skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The number of cores available on M1 is a consequence of Apple's product lineup. There is no 64-core M1 yet because there is no product for it. Yet.
ah, that's what I meant—I didn't realize it had been renamed!
It's astounding to watch businesses just demand workers without the willingness to pay what the free market demands. Some of those restaurant workers upskilled to better jobs so don't expect them to go back to lower paying jobs if they can.
Those technologies reduce inputs - a good thing. They don't reduce the use of labor.

But just as much, all these technologies can be used with large scale, industrial agriculture.
> tolerance and withdrawal

I think they mean truly physical, like DTs for alcohol, and dope sickness for heroin. You don't get those types of symptoms from MJ withdrawals.
You comment reminds me of one of my favorite short stories, Harry Turtledove's "The Road Not Taken": https://eyeofmidas.com/scifi/Turtledove_RoadNotTaken.pdf
A few comments pointing out the correlation to spiritual / mystical communities. I know many engineers who use or have used and have fallen deeper into their hustle life style. I would say that it helps you explore yourself, be that chakras or crypto.
100%. And it's actually just like you're making cool new foreign female friends while traveling.
Source for the “optional” thing? I tried searching for this but didn’t find anything.
Indian Railways Plans Four New Bullet Train Corridors Connecting 9 Cities
But there is some limit to the number of lanes you can add, even theoretically from a topological perspective, but more imminently from a practical standpoint of limited budgets and ability to tear down existing non-road infrastructure.
This article doesn't add up the points to anything that solves for the given problem. Owning identity isn't solved by saying "don't trust ${third party}! Come trust ${my preferred third party}, it's better!" Any blockchain is still a third party that all parties involved with need to place trust in. It isn't somehow more or less trustworthy just because it exists.

> Many people, including myself, believe that the individual should be able to own their own identity.

Yes, this is nice wishful thinking, but on a global scale it's not really possible or feasible.

> OAuth2 should be used for what it was intended to, which is for a web service to provide another web service with a user’s data given that user’s consent. It should not be used as a global digital identifier because that’s too important to be owned by anyone but the individual themselves.

So, instead of OAuth being in the hands of FAANG[1] it's in the hands of ${blockchain-of-the-year}? How does moving the trust from a centralized company to a centralized blockchain change MY ownership? If I move everything away from FAANG to someone's blockchain, I have no assurance that chain will continue existing. If there's a flaw found in it and everyone moves to another chain, now what? Sure, we can make the same claim about FAANG not continuing to exist, but the point is there's no inherent advantage here, they're equal. FAANG are supported by millions of individuals and companies that are all, together invested in their success. There's no unilateral agreement on blockchains and I doubt there ever will be.

>With social recovery, instead of having to trust Google, you can choose who you trust, and instead trust a given set of friends, family, and services.

Again with the trust this and not that. All of my friends, family and other services need to then agree that they're all going to trust ${chain} instead of FAANG. It doesn't fix the problem. "the blockchain" isn't just one thing. Who's chain do we all shift trust to and from and based on what security? At least with Google I can rely on their security because if they end up with a breach of trust it's going to have a massive, real impact on share prices and consumer trust around the globe. That's incentive enough for me to rely on it day-to-day.

This article has some interesting tidbits but overall seems like just a baseless rally against FAANG by someone who knows very little about complex authentication or trust and security in the real world.

[1]https://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/faang-stocks.asp
Well some ancient alien conspiracy theories suggest nuclear bombs have been dropped on different parts of the planet.

Mahabharata a short distance from Jodpur in India, which Oppenheimer commented on.

Mohenjo Daro in Pakistan

Nuclear destruction of Sumer linked with the Anunnaki.

Pyramids in other places around the planet besides Egypt, its possible mainstream history isnt telling us everything or we have a sanitised version of history.
Location: US

Remote: yes

Willing to relocate: yes

Technologies: Rust | Javascript+Typescript | HTML+CSS | Go | Python | Java | C

Resume: https://www.bytedude.com/resume/

Email: marcin@realemail.net
Yeah, at best we have the-turn-of-the-century (millennium?). Though mid-turn doesn't seem quite right either.
I mean, I understand why someone might say that, but I think that's actually a critique of western medicine in general rather than this study in particular. In that I think it's understood that studies like this are measuring harms with commonly understood (but hard to rigorously define because you don't know what you don't know) limits.

