skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The reason I don't is that those are not the only browsers I use. And I want my passwords available to me everywhere.
I know this is a tangent to the topic at hand, but this reminded me of an interesting video I felt compelled to share.

It’s a video on the history of explosive barrels in video games https://youtu.be/LMYEE8lvlvA
Hum... You are complaining about a request having the side effect that a server may fork another process to answer it? That's not really much anybody can do about this.
Which is funny because Delta's NS:S ratio is also very high. So by her own logic, the NS:S ratio -- what you called her "main" argument in the other thread -- has no predictive value whatsoever for the natural vs lab leak question.
Definitely two types of software here. Everything about that post is spot on.

Internal software is messy. Testing is also messy. Lots of things need to be automated. End of the day, it’s a bunch of hardware people.

The exciting stuff are the physics simulations. Modeling how lens aberrations affect the light that passes through and how to correct for that.
We all go through phases. I was on Cinnamon for the past six years and see myself returning to GNOME. I find myself wanting less cruft out of a DE as I get older. And more keyboard friendly too.
Oh God, the autoplay... That one "feature" did more than anything else to push me onto competing platforms.
Wait, you don't want your escape key to panic? :D

They fixed it in later Touch Bars by adding back a physical escape key next to the Touch Bar. That at least makes it slightly easier to arrange the Touch Bar to not trigger random behaviour :D (apparently I float my little finger above the top left of the keyboard)
Agreed, it's a surprising omission that there's not a built-in solution for this, but for me it was a huge improvement to find out it can be done manually.
What do you mean by taking a disease into a home? Will the host sojourn with you?

Does the cancellation fall within cancellation conditions and deadlines?

>3 of my friends caught covid this week,

May they recover soon.

>and I don't feel like catching it so I reached out to airbnb

Don't go, then. What do they have to do to help you not catch it when you know beforehand your friends have it and it's not within the control of the host or the company.

>We reached out to the host and he didn't seem to care we had covid either.

Why would he ? Is he staying and celebrating with you ?
As an American I think we could learn something from Germans and Koreans. Not saying that we should totally dis our soldiers, but I'd like to find a happy medium between dissing and worshiping.
Product-Market Fit Compendium
Thanks!

BTW I agree with your overall sentiment. Sorry if I was too obnoxious with my post. Sometimes I overthink things (such as with the rest of this comment).

On your comment:

> > She only pauses in her work to run — seven miles a day.

> -- Laura Arrillaga-Andreessen, yes that Andreessen, writing in the New York Times Magazine about Visionary Tech Entrepreneurs with, um, no conflict of interest whatsoever I'm sure.

> Turns out Palantir's Alex Karp was also "harnessing goodness through technology." No idea how she missed Adam Neumann.

> https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/10/12/t-magazine/el...

My issue is only with the first two lines, therein I can only discern one meaningful interpretation given the context.

1. You begin with a puffy quote from the article about Elizabeth Holmes

2. You name the author and publisher

3. You commented that she was writing "with, um, no conflict of interest whatsoever I'm sure" -- which is most likely sarcasm and that you suggest the opposite is true.

Therein is a claim (or at least a stated belief): that the author had a conflict of interest when writing about Elizabeth Holmes.

The nature of the conflict wasn’t clear. I looked it up (and later posted an article which asserted such a conflict) but didn’t find any clear connections between the Andreessens and Holmes/Theranos specifically.
I’m curious about this too. 1Password used to sync to a file that could be backed up to iCloud/Dropbox/drive and I wished they’d kept it that way, but it at least partially suggests they may have stuck with full client-side encryption (I have not verified)
CFTC fines Polymarket $1.4M, orders markets shutdown and user refund
I wrote my own with ridiculous Argon2 requirements (Takes 18 secs to open) combined with PKDF hybrid hashing system. (not chained) and strong AES256 CBC implementation with proper random IVs for each field and correct padding. You can encrypt any kind of data and files, it's encoded as 32k UTF-16 + sig XML losing only 1.3% over binary, but I like text files. Of course, some files come out smaller due to the Gzip compression.

It is Dropbox friendly meaning any change or addition in another person using the same vault in the same directory is automatically updated in all open vaults. This was originally for collaboration. You can have your own private vault too with a unique password, as many as you like. They just end up as XML files. It runs fast as uses databinding, can generate strong passwords, and makes copying/pasting easy. I am having trouble encrypting files over 1GB though.

I take great lengths to protect the key. If the file is open too long, it minimizes and locks, when you open it, it decrypts everything again. As soon as decryption is done, the key is stashed away using ProtectMemory function in the framework. I have done memory dumps to ensure the key is not visible when the app is idle.

Files works differently, Their meta data is encrypted but you are able to checksum then and preview them in memory without the key ever being exposed and the content never touches the disk and is zeroed afterward. You can currently play sound, view pictures, execute files (in memory!) and soon video.

