skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I am looking forward to seeing a detailed list created by these doctors and scientists with time stamps from the interviews that counter or refute the statements with references both with the interview of Dr. Malone and the interview with Dr. Peter McCullough. If there are alternate sides to the story then we should all have access to them and hear what the medical community have to say. Even better might be if the medical community put forth some doctors to be interviewed on these podcasts.
The bigger picture was that these moral crusades create an environment in which few are willing to openly discuss the facts, what lines are crossed, their thoughts on those lines, etc.

I abstain from defending RMS, but it is amazing to me how damaging these moral crusades are. I wonder if my feelings currently are similar to those of the public audience during a witch trial. If the imaginary members of the audience stood up to say that the witchness is a bit absurd, they too would be accused of some relationship to dark magic, etc.

Don't you feel, to some extent, worried that by discussing Stallman's comments and their nuance, you yourself may one day be roasted in the same way the RMS is?

Its incredible.
I mean, that’s the whole point of a country - to serve it’s citizens. Luckily that usually works out for the best.
You seem to be implying that this is secondary effect of being "more ideological," and not following from the ideology itself. The point is rather that libertarians say that the state should not have a right to define such limits at all on people. Not sure where the parallel would be for leftists/socialists?

Also small nitpick but one cannot be "more" or "less" ideological, we all are whether we like it or not, it's just the question of which ideology you are. You might say, "well I am not one of those fanatics on either side of the horseshoe," but that doesn't make you "less" ideological, it just defines your ideology.

Ideology =/= belief system. It is rather the implicit, subconscious framing you have to the world that informs the belief system you arrive at ("rationally" or otherwise). So, in fact, denying you have ideology, or having "less" ideology than the radicals, shows that the influence of ideology on you is stronger than otherwise :).
In Russia, they actually do film raids/arrests. It's later used in court I think. It's pretty common, they do it with low profile criminals, too. There's a special officer with a camera filming everything. You can find plenty of such videos on Youtube.
> In the end Crimea people did voted to rejoin Russia.

Cool, any invasion and occupation and annexation is justified if you stage a vote to retroactively justify it after the fact.
I never knew this was a thing. I'm not on board with promoting the use of "we" as a replacement for first person singular as being an acceptable societal norm, unless you're the Queen.

Sorry, but it is too close to contributing to mental health, or personality, disorders for me.
You should just google the definition of culture. Lots of work has been done to study culture at numerous levels from nations to corporations to small communities. It's called anthropology.

If you're actually curious, you should actually read papers and studies. This HN trend of ignorantly waxing philosophically about some topic adds no value to anyone's mind.
I guess it would be a hassle updating geoip databases every few seconds with a new location :D
The ASN.1 specs are beautiful. They are beautifully written, better than anything the IETF produces because the ITU-T is an expensive standards development organization that can afford to have people who only do this sort of thing.

The ASN.1 specs are very readable. Much easier to read than many important RFCs.
Most people are doing containers wrong
"In the 90s when you had to convince people that video games were worth the time + most people didn't have a home PC? Yeah, in that case a person who plays games on their Linux machine is important to growing the community."

There were no games available on Linux in the '90s.*

* Except for those specifically written there.
Quantum mechanics news hasn't been giving us anything new for decades. Every modern article is about a new speculation, or at best an or experiment that reconfirms what we already knew. Yet, articles will never cease to use click-bait to make you think a revolution has occurred.
If you use Tor, and you're not a criminal, you increase the deniability of anyone else who uses Tor. Thus, ever so slightly, you help everyone else to have an easy way to be anonymous.

Of course, for any serious anonymity (against western LEAs, not against corporations or 3rd world governments), you're most likely correct.
In the research industry, it is well established for anyone wanting to publish or utilize / include another's research in their own, to contact the source author and receive explicit permission to do so.

More often than not, they are more than willing to help.
> It's still fair to call this a violation of free speech

You can call it a violation of rock and roll, if you like. Normally, "violate" is something you do the law, or a contract, or an agreement. You can't normally "violate" a principle that you haven't declared your adherence to, just because someone else adheres to it.
And IPv6?
Wait, is this a real question? With one exception, I would prefer to have any of the last four US presidents or their major party opponents solve problems instead of Elon Musk.
Oklahoma Bill Would Let Any Parent Veto Any Public School Library Book
r/evil
Why would we ignore the medium if the medium is the message?
I try to avoid snacking whenever possible but you always have to plan for at least one trip to the kitchen per day. I can’t tell if there’s some subtext in your question about “healthy” snacks, but that’s what you’re gonna get from me.

Bell peppers are an awesome snack. Just sweet enough to stop the craving and I never need more than one.

