skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
So are overweight persons, people doing bumpy jumping, the non working living from social assistance, the weak of physical body and mind. However society does not discriminate them near as much.

I find your comment on the non vaccinated statistically being a
burden to employers and society as a whole, interesting. Because of
what seems to imply about shared duties within a society.
Not that I disagree with it, but what seems to imply concerning
choices and decisions as a society as a whole. Let me explain...

I am curious about the Netherlands handling of the pandemic. I have been following it along with other countries. The Dutch medical system is regularly mentioned as one of the best in the world, and used as an example by
politicians in the US.

I have also noticed that after 2.5 years of one of the biggest pandemic of
this century, the government seems to have made absolutely zero investment in
IC beds and is flying patients to Germany?

Although politicians mention the unprecedented and the seriousness of the
current situation, there seems to have been no political wish to invest
in medical resources, or make the societal changes required by
the current pandemic.

Maybe the arguments directed to the non vaccinated about their unjustified burden on society, would not be so significantly weakened by the observation that, no efforts were made to prioritize and expand medical capacity. Or the observation
that in the middle of one unprecedented pandemic, the Dutch state seems to have recently prioritized to spend 200 million dollars on a painting?

So much about choices and societal burdens?

"Dutch agree to spend €175m on a Rembrandt, but not everyone is happy"
https://www.dutchnews.nl/news/2021/12/dutch-agree-to-spend-e...

"Dutch COVID-19 patients transferred to Germany as hospitals struggle"
https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/...
> going to lower your security by some degree.

Not really, the security is the same.

You just make the work for attackers a bit faster=>cheaper.

But IMHO for an experienced attacker it's just a matter of "a bit faster" (like their attack comes a few days earlier), not a matter of "being more secure" (like their attack doesn't come at all).
1 fun thing learn about my ISP provider a few days ago is their block example.com
The interesting conclusion from this is that if you are a crap-identifier you are not very valuable. i.e. a machine that calls everything crap is going to true-positive 90% of the time. So if you're like "That thing is crap" you are very similar to that machine, and maybe with some handwaving you are in the 90% for identifiers.

The hard part is to be the kind of person who can identify the 10% thing. It's even harder to be the kind of person who can offer the 10% thing.

In this way, mistake identifiers are low grade contributors.
Surely the only part you need for this scenario is a way to dispose of whatever resources are behind the elements?

So if you have interfaces a Disposable interface is enough, the code can determine that these elements are Disposable and dispose of them when they're removed.

That's quite a lot less intense than needing a language-level concept of destructors. If you're writing a low-level language it might well be better to hook this in explicitly like Rust's Drop trait (the Drop trait is a langitem in Rust, it must exist), but in high-level languages I think you'd get almost all the value from a Disposable interface even if there is no actual language support provided.
501 iirc
Using GitHub Actions to get notified when an API response (or web page) changes
Tell me you've got no experience with 70s and 80s compact cars without telling me you've got no experience with 70s and 80s compact cars.

There's a reason imports had a tin can reputation to overcome.

The fuel crisis gave the Japanese brands a foot in the door. Detroit had to take languishing compact car platforms that were only available with poverty spec trims feature sets (because the target buyer was someone who's #1 priority was low cost) and bring them up to snuff with the features and comfort the average buyer wanted. Japan had those products ready to go. They weren't "beating" anything until the mid to late 80s. The boomers didn't grow up seeing Japanese cars out-compete. That didn't happen until they themselves were well into adulthood and bought a bunch of Japanese commuter cars in the late 80s and 90s.

The 80s decline of Detroit was just the collective bargaining and corporate management hens coming home to roost right at the same time that environmental law was really hitting US industry hard.
Google gets a lot of criticism and all of it is justified.

That being said, I suspect YouTube will survive much longer than Twitch or eventually merge with it. Unlike Twitch, YouTube has far superior discovery and it’s easier to build your brand on there.

It also is less stressful because older videos can be rediscovered, even though the algorithm favors newer content.

