skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Right, but in so doing you're also switching the grammatical subject. The original statement assumes the same subject, moving from rights -> obligations implies a different meaning. I.e., when speaking of myself, "my rights" vs "my obligations" are very different things. Likewise when speaking of society, "our rights" vs "our obligations" also lead to a different dialog. The onus is on what we owe to others, rather than what we are owed, even though such a contract necessarily implies both.
Nowhere am I saying that failure to get a vaccine puts you at risk of death. I'm saying they get hospitalized [1].

60-69 yolds had ~2k hospitalizations last week

50-59 yolds had 1.5k hospitalizations last week

40-49 yolds had 1k hospitalizations last week

30-39 yolds had ~1k hospitalizations last week

Thus we see each age range has roughly the same number of hospitalizations. Not sure how this correlates on a per capita basis although in this case it doesn't really matter since the healthcare system is a shared resource.

Why are hospitalizations important? At this point, you dying or having complications from a failure to vaccinate is thankfully mostly your own problem since vaccinations are supremely effective at preventing this regardless of the COVID strain from the looks of it. Overwhelming the medical system and placing an undue burden on it because of refusal to vaccinate is why we're still facing lockdowns due to spikes of variants. Hopefully with the new treatment pill and evolutionary direction Omicron is taking means we're on our way out of the pandemic.

Again, focusing on the mortality when a massive problem is overwhelming our shortstaffed medical system is myopic. 25% of hospitalizations result in an ICU visit [2].

> Patients who were hospitalized more recently with COVID-19 (April to June 2021) were younger (median age of 59 compared with 68) and experienced lower in-hospital death rates (10% compared with 18%) than those who were hospitalized between January 2020 and March 2021.

This indicates the old people are smartly getting vaccinated or dying off. But again, deaths is not the primary problem the unvaccinated have at this point. Primarily they form a reservoir for the virus to mutate and put burden the health care system.

[1] https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#new-hospital-admis...
[2] https://www.cihi.ca/en/covid-19-hospitalization-and-emergenc...
If anyone remembers the infamous "pickles" drama in the Rittenhouse case, this is another example of why it's so important to know exactly what technology is doing to a photograph.

An aside, the judge's demonstrated understanding of pixels, despite being slimed by most media, was actually quite good. During the trial he demonstrated understanding of how an algorithm can take as input the original pixels and calculate estimated (or interpolated, whatever you want to call it generically) pixels from that input.
There's good reason to be skeptical. Here's a video on pfizer's own clinical study, that raises many questions on the rate of side effects, all cause mortality.

https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/media-resources/th...
I agree mostly. I don't think an unsanctioned assessment that goes this deep is pure white hat. It seems firmly gray to me.

> PCI and all of those other security protocols and programs don't draw the line at white-hat access vs black-hat access.

PCI mandates penetration tests. A white hat finding as a pentest isn't reportable as a breach. This one may be unless some gymnastics are used to call it an authorized test.
Indeed. I wish I had a list of everyone parroting the wisdom that "it's all about the size of the lens, a smartphone can never be as good as a DSLR" so as to ignore their future opinions. Camera phones now beat cameras worth thousands of dollars with better software and larger R&D budgets, at least in low light performance and color gamut.

Closely related: "It's impossible to just 'enhance' an image to make a license plate readable. Lost information ist lost". This was big due to some US TV show at the time, I guess. Here, the error was in the assumption that the information was lost: as it turns out, there's a wide space of possibilities for image quality to be too low for us to easily read some letters, but good enough to contain the clues allowing a smart algorithm to reconstruct them.
> There aren't any fundamental rights which require someone else to provide them to you.

But don’t all of the fundamental rights require someone else to protect them for you? Otherwise they aren’t rights, they are just observations of the state of the world.

In the end, what is the difference between protecting a right and defending a right? They both require action and resources, and are both an obligation.
> Why should they benefit from these works?

