skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
My LinkedIn recruiter spam dropped substantially when I added "literally a wizard" to the skills section (and removed everything remotely tech-telated).

https://www.linkedin.com/mwlite/in/mikkelpaulson
I seems sensible for them to have a "Crypto team" to "an entirely new model for the Internet" from a business point of view. It works - big money, doesn't work - shut it down.

I'm not sure about "people, not platforms, have real ownership and control" though. It seems to be more crypto bros and scammers who get the control.
On safari, can confirm it just looks white. Even tried turning off Night Shift.

Not sure if this is a gold dress blue dress situation.
Perhaps it will be a series inspired by the book (the physical object) not the contents/story

They could release a series about overpaying for a copy of dune at auction and technically fulfill their mission
> I don't agree
> The hackers are criminals and extortionists.

I think where we disagree is the impact of the crime. I'm pretty sure the UKG hit is going to do a lot more damage to UKG's customer's customers (patients not getting good care because the hospital couldn't write a paycheck) that "embarrassment" and "data loss".
Have you considered that using a wireless keyboard and other tech is OK under their threat model? I use one at home and I honestly can not see any downside to it.
> We look at their motive. You know, what would the motive be? Were they antisemitic? Were they trying to do this for money? And then opportunity. Were they even in town?

I think this is insufficient to describe possible motivations at that time. Many people that betrayed others did so under duress. In poorer families it was still common to house where you work so many people lived together in larger communities. These were often infested by Nazi spies that reported anything suspicious to official bodies. People didn't necessarily knew who did the reporting in their communities and this atmosphere of fear was used to get people to talk.

If someone harbored antisemitic beliefs, they would probably be forthcoming of course. But the real terror of the Nazi regime is that friends betrayed each other out of fear. Jews themselves were questioned if they knew about others and some did answer because they had a glimpse of hope that they might be spared. They weren't of course.

Still interesting article and interested in what they will reveal.
Modern Vulkan Example Project
I guess it's because otherwise the fixed cost would overwhelm small payments.
Ephebophile. Still sounds like his was massively creepy in that respect IMO, but if you are going to throw words around throw the right ones.
Watch SpaceX launch more than four dozen Starlink internet satellites tonight
No, the constraint can require exactly one column. PostgreSQL even has an optimized builtin function for this, `num_nonnulls`.

In a recent feature I had an object field modelled as:

type Destination = Customer of Customer | Supplier of Supplier | Warehouse of Warehouse

and the table representation was

customer_id uuid null
, supplier_id uuid null
, warehouse_id uuid null
, constraint unique_destination check (num_nonnulls(customer_id, supplier_id, warehouse_id) = 1)

It's not first class support, but manageable enough.
The scientific method does not give an account of why a given theory must be accepted or rejected. That process is ideological - and no, Popperian Falsification isn’t used, update your understanding of this phenomenon (science) you love so much. Read The Structure of Scientific Revolutions and join us in the post-1960 understanding of science.

To give you a taste: if falsification of theories is grounds for rejecting them, all theories must be rejected at all times. There are always - always - some phenomena that are not explicable with current theories. Much of the practice of normal science is in coming up with an explanation of these phenomena using the current theory, not coming up with new theories. Coming up with new theories is an extremely rare practice not done by most scientists. So how do you tell whether a given anomaly will eventually be described by the current theory, or will remain inexplicable until the formation of a new theory? You cannot. New theories also have many more unexplained phenomena when they are first articulated, since not as much work has been put into conforming observation to theory (if that last sentence seems backward to you, you probably don’t know how science is actually practiced). So what grounds does a scientist have for choosing a new anomaly-ridden theory rather than an old anomaly-ridden theory? The process is in part ideological and has nothing - I repeat - NOTHING to do with the scientific method. Emerging theories are chosen by scientists with a high risk tolerance using not a small amount of faith. And many times this bet doesn’t pan out: the theory eventually dies and considerably sets back their career prospects, as all the time they spent conforming observation to theory (again, the practice of normal science) is completely discarded.

