skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I don’t think their claim is bizarre at all. Almost every other sentence insults Scientific American or McLemore. A lesson for others wanting to get a rebuttal published: You can embarrass someone with facts, but you can’t say they "demonstrate a baffling ignorance of one of the most basic concepts."
Maybe for technical people.
> because you can't choose

That seems like just an implementation detail. If users are able to choose/vote what is "acceptable" that seems like a concept worth trying.
Managing managers is as boring as hell. Get prepared for that!
Are we playing a different game? By me the word starts with a "מ"
I’m glad we can predict that far in the future. IMO, it won’t be, as inflation will continue as we spiral downward. Venezuela will be super jealous of our inflation.
Are people reporting this because he's a tech founder so he must be smart? Because that figure doesn't make any sense at all. Play-to-Earn will be a thing, but 90% of games? Is he aware of how many games exist and how many are passion projects from individual developers and small teams that care about quality vs milking players?

For every Ubisoft, there's a dozen Eric Barone and Tarn Adams that care about creating art and entertainment.

Sorry, that's just a dumb prediction with no basis in reality. If you were to say 90% of worldwide game revenue will come from crypto scams^Hschemes, I would have an easier time believing it.
Crypto miners are buying electricity from the open market, same as everybody else. If externalities aren't fully included in the price, than it's a problem which is about 0.1% crypto and 99.9% regulatory. I fail to see how focusing on one particular use of electricity you don't like is helping solve the greater problem at all. We can just as well start regulating the use of electric kettles. The only difference is how the public is perceiving that particular use... which is exactly what I said.

> While I tend to agree with you about the futility of government regulation, it’s hard to see a future where proof of work mining is done sustainably.

Just replace "proof of work mining" with "electricity consumption".

And speaking of straw man, focusing on the specific while ignoring the general is a pretty standard debate technique. I can provide sources if you want.
Sadly not supported by TailwindCSS!
It's partially blocking the virus.

Summarizing that as "it's not blocking the virus" is misleading.
This is terrible news.
TFA is the source
From what I've read, sterilizing immunity from vaccines may simply be a myth, and vaccines thought to have this property don't stand up to scrutiny.

https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2021/09/steriliz...
Eh. I used to use 1Password long ago, when it was still a "normal" app (one-time payment, not trying to become a unicorn). It was easy for me to switch password managers (my needs are modest, and I generally like to break my app habits once in a while). My journey included (1) self-written manager; (2) LastPass; (3) pass CLI, and (4) Bitwarden (free tier).

I'm now a happy Bitwarden user. It's ugly, and I'm a UX designer, but it's the least worst! (to me)
> most families/individuals just don't give a fuck about security nearly enough to pay a monthly fee for a password manager

It's more than that, most families that do care about security don't need features beyond what is built into iOS/Android. When I encouraged my wife to start using randomized passwords, I didn't even have to help her get set up. She already knew how to use Apple's password manager, so she just started using it. No setup, no additional monthly fee, just a quick decision to start using it.

When we need to share a password, we just read it off to each other and put it in our respective password managers. There aren't really any features in a paid password manager that we miss.
Show HN: Advanced Search for Multiple Services
So those in high cost of living areas are still just screwed? $30k/yr isn’t even enough to pay rent.
A small market that cares about 10G performance but don't have a device with a thunderbolt type-c port which performs much better. I'm sure they'll land eventually though.
Doesn't crash on Windows, but boy it uses CPU to the last register; it goes up to 95% usage.
Market is hot, not so much for Juniors. Big part is that with everyone working from home mentoring junior developer is a massive pain. For every 2 you hire you lose probably 80% of productivity of a senior dev for at least 3-4 month.

For concrete advice, drill those idiotic interview questions. People use them because who knows.. being able to solve everything is impressive. For take homes do a good job on the cleanliness aspect, write tests..

