skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I'd say Mac you get into knowing that it has opinions and not a lot of customization options. Coming from Linux, yeah that's going to be an adjustment.

That being said, the author has gone out of their way to take the customization options that it does have and set them up in a way they don't like, apparently just to have something to complain about.

Take this screenshot: https://miro.medium.com/max/700/1*YT_A3adukXXku33P2htLUw.jpe...

By default, the tab bar isn't shown when there's only one tab, so they've gone and enabled that. The path bar at the bottom is also not enabled by default. All you would normally have is the selected folder in the sidebar (when applicable), and the current folder in the title bar. But you can turn on other options if you want to complain about them existing.

But then he's steadfastly refused to change the icon organization settings, just to make sure he can complain about that too.

I don't think the author is coming into this with a healthy attitude for trying a new OS. I get along just fine in Mac, Windows, and (occasionally) Linux, and despite the occasional adjustment to different conventions I've never felt a need to write an angry blog post about how garbage anything different from my default is.

EDIT - taking a look at that screenshot again, it's from before the Big Sur redesign, so at least 3 releases old, and apparently from before the author ever used a mac. So he's gone and dug up someone else's old screenshot just to have something to whine about or what?

Apologies for taking the flame bait, oh well.
They use a common medical technique called anastomosis. Basically they just sew the two arteries/vessels together with suture and the blood and tissue seals it as any other cut or nick in the body. Sometimes they use "bioglue" but its not strictly needed, just a timesaver.
What was the story in this sequel? The original matrix was about "techno-buddhism" and even character names were carefully chosen, e.g. Sati who could cross the boundary. It wasnt about green characters on the screen and black leather suits, and people felt that, even if they werent familiar with this philosophy.
Unfortunately, no one can be re-told what the Matrix is.
Spider-Man I thought was a well done blockbuster. First half drags a little but the climax and second half are pretty solid with an emotional scene and great chemistry

If you like Spider-Man or marvel you’ll enjoy it
The tissue component of bioprosthetic valves is treated ex vivo in such a way as to greatly reduce the immune reactivity. It's practically not a consideration.

Mechanical prosthetic heart values are generally favoured only in older patients where re-operation is not likely to be required. The reason being that bioprosthetic valves have a more limited long-term durability. So why not always use mechanical valves? Their clotting risk is considerably higher and so they require higher intensity anticoagulant therapy - along with all of the attendant complications of that...
> Invest in university programs to train process engineers, physicists, and circuit designers. "Seed" several universities with small 300mm fabs to give students real experience rather than just "book learning." Aggressively weed out people who cheat to get through school.

This requires a deep cultural change. Because of high pressure cramming exams that favors rote, Chinese students are incentivized to just cheat from a very young age.

Also, keep in mind that no matter how much you invest, studying at an American university opens the door to working in America and getting a western passport, something more and more Chinese are desperately trying to do.
The word "pornography" puts the focus on the person consuming it, as opposed to "nonconsensual" or "abuse" which puts the focus, rightly in my eyes, on the people who did not consent to having their images either taken or made public.

Not confusing at all.
Well, you don't. That's the point of a startup. If you want guarantees, then you are definitely better off working a high paying job.
The movie even went meta explaining what it was. It's hard to be mad after that.
I don't understand how they do the math with streaming.

In a way, you can say that everyone who is an HBO subscriber has already paid for the Matrix Resurrections. Obviously you don't have to watch it immediately, since it's now part of the streaming service catalogue, so unlike a movie theater where all people who intend to see the movie must watch it before it leaves the cinema, all HBO max subscriber can just think: cool new matrix, I should watch that eventually, and continue being happy subscriber even if they don't watch it yet (like me).

So for me, this is building a catalogue. I'm sure they have things like immediate conversion, how many subbed and The Matrix Resurrection was their first thing they watched, etc.

But basically, I think it's a very different formula, and it's probably a lot harder to figure out what success means and how important The Matrix Resurrection is to HBO Max's growth and continued subs.
I'd want to question why I'm doing it. For example do I have kids I need to stick around to support? Or am I just going to be discharged to mostly play video games, alone? Because I don't see a need to extend that life.

Then I'd want to think about what it symbolizes. Is it really so irrational to just let my body die when my God-given guts fail instead of depending on the hands of man to possibly convert my body into an abomination just to keep me alive here longer?

I read in a book about a monk refusing to get a pacemaker, saying "Imagine, God is calling me up to Heaven because it's my time, and this machine holds me down here on earth!" and while I may not be a monk, his decision seemed fairly wise to me. So I already have an example of a devout faithful man eschewing a life extending operation that involved no replacement of human with animal parts.
That figure is an estimate of the production budget only. In order to know the estimated gross profit, we'd have to have some sense of the promotional and distribution costs. For a tentpole like Tenet, those are usually pegged at pretty near the production budget. So, call it $400 million.

