skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Further, his video conveniently cuts to the tail camera when the engine goes out, making it impossible to see if he manually cut fuel, mags, etc (which I strongly suspect he did).

We also never see him even attempt to restart the engine - let alone glide to a reasonable area to land (at the altitude he was at, he had time to think before jumping as a last resort - he also crashed the plane near what appears to be a road, which would have been sufficient to land such a small aircraft).

Instead, he immediately opens the door and starts looking below himself... with his conveniently already strapped-on parachute... and his go-pro selfie-cam. Without even attempting to call mayday or restart, he jumps.

He jumps without even radioing his location on UNICOM or closest airfield freq - made evident by his repeated claims he has no phone service and therefore can't reach help (I suspect he was hoping this entire video would avoid notice of authorities). He had plenty of time to radio for help and attempt a restart at the altitude he was at.

Everything about this video screams fake crash.

I hate to second guess a pilot in a real situation, but nothing about this video makes me feel it was a real situation. Seems like this youtuber was trying to get some easy views and that sweet, sweet monetization. What a shame, really gives the aviation community a bad rep if there's folks out there like him.
Link to study PDF: https://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/doi/pdf/10.1176/appi.ajp.20...
I've used Vite for a handful of projects now and have been quite impressed. My projects use Preact and associated tech which I haven't had problems with in Vite. There are some teething issues still with tooling integrations like Storybook, but I'm hopeful they'll improve. In fact, Vitest fills quite the void already. Testing applications built with Vite was a bit annoying since you had to wire up Jest to use Vite. Lots of redundancy in that toolchain, making Vitest a welcome replacement.

I do agree that a lot of this technology is being developed out of a need from the Vue developers and community. That's not at all a bad thing. Vue's cli UI (oxymoronic, huh) is still lightyears ahead of any other offering. I'm amazed that it's been some 4 years and nobody has replicated it in popular projects. Though, what I do appreciate with Vite (and tools like Vitest) is that while they were built from a need of the Vue community, it is architected to be largely (or entirely) framework agnostic. Preact and React work great on Vite.
No. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Credential_stuffing
>Or am I misunderstanding things?

I think OP just got it mixed up.

The Intel NAND Fab is in China and sold to a South Korean Company. SK Hynix. Once merge they could become the 2nd / 3rd largest NAND manufacture, depending on talks between Kioxia and Western Digital merger.
No way to turn the music off? Couldn't find a "settings" or gear icon anywhere.
No! I've somehow never encountered `tab-always-indent`, according to my detailed past records. It actually looks like `(setq tab-always-indent nil)` should get me pretty close, according to the documentation.

"If the value is t (the default), the command normally just indents the current line. If the value is nil, the command indents the current line only if point is at the left margin or in the line’s indentation; otherwise, it inserts a tab character." (https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/elisp/Mo...)

Unfortunately this doesn't immediately work as described (Mac OS, GNU Emacs 27.2). When the buffer x.c looks like this (^ showing point):

int main(void) {
aaa
^

Pressing Tab now does nothing. I wonder if I need to do something to add this to c-major-mode. I also don't yet understand `setq-default`.
Small sample size, but:

- Building upon mounting evidence of TMS efficacy in patients with severe, intractable depression.

- 79%-- 11 of the 14-- no longer meeting diagnostic criteria for depression after treatment, and another was improved.

- It's an RCT showing both massive efficacy and statistical significance. (2 of 14 in placebo group entered remission).

I know we like to chant "more n"-- but this is very likely to be both real and a clinically useful finding.
Overlooked Countries to Visit
I guess it is economics. If the company is paying to store your data, they want unencrypted (or decryptable) access to it to use the data to make money. If they are storing it encrypted (and not decryptable), then they are not able to monetize your data. If you are also not paying them, they have no incentive to invest resources building migration tools. If there is an app out there with e2e encryption and easy migration, I bet it is paid.
There is, for sure, a definition of terrorism (by Alex P. Schmid) agreed upon by academics. It has 12 subchecks though; not simple (unfortunately circumstances require it to be complex as-is). If I were to fact-check this (say as journalist) I would reach out to academics, asking them their take on the matter by presenting them facts (and, perhaps, uncertainties).

