skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
A Neovim config designed from scratch to be understandable
Ok, but if "depression is a biological condition" — I understand we don't know the details — would you agree with what is said in TLA, that "[t]here is no depression Gremlin, either"? The biological condition — that we can't test for yet — seems for me to be exactly that "depression Gremlin".
> Why does anyone think it's OK to pay less on money you made with money you have?

The venn diagram of people who make the rules overlaps with those who benefit.
tl;dw summary?
For the record, I'm in favor of legal mandate that hardware owners have the buy-time option to enable adding their own keys to any root trust stores on their devices. However, that'd be in addition to Apple's keys and wouldn't be about the security of Apple's keys, because Apple is part of the fundamental trust foundation if you buy a Mac or iDevice. Period. The devices are massively vertically integrated, right down to the core silicon which is completely custom. Apple has absolutely unfettered ultimate low level access opportunity up and down the stack. If you completely don't trust Apple, then you absolutely should not use their hardware at all. So some level "trust Apple" is simply a security axiom on this platform.

And they've shown that to be not unreasonable at least when it comes something like root private keys. Fact is they've been operating for a long time now and like the rest of the big players that hasn't been a leak issue. It's not that big a deal for a big player to physically secure such things to a high enough degree that it's unlikely to be a limiting factor. Dedicated rooms, full offline, hardware backed Shamir's secret sharing for m-of-n key signing ritual requirements etc etc.
I briefly looked at their website recently, and it looked to me like Penrose just renders the diagram interactively as a webapp. I didn't see a "compiler" that would translate the diagram code into a standalone PDF/PNG file that would be easy to include in a LaTeX document.
I'm surprised they put mixture when a simple no would suffice.

There is no conviction of terrorism on her criminal record
There are reasonable discussions to be had about the CDC's credibility.

Then there are bad faith discussions about the CDC's credibility.

Are you aware that repeatedly exposing someone to false information leads them to believe it?

If you start from the belief that the CDC is credible, you can use phrases like, "The CDC made a mistake in relying on this study."

If you start from the belief that the CDC is not credible, you would can use phrases like "CDC / Junk Science."

You could, as another commented on this thread, say "If the CDC intentionally chose to lie to the public about their reason for a decision, that's really really bad."

There's is ZERO EVIDENCE that they intentionally lied.

That's like me saying, "If user lghh was involved in dog fighting, that's really really bad."

I have no evidence of it, and it gives people a bad impression of you.

The CDC has well-earned credibility, and the people who are questioning the CDC most effectively in the public circle (Fox News, Infowars, Joe Rogan) should have lost any credibility they had long, long ago. But questioning the CDC is profitable. People are exploiting fears to make money.

So, if you want to engage in good faith discussions, that's awesome. But maybe, just maybe, avoid phrases like "The study (implying there was only one) that convinced the CDC to support mask mandates in schools is JUNK SCIENCE!"
He said she "acid washed 33000 emails". BTW, he was still saying that years later. From a May 2019 Tweet of his [1].

> Will Jerry Nadler ever look into the fact that Crooked Hillary deleted and acid washed 33,000 emails AFTER getting a most powerful demand notice for them from Congress?

[1] https://web.archive.org/web/20190824131756/https://twitter.c...
Also the 'metrics' being used to make the final decision are secret, most likely not known even by the interviewer. This prevents gaming the system but the lack of transparency makes it easy to imagine that MANGA companies choose new hires the same way that South Park depicted the FED making economic decisions: with a headless chicken running around and finally falling down on a big diagram.
Yes, but that's 90 degrees to the current direction of travel. The L2 orbit insertion burn will achieve that.
https://history.state.gov/milestones/1830-1860/china-1

Regardless of one's feelings towards China, this statement from the US state department, themselves a part of the conflict, more or less describes the events in almost exactly the same way.
DSLRs were introduced at a time where portable displays were, in charitable terms, not par to broadcast or photography standards. However, the advances brought by smartphones and the consumers' desire for realistic color-accurate small displays means that small displays now can actually simulate everything* that was previously handled physically. Some might grumble with this and might have reservations like how the transition from film to digital photography left some people stick to film, but considering that most of the time the pictures taken are being looked at the exact same screens as smartphones have, it's not surprising that more and more photographers have traded weight reductions rather than dealing with a physical viewfinder.

