skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
ESP series are very popular in makers' projects, ESP8266 and ESP32 are the most commonly used, We will talk about those 2 ESP series from Espressif, and some ESP8266 and ESP32 related products designed by Makerfabs.
'Brain-controlled weaponry' seems more likely.
The rich city that can't even be bothered to deal with the shitty conditions that drove most of them to Uber everywhere?
Trust people to know what they're doing? A lot of PR reviews tend to devolve into almost anything but solving the issue at hand.
Show HN: RTTI and type-generic user extensible print in C
Active duty doesn’t include all DoD employees, bruv. It’s by far the biggest department.
He's been out for about a year, let it go man.
The "magic" of doublespace / norton utilities, XTree Gold hex-view and other programs amazed my young self.
DataFrames1.3 is a lot faster specifically.
Disinformation is widely accepted by much of SV and FAANG. Amazon isn't different than Facebook in this respect.

But it's widely accepted by the public. I can barely complete a sentence about it without people dismissing it.
Alpine is extremely popular for containers due to always picking lightweight choices like not using systemd. I don't think any of the Google distros (Android, Chrome OS) use it either but that shouldn't be particularly surprising. And of course hardcore classic Gentoo still lets you pick whether you want to or not. Void for a more traditional "user desktop" distro.

I like systemd and those are the only cases I remember being surprised the usual commands didn't work.
Interesing. I know this is something that is supported by Find My, but they don't make it easy to see the battery levels at a glance.
We do have centrist parties in general elections. The non-centrist tendencies arise in the primaries. Then the non-centrist primary voters get miffed after the general election on account of the centrist lurch to collect independent votes.
> Ultimately political systems are judged by the quality of their policies

thanks for putting into words exactly what I thought without really being able to explain it

"fair" voting systems feel good but from what I've seen they seem to kind of end up amplifying extremism and bad policy
Hmmm .. in the linked benchmarks [1], DataFrames.jl (Julia library) appears to be fairly competitive.

[1] https://h2oai.github.io/db-benchmark/
ooof this is news to me and my group
> Meh not sure what the big deal is with "self selecting" and "self defined circumstances". Perhaps you should make more arguments for it so I don't have to but you do you.

You're not sure, but self selecting/self-defining matters a lot to me. Whether we merely apply our own pre-dispositions & already-knowns as to what is, what we know, & regard that as what shall be, or whether we admit that we don't fully know the possibilities that are about & haven't really tried outside possibilities matters a lot. To me. You can be meh about it if you want, but knowing our unknowns is vitally important to me. One needs to try to have experiences, in my book, before they are adequately rejectable. Even if it doesn't work for me, understanding how it works for another is just as important. Good experience sharing relies on empathy & openness, in my view; that's how we begin to figure out what foundations we may or may not personally share.

> That circumstance I presented isn't actually as rare as you might think. It was a genuine use case for myself and actually opened my mind from thinking it was completely useless, to thinking it is a niche.

I'm not sure what scale of current, existing plurality we need to start ignoring & telling those other people that their points of view & engagements are relevant. You're basically saying you are the status quo here, and I don't really disagree. I think that's probably accurate. Probably isn't rare. Where we seem to differ is that you think that matters a lot. I don't think that really matters for trying to read & understand the value latent here.

