skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Does Open Camera not show the switch multi-camera button on your phone? From https://opencamera.org.uk/help.html

Switch multi-camera icon - This icon only shows on devices with more than one front and/or back cameras, and allows you to switch between those cameras. For example, a device might have two back cameras, one standard and one ultra-wide, this icon will switch between the standard and ultra-wide camera. If Settings/On screen GUI/"Multiple cameras icon" is disabled, then this icon will not show; instead the "Switch camera" icon can by used to cycle through all the cameras. Note that some devices do not allow third party applications to access their multiple cameras, in which case Open Camera isn't able to use them.
Commenting on my own thought - if your CEO was an AI, then they would be able to drop in on your daily standup and comment on your tickets / powerpoints. which is one end of a spectrum of new org models - the other being (I think) actual independent decision making - something like the difference between a single agent as a company and an eco-system of units as a company.

I suspect we need to revisit Roald Theory of the firm
I suspect that additional incentives wouldn't have changed anyone's behavior here. Nobody involved wanted to crash.
I thought rectangle was the next evolution of spectacle
I think you can just customize the backup-by-copying variable to t, though I haven't tried it. Check the manual.
I have been using Transmit for iOS, and it fits this use case perfectly. In particular I use SSH/SFTP (with key based authentication) to ship files around my WLAN.

Unfortunately, as I have just learned, they stopped offering the software for sale https://panic.com/blog/the-future-of-transmit-ios/.

Disappointing.

That said, I will continue to use Transmit because I paid for it and it does its job well.

From this thread, it appears that secureshellfish may be a good equivalent.
I do this too, also to insightful comments occasionally. I like how you can grab a short link to a specific answer.
TBH, I'm not sure what those "usual first-year-car problems" are these days. That hasn't been my experience though that's admittedly a small sample size.
But the higher the framerate, the less time you have for exposure on each frame.
OP is almost certainly talking about Thiel, not Kurz.

Thiel is a libertarian, and is ostracized by many in tech for rejecting the tenets of Bay Area progressivism. Kurz is not, as far as I can tell, a libertarian.
Gongoozler
Transactions on LN are almost as secure as regular transactions onchain. There is no centralized party involved that you have to trust, to use LN. The funds just get locked on a multisig UTXO and can be unlocked at any moment by broadcasting an onchain transaction. This is more than enough, considering that LN is only needed for small purchases.

The privacy is also better with LN, since nobody but the recipient of the funds knows that you sent them money - LN routing is similar to onion routing that is used in TOR. The node that you are connected to, knows that you're sending money, but doesn't know the recipient. The last but one node knows who is the recipient but doesn't know the sender.

Despite the public ledger, I find blockchain much better for privacy than having to trust my credit card details with actual PII to various companies.

>And maybe that is subjectively valuable to you, but it's not serving as a currency for most people, and maybe it's not good for a tiny subgroup to argue that their interests should be given equal resource budgets to activities that are accessible and useful to the majority of the world?

I don't think that it matters, but it's not a tiny subgroup of people anymore. I think it would even be comparable to the amount of PC gamers worldwide.

The fact is that crypto miners are paying for the energy that they are consuming on the free market, but for some reason, they are criticized for that, unlike other industries.

Gold is quite similar to crypto. It is used as a financial asset (Bitcoin) and as a luxury item (NFTs) which makes up most of the usage of Gold. Gold mining also consumes much more energy than Bitcoin mining, but nobody seems to be upset about it or really care.

Same goes for various entertainment industries, including videogames. Does anyone care that gamers consume X amount of energy for their entertainment? No, because that's not what people normally do. But when it comes to crypto, it's all double standards.
Not really, I have thought through libertarianism pretty completely, and there would be some very big differences between the system we have today (in the US) and what libertarianism would call for.

Hell I can even come up with a workable UBI using libertarian philosophy that would at the same time solve the productivity / automation gap in wages people are seemingly concerned with using georgism as a base.

