skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Hmm maybe I'm younger than you, but I thought this was going in a different direction, to me there was often too much of an open acceptance. Growing up for me, drugs have felt like the opposite. It's what the cool kids did, and doing it was cool. Not doing it well, mind you, with lots of rules and carefulness. Just doing it to party and fit in. I know that isn't new, but where I was growing up even the smart kids who were clean most of the year would go to music festivals and experiment with ecstacy and other powerful drugs. It's in music, on tv, and multiple presidents have done them. The problem I've felt, has been that very few seem to know how to do drugs the right way

Most people seem to use them like a button that you hit when you wanna party and let loose. To me, they're very different-- they're buttons with very specific effects. A very very small dose of an opiate can make you more sociable and even less stressed. It's not optimal, but before I learned healthier coping mechanisms I used this a lot. But damn it though I stay away, I have to admit in extreme moderation they still can enhance performance unbelievably well. Only problem is they're insanely addictive, so I stay away.

My point is that I think there are smarter ways to use drugs, more like a doctor than like a rapper. I know some people will always want to use drugs like they're in a music video, you can't do much about that. But I think much of the population would actually like to use drugs in a more informed and pragmatic way. Is it not right to use drugs to have fun? No, at least I don't think there is a right way to use drugs. But I do think treating them like "fun" buttons is a terrible idea. I'm not against ecstacy, but it's neurotoxic. I'm not against weed but it can trigger mental disorders in some who are susceptible. I'm not against cocaine but honestly a lot of it does have fentanyl added in nowadays and unless you have the patience to test it in advance first you should stay away. Most people don't consider any of this, but they should. Drugs change your brain permanently(that's why the second time is never like the first), they're not to be taken lightly.

Unfortunately, there's very little discussion on harm reduction and smart drug use. It's either the devil, or it's not a big deal. The truth, as always, is somewhere in between
I use MetalLB and the comparison table somewhat confuses me.

> Expose default type of services (ClusterIP) external

What's the use case of this? ClusterIP, by API definition, is used within the cluster. If I need to expose something to external, I use a LoadBalancer service.

> Frontend IP Address sharing

The table says MetalLB cannot do this. But isn't it just: https://metallb.universe.tf/usage/#ip-address-sharing ?

> Auto-add Kubernetes nodes

MetalLB speakers are commonly deployed as daemonsets. When a new node joins a cluster, the speaker will be deployed onto it by the daemonset controller. Isn't that what "auto-add" means? What kind of auto-add functionality does MetalLB miss?

With that said, software LBs do have a lot of issues, and this is a pretty interesting approach.
This brings up an interesting question, where does innate character come from?

In the case of identical twins, their (biological) nature and nurture (upbringing) are the same or very similar, yet their innate character can be very different.

If you believe in the existence of a non-physical soul/spirit, that could be an explanation.
I'm not implying a value judgment about Singapore's drug policy. Drug policy is what I'd call a Wicked Problem[1] and there's no black and white 'right' thing to do. They might execute some drug dealers and imprison a bunch of people, but on the other hand they have drastically reduced overdose deaths, which in the US' 18-45 age group have killed nearly twice as many people Covid[2]. Is that an excuse for the authoritarianism? That's not a judgment I'm making, just pointing out that there are tradeoffs.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wicked_problem

[2] https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/fentanyl-overdose-death/
The NSA is actually it's own layer in the OSI model. They won't teach you about this in school, though, but there are even more than 7 layers.... /s
Guess what? A ladder turns parallel immigration into serial immigration. It's a lot easier for border patrol to wait for people to climb over the ladder to arrest them than it is to chase 500 people all running in different directions.
> It's very rare that you see acquisitions work out like this

The acquisition was a normal acquisition.

What made it special was the DOJ stepping in to destroy Microsoft because Bill Gates was essentially too rich and his riches were so talked about that people in DC wanted to show him who's the alpha.