I plan on browser integration by a cross-browser userscript and loopback routing (127.0.0.1) that recognizes when the cursor is in a field specified in the login's metadata. But I am am running into trouble because sites like to randomize the name of the login fields, so I a have to use some reliable heuristic approach.

Does anyone have any ideas on how to deal with that? If I can figure that out, and get video previews working I will open source it.

EDIT: Here's a preview of the app: https://imgur.com/a/rZGPCPZ
Location: Philadelphia, PA

Remote: Yes

Willing to relocate: Yes

Technologies: Native iOS in Swift (UIKit), Java, Spring Boot

Résumé/CV: https://www.linkedin.com/in/zcwrgross/

Email: ryan.gross1993@gmail.com

iOS Developer looking to move to a sector with less 'red tape'. Used to lean, autonomous agile teams. Currently teaching myself SwiftUI and Combine.
keepass tics all those boxes for you.
Lots of extreme generalisations and exaggerations of the situation with C. It's great that you like rust and want to write your code in it, I don't really care at the end of the day, but vague statements such are not very useful or productive.

>There's no standard for building C programs.

Is there a written standard for compiling rust programs? I don't think so. Rust doesn't do standards after all.

Jokes aside, this is basically irrelevant. Why does there need to be a standard for building C programs? Making something build across platforms (including cross compilation to other platforms) has been solved by everyone and their grandmother at this point. This means that aside from taking the route of re-implementing it yourself (not particularly difficult) you have literally dozens of perfectly good options to chose from.

In fact, most of this rant sounds like it stems from your dislike of OpenMP not C.

>I could have kept the library in C and replaced OpenMP with some other solution instead, but I wasn't keen on reinventing this wheel. Even basic things like spawning a thread run into C's portability woes.

Thankfully, you don't need to reinvent the wheel, the problem of cross platform multiprocessing in C has been solved at least a dozen times by now. It should be trivial to use one of these many options (or even write your own, even if you don't like the idea of "reinventing the wheel" it's certainly not particularly difficult either and can likely be lighter than any other more general option).

>The platonic ideal portable C exists only as a hypothetical construct in the C standard. The C that exists in the real world is whatever Microsoft, Apple, and others have shipped. That C is a mess of vendor-specific toolchains, each with its own way of doing things, missing features, broken headers, and leaky abstractions. Shouting "it's not C's fault, screw <insert vendor name>!" doesn't solve the problem, but switching to Rust does.

I mean, rust is hardly helping you here. There's one implementation of rust doing their own thing so far, nothing stops anyone from making this situation as "bad" as in C. You may as well just say you only support clang or only support GCC and base your project around that assumption. In fact, if you're making the mistake of trying to support a microsoft compiler then I would argue that you've made your life difficult for no reason and blamed it on C.

>dreadful state of C dependency management did.

Hardly any more dreadful than rust's solution to the problem.
Using AM2331 Sensor with a FreeBSD/Raspberry Pi
What do we talk about when we talk about ML Robustness
Blackberry Devices Will No Longer Work After Today
As someone from India, "tor-toys" is what you would hear from most Indians. For most words of the kind, in india they would be pronounced in exactly the way that would make you remember the spelling of the word (since you are graded on that). I would bet that's the case with most non native speakers.
Bitwarden can be self-hosted. $10/year subscription cost is well, well worth it.

If you don't self-host, note that everything is encrypted before being stored at bitwarden. They don't have access to your passwords.
Is there a name for the effect where there is a superior product X, everyone who uses it agrees that X is superior (to the point of acquiring their own personal X's when they can), but when shown to those responsible for procurement, they say "I don't get it" and continue to order the same old thing?

I'm specifically thinking of cases where it's not corruption causing the purchases, but plain-old incompetence.
> and only a few people on earth know because webpack is so hard to understand

Absolutely not true.

This isn't a comment about webpack (nor is yours) but looking at this specific example, how to deal with feelings of powerlessness is gain power. In this case, take apart webpack. It's JavaScript, after all. Create a new project using webpack using your default tooling, create a project using webpack with no magic tooling, reproduce the problem with webpack in with your repo in various states/at various points until you really understand the issue. Understand what webpack is doing under the hood until you're not powerless.

Extrapolate and figure out how to debug Python/Django. Bang your head against the code until you get frustrated. Take a break, a breather, some space. Go back to it. Eventually something will give and you'll figure it out.
I hate what 1Password has become, and how user-hostile Agile Bits are. BUT after the last bait and switch they pulled I tested _every single password manager on the market_, and the bad news is that the others are all worse. The only two I found that I liked, but sadly lacked at least one feature that we need, were Secrets [0] and Elpass [1]. I think both might fail your requirements list too. I've begrudgingly had to stick with 1Password, but after the way they've treated the customers who have been giving them money for over a decade I'll be off the second someone makes a password manager that meets our requirements.

