skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> when your investment is six digits or more and a stupid law destroy it you know it.

Rule #1: Investing does not guarantee you will get back more than you put in. Your capital is at risk.

Honestly, you’re complaining that you’ll lose a bit of money because you have to modernise “your investment” due to the fact that we’re in a GLOBAL FUCKING CLIMATE CRISIS. Think about how privileged and out of touch that is.
Thanks for the tip! I had a look but Roslynator seems to be C# only, and I'm coding C++.
When Putin wanted a good return on his bought-and-paid-for lackeys in European governments.
Nuclear does produce radioactive waste. It's why Chornobyl, Fukushima, Kyshtym, and few other places are inhabitable. We should clean these dirty places before we call nuclear energy «clean».
You understand that you made the mistake in that case right?
Sounds familiar. I often do the 'real work' in the late evening hours, when the world is quiet. So, you allow work to happen in your free time - are there limitations what types of personal activities you allow yourself in your normal work time (the time where you have to be reachable). I'm just curious because erasing the split between work and life is often in favor of work.
I’d be less worried about long term effects and more worried about the fact that lithium-ion is very flammable. It’s bad enough that airlines ban lithium of quantities no more than a single smartphone from entering the cargo bay of a passenger airliner.

And then you have an entire car’s worth just strapped to the bottom of your chassis.
1. Big cloud provider outage that last days, raise questions about big/public clouds premise.

2. Bitcoin crash to 20K or less. Raise questions about web3/crypto.

3. End of the pandemic actually crash the stock market.

What I hope for:

1. Breakthrough in unsupervised learning, leading the way to semi AGI.

2. Breakthrough in combination of logic AI and DNN.
> The common American name "Randy" is also a source of some humour (in the UK randy=horny).

We know that sense of the word in America too. I saw a friend once try to forestall that interpretation after saying "I'm Randy" by elaborating "Randy with a capital R".

Since that's a standard way to express emphasis, it did not succeed at disambiguating what "I'm Randy" meant. We all had a good laugh.
Sadly, the U.S. oligarchs profit from the enslaved suffering from the working class through increasing wealth inequality, water pollution, carcinogenic junk foods, carcinogenic alcohol, carcinogenic junk drinks, broken education systems meant for indoctrinating poor people, elitist healthcare systems meant to protect only the oligarchs, media companies owned by oligarchs, war propaganda in Hollywood to make oligarchs wealthy through blood money, etc. The U.S. is founded on slavery and genocide. It was founded by greedy monsters who promoted misogynistic religion while robbing the natives' land with military puppets. Which the U.S. culture allows religious institutions that promote misogynistic scriptures to make trillions of dollars now. When you get a society influenced by all of these things, it inevitably has poverty, homeless people, crime, domestic violence against women, illiteracy, lower I.Q's, mental health illnesses, personality disorders, health illnesses, sadists, con artists, incels, fascist politicians disguised as democrats or republicans, heavy political corruption, human rights violations, lack of happiness, committed suicides, etc.
My abiding memory of typing in listings on my TI-99/4a is how often I intended to type shift-equals to get '+' but instead hit function-equals, which reset the machine and lost all my work since I last saved (and since it was saving to tape, I didn't save all that frequently...)
It'll be useful leverage to get 7 south pole claimants, and 8 arctic states to share land / transit rights.

Interesting to speculate if moon claims will intermingle with that on earth.
Denmark to make domestic flights fossil fuel free by 2030
Crazy learning about the woman. Read about this parity discovery not even once i hear about the lady contribution. Another dna X-ray or Einstein underlying maths … should have a correction prize say 20 years later even if you have passed away kind.
Ownership of "content" requires intellectual property laws, which are enforced by courts of justice, and we already have these. A blockchain cannot enforce intellectual property rights because it lacks coercive power. If your goal is to "retain ownership" of the content that you produce, a blockchain is not going to help you AT ALL with that.
I opened the comments just to warn people how shitty this article is, but I guess I was not the only one.

In my experience foraging is regional, locals know what kind of mushrooms grow in which forest. This kind of "look out for these LOL" list is not useful at all.

e.g in my region the parasol mushrooms are one of the best picks due to their sheer size and distinct characteristics. I would recommend it more to beginners.

Some mushrooms on the list have similar quite toxic ones, and here there is only one picture, there is no explanation on what to look out for. I hope no reader gets the false impression of it being safe (which is literally in the title of the article). Hate it.
If wind power prices are negative on a regular basis, doesn't it make it unprofitable for the operators and thus eventually decrease production?
You're right in that it might be the only viable option for some usecases, but that doesn't make it good. It makes it passable :)
A year of therapy weekly here.

That’s just BAD therapist, whom you can leave right away without a privilege of explanation. It’s hard to find a good one, but when you find em, your mind will “shit bricks”.