The reality is people that only have a basic understanding of libertarianism, often only looking to Anarcho style libertarinaism specifically, that make the statements you have.

Other forms of Libertarianism, like Geo-Libertarianism do exist.
How is this over-regulation?
I wouldn't be surprised if that happens regularly. There's lots of insecure code on SO, either because it was written in an insecure way or best practices changed (like md5 hashing passwords).

https://grahamcluley.com/take-care-copy-pasting-code-stack-o...
I’ve got nearly the same CPU in my iPad, MacBook and iPhone. I can do the processing on any device…
> So what if you use a library to do one thing that just happens to do 100 other things (this having a much larger attack surface and bug potential)?

I’ve wondered about this for a while, and one idea that’s crossed my mind is whether compiler stages could be introduced to do this. For example, you add a dependency, you use a few methods and structures. You compile it, the compiler goes through your code, looks at what traits, implementations, etc that you do and don’t use, it grabs just the code required to satisfy these, and proceeds as normal. At the end it spits out a little report for you telling you what specific things it included/excluded from your binary/library. Like tree-shaking in JS but better.

Maybe this already happens during dead-code-elimination passes, or during some other compiler step, maybe most of our libraries are far too interconnected/non-modular to be able to do this without ending up with the whole dependency anyway, maybe it’s computationally infeasible due to some result in Computer Science, I don’t know-and wouldn’t really know where to look to find out-but if it could be done, and if we could go even further to embed this metadata into the resulting binary itself, we’d at least have a provable way of saying “my application is safe from x because it does not include <vulnerable part of lib y>”.

I imagine to do this, you’d need to operate on source code-unless there’s some magic way to do it with precompiled binaries-and runtime dynamism would make things extra difficult, but it’s an interesting idea.
Thank you for the detailed reasoning and explanation.

I was unaware of these nuances, and remember at the time there was a lot of talk of using the legal sledgehammer to set an example (possibly the same media echo chamber you mention).
No imaging system reproduces reality. You're always getting a compromised result.
Who said the unimportant sales computer (desktop) uses ILO? You said you have 500 ILO servers on a special VLAN (or even galvanic separated).
Given that you can order the exact same car three times in a year and get three different configurations including missing components, that's not a surprise.
The most secure system is one that no one can access or use.
The "hard requirement" is just multi-frame noise reduction, which has been around for a lot longer than the AI/ML hype wave, and has always had a risk of producing similar artifacts to this one.
I think you have an oversimplified view of very complicated problems.

1. The long-term pattern of behavior from Apple is to work with manufacturers in developing countries. And to write in very specific requirements for worker treatment into contracts. And to audit facilities, and shut them down when not compliant. And to have Apple staff on-site at those facilities.

They do not see everything, and they do not prevent everything. But they do make more, and a more visible effort than anyone else.

2. Apple cannot "fix" the woes of the developing world, certainly not alone, and certainly not immediately. Even with the cooperation of foreign corporations, with Amazon and Microsoft and Dell who all work with the same partners. Even with the cooperation of foreign governments (local, regional, national), who are of course never ever corrupt, and never look the other way when a sub-sub-sub-contractor does a crappy job. Perfection is not happening.

The proper questions are: Is Apple leading the way for improving things for workers? And are they doing enough to improve things such that additional doings would have only marginal effects? Clearly the answers are YES and maybe. My opinion of the latter "maybe" is more like "probably" because I'm biased to believe that the people who run Apple recognize the moral and economic value in doing so. Obviously you disagree on that, but you are no more objectively correct than I.

3. You honestly believe that someone in Apple was aware of tainted food being served to workers, and decided "eh, who cares?"?? Honestly?

I think that would say more about you than it would about Apple.
Nice !

