skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> He looks at the code and criticizes design decisions, some of which were made largely on my manager's explicit suggestions. (When I bring this up, he says I probably just misinterpreted an offhand comment of hers as a hard requirement.)

This is very hard to do and feels very unfair, but try to own this rather than say "but this is what I was told to do." If the person is a manager she isn't writing code day to day; she is likely experienced and can offer helpful suggestions, but she can be wrong or vague, or you may simply not be familiar with the way she uses certain terms. Try to discuss these suggestions with technical leaders or the more senior engineers on the team, they will likely have more context.

Make sure you're actively listening to what people are really saying in meetings. Volunteer to take notes if it helps and then review them with the participants at the end to make sure you got their key points.

When I worked at Amazon, I was really impressed by how seriously folks took the "Leadership Principles." Two particularly struck out: "disagree and commit" and "have a backbone." Obviously the two conflict with each other at first view, but on a second look the theme is the same: know when and how to listen to others and accept their suggestions, but also know when and how to convince others to accept yours.
Mr Smith Goes To Washington was a hit film because it described an ideal nobody believed existed.

The situation you described is as old as the republic, and probably for all of human history. The American revolution itself succeeded through bribery in Whitehall.
You are of course free to use words to mean whatever you want, but if you choose to use "anarchism" to mean a non-leftist ideology, you should expect that most people will misunderstand you; in some cases that can slide into deliberate deception, though I don't think that's your intention here. You aren't the first, of course; Rothbard and arguably Spooner understood anarchism in the same way you do, though Spooner belonged to the First International. But when you slide into attacking people as "pathetic" because they use the word in its mainstream sense, you're tempting people to label you as a troll. Please don't do that.
I own a CharaChorder and this is exactly right. Using the CC, you can't get 100% on monkeytype because when I type `helo` it then backspaces that and types `hello` using the CharaChorder's onboard firmware.

The final text is 100% accurate--it's just what was typed by the keyboard wasn't 100% accurate.
This is how sus became the one true way.
This is a very abnormal vesting schedule. I've never interviewed with a company that has a schedule like that. The most common schedule is 25% per year, over 4 years, vested per month, except that the first 25% comes as a lump as the end of the first year. Most companies provide refreshers every year during the comp cycle. Normally during times when stock prices are low for a company, they'll take that into consideration during the comp cycle and give larger bumps.
I have never participated in a typing competition but I would be shocked if they consisted of typing a single canned sentence.
Nice reddit-esque attempt to use “literally” in an irrelevant context, but PDFs are not code.
If the only capitalist in Argentina you know is Milei (far right, self-proclaimed "libertarian", worked under a known criminal of our military dictatorship) then you're out of touch.

Really, consider how you're shifting the goalposts: you only consider far right libertarians as capitalists. The rest of the world disagrees with you.

Anyway, I live in Argentina and you don't. You are wrong.

> That is not capitalism. Call it something else.

No. You must use definitions of capitalism compatible with the current consensus. Otherwise you're playing the same game you keep accusing leftists of, "that's not true capitalism, I mean something else!".
Because no rationale was given for why.
The big issue is you can't let your kids go outside, unsupervised, and go make friends with other kids in the neighborhood until about 12, which by that point they're basically teens and in a completely different stage of life. Before the 80s, you were able to do that. If you do, there is a chance that you get stressful CPS visits, criminal charges or your child taken away from you. And because nobody else is doing it, if you decide to be a rebel the kid will have nobody to play with anyway.

Kids used to be way less of a time investment. There were more around, and they very easily latched on to playing with other neighborhood kids all day which acted like free daycare. You could send them out and tell them to be back before dark, feed them food, have family dinners, fix their boo boos and not much else. Now in today's limited age, kids can only play with their literal line of sight neighbors unsupervised and are mostly stuck inside, dependent on a parent to become a playmate because they eventually get bored of the video games. Or they get obsessed to an unhealthy degree.

The independence you talk about is another kind, but still a dependent kind on the parents. I think a cell phone coordinated childhood with the permissiveness of the 70s is the ideal + all the info of the internet, but it's not something you can do in english countries.

There is also a curse-of-knowledge aspect to today's age. The average teen does not seem to deal well with instagram and cell phones, especially girls. It's unique. I think society will eventually create an immune system to universal cellphones and social media, much like we did with TV, but until then we are dealing with it downside more than we should.
I concur. My first thought was it was some federal government "fellow kids" effort.

It's a shame because I'm really, really excited about a Renaissance of the federated web.
Death by genetically enhanced, unstoppable fungi which grow in the lungs, and nose.

Truffled to death.
On what basis? Knowing the candidates job history may do so, but what signal does the salary itself give?