[0]https://outercorner.com/secrets-mac/

[1] https://elpass.app
How come? Seems to work pretty well for me. Better than LastPass/Dashlane worked for me in the past.
The government literally put $6000 of stimulus money into our family's checking this year. I got a 45% raise. At least in my world it seems like just about everyone had more money this year. We bought a chest freezer and splurged on much more meat this year than previous years.

I haven't seen any significant supply constraint. The food would not be scarce if the prices actually raised at the pace of inflation.
This isn't the same search. The parent post had quotes around the phrase. You.com returns identical copy-cat results if you do the same search.

To be fair, not sure what other results we'd expect if we're going to search for a specific, plagiarized phrase.

Edit: actually, upon review, you.com does indeed give one extra useful result within the top three. So one point to gryffindor.
For me, the journey started with the 'Train to Busan'!
Layer Zero, the Moral Case for Web3
Can you elaborate on

> they seem insistent on making the experience as terrible as possible lately
Looks cool but did a very poor job of importing the first recipe I tried.
I believe they are encrypted with you Windows credentials.
Or moving to a warmer climate - and burning my windows
Haha, nope, not just you. I can't count the number of times I've gone too far in one direction and it's taken me 20+ adjustments before I realize I've overshot and now I'm making it worse with each button press. I don't know if it's just a subset of us but my brain has not found the "trick" to noticing this, I have to very consciously think about it each time I make an offset. No joke, I've consider laminating a quick "crash course"/"flow chart" of how to fix subtitles just for myself since I have to stop and think every time I do it.
I was a happy 1Password user and warily switched to their subscription model. But It still does everything I want and now it even does more -- e.g. I can have shared vaults with my partner and other family members, which is more convenient than duplicating entries between machines or going to each others' computers to look something up.
I think the primary competitive advantage is in the confluence of features. There may be other sites dedicated to one thing or another, but by combining all those features in a way that is super convenient for a single purpose (planning where to go + what to do + people to do it with) you get enhanced value.

One example is Docker. All the features of Docker already existed in different tools. But Docker combined everything into one tool, making it easy to solve many different problems with one solution. The only "competitor" to Docker now are the other tools imitating Docker. (Has anyone even tried to use LXC or OpenVZ since Docker arrived?)

Another is Facebook. All of Facebook's individual features exist in other sites. But they combined all those different things into one platform, so people naturally went "Why would I use 10 different sites when I can just use one?" Once Couchsurfing's forums went south, people found Facebook much easier for group and event organization, so all the local Couchsurfing communities fled to Facebook regional groups (..... and made them private and locals-only, excluding all the travelers). Even with a first-mover advantage, Couchsurfing lost their user base and engagement when they chased away the community (as they were chasing investors, revenue, and irrelevant design trends).

The one feature Couchsurfing has that nobody else has is references. My profile has like 70 positive references from hosting travelers over many years, people of all ages and genders, with zero negative references. But some people have references from only one gender, and some people have negative references. This gives people a much better idea if a stranger is worth hanging out with; their profile may look bland, but a bunch of glowing reviews makes you think, they might be fun, let's give 'em a chance. This is distinct from a "friends list" with no reviews or context; they might have 1000 friends, but only 5 reviews. References also help reinforce good culture, as people know if they act like a dick they will get negative references.
Maybe for the people that could afford to own a mac. Compiz was something I, a student could use though. And for free.

Maybe it’s more accurate to say it brought it into the reach of everyone with a bit of willingness to learn how to install an obscure OS (as opposed to having a ton of money)?
Well, GET is not idempotent if the document has been updated.

The specs do not talk much about the document changing behind your back, only about the changes you cause by yourself.
What I found is with texting and emailing is that people get distracted and you aren't getting their full attention, if at all -- very easy for them to ignore you or drop you into spam. You need peoples focus to be able to talk through things rapid style, back and forth. The issue with phone calls generally that I've had is you are not a priority because you aren't physically in front of them so they will quickly dump a pre-sales type call and may never get back to you again or tell their staff to put you on eternal ignore (fun times).

I do think with Covid using video has become so much more natural you could use that and keep peoples focus better. But for me I always found that you are the least important person they are talking to until you show them you are worth talking to. Sounds harsh but sales sucks for that, and pre-sales exploration (e.g. business dev) can be even harder at first. So a lot of times being in person is the best way I've found, maybe others have found other ways. FWIW, I've used all kinds of ways to get peoples attention as well, buying them lunch, sending lunch to their team in exchange for an hour of their time etc. I've found if you give them something people feel more obligated to give you their dedicated time, so it can help, and if you have mobility restrictions it might be worth experimenting here.

