skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
These are true:
- hiring managers that actually read resumes are golden to work for
- a test of your awareness of the fact that, yes, in critical business communications at least -- this level of correctness does matter, and it matters a lot.

And for people who want to work in startup land, it’s an ideal.

Once a company gets past 40 or so people, though, ATS adoption increases. And 150+ employees without an ATS are rare. It’s just that the volume of candidates and interview processes that need to be managed require there be some software to manage the workflow.
I thought apktool was for verifying the signatures of APK files. Or am I confusing this with a different CLI tool?
So many great (and bad) things: The Aminet repository. AREXX language. Directory Opus utility customizable file manager. Ability to sync w/ TVs. Hundreds of rich assembler coded video, audio, and graphics Demos of international origin. Cinemaware games. NewTek DigiPaint. Diga telecomm tool. Miami TCP/IP (I helped H.K. to get PPP working with NT Server). Unixy and open source tools available. Lattice C. Very capable multi-tasking. Hardware accelerators, FPU, SCSI boards. Dragging dropdown virtual screens. A single fixed root vector for OS (I no longer remember why important but the obvious), Logical Volumes and automatic mount requesters; good for small storage systems as the system knows to search and otherwise ask you to insert the correct disk, data or program. Dungeon Master. FA-18. Music Tracker and mods. Good enough quality sound. Again Directory Opus and Im sure I missed a lot.
OpenSea, Web3, and Aggregation Theory (Stratechery)
Now that’s just plain victim blaming
Show HN: Crosswordle: Sudoku Meets Wordle
While Gmail might be a major source of SPAM, they're also the email service most people legitimately use.

That was once true of Yahoo, Myspace, and even AOL.
> CPython doesn't have a just in time compiler right now, instead the interpreter is running the bytecode instructions directly.

Isn't compiling and then immediately running the code exactly what a just in time compiler is? Or do I have a misunderstanding of the term?
> By Richard H. Adamson on December 19, 2012

> Variously, despite no actual evidence of causation, soda and even diet soda are claimed to be responsible for heart attacks, stroke, asthma, COPD and even death.

> In 1994, Dr. Adamson joined the American Beverage Association (ABA), formerly the National Soft Drink Association, as Vice President for Scientific and Technical Affairs. He retired from ABA in December 2004, but remains a consultant on scientific and regulatory matters.

Four years later:

> How the Sugar Lobby Skewed Health Research - https://time.com/4485710/sugar-industry-heart-disease-resear...
Most people are not using anywhere near the entire amount of drive space on their Windows 10 C: volume.

And it's so easy to shrink the C: volume while you are booted to W10, leaving over 64GB of unallocated space to format so you can do an additional clean install of W11 to the previously unused drive space, after booting to the W11 USB install media, without disturbing W10 in any way.

The built-in Windows multi-boot menu accepts an additional entry for W11 alongside your present W10 boot entry, then the resulting dual boot menu will pop up every time you reboot so you have a choice of which partition to boot to, either W10 or W11. The most recently installed version of Windows will automatically become the default OS appearing on the bootmenu if you do not change which one you want to be default afterward.

Whichever partition you choose to boot to will be autoenumerated as your C: volume at the time, with remaining "unhidden" volumes occupying other alphabetical designations. i.e. when you boot to W11 it will be your C: volume and your W10 partition will not be C: again until you reboot to W10.

The built-in multiboot menu simply remains unseen when there is only a single boot entry, such as on a factory W10 PC.

cons:
-you basically update each OS separately
-you back up each system separately
-unless you make the desired adjustment to the OS's in a multiboot system, more than one correction for Daylight Savings Time may occur after that date arrives. Only the most frequently used OS should be the one to autoupdate the mainboard timeclock for DST

Alternatively, without using the conventional Setup.exe to install W11 from the USB install media, you can place the W11 virgin fileset onto a formatted partition from an administrative command prompt using DISM.exe.

i.e. in W10 after shrinking C: and formatting the unused space as new NTFS volume "T:", you plug in the W11 setup USB stick, cancel the setup/upgrade option then use W10 CMD line to access the files on the USB volume and bring in the W11 fileset to your target partition.

