skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Depends on the compiler toolchain.
It's worth pointing out that the Secondary Market Corporate Credit Facility has ended, and the Fed has sold everything it has bought [0].

But of course the precedent has been set, which may be why you chose to use the present tense.

[0] https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/H41RESPPAABNWW
> interaction of different system at the object level has been done before though

Yes. I have used this (CocoaJava, Tcl/ObjC, Ruby/ObjC, etc.) and also implemented it myself (Squeak/Objective-C, among others). Even though I'd say that Objective-C is probably about as good at this as it gets, the end results are still complicated and fragile.

In the end, what ends up most workable is that one object model is declared "it", and the rest of the languages then just skins on top of that object model. (See the various .NET languages and reimplementations, JVM languages and reimplementations, and now Truffle/Graal).
Trusted computing environments only hurt 1% of the users anyways.

We live in a world where people talk about Thinkpads vs Macbook Pros, but for 99% of the world laptops are appliances they buy like we'd buy a toaster.

They don't care that they can't run Linux, if anything onerous code signing requirements ala mobile devices would be great for the safety of their devices with minimal effects on what they can do.

-

I'm not saying I want the market for power users to die, I'm one of them after all, but I also feel like these conversations on HN are often disconnected from the reality most people live in...

This isn't really a "they don't know better so they don't complain", this is a "even if they knew better they wouldn't complain"
It's not a "couple" of unverified outliers for Citadel, it's like half of their offers in the last few months.

It's also baseline entry-level comp at Jane Street, and Hudson River Trading goes even higher.

First-year bonuses are generally guaranteed, and after that are "speculative" in the same way that stock compensation is speculative - largely dependent on firm performance (though personal performance can actually pull it them significantly in finance, unlike with stock).

I didn't say this was the majority of devs, I said this was entry-level comp for "top-end finance shops", which is true. It is also true that there are competitors in that space which pay much less, just like there are tech companies which pay much less FAANG & Co, but does not mean that FAANG & Co don't exist or shouldn't be relevant to people's decision-making.
All this security is making me feel claustrophobic.
I wonder if even a majority of people who file one have a legitimate religious objection instead of abusing this ability to get out of mandates.
> What about if I decided to remove your access to the internet in case you continue to espouse your pro-capitalist thinking? Would you have an issue then?

Who are you in this case? The government? (Also as an aside "pro-capitalist" being applied to me of all people is a good one. I'm taking a pro-free-expression opinion here, not a particularly capitalist one).

> it seems that you would have no issue with being silenced by an authority, regardless of the justification used or its validity,

Depends on the authority and what you mean by "issue". Governments, no. That's problematic. Issue? I take issue with many things I ultimately believe people should be allowed to do.
>From the prospective subscriber’s perspective, that’s your problem to worry about — not theirs.

exactly...which is why there are blacklists like the one linked in the OP.
How to Allocate Memory in C
This is not outside of the realm of possible. Google does nothing to stop spammers, makes up their own non-public rules and doesn't communicate with the Internet community, so Gmail addresses are already on shaky grounds.

For instance, for starters, go search through all of your email for any email sent from Google servers where the "Reply to:" doesn't match the "Mail from:", and tell me if there are any legitimate instances. We could all benefit by starting to reject all Google sourced email with a different "Reply to:".

What we really need is a blocklist / allowlist system which tracks the millions of Gmail email addresses. Has it never been seen before? Reject it with a message telling them to go sign up for the allowlist. Has it been around for a while? Allow it.

Google can't be asked to keep their own spam in check. We have to force it on them.
DuckDuckGo's duck.com is still not added to this list. Phew!
That’s the approach used by the Apple T2. On the Intel side, it’s the chipset soldered on the motherboard which does that verification, so CPU swapping isn’t affected.
ugh, relay is a service i enjoy and pay for
But amphetamines and benzos are organic... So that definition literally is incorrect the way you use it in your top comment
There's definite vaccine rate differences in industries, but much of that might be largely explained by age demographics of industries..

Given two people who WFH the vaccinated one can conveniently eat in a restaurant and go to the gym while the unvaccinated needs to get take out or is getting regular tests. I think vaccinated people have much more interaction with the virus unmasked in an indoor environment but much less likelihood of ever being tested when having light or no symptoms.
I would expect a process reviewed by the Victorian Department of Health to have enough authority to make a medical exemption.
>or access to the OOB / BMC / IPMI

I've worked on a few SuperMicro servers that bundled OOB/IPMI onto the same NIC that is used for the LAN.
1 RJ45, 2 MAC addresses

I will stab the bean-counter that thought this was an OK idea with a fork if I ever meet them.
Not sure which version of Windows you're on but a lot of things like this have been blocked in newer versions, here is a screencap from attempting this on 11: https://i.imgur.com/xY4dNVL.png

> And even without checking, being able to disable malware protection is a necessary feature in any OS, for SW development and debugging activities, so I would assume malware protection could be easily killed without a problem by the user with admin privileges.