As a Electronics noob, i have a suggestion to make it complete. Can each pinout be detailed with description of function of each pin and a complete usage scenario with details of voltage levels and data communication? Sort of a Tutorial+HowTo+Reference all combined together.
That has always been the case for photographs from every device that has ever been capable of recording images.
On Linux machines it is probably implemented with vfork + exec.

But the GP joke is (I guess) in suggesting by the "(2)" that it should be a system call, and not a library function that composes system calls.
A Russian Degen's Guide to Making Moni
Possibly. The thing about fair use is that you can never really tell. Commercial intent is only one of the four factors. The market-effect factor would also weigh in her favor. The other two factors — the nature of the work and the substantiality of the copying — plausibly weigh against her. Of course I don't think she'll be prosecuted, or I wouldn't think about posting this, but that's partly because she's not a well-known political dissident who the FBI has a pre-existing grudge against.
And I’m going to take thousands of pictures and never look at them.
Try the Print Friendly browser addon mentioned in the article. You can select what aspects of the page to print or not print.
If someone tells me there is an electrical imbalance with the computer, then I will know we need to fix the computer, rather than the software that runs on it.

with your engine oil analogy, it seems like you are agreeing that brain chemistry is an important part of good mental health, just not the only one.

So if all the other parts of good mental health are in order, that leaves brain chemistry, hormones, etc. As the problem.
Switching speed isn’t really what people are after with CNFETs, broadly speaking they’re after parameters like increased drive current per unit of gate capacitance.
What’s the current state of tiling managers on macOS? Seems Rectangle, Magnet and Amethyst are all mentioned below, has anyone done the “pepsi challenge” and cares to share their findings?

I’d be grateful but I guess I just have to try all three myself…
I meant the first year Model S was built.

Plenty of people advise not buying the first year of any new model from any carmaker, because there are usually more problems than usual. Refreshes are safer.
Pretty sure it's this paper: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1164317

That is Griffin-Lim, which matches the second mention but not the first. It's a fairly well known algorithm for reconstructing speech from spectrum, though I believe is largely superseded these days by vocoders based on neural techniques. (Actually I just checked and the original Tacotron paper cites Griffin-Lim; I do think newer neural TTS approaches have gone beyond it, however)
That's what the "a" in "..as A 'Legal Name'" means, right? That there's not one, all-encompassing, in all legal situations, name.
I don't agree with the premise of this article.

We're talking here not about Amazon warehouse staff, but white collar software and systems engineers. These are people with many employment options.

I am totally free and valid to criticize those who go work for Amazon, the CIA's sysadmins, or those who go work for Microsoft, who makes the software that helps the USG run concentration camps, same as I am to criticize people who write software for smart munitions at Raytheon.

To play the race/orientation/gender card to shut down entirely legitimate moral criticism of certain employers is entirely unreasonable. :(
It's not just the Micron. The Micron is only mentioned specifically because it lets you change the OP area size as a feature. Any SSD where the OP area can be resized dynamically for any reason is affected, and the paper says:

>Recently, many storage devices vary the size of the OP area in real time to optimize performance. [...] The OP area can be freely changed by the user or by the firmware manager.
>Tesla finances and number of EV produced have already proven everything that needed to be proven.

It reads like you mean this in a positive way. I see it as the exact opposite. Tesla have made very few cars unless you compare it to brands like Lamborghini or other speciality cars. VW EVs already outsell Tesla even though they are just ramping up. Tesla's finances is also almost completely based on non-car sales. If Tesla only had income from car sales it would go bankrupt in a few months.
Why men are lonelier in America than elsewhere
"unsubstantive"? This technology will be used against people. I just wanted to point it out in the most unflattering way possible. Like graphic warning and danger signs, it makes people stop and think.

And strange to hear from you for a second time in the last week or so.
> I am unaware of how it handles math expressions in particular.

