> "If humans didn't use cases, and this is not how we use writing, i can just write will all lowercase letters and make distinctions between apple the fruit and apple the company, or turkey the animal and turkey the country some other, more convoluted way. Cases matter. They carry information. Try to tell a mathematician or any scientist that their formulas are moot because X and x are the same variable."

I have occasionally complained that I find math notation frustrating to read because of the use of the same letter with a tiny variation, maybe an unpronouncable one. Mathematicians are not particularly interested in what outsiders find difficult (why would they be?).

I have occasionally enthused about PowerShell, a shell/scripting language where string comparison is case insensitive (by default, sensitive if you want it), where variable names, method names, object properties, function names, are all case insensitive, and how wonderfully convenient, liberating, easing and brilliant I think that is for an interactive shell experience. And about other simplified systems such as APL and Dr Iverson's work to simplify math precedence rules and how its builtins try to work the same over scalars, vectors, and multidimensional arrays. About Simplified Music Notation and their work to reduce cognitive load by in-lining sharp and flat information into the shape of the note instead of having to remember it from the beginning of the bar; the Esperanto language and the 'clockwork-morphology' where all the patterns about past/present/future apply to every verb with no exceptions for strong verbs or loan-words, and how much easier that makes it to learn.

Humans use case flexibly, it adds meaning but it can be overridden. News headline "Apple Announces New Computer" means something different from "Fruit Grower Announces New Apple". Humans now have to deal with more and more different systems, the fewer nitpicking rules humans have to learn for each one to be able to do that, the more the systems adapt to humans, the better.

> "Computer is the ultimate data storage and manipulation device we have, and I don't want ambiguity in any parts of it."

I don't want ambiguity, mapping "a = A" for information retrieval isn't ambiguous, it's completely specified. I don't know what it would do in Turkish, but your own example tells me you can see those four things as variants of 'i' differing in capitalisation and you don't confuse any of them with K or Z. If you can, computers should be able to. I would expect datetime and number formatting to be different in Turkey, and capitalisation too. If i, İ, ı, I are different, then they are different and need to be carefully specified each time, that Turkish case shouldn't mean English a-z and A-Z must be considered different.

> "I'm the opposite. I consider apple being equal to Apple "Dreadful UX", so it's subjective."

You consider it "a dreadful experience" that someone searching Google for 'apple computer' gets results instead of nothing? That "December 2021" and "december 2021" are considered the same month? Someone who doesn't remember the correct capitalisation for XF86Config, what should they search for to find it in your world? All possible case variants? One way they could find out is to list a directory which contains it and read the listing, and the only reason that works is because their brain can recognise 'the same thing' without knowing the case(!). Humans do it, machines should do it (unless explicitly overridden).

> "Case insensitive passwords and usernames are big security nightmares"

Passwords yes. Usernames, no. Case sensitive names are a security nightmare, they lead to problems like phishing. It's bad enough getting an email from @bankofamerlca.com but if the official one was bankofamerica.com and BankofAmerica.com was a scam domain, what chance would anyone have?

Like, apple and APPLE are the same company name in the UK! Search for 'apple' on this government site https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/c... - and it says "The company name "APPLE" is considered to be the 'same as' the existing names shown below: APPLE.COM LTD". If that's ambiguous, a computer system should represent the ambiguity of real life.

> "In normal human language case conveys meaning."

But the case difference is not pronouncable, not memorable. I don't have to learn apple and Apple as two different words, I change the case on-the-fly as I need it. Same way I would not want to condiser apple and apple as different words where I have to get the italics correct before the computer will find them, or underlines, or bolding, or colour, I don't want to have to specify the way the news headline was written before I can find it - not font size or emphasis or capitalization. "README.TXT" is still at the core saying "read me" not anything fundamentally different.

> "Try to lower() this comment, and try to read it. It may not be nice, convenient and helpful."

Try to transcribe a talk and write the case they are speaking. They aren't speaking cases, you have to guess from your knowledge of language and work out from context which things are names and where sentences begin. Case isn't present in speech but it still carries meaning.