Apple would have gone to zero without Microsoft essentially saving it from bankruptcy, and it would be irrelevant had the DOJ not attacked Microsoft with such vigor.
> Mullvad is Swedish.

Indeed, it's the Swedish word for "mole". Chosen, I assume, because like a VPN, the animal digs tunnels.
Single-sided: 360 KB, double-sided (or double density): 720 KB, high density: 1.44MB.

There were 2.88 MB disks and drives but they never gained much traction, because they were expensive and the PC industry kept promising various "floppy killers" like the ZIP drive.
I had no idea it was focused on hardware. It applies to software too.
Mikrotik has a ton of options for that.
The redirect to a $LARGE_COMPANY/process is best understood as what everyone who does not have $THE_WIRE/suction deals with to get anything done. No one that matters at a $LARGE_COMPANY is impeded by the process unless they want to be impeded by the process. (eg: delaying tactic, turf war!, pass for political reasons, don't think it matters and so can't be bothered, think that the request is wrong for reasons, and so on.)

Large companies view your day-to-day activities through a very different lens than a startup, and they want you to use a very different lens as well, and you'd need to get the right combination of manager and mentor and team and teammates and yourself to get the payoff.

I'd roll into another startup; since you haven't, I'd assume you have reasons for not rolling into another startup, but it's getting kind of abstract at this point.
Sadly OpenWRT doesn’t support band steering.
I'm not very good. Maybe partially lack of experience. I think I mostly have some 400TX and Fomapan. I think I have some Fuji 400 something for color. I have some dry developer too. Probably have to use it up fairly soon before it gets too old. I develop the negatives, but then scan them using a photo scanner.
> 1if_

This is a neat shortcut to simply get the very first archived version! I often have to go to /*/ and manually click on one of them, which is very tiring.

Is there one to get the latest?
Probably nothing but most decent French wines use a cork and I use stopper to close it if we're not finishing the bottle. I guess I could buy a fake cork instead but it's pretty much the same at that point.

My point was, it's not hard to seal an opened cork bottle
Wow. That audio chat was obnoxious. Nerds laughing at themselves about how smart they are (in hindsight).

NeXT was attempting to bring OOP programming to the masses, along with some really excellent for the time (and even now) rapid development tools.

Try some of the applications (FrameMaker, Mathematica, IB, etc) on NeXT. Then try the equivalents on Sun (which they were holding up as the exemplar in that audio chat), not even in the same ballpark.

They actually got very good traction in financial services and a few other areas. Just too late.

As for the hardware, they were 3 years too early for what they wanted to do.
Had they held in until 1996 they could have had a fast enough machine for the price target they wanted. (Say 100mhz, 32meg ram, ~gig disk, high res colour).

Edit: Of course it turned out NeXT was right once they got a large enough market for it when they acquired Apple.
I understand it this way. Say, you are a nuclear terrorist and store atomic bomb schematics in S3. The FBI learns about that and tells Bezos (or whoever is Amazon CEO these days) to delete your files or go to jail. Bezos obliges. That's the centralized service.

Now if you store your atomic bomb schematics in Storj, FBI can't delete it because it's distributed across thousands of computers whose owners don't even know what they are storing.
This wasn’t a merger it was a reverse takeover. Jobs basically got rid of a large amount of unprofitable projects and merge NextStep with a Mac UX and make a compelling computer to use it with.

The result was what Apple needed to compete. A modern OS made of with a modern UI with XNU that had memory protection that can compete with Windows. Also a transition VM for older software.The iMac broke away and showed that computers could look cool.

The iPod showed Apple could make compelling Consumer electronics
XNU got adopted with the iPhone iPad and with what they learned with the iPod.

And moving Apple to Intel and then to Apple Silicon was similar to going from MacOS 9 to 10.

Not many companies can claim so many innovative devices and most get 2 or 3.
For the curious, I found this manual[1] about programming the IBM 7090 (the mainframe mentioned in the article).

The machine language and corresponding assembly code is still recognizable by today's standards. It looks pretty similar to the Z-80, 6502 and 8086 assembly that I learned back in the day.

