skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
With every booster being taken, the risk of Myocarditis is increasing.

The vaccine-induced spike proteins (which damage your cells and internal organs) can stay in your body for 12 months, which means that if you're regularly boosting, you're not getting rid of them.

This is not the case with Covid, and people rarely if ever get Covid twice.
GRDB 5.17 with async/await (SQLite toolkit for Swift)
You seem to be conflating also biological with purely biological. The parent was arguing against reducing depression to biology only, not claiming that biology plays no part in it. The link you provide does not prove that "medical and scientific mindset" views depression as purely biological - it just shows various ways depression affects/is affected by biology, which is not mutually exclusive with other things playing part in depression. I believe the current scientific consensus is that it is not even possible to clearly separate biological from psychological or behavioral in a complex system where psychological states affect biology and vice versa.

Your invitation to "educate yourself" seems condescending and unnecessary.
> Looks like you're repeating some politicians' talking point without bothering to check it yourself - the existing vaccines have no noticeable effect on the spread:

If you assume that everyone except you just repeats something some other party has said then I don’t think there’s much to discuss here.

I admit that I haven’t run studies myself, but I have read up what experts in virology and epidemiology have to say and I do have a bit of an understanding about how statics work. The studies you cite show the risk of spreading an infection once a person is infected and that’s the same or at least similar to what for both vaccinated and unvaccinated people. There was hope that vaccines would also reduce that risk, but they do not significantly, at least from what we know today. However, this only is one very small piece of the puzzle. To spread, the virus needs to infect a person in the first place - and that risk is significantly reduced, even for the latest variants that partially escape the vaccine. So getting vaccinated significantly reduces both your personal risk and the risk of becoming a spreader.
>Wikileaks chucked what they received up on a web page

After partnering with the New York Times, The Guardian, Le Monde, El Pais, redacting anything putting people in danger and inviting the US Govt to tell them anything they wanted redacted (who did not suggest a single redaction, nothing) and then writing their own stories on it then, yes, they did put the source materials on the website so you /you/ can decide their and their partners' reporting is accurate, all of whom linked to specific source documents in their stories. About the Afghanistan war there doesn't seem much doubt anymore does there? Another decade of increased resources got nowhere with President Trump, then President Biden and a majority of Americans agreeing that it is a failed mission and withdrawal the correct option. The level corruption involved, snouts in the trough, is astounding.

The quantity of lies about Wikileaks is also astounding. They're as much like the printing press operators as your favorite goldfish. I doubt you're deliberately lying and pretending they didn't redact documents, nor partner with newspapers, nor write their own stories and you actually believe what you wrote there. How badly have you been lied to, it's astounding, huh? Why? Do you think another expensive in lives and money decade of the Afghanistan war had anything to do with it? Who did that benefit? The answer is many different parties for many different reasons all of whom /hated/ being called on it with very strong, published evidence.
This response is like so many others on this topic.

"Dopamine fasting" is not a literal or scientific term, its not pseudoscientific either. It merely describes the process (perhaps incorrectly) of imposing some challenge to impulsive behaviours which is a perfectly acceptable way to help break these habitual behaviors, neurologically speaking that is perfectly sound, and consistent with scientific insight into this area.
People often misunderstand and apply the overly simplistic "dopamine bad" mentality and think it's somehow about volume of dopamine which is laughably incorrrect for such a complex and nuanced process.

But critics can't see the woods for the trees with this one.
I think its a mute point anyway, excess deaths are hard to argue statistic.
Also hard to explain with any other means than Covid.
Indeed. Presumably extreme weather events were in existence before humans were here to experience them, and they will continue to exist so long as the Earth's surface is heated unevenly by the Sun. But which events would have happened anyway, and which are the result of some new element(s) accounted for by the theory in question?
In fact - if we are unable to distinguish the former from the latter - is the theory in question refutable by any conceivable event?

https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/7434469-a-theory-which-is-n...
As someone who had a clinical depression after a psychotic episode, which lasted a couple of years, I would say — it's complicated.

I've actually maintained a pretty healthy schedule, with regular swimming, intense hatha-yoga (more like gymnastics), spend a fair amount of time with people. At some point I've also became a workaholic.

How I felt — pretty horrible, all those nice things (unhealthy attitude to work is not nice, of course) barely helped to maintain a thin veneer of my social persona. Basically, most of the people who interacted with me would not know that I'm depressed. I think there are a lot of people like that, just outer shells.

I did not get medical help either in the form of therapy or drugs.

In the hindsight, I think that depression could have been helped at least a bit by going to the good therapist. I had some issues with rage a couple years later, and going to psychoanalyst really helped me a lot.
Oh, you know what also helped a lot? It may sound stupid, but at some point I've started going to piano lessons and it really was beneficial somehow.
>So the fairer comparison might be TLS 1.3 under all three, but if you need to upgrade why not upgrade the whole HTTP stack?

