skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I'd disagree about debugging; you can create custom probes for any given wire that run arbitrary code whenever the data gets updated, that combined with the ability to "hold wire values" aka program state, after execution has finished (or even paused) is a godsend.

Re: merging; yes absolutely, this is totally broken. NI should either release the file format for VIs, or offer conversion to something saner like XML, which you could easily build a nice git-diff tool for.

I maintain that LabVIEW is a good language with a terrible teaching problem; you can do so much if you just master the queued message handler architecture, and you can do things in a way that are extendible and maintainable for years afterwards
What tech companies have external referral programs?
I'm curious why this isn't more prevalent, given that it is so difficult to hire right now.
Tesla Full Self Driving Beta Gone Wrong: 2 Wheels Destroyed
it doesn’t matter what you and I think should be the result of the operation; it matters what the standard says on it

In practice, this offloads the problem to your programmer in at least every other case (i.e. when % doesn’t what they need out of box), who then miscalculates or mistests their solution and now the problem is yours.

It doesn’t matter what the standard says, there should be many functions, each for a combination of signs (or roundings) you want in the results. Because your library doesn’t suck and your programmer has things to do instead of fiddling with off by ones and other primitive but highly error-prone-under-stress bs.
I haven't seen the term "founding engineer" used commonly, but my assumption is that a founding engineer would be a cofounder with equity comparable to the other founders. However, it seems unlikely that someone would place an ad for a cofounder, so you're probably right that it's just an ad for an early hire that's phrased in a misleading way.
Why would you want the minter to be prevented from minting multiple NFRs of the same content? The content is totally moot! It’s the ownership of the scarce token which the author claims uniquely represents the content that people are valuing. Obviously if the author is minting multiple tokens and claiming they all uniquely represent the same piece of content, most likely no one is going to value those tokens much. None of this strikes me as odd or troublesome. It’s how all collectibles have worked long before NFTs.
And yet the vast majority of money laundering still happens through traditional banking channels. If crypto was such a panacea for laundering all the traffic would have switched over by now.
Does having churches as polling stations sway the ballot?
No I'm not referring to freedom. Wild animals have freedom. I'm talking about drive/greed/motivation/moxi or w/e you want to name it. The thing that delivers ingenuity but also locks us into a winner takes all (or as much as possible). I'm speaking at a species level, not an individual (you can moderate as an individual, but as a species we will push every button eventually).

I'm not suggesting a solution, as I don't have one, and would be extremely sceptical of any proposed solution. Doesn't mean we shouldn't recognize it. "Know thyself" etc.
I’d rate the article an 8 out of 10.
Maybe. Does the billboard get in your pocket and follow you around, keeping track of your location? Does it parse your email for metadata? Does it insert itself in between your news feed because you happen to be in its target group? Does it ask you to accept its Terms and Conditions of Billboard Use and its Privacy Policy?
> Germany doesn't get robo calls, but that is at the expensive of not being able to use their phones as a phone when they want to.

Can you explain this? My German friends have never mentioned that as a problem and based on how surprised most Europeans seem to be that Americans let spammers train the country not to answer calls it seems like the opposite is true.
It's not as if the first party antivirus inspires any confidence, either. It still loses in performance to some 3rd party ones, and has had its own list of security issues.

For those who remember, its early versions (before the MS acquisition) required the Visual Basic runtime.
And to this already perfect list, I'll add the subjective:

- terrible acting
I thought you were going to post Steve Henry's stuff:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0zDo7hkmCNY

There's a great clip of him parallel parking a tail dragger at some fly in on the side of a mountain somewhere in his videos.
Typescript: Modify objects with JavaScript ease, but never get an undefined property error.
Looks pretty fair to me. Kinda jealous actually.
TwidereX 1.6.0-dev01 pre-release rolled out for testing on Dec 25, 2021 (binary packages available for Android, Linux, Mac & Windows).