We don't really know yet, we can't really assess the genuine value of this. There's definitely some segment that stands to be helped immediately, strongly. But if this tech really is as valuable as it feels like it could be, it will be a changer, it will ongoingly beget new & different experiences. Me and you are both limited in our crystal ball reading on this. Neither of us really knows what potentials are afoot here. Even if we don't end up seeing radical vast & different change, we still won't really know what potential there was here. There's all manners of good reasons to believe this isn't significant, that it won't change things. But the absence of evidence is not evidence of absence of value. For this basic Pascal's Wager belief, I think it's worth spending more effort trying to explore why we might opt to believe in this tech, to wonder about it's possibilities, instead of reflecting on why we think it doesn't readily apply to current circumstances. Not that we should reject counter-though. But it seems pre-emptory, since we have so much left to explore about why-for, which will inform strongly what why-against concerns are most important to look at.
From blood clots to infected neurons, how Covid threatens the brain
If you really have a breakthrough you rewrite that 200 lines of code from last week to 10.
All write operations reduce the life of the SSD. I use 50 GiB volumes on a 4x NVMe RAID-Z1. Each drive is rated for 3500 TBW. I also only call this script when I want to reclaim space, such as after downloading many large dependencies for a one-time build. My home use case is read-heavy, so I'm really not concerned. When one drive goes, I can replace it. If they all go at once: I have remote encrypted B2 backups.
I can imagine at least a "hello world" project with all the settings configured to work out of the box on Steam Deck would be a start. Maybe they have some custom libraries to hook the game in to the OS, and they want to give developers a running start with menu systems etc.
> I'm just more inclined to look for sturdy, well-made products elsewhere.

Any tips?
Made me think of El Capitan[1] from the original Ducktales (spoiler, though the description doesn’t do it justice):

> After everyone makes it out of the destructing Valley, El Capitan breaks loose, but when he comes to the spot where the Valley would be, he finds that it is now all buried under a mountain of dirt. Frustrated yet undaunted, El Capitan starts trying to dig up the gold.

[1]: https://disney.fandom.com/wiki/El_Capitan
There are two clauses to the statement. I suspect OP was referring to the first. You seem to be focusing on the second.
I think it's true for both -- they mention this both under the "Deep copies" section where it's talking about JSON.parse(JSON.stringify()), and also under "Structured cloning" > "Features and limitations" where it's talking about the new function. The line GP quoted is from the section where it's talking about structured cloning.
It is not maintenance. An AC grid is a complex beast that needs to continuously match power consumption with power generation.
When you add an intermittent source like solar that has its peak production about noon you’re displacing baseline generation in favor of dispatchable sources like natural gas.
Besides, the operator is forced to buy your energy paying a price a lot higher most of the time, and indeed at some periods in the day the power generated by your solar system has negative economic value, and yet the company is forced to buy it from you at almost consumer distribution prices instead of buying the same power cheaper in the spot market from some baseline generation facility.
Throughput and seek time were the big problem.

You probably want a few alternating stripes of files and free space. Or do what most people did, which is keep a mostly empty hard drive.
This is where we get, "Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence".

That can also be abused, but it takes some doing.

Sometimes absence of evidence really is evidence of absence, if you would expect evidence to have surfaced by now.

Nobody knows whether 5G will cause cancer. Nobody knew whether 3G and 4G would, either. We ran the experiment on the general public, and with very large N, it seems like not: no rash of cases seems to have appeared. Absent evidence is considered evidence.

But that tells us nothing about 5G. It looks like they are going to run that experiment, too. (Does anybody need 5G? Doesn't seem to matter. One thing we know is you and I will be paying for it, regardless.)
Levin was right and always has been. The arbitrary “big claims deserve big evidence” standard is preventing him from getting credit. Why is it a big claim that there was microbial life on Mars? Because competing more famous scientists say so on the basis of Christian biases that even modern astrobiology can’t seem to weed out.
I have extensive experience with Elixir/Phoenix, Ruby on Rails, Laravel, and Django and I have to say I disagree. Rails and Phoenix are both opinionated in similar ways, both have similar generators, both have excellent/similar tooling, and many of the same ideas exist in both (e.g., Channels and Action Cable). I view Elixir/Phoenix as a natural evolution of Ruby/Rails.
Open primaries would permit centrist voters to 'shave off' what they see as fringe positions prior to the general election.
Another comment in this thread points out that a huge confounder could be income. Indeed, as @robwwilliams points out, there could be many potential confounders, including genetics and environment. All that means is that, if drilled into, researchers might find that X (where X is whatever confounder you can think of) might be a better predictor of mortality than protein intake.