As for most of the ideas, most boil down to who the clients would be, what the cost to develop is, what they would be willing to pay and how much support and on-going maintenance it would take to make it profitable. Some combination of those is the root cause most stay as an idea until there is some situation that can show a path forward. One of my personal biggest mistakes I had to overcome was I would create a product and not consider the training, maintenance and support costs early on. To a certain point that is ok, especially if you have funding, but if bootstrapped it can be a much larger factor in your plan (especially if you dislike doing support). With scale/funding you can bring those costs in line pretty quick as you grow but if you are bootstrapped it can be much harder.
BitWarden is good. Codebook is the commercial version of the earlier Open Source "STRIP" and underrated.
Yeah they still claim to have full client side encryption for the cloud service. Maybe it's the subscription pricing model that's the issue for people?
But now the traits aren't connected with drums (or sticks) but MusicParts.
Or you end up having some `drum.foo` too.
You can use it but maybe I didnt explain that I work mainly in performance optimization of heavy trading applications in electronic trading for a tier 1 investment bank.

No I cant explain why we wont finance a gigantic team to redo it all, but anyway: we need this to go faster, and I wish MS would fix WinForms to make them transparently faster rather than me profiling with despair "yes hum modals will always be a bit slow to redraw 50 controls, we could port to the new stuff but we're not sure it ll get better (but at least we ll benefit from more framework level optim) and it's so different we need a new guy" "then find a new guy", im told, and then every new guy who did some low latency GUI at our level (our app is very optimized but China will decuple volume eventually so...) will tell me he desperately wants out to move to java backend where all the fun is... which I cant deny since that s where I got extracted from urgently when half the .NET team left out of despair to go do Java in other banks lol.

I even grew to like .NET even if Ill never wrap my head around the build process and dependency management. Just a wish that MS would continue to optimize winform somehow so I wouldnt have to recode forms doing exactly the same thing. I suppose it s nonsensical since the new paradigm IS the optim but one can whine :D
I wish there were some “intermediate” websites for cooking. There seems to be a missing middle, where I don’t know exactly to do, but know enough basics to only meed a little bit of direction.

Ie, not step by step, but more general. Let me improvise, but still guide me.
I don't think dhcpcd will create and configure VLANs and WireGuard VPNs for me
This!

I've only dabbled with a few Electron text editors, but they are... kinda the opposite of "amazingly fast", too.
I wonder which company they wrote about. First I thought that it might be Microsoft but Microsoft is not located in Silicon Valley.

Which one is it? Edit: Is it Oracle? Or Sun?
What symbols do you want? Kanji and Russian Cyrillic also?

The limited subset is that they're easily typeable on a normal English keyboard without having to resort to on-screen keyboards or alt sequences.
Pass! https://www.passwordstore.org/

With git or whatever you want for sync, and whatever GPG-compatible security device you want for encryption.

I swear, pass is the piece of software that has improved my digital life the most per line of code in the software.
If winning the prize is somewhat meaningless and awful people won the award then bombing a winner is not, by itself, a significant factor in judging the event. (well, not more significant than the fact of the bombing to begin with).

Heck, if we're choosing awful moments in Peace Prize history, one winner bombing another winner isn't even unique.
1Password is consistently fantastic.

I hear you about problems with a server/subscription-based model, but a) it's the least of all evils, and b) I've come to enjoy financially supporting them (i.e. my subscription means they can keep making great software, which is definitely valuable to me).
I tried to submit a product using the site's form[0], but only get a page error.

The product I wanted to submit was Tilley hat (made in Canada). I had one with some wear after 10 years that made it unsuitable for everyday use. They did send me a "free" replacement (I still had to pay $20) and the replacement hat, while very nice, no longer came with a lifetime warranty. And I had to send a photo to prove that I had destroyed the worn out hat. I think they still offer products with a lifetime warranty, but now you have to register the product when you buy it and I think they've introduced some other restrictions.

[0]https://www.buyforlife.com/product-submission
I've been a happy 1PW user on Windows 10 for a few years, but admit I haven't paid a lot of attention. I haven't noticed any big changes. What are you guys referring to?
Pre-modern manuscript practices are remarkably alien to us today. A single codex might contain multiple works in it with no external indication of its contents. It's entirely possible that many lost works are sitting in manuscript libraries because nobody has been able to catalog everything in them. Add in the palimpsest practice (which would not only impact situations like Saint Catherine's but would also cause a manuscript containing some pagan text to be overwritten with a Christian text—or in later centuries for a Christian text to be overwritten with an Islamic text) and it's entirely possible that somewhere there's a copy of Aristotle's Second book of Poetics or more of Sappho than we currently have. It kind of excites me to consider the possibilities (and wonder if the alternate universe version of me who majored in classics might be combing through the Vatican archives right now).