> For the uninitiated, does this have an implication in terms of quality of photo or video?

The quality of the photo or video doesn't depend on whether it has mirrors or not (since that the mirror is solely used for viewfinder) but on the sensor, lens and the internal algorithms (if not taking raw shots for further processing). So practically none.

> Do DSLRs have some insurmountable advantages compared to mirrorless cameras?

A bit lighter (no more mirrors) and a bit more reliable (the mirror system is a physical component that can shatter when the camera is dropped), although if someone is using a relatively heavier lens then there's nearly no difference on that front.

Some might hate the fact that the viewfinder is now a screen though.

* Technically it isn't, but does that have a real practicable difference? Some may get annoyed, sure, but most will just ignore small differences.
Tends to wear off too quickly - amphetamine salts are cheaper, definitely last longer, and even come in extended release forms. they can also be prescribed, so that’s nice.

cocaine’s more fun though, I’ll give you that. and would probably make for a good reward system. Write a paragraph, do a line. I wouldn’t recommend a 1:1 write a line to do a line ratio.
Most meditation techniques involve stabilising attention. That is, you can keep your attention on the same stimulus for longer and get deep focus.

Another benefit is increased awareness. You become more aware of your thought patterns and the emotions they trigger. This way you can become less reactive. You have space to not follow the initial impulse that comes up.
The truth... the real truth is sometimes even scientifically impossible to find, like it is parodied in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Ua-WVg1SsA
Fact-checking sets up a seemingly-circular definition where "a trustworthy source is a source trusted by trustworthy sources"

It reminds me of a similarly recursive definition in Google's original pagerank algorithm: "A popular site is a site linked prominently by other popular sites". for pagerank, there was a nice way around the issue: apply popularity iteratively.

You can imagine starting with some initial guess (perhaps that every site is equally popular), then score sites which are heavily linked higher to update the score. Then, use those scores to weigh the value of their links (unpopular sites' links matter less, popular sites' links matter more) and evaluate popularity again, and again...

Of course, this is simply a matrix multiplication applied infinitely many times. If the matrix is not singular (which, if your system is sufficiently connected, is vanishingly unlikely), then the final solution will converge to the eigenvector with the largest eigenvalue no matter what your initial guess was. The definition of popularity which seemed which recursive, wasn't. It doesn't matter who you assume is popular to start with, if you apply the definition enough times, you will arrive at the same result.

It makes me wonder if there is a possible computational aid to some of these fact-checking dilemmas, where we don't need to trust anyone a priori to have trust in the whole network. In areas where we can't look at truth as some absolutely thing, that doesn't mean we should we throw our hands up and say "everything depends on who you ask". We can still have a goal of evaluating things that are incredibly likely to be true, false, misleading, etc.

Society has lots of imperfect tools for evaluating information from those who know more than us: We can look at their past performance, we can understand their incentives (e.g. brand harm if discovered), we can check if others disagree, we can use quality heuristics (e.g. superficial flaws can be a sign of deeper flaws), we can gain some small expertise to help evaluate the greater experts. None of these things are perfect signals but they are strong signals.

Currently fact-checking is cobbling together these signals informally, with responsibility spread out culturally among the organizations' internal hierarchy, the fact-checked victims complaining, some outsiders who bother to fact-check the fact-checkers, everyone's subjective trust of brands, etc. I wonder if there could be a more formal way to do this, where sources fact-check each other in a decentralized way. The ultimate score of trust would come not from one single source of authority, but from a global evaluation, which anyone could calculate, of this recursive definition of trust.

