skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
In rural, very red California, solar is installed everywhere. I doubt its being done because of climate change, or "for the environment". Its the payback.
This may be an extreme belief, but I don't think we need intelligence services to operate anywhere wear regular courts would be an answer. The FBI can get a warrant if they have a reason and the intelligence services obviously don't stop things they should, such as corruption and child sex abuse.
How many of the COVID-19 patients currently in hospitals really need to be there, and how many would be triaged out if more urgent cases presented? If a hospital has bed space, why would they not admit a COVID patient? It's money, and they are a business for the most part that wants to maximize revenue.
I guess that is the whole point of not having a stable ABI, you also won't find much documentation how C++ compilers do it, beyond reading the code.
Actually ibuprofen is a vasodilator unlike caffeine.
I had this exact same problem just back in November.

Regular coffee drinker (1-2 cups), having pre-workout before the gym.

Starting having an absurd amount of anxiety and what I can best describe as a panic attack or flu-like symptom making my heart race & feelings of palpitations.

Go to the ER, they find nothing wrong. Doctors say "cut your stimulates and lower your stresses".

Seemed to be a combination of work stress & the stimulates. Ever since going cold turkey, I've been better than ever. I continue to get headaches but they are manageable with plenty of water.
There are other benefits to the vaccine other than reducing spread. They of course are not quite as effective against Omicron, but they are still there.

With the testing infrastructure beyond capacity (some samples have expired before getting tested), I don't think catering to people who chose not to get vaccinated right now is a good idea.

This will of course change as the pandemic further develops in Australia, but the rules as they are written at the moment make sense. Australia doesn't need to be importing further risk to its health care system already at capacity.

Absolutely clumsy performance from the government and they should have to answer for this show.
Please explain. It seems you harbor assumptions as to the context in which right minds are making their decisions.

Perhaps a German citizen living in Germany with young children that is supported by local family; "only" speaks German, Afrikaans, and Chinese; and is independently wealthy but enjoys writing software might disagree.

I know that since I dramatically changed my contexts the way I look at roles changed dramatically.
same with me
It's a game changer for US companies as well !
I know one good reference.

https://www.deeplearningbook.org/

Also there are various courses and lectures but that needs time and effort. There is no short cuts like the book posted by OP.
With two small kids I'd much rather have 5/8 instead of 4/10 so I can spend more time with them every day. I don't know how I feel about 4/9.
Section 13 of AGPLv3 lays this out:

> Notwithstanding any other provision of this License, if you modify the Program, your modified version must prominently offer all users interacting with it remotely through a computer network (if your version supports such interaction) an opportunity to receive the Corresponding Source of your version by providing access to the Corresponding Source from a network server at no charge, through some standard or customary means of facilitating copying of software.

https://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl-3.0.html#section13

In the mall example, this requirement can be fulfilled by having a link to or an attachment of the source code on the interface that facilitates the photo upload. The developer does not have to communicate with the user, since the requirement applies to the software ("your modified version") and not to the developer.

When a software license requires the source code of the licensed software to be released, that does not make the software unfree. This is because allowing users to access source code is one of the goals of the free software movement, as well as a prerequisite for freedoms 1 and 3:

> The freedom to study how the program works, and change it so it does your computing as you wish (freedom 1). Access to the source code is a precondition for this.

> The freedom to distribute copies of your modified versions to others (freedom 3). By doing this you can give the whole community a chance to benefit from your changes. Access to the source code is a precondition for this.

https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.en.html#four-freedoms
A few interesting ideas from the article, which uses Decentraland as an example of the metaverse:

"There is only one metaverse. While the buzzword's meaning is often stretched into different configurations, there is a clear definition. The metaverse is simply the internet, updated to accommodate spatial experiences."

That Decentraland is built in the "browser, open-source, with a peer-to-peer server architecture, leveraging an immature blockchain ecosystem".

"In early 2020, Decentraland completed one of its initial goals – to hand control of the project over to its community. It did so by formalizing a DAO and handing it power over the essential smart contracts controlling LAND, wearables, the marketplace, and more."

Here's a link to the project's original white paper: https://decentraland.org/whitepaper.pdf
> The law allows people to circumvent copy protection to access works they are entitled to access.

Claiming that such an allowance exists is not the same as actually identifying the statute or ruling that creates the allowance. What is your textual basis for claiming that there's a general permission for circumvention?

> If they do clash then you have to side with the consumer.

This sounds like you're referring to a concept that exists in contract law, but has no applicability to a question of how to handle a conflict between two provisions in law. In such a case, the courts will usually uphold whichever provision actually exists in the text of the law.
I do one reasonably weak cup with lots of creamer first thing in the morning with breakfast. Then, on a normal day, I have mostly water. This solves two problems for me: (1) by the end of my typical day, enough caffeine has flushed back out of my system that I have no issues falling asleep, but also (b) I'm maintaining a tolerance, so if I'm out with friends I can have a glass of whatever and not totally wreck my system doing so.

