skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Chantrelles are a terrible pick here imo. They can be easily mistaken for highly poisonous and probably even more common jack-o-lanterns
The Wide World of Disease-Based Dutch Profanity (2020)
Reminds me of this real time map of trains in France (including subways, in Paris at least) : https://carto.graou.info/48.6/3/7/0/0
BSC isn't strictly a fork of Ethereum, though it is EVM compatible and uses the geth protocol. It also uses the Tendermint consensus protocol from Cosmos, which is different from the PoS implementation being worked on by Ethereum.

Sharding is definitely proving to be challenging for Ethereum, but my understanding is that it's being worked on independently of the move to PoS now.
The point is that gas is not green, but it’s a whole lot greener than many alternatives.

Replacing a large coal plant with gas is much better for our future than opening a same size solar plant (and not closing the coal plant).

Of course greener still would have been to build a solar plant instead of the gas plant. But solar is intermittent and coal isn’t so that wouldn’t be sufficient.

All of this is true so long as the gas plants are treated as temporary solutions and this does that.

I guess technically it could have been labelled ‘purple’ and a new rule made that all allowances made for ‘green’ also apply to ‘purple’ but honestly that sounds to me more likely to be abused in the future.
Don't know, but in general arbitrarily set limits are bad. Note, the bug is not in the long name. The bug is in the inability of system services to handle a long device name. That I imagine is hard to fix, but this is exactly what needs fixing. Limiting the name length is akin to band aid.
"The correlation is stronger for Bitcoin than for Ethereum" indicates that there is no direct causation since GPUs are useless for Bitcoin mining.

The author suggests that the demand for ASICs may contribute to the chip shortage which then drives up GPU prices, but that doesn't explain the lack of correlation with CPU prices.
Landlines are backed by large -48V battery banks, the uptime on landline phone service is much higher than the power grid.
Both squirrel-json and simd_json are doing UTF-8 validation, that’s not the difference. squirrel-json does it as a first pass before the parsing, simd_json does it during parsing, but both are doing it.
> But the people reviewing the claims at the managed care organizations are not looking at what kind of coverage a patient has to decide if they do or do not need a medical procedure or a lab.

Unless it either meets preselected criteria (or gets lucky with the RNG for orgs doing random spot review) for manual review, or is an appeal, the “people reviewing the claim” aren’t actually people in many cases.

But, people or not, they don’t care if the patient needs it (well, they do as one factor, but its not the ultimate question), they care whether it meets the plan’s coverage criteria. Outside of what is minimally mandatory under health insurance laws and regulations, the coverage conditions for certain treatments (and even certain tests) are often more restrictive in “less good” plans.

So, yes, the systems and people reviewing claims do look at what kind of coverage you have when deciding whether or not a medical procedure or test is covered (and to what extent it is covered) by your insurance.

(I know, I’ve been deeply involved in building and maintaining some of the involved systems for a public sector payer.)
Clarification?

I can participate/play in my democracy with little to no cost. Unless you are arguing time (~20 minutes/year) commitments to vote?
It's not great though unless your requirements are rudimentary. I wasted a huge amount of time on supporting high-dpi. The architecture is archaic.
I had recently read the coverage on Slashdot [1], which makes mention of territorial claims. China and Russia oppose the US' claims.

[1] https://science.slashdot.org/story/22/01/01/042219/china-spe...
This is true. I think however this is not relevant to unit tests. If you choose not to do unit tests, because they're not valuable in your software compared to automating end to end tests, that's fair enough, but on the topic of unit tests, talking to a db isn't really a thing.
I flag those but it is a Sisyphean task.
This one?
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24537865
Anytime you take a plant from the forrest - tearing it from it's roots to plant it inside your green house - if you give it the fertilizer and the ammount of water you think is required while depriving it from it's environment - are you responsible if it's life expectency is drastically shortened and it dies?
Agent contraints dictate survival.
What about mandating corporate structures to have vaccines distributed to every single person on earth at the lowest cost under threat?
The vaccines might just get better too if they need to make fewer doses.
Yes evil people exist; I've had the honor to meet a few.
Total vaccination will not mitigate what is naively feared as the worst.
Creation of these incentive structures is not conducive for the longterm survival of critical thought.
I've lost more people to sickness via policy than virus itself.
Scientific experimentation has been my life and I will die too.