The use of “theory” in the above paragraph is probably different from how you think of the meaning of the word. This is analogous to how new theories work: they aren’t just a refinement of previous theories, they actually explain the world in a novel way using different language, occasionally the same words with wildly different definitions (for example, Newtonian mass vs. Einsteinian mass). The author Thomas Kuhn often uses the word “paradigm” in the way I’ve used theory up above to help avoid this confusion. Incidentally, that book is why the term paradigm became popular.
Wow, Agreed. The window shadows here really help them pop way more than I remember, and they seem to do a much better job delineating overlapping windows than the current “styles”.
Yes I used it for the first time in ages recently and I have to say I found the whole thing a mess. There are about 5 ways to do everything.
For most of human history, people have lived in small, local information bubbles which were hard to penetrate with facts from the outside world. We see this manifest as the pre-industrial global patchwork of weird and wonderful religious/spiritual/cultural variety.

Then somehow the world started to join up and information began to seep into local cultures and sweep away a lot of these pre-rational beliefs. And for a while, it seemed like the direction of travel was towards a global system of thought based on a widely distributed factual, rational approach.

But in the last ten years, something seems to have arrested this direction of travel and reinstated local bubbles of thought, insulated from outside challenge.

Cryptoscams are the perfect (but not only) example of a self-sustaining shared consensual delusion. They don’t talk to the outside world. So much so that something like this happens. They are living inside a pre-rational info-bubble which has budded off from reality and floated away on its own wind.

We are not just dealing with scams and fools here. There is an intense current of reality-defiance and cult behaviour. Some people get sucked into the crypto-attractor, but other hallucinations are available.
It has been forked as InterWebPPC
It is about the actual purpose of the Law and it references ritual purification. It's about human traditions vs God's Law. We don't need to wash our hands as a spiritual ritual before eating, we absolutely can wash them if it makes sense to wash them, e.g. hygiene.

Read Mark 7:

1 The Pharisees and some of the teachers of the law who had come from Jerusalem gathered around Jesus 2 and saw some of his disciples eating food with hands that were defiled, that is, unwashed. 3 (The Pharisees and all the Jews do not eat unless they give their hands a ceremonial washing, holding to the tradition of the elders. 4 When they come from the marketplace they do not eat unless they wash. And they observe many other traditions, such as the washing of cups, pitchers and kettles.[a]) 5 So the Pharisees and teachers of the law asked Jesus, “Why don’t your disciples live according to the tradition of the elders instead of eating their food with defiled hands?”

larger second EDIT:

The focus is of course, spiritual, and it is on the actual things that defile people, for example:

20 He went on: “What comes out of a person is what defiles them. 21 For it is from within, out of a person’s heart, that evil thoughts come—sexual immorality, theft, murder, 22 adultery, greed, malice, deceit, lewdness, envy, slander, arrogance and folly. 23 All these evils come from inside and defile a person.”
I have done the same with this list before!
OSX Tiger running on a Power Mac G5 was my dream setup I never could afford. Time flies.
I believe JPEG2000 is commonly used as an archival format.

Compression artifacts are irrelevant if your scan resolution is significantly higher than the print resolution.
Same here, and to be honest I'm still not sure what the clean solution would be for this level. With that particular html structure and class/id usage there maybe isn't any…
I think they were probably referring to https://github.com/tinyplex/tinybase/blob/main/src/common/ar... and the like for wrapper array.map and array.forEach and array.sort.

I don't think there's dozens, but there's a fair few. Most of the stuff in the common directory seems to be standard patterns they use, so it's doing more than just wrapping a function.
Telegram: How to Counter-Attack
Reading the comments here I initially misread ‘cryptobros’ as ‘cryptouroboros’.

