skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> I think the exact opposite. I think if you’re cherry picking pieces of thought from a figure and ignoring the bits you don’t like then you’re just using them as a prop.

I'm not using anybody as a prop, nor am I ignoring anything. If you want to talk about King's positions regarding socialism, I'll tell you why I disagree with them. If you want to talk about his position regarding color-blindness, I'll tell you why I think it's the single most important notion to arise from the civil rights movement.

This doesn't "prove your point" that I'm somehow erasing the other positions he held or using him as a prop, I simply don't agree with all of his positions. You seem to be of the opinion that there is some sort of contradiction inherent in that, whereas the position of color-blindness actually has nothing to do with socialism. In fact, the most prominent advocates of socialism today specifically advocate AGAINST color-blindness.

> What, so the rest of what he said wasn’t ideas? Or that the rest of them have less value because someone said so? If so, who decides which ideas are the real ones to be remembered? You? Me? Our political chattering classes?

This is an absolutely ridiculous statement. Of course the rest of what he said were ideas, the point is that arguments/positions aren't bundled together arbitrarily simply because you would like them to be. If I say "the sky appears blue, I think it has something to do with the way light is scattered through the atmosphere, and that probably means there is a god," hopefully you understand that I've actually made 3 arguments, 2 of which you might agree with. Agreeing that the sky appears blue doesn't mean you have to agree that there is a god. Regarding which have more or less value...you're free to venerate whichever ideas of Dr. King you'd like to, nobody is stopping you. There is no political chattering classes demanding that you do anything regarding which positions of his you found compelling.
> When an MSC makes it through the process, it is added to the protocol, right?

Yes.

> Then all the servers and clients need to implement those MSCs or else they are not compliant with the protocol.

It's no longer a MSC at that point; it's part of the next versioned release of the protocol. So yeah, if the feature profile their client/server is targeting doesn't implement the required features from that version of the protocol, it's not compliant.

> Either you're not compliant with the protocol (Matrix), or you're not compliant with a certain extension (XMPP).

> I don't understand how these are different. Matrix has a lot of non-compliant servers and clients. XMPP has a lot of servers and clients that don't implement certain extensions.

The difference is that in Matrix there's only one specification which servers & clients can be compliant or not compliant with. Whereas in XMPP, there's an arbitrary combinatoric explosion of XEPs which you may or may not be compliant with.
ban dang
The classic child safety card to build support for this argument.
A standard would include standard forms of expressing things--there shouldn't be anything (other than names) that doesn't appear in their dictionary.
I’ve spent a lot of time, made a lot of manual trades, and lost a lot of money on crypto futures in the last three months.

I’ve learned some things…

One is that the order books are virtually meaningless, at least for humans. They change so rapidly, bulking or vanishing, that you cannot gain any sense of what the market wants or is doing.

I’ve also seen strings of tiny trades, apparently strategically timed with order book cancellations, causing big price changes on almost no volume.
Sounds to me like what you're saying is that the walled-garden approach of needing to approve every app that ever gets developed as a whole is what's infeasible without creating kafkaesque conditions dealing with their automation, and I fail to see how you've made a case for this automation being all that good in the first place, given that your main argument for it is that it's found "millions of vulns in apps over the years" but then later cite "millions of apps" as a reason you can't expand the support team.

I would suggest that it might be worthwhile to use OS-level features to stop apps from behaving maliciously in more general ways, but a lot of what I would consider malicious behavior (e.g. sending user analytics to third parties, feeding them misleading ads, messing with other processes, etc) is part of google's business model or claims of added value in many cases, so that seems unlikely to happen.

You are nonetheless astute to point out that we can't really blame the individual or even group-wise incompetence of their support teams here. What it is worthwhile to blame is the entire business model of trying to own and control a platform that supports so many users in the first place without giving them the autonomy to self-govern. No company can possibly be so many things to so many people and not screw them over. In a way, it's the same problem planned economies have. Even making the very generous assumption that this is never out of malice or greed, we can still view the major problems millions of people face due to this scale and inflexibility as practically inevitable.
It's unfortunate, but cranelift might still be considered too unstable for "primetime": my understanding as an outsider is that they're looking to stabilize YJIT sooner rather than later, to prevent it from being a perpetually unstable/experimental feature like MJIT ended up being.

(Also, the last time I checked, cranelift emitted extremely suboptimal code. That's not their fault given the design constraints (it's a new project and they're aiming to beat LLVM's SelectionDAG in codegen performance), but it's probably not ideal given Ruby's long term performance goals. I'm also not sure how easy it would be to retrofit the LBBV[1] architecture of YJIT onto cranelift.)

[1]: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3486606.3486781
I mean: this is how you do it. Better than posioning a popular js library and just being an annoyance.
> They claim that "standard containers" cannot run a full OS. ... this works just fine with rootless podman and, more recently, rootless docker.

