skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I don’t make it easy for kids to skip ads. Ads is a way to stop them from watching for too long.
Ironically, the ad-free version of C4 still has 'promotional messages' on some shows.
Metaphors We Live by with the Legendary George Lakoff [video]
It depends. You an either have your mutable torrent point to the head of a liked list like this:

head
|
|- post.txt
+- prev.torrent

prev
|
|- post.txt
+- prev.torrent

You get the idea.
With the not yet widely-supported BitTorrent v2, you can just add files to a new torrent and seeders of the old torrent will seed the files that are also in the new torrent too.
That's the one! Such a good idea.
I have mentally trained myself so that whenever I see the name "Oracle", related to any new product, I think "Larry Ellison needs a bigger yacht".
From what I understand a clan would be even more tight-knit not intermarry but marry into the clan. A woman from clan Campbell marries a man in clan MacDonald she would now be a part of MacDonald.

A tribe or band could bring in someone not necessarily by marriage alone. It's a common thing all over the world whatever name it is given; clan, tribe, band, caste.

There are probably some differences between all those terms but an anthropologist would have to explain it not me.
After the trial ends, your ARM instance will get deleted and you will be back to free tier offer. You can use 300$ to try with.

You have to upgrade to paying accounr manually so you are not going to have surprise bill if you stick to free tier always and never upgrades.

But good luck finding arm instance in your home zone because the demand is very high so you have to keep trying from time to time.

There are some people using scripts to automate the instance availability and registration so they can catch the opportunity.
Scanning for the string length (e.g strlen()) is asymptotically worse than reading a fixed size integer, so obviously don't do that unless it's a good memory/speed tradeoff (i.e. when you know the string is at most say, 16 bytes long).

Overall, it seems you didn't read my comment either. Or was I _that_ unclear?
I get that when you boil it down to pattern matching it sounds less impressive, but we are starting to see superhuman pattern matching algorithms, and algorithms that display logic through advanced “pattern matching”. And it’s quite obvious now that pattern matching is far more useful than pure rule based systems for any problem of sufficient complexity.

And AI is a very broad field, including pattern matching (supervised ML or otherwise), logic/rule based systems, etc. Is your complaint that they use AI/ML interchangeably? Because in this case, while AI is a more term for the technology than ML, it is not a strictly incorrect title.
If you're like me and this doesn't work because you've moved on to Wayland, I was able to run it as follows:

# Xwayland :2 &
# export DISPLAY=:2
# ./xantfarm
I'm not "simply wrong." I just has a cell phone long before you did.
You know it never really occurred to me before this, but is there anything more American than working hard to skirt poorly implemented rules in order to enrich yourself and those around you?

Am I talking about illegal immigrants or Uber?
You can assign scores say in a health economics setting, where you're a public health system choosing the drugs to fund that will do the most good.

Do you buy the drugs that keeps 70 year olds with X disease alive for 10 more years, or 20 year olds with Y disease alive for 2 more years?

While it might be qualitative for individuals, it can become (more) quantitative for populations.
Oh, well, this is the opposite of how the European Commission works:

Managers climb higher in the hierarchy and get salary increase according to how high the budget they manage is.

There is therefore a consistent effort in all the units of all the Directorate Generals to ask budget for new projects, and find a plausible excuse about why an existing solution cannot be used, and a new solution needs to be built from scratch.

Then, once this is built, it is common practice to initiate a new project to throw away the solution and re-do it from scratch, again using an excuse reason like adapting to more modern technology, or providing better performance.

P.S. The European Commission is composed of 33 Directorate Generals (DGs), each of it responsible of a specific topic. One Directorate General, called DIGIT, is in charge of providing IT solutions to all the others. However, each Directorate General has its own IT department (called 'Unit'), developing solutions on its own, rather than using what is commonly available at DIGIT, or already created in other DGs' IT unit.
You got it backward buddy. If Western countries imported workers, they would not need to externalize their industry. As a result, third-world countries will remain as poor and undeveloped as 30 years ago.

Offshoring basically transferred some of the wealth from the bottom middle-class/lower-class to the developing/poor world. The arbitrage value went to some lucky dudes who knew how to play these international games.

But these days are over. And it's hitting poor countries hard and making illegal immigration a more apparent problem.
You don't have to use "proper legal means". Which are rigged against you anyway.

Use secondary bank accounts and cards. IBM loses a thousand yoyos, no one even farts. You do, it's a major loss.

