skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
A problem I have recently observed a few times: people add DNS records to the wrong zone. For example, they add an a.b record to the example.com zone, but b.example.com is its own zone.

Bind doesn't complain about the extra records, but also doesn't return them, even if b.example.com is hosted on the same bind instance. (Which is technically correct, but sometimes confusing).
A refinery can leak explosive gasses that form a plume in or around the refinery that rises off the ground. Once detected, there's a fairly high chance that one small spark will set it off but it could be many seconds or minutes until it's ignited and it could take multiple smaller explosions to mix in enough oxygen to cause the big one. This gives the staff "plenty" of time to evacuate but it's still an emergency situation where arguing about carpools or knocking things down frantically looking for keys (causing that spark) will eventually get people killed for no benefit.
10 years was not quite worst case but definitely a conservative estimate.

L2 is an unstable orbit and needs constant corrections to not drift away, so JWST has much more significant fuel needs than if it were in say Hubble's orbit. How much fuel it would have left for these maneuvers depended on how precise the launch was (i.e. how much fuel it needed to spend on corrective burns just to get to L2). This was obviously uncertain until after the launch, but ten years was a lower bound above which the launch would not be considered a major issue--if it only had say 5 years of fuel left after the launch that would be an indication that the launch was flubbed some how.

TLDR: JWST was not "supposed" to last only 10 years. It was designed and built to last much longer, that was just a lower bound assuming nothing went very wrong.

cf. Mars rovers operating long past the "planned" mission length, e.g. Opportunity's "planned" 90-day mission turning into over 5,000 days. It is vastly unfair to the people who designed and built Opportunity to say it was "supposed" to last only 90 days. It was built to last much longer; 90 days was a lower bound for the mission to be considered a success.
Well it looks like I triggered a debate about Friedman's MO, which is fun, but not necessarily what I was after.

So asking again: why is the mismatch between interest rates and credit volume not just explained by the delayed system response to the interest rate change, versus the extremely complicated supply-side explanation in the blog post?
YouTube is deleting JCS Criminal Psychology videos without explanation
Affidavit with picture of positive result is on page 11: https://www.fedcourt.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/9505...

All files are here: https://www.fcfcoa.gov.au/migration-law/online-file/djokovic
I'm unimpressed with these commenters griping about the UI change or sponsored this and that. I don't think that's an honest standard you hold yourself to in any fashion and is simply not a functional way to live your life! What about your toothpaste packaging -- or gasp the product itself?! Things change all the time, you can be annoyed about it, of course! But accepting change is part of being a human in societies. "UI changes breaking my workflow" -- seriously? I don't buy it. I wish the conversations like this would fade because it encourages bad attitudes across the board -- I can't put my finger on it. Is it entitlement? Mozilla owes ME a good browser?
I asked for death per turbine not per TWh.
Nuclear energy provides lots of TWh so it skews the statistics in their favor.

That's like comparing death by train accident or plane accident.
Planes are better per kilometer but worse per hour.
There's a reason Google operates an entire stack for completely encrypted end-to-end communication to Google datacenters, including now encrypted DNS. Essentially anything connected to the Internet, Google can establish a completely unblockable communication with directly, provided you intend to allow it to connect to Google servers at all.
great mask would recommend
Nonsense.

You have been able to clone over https since day 1 of Github and still can:

git clone https://github.com/user/repository
Agree that that kernel can handle many sleeping threads fine. The main problem with a million threads is that they all take up some fixed memory for stack. 1 MB/stack as a rough estimate. Go’s green threads use some kind of dynamic stack implementation to solve this problem. Dynamic stack requires a language specific implementation, for ex, with C pointers it would be difficult. Depending on how python C modules work, a similar solution would be needed to just offload to the kernel.
This is one of the use case for the tor network. Gives access to local machine even if all the ports are blocked by isp
Off. Too much unnecessary cognitive load video on.
This is like posting your SSN to make yourself immune to identity theft.
I used to read la Repubblica but the quality of the online content has gone down significantly (the physical newspaper is still good).
I think ilpost.it is well curated non-partisan journalism - I’m a happy subscriber - and for more in depth articles I like internazionale.it, which instead is left wing but not to irritating levels. Hope it helps :)
Fuel for station keeping depends on how accurately we can measure its location and predict orbits.