Because it's a benchmark of HTTP3 and not a comparison of "as it might be stacks".

It would a bit like bench-marking HTTP/1 with RHEL7 and Apache2, HTTP/2 with RHEL8 and NGINX and HTTP/3 with...let's say Alpine and Caddy...it's just not a clean benchmark if you mix more then one component and try to proof that this single one component is faster.
On the surface this looks nice, until you start using 3rd party componentsand the defaults they assumed for the component are overwritten because the default is changed.

It's no coincidence that we use classes to explicitly apply styles, I don't think this library is a good idea.

It's the same issues as changing native prototypes in Javascript, stuff depends on the defaults to be exactly as specified.

Explicit > Implicit
Stuff magically working is great until you need to make an exception.
What's cooking on Sourcehut? December 2021
FWIW this should be the standard practice anyway.

Your dev environment should be running on a sanitised version of prod data.

Some people prefer to operate on a subset (10%~) of prod data, I have always preferred to take the cost of taking everything.

This has a nice consequence of allowing you to test automated restores at regular intervals, but you must be mindful of the "fail-open" nature of sanitising data. (IE: new data must be known to the sanitisation tool).

Pipeline usually goes:

Prod/live -> Replica -> Backup/Snapshot -> Copy to archive -> Copy from archive via streamed sanitiser -> sanitised backup -> Restore[n] Dev Envs from same backup.
I would build a rest service that provides the code to do this, and I would test it extensively before releasing it as the mechanism to effect the change.

In addition I would build a validation service that checks and tests the update data (the list of changes) before they are submitted to the change service.

I would not permit any adhoc changes to the prod database. The rest service should be the only way for a mutation to be done short of a complete new release.
This was my thought too. I hope OP responds with why they think lessened demand would lead to lower prices. That doesn’t make any sense.
Because owning something means you have the right to trade it and sell it. Most workers, if they came into ownership of such shares, would quickly sell them to a few people who would build up many such shares: Capitalists.

You can't declare who will "own" what in the long term. The people who own it decide whether they will continue to own it - not you. They will decide not to.

If you say the workers can't sell the shares of their workplace, then they don't really own those shares. In fact, it's more like the shares own them. They are forced to continue "owning" part of their workplace, which someone decided should be their workplace. Variations of this are how authoritarian communism work.

(This is ignoring lots of other such issues with worker ownership, e.g. it becomes very complicated or impossible to bring new people on even if desperately needed since existing workers/owners don't want to dilute their shares. Also how can a new worker join if he cannot afford the shares to do so?)
At least HTTP/1.x is the default for command line testing and debugging. I'm a bit worried we'll lose testability of servers as we add more and more layers on top of 1.x. Say it works with `curl` for me, what are the guarantees it will work the same way over HTTP/2 and /3 multiplexers?
I know of at least one ISP that plain blocks outgoing UDP/443 or at least messes with the packets, so I wouldn't rely on its availability.

I'm also hesitant about HTTP/2 and 3 because of their complexity, but if you trust the systems and libraries underlying your server I don't see any problem in activating either. Just watch out with features like 0-RTT that can have a security impact and you should be fine.
OTOH, QUICK will mean UDP with per-stream flow control gets through every corporate firewall on the planet in 5 or so years. Hurray!
How to prank your developer colleagues
Having to lie completely still for hours with a constant plain and repeating sound in the background definitely stimulates some part of your brain.
Thanks. It didn't look like a slider to me (Firefox).
Do you really need a home assistant?
Indian govt clears Rs 76,000 crore PLI scheme for semiconductors
Library author here - SQLite concurrency needs a little care: don't miss the Concurrency Guide: https://github.com/groue/GRDB.swift/blob/master/Documentatio...
Lora Hat for Raspberry Pi – Communication Range Up to 5 KM
It reminds me how limited the human imagination is, especially in relation to fictional alien life forms.
Reliance Jio’s latest data pack is the cheapest in the world at ₹1 ($0.013)
Five democracies conspired to entrap Julian Assange
The roles played by Australia, Sweden and Britain under pressure from America to persecute the founder of WikiLeaks is well-known. However, Ecuador and its domestic politics in the past decade may be even more relevant, but little understood
what hppen after that to spacecraft
>Because that's what you do every time you drive. 11 crash fatalities per 100,000 people

This is a ludicrous abuse of statistics. 11 fatalities per 100k people is 11 fatalities per 100k people's worth of trips. That is a few orders of magnitude less than executing 11 people out of every 100k who show up to a stadium.
Procreative sex is deadlier, pregnancy can cause the same symptoms as taking the pill, but worse, and the act of giving birth is about 1/10000 chance of death.

Life is deadly, but both sex and covid vaccine rank low on the death list, and high on the life list.
As long as it’s still difficult to create a (usable & reliable) site editor, these services will keep being subscription only.

