends up with a persistent layer.

I will never understand why they don't just replicate the source model.

https://datacadamia.com/data/warehouse/data_vault/data_vault
How is that the opposite? Anyone is free to extend the protocol with whatever they want — e.g. wlroots-based compositors have exactly this “standardized way of doing toolkits/widgets”.
Yes you can, however you need IAM credentials which permit invoking the AWS Lambda Function and you need to sign the request using SigV4 with these credentials.

There is a somewhat incomplete answer on Stack Overflow for a similar question: https://stackoverflow.com/a/57809234
Neither did they invent Maria Magdalena.
PyPy is not fully compatible with CPython. You won't have the same behaviour and CPython C API is not guaranteed to be fully compatible. So, I'm not sure that having a JIT that is fully compatible is easy.
It's for similar reasons that people call vacuum cleaners 'hoovers', they 'google' for things on DuckDuckGo, they 'Xerox' documents on a Cannon copier, all on-road reflective lane markers are a 'Catseye' etc. It may not be accurate but I don't find it at all odd.
After twenty years of using wikipedia, my conclusion is this: in order to keep a single article in decent shape, you need both:

1) Constant vigilance, to monitor the article and revert drive-by edits putting up random nonsense.

2) Solid political backup from other long-time wikipedia editors, to fight off constant AFDs and DRN attempts to destroy whatever you've done.

If at any point you slack off, the article will be gutted and replaced with garbage. This resembles any other human endeavor, in that you're valiantly resisting entropy while everyone in the world calls you a moron for even bothering.

As a disclaimer, I suppose I don't see any way this could be technically "fixed", short of replacing humanity with something else.
With the «plus» subscription you also get a few Nintendo 64 games and Sega Mega Drive games.
You can kinda fix this by lowering the ndots value. But probably the better way to fix this is to not include a 'search' directive at all. Don't specify anything for 'search' or 'ndots'. And then do as you say, use FQDNs everywhere.
You've gone from being one zealot to another. Oh well, whatever floats your boat.
Does anyone have any stories to share involving apktool?

Random note: It's curious how the homepage and the linked repo are on GitHub but the binary downloads are served from bitbucket.
This looks a lot worse if thisplace is a long subquery itself.
other points : as a french, I have access to french cheese for my photo for the most part, this i why the model is focused on french cheese

But I hope to learn more about other countries cheese !
We should probably put some image gathering / labelling website somewhere
I was out of the loop on this and I stumbled across this -> Neighbor on Queens man with bomb-making equipment: 'Obviously the man is sick'[0]. This is just weird. It isn't like what the OS community could have done for him, it is what he should have done for his mental health.

0: https://abc7ny.com/suspicious-package-queens-astoria-fire/64...
> Asking for a browser with Cookie Autodelete.

FTFY :)
16 years ago.

And below, a broken banner for "Take back the Web, Get Firefox".

Complete with a link to spreadfirefox.com that seems to be broken.
I'd argue this is a denial of service attack, inconveniencing the target and possibly costing them money but without stealing or destroying anything.
> single-pixel modifications would be paint-style programs

Any app that draws a pixel as a single operation does that. In order to make this faster, you'll need to keep a bitmap to hold the image and then, maybe, use the blitter to render it to the screen. Bitplanes allow some tricks with games, when you split the planes into more than one playfield, or could even use it for windowing, putting the active window on one group of bitplanes above the rest so that you wouldn't bother to redraw windows because oclusion isn't destructive.
Not right now but I did read that AWS were planning to allow use of lambdas like this without a ELB fronting them in the future.
> 6-month resume "gaps" that may be due to normal life circumstances

Yep, that's me taking care of my mother undergoing cancer treatment.
FAANGs are at best half a million to 1 million people and there are at least 35 million developers out there, in total.

Even FAANGs don't pay that well except for maybe 10-20 select locations.

My point is that most devs worldwide, even with experience, make less than $200k in total. More like less than $100k.
I remember so many of those cars depicted there. Great memories!
I might have a form of this that is probably (definitely) not as great as her top 50 score.

When Facebook became ubiquitous it was especially awkward to know and recognize people way before they knew you based on the fact that their face showed up on the ”you might know this person” sections with a nice photo of their face. Pretty much the same way she explained it – it is awkward trying to act like you don’t know the person and who they know in turn.

If I had to guess where my face-keeping started it could be my parents’ giant social circle and getting tested on and teased if I didn’t recognize the person they’ve introduced to me before.

