skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
sorry. should have included, that i looked up that mask specifically because i have some. they do not have the printed text on them, nor the original images from when originally purchased.

can't be biased if i have like physical evidence of it, but in this post fact world, i guess that might not be worth much???
>"Two coins can be maximally entangled, and so can three, but not four"

How can 3 coins be maximally entangled? Is there also a quantum solution to entanglement monogamy?
> If they refuse they're kicked out, which usually provides enough incentive.

Absolute bullshit. Member states cannot be forced out of the EU. Laws are proposed by the EC and voted by the EU Parliament, both of which are representative of the EU member states.
That's a pretty neat idea! (Though probably hard as hell to design...)
IRA?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irish_War_of_Independence#:~...
> [1] Me, for example. I wouldn't be here right now if it weren't for that, and I could tell a long story about how most investors weren't interested in us even after we got into YC.

You were in YC? What!? I thought I knew about Daniel Gackle from the piece in (NY Times?). Or a little bit from our email conversations...I had no idea you were ever a founder. I thought you were a book and poetry woodsman who somehow found his way into moderating an internet wild west. Like a new Sherriff wanders into town fortuitously as the old was is killed in a showdown. But its, not...like that?

As someone else said, please tell more!
Being against harassment doesn't make you any less a believer in free speech.
I think that makes it an even more fascinating gray area, actually. It's exactly the important case where the hair needs to be split.

Using a technology like this for removing leaked private photos is one thing. Using it to enforce simple copyright is a whole other matter. If this were being deployed as a copyright enforcement tool, absolutely everyone here would be livid.

So, the question then is, if its used to censor a nudge image, but that image had been originally uploaded with consent, is that a matter of privacy, or copyright? And if it's merely a matter of copyright, is it appropriate to use this technology in that context?
If you read this, you might enjoy Mike Duncan's Revolutions podcast:

https://thehistoryofrome.typepad.com/revolutions_podcast/
Your second link completely looks like another similar item that we've been buying, down to the box graphic design (but with obscured brand name) ... https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B08JZL41H8 . Just under the "10 PCS" in the lower-left corner on the front ours says "MAXBOOST N95", implying maybe the brand name is "MAXBOOST"?

Further details if you care to compare:

* manufactured by: Suzhou Fangtian Industries Co., Ltd.
* distributed by: Endliss Technology Inc.; 30773 Wiegman Rd.; Haward, CA 94544; USA
There's a side-by-side video of the Wuppertal "flying train" from 1902 and 2015
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=7TqqdOcX4dc
And what’s the likelihood of a young child developing myocarditis from COVID? You can’t apply whole population statistics to children blindly. If COVID has shown us anything it’s that diseases can discriminate.

I’m all for getting kids vaccinated when it’s deemed safe and effective (my daughter got vaccinated the first week it was available). But the risk to kids is quite low.
That's exactly backwards. He wasn't granted permission to run code on other people's machines, he granted other people the right to run his code on their machines!

Wow!
I think they would still be asking to unmask this person in whatever else is available.
Not exactly.. it really depends on the situation.

For example an ASTM 2 or 3 surgical mask fabric has a filtration of 98%+

On my face I have a leakage of about 21% or PFE of 79% when worn normally.

With an ear saver, it jumps to 91%.

With a mask brace, it jumps to 98%.

So it really is about the fit.

If I put leakage % it would vary from person to person and many people would be mislead by this.
> Editorial decisions are a part of the first amendment too.

Agreed. And editors are liable for what they publish, which is something Twitter is claiming they aren't.

Twitter's legal statement is not claiming either their rights to speech or editorial rights, which makes it moot.

And now we're back to this being a user, responsible for the user's own speech, and Twitter conflating a privacy rights argument into a speech argument because it's easier for them to argue.
And you learn literally zero about a candidate's ability to understand when and why things work by asking questions about eigenvectors. Someone can understand what an eigenvector is and still not have any clue about how you figure out a system is working, why it's working, what is likely to happen in production, how you test the limits of your method's ability to generalize, how you take an real problem and find something that you can productively use ML on, etc.

People say things like "you need to know how it works" but "it" doesn't work using your knowledge of eigenvectors. If you want to test how "it" works, test that, literally. Put up a model on the board and a dataset. Ask people about what might happen when you apply one to the other. What changes they would make in response to changes in the data. What they would do in response to the following training curves, budget limitations, etc.

These interviews are terrible and they select for people that regurgitate facts.
Possibly The Guardian given the View from 9th Avenue's implications for New York geographers. (-:

* https://saulsteinbergfoundation.org/essay/view-of-the-world-...
3 years of software development experience. Currently an AI Consultant. I was a Cloud Security Engineer and a Full Stack Dev in the past. Really enjoy learning new skillsets and not afraid to ask questions. Want to continue building secure tools. Open to Data Engineering Roles too.