Apart from that, usually, when it comes to democratic countries with a working objective justice system, I would say we can trust verdicts unless proven otherwise. A presidential pardon could be such, I don't know. I do know the case of Scooter Libby, where presidential pardon was unjustified (Valerie Plame case) but as an outsider of USA I don't know if that is common, and how common (I can imagine its an abused political tool).
It makes more sense if you think of these token sales as Angel/Seed rounds that are fully open to the public.

Non investors never got access to these rounds before and never saw just how many companies are raising them.

This environment is foreign to most but would be familiar to well known angel investors constantly getting pitched new opportunities.
The two mentioned in the article met the FDA definition of remission. It doesn’t say, how many improved in general. This is important specifically since the sample size of the trial is small.
Okay, but if he’s faking the video and the most believable video would show the part where the engine stops, then why wouldn’t he include that in the fake video?
ElectriCushion Review of Album “This New Heaven” by Fine Place
The Long Island Railroad Iceberg Explained
> Consider how much tip you will make as an attractive flirty woman vs someone who is unattractive, regardless of food and service.

~4% difference according to this article [0] and still thus 21% more than the next highest paying country.

[0]: https://www.businessinsider.com/pretty-waitresses-earn-bigge....
The value of a working system NOW that is in place, guaranteed working, and already trained .. is significantly higher that some quotes for an unknown result in the future.

The real value to the business of your system, if they thought about it fully, would probably be 150% of the quoted cost to replace it by an unknown quantity at some time in the future.
Some good tips here!
Likely more than 2 of 15 improved. The numbers to compare are 2 of 15 remission vs. 11 of 14 remission-- not <<unknown>> of 15 improved vs. 12 of 14 improved.
Mods pls remove. This is a repost
HN is not the smartest place on the internet. It just has a high concentration of engineers and tech money men overwhelmingly skewed to a very narrow demographic (white men 35-45, high earners, mostly in the bay area). There’s nothing wrong with being a high income white man 35-45 living in the bay, but there’s nothing particularly insightful either about discussions between them — especially when it comes to situations most of them would not have experienced.
Because executives at Generic BigCo don't understand or care about their employees' productivity.
I was referring to a censor in the country of China. My comment had zero to with ethnicity.
“I’m Surprised You Got This Far”: Annual Review 2021
I agree both endpoints are interesting-- but arguably remission is more important of an outcome measure than improvement.
I would argue that TGM is closer in spirit to NES Tetris than to modern Tetris. In both NES and TGM, the speed of the game is extrinsic - it comes from the game itself, forcing you to play faster and faster.
In modern Tetris, the speed is intrinsic - it comes from the player skill. Even with forced 20G the rotation system and the wall/floorkicks mechanism makes it much more easier to both move and recover from screwups.
no they just are really good

it’s insane how good you can get in so little time tbh
Really? Some parts of this website used to push that hard back in the "MVP" phase. And I've been here nearly as long as you (I made an account much later after lurking for years) -- what was that start-up that was a website that literally fed into an excel spreadsheet, to fake having a real product?

The growth hacking stuff took that idea even further, and for quite a while was all over this website.

That said, I disagree with said "wisdom", I just find it interesting that we've got diametrically opposed views on how this website perceived it!
> Don't conflate decentralization with blockchain.

Well it’d be easier if crypto wasn’t every second word out of someone’s mouth when they talk about “web3”. The technology to do pretty much everything “web3” promises already exists, and works better than it’s crypto-equivalent. The Local-First software movement is a good example of this.

If the proponents of “web3”actually cared about decentralisation/federation/user controlled data/etc they’d be pushing *actual solutions” instead of recruiting for yet another crypto Ponzi scheme.

