skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
As a kid in a computer store in 1987, it was a pretty easy choice. The PC was either monochrome or 4 color CGA graphics. The amiga had a 3d ray traced animation of juggling spheres.
I very much like to write my resume the way I think represents me the best. The last think I need is to tailor it so some programmer who struggles with parsing.

When hire I also like to receive custom resume that helps me to understand better why hire. Again I am totally uninterested tailoring my offering to formalized set of checkboxes concocted by some "industry expert".
And Apple at 9%.
I'd say you're wrong. My business is just me, and I offer a free plan to let folks kick the tires. My biggest competitors charge nothing for their services, so I can't compete if I don't offer a free plan.

I don't think you could produce data that shows what you're suggesting, and in fact I think the reality is that the opposite is quite true. Any business that offers trials or free options is vulnerable to abuse, and any amount of abuse will eventually begin to eat into business resources. And business who do charge for their products don't have the "growth and engagement" money to burn on bad actors.
Classic Shell from Ninite.com,

updated with an executable on their desktop called:

YourName.exe/msi
The Kensington looks to be 7 stories, .44 acres; that gives it about 134,000 sq ft. There are 171 1-bed, 1-bath units, (and apparently 2-bed units) so ~800 sq ft per apartment. Its total property tax bill is $82,000, or about $480 per apartment, or about $1.60 per sq ft. (That's a little odd, since apartments.com shows a "similar rentals nearby" 1-bed, 1-bath apartment as $450 per mo. (But it's 250 sq ft. (OTOH, The Kensington is unlikely to be entirely devoted to apartments. YMMV.)) In comparison, the author's property (.18 ac, $1693.14 per year) is about 22¢ per sq ft.

So here's my question for the author: Would you be willing to live in an 800 sq ft apartment paying 7 times more property taxes, per sq ft, or roughly 1/4 total?

(Oh, by the way, The Kensington is an assisted living facility, meaning that the residents are likely paying somewhat more than $480 per month (or at least Medicare is), which is likely why they can afford $82,000 per year in property taxes rather the Kensington being an empty building. (Trying to fill downtown with assisted living facilities is an exercise for the reader.)

"You could build 3 of these 18 foot wide houses and people would want to live in them and they’d be profitable for the city per the infrastructure needed."

Here's a collection of 18 foot wide house plans: https://houseplans.co/house-plans/search/results/?q=&am=&ax=...

And here's realtor.com on Galesburg: https://www.realtor.com/realestateandhomes-search/Galesburg_...

* https://www.apartments.com/the-kensington-galesburg-il/qyk39...

* https://thekensington.net/index.htm
CTRL+F
Those are good points. One of the reasons I was thinking of building it was to put it against a tinySA and see what it's putting out.
I used to upgrade to the latest versions of things as soon as possible. I was excited by new shiny things. I also got regularly burned by the new shiny things.

These days I stick with what works, and only upgrade when I know I have a need for it. Much more boring, but I don't look to my OS for excitement.

So to me, the fact you're asking the question tells me that you don't really have a need.
There are many parts of the country I would consider so, including parts of cities, such as we see here.

This is what growth optimized capitalism looks like.
> not really of note when discussing what you can do to increase you odds of succeeding in something

It's because it chips away at people's egos. It hurts people to realize how much of their success was pure luck. It's hard to look down on others that way. Same with intelligence -- no one chooses their intelligence, so I find it odd when people boast about their borderline-pseudo-science-better-than-you-score, I mean, IQ score.

What is the story about the emerald mining, abused Zambian worker who turned into billionaire who started their own space program again? Right, it wasn't that person, but the son of the family that owned the mines that started his own space program (Musk).

> It's also worth noting that the advice applies to people born wealthy too. You aren't likely to become a guitar god without practice even if you have money. It just might be easier to find the time to actually practice.

I completely agree. One has to use what is given to them, but it's a lot easier to use an ability when one has an opportunity.