[1]https://justine.lol/sectorlisp/ibm709.pdf
Looks very cool - first time I've heard of this one. Minor feedback note: in your demo video, the top menu bar is mostly cut off (viewing on Chrome on Mac M1 Monterey), so when you are explaining the menu bar, I can only see the bottom sliver of it. I can use my imagination to figure it out, but ideally the video would be showing the whole menu bar. Other than that, looks great!
I think a downvote on this is unfair. Excessive memory usage starts in the data model. And yea, a difference of a few bytes there can quickly stack up (sorry for pun).
CPU time is far from free unless you never needed it. W.r.t cloud pricing the expense (ime) goes:

CPU > Ram > Network > Disk(even the fastest).

That’s at least the most difference compared to a normal server or even a desktop. The markup on CPU cores in the cloud is insane.
> My friends and family who have been the most active users of psychedelics have had their post-adolescent lives plagued by divorce, alienation from friends, misguided career decisions and have made them easily distracted and often hurtful insensitive people who seem to have a perennial inability to empathize with others or feel emotional remorse.

These sound like personality problems that cause drug use.

It's very hard for me to imagine drug use causing personality problems. Unless they were using them in childhood.

> Ultimately the heavy users of psychedelics I am closest with seem like they have become docile bodies with a diminished capacity for critical thought that fit very neatly into an abusive capitalist society that wants them to endlessly chase fame and fortune while remaining addicted to over-stimulating digital media. And its hard to believe thats what Huxley and the intellectuals of his generation would have wanted.

That's what our society does to everyone, not just drug users.

Maybe the drug users have a harder time "growing up" because of the personality problems that caused them to use the drugs.
I genuinely didn't understand the point he's trying to make.

Could someone ELI5?
Remember the "Nothing is Beyond Our Reach" mission patch? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USA-247

I sense the people running these things don't care as much as they used to about blending in.
Those "rare issues that would have been tolerated in almost every other field" are the root cause that killed hundreds of people.
Now fixed, thanks for the heads up!
That would just remove the food-source. Removing the food source for a colony that you would rather have stay-put seems like it would be counterproductive.
The Oldest House
From Maven 3 to Maven 5 (Java)
They're a day late and a dollar short. 5G is widespread in metropolitan area which tend to host airports. What's the actual deal with this?
Any conversation around the 5g rollout was colour washed from day one. I assume that happened naturally but who knows really. I have seen very very little informative conversation online, mainly because it became something like the current vaccine debate where the middle line is drowned out by the "believers", and the "crazies". I'm not really surprised to see seemingly routine issues go unnoticed until now.
Why is it not OK for companies to ask you to use the software on their terms?
This is a limitation of the OS though. The CPUs are the fastest JavaScript rendering CPUs that exist at any power consumption point.

I think that’s why people are so amped about the M1 (and getting Linux into it)
I don’t believe it was the money that really mattered, but the commitment to provide Office for Mac made a big difference.
Nope, sadly.
You're so entangled in the shit you tried to paddle you don't even know where you are now.

Let me get you back on track:

You were saying FOA deemed sea food as important, like that was some argument that justifies breeding yet another animal with high levels of cognition.

I said that Pescanova wasn't trying to save the world from hunger, they sell to retail and restaurants, so this is just a way to cut costs.

And you went on some non-sense bullshit about culture - which of course doesn't justify wrong doing am I right? I broke it down to help you understand it giving you examples.

Now... you're trying to flip this around, bridging from FOA - which you mentioned in some stupid attempt to justify eating octopus and lobster - to me being jealous of those who can afford to pay for such foods.

You are owning yourself with your own arguments man, we just need to sit back and watch you.

>I'm adult, and not impressed by such dumb attempts of emotional manipulation.

Well you're not behaving like an adult, but more like a teen that's grasping for arguments after he paddled bullshit and got caught.

>You obviously never has been in a Mediterranean country. Or in Southern Asia. Or in South America.