Assuming your W11 USB drive is "U:" and your target NTFS volume is "T:", first use DISM to find out which versions of Windows 11 are available within the install.wim file:

DISM.exe /get-imageinfo u:\sources\install.wim

Most of the time the "pro" version of Windows will be the sixth choice, which is identified as Index 6.

Apply W11 pro fileset to target volume "T:":

DISM.exe /apply-image u:\sources\install.wim index:6 /applydir:t:\

-w11 can actually be applied to volumes smaller than 64GB this way also

Without employing the consumer W11 Setup.exe routine, you would then need to manually add a W11 bootentry (pointing to your new Windows 11 fileset) into the existing (hidden) EFI folder that you have been using for W10 booting all along:

bcdboot t:\windows

This manual deployment approach can also be accomplished similarly from the CMD prompt when booted to the W11 install media itself, which can be helpful when your target partition is not empty, as Trusted Installer you will have fewer permission problems than a W10 Administrator.
I seem to recall that Dice-C was faster than Lattice/SAS.

If C compatibility wasn't required, then Amiga-E was possibly the best option if one wanted a (very) fast compiler paired with a high lever powerful language.

https://strlen.com/amiga-e/
On the other hand, some features turn out to be a very good idea and do stand the test of time. Designated initializers and compound literals, introduced in C99, are perfect examples of C features that stuck and became very widespread, while keeping the spirit of the language. C shouldn't be set in stone.

The fact that goto-based solutions and a non-standard GCC extension are common methods of resource cleanup in C today seems to suggest that a standardized language construct for resource cleanup would be appreciated.

> A great strength of C is that if you want more features you just go to a subset of C++, no need to add them to C.

What is C for then? Cleanup of function-scoped resources is a major concern in every large C codebase I've seen.
They already have their own cryptocurrency.

In r/cryptocurrency you can earn “moons” based on your monthly upvotes. Lots of karma farming going on like you said.
Good preparation? The fact that this site is at the top of HN? I don’t think anyone really cares as long as the community settles on only one. Personally I’m happy a group (and only one group) of people has stepped up to take over stewardship.
Interestingly enough, I turned this off some time ago, and just yesterday, I noticed the hover behavior, and had to go back and turn it off again. I wonder if some / all of user prefs for this field got botched?

Thankfully, unlike sibling comments to mine, I still had the option and it worked no problem.
Probably 8 to 15, versus 80 to 100 now.
The same thing is true of many high paying white collar jobs. Lawyers, physicians, CPAs, PEs all have to pass exams to become licensed. Many of these are gated by non-optional schooling. E.g., in most jurisdictions, you cannot just pass the bar and become an attorney. Others, like physics and architects, are additionally gated by mandatory apprenticeships.

Gatekeeping is not some thing that just the scare quotes skilled trades do.
It's not about communication, or spelling, or grammar, it's about attention to detail.

I've seen my fair share of resumes and hired my fair share of people, and I've come to the conclusion that sloppy, error-ridden, CVs are a sign of a lack of attention to detail.

Here's a candidate with all the time in the world, and huge motivation, and they still can't complete this task correctly. It's not a good look.

I'm not saying a single error I'd a deal-breaker, but it puts the applicant on the back foot. No doubt many of my rejects are quality engineers, but engineering, and software development are all about details.
I can't access it either. It looks like it's just timing out. We did it, guys! :D
Para. 2 - Yes...but notice how few people or organizations need private non-cyber security. And even when they do, it's usually a tiny number of modest-training, modest-pay security guards. If half a dozen bandits with automatic weapons started robbing a Tiffany's - is Tiffany's expected to have (or foot the bill for) a security team armed & ready for that? Or would public (city / county / state) law officers be expected to arrive ASAP, and take over?

