skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You might be interested in some code that illustrates the problem of hidden variables and the EPR paradox: https://pastebin.com/J4ZUhG8e. The issue is that we can't replicate what QM predicts (and experiments validate) using hidden variables without additional steps or assumptions. For example, in that code, there are a few possible ways we could still produce the QM correlation function with local hidden variables:

1. When we measure the first particle, we alter the second particle to produce the desired correlation. This is the communication loophole. If you move the particles far enough apart, it requires superluminal communication, which GR says is impossible. This is what Einstein was getting at in the EPR paper; if what the Copenhagen interpretation of QM says is true, and the particle is in both states at once, measuring it collapses it to a given state, and the other particle suddenly "knows" what it should be, even though the propagation of information through the universe has a speed limit.

2. We could define an additional hidden variable in [0,1], and do rejection sampling at the detector. Anything that is rejected is not detected, and we only deal with detected particles. This is the detection loophole. I'm not an expert, but this is the only one that really makes sense to me as a good candidate for a hidden variables theory, and I believe it's been ruled out by experiment.

3. We could bias the initial sampling of our hidden variables. The problem is, this requires that we know the setting of the detector ahead of time. As far as I understand it, this is essentially what superdeterminism comes down to: you know the experiment setting ahead of time because everything is completely deterministic, like a movie reel being rolled forwards. You can thus bias the initial sampling step to produce the QM correlation function. Aside from being unfalsifiable, it still leaves open the question of why this would happen. It essentially means that all QM experiments have predetermined outcomes, and for whatever reason, those outcomes are the outcomes we observe.

Ultimately, it seems to me that Bell's inequality is more a statement about the fundamental incompatibility of quantum probability with classical mechanics and probability. If QM is correct, and it seems that it is, then you have to give up certain assumptions such as locality.
ok so you’re upset that I simplified the quote, got it (sorry for the out of band reply, it cant nest any deeper).

I should have singled out the word “attacks” because thats the bone i’m picking… no one is attacking anything, that’s reductive language that insinuates hostility towards algebra and creates this divisive rhetoric. It’s simply a curriculum change, maybe it’s a bad one… but it’s not completely illogical and I’m interested to see how it goes.

Sorry if I was unclear, I can assure you I have no interest in making you look bad because I have no idea who you are.

Update: “early” doesn’t change that for me, it’s not “attacks on early algebra” it’s a curriculum change

“revolting liar” also seems really extreme and personal for this simple disagreement
I am 50+ myself and really surprised that you think so. All my knowledge and experience is still relevant and valuables today. Would you mind letting us know more details of why you think your experience is not valuable?
You're very lucky to have that. I've always wanted a circle of programmers to build stuff with. Its an incredible force multiplier and I'm sure you'll have fond memories of that camaraderie for life.
I wrote about my unconventional use of Swift on Linux (i.e. not a web app) a few months ago: https://liuliu.me/eyes/data-science-setup-with-swift-in-2021...
With so few spots available, elite college admissions cannot be fair by definition. Nothing will ever change that. You can’t have an elite institution that everyone can get into. I mean, you can if that’s the goal but then it’s not elite.
If you consider Symmetry investments a D success story, we do not do that - we do have a fork of LDC but I've never needed to use it, as far as I'm aware it's just an early release in effect, no new features.
"I've given up... That's probably what "tech" companies are hoping you will do.

You don't have "googlesyndication.com" blocked?
Backpropagation sort of handles this.
The real reason we don't have what you describe is learning algorithms have to be efficient. So, our training/inference algorithms and 'neural' network design is all targeted to be easily representable as matrix multiplications.

Maybe with some hypothetical analog computer we could have fast training of arbitrary networks.
> Hierarchies work because they allow someone close to the work to take a very deep, detail-oriented view, while allowing others to operate at broader, higher layer of abstraction.

I almost never see this happen in real life. Maybe for a little while when a team first starts to establish hierarchies. But it always degrades, in my experience, until there exists an middle layer of management that only serves to slow down productivity. If you want to find out what's going wrong in any large corporate minded software studio, the managers will never give you the correct answer. Go ask the thought workers in the trenches as they typically understand why productivity drops off a cliff. When you have a brilliant visionary at the "broader, higher layer of abstraction" with the productive members of the team reporting directly, magic CAN happen. But largely, "managers" and similar roles are useless bloat. Same goes for the PM/producer type roles. I have a friend who started a game development studio a few years ago and committed to NEVER hiring a producer. It was bold. It's going really well and I think he's totally on to something. IMO, you can build better teams without those roles involved at all.
Regan passed a bunch of bills as Governor that basically disbanded mental health care for the homeless.