Perhaps I missed it in the article but things like recognizing a persons’ gait could also be included in the general ”recording” of a persons’ appearance profile.
Depends on the language. XML maps nicely to C/C++/Java/Rust/... structures, that you can generate from a schema at compile time. Dealing with arbitrarily typed arrays and objects is painful in some languages because you need to use variants and dynamic-cast every access to the document.
You're right, social mobility and overall standard of living matters as well. Also, how strong the state itself is and how decisively they can put down insurrection...
For the majority of applications, locks are for "keeping honest people honest". With the right tools most locks take seconds to circumvent, think breaking a window, cutting the steel, drilling out the lock. For situations where it actually matters, professionals know to secure elsewhere before the actual lock is considered.
This version of the same game isn't multiplayer, but has much nicer sounds and graphics: http://99balls.buyhtml5.com/
I think its too much to lump all RISC chips in the same bucket.

I have written some assembler for MIPS and Alpha AXP back in the day. The mips assembler was quite straight forward and reasonable but I found the alpha to be very hard.
It greatly depends; the notorious slot machine (pachinko) industry is mostly run by organized crime [1] and pachinko lovers are not well received in general, but arcade game centers described in this article are not necessarily pachinko parlors. And if a single arcade does have both pachinkos and other ordinary games, they are typically sectioned so that if you only want to play ordinary games you don't ever need to cross the pachinko area (in the other words, pachinkos are pervasive but also well hidden from the public sight).

[1] Many of them are also run by Korean Japaneses and this is a consequence of the discrimination of Koreans in Japan.
> Johnson is not even capable of comprehending

Alex Johnson was scholarship boy at Eton and writing books about Shakespeare is his hobby. He is very well capable of comprehending abstract concepts and manipulating their perception to his benefit. He publicly portrays himself as "Boris the bumbling fool" but unlike Trump does not act like that in private. The fact that he is unethical and lazy does not mean he is stupid, and it is a dangerous assumption to make.
Copilot lets me think about the code without being distracted by the boring parts. And from my experience, blunders like in the article happen rarely.
This article ignores the most common problem I have with DNS these days which can roughly be construed as: What is actually handling resolution on my system?

We've come a long way from good ole fashioned libc/glibc acting as a good ole fashioned stub resolver on my UNIX system. Is systemd even looking at /etc/resolv.conf anymore? Who is overwriting /etc/resolv.conf? Is the information provided via DHCP being ignored? Is Firefox using DoH? Where is caching happening? How do I clear it?

All of these questions have completely different answers depending on OS and how they're configured. I work with OSX, Debian, Redhat and OpenBSD on the regular and they all have different answers for the above questions.
The New York Times often subtly endorses conflict escalations that lead to war and death.

It is Kremlin propaganda to say Ukraine is in a state of civil war to undermine the legitimacy of the current government. Because the revolution was unconstitutional is of course an excuse for Russia to not accept it because of their strategic interest. But the existence of that conflict is true and Ukraine should do everything to resolve that problem.

Western nations did influence the formation of the new government in their interests. I think this was a huge mistake, just as the invasion of Crimea was a huge mistake. Is this on the same level? Perhaps not, but the distance is subjective since the separatists did reject free trade with the west because it would have meant their economy being out-competed.

The current government asks western nations to supply weapons as the separatists get armed by Russia. Further updates on the conflicts are pending...

Honestly, I think mutual disengagement in the region is the best scenario we can hope for if people like peace.
Why didnt intellisense pick up on this, i dont use github pilot, but does that override intellisense or wasnt it installed correctly ?
That's the first / starter use case though, SQL can get a bit crazy once you get into enterprise spaces - stored procedures, funky datatypes, auditing & history features like temporal tables, hundreds, thousands of tables and a similar amount of columns, naming & organizing things, etc.

Thankfully, most people will never have to deal with any of that, myself included. The biggest databases I've had to deal with were very relatable - one about books & authors, another about football and historic results. The other biggest database is one I'm working with and building right now, it's a DB for an installation of an application managing tons of configurations, a lot of domain specific terms. The existing database is not normalized of course, and uses a column with semicolon-separated-values as an alternative to foreign keys. Sigh. Current challenge is to implement history, so that a user can revert to previous versions. I'll probably end up implementing temporal tables in sqlite.
> And if defer is meant to make code slimmer, it still doesn't belong to C, because it leads to implicit execution and memory/stack allocation.

I don't see why block scoped defer should cause any more memory or stack allocation than a goto based cleanup handler. It's just a different way to organize the source code. In some instances it might actually allow you to omit some local variables (that otherwise would have to be optimized out by the compiler).