I'm from the south of Portugal my guy, you know, one of the cultural groups you were talking about. We have plenty of octopus and lobster - we also have bull fighting just in case you didn't know.

Yeah... that's a wrap.
Having movie guns (and other props) as a hobby isn't specifically American.
I live in a country with very strict gun control laws, and I collect and build replica movie guns (and other prop replicas).
I hate what guns are used for, but I love movies.

BTW. As a consequence of my hobby, I have begun finding the history of handguns interesting though. I have also started to appreciate the human-scale mechanical engineering and the design for usability and ergonomics.
Gun designers don't mess about with the user interface when it is literally a matter of life and death.
It is possible on DVB-T and DVB-S, and it's possible to extract the teletext service from the transport streams.
This feature is stupid. I never buy TP-link products because I can't believe people who ship like this. ref: https://community.tp-link.com/en/home/forum/topic/160293
Does Ubiquity use a standard ad network architecture that allows code from unknown third parties to run within your network?
Bayes’ Theorem Unbound
Matt Mullenweg, WordPress are building a more open internet
> They're still a somewhat small fraction though

Feel free to cite some sources and specify what you mean by a small fraction... The United states is large and I can point to several areas where pedestrian and cyclist injuries and fatalities are not a small fraction. They tend to be where people are allowed to walk and bike and not just areas where it's only legal or feasible to drive.

> The average crash kills more occupants than pedestrians

In the United States, that is by design. Besides a handful of primarily coastal cities, you cannot legally or feasibly bike or walk in many places.

> I don't think pedestrians are a reason to say teens shouldn't drive.

I can't find anywhere in this thread that anyone was making a claim that teens shouldn't be able to drive. I believe people were saying we shouldn't allow people who are, statistically speaking, the least capable of driving safely to drive just because they'll be safer if they crash. We shouldn't lower our already extremely low bar for driving standards just because cars are getting bigger and occupants are more likely to survive when they run into a person or a tree.

I'd be perfectly fine with a driving age of 16, as long as the license was limited to vehicles that were under a specific size/weight and our driving standards and tests were greatly improved... With states like Georgia moving ahead with allowing anyone to get a license only with parental approval[0], I have no faith in things getting any better.

[0] https://www.complex.com/life/2020/04/georgia-drops-driving-t...
The real reason is that the manager doesn't care at all, and it takes a lot less effort to say no than yes.
There is a classic programming joke where, to my eyes, the Oxford comma is a must:

"There are two hard problems in computer science: naming things, cache invalidation, and off by one errors."

Without the comma it seems weird to me:

"There are two hard problems in computer science: naming things, cache invalidation and off by one errors."
Honestly, I kind of regret the sentence that you quoted. Whether the OP is correct about the complexity of the change or whether the deploy team is right to be protective over it is is really missing the point—the point is that the OP needs to have more humility and understanding for the perspective of the other team when navigating these processes.

EDIT: I felt bad enough that I went and edited that sentence, in case anyone reading this later is confused.
So what if the name leaks and some hapless computer-unsavvy person happens to call John's Computer Services to help him get rid of the 32 rows of IE toolbars on his Pentium IV-based PC running Windows Vista?

At least Titanpointe sounds like a government codename and something vaguely menacing that you shouldn't really mess with.
Should customers of a product be forced to either spend 100$ for a new product and generate more ewaste, or tinker with their device leaving it in an unsupported perhaps even out of warranty state?

Maybe some people are happy with either option, but it sure is unethical to force that choice, especially when all the effort it could have taken from the manufacturer was to add a boolean flag.

I'd complain too, not everyone is in the same situation, and this is dodgy behavior anyway regardless of me liking the workarounds or not, simply having to workaround is bad enough in principle.
that statement about "me" is not really justified by the science. https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn2943-brain-tumour-cau...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuroscience_of_free_will

In some contexts we are creatures of cause and effect, interdependent on many chance things. Even yawning is not solely a matter of sovereignty.