It does not automatically do order of operations. You have to explicitly use parentheses, as you say. However methods in Smalltalk tend to be quite short do to the nature of the system so it tends to not be as messy as one might expect.
I don’t think the person you’re replying to meant to use “concern” in a positive sense. Does anybody else?
Fascinating. I know very little about golf, but it's always a treat to read a detailed and well-explained article in a completely unfamiliar field. Thanks for sharing!
some campus wifi networks require “security scan” software too.
Trust me it is!
This.

The assumption that we know how atoms work in the brain is absurdly reductionist. I would ask a physicist well versed in information theory to validate the holographic principle's validity. Once they make this breakthrough in physics, then I would use that result to begin to put faith into Sean Carroll's assumption.

"Afterlife" isn't even well defined in this argument. What decisions and experiences are the ones that define you as a conscious individual in the physical sense? Based on your answer to this, I could recreate an "afterlife" decision matrix for you matching your personality to varying degrees by reprogramming the relevant constructs that exist in your brain.

For a physicist, this is not a scientific argument at all. It all sounds very philosophical.
I venture to aver, you pusillanimous chop-logic, that upon undertaking to investigate the situation in greater profundity, you would in all likelihood discover that you are taking the entire thing entirely too seriously!
Nope. Give me a 40 year old East German camera and a roll of Ilford and I’m still perfectly capable of corrupting reality intentionally.
As soon as people get together, they tend to form rules, a leader, and a means for dealing with someone who breaks those rules.

How we find out what the rules should be is by observation of the results. A very large number of societies have been created, with every set of rules imaginable, multiple times.

By correlating rules with success or failure of the societies, we can begin to tease out what the best set of rules are. Clearly, some sets of rules work a lot better than others.

The best outcomes come from rules that guarantee a set of rights, best excemplified by the Declaration of Independence, the inalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, and later by the Bill of Rights.

Some rules work out very badly, like Marxism. No amount of wishing Marxism would work made it work, and no amount of coercion made it work, either.

This strongly implies that rights are natural, innate characteristics of being human.
Given the story is about a particular instrument, it was kind of annoying that you can only really hear it by itself for a brief segment. If I was listening to the music just to listen to music, then yeah, the extreme bass flute wouldn't be what I would be focusing on.
It's hard to tell where the paragraph breaks are.
Yes I'm more likely to let Apple off for not training enough "people with a leafy backdrop" than "people with different colored skin" into their ML.
> I never think about performance, everything is immediate.

It performs all compute tasks immediately? I should start compiling LLVM on that instead!
IANAL but it should not be an issue, in theory. Most of those IP assignment clauses cannot be enforced in court. But your employer can still sue you and their war chest is likely be bigger than yours.

Maybe to avoid any frivolous lawsuits, register domain name using gift card under fake name. And once you are ready, buy it from that fake account. Again if you are really worried, talk to a lawyer.
Strongly disagree, for Steam in particular. I played a lot of computer games in high school and early college, then stopped for about 7 years. When I finally bought a new computer, I somehow remembered my old Steam password and was thrilled to find that all the old games were still on my account, ready to download. In comparison, I had long lost any physical copies of games I had purchased as a youth.

As a bonus, I get the “bragging rights” of having nearly the oldest possible steam account (it can now vote).
Keep digging that hole bro.
I would have liked the world where AIA chasing happened in servers.

Today several browsers which don't have Mozilla's list of intermediates instead (if they don't have a satisfactory chain offered to them) do AIA chasing, meaning that the browser consults the Authority Information Access fields in the X.509 certificate, finds a URL in there and fetches that URL hoping to get a certificate it trusts, often it iterates several times before giving up or reaching a dead end. AIA chasing in browsers is a (small) privacy risk and a (non-trivial) performance cost, plus it can just fail if you don't have as much Internet access, perhaps because you need to talk to a server, whose certificate you are trying to validate, before getting access; or of course it can just fail because temporarily some server is down somewhere.