Pick one language and get decent at it. Be it python, js or C++. Be able to solve basic stuff on the HackerRank etc using that language.
> We’ve been hearing about kids who are asking their parents for more tasks at home (whether it’s chores or family activities) every day so they can play Joon, so it feels like we are on the right track.

As a parent ... this might be the right track for you the game creator, but it is not the right track for the kids.
There are a lot of m.2 to full-PCIe adapters on AliExpress. And a lot of cheap 10G cards on eBay.

I’m using 10G in my home LAN already for ~5 years. And just a month ago I contemplated about upgrading my notebooks to 10G.

I ordered a cheap thunderbolt→nvme adapter (for ssds) + m2→pci-e adapter on AliExpress. And they all work like a charm! Total cost was about $55(tb3 adapter)+5(m.2)+25(network card)+$8(SFP+) = 93USD. A lot cheaper than other options like QNAP or Sonnet Solo (which are in $200+ range)
They might have changed it just now, or I copied the wrong one.

Either way I replaced it with the correct url
I don't really think so but I do understand it's the mainstream viewpoint and I'm not trying to have that argument right now.

What freaks me out is the tone of all the comments. Just zero understanding that there is a person being talked about. When you "remove them from your community" they go somewhere. Things happen to them. They are harmed, as well.

If you're going to demand that I think you the language used should be less euphemistic.

"I value these goods and the order their transit represents very highly. I believe a person should be harmed to discourage this behavior" is honest and clear.

Stuff like "remove from the community" or "prosecute" hides those details of what will actually be done to the person.
Advanced algorithms can be helpful in allocating interceptors and launching platforms, and then deciding on optimal salvo size and launch time. But what we think of as "AI" doesn't necessarily add anything there. Simpler deterministic algorithms are usually superior because they're easier to test and less likely to fail in unexpected ways.
Ask HN: Those making $500/month on side projects in 2022 – Show and tell
Previously asked on 2020 → https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24947167
> If that's not enough, change the definition of "vaccines"

If “vaccine” meant “thing that 100% stops you from ever even getting infected”, most vaccines throughout the history of vaccination wouldn’t meet that definition.

But that’s not, and has never been, the definition – so nothing needs to be changed.

>> Vaccine: A product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease.

That doesn’t mean what you seem to think it means (so-called “sterilizing immunity”). A 20-fold reduction in hospitalization is by any read protecting you from a disease.
> So you can't imagine how owning the passwords...

Emphasis mine.

That's the thing that bugs me about 1Password's recent moves. They don't own my passwords and I don't want them to own them. They're my passwords, and I want to store them how I want. Not be at the whims of 1Password's business strategy.
I do agree with this argument. Some robust telephony stack made for pinephone tech is needed and should be prioritized.
> Intellectual functioning is one of the most heterogeneous aspects of autism (Maenner, 2020). In the APP, we identified subgroups based on the trajectory of intellectual functioning across early childhood (Times 1–3) (Solomon et al., 2018). Four distinct trajectories were identified: two groups, comprising 26 and 18% of the sample, respectively, had IQs in the intellectual disability range at both time points; a third group (22%) had IQs in the normal range at both time points. Of particular interest, a fourth group, comprising 35% of the cohort, initially had IQs in the intellectual disability range but made significant gains (34 points) to have IQs in the normal range by age 6–7.

Are there none with above normal IQ? For your purposes, does above normal IQ rule out "autism" by definition, as in, such will never be included in any groupings?

Given debate whether Asperger syndrome is a thing, and what seems to be emerging consensus Asperger's should be collapsed into autism spectrum^H^H^H diversity, what grouping contains those with well above normal language expression and intelligence?

I imagine such grouping to be of interest to this HN community:

"In the social world, there is no great benefit to a precise eye for detail, but in the worlds of maths, computing, cataloging, music, linguistics, engineering, and science, such an eye for detail can lead to success rather than failure."

https://web.archive.org/web/20081217140628/http://autismrese...