According TwidereX TODO, desktop version planned[0] to be rolled out on Aug, 2021, but 1.6.0 is still WIP.

[0] https://github.com/TwidereProject/TwidereX-Android#what-is-b...
Huh? If you can’t verify that the public key is the author’s then you wouldn’t consider the message to be signed by the author.
So, gfortran is used to control nukes. Now I do wonder, how hard would it be for a foreign influence to sneak bugs into an almost-functional module providing the requested feature so that whatever control system gfortran operates faults or fails?

It's not like Cray/HPE are looking deeply into the code, they're too cheap to pitch in any effort themselves, after all, and arithmetic bugs that only appear when calculating orbits or trajectories might just be hidden from most unit tests.

Open source is great for a lot of things, but don't trust a bunch of randos from the internet to maintain your critical defence infrastructure.
You're forgetting about the part where the same system can provide those people with an income. Excluding people from the global financial system, imo, is the opposite of where we should be headed. The notion of paying people for their contribution to the network, no matter how small, is discussed in "Who Owns The Future"
> If your conclusion from that is that it’s ok for the school to enforce one group’s values on the children of parents who disagree, then I don’t think you can have a principled objection to the “banning” of books.

How is not banning / removing / restricting a book "enforc[ing] one group’s values on the children"? Just having a book available for those kids who want it is not the same as forcing all kids to read it.
I prefer civility so we can try to have a discussion free of distractions.
> I very highly doubt France would work with Cray/HPE, or any non-French contractor for that matter, on this.

If the customer was the Government of France, the line “the customer has nuclear weapons” would be factually accurate irrespective of whether the particular work was on, or even remotely related to, nuclear weapons.

It might not be relevant, but then, even if the work is on a nuclear weapons program, “the customer has nuclear weapons” doesn’t seem relevant to the discussion. Really, short of the case where the customer prefers to motivate software developers with the threat of nuclear annihilation rather than feature bounties, it seems a complete non-sequitur no matter what the work is.
A lot of VC firms just raised huge funds that likely have a ~10yr lifespan, and they're going to need to invest that money, so I think this whole web3 thing could actually last a long time. Retail traders buying fractions of a single bitcoin and all the memecoins will likely get squashed though.
I am not at all shocked by this. FWIW, iLOs have unique highly randomized default credentials, but I'd guess the vast majority are never even touched, much less thought about, by the people who manage those systems.
Or really good at understanding how ad targeting works!
Kids require enormous energy to raise. Or even just to carry to term.
It has the same fundamental problem as standardized tests that frame questions around how many polo ponies Alistair and Theodora have at their summer stables. Some people are disadvantages by having just literally no idea what the passage is talking about.
% has always been remainder operator and mistakenly referred to as the 'mod' operator:

"The expression x % y produces the remainder when x is divided by y" K&R C p37
In the USA in virtually all cases where a study says some population metric is changing the actual correct interpretation is that it’s the population itself that’s changing. If you control for that the trends look very different.
> Contrary to systems such as the German one this identity system actually has a working upgrade and revokation path.

Systems without this are even more broken, but this is hardly the main problem.

The problem is that with a system like this, if you can compromise one person, you can compromise them totally. You compromise every part of their life that uses this system instead of just one when it's isolated from the others.

And if you can compromise that system itself, even temporarily, you can compromise everyone that comprehensively at once. Everyone's health records, stolen. Bank accounts drained. Trade secrets published or sold to foreign competitors.

Canceling their credentials after the fact doesn't undo all the damage.

> These private keys are not isolated from your identity. You receive them from government institutions that use the exist physical identity infrastructure.

In most cases this is a liability rather than an asset. It's only useful if you for some reason need to prove your physical government identity, e.g. so you can vote. But those few things can use the same process you use to bootstrap into this identity system to begin with.