It’s actually a pretty good description for a bunch of guys passing the same tokens around for ever increasing amounts, thinking they’re getting richer.
You can use DuckDB as a processing engine on top of Pandas [1], while continuing to use Pandas as a data storage/data interchange format.

[1] https://duckdb.org/2021/05/14/sql-on-pandas.html
NFT data is public, generally.
That doesn't give me peace at all. We can not ameliorate the torturous acts we commit by making comparisons to the worst natural scenarios. Santa doesn't exist and we are dirty, stupid monsters.
> I think that someone who doesn't want to give their real email address to try out a service is even less likely to trust an unknown service with their credit card number.

I think you'd be surprised. Credit cards are easier to dispose of then email addresses, and they offer greater protection with fraud and billing dispute processes. Some banks even offer virtual cards that let you set limits on duration or amount.
That quote is the perfect definition of "everything you do must be awesome".
Property? Gold? Industrial commodities? Mining rights? Used cars? Bitcoin? Farmland? Other hard assets? Arguably that’s already been happening, with the global melt-up in asset values across the board.
I guess we're all waiting for the first NFT legal dispute, and see how it will roll out and what precedents it will set for the future.

Because until then, they're all playing a make-belief game.

Like the guy who claimed the moon and actually sold plots of land on the moon to people[0]. He was navigating a "loop hole" and no one cared about it, or even took it serious. But if people are putting money upfront, at what point it should be addressed?

[0]https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2013/03/25/meet-the-man...
My nostalgia is that iPhone rumor render at the bottom. Kind of love and want it.
It's not surprising that those industries are more than willing to pay a premium for innovation and execute. They can't survive on branding and marketing so must innovate to stay ten steps ahead of the competition just to stay afloat.
Technically maybe. Within the budget set by central government? No.
As of now, Africa is still waiting for vaccines: https://www.kuow.org/stories/for-the-36-countries-with-the-l...

It would be disinformation to suggest there is an over-abundance globally.
Russia detains six more suspected REvil group members
Look at Israel. They vaccinated themselves out of epidemic twice. Just stop pretending that delta was the same as native virus and everything moves into place.

Their current vaccination levels are too low to stop omicron but they are not dying from that like happened with delta, so they are doing fine.
IPFS isn't hosting, it's transport. You can't "put something on ipfs" and expect it to stay there any more than when you "put something on http".
>With function-scope defer, the semantics are extremely dynamic, requiring bookkeeping of a runtime stack of defer thunks, and compilers have a hard time optimizing it.

As far as I know, most functions have only one defer, and Go optimizes such cases quite trivially, by inlining calls to the deferred function at every function exit at compile time, without managing an additional stack. If there are several defers, then yes, the slow path is used.
Neither -- it appears to be a third-party mockup of what an Apple phone could have looked like.
Check. Thankfully I come from the physics world, where we don't trust ourselves with any analysis method unless we have some independent way to make sure our results make sense. Most physicists are uneasy about "fancy" statistics.

There's the famous quip: "If an experiment needs statistics, then one ought to have done a better experiment." While this is a bit extreme, it does represent a tendency to design experiments, when possible, that lend themselves to relatively basic data analysis. In fact, I haven't ever calculated a p value in my work.

From what I've read about Bayesian statistics, I'm not sure it's going to get the life sciences out of the mess they're in. That's just my personal hunch. The trouble is, for justifiable reasons, life science research is hard, and is conducted with urgency due to the immediate need for solutions (such as vaccines, therapies for mental illness, or cynically, advertising revenue).

