skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Defenestration doesn't seem appropriate here.
His main point is a straw man, since none of the "defunding" initiatives are as banal as simply taking money away from the entire picture. Defunding has always been about reallocating the money to help fix the root causes of criminal behavior in ways that don't involve a bunch of middle aged men in uniforms pretending to be the heroes of their own action movies.
I moved to tailwind a month ago and it’s become incredibly easy to read and work with very quickly. It’s one of those frameworks that just clicks when people start using it, though I think a lot of people don’t feel that way until they put the time in to get familiar.
> That or just let car people (majority) have these areas that are good for cars and

The idea is that a well planned city/suburb will turn car people into people that also enjoy safely not using a car some of the time.

> let the anti car people have their crowded little streets with no parking elsewhere.

Bleh. Such an us vs them mentality. I'm suspicious of cars because I have literally gotten hit by them while cycling (edit: multiple times, thank you very much). I'm not "anti car."

Try getting hit by 2 tons of metal and see how that makes you feel about safe infrastructure.
> Who needs S3? Host your own files.

You joking but I read this comment way too often on HN.
Thank you for the explanation.

Mitigation seems to disable JNDI lookups. Wouldn’t it make more sense to disable parsing altogether? In what possible situation does anyone want their logging library to run eval(…) on arbitrary inputs?!
I'm not looking forward to asking my parents to visit http://[fe80::abcd:whatever] to access their router interface when something goes wrong. Hopefully they'll be able to use basic numeric IPs for the rest of their lives.
Yes Charlie Lee even said after selling that people should be careful investing in Litecoin at those high prices which caused a major crash in the price. It still amazes me he was able to both sell at the top and crash the price without any legal ramifications.
> areas that are good for cars

You're talking about a road. Stroads are not good for cars. Because stroads have crosswalks, and people's driveways opening directly onto them, and many other things, traffic flow and "attentional efficiency" are both far worse than what you'd get from a real separated road with onramps/offramps.

Roads are great. Streets are great. Good city planning involves plenty of both. Just like your body needs both arteries and capillaries. Stroads don't solve either problem as well as just having both does, and they introduce tons of problems besides.
> If financial interests largely decide who gets enough funding to run in an election then how is it up to the average voter?

You're responding to something completely unrelated from what I claimed. I didn't say anything about how controls the government or election funding or anything like that.

My point was that if you tried to implement LVT (or any other policy that would have the effect of reducing land/home values), you would face the biggest opposition from the average voter, who has a large chunk of their net worth (and often retirement savings) in their home. They have a material interest in their home value increasing.

Take a look at who is the primary opposition to building new housing in metro areas and drives NIMBYism. Is it the "wealthy" or "financial interests"? No. It's the average homeowners who live in that community/city.

> It is a theory with some pretty strong evidence, showing that normal poor people do not get their interests heard in government.

That study is irrelevant, because it looks at Congress. Housing is not a federal issue though, it's a mostly local issue (with a bit of involvement at the state level). At the local level, average voters have a lot more power. If corporate interests are that powerful, do you really think the Bay Area would like it is now? Tech companies have been fairly unsuccessful in getting what they want in Bay Area cities.

Again, we're not going to fix housing by yelling at the rich elites. They're not the ones stopping housing from being built, it's the average homeowner.
The wealth transfer from the working class - who generate it - to the wealthy continues!

Things have gotten much worse since this was published: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPKKQnijnsM
My favorite thing about Tailwind is all the sites that offer copy-and-paste components, ready to use (since you already have all the CSS, you just copy HTML-and-classes and it looks exactly how you'd expect). Sure, you can pay for TailwindUI, but you can also just browse (free) components from e.g.

* https://tailblocks.cc

* https://blocks.wickedtemplates.com

* https://tailwindcomponents.com/

* https://merakiui.com/

* https://www.tailwind-kit.com/

* https://www.tailwindtoolbox.com/

Most of the sites I put together this year used an amalgamation of components from those sites for basic structure, and then just get customized to the brand and site function. I hate writing raw CSS and I would also hate writing raw Tailwind.
uBlock origin makes the Web safer. End of Story. You cant argue about scammers going after high value targets without mentioned every other popular application out there.

I should not be able to write a JS popup that looks like a browser dialog - that would be a pretty good start to improving security of the platform. Instead they remove the APIs that run the ad-blockers. Then give the MAIN APIs used by scammers/ad networks to deanonymise, track and trick you, free access to your system without your agreement.