- and -

"JPMorgan Chase’s Autism at Work program has helped the company fill a talent gap in its software engineering and quality assurance departments. When the program first started in 2015, a cohort of five employees on the spectrum were hired. Within the first six months, those employees were 48% more productive than employees not on the spectrum who had been at the same job three to ten years."

https://www.benefitnews.com/news/jpmorgan-chases-autism-at-w...
I exported successfully from 1Password 6 onto Secrets and KeePassXC. Only thing missing were software licenses (some attachments may not carry over correctly or show up as notes).
I also got r/thathappened vibes, but I choose to believe. Anyone who's worked for more than a few places can name a business that's held together with rubberbands and excel spreadsheets, especially small businesses. This is an entirely believable story.
Sorry! Had to rename it because of issues with uBlock ironically [0]. New URL is https://isgoogleanalyticsillegal.com/alternatives/

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29994768
The Dropbox integration to me became worthless after Dropbox limited the number of devices it would sync to on the free plan.

If I can't have my passwords everywhere, then the value delivered drops off a cliff
I for one am overjoyed that the <marquee> tag seems to be coming back
I can't stand nerds that fundamentally can't learn this nuance. It's like the biggest blind spot ever. There are just so many of them in the tech industry working as software engineers, which is why we have powerful tools that are a pain in the ass to use. It makes me hate software engineers, and I am one.
... This feels like someone was shocked at what their users did... because they lack an understanding of people on a statistical level.

The quote "According to Gambelin, however, the violent tendency of these users may reflect violence against women" is anchored on the basis of other chatbots often being female and their website having a female avatar to represent the chat bot. They have done nothing about the subservient female avatar trope, they have leaned right into it, so making these claims feels pretty stupid. If they were genuinely concerned they would not have presented their chatbot this way and done something to counter the notion that these chatbots are inherently feminine and by extension reinforcing subservient female stereotypes.

This feels about as shocking and unusual to me as the legions of people who had fun playing the first Sims game, where if you didn't tell them to go to the bathroom they would piss themselves. This isn't a person, its a toy that acts like one, and I know it. I will treat it like the weird curious automaton toy that it is, which includes when my mood strikes, seeing what happens when I act differently towards it. Safe in the knowledge its not a real person and I am not causing any harm to anyone. Just like when I trap some Sims in a pool or lock them out of the bathroom, slaughter sheep or cows in Minecraft, play a first person shooter with some degree of realism, or play an interactive Novel which presents a conversation with similarly fake people with vastly less impressive conversational abilities.

This is definitely just a case of someone is butt-hurt that the mean people are playing too roughly with the toy they lovingly designed. Tough luck, you want people to play with it, some people are going to play with it more aggressively than others. It's not a person, it's weird your acting like it is.
* insert oxford comma debate/every grammer debate ever*
4) “Developers, developers, developers”
When I was 9 years old I discovered bulletin board systems, and The Cuckoos Egg. Dare I say, the headline made me shake my head and smile…
Google "Ius primae noctis" for the libertarian fantasy that was replaced by the very strong state.
Copy that, on the family plan, works on all the devices that need it. We trust their shared vault technology enough. 1password is compelling. Not sure it's a billion dollar thing but it's good.
>PS: What adds salt to injury is that you're using Google Fonts on this website. If you were privacy-conscious, you'd self-host at least. Read here: https://developers.google.com/fonts/faq?hl=en#what_does_usin...

Thanks for pointing that. Don't know how many time have met privacy advocates, etc has made a such a strong point against google, and still embedded youtube video or google font on their site. Is there are github page where one can block all google or fb used domains or ips? Would be very useful!
I don't really have a dog in this fight. I highly doubt the miners would move to that chain/protocol. There would be a hard fork of the source code and chain, possibly by people outside the reach of whatever jurisdiction this guy is in. It's just completely impossible for this to actually happen AND actually mean anything. Anyone can get access to any coins by changing the source code/protocol and hard forking the chain. But they won't be worth anything, just another orphaned side chain with nobody on it.
> If that's not enough, change the definition of "vaccines". Surely that should convince everyone!