A good rule of thumb seems to be: Multiply p by 10. In other words, p < 0.05 is a coin toss. This rule seems to replicate the entire replication crisis. ;-)
It's been offline since like 2014, so probably wouldn't even work on newer Android versions. But we did have competition, so it seems like there should be equivalent functionality today.
Assuming you're Dutch, get a lawyer, get your contracts and communication. Also, be aware that if the gov. sees you as an "employee", you have much more protection in terms of getting paid.
I've seen bundles of cat 5 cabling the girth of a 100 year old oak tree. No chance anyone knows every cable in such a data center.
I like interface-only packages in the Julia ecosystem e.g. Tables.jl enables the development of several packages for querying tabular data that work across many concrete implementations; Plots.jl separates the high-level plotting interface from the plotting backend.
That's an interesting point. As I recall (unfortunately it's been a while). There was tension at first who would be top dog. SharePoint or OneDrive, and OneDrive won, so SharePoint Online is actually mapped over OneDrive. MS could do that because ironically even though SharePoint On-prem had been entirely SQL Server underneath, SharePoint On-prem devs generally never wrote a line of SQL. They interacted with the SharePoint Object model and that was basically mapped over OneDrive. What OneDrive is underneath I don't think MS had to be as forthcoming about because of it's cloud-based nature. I was on my way out by that point though.
Problems can "grow" too. I guess people implicitly assume businesses grow faster than their problems, but given the broken window effect etc etc I'm not sure ignoring the issue here is what a capitalist should be doing..
Who was the other bidder(s) I wonder that allowed them to buy it so high
He really shouldn’t be fired. But I would council him to consider retirement to live his life. YOLO and all that.
Sure. And just like libc, you could easily disable (by not using) a theoretical libc_defer that provided defer semantics. Kind of like libm, you use it when you need it.

This has been a fun conversation, and I really enjoyed chatting with you about this. :) Take care.
The article claims the Department of Education is distributing monitors to UK schools, but the DofE doesn't operate across the UK, so perhaps the story is actually about schools in England.
>If it stops being hosted it disappears

The same thing applies to blockchains. If no one is hosting it, you can't download it.
Editing of answers is fine - by anybody, not just mods. That's because there's a clearly shown "edited" section displayed at the bottom of the answer, along with the editor's name, right next to the "answered" section showing the original author's name, indicating to anyone who reads the answer that it's a jointly-authored post that isn't entirely the original author's work. You can also look at the revision history to see exactly who wrote what. There's no false attribution there.

Comments don't have this history or indication of being edited by a third party, though, which is why only moderators have the power to edit them and most such edits are considered unacceptable and banned by policy.
groupby.apply is often the thing that is already way too slow though based on use-case - because I think it pretty much does what you wrote rather than something that makes stronger optimisation assumptions.
Because they don't want to commit to it. It would instantly become legacy and an increasing thorn in their sides.

That was what I learned in ontologies: there is nothing so well understood and immutable that the business case won't change. It's so much easier to be vague than to be clear.

I too was convinced that people would rather have good clean data that they could trust, and it would save them a ton of money in the long term while costing a little up front. Maybe someone out there can sell that idea, but it wasn't me.
What blockchain? Some newer ones are not expensive (but also are not decentralized enough yet). They dismiss ipfs straight away in the responses already for it and actually say they will put the actual imagine on the blockchain. This will cost something (possibly a lot) depending on which chain, but they have $4m+ left to burn on ‘the good cause’. This all stinks but I must agree, if you want something for eternity (well, in their minds), putting the content on a big (btc/eth) chain would be the only way; seems the rest is far more brittle.
Cut your loss.. you'll never be paid, even if the money was there.. I've had 'clients' like this in the past. Just a very expensive lesson.
Which is exactly the problem. The risk of life long debilitation is far more than 1%, and should always be included in the assessment of risk.
Actually the opposite, likely. The tooling was preinstalled and ready to go, and you could largely click your way through building interactive experiences.

Compare this GUI-driven, mostly-discoverable flow with the incantations you need to know to set up a React interface, for example. It's night and day.
Nice! I completed it in 05:40:2. Would be fun to have more levels and/or scoring criteria.
At the risk of being a terrible off topic HN commenter,

> He's taught

> He's explained

> He's taught

I'm not sure if it's technically correct (or incorrect) grammar, but I (native English speaker) found these constructs to be really difficult to parse. I wasn't sure whether it was a contraction of "he is" or "he has" as both made sense (though the second point later has context that points to "he has").