Talk about having your cake and eating it too. Its Prohibitionist rhetoric all over again.
In retrospect, bravo, it seems like common sense that things that the People pay for should be freely available, as they're the ones purchasing it ostensibly by paying taxes.
If you would decide or have to use Vue for a complex project today, would you use Tailwind with Vue? If yes, why? If no, why not? Would your answer and rationale change in cases, when you decide or have to use a Web application framework like Nuxt or a UI component library like Vuetify and PrimeVue?
> making pedestrians hit a beg button to cross street is just reinforcing that they are trespassing on land that is not for them.

I love this quote.
putting in crosswalks on a road like that will slow down drivers and get people killed, it is an inherently unsafe place to be.

the other reason that this is bad is this section of development is unprofitable for the city. The amount of resources it uses (road maintenance, electricity, sewage, emergency services) is far greater than the amount of taxes it brings in. This is why its mentioned at the end of the article that a place like this will inherently wither away and die.
Really? I assumed developers managed that bit of the CI pipeline
> If a man can expect to meet exactly N eligible women in his life, what strategy should he use to maximize his chances of choosing the very best one?

If you show her this article and she's still into you, that's the right one for you.
I do use its inheritance functionality though I have mixed feelings about it. I also like how you can group classes with in each other.
> (It also lowered the top tax rate from 50% to 28%, and raised the bottom tax rate from 11% to 15%, so it wasn't a complete win).

The Tax Reform Act of 1986 also eliminated a ton of shenanigans that sophisticated taxpayers could play with income and expenses. For example, prior to the reform you could write off any interest expense against your income. So, you could borrow money to invest in long-term investments and then deduct the interest expense against your current employment income. There were investment products that were essentially just buying a tax deduction. The reforms shut all of that down.
The NEC is available to read online for that reason, although if your not an electrician, it's nearly incomprehensible. I have an entire book explaining bonding and grounding. It requires too much experience to understand, but it is still essential to a free society that laws be public.
Did you happen to have these thoughts when the CEOs were white males?
Beach combing is a career? Hmmm, very tempting.
Except streets and roads are designed to solve different problems:

> Streets: The function of a street is to serve as a platform for building wealth. On a street, we're attempting to grow the complex ecosystem that produces community wealth. In these environments, people (outside of their automobiles) are the indicator species of success. Successful streets are environments where humans, and human interaction, flourish.

> Roads: In contrast, the function of a road is to connect productive places. You can think of a road as a refinement of the railroad — a road on rails — where people board in one place, depart in another and there is a high speed connection between the two.

> Stroads: Stroads are a mash-up of these two types of paths. We like to call them "the futon of transportation" because, just as a futon is neither a particularly good bed nor a particularly good couch, a stroad is neither a particularly good road or a particularly good street.

* https://www.strongtowns.org/journal/2017/10/30/the-stroad

A high-speed, high-volume thoroughfare with minimal obstructions to flow will have its per-hour capacity decimated by having to stop every couple of hundred meters by traffic lights and crosswalks. On the pedestrian side, who wants to cross an area where cars travel 60 kph (or higher): what happens if they don't stop?

This video from the Not Just Bikes channel shows the stark difference between a street and a road (using examples in the Netherlands) and stroads:

* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ORzNZUeUHAM

If you make a place easier to get to primarily by car, then you need lots of parking—which makes walking a chore because of colossal amount of space needed for spaces. Do a satellite view of the mall closest mall to you: how much square footage is for retail and how much is for parking. Sometimes parking lots are 3x (or more) of the area of the actual store(s).

If you make a place easier to get to primarily by foot (or pedalling), then there's a lot fewer parking spaces—because why 'waste' the space on that form of transportation. (Outside of delivery trucks/vans.)
Doesn't consider that what one wants in a spouse/partner can change over one's lifetime.
Remember, you would have been downvoted/flagged just 8 months ago on HN for mentioning inflation or criticizing gov spending, covid checks and the money printing that happened. Let this be a lesson that whatever the current zeitgeist is on HN, truth can possibly be very different. I remember this extremely clearly, my own comments were getting slaughtered here.
California Property Crime Surge Is Unintended Consequence of Proposition 47: https://www.independent.org/publications/article.asp?id=9417
When you first hear Tailwind's concepts, they seem to contradict everything you know about good software design. When you try it out and begin to remember some of the class names, you get into a great state of flow - it's the high developers are always chasing.

I can't help but feel that Tailwind detractors have never actually tried Tailwind or are too square to give it a chance.
Tauri is a lightweight alternative to Electron.
There is a lot of room for a new type of browser that doesn’t treat “install base” as a reason not to try.
I tried Tailwind (and a similar project Windi) on a few projects now and have some findings.

Tailwind aggressively speeds up development time of components by allowing me to stay in the same cobtext when styling things. The brevity of class names also dramatically shortens the time spent writing styles. While working on the projects I'd setup with Tailwind, I felt far more productive.