- fellow canadian
Dangers of Asteroid Deflection (1994) [pdf]
Moon's gravity is much weaker than ours, which makes it an attractive starting point for missions to the rest of the solar system.

Launching anything from Earth's surface costs a lot of fuel. In case of Falcon 9, max payload is about 5 per cent of the total weight of the stack on ramp.

If I had to guess, I would guess that the space industry is going to move away from the Earth before, say, 2070. Among other advantages, energy in space is dirt cheap. You get the full solar constant when not in shade, no clouds, no rain, no wind or hail to damage your solar panels etc.
Why go out of your way to make absolutist claims? you're just setting yourself up to fail.

What you really meant to say is, "where is my evidence", and well we've been doing this since 2012, at least.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22722205/

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22723413/
It seems you can actually buy these things for single-digit thousands of dollars!

https://www.sparkfun.com/products/14830

https://www.mouser.be/ProductDetail/Microchip-Technology/090...

That puts them in the price range of handmade swiss mechanical wristwatches.

Anyone walking around with one strapped to their wrist yet?
Oh that's a scary thought. Authoritarian countries growing children for war and might. Sprinkle in some genetic engineering!

Interesting thought about gender separation in authoritarian countries too. A lot of outdated concept of gender is rooted in the role of motherhood, which in this scenario wouldn't really be a thing. More a specialized career.

Yeah I guess my meta point was a lot of people wait to have kids because of their careers and the ginormous cost of raising kids. But that's a good point about education; even with all the resources in the world it's hard to raise kids and attain grad school or higher education. But graduating college by 21 still leaves a lot of time.
My idea is that the script contains the basic steps which building an MVP usually contains: setup, routes, templates and user accounts.

From there on, it is up to the developer to add their own design and functionality. After you understand the code for setup, routes, templates and user accounts this should be easy.

As for mutliple steps adding to the same file, I think overwriting the whole file every time is doable. For example when we introduce the concept of a template, the template can be created like this:

cat << 'EOF' > templates/index.html
<h1>Hello World</h1>
EOF

Now say later we want to use a base template which contains a content block. Now we modify the template to extend the base template:

cat << 'EOF' > templates/index.html
{% extends "base.html" %}
{% block content %}<h1>Hello World</h1>{% endblock %}
EOF
What you call them is also important. Otherwise people won't know what you're talking about. You might say "it's better to do integration tests with SQLite than unit tests", but that's a different question.
It's amazing how much I can read about web3 and still be confused as to what problems it solves.
> a global pandemic far worse than any in living memory

I beleive author means that 1918 Spanish flu, with death toll of 25m to 50m according to different sources, is something no on living today has a memory of.

But smallpox death toll in XX century was about 300m, and there are a lot of people alive with memories of it.
Right, but the bit I quoted above seems to suggest that this "ban" is weak and can be circumvented by the out-of-network doctor explaining there will be extra, non-covered charges, and then getting you to sign a waiver saying that's ok.

If not signing that waiver means your surgery gets canceled (especially in an emergency situation), most people will feel coerced to sign. Hell, most people will probably feel coerced to sign in most situations.
Isn't fuzzing more than just random though? I was under the impression fuzzing could introspect branches in the code and work its way backwards to generate inputs to reach that coverage?
• Web3 becomes way more about portability of identity and micropayments than ownership of expensive 8-bit art

• Live commerce finally becomes mainstream in America

• Google tries to copy Notion

• Tidal waves of headlines about the upcoming demise of Bitcoin and ETH. Both tokens still end the year significantly stronger

• Bay Area to continue losing relative importance in tech. Anyone with hard skills itching to maximize bang for their buck

• Apple Sidecar still inexplicably buggy
you only 51% this stuff if the goal isn't to make money, but something else.
https://eu.boell.org/en/2021/04/26/7-reasons-why-nuclear-ene...
> Weird that it would be a boon for both forensic accountants and fraudsters. How do you reconcile that sentence?