Since it’s illegal to stick them in a drug rehab clinic, mandatory counseling sessions, or even force them back on their meds (with their prior written consent), all that’s left is putting them out of the public eye while they get high, I guess.

Or, maybe we could just switch the law back to what it was in 70’s.
The best you can come up with for controversies in epidemiology are from non-epidemiologists?
You've nailed it.

DevOps guys are senior sys admin in the cloud (and that last caveat isn't mandatory). People shit on sys admins all the time but the only real difference between senior sys admins and DevOps engineers is pay packet, tools and responsibility.
The code used in the exploit itself itself looks rather harmless, as it was created to be a mitigation against finding players based on previously loaded chunks. https://github.com/PaperMC/Paper/blob/ver/1.12.2/Spigot-Serv...
> resting at home

Home arrest, more likely...
'Free Market' doesn't mean 'no regulation', in fact the existance of externalites prevents a free market from functioning as it is supposed to.
Simple probability and mathematics may be the answer to life's origins
A file system as a database is one of those things that makes a good pitch but falls down pretty hard once you try implementing it. It falls apart faster if you've got to touch the Internet.

The first and biggest problem is that different types of files have metadata they consider to be important. Author and editor information useful for collaborative editing in a Word document is immaterial to a static raster image saved with a lossy codec. So your database ends up with dozens to hundreds of schemas to store metadata. You still need to serialized and deserialize metadata on files going out or coming in. If some unrelated application (not the authoring application) went and edited the database, which metadata for that file is canonical? The world may never know.

If you're building some metadata management database that's also storing binary blobs on addressed blocks on a disk, you might as well use a traditional file system and have a read-only database on top.

That way the file system stores bytes. An application unrelated to authoring can safely shuffle those bytes over the Internet. It's up to an authoring/editing application to store appropriate metadata.

The files themselves always have the canonical metadata and the read-only database for finding/organizing the files can just update when it's notified of a change in the file.

The database can focus on database things and the file system can make sure bytes go where they need to be. This also gives the flexibility to swap out either the file system or database at any time. This is the way Windows and macOS went and how many Linux DEs work.
I do, it's called "quantum mechanics". It's the most thoroughly verified theory in the history of physics, and in my subjective opinion the most mathematically beautiful one. It is the greatest pinnacle of human scientific achievement.

But people think the idea that things might superimpose on each other like waves is weird, it's not what they see everyday objects that are 10,000,000,000x larger behaving, so it can't possibly be right, and they keep making up overcomplicated nonsense so that they can keep pretending that elementary particles behave like billiard balls.
If a graduate can't pay back their loan, all four of the involved parties should have to take a hit. Yes, four: the graduate, the bank, the university, and the taxpayers.

You could divide it up into 4 equal parts for all I care: if someone has paid back at least 25% of their loan, and get want to declare bankruptcy, they should be allowed to do so, but the taxpayers shouldn't pick up the whole check. The bank should definitely eat some of it, and the university should take a financial hit as well.
Amputated fingertips sometimes grow back (2013)
It is open source:

https://github.com/stream-labs/streamlabs-obs/
There's only one real blockchain; the longest one. That's the whole point of the blockchain. It's a global solution. If someone's trying to sell you on parallel blockchains they're trying to scam you.
If their data comes from a controlled bubble and they need not assume "real-world" data, then CLMUL might do nicely but best case it would likely only be a marginal improvement (and even then I would be willing to bet, not at anything less than 512 bit vector sizes). Best case, it still needs additional vector calls to support quoting. Obviously, if no quoting will be supported, it's even simpler, but then you also cannot support commas or newlines inside of cell values and are getting so far from "CSV" that you might as well just say you have pipe-delimited data which happens to use comma instead of pipe in which case you don't need CLMUL. If quoting needs to be supported, CLMUL will still require a number of repeated passes, shifts etc to deal with the various cases including an escaped first quote char, last quote char, non-first-or-last quote char and embedded commas/newlines.
Oh yes. there's absolutely analogies to that here. It's more common with liquor. Quebec has substantially lower taxes than Ontario and there's a major city straddling the border. Both ordinary individuals and bar owners do routine runs to Quebec to stock up. This is illegal, but given the unrestricted internal border, is about as likely to be caught as interstate smuggling in the USA.
From academia, it depends on which field. Too much of a black box to rely on nns
Civilisation started heavily relying on coal a few hundred years ago. The Earth was well-dominated by humans by then. It very probably would have taken a lot longer to get to where we are now, but I don't think there was any danger of seventeenth century civilisation falling to dust because there was no coal to be found.
Unless the synth has usb, you would need a usb audio interface with midi, or a usb midi interface. This only adds wireless capability.
The point is that exa is a tool for listing files in a more human readable way. In what situation would you ever need to manually read (with your eyes) a list of 70k files? For this use case you should just use ls.
Beanstalk: A Decentralized Credit Based Stablecoin Protocol
I'm creating a faster search engine of usual programming queries and this article is very helpful. The quick search is performed from a preloaded database in memory, so it takes milliseconds to find and update, no web queries, no page reloading. I started this project because I switch a lot between languages and constantly forget/confuse their syntax, so I wanted it to show me the snippet for that same operation in those different languages instead of doing several searches. Don't want to hijack this thread, but I'd like to know what features you people would expect.
What is that paragraph indented to demonstrate? It looks like he making a decent point using generalities as examples.
As promised: https://github.com/liquidaty/zsv
You're still taking the "early" out to make your rhetoric work. And justifying it by equivocating between a material misquote and a "simplified" quote. This doesn't fly anywhere.