Worth noting, however, that I’m not saying there aren’t improvements to be made, but I have yet to see any demonstration that the crypto space can contribute anything actually meaningful to this space.
Do you have a way in place to turn off the software, to protect yourself in case of termination?
HN is just heavily moderated. It’s the same dumpster fire as the rest of the internet, just with dang’s yay/nay filter applied.
mouse wheel does volume, there's also a settings page
At the dropzone the pilots usually wear emergency bailout parachutes. But yeah you're right, a skydiving rig would be really uncomfortable to wear flying. It looks like he was planning to jump before he ever took off to me. I've never seen anyone pilot an aircraft wearing a skydiving rig.
hi xynix i am your no 2 fan can you make me a stream overlay with pictures of sec and everywhere
>Would you really be more comfortable knowing that your hardware vendor had the capability to produce machines with a low-level, unremoveable backdoor?

What? They do. Apple absolutely has the capability to build any or all machines with low-level unremoveable backdoors, like, in the freaking processor if they wanted. I'm not clear on what your issue is here. The current state of affairs is that for devices like the iPhone, the manufacturer can setup a secure software tree where the root of trust contains only their keys. And for many (if not most) of their customers that's a good thing, because in their threat model running their own arbitrary code is of lower utility and much higher risk then getting social engineered into bypassing key protections or the like. There is important power in grouping together buying decisions in an unbypassable way, it's why the likes of Facebook for example cannot insist on bypassing iOS privacy protections. They can't pick people off, because people literally do not have the choice. Facebook must deal with Apple for the ~97% (or whatever it is who don't/can't jailbreak) majority of users.

However there are real issues with that too for a sizable number of owners. So all I want is that there be an option at purchase time which allows owners to load their own root keys. The whole chain of trust infrastructure is still there, but technical users or those with specific needs can then run their own (and still be better off). Making it buy-time means that users who want to ensure they cannot be compelled later can still do that too. Nobody loses.

A feature like that can be used against users more easily than it can be used by those users.

How? Most people will stick with defaults, and I'd be ok with Apple or whomever qualifying an open device with reduced software support or some small charge for example too. And once it's been sold, it's the same as currently. I think that's a reasonable tradeoff.
What's the goal? Own domain works just fine if you aren't aiming for "greatest readership as fast as possible"
Day trading crypto isn't just a quick way to lose money, it's also a quick way to make accounting for taxes extremely tedious.
Skydiving rigs are also big which make them annoying to fly with. You can tell early on in the video that he's basically on top of the yoke, which would be extremely obnoxious for obvious ergonomic reasons. The idea that someone would "always" fly like that (as the pilot claims) is ... dubious.

Also, there are other videos of this guy flying without that rig, which doesn't help his case.
But how to convince the 1% to dramatically cut back their wasteful ways?

https://thehill.com/changing-america/sustainability/climate-...
Both exist. Teachers make a huge difference, and there is absolutely a range of ability amongst students. (For dozens of reasons)

When I was teaching programming I realised that by best students were going to become excellent programmers regardless of what I did. Like, if I literally didn’t teach them anything and left them to just goof around quietly on their computer on their own, they’ll still end up great. Teaching still matters. (Maybe more). But the difference is 10/10 meets expectations and 20/10 exceeds them.

Weaker students essentially could not learn the material without both of us working really hard to get them over the line. For the weaker students, the default is failure unless a lot of things go right.

And so as a classroom teacher you have the devil’s choice - who do you pay attention to? In a large classroom some people inevitably get ignored or fall through the cracks. And in school the problem compounds year on year. Learning issues tend to take a lot longer to fix than they do to create. Didn’t learn calculus last year with everyone else because your home life is a mess? Now the only way you’ll learn it is with 1-on-1 time with an overworked teacher. That didn’t happen? Now you have panic attacks when you think about it. And home life is probably still a mess.