It is very common to track people by the tokens they hold and target them for theft and fraud.

One example is to airdrop a backdoored token, and when the user tries to move it they wind up authorizing movement of their other valuable tokens. Or to just use the airdrop to lead a curious user to the airdrop event's website, which is then a phishing campaign that achieves the same result.
Sounds like they had their holiday period B team both in the crew that flew the plane and in the department that wrote the memo.
We are descendants of people who had strong survival instincts. No surprise here.

An intelligent species consisting of individuals who do not value their continual existence would disappear fairly soon.
For me, that indicates that it's not a "general chip shortage" issue (i.e. not "ASICs are making the chip shortage worse" either), at which point https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29766829 makes it hard to see the correlation as caused by cryptocurrencies.
because you are clueless and/or misinformed as to what separates this virus from other coronaviruses and HOW different it is from other coronaviruses. the technology absolutely does not exist.
The timestamps are naive (no timezone) and therefore hardly useable for a non-local installation (backups on/to servers in different locations).

See for instance https://github.com/borgbackup/borg/issues/4832
You pay now by paying with your privacy. Someone makes great money by tracking you and selling it but it isn’t you.
Nuclear is not renewable… right? Ie there is a finite amount of nuclear material on earth and it’s not overly abundant either.

Am I missing something?
The “unit” in “unit testing” is unambiguous across the industry, referring to a function or a class that you want to verify the implementation of. Trying to impose another meaning onto the word is a sure way to complicate knowledge exchange with unnecessary misunderstanding (I certainly would think twice about joining a team that invents its own bespoke language to reference common concepts).

Testing a unit of any complexity is already a can of worms; with multitudes of factors like hardware conditions, memory state, or phases of the moon causing Heisenbugs what we need is more predictability, not less.

So if some runtime quirk at the database server, unavailable connection, etc. has the power to fail your tests, call those tests “integration”, “component”, “service”, “behavior”, “e2e”, anything else—the available vocabulary is rich enough that it doesn’t really call for overloading existing designations.
I have certainly had better success pushing my sleep cycle forward over the course of days than trying to pull it back.
Is this one of the DCS developers?
This is a chicken-and-egg situation.

Without Helium-3 available, you do not have any incentive to sink money into reactor R&D.
Are you using any decentralized social networks significantly?
It already exists on many telephone service providers in some countries. It doesn't have a specific button, and it isn't standardized across providers. But on one provider in the United Kingdom, for example, it is 14258 then star twice to blacklist the number that last called. (On another provider, just to show the variation, it is 1572 then 1.)

* https://sse.co.uk/asset/pdf/guide-to-call-features-with-your...

* https://plus.net/help/phone/call-features/

The downside of a single button would be that even with the existing systems it is all too easy to accidentally blacklist the wrong people. I know someone who was accidentally blacklisted by one of xyr elderly friends. It caused all sorts of interesting fallout until the two of them had the opportunity to speak in person.

One can imagine what a single button could do in the hands of small children. And, indeed, we have known for a couple of decades what anti-spam buttons can do in the hands of people who (say) decide to "junk" every mail message after reading it.

For Australia, see rather the Do Not Call Register, which is the better option as these blacklisting systems are usually restricted to a couple of handfuls of numbers.

* https://donotcall.gov.au
leave the country while still using changes that might be inconvenient for others
This is far more a us/Canada problem than a European one, and this is a European proposal.
> MACOS (NOT SUPPORTED)

So folks what are the good MacOS alternatives currently?
What kind of features of electron are you using in the UI?

If it's only http/websockets and the UI, you could try webkit2gtk or other alternatives. It's actually quite easy to build a gjs or Qt wrapper on Linux. WebKit(Legacy) from webkitgtk also builds on Windows.

