skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It's a combination of several factors: American kids foods tend to be heavily processed and run to sweet, which will set the baseline if you let it, and there's this widespread belief that children won't eat grownup food so you should offer something else.

We only offer what we're eating and, unsurprisingly, he has learned that as normal. That doesn't mean he eats everything — bitter flavors really are a learned taste — but he'll eat enough of it to get proper nutrition and understands that rejecting dinner means getting a second pass later rather than something else. We're also not monsters so there's always some high-probability staple in the meal so it might be that e.g. he eats the fish and sweet potatoes/kale chips but not the squash, which is acceptable. There are also some amusing outcomes: I haven't had asparagus tips in a year or two because he eats those happily but not the base.
3 lights could also work:

1 - actually nothing

2 - maybe something

3 - actually something
John Deere's Self-Driving Tractor Stirs Debate on AI in Farming
I prefer a top down where project leads are responsible for code, I.e. they review all code and they are simultaneously responsible for getting things done. It forces balance. I will let juniors make a mess in certain areas and not others. Sometimes you even let bugs in if you know a specific test will fail so people are more careful and don't depend on reviews too much. If you are a bad lead and nitpick every little thing, then you get to explain why your project isn't ready. Honestly getting devs to git add -p and look over their own pr catches much of it.
I think we all are willing to bet on your side.

People will kitt out their cars after this, but having lived in PA, NY and DC I can firmly say that in PA and NY I owned a brush, had water in the car and the like.In DC I legit brushed it off with my gloves.

6" was enough to just not go to work.
It is still a thing. Hell, even AWS let someone create an account with my email address without validation. Stupid system kept spamming me to alert me that the instance of whatever they spun up was stopped because there was no money in the account.
I haven't watched the move 100 times, but there is something I think isn't addressed. If the "war" ended tomorrow, and all the humans are freed, freed into what? You wind up with billions of naked hungry adults wandering around, no food, no sunlight, all going to die quickly.
This is too crazy for even 50's sci-fi to dream up. "Troutinator II, in theatres now! Underwater, nobody can hear you blurb blurb!"
Embedding copyrighted images into social media posts without the necessary publishing rights has already been found to be illegal in some cases:[1]

> Federal courts are split, and recent rulings found that embedding social media posts on third-party websites could be copyright infringement.

> Some decisions have even stated that while social media sites “clearly foresee the possibility of entities…using web embeds to share other users’ content, none of them expressly grants a sublicense to those who embed publicly posted content.” The courts rejected motions to dismiss for fair use, stating that sharing such content is not a transformative use.

A seller who embeds a copyrighted image into an NFT marketplace listing without the necessary publishing rights and then sells the NFT would be more likely to be liable for copyright infringement than the social media embedder. This is because commercial use of copyrighted content is less likely to satisfy the fair use criteria:[2]

> Purpose and character of the use, including whether the use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes: Courts look at how the party claiming fair use is using the copyrighted work, and are more likely to find that nonprofit educational and noncommercial uses are fair. This does not mean, however, that all nonprofit education and noncommercial uses are fair and all commercial uses are not fair; instead, courts will balance the purpose and character of the use against the other factors below. Additionally, “transformative” uses are more likely to be considered fair. Transformative uses are those that add something new, with a further purpose or different character, and do not substitute for the original use of the work.

Someone who sells an NFT without publishing rights is harming the market for NFTs derived from the copyrighted work. This also reduces the chance that a fair use defense would be accepted in court:[2]

> Effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work: Here, courts review whether, and to what extent, the unlicensed use harms the existing or future market for the copyright owner’s original work. In assessing this factor, courts consider whether the use is hurting the current market for the original work (for example, by displacing sales of the original) and/or whether the use could cause substantial harm if it were to become widespread.

[1] https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/is-embedding-socia...

[2] https://www.copyright.gov/fair-use/more-info.html
It's still there.

https://www.volvocars.com/us/care-by-volvo/

There are a bunch of manufacturers doing "subscription" models now. I believe Porsche, Lexus, BMW and Audi have either offered or are still offering something along the same lines.
As trustworthy as any Linux distro repository. Which is to say, everything built from public sources, and much of it patched and audited. I'm very grateful for F-Droid.
I can't disagree with this more.

Money is a means to obtain immense happiness. It is the medium one uses to secure housing, food, and the future ability to acquire the same without struggle. These are incredibly important things, and themselves sources of happiness.

The phrase "money doesn't make you happy" may be true--but it's misleading.
https://wayfire.org — you're welcome :)
I've heard the phrase: You see people going fast on one-wheels, but you never see the same person doing so twice.
Facebook groups pulling parents towards vaccine misinformation
A drop indeed, a drop in a bucket. In total fireworks resulted in about 400 emergency room visits in 2019-2020 on a population of 17 million.