Para. 4 - Lordy, yes. Though that needs to be competently done. Starting with setting up a computer version of Underwriters Laboratories - that could drive the sellers of Internet of T*rds crap out of business (at least in the U.S.), revoke Experian's right to operate a database full of sensitive financial information, etc.
There are many ways to create such format, and quite easily - using RDF plus some suitable ontology, etc. In fact, DOAC ontology is meant exactly for that, and I am sure there are 3-4 alternative ones too, and making a process to parse it would be relatively trivial. Why it's not done?

My guess it twofold. First, none of the resume sites is even remotely interested in data portability - they want you to use their site and their site alone. Why make it easier to go to the competitor? Second, despite all efforts, the usage of semantic web paradigms and all the automatic data processing that it enables is still minuscule outside of very niche communities - so most people aren't even aware of these solutions, and if nobody uses them, then nobody supports them, forming a vicious circle.
No. People can evaluate the evidence for themselves. We do not need authority figures to tell us what to think. This is particularly true when it comes to assessing probabilities, an activity at which most experts have proven hilariously incompetent.

(Musing: What is the probability that a genetics expert's opinion on the probabilities at play would make the discussion less well-informed rather than more well-informed?)
I’d say they are. Who cares if I write “Nodejs” or “Node.js”? The reader knows exactly what I meant, and that’s what matters. Anything else is just needless pedantry.
I don’t think most people think it’s immoral. I think most people think it’s ‘questionable, but probably practically the best choice’.
Well and don't forget about the sentence right before that one:

> Furthermore, due to recent advances CSI based systems do not require the user to carry wearable devices and do not depend on lighting.

("CSI" stands for channel state information... this refers to sensing implementations that take advantage of channel state information broadcasts)

By the way, most of this doesn't require 5G. A lot of these sensing technologies have been prototyped in the 1 GHz - 5.4 GHz range, e.g. with WiFi and 4G.

But 5G infrastructure offers a lot more resolution because of both multiple incorporated frequency bands and shorter wavelengths at the highest end of the allocated spectrum.
He could have avoided the choice Intel had by not using MIT license.
“Your freedom of speech ends at the tip of my nose.” as the saying goes. He took a swing, not just a stand.
Maybe it's just bad writing.
I think about half the comments I've ever made here on HN are about my Amiga 1000 that I got in 1985. By 1989 it had a 14MHz 68020/68881 with 4MB Fast RAM, an 80 MB SCSI drive, and a MIDI interface that I built myself from diagrams from a Byte Magazine article. Such an awesome piece of kit. I worked in front of a Sun 3/50 (that's were I got the SCSI disk) and used the Sun compilers to write my Amiga code. Poor person's Sun workstation it was.
Definitely possible. Masters/PhD not necessary. We already have incredibly accessible tooling and with a little bit of reading, you can get a lot done.

I'm recently finished an ML project which had many people who had never done ML before this. By the end of the project the team was competent enough to ingest new data, perform EDA, annotate, fix annotations, train, generate and interpret metrics, experiment with different models, re-train and so on.

The tricky part is finding the org or the opportunity that has a need great enough that they will take you on.
There's no real reason they couldn't but polling systems tend to be the first thing implemented as conceptually they are simpler and require less rigor to enforce. Switching from a polling pattern to an event pattern however is a sizeable amount of work required and you can frequently get bugs in the switch. The discussion here is in the context of a greenfield project where such concerns aren't an issue.

To be clear it's not like an event registration system is better in every way than polling. It's trading some extra hd and (potentially) memory usage for upfront and cheaper cpu costs. It is possible that whoever made the decision weighed the two options and decided on polling instead of events, and this decision was made long ago when os filesystems were first being designed and storage was at much more of a premium.
Nothing constrains it to a linear relationship, existing compute hardware is essentially single-threaded but neurons are massively parallel. If you need to iterate through an O(n^2) algorithm over 1.4 PB and the brain can do it in O(1) then you still need an absurd level of processing power to get back to 1:10000.
ooooh, one of the older but nicer article of Smithsonian Magazine.
Check out vyos and vyatta; both excellent in my experience.
The karma farming point reminds me of Steemit: https://steemit.com/

I visited this a couple of years ago to see what all the fuss was about, and what I saw were many people from mostly developing countries posting very low quality comments and content, all in the hope that it would bring them money. Once you change incentives like that, you don't need to worry about posting quality content, you're only focused on content that brings in money.