I am currently in the process of making WebKit into a webview that only includes websockets as an API, so the long term goal is to have a minimalistic webview that doesnt have everything that a browser has. [1]

Maybe it makes sense to combine development efforts?

[1] https://github.com/tholian-network/retrokit
Yeah it can get that advanced!

But the distinction is still generating junk until you get errors while pbt is about checking business logic (properties) hold under random generators. Saying this I’m sure the cutting edge of both overlap!
This is as close to arguing about what colour to paint the deck chairs on the titanic as I can imagine.

A non-carbon neutral source of energy is not any shade of green, until we’ve averted the upcoming climate disaster. And then maybe we can debate about how to spend our limited carbon budget.
Wait, most uses of macros in Rust don't have much to do with memory safety. RAII and borrow-checking don't rely on macros at all. Most features of, e.g., serde would work the same way in a garbage-collected language.

The primary exception that comes to mind is pin_utils::pin_mut, which is a macro primarily because of the somewhat circuitous route by which async came to Rust. If the language had been designed to support async from the beginning, I suspect that it probably would have been built-in syntax (assuming it didn't avoid the need for such an API entirely by using a different design).
I will agree that a patient with a higher deductible and higher out of pocket maximum may be subject to less unnecessary things. And that is why I think high deductible health plans are the way to go.

I guess doctors could be basing their diagnoses and recommendations on the out of pocket costs for the patient, but I like to think that is not the case, by and large.
Nothing except human nature ... see the current controversies in the South China Sea.

States are very territorial. There are emotional reasons for it, but also the exclusive claim for natural resources.

If water is found in mineable concentrations in only a few spots of the Moon, I bet there will be a serious conflict over those spots. It is literally a matter of survival for the future colonists.
Breeder reactors can create more fuel, but even without these, there is a substantial amount of uranium that this is a non-issue. By the same token, solar is also non-renewable since it requires real resources mined from the earth which are in finite supply and solar panels are not 100% recyclable (and especially not the batteries required to make solar reliable). In this sense, nothing is renewable -- even hydro will run out eventually when the earth cools and plate tectonics comes to an end.
Here are the links in clickable form:

Demo: http://unalerted.com/demo-s.png

English version: http://unalerted.com/adhd-cards.pdf

Japanese version: http://unalerted.com/adhd-cards-jp.pdf
What causes this level of exaggeration? (which seems to be across all indian news sources talking about such topic), especially considering india is strong on compsci, right?
Web3 is even less private, since your stuff is stored in a public chain that can be deanonymized even years later.
4. Meltdown Risk
To date, 1.5% of all nuclear power plants ever built have melted down to some degree. Meltdowns have been either catastrophic (Chernobyl, Russia in 1986; three reactors at Fukushima Dai-ichi, Japan in 2011) or damaging (Three-Mile Island, Pennsylvania in 1979; Saint-Laurent France in 1980). The nuclear industry has proposed new reactor designs that they suggest are safer. However, these designs are generally untested, and there is no guarantee that the reactors will be designed, built and operated correctly or that a natural disaster or act of terrorism, such as an airplane flown into a reactor, will not cause the reactor to fail, resulting in a major disaster.
The year-of-the-Linux-desktop one came true for me. After a decade on macOS I moved back to ion3’s successor, i3wm. Sweet, minimalist joy.
Wrong, it is the current version of public source for Android, including version 12.
2. Cost
The levelized cost of energy (LCOE) for a new nuclear plant in 2018, based on Lazard, is $151 (112 to 189)/MWh. This compares with $43 (29 to 56)/MWh for onshore wind and $41 (36 to 46)/MWh for utility-scale solar PV from the same source.

This nuclear LCOE is an underestimate for several reasons. First, Lazard assumes a construction time for nuclear of 5.75 years. However, the Vogtle 3 and 4 reactors, though will take at least 8.5 to 9 years to finish construction. This additional delay alone results in an estimated LCOE for nuclear of about $172 (128 to 215)/MWh, or a cost 2.3 to 7.4 times that of an onshore wind farm (or utility PV farm).