So this went from about 5 visits per emergency location per year to about 2. Totally and completely insignificant.
I don't think that was in dispute
As a thought experiment, could it be a units translation issue?

A person who lived 175 seasons (each 3 months long) would be 44 years old. A person who lived 900 moons would be 74.

It’s happened to spacecraft, http://www.cnn.com/TECH/space/9909/30/mars.metric.02/
It’s pretty alienating to the vast majority of underage minds who don’t have their own credit cards, as well as a tremendous amount of people outside the US who have different payment systems.

Personally, I use it to support public content, because I have the means to do so now, and because I didn’t always.
We've switched from "Is the Old Testament historically accurate?" (which was the HTML doc title, not something the submitter made up, but still too baity) to the page title, which seems more factual and neutral.
> If everyone was a sociopath it would fall apart pretty quickly

What if 1% of the population were sociopaths?
Also parents are the caretakers of children. If they're sick or incapacitated or die, that's going to have a negative impact on children. As will having a greater number of essential workers becoming sick or dying.
If you don’t need a blockchain what makes this web3? I thought that was supposed to be the defining feature.

If it’s just cryptographically signing things we’ve had that ability since PGP came out.
Complain how? In older times we could just mail the company now the support page has stupid chat bots that do nothing, and you have to fight with it or the damn page for 5 mins before you can send a mail. Most of the times I just give up. And if we complain for every site takes too much time. And it will boil down to "sure sir, but thata how it is"
What happens when you prod a gas tank with a screwdriver?
Usually if you manually hold back the vapor guard, the gas pump will still work. I know this because you have to do it to fill most motorcycles because their tanks aren't designed to fit the vapor guard, much less have it create a seal.
Regardless of how well prepared you are to comfortably hunker down in your vehicle, unless you're truly in no mans land without any reachable alternatives for shelter, it's best to lock up the vehicle with a note on the dash and make your way to a shelter out of harms way. Preferably by way of a route that is not along the road, even if it's more difficult.

It's never safe to be arbitrarily stopped on a road, even if you're on the shoulder. Even if you're under the impression no other vehicles will be going fast enough to not see your vehicle or cause an energetic crash. The last thing you want is to be sleeping in your stuck vehicle when a jack-knifed semi takes the roof off.

Unless I know I'm going to be in extremely isolated/rural areas, I prefer to be equipped for a hiking excursion more than a prolonged unplanned car-camping scenario. A stuck car on a thoroughfare is a very unsafe place to be, especially in slippery/poor-vis. conditions.
15% is just straight up daylight robbery. Shockingly brazen.

For comparison XMRig's default developer donation is 5% and can easily be changed to 1%. (It's open source of course, so only slightly less easily changed to 0.)
tl;dr: He does some philanthropy and collects art, but the article doesn't say anything more about that.

----

Also

> Norton AntiVirus, which eventually became the best-known Norton-branded product

If you ask me, this was, and always will be, Norton Commander. Anti-viruses are a dime a dozen, and Norton's didn't outshine others. But the two-column sub-columnized folder display - which NC either invented or perfected - was a UI design gem.
> I really, really hope that GETTR doesn't turn out to be another Parler.

That seems like wishful thinking. "So you got banned for good reason, come here!" is a recipe for a Parler.

> I want a social media platform that everybody feels comfortable using, and that nobody's banned from.

That's literally impossible. A community will quickly become dysfunctional if it can't regulate its members' behavior, and a dysfunctional community is not appealing to "everybody." Banning is one of the most important tools for managing user behavior in an online community.

I think it's pretty clear that extreme forms of the "marketplace of ideas" simply don't work (e.g. ones where everyone is expected to sort through a haystack of lies to find a needle of truth), because probably a majority of people lack the time and/or competence to find that needle, and will instead pick some lie and then fight for it. Two truths and a lie can work, ten-thousand lies and a truth cannot.
I suppose it depends on the type of data? If those are e.g. video files, I don't suppose there are many 1kB files...
This is like saying my Python app is written in C because Python is C.
Sure, though systemd does support the inetd style setup also.
Anathem by Neal Stephenson has some of that vibe. If you haven't read it, I'd recommend reading it without even glancing at the Wikipedia page or plot synopses to avoid conceptual spoilers.
yeah I didn't discover veggies actually being good until adulthood when I learned you can just throw a little oil and salt and roast them in the oven.

My parents always steamed them to hell and put almost no salt on
You mentioned that induced demand is bad; someone pointed out that induced demand is not bad, but actually evidence of increased efficiency; someone else elaborated that the contrapositive is equally insane- if induced demand through efficiency is bad, then reduced demand through inefficiency is good- along with an example of the implementation of what you are asserting noone is proposing.