I boil 6 eggs whenever I’m out and leave then in a bowl in the fridge. I love boiled eggs but rarely have more than 1 at a time, and I’ll never take the time to boil a new one in the moment. Boiling 6 at once takes care of breakfast and snacks for a couple days.

15 almonds is about 100 calories. When I want something crunchy and savory I’ll eat that with a bit of salt.

Yogurt. Again, it’s one of my favorite snacks and 1 cup is a bit under 200 calories.

Stay hydrated. It’s amazing how often you’re actually slightly thirsty but feel like you need food. I keep a liter of water at my desk.

If I find myself hanging out in the kitchen for any longer than 1 item, I go for a walk or stretch for a few minutes. I need to physically distract myself to give my body the time to realize it just ate something.

When I absolutely need sugar, I try to reach for an apple but it often transforms into a handful of Mike and Ike’s.
Google's Android 12 update has been the rockiest in years
> It is a speech issue, even if not a legal issue, if you can pay Google to shut down random accounts that say things you don't like. The ToS violation is a red herring.

I think we here all presume that interested parties can pay corporations to do anything that is both legal, and which remains within the letter of the contracts (e.g. Terms of Service) that the corporation has entered into; and that the only thing stopping corporations from not being actively malicious/malfeasant (though not illegal) in their interactions with customers/users, is that they don't want to be perceived as breaking the terms of contracts they themselves offer.

Voluntary self-bindings in a contract like a ToS are effectively precommitments about a corporation's own ethical behavior; with negative PR as a punishment for breaking said precommitment. Corporations offer these because they want people to have faith that they won't do certain things, even when interested parties offer to pay them to do those things.

So it's not interesting to me that Grammarly can pay YouTube to terminate creators that were already violating the ToS in some way, but where YouTube previously hadn't much cared. Of course they can. Selective enforcement is an omnipresent fact of how corporate social-network moderation works, because corporations have no legal mandate of 100% enforcement, and costs can be cut by doing as little as it takes to make users not complain. So there are always going to be cases where a corporation didn't notice a violation. And why shouldn't a paying customer (one of their advertisers) be able to prioritize YouTube's attention on a previously un-noticed violation? If YouTube wanted to promise us that they wouldn't do that, they'd put a self-binding to that effect in the ToS. YouTube, like all corporations, is an evil genie that starts off by telling you a bounded list of ways in which it won't screw you. You still have to assume it'll screw you in every way not mentioned in the list.

But it is interesting to me that Grammarly can pay YouTube to terminate creators that weren't already violating the ToS in some way. Because that sets a precedent for the ToS not limiting YouTube's behavior — of YouTube not abiding by the precommitments they have made, of not caring about the negative PR consequences of doing so. Which really means that — to the degree that this is a structural issue rather than a "renegade" actor — there is no reason to believe that YouTube will hold to any of its own precommitments in the future. Like, say, its precommitment to pay content creators.
I wanted that very much when the kid was younger. However it took them ten years to add profiles so wouldn't hold your breath.
is this in the tech industry or the economy as a whole? people in the service industry are leaving because it's even more miserable during a pandemic
It's an attempt to legalize theft.
As can be seen in this case ignorace does not help much. It's a lesseon that all of us have to learn from time to time.
Generally if you want that, the derived Debug impls are good enough, and then you can print the debug form with: "{x:?}" and that can be made to pretty print (newlines, etc) with "{x:#?}". That will print the entire structure of a type and its associated values (can be quite verbose, though).
I'm willing to spend a few internet points to say things that people don't want to hear.
On similar note (but maybe not too similar): My work switched from being a in-office company to everything-remote. Productivity took a big hit because we were a small, tight-knit company, and people stopped talking with each other. Left it to take a job in a company that will never switch to remote-only. Much happier again.
The really key part seems to be this:

"If you aren’t using mmap, on the other hand, you still need to handle of all those issues"

Which seems like a reasonable statement. Is it less work to make your own top-to-bottom buffer pool, and would that necessarily avoid similar issues? Or is it less work to use mmap(), but address the issues?
I actually forget to eat (including snacking) while coding. It is not good as when I come out, I eat fast and more than I should. However, I have not been able to break these habits in the past 3 decades.
There are two questions at the core of this: "What made you look" and "What made you leave". They can have the same answers but this isn't a great poll IMO.
Probably the same people who are saying they are much more productive working from home.
Wow, did you buy it new? My '95 has been amazing for the past 8 years, wouldn't drive anything else.
Re: that last part. We’re probably thinking of different generations, but I agree. Demographics from a random unreliable source:

Age vs ad blocker usage (female, male)
16-24 43.2%, 49.2%
25-34 43.0%, 47.6%
35-44 38.4%, 44.8%
45-54 33.5%, 39.1%
55-65 32.1%, 37.3%

