skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I believe Premiere is very popular for mid-range stuff, but it's not really the "industry standard". If that was anything, I think it'd probably be Avid Media Composer. Linux has (freemium / non-Free) Davinci Resolve, which is increasingly popular in the mid range, across all the main platforms.

Edit: The multimedia things I find really painfully missing in Linux are Izotope RX9 and Kontakt.
> Some of the wording in the article is weird, and the "Context" gives very little of the relevant context.

You're only looking at the abstract. (Weirdly the abstract has separate sections. I haven't seen that before.)
Do you have any favourite examples of situations where notation has enhanced intellect?

(one of my ongoing software-related frustrations is that communicating in text about software behaviour can be a challenge - I don't know whether being able to communicate the potential source of a logical error at a specific line at a given commit/version of a codebase counts as intellect, but it does involve mentally modelling how code changes over time and how best to help navigate someone else to inspect the same thing)
So this would be a system for the civilized world, for democracies, where the government's definition of what a crime is at least coarsely coincides with my definition?
More authoritarian or non-democractic governments will just not approve it and have their citizens use surveillance-based mechanisms that allow their secret services to track everything their citizens do, even as private customers.
Mechanisms, like, for example Visa, Mastercard, or Paypal.
The natural numbers don't start with 1... The convention is inconsistent, but for many mathematicians, especially including logicians, they start with 0. It is best not to use the term "natural numbers" at all.

By the way, your point about polynomials works in favour of the convention that 0 is a natural number.
I can recommend apps like kubios (my fav), hrv4 and elite hr (I use all three daily). Coupled with even a cheap heart rate monitor, you can see the effects of 'everything' on your body/ soul as well as track sleep etc. Oura rings do similar, but they're subscription based.
You need to relax.

There is no legitimate reason to force people to undergo any medical procedure.
Isn't the fundamental discussion we should be having if decentralization embodies trust? Is something decentralized automatically trustful? Or can trust only be established in a decentralized way? Which way is it?

The only thing I see people agreeing on is that centralized setups are never (infinitely) trustworthy.
you do know that raspis were involved, so it can't be before 2012. However, AirFoil/AirPlay existed before that and could do this.
Fortran excels in array computation but I was advised against using it for graph structures. I think with Modern Fortran it would be not so onerous go handle, but maybe because good libraries already exist in other languages.
Ever seen an axe for splitting wood? Doesn't need to be that sharp... Just needs to be wedge shaped with decent heft behind it and a long handle. This particular axe could be a tool, or a weapon used more like a war hammer (those were a thing). Metal war axes typically had shorter handles, less weight but a sharper edge.
It can, you just have to reject the pushy signup screens on startup.

Can it be kept updated with system updates? Don't know any more.
I’m in it for the money if the prices goes up, I’m in it for the art if the price drops
Indeed hardly comparable. https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/hsph-in-the-news/reliance-...

Coal is much bigger killer, just too slow to make for good news story.
no we don't, when some one is a cunt you have to call it
Will OpenSea verify an NFT minted on a non-OpenSea platform? I had assumed the answer is “no” but I’m not 100% sure.

> It's trivial for Twitter to add another contract address verification source.

It’s technically trivial, but then they are putting themselves in a position to verify the verifiers. It seems like they are outsourcing verification because they want to avoid the overhead of deciding what a verified NFT is, which is something they would have to do if they invited in more sources.
Sorry, my post wasn't clear. These organisations do a lot more than exit interviews, those are just one kind of input.

And knowledge management isn't limited to the military, I just don't know other examples off the top of my head.
Could you? Yes. Could you do it with 99.99% uptime and without spending any money and time for system maintaince? No.
Well, there’s “bad habits,” and “lack of discipline,” vs. true, hard-core “addiction,” like alcoholism, compulsive gambling, sexual addiction, and drug addiction.

For the former, mindfulness, metrics, and discipline can be extremely effective (and can provide many benefits beyond simply quitting the habit).

For the latter, they can be helpful, but we usually need a great deal more assistance.
Each of these has a story behind them. Some were getting DOD money, so of course they joined.

Spdcc is Steven Dyer, a big name in Usenet and always on the cutting edge… also openly gay which was rare then.

The list shows who the big computer vendors of the day were: HP, IBM, DEC etc. none of those companies exist any more (just kidding… but not really).

1986ish was when the concept of a workstation was new. The list embodies that movement. (The MIT project that galvanized a lot of that is an an interesting story). All involved have domains.

So many of these companies are gone. Each has a story and a lesson to learn.

Who isn’t on the list is interesting. Microsoft. They ignored the internet for years. AT&T ignored the internet but someone in R&D registers the domain.
I didn't really leave it out, I just don't think it's relevant.

