skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
They weren't tracking concerned parents. They were investigating threats. Unless your counterpoint is that being a parent makes you immune from scrutiny the FBI did exactly what it was supposed and did not label anybody anything unless they found a credible threat.
Make it CI’s problem. You should only really be running tests regularly for the component you’re currently working on with CI making sure you don’t have accidental regressions.
Persistent EBV and long COVID are very unlikely to share any mechanisms, those are apples and oranges.

With little protein expression, training T-cells to identify viral MHC-epitopes is unlikely to ever clear something like EBV. There's no proteins, there's no virions, there's no proteases, the better target is the genome itself:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4445958/
Of io is the problem I general solve that by testing smaller data sets. I have not found io to the local disk is slow. Of course if it is network io that is bad, but local disks are fine for the size of data in my tests
Thanks!. Yes, in Chaskiq you have conversations like Tickets. You can tag them and assign them to the right agent (manually or automatically). You can also create your own plugins to extend the features.
OP here. This is my favorite comment in the entire thread. Thank you!
I have had success teaching complete beginners how to code using the following approach:

1. Show them how to implement a super simple text adventure game in Basic using just print, input, if, and goto.

2. Ask them what cool things they want to add. Show them the minimum coding skills needed to accomplish it. Only adding new skills when the students wanted to add more advanced features to the game.

3. Repeat.

I was blown away by the joy and happiness the students were displaying. They were programming and creating a fun game in the first lecture. Most of them stayed behind afterwards to expand their game, play the games created by the other students, and helping each other make more complicated features. What a joy to see.
My wife has similar feelings about my semicolon usage.
I basically mean (open ended), what are they doing? Seems like we are quickly moving towards multiple conflicts that will threaten most of the world.

They must think they have some sort of upper hand, judging by the aggressiveness.
No, because the `container` element uses `margin` and not `padding`. This results in margin behavior, where two adjacent containers with `margin: 10px` will have only 10px between them instead of 20 like with padding.
Dropout is random, rather than learned. But I can see how it could have a similar effect to forgetting.
Dropbox finally supports M1 Macs natively with new beta
i'm leaving goldman after 12 years next week after our yearly compensation discussion. i started right after the crash (and one of their best years), i loved the culture out the gate. i am in the tech, often called strats, apparatus that straddles trading and technology. it's been a great place to be as the perceived "value add" against the exodus of voice traders.

but the culture has changed. we can't land the best and the brightest anymore. our tech stack is antiquated and arguably the company's biggest risk. we work long hours, and it somehow was able to get worse during this pandemic. the new mgmt has made comp allocations to the trading side of the business an after thought; a cost cut. little to no innovation or investment is flowing to this side. and they want us back in our seats, back on the trading floor, two feet from our overworked and diseased co-workers as soon as it's politically viable.

above all i (and many of my colleagues) have been promised for several of these years that compensation and work/life would improve. That "the firm's performance was soft" or "the division didn't get the allocation expected" or "this year was a challenging environment" but always "next year is looking much better." they've traded on their name. it used to mean something to be hired and work for goldman sachs. that means so much less now. they've made a point to say that compensation will be good this year, but, whatever it is, it won't be enough. it's not the money; at least, not all of it. i feel i've been fooled for many of my 12 years into thinking things will change. we've now been through a pandemic. we've watched out friends and families get sick or die, and the lockdowns and time at home have finally changed our perspectives on what really matters.

so, next week, i am going to take whatever it is they give me, and kindly submit my resignation. i'll be taking time to be with my friends and family, some of whom are terminally ill, and to plot my next move. i look forward to enjoying my work, respecting my managers and colleagues again, but it will be when i am ready. maybe a month from now, maybe a year.
I've done this dozens of times. Somebody needs a break, and I have an opportunity. It's not a zero-sum game. That's the realization I made very early in my career.
I try to write the test first, or at least stub in the test how I think it should work. Or at least enough notes to pick it up "tomorrow". Then I have a reference for usage i can build with that in mind
I find that sad. Do you also hold that view when interacting with people different in other ways? People that dress differently, hold different political or religious views, people from other places to you?

I have acquaintances who was lyrical on the topic of LGBTQ+ folks, feeling that somehow, non-LGBTQ+ folk are being "oppressed". I keep asking them, "What are they taking from you? What could you do before that you're not allowed to do now?". They typically don't respond or change the topic. We both know that the types of behaviours that are no longer "acceptable" lie on a spectrum that starts with "being casually disrespectful", to outright *ism. It's sad to me that a lot of people value the rights of some to be jerks, over the rights of others to partake equally in society and to feel equally safe and valued in public spaces.
I used to follow his blog posts when he was at Harvard and Google and didn't realize he left: https://www.mdw.la/mattwelsh-resume.pdf

Looks like he left Google in 2019 after 8 years there, went to a startup, worked at Apple for a few months, and is now at another startup as VP of Engineering.
Ok, I'll bite. Citation? Any evidence of any kind to offer?