The company is highly unlikely to answer the question, "what did you pay the previous employee in this position?"; why should I answer "what did the company that previously employed me pay me?"
At my workplace, we have explicitly banned the use of "should have".
The first phase of the transition to ETH2 was implemented on December 1st, 2020, with the launch of the Proof of Stake Beacon Chain. The Beacon Chain has been running without problems for over a year now.

The testnet for the second phase of ETH2 - which is when the execution chain is merged into the Beacon Chain so that Ethereum can fully switch from PoW to PoS and reduce its energy consumption by 99.95% - was launched on December 20th, 2021:

https://blog.ethereum.org/2021/12/20/kintsugi-merge-testnet/

The second phase is expected to be completed before the end of 2022.
If that would be the case, then it would also then manifest in behavioral traits of non-human primates, since they would not yet have this relatively recent adaptation.
I've written several APIs and middlewares for freight, inventory, WMS and OMS platforms. You absolutely can represent data with json over "archaic" xml, and edi.

I set up our company with EDI through sps commerce - we didn't want to build a tight integration so we exchange flat files on SFTP.
Are there current plans for a lidar derived surface elevation tile from mapbox?

Even the USGS 3DEP program only offers preprocessed DEMs (that is, DTMs). I can see generating that sort of thing at ~5-10m resolution on a global scale from satellite imagery / photogrammetry.

A global or even regional DSM would be quite a product.
I've began to answer, at least to myself, the question of "how is this legal?" with: it makes rich people a lot of money.
They have similar stability as USD. The crypto community is overusing the USD conversion ban argument, but there are easy ways around it.
It's not advice. It's just what I do.

I've never had a contract that explicitly stated I couldn't work multiple jobs. (I work multiple full time jobs now)
Growing up poor white trash gives me a completely different perspective and makes me crass enough to say go fuck yourself you entitled prick.
The U.S. does prevent trade with other countries.

From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_embargo_against_...

“In 1999, President Bill Clinton expanded the trade embargo by also disallowing foreign subsidiaries of U.S. companies to trade with Cuba.“

“The United States has threatened to stop financial aid to other countries if they trade non-food items with Cuba.”

I was there in the brief time when U.S. citizens were permitted by the U.S. government to visit on cruises. During my stay, I was constantly reminded that I was disallowed to spend money there on unsanctioned activities.
As others have said, you need friends who don't drink.

From there, you go have fun. Shortly you begin to wonder why people think drinking is tied to fun at all.
I love that this thread popped up when it did, as part of a new years resolutions of sorts I decided to start writing short stories and have been thinking about this topic quite a lot. For me it depends, when I know exactly what I need to say, it's pretty quick 70-80 WPM or so, that's with the pauses, edits, etc.. If am really struggling to come up with the words, it's probably closer to 10 or 20. One of the perks of being able to burst type though, and I don't really have a better term for it, I'm able to just kinda tense my muscles and 'jiggle' my fingers in fast succession, is that I can backspace and move the cursor _very_ quickly on the edits. Typing is a means to an end though, the hardest part of writing is ensuring the communication fits the bill. If the bug is tricky, for example, my words per minute can turn into words per day :)

Being a programmer probably allows me to be faster than a lot of other speed typers for specific tasks, but I'm nowhere near as fast as they tend to be for straight word counts where the numbers tend to look like 100% accuracy at 200+ WPM. As an example, I always set my text editors to backspace both words, and sentences (ctrl+backspace, and shift+backspace). This trick, jiggling, and good searching, allows me to move through code _much_ faster than most other programmers I've meet. The only exceptions have been people who've setup and mastered vim, (sorry emacs folks, I've just never encountered any of you in the wild) and I've been slowly been working on gaining proficiency there.

Another user pointed out that there is a zen mode for monkeyType, I'm trying it out on this post. I just sat down to write for the night and I'm using this as my warmup (going this fast requires it for me). I knew a good bit of what I've wanted to say as I started this post but there have been some pauses and edits.

MonkeyType claimed 72 for this comment, bit faster than I would have guessed, I'm curious as to how realistic that number really is!
It goes back even further, to a word game from 1955, though I'm sure it's been invented earlier. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jotto
Absolutely, Vasili. If waiting around for 9 years for truffles was the main pursuit of an entire orchard, that's probably a waste of time and land.
If I remember correctly, the system font size couldn't be changed independently of the DPI, at least not in a supported way. You could change it yourself on a per-window basis, but a well-behaved app is not supposed to do that.

Fixed layouts is orthogonal to all that - so long as those fixed layouts are defined in DPI-independent units, they will scale just fine. FWIW in WinForms (and also Delphi VCL, where this originated) you'd normally use anchors to design layouts that scale when the window is resized. Granted, it's nowhere near as flexible as proper layout containers - which WinForms (2.0+) also has, and which the visual form designer also supports, although it can be a pain to work with them.
Maybe there's no pill, but there are several procedures...
Why not?