In other words, its pretty unlikely the theatrical run yielded a profit.
Surely they flew cargo? This seems absent in the article.
Given Hollywood accounting I don't trust this one bit, and I haven't even seen this film - I might not for a few years, but it just sounds like nonsense.
Indeed, but they've done it. Check out LVADs like the Heartmate 3 and Heartmate 2.
> How much did HBO pay for the streaming rights?

They wouldn't -have paid- anything, HBO is owned by Warner too

edit: ...they wouldn't have to have paid anything..
Weird how this is said without a shred of sympathy or concern for an intelligent, helpless creature. Weirder how it can be said without a sympathetic or concerned response. I hope we can someday move beyond seeing animals as a mere resource.
These terms change a lot and it's very confusing indeed.

PTSD has been called: Bullet wind, soldier's heart, battle fatigue, operational exhaustion, combat neurosis, Combat stress reaction (CSR), combat fatigue, and battle neurosis
I believe that's how solo entrepreneurship and side hustle culture was born.
Tesla’s New Safety Score Metrics
So at first I dismissed your comment and moved on. But then I realized... maybe this was a troll? If WB really did try to strong arm her into making another one, this feels like the perfect response. "Sure, I'll make another one..." and then proceeds to make sure they never make a 5th.

On the other hand, she has said in interviews that she was motivated by a personal loss to reach out and try to make it. Not sure who actually initiated trying to get the movie made as I've heard both versions now.
Instead of forcing the airlines to fly empty, just charge them for maintaining the flight slot. Everybody wins, including the environment.

Of course, the correct way to allocate slots is to auction them off.
Say you're in China's position. The base of your power is your economy, and that's predicated on your workforce. That workforce is now at it's peak, and will shrink as people retire faster than they graduate from school. As your workforce shrinks and greys, companies are going to look elsewhere for cheap labour and your economic clout will decline.

What do you do?

There are things working in your favour, such as the inertia of supply chains. But that inertia is finite. You can try to negate the problem. Bet big on automation. Will that become cost effective soon enough, and will foreign owned companies choose to run automated factories in a foreign country when they could run it in their backyard? You can offer incentives to families to have more children (China has already done this), but can you afford to make them big enough to work? Ultimately, you have to plan for the case in which all else fails and your power declines.

What's almost as good as a continually growing workforce? The wealth and resources to command other nations' workforces. Hence, the Belt and Road initiative. Bake China's current wealth into the foundations of a global trade empire, and bind those it connects to China.

Buy control of resources expected to be crucial in the coming decades, such as rare earth minerals.

Also, grab as much territory as quickly as you can while you're powerful enough that the world might not say, "No". Build islands. Pressure other nations to get out of "your" territorial waters. Reabsorb Taiwan. etc..

Xi Jinping is getting his while the getting is good.
a great series, at least the first two books

I think O&C and The Year of the Flood represent the most likely near-future world, maybe 2035 or so, of any science fiction I can name.
V for Vendetta is classic.

Cloud Atlas is one of my favorite films of all time. It's incredibly divisive, but if you appreciate its deep symbolism and rich interwoven storytelling, it's beautiful. The wide dynamic range of genres it attempts to fit - romance, comedy, science fiction, murder mystery, spy thriller - is not only ambitious, but absolutely works to establish the symphony of it all.

Resurrections surpasses the mediocre second and third Matrix films and manages to troll both the studio and the audience in a deliberately tongue in cheek, yet equally trippy way. It's clever for working with the tools they had.
For even more of a tangent, there is a South Park episode (S16E9) with a heart transplant from pig to human

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raising_the_Bar_(South_Park)
Bundle hung again?
Ah, it's just Nokogiri's
Native extensions.
I do wonder at what point Intel will no longer be able to function being the sole source of products running through their own fabs. Companies like TSMC can amortize the cost of fab construction and process development over a much larger swath of the electronics industry. Combined with the fact that Intel no longer has Apple as a customer for new products, they could be facing enormous change by 2030. AMD couldn't support their own fab, and I think that's still a risk factor (albeit much smaller than it was for AMD) for Intel if the cost of new fabs keeps going up by factors of 10 or more every generation.
Just mentioning, but 30 october is still pre-omicron in many areas
> When worn correctly by large groups of people in risky environments (indoors, poor airflow), they greatly reduce transmission rates.

Not if the time in said environment is long. Also masks have good protection against droplets, not much against aerosols.
Omicron would have been absolutely devastating in the early days of the pandemic. Remember, we didn't have enough masks, no treatment, no vaccines, limited testing, unprepared hospitals, limited knowledge about the spreading mechanisms and a completely vulnerable population. Omicron is far from harmless, I've seen people saying that it is as deadly as the original Wuhan strain, so imagine the first wave, but 10 times higher. A Delta first wave would have been worse, but an Omicron first wave is still a nightmare scenario.