With future tech and more research, we will be able to use the fuel it has far more effectively.

the theoretical fuel use is zero... The actual use is proportional to how our calculations of orbits and stuff differ from reality.
At a previous company, we had to _add code_ to our software in order to avoid violating a patent. Yes, if we just let our system do what it could, that violated a patent. We had to check for a certain condition, and disallow the generic system from doing a specific thing, in order to not get in trouble. Sorry, but that's insane.
By "servicing" I actually meant more "repair". The initial burns left enough fuel that JWST is likely to wear out before it runs out of fuel. The refuelling I meant was for craft to get people there and back, because repair is significantly more difficult than refuelling.

https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2021/12/29/nasa-says-webbs-exces...
There's a caveat to the rosy picture this article seems to paint of the past. In the 14th century, the black death and The Great Famine Killed a huge number of people but also is believed to have raised the standard of living for lower class survivors (I wonder if this was an inspiration for Thanos' plan).

The article briefly mentions the plague but doesn't really seem to address that this event strongly changed the economic conditions of Europe for 150 years. Coincidentally, that 150 years heavily overlaps with the period of analysis for this article.
How do you browse the web without using Edge or MS Store to download another browser?
There are numerous reliable sources that have confirmed the existence of Chinese Concentration Camps.

Whether you dismiss them is up to you, but the fact remains that numerous sources have reported on the existence of Chinese Concentration Camps.
I'm not sure if it's possible to edit userContent.css in Android or iOS. Is it? I can't find a way to do it.
Thanks for this! I did not even know about Purelymail, and have been considering moving to a new mail provider. Protonmail, Zoho, and Fastmail are all on the list of options. I'll add Purelymail.
Churchill was well known for genuinely hating indian people. Also Great Britain kind of had a habit of either creating, or worsening food shortages for political reasons. For example, the British parliament refused to stop grain exports from Ireland during the potato famine, or provide free grain to hungry people, because they thought that the Irish were lazy and giving them free things would make them lazier (sound familiar?)
Mr Plow: A Lightweight Logstash Alternative (MySQL/Postgres to Elasticsearch)
Another author of the paper here. We are recruiting in case you would like to contribute in further meaningful projects. https://www.instadeep.com/about-us/careers/
I guess I just assume they learned a lot in building this and that knowledge will transfer into new telescopes, launches, deployments, etc. Do you think they didn't learn enough by figuring this out?
Not from me. I personally don't need Dropbox but I can see the utility if a company want to share a 1 TB storage area between employees. I'm guessing that's how it's used since I've never used it.
Before Google complains about Apple holding back interoperable rich texting with RCS, Google should make RCS work with Google Voice. The people in charge of product at Google remain utterly incompetent. Get your house in order.
Check-in NPM tarballs to freeze changes and install offline
Yet again, the harsh reality that we are launching two-decades-old designs. Hopefully these timelines seem to be speeding up a bit in the past decade.
It wasn't optimized for mobile but is now... please LMK what you think!
IMHO fixings tend to be selected prioritizing a manufacturing point of view rather than how easy they are to disassemble (with the exception of specific security screws). PH/PZ screws can get cammed by a misaligned tool or unskilled operator in assembly, requiring a rework or writing off the chassis. This is less likely to happen with Torx.
This is one of those things that has been really exaggerated. Medieval people were concerned with water quality and protecting wells, rivers, and other water sources from pollution/poisoning. Beer isn't really an efficient way to purify water either, the alcohol isn't strong enough to ensure it won't make you sick. Much like us though, medieval people didn't really like drinking plain water much, as well as beer barley water and various herbal teas were very popular.
> So it's mathematically interesting that the puzzle cannot be solved in a conventional manner, but it's also interesting that it can be solved by applying quantum concepts.

