skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yeah that's my issue as well and so much divitis and unnecessary nesting...
I expect that vaccine mandates for employment (a la Biden) will go away eventually, yes. But that won't happen "once the ERs slow down"; rather, it happens when we are confident they won't "speed up" again. One operationalization: I would figure that when we are at 95% vaccinated or so, and when it is no longer a major news item, the mandate will be repealed.

>or leave their homes?

I do support continuing the vaccine mandate for as long as people continue to say ridiculous things like this. Government policy has rarely been so funny.
This is wrong on two readings: the core team is a governance team, not an engineering team, and the people who have raised concerns thus far have been prominent contributors to the Rust ecosystem.
Scribo AI – Your AI Copywriter
If you are the business owner of an e-commerce business or just starting one right now we would love to hear from you!

Scribo AI can help you write product descriptions for any industry in just a matter of seconds.

Looking forward to hearing from you!
Many available options seem to be based on manual annotation and, therefore, cover a limited range of all legal texts. Especially with regard to regulatory topics, those research sites usually fall short.
> In my case, the goal is to let as many people as possible benefit from my labour ... The end consumers got better software as a result

That is your prerogative for your own software. FSF's goal, likely shared by the author when they picked the license, is not and has never been the maximal popularity of their own software. You may not like their goal or see it as valuable, which is a reasonable question of values, but that does not make their strategy poor for achieving what they care about, which, I repeat, is not "popularity," nor even "better software for end users," strictly speaking. Confusion arises when people subconsciously project their own goals/values on FSF and then evaluate FSF's strategy under that pretense. GPL is a very effective tool for accomplishing what FSF wants, and the trade-off with popularity is very much deliberate, not some surprising side effect.
A US company, Ambri, is also working on a molten salt battery.

"The liquid metal battery is comprised of a liquid calcium alloy anode, a molten salt electrolyte and a cathode comprised of solid particles of antimony"
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/video/2014/dec/04/i-cant...

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/23/us/in-tamir-rice-shooting...

https://www.cnn.com/2017/06/20/us/philando-castile-shooting-...

I'm sorry, but it's starting to feel like you're being willfully obtuse.
Makes me think I should figure out how to sell my /24 ARIN block I registered years ago. I wonder what it is worth...
I'm saying you don't need that and almost nobody uses it. There are tons of snippets in the Tailwind documentation. I just scrolled down the side nav and clicked a page at random:

https://tailwindcss.com/docs/divide-width#add-borders-betwee...
Molten NaOH will oxidize many metals, including nickel and iron, so maybe cathodic protection?

Yes, that's what it looks like: https://www.freepatentsonline.com/y2020/0105424.html
I couldn’t tell but does it include an inline Rich Text Formatting browser based editor like Gitbook does?

Once git and markdown are supported; This product lives and dies on this feature I believe.
The answer to this is simple - TLS will start being terminated at the pods themselves. The frontend load balancer will also terminate TLS - to the public sphere, and then will authenticate it's connection to your backends as well. Kubernetes will provide x509 certificates suitable for service-to-service communications to pods automatically.

The work is still in the early phases, so the exact form this will take has yet to be hammered out, but there's broad agreement that this functionality will be first-class in k8s in the future. If you want to keep running proxies for the other feature they provide, great - They'll be able to use the certificates provided by k8s for identity. If you'd like to know more, come to on of the SIGAUTH Meetings :)
> Those customers will complain to their ISPs, which will provide incentive to get IPv6 deployed

Your experience with huge ISPs has obviously been different from mine. I am deeply grateful that I've benefited from two "first world" advantages: Comcast has (surprisingly) been very proactive about IPv6 support, and here in the Bay Area I have actual competition available for me to switch to. But in other parts of the country, that's for sure not true

---

to address the dig portion of your comment, the AAAA record (err, or lack of it) for github.com likely is a lot more impactful than HN

It's not that I think major users are going to switch, but I'll point out that GitLab actually does have AAAA records
Not at all. There are many ways to let an audience decide whether the rest of the material is worth their time. Summarizing to give them a preview is only one (and often the least interesting one).