Now for the possibility to do it. Remember that vaccines took months of testing before getting approved, which is way faster than usual. And yet, with a vaccine, you don't have to worry about spread, mutations, etc... If you inject a really bad vaccine the worst that can happen is for test subjects to die. Now, try working with a live virus instead, you realize that your "safe but easy to spread" virus is not that safe after all, oops, no recall possible, you just killed millions of people. And even if your virus really is safe, viruses mutate, and despite what many people are saying, not always to become less lethal.

Really, I think we are lucky that Omicron turned out the way it did, it could have been much worse and it can become much worse. I don't think we should look further than that, it is just luck.
Far further back still in so many ways

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pv6Tuq1Dkfk
And do what with it? Send the data to the police to do what with? Their job? You never know if the LEOs might not just feel the same way and are deliberately looking the other way.
Yeah, but those early attempts were not performed with genetically engineered donor animals. Doomed to failure from the start.
Sidenote: I think Pig from 2021[1] is the best movie of the COVID era.

[1] https://www.imdb.com/title/tt11003218/
Pin dependencies. That's it. If you want to try out the new version, just test it on staging. Otherwise, you'll just be shooting yourself in the foot
Meta comment: 7 hours in on the post, and the first 25 comments on a posting about giving up an addiction are by folks saying how the “drug” is actually great and even better if you get the right stuff. You have to get past those comments to get a few comments about how someone also had a positive experience quitting, then a post about a “contrarian” supporting the drug again.

Don’t know how to interpret this: defensiveness by addicts, “Big Coffee” trying to do damage control, etc.. I know what I would think if this was about quitting a fentanyl addiction…

The 3-4 times a month I drink coffee (and I do drink the good stuff without obsessing), I make it at home almost as a psychological diagnostic. If it makes me sleepy, then I know things are just fine body-mind wise. If it charges me up, then I’m under more stress than I’d like (as a baseline). OK if I’ve got some early morning physical work to do, not OK otherwise.
Oh very interesting! I wonder how that looks from an accounting/profitability perspective?
I'm going off of Strong Town's differentiation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZ1HhLq-Huo, also tackled by Not Just Bikes https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ORzNZUeUHAM.
I am finally going to get a subscription specifically because of this movie. I can't be the only one.
The nature of investment theses are self-reinforcing because they are based mostly on predicting the beliefs of others. This one even more so than the rest.
I'm not sure how you want me to respond to what you stated since it has nothing to do with what I stated.

Long term data doesn't exist. There's no evidence the vaccines are safe long term. They also experienced greatly accelerated trial periods with data and time that would have been woefully insufficient for any other medical intervention. The data, results, and methodology for the trials is currently embroiled in scientific and ethical controversy.

To state they are "the most well tested vaccines ever" is blatant gaslighting. Widely distributed is not tested.
I wonder if this is good news for Dune's future, as it was one of the few bright spots from WB's "stream on HBO Max concurrently" strategy.
I think that's a fair question.

I guess my idea of winning is like the web vs. gopher. I want the good, federated protocol to become the default. I want my friends to be using it not because I have to nag them to, but because it's just objectively a better experience. The federated nature of the thing being invisible and irrelevant to them.

I think today that's impossible - not because of issues related to Matrix, but because of deeper problems with our computing stack and the web. Federated systems can't match the UX of centralized ones and when they come close its often because they've recentralized anyway.

I think we agree more than we disagree probably. I just see Signal as good given the current tradeoffs.
A general rule of thumb is a movie needs to make back double its budget to recoup after-filming costs, like advertising, ect to start turning a profit. A $363 million return on a $200 million flick is not a good return.
Was it a cop?
Something I've always tried to drill into ambitious intermediate devs - you're writing the legacy shit of tomorrow, today! And when you're a senior, the next generation of ambitious intermediate devs will wonder aloud at wtf you were thinking when you wrote it, and it's just part of the software developer maturity cycle.

Code-bases grow through different phases along with the company - there's the "we need to ship the MVP, so just comment that out" codebase, then there's the "we're starting to understand the problem domain better" phase, followed by the "I just read a book by Martin Fowler/Uncle Bob, and I'm going to fix all the things", then the "wait, the problem domain is hairier than we thought, let's iterate on this", then perhaps, depending on company dynamics, the "a charismatic senior developer convinced enough people to use <technology X>, so we started moving towards it" followed somewhat later by "well, the senior dev left, and everyone decided that X was bollocks" moving away...

Or perhaps the entire model of the system changed. Your batch ETL pipeline delivered yesterday's data in time for start of today's business, and that was fine for a few years, but now the sales team want today's data refreshed twice a day, hang on actually, we want it updated every hour, now we want it updated within five minutes.