I guess the question was: Is the "quantum officers puzzle" the same puzzle as the one proposed by Euler or a variant?

If they're not the same, it's not a "quantum solution" but "a solution to a quantum variant". That can be interesting on its own (with proposals made in the discussions here), it's just that "Yeehaw, we solved something for the first time in 243 years With Quantum[tm]" seems to be the wrong take away (although it might mean the next round of public funding)
If only it was a conscious choice... I fear significant climate has happened already, and even if we stop burning fossil fuels tomorrow will continue for a long time to come. Putting up a few km2 of solar in e.g. the Sahara now is surely less effort than decommissioning dozens of nuclear plants in 50 years.
Doesn't the thread suggest someone has fiddled the system on Djokovic's behalf? If that's the case then the centralized PCR verification system is nothing but a house of cards.
Unionizing for Profit: How to Exploit the Power of Unions in C++
No, the complain is that he basically doesn't understand what his guests are telling him so rather than asking a followup question or transition smoothly he just jumps around from question to question. Just listen for your self, it's obvious.
And we're putting in wind and solar at record rates, but that still doesn't cover us at night or when there's no wind. Batteries or other energy storage cannot meet the demand yet. Nuclear is still the best option for continuous weather-independent power among all the low-polluting options.
Interviews aren't a perfect selector. They have a huge random element. So if minorities consistently get more interview opportunities with the per-interview variance and per-employer bar variance they are more likely to have an interview where they do better than the bar. This means that over-interviewed minorities will be hired even at a lower "quality".

Basically for both groups there is the top quality which will always be hired and the bottom quality which will never be hired. However the difference appears in the middle group that will eventually be hired given enough interviews. For minorities with more interviews a higher portion of this group will be hired. The more over-interviewing and over-hiring you do this group will get more and more drained. But there are still members on the lower end that will eventually be hired given enough opportunity.
Hello gus_massa,

I try to improve it even more in my free time and share it

Let's say that the latest news mainly these are:

- minor bug fixes and general improvements, updated dependencies to the latest version

- added a button to put the video on full-screen mode for mobile

- possibility to protect your host by username - password [1]

- possibility to set the video aspect ratio (16:9, 4:3, 1:2, 1:1) [2]

- added the image avatar to the participants' list [3]

- added a new API to create a personalized link for the direct join to the room [4] doc here [5]

...

[1] https://github.com/miroslavpejic85/mirotalksfu/commit/ab2168...

[2] https://github.com/miroslavpejic85/mirotalksfu/commit/bdefab...

[3] https://github.com/miroslavpejic85/mirotalksfu/commit/16ad8b...

[4] https://github.com/miroslavpejic85/mirotalksfu#direct-join

[5] https://sfu.mirotalk.org/api/v1/docs/#/

...

Thank you gus_massa, yeahHN!
My Rare Collection of 250 Unreleased Apple Products
Yes! Use these:
https://www.armbrustusa.com/products/armbrust-ear-savers

Screenshot this post and let support@ that I said to include a pack for free with your earloop replacement.
You should be disappointed that it took 20 years to build, period. Anything that runs for 20 years unattended is a massive technological achievement.
Thread in English : https://twitter.com/zerforschung/status/1480924205352996870?...
That's negating the cost of the telescope itself, though. JWST may be more expensive than something you could launch with e.g. Starship, due to the need to fit into an Ariane 5 payload, but it's still an insanely high-precision instrument that would surely have cost $billions even without the unfolding procedure. If you could refuel it for, say, $250 million, because Starship, why not do that instead of launching a new telescope for $5 billion?
Wow, amazing to see you here. I have somewhat of a bioinformatics background, and this is the sort of work that I always found very interesting - do you think your team will produce some sort of high level architectural and process breakdown at some point?
If I were a 100-billionaire, I’d finance several of these. There was a fashion among the very rich 100+ years ago to finance ground-based telescopes and have it named after themselves
>we disconnect the WebSocket consumers whenever a server is restarted for the update

Isn't avoiding this the main selling point for BEAM? As in Erlang: the movie. Can't that be done with websockets?
They have Twitter here though.
For Omicron, with an incubation period of three days, one should expect negatives to turn positive with a transatlantic flight.

