skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Dual Stack. Means twice the work for barely any benefit.

I should be able to have a router with a ipv4 network and multiple ipv6 networks without losing access to the ip4 network. The ip6 network should be reachable via port natting on the ip4 IP

I.E I have three networks on my router, two on ipv6

1000:2000:3000:4001::1/64

1000:2000:3000:4002::1/64

192.168.0.1/24

the ipv6 only server on

1000:2000:3000:4001::10

should cope with sending a packet to

1000:2000:3000:4002::10

By routing it via the router

It should also transparently convert a target of 192.168.0.3 to ::ffff:c0a8:3 and send via the gateay.

The router should then convert it to 192.168.0.3, with a source of 192.168.0.1, and maintaining a NAT state so return traffic goes back to 1000:2000:3000:4001::10

If there's a service that 1000:2000:3000:4001::10 needs to expose, the router can do a dst-nat on say 192.168.0.1 port 80 and forward to 1000:2000:3000:4001::10 port 80

That way you can comfortably deploy ipv6 wherever possible and not have to worry about ipv4 other than at the router, where you just have the ipv4 subnet

Likewise my ipv6 network can reach 209.216.230.240 by running ipv6 across my network until it comes to a device with an ipv4 address, where it gets natted. Just like it runs across my private rfc19xx ipv4 range before srcnatting at the edge of my network.
The point I am making is every smart contract is Schrodinger’s contract where the user has no idea what is inside and no way to know. Say you have a game called, I don’t know, Crypto Run. To purchase in game assets, the developers of Crypto Run deployed a smart contract that lets players do this. You have to use the smart contract from the developers and even if alternatives exist, people want to use the official contract from the development team. There is nothing stopping the Crypto Run team from sneaking in some telemetry code and we have to trust that they don’t. So we’re back to a trust-dependent system.
You're kind of dodging the question though.

The internet was competing with physically produced and distributed media and information. But web3 is competing with the internet. So...

What is web3 better for than the current internet?
When I worked at Facebook, I worked on a web memory tracking tool I was particularly proud. It went through links, grabbed heap snapshots, diff'ed them, found objects that weren't cleaned up and gave detailed information about its retain chain. You can see a lighting talk I did on it at BlinkOn: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JuyaGFApifA&t=1427s&ab_chann...

We used it to find a problem fixed in React 18 that caused large leaks on Facebook.com: https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/21039#issuecomment-80...

We also found one issue that caused a leak that's impossible to spot unless you know how V8 closures are implemented and retain one another.

I'm really hoping to see Facebook open source the tool some day!

Fuite seems really interesting. I like the idea of an automatic crawler!
Why don't they add IQ tests as a parameter? Instead of SATs we can identify smart individuals from bad schools. No more privilege excuses.
Why would you delete historical footage ? No one would even think to destroy or censor the footage from Auschwitz
Did he get feedback from his peers?
Re: the docs, I find your assertion puzzling, or at least, incompatible with this quote:

> [OCaml's] clear expressiveness made it possible for code reviews to be performed [at Jane Street] by traders who were not programmers

If OCaml was a mess, difficult to understand, or had terrible docs, what the quote describes just wouldn't be possible. Non-programmers doing code reviews! What could be more pragmatic than that?
Does anyone feel like wire fraud is a catchall term for when some people are hellbent on sentencing someone, who didn't do anything that was by itself a crime?

Shouldn't this be a civil case between Netflix and this guy? Why is criminal justice system even involved in this? It looks like very bad way to spend tax payers money.
> You should embrace this future and price it in.

Should we though? what you and the parent outline is a most sensible way of accommodating it while minimising invasion of privacy, however I question the underlying reasoning, and therefore whether or not we should encourage it. What perceived gains are to be had beyond merely box checking for accreditations? and in those cases why is it part of those accreditations, what is the intended effect? I can think of a few but they are all flawed or attempting to enforce something impossible:

1. Preventing leaking code/IP (But if you can't trust them they could just as easily take a picture of the screen, capture the HDMI, copy the drive, even log their own keyboard... there are always side channels unless you physically control the environment).

2. Preventing them from doing something malicious... But if they are writing code for you and they are untrustworthy, isn't it already game over?

3. Bean counting, monitoring time spent at keyboard etc - which we all know is not an accurate metric of productivity for cognitive work.

4. Similarly to #1 and #2, unintentional breach or security issues, i.e you trust the person but not their device or their ability to secure their own device - In which case spyware seems wholly inadequate to cope with this situation, if you are serious about this, you should be controlling the hardware and OS (which lots of orgs with highly sensitive info do).