You are young aspiring author. You have a family. You publish a greatly successful novel/series which would bring you $10M annually for at least 30 years.

You and your SO die in a car crash. Your children, 3 and 5 y.o. now without a parents.. and without ANY part of that probable $300M. Good luck, children, you did nothing at all.
Modern phones take long exposures and try to make sense of it by analyzing it.

Basically, a one second really dark video can be summed up into one very blurry but bright enough photo.
But if you carefully move each frame to compensate for camera movement when summing it up - you might also get a sharp picture. But then the subject moves, or a leaf moves, and the algorithm has to decide which parts of the photo should be a priority for not being blurry. And that would be faces, usually. So the camera now needs to decide what is a face and what isn’t. Just to take one single telephoto picture.

Only doing “in camera processing” like a 2015 digital camera with some sharpening, color curves etc doesn’t cut it anymore. If your phone does that, it’ll be laughed at. Phones these days need to do clever long exposure stacking with image recognition and all.
Am I reading this correctly:
* 1st: Adjust the overprovisioning area and hope that the filesystem does not budge,
* 2nd: run the malware as it is now accessible and
* 3rd: change the overprovisioning again to hide the malware again?

Or is the malware executing from non-partitioned disk space?
My twins both had Roseola around the same time, when they were about 18 months and had recently entered day care. They both went around 104* F.
The title is a little misleading. This is not a discovery of malware, but rather a theorized capability that malware could use.

Link to the paper on which this is based: https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/2112/2112.13923.pdf

It appears as though the attack is based on the assumption that you have admin level access to the computer.
The Samsung photo app offers to store RAW files (when shooting in Pro mode) as a setting. YMMV on others.
That’s attractive! To be fair,
that dream is more likely a dream that is inevitable to come true at some point, given the enormous base of JS/TS developers it will immediately be able to draw from, given the lower/zero knowledge barrier for them to learn it.
Changes here definitely should be made. The laws were changed in the late 70s to make student debt largely ineligible for bankruptcy discharge for no reason beyond baseless claims of bankruptcy abuse by recent grads.

That doesn't solve all the debt currently there though. We allowed banks to write student loans for 50 years knowing that the debt couldn't be discharged.
Total student debt I'm the US is upwards of $1.7T, and the government would almost certainly have to eat that cost for any defaulted loans.
> However, I've zero desire to intentionally alter the frequency response so I'm hearing something different than the musicians and mixing engineer intended.

I’ve done a lot of research on this as a recording artist myself and what you’re saying here is a misunderstood meme.

Eg Half the records released before 80s have been remastered to sound different to what the musicians originally recorded.

Plus any medium adds colour, vinyl adds warmth to the playback, digital formats (unless you’re using lossless, which most people don’t) add artifecting, etc. Songs are often written for their preferred medium.

So there isn’t really an exact “as intended” but rather a broader “Goldilocks zone” (for want a better term). This is especially true if you listen to a broad variety of genres.

You’ll also find that most songs record in the last 20 years will be compressed to hell and back so they sound good regardless of how shitty the sound systems are in peoples homes and cars. This isn’t an artistic decision, it’s what producers and sound engineers do to make records sound good for the lowest common denominator. It’s also part of the reason why live music sound better (if the gig or club has a half decent sound engineer anyway).

> Intentionally having a non-flat frequency response is equivalent to adjusting the colour space / colour grading of your monitor to not accurately represent colours.

Some content is actually deficient in some spectrums due to the limitations of the media or technologies of the era. Those limitations were intended to be compensated by speakers that added that colour. There’s a reason why studio monitors with zero frequency curve are less common to for rock
fans than acoustic speakers (for example).

Lastly it’s also worth noting that not everyone’s ears hear spectrums equally. Our ears don’t have a zero frequency curve and that curve will differ from person to person. Which is why some of the best headphones out there are ones that profile your hearing and then perform post processing on the music based on your hearing profile.
> Bitcoin/Ethereum does not consume more energy as more people use it.