It annoys me when they try to make it look open source but it’s only a glorified api client.. same with builder.io [0]

[0] https://www.builder.io/m/visual-cms
Please check the charts at the last lage of this document https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.04.21267114v...

It seems that three doses can drop down your risk of infection below what being previously infected with covid, or even being infected and then vaccinated with two doses can provide.

I think we made a great mistake by not making this vaccine 3 doses from the start.
Anyone know if this breaks on legacy hardware running legacy browsers? Yes people largely use modern hardware, but there's always eccentric folk with old hardware who like to browse the web on old browsers (for whatever reason).
You obviously know way more than I do about this, so maybe I completely misunderstood but what I saw on one of those YouTube videos by a 737 pilot was something like that before MCAS when you got a runaway trim situation and followed the procedure and got trim back to normal and had the trim system turned off, most of the time you could turn the trim system back on and the problem would not come back. Runaway trim was usually due to some transient problem that would be gone after the system was turned off and on.

In those cases where the problem does come back it is not any worse so you can just try again. You might go a whole flight doing this if you are getting enough time between the problem recurring for restarting the trim stab system to be less annoying than not having it.

With MCAS, if I understood correctly, it would add a bias to the trim that was not reset when you restarted the trim system. Each cycle of turning it off and back on that was harmless pre-MCAS would increase that bias until you reached a point where the trim down bias was more than you could counter.

This wouldn't matter for the flights that crashed, because they didn't get to the turn it off stage, but it seems likely it would have eventually happened to some crew that did follow the procedure including the emergency directive.

The impression I got from this, and from watching many episodes of "Air Emergency", is that there is the official way to operate a plane as documented by the manufacturer, and then the unofficial way that pilots actually use that comes from combining the official way with the pilot's mental models of how the systems work to cover what can actually be done. So if the official way says to turn something off, but does not say "and then keep it off until a mechanic checks it out", and the pilot's mental model says that it is safe to turn back on, then they might turn it back on.

MCAS invalidated the mental model pilots had for the stab trim system, but the MAX-specific training they got and the emergency directive after the first crash did not do anything to tell pilots that their model was invalid.

When documenting a system and training people to use it, you really need to take into account the mental model they will have of the system. It is their mental model that people actually use to guide their interaction with the system.
Use your standard DB migration tooling, with code/change review as part of the process.

I’m a big fan of sqitch[1] but many migration tools will handle data updates as well as DDL.

1: https://sqitch.org/
This isn’t about opinions!

In a normal trial, you give half of participants a vaccine, and half of participants a placebo. Then, you wait around and see how many people in each group catch COVID naturally and get sick. Your vaccine works if fewer people who received a vaccine get sick compared to the placebo.

In a challenge trial, you give half of participants a vaccine and half of participants a placebo, and then purposefully expose them all to COVID so you don’t have to wait around for them to catch the virus naturally. As before, your vaccine works if fewer people who received a vaccine get sick.

A challenge trial gives you data which is more, not less, robust, because you’re controlling for more variables between groups. And we’ve used challenge trials to test vaccines in the past—just, never with a disease that’s nearly as deadly as COVID.

Any firestorm would result from a trial participant dying from the COVID they were purposefully given (which could absolutely happen), not from the vaccine. This has nothing to do with vaccine mandates.
Time Appliance Project
TL;DR: The plan costs ₹1 (0.013$) and lets you use 100MB for a month.
I don't care. I already switched my business to Linux Boxes. The last Mac OS in use is Catalina. All of my critical software runs under Linux. Figma is in the browser. Affinity Designer is running perfectly under Isolated Windows VM. If I ever use Apple computer again it will be with Linux.
After 20+ years of using Apple computers I don't find them interesting enough to risk my data and be scanned, categorized and processed by third party criteria.
Think different. Use Linux.
"Although BoringSSL is an open source project, it is not intended for general use, as OpenSSL is."
I'd advice against it, unless you want to write every component by hand.

Any third party library or component you use will be affected by "classless". There's a good reason explicitly define classes.

It's the same reason you don't change native prototypes in Javascript. Libraries assume the defaults, both for styling and code.
AFAIK the same is true for any WLAN card with antennas, radio with antennas, HackRF, etc etc.
Being a deep water fish, will have the delicate taste of urine, probably. Nom, nom. Delicious.

Lophius is pretty good. White, medium soft flesh, without any particular strong flavor. Is a bottom fish so there is not a hint of ammonia. The chicken of the sea.
Sadly over-fished currently.