It seems to me that the parent comment doesn't aim to "hand wave away" this paper, but instead to suggest that it is a singular datum whose findings should be tested by larger, more in-depth, research (which could test for a whole set of confounding variables that might come to mind). The authors of the original study state the same thing right in their abstract!

I'm not sure why you think that point is not meaningful. IMO, that is exactly how science should be done ---interesting correlations should be stress-tested. If the findings hold up, then we can be especially confident in whatever choices we make. If the findings don't hold up, we then have new avenues to research.
Zig. Rust. The others in this thread.

There are quite a few. Go chose possibly the weakest-safety option of them all.
the benchmarks are a bit out of date (missing DataFrames 1.2/1.3, Julia 1.7, CSV 0.9). I'm planning on running an updated version this weekend.
Two wrongs are two wrongs no matter which way you slice them.

Still, it’s an amusing comment. Amazon is complicit in aiding a third party to commit fraud.

Not all of us are just, up right, mature adults, of sound mind and strict morals.

Sending them back a steaming pile of dog shit is kind of amusing.
I can't wait for holographic jump scares.
The idea that a wholly vegetarian or vegan diet is healthier than sometimes eating meat is extremely questionable.

It completely flies in the face of common sense and only really makes any headway at all due to the "everyone should do less" variety of environmentalism.
> Deploy now, catch bugs...sometime, maybe (TM)!

Given the state of literally all software I use, this seems to be the default behaviour.
The admiral was great; Michael and other characters crying/shouting almost constantly were not. They are supposed to be the best of the best, yet they behaved like whiny teenagers.
I like MAMANG, my man.
I think the author is really complaining that opening something up for the masses kills art. It like pop music or McDonald's, they appeal to huge audiences but are not the peak of artistic expression.
Devil’s advocate: great; If you’re high up in the heroin supply chain or simply secure your own source, you can save countless lives that would have been lost to fentanyl hotspots. Everyone says that legalization would be safer due to known purity, and you could label your bags with an ingredients panel showing their exact contents and purity levels.

What I actually think: Unfortunately if the casino and alcohol industries make 90% of their money from addicts I’m afraid the hard narcotics industry is even worse still. Traffic good drugs only if you have strong pro-social morals and want to sleep easy.
I need that as a screensaver!

Oh wait, we don't have screensavers anymore either...
Unless you’re a giant corporation run by giant arseholes aiding giant arseholes to commit fraud.
I'd put a caveat on this. If you already suffer from panic attacks, have schizophrenia or have suffered psychosis, meditation may _not_ be for you.
Fragmentation is even beneficial in SSDs. When the contents of a logical file are physically scattered, the internal parallelism of many flash devices can be exploited. If your file are physically compact, you'd lose that parallelism.
Taking a break and going for a run sometimes does this for me as well.
> That's not to say the US or UK or what have you systems are better or worse. All voting systems kind of suck and suffer from mathematical and political paradoxes.

The argument that everything has >0 flaws, therefore everything is the same, is a bit bizarre to find on HN. Is every solution in every category the same?

> just like this proposed one probably is

Even when we don't know what it is?
Your like ironic actual point is well taken but I just wanted to note that even without the irony this is actually a very cool thought provoking question and I couldn't answer it at first.
putting science in political science.
When learning, extending, or fixing software, I generally work by building an understanding of software's principles, implementation, and runtime behavior, so I can reason about the current state and the effects of potential changes. Though sometimes I tweak code to see the effects and better understand the problem (shh we don't talk about tweaking things until they "work on my machine" and we're done).

Understanding runtime behavior is easier in software with high debuggability and transparency (which is orthogonal or even opposed to performance, since logging slows programs down and optimizations impede debugging). Bryan Cantrill's "Platform as a Reflection of Values" talk (https://vimeo.com/230142234) has a list of software values.