Lol, one would assume wouldn't they... in 11 even setting the GPs for all of the antimalware stuff to off won't stop the processes from running. You can still get it to a decently "get out of my way" level though.
I have encountered services that block gmail and instead demand work emails.
> a free architecture that doesn't include that shit

There is nothing stopping RISC-V SoC/CPU vendors from tacking it on.
If your accounting and marketing team are using a mail provider that DKIM signs their emails that would be the most standard and widely adopted method I know of. Each mail provider has different options for what to do with DKIM validation results but most will allow for quarantine, reject, put in a folder, or do nothing based on DKIM/SPF/DMARC results and based on the DMARC rules you create for your domains.

LearnDMARC [1] was posted here recently and can show you how this is validated.

[1] - https://www.learndmarc.com/
This is a great list - thank you. I learned a long time ago to not use “you” or similar in code reviews, as it is too easy to associate a critique of code with a critique of the coder. Changing “You should change this” to “This should be changed” or even “We should change this” can make a world of difference.
Can you please try again?
Is it worth the hassle to have a free tier? Is it a good enough funnel to the paid tiers?
If you write it in Python and add it as HomeAssistant plugin (http://hacs.xyz) I think you will get a lot of users, and help from the community building it further
… which makes it the prospective subscriber’s problem, pushing nearly all risk onto them, and requiring them to trust that the service won’t spam them or sell their e-mail address.
I cannot find a casus belli in that regard, either. While the Ukraine is supported by the West and has some multilateral agreements and contracts with it, it's not part of NATO or the EU, while a lot of the former soviet states are. Russia declaring open war against NATO or EU is not something Putin is stupid/narcissistic enough to do.

A lot of the former soviet states outside of the NATO and EU sphere are furthermore already defacto under Russia's thumb, so there is little incentive for Russia to invade, and NATO/EU/US who could invade wouldn't either because they lack the ground to justify this internationally and/or to their own populations and really would have very little gain from it. Aside from recent (partially) failed campaigns in Afghanistan and Iraq, and the West in general considering China the bigger threat anyway, all of which would make any politicians think trice about invading former soviet states.

If Russia invaded the main Ukraine, things would still get pretty "interesting". It might push the Baltic states and even Poland over the edge, in turn resulting in a NATO and EU casus foederis, and open war against Russia at worst. An invasion of the Ukraine by Russia thus could become a casus belli, just in the other direction.
And that's fair enough but this is just another thing that businesses have to chalk up to as a cost of business because users' privacy is more important than your dollars.

I have sympathy for businesses out to make a buck: they are the reason I get to put food on my table. But on the scale of balance between users' rights and business rights over the last twenty years, it's no contest: business rights reign triumphant.
Ukraine: Evidence implies Russia behind cyberattack on government websites
> PostScript is a lot like Lisp, where everything is an FEXPR. You pass around executable arrays to control flow functions like "if" and "for", and can write your own like "send".

TECO had that property too and it made it easy to write incomprehensible code (even for those of us who grokked the syntax)
It depends. My nodeRed flow for grabbing various sensor data and sending them to influxdb: https://pictshare.net/mvarpf.png

And my home alarm system flow: https://pictshare.net/82qfpa.png

To be fair though you can create sub-flows to have it more compact but when I designed it, I didn't know about theseyet
Apple at its core: How 1984 ushered in the golden age of computing
In all of those examples that talked about which pointer value to capture, it would perhaps have helped to use the built-in (standard, although in my opinion way too few programmers use it) way of indicating that a value won't change, i.e. const:

double * const q = malloc(something);
/* use whatever magic new syntax here, 'q' will not change in this scope */

That wasn't so hard, in my opinion. They could simply let 'defer' fail if the referenced pointer isn't constant. Also, as a micro-wtf I was confused by the use of 'double', for a generic allocation I would have expected void.
Research is showing that most (all) of the benefits related to IF are due to fat loss. As long as calories in - calories out are equated, there is no statistically significant difference between a regular caloric deficit and IF. This isn't to say IF is bad, adherence is the most important part of any diet. If it works for you great, but there's not any evidence that it's superior to any other form of diet in terms of bio markers.

There's really not enough evidence for longer multi day (5+) fasts at this point either, but it's a promising avenue of research.

EDIT: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32363896/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34733895/
There's a fair bit of content at https://archive.org/details/jcs-criminal-psychology_202108

https://www.reddit.com/r/jimcantswim/wiki/index/episode-dire... seems to be a complete listing of available content.