It means you don’t have to be perpetually online like Twitch.
Totally understandable. It's pretty sad to me, but people nowadays doesn't want sport cars, they want SUVs, and companies will orient what they sell to those products that can sell easily.

Also, we have to remember that Dodge, Ram Trucks, Jeep, Chrysler, and Fiat, as part of Stellantis, are going to share parts with the other brands, and that means not only to lose some parts designs that sell less, but also could make some brands to disappear, and if they don't do that is due to heritage.

At least in the US, what some years ago was the FCA group had and have more coherence than their actual European team makes, and sell different types of cars in their different brands.
It's amazing to me that an open source product can be better than a paid product.

I think OGS is quite good vs fox except that fox has alot more players in the go world
You assume that there wasn't a period of several decades where many of those squares and plazas didn't have roads running though them, and needed to be reclaimed from cars, much as streets in general needed to be. That assumption would be wrong.
This. The comments here are insane. There is a pandemic of child sexual abuse thanks to the internet. They are being forced to send (and receive) nude photos to strangers on the internet as well as getting groomed into meeting the predators in person. Just having one nude photo of yourself at an age where you are not aware of the consequences will ruin your life forever. This has to be stopped.

Apple's proposal was just to warn the child before viewing or sending a nude photo, and warn a user that he's commiting an immorality and a crime if he tries to search for child porn, and report you if you save child porn to the cloud. At other companies aside from Apple, the same thing is done, but in a way that breaks privacy. They just upload your stuff unencrypted. Apple is just doing the same thing but using encryption to prevent them from seeing your data in the cloud while still being able to detect CSAM. How can you be against any of these??
Often these people will seek problems, but then use them for their advantage when they happen. It's the same with people who seek fights, often they'll seek a fight in order to end up on top (in their heads).

Problem is, when you're seriously being mistreated and then you call wolf in the same sentence when there are no wolves, you definitely deserve further analysis.

This girl has some problems. The person who grabbed her butt have problems too. But of all the text she managed to write here, it is nearly entirely her problem.
> decreasing link times on the Rust project I work on from approximately 10 seconds to less than one second.

But enough about writing “hello, world“ programs in Rust.

I kid.
Well, all I mean in the "ETA" is that if you want very robust guarantees about type safety - more robust than Rust's notion of safety - then you're going to be very, very restricted in what you can do.

OTOH, if you're fine with looser guarantees about correctness, I'm not sure if marking blocks as safe/unsafe really gets you much more than Typescript, which does (with strictness turned on) force you to be explicit whenever you're using anys. And it's unclear how you can "button up" dynamic data and pass it back to the civilized world.
Along those lines, how about something like the NFL, which asks you risk serious injury for entertainment. A coal miner. A race car driver.

And in fact, a porn star, who IS required to do sex acts as part of the job.

I think to me what the job requires has something to do with it -- if your job necessarily entails something, then it's OK to require it. Otherwise, I would prefer the company stay uninvolved.
What happens when you scale java development to a team of that size? Short version: every optimisation you can dream of gets implemented.

Clever use of Off heap datastructures aren’t going to be enough to impress. Forget thinking your custom class loader with cooperating javaAgent that manipulates the bytes of classes to dynamically add or remove instrumentation is going to impress. These things are just taken for granted.

Even a bot that identifies dead code after traversing the AST, then re-generates valid source code from the (now pruned) AST, runs the test suite then checks in the change all by itself is seen as meh after a while.

No matter how out-there an idea is, the play area is constrained by some immutable platform rules (the java memory model). So no matter how funky things get, any other java dev will still be able to reason about any code in the system.

What happens when you remove those platform constraints? What happens when you say, we started off with lisp but we’ve ended up with something quite bespoke?
If they're halting production of the V8 and replacing it with a V6, then presumably that means V8 crate engines won't be manufactured either.
IBM and Samsung claim 85% reduction in energy use for new chip
That would require me knowing the answer to the question I asked.
Yeah, certain turbo powerplants are AMAZINGLY durable. The 4G63T, 1JZ-GTE, and 2JZ-GTE are all standouts: stout, overbuilt, iron-block Japanese engines.