We've found new harms for medicines or treatments many times, and in each case we generally had previous studies that missed those harms. It's always possible, so calling it out about mushrooms in particular feels odd because the same critique applies to the western approach to every other medicine.
Put ads before you have a product. Send people to a fake landing page when they click, just to see if there's interest at all.
But I wasn’t sweeping up all recipe blogs, only those that are festooned with obnoxious ads. As to moral cleanliness (wow) it matters what use the recipe will be put to. If I just want to cook something, it’s fair use. If I am setting out to scrape massively and create my own spammy site, that’s not cool obviously. Please consider more angles here.
I've had very similar thoughts and feelings - before wfh started, some people in my cube would always say good morning etc when they arrive, and I started panicking that I didn't say hi to others, or in a group meeting where I really didn't have anything to say and stayed silent and smiling.

Then I began to think how would I feel had I acted like X and X who initiated the interaction and participated in the conversation? My answer to that is, I would probably be clueless on how to carry on the conversation and feel awkward not knowing how to stop / concluding the small talk of the morning. That's when I realized I don't enjoy initiating such interactions. Later, I realized that the real reason is that I fear I'll be perceived as less cool or less cheerful than others, but is this an actual problem, though? I've concluded that it's not, for me - I'm in a team that thankfully doesn't push everyone to have the same temperament and I just need to socialize in a way that's comfortable to myself: I might not want to greet everyone everyday, but I could hold private conversations that's a little deeper than small talk which might make slightly stronger bounds.

BTW, Quiet is a great book that I highly recommend.
Wow. I've just used text.npr.org and I've realized that I forgot just how fast a website can be. Even on a current gen S21+ Ultra I've had the habit of "zoning" out for the few moments that I'm expecting a news website to load for. Thanks for the link!
Google's ranking algorithm is broken. Just yesterday I got one of those fake developer forums as the first result for a search. The second result was the stack overflow page that the fake result had scraped from. I've noticed they are censoring a lot of results related to the vaccines. I'm switching to duck duck go.
Out of curiosity, how are you measuring your calorie expenditure for these workouts?
Title differs from the source for whatever reason. Maybe the author edited out the misspelling.
Nobody cares what the agile manifesto says. The only way I have ever seen scrum manifest is as a daily meeting where everyone on the team reports their incremental daily progress to the manager. Of course, no developer actually makes uniform incremental daily progress so this really just turns into a demoralizing exercise in lying about what you did the previous day, punctuated by underselling the days where you actually got quite a bit done. Then you tune out as everyone else goes in their turn giving updates on something that doesn't affect what you're doing in any way whatsoever.

The best weeks are when the manager goes on vacation so you don't have to put up with the daily bullshit. Also, every manager swears their scrum isn't like this. And every one of them is wrong.
https://archive.fo/EyxYc
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. The problem of low wages isn’t that your margins are low and you’ll have to increase price of a sandwich to pay people enough.

The real problem is restaurants artificially lowering prices of a sandwich by paying people less for decades to the point people don’t realize that eating out used to be expensive. All the full service restaurants in my small town still do well. The ones that don’t are the sandwich shops where you pay $14 for a cold sandwich. Eating out is expensive and should be expensive if you want businesses to sustain themselves when there’s turmoil in the industry.
This small child has a better UX than many things I have been forced to implement. At least as it iterates, improvements occur that make the UX better and provide a more pleasant experience.
Surprised i had to scroll so far down the comments to see this reply among the sea of “but weed is addictive, despite everyone claiming otherwise”.

You are fully correct, people talk only about the physical component of addiction when it comes to drugs, because, as you said, literally anything can be psychologically addicting. Videogames, movies, tv shows, work, etc., all of those. If it is an activity or something you interact with, it can be psychologically addictive.

In light of that, I am confused by all those “but weed is addicting” comments. It is kind of obvious that the article is talking about physical addiction exclusively.
But I think you'd also be quite hard pressed to find any peer-reviewed study that shows a professional therapist yields better results regarding long-term detriment after exposure to psychedelics than mere access to health care when needed along with friends or whatever circumstance people find most enjoyable to take psychedelics in.

There's scant evidence that mandatory therapy sessions are the determining factor of whether or not psychedelics can be taken safely.

This is simply a poorly understood area, scientifically, due in part to government restriction on research. The intertwining of the therapy could mean psychedelics counteracted bad therapy, or the inverse, or neither.

I am going to offer a piece of opinion here that will offend the psychiatrists, psychedelics enthusiasts, and many of those with more conservative views about drug use: what if psychedelic drugs are just another form of entertainment for the mind, like television. What if our ancestors in places like indigenous communities in present-day Mexico actually first started taking them because it GAVE THEM SOMETHING TO DO and a reprieve from boredom, and the spiritual interpretations later just added to the entertainment. What if therapists and psychiatrists, lawmakers, doctors, parents, shaman are making much ado about nothing while injecting their own influence into the mix, particularly for the relatively low risk drugs.
How can you safeguard against programs like this one from Verizon?
I see these becoming more and more common and the goal posts keep moving. From cookies in your browser to now logging your actual browsing history at the ISP level.