I’m not apologising or excusing anything. But it is a hard problem. I don’t believe the same philosophy of teaching which created this problem is equal to the task of solving it.
> Copies of music recordings aren't typically sold under the pretense that they're unique.

My point is that if you buy a new record from an artist you generally expect it to be original music that’s the product of creativity. But a lot of artists release things that are perceived by many to be very derivative, unoriginal, and not creative.
For what it’s worth, I’ve implemented Freshworks and while their customer service is excellent their software is meh. Moved to Zendeak and very happy
Unfortunately I have to concur with GP, my experience in penetration testing is that many sysadmins seem oblivious to the existence of ILO systems, or don't believe they can cause any harm. Alternatively, sometimes one simply slips through the cracks, and all it takes is one system with cached credentials to wreck havoc to a network.

Ironically, the more expensive ILO systems can be easier to exploit. Just throw a Linux live rescue image onto virtual media, reboot the machine, and you can grab everything sensitive fairly quickly.
I would not ask someone on the Internet if they were autistic except in extremely rare instances. There's just so much connotation behind that, I have no idea how I would ever approach it.

What I will say is: I don't think that this is purely a problem that autistic people struggle with, I think that neurotypical people (and neurodiverse people who aren't autistic) fall into the same traps, so it makes more sense to me to attack the specific problem when you see it, rather than to try and identify a cause every time.

I have had limited success in the past walking back arguments and trying to get at the root of what people actually disagree with, and sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't work, but generally I don't feel like I need to categorize someone to try it. It's often enough to say, "hold on a sec, are you upset with claim X or are you specifically upset about just claim Y?" And if that on its own won't work, then I doubt that saying someone is autistic would make it more likely to succeed.

It is generally good practice to try really hard to stay on topic and to stay very specific when arguing with people. Step back from details occasionally and think about what you're actually claiming, and keep just going back to that. Avoid tangents as much as possible, avoid equating disagreements over details with disagreements over philosophy/broad claims. I will not claim to be good at this: quite the opposite, I struggle with it a lot and I regularly fall into petty arguments with people online that I regret later. But when I am conscious enough to think about it, it tends to make my conversations with people online (outside of rare bad-faith actors) happier and more respectful.
At what point do we just assume that all machines connected to the internet are compromised?
Yeah but once you make it to the plane the best bet would be staying in that area after activating the ELT, perhaps only making slight excursions in search of water or food.

The plane even if it didn't have an ELT would be a great beacon for rescuers that works come looking after he didn't arrive back on time.
I think everyone misunderstood your suggestion as an ethics clause when in reality it's just fluff, as you state later, something to this effect is already mentioned in the warranty clause.

But, I should point out: Someone can acknowledge that something is not designed or intended for a certain purpose but then recognize that despite this, it is perfectly suitable for it. i.e. a butter knife is neither designed nor intended for opening paint cans, but it's perfectly suitable for the task (at least some are).

Moreover, as software is not often stationary these days, what something is designed or intended for changes over time. Does this clause mean that no patches which intend to make the software explicitly usable in the context of a nuclear facility will ever be accepted? Does everyone sign a document saying: "While writing this patch, I made sure that I didn't accidentally think about nuclear facilities and how this patch may make the software more useful in those contexts." ?
There are C99 (and beyond)_ compliant compilers for windows, aren't there?

Why insist on MSVC when it's not one of them?