In all these cases spyware is futile. Am I missing something?
> Sure, the stories are parodies and written in an exaggerated manner, but the underlying humor seems to be saying “Isn’t this what we all really think? Isn’t this how we would all wish we could behave?”, which is an attitude I find deplorable.

No? Not everyone sees all types of humorous behavior as something to aspire to. Did people always look at Chaplin's antics as the fool and think "that's funny, I should act the same way"? Do people look at asshole comedians because that's how they wish they were?

I think it's more accurate to say that people find extreme behavior funny because we have urges sometimes to act the same, and while we recognize that's not a good way to act, it can be cathartic to see someone unrestrained by social norms in a fictional setting where nobody is actually hurt or upset.

I'll be the first to condemn someone for harmful behaviors to others without cause, but fiction is another thing entirely. Even if I didn't find this type of fiction humorous, I would be very careful not to ascribe motivations and idea about those that do. People have many reasons for enjoying stories, and they may be entirely alien to your own way of thinking, so generally I find it's best to deal with the individual (if needed) and not the source.
> I've been looking for mention of

<list of bullshit tech and fictional tokens that doesn't require blockchain or are outright scams>

> but instead get tired critiques of

<list of bullshit tech and fictional tokens that doesn't require blockchain or are outright scams>
You suck at directions because you rely on GPS. Navigating is a skill like any other.
My question is how this could lead to jail time? I mean, its against policy, the employer can sue for damages, fire the person, etc. But to throw someone in jail for breaking essentially a corporate policy seems really off.
Again, I find this answer somewhat evasive. Many languages support functional programming and are used commercially. You still have not told us: What problems is Haskell best for? What is its comparative advantage?

I don't think it's unreasonable to expect a more concrete reply to that quesiton than "First master the language, then figure it out."
It varies a lot by where you live and how much premium you personally care about following the letter of the law.

I think HN tends to assume nobody has any freedom because most of HN lives in "nice" suburbs or "nice" parts of cities where law enforcement is being used in a backhand manner to enforce conformity and also comes from a life where obeying basically all the laws basically all the time is considered default behavior. The lower classes are far, far free-er on a day to day basis than HN is. Nobody cares if you smoke weed on your porch in any neighborhood where a Ford E350 is a more common driveway adornment than a Mercedes E350. I walk my dog beer in hand two days a week. Kids ride dirt bikes on the street. The section 8 people play loud music in languages I don't speak. Nobody gets hassled by the powers that be, as far as I can tell. And this isn't some rural area in a small government red state, it's working class neighborhood in a blue state.
its nature to murder. humans murder each other far less than other primates.
Looks like jjulius used 20 months in a year.
Wishlist: an open-source Firefox add-on that does nothing but launch youtube-dl and get a video at top quality with one button click.
You assume that once the job was done, he washed his hands of it and it was over.

I once digitized a large media collection for a company (not audio, though), and it regularly used me as a backup source of last resort for when the files failed/got lost/needed to be transferred in bulk to another company/whatever on their end.
> You are very unlikely to be delivering "10x Developer" work.

The OP never said he thought he did. He was speculating if perhaps the reason he got good reviews (for a "1× developer") was because he is a "10× developer" delivering at 0.1× of his capacity, which works out to "1×".
yt-dlp is worth it just for the sponsorblock integration.
I suppose we bring some of our own theology to bear on 'eretz'. If you believe that after the flood only 6 persons remained alive on the earth, then that suggests that the flood was global.
There are already several (razorpay, paytm, payu) that do exactly that. They do charge 2% flat fee which is still high by Indian standards (comparing to cash and upi). So merchants do try custom solutions with bank gateways to reduce the fee.
Always a fair question, but I don't see how that applies to his point one way or the other. There's an ounce of meat AT BEST in this article.
The Unseen Side of “Cancel Culture”
I'm not involved in this personally.
'Mini-brains' provide clues about early life origins of schizophrenia
Any new protocol is going to have adoption costs. The "issue" with ipv6 is that for a lot of people/organizations, the tolerable cost of adoption is still pretty much zero. Adding yet another protocol to the mix would not make that better.
Your experience will determine where you're able to contribute and that determines what the blast radius is. I don't believe that you only learn from big mistakes and that was not the point I was trying to make here. You learn from all mistakes and if you're in a job or relationship or environment where you feel punished for making a mistake then that's probably not a great place to be. What I'm encouraging here is getting over your internal resistance.
> Then why can't you provide examples which are useful for things other than moving cryptocurrency tokens around?

I provided, among other things, examples of trading tokens that track real world assets. Or what, you think the stock market isn't actually useful because it doesn't do anything useful other than moving money around?