Next, the LCOE does not include the cost of the major nuclear meltdowns in history. For example, the estimated cost to clean up the damage from three Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear reactor core meltdowns was $460 to $640 billion. This is $1.2 billion, or 10 to 18.5 percent of the capital cost, of every nuclear reactor worldwide.

In addition, the LCOE does not include the cost of storing nuclear waste for hundreds of thousands of years. In the U.S. alone, about $500 million is spent yearly to safeguard nuclear waste from about 100 civilian nuclear energy plants. This amount will only increase as waste continues to accumulate. After the plants retire, the spending must continue for hundreds of thousands of years with no revenue stream from electricity sales to pay for the storage.
That is a bit of a misunderstanding. I do not want to build a collection of repos or projects which the user can read through or try out.

My whole project is just one page!

The page displays multiple scripts side by side.

One script per framwork.

Each script can turn a fresh Linux installation into a working web application with routes, templates and user accounts.
This looks fantastic, I'd love to try this.

Regarding your question about why this works : I urge you to read at least the first chapter of Frances Yates The Art of Memory https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Art_of_Memory - how people learned to retain vast stores of knowledge before the invention of the printed page.
As a lesson that ISO C++ contributions are themselves not an example of the kind of code shown at CppCon talks.
I don't understand what your comment adds to the discussion... Are you saying it's OK for some states not to have healthcare for poor people? Or that poor people should move to better states (they can't because moving costs money; poor people aren't mobile)? I don't see how pointing out that some states are worse than others is useful.
The actual bark is incredibly difficult to grind to a powder which would be important for a good extraction.

One would assume anyway, not that I would know of such things.
For me, the opposite reinforcement cycle holds true too and is just as important as meds. Exercise -> eat better -> more energy to repeat the cycle and level up
The public source code for Android, written by a company that seats on ISO C++.
7. Waste Risk
Last but not least, consumed fuel rods from nuclear plants are radioactive waste. Most fuel rods are stored at the same site as the reactor that consumed them. This has given rise to hundreds of radioactive waste sites in many countries that must be maintained and funded for at least 200,000 years, far beyond the lifetimes of any nuclear power plant. The more nuclear waste that accumulates, the greater the risk of radioactive leaks, which can damage water supply, crops, animals, and humans
Moving money upwards in the pyramid.
Crypto market is really sad. It's a novel technical solution. But it can't find a problem where it fits as a good alternative.

It's not a good alternative to banks, art collections or web hosting. But Bitcoin is still worth billions, NFT are all the rage and Web3 went from new concept to "trend" in the span of what feels like a week. But even with all the success they don't seem to be convincing many they have any intrinsic value.

So here we go again a clearly horrible solution to a problem most don't care about, but I'm sure will make some early adopters rich, and inevitably end in disaster for most.
Aren't they aiming to do that for plants that will be using synthetic methane as alternative to battery storage?
> There’s also those studies that indicate prolonged sleep deprivation might help reduce depression.

Imo sleep deprivation helps in kind of the same way that self harm does. It makes you focus on something else, rather than how miserable you are. All your energy goes to keeping you awake. I wouldn't recommend it as a long term solution.

> Maybe after a long stint of wakefulness, in the wee hours the depressed shift back to being non-depressed!

I can't answer for everyone, but this is not the case for me. I regularly fall asleep at like 03:00, and it has never helped me in any way.
They're missing the point. The web already allows you to easily spin up a private network where you can set all the rules. Web2 was the cash grab based on the realization that if you can bring all these people under a network you control you can run the web. Web3 is about the meta-features people care about that brought them onto web2 -- shared state, a common truth, enforceable rules -- but putting them at the protocol level, out of the control of a single actor. That takes trade-offs. (If you know how to solve these issues without these trade-offs, let me know and let's build it!) The original web is still there, and it's still useful. So is web2. This is about building an alternative.
not sure how web3 would solve any of that