> Anyone who wants unprivileged system containers might want to look into rootless docker or podman rather than this.

Perhaps I'm missing something, but I have been running full OS userlands using "standard containers" in production for years, via LXD[1].

[1]: https://linuxcontainers.org/
Event Capturing and Bubbling in React
Shift+F10 is the trick; you're editing the registry of the live Windows system which is the install environment:

https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/microsoft/how-to-bypas...

If the installer didn't complain, it was a supported configuration.
I feel this just shows lack of imagination in the search algorithm. It seems pretty trivial to discourage this kind of thing - to start with, how about penalizing longer titles or longer lists of keywords?

Let the publisher decide whether to rank low for lots of words, or high for a few.
There's also no functional difference between net metering and having a farm of a million hamsters spinning little wheels to turn little generators. In either case the light switch will work at night, but one is obviously cost prohibitive. But the difference between the cost of paying your electric company and the cost of powering your house with hamsters is not a subsidy, no one is giving you that money, you have not become richer by some amount, you've merely not pursued an uneconomical option. Using solar power during the day and paying for gas at night is more economical than using stored solar power at night, so that's what people do.

The rooftop owner is offering to sell electricity for exactly the same rate that their neighbors are purchasing it at. When you buy electricity from the electric company, they are doing the work of going to the wholesaler, making the contract to get some basic amount of capacity, setting up all the distribution infrastructure to get it from the wholesaler to you, etc. That is value added, and the retail rate is marked up accordingly. When rooftop owners pump electricity into the grid, the electric company isn't doing any work, they're not adding any value, they don't profit directly from the affair but they have no reason to. They do, nevertheless, save money on reduced maintenance expenses.

Everyone in this scenario is coming out ahead, but no one is subsidizing anyone else. Everyone is better off simply for the more efficient utilization of resources. The rooftop owners aren't paying to burn gas during the day, the electric company isn't paying to pump large amounts of power where they don't need to, and non-rooftop owners are buying power that is in lower demand. Win-win-win.
Not even - those were my top results.

Yeah I noped tf out pretty quick too. This isn't even the first time I've seen crazy shit about YT - these parents are 100% right not to let their kids on unsupervised. Weird how it's not news more often tbh.
If I understand this is a fairly straightforward source-to-source PHP-to-Javascript compiler. It is so simple that when complied to Javascript it uses Javascript semantics!

If a PHP look is all that matters I guess it is useful, however the semantic difference between the two languages would be both a pain to work with an a footgun. You are essentially writing two languages at once and you will need lots of diligent testing to ensure that the two behave the same if you ever want to run the same code on the client and server. From my pessimistic viewpoint it looks like using the same code on client and server is not going to work with this approach.

If I was writing this I would have tried to make a much more faithful implementation of PHP. Obviously you can't directly connect to your database from the browser but I would try to make the code behave identically (within the supported features). This would likely result in slower code on the client but at least it would be predictable.
Maybe it depends partly on having a sizeable African-American population? Is there one in Madison? It's not African-American businesses that I see closing, but there might be more emphasis on the holiday in general.
the NIH is awesome. we owe those civil servants a debt of gratitude for sacrificing higher compensation in industry and performing as well as they do given the constraints.

breakthrough ideas typically come from unconventional ideas, i.e., risky ideas or ideas likely to fail -- and thus waste taxpayer money.

yet the funding process is mostly about conforming to traditional assumptions, which naturally gates scientific breakthroughs.

the problem lies upstream. politicians don't allow the NIH to fund risky research and waste money.
My Netflix account goes way back to the mid 2000s. I just cancelled it over this price increase. I'm definitely not getting $22 (Premium + tax) of value from Netflix every month. They just don't make all that much good content. My go-to is still HBO (and not 'HBO Max'), whose production quality I would have preferred Netflix to emulate.
> Right, "based on zat tech" and so not real zats. So they understood zats enough to come up with a facsimile, but not devise real combat zats better than those ridiculously awkward things the Goa'uld built?

They didn’t reverse engineer the Zats, they scavenged those Zat-based weapons and built more.

Look, I went into detail about this at the start of this conversation. I don’t really see the point in repeating the same thing over and over.

> Look, if you're not interested in critiquing the internal logic of this show

I felt we’d exhausted any constructive critique and just moved onto browbeating me into agreeing with you that the show isn’t super realistic.

The point the other commenter was making is that this show was a little easier to suspend disbelief with regards to their use of tech than your average SciFi. While I don’t disagree with the overall point you’re making, you’ve really missed the spirit of the conversation (and the show) with your nitpicking.

I mean if you want to get scentific then where to we start? The impossible glowing eyes, snakes the size of squirrels living inside peoples brains, the entire concept of ascension, time travel, or what about their frequent use of fictional elements? It’s literally make believe.