If server software did AIA chasing (e.g. nginx, or your SMTP server) it would see during startup that you configured a bare certificate, and do the same AIA chasing that browsers do today but only once for the lifetime of the service and with the privilege of being a server (likely better Internet access, and more likely somebody technical sees the error output if there are problems) and it could have retry/fallback behaviour and if it doesn't work well the server can tell its administrator to fix the problem, whereas the browser doesn't have a way to contact that admin.

But Mozilla's choice here was pragmatic. We get the world we deserve.
The "V" programming language has these features built in. https://github.com/vlang/v/blob/master/doc/docs.md#orm
The sign of corruption is that reputation is no longer an irredeemable asset.
That happens sometimes. Knuth got mad there wasn't any good typesetting software for his book and wrote TeX.

Stallman wanted an ecosystem he could control. Did it work? Sort of.
The fact that to execute the malware you need to be able to see it. If there's something that's visible whose job is to execute the payload hidden in the SSD, then that's the part that could be detected by AV software.

That said, it might still be a useful technique just for storing data in a hard to detect way.
It took me about a month (thanks to the Archive for lending me the machinery!) but that was mostly because I kept getting distracted by reading the damned thing. If I'd had greater discipline, I would have missed out on a very pleasant month of evenings reading the OED and listening to the Crash Test Dummies, but I probably would have been able to finish in a week, and then I would have been much better prepared for moving out of my house and into a Volkswagen Vanagon.
Its a GoPro Fusion 360° we never see any video from.
Van der Bellen is doing a great job and has great approval ratings. Also the role of President in Austria is vastly different than the role of President in the U.S.
Usually the Austrian president appoints a new cabinet and dissolves it after the regular period (or this year several times, thanks to our corrupt chancellor)
Isn't that the the end goal of technology? Those of us working in the technology field have had a hand in replacing labor since the first guy that figured out how to connect a plow to an ox.

Our hope, at least mine, is that we remove drudgery and difficulty from people's lives and create new jobs to replace the ones that are lost.
The right to be ignorant is a negative right - which might be why it is so well spread and used :)
The Parallels Developer edition comes with a pretty great window snapping feature. Parallels was the only solution to run Windows on my M1 Mac. In addition to doing a great job at VMs, it comes with a bunch of handy utilities.
AFAICT, BLAKE2s (previously SHA-1) is only being used for the forward secrecy element, in this case mixing a hash of the pool back into the core state, which is actually still using ChaCha20 for expansion. From quick inspection (never read this code before) I think the number of bytes in the pool is 416 (104 * 4). (See poolwords defined at https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/lin...) For such relatively small messages and based on the cycles-per-byte performance numbers from https://w3.lasca.ic.unicamp.br/media/publications/p9-faz-her... (SHA-NI benchmarks), https://www.blake2.net/blake2_20130129.pdf (BLAKE2 paper), and https://bench.cr.yp.to/results-hash.html (comprehensive table of measurements), I don't see any performance reasons for choosing BLAKE2s over SHA-256. Rather, software SHA-256 and BLAKE2s seem comparable (and that's being charitable to BLAKE2s), and SHA-NI is definitely faster.

Perhaps there were other considerations at play. Maybe something as simple as the author's preference. One thing that probably wasn't a consideration is FIPS compliance--the core function is ChaCha20 so FIPS kernels require a completely different CSPRNG, anyhow.
Yeah I personally really like array langs so I was just wondering why other people don't.
Hows the macOS support on these? I’m due a monitor upgrade and an ultra wide is where I’m leaning..
I gave all three of those a try when I was trying MacOS a year or so ago. Rectangle and Magnet basically fill the same niche, except Rectangle is free and kinda eliminates the need for Magnet (I don't quite remember what Magnet did better but I don't remember it being enough to convince me to use it). Amethyst is entire beast of it's own though, and I almost immediately decided it wasn't for me. It doesn't replace the default window server, so it ends up running like a bad TWM and an even worse desktop option. Of the three, Rectangle is the only one I can't live without on MacOS. Amethyst kinda just feels like a waste of resources.