What methods are there to avoid this type of information gathering, besides opting out - which IMO can't be trusted anyway.

Normally I'd ask this question on other forums, but I would really, really like to hear HN's take on this.
Recently learned about Bitwise funds. They seem reasonable on the surface but I haven't done much research.
The proposed hypothesis though is that unsuccessful nobles spread their "favorable genes" by descending into the lower classes. To fall that far you'd have to be deeply in debt and not particularly high status.
I think you articulated my point much better. The spiritual effect I was describing is definitely also:

"to them being almost completely fried/detached from reality"

What these researchers are doing in a lab on well adjusted humans with no psychedelic experience, and what happens when people take doses recreationally are two completely different things. Its like doing cocaine one time with a small dose and claiming it has no negative effects.
The end of software is coming – Peter Wang and Lex Fridman
edit: upon discussion with the parent, it appears that the parent was supporting the author's argument, not critiquing Chipotle or saying living wages require charging $15 for a $7 sandwich.

No...

> 4% price increase to get to a living wage. Not $15 sandwiches, just $7.28 instead of $7. Pay your employees. It's that simple.

This isn't in the article [0]. You're conflating revenues and wages.

Chipotle raising prices by 4% for EACH sandwich allows you to increase salaries by way more than 4% for employees.

Taking a $7 sandwich, a 4% increase yields...

[$7 sandwich] * [4% price increase] * [20 sandwiches/hr/employee] * [1hr/employee] = $5.60/hr/employee in incremental wages

[0] https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/08/chipotle-hikes-prices-to-cov...
It's not a big burden to update people, I've just seen the process abused so much that it becomes a colossal waste of time. Why can't I just post an asynchronous update to some group page at the end of the day?

> If you don't remember something the next day, it's probably not important enough to report anyway.

It can be a big enough deal and still take A LOT of effort to have all the abstractions ready in my mind for that meeting.
No one is against increasing access to healthcare. But I deliberately chose the example of healthcare costs to be analogous with people experiencing traffic congestion.
they'll fight other countries to deflect from internal problems
That only covers backlinks and authority, it's just one piece of the puzzle. Ironically, that's called a "black-hat" way of obtaining backlinks and authority. The "white-hat" way is to go to legit websites and purchase links, literally pay them to link your website. This is a great example of what's considered "ethical" in SEO
Prisons have many violent sociopaths. Studies on this are pretty clear.

There is, however, the weird outliers. There are those people with similar brain patterns that are not of the violent variety. They seem to succeed in business, for example.

I wouldn't be surprised if, for example, Steve Jobs or Bill Gates or Jeff Bezos or Elon Musk or Linus Torvalds (essentially the tech greats) were all sociopathic in some way.

FWIW, I am not a trained psychiatrist and am only speaking from the sort of popular psychology news articles and documentaries and TED talks I have seen on this particular topic.
That's literally the conversation though. Google has enough context to know that you want programming language results, not porn or gemstones.
This is such a cynical take. Some people travel to meet fun, interesting, and different people, while some locals are also interested in meeting fun, interesting, and different people.

Sure, you wont understand what it is really like to be a local resident from a single conversation, or spending a day together, but you can connect and learn more than you knew before.

You don't have to fetishize locals, to seek out their company and perspective over other tourists. Some of my fondest travel memories are from being invited into peoples homes for meals with their family, talking with them, and getting a tiny peak at their experience.
Physiological! This is a psychiatry journal!
Here's some pictures of what the US millitary replaced the Jerrycan with (A-A-59592 B):

https://www.google.com/search?tbm=isch&q=A%2DA%2D59592%20B&t...

> The National Stock Number is 7240-00-222-3088. It is considered obsolete by a new A-A-59592 B specification, having been replaced with high-density polyethylene versions.

A website with the scope and original development documents for the replacement of the traditional jerrycan (plenty of military bureaucracy went into this too): https://quicksearch.dla.mil/qsDocDetails.aspx?ident_number=2...
Rugby feels angry and aggressive about the situation, but in a joyful sort of way. Rugby throws its body at the situation while shouting. Then afterwards it shotguns a beer out of a boot and screams while beats its chest.

At least that’s what I gathered of the rugby stages of emotion when my girlfriend played.
https://wavianusa.com/
>Is that necessarily true? I think it's common to speak highly of talented individuals as being blessed with "raw intelligence" and the like.

In some circles, but in others there is a lot of push that 'it's hard work' or 'privilege' that makes some students test better. Along with lots of excuses like '<Student> doesn't test well' instead of 'maybe <student> just isn't that smart'. Recent pushes by groups in CA (and elsewhere) to remove advanced math tracks and remove SAT requirements for college are examples I'd consider emblematic. See also the amount of consternation and hand-wringing over IQ[0] as a metric in other sub-threads.