> C is an explicit and verbose language.

It's relatively explicit, I agree. However, defer doesn't change that much. You still see exactly what code runs inside your function. The only real change is that code's location. It's not that different from putting expression-3 in your loop header and having it be evaluated implicitly when you reach the end of the body or do a continue. If you wanted to be explicit, you'd ban for loops and use gotos in a while loop to replace continue. Umm, be my guest, but I prefer the less verbose approach.

And that gets me to the second point... C can be surprisingly terse despite requiring you to be rather explicit, and that's one of the things I really like about C. If anything I'd love to see features that allow it to be even more terse.

> Unlike with, say, C++ where "a + b" may actually produce kilobytes of machine code

Oh, I agree. I really don't want tons of hidden code in C. However, the deferred block is still explicitly coded inside your function and not at all hidden from you someplace else. So it's not like you need to go spelunking through a pile of headers and class definitions to discover that there are destructors running SQL queries when your function returns.

In that respect, defer remains very explicit and transparent so I'm ok with it.
> Additionally, iOS only supports a subset of UNIX.

Of course. It only needs what the applications supposed to run on it need. The same is true about my car entertainment system - it probably doesn't have many tty's and doesn't really need more than one filesystem. Same, BTW, applies to Android - it's a Linux, but it's not really a desktop OS.

> How many iOS apps have your ever shipped?

Does it have any relevance to knowing the difference between an OS and a GUI?
Breaking a build in a way that is trivially rolled back is not in the same league as pushing code that harvests email addresses, CCs and mines bitcoin.

I'm disappointed to see this kind of comparison made.
You're conflating so many different factors here: openness of architecture, diversity of design / manufacturing, market needs in different sectors etc - all of which influence what features are built into CPUs / SoCs.

There seems to be a bit of a consistent thread running through lots of discussions that RISC-V because its 'open' magically solves all sorts of problems - it does have some advantages - but it doesn't solve these issues any more than Arm does (and Arm already has massive diversity of supply and billions of CPUs shipped without ME type issues).
Sweeping and silly customer complaints at phone stores
Many on the internet seem to jump to the conclusion that any sub-optimal allocation of capital is money laundering.
It was explained to me by one of Arthur's colleagues at the Turing Institute that PdB stood for "Pure Dead Brilliant" - which indeed it was and the Institute being in Glasgow.

HyperNeWS was definitely one of the neatest systems I have ever worked with.

Edit: I also really liked PostScript.
Why is it that someone that delivers 10x units of work calls everyone else lazy when they only deliver x units of work? Some people can deliver more for a while and then burn out, while some people can't or won't do either.

It would be best to realize that not everyone is lazy just because they won't deliver the same ammount of work units as you. We are all different, with different needs and handicaps.

1. Be patient. No matter what.

14. Learn the needs of those around you and respect them.*
> Although you could argue that people should use private networks and maybe not use IPv6 at all.

Managing 10/8 space is still a chore in an organization when you have lots of vpcs and lots of subnets per vpc; even with private space ipv4 is too scarce. I'm hoping ipv6 will help with that
VNC outperforms it, which is saying a lot since VNC is terrible. Remote x apps were always this selling point in linux culture and I always thought I was doing something wrong because they were so incredibly slow until I realized its the protocol that's just slow.
There is. LinkedIn.
Sounds a bit like the more sleazy casino's in europe and the US to be honest, or random slot machines in the corners of restaurants and bars.
No TypeSafe, No Transaction. This thing seems not helpful.
You're right: object orientation and relational data don't mesh well together.

Where you're wrong, and it may take more experience to realize, is that the problems in the mismatch lie far more on the OOP side than on the relational side.

Object oriented designs - the navigable graphs of objects, leaving aside polymorphism - usually privilege a particular perspective of the data, a perspective which is suited to a specific application. For example, a store with items, customers and orders: the application is focused on creating transactions. Relational models, on the other hand, support multiple perspectives "out of the box" and are expected to support multiple applications; for example, reports that roll up by item, by category and by customer; reusing the same customers for a different application; and so on.

Different applications and perspectives usually require different object models. The alternate application reusing the same customer entities won't want to couple with a store application and decorate every customer with an irrelevant list of orders. A reporting app is better off with a visual query builder that creates SQL to hand off to the database than trying to iterate over object graphs performing aggregations and sorts. And so on.