> We agree that SG-1 did tech progression better than most shows, but it still left some glaring holes regardless.

Nobody is arguing it did. As I’ve said numerous times, this wasn’t intended to be hard SciFi. That’s a whole other genre
What is crazier is with Windows Linux Subsystem, I have the best of both worlds. I can't imagine suffering a Mac or Linux desktop now.
It's ironic- Fuji have a monopoly so they can charge however little they want.
> Sounds like she just isn't the audience Frank was writing for

So who do you think is the audience Frank Miller is writing for?
I really enjoy uLisp. It would be nice if it had fexp, or nlambda's if not full blown macros for building further language forms. My dream would be an emac's like environment built in uLisp loaded on a mechanical keyboard for doing password management and writing without distractions.
To the physicist here, how much of "physics" you really get if you go through all this "minimal" courses?

To give it some context:
I watched classical mechanics a bit. Basically it's just math in the end, and to be honest after 50% of the lectures I had the feeling that the "practical" side or "intuition" is lacking. Especially in case of the conservation law's.

So maybe the question would be how much more do you get if you go through a true physics bachelor progamm?
> Did you see that I presented a valid use case, and nobody responded to that part?

Did you miss that people just pointed out that it wasn't much of a use case?
Fair. Though, I suspect some super hero comics are fine.

I am also ok with the thought that that earlier exposure clouds all later exposure.

I am further ok with someone not liking comics. Or super hero stories.
Yeah, you can listen to the 42 minute recording at the link I posted.
No mention of Linux Mint, which has the pros of Ubuntu but not the cons.
The race to dominate the DeFi ecosystem is on
That seems like very cheap insurance... Even the legal filings to fight someone launching WalMartCoin are more...
My advice:

- Learn how to multiply a matrix M by a column vector v.

- Generalise that by noticing that M[u|v|...] = [Mu|Mv|...].

That's matrix multiplication.
An alternative to dagre-d3 is d3-dag: https://github.com/erikbrinkman/d3-dag

I've had good success with cytoscapejs as well, integrating with react so the graph will animate layout on transition. I use elk, which is apparently superior to sugiyama (the algorithm graphviz uses for force-directed dag layouts).
Taking Hawaii isn't really in China's interest, but denying it to the US is, because that would help it achieve its goals in Taiwan.
Of course. Printing money inflates its supply. And increasing the demand for products (by providing easy money) without increasing the supply of products (and actually decreasing it by restricting work) will lead to higher prices. It is economics 101 and it was tested by many countries eg Germany before the WW or more recently Venezuela.
Per email?

Or per address/domain?

What's the best "altruistism wins" way?

Paid addresses, like ETH network?
That's a hard No!

One of my jobs had the dysfunction cranked to 11 with politics (government and inter-office). I can honestly say that screwed me up for a good long while. It took two job switches to be normal again. You don't realize how far down you are until an outside observer points out you haven't smiled in months.
There's no competing with UBI. People with jobs still get UBI. That's what the "U" part means: Universal.

Pay for waiters and labourers, like pay for everyone else, is on top of UBI. There's no particular reason it would have to rise by 2x or 3x—unless the industry is categorically unwilling or unable to ensure that their workers are treated well enough that they just don't see it as being worthwhile for less.
The `gvpr` tool in graphviz deserves more recognition.

Graphviz, at its core, is a simple graph description language (DOT), which allows progressive enhancement, and a bunch of auto-layout tools where some double as renderers.

The double-duty of the layout/renderers masks GraphViz's true power, which is that you can create a pipeline modifying your graph source (confusingly referred to as '.dot' files), progressively adding attributes.

This is where gvpr comes in. While most are familiar with GV's all-in-one layout+rendering tools like `dot` or `neato`, gvpr is a generic Awk-like programming tool that iterates over nodes and edges. With it, you can implement any layout algorithm you like (or not!), to specify part or all of the attributes of your graph (like positioning and style), to then be rendered using `dot` to the format of your choice.
Sorry, I meant ponzai scheme.

Marketplaces are where things with inherent value are exchanged. Crypto has zero inherent value - it serves only as a record of previous players in the scheme.
Yes, the name of this attribute is rankdir.

See in the docs: https://graphviz.org/docs/attrs/rankdir/

In the sketch example:

digraph G {
rankdir="LR";
graph [fontname = "Handlee"];
...
Tesla haters complaining about this are like the guy at the end of video. If you don’t like the website, just don’t visit it.
That camera (and a lot of similar cameras from around then) is fixed focus, so there's no focus delay, but you also can't adjust the focus either. With a fixed focus camera usually everything farther away than X is going to show up in focus (or nearly so) and anything closer isn't going to be in focus. But a lot of the time, you will be at least X away to frame your shot anyway, so no big deal.
Don’t even try. You would basically have to rewrite the entire YouTube client to get rid of all the dark patterns.
The whole Bobiverse series is built around this concept of one guy's brain scan and him embracing his new existence.