Of course, quality is subjective, and you could say something similar about some of the popular YouTubers, but there at least some resemblance of effort is needed to produce content and have a consistent viewership. For Steemit, it seemed doomed right from the beginning.
Probably not Framework or Apple? Haven't experienced these two yet, but don't almost all windows laptops come with McAfee? Removing it is a pain.
Not a whole lot of context or detail in that, it could be at the peak of the effect or at some other point in time (even just bau, or an unrelated dos)
Entropy isn't sufficient to measure password strength
I used to come from the whitespace-hate camp but I just use linters now and presto literally all of my problems ever with YAML gone.

Use YAML for k:v things, programming languages everywhere else. It's eminently readable and writable and with those linters I mentioned, untroublesome.
Not sure this author understands, but he didn’t get his visa canceled for not getting vaccinated - he got an exemption as he recently recovered from Covid (which Australia allows for and why his visa was first approved).

He got his visa canceled because they didn’t like what he said about the vaccine and Covid.

https://foreignpolicy.com/2022/01/14/novak-djokovic-visa-aus...
A throwaway line in Wikipedia that does not cite a source ... versus the Jargon File.

http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/T/Trojan-horse.html

If it isn't security-breaking, it isn't a Trojan. I have not seen any evidence that this prank, immature as it may be, resulted in an actual security breach.
This is exactly why I really like functional programming / OCaml. It feels like piping modules to let data flow through, which is an abstraction I seem to be most comfortable with. Unlike OOP, which is nothing like this and offer a much more "realistic" abstraction (e.g.: the typical Vehicle > Car analogy), that in my head crumbles a lot quicker when faced with programming problems.
A Necropolis in Naples Reveals the Enduring Influence of Ancient Greece
I’ve interviewed the CEOs of many of the largest ATSs for Ladders News, and while there is no automated system, the tools do exist for a company to screen in this basis.

But none of the ATSs really collect great data on how many of their customers use them in their core processes. From observing actual, heavy duty recruiter and HR usage at Ladders, I suspect it is not very many.

These are people people after all, and they are not great at writing REGEX style queries to find only the precisely correct resumes they are looking for. You also need to remember that they are frequently working on novel searches each week, and wouldn’t have the confidence or the capability to craft such searches.
Sounds plausible however I am not much of browser fan, while I really do like the speed and size of DNS software, so I will always be experimenting with different approaches. The world of the web browser is dominated by advertising and surveillance. Unless that changes, I care little about what the web browser may or may not do in the future. I am more interested in relatively small DNS software.
That's the one. Obviously they go a bit crazy at the end, but you can get ideas on subtle tweaks you can make to embellish a game. For something like WallSmash, I'd also suggest picking a stronger visual theme for the brick/ball/etc elements. e.g., this game has a retro thing going on: https://retrogram.app/

With the one game I've been involved with making (https://hexiled.com/ from years ago), the juicing video motivated us to spend time on sound, explosions, bit of shake, etc. One day during development, we tested the hexabomb explosion with a phone connected to the office speakers and it was room-shakingly awesome.
Frankly this is a moot point until there is more than one complete implementation of the Matrix "protocol", including particularly the critical "homeserver" part.

Until then it really isn't standardized; the protocol is, effectively, "do whatever the one and only implementation does".
There are many reasons other than commercial motive that have eroded the P2P nature of the internet. The single most prominent is security. Improved network hardening practices by OS vendors have mostly eliminated the historic problem that computers directly accessible to the internet were quickly compromised (SMB on Windows hosts used to be a huge problem this way), but for years in the late '90s to early '00s directly connecting computers to the internet was considered a very problematic practice due to the number of worms. The more durable problem has been DOS. Home networks are, for structural reasons, extremely vulnerable to denial of service attacks and it's difficult to fix that. The best way to fix it is to be extremely conservative with inbound connections by dropping all of them, and indeed that's what home networks do. For many years NAT was frequently described first as a security feature, although its security benefits were purely incidental. DOS attacks on home networks remain surprisingly common in certain circles such as multiplayer videogames, and have resulted in a climate in which multiplayer videogames are expected to actively conceal the network identity of other participants.