I'm not bothered, and I hope no offence is taken by this, I just thought it was mildly fascinating. I don't think I often see that "He's" contraction in English.
No. Tenure is supposed to protect you from getting fired for controversial but sound research or methods. Tenured faculty can and should get fired for acting like assholes. If a professor took a shit on their desk at the beginning of each class period and then left, assigning students all 0s for grades then they'd be rightly fired regardless of tenure.

Students are paying thousands of dollars per course and tenure should not prevent them from receiving an education.

The question here is whether this is eccentricity for the sake of learning or eccentricity that inhibits learning.
How soothing. Rats are so zen.
Thank you for the reply, it's not really about right or wrong, it's just different. I guess in one way or another you will find yourself at the situation where you have too much to remember, and you might open a new text file.
As someone with years of working experience with dplyr who had to learn pandas, 100% agree. And thanks for that post, I thought it was just me.
a large weakness of smalltalk (pharo/squeak at least, i don't know about the others) for every day use is a good text editor. it doesn't have to be emacs or vi, but something in that range would be nice to have.
> that's not really how it works. If you create something and unless you license it permissively that product is yours and you get to set the terms and conditions.

It's exactly how it works, if you want to succeed. If you don't offer value that enough people are willing to pay, you still own the product, but it's worthless.
Sri Lanka's Colombo Port City: A New Dubai or a Chinese Enclave?
Maybe I've not applied and worked with big enough companies, but I've never seen an HR person be helpful or in any way been aligned with my interests. This could be forgiven as they may well serve interests which are opposite to mine at times, but there are numerous times where HR representatives just (from what I can gather) pick suboptimal strategies to try and convince me to do something, be it remain or take up a job offer or anything else, i.e. I've yet to see an HR person successfully manage a human resource in an optimal way. And by that I mean that statistically the outcomes would be no different if it was a random person with normal communication skills doing the job of HR or if it was someone with training and experience.
Don't try to get a piece of the company... Cut ties with them, as the headache and bs is not worth it. They will always try to screw anyone over.

Try to get whatever you can get out of it. Don't give a license of your code and technology.
Cool, more space junk. Currently 2000 satellites to services 140,000 customers doesn't sound like much of a benefit to society, honestly. And at $99/mo its not likely to help the people who actually need remote internet access. This can all be done on ground level.
> The road from there to something noteworthy is still long, but I don't think it's inconceivable.

That already happens. People who know what they are doing (i.e. professionals) already buy scripts and book rights and make movies out of them. It works pretty well already.
I can not read that at all.
Sure, just take a newly launched one. People are launching bollocks coins every day.
I know I'll probably get downvoted for asking, but is theology nonfiction? Perhaps the pieces where religious belief is studied but I'm not so sure about studying the divine or supernatural
There is a calibration pin which you can connect to GND for 4-8s to force a manual calibration (if you can bring the sensor into an environment of ~400ppm): https://emariete.com/en/meter-co2-esp8266-nodemcu-sensor-sen...
problem: systemd-resolved fails randomly: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/19118

- this happened to me on two arch linux installations for different domains - I was unable to debug this - would love to somehow get this fixed but I switched to dnsmasq that works fine for me.
I was absolutely expecting a comparison with how hard it's to get started and develop software on modern MacOS and XCode today (is it? I haven't used it).
That absolutely breaks the law of least astonishment. It's worse to look familiar but have hidden differences than to just look completely different.
> Ability or willingness?

That's the key indicator.. 95% it's willingness.
> US have the best aircraft, missiles, and more flying hours than anyone else

Well said.

That arrogance must come in handy for bombing goat herders in the desert.
Performance aside, I think one of the main criticism of `groupby` in pandas is that they are not composable and become verbose. I'd argue that's the case with your example too.