Edit - after looking at the wiki page it seems a lot of the YouTube links are already taken down or made private.
AMD CPUs are full SOCs nowadays. Everything is on CPU die.
This needs a [2020] in the title as significant new information has been unearthed as a consequence of this article as mentioned in other comments in this thread.
Businesses almost exclusively purchase prebuilt computers.
North Korea stole nearly $400M in cryptocurrency last year
Fastmail offers disposable email addresses (Masked Email addresses) on its fastmail.com domain:

https://www.fastmail.help/hc/en-us/articles/4406536368911-Ma...

Fastmail does have undisclosed limits, however:

> If you're having trouble creating new Masked Email addresses, please note that we have limits on how many new Masked Email addresses can be created within a certain amount of time to prevent abuse.

It would be good to see other email services offer a similar feature.
This is genuinely concerning to me. The www and various systems, such as email, should be agnostic to whomever I am providing my details to. If I purchase a new SIM I expect a number where I can make outbound calls, receive inbound calls and use data without worrying about any "lists".

Email should work in a similar fashion but as we know it doesn't, and there are various systems in place such that it's a game of roulette if your email reaches its intended target, and worse of all to me it's opaque, there's no way to know how likely it is or the various processes that may prevent my email being received by the other party.

And for systems that are critical for communication we should not allow them to be put in any type of "allow"/"deny" boxes and no domain should be either trusted or untrusted, after all Gmail can be a huge source of spam, but it seems those who provide users control and privacy are considered an adversary which is really sad.
It's a putdown to snarkily sneer at others in the community, which is why the site guidelines specifically ask you not to: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html.

I understand the temptation to do this—we all feel it. That's why that guideline is in there. Such comments reliably lead to lower-quality threads, because they don't add anything that anyone can learn from. They just assert the commenter as somehow different from / better than others.

That's not to say the comments you were criticizing aren't bad. Of course, shallow dismissals are bad. But it only makes things worse to respond with a different sort of shallow dismissal.
> I'm sure it would get muddy quick.

I see what you did there...
But why would having a "valid" email address help you more getting payment?

At most you may send reminders, but even then, those may end up in a spambox?

Even once you've verified the email, you have not much of a guarantee it will stay verified/working long. That's more the subscriber's problem, if they want to continue to use your product.
Tessier would have just stolen the fork, I imagine, and reported having not found it. Gold is gold.
I’ve browsed weird Wikipedia articles for over 15 years now, and Tarrare still stands out to me as one of the strangest people in history. Can anyone name anyone stranger?
Signal Increases Their Reliance on SGX (2020)
C could really use a standardized defer feature.

I don't like the proposed syntax though, because it introduces a new meaning for the & operator. In all other uses, the & operator modifies the type of the operand, to be the opposite of the * operator.

In the proposed syntax, & becomes something a little bit different: a C++-style reference. I think it would introduce too much language confusion.

A more C-like syntax would be:

defer(captures-by-value; captures-by-reference) {}.

Defer() statements would be executed at scope-exit, in last-in first-out order. Standard block scoping would apply for anything declared inside of the defer().
>... why spread FUD when you can easily test if your thought is true or not.

First, how do you know they're in front of a Windows machine and not casually commenting from their phone only to have life get in the way and make them set their phone down before they can Google it?

Second, I argue that FUD isn't spread if you're commenting and saying "I don't think it does this". Were they to say, "You cannot do this," then they would be spreading FUD. They didn't, they were corrected publicly, and anybody reading this thread can see as much. Maybe they'll even edit their post after they see this, who knows!

Edit: Even if I'd agree that they're spreading FUD, it's so minor and innocuous that it's not even worth getting angry at them.

Edit 2: If it's as easy for them to test if it's true or not, then anybody else with a Windows machine who sees that comment should also have just as easy a time testing it themselves. IMO that only serves to make this less FUD-dy than people are suggesting.
This is disappointing as I have really been enjoying using Firefox Relay to cut down on the email spam I receive. It looks like they are even planning on blacklisting the "custom" @personaldomain.mozmail.com domains that come with paid accounts.
I think as long as it's just INCOMING email, what's the harm in it?
Wrong. Monetary policy is the key here. Price discovery, volatility, reflexivity, add noise to the procession/price-chart but over any 4 year period the fundamentals matter. One would have to be insanse to claim btc doesnt act like an inflation hedge, it literally averages approx 200% return every year, over any 4 year period.

Gold is called an inflation hedge by many confused people, compare its performance to btc over the last 10 years and tell me which performs better in the face of fiat inflation.

>Price and supply are independent

Wrong. Price is literally discovered by supply vs demand.

Say 5 billionaires want to buy coin-x and the max circulating supply is 1 coin... When the bidding war starts, are price and supply independent?