I don't think knowingly persecuting citizens (in bulk!) for something they did not commit is something that ever should happen. The tax service literally flagged people based on nothing and then pushed on without listening to any arguments from their side. This is not "tougher on fraud". This is just pure bullying to inflate "frauds caught" numbers, helped by the "guilty unless proven innocent" policy which is really unfair. Many of these innocent people are still waiting for compensation!

Of course there were some that did commit fraud. And the current privatised system is really prone to abuse anyway. With the old state-run system every healthcare was given 'in kind' and there was no need for financial reimbursements. They should take money loop out of the system again. Then there will be no more scope for abuse in this way. All these dodgy agencies only cropped up to take advantage of the privatised system. And in many cases parents were not aware of their dodgy nature - in any case those agencies should be the ones being prosecuted, not the parents.

But no real systemic changes were made. An apology to those affected, some promises for compensation they're still waiting on. And things are back as they always were.
Also entire classes of bugs. You screwed up a JOIN, or an application-level lookup for that matter? With UUIDs you'll get no results, with sequential ints you'll get a valid but wrong result.

Or worse, the right result for the wrong reason. I've actually seen a case where creating a new entity in the application populated X records in X child tables, each with a sequential ID, and as a result all of them had the same surrogate PK. They were 1:N relationships in principle, but the software wasn't feature complete yet so the actual records were all 1:1.

Years later one of those tables finally received some extra records, and it caused a really weird bug because a query had accidentally used the PK instead of the FK as a join key, but for years it had happily chugged along because the two columns were in sync.
That's a different topic. I was addressing why Rolex might prefer a blockchain ledger over their own internal one.
Marak adds infinite loop test to popular colors.js
If most of what we know of Zen in the West was disseminated by him and his followers, that points to DT Suzuki. I'm not aware that he was a con-man, although he appears to have had some pretty distasteful opinions.
This exemplifies the worst part of this pandemic - the mind virus.

A lot of people in the society are LARPing (pretending) that the virus is serious - staying home, testing constantly, "close contact notifications", "running away from a positive student" - yet at the same time, acting as if it's obviously not a dangerous virus - if it were, they'd all be staying away from each other.

Basically new "security theatre" like after 9/11.
I agree broadly with the sentiment, but this isn't very helpful to OP.
Yeah, I know. I feel for you. This sucks! So what is going on here?!

Someone may have owned or used the computer before you, even if you bought it “new.” It might have been purchased and returned and resold as new without your knowledge, and not properly removed from a prior associated Apple ID, perhaps. It might have been purchased fraudulently by this hypothetical prior owner. Or your purchase may have been flagged as fraud post-sale by the vendor for unknown or no reason, and reported to Apple as stolen by said vendor.

Apple will be able to help you with any of these concerns, if you are the legitimate owner. I don’t mean to offend, or to imply or to suggest you are not. All Apple needs to prove ownership is a picture of your receipt or a screenshot of the invoice if purchased online, whether from Apple or a third party.
Fortran is great for computational programmers (ie. scientists) who can code things up without worrying about certain details that you need to keep straight in other languages. A lot of the things you're talking about are for general programming for which Fortran is not well suited. May be your initial interest in programming comes from games essentially which is why Basic appealed to you. For a fortran programmer, the initial interest comes from "what tool does my advisor use to calculate light propagation in semi-ionized media" and for that Fortran excells.

When evaluating what is good for beginners it helps to remember not all beginners approach programming from the same place. Traditionally computational scientists were a distinct and equal in size subset of the users of computer resources in academic and industry research centers accross the nation, specifically distinct from computer scientists. Today they are smaller total fraction but that history continues to inform how they approach computation and mentor new scientists learning to use computers for science, which diverges from the way computer scientists do both in approach and requisite mental model.
I am very relaxed. We had mandatory vaccination against smallpox and measles, and it worked well. There weren't even any discussions. The doctor came to school, we formed a queue and each got their jab. Nobody whined or wrote home about it. And hopefully we'll do it again very soon whether anyone whines or not.
This comes days after he nukes the faker.js library https://github.com/Marak/faker.js
Anything written into law is lawful. I'm trying to discern what's ethical to write into law. It would help if you answered the questions I posed.
I read your post in QTweb, Javascript disabled, just fine, so it must be something else.
This is all discussed in the original article ("My first impressions of Web3"). The post here is a response to the article. My comment says that the response may have missed the point made in the article.
That's wrong.

Linux works for myriad of usecases the same way that windows and macos do. And it sucks at a fraction of other ones but windows and macos do too suck big times at other things.