By the way, do you have the title of the book you mentioned?
I love WLED and have used it on over a dozen lighting projects with ESP32s and ESP8266s. It makes it so ridiculously easy, and has an incredible set of features with a great app to control it all and integrate with other services.

- Kids bedside lamps. Using the timed preset changes in WLED it goes from bright white/blue for reading time, then at bedtime it plays a rainbow animation and fades to a bright orange with pulses of similar colours, then throughout the next hour fades to a gentle animation of soft colours that stay on all night as their nightlights.

- Down-lighting on shelving, using strips of LEDs under each shelf lip. Gives a nice bright warm-white glow to everything on the shelves which shifts to a soft blue at night for mood lighting in the room.

- Ambient lighting throughout various rooms that is controlled via Home Assistant.

- LED strips on my 3D printers which are turned on via Octoprint when the printers start warming up, and stay on throughout the prints for timelapses then the lights all go green when the prints are finished.

... and many more. Every single one of those projects were simple 1-day affairs thanks to WLED. Stick the LEDs where you want them, wire them up to an ESP + a PSU (usually an old phone charger with a chopped USB cable to split out power), and flash the ESP and boot. Then the rest is done sitting down with your phone and playing with the sequence editor or choosing presets/timers.
I'm in a walmart the order is still processing loop.
Would you say that the tractor for instance has only made John Deere wealthy, or has it made the world better off?

Has the motor vehicle only improved the life of the Ford family or would I be better off with a horse and carriage?

Have personal computers only made Bill Gates and Michael Dell richer or have they benefited the human race as a whole?

All of these are examples of automating laborious processes. All of them have made inventors wealthy and the world a nicer place to live. The economy isn't zero sum where to make one person richer another must necessarily become poorer.
It’s certainly possible for changes in UI to significantly harm productivity, but you would need to systematically gather evidence to know if this is happening. Whether it’s happening is almost completely independent of anyone’s individual feeling of frustration at needing to learn about and adapt to new UI changes.

But more importantly, they existence of change is inherently important to the large-scale advancement of computing over time. Even if it is the case that a certain UI overhaul of a major operating system harmed productivity, the solution is not “permanently halt all software changes after this specific version that I have learned and enjoy using.” We ought to reject arguments that forced stasis is the solution any time changes introduce risk.
oh thanks for giving a great example definitely well written code. been reading this https://github.com/apache/guacamole-client/blob/master/guaca...

don't you find that comments are taking a lot of space more than the actual code or do you think this is what a takes to avoid confusion. I found that single line comments are much better, compact and enough to explain what is happening as opposed to those multiline comments that take so much space.
"There were always large parts of science that were wrong or meaningless, so the present situation is not worse than the past in this respect.

Even if 10-50% of the studies I mentioned in the first section turn out to be wrong, the pace of correct and important results is still astounding."
And the caveat for the former is that you are linking your email with a username when you sign up for the service. It doesn't guarantee it is the same person and doesn't affect people whose username is their name and the email can be found via other means, but it can affect people trying to be more anonymous.
Ah didn't realize it was just a folder in the project directory, oops!

Nuked zig-cache and zig-out, rebuild, no change in build times.
Is it illegal to manipulate crypto? If so, then how many people have been prosecuted for manipulating crypto?

I think all of it is manipulated at a scale never before seen.
Nah I don't believe it.
Snow Leopard was also probably the most stable Mac OS X ever. I had it for years and I don't ever remember it crashing under duress.
I hope that I'll have time to go through this lectures. I didn't have any physics classes after the high school. It would be nice to refresh my knowledge and to learn something new :)
No one took steps to protect JS projects from malicious updates. They took action in this one case but did not fix the underlying issue which is with package managers.
For people who came here.

If you are ok with Windows/Mac stay there.

If you are linux curious just use something.

- If you have a friend use something that they say will work for you and they 'll support.

- If you have no-one just go with Ubuntu because searching (the error on) the internet works better with ubuntu (IMO).

- If you care what I 'd suggest, and use myself: Go with Fedora (Silverblue) and use flatpaks to install software.
Not sure what you mean, you can install it other ways, and the dist is packaged up in a variety of ways. (https://github.com/cytoscape/cytoscape.js)
As you say, they are streaming the content and therefore there are streaming rights involved regardless how they stream the content.

Consider for a moment that Netflix offered that service, how would you choose the menu options on that DVD? You'd have to wade through all those copyright warnings and adverts you can't skip. You'd have to pay more for the power consumption of the DVD player. Consider if every consumer had this service, how big would their warehouse have to be to store all the DVD players along with their collection of DVDs to play?

It would be a logistical nightmare for Netflix.