Unless you're rich and somewhat of an idiot, of course. It's really hard to get rich playing by the rules.
That really depends on geography, if you border with a rich country also the poor people can migrate illegally just by crossing the border, that's what happening with Mexico and the US or Africa and Europe. But indeed those people don't always do so well in their new country, it just creates more problems. In general migration is not such a great solution because once too many people migrates from the same place it just creates a nation within a nation and you are setting the country for the next civil war, whether proper war or low key between all the different groups. The best way to solve the issue is within each country, China did much more to alleviate poverty for a huge number of people comparing to what migration achieved.
Hmm. How does cargo handle this? TOML is not in the rust stdlib either.
Tie just set a new High Score of 134
Authors point about trustless commitments, ignoring the semantic arguments posed in the comments, is important.

Not mentioned but I would argue as equally or of greater importance is interoperability. If you lose trust in the commitment you've made, you can move your capital/identity/etc. To the new thing relatively seamlessly. This is the DeFi experience already built that's so amazing to interact with relative to traditional banking and capital markets. If you apply that same functionality to other markets, such as social media or healthcare (using zero knowledge rollups to protect private data), I think that's inevitably an a-ha moment.

It's like the Amazon API mandate - https://nordicapis.com/the-bezos-api-mandate-amazons-manifes... - if you build with interoperability at the core, the knock-on effects can be exponential. It's a game changer. The consumer is no longer captive to walled gardens.

Drop play money into a low fee blockchain, stick to a stablecoin, and mess around with some of the DeFi apps. I think it's easy to become a believer if you do that and compare to your normal banking experience.
2063 is gonna be a crazy year ;)
I haven't had this experience at all with my new TV I bought this year.

It boots up in quite literally 3 seconds and I can navigate to netflix or the criterion channel right away and begin playing stuff there

I can even mirror my phone screen directly to my TV with with my phone's built-in functionality, which has actually been useful more times than I would have expected!
Deep learning is pattern finding, not pattern matching. That is the difference. There is a business narrative that's hyping up ML/AI, there's lots of retrospective tracing of modern ML's roots back to something older, but that doesn't change the fact that there has been a big explosion of demonstrated advances opened up by modern approaches over the past 10 years.

Edit: just to expand a bit, the "intelligence" in modern AI is in the training, not inference. I think people see inference in a neural network as pattern matching or some kind of filter, and that's basically true, and "dumb" if you like. But learning the weights is a whole different thing. Stochastic Gradient Descent et al are using often only a comparative few examples to learn a pattern and embed it in a set of weights in a way that can generalize despite being highly underdetermined. It's not general intelligence, but it's a much different thing than the casual dismissals people like to post, usually directed at the inference part as if the weights just magically appeared
I’m pretty sure that cockpits have glyphs instead of words because it’s known to be faster/more reliable to recognize them than word labels, and language is not an issue.

Cockpits are expert user interfaces.

Some icons are better than others, and some are bad. I’ve never loved the burger menu button, for example.
Another factor is not all doctor salaries are the same. Anesthesiologist 400k, Family practice or OB/GYN 200k.

Anesthesiologist is buying a lamborghini, the family practice person needs a few years before they can entertain buying a house.
This is an age of extreme luxury

But hasn't every age been one of luxury for those who lived it?
Hey, look at the upside - “unplugging” your car from the Internet may make it more secure.
‘The French Dispatch’ and the New Yorker’s Collapse into Resistance Journalism
It's cool to find this evidence.

But now we have the opposite problem... there is so much good information and technology out there, yet we're often not able to effectively use it. (What, another failed infrastructure / IT / software project? Don't we know how to make those?)

Our collective ego has gotten so big, we often lack the humility to say, "Wait, I need to see who has the best technology / method in this area", and then learn it and apply it.
Oh my god, lmao
That works as long as:

1: someone other than the user is footing the bill (bulk licensing)

2: there are no suitable alternatives

Adobe will fade (or be forced to change) over the next 20 years as different tools pick them apart one niche at a time. It's already happening: the Affinity suite, Procreate (and similar indie-focused tools), and DaVinci Resolve, among others already serve huge niches within the Adobe suite quite well. Capture One, which predates Lightroom, is getting better as it expands out of the portrait studio.

This is essentially what happened to Microsoft. Macs got good (for definitions of good that matter to non-enthusiasts), mobile swept up almost all casual computer usage, and the web took much of the rest by way of Linux and open source. It happened a niche at a time until the world outside was too big to fully EEE.
It should work one way or the other, not both. For current logging APIs, the format string is used. It actually turns out that the call using string concatenation corresponds to log4j1 rather than log4j2 (looks like this was an error in the post, though it's being fixed to use log4j2).