I can't remember who, but a highly talented and famous musician , was once asked, "Who do you think the greatest <instrument> player of all time is?" He said, "It was probably some kid in a 3rd-world factory who never got to hold an instrument in their life."
Imagine if we got a glimpse of Minecraft back then. This and probably many future generations have that.
Yeah I’m with you on that much so far.
Would be too difficult to implement. x86 is a very big instruction that is impossible to implement with an hardware: both Intel and AMD processors in fact run inside a virtual machine that translates x86 instructions in an internal RISC instruction set that is manageable by the real CPU architecture. If Apple decided to move away from x86 and go to ARM to have their processor, and we are talking about one of the biggest companies, I don't think any community project will ever succeed in doing another x86 compatible CPU.

On the other side RISCV instruction set is far simpler, being a RISC instruction set it decides to not have advanced optimizations in the processor (even better, none at all) and leave the optimization work to the compiler, that not only simplifies the processor, but also reduces the surface of attack of the processor (Meltown, Spectre, and all these attacks are just impossible on RISCV!). Of course that has a performance penalty, but since you simplify the processor you can just put more core in the saved space right?
Shoplifting is the act of stealing from a retailer, not an individual. Yes, I make a very big distinction between the two. I just don’t see why corporations in the US can get away with so much (shoplifting and wage theft are both estimated to cost the economy $40bln per year) and I’m supposed to feel bad someone is stealing from Amazon or Louis Vuitton? Doesn’t mean I’m “ok” with shoplifting, I simply feel it should be a civil matter like wage theft.

Railroads have always had their own police, so I’m not sure the reluctance. Retail/supply chain theft is a cat-and-mouse game… always had been, always will be. Step up enforcement, improve the locks, house the homeless and move on.
> projecting your internal image of a hypocritical political enemy onto them by extrapolating to things they didn't say, is one of the most common forms of conversation poison.

Can you explain how they did this?
Yeah, a 486 is not a slow CPU - not even the 25 MHz SX version that the server has. But Windows 95 is a 32-bit protected mode OS. My OS also works on a 8088, but I don't have a 8088 computer that I could use as a server.
> Yup. As soon as you think you're "non-ideological" at that point you're fully ensconced in ideology

I don't think this is the case in every instance at all.

I think an individual can strive to scrutinise their beliefs, wrestle with their own conscience and try to come to conclusions based on scientific observation, where appropriate, as much as possible.

A person who is "non ideological" can be just that.
There's a new(er) fork that doesn't use CGo.

https://github.com/zombiezen/go-sqlite
Maybe you're mixing up with SEH (Structured Exception Handling) which is a Microsoft extension to C that came even before C++
My relatives work at Amazon and Netflix. None of them have time for anything other than work. The culture at those places seems unbelievably toxic.

I am the same age as them, make more money, live in a more pleasant place (i.e. not an overpriced West Coast city), and have a lot more free time and freedom.

I did this by working at (or starting) boring lifestyle software companies that sell for $10-100M.
> Yup, what an era. At least I've got my Raspberry Pis today.

Yeah... Computers used to be more exciting. And don't forget the M1.
True. However, sometimes large buyers, such as governments or enterprises, change their policies towards purchasing requirements. For example, since 2013 France has had an Inter-Ministry Foundation of Free Software[0], which provides the preferred software to be used across France's government, as French law requires preference be given to free software (logiciel libre).

What impact might occur if a government like France were to require in the future only RISC V architectures with free boot loaders, of if the US government or a large corporation required use of measured boot to see at boot-time if the boot code or subsequent OS had been compromised?

With persistent threat actors and the falling price of processing power, I wouldn't be surprised if in the next ten years some larger organizations (or tens of thousands of small businesses) start demanding this kind if IT security from their vendors.