My (experience-based) way to detect a good one:

They can prescribe. That means they are a real doctor and not a “great courses plus grad”. If they work with drug addicts, good.

They only ask, never theorize, nor criticize, nor give a “dad lecture”. They ask, listen, note key points, rephrase and ask if they got it right. Then they ask you a question about the above, which is both perplexing and obvious at the same time. This is the moment when you realize there is a effing wrong pattern in your mind that you weren’t even aware of. Then, often the resolve is just a matter of understanding the issue and being aware of it for a week/month or so. If that doesn’t help, e.g. you now see the issue daily, but can’t help but feel emotion pressure, they give you an algorithmic method or a medication.

They always go from your issue you came in with down to basic mind patterns and emotions, small step by small step, with your affirmation, and do not jump into conjectures straight away, which you can’t even evaluate logically and emotionally.

They clearly explain their methods, if you ask them, or by themselves. It’s not a black magic neither a brain surgery, therapy is a thing you may do yourself, but sometimes you need a mind different than yours to mirror your findings.

There are 10+ charlatans per one therapist.

I would appreciate if someone with a similar experience added/fixed my list, or taught me of why sometimes they behave differently and that still ought to work.
The trouble is that these hydrocarbon will just be burned like all others, causing GHG release.

If you want something actually green, try ammonia via electrochemical methods, from hydrogen.

This is also why these gas investments are a trap. We're already generally low on gas for winter and increasing the intake will not help, plus any operational emissions is too much and has to be optimized. 270 g CO2e is a plenty in a series of small deployments to ruin the targets.
Dunno, I (and most people around the world) quite enjoy the feeling.

Keep in mind, chilies are native only to Mexico/Central America. Yet almost every culture on earth has adopted them into its cuisine (India, China, Thailand, basically every Asian cuisine except maybe Japan, African cuisines, a bunch of European cuisines, etc...).
The issue is that even when retired, it might hit us in one form or the other.
I try to focus on the reason, write it down, test it for a while, if knowing it is effective I add it to a list. After a few months, you will have like 20 reasons that summarizes why you get stuck in this period in your life.
can give an example of innovation suppression?

very curious.
Baffling neurological illness affects growing number of young adults
These books were great. What especially captured my imagination were not just the drawings, but the fact that every listing would be prefaced by a print-out of a run of the game. This made it really easy to see what the program was about (entertaining enough by itself) but it would also allow me to map whatever the game was doing with the BASIC listing next to it. This was kind of like using a debugger to step through the program and it was a really neat way to learn about control flow and program structure.
I organize my day around my work - where work means professional and personal objectives. I list them, I prioritize them, and then I ensure I cut time out to at least tackle something. I put myself in the best environment (for me) to complete the task at hand. For example - I have important (personal) conversations away from my workspace and computers, I work only in my 'working space'.

When I focus on an objective, I ensure my phone cannot be found. I turn off slack and the like - and I generally make it impossible to distract myself. I fight myself as much as I can, to live in the moment.

As for my works: I have permanently disabled notifications on my desktop. I read e-mail during specific windows, and the same with slack and the like. In office, with people is more difficult. But I generally work on getting teams to agree to 'zone time', ensuring that it's not my idea, but our shared goal.
Hi, I'm interested, nicolas.bg at gmail
This would take substantial time.

Would you manually reinstall and reconfigure your workstation every morning?
That's cool, especially like that the parallel lanes don't overlap. I did something similar, but simpler, a few years ago for Hamburg's public transit "hvv" [1]. Described my approach in a blog post [2]. Hasn't been updated in three year, so probably some lines are broken.

[1]: https://hvv.live

[2]: https://franz.hamburg/writing/the-moving-city.html
Same. Those hours between 4:30 - 8:00AM are magic. The rest of the day is lost, even without kids. Errands, messages, meetings ...
There's also the commonly overlooked fact that sometimes people don't even need to get together, they already have aligned interests and go with the flow.
This is a valuable experiment to run for any hiring process.

Generally, you want to select for successful employees in your company, which hirers normally are. If they can't get selected, something is very very wrong with your process.
The patterns that persist are the ones that collect patterns that make them more persistent.
I miss Japan.
An explanation of why some texts by W are still missing from the OP: https://www.wittgensteinproject.org/w/index.php?title=Projec...

TL;DR: substantial editorial input
> silent unintended underflow behavior

Please show me an example in the wild that could not be trivially caught/alleviated. With 'trivially' I mean the code that needs to be written to prevent it, not the thinking you need to do to consider it.

As for the latter: this is what I get paid for. Writing the code out is necessary but not what I really get paid for (unless I were a very slow typist, that is).

I find that most of the time I was simply too lazy. Or rather: I wrote C/C++ code for 20+ years. I used int and didn't think (unintended rhyme).

Now I write (mostly) Rust I find myself considering the edge cases regularly and also covering them because the compiler forces me to. See also this comment [1].