I guess aesthetically you could argue either way, but I think the main purpose of the formatting string method is that you can write:

> logger.trace("Updates: {}", longListOfUpdates);

and if trace logging is disabled (which can be done dynamically), it's not going to invoke `longListOfUpdates.toString()`, which is what happens when you perform string concatenation. If it didn't work that way, I suspect people would end up writing extra `logger.isTraceEnabled()` conditions around their logging code.
1k companies per Y Combinator batch?
Quick Guide: Go 1.18
Hi,

This is a quick guide about which features will be delivered with Go 1.18 version. You could reach one of the below links.

https://dev.to/emreodabas/quick-guide-go-118-features-e78

http://emreodabas.com/go-1-18/

https://medium.com/@emreodabas_20110/quick-guide-go-1-18-fea...

#go #golang #generics #fuzzing
Sure, but Oracle can probably send it to collections and at the very least waste your time getting things fixed at the credit reporting agencies. At most, they'll sell your "debt" to one of those lowlife collections agencies that keeps calling until they get through to family members and then makes veiled threats. It's not legal, but with an unlimited supply of overseas "agents" that isn't really their problem, and it most certainly isn't Oracle's problem.
> you have to guess the language up front

I don't know many people who have no idea what the language of the country they're in is. For languages on the internet, cut&pasting the text into google translate works fine. Google infers the language.

> you have to know the ordering

Not necessary. Even for Chinese. I bet you could quickly infer the ordering of a script unknown to you by just flipping through the pages of a dictionary. This is impossible for icons, as icons have no order.
I want to like Rocket as being the slickest Rust web framework that leverages Rust's features to do some pretty handy stuff. Unfortunately, it seems to be run / maintained by one guy who's taking some time off right now and hasn't been able to get the new 0.5 version that moves to the stable rust build and async support officially released. I'd like to see a reasonable size professional team in charge of the project before trying to use it for anything bigger than a toy project.
This, 100% this, all the time, every day.

Stop making buying your content so hard, impossible, or generally shit that it's easier to get illegally.
See also: A Conversation with Anders Hejlsberg [about C#] <https://www.artima.com/intv/anders.html>
> The "priority view" in this article is known as the "Kalai egalitarian bargaining solution" in economics and game theory, or the "Rawlsian" social welfare function

No, that is a common misunderstanding, especially understandable here since some of OP's formulations also conflate the two. If you're an econ person a good text that puts the prioritarian view in context is Matthew Adler's 2020 Measuring Social Welfare: An Introduction. I'd also recommend that book to anyone here who claimed e.g. "we can't compare across persons!" but who is open to reading a case against that claim.
Nyxt Web Browser – Keyboard Driven, Lisp Powered, and Does What I Mean [video]
Chrome backpacks. I bought one used from someone at college around 6 years ago and it has been a champ. I've used it daily since and it still looks like the day I bought it. The water protection was great during a Michigan winter, and is incredibly comfortable, even on long walks. Cannot recommend it highly enough!
https://www1.grc.nasa.gov/space/science/lattice-confinement-...

They don't use the term 'cold fusion', and obviously the fusion sites would be hot, but the bulk material isn't.
google developed golang instead of improving pascal, so you probably can't. the two languages have surprisingly similar goals.
There is the possibility that GPL's viral nature is not actually fully possible in EU and EUPL is "the most" you can get copyleft-wise there. There are two articles about it on the EC's site:

https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/collection/eupl/news/why-viral-l...

=== (relevant snippet)

As a conclusion, it looks that in most cases, linking two programs or linking an existing software with your own work does not – at least in Europe – produce a derivative or extends the coverage of the linked software licence to your own work.

Such interfacing or linking escapes to the copyleft provision of any licence, open source (like the GPL) or proprietary. The technical way of linking for interoperability (static or dynamic, permanent or temporary reproduction of the needed code) should not make any difference.

Because of this, and in so far linking (even statically) is done for interoperability, does not prejudices the legitimate interests of the rightholder and does not conflict with a normal exploitation of the covered program, it seems that the differentiation between strong and weak copyleft has few legal reality. In applying all relevant licences, the copyleft effect should target the copies and real derivative works, where a significant portion of the functional covered code has been copied, modified, extended etc. At the contrary and in most cases, it seems that in European law the fact of linking two programs and the technology used for it does not by itself produce a derivative work: viral licensing is just a ghost. It does not exist.

===

This article (from the same author) also goes into virality in EU:

https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/collection/eupl/news/copyleft-or...

=== (relevant snippets)

Although often highlighted by some free software lawyers, this notion of “strong copyleft” has never been recognized by case law. On 2 May 2012, the Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that a software licence cannot prohibit the legitimate licensee from reproducing the portions of covered code (for example, the APIs or data structures) that are necessary for interoperability and for linking the covered work with others that could be licensed differently. This was ruled in application of the Directive 91/250 EEC on the legal protection of computer programs.

[...]