Location: Boston, MA
Remote: Yes
Willing to relocate: May be after a year
Technologies: AWS (in depth) Python, Terraform, Airflow, React, Cryptography
Résumé/CV: https://kalapathar.github.io/online-cv/
Email:kalopatthar at gmail.com

Also forgot to mention. I am on a work visa which expires in 2025. I will need a visa transfer!
If this happens, I hope it happens decades after we switch to factory produced meat.

There is a multiple orders of magnitude more benefit from using animals for medical research and medical care than from using them as food. I realize our psychology makes us empathize with whatever case we have in front of us right now, but when it comes to orders of magnitude difference and human lives, I'd much prefer we better control our empathy.
> There is no evolutionary benefit for raw aggression. Raw aggression appears during times of limited resources where aggression contributes to survival.

Those sentences seem to contradict each other very directly.
Another new record in self-cleaning Turing machines
I’m not sure I follow. It’s pretty straightforward to write the contents of a vim buffer to a file.
If there are a large number of these articles post a few examples. Posting articles where "the left side" and the scientific consensus happen to align is cheating of course. There are a lot of those.
Found this funny on the site, can you catch the pun.
"All transactions are manually entered by Roy to minimized mistakes."
Can someone provide a how-to on installing/using curseforge without getting involved with 0verw0lf?
'we're all living in a situation right now where we're making emergency decisions...'

Not me, but you seem to be hooked on fear. May you find some peace in life.
Just discd potentially big privacy big in Discord AND/OR iOS. Help diagnose?
I have proof. I can see the entire camera when you’re screen sharing the entire phone.
Probably the clearest example of Conway's Law I ever saw was when I was consulting for a dev team whose product used a complex database. They were facing a very stiff deadline, which I was there to help them achieve. Suddenly, one of the server processes started to fail, though it had been working fine up to then. After a fair amount of panic (at this point in the dev cycle pretty much anything unexpected triggered panic), the cause was found: the DBA had made a small schema change. Knowledge of the change didn't propagate to the dev team because the DBA sat on the extreme other side of the cube farm.
Many possibilities: firstly by reducing costs from excessive profits, insurance company staffing, "management", etc. Secondly by increasing revenue, e.g. from reducing corporate tax loopholes & increasing corporate tax rates.
Apparently, "contents" line is missing in the contents.
Thank you, I can see why this could actually become practical. I was prematurely wincing at what I thought was watered down use of the word solution but that's just pedantry on my part. Cheers.
Haha thanks.. this one got out of hand. People kept asking me if x or y mask was "good" and I was just really curious... one day I looked up and had tested more masks than the CDC.

I learned so much though about how different manufacturers do things, where they cut corners, where they invest.

One crazy thing I learned was that almost all of the KN95s on amazing were not following the GB2626-2019 ("KN95") mask spec.... even though it's not that hard. So I decided to make a KN95 that followed the spec! Great way to really get into the product.
I tried quiting caffeine and excess sugar (Obscene amounts of sugary drinks is my vice, not coffee) and it was even worse!

I've been completely dysfunctional for weeks, and first week I basically slept through, i.e sleep for 15 hours, wake up for an hour or so and head back to sleep.

I couldn't get off sugar completely (or get it to healthy numbers), because my brain just wouldn't function without a hit, but I reduced my intake considerably since then (5x).

I stopped ordering Coke in crates for one :shrug:, still hopeful to find solution to this while my insulin levels are normal and it's not too late.
I mean this is a common sort of thing, where you take something that has no solution, relax the setting, and find it has a solution in that relaxed setting. You're not finding a solution to the original problem, but you are finding a solution to a generalization, and that's still interesting.
Oh give it a rest.
Even if you would rate the languages themselves equal to one another. The ecosystem of Python is several orders of magnitude larger. Anything you want to do has a python module or an example. I think the real question is, is it really worth giving up all that for two minor improvements in syntax.
Blind spots. The driver turning right doesn't see the cyclist planning to take the next exit if the bike lane is right next to the car lane.

With a segregated bike lane the driver turbing right has the bike lane in front of them.
This is pretty much expected.

The Tesla API was _really_ not designed for 3rd-party use. For one, it uses OAuth, but only one client is registered with it, and its client ID and secret are extremely well known. This is extremely problematic if you wrote some automation against your car but forgot to not commit your access/refresh tokens.

Fortunately, they are revocable with a single POST, though I haven't tried it: https://www.teslaapi.io/authentication/oauth
I think it is not unimportant ti be padantic here, a lot of classical problems and games generalize naturally to a quantum version of that problem which then admits for different solutions. I think that is great. But also (sometimes I think intentionally) misleading the non expert.
HN post that upvoted itself: https://news.ycombinator.com/edit?id=3742902 (from 2012, before HN put CSRF protection in place).