I think "observability" is another good word for what I want, but it tends to be thrown around in cloud-scale software rather than the human-scale software I prefer. Perhaps "empathy" is a workable word for developing an intuition (and less so for building a mental model).
GoldWave 6.57 Crack License Key 2022Free Download Full Version
It's been a while since I've used sort by average customer review. Only useful sorts are "featured" or possibly price if you put in some filter parameters on the side. Anything else is just asking for hot garbage.

There are few things that I buy from amazon now that aren't shipped and sold by amazon. I just don't trust third party sellers unless it's a 'direct' seller aka the company making the product. Almost would prefer if amazon would just remove all third party sellers but I guess they need to maintain their reputation of being the everything store.
Is this the drug that was approved over the objections of the FDA's panel of experts, and that has triggered the biggest rise of Medicare premiums in history? Biogen seems to be pulling off one helluva scam.
Same with their demo tvs that have chrome cast. Found that a lot end up connected to the public wifi.
> This is a low cost way of experimenting.

No, it is not low cost for people who bear the brunt of crime on the daily.

> Here is the kicker: SF residents also want more restorative justice (based on their official votes).

He won by a 1.6% margin. A narrow victory is a victory yes, but recalls and impeachments are a part of democracy - and he will be recalled no matter how narrow the margins are.
It's been a legit language for years. Frankly I've enjoyed the lack of generics acting as a filter function for astronaut engineering.

I don't want to read through a heavily templated, generic code base when concrete, simple types will do. Go is so easy to read and reason about that I'm genuinely afraid of any change which could affect that.

The best advertisement for avoiding generics in Go despite their availability is the fact that they won't appear in the standard library for some time, and that the language maintainers believe it will take years to understand how to use them appropriately.
This method relies on the idea of a cost, most likely monetary, proportional to the choice. This is obviously incompatible with core principles of modern democracies.

This article reasoning compares the Brexit and Trump votes, and speculates that they might have had a different result by changing their voting mechanism, almost exchanging them. Rather than a good argument, this is exactly the reason why voting mechanisms should be dealt with carefully.

More generally, the idea of voting mechanisms using preferences is a few centuries old. There is an abondant literature analyzing its potential merits but also failures.
Sorry, not following. The recourse I was referring to was a fork and modification of the transactions in question.
I usually use a word like "guess" to describe a prior that sounds plausible but hasn't been confirmed:

"Our best guess is that the moon is made of green cheese"

or

"Our best guess is that jumping out of a plane without a parachute would kill you, but there has not been a formal study"
Wasn't Marvel always a money making machine?
Sounds extremely charitable to me. There is no indication from the OP they’re solving crazy hard problems requiring a ton of thought, or that they’re actually thinking about said problems while goofing off.

It just sounds like they’ve managed to get enough done to get by, and continue skating like this. I’ve seen quite of few people do this professionally. It’s just important to be honest about it.

My guess is there’s a motivation problem, which may be from the job itself, or something else.
What do you use as an alternative to Yelp for finding restaurants?
There is some distinction if you know where to look.

“no evidence so far that the disease can be passed through human contact”

“No clear evidence Wuhan coronavirus can spread before people show symptoms”

“‘No hard evidence’ new coronavirus strain is more transmissible”

“At this time, there is no evidence of human-to-human transmission outside China”

These are all statements that were thought at the time to be plausible, perhaps even likely, but not proven.

In contrast, most of the unqualified “no evidence” claims are for statements that were thought at the time to be false: Covid is airborne; non-N95 masks are effective; Covid came from a lab (still considered doubtful), booster shots are necessary (would still be debatable if not for Omicron).