For lighter aluminum-block turbo engines, I'm a fan of the 4B11T (in my daily driver, an Evo X) and the BMW B58 (with continued development, I think it will become the greatest inline-6 of our time, this generation's 2JZ).
Good riddance! I live in DC and the streets are riddled with bad drivers. Invariably the worst are driving Chargers, high on their own gas fumes.

I used to own an ‘84 LTD with a 5L V8. Its horsepower was more modest than today’s hyper optimized engines, but it could still peel out of any parking lot and cruise down the interstate, a lot of fun to drive. But it’s a car of the past, and now these terrible Dodge Hemi-roid-rage cars will be, too.
I don’t necessarily agree, since this depends so much on the political agenda and peoples willingness to accept a lower standard of living.

The energy density of fossil fuels is remarkably more energy dense than the best battery tech we can come up with, and I don’t see any scenario where the grid supports the average person filling up the equivalent of ~20 gallons of gas or ~600kwh of energy in under 5 minutes without superconductors and some other Star Trek league tech. Now expand that to trucks and aircraft that fill up hundreds or thousands of gallons of gas in a matter of minutes; it’s just a complete fantasy that EVs will meet our transportation needs at this point.
Careful - if the mods disagree with your vouching decisions you can lose vouching privileges.
That's what I do as well. Many people are not aware that std::unique_ptr can do more than just manage heap memory.
You are completely missing the point. Risk analysis is a balancing act:

Pros: open source, white hats can easily inspect the source

Cons: open source, black hats can easily inspect the source

You don’t get to just delete the cons you don’t like, even, if like me, you think the pro out weighs the con.
I think you’ll far more often see gas stations replaced by other uses. It’s too easy to install residential chargers.
I’m curious enough to give this a try, but can it really be good when Xcode is so bad? Are they written by different teams?
This is a similar (I think slower) pace than you'd see at CMP bolt gun matches. It's typical for even average participants to at least get all the rounds on target.
Don't try and use logic against dang. He doesn't understand it.

He just assumes everything is bad emotions.
An important note about this as well is that when people become intoxicated they tend to become more flagrant about wearing masks and maintaining social distancing. This is generally true whether the person means to be that way or simply starts losing their ability to pay attention. Yes, you are not supposed to serve a person who is visibly intoxicated- but even a single alcoholic drink effects the way that we as humans relate to our environment However I would also argue that even under those circumstances outdoor seating will still remain safer as we continue to live in the pandemic. I think that rushing to remove many of the changes we have made to our society to help mitigate the effects of the corona virus is a mistake. We are not through the woods yet.
I'm not sure which is more impressive: the ability to create such a complicated exploit or the ability to clearly describe how it works.
OK, let me expand it out: F9 is a little smaller than Ariane 5 and FH, everything other than Delta IV Heavy is a little smaller than Ariane 5 and FH.

You probably know all of this already. Please, let's stop deconstructing my grammar, and instead start communicating.

BTW the two Falcon Heavy launches I witnessed were extremely cool.
Work smarter, not harder
IBM couldn't compete with Dell and other direct to buyer manufacturers - but it wasn't because of IP. It was economic. IBM's sales channel had two extra levels of markup, inventory that would go obsolete in warehouses (and have to be bought back by IBM to keep their resellers and distributors happy), it took 4-6 weeks to go from the manufacturer's loading dock to the customer's desktop. Then there was configuration: Dell and the directs custom made each computer - make it once. You had to get an IBM out of the box, rip out what you didn't want and replace it - make it twice - which added even more to the cost.

You're not wrong that OS contributed to it, but having no IP moat (proprietary hw/sw) was the cherry on top, but not the entire sundae.