However, those were new projects. After completing them and needing to go back and modify or maintain them, the experience has been horrible. The resulting style declarations (as class names) are completely unreadable and unmaintainable. I've tried organizing them and splitting class names onto multiple lines, but it has only cluttered things.

In my experience, Tailwind (and similar projects) produce styles that are effectively read only. They are superb when writing a new component and styling things from scratch, but maintenance is nonexistent.

Because of this, I've now switched to using a CSS-in-JS solution to gain the benefits of in-context styling and still have the ability to write CSS declarations in a structured and maintainable way.
Google’s Entertainment Space has potential, when paired with Android tablet
Reject 33 candidates if you want to maximize your likelihood of getting the best candidate out of 100, and 9 if you want to maximize how good the candidate you get is.
Wonder why the documentation changed so recently
Survive and reproduce.
If only our nation were able to pass some sort of "infrastructure bill".

No, I mean one that actually did what it said on the tin.
I interpreted coffeefirst as referring to the current antitrust action against Google, and saying that I expect more information will come out as it progresses.
the vulnerable feature is not in log4j < 2.10

see https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/608#issuecomme...

and you can just delete the affected class
I use stroads all the time and I can't agree. They don't bother me at all. Easy to navigate and not too slow or fast.
> "Once they are launched, they cannot be recalled,” former Defense Secretary William Perry warns.

Maybe we could start by doing something about that? Obviously there would be a danger that the enemy might learn the secret codes for initiating the harmless-self-destruct sequence, and having such a system would only buy the president maybe an extra 30 minutes to discover they had made a mistake, before the enemy retaliated for real, but a cost-benefit analysis seems to support adding a Ctrl-Z keystroke to the "Destroy civilization" tool.
:-) I personally have nothing against cryptobros, but this reminds me of this tweet [1] by creator of Signal:

> I rarely have much use for ML, but I made a chrome extension that auto-blocks anyone with laser eyes in their Twitter avatar and I gotta say that so far it really seems to improve the experience!

[1]: https://nitter.net/moxie/status/1466454602337771521
Uh...

1970: Early networks suffered from congestive collapse problems, routing protocols were slow to converge, computed suboptimal routes, and had count-to-infinity problems, only a handful of transit networks existed, domain names were managed by one dude broadcasting a file to everyone, little to no security infrastructure, etc.

2021: We have robust congestion control and queue management, scalable routing protocols that find optimal routes and have no count-to-infinity problems, DNS, large numbers of transit networks with a high level of redundancy, and at least some security infrastructure in key places (DNSSEC, RPKI, etc.).

Don't confuse web infrastructure and hosting services with the Internet itself, which is the network and which has never been more distributed or more robust than it is today.
I hate to say this, but, I think this topic should be mostly banned on HN. There's nothing new to say about it, and there isn't likely to be anything new anytime soon, if ever. I can practically guarantee that if there's any discussion, it will devolve into some flamewar shit storm, and the only thing the community gets out of that is burnt and covered in shit.
They have right of way regardless but the flashing sign increases safety.

Are turn signals a "beg button"?
Nice. I like that idea.
If you’re not coding and you want an MVP you need to act like a manager. Document everything, do code reviews. These activities will also consume time and will depend on the developer you’ve hired. It will be hard to find a good developer at low hourly rates
Jazz was literally born in brothels and bars owned by gangsters. It doesn't exist without actual criminals LITERALLY supporting its birth financially.
You would also not have any real control over what gets installed with just venv. So everyone might think the grass was greener on the other side, but it might not actually be, if you value reproducible environments.
What do you suggest? That is, what is proper? I haven't found a good example showing how to use it without environment variables, files*, or http interfaces with shared secrets, but it has been a while since I dug in and I could have missed something obvious.

edited to add "files"
How I spend less time on YouTube: I spend ~0 time on YouTube. I’m definitely not the average user, but I find video content overwhelming and usually low signal:noise. So I just don’t consume it for the most part. I’m sure I’m missing out on stuff that I’d find valuable, but the vast majority of the time I find the same content summarized in a tweet or thread with links to readable reference material where appropriate. And usually that’s how I get introduced to the video I’m not gonna watch in the first place.
Except Poetry's recommendations/decisions around version capping doesn't make sense for libraries. https://iscinumpy.dev/post/bound-version-constraints/
Apple had choice. They just didn't use it or much of it.