Eh... you are correct that capacity is separate from the number of miners. You are incorrect that the number of miners don't increase as chains get more attention, and incorrect that miners don't increase as new chains get created.

Somewhat worse, we're both kind of glossing over the fact that mining cost/profit is what puts a limit on the number miners more than anything else including demand. That means that widely available cheap electricity becomes something of an impossibility under this system because as electricity gets cheaper, more mining operations get set up. As coins go up in value, the cost/benefit of mining changes, and more miners get set up.

There isn't really a version of this world where coins become tremendously valuable or renewable electricity becomes cheap and widely available, and we don't have any new miners entering the system. In fact, quite the opposite, the system relies on that not happening -- if electricity and GPUs get too cheap, the network has to scale or it becomes vulnerable to attacks from rich actors.

> videogames are less important than having a decentralized monetary system. Now what?

What's now is that you haven't got a decentralized monetary system, all of it has been a pointless waste.

Bitcoin's fees are too high for normal transactions and the transaction speed is too low, the Lightning Network hasn't really worked out the way people hoped it would and has helped re-centralize parts of the chain and make it less secure. The ecosystem is fragmented because people fork chains when they're not high-enough capacity and build new ones, and the vast majority of Bitcoin holders are treating Bitcoin as a speculative asset, not as a daily currency -- which the government has bowed to and now recognizes for the purposes of tax returns, making the 'currency' wildly complicated to use legally as a normal transaction method.

Far from being a general-purpose asset, NFTs commonly have double-digit transaction fees to work with or mint, making them unsuitable for the vast majority of artists who are interested in them. They're plagued with copyright issues and asset theft, which has demonstrated that these so-called decentralized systems actually rely a lot on traditional centralized power-structures like governments to force legal norms and to prevent scams. And half of your community is running around saying things like "energy is security", which really does not bode well for the future of blockchain or the environment.

So you've spent all of this energy and wasted all of this power and you didn't even get the subjective thing you wanted out of it. At least the rest of us can actually boot into Crysis today with our GPUs.
I recently started using MacOS. Rectangle is one the most useful apps I’ve come across… and free. I like that you can add padding to the windows. With keybind customization it’s a nice replacement for a tiling window manager.
One reason Lyme disease is so scary is that it’s really common to not notice that you got bit. How often do you inspect the back of your knees? (If you live in tick country, it should be “every time you get back from being in the woods”, but many don’t know/practice this.)

It’s a common story to hear about people who don’t connect the dots, and don’t get properly diagnosed early when it’s more treatable.
It's already happening. I saw an extreme eye enlarging filter accidentally applied to a video by Matt Risinger (YouTube videos about construction and homebuilding).
> who is “you”?

Anyone who uses the "Foobar" picture reachable within my legal jurisdiction. Which would include any NFT "owners" who are trading some crazy token that has no claims over copyright.

Lets say Alice (currently the NFT owner) gets sued by me for her use of "Foobar" without my permission. Upon receipt of the documents, she sells the NFT to Bob and uses the money to pay for legal bills. Did Bob in fact buy anything useful from Alice? Bob may not even know that a legal proceeding is happening.

Later, when Bob realizes he's been conned, he sells the NFT to someone else again. But I sue Bob as well for any damages associated with using the Foobar picture without my permission. Maybe Bob keeps passing the NFT to other people, but its clear that the NFT is fully meaningless at this point (at least, to Alice and Bob). Other users may keep getting tricked, but that doesn't change the fact that the NFT affords no legal rights to this entire exercise.
Chrysler Pacifica, though only for the first (estimated) 33 miles. Still, I've been very tempted as I shop around minivans. 33 miles is enough for almost any day of my driving, aside from trips. If I'm regularly exceeding that distance in a day, it's time for me to move somewhere more compact.
Pretend you are a developer at X. You work from a backlog. You are judged versus your peers by how many items of value are worked. Optimizing for writing code wins over other optimization strategies. Npm install your way to features is cheaper for you personally compared to writing optimized compact unitasking code. It is understandable by other developers and wins you that exceeds expectations rank come review time.
> Those of us who have been shooting large digital cameras for the past decade and are some times sad that our photos often come out unsharp in poor light compared to smartphones can at least take some joy in this “no free lunch” demonstration.