Caution against the short-sighted pursuit of easily-quantifiable goals at the expense of actual value is not 'arguing in bad faith'.
You got downvoted for the overly simplistic reduction. But many of the new "features" of modern Windows are exactly what we used to call "spyware" and "adware" in the 2000s: Barely useful tools, if at all, that tried their best to promote other tools from the manufacturer, tried to dark-pattern their way out of being uninstalled and for which we had to use specialized tools for their detection & removal.

With that era acting as hindsight, and specially taking into account the anti-trust suit they lost for bundling IE, the fact that Windows ships with such software now feels like very lazy satire.
> Sure, multiple independent sites could individually ban you. That's a fundamentally different problem, and much much less likely.

Wouldn't there be a common, shared list of malicious wallets that can be automatically blocked?

Ublock Origin doesn't update its ad domains list itself, it relies on a number of lists that other people have created. I've never had to lift a finger ever since I installed UBO.
"Please don't pick the most provocative thing in an article or post to complain about in the thread. Find something interesting to respond to instead."

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
Videos of Stanford Course on Web Security
Are the parts of India where ivermectin helped places where worms are common? https://astralcodexten.substack.com/p/ivermectin-much-more-t...
That is the method that is apparently common in France. I recommend this book:

https://www.theguardian.com/books/2012/jan/20/french-childre...
I'll never know. :(
If democratically-elected government disappears, something will fill that power void, and they will control that arsenal. Who knows what could happen with them.
> Also violative of Disney’s rights to Cinderella’s name and likeness.

How the fuck can they have any rights to her name?!? I'm fairly sure that's been the name used in English for the heroine of that story from the first English translation of the folk-tale collection of the brothers Grimm. (Or does this particular story predate even that; maybe Perrault or La Fontaine?)
Please don't take HN threads into religious flamewar. It's the last thing we want here, and it's particularly easy to avoid.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
On the other hand Theranos and by extension Holmes had a duty to the patients which they clearly breached. It's definitely more clear cut in terms of negligence.
Only if town bar isn't a place people want to be. I call it a good thing is bad towns die.
I thought Q Continuum and Q as individuals existed outside of normal spacetime, although I do like the line of reasoning you have traced.
>rayon = "*".

Doesn't this either effectively force you to pin versions to ensure your code doesn't break or require you to constantly re-test your code to ensure there wasn't a breaking change? I don't see how that's a desirable thing.

>How do I add multi-threading to my project in a way that allows me to run a function on all available cores in two lines of code

The author had to rewrite the project in a different language to add this cross platform multi-threading support. I'm not saying you can do this in two lines of code, the code likely needs some modifications and some considerations, but it's definitely easier to just use one of the multiple cross-platform threading libraries available (or even to write your own) and adapt the code to use it than it is to rewrite a whole project in rust.

It's a little bit disingenuous to suggest that in rust any parallel processing task in any project out there can be achieved with 2 lines of code, it's like claiming that OMP can be effectively used by any C codebase with just a 1 line #pragma. If you write your code with the intention of using rayon for your multi-threading tasks then obviously it will not require any modification to make it work with rayon because presumably you had already written your code in a way that makes it usable with rayon. If you write your C code with the intention of using it with your multi-platform threading library of choice then it won't require changes to make it use that library.
> including the ability to not work anymore

I have two takes on this.

The first is: I've met people who don't work. They're some of the most boring and wasteful people I've ever met.

Lying down on a beach, or watching tv 12 hours a day (random cliches), get boring after some time.

So one's going to look for something more meaningful and committed (in best case...), which brings to the second point: anything that's going to take a consistent share of one's like, inevitably becomes "work".

Morale of the story: there is no freedom from work. But there's the option to pursue the work one likes :)
Is there any restrictions on this option? Eg only children of the same parent process are allowed to bind to same port. Otherwise how does the packet distribution work? And how does the response from that port work?
That is insane.

What happened next? Does a patient get tossed for that? Are criminal charges brought? Did you test for any STI?

Your perspective on life is fantastic. Cheers.
for credibility
>zero down; only $xxx per month on a two year contract, then get a new one.

Isn't this your average vehicle lease agreement, in simple terms?
Sure, should have mentioned that, and perhaps namespaces too.
You just used request to define request. This isn't working.
And no mask/Vax mandates.
Priority was given to running an empire, which didn't require too much mechanical ingenuity, just political ingenuity.
The question only ever asked by people in no danger (or who believe they're in no danger) of the consequences of what they propose.
I didn't say they don't work. They clearly work to significantly reduce deaths and hospitalizations. I totally agree on this. But they didn't stop the spread anywhere in the world. If you want to paint me with your stereotypes, go ahead.
> That being said, if (major if) auth through web3 did take off, I wouldn't be surprised if over time it slowly creeped back toward a solution that doesn't use blockchain since a non-blockchain solution would probably be simpler, cheaper, and faster.