We're done here. You're a revolting liar and always will be.
+1. Their business model isn’t ads, it’s 4k$ open access fees paid by the authors
Does anyone have first-hand experience with a company using fingerprinting in practice for the more standard marketing uses?

How does it work? What value does it provide? Who are the major players?

I work in marketing but feel like it’s a completely other world.
What is your opinion on impromptu[0]? This is my favorite music video of his[1]. The creator is now working on Extempore[2].

[0]: http://impromptu.moso.com.au/

[1]: https://vimeo.com/2579694

[2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extempore_(software)
The odd thing is that a public API is just as often an attempt to take something away as opposed to give something.

This one is really good

https://metmuseum.github.io/

but the first result on bing is this spam page (boy the "API Economy" attracts spam)

https://www.programmableweb.com/api/metropolitan-museum-art-...

The Met has a generous API limit, 80 requests per second! Usually though an API exists to make you suffer, register, deal with API limits and get access to less data than there is on the website. Around that hover a large number of "integration" providers that boast about the quantity of "integrations" that they have (table stakes are "hundreds") but say nothing about the quality.

There's nothing like having a complete copy of the database or at least a complete summary. There are many things that are obvious when you have a mirror of the whole thing but that's you'll struggle with like a bubble under the rug if you are forced to look at things a record at a time. One of the reasons why the semantic web idea of dereferencing URLs has been at best a partial success is that randomly poking at a data set means you're likely to miss what's important and get stuck in trivia.

I downloaded all the metadata for the met and that lets me ask questions like "show me all the images with an aspect ratio between 0.98 and 1.02".
> Interesting read, thanks, but so far I don't get the impression that the gold standard features as prominently in the explanations as you claim?

To preface this, I think a combination of the two mainstream proposals (Keynesian, Monetarist) provide the best explanation, rather than an either/or approach.

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causes_of_the_Great_Depression...

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causes_of_the_Great_Depression...

The Keynesian and Monetarist explanations are slightly different, but both point fingers at insufficient money supply. But why was the money supply insufficient? Well, because of the gold standard. The federal government would trade dollars for gold at a fixed conversion rate, so the supply of dollars was fixed against the supply of gold that the treasury was holding. As demand for dollars grew faster than the treasury could expand its gold reserves, deflation happened. As banks started to fail the need to keep the money supply proportional to the gold reserves prevented the Federal Reserve from creating money to extend loans to failing banks, touching off waves of failures and economic crisis. And then with the economy stagnated due to demand shocks, business failures, and unemployment, the need to keep the money supply proportional to the gold reserves prevented the Federal Reserve from creating money to loan to the federal government to boost spending. Instead the federal government raised taxes to strengthen government finances, taking even more money out of the economy at a critical time, because it could not originate money without buying gold from somewhere, and nobody was selling, including other countries that themselves needed gold for their gold-backed currencies. (The money shortage was at this point basically global.)

It wasn't until FDR suspended redemption of dollars for gold and forced everyone with gold to turn it over to the treasury in exchange for dollars that the money supply could be meaningfully expanded (and then only in proportion to the amount of surrendered gold). Then, with the nation's stock of gold under the control of the treasury and redemptions of dollars for gold suspended, the federal government could go about meaningfully expanding the money supply, which it did by announcing that the value of gold had increased from $20/ounce to $35/ounce, which allowed the federal government to issue 70% more dollars, since the money supply was still actually restricted to the amount of gold held by the treasury. (Though if the government owns all the gold, and doesn't actually allow redemptions of dollars for gold, and gets to set the price of gold, you basically have a fiat currency with additional steps).
Just saw your reply, but I think you're missing my point and I'm not sure if it's willful or not. If not, here it is again: The difference in experience between Word/Docs and the various text-based markup languages is not as significant as the difference that someone would have experienced going from a typewriter to something digital, whether troff or anything else. It is like trying to get someone to go from Excel -> another programming language, versus a handheld calculator and pen and paper to anything on a computer. There are differences, I'm not saying there aren't and you're being obtuse if that's how you're taking it, but the magnitude is far less.