Can't replace sensor area with anything other than more sensor area. Week ago I got the perfect demo of that when I filmed a happening at around 10pm with only some dim garden lights off the scene for light. Some other people had their iPhones, I had an f2 lens on my Z6 - while the videos from the iPhones looked like crap even on the phone screens, basically just blobs of dark noise, the Nikon produced a remarkably clean 4K video - at ISO 16000 or so - that made it look like the scene was lit by floodlights.
I don't have a great answer. But I'm guessing that typically we'll have better discussions if we set a high bar for assuming bad intent.
FreeBSD Foundation is still $55k short of their fundraising target for 2021
Small people can use child size, which is usually much cheaper for the same thing.

Large people are out of luck.

But your point still holds, it is just that if you include children, small sizes don't follow a normal distribution, large sizes do.
I printed it in the end, same result. Circumventing DRM
To be fair, basically nobody uses magstripe anymore.
I’m just expanding the example in my mind, nothing arcane. And maybe it’_.s just me, but I _.fail to _.see how lodash _.is “cleaner”, or why “new” makes things dirty. Are we discussing The High Art of Source Code here? If yes, it ain’t my thing.

functional stdlib can be pretty clean, such as something like Stream(persons).filter(person => person.age > 18).map(person => person.firstName)

I see a stream object with at least a couple of methods, how is it functional? What does functional mean here, callbacks? I mean, array.filter(predicate) also takes one. If that’s the thing, nobody takes it away, it’s already natural to js, since it’s multiparadigm. And we already have piping, it looks like foo().bar().baz() or map(foo).filter(bar) or Object.keys().reduce(quux). If you want a class deconstructor for FP-101 code, here it is:

const fize = (name, …args) => (obj) => obj[name].apply(obj, args)
array.map(fize("toString", "hex"))

You can turn it into “fize.toString("hex")” with a little Proxy magic (still no chance for a type safety, sadly).

I understand the different approaches you propose, and I could even write some decent Haskell in my experimenting ages, but my main question is what problem do we solve here and how this solution would be functional and not “move methods to same-named pojos, write them explicitly and pretend it’s FP”.
How raw is “raw”? If you take a long exposure in a dark room with a recent iPhone you can see the long exposure shake being removed and the picture coming out a lot sharper than it should. Would a “raw” version of that photo be a traditional long exposure or would it be the clever stacked image but with less post sharpening etc? Or is the raw even a short video sequence? (that would actually make the most sense)

I have an iPhone11 but not sure that has the raw option.
This is kind of complicated because [u] is a rounded vowel, so it's slightly "labialized" even if it's not preceded by [w].

Additionally, English spelling rules are complete insanity, and if an English speaker sees "uhan" they'd probably pronounce the 'u' as [ju:].
For most phones, there's the possibility of using a third-party camera app with less automation, and even capturing in a raw format (almost always dng). Open Camera for Android is an open source option.

Of course getting good results with this approach requires the user to have more knowledge of and practice at photography.

https://opencamera.org.uk/index.html
Why is it not SHA2 which would be faster still with hardware support?
Probably the most famous one:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Falling_Soldier
Looks like they should have invested in alternative non-water fire suppression technology rather than choosing the "no suppression" option.