(Genuine question. I remember python was c89 for similar reasons).
Google doesn't control the w3c. And Google Chrome is severely limited in what they can push due to threatened/actual anti-trust litigation. Their whole "privacy sandbox" thing is being done under the scrutiny of quite a few governments in addition to practically every digital advertising association on earth.
Wouldn't a snapshot mechanism plus load-balancer handle this case and still keep the architecture simple?
got curiosity + nebula,
now I can enjoy 'Not just bikes' without ads
also up and atom, MKBHD, the Friday checkout, city beautiful.
JVM has done pretty well in that space over the years ... with the upside that you also get a huge library ecosystem for free which is less accessible with the LLVM approach.
Much of red-team/pentest/malware code works like this and is surprisingly reliable.
Seems correct based on this video from 7 months ago stating he died in 2015:

https://youtu.be/1n4kFN-1axs
You'd be surprised how deep the skill hole can go. Looks at this 20-ish seconds for 40L mode with hand cam:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4OFq31lek2g

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MJDz4-pr9J4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Azm-hbVTRJk
If the proponents could catalyse their solution into anything more concrete than “Something something crypto currency” we might even be able to figure out what their proposed solution actually is lol.
On that linked Wikipedia page, the major western countries (e.g. Australia, Canada, France, Japan, Switzerland, UK, US, ...) don't appear to have any data listed.
> While they did fly it out by cutting/sanding all the prop blades to match and reducing weight, it would seem to easily match the definition of "significant damage"

Probably not (assuming you're trying to determine reporting requirements and figuring out if it's substantial damage). It's specifically excluded: "ground damage to rotor or propeller blades, and damage to landing gear, wheels, tires, flaps, engine accessories, brakes, or wingtips are not considered “substantial damage” for the purpose of this part." The NTSB doesn't want to be bothered everytime a prop makes ground contact, hits a runway light, a towbar, etc. It happens a lot.
Unfortunately it is never simple. All my previous therapists affirmed my own projects as positive and even admirable and encouraged me to continue working on them. That was in spite of me ostensibly seeking out a therapist to address other issues despite believing that I was receiving some amount of fulfillment from the projects also.

Whenever I leave my project, it doesn't feel like there's a whole lot else I would rather do. When I seek answers, the "tough" advice that I'm greeted with instructs me to make something of my life. But wasn't that what I was already doing when I was still working on my projects? So I don't see any reason not to go back, if I can't find a way to make other kinds of progress myself, or am too good at avoiding internalizing the need for it constantly.

Unfortunately, if you tend to gravitate towards computers, and fail to find a professional who can give you more constructive ideas on how to define a concept as ambiguous as "working on oneself", it becomes far too easy to go back and self-medicate. I find it hard to judge someone else on the basis of how passionate they are about their hobbies, but if it's directed towards ourselves instead it sounds like we ought to be doing it more.
Wouldn’t it be risky to perform TCMS in a region unknown in impacts of TCMS?
If that comment is intended as a ‘call out’ then it’s not going to receive a response. This site is not for ideological bullying. I wonder if Dan meant it that way, or whether he was just engaging in the discussion normally?

As you are the author of the piece, I’d expect more from you. Call out culture and ganging up has no place in autistic advocacy for reasons that should be obvious. This is also behavior that I do not see on this site in general.

I suggest checking in to see whether you are in touch with the double empathy problem if you can’t engage with a bluntly stated opinion for what it is.

Whether or not there is room for disagreement over the impact of the word “ambassador”, or for that matter claiming to represent a “culture”, there is no room for this kind of tactic.

From this response, it looks to me like you in fact do see yourself as a specially correct voice in this, and not just someone with a point of view which might be disagreed with.
That's always the case.
Okay, I'll bite. Why would you assert that he is the "most dangerous person at the moment"? Dangerous to who? I have not read anything from him claiming that a dark and evil plot is at work and I don't know anything of his wild theories. Do you have a source for this claim?
Have you ever looked into Dyslexia? I was diagnosed around thirty and it explained a lot and helped me figure out how to operate in a society that isn’t designed for my brain type
That’s good, but the part about losing access to the original files, if true, is a deal-breaker.
Yeah. How many of us did not care for mucv than free storage ? Probably the 50% mentionned ib the article
> On the other hand, you also list your pronouns and BLM in your bio... so i don't know what i was expecting.

That's a nasty thing to say, and I hope you do leave.
Wait does C now have try/catch?