I dont think you understand the topic we are discussing here, so I will move on.
You might be sharing thirst comments about fetish porn pics. Or you might be discussing tips and techniques for artisanal home cheesemaking. Either way, it feels like Reddit.

Different subreddits have different levels of quality and effort in the average post. But "group" != "audience". The culture trends on Reddit are site-wide, even if the subject matter of each sub varies wildly.

I THINK that what parent commentor is trying to say is that pre-Yahoo-Tumbler, Reddit culture was predominately male libertarian Ron Paul fans... while post-Yahoo-Tumbler, there was an influx of "purple hair" female social leftists. And that Reddit's culture has been somewhat fractured and at war with itself ever since.

I'm not sure that I accept this theory (I think simply has more to do with a continuous influx of newbies, and general youth culture shift over the past 15 years). But I do agree with the result, and the timeline happens to match up neatly.
Not really, you're competing against a ton of people from different countries if you want to work in Zurich. Switzerland has a ton of foreign people working there.
How do they avoid payment? Do you have a trial period and people are signing up with different emails?
Dumb stunt-

has a critical safety malfunction on average every 8 minutes;

has been on the market for at least 6 months;

has never been recalled.

Have they tried Ford's self driving system on the Mach-E, and see how it auto-disengages when a highway curved more than what the system can handle? Would that count as a critical safety malfunction?

I'd never use FSD in its current state, but FSD had plenty of recalls by way of version rollbacks.
That link doesn't explain how it improves security, as all mainboards of the vendor have the same key. All it does is prevent somebody from sneakily replacing the mainboard with a different brand! It would make more sense if the board was bound to the specific CPU (assuming the CPU is the root of trust). But then you could just encase it in some kind of thermal epoxy...

It's obvious that this is supposed to limit the second hand server parts market.
There are a lot of problems with that article. See https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8797002 for a discussion.
Hospitals in the US are not especially profitable. Including federal relief, median hospital profit margin is 2%.

The whole market is wildly distorted- starting with doctor education up through private insurance and government programs like Medicare and Medicaid- that simple answers like this totally miss the mark.
The hypothetical homogeneous group 'they' you refer to doesn't exist. It's billions of people and 'they' feel many ways. By painting with a common brush, you shut down discussions of what could be and encourage fence sitters to give up. Let's talk about why it's possible, easy to do, and how to do it.

The more fence sitters you convince that things are possible, pushes the fence further and further towards the other side.
You're ignoring the possibility that the value of the private school is in network effects via filtering out poorer people. That would be beneficial to the students who attend, but neutral or even negative for society as a whole.
Recently, I wanted to try a web service but they did not let me register with a disposable email address. Well, I guess I will not try the service then.
Six years ago I was looking for a place to host a simple "archive" of blog posts with embedded media, and Tumblr was the easiest and most flexible by far, and the audience was already there in the form of the fandom for a couple of very specific TV shows.

A lot of the fandom exists on Tumblr and Instagram and Twitter as well, but on the latter two, you can't have any permanence. It's all about the ever scrolling feed, and it's about getting on people's feeds again and again and again with new posts, new content all the time. And the type of content you can post there is extremely limited.

Tumblr allows this style as well, and a lot of users engage in it. But it also allows for being an archive, a curated collection of long-form posts about a subject, tagged and organized and easily browsable, no matter how long ago the posts were made.

I do not regret choosing Tumblr six years ago, and people keep discovering my stuff, keep liking it, keep reblogging it, which shows it was the right show.

Let's hope Verizon doesn't fuck it up.
Yahoo is effectively dead. abuse@yahoo.com doesn't work, nor do any email addresses in SOA or WHOIS. The people who are running things aren't even keeping them up very well.
Agreed, if he is head of it… it’s his thing.

Reminds me of the Panera executive who got upset (seemed to be confused) when a security researcher wanted to exchange keys…. dude thought it was a scam / sales tactic.

https://medium.com/@djhoulihan/no-panera-bread-doesnt-take-s...
Even more so, there is no organization. The IETF is an activity, like dancing, which humans can participate in or not as they please. You can't "join", there's nobody "in charge" and it can't believe anything.
> People give sales pitches for lots of things. You don't have to listen to them.

No, but when something has completely failed to live up to the sales pitch and then people try to pretend they'd never made those claims, it's important to remember that track record when deciding whether to trust the new claims. This is especially true in the case of cryptocurrencies which have no value other than social consensus because the same people who were making those original claims stand to gain the most if the new claims convince someone else to buy otherwise worthless tokens.

> Whether I'm sure or not... I think everyone should be given the choice.

Which they have and nobody is saying should be taken away from them. This is about the conflict between the stated goals and actual demonstrated behaviour.