If all you want to do is sign into a website or acquire a book or a contraceptive or travel, having that tied to your government identity is bad.
>every DeFi scheme is a money loser relative to just buying eth and waiting for a pump

Maybe, until ETH never pumps again.

Eventually the blue chip cryptocurrencies will find their fair price, and price swings of 10-20% in a single day will be a thing of the past.

DeFi DAOs like Curve Finance [0] (currently leading the DeFi pack in terms of Total Value Locked [1]) will generate income for whoever holds a CRV token... so long as the crypto trading markets exist.

Curve actually provides a service. They pool liquidity to enable larger trades with less slippage, and as such they're extremely popular.

The gas fees are not an issue either, as Curve works across 7 different layer 1 blockchains at the moment and I am sure that is bound to increase in the future.

[0] https://curve.fi/

[1] https://defillama.com/
> you (I) internalize a hell of a lot of guilt and trauma.

If working through internalized guilt and trauma requires externalizing that guilt and trauma, have you really worked through it?

> A diagnosis doesn't have to be a badge of dishonor.

Honestly, I dislike that I received an autism diagnosis in the first place. The dishonor inherent in a diagnosis arises from the almost inevitable propensity to incorporate that diagnosis as an excuse within one's own internal monologue.

> It can help you recognize that, no, you're not morally broken

That is achievable without a diagnosis.

If you have to work harder than the majority of others to achieve something, that doesn't mean you're morally broken, it just means that particular thing is harder for you to achieve.

Do you feel morally broken for other areas in which you do not have a natural talent?

Why do you allow others to make you feel that way about this area?

> Claim some ground for yourself, is the feeling.

You can only claim ground for yourself through achievement, not through a diagnosis.

> What's wrong with listing disabilities? I don't even know what identity politics is, so maybe I'm just not predisposed by the concept?

In general, what is the purpose of listing disabilities outside of requesting specific, personally necessary accommodations?
"It's baffling, that you need a method and something special"

Spanish has almost perfectly logical spelling. I mean: given a sound, there's one way to write it. And, given an unknown written word, there's one way to pronounce it.

Even if English were to have these two properties:

- we would still need a method for teaching reading

- it would be possible for more than one method to exist

- it would be likely that one method would be generally better than all other methods
My body fat percentage: 12.8%

My BMI: 21.5

I learned from Facebook that numbers have a funny way of becoming the numbers you want them to be if you just measure and frequently record them. I highly recommend this body fat percentage scale with Bluetooth for $21-$22. I use it myself. It also measures changes in muscle mass and percent body water.

https://www.amazon.com/Bluetooth-FITINDEX-Wireless-Bathroom-...

Not an affiliate link; just a recommendation. I have to remove the batteries when it’s not in use though so the AA batteries don’t corrode or die.
Right you are about Sims 1... and I did love that game! Kudos.

Wingdings as Comic Sans is indeed the stuff of nightmares. I'll be lucky to sleep tonight :-)
That is probably the smallest and least interesting of the problems with this. Any method for injecting code into another process is inherently going to be platform-specific and outside the bounds of the C++ abstract machine.
i did a quick comparison with regards to word error rate... https://robmsmt.github.io/2021/09/04/benchmarking-asr-first-...

For my particular dataset it worked quite well. It was the best offline ASR that I tried.
No, vei nid to do al the saim drujeri bicoz ze jenerashon befor vem had to :)

Olso, zis kaind of speling luks strainj to old pipl.
This is why Literacy-as-a-Service startups continue to find success.
> My understanding is that it wasn't IBM's fault at all. They delivered exactly what was aggreed upon. What the government asked made no sense.

If what the government asked made no sense, why did IBM agree to do it? Rhetorical question. Money talks.
You can't provide services for free without exploiting people. I recommend reading "Who Owns The Future" for a for discussion on inclusion.
>The prop stops spinning and he immediately opens the door.

I'm no pilot (student or otherwise), but as a comment in OP's link points out, his door is cracked open before the engine shuts down.