[0] (in French, of course) https://sill.etalab.gouv.fr/fr/software and their repo, https://github.com/disic/sill.
So you're accepting that for every company you sign up for you should expect at least one spam that requires time & attention to deal with (some may require login, etc)? Fair enough but I disagree that this is something we should all be accepting just for the benefit of a minority that happens to work in marketing.

> of those kinds of emails [emphasis mine]

Also keep in mind that scummy companies have caught on to that and now have dozens of different categories of marketing emails and unsubscribing merely unsubscribes you from one of them.
The book Monetizing Innovation is a book all about pricing [0]. It's a great read. I'd also recommend this talk by Rahul Vohra, founder of Superhuman, who talks about pricing with regards to product market fit [1].

[0] https://www.amazon.com/Monetizing-Innovation-Companies-Desig...

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhDj_C4Qzhk
You're right.. he was a resident under an O visa.
A lot of these scams originate from outside the US though, so presumably it's a lot more difficult for the DOJ to go after them.
In my opinion, there shouldn't be.

Documents like these shouldn't be automatically processed, they should be reviewed by humans. Reducing someone's life history to a list of educational institutions and employers feels robotic even for a software developer's mindset.

I understand that there are real life problems because companies do use automated processing on applications, but that kind of behaviour shouldn't be encouraged.
People resort to stealing when they have unsatisfied ambition. When they want more than they have, and don't see a legal way to get it. If every job available to you is minimum wage where you don't make any noticeable difference, you resort to making that difference elsewhere.

UBI won't solve this problem. It will skyrocket the rent/food prices due to supply/demand mechanics and further entrench stockholders/real estate owners vs. the salary/rent class. And even if you somehow solve that (somehow get free food/housing for everyone), you will still end up with plenty of depressed people with plenty of free time and a strong belief that someone else is hiding a patch of greener grass under their carpet.

On the other hand, if you modify the tax rules to make corporations and large chains less viable than small businesses (i.e. forcing most of the population to work for themselves and trade with their peers, rather than following the corporate manual), people will suddenly start respecting each other more and will pressure the victim mentality folks to sober up and join the ranks.

But that's not going to happen, because all 3 branches of power + the media are controlled by the shareholder class, that will swiftly redirect any dangerous leanings to the direction bringing them further profit (remember how BLM conveniently diverted the "protestor type" from Occupy Wall Street?). So don't be surprised if having a mailing address will soon count as a privilege and your workplace will offer mandatory trainings asking you to denounce it in the name of all good against all evil.
she's dead jim
There's no violence to be seen in white collar crime. There's no single image that says "this is a society in decay, next they're coming for you" like those images from the train tracks. Obviously the problem is not an objective one (I'm sure USPS loses more mail a day than lost to train robbery in a year), it's one of trust in law and order.
I don't really get this. Where do you draw the line between disposable and non-disposable email? What prevents anyone from creating <random string>@gmail.com addresses?
No, the Government has to stay out of business. The business of America is business, so Government should stay in its lane. I'd quit and find a new job if the Government imposed new conditions. Except for National Security reasons, like getting vaccinated. We need to have healthy people to go into the army if we get attacked.
Well... Would you rather apply to a job by sending a pdf that you carefully crafted, or by sending your linkedin profile?
I don't want to say "advantage", so much as preference. But a few things come to mind.

- Lots of high quality statistical libraries, for one thing.

- RStudio's RMarkown is great; I prefer it to Jupyter Notebook.

- I personally found the syntax more intuitive, easier to pick up. I don't usually find myself confused about the structure of the objects I'm looking at. For whatever reason, the "syntax" of pandas doesn't square well (in my opinion) with python generally. I certainly want to just use python. But, shrug.