I.e. a - 1 + b where a is always positive (incl. 0) and b is always > 1 'just' works with int (and unsigned [overflow] too!) in C/C++.

In Rust you will get a panic when a = 0 which will then make you think what you're doing and simply reorder this to a + b - 1.

I find that this is the 'cognitive load' that needs to be applied commonly and I'm pretty fine with that.

> dangers of mixed signed/unsigned code

Alleviated by simply not mixing. There is a reason languages like Rust simply do not allow this without explicit typecasts. And those, in cases where one type is signed and the other is not and they have equal width translate to "all bets are off".

> more cognitive load to read and understand unsigned underflow detection code [...]

See first point. IMHO this is simply the same point expressed differently. Underflow happens when you subtract.

Ensure you do not subtract a larger value from a smaller. This is as easy as writing max(a, b) - min(a, b) or what author of [1] does.

Same as abs(a - b) but works with unsigned. Cognitive load? I do not see any and I agree with the author of the article that this is easier to read.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29767877
Before the web, we used the word "cloud" when discussing networking. It's been hijacked. We used to draw cloud-shaped bubbles in network diagrams, with the label "X25".
You're right, that wasn't well phrased.

What I meant is that make doesn't have special code to handle "gcc -MD" output. gcc is adapted to the needs of make, not the other way around.
I mean I could go through this bit by bit and provide good rationales for why things are the way they are, cite my own examples and provide links to industry whitepapers and even detail the numerous ways that such companies do indeed improve their supply chain (even how they do quite a bit of their own assembly as you casually solve major problems with little more than 5 seconds of thought)... but I've learnt that certain figures on HN are not interested in resolving the real issue (nor do they really care) and the facts are disinteresting to such people because you could have looked up plenty of counter-statements to what you've stated there.

No, it's the drama you want, and you want it to be loud and about specific brands that you don't personally like.

That's why I don't bother.
Buying the manuals wasn’t the crime. He violated the Arms Export Control Act, when he tried to ship them back to Russia via an American stooge.
An Aquatic Plant That Bloomed Underwater Was Among First Flowering Plants
I don't get the argument. We all follow standards like HTTP, IP, ECMAScript and others that are developed by single entity. That doesn't mean it's centralized. It's like saying open source doesn't exist because most of the open source projects are hosted on github owned by microsoft.
If it only went proportional... The results are closer to logistic with some stability islands, exceeding certain thresholds causes runaway changes moving the equilibrium up. And there are some terrible end game scenarios we do not want to ever reach, such as exceeding wet bulb temperature in most living and farming places - cooling requires huge amounts of energy in scale. Exceeding that would make many places unlivable without technological support.

Then there's the ultimate point where hydrological cycle stops, causing runaway drying.
Cars are the main source of noise pollution and air pollution in cities, nothing else comes to mind. Factories and such were either moved to other continents, or zoning was updated to ban them in population centers. I guess fossil fuel combustion contributes as well, but that's on its way to becoming less of a problem.
Counterpoint, the standard library is available everywhere the language toolchain exists, external dependencies are hit and miss.
Work from home has basically fixed this for me. Disable your works preferred messenger notifications and set a few times during the day that you will check them. Same goes for email.
I call bs on this argument. Protocol on the blockchain still has to abide by the rule of law. And the idea that certain things are not allowed on the blockchain is false - someone will create a new fork, chain or there will be a more elaborate workaround.
It’s just a very complicated way to deliver anything.
Don’t make the mistake of signing up for random websites
I cry a single tear of joy, then shuffle back to the black and green glow!
The point is you don't need to control them to wreak havoc. Yes you would harm your own community/country, but this is already in many ways the case with conventional weapons.
Given that the “foundation” didn’t exist pre-ban, I’m not sure why that would have anything to do with this.

> Is the fact that the person behind it is guilty of "bad think" a good reason to ban or was it something s\he posted?

Do you think that it is a bad thing for twitter to ban people who use bots to artificially add more followers and retweets to their accounts?
Plus self custody, where if you make a mistake like forgetting your password you lose everything permanently, is a bad idea that is incompatible with how human beings actually work.
Why should twitter explain this particular ban over any others?
All the arguments made can be made in the context of the internet as well. It is acknowledged at some places, but is then shoved aside with hand wavery counter arguments.

I also don't understand the jab at gcp for honoring DMCA. You're always reliant on an ISP on some level, there's no real self hosting from the bottom up without having to play nice with other parties, in this example, honor DMCA.
Where can I verify that you’ve stopped beating your wife Joseph?
Yeah, I know about ppm but I didn't know about .obj files. That's great.
And sdl is a good crossplatform choice because linux doesn't have similar to win api GDI.
Thanks for the links.
I disagree.

If crypto is a thing, then I'm really wondering what happened in 2018 - 2020.