Google suggests that it takes 10-12 hr to fly from NYC to Israel. That's a long time with a fast virus. (Even with a week's incubation period, you'd still expect to see it, just less.). Furthermore, many of those negative tests will have been 24-48 hr prior to takeoff, depending upon legal requirements that day.

It's okay to suspect malice, but it may not be necessary here :).
Agreed.

At least the movie says it right up front with the dialogue between Neo and Smith, "This is a total sellout and nobody wants to do it but parent company wants some money."

The only thing missing was the two of them looking directly at the audience behind the fourth wall in awkward synchronized silence.

That said, Art that wishes itself never born is not art I care to watch.
A modern CMake toolchain for Symbian S60v1/Nokia N-Gage devices
>Why are you so sure of that?

Because I understand basic macroeconomics and how prolific and dependent global finance is on the USD.
Adding Vibrancy to Prosaicness – 2021 Reading List
1. go to github and create a new repository (https://github.com/new)

2. read the text in front of you:

git remote add origin git@github.com:yourusername/repositoryname.git
git branch -M main
git push -u origin main
Maybe a big infrared space telescope isn't the highest priority to build next compared to other instruments we could put in orbit.

I mean, we'll still have some big terrestrial infrared 'scopes. And we'll be coming off 20 years of very good space infrared scope data... And we'll have had the smaller Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope up in L2 also (launching in 2027, nominal life 5 years).... ESA is launching an exoplanet-focused infrared scope to L2 in a similar timespan... Presumably other "smaller" infrared scopes will fly by 2042. So...

There's so many wavelengths and different possible space telescope missions. Let's not replace JWST (assuming it gets a normal mission life)-- let's keep some infrared capability and do something else.
What Moxie Missed on Web3 Wallets
Well, any plan for green energy has major holes in it. If it was easy someone would have already done it. The EU is taking this very seriously however as part of their climate plans.

The big problem with the hydrogen economy is not the conversion of the gas plants, it is having enough wind to generate the hydrogen in the first place. You need excess wind capacity to make hydrogen, and no private venture will invest into wind turbines that aren’t needed. Without a strong government hand shaping this market it will not happen.

If you are looking for a skeptical take, here’s a good one: https://cleantechnica.com/2021/12/06/new-eu-hydrogen-policy-...
UCSF ER Covid head hasn't “intubated a single Covid patient” in Omicron surge
Right wingers want to paint it as a violent wasteland. Left wingers want to paint it as a promising post-police utopian experiment.

Rhetoric aside, there are empirical questions that can be answered.
Is Elon Musk the very first space bro, followed by Bezos?

Or do we get to go all the way back to Shuttleworth, Tito, and Branson?

Surely Branson is the first space bro.
I think your last paragraph is a good point for using services like the OP. All three of the examples you mentioned are already solved. Granted, you're buying into their paradigm particularly regarding communication model but that's a small price to pay for the upsides.

Disclaimer: we've been using Ably for years and their service and reliability has been outstanding, and we have worked closely with their engineers and I've found their expertise to be above what you may expect from experience with other company's support personnel.
Bad headline. The evidence is very conclusive: masks don't block air, and therefore can't block an airborne virus.
Well we already know the political affiliations of OP and OP of OP.
This data set took me 2 years to compile but just recently seemed complete enough to post.
Dear Marcin - congratulations on the manuscript!