Where have you ever seen a definition of the word "vaccine" saying or even implying that it "blocks transmission and infection"?
I'm not sure how you see this as incompatible.

Ball bearings require "lubrication", and the lack of good lubricants is exactly why they use fluids that end up behaving as I described, and why "lubricant" is the wrong way to think of it in this case.

If anything, the existence of a good lubricant would prevent the surface wear. Temp control and fluid dynamics are what they have to work with, and yes it results in surface wear because it's suboptimal.

But so does running your 4-stroke too hot.
Let's not forget no sign-up/authentication. The session is stored locally, so you keep your stats as long as you use the same phone/browser each day.

Interestingly, this lean design also means the answer is stored locally, but as one commenter observed "Anyone pointing this out would have their mind blown when they learned the newspaper jumble and the answers in the corner upside-down"

These decisions would be terrible for a competitive game where folks are striving to top the HIGH SCORE tables, but are smart for an approachable little daily routine.
I believe that this is a great idea but I was kind of wondering why people are not resorting to this method?
I've found [1] to be a good resource for this.

[1]: https://covid19.trackvaccines.org/vaccines/
Posix shell do it. Any cross platform tool must handle it per platform. On Windows you can e.g. call a OS function.
Your 1G switch should be able to do 1g from your computer to your internet router and 1G from your roomate to the NAS and whatever from your NAS to the guy watching movies. Even cheap gigabit switches can process (large packets) at line rate on all the ports. If your NAS is also your internet router, maybe you can't make it work with a 1G switch, unless it can do link aggregation.
there is no recruiter who is going to waste their time filling in a form to contact you. recruiters nowadays use linkedin for all of their correspondence with candidates, only the schumbags use email or text. any email i get from a recruiter, i just mark as spam, any text or phones calls, i just block. just open a linkedin account, update your profile to match your resume and start connecting with the recruiters you want in your area or industry. it's that simple.
It looks like this is a case where everybody is happy. A process that was plagued by manual errors now runs smoothly. And there is an admin around to jump in should it break. While the firm might be indignant if they found out, they may actually already know and just accept it. They're unlikely to change it if it runs well.

On the other hand, I don't think I could work like that. I always look for ways to improve life, and that includes the life of my customers. Not letting them know that the thing is automated keeps them in the belief that it requires manual action, and that to me is a lie by omission. Likely there are other low-hangig fruit to automate, once you're in the mindset.

Another consideration is when the script does something dumb a human wouldn't have done. Is the operator liable for that? Because after all it was not considered part of the job to automate it? Of course, the likelihood of human mistakes weighs more in all likelihood. But when the firm argues (they're lawyers right?) that the mistakes wouldn't have happened if the employee followed protocol, there may be some ugly liability.
If your usb-c is capable of thunderbolt, there are options (prebuilt and DIY), see my other comment in this thread
LGTM, sure you're not having an issue on your side? I even see http redirect to https. Cert was also issued yesterday.
Database on Fire: Reflections on Embedding ClickHouse in Firebolt
To find people's work email addresses, you can try:

hunter.io

GitHub commit histories (although I think this might be against the TOS)

It's also worth teaching out to folks in your network to ask for intros to specific companies. An intro to a non-hiring-manager at a company can be more fruitful than a cold email to a hiring manager.
> Also they are wrong factually. Google Analytics is not illegal in Austria. The court made this clear. Transmitting the IP without anonymizeIp is. Also transmitting PII data unencrypted to GA us (but GA does forbid that in their TOS as well).

I've only got a machine translation of the ruling (https://noyb.eu/sites/default/files/2022-01/E-DSB%20-%20Goog...), but it includes:

"The specific IP address used can no longer be determined by the
complainant either. However, this is irrelevant, since the UUID in the cookies is already clearly linked
to a person."