IBM could have fixed the IP moat by shipping OS/2 for free, but that still would not have fixed the channel problem. The channel problem made an IBM PC cost 20-30% more than their competitors... regardless of OS.
I've looked at the https://github.com/chiselstrike/chiselstore/blob/main/proto/... - and calling the service "RPC" is not great if this is going to be bundled with other gRPC services - why not call it "chiselStore" or something more concrete?

on a 2nd note, each method should have it's own Request Response, and ideally they should be suffixed same way. Returning same proto for multiple methods might break future compatibility - e.g. what if AppendEntries needs to return somehing else than Void? - ideally you make it from the start to return an empty AppendEntriesResponse, and then you can extend that proto.

https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/docs/proto3#u...

(edit again, also the package should not be called just "proto")
I agree with you completely. We know exactly how it works. What we object to is Apple acting as a police agent without a warrant. It's as simple as that. It sets up a precedent to do all sorts of similar policing (without reason for suspicion or a warrant) for everything from DMCA to thought crime. We are not luddites. We are also not suckers for the police state and authoritarianism creep.
Show HN: A to-do app that helps you stay organized
Modern feminism has been poisoned. But that doesn't mean feminism isn't still a great goal to work towards.

Sadly most people don't realise what's poison and what is not. And there's a whole lot of poison out there.
Mhh the internet has been getting better than any point in the past /all the time/.

So in order to prove that abolishing net neutrality was a good idea, they would need to show that it got better than the level it was going to improve anyway.
The fact that you don't notice the guys in BMWs and whatnot who do the exact same thing tells me you probably just don't like the FCA (I'm sorry, Stellantis) demographics.

Frankly I think that it's a good thing that there exist value brands that can give people with room temperature credit scores the ability to own flashy sports cars, big sedans and 3-row family haulers.
"All this is ostensibly to combat the slowly, and ever-slightly increasing global temperature."

Am I missing something, or does the writer of this article live in an alternate reality where global warming is only a minor problem?
> 1. High total compensation (not salaries) is limited to FAANG/Unicorn employees (awash with money)

Very nearly every publicly-traded tech company, actually. The list of "tech" companies where mid-level engineers aren't breaking 200k TC is much shorter than the opposite.

> 2. That high compensation has been achieved by stock options multiplying in value, thanks to abnormal run of the stock market (thank you Federal Reserve), which is not going to continue with rising interest rates

Initial offers have been increasing; we aren't talking about golden handcuffs that employees have from stock growth. To give a very recent example: Amazon recently bumped up their pay-band for mid-level engineers and they seem to be hitting 350k/year (maybe more; have seen a couple reports of 400k). Their mid-level pay-band previously topped out at ~300k/year.

> 3. Salary base seems to be stuck at $150K for mid-senior developers in bigger cities (except for NYC) for many years now

...you mean "except the Bay Area", right? Though it's definitely not true either way; I live in a large city that isn't in the Bay, Seattle, or NYC, and 180k is a pretty common number for senior engineer base salaries, and I see 200k+ more and more frequently. (Not that I care too much about just base; given the choice why would I work for a company that only pays base salary, i.e. ~half of what other companies pay?)
Just because the internet is better (by whatever metric) than before, doesn't mean the current policy is detrimental to the growth. ie. Internet might have been even 'better' if Net Neutrality wasn't repealed.

Certainly, with the fragmentation of streaming services, I'd hardly say the internet is better than 4 years ago.
The log4j incident is an excellent example. A fix to a closed-source vuln of a similar nature would've taken months, compared to ~5 days (if we include the 2nd CVE fixed in 2.16) for an open community response to an open source issue.
Auth0 Fine Grained Authorization: Developer Community Preview Release
Or just use this instead. https://github.com/flowchartsman/deadman
A smidge off topic, but I'm curious; is there a place where you can upload (say) a chess bot you designed and play against other uploaded chess bots? (or any move base game, even as simple as 'paper rock scissors')?
It's irregular to misrepresent a free property transfer as a non-disclosure agreement. Even signed, something like that sounds so silly that I can't imagine it being binding. When businesses do things like that, it probably only works when people are afraid. I'm not sure if it's helpful to keep insisting he lawyer up before saying "no" to an absurd ask. Nothing wrong with pushing back.
I have this "what happens next?!" feeling about this post. So exciting. It's also exciting to know that you can send a pdf as any filename through iMessage and it will display! :)
Agreed.