- The tidyverse package, especially the pipe operator %>%, which afaik doesn't have an equivalent in Python. E.g.

with_six_visits <- task_df %>%
group_by(turker_id, visit) %>%
summarise(n_trials = n_distinct(trial_num)) %>%
mutate(completed_visit = n_trials>40) %>%
filter(completed_visit) %>%
summarise(n_visits = n_distinct(visit)) %>%
mutate(six_visits = n_visits >= 6) %>%
filter(six_visits) %>%
ungroup()

Here I'm filtering participants in an mturk study by those who have completed more than 40 trials at least six times across multiple sessions. It's not that I couldn't do the same transformation in pandas, but it feels very intuitive to me doing it this way.

- ggplot2 for plotting; its really powerful data visualization package.

Truthfully, I often do my data text parsing in Python, and then switch over to R for analysis, E.g. python's JSON parsing works really well.
> Initializing 512 bytes

RAII in C++ does not mean that all bytes are initialized, only the ones you want. In

struct Foo {
int header = 0;
float foo;
int data[64];
int footer;

// just to show that having an explicit constructor / dtor does not change anything
Foo(): footer{456} { }
~Foo() { }
};

only "header" and "footer" will be initialized: https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/4W1WzfPEv

It's not a matter of optimization, absolutely no compiler will zero-initialize unless you explicitely ask for it (or you are in a situation where the language mandates initialization, like global static in C and C++)
>Shoplifting is the act of stealing from a retailer, not an individual

No. You can shoplift from a small business or a family owned convenience store, which is essentially stealing from an individual. Those packages on the trains belonged to individuals btw.
You can, theoretically,

have security without privacy,

but no privacy without first having security!
Railroad theft sounds like a federal crime, the district attorney is partly to blame if they are charging these people under state trespassing laws instead of federal railroad laws [0]

[0] https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1991
Rat Tickling
Thanks. I found interesting that you like the Dutch book arguments more than the axiomatic ones.

> Moreover, in my opinion a good representation of epistemic states should at least account for uncertainty (as opposed to risk), because uncertainty is omnipresent.

Maybe I'm misunderstading that remark because the whole point of Bayesian epistemology is to address uncertainty - including (but definitely not limited to) risk. See for example Lindley's book: Understanding Uncertainty.

Now, we could argue that this theory doesn't help when the uncertainty is so deep that it cannot be modelled or measured in any meaningful way.

But it's useful in many settings which are not about risk. One couple of examples from the first chapter of the aforementioned book: "the defendant is guilty", "the proportion of HIV [or Covid!] cases in the population currently exceeds 10%".
…

I was specifically replying to a segment about the reasoning behind the creation of those places, to indicate that financial viability far from the only input into their design.

If these cities were not created with financial viability at the forefront, it’s unlikely you can magically make them financially viable.

But I guess you’re more of the “ignoring inconvenient history” persuasion. I’ve had bosses like that, always asking for solutions to the problems they’d created (against advice) and oddly enough never interested in riot cause analysis when there was any chance it would not be favorable to them.
I use it to run internal services I don't want going down when I'm messing around in the homelab. Namely: internal DNS, MQTT broker and various prometheus pollers (e.g. unifi-poller). I'm a big fan of this project.
> If you can capture it in a data structure, it's not a resume!

Pretty sure a Word file is a data structure.
An important thing to note that is a bit buried in this text: Python bytecode changes in every version, sometimes just a little, sometimes a lot. So Python 3.10 has difference in the bytecode instruction set from 3.9, and 3.11 will have differences from 3.10.
It won't be considered malware because techbros have embraced Apples closed down systems and Microsoft and every other player is just getting up to date. This ship has sailed long time ago.
Show HN: Hatchet – Extracts unique unsubscribe links from mailing lists in Gmail
It's been around a decade since Secure Boot first appeared and I remember well the opposition that had, along with a rallying cry based on the infamous Franklin quote. Unfortunately many of the opposition either accepted it or even defected, but the more this "security" stuff appears, the more I like that quote. It's succinct and gets the sentiment across very well.
Pregnant people are still not getting vaccinated against Covid
How to Drink Vodka Like a Russian
Something close. In the end of 80's I had preemptive multithreading and scheduling right inside my old DOS program. Had to switch timer interrupt frequency to 4kHz for that.
Hey HN,

I got frustrated with the amount of daily spam in my Gmail "Promotions" tab -- especially since it made searching for email basically impossible. While there are services that will help me unsubscribe from all the mailing lists I'm signed up to, they wanted unfettered access to my Google account, which I wasn't going to give.