Those poor boomers. They grew up watching ads on every cable television channel and now they watch ads on every YouTube video.
I‘m a proponent of MIT and BSD style licenses normally, but this calls for something like AGPL: Allow other researchers and engineers to improve upon your code and build amazing things with it. If someone wants to use your work to earn money, let them understand and reimplement the algorithms and concepts, that’s fine too.
I've used Zelle and it was easy. My bank is suggesting them (they have first class support), but I have no idea if they are otherwise better/worse than paypal. Most of the time if I owe money it is either credit card or I used my bank's bill pay (which sends a physical check if they don't have an electronic arrangement)

I did a wire transfer once, $15 in fees, but since the amount was from a house sale (to get from the bank where the money was deposited to my mortgage bank - they couldn't do this direct which was annoying). I wouldn't do it for normal things, but with that much money involved I don't blame the banks for some friction and the cost wasn't much. Hopefully I never do one again, and also I hope I'm an oddity for even doing it at all.
Sports are conundrum for sure and one of the only valid reasons to watch "live tv". Personally I don't care for sports but my parents do. The landscape there is pretty terrible as well IMHO. Cable or Satellite are probably the best picture while something like YouTubeTV is probably the best experience (but damn that picture is not good, at least to me it looks blocky often and there are a ton of artifacts on the picture). Game blackouts are something that I just don't understand to this day, like I understand them but how are we still living in the dark ages (pun intended)? IPTV is another option but it's temperamental and has similar picture issues to YTTV in my experience.

TV/Movies can be solved with piracy. Sports can't be solved with money or piracy.
What is the allure and purpose of going back to 800 Mhz? I mean I did it myself this week, but was frustrated enough to think it's a really dumb idea, waste of time. I can't even articulate why I did it in the first place.

I used a Raspberry Pi 4 (1500 Mhz) as a daily driver for 4 days. Struggled with hidpi scaling, no Signal Messenger, overheating CPU, Youtube at 360p, HTML Gmail.

I went so far to upgrade Pi to SSD, plus heat sink. Considering adding active cooling... but the said nope, back to Macbook Pro. Why do we even try?
1,760 Acres. That’s How Much More of Manhattan We Need
Plenty of countries actually do this, not just Russia. In fact, I think the US is the outlier here in not documenting their raids.
> a sold ticket is a sold ticket

> But a sold ticket that doesn't result in a swarm of complaint emails is worth its weight in gold

What? Service sucks but we're not supposed to complain? We're supposed to just pay quietly and shut up?

It's comments like these that makes me glad piracy exists.
because people became millionaires trading CUMROCKET and Tesla
My previous organization has been totally emptied out during the Great Quittening. All of us left for various reasons, including mismanagement, and the eminent impossibility of pay raises that kept up with the hot market + inflation. I was fielding offers at 20% past my previous base salary, plus MASSIVE equity upside, at a much more exciting company. I feel bad for any engineering leaders attempting to retain people right now.
Check out the creative use of emoji in the running header!
Thank you for following up.

If you consider negotiating commercial terms an undesirably adversarial process, I completely understand needing to stick to, say, permissive open terms. There's plenty of murk even in the popular permissive licenses these days. I've written on them in MIT, BSD, Apache, and the GPLs. But those issues are largely ignored by small-shop and solo maintainers, because in their minds, the point is making clear there isn't anything to enforce in the first place. Many choose licenses with attribution requirements and simply don't enforce those, either.

You mentioned not wanting to sue people. I can assure that you the vast majority of fully closed-proprietary software companies don't want to sue anyone, either. It's costly, time-consuming, and hardly their specialty. Which is also why, the vast majority of time they have an issue with a customer or would-be customer, it's handled between business people, as a negotiation, rather than by immediately calling in thousands of dollars worth of litigators. Some fear or lawyers is definitely justified. But please don't overestimate how much of all the "legal work" out there lawyers actually do. Self-help is the most popular kind.

On the user side, I was saddened to read your comment. We've done a lot of work on Big Time to make it a whole lot more readable for people who aren't lawyers than even terms like Apache 2 or MPLv2. But the issue here is what Big Time says that's new, not whether it expresses familiar terms more clearly.

As for "nonstarter", I'd stress that the whole defined concept of "fair commercial license" only matters in the case where you are or become a big company. I hope you'll agree that threshold is more "objective": revenue, headcount, and finance thresholds. The consequence of exceeding one of those limits is that you have to negotiate a separate commercial license.