Code written for old paradigms always look crap when all you know is the new paradigm.
That remains to be proven, since authorities have a large incentive to play the COVID-fear card.
I had a similar issue when I first picked rspec up over a decade ago. At first I was drawn to the allure of an approach that would have the tests better match the intention of a customer (more general BDD, and not just rspec). You’d sit down with the customer and write down what they wanted to happen in natural prose, the tests would (almost) write themselves, and the opportunity for misalignment or miscommunication would vanish!

Except it wasn’t natural prose. It ended up being ham-fisted attempts to write “as a user, when I…” style paragraphs that most closely matched whatever marchers already existed. Then there’s be nuance in the differences so you’d have to write specific assertions anyway. In the end it rarely felt like magic to me, and that I spent just as much time if not more writing and maintaining the test implementation as I’d always done. Just now with an extra layer of abstraction and misdirection.

At some point I realised the value wasn’t in BDD, it was just the conversations it was forcing. Nobody outside our team cared if the tests were green if it didn’t actually give them the outcome they wanted. There was no pointing feeling like you’d won on a technicality. So I switched back to implementing tests the way that was quickest and easiest for us. And writing the other forms of documentation others needed, in the formats that were best for them.
Everyone forgets about the avant-garde energy that was Speed Racer.
I'll just throw out but I felt I was actually watching 3 different movies stacked one on top of another the first was some sort of meta-comedy about bad sequels and reboots then it went into some sort of shaky cam action film then it turned into some sort of zombie film.

Having watched it I still don't think I could really explain it to someone else.
Okay. Let's change the example. I make my full, legal name the same as my credit card number.
We live in a society and names are tools for relating to other people with. I think it's fine to expect people to either conform to local cultural conventions or accept responsibility for any consequences themselves. I changed the name I go by when I immigrated to one that fits better with the people around me (and would have changed it more thoroughly if I'd known before the current form of it got entrenched in this country's bureaucracy). Expecting the world to bend to your arbitrary naming whims (and it is explicitly a personal whim in this case) instead feels pretty entitled.
> This movie had to be a troll.

Not so much a "troll", but there's a scene in the first act that literally lays out the entire premise of the production and the creator's feelings about feeling forced to do it.

There are "lampshade hanging" fourth-wall breaks in the production meeting scenes that make Deadpool look conservative.

The Wachowskis didn't want to do more Matrix. Warner were going to do more Matrix regardless, so Lana Wachowski decided to do it herself and use it to deconstruct both their own movies and reboot/nostalgia cinema in general (looking at you Force Awakens, Ghostbusters: Afterlife, Space Jam et al)
Because they're suitable enough (size, pump performance, etc) and also mass produce-able. The rest is for the same reason we don't eat Monkey bacon via mass farming of monkeys.
Men were so much better dressed back then.
There were plenty of world wars before WWI. WWI was simply the first in which America played a major role. The empires fought each other across the planet long before America was a thing. Nearly every country was repeatedly involved in these conflicts. War was not an unussual thing then nor now.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napoleonic_Wars

"The Napoleonic Wars (1803–1815) were a series of major global conflicts pitting the French Empire and its allies, led by Napoleon I, against a fluctuating array of European powers formed into various coalitions."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Years%27_War

"The Seven Years' War (1756–1763) is widely considered to be the first global conflict in history, and was a struggle for world supremacy between Great Britain and France."
Yes, they mention one in the article.
First act was by far the strongest point!
This is hypothetically the redhat/monte vista/canonical business model, or part of it. They don't do deep curation though because they're not spending the money on it either, but at least they do some basic vetting.

Which is apparently more than most of the coders out there.
>diversifying our standards for success.

AKA rewarding mediocrity.
Friendly reminder that the heart produces electricity; ergo, it can be used to mine crypto.
(Note, my original comment has been edited and the entire contents have been changed)

Revenge porn implies, well, revenge. This covers non-revenge related sharing.

That being said, I would be incredibly appreciative if we could keep these defined terms less than 10 syllables. Not sure how they expect people to adopt the term when the alternative, "revenge porn", is so easy to say.

My only gripe with the term CSAM is that it looks like an acronym for a missile system at first glance.
It is fairly easy for a person in industry to go back to academia as a student. If you are serious - talk to a faculty member - and chart out a plan.
Your initial comments are thought-provoking, but to be blunt: the examples you give are the sort of hyper-exaggerated strawman so often deployed against people with marginalized identities, intended to induce the slippery slope fallacy rather than doing anything about actual problems.

There are plenty of names (as enumerated in the “Falsehoods programmers believe” article linked from the post) which have complications already, without needing to invent new ones.
Node.js – v17.3.1
A documentary called South Park showed just that in this episode: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raising_the_Bar_(South_Park)

/s
Would I go about creating a programming language