Do you know why Ethereum gas fees are so high? Because lots of people are using Ethereum. Obviously because they find it useful for -- yes -- moving tokens around and whatnot.

Again, you're obviously not someone who would find it useful or even interesting. But seriously, how is it so hard for you to understand that the world isn't just you?

> More crassly, why do I not hear anyone saying it's useful unless they have a personal financial stake in me buying their tokens?

Maybe because you're not interested in the tech, so the only people who you ever get to talk to about crypto are the shills? Because that has obviously not been my experience, which has been a lot more technical.
Yea, Twitter has vastly improved its UX here over the years. Thread unrolling isn't really necessary any more.

Twitter is actually an incredible feed if you meticulously scope your feed or lists to industry folks, people doing advocacy for various marginalized groups, and individual journalists (not their news outlets, whose editors add the clickbait). If you do this, Twitter becomes a place where people proudly try to summarize their own intensive research and journalism into 280 characters, and thus present varied insights at extremely high density. Every tweet tends to link the long-form work itself, as well as a thread, by them, that is essentially an abstract for their long-form work. And professionals who want to post off-brand content will often times open up a second account for trivialities, which you can choose not to follow.

To put it another way: If you wanted to capture the zeitgeist of, say, a machine learning conference, and made a user interface to let people summarize their work, speak excitedly about it, be able to present multiple levels of depth (single-sentence, abstract, images, full paper), and throw in the occasional meme whose comment section is actually an insightful take on challenges people are facing... odds are your interface would look very similar to Twitter as it currently exists. The difference, as always, is the content.
Just wanted to say thank you for this response around what the agent actually does, there is a lot of misinformation here around what the agent does and we are trying to clear that up.
What did you hear about it?
> A similar issue has occurred with Java (and other languages, see https://frohoff.github.io/appseccali-marshalling-pickles/). Java provided a suberbly user-friendly way of serializing any object to disk and recovering it back in its original form. The only unfortunate problem was that there was no way to say which object you are expecting! This allows attackers to send you objects that, upon deserialization in your program, become nasties that wreak havoc and steal data.

Not correct. You can certainly inspect before instantiation:

https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/platform/serialization...
You're clearly on the dplyr bandwagon, but as someone who wrote R code for about 10 years before dplyr came along, and saw the direction the language was going, it's the reason I now mainly use python. I just could not put up with the non-standard evaluation so everything ends up being a 100+ line script instead of composable functions, and breaking API changes every 6 months.
Yes, for US citizens the right to information is almost unlimited. Even plans for (nuclear) weapons is protected unless it’s stolen classified material, you intend to develop a nuclear weapon, or you intend to export that information.
> Imagine that today is 1994. Now replace the word web3 in tour first paragraph with the word "internet"

Imagine today is 2013. Now replace the word web3 with the word Juicero.

Somehow every single crypto project is always, without fail, the next Internet. And not the next Juicero or ET: The Extraterrstrial video game
I think every school, has its "smart kids" who define their identities by their academic achievement, and who seek to ace every test. It's their way of standing out and being special so they try extra hard to keep it that way.

Unfortunately they often tend to be introverts which colleges want less than overachievers in other areas. Except for the science/technology departments, who were probably overruled by other departments if decisions like abandoning test scores are made.
FontCreator Pro 14.0.0.2814 with Crack and Serial Key [Latest 2022]
Why is Vistara LLC not charged for bribing this guy ?https://www.linkedin.com/company/vistara

I know anecdotally a lot of US based Indian Outsourcing companies, TCS, Infosys, Mahindra, HCL bribe the mid-senior IT executives by buying them offshore properties under LLCs. If you look at Avis, Disney and other corps, the top level IT execs are bribed to the gills by these companies.
I like simplicity of mochajs but chai felt really outdated. Jest on the other hand is so complicated and magical that I have no confidence in tests that I write using it. That's why I've created earljs: https://earljs.dev/

It's a modern, fully typesafe chai replacement that works great with mocha. Very inspired by Jest (matchers, snapshots) but without magic that makes Jest hard to reason about.
See: Nouveau and Nvidia.
Prices are discovered on the margin, I wouldn’t be so sure. I believe university administrators do care, anyhow.
Apple currently uses commodity PC hardware, from vendors including HP, and Linux as their standard data centre platform. I suppose it's possible they might start experimenting with Apple silicon servers in their data centres, but I doubt it mainly for supply reasons. They need all the 5nm TSMC fab capacity they can get for their consumer products. There's no way there's enough spare capacity to start diverting significant numbers of these chips into their data centres. Maybe one day.
> this is a cost of doing business in Hollywood.

First off, these were tech vendors giving kickbacks to the CIO, not producers bribing studio execs to get someone specific cast.