Some people still seem to thing that when we finish with the edible species inhabiting the platform and sea surface we will have plenty of fish in the deep sea, but it does not work like that. They will be disappointed.
Via what mechanism? Were people not wearing masks in Scotland despite the mandate? Were they wearing masks in England despite no mandate? Is there enough difference in behaviour between Glasgow and Manchester to explain the difference?
I use two-finger scrolling on my touchpad when using a terminal. Is it necessary? No. But it's certainly easy and convenient, particularly since it works the same as it does in every other application. I can scroll faster in man with my trackpad than I can using the j and k keys. I know I could also use pgup/pgdown, but with those I have to move my hands anyway and I'm more likely to visually lose my place in the document (same problem with d/u, and the others.)
The "scanning" feature that underpins this has been deployed for years, and I dare say wouldn't even be considered unique for photo library managers. If you can search for "cat" and get photos of cats, then your photo library already has the tools necessary for CSAM detection.

I feel the fears about this implementation are largely overblown - equivalent features are not being misused on Google and Meta/Facebook's properties, despite having a much larger audience and less procedural oversight. Rather Apple is the outlier here for being not just late, but also by having minimum thresholds that must be passed and an unskippable step of human review.

I'm yet to hear a coherent argument about the potential dangers of the system that understood the implementation, nor the state of image scanning amongst cloud providers - even this thread seems to believe that Apple is the first here. Apple's approach was the most conservative, Google's goes much farther: https://support.google.com/transparencyreport/answer/1033093...
How is it not now? Dems never nominated a non-Christian candidate for Pres.
I enjoyed it early on (about a year ago) as it was novel and had this sort of "cosiness" to a lot of the chats. I stopped using it as much when my dad had a stroke in late January and I just wasn't in the mood.. but I've since returned a bit and it still isn't clicking for me anymore. A few ideas as to why:

1. A core group of speakers got addicted to it, tended to dominate many of the rooms, and appeared to know each other. So it got a bit samey and boring with them moderating everything.

2. A quantity vs quality dynamic seemed to appear in order to grow following counts and club sizes, which led to non stop lowest common denominator chats. I just went on now and this is clearly still a problem.. "Big Income Opportunities for You in 2022", "Real Relationship Talk", "Networking eLounge".. these sound like email spam subject lines. For me, these topics suck for the same reason on Clubhouse that they would if they were Ask HN topics..

There's probably more to it than that, and I might be being unfair, but those are just my initial gut answers.
Vaccines causing myocarditis isn't disinformation.
Or it could act as economic stimulus, as the exit dollars get invested in productive endeavours, rekt coiners have to get a job, and electricity and electronics become cheaper due to the capacity being freed from cryptomining.
BusKill – A USB kill cord for laptops
For the few static websites remaining, this is a great advancement. As long as you don't need to deal with user input, this can be achieved easily for things like blogs, news websites and ads.

Of course, these protocol improvements mostly benefit companies the size of Google. Smaller, independent hosts probably won't get much out of improving the underlying transport outside of a few edge cases.

This blog page loaded very quickly for me compared to most websites, though I don't know how much of that is in the network part and how much of it is because of optimized HTML/CSS/JS.
That would happen if supply goes down even more. Is this the case here ?
An ICE maker could do very well, just executives throwing chairs, calling electric cars cancer and suing with proxy patent trolls. They could mess up charging infrastructure standards by introducing their own incompatible ones. For example if a manufacturer has plugin hybrids but no electric cars, then it's in their interest that where a hybrid can be charged, an electric car cannot (or can only very slowly).
It can, but I’d be a little surprised if the zero w makes enough power to destroy its output without an antenna.
That's explained in the comments on the original source. It turns out that the curved bit of trace is significant: if you leave it connected but unterminated it'll be resonant near the 5th harmonic of the wifi signal, which is bad.

Microwave RF is hard.
You missed the point. The person I'm responding to believes dopamine is the brain's reward chemical. It's not.
Let's take a step back and look at the entire picture: Earth is not only people. Where can we move the refugees if the bees are dying off?
The problem is not about if the MAX is the safest airplane now. If Boeing can get away with it like that then it lowers the general airplane safety in my opinion. Now that Boeing has designed an airplane by cutting corners to safe money (even though it did cost them a lot, the government saved them), then this means that other airplane manufacturers must also cut corners to stay competitive.
Seems like they have it mostly resolved, the releationships were restored from a backup 3 hours prior to the incident, and they are working to restore the data for the 313 (sic.) items still affected: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/348547
It's a consequence of a demand curve: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demand_curve, an established concept in economics
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28140732
So, here's the worldwide cumulative prevalence of COVID:

https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/cumulative-covid-cases-re...

Assuming a world population of 7.75 billion, that puts the estimated prevalence at about 3.5%.

However, that's using confirmed cases. Estimates of actual cases would put it at 4-10 times higher (https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/cases-updates/burd... or https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2021/02/06/9645278...).

So that puts it at 14-35%, right around 25%.

Although that's over the last 21 months or so, it means you're more likely than not going to be infected with it in the next few years.