The difference with my grandmother and most average people is she hasn't been forced through school and work to the windows or mac ecosystem. She wasn't used to software x and y. When she asked how to do things, she didn't have any preconceptions. Resistance to change is the main deterrent to people. Most people used to amiga or atari suffured when they had to learn windows. Most people are struggling a bit when switching to MacOS, I sure do as well. The difference is you seallow it easily because you actually bought a freaking expensive equipment and feel forced to get used to it. While if you are just a format + reinstall away from windows you will just not have the patience to dedicate the time to discover the UI, shortcuts and softwares to achieve the same thing but with a slightly different workflow.

If anything, Linux and the BSD have never struggled from unsolvable usability or compatibility issues, provided the hardware was chosen carefully, they struggled because they are free, are installable on commodity hardware already sold with other OS and thus aren't taken seriously.
> Both of the proposed solutions solve this.

Moxie spoke about how web3 currently works. Not about the hundreds of proposed solutions. And no, proposals don’t “solve” anything, until they’re actually implemented and tested.
They had two groups, one who heard 432 Hz and the other who heard 440 Hz first.
If you're afraid of the virus, get vaccinated yourself. That's literally the most you can do.

If you're still afraid of the virus, you should know that vaccinating people (even forcefully) won't stop transmission. The virus is endemic. The only thing that can change between now and "back to normal" future is, your mind.
I think the answer is not so easy.

For example I would prefer webhooks over /events if the chance of something happening is low. It does not make a lot of sense to keep long pulling when chances of something being return are small.

I think a sane alternative is to have webhooks with ack for example. Where if the client does not ack the push, the API will retry a couple of times with exponential wait time.

Of course if the expectation is to have a lot of events it makes sense to have /events. But somehow I feel /events and webhooks solve different cases or at least as a client I have different expectations.
I’m clarifying my position. Take it as you wish.
I'm not sure I understand, running a full node requires some consumer hardware and a few days. And most infura usage doesn't even need a full node, so it's easier to run.

The API is the same, swapping out for another node is just a config change
Google launches Ripple, an open standard to bring tiny radars to cars and more
Surely that's much easier and less ressource intensive than using less planes and helicopters.
It's a tool and tools doesn't private me of freedom.
You can also use a local non-Apple ID account to login, and selectively login to only the Apple services and apps you need or want, including App Store.
I really like the concept and wish it was reality.

Sadly, while the project even seems attractive to states, I think they killed it before it could become reality by choosing a GPL licence.

Probably nobody will touch it...

PS: it's not like I have a problem with it, but mostly it's reality

PPS: move to GitHub or alternatives, please - accessibility right now doesn't seem great
Bold! That's bold leadership, Snap! (/s)
> A well funded competitor could take them down quickly

Ok, maybe, but that would mean they would be simply replaced by more of the same. It would not mean a return to a decentralized system.
If this is accurate, they have last summer's SLC internship at $34/hr: https://www.levels.fyi/internships/Goldman-Sachs/Software-En...

Not bad in absolute terms, but even their NY/NJ offerings are half of what the top trading firms seem to offer, and middle of the pack for tech: https://www.levels.fyi/internships/
There's more than one codebase though, and having more is something commonly talked about.
It's a bit like an Android phone: you can use it perfectly fine, but the Play Store requires you to log into a Google account before letting you install apps.

At least, on Android you can use the Aurora store, or install .apk files manually... but that's another story.
Actually an interesting article (for context: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29850750), and demonstrates that locks are indeed only keeping honest people honest. Unfortunately, it seems that locks suffer from the dilemma of being low-cost enough while looking that it provides security.
> Sure, it would need some massive network effect to work at scale

And nobody wants to participate. These projects are doomed to be extremely niche. As TFA points out, even nerds do not want to run their own servers at this point.

It could have worked in the days of casual piracy (kazaa, napster, certain private torrent sites etc had a shitton of users) if you managed to sell it as a way to do exactly that..

But getting people to install apps today to donate their bandwidth and disk space for.. what cause? Let alone when they figure out that gasp your storage may then be used for illegal material. Nah, it just doesn't work.
And adopted
> Is that a fairer statement, or would you like to just say I'm once again moving the goalposts by clarifying?

No it isn't and yes I would: Now you're trying to move the conversational goalposts by calling your moving of the goalposts "clarifying".

This conversation simply never was about your snobbish True Mountain-Biking Scotsman perspective, and no amount of your attempts at obfuscation will make it have been so.
Why not? Sell your overpriced mac and buy a new better non-apple laptop for less money. It It would have been faster than trying to deal with apple's customer support.
https://stevelosh.com/blog/2018/08/a-road-to-common-lisp/ is reasonable.
Note that if batteries stayed at their current level of development forever, wind and solar would still be the best choice to build out at large scales today.

It is unlikely that they wont progress dramatically, but even in that extreme case there's no need or reason to wait.
> First the most nitpicky but easiest to solve: They tried lowering the music by tiny amount. Will lowering it more be even stronger? In particular will lowering it by a semitone work even better? Then it would suggest it's about the pitch rather than the tuning.