Other ways:

* Describe a problem that the audience also has, so that they understand that you are aligned with them.

* Tell an engaging anecdote so that they expect it will be a rewarding experience. (The idea that a piece of writing should entertain, inform, or persuade and that those are mutually exclusive is another canard that I find to be completely toxic and antithetical to good writing. Good writing should entertain, inform, and persuade.)

* Telegraph that the time investment will be smaller by getting started and making the overall thing shorter.

* Describe previous failures to solve a problem.

* Give them an interesting insight right off the bat, which implies there may be more to come.

* Tell them something personal which conveys whether you are likely to be a person with interesting things to say.

* Throw out a detailed, hard to acquire fact, which implies that you have other hard-won knowledge.

Note that what all of these have in common is that the intro material is unique and is not simply a pre-statement of information they will encounter lately.

Also, the fact that I made step 3 optional is significant. Most writing and presentations don't need a summary and a summary will often detract. If you want to stick in the audience's memory, what you really need is a climax, and "here's what I just said, said again" is about the most anti-climactic ending you can imagine.
Well it says that's the company's core IP, so...
They aren’t gonna steal your app. Don’t worry about it. Just send tidbits, no one cares.
The pricing is per page, not per document. One larger document can go over the free threshold.
We should be comparing Tailwind to modern alternatives, not vBulletin CSS from 2004.

FYI I'm a recent Tailwind convert so I agree that Tailwind is good, but your comment is like saying Tesla cars are great because they aren't horses.
Thanks for the tip. Weird thing is I'm not the only one experiencing these issues with the same model of laptop. Possibly a bad batch, but worthy of further investigation, for sure.
Coming up with variable/class names is one of the most annoying aspects of programming, so any way we can eliminate that task I think is always going to be a productivity boom
Not all unions are like that but some definitely are. Some unions seem to be connected to organized crime or powerful political players and protect their turf very strongly. eg Longshoremen in New York. The union is used as a make-work organization (hire my cousin for a high rate where he barely shows up and I'll fix $X problem for you). A portion of dues goes to political lobbying which gives them political power - eg in California the PG&E Lineman's union is one of the reasons PG&E hasn't been nuked from orbit given how badly they maintain infrastructure and how high their cost for electricity is - Silicon Valley Power charges $0.129c/kWh where a mile down the road PG&E charges $0.28c/kWh-$0.33c/kWh. If they were actually subject to a free market they'd have been liquidated long ago, but the union fights to protect them.

Others are more like European unions thus are more reasonable. In the limited times I've worked with IEW union electricians in the bay area they were reasonable people who did good work without any slacking, fake make-work, or outrageous prices.
> and whose parents are from the same county

With the vast majority of Americans, a few generations back the ancestors are are immigrants, and they can usually tell you from where.
Hi, yeah week 3 collinear points, I had to post a number of questions on the message board due to language being ambiguous. In the end I could only get 74 percent and I had no idea why. I spent hours and hours and hours on it.

Yes percolation was a tough first assignment.

Week two was linked lists and really straight forward.

Also I found Sedgwick's explanations too terse, I ended up on YouTube countless times watching other videos that helped me get what he was saying.

I think it's probably me though, it's a Princeton course so I guess it's aimed at the very bright!
The real Google response would be - it's to facilitate a migration to new signing keys in case the developer:

1. Loses their signing keys

2. Needs to migrate to a better signing algorithm

Google can just handle that on your behalf. Additionally, there's no more need to care about signing keys at any point in the development pipeline. Rather than keep it secret, anyone with proper access to the Google developer console can sign and release apps

More cynically, what they're really guarding against is other app stores. It's MUCH harder to migrate an app from the Play Store to another store if the signatures don't match.