It would come with its own set of problems (google-bombing was a common thing in that era for rarely-searched terms) but it still seems like a massively useful tool, and one I've never seen an attempt to formalize.
Advertising, merchandising, value-added services, free-to-play monetization, performances, or experiences
Identifying Fake Voice Recordings
That tool is double sided as well:

1. Don't report stolen property as income? Tax evasion.
2. Report stolen property as income? Proof of theft, readily shared to other TLA's
The Yahoo login thing killed me. But I did like the idea of "flickr: photo sharing for people who have Yahoo.com email addresses"
Infra-red is optical. Just not visible light but it uses lenses and mirrors like every other visible light telescope. The main difference is that those lenses are designed to be as transparent to IR as possible instead of accidentally filtering it out.

The big trick for Webb is that it will allow for extremely red shifted IR to be received, which translates into 'light from very long ago and very far away'. To be able to do that the sensors are cooled to extremely low temperatures to ensure that the instrument noise level is brought down as low as possible, allowing for extreme sensitivity.
It's interesting how much contempt people have around here for one of the most successful open source oriented companies in recent memory.

Most of the bad things about MongoDB are actually bad things about the NoSQL fad, and that fad was huge around here a few years ago.
If josephcsible intentionally chose to lie about running a dog fighting club, that's really really bad.

I have as much evidence for my bad faith statement as you do for yours.
Same experience but while I was in college, and I was not a casual or recreational user. I fully bought into the whole psychedelic mythology, poured of Erowid trip reports, read books by Timothy Leary, kept trip journals, trip-sat for friends, tripped in nature, tripped alone, experienced ego death, etc. At one point I even backpacked a short portion of the Appalachian trail with a friend and ate mushrooms each morning before setting out.

The "insights" I gained certainly felt profound at the time, but they were kind of silly in retrospect. I'm actually cringing a bit right now remembering what I was like back then. I remember going on a first date with a girl the day after a particularly intense mushroom trip and trying to share my "wisdom" with her. She must have thought I was completely insane haha.

Sitting here now almost a decade since my last trip, I can't say it permanently changed my outlook on anything. I still dealt with a lot of depression and confusion in my 20s, just like anyone else. The things that really ended up moving the needle for my depression and anxiety were: quitting alcohol, lifting three times a week, therapy, getting married, and having a kid.
I don't see how Facebook could staff a fact-checking operation with a high quality army of nothing but sharp, critical thinkers who have excellent reading comprehension. Those kinds of people will tend to be educated and have real jobs.
If you enjoyed this, you might enjoy "Smart Contract Rescue" where Dan Robinson describes the original 'Ethereum is a Dark Forest' problem.

https://corecursive.com/064-ethereum-rescue-with-dan-robinso...

Dan: Maybe I’m like a predator in this environment where… In this case, I was a white hat hacker, but maybe I’m a black hat hacker. Maybe I’m trying to take money from a smart contract. And I think I’m so smart. Like I put a bunch of effort into figuring out this way to steal this money from it. And as soon as I go to do that, just this whale comes up from the deep and just devours me whole. I think I’m actually at the top of the food chain and I’m not even close.
It was somebody else's suggestion, I was just echoing it. What's your SaaS? Customer service is my jam. I'm a Customer Success Manager for a company.
I searched for weeks for a domestic Lizard Labs reseller, no luck.

I don't do custom, especially from NL.

Good to know they are still around! May look into their new new new novel lysergamides.
Maybe that depends on if the rightful owner deducted the stolen items from their taxes.
I don't disagree with you from a very materialist, evolutionary, and anthropological point of view. But we're humans and we can rise above this base analysis.

I am coming at it from more of an ethical point of view, largely utilitarian, I guess, although I don't necessarily describe myself as a utilitarian. Nobody chooses to be brought into this world. To be wrenched from the void into consciousness. It's something inflicted on them by others - specifically their parents. It's the heaviest, most serious ethical decision most people will make in their lifetimes.