Seriously. I'm not saying it should necessarily be public information, but "I don't wanna" isn't a good reason for anything. What damage is done to you because someone knows you make $45k vs. $145k vs. $445k? You are not harmed in any way. But the people making $45k while all their coworkers are making $95k have some information that they can use to objectively improve the lives of them and their families.

I say this as someone who is the highest paid person on my team. I stand to gain basically nothing from having salaries published, whether anonymous or not. But I still think it could be done in a way that helps underpaid and underrepresented people.
Thanks for the heads-up, I just tried it out, somehow never noticed it before!
It's not 76% accuracy of the final text--it's 100% accurate, it's just that the way you get there using the CharaChorder is recognized by Monkeytype as inaccurate.

If I type the word "hello" on my CharaChorder, I type the keys `helo` which Monkeytype will recognize as an inaccuracy. The CC's internal firmware then recognizes I typed helo and wanted hello and will backspace the word and replace it, much as if you did the same thing.

Do this on enough words where the chord trigger doesn't line up with the chord and you get the ~75% number.

But the final text is 100% accurate
ama – A system to amalgamate any features you want into any language you need
I'm a bit of shocked of how many dead pixels are on the display shown on the photo in the article.
That's where we get back to my original point - the goal of these measures is not to ensure that there are no loopholes, but rather to make it difficult enough that the vast majority won't be able to / won't bother to use them.
There's also the whole field of radio signal propagation, the cellular industry regularly uses essentially the same type of product to model shading of cell tower signals.
Even if I dont have signatures in my code, can I use it to get stdlib/gems signatures?
> The amount of energy consumed by the network will continue to increase, as it should, as it secures more wealth.

this is very apt. after exhausting the worlds resources guarding our money from each other maybe we'll reflect that it was money that was the bad idea and bitcoin was just an implementation detail
Ah yes, a bunch of silver-spooned layabouts, who happened to be able to read and write thousands of years ago, serve as a monument to man's ability to convince himself he's not just a sack of meat that's slowly rotting, thought by pointless thought -- and not just the collected writings of amateur poets who had no sense of prose.

There is no mind. There is no body. Any separation and categorization of groups of ever swapped-out atoms is arbitrary.

To a krill living in the ocean, there is no mind, or body, or any such nonsense about thought. There is simply food and not food.

To the universe, there is none but itself. And itself is all there is.
>the accumulation of capital is what's truly exploitative

When I think of "accumulation of capital" in modern society, semiconductor fabs are the ultimate example.

I can't imagine disagreeing that the building of such factories encompasses most of the world via supply chains and most of the exploitation in it.

But I feel like there's an ambiguity and I don't understand what is to be our goal.

Should we not have "accumulations of capital"? That is, should we tear down (and hopefully recycle) all of the incredibly expensive factories?

Or should we have accumulations of capital that are not owned by specific people? What is ownership?

I don't know about the real Mafia, but in fiction, there is the trope of the wealthy mob boss who owns nothing on paper, in order to avoid the law, but relies on relationships to define what he has.

On the other hand, many large companies are presently not majority owned by any human being, but mainly by collective entities like index funds. Is that good enough? Or is that irrelevant to an economic system because some people own more index funds than others?
And that is a good thing, no?
Matsutake are prized for their odor, not their taste, and to the non-cognoscenti they smell like urine.
So broken that the original inventors aren't even part of the conversation, because neither the plaintiff or defendant invented any of this.
Despite your framing, I'm actually curious about your criticisms. To me, a federated world is strictly better than the increasingly centralized world we find ourselves in. Are you suggesting anything less than fully decentralized is not worth the effort?
I've priced them all out. It's orders of magnitude difference in cost.

12kw gasoline generator: $5k

12kw solar: $25k + $20k in batteries
If you liked all those books, I'd also recommend Den of Thieves, about the junk bond trading in the 80s.

I've read an interesting book about Bear Stearns but unfortunately I dont remember the name, it was > 10 years ago.

If you haven't read The Big Short, or seen the movie, it is a pretty popular one
Achieving lift, presumably.
Rarity + good !> Common + good.

In fact, if you don't care for the social prestige, common and good things are better because they're more easily accessible at better prices.
Yeh that was my thought, I only got as far as that flow chart. It's missing a path from "your manager hears you out" to "you get fired because they've decided it's better for them if you go now".

And while that may be better in the long term, it's not so good if you want to keep earning while you find your next move.
Despite that, people were healthier day-to-day. Less obesity.
If you're self-employed your FICA rate basically doubles. Depending on your state, that means your tax burden at $40K could be ~$9-12K. Even with a subsidy you're looking at another $2-3K for health insurance. That makes your take-home less than $30K, 25% less than what GP proposed was sufficient income for basic comfort.
No, I don't, is this something you think it'd make sense for me to request?
I agree 100% that learning from the people around you is paramount.