You write like China has a lock on this ... like it's the perfect lobby. There's only one perfect lobby: and that's the NRA in Doonesbury cartoons.
Polygon acquires ZK-rollups startup Mir Protocol for $400M
> If you think Google is doing this for their own gain, I guess you can simply ask if declarativeNetRequest will be able to block all Google ads

The answer to that is "no". declarativeNetRequest is a more restrictive version of what Safari current supports, and Safari ad blockers don't do as good of a job of blocking Google ads as ublock origin does.
My observations:

I grew up in Northern Ontario, where the cities are basically long stroads. Inside of a car, they can be stressful to drive in, as they combine high-speed travel with frequent and awkward turns.

God forbid you want to walk or bike next to one of them. The noise is extreme, and the infrastructure surrounding them is horrid. Whether in a car, on a bike, or on foot, they are ugly and soul-crushing. The patio bar next to a stroad isn't going to be people's first choice.

I haven't been to the Netherlands myself, but it appears that after moving away from stroads and "car-centric" infrastructure, the driving is actually much faster and more pleasant [1]. It gives me hope at least!

1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8RRE2rDw4k
Washington state has a capital gains tax that goes into effect next month (pending court challenges), that might have some Microsoft and Amazon people selling.
Why would anyone use C/C++ for new code: because they're forced to.
> Bleh. Such an us vs them mentality.

Doesn't the "us vs. them" mentality come from the fact that most of Strong Towns' ideas will make life worse for everyone who needs to drive, without giving most of them an alternative to driving?
I reckon Wife-Optimizers also tend to be Resumé-Optimizers or Driver's-License-Picture-Optimizers.

Alternatively: Drive safe, work hard, and build a healthy relationship/family.
I hope that they also start talking about making the court trials public on live streams in federal cases. Currently only state cases are public streamed and even that's up to the discretion of the judge. Having live stream of all trials would be enormously beneficial to society.
Exactly!
My example fit a just seven lines colocated with your HTML, in CSS you would need to read a full page in a different file.
Huge fan of infinite's multiplayer. They knocked it out of the park in my book. Need splitscreen support to seal the deal though — Splitscreen multiplayer is the ultimate halo experience, in my mind.
downloaded, i like it. the rolling chat feel is just awesome for journaling. im craving this on my computer now and love the #hashtags, could do like #todo thoughts.
Why is Pepsi getting into NFTs, you ask? Simple: It's because of you
It's not just (or maybe even primarily) about money. As is indicated in the first part of the OP, changing things means changing things that a lot of people are fine with, affecting many businesses, causing a lot of disruption, etc.

I'd be fine with more walkable areas but it's not just about spending money.
probably closer to the bone is the absurd bubble of valustions without any production or efficiency gains, pure speculation
>If police as a concept didn't exist already, no one would create it.

Eh? Community policing has been an universal in every culture. Not in the way conventional "modern"/Western police forces are, which was invented in Paris, but city and village militias took turns standing guard and arrest/whack away violators, drunkards, thieves, etc.

So if there's no police, expect communities to make their own.
Hell, don't crime gangs like the Mafia have their own professional policing forces? To catch members who are too violent, or dissuade informing the state/police?
> The only relevant comparison is manpower losses of the two sides, and every assault cost a lot more men to the attacker than the defender.

OK, we've established that you're eager to declaim on a subject you never actually bothered learning anything about:

>> Consider: at the Somme (1916), the British and French attacked and the Germans defended; the allies took 620,000 losses, inflicted 445,000 (a ratio of about 4:3 favoring the defender) and got basically nowhere.

>> At Verdun (also 1916), the Germans attacked and the French defended; the Germans took 355,000 losses to the French’s 400,000 (a ratio of 7:8 favoring the attacker) and got basically nowhere.

>> Over the whole of the German Spring Offensives (1918), the Germans took 688,341 casualties and inflicted 863,374 (a ratio of about 3:4, again favoring the attacker), knocked huge salients in the allied lines, didn’t break through and thereby lost the war.

>> I think here it is worth really noting how high the defender’s casualties are in these battles; I keep noting this but I want to stress: defenders suffered high casualties in trench warfare. Being on the defensive operationally did not save you any more than being tactically on the defensive did. You were just as likely to be killed in your trench by an enemy shell or grenade as you were on the offense machine-gunned trying to cross no man’s land. If the latter holds a larger place in the Anglophone consciousness (e.g. 1917 and Gallipoli) that has more to do with the British and Commonwealth forces being more often on the attack than the defense, not on the casualty implications of attacking or defending.
I imagine you'd change your tune if you had to choose between driving on roads vs. stroads professionally, as a truck driver, cab driver, etc.

Roads — separated thoroughfares exclusively for cars, engineered to remove anything that would require stopping — minimize travel time, gas costs, and accidents. Stroads do none of those