At the contrary and in all cases, it seems that in European law the fact of linking two programs and the technology used for it (i.e. dynamic or static) does not by itself produce a derivative work. This is the reason why it was considered that adding copyleft licences like the LGPL or the MPL to the EUPL compatibility list was not more problematic than adding the GPLv3 or the AGPL.

===

It should be noted, however, that this hasn't been explicitly tested in court with open source software (the software case mentioned in the second article was between proprietary software developers).

Also in practice most projects aren't released in just the EU so the GPL's strong copyleft still holds true in US, for example, even for work done in the EU. But this isn't a concern for the European Commission since the EUPL was made for EU use.
There's a weird and persistent-over-years blindness by a really high percentage of HN posters to how amazing iPads and even iPhones are as tools for creative work of practically every kind that isn't programming or extremely mouse-centric. Meanwhile they're way more useful than a laptop would be for damn near every creative task I partake in that's not programming. The combination of form factor and sensor suite is pretty amazing, and very useful. If I were only allowed one computing device in my house, no question I'd choose an iPad of some sort. Probably the big Pro. It'd hurt more not to also have a phone (for the tiny size & portability) than it would to not also have a laptop. I can always SSH somewhere else to run my software. I can't access the extremely useful capabilities of an i-device without having it present with me.
Encryption for communications to include HTTPS and TLS 1.3. If it wasn't for all that, you could take an early 90's computer on the internet still.
Not a problem. Every time I give my contact I let people know it may take me a few days to reply and I am ok if they take time to reply to my messages. I tel them if it is urgent, I will add a note on top of the message. People who have a life are not offended by this.
Full Metal Alchemist Brotherhood. The best anime by any measure. The soundtrack is extraordinary.

#1 all time on MyAnimeList and #19 all time on IMDb.

By the way I know you didn’t mention DBZ. It was an example of a show that I thought was incredible as a child and simply doesn’t hold up today. I speculate that some of your favourites could be the same.
I believe they’re treated as byte sequences: https://go.dev/ref/spec#String_types
At least in Germany it is still used enough to have a presence on some magazines, and there is an yearly conference.
> If it is the same morality for everyone, then why bother categorizing people into how much power they have?

While (as you say) analytics tools such as the one under discussion aren't useful for assessing individuals, they are appropriate for assessing populations.

When you asserted that only individuals have agency here, that was refuted with the example of leaders, who do have to make difficult choices about populations, and rely on tools such as this to do so.

In no way was that about different moralities for different people. Just about who can use this tool in a useful way. If you read the thread you'll see it.
This is a large part, from my observation at least, of the reason why Game of Thrones was so insanely pirated. If you can recall a few years prior another nerd sensation was sweeping the country (Lost) - but by the time GoT came around Netflix and other streaming services were really coming into prominence. HBO Go in that era refused to offer you a la carte access - instead requiring you to have an account with a major cable company to gain the privilege to pay for access. I think the contrast is pretty clear because now we've got a plethora of independent streaming services with their own costs (like Dropout and Nebula) that don't seem to be having trouble attracting customers - even if it's just for a single series or creator (i.e. Dimension 20).

The ease of access is a key point for me. I am morally opposed to piracy under normal circumstances - but if you're levying a price that I need to pay with my time or sanity I'm going to table flip and go back to the dark side (or, more likely in the modern day, just not watch your crap since there's plenty of stuff out there).
>For local matters, there is considerable flexibility and internal conflict. Currently, Beijing encourages citizens to find fault and report administrative issues at local levels, but will brook no dissent of its own management. In domestic administration China is less coherent than your claim.

Your social credit score will go down if you do.
For coming up on 8 hours now. Not a customer but was looking at opening an account when I got blocked by this.
It needs corporate backing. It’s amazing what this one guy has done, and imo he’s proven that the model works, but I don’t think one person could ever make something like this fully production-grade and give it the ongoing maintenance attention that it deserves.
I remember talking with an investor about a founder CEO and said I was friends with a lot of his employees who say he's a bully. The investor shrugged and then said with a smile but he's a bully who gets results.
Unrelated but might trigger a few memories on here:
I managed to get a copy of povray on one of those freeware cd-roms that computer stores often sold for a few dollars (since the internet wasn't a thing yet and getting it from compuserve was tricky). I think I sunk years of my life rendering beginners geometry, all the usuals: snowmen (spheres!), tables of still life geometry, basic animal characters and lots of snow scenes or rippling water sunsets (povray was particularly good for these.)
I'm trying to add an IMAP/SMTP account and checking the SMTP connection fails with "The specified string is not in the form required for an e-mail address." The credentials are correct - it looks like Scailer is expecting SMTP login to be an email address for some reason.

Additional suggestion: Allow me to copy & paste error messages :)

(Windows beta)