Yes, this is basically all an accident of history, but so is everything else about computing. There's no real sense in which the original "network of peers" IP concept has been successful since IP spread beyond the realm of the National Science Foundation. It is possible to build systems which are far more resistant to these problems but it's difficult to begin with, and on top of that adoption would require turning the battleship that is the internet around. We're sort of stuck with the situation we found ourselves in, which is that we build peer-to-peer system by piling a few hacks on top of IP to enable peer-to-peer application layer usage.
One of the most famous Victorian dishes is a hilarious lie
It's a nice thought, but describing the color in the OP as emerald seems like it would be a fairly poor attempt at describing your vision. It's more of a cornflower blue, or even as you say (and something easily accessible to the ancients): the color of a clear summer sky.

For example if I was John and I saw the color of infinite temperature around God's throne, I would probably say something more like:

> and there emanated from the throne an incredibly bright blue halo, as if a clear summer sky was shooting forth from God's throne.
That's apksig.
https://android.googlesource.com/platform/tools/apksig/
I very commonly catch inadvertent quadratic or even exponential algorithms in code reviews. The code normally will produce the right answer ... eventually.
>> had a few cases of two senior devs reviewing my PR at the same time and going back and forth to tell me to revert what the other dev had me put in

As a senior guy reviewing code I’ve asked for reversion of stuff i made the dev put in. On more than one occasion. Nobody’s perfect.

I admit that after a few cases of that I realized I needed to rethink code reviews and became more mindful of distinguishing between things that really needed to change, things needing explanation, and things inspiring overzealous pedantry. Made code reviews much less time consuming.
Looks like the frame color of a C64 screen.
Blame TikTok?
Chalk maintainer here. I said before I wouldn't comment on Marak but I don't want to stand by and watch him profit from this like he is, monetarily or otherwise, nor should GitHub receive ANY hate for their actions.

He's not banned. It was most likely an initial response to a suspected compromised account situation. Once they determined the actions were carried out by the account holder, they reinstated it.

There are MANY reasons to be annoyed with GitHub but this isn't one of them. Github's actions here helped, not hurt. I would hope they'd suspend my account if they too thought it was compromised and pushing out malicious updates to packages.

The security of users is of the utmost importance.

Marak needs professional medical help. It is clear he's having a mental break and the people defending him and egging him on are only making things worse. He has a history of erratic behavior (dating back to almost a decade ago) and needs to find healing, not accolades.

Since this whole fiasco, Marak has garnered loads of followers and has increased his sponsor count dramatically. We should not be rewarding this behavior. If you at all dig into this, you'll find not a stable, perhaps loud individual, but a troubled, erratic, unpredictable, and hurting one. He is not martyr. He's not a patriot or a revolutionist. He's an abuser, potential "freedom fighter", malicious OSS maintainer and a beggar.

Please. Let's end this and not give any more attention to Marak. He needs help, and we're all collectively making things worse.
How is the power bill for this device going to be? Because my SGI Octane which I used back early 00s was drawing a lot (as did the AlphaServer DS10L), and also was a nice heater in the winter (not in the summer...). Which is why I avoid old hardware these days. Especially worth considering given current EU gas and electricity prices.
Going direct to a hiring manager is always the best route to the job.

Any standardized process will lack fidelity and excellence in specific cases. Or maybe even in all cases, when the company has made the trade off for cost or speed over quality.

But that’s what big company life is like, and that’s why they have standardized processes. Because even with the errors, in aggregate, it works out better for the business.
This is something you should share. Many would love to see what you came up with.