But I disagree with the idea that you can't/shouldn't do that in an academic setting. During my undergrad, a lot of the more driven students were always bothering the professors for help. Those students often brought back gold nuggets of information while working on a team with them. It made me regret not doing so more myself.

Though to be fair, the assignment doesn't really change in academia - that's true. Those students aren't asking the professor if the requirements changed; they're bouncing ideas, and asking for further explanation.
If we're going to talk about polarization, it behooves us to bring up that this isn't a either-or topic: you could take risks and succeed, avoid risks and stagnate, but also take risks and fail as well as avoid risks and succeed.

If we're really going meta, it might also be appropriate to think about our tendency to attribute causation to simple inputs (i.e. either X or Y), when in reality, there may have been a mix of multiple things.

For example, the author attributes the existence of the palladium site to be a result of interest in governance, but wouldn't his background in engineering (instead of, say, rice farming) also logically have something to do with the physical manifestation of a website?

The idea that I think should be questioned is the one about "hacking life" in the sense of going all in on a single thing. In investment, that's called diversification. In nutrition, it's called a balanced diet. But for some reason, in some endeavors, moderation gets shunned (work hours in startups come to mind)
I don’t have any skin in this game, but you have my praise for finding a way to mention three of the greatest philosophers in a single post.
> No reason why my coworkers should make more or less than me if we have the same title.

Of course there is. You wrote a book and they didn't. They have more relevant experience than you. The hiring manager really wanted you but you had a competing offer and they didn't. They are young and wanted more equity and you wanted higher cash.

There are a whole host of reasons why people in the same title can make wildly different salaries - they're not all nefarious.
This is about Brave. Change my mind Vivaldi is better if you want to assert your opinion.

Tor, Webtorrent support are nice. Not sure if Vivaldi does this.

edit: No I doubt it's about someone's emotional hissy fit post w/ 18.1k views and 31 likes.
At present, you can move a repo between forges by cloning it locally and pushing it back up. However, you lose the issues/milestones/PR comments etc.

Federation is useful since it defines a portable standard for those things.

If you have an account on federated forge site A, you can use it to file bugs (via the forge A UI) against a project on federated forge site B.

Both websites UI will show the bug and any comments on it - data will be replicated.

In practice, there'll likely be complexities around EG moderation (particularly for larger projects making controversial decisions), replication occasionally losing data due to intermittent faults, etc. IMO those technical reasons are less likely to sink the project than inertia is; people are already using github.
In financial terms, it's even worse than that, because he ate the truffle instead selling it.
Level Up Infosec
I've had Solar for 10 Years Was it Worth it? [video]
Register mapping is much harder, because you're going many->few, rather than the reverse.

On the plus side you don't need to translate x87.
> I'm aware of many people who were hired who brought negative value. A salary history of low wages is a red flag for such.

Is it really? If someone's bouncing between jobs, doing a terrible job at each of them, why would their salary history be likely to reflect it? A given company might fire them, but lowering someone's pay to indicate poor performance is not common.

> Just try hiring a minimum wage worker as CEO for your next company, and see how well that works out.

That has nothing to do with what they were paid and everything to do with their experience. No one's discussing not talking about experience.
To preface my comment, I totally agree with your take away. Prioritize your own success above any other company, organization, or individuals success.

However, I can't help but feel you're painting with an overly broad brush. There absolutely are CEO's out there who would lie awake at night after laying people off a week before Christmas. Does that mean they wouldn't do it? No. They, like all of us, will ultimately make the decisions they need to make to succeed.

It may be comforting for you to imagine that everyone in a position of power over you is some evil super-villain devoid of empathy or emotion, but that isn't always the case. Things aren't that black and white.

Again I agree with your general sentiment. Be greedy and ruthless in your career. Don't make decisions that benefit your employer to your own detriment. Look out for yourself. 100%. I'm just not a fan of absolute statements like yours and wanted to add that businesses are ran by people too, and while some may be complete sociopaths, not all of them are.
This may not be the case where you are, but it illustrates the things that you can't see that could color interactions.

I was hired into a highly prestigious team. My manager always seemed gruff; I worried that he regretted hiring me.

About eight months in, he had back surgery for a slipped disc. Suddenly, he was fun, joking, smiles. I realized that all the time before, he had been in pain.

Later, a friend in HR broke the rules and showed me the notes from my interviews. My manager had said something like, "He didn't understand how X works, but after I explained it to him, he understood how to solve the problem." And this exact quote: "We should try to hire him for my team." I felt such pride.

When I later had a medical crisis, he turned out to be very empathetic. "Take care of you. We'll be here when you get back," or something along those lines. This was the guy I thought hated me.
Wouldn't it be possible to do a vector product with the wrong RGB gamma ramp to get a resulting color profile that would work system-wide? (as it may be easier to change the color profile than the RGB gamma ramp)