* Without a matching signature, the user can't pull their data from Google in the same way. They'd have to completely uninstall and reinstall the app, potentially losing data if the app isn't backed by a server.

* With a matching signature, the other app store should pick it up seamlessly.

Modifying apps without opt-in seems like a step further than they'd be able to pull off without massive backlash right now.
Of course, if you want a very efficient application, you are completely right. But the thing is that with Swift you can get a Java like performance (which is pretty good) out-of-the-box even while paying the ref-counting penalty, without the Java memory penalty (it has a low memory footprint) and without having to run it all with a external VM.

Of course, if you want to catch-up with the average speed of C++ you will need some effort, but knowing that it will be pretty fast without much effort and without all the other penalties is reassuring.
The merge is all but inevitable now, and it seems that there are quite a good number of validators for the Beacon chain: https://etherscan.io/address/0x00000000219ab540356cbb839cbe0...
I had not considered that single person households would be more willing to live in shared housing if it had better noise insulation. That is a good point.

However, I feel like the cost for building concrete shared housing unit must be high enough such that the people willing to pay that much for shared housing units would rather just pay a little more and buy a detached stick house.
Yes, it's a bad joke, but the propaganda works very well indeed. So much so that even back when some of this stuff was in the mainstream news (OK, not the details, but still), hardly anyone cared - because it was the "good guys" doing what "needed to be done" to "keep us safe", and anyone saying otherwise was a "nutter conspiracy theorist".
The WaPo isn't owned by Amazon, the WaPo is owned by Bezos, who also happens to own Amazon. So I don't think an FTC breakup would really work at all.
It's only implied in the article, but developing such a 1000+ megaton bomb would probably have been possible. There is no clear upper limit to the yield of a thermonuclear device; it seems it's mostly a question of adding more fuel.
Then you should interview again but with us.

This is not too different from wpa_supplicant used by several operating for key management for wireless networks. The complicated key negotiation and authentication can remain in user space, the encryption of the negotiated key can be done in the kernel (kTLS) or, when eBPF can control both sides, it can even be done without using TLS but encrypting using a network level encapsulation format to it works for non-TCP as well.

Hint: We are hiring.
It's almost unbelievable.. If not even Google can make their own software work on their own hardware, can you trust Android phones at all? Not that I'm particularly impressed by Apple's phones or computers for that matter, it seems they refuse to work without a connection to phone back home to Apple.
This whole thing sounds like a case of chasing the wrong market killed it.

When I walk up to a pinball machine and put a buck in (or thereabout at my local pinball place) and the game is over in 15 seconds because I suck, I don't put another buck in. So the minimum skill level is too high to attract new players.

I'm pretty sure that they can make pinball incrementally more difficult simply by raising/lowering bumpers in critical places, but I only vaguely remember seeing that at some point in the past.
“ ossibly I'm going against the grain here, but I don't count e.g. driving for Uber as "entrepreneurship”

Does anyone? How is setting your own schedule at all akin to owning your own company?
Some technical thoughts as someone who could care less about fanboyism:

- One point where atomic CSS frameworks are supposed to shine over conventional CSS is bundle size, since they (at least the good ones) compile to only a single rule for any used value, rather than potentially repeating rules for semantically different classes.

- Another point where atomic CSS frameworks shine is just sheer volume of banging code out. When the bulk of your output is visual, mastering tools based on shorthands like tailwind, emmet, etc can feel very productive.

- Purely atomic CSS frameworks can make some workflows more difficult, e.g. by having too granular call sites and not allowing "let's see what happens to the overall theme if I do this design change" iterative style of work, or because workflows that edit CSS on the fly via browser devtools can no longer be used to limit impact within semantic lines (e.g. "I want to change padding only on buttons, without breaking everything else that happens to depend on the same padding value"). There are both design-oriented and debugging-oriented workflows that are affected in similar ways.