There must be a self-linking post as well, but I can't find it
> AIER denies climate change, thinks herd immunity is a good response to COVID, and has been dismissed by public health experts.

None of this is true. Frankly, I'm not even sure what the middle part means...herd immunity is not a "strategy"; it's just a fact. It's like claiming that "gravity" is a "strategy" for landing an airplane.

> So I'm really not even sure where to start

It's always good to start with something that isn't a fabrication and an ad hominem.
> The article mostly talks about IA (instant answers)

Not really. TFA is discussing the search results. If google/bing want to put instant answers then that is what will get judged. If your ML/AI is not good enough yet to provide natural language answers, don't make it the most prominent part of the search results.
This panel discussion by several leading physicians provides an excellent and balanced overview of the current situation. It's long but very understandable, and they clearly distinguish between scientific information versus their own opinions.

https://youtu.be/GklHGYY8vN8
There is a social contract in the world of open source. The author violated it.

If he exploited trust to steal private crypto keys, we'd have no trouble calling it an attack. The difference is merely a matter of degree.
I mean, it was a bad movie. So I'm not terribly surprised.
Yesterday on HN someone claimed that they were more or less happy with code that they wrote 10 years ago. My question, is this a brilliant senior dev that I could learn something from or a grad student that doesn't know what they don't know? My impression is that 2015 could answer this question but 2022 google can not.
And Hong Kong is democratic too
I think the question still remains - is codifying law in a database schema the right place for that. It seems like it would be rather brittle compared to making this an application level concern.
Another way to fight back against social media is abstinence. But we all know how well abstinence works. I am pretty pessimistic about this whole thing.
Bill Hwang, revered as a God Of YOLO on WallStreetBets, once lost $20B in two days: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2021-08-09/where-is-...
“So what is the goddamn solution???”

It’s on page four: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2104.05122.pdf

It might not mean much to you unless you take a deep excursion into rigorous math with Dirac notation and Hilbert spaces and God-knows-what. The quanta magazine article is there for you if you’re somewhat generally interested and don’t have years to invest in study.
https://twitter.com/bahstgwamt/status/867609109276872704?s=2...
I think that to be able to properly answer a question, it is very important to first try and fully understand the question, and to know where it's coming from.

If the egg IS a chicken, then the question "the chicken OR the egg" does not make much sense, does it? You can't chose "the egg" for an answer as that still would be the chicken (just inside a shell).

Given that the question is ancient, as well as the fact that the question has been used to further philosophical debate about first cause, infinite regression and cause & effect, it seems pretty unlikely that - within the context of the question - "chicken" is meant to refer to the entire animal species including the ovum.

It seems way more likely to me, that "chicken" is originally meant to refer to the adult animal, as in:

ovum -> egg -> chick -> chicken

Thus the argument that the chicken came first, because of the ovum (also known as "egg cell") - does not just misinterpret the premise that the question is built on - it kinda breaks the question, because basically it turns it into "What came first? The chicken or the chicken?"

Of course the evolutionary answer does defy the purpose of the question as well - finding an answer was never the purpose - but at least it sticks with the meanings of "chicken egg" and "adult chicken", that are kinda implied in the question.

The question treats the egg as NOT being a chicken. And thus by extension the ovum should not be treated as a chicken as well.
It's of the species chicken of course - but it's not an adult chicken - which is the meaning of "chicken" used in the question.
I'm curious, you seam to have a particular animosity towards physicians. (Or at least animosity towards the idea that physicians should be well reimbursed.)

Is there a particular reason for this?

In a world where people are making billions for photo-sharing apps and financial rent seeking, is it really that egregious for people that treat disease to do well financially?
How did you determine those percentages?
Free speech is nothing to be absolute about. Things that were encouraged before can become absolutely abject later on - free speech in the public sphere must be regulated, and is in many jurisdiction (I'm French, I live in China - both are very similar in how they approach it in principle, China is more ideological when implementing but France can go very far when someone must stop talking).

I'm glad that as an absolutist, you managed to make a compromise, even if it's just for beheading. How can we convince you rape, insults, religious conflict, racism apology, or even treasonous discourse also can be regulated ? What is so good about stupidity that it has to be exposed so free to the public or what is so special about it that it can't be distinguished from intelligence ?
It has been nearly two years and government MSHA hasn't mandated anything to specifically change for workers. The inspectors did reduce the small group chats, which I suspect is going to be counter-productive for injury counts in the medium term.
Someone senior in MSHA has big stones for not getting on the safety theater bandwagon like OSHA did.
I almost thought Euler was wrong*, but that's just different problem, yet still interesting.

*) that would just destroyed internal peace and general view on the universe.
Is it typical for quantum computing to use such specialized terminology?