On the other hand, even the least probable of those statements is still orders of magnitude more probable than “homeopathy works”, so there’s definitely a missing distinction there.
Activist Teachers Recruit Kids
Yes! I don't think liberal democracies should tolerate parties and policies that dismantle them. In many European countries people like Pauline Hanson would have been put jail (where she belongs) for hate speech (and probably any number of other things) a long time ago.
The Rittenhouse Trial: A Legal Scholar Responds
Omicron is dominant in wastewater samples in Florida county
One hint is that some jurisdictions, including France, have a law that says that merely breaking the spirit of the law is also illegal. Other countries, especially dictatorships, are less textbook about legal interpretation. In other words, if you wanna play with loopholes, do it in the US and similar countries.
Ah, my bad, never saw your previous reply. The name of Him will be spoken no more. Let him rest forever.
If anyone doesn't know what liquid democracy is yet, I recommend looking into it. It's not a perfect idea, but it's worth having in the toolbelt.

"Liquid Democracy in 60 Seconds"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ya1dNNzkQTE
I have nothing to add but just wanted to say that I'm pleasantly surprised how knowledgeable everyone here is on world politics, especially for a tech site.
>>>> I find it utterly hard to believe that any full-time professional, even in America, is employed without having any piece of paper signed by their employer -- and they a copy signed by him -- that states basically "John Doe and Corporation X agree that John shall work full-time for X, and receive a salary of $Y per month".

I never signed such a thing. Roughly a quarter century ago, I received a job offer letter with a salary level. I verbally accepted the offer. But my salary is much different today, and there's nothing with my signature on it to that effect. It's very loose and informal. The payroll software knows. This is at a huge and well managed company.

I have no doubt that the company's ability to cut my pay is constrained by regulations, like they probably have to inform me in advance. One of my employers once announced a furlough and temporary pay cut when there was a financial disaster. Nothing was signed.

About counting hours, this is a US thing. We have two classes of employees, depending on whether they are entitled to overtime pay or not. Most professionals are not. There are criteria for classifying employees, and one of them is whether they are required to work a specific number of hours.

Sure a company can say something if I show up 3 hours a month: "You're fired." Or they can cite a specific shortcoming in my performance. What I think is a sub-plot of this thread is that measuring this performance and tying it to a relative workload is not always straightforward.

Note that I'm not a lawyer, this is not legal advice. A lot of it sounds strange because it is strange.
Developers absolutely miss the big picture because they're mired in the tiny details. There is a tendency towards perfectionism.

That said many of us spend much of our time maintaining the half baked features of devs long gone. It's time consuming. It's reverse engineering, support cases, meetings, bug fixing, digging through vague logs, workarounds, knowledge transfers and there's never the political will to re-do it plus it's more than twice the work because you have to migrate existing customer workflows. It is work that is neither rewarding nor rewarded.

With that in mind there are categories of things that should be tackled upfront. Besides glaring bugs there is security holes, traceability, auditing, overengineering, real world performance, documentation, preventing bloat and my pet peeve - changes that slow down development by requiring duplicated work or affecting the ability to run locally.

The business pressure encourages developers to skip these because usually someone else will end up dealing with the mess.
Same here, but I found the image flipped randomly over several reloads. Seems the race condition exists in that POC also. Perhaps there's a hardware condition in the authors' particular iDevice that causes it to consistently favor one path.
Honestly, if you're going to modify Windows, why not just go Linux? Monkeypatching Windows into a good (useable?) OS seems like more effort for less return than just picking up a distro. The only advantage I've heard people claim for Windows is that "it just works." If it can't even meet your workflow, why bother?
Yes, industry people who want to protect their income no matter the moral cost are interchangeable with non-profit entities.
> When the spike changes sufficiently, there is no mechanism by which the vaccine works

this is not entirely correct T cell response uses a vast array of much smaller epitopes as compared to the antibody response. These much smaller and much more numerous epitopes almost certainly cannot be entirely mutated away while maintaining function.
Thats a great read, enjoyed it a lot
The Web3 Fraud
I think this is why people believe 10x developers exist. They are just developers who actually work a full work day consistently.
I talk to actual people.