- You generally don't get visual regressions at a distance w/ atomic CSS. This matters at organizations where desire for pixel precision and simultaneously fickle design teams are the norm. But conversely, "can we just change the font size to be a bit bigger across the site" can often run into issues of missed spots. On a similar note, designs may become inconsistent across a site over time due to the hyper local nature of atomic CSS oriented development.

- Custom rules may as well be written in APL[0]; they usually aren't documented and it takes a "you-gotta-know-them-to-know-them" sort of familiarity to be able to work with them (or get back to them after a while).

- There are some tools that mix and match atomic CSS with other paradigms. For example, styletron[1] can output atomic CSS for the bundling benefits, but looks like React styled components from a devexp perspective, and has rendering modes that output traditional-looking debug classes for chrome devtool oriented workflows.

The main theme to be aware of: proponents of atomic CSS rarely talk of maintenance, so beware of honeymoon effect. Detractors often omit that traditional CSS (especially at scale) also requires a lot of diligence to maintain. So think about maintenance and how AOP[2] vs hyperlocal development workflows interact with your organization's design culture.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/APL_(programming_language)

[1] https://www.styletron.org/

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspect-oriented_programming
LIR = Local Internet Registry, for those wondering.

Funny how their site has a handy pop-up definition when you hover over IPv4, but not for LIR.
Your point is not specific for ads and completely ignores the dynamics of reviews. Your app will immediately receive a ton of 1 star reviews for misleading the users.
PACER explored new boundaries in regulatory capture “from the inside.” It is now all too obvious a trend to have taxpayers fund and mandate the development of an institution, then subsequently build a sinecure upon its rental to those same taxpayers. This kind of triple-dipping is grotesque, and never should have been allowed in the first place.
That seems like a rather premature conclusion. WHO mentioned:

> Data which looked at hospitalizations across South Africa between 14 November and 4 December found that ICU occupancy was only 6.3 % – which is very low compared with the same period when the country was facing the peak linked to the Delta variant in July.

Did they account for previous infection or vaccination status? What if a lot of these are breakthroughs/reinfections. Considering excess deaths in South Africa, their national data on number of cases is sort of, doubtful [1].

Further, they seem to have observed mainly a population under 40.

[1]: https://theconversation.com/unpacking-south-africas-excess-d...
When in retail IT I created a script that improved the daily polling processes from hundreds of retail stores to the central system. All I did was make it more resilient to error conditions, and re-poll any error’d stores once.

Before: I’d start work and manually fix ~30% of sites which didn’t poll properly

After: I’d fix the one or two, usually their link had been down for a while or was still down and I couldn’t get the data anyway. it saved around 60-90 min a day
Maybe with this IPO they can finally start reviewing terraform PRs again
You're being downvoted because people just want everything to be free without ever paying for it or doing any work to achieve it. They're the same people who expect politicians to fix everything for them, rather than us having to personally get involved in solving societal problems.
At their valuation 20-30% is literally billions of dollars. You can buy a lot of ads with a billion dollars.
That would make GitHub toxic
To be able to have a meaningful personality test, the subjects need strong introspection abilities.

And there are a LOT of people that are awful at introspection.
There is a dead sibling comment which I will repeat with a bit kinder words, and with a different caveat.

As a frontend developer I don’t like Tailwind for several reasons, it brings the styling into the structure. As a frontend developer Tailwind is at a forefront of what I would consider bad practice and encourages a code style which would be a nightmare for me to maintain.