See, that post just read like negative chatter. "Folks are always doing wrong stuff." Meaningless to offer without anything concrete.
Thanks for sharing this. I'm not a fan of this kind of design when browsing from my desktop, but I did enjoy browsing through your Projects list. NIGHT.FM is great!
I'm sure that phrasing will endear them to the NRC.
US test reactors have a reputation of running very very clean and being safe places to work.

The well-established LWR has had continuous improvement both in terms of reliable performance, high uptime, and reduced occupational exposure for nuke workers.

The cost problem is not over-regulation but: (1) the LWR depends on an oversized steam turbine and heat exchangers that an order of magnitude more expensive than the gas turbines used to produce energy from fossil fuels today; they quit building coal plants in 1980 for the same reason they quit building nuclear plants, the cost of the steam turbine. Even if the heat was free the steam turbine would struggle. (2) Building an LWR is a bungle-bung bridge right out of Dr. Seuss, it's hard to find a complete reckoning but it seems anything that can go wrong will go wrong, everything from All-American Cost Disease to the factory in China that struggles to build the pump that was supposed to be cheaper to manufacture.

Even if LWR construction went 100% to plan, (1) would still make the LWR unattractive. You might be able to add pre or post combustion carbon capture to the gas turbine, compress the CO2 to 1500 psi and inject it into a saline aquifer for less.

If you want "the power to save the world" you gotta quit it with the "conservative" claptrap and take the radical step of coupling a higher temperature reactor to a closed-cycled gas turbine powerset. In the 1970s it was thought that a fast reactor had to be more expensive than an LWR but in the 2020 it is not worth moving forward unless you can do better.
There are also Function Tests and Integration Tests. Seems the author took Unit Tests for all three.
France does not appear to have the expertise either, Flamanville and Olkiluoto have been disasters.

Plus, it's really not clear how they could translate their organizational skills to entirely different culture. Maybe it would work, but it's certainly not a sure thing.
proactively reward your ICs, don't wait until they're halfway out the door.

[Insert frustrated comment here about how capable, sufficient and well-performing ICs are absolutely rewarded.....with more work and additional duties]
"While spirited debate about policy matters is protected under our Constitution, that protection does not extend to threats of violence or efforts to intimidate individuals based on their views,” Garland wrote in a memo

That's what Garland said per your article. The only ones who mentioned terrorism was the NSBA and they didn't accuse anyone of it, they suggested some of the threats they'd received could be equivalent to terrorism. So, no Polifact is exactly correct here and the NY Post agrees.
Looks like ripping movies was just made legal:

> The 2021 exemptions, issued in October 2021, are for:[15]

> Motion pictures (including television shows and videos), as defined in 17 U.S.C. 101, where circumvention is undertaken solely in order to make use of short portions of the motion pictures for the purpose of criticism or comment, for supervised educational purposes, to accommodate for accessibility for disabled students in educational institutions, for preservation of the motion picture by a library, archive, or museum, or for research purposes at educational institutions;
From https://muted.io/c-minor-scale/

> C natural minor scale. the default when we just say 'C minor scale'
Title on the webpage now reads, hope someone can update this HN post:

"Google, Facebook CEOs oversaw illegal ad auction deal that gave Facebook an advantage, states allege"
Would the inactivity clock keep running while you are locked out?
When the thing you want to fund is infrastructure, a huge portion of the cost is the real estate, which has to be reimbursed at market rates, so the projects become more expensive as well, even if at a slightly slower rate.

However, big projects have to be justified in multiple ways: environmental impact statements and cost/ benefit analysis are two that are almost universally required throughout the US. Especially in expensive NIMBY cities, a sudden spike in costs (or any other significant change) can be a political tool for opponents to claim those justifications are no longer valid, as a way to halt or delay.

And this being government, there's a good chance that the multi-year planning, approval, and funding process assumed a lower rate of inflation, and now some projects may simply not have enough money and have to start the process over.
i quit my job to a ski bum. I am in my 40's . Just needed to live a differnt way for a little bit and out on the mountain skiing is the happiest i am.
> It’s interesting because beta coronaviruses likes this don’t have a furin cleavage site, this is the only one.

Well that's just entirely false.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187350612...

I'd draw your attention to section 2.3:

> 2.3. Furin cleavage sites are common in Betacoronavirus

Oh, also, if you click on Prashant Pradhan's paper it has been withdrawn:

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.01.30.927871v2

> Abstract

> This paper has been withdrawn by its authors. They intend to revise it in response to comments received from the research community on their technical approach and their interpretation of the results. If you have any questions, please contact the corresponding author.
This is almost right except for two points:

For fakes, spin up the real thing. If you’re not able to model your database transactions deterministically, then your transactions could themselves be flawed and tests are great way to catch that.