For applications with ambitions for a longer lifespan, start with the database schema. Keep application models fairly thin; focus on verbs; try to ensure only one piece of code owns mutating a logical database entity with a set of verbs; and keep entanglements like UI out of those verb implementations so that you reuse the verbs, rather than being too tempted to reimplement direct database modifications or push too much logic into models.

Object oriented models come and go, applications are rewritten, but database migrations happen at a much slower pace, and data lasts for a very long time.
Is there are good source that compares bytecodes across languages - e.g. Python, Lua, Ruby etc - and explains the design decisions.
An Eye Tracking Study on CamelCase and Under_score Identifier Styles [pdf]
1) no, except by cheats like virus or prions from space, which is Fred Hoyles theory with others (pangenesis from comets) so no intelligent aliens among us

9) you animal

10) not without limits on insurance company use of data to deny cover for genetic disease or a national health system.

15) or a third strand in the field so men's X women's X and mixed gender X

19) only by cheats. Like having children

20) you non animal

31) maybe

34) you hipster not on blockchain otherwise yes

36) nope

47) regression tends to the mean. The direction is efficiency or energy
Pachinko is a slot machine and is gambling, but they use a loophole to not be considered such - it pays out tickets that you can use to get toys and stuff like an arcade, but they will buy the toys back from you for money.
It was a bit of code printing ascii art in a loop, with a preceding comment "don't commit this", and we have bo information about whether it was put into the release on purpose or malicious intent afaik. Is it really malware?
Probably not stop counterfeit , but would significantly reduce it having domestic accountability. Much easier to do criminal charges, apply fines to property/factory etc. That recourse for quality largely doesn't exist for most importers and foreign governments to place like china except for the most serious of offences. And with things like Apple (or any big brand), they have incredible buying power + ability to resource high level of QA. That works for powerful companies for sure but once you drop in scale and on more generic goods, that is clearly another story.
I would go further and say disposable online identities are getting more and more important.
When the bones have turned to stone there's not much to restore as the stone/minerals essentially just fill the empty shape that the body left behind. I think they can do some minor analysis still, like e.g. pigment analysis to identify possible colors. But if its just 'very old bones' you can still get DNA fragments. The chance of getting a whole strand of DNA is however pretty low. So you might be able to identify relations, but you wouldn't be able to clone them.
It’s hard for me to see this happening. Spotify has not improved their core offering at all. The interface is terrible in many ways, and inflexible. Their ability to innovate seems nonexistent to me, a paying customer of many years who would give them the benefit of the doubt. Then there’s the whole fiasco with them getting the rights to Joe Rogan’s show but then censoring large amounts of it, caving to the demands of activist employees. Now per this article, they want to become the invasive ads network every other tech giant wants to be. I used to root for them as the underdog but now they’re indistinguishable from the tech giants I would’ve liked to see them challenge.
It’s interesting that: “results indicate no difference in accuracy between the two styles, subjects recognize identifiers in the underscore style more quickly.”
It probably makes a bit more sense if you consider that the “per-function stack” is really the tail of the call frame.

That also means the bytecode works solely within its own stack segment.
Different cultures distinguish colours into different classes. You can do an experiment where you give a person sheet of randomly colored pages and ask them to divide them into named stacks.

A western civilisation member might do something like Red, Brown, Orange, Yellow, Green, Blue, Pink, Violet, Grey and perhaps do something special with White/Black. (11 basic colours)

A Russian will most likely split blue into light blue and dark blue. (12 basic colours)

Himba people have 5 basic colours:

Serandu – used to describe reds, browns, oranges and some yellows

Dambu – includes a variety of greens, reds, beige and yellows

Zuzu – used to described most dark colours, black, dark red, dark purple, dark blue, etc.

Vapa – used for some yellows and white

Buru – used to describe a collection of greens and blues
In addition to sibling comment. APK is more or less zip file, with exception to one of signatures, all the interesting part that you want to reverse are the files inside it not the container: dalvik bytecode, binary encoded XML files of UI and other API specific resources.
Laravel has a similar convention, wrapping everything in static classes. I hated it at first - and still hate the convention outside Laravel - but in context it works well. Not for minification, but rather for reducing cognitive load while maintaining code while preserving good separation of concerns.
Thanks. Looks like the royal society link is the original work, but the nature editorial also mentions the same - it’s still possible we might have higher stability in other conditions (they only loooked at dna in bone samples). Not saying we will hold hope for dinosaur cloning, just that 521 years sounds too small.
The MIT license doesn't prevent you from doing this. If someone cloned the repo, they could continue doing whatever they wanted with it, but the owner is entitled to put up whatever new code they want on their repo.