Incorrect. The dollar is printed to benefit those who receive it first (who we will call Cantillionaires), at the expense of you and me who have dollar assets, property and (fixed) wages which we see decline in purchasing power as a result of the increase in the supply of money. It has been known for many centuries that increasing the money supply leads to a reduction in its purchasing power.

If the dollar were to be an ethical currency, the newly created dollars would be evenly distributed among US citizens. Evidently, you and I receive none of the new dollars initially, but they trickle down the economy along with the price inflation which they cause. By the time we receive these new dollars, they are worth less than the old dollar before the time they were created. However, the people who got to spend the new money first got to do so at the old value of the dollar. This would certainly fit the description of "leech society currency."

The value of bitcoin is precisely to end this unfair arrangement and to have a means of saving which cannot be deliberately debased by a privileged few.

When new bitcoin are released into the economy, no new wealth is created, that's for sure. The releasing of new bitcoin is itself an expansion of the money supply and would, if demand were to stay the same or decrease, lead to a reduction in purchasing power of bitcoin until the time when no new bitcoin will be released. The reason we do not see a reduction in purchasing power with time is because there is a high demand for people to save money which cannot be deliberately debased. People will voluntarily choose a volatile, riskier option which might retain its purchasing power over the alternative option of holding an asset which is guaranteed to continue declining in purchasing power. So far, people who have made this bet and held onto it for a few years have all seen an increase in their purchasing power.

"crypto" enthusiasts try to include Bitcoin under their umbrella because the name recognition helps them to sell their scams, which are just alternative digital versions of fiat money (by decree). But 100% of crypto projects were birthed in a world where a fair money (bitcoin) already existed, and they attempt to bring back the old, unfair version of money, where a privileged few get early access to the new money.

Bitcoin is not "crypto." It is a unique invention which cannot be duplicated because duplication erases all of the characteristics which make it worth having. Primarily, that no privileged insiders get early access to the money. Satoshi did not grant himself any bitcoin before making it public. The bitcoin he mined in the first year or so when bootstrapping the network have never been spent. Miners are not privileged because they must put in the work and risk their own assets in attempt to gain rewards later. There is no guarantee of profit for them.

Bitcoin does not leech of anything or anybody. People choose to transfer assets to it, either by hard work, exchange of goods, services and time, or by exchanging electricity in effort to update the ledger and obtain transaction fees plus a subsidy (a subsidy which declines and will eventually end). The only way to obtain bitcoin is to put in the work.

That is not true for dollars, nor "crypto."