Deterministic tests are not a goal in and of themselves. Controlled non determinism is valuable. This is popularized in various frameworks under the names of property checking and fuzzing which will let you know the seed to use for the failure for example so that while the runs don’t have the exact same input/output for every invocation, you get better coverage of your test space and can revisit the problematic points at any time. If you’re doing numeric simulation, make sure you are using a PRNG that’s seedable and that you log the seed at the start if you’re using a seed (and make sure time is an input parameter). Why is this technique valuable? You transitively get increasing code coverage for free through CI/coworkers running the tests AND you have a way to investigate issues sanely.
> There should be no illusions anymore about what Facebook is, as a platform. It’s just random bits of sensory information meant to make old people fight with each other

I'm confused. It seems the author's statement is also random bits of sensory information meant to make people fight with each other.
But aren't those hz bands limited in their throughput to about where 4g is?
Another consideration is how expensive is it to do the check? Maybe you don't want expensive-to-check invariants to be part of the developer's inner loop when writing code?

Incremental compilation helps, but fast performance in the non-incremental case also matters, or you might get something like Julia's "time to first plot" problem.
fwiw; for i3/sway I use this autotiling script: https://github.com/nwg-piotr/autotiling
No lights, no heat, no money – that's life in Ukraine during cyber warfare
Do you have any more detail of the leak event? My google-fu is failing me
That's the worldwide usage statistics. In the U.S., a majority of users are over 30: https://www.statista.com/statistics/187549/facebook-distribu... Obviously, very few of us, if any, would be qualified to speak on Facebook usage outside of our own geographic areas of experience.

Another thing to consider is that simply looking at the age distribution is not enough. In my experience, older users (like 60+) are much more likely to engage with content. While older users may be a minority, they can make up a sizeable amount of content on the platform.
One example is DBOS: A Database-oriented Operating System, https://dbos-project.github.io/ / https://github.com/DBOS-project (more details under "Publications").
In other words, shouldn't we prefer integration testing, or perhaps partial integration testing. This requires an initial effort of setting up your test framework/environment, but in my experience integration tests provide good value for the time you put into testing.

Rather than a granular test on a single class, test the orchestration of many classes. You end up hitting big % of code. As always, depends on the project. If we're building a rocket ship, you need both granular testing and coarse testing.
thanks! what do you not like about it? the animations?
> Once in a while, I think "Wow, how did I come up with something that insightful? When did I ever learn that?"

... and then I look it up and usually realize I was way off :)
All I had to do was login to be suspended a few minutes later for "suspicious activity". Fortunately I didn't have any money in my account. Fuck PayPal.
As much as everyone liked to rag on MySpace, there were valualble skills being taught. How much about web development has Facebook taught its average user?
Almost all jazz players I've played with and many jazz textbooks use aeolian when referring to natural minor.
I think the original ideas of mocks (if you go and read Growing Object-Oriented Software, Guided by Tests) had some merit: In that style of TDD, mocks are used to discover (hopefully somewhat stable) interfaces between components, and in theory, it fits with the idea that OOP is about "objects sending messages to each other". I can believe that it's possible to write good systems with this kind of approach.

Unfortunately, in practice, mocks are rarely used like that and most "OOP" designs have horrible boundaries and are really not much about message passing anymore. That leads to brittle mocks where you constantly have to change tests when you change implementation details.

I have also gravitated away from classic OOP and much more towards the "functional core, imperative shell" concept as outlined in the article (although it's difficult to keep this pattern throughout a codebase, especially if you have team members). In such a system you really rarely need mocks.

Agreed that fakes, when you have them, are nicer than mocks, especially when the system to be faked has a large API (i.e. use a redis fake, instead of checking the exact commands you send to redis).

However, for some outside systems, writing a fake can be a lot of effort. In such a case, I think it's totally valid to write a "gateway class" that isn't unit tested (you can cover it with integration tests instead) which exposes a nice API (e.g. "storeFile(...)") and then to use mocks of that class in other tests.
Astonishing!
It isn't immediately obvious to me why a small Go static site generator would require "massive amounts of time" to run its tests, so it's hard to answer what you're doing wrong.

Are your tests perhaps just too darned big? You don't, in general, need to render 5000 pages of something to test your template doesn't crash or something.

It could also just be disk access. Consider trying an in-memory file system, or if you're on linux, look at using /dev/shm which is a RAM disk.