I wrote a open source tool called hatchet which will access your Gmail account using IMAP, find the latest unsubscribe link for each unique email sender, and write it all to a csv/spreadsheet file.
GCC 12 Ready to Help Fend Off Trojan Source Attacks
...of the function? You could append to a slice, after setting up a defer to free everything in the slice.

...of the loop? Call a function.
schema.org/Person is a terribly designed format, that I would not bring into new projects. Here are some of the reasons:

1. It lacks diversity (e.g. GenderType is incompatible with German laws, requiring "diverse" gender in official forms, which is definitely not "unisex" defined in the format).

2. It looks very much like a US-centric God Object. It is not clear why DUNS, ISICv4 or NAICS are there, but other identifiers like national ID or SSN are not. It would be better to have a single "identifiers" key-value map instead of them, that would be extensible.

3. Contacts would deserve a dedicated structure and key-value map (why single telephone field? why messenger IDs not there?).
Sounds like a bunch of personality traits which are good to have in theory, but hasn't psychology taught us that you can't change personality even if you try very hard?
tl;dr - HR is underfunded / under-resourced / un-aspirational.

Even if there were a turn-key software platform they all used, which natively supported a standard data format, they'd still find a way to screw it up.
Back when I had looked into the literature, the consensus seemed to be that it was not more effectice than CR for weight loss.

If that's still the case, it would depend on what you find easier to maintain over long periods of time. For some people, eating healthy/less and or tracking calories is a lot harder than just eating one big meal a day.
I have my resume in markdown so I can create a word/pdf/html etc. with pandoc. It would be possible to write something that parses a json resume into markdown so it could be trivially format shifted
Yup, that’s one common way to do it.
Have you seen the kind of code professors write?
Also having this it will give you the User to make 1 resume and apply to millions of jobs. It’s a win / win situation
You have a serious lack of understanding of the US Constitution and the philosophy that lies behind it.
the systems and infrastructure are nice to use

That's true...big companies just have that infrastructure thing ironed out. There's bureaucracy (like having to get security to sign off on some new software), but there is also support. It's not FAANG but I work at Disney and a question came up about transferring 8K video files back and forth between documentary filmmakers and editors who are now working remotely due to covid. Before going down the rabbit hole of researching options to get it done, we got Pixar on the phone to see how they do it. That would have been tougher at a plucky startup.
That explains the eating but not the hunger and digestion, does it? It's pretty crazy that he could consume all that and turn it into nothing but foul odor and diarrhoea. I suppose he must have not been metabolizing that much and just producing large amounts of gastric acid that slurrified the food and then released it via faeces.

Otherwise, surely he would have gained mass or been particularly energetic.
The Attack of Zombie Science
That's not how it works. They're going to have bail and will probably pay it no matter what. People shouldn't be imprisoned until their trial outside exceptional circumstances. Stealing packages doesn't qualify.
The difference with Apple's hide my address feature, is that it will only give you one per site. So even though it's an address generated specifically for that website, it's still your "primary" email for that domain.

If you signup for Netflix using the feature, you can't cancel your account and then signup with a new Apple email, it will only allow you to login with your original one.

This negates the primary reason for blacklists like in OP, in that users generate multiple disposable addresses, within the one domain, for their single identity, usually to circumvent account limits, user blocks etc.

This whole thread is going on about spam but most have misunderstood what "spam" the blocklist is trying to tackle. It's there to tackle people signing up with a disposable address, spamming or abusing the platform, getting blocked and then creating a new account to do the same thing again.
The vaccines were also developed for a previous variant and work so so with Omicon.