I've considered ditching the coffee entirely; it's mostly the routine I enjoy, and I could probably replace it with an herbal tea. My system on an actual energy drink is just as jittery and anxious as the author describes. But for now, keeping my intake low seems okay.

The biggest surprise for me was really switching to plain water as my beverage of choice. Growing up on sugary beverages I craved them something fierce; now I actually crave water, and enjoy the taste. The only downside is that at restaurants, the servers will swing by and refill an ordered soda (or tea) endlessly, and they get this funny look if I try to explain that "no really, just one is enough."
I thought it was JWST deployment, but that finishes in 13 days. Maybe first images? But I'd assumed that would be further out.
I *think* that this is overall a good thing, but does it not implicitly create a floor for what a future funding round would be able to raise at?

My basic back-of-the-envelope math looks like this makes raising a future round at anything < 5M pretty impractical? This obvious doesn't affect the big-wins from YC (at which point the additional equity from the 375k is likely trivial anyways).

I know that YC (like any VC) is really betting on it's unicorn outliers for it's returns, and this is likely a big win for middle-of-the-pack companies as well, but could easily lead to many "smaller" outcomes being unable to raise and forced to shut down, no?
It's not "dicking around with a laser pointer". Actions have consequences. Blinding pilots and causing a plane crash is not really going to be classed as "dicking around" is it?
I agree with your optimistic take here. A lot of people are reading the “200 projects” and assuming they are all big projects. On the contrary, a lot of your projects seem to keep a very narrow focus that allows them to get to a state of “done for now” even is nothing is truly ever finished due to upstream and downstream changes around the project.
Glad to see they're making an attempt, and I hope it works out well, but there is a big difference between talking about something that will (might, we hope) get done in the future, VS something that has already been accomplished that one can feel proud of. I look forward to seeing if this can make the transition from the former to the latter.

Also, major yellow flag: "The paths will also feature state-of-the-art infrastructure, including low-impact motion-sensor lighting, digital displays, and a network of fibre optic cables, ..."
Sounds like exactly the kind of over-engineering and over-specing that plagues these kinds of projects.
Sorry again, I see that I forgot to answer your good points about crypto api and permission.

- I think the permission thing is bullshit (and probably a reason enough not to take deno seriously). I'd be interested to be proved wrong (I work on backend security so this is sincere), but it feels like traditional server side isolation mechanims (cgroup, namespace, outgoing http proxy, ...) are well known, work well, seem safer and more flexible and are not nodejs specific, so are better in any system that are not running JS only backend (probably any reasonably large system)

- nodejs now supports the webcrypto API - experimentally (and for what it's worth, I liked the nodejs one better ^^)
It's trivially easy to log messages and content on an xmpp server. It's not a secure protocol at all, just because it uses tls in transport.
I noticed how much caffeine was affecting me when I started getting way too sleepy at a certain new job after lunch. It was weird, because before I didn't really feel tired after eating unless I stuffed myself, but now I was really tired and sleepy and could barely function.

Turns out that this new job offered free coffee, so I was drinking one cup of coffee before commuting, another one when I arrived, and maybe one or two more later, but before lunch. The only reason I was sleepy was coffee: I was making my body dependent on caffeine to function normally in the morning, and I wasn't giving it coffee in the evening.

Luckily I caught it early and could quit without problems, but it was interesting to see how quickly your body builds a tolerance and makes you dependent on a drug. I back up the advice of the OP and I'd suggest to everyone who drinks coffee regularly to check themselves, because they might be addicted even without having those noticeable symptoms the OP talked about.
I used to take a large number of black coffee throughout the day. Otherwise just feel tired even though I am fully rested.

Recently started experimenting with nootropics as a replacement for coffee. Started L-theanine + caffeine capsules. Surprisingly, feel attentive throughout the day and better sleep at night too. Workout is better as well. Don’t know how long these effects will last. But for now, I have quit coffee for good.
I believe an issue with that is it can overheat the individual cells and damage them prematurely.
New lava-like coating can stop fires in their tracks
The American Mafia ran it's biggest and most profitable racket, concrete for construction in NYC, aka the Concrete Club, from 1977 to 1985...long after the period you're talking about.

You can even read about the corruption and (non-mafia) racketeering involved in NYC's lifeguard union, which continues literally to this very day.

In most major cities, the mafia controlled a majority of the unions and used them to effectively provide mafia made men and associates with no-show jobs to provide non-earners in their organization with a paycheck -- on top of all of that they would find ways to skim a few percent off any labor being done.