Also, the way they lowered the pitch was to slow the music. So the change in tempo could also have an effect.

> Second, they did first 440 and then 436. There will be a familiarisation effect. 2nd time in the same situation with the same music could likely less stressful. But yeah they mention they want to do randomization next.

They had two groups, one which did 432 Hz first and one which did 440 Hz first.
Slightly off-topic, but how are children dealing with non-fixed classes? Thinking about 7 year old children (or even adults), getting on time from one to another classroom according to an indvidual schedule would not be an easy task.

Are there provided with extra help, like single-purpose classrooms according to subject? Do teachers announce where the next lessons take place? Are students split into sub-groups sharing the entire schedule, so they can team up and not lose track of it?
Except when your tool stops working as intended because the company that sold it to you still has more power over it than you do and suddenly you can't work to sustain yourself with the tool you paid for.
iiuc this is a very similar design to how Mullvad accepts payments[0] except that they have a token used to pay multiple merchants.

[0]: https://mullvad.net/en/help/no-logging-data-policy/#numbered

edit: add mullvad link. correct typo.
No, we don't. IPFS guarantees that the owner can host their own NFT forever (there are multiple pinning services if they don't want to run a server). This is the best possible model. If even the owner doesn't give a shit, why should anybody else?

It's true that most NFT buyers have zero idea how this works. In 2 years multiple shitty NFTs are going to turn into 404. This is fine - people will learn to only buy images that use ipfs.
Automatic updates or manual updates to macOS do not require login with Apple ID. You don’t even need original Mac hardware, as is the case with hackintoshes and virtual machines, although full backups before installing a macOS version upgrade is advised in the case of non-genuine hardware.
I'd take more of an issue with the fact they suggest this avoids money laundering.

One of the easiest ways of doing money laundering is using businesses that can get away with large amounts of anonymous income without proportionally large production or purchase costs, and then buy your own products and services with ill-gotten money to produce a legitimate-looking revenue stream.

"Just" having to pay tax on the income is hardly a major barrier to using it for money laundering.
Nails going back to 1600's ? Nice, but it's not the gold standard of comparisons that is the cost of lighting which has been tracked back over 3700 years from LEDs to Babylonians and sesame oil lamps.

https://www.statista.com/chart/10567/the-cost-of-light-throu...
some highschool senior hazed me as a freshman with a gentoo install but boy did I know linux after that. It's unfortunately caused me to have Opinions about systemd et al.
It’s curious that a Russian version is much more precise:

“Not everything that glitters is gold”. (The truly 1:1 translation is “not everything is gold that glitters” but that word order felt very wrong and I believe the change doesn’t change the meaning, does it ?)

How does it sound for a native speaker ?
The author is pseudointellectual privileged douchebag.
For straight up "Is my Mac infected" scanning, I would use clamAV.

But I actually don't run it all that often. Instead, I try to monitor activity, like network access, or writes to file system areas that might indicate weird behavior.

But -- Now that my kid is heavy into macOS usage, and relatively inexperienced regarding possible malware vectors, I can't rely on runtime observation. I've installed a DNS block list for malware sites, log our net traffic, and periodically scan with clamAV.

For my own box, I try to keep things simple and learn how the system normally behaves, in the hope that I might notice if something weird is going on. I realize this is not an adequate solution.

I use Little Snitch for real-time monitoring of network activity; it can get distracting but it's a good way to see how much a process or application likes to phone home.

https://www.obdev.at/products/littlesnitch/index.html

It's worth looking at some of the tools provided by the author of the OP, ObjectiveSee.

https://objective-see.com/products.html

I used BlockBlock for a while. It pops up an alert when software tries to install itself into places that might run without your knowledge. LaunchAgents and system extensions. I don't recall ever seeing actual malware with this tool.

The author runs a Mac Security conference that seems to generate good work among the attendees, those who track Mac security best practices. Sysadmins and researchers. I have not attended, so my endorsement is perhaps not useful... Back in the 20th Century, I built and ran a business Mac network with hundreds of nodes, which was considered pretty big at the time. Focused conferences and workshops were amazing in getting an idea on how much I needed to learn.
The paper itself is hardly sane:

> Because of this harmonic misalignment, listening to 440 Hz music would seem to make people anxious, nervous, or aggressive, because it is not in harmony with the natural frequency of the planet earth.

> These same effects would have repercussions on human health since our DNA is sensitive to frequencies, as stated by the Professor Carlo Ventura’s team.

> Human DNA is sensitive to music and its relative frequencies to the point that it can even be reprogrammed through them. In fact, by subjecting stem cells to various frequencies it has been possible to modify their natural organic function.