From Article linked by parent:

> A Hampshire Fire and Rescue Authority report found there was an hour's delay in dialling 999 and staff had turned off the sprinkler system.
In PostgreSQL you can GROUP BY on the primary key so you can omit specifying all other columns
It was not. Popular coverage cited the court as debating "iphone pinch and zoom," but in reality, discussion mostly focused on the actual forensic application that was used, and the effect the algorithm that application produced on the output photo. The judge displayed a good understanding of how an algorithm takes as input original pixels and produces new pixels from that.
https://www.theverge.com/platform/amp/2021/11/12/22778801/ky...
Didn't Musk sell a billion dollars worth of stock a few days before this recall was announced?
Another alternative is yobai (+ skhd) https://github.com/koekeishiya/yabai

I switched to it after having some issues with rectangle sending some of my windows into the abyss (way outside of the screen) which forced me to kill the app and restart it to get it back. But if Rectangle works for you that's good too, it's probably easier to configure.
The fact that Psaki gave Trump credit for coming up with the vaccine during a press conference last week, kind of tells you were this is going.
Across Europe, more people have bought Farming Simulator 22 than Forza Horizon 5
what sort of illegal content…
Sorry what's the difference between the "artist <-> artwork <-> fan relationship dynamic" and the "grower <-> tulip <-> enthusiast relationship dynamic"?
> This is, of course, totally false.

Your example is one of the state punishing you, not an example of a fundamental right. Services provided to you is not a right simply because the government provides them.

The proper role of government is as guarantor of fundamental rights.

> you are getting tons and tons of things for free without realizing it.

This is confusing rights with getting things for free. Nothing about fundamental rights prevents you from providing free stuff to others. In fact, you have a fundamental right to choose to give your stuff to others for free. Heck, I work on D every day, and give it away for free. My salary as CEO of the D Language Foundation is $0. There's nothing non-libertarian about that, since I freely choose to do it.

As for children, as a hardcore libertarian you should be aware that the notions of fundamental rights apply only to legally consenting adults. Children enjoy only a subset of those rights.
Side note regarding humans: I was in a hotel in France that referred to the ground floor as "floor zero" in their elevator. The only time I've ever seen zero used to count something IRL.
With video you can’t “cheat”. You can’t gather up a second of frames and stack to one photo. That’s what phones to quite well. You only have 1/24s (say) to get the shot before you need to get the next one.

I bet an Iphone12 would have made better stills than my aging canon 60D which I try to keep at 1600 or lower. And that’s pretty remarkable to be honest.
If you think the US is bad, you should see Europe. Covid has blown open the door for essentially war time powers. It’s crazy.
The pendulum seems to be coming back on that one with the "Filmmaker Mode" and all that.
This is a feature of Snapchat, to give one example.

https://www.google.com/search?q=snapchat+cartoon+eyes&tbm=is...
This is not actually compatible with SQL semantics.

An important constraint on SQL is that a query must run, and produce correct results, relying only on the structure and content of tables. Indexes (can) make queries faster but must not inhibit, or be required for, correctness. The same is true of primary key constraints, foreign key constraints, check constraints, defaults, triggers, partitioning, whether a table is heap/clustered, and literally every other implementation detail of the RDBMS.

This proposal would break that constraint, by elevating the _name_ of a foreign key constraint to an identifier usable in a DQL statement (as distinct from DDL statements where such names can already appear). That's not allowed.

More importantly, it's _not a good idea_, because that semantic separation between data on one side, and the machinery of acceleration and validation on the other side, is critical to the value prop of the relational model and a big reason why it's been so hyper-successful.

So no, let's not do this.
> kept going for another 10 days

This is the problem I have. They kept going without permission. Leaving your key in the door doesn't give someone the moral authority to go through your house and look for other issues.
I am not sure what you are trying to say here. They definitely did not ask for their face to be replaced by leaves either. Is it either unmodified, or leaves? Is not there a middle ground?
All articles are sponsored. The internet is one giant ad.
Sony used to have that problem with their real cameras a few years ago. Earned them the nickname Stareater iirc.
For a bit on this - from Radiolab https://www.wnycstudios.org/podcasts/radiolab/articles/alpha...

There was also a followup a few weeks ago - https://www.wnycstudios.org/podcasts/radiolab/articles/retur...
Defining Success
Problematic Employers in Tech