So if there's unpredictability in "fair commercial license" as defined, it bruises only the clear obligation of the developer to offer commercial licenses and negotiate, without gouging. Using roughly the same terms---FRAND terms---that huge corporations accept from other huge corporations when engaged in standard setting. We could have taken another tack, also commonly found in contracts, of requiring the developer to negotiate "in good faith", "reasonably", or both. But that would arguably offer less predictability, if you guess how a court would rule, than the developing FRAND concept.
US intelligence indicates Russia preparing operation to justify invasion Ukraine
How do I develop better User Stories/Requirements?
I'm about six months into a new role where I lead design sessions for a SaaS product and help develop the solution alongside an implementation team.

In User Story meetings, I'm usually the only person representing technology, and I facilitate the conversation and take notes to write user stories after the fact.

When writing the User Stories, I find that sometimes the ask is too specific, e.g., "Add a field." So when a developer picks it up, they easily create the field, but then the business will ask for three more things out of the initial ask.

Is there a method in interviewing the stakeholder which helps round out the user story a bit better so that the feature solves the business problem?
I see. Imagine that a LdapAddress class helpfully overrides __str__() in the way it happened in Log4j. Then a completely innocuous f-string that just prints the value of such an object in a log line could trigger execution of that code. No need to even have an expression that calls anything explicitly.
Mirror: https://archive.is/IQRRk
You can bet both paid good money to be listed there.
My old boss Eric Carlsen used to say, nobody left because of money.

They may get more money if they change jobs. But they start looking because they're unhappy. So when somebody asked for more money, he'd start by asking what was bothering them.
> It was horrible for me, but that's what the says that they had to do, and if they didn't the could end up in trouble with the feds facing huge penalties.

Except that most likely isn't true. The law does not require banks to have your home address. The law does require banks to verify your identity, but there are many ways to do this without requiring a "home address".

The "home address" rule is self-imposed by banks and is yet another way that our country makes life unnecessarily difficult for homeless or itinerant people.

Edit: This is regarding USA law, and I realized I am not where you reside. I assumed USA because of the FDA mention but I realized that was referencing the article so may not be a good clue.
Osteoarthritis: Electric knee implants could help repair worn cartilage
It's, of course, made up. But everyone can appreciate the anguish of having to talk to someone like this and trying to discern what it is they actually need. Macy, the Macy's chatbot? They can go through hundreds of terms that correlate with resolutions in milliseconds. if chatMessage.contains?(typoOrExactMatch('exchange')) then chatSession.initiateExchange() end

Like the grandparent explains, some people just need a way to explain what they need in their own words and I don't think chatbots completely fail at that. The best one's I've experienced have prescreened me for common issues and then sent me off to a live person as soon as it was clear my request was not easily addressed with the built in script.
"The productivity, and the free time, would accrue to those expending the effort of production - as morally it should."

This argument is not only not what happens in practice, it is a bold assertion for morality. What we actually have is that a class of people have infinite free time because people believe this lie - the "Job creator class" myth. The same job creators that need to be bailed out (with our money) every time the economy sneezes.

There's nothing morally correct or right about working under the assumption of homelessness or starvation - it's a threat that doesn't need to exist, to "produce" more. More of what? We already throw out tons and tons of food to keep prices at certain places for the sake of farmers and "the economy". The whole thing is artifice upon artifice - thousands of empty vacation homes, workers living with multiple people.

What is the point of all this production if the gains don't ever actually reach the people doing the work?
I understand, and I assume you're probably right. What I'm saying is that it's ok to commit this crime. You're not harming anyone, and in the particular scenario we're talking about, there's no chance that you'll face any consequences.
> Glad you enjoy your life at 800 MHz! I appreciated your article although the plural form to address a single person (not the editorial "we") makes me uneasy for political considerations.

You assume Artemis identifies as a single person. In all likelihood, they are a plural system. Statements like yours are microaggressive at best.
Apple’s New VR/AR Headset Risks Being Delayed Until 2023
I quit my job to move into web3.

edit: I don't know why I'm getting downvoted, but I can guarantee you I'm not the only one.
Releasing the code is the very least you should do to make your analysis reproducible. I would be surprised if it was possible to exactly reproduce the results from the paper alone.

From Heil et al. (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41592-021-01256-7):

> Documenting implementation details without making data, models and code publicly available and usable by other scientists does little to help future scientists attempting the same analyses and less to uncover biases. Authors can only report on biases they already know about, and without the data, models and code, other scientists will be unable to discover issues post hoc.

Even better would be to containerize all software dependencies and orchestrate the analysis with a workflow manager. The authors of the above paper refer to that as "gold standard reproducibility"
I think that is a strange use of the word "escape". You "escape" from something, in this context the query string. If parameters are not passed inside the query string then how can you say they are escaped?

At least for the database I am familiar with (mssql), the query string is one parameter in the binary protocol, and then there are the other parameters that are not the query string which are used as arguments.

Your usage here is a bit like saying that a standalone PNG file is "escaped" from the HTML document it is referenced from...since it is marked as not being HTML...