My thoughts may not control your thoughts but still the analysis of more than one person at a time is useful.
A completely useless busywork to generate a chart that will eventually get upper management to devour each other? Boy, that sounds like a job for ISO 9001: http://9001quality.com/iso-9001-organizational-structure-job...
Why do Ethernet standards mostly come in 10x orders of magnitude, anyway?

10 -> 100 -> 1000 -> 10G -> 100G

I know there are some oddball 25G, 40G, and 2.5G out there too, but always wondered this.
Create a localized field that disables the phone except for 911 calls when the car is in motion. If the car is not moving the phone can do anything. Once the car starts moving everything except 911 calls is disabled. Now this can't be just a Bluetooth signal or RFID signal because those can extend far outside the car and disrupt other peoples phones. So you need to limit the transmission of the disabling signal to only the interior of the car, preferably just near the driver. Using the near field effect of radio might be a solution, see this paper:

https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3300061.3300120

This could give you fairly precise proximity limits which could be used to define a zone of no operation around the driver. It would likely extend a little beyond the outside of the car, but if widely used and known about would not cause most people any issues, they'd know to move a foot or two away to regain use of their phone. In most circumstances they'd never be close enough to be affected.

A similar solution might be to use skin capacitive conduction effects to create a body area network for the driver. The driver sits on the seat and if the car is moving a signal is capacitively coupled to their body from the seat. The outside of the phone is metal or has an internal capacitive sensor and conducts the signal to circuitry in the phone disabling it. As long as the driver is in the seat and the car is moving the phone does not work (again except for 911 calls). This might be easier to defeat by placing something on the seat, but perhaps some capacitive or radar sensing of the driver could make that difficult or could detect an attempt to defeat it.

If you want the phone to continue to be disabled at stoplights/signs then have the stoplight/sign talk to the car and tell it to disallow use of the phone, just the same as if it was in motion. If a driver wants/needs to use their phone they have to stop the car somewhere away from a stoplight/sign. Or disallow use of the phone as long as the driver is in the drivers seat, though that seems more dangerous since it forces the driver to get out of the car if they want to make a call (though again 911 calls could be allowed).

Probably a machine learning classifier could tell when the phone is in a moving car using accelerometer signals, but I'm not sure I'd trust it to be accurate enough.

Extra points if you can figure out how to let background processes on the phone keep running so that data transfers are not halted while still blocking use of the phone (maybe just as simple as disabling the screen showing only an emergency button? But then there are also voice assistants. Maybe it's ok to let those function?)
Ansible Red Hat detector Remote Code Execution – Log4j (CVE-2021-44228)
Ansible detector scanner playbook to verify target Linux hosts using the official Red Hat Log4j detector script Remote Code Execution - log4j (CVE-2021-44228)
If the framers hadn't felt the First Amendment to be necessary, based on their awareness of both classical and all-too-recent history, they wouldn't have bothered including it. Arguably the same is true for the Second Amendment.
Why avoid it though? Why share an inferior resource that's also more expensive?
I emailed Steve at Apple right after the merger.

Said what could save Apple would be a small, handheld, battery-powered device that WAS your computer, and could plug into anything and be your computer.

Today I'm happy to use a Samsung Galaxy S21 that plugs into a monitor and is my computer.
That pretty well fits the typical mindset of the past decade. Nobody wants to take risks and build shit, everyone is instead looking for a noble excuse to get their share of money and authority without actually doing any hard work.
This is such a cool demo!
"your presupposition that only the top 1% .. have health insurance"
"so could only come up with the above as riposte."

So you throw an accusation that you literally pulled out of your rear and will not dignify the point that your interlocutor made with any response?

I think this has gone well past reasonable discourse and we can no longer assume good faith from you.
Not only that, the issue was caused by Boeing cheaping out on quantity of sensors, and then the ‘there is an issue’ light was sold as a safety upgrade. And the reason this was all needed was because Boeing wanted to escape having to recertify pilots for a new type rating.
Wasn't there some language in the deal about Internet Explorer as well as Office?