At 2:35 we see it properly closed (as a layman would expect from someone sitting in a chair in the sky). At 2:37-42 in the establishing shot and the shot of the engine shutting down, it is clearly cracked open. As tho he was peaking out to see the terrain prior to killing his engine, like he does right after in the video.

That alone makes it... suspicious. You'd think he might have spread his friend's ashes just before as an explanation, but considering how he used said ashes as a video prop, I'd expect him to include that shot in if he'd done it. Does a small plane pilot have any reason to open the door other than anticipating a jump?

Than there's the whole parachute thing, which is further notable as you don't see him wearing any in his other flight videos.
Problem might be the network traffic. Maybe they could not afford the 4K streaming if there are so many people use it.
>Wikipedia happily reports that North Korea has a 100% adult proficient literacy rate. Cuba has a 99.9% rate. Brazil 98%, all leaps and bounds beyond any western country.

Spain is right there in the table you linked, with their 98%. And what's common in countries you listed is not untrustworthy regime, but writing system that allows to easily achieve those numbers of literacy in their respective native languages.

Sure, poverty and attitudes matter, but achieving literacy in some languages just doesn't need that much of effort and privilege.
What prevents a musical artist from publishing a bunch of unoriginal filler after having a major hit? Is this really a serious threat to the concept of publishing music?
This was common back in the day with ezines. They would include codes to exploit security bugs in common software but they would have intentional errors so script kiddies couldn't compile them.
The teams at Zendesk and Atlassian also think they’re building for users. I doubt Freshworks is any different other than this being their marketing.
Yes, there are two groups: pro-MS and anti-Google. And maybe there is a large overlap between these groups. Not some privacy warriors as many of these anti-Google jihadists claim or pretend to be.
> People are hostile when I say there isn't such a thing as a learning disability but rather only teaching disabilities.

People are probably hostile because you're going against scientific consensus and saying a range of disabilities that affects millions of people doesn't exist.
They said. I never had a single picture removed, going back to 2005.
I don't know much about Windows GUI programming, but in other GUI toolkits I've used, there's usually some sort of text_field.get_current_value() function you can call. Presumably the parent injected some code that repurposes the callback of a button or something so that when you click it, it calls get_current_value() and then dumps it to console or a log file or something.
Well, it wasn't that much annoying, but I would sometimes have to use other people's (customer's) computers and I kept pressing Capslock hoping it would be Ctrl like an idiot :)

Besides that, can't remember if it was on Linux or Windows, but there was an input lag when using Capslock as Ctrl. I had to wait like 1s for it to register. Mostly unusable, and I used both systems a lot at the time.
FWIW, I find that I retain information from audiobooks and podcasts more readily than I do from written text. So, this is probably one of those things that varies from person to person. I've also been listening to podcasts for a long time, so maybe that's conditioned me.
OG does not mean “original gangster”, only confused senile journalists believe this. Just read it as “original”, or accept that nobody uses it as an abbreviation anymore.
Update: now nothing is working. I think maybe it's because I switched machines from Linux to Mac. Nothing is working on Mac OS running GNU Emacs 27.2 installed using `brew install`. I'll circle back in a few hours and post a more careful update describing what I see on each machine (if that matters) with each of the solutions.
Im sorry, but im really missing concept of any cloud/online password manager. I believe this one was hacked some time ago. Obviously the whole thing being online increases attack surface.

Im using KeePassX, when i know i will move/use it on other machine i just transfer it via gdrive or whatever and delete that afterwards.

So... Unless you change your machines constantly or travel all the time and use different machines whats the real benefit of using online password manager? Its not a "nasty" question, im just curious of benefits and hope to get enlighted by people who use it.
The government says "give us the password or you're going to jail for life".
The carrier will soon require a security deposit or guarantor.
> Sure, but now we’re talking about a situation where your engine has already failed… That’s very different.