I've been skeptical of the "just turn on anonymizeIp" approach for this reason; xxx.xxx.xxx.0 plus, say, the user agent, is likely plenty to identify me.
So why aren't we asking what's happened to him,

instead of presuming malice?

(Genuinely)
>If “vaccine” meant “thing that 100% stops you from ever even getting infected”

Not taking sides but that's exactly how most people think about vaccines.
BiteLabs Wants to Turn Celebs into Lab-Grown Salami. And It's Perfectly Possible
In my case, this was caused by a corporate "keep our internet clean" (lol) install of Cisco. Check what the cert actually is.
Love the poster's ingenuity and hate his attitude, and the antiwork subreeddit.

Attitude: $90,000 per year isn't likely to generate enough money for this person's retirement, particularly if they encounter major expenses. He should be spending his new free time either developing a side-hustle, a business, or delivering additional value for his employer for which he must insist on additional compensation. I used to be well aware of evidence & case management systems and this person is one decision away from existing software making his perceived job less relevant.

Antiwork: I entered the workforce during a deep recession, and I was a recruiter for infoTech during another recession. I've traveled extensively overseas for work. It will be an employers market eventually, perhaps soon, and the antiwork crowd is going to meet reality head-on when it happens. Nothing wrong with ditching bad employers & developing side-hustles. There is something wrong with demonizing work. Part (by no means all) of the growth one sees abroad is due to acceptance and often positive attitudes about work, with less emphasis on "fairness". Life isn't even close to fair and some societies and people understand how to work with that better than others do.

Let the downvoting and flaming begin (sadly).
The book itself is $100. I get that it’s a scholarly work but … I find it hard to justify spending that much as someone not in the field professionally.
How do you compete fairly with somebody that engages in monopoly abuse and anti-competitive behaviour?

It has been more than 3 and a half years since GDPR was implemented, yet it took concentrated efforts of non-profits and individuals to come to this extremely obvious interpretation that EU–US Privacy Shield is nonsense.

Maybe if EU and member countries actually made any enforcement efforts, a viable competitive space would emerge.
If someone says they experienced free will today, the claim is ludicrous without a definition.

As such it's on them to first state a complete hypothesis of what happened to them, because absent that it is not even possible to start disproving it, and so rejecting it out of hand is perfectly justified just as much as it's justified rejecting Russel's teapot.

> What is your benchmark for determinism?

That everything we have so far observed with any kind of precision has turned out to be predictable to our level of precision or to show no sign of deviating from randomness.

Determinism is also a falsifiable theory: All you need to disprove it is to show the existence of a type of events which are biased in ways which can't be explained in a mechanistic or by randomness.

The total lack of such examples, despite a very substantial amounts of claims, which always collapses under scrutiny, gives me as much confidence in determinism as in gravity.

Our understanding of gravity could be massively off too - I'd consider it far more likely that we'll need to revise our understanding of gravity than determinism, because a non-deterministic model would require a fundamental change in logic to accommodate another category of causality which can not be modelled as a computation over a combination of mechanistic determinism and randomness and without just introducing regress (the last part there is essential to rule out "God did it" or "we're in a simulation" answers, both of which just lifts the question one level up).

The first step in falsifying determinism is to actually find a way of determining whether or not an event fits that criteria to show that it's even logically possible for such events to exist. Just that would get your name in the history books. Of philosophy anyway. And if anyone could present a logically sound argument for how such events could exist, it would seriously shatter my world view. I'd love that anyway because it'd force us to rethink a whole lot of things about the world from scratch. Unfortunately I think I'm more likely to meet santa.

> Yet many believe they experience free will everyday and many don’t, because it’s a subjective experience.

People's subjective experience is not in question. I feel like I make free choices every day as well. I feel like I'm exercising one right now in choosing to answer you. That does not give me any reason to presume that feeling reflects the underlying processes. That subjective experience have no bearing on the issue.