But you seem to be missing that kickbacks aren't illegal in and of themselves. Netflix corporate didn't have to institute an anti-kickback policy for its employees. But they did, likely because they didn't want an environment where execs are negotiating both for the company and for themselves. The moment an executive violates corporate policy to enrich themselves, it becomes fraud.
I know of people who AWS fully sponsored, including business class intercontinental travel, to attend re:Invent which is essentially a week long holiday party, by virtue of AWS bill.

Every vendor has marketing budget and a decent portion of it goes to keeping their point people at clients happy. You can call it kick back or whatever, it’s a matter of semantics.

So yes it is normal. And no it’s neither cynical and nor have I been involved in. But I’ve seen it happen around me. So I know it’s a routine thing.
I had a senior dev at a past job who did this constantly. And when it was found out how much he actually stole, our entire team was laid off and replaced by the company that did the audit.

He just refused to believe that software licenses were real. That and I dont think he could actually code anything from scratch without stealing large swaths of code from open source repositories.
I guess I'm not seeing it in that video. The video you've posted is pretty clearly reading from use blocks and writing to unused blocks, in contrast to this webapp.
The subdomain chai.js.org is available and it may be worth investigating that as an alternative. (https://js.org/ has more details)
Very cool. Reminds me of Erlang Observer.
> The point I am making is every smart contract is Schrodinger’s contract where the user has no idea what is inside and no way to know.

I literally explained a few comments ago how that's not the case. Did you forget what you read already? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29588550
It's corporate corruption and this type of behavior prevents companies from competing fairly. It's bigger than "corporate policy". That's like saying "theft" is against corporate policy, so when I embezzled $10K I should just get fired instead of jailed.
Your comment still doesn't actually illustrate any example in which web3 is superior to a centralized entity. You must always trust something. Civilization is already inherently centralized.
Try this https://chaijs.github.io/
The use of the word "illegal" seems problematic if this is a contractual dispute over (GPL) license terms. No one seems to be claiming that TikTok actually committed a criminal act (although, perhaps they did, if this was intentional as it appears, and TikTok is engaging in criminal-levels of distribution. Not a lawyer, so just speculating here.)

It probably would have been better if the OP had said "violated the license agreement".

Still, many other companies have eventually caved under GPL lawsuits, but apparently none in China; probably because it's virtually impossible as a foreigner to win a tort case against a Chinese company.

https://wiki.fsfe.org/Migrated/GPL%20Enforcement%20Cases
This is actually an interesting use case for us, I don't think we have addressed it yet but thanks for giving us something to think on.

Source: Drata CISO
Could you give me a source for "Run over and the reversed".
I'd be interested in reading about it.
What is the end game in allowing PROC nationals into American universities?

Even without a kinetic confrontation, current trends indicate PROC will dominate the world economy, ocean navigation, the African and part of South American continents, near Earth orbit and the Moon because of technology they've already stolen, downloaded, misappropriated and bought from the West --and they're known to be creating bioweapons that kill only non-Chinese people while operating concentration camps that harvest organs, rape and murder millions of racial minorities!

Let's see Purdue prove they are not feckless by leveraging this to terminate Chinese investments and expel all members and family members of the CCP that refuse to surrender their Chinese citizenship, become naturalized Americans and (civilly) agree to lifelong warrantless monitoring of their loyalty to America.
I don't like the idea of gatekeeping, it's hard enough to hire people.

In the US we don't really have licensing for engineers (there is PE, but it's not anything close to ubiquitous). I think it's one of the best parts of our engineering/tech culture.

You're an engineer based on the skills you employ to solve the problems you do, not because some body of people gave you a slip of paper that says you can employ those skills to solve those problems.
Interesting. I wonder would it permit more advanced optimization passes that might have too much impact on performance otherwise?
I'm curious - which specific laws have you found to be "impossible not to break"?
Where did I say that? It's literally this ridiculous jumping down people's throat the second they mention anything slightly negative about 'COVID culture' that I'm criticising.
100%, I totally agree. I linked to an article [1] that talked about one person's experience with this. My argument here is that I believe it's overall better to accept that risk and important to encourage that in others.

[1] https://danluu.com/look-stupid/
> Every single one of the problems in the article are due to binary-exponent / decimal-exponent mismatch and the inevitable differences in how different platforms do the conversions.

The article itself actually started with your assumption... and found it wasn't true. The type conversion wasn't the issue--it was coming back as the same value on all the different systems.

The flaw was that the sum came out wrong depending on the order that it was done. And the input numbers were (if I'm understanding correctly) computed as a / b, for some integer values a and b, which are not generally perfectly precise in decimal or binary floating point.