When it went from 20 k to 4,5k.

Everyone always seems to be forgetting this.

It took a pandemic to get crypto interest back up.

https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=today%205-y&q=...

Ps. With crypto, i just think we are in a loop where the end result is failure. And the news flow/discussions are literally the same as in 2017 but with more buzzwords that even techies don't understand it anymore without spending ( significant) time investigating it. The average population doesn't really care and i need more arguments than "i think it's a thing".

Just like in 2017, one of the main problems is that the people vested in crypto want to convince people that don't care. And because of their money involved, they can't let it go.

Eg. The surreal spectacle of a president 'fixing' his country by shouting: "bought the dip" on Twitter every month.

Also for the web 3, i don't really see a reason for it. They claim decentralization, but if you look at eg. OpenSea, the power is not with the "people" and it's really expensive to "mint".
1. ETH overtakes BTC

2. Omicron is now seen as a mass immunisation event that lead to the end of the pandemic

3. Most Blue States turn Red

4. Something akin to P2P Substack rises

5. Moderna's shares trade horizontally

6. Gold oz. price crosses 2k USD
“The Most Powerful Idea in the World” by William Rosen
Ubilabs did a 3D version here https://demos.ubilabs.com/moving-hamburg/

Tweet: https://twitter.com/ubilabs/status/1448271663041220613

Article: https://ubilabs.com/en/insights/potential-of-digital-twins-f...
So if I just stop using web3 as a catch-all for the things I work on (i.e. IPFS, Crypto Wallets, Merkle Trees) and just start naming them one by one everything will be OK and it's not a marketing buzzword anymore? Or should I be aware that I am in fact only building marketing funnels even though I find value in the technology being built?
how can gas be green since it produces co2 throughout it’s lifetime?
how can nuclear, solar panels, wind turbines and electric cars be “green” when we’re polluting the planet while producing them? shouldn’t the focus be on zero pollution during manufacture or are we not there yet?
It does matter, i'd be pretty upset if Pizza now costs 1 BTC.
Do you need someone to repeat what's scarce? The digital anything can be written down in the blockchain notebook with your name/key and it's yours then. Same as when you would get a C from your teacher who would write it into one of those big notebooks with everyone's names. That combination of your name + class + grade is the asset uniquely assigned to you. Now when you asked your teacher to change that C to a B, to maintain your average, that wouldn't be possible as the teacher would have to write a new record and we would all know that you had a C actually. But all those grades are your only and thus scarce by definition.
Please do write up and/or share more sensible articles of what “web3” is and what it does. I’ve read a few and they’re always the best arguments against it. Sure it might all sound good when all you have to say is vague things about it being interesting and exciting. But as soon as you pin it down to and show what you actually mean when you use the word then things are a little different.
I attempted to do something like this for Lisbon's metro but unfortunately never managed to get it working well enough (due to my own skill shortcomings).

The data available is the waiting time for each train ID per station, with infrequent updates and very non linear behaviour. If anyone has tips to turn this into a linear movement along a line I'd be very interested.
Maybe flight crews/maintenance staff should configure the machine randomly after a flight/maintenance, so as to force the next crew to actually run the checklist carefully?

This reminds me a little of Adam Langley's advice for keeping software protocol extensibility points well-oiled:

You might want to define and implement dummy extensions once a year or such, and retire old ones on a similar schedule. When extensions contain lists of values, define a range of values that clients insert at random. (https://www.imperialviolet.org/2016/05/16/agility.html)
Then you can use Bitcoin Lightning, a micropayments network layered on top of Bitcoin, and settled on-chain. There are solutions to these things, it's still just an early market.
> Fortunately we had good laughs over that and how I kept saying "yeah, I'm sorry" at the end of every fifth sentence.

Didn’t they also find it amusing how you pronounced “sorry”?

There’s an episode in South Park where Butters has a Canadian girlfriend and he tries to say it like she does.
This sounds like a very US minded view on EU. As an EU who has been to the US a couple of times I could write the exact same piece with the opposite conclusion.

Housing is smaller but one doesn't live in a suburb, cars are more expensive but that's the idea, fuck cars. The one that stood out to me the most is "so is food". What? American supermarkets are cra-zy expensive to me.

I'm not saying you're wrong but that both our analyses are probably nonsensical.
> Most Blue States turn Red

What does that mean?
Open ledgers could indeed be a good thing, but no need for blockchain for that, the legislature could simply require all banks to dump all tx daily in a standard format (a payment system version of what the SEC's EDGAR does for US public company disclosures).
You mean the quality of using strings as errors?

https://go.dev/blog/go1.13-errors
> So, let's make an odd_int_less_than_20587 type and a billion of other types?

Bounded integer types have been extremely useful for me on a few occassions, and I wish more languages had type systems powerful enough to support them. They also address your concerns about subtraction.