Do you think the immune escape parameters would need to be retuned in a post Omicron world? Do you need the actual epitopes recognised by antibodies, or can you guess this from structure.

Do you capture any aspects with respect to changes in spike glycosylation in your models?

Finally, as with another reply, do you have a guess about the specificity of this system? Is it good enough to get production of vaccines going on variants that are flagged, just in case?
JWST isn’t in Earth’s shadow - it orbits around L2 (approximately perpendicular to the Sun-Earth axis) at a radius comparable to the Earth-Moon distance. JWST has a huge solar array used to power the electronics on-board.

Even if it was stationary at L2, Earth wouldn’t completely shield it from the Sun - the point is too far from Earth/the Sun so large for it to.

There is a nice animation on https://webb.nasa.gov/content/about/orbit.html
I find it interesting that planning overruns such as this seem to get pinned on implementation, rather than the planning and approval processes themselves.

The evidence is that the time and cost it took to produce JWST are what they are. That planners lowballed these estimates, or that administrators and legislators wouldn't have approved greenlighting based on accurate estimates, speak to failures in planning and administration, rather than engineering.

Much of the planning / large-project literature, which I've studied for some three decades, seems itself to be largely blind to this distinction.

As to many comments found on the Internet mirroring such viewpoints.
That's not what I meant, no.
i am not an american or chinese so a third party. here is my question.

does "America has lost the narrative and the Chinese have gained it without question" this mean till now it was america who was defining what the rest of the world saw and remembered, making history for "everyone" not just for themselves. remember rambo and the mujahideen?
america has for long used its power to influence narrative across the world. asl a random person on the street anywhere in the world about iran and "anti-israel muslims, evil" would be the answer 7/10. why was that? because american hollywood has made boogeyman out of american military enemies.

now china is doing the same so why is this a big deal? why can't americans live with this?

uh, "destroying our freedom of expression " more like free market with power and tested capability to use as a propaganda tool because "hey. we support freedom of expression so anything we say is correct".

i am not criticizing you personally. just saying americans should come down a step from their self proclaimed high horse of world saviors and be like the rest of the folk.
Sure! But it's not a warrant-like system.
I used Internet Explorer to download Firefox ESR and went from there when setting up the machine.
This is a common outsider's view of the sober-for-life perspective I think. It's not about sin or penance or precluding forgiveness. It's just an individual's personal acknowledgement that the same pains, proclivities and weaknesses that led them into addiction are still present in them.

It may not even be true necessarily, but it's still a useful view for a lot of people with addiction in their past. It's just lower risk to assume you're permanently vulnerable and so never use the drug again.
"I'm all for stopping new variants of COVID"

That's very likely not even possible[1]; and, it not being realistic, would be a waste of time, effort, and money. There are lots of corona viruses that we have never stopped, and we live with via herd immunity, hygiene, and therapeutics[2].

[1] https://www.acsh.org/news/2020/11/05/covid-why-we-will-never...

[2] https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/general-information.html
Well to be classified as a variant it would have to be phenotypically different right? And also viable enough to infect a number of people.
No one is vacationing to China? Some Americans who might have picked China in the past are no longer vacationing to China. Massive amounts of people of Chinese descent still vacation to China.

The difference between them and Soviet Russia is people. There are a billion and a half Chinese people. There was less than 300 million people in Soviet Russia. You don't need tourism or immigration when you have a billion+ people with now a healthy middle class.
The "look at your own backyard first" is a common technique used by Wumao [0].

It is used to reduce the force of any criticism of CCP. Human rights are universal and know no national borders [1].

That being said, thanks for qualifying the often repeated statement in this thread about US prisons. Surely, more needs to be done. That does not mean we need to be silent about Xinjiang slave concentration camps.

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29893724
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29893855
Thanks for adding this information. I was unfair to judge so harshly and be so sceptical.

So the $1T question is ... what (if anything) is this model currently predicting about the next variant?