It's also easy for you to bring up teachers and nurses' unions not being mafia controlled -- jobs predominantly staffed with women. The American mafia literally cannot have women members per its own rules, so of course they couldn't influence those unions.

If you do your research though, you'll see that the Russian mafia is heavily skimming from medical services through control of the nurses' union in Germany. There is no reason they couldn't replicate that here.
> I suspect in practice we're not going to see a lot of structs with a bajillion generics in them

Sure, but note that it only takes a single generic parameter to exhibit this behavior. Consider the original struct definition in the OP: if we imagine that the first field was generic instead of uint8, then the struct has padding only when the type is less than 16 bits in size. No matter where you manually reorder that field, some possible types will still result in padding if the fields are forced to be laid out in order, and it took no more than a single type parameter.
My impression has always been that you are paying a premium to have the YC partners, and their network, spend part of their day thinking about how to make your company succeed. That "access" seems pretty valuable? I have no idea how to value it though.
Same experience. I didn’t quit completely, but I do limit myself to one cup of coffee in the morning. The rest of my fluid intake is water. I don’t have trouble sleeping anymore.
>I see nothing immoral in a bear eating a human. It’s just being a bear. But just like any other social animal, as humans we’re of course going to kill that bear so it stops eating us. It has nothing to do with us being superior than a bear. We just don’t want to die like any other animal!

Right.

>And as humans I see nothing wrong with eating other animals (outside of animal cruelty, e.g. factory farms).

Bears can't have moral culpability because they aren't intellectually sophisticated enough, much like how a theoretical profoundly mentally disabled human, or an infant human, wouldn't be morally culpable for killing someone. The "mens rea" can't be established. However, nearly all adult humans do possess the capacity for moral reasoning.

>As animals, we naturally eat each other.

Even though bears and humans are animals, and animals often eat each other, we're the only animals blessed/cursed with the knowledge that if we were to maul someone to death, they'd experience terrible pain and suffering, their life would be cut short, and their family would mourn their death and lose resource support and potentially suffer and die themselves. If a bear had those thoughts, they would be morally culpable, but they almost certainly don't.

>If there is something immoral about this, does that mean a rabbit is morally superior to a fox?

No, because a rabbit's moral reasoning is in the same class as a bear's and a fox's, and not a human's.
I think its a common misconception that YC primarily invests in 20-somethings eating ramen and dreaming big. Lots of YC founders have kids and stuff. This was true when I went through in YC in 2011 (interestingly first batch that got $250k from Yuri Milner) and doubly true when I just went through in 2021.

I'm skeptical the goal of this is to encourage high salaried people to start companies though, it's probably just to give people extended runway.
+1 for Zojirushi. I do wish they made something shaped more like a traditional mug than a travel mug. I've tried various brands of insulated mugs, and at most they let me stretch out my cup of coffee to 45 minutes. With a Zojirushi I can make a cup last hours.
I've definitely noticed a change in how my body handles caffeine now that I'm in my mid 30s. Less euphoria, more heart-pounding-through-my-chest. I still love the taste, though, and the routine of making pourovers/aeropresses/etc.

One thing that's really helped me is to always have decaf as easily accessible as regular. It helps me separate the caffeine dosage from all of the other things I love about coffee.
Report from Phase 1 of the Swedish Central Bank's Blockchain Currency Pilot [pdf]
The website for the e-krona project is here. https://www.riksbank.se/en-gb/payments--cash/e-krona/
"Never. By a long shot." At least in terms of financial outcomes.

If it improves reliability, it's common enough, but a solar + battery system does well to come in at 4-5x grid rates, even in expensive areas.

My office system (off-grid solar + battery) has now dropped below $1/kWh delivered... but not by much. And the batteries are more than halfway through their expected service life (10 years, flooded lead acid).

I do it because it's interesting to learn and experiment with, and because trenching power out here would suck, but I don't pretend it's cheap.

On the other hand, it is more reliable than the power grid...
That's not universally true.

Imagine this scenario: If as OP stated employees treat their employer as an adversary, it's a reasonable outcome where adversarial employees demand more than a sustainable company would be willing / able to give. You cannot trust employees to demand a reasonable amount any more than you can trust companies to offer a reasonable amount. Both sides want to maximize their gains. If a collective group of employees have leverage over their employer (through strike threats, mass resignation threats, etc.), it's a perfectly expected outcome for them to squeeze the last ounces of profitability out of a company before it fails, then jump ship to the companies that replace it, especially for non-geographically dependent tech companies.

Just as if the company had maximum leverage and no minimum wage / government intervention it would be a perfectly expected outcome for the company to squeeze the the last ounces of concessions out of their employees before replacing them, as we saw throughout most of history.