What to do on engine failure is one of the first things they teach you after basic flight lessons. After that many instructors will even simulate surprise engine failure by cutting off the engine at random while the student is trying to learn about some other emergency situation. Engine failure is part of the check rides every pilot needs to pass to get a license.
It’s hard to get someone to not only change their mind, but openly agree with you that they are wrong and you are right, if they hate your guts. I’m always perfectly happy to change my opinion when discussing things civilly, but I’d never admit I was wrong to an asshole.
This is pretty common. We usually do not need to write correct sentences to each other. I am only now learning how to write well.

The gist is that it probably doesn't matter. Culture does a lot of work in letting us communicate in fragments.
Everyone loves to say their politics are just common sense but characterizing all of crypto as “rich libertarians who see crypto as a way to protect their assets from the government” is an inherently political narrative and it simply isn’t true.

There’s also a big difference between valuable emerging technologies that have a lot of speculative investments & charlatans selling snake oil vs “the whole shebang”.
NY Obliterates Single-Day Case Record with Nearly 70K New Positives
Improve your attitude. Seems like you're letting your incorrect assumptions hold you back.

I had to write documentation for a DSL a couple of years ago. I studied what made good documentation, what were considered the best docs, the different modes/parts of documentation etc. There are some very good talks on that. It was really fascinating. I realized how much I didn't know about it — doesn't sound like you reached that stage yet. Recognize that you are a total beginner, with everything to learn. Good luck!

e.g. I don't know anything better than The AWK Programming Language. It's great on so many levels - how it explains what AWK is and does (often omitted in github docs!), how it starts you off using it from page 1; how in <20 pages it's gotten you using all the main features; the friendly, helpful tone; the later chapters making advanced/useful tools/programs, etc etc. That and K&R C were my exemplars in great docs. Until I started learning about documentation-writing I didn't begin to appreciate just how good they are. Can't be an accident that bwk had a hand in both! https://archive.org/details/pdfy-MgN0H1joIoDVoIC7
> There is no "us" in the sense that we have something in common which distingushes us from all neurotypical people.

Would you mind expanding on that a bit?

I'm probably misunderstanding, but it seems to me that by definition an attribute like "on the Asperger spectrum" is the kind of partitioning you're saying doesn't exist.
Yeah, but I used a lot of different modes and the configs were annoying to port.

For example, there wasn't a generic "run the code in this buffer" command for me to map. I'd have to map all the run-foo command for all languages.
So hilariously, by jumping from the plane, the plane has a very good chance of recovering on its own, obviating the need to jump

That reminds me of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cornfield_Bomber
I think the customer is NERSC (https://docs.nersc.gov/); the commands in the bug report match those described at (https://docs.nersc.gov/development/compilers/base/).
He probably has insurance on the aircraft, so the YouTube earnings + increased publicity + insurance payout could make such a stunt profitable.
Don't publicly make fun of your customers... unless they are an anti-virus company.

What boggles my mind is how they went on to ask MS for help fixing their obviously wrong vulnerability-and-crash-introducing software.
And early, way earlier than I expected as a student. In my flight club at least they taught you engine failure explicitly early on, then practiced it frequently throughout rest of the lessons and training. I. E. My instructor would literally pull out throttle during a different planned exercise which was my signal for "oh crap I guess we are doing engine fail sim now" :-D

There are very very very few situations where I'd imagine trusting my parachuting skills over my Cessna gliding skills. That thing is meant to protect you all the way down.
I don't think I have that code around anymore, at least I can't find it now. And it's been a while. Here is what I remember:

Basically you use VirtualAllocEx() to allocate some memory in the remote thread. The returned pointers are in the context of the target process.

You can access that remote memory with ReadProcessMemory() and WriteProcessMemory(), which uses those "remote" pointers to copy data to/from your process.

You can then use these memory areas to pass global handles and other stuff around.

For accessing the actual password field data, you use standard Window-Messages with SendMessage() etc.