It is also possible you've snuck in a quadratic or worse time algorithm. There's nothing fundamental to the problem of a static site generator that would require such algorithms, but speaking from experience it is an environment where it's easy to loop over the return value of one function, which itself loops over something other function (quite likely the same data), which itself loops over the same structure, and it's easy to end up with O(n^3) or O(n^4) without realizing it. It's especially easy to end up with that being a "for each page" type of loop. Static site generation should be O(n), give or take small factors (maybe O(n log n) for some things technically, but at a scale where O(n log n) is practically O(n) anyhow).
The problem started with using the word code as a verb. To code used to mean (1) translating a message into a coded form (e.g., cipher or Morse code), and (2) classifying something by attaching pre-defined codes to describe it (e.g., data entry). Programming a computer is not like either of those tasks, except to someone who doesn't understand programming.
If that works for you, ok. I have my keyboard connected to my computer, so I am actually at my keyboard as I use the site. Its still nice that I can click around quickly and hear different chords and scales and such, without having to be held back by my limited piano skills.

Could it be improved if it supported web midi and encouraged you to actually use your keyboard? Maybe. (I actually do web apps that do that) But I'm curious why you can't see its value for what it is, which guides learning rather than just basically saying "figure it out on your own."
The NSBA labelled specific threats as equivalent to terrorism. Not differing opinions. Making threats can absolutely be equivalent to terrorism. Being a "concerned parent". And the accusation of this thread was against the government made this analogy. The NSBA is not a government agency. The DOJ is and the DOJ explicitly said that they were only investigating threats. Which is exactly what they're supposed to do.
No I think that's fair. This particular one I think was originally a spoken word performance over jungle music or something and it's more like cyberpunk fiction than a philosophical text.

And when you get to his later work and he goes into numerology it gets really weird. It takes a while to get used to but there's some truly insightful stuff in his earlier, more coherent work in particular. And he had an underrated influence on a lot of British cultural figures all across the spectrum.
Sodium fires are often flashy but not that bad. They look scary because they form hot aerosol particles that radiate a lot of light and heat. It's nothing like a hydrogen fire you might walk into before you see or feel anything.

Sometimes you spill a few liters of sodium and it goes poof and makes some caustic aerosol you have to clean up. If the heat exchanger with a carbon dioxide secondary pops it forms a crust that will probably keep the carbon dioxide inside. Even if a water tertiary heat exchanger develops a pinhole leak the reaction happens on a 2-d surface and develops more slowly than you might think it would.

https://www.fireengineering.com/leadership/dry-extinguishing...

https://www.osti.gov/etdeweb/servlets/purl/21330020

https://www.osti.gov/biblio/6669413-xoXD4J/

Russians documented hundreds of fires at a reactor in the 1970s most of which were little poofs, they kept calm and carried on because the prize is clean energy to power civilization for 1000s of years.
I've never had any use for such a mnemonic, it's a needless intermediate
Term life insurance. Resident license for whichever state you are in. Convert former residences to non-resident licenses.
Yes, automated test suites are great! I don’t know that they need all the things some people stuff into them, but the idea is a useful one.

If you take my comment in the context of REPL-driven development, it’s going to seem tangential at best. But you mentioned that you prefer IDEs over REPLs; I’m merely suggesting that the two need not be exclusive.

Unless you’re advocating for TDD, in a strict sense?
Start with one thing at a time. Do that one thing excellently until it becomes part of your soul, and you could never imagine not doing it. Then move onto the next thing.
Ah, good point. That is most obvious. Blood pressure is unrqual and too high in the head in 0g, too low in the bottom extremeties.

I was imagining intracellular processes being effected. There are such processes in plants that are usually used for steering. In animals cells, if such thing exists, it may be minor efficiency changes in processes that add up to diverging from homeostasis.
Regarding point 5 (Antimatter might fall up.)

Today we know little bit more about antimatter-gravity relation[0][1].

It looks like, matter and antimatter behave in the same way under the influence of gravity. So antimatter does not "fall up".

[0] https://home.cern/news/news/physics/base-breaks-new-ground-m...

[1] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-04203-w
C++‘s initialization is utterly broken. Eg to understand the difference between just ‘struct Foo f;’ and ‘struct Foo f{};’, you have to come across about 10 different kinds of c++ initialization terms.

Is there a way out of this (serious question)?
I wouldn't expect anyone to unintentionally use these two servers. But traditional ntp also publishes time, so it would be easy to propigate.

Since it's not identified as an alternate time scheme on the wire, there's no way for downstream ntpds to know and refuse ut1. Falseticker checks help, but don't eliminate the possibility of following the wrong clock.
It just immediately struck me as a website optimised for a mobile device - but this is very much a personal preference/bias. As soon as I saw 4 small icons in the middle of a black void I twitched :) I do like the minimalist approach though.