It's nice to think that morals would intervene and both sides would find a healthy, sustainable balance, but that's the ideal outcome, not the realistic one.
What you're describing is the lack of a normal market, and even that only applies if you have insurance. For the millions of people without insurance, they do indeed shop around.
It is very much a capitalist system, since the ownership (& control) of the system is not in the hands of the workers - in insurance companies, hospitals, pharma, etc - but in the hands of wealthy shareholders.

To be fair, I suspect your definition of capitalism is very different from mine...
> I don’t know why people are throwing their hands up at technology and using quarters when the apps are much more convenient (especially since you can remotely extend your parking time).

Because popping a quarter into the machine is much more convenient for most people than downloading a questionable app, typing in your license plate, address, and credit credit card.

I'd be willing to bet the number of people who need to remotely extend their parking time by app instead of feeding the meter are vastly outnumbered by the people who just want to park downtown for 30 minutes to grab a sandwich and move on with their day.
Using excess energy to heat a thermal mass is infinitely better for the person who owns the solar panels / efficiency than piping it back into the grid, where you a) need more electrical work (paying an electrician to install a grid-tie inverter costs thousands and also negates your ability to use the power off-grid if you ever wanted to add batteries) and b) best case get credits that are deliberately priced next to nothing.

The price of LifePo4 lithium batteries has also plummeted in recent years.

Cool project though!
With lasers that powerful, it's not just about aircraft. If you pointed it at people intentionally you could blind them, which makes it a weapon.

There's tons of stuff that has legitimate scientific uses that needs to be licenced for lots of reasons. For example, you need a licence to have iodine with concentrations above 2.2%.
Parent meant “do anything to curry favor from your boss.” Not that everyone gets promotions no matter how bad they suck.

But even that’s not true in my experience - under the union there were still performance reviews where you had to advocate for yourself a little bit. It just all had to go through official channels.
Right there with you. I have this vague dream that one day, the tech will be there to automatically collate and reference all my stored data more easily, sort of like how I work with physical sources.

Even as I type this, though, it feels more and more like a pipe dream.
They're a very common combo used for pain and migraines though.

Cannabis can be used for instant relief, but it opens your veins, causing headaches or worsening your migraine.

Caffeine for extended headache relief. Sometimes you need an Advil and/or Aspirin depending on the pain. IANAD.

Aspirin Acetaminophen and Caffeine or AAC is very effective.
Thanks for trying us out and for the feedback! I agree that our filters are a little confusing right now and we're working on fixing it. In the meantime, here are a couple of filters you could try:

- To see all cases where the model disagrees with your annotation: Function Output = Disagrees, Desired Output = Any.

- To see the least confident predictions from the model: Function Output = Any, Desired Output = Any, Sort By = Least Confident Prediction.

Your idea us helping you pick a confidence threshold is a good one. We'll get that into our near-term roadmap.

We use a technique called cross-validation to seperate training and test data. We have that documented here: https://www.nyckel.com/docs#cross-validation
but you can alllways find replacement like tea
Oh, and another Rust question, if you don't mind. If I have both versions 1.0 and 1.1 of package X in my binary, and X defines a data type called foo, and one of my dependencies constructs a foo using X 1.0, is that value of a different type than a foo constructed by X 1.1? Or can version 1.0 foos wind their way through the code and up being processed by version 1.1 code?
It kind of does if you choose to seed stuff that is ripe for DMCA takedowns/copyright infringement, right?

That's not the protocol's fault, but it's pretty much one of the biggest reasons most common people use the protocol: to pirate.

Get caught pirating? Probably get some fines, right?
In 2021 we covered more than 2,1B in scams, hacks and rug pulls
I’d be okay with using the new pronunciation for this new meaning.

- GIF /dʒɪf/: Graphics Interchange Format

- gif /ɡɪf/: short looping silent video
> Freedom (or possibility of) for women, at least in some sense from their spouse/family.

Does this actually work against the two income trap?

Before you needed one income, so a woman not allowed to work had to find a new man before she could cut loose a bad one.

Now you need two incomes, so a woman who has to work in order to provide one of the incomes has to find a new man before she can cut loose a bad one. And has less time to find one because she's working 40 hours on top of everything she used to do in the home.

Sometimes progress doesn't know which way the arrow is pointing.
What violence?
ANN: Pigiron Version 0.2.0
Pigiron is a go based MIDI routing utility with remote OSC control. This updated version has switched to gomidi as a backend. It has better stability with fewer crashes then version 0.1

https://github.com/plewto/Pigiron
Observing a schizophrenic I knew made me realize people high in "intolerance of uncertainty" can probably discard reality checking to arrive at a firm conclusion. I googled that and found a psych paper claiming schizophrenics indeed tend toward high intolerance for uncertainty. It was a relatively new finding.