I have a good understanding (i.e. graduate level study) of general quantum physics as well as pure mathematics in general, and can generally read quantum physics papers without issue and somewhat understand pure mathematics abstracts at the least (though the extent of my understanding depends on the subdiscipline).

And yet, the abstract for this paper reads like complete technobabble to me. It's filled with individual words which I know like "entangled", "orthogonal", "tensor", etc. and yet after reading both the article and abstract I have no idea what the hell is going on here.

Reading the body of the article, I can start to understand but it looks like I'll need to do a lot of study into quantum computing to get up to speed on it.
A few things. The PFE test I'm doing is a 2min test and doesn't tell you what the mask will do under load (all day use). It's really a simple way to tell if the mask sucks but not if the mask is good (if that makes sense).

If someone doesn't label the mask correctly...are they even reading the standard?

The gb2626-2019 standard is 57 pages and in it you have to do a lot of very technical testing. One test requires several days of testing in a lab and is very expensive, but it's designed to make sure the mask performs under actual use (called the loading test).

If the manufacture isn't willing to put some simple words on a mask, do you think they did this complicated several-day test? Probably not.

IMO it's the brown M&M or canary in the coal mine test.
Ideas that have to be defended by censoring its opponents are not science. Science requires opponents.
The same happens with image search. Google is just broken in this regard.
People tend to vote with their feet and their dollars. It's unclear to me how Elk Grove is "worse" than Davis from your description, besides that there are multiple places for lower income to shop closer to metropolitan areas, in this case Sacramento. Skunks aren't unique to Elk Grove, they're n very urban environments too. "Homeless coyotes" might be a unique phenomenon, most are wild.
IYKYK
I don't see that as really an ethical question... from their perspective, probably yes. From our perspective, we'd probably be trying to kill the aliens.
No, V2 is being kept internally and exposed for Enterprise Chrome deployments. We at Brave have committed to keeping webRequest exposed to extensions too, while the underlying support remains and can be enabled for all Brave users.
Hollywood Accounting: how movie studios hide profits
The post above me was asking us to think about the incentives at every level of the government/state machinery.

I was merely pointing out that the we should also take the incentives of these "scientists" under consideration.

> what a supposedly bias scientist living in Canada has to gain

Just speculating: the same thing any bs vendor stands to gain. Relevance and funding..

Again, what they say could actually be true. This simply isn't rigorous enough and it boils down to "I think the number is higher"
I vouched for your comment but suffice it to say it doesn't match my experience. Being on the right team and having the right project makes a lot of difference. Way too many meetings is definitely a common problem at Google but you also don't have to be completely passive and helpless about it either.

In any case, glad you have found your niche in academia! Working with students is indeed rewarding - I've gotten to do some through Summer of Code, but academia is definitely a better place if that's your passion.
Sad, but true. Those who don't care had to leave..
Well there ya go
You could add a clear statement to the testing procedure popup that you are measuring the fabric only, and that (except for N95) the filtration of a mask is strongly dependent on fit and leakage.
Just a bit of color to other replies here. Financial industries of course have audits and those audits require controls to be written. Controls can have human / organizational solutions as well as technical solutions and they'll ask for proof that these controls are followed.

Figure out how to write a control and prove it to the auditors that it's followed and adheres to both of these, then I guess you're golden. Probably easier said than done.

FFIEC audit handbook excerpts for "Segregation of Duties" [1] and "Principle of least privilege" [2]

[1] https://ithandbook.ffiec.gov/it-booklets/information-securit...

[2] https://ithandbook.ffiec.gov/it-booklets/information-securit...
I mean... If anyone would know it's Google. Nobody has held back functional instant messaging more effectively that them.

Let's see if RCS actually works? Telecoms and Google saying this new messaging standard will be better is not exactly an endorsement I would trust.
It seems a little ridiculous to worry about animals being used for life-saving medical research when most Americans are eating meat every single day, to be honest. Sure, one could consistently oppose both, but from a sheer sense of proportion, why is _this_ the thing to worry about?
That's very interesting, thanks!

And, it makes sense that beans makes people pass more gas only if they are not used to eat it regularly.
Fair point, why does this correlation only manifest now, not sooner?
Also tough to guess at how much this might skew things.
If the guy had installed keyloggers, or formatted drives, would you still say he's within his rights?
Nah, the ideologies of fatherhood change over time all the time. And even in 1950, many dads would show affection to their children. Even if they would see child caring is female thing, many would be kiss and show love to them.

Also, in small easter european democracies before communism, politician had to kiss kids and at least pretends he likes them. Otherwise people assumed he is bad person. They valued family a lot.
Just don't forget, this does not mean you don't have deadlines.
On top of deadlines, you have the cultural pressure of publishing.
In Denmark a billionaire wanted to build a 320m skyscraper - the tallest in western europe - in the small town Brande (population 7000). https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2019/apr/01/like-the-eye-...

It was however shelved recently.