I don't think you necessarily need blockchain. Can't you just prove that you are who you say by signing something and sending it to the service? You can just use the protocol.
What percentage of all web logins are using web3 vs web2? When we say "work" here, we mean taking market share.
>You’re exactly right- but it isn’t a timeless problem.

It's a timeless problem insofar that it dates back to ancient times while remaining unsolved today.
This is very high quality advice and worth a read if you are interested in working for a FAANG.
Building an entirely new bridge isn't going to be cheaper than adding more cars to BART. Even assuming it was (which it wasn't), it's not going to help as much as you think it is. Not sure if you've ever commuted on the San Mateo bridge, but it's basically fully backed up from the exits onto 101, because 101 is also grid-locked. So in addition to building an entirely new bridge (which, again, more expensive than adding more cars to BART), you also need to add more lanes to 101.
Ask HN: What are your favorite newsgroups on Usenet?
For those using Usenet what are some of your favorite newsgroups?
You can go up and down though.

Again, I'm not making a value judgement here. Transit is a valid option that could be better
> this started out a positive thread talking about Linux composing managers and there wasn’t any need for anyone to start arguing about how much better Windows was but that happened.

That isn't what happened, this is my point about taking things personally. Let's look at what was actually said:

> Compiz was great at drawing curious people in but I'd argue that Compiz helped many people write off Linux.

After which that opinion was elaborated to say that despite the attraction of the window effects, Linux's issues during the time period in question drove people away and left them with the impression that Linux was all gimmick that couldn't hold up to serious use.

Your response to this was:

> I switched to Linux full time before Compiz took off and did so for exactly the reasons you cited the other platforms were superior: Linux was more stable, easier to reason with (as it was doing less magic behind the scenes), components worked better with each other since POSIX is designed for interoperability.

Which, at least to me and apparently nebula, sounded a lot like the "no, Linux is great actually" defensive anecdote you see every time anyone says anything negative about Linux. Worse, you didn't even engage with what was being said, only saying that you had a great experience. What does that have to do with the argument presented?

> That’s literally the point of social platforms. You cannot post an opinion on a public forum and then declare that other people are forbidden to rely.

There are useful replies and then there's tired old defensive performative argumentation. I'm arguing that 'I had a good time with Linux' in the context of what was posted is much more the latter than the former. I might be a touch too sensitive to this sort of thing after hearing it out of Linux Desktop evangelists for 20 goddamned years, though.

> Yes. Happens all the time and on any topic. [...] Eg this started out a positive thread talking about Linux composing managers and there wasn’t any need for anyone to start arguing about how much better Windows was but that happened.

Take a look back at the original nebula post and you will see that he only ever mentioned Windows negatively.
I think if Korean kids can love kimchi, Italian kids can love eggplant, and Mexican kids can love nopales you must be able to condition kids to like anything.
Yes, combustion is internal. Compare this to an external combustion engine, like a steam engine, which uses an external heat source to boil water.
OK, you're right. From my experiences with relatives, it takes several days.

The problem with doing what you said immediately is "false positives." Up to the 1800s, being buried alive was a very common fear, probably because it really happened sometimes. They didn't have any way of measuring brain activity, even an imperfect one like we have now.
If you ever played music, you know it consists of parts. Say, a percussion part, a bass part, a rhythm guitar part, a lead guitar part, a vocal part, etc.
Technically, it should be possible to pass a file descriptor to a docker process, but I haven't seen that before.

I don't like all parts of systemd but I think the socket activation is pretty elegant. The decoupling also allows to bind on port 80 and 443 (because systemd runs as root), and then still have Caddy run as a user process. I think it would unlock nice things for Caddy.
> The problem is not with code reviews but with how ... they have become.

Perhaps "banal" is the word you are meant to use.

There's a saying about that a 10 line PR will get 10 comments, but a 1000 line PR will get a "looks good!".

Of course this is not really what is happening. A 10 line PR can be completely unintelligible and a 1000 line PR might be a joy to read.

Once the code base has become a ball of mud, no one really bothers to review anything properly - it's going to take as long as writing it yourself. So perhaps, we get picky about some worn out code style point (incorrect indent etc) just to show we are alive.
You're making the assumption that there is no value in the development itself. Tackling unique problems can be invaluable to building skills, can be a lot of fun, and can be relaxing.

All of those things can be extremely valuable uses of one's time, even if you assume that the product itself had absolutely zero value to anyone.
Obviously when you realize that there is critical mass of dense people you want to use phrase that is more clear.