Regarding your "don't want to be distracted", Word has had an outline mode since at least 1995 (first time I used Word). Not sure about Google Docs, but it's a perfectly fine distraction free writing environment. So that's not even a selling point for users of Word.
That's exactly how I see it. A manyfold return on the money investment. I was an obese sedentary homebody before I signed up for a running class on a whim. It's been 3 years. Every run is a celebration of what I can do. I'd cut many other things before I cut my running expenses if push comes to shove.
The born rule for starters.
But this isn't about what you know or don't know. It's about the most expedient way to solve a problem. A lot of times, you might know enough to figure it out within five or ten minutes, but if you Google it, that goes down to 30-60 seconds.
*Cease and desist

Though right now it's kind of an unintended assist
Some googling turned up https://github.com/mit-pdos/noria.
Windows can run Linux in the subsystem and has a better Android emulator than Linux. Windows doesn’t run old windows programs as well as wine though, and if it hasn’t happened yet I can’t wait for the day you run legacy windows programs in the Linux subsystem through wine.

You’re not wrong, using virtualization like a Windows VM in Linux is still using windows and is the best way for compatibility. Wine either works ok (mostly), needs lots of weird configuration to get it to intergrate into Linux or look ok, or it doesn’t work at all most of the time.
The goal posts change because the variables change while the prior post is never met.

In my world, everyone that could segregate from vulnerable populations already has and vice versa. They moved, and go out with everyone else that wont go home to an immunocompromised or prediabetic or elderly person.

Multiday 300,000+ attendee music festivals have occurred in major US markets without making the news as reckless and welcomed by all levels of government at the time.

Commonwealth countries and major markets in Europe seem to be less tolerant to the idea of governing, I mean a lower threshold to infection to justify continued restrictions.

Many of their citizens are coming to the US if they can, as well.

US is still doing way worse with infections, deaths, ICU capacity, but its a two tiered reality. And as long as emergency services remain available for everyone else I think thats a good enough bar for people to make their own decisions - which is an opinion matched by even the most restrictive major municipalities in the US, for some time. Remote work has been normalized enough for enough people/office jobs to not require a compromise to stay home.
Using Google less for privacy reasons aside (and you should too), I’ve found that as my career has progressed, I find myself way more often reading source code and the base documentation. Or in the case of JavaScript and CSS usually the W3 spec is the clearest source; not only is it straight from the horse’s mouth (more accurate), but it really isn’t overly technical with use cases and examples, and most importantly it displays the types of the inputs and outputs.
Could you point me to other examples of people publically professing values with a similar mix of stances, so that I can agree with you that these are completely mainstream?
I think i have a similar background to you. Mind sharing how you got into data science contractual work? Is it through academia or in the business world?
Look at BC Canada, 90% vaccine uptake (2 doses). Very strong public masking. Vax passport checking at most businesses. More restrictions recently introduced. Hospitals on the verge of being overwhelmed.
> Also, in the UK, they don't have dried fish/octopus snacks in pubs!

We have Scampi Fries (with no fish in them). Drying fish isn't really a UK thing.
Windows 95 OSR2 IIRC. If you bought Plus! I believe that upgraded you to OSR2 but there was an independent update and OEM build. I got a PC in 1997 with two USB ports but the documentation said they wouldn't work until a later Windows 95 release.

By some means I got OSR2 and the USB ports showed up in the Device Manager but it I had to wait a few years before I even owned a USB device to use with them.
Simply because we can't know if the 10% error is because of measurement error of the method used to produce the labels. It is therefore only speculation that ~it is not good enough. It could very well be even better. For us to be sure, it is necessary to repeat some crystallographies and/or find a better method to produce these labels.
I think you might want to reexamine the market. I'm several multiples more than $250k and have a BS and ~15 years of experience working in web development.
Do you have good resource in how to discovery/user interviews? I’m on a DevOps team working to mature the first few tools we made
Superdelegates were also problematic, as was a constant drumbeat of the self-fulfilling word "unelectable." But that's ancient history at this point and the current challenges are different.
The implication of the tweet is that somehow the U.K. standards dropped.

In fact the EU changed their standard for consumer messaging, and the U.K. hasn’t adopted a new scale yet.

So no. Not deregulation.

By the same measure, the U.K. could adopt a new scale where this bulb was listed TRIPLE F. It wouldn’t have made it any more or less efficient in the EU.