That said. Tailwind seems to be loved be people who are not professional frontend developers. It seems to be just the right tool for people who are not necessarily proficient in CSS. And perhaps people like me (and the dead sibling) need to learn to let go and allow other people to have the tools which makes it easier for them to do the job which they are not experts at. For that reason I understand Tailwind, even though I don’t agree with it.
I looked at my department website, it's 25+ years since I started uni and the 2 lecturers I had the most trouble learning from are still there. One is had of department! He was a good guy, I just didn't "get it", but the other one was awful at teaching. He did have amazing credentials from Stanford and another top tier uni in the States before coming over to the UK. Teaching was never a priority at that uni!
Bill Gates says meetings in the metaverse are an inevitability
I'm not sure I get Tailwind still. Doing everything with utility classes and OOCSS / BEM are things we stopped doing literally decades ago. CSS modules still seem to solve every problem Tailwind solves, and better. CSS modules combine the power of global utility classes with locally styled components/locally scoped classes, and compile to static stylesheets, a requirement for performance. I'm not sure how Tailwind works, but any CSS that's built at runtime and JS and inserted into the DOM dynamically should be avoided, and is an example of favoring developer experience over end user experience. It's always surprising to me when the build process isn't front and center of any CSS framework, since that's the most important performance aspect. I'm not concerned about Tailwinds verbose CSS use since that's gzipped away, but the static stylesheet compilation aspect worries me if it's not front and center of the framework.

CSS modules let you use the full power and control of vanilla CSS, without having to worry about styles bleeding across components. Sprinkle in your global utility classes for your design system and you're good to go. Or sometimes even better, abstract design into components like `<grid>` `<column>` etc and not even worry about the classname implementation.

I know I'm missing part of the picture, because of the hype and joy that people report from Tailwind. What part(s) am I missing that move folks from the power, beauty, and simplicity of CSS modules, to all-utility-classes-all-the-time Tailwind?
Seems to be around $10k-15k, according to https://auctions.ipv4.global/prior-sales .
Sartre replied 'Ill have you instead.'
Stealing the network series is worth reading once for sure :)
There are benefits to Terraform, even at basic levels. You can version control infrastructure, check if manual changes have been made, and quickly spin up new, identical environments from the same configurations.

Yes, there are alternative ways of accomplishing this, but simple config files that can be easily validated and used to check against current infrastructure is an ideal way to do this.

Before Terraform, I worked on a team that built what was basically terraform. It's just a natural, obvious, and effective way of managing cloud infrastructure.
I'd only do that if you think it's likely to decrease in value. Do you think it'll be more or less valuable in 5-10 years?
Yeah, I think the author fails to explain the actual context of the alleged toxicity.

Context (in order):

1.) https://archive.fo/f10KK
2.) https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/announcement-ashley-willia...
3.) https://github.com/rustwasm/wasm-pack/issues/914 and https://github.com/rustwasm/wasm-pack/issues/928 and https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28515306
4.) https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/qzme1z/moderation_tea... and https://github.com/rust-lang/team/pull/671
Most interns and industry veterans don't write wordpress plugins either ;-)

The point is that you can learn enough of the basics to do useful things in 3 months with minimal prior experience.

Working with petabytes of data isn't a "hard" problem like it was 10 years ago. IDK how large PACER is, and I'm not suggesting that an intern could implement a new system, but $x0,000,000 and a decade of lead time is at least an order of magnitude off.
about $45 an IP right now if you're eligible to transfer out, but if you only have one /24, I'd hold onto it.
As always, ‘it depends’. I know he’s not YT strictly speaking but I love learning from Wes Bos. But the first time I watched him I was like holy shit boy, slow down! I thought it was terrible.

Then I learned some more, which got me to the stage where I knew what the hell he was on about, and now I love him. Information at its maximum density.
I only keep my hands on the steering wheel because I need to confirm attention. And the car changes lanes to pass, etc. without input from me.
As a renter you have almost no leverage over this. Nothing you can do except get the hard key like that tenant.
“If we filled up a building the size of the Colosseum in Rome with the salt and heated it to 700 degrees, we would actually” … have a whole lot of pissed off Italians on our hands
> It was overpriced, the small screen sucked, and it had no games

And $ for $ I had more fun with my Wii U than my Xbox One.

Nintendo's Wii U games were full of joy and happiness. They are all an absolute delight to play.