>The more unseemly thing is to characterize entire groups of individuals with that.

Most definitely agree: imo a lot of harm has been done to rational discourse by persons trying to justify and enforce their pet views of ethnic superiority.

[0]Hardly the be-all and end-all of intelligence, but people don't seem to have nearly the same hang-ups when discussing e.g. athlete's 40-yard dash times and the implications thereof for their performance in a higher dimensional environment like a football game.
Not just your electricity, but also your processor time, which you likely intended to use for something else.
In my browser, any edit anywhere in the left pane repaints the right pane AND scrolls it back up to top.
I mean, at some point isn't it reasonable to expect people to do some basic due diligence before dropping 10k on some metadata. If they don't, who's fault is that really?

Read the spec. Jeez (not aimed at you, just generalized exasperation).

https://ethereum.org/en/developers/docs/standards/tokens/erc...
What’s the recourse if you lose your private key?
You might well be right. I was at university during that time, and people would legitimately see that someone else had wobbly windows and cool effects and end up getting Linux because of it.

Just looking at all the options in the Compiz window was exciting. I can have fish inside my desktop cube?
Or an example of Muphry's Law.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muphry's_Law
The copyright term was 28 years, with an option to renew for another 28 years, at a time when distributing your work worldwide, or even nationwide — to derive its full value — could take years, or even longer to promote and gain awareness.

Now distribution and promotion are very much faster. It can takes weeks, or even days, for a work to gain popularity.

The term should be updated to reflect that reality: it should be something like 3-5 years, with the possibility to extend if necessary.

In all cases a copyright should be treated like trademark: use it or lose it. And if an author isn’t responsive to requests, there should be some relatively simple way to force expiration of the copyright and use the work.
They allow direct installs of add-ons that they know were tested properly and work fine on a phone, not those where they can't guarantee that level of stability (while still giving you that as an option if you feel like experimenting).

I don't see how that's arbitrary, I see it as a well thought out process, even if I wish more add-ons were added to that collection.
Here we go...down the same rabbit hole that these Linux vs whatever else conversations always go down.

Just to reiterate: Every OS has problems but in MY experience Linux has broken on me in fundamental ways. MY experience is that Linux cannot be trusted for day to day usage even though I have been giving it chances for 15 years now. I'm glad that you have the fortune of having a better experience but I am not going to ignore what I have experienced with the OS just because you said it was good.

I'm not going to waste my time with this anymore so I bid you good day.
As is the case when someone discontinues SSRIs.
> Linux isn't an operating system.

While some of those VMs may be running trimmed down OSs tailored for their individual workloads, the fact remains they are all running under some sort of GNU/Linux or, at least, relying on the services of a Linux kernel.

Now that you mention it, WSL1 should be called GNU/Windows instead, because it's the GNU userland on top of a Windows kernel with Linux lipstick.
> It ultimately boils down to "I don't want to report on what I am doing or how I plan on doing it."

That's not a good take on it, let alone all boiling down to it by any measure.

The constant status reporting of scrum is a distraction. That doesn't of course mean the engineering team shouldn't communicate both plans and results in a timeline that makes sense.

If the work is so incredibly trivial that status needs to be reported every.single.day, then it's not work I'm interested in even doing. Progress on anything creative and challenging takes a longer timeline and daily reports are a very annoying distraction.
Intriguing idea. This would be very interesting to try with a Lisp or Scheme like language. Does it have any support for S-exp based languages?
Administering Workspaces in Aspera on Cloud
A new analysis by Peter Ganong, Pascal Noel and Joseph Vavra, economists at the University of Chicago, uses government data from 2019 to estimate that 68 percent of unemployed workers who can receive benefits are eligible for payments that are greater than their lost earnings. They also found that the estimated median replacement rate — the share of a worker’s original weekly salary that is being replaced by unemployment benefits — is 134 percent, or more than one-third above their original wage. A substantial minority of those workers, particularly in low-wage professions like food service and janitorial work, may end up receiving more than 150 percent of their previous weekly salary.

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/many-americans-are-gett...

A Bank of America Global Research report published in April estimated, nationwide, workers who earn less than $32,000 annually could make more money on unemployment than they could from work.

An analysis of California Employment Development estimates showed $31,200, or $15 an hour, was the break-even point in the state, not accounting for differences in how the money might be taxed. The state portion of benefits is capped at $450 per week for higher-income earners.

“You could potentially earn $750 a week maximum in California using unemployment. That can be a disincentive to some workers especially some of those workers in lower-paid jobs,” said Roccato.

https://www.cbs8.com/article/news/verify/verify-can-you-make...