I have owned turbo cars and have added turbo's to cars that didn't come with them. They reduce reliability and greatly increase complexity. A bonus is higher cylinder pressure and more heat. Changes to EGT's can effect the emissions as well.

IMO turbo cars are very dirty "under boost". Often turbo cars are tuned rich (more fuel) to prevent detonation. They can have great emissions just cruising around, but the second you build boost....not so much.

I ran methanol/water injection to help keep things cool which was a nice solution, but not for the average person. From my research this would improve the emissions as well. I was able to run more timing advance and slightly leaner fuel ratio as a bonus.

Getting a turbo rebuilt is a pain. As a 30-something boomer I avoid turbo engines if there is a large displacement option.

Can you build a gas 4cyl turbo car that can hit 200,000 miles? Certainly. Can you do it at the same cost as a non-turbo v6 that can go 400,000 miles? Nope.
I am sorry for being this guy!!! but when I see overpass and self-hosted I instantly think of hosting my own Openstreetmap server.
This project looks very cool, and I know how hard naming things can be!
We had a vendor who implemented their stack with Flask and Postgres on Debian. Their API is consistently slow (seconds to tens of seconds) to the point that we wrote our own app in Dotnet Core (running atop Postgres and Debian) that queries the available content once a day (500k rows of data) with minor refreshes hourly.

We take tens of milliseconds to query Postgres and generate a rendered HTML page for our clients. Showing this to the vendor's devs we got a very surprised response.

Admittedly, we do not operate at their scale, but I am certain this $5 a month droplet will keep running this app for a long time yet even with many users :)

Edit: I did write an MVP in Python atop Sqlalchemy wrapping Postgres, but the performance was still not ideal when rendering hundreds or thousands of rows of data, and the primary developer was already using Dotnet Core.
Where I live (Montreal), a few gaz stations have been replaced by condos. There are still way too many stations, and they always seem empty, but presumably still lucrative.

Outside the cities, increasingly gaz stations also have charging stations. It only takes a bit of space, and it's subsidized.

10% of new vehicle sales are EVs (in the province), and it has doubled for the past 5 years. We're getting there :)
> if like me, you think the pro out weighs the con.

My point is very simply that in my opinion that you're wrong to think this, and that opinion is shared by most of the security community.

There is ample evidence that the cons FAR outweigh the pros in this particular comparison.

---

Another way to visualize your comparison would be:

- Closed source:

-- Pros: 1 white hat can easily inspect the source

-- Cons: 1000 hackers can blackbox-attack the application

- Open source:

-- Pros: 100 white hats can easily fix the source

-- Cons: 1000 black hats can whitebox-attack the application

You're arguing that 99 white hats don't trump black-vs-white.

---

Even if I play devil's semi-advocate here and consider that the pros balance the cons, the statement in the article is still wildly out of place in that context.
Wonder if Apple would work with Google to bake this into google play services as well.
One way would be for Signal to create a hash of all your contacts phone numbers and look up if those hashes exists on the server. No contact details needed on the server, just the hash of the phone number connected to Signals user ID.
The internet is worse than ever, but mostly not because of that net neutrality repeal.
I mean...you tried. What are you supposed to do if you fail, quit and never come back? That's terrible logic too.
Because it's a bit of a pet peeve of mine, what you term "strong" and "weak" are more typically called "static" and "dynamic" typing. They do not correspond to "strong" and "weak" as a general rule. Python, for instance, is "strongly" typed (try printing the result of `2+"3"` in its REPL) but also dynamically typed. Neither "strong" nor "weak" typing is well-defined, but the most consistent differentiator is about implicit conversions or casting. Like in Perl you would get "5" as a result of printing out that previous expression.