I think that by having children you are implicitly saying one of two things "I believe that I will be able to provide this new human I've decided to create the resources, skills, and life such that, on the balance, their joy will outweigh their suffering." or "I care little to none for whether their joy will outweigh their suffering. I want to perpetrate my genes and culture and I need another body to help with the work and secure my comfort in my old age."

I think the former, if carefully considered in an honest way, can be an ethical decision. I think the latter is wholly unethical and more or less amounts to a desire for filial slavery.
> Refuting crypto is an exercise in futility

If your only goal is to persuade people who have no interest in utilizing reason, or to dazzle people who already agree with you with your rhetorical skills, then sure, there’s not much point. But if you actually want to utilize reason yourself and construct or refine a rational argument, that’s certainly not futile.
The original term yog/yoga has very little to do with stretching. Yog in Sanskrit means to unite with, and historically in India it's used to refer ashtanga yoga (raja yoga) which has eight limbs. It's a complete science [0] to master your body and mind, to experience different states of consciousness with meditation.

> Yoga is the mastery of the activities of the mind-field.
Then the seer rests in its true nature.

0: https://swamij.com/index-yoga-meditation-yoga-sutras.htm
It's been used in emergency care for decades. It's one of the most used drugs and part of the basic kit in an ambulance or ER. It's safer than other anesthetics because it doesn't affect respiration so much.
Maybe not 100% requirement, but we have always had the kids’ social security number on taxes. Might make it more difficult to claim without.
But then you've haven't been doing that at all? "web3" has been around as a concept since before Ethereum was even launched, plenty of people in the space have been talking about it for ages (internet time), and it is nothing new. What is new is the internet outrage against it, but easy to avoid that outrage too.

If you have zero desire for something, just stay away? I don't want to write Java code, so I don't.

Hopefully other developers will do whatever the fuck they want to do. Wanna work on cryptocurrencies? Go for it. Wanna write Java code? Sure, why not! Why care about what others are doing?
Even ignoring that a driver is presumed to be more capable (licensed + an adult), driving into a lake is somewhat more obviously dangerous.

Everyone should know not to touch a live plug. But electricity is a more abstract concept and knowing whether the shock will kill you vs. merely stun is probably outside the common knowledge of most people. It's not entirely unreasonable to assume that if Amazon is telling you to touch a plug, that it's not going to horribly maim/kill you. It's dumb, but not so dumb that Amazon should escape liability for it.
I’m sure local police and prosecutors could have gotten him for murder etc. but he had them all on salary.
If your kid is kidnapped you should get a break…
The explore all deployments section is worth a read too. Wealth of info on the whole site and it's designed really well. Clearly catering to the education / general public good will with this site. https://jwst.nasa.gov/content/webbLaunch/deploymentExplorer....
The 'should' in your question is doing a lot of work. You should do what makes you happy.

Sometimes that means trying new things to see what makes you happy!
The writing has been on the wall for awhile.

I picked up a nikon z5 after a long haiatus from using dslrs. (for the last 5 years, I made due with just a google pixel)

#1 thing you notice is the camera is much more compact. Video feed from the viewfinder is close to flawless. (on rare occasions, it lags)

#2 exposure is wysiwyg. I can get an instant preview of the exposure of the image. Its like going from film to dslr in terms of feedback

#3 autofocusing is SOOO MUCH BETTER. I can ove around a autofocus pin anywhere on the screen. its just a green square on a video overlay. I can also take advantage of eye tracking in real time. this is a game changer when shooting difficult subjects. Its not perfect but I can easily see it being flawless in a few more generations.

#4 this one is specific to nikon but mirrorless gave them the opportunity to rethink the lens mount and lens ecosystem. The lenses sit much closer to the sensor so wide angle lenses can be made MUCH lighter. It also means larger theoretical aperture sizes. Nikon has a new manual focus lens that stops down to f0.95!

Additionally, a lot of the things that were downsides of mirrorless have been mitigated as technology has caught up. Battery usage for instance has been an issue with mirrorless systems as they are always on to power the viewfinder. DSLRs by comparison sip power since they only draw a lot of power while taking the photo. I can easily get a full day out of one battery and they are easy to swap so I always walk around with 2-3 backups. Never needed to use them. When I flick it on its pretty close to instant. I wont say its as good as a dslr but Im not using their flagship either. I hear their new z9 is insanely fast.

All in all, I'm very happy with switching to mirrorless
Not all fields of science are created equal. Whether or not studies are replicated or data is available will depend entirely on the field of study.

Certainly, a lot of the social sciences and "soft" sciences have a fair bit of replication/data problems. That said, the biomedical, environmental, geologic, and chemical sciences by and large have really solid data and repeats of that data. The areas of sciences we have a harder time controlling for are those where it'd be unethical to get better data and examples (nutritional science, for example).

There are far too many fields of study to lump all science into the same bucket and call it all untrustworthy.

A bigger problem is that scientific journalism treats every study as being equal. When, in fact, some studies are far better than others and carry a much larger weight of truth.
Offensive Security has few courses that might be interesting.

WEB-300 course in particular https://www.offensive-security.com/awae-oswe/ It shows how vulnerabilities are found using code review and how to exploit them in lab environment.

There's a subscription based model for $2000 where you can pick a course and work on it for a whole year https://www.offensive-security.com/learn/
plenty of “crypto refuters” act in a cult-like fashion as well
mmm everyone should do that to increase its utility

I wonder if there are any tax journals or case law about this

Its up to the government to learn of the illegal activity to levy a charge on that, to then tack on any money laundering charge or wire fraud charge. So if they dont have ways to figure it out, then everyone is good. And investigating something specifically due to fifth amendment use I think would not work well as probable cause - as long as you can afford all the motions and appeals court to afford your rights
You don’t have to admit or declare that the property was stolen. There’s no line for stolen property on a tax return, after all. There’s a catch-all line for “other income” on Schedule 1 that the value must be reported on.
The best part is, in the pure Web 3.0 vision, http:// would be deprecated. It's somewhat absurd. The description of a proposed post-WWW Internet as "the Web" is incoherent. That being said, I think there are some critically important ideas involved. I came up with the term Internet 4 as a substitute but that's also not exactly accurate.
You should keep using vim; there isn't a straight-to-the-point reason why you should switch from vim to Emacs, or vice/versa.
Then stop censoring. Look at what happened in this post. Experts said X, the author said Y, and Y was censored because it disagreed with the experts. Later the experts admitted that X was incorrect. Of course, the experts, who ended up being wrong faced no consequences, while the author who ended up being right was censored. The experts are essentially a privileged class whose opinions are considered to be true by default, and when they get things wrong, it is assumed that this is just a good faith mistake, and forgiven. Everybody else is assumed to be wrong by default, and spreading politically motivated misinformation. When they are right it is assumed to be a fluke and swept under the rug. In this environment the only logical response is to mistrust the appointed "experts." If they are what they say they are let them defend their point against all challengers.
> As someone who has stood up to FUD about bitcoin on this forum

One of the problems with cryptocurrency communities is that they often immediately label any criticism they don't like as "FUD". It's a thought stopping cliche.
I cannot point to any research papers, but here are a few books if you are curious:

- Waking the Tiger: Healing Trauma and Healing Trauma: A Pioneering Program for Restoring the Wisdom of Your Body by Dr. Peter Levine

- The Body Keeps the Score: Brain, Mind, and Body in the Healing of Trauma by Bessel van der Kolk, M.D

Some other keywords to research: complex trauma or CPTSD, somatic experiencing or somatic psychotherapy.

Here is one that points to the psychological effects of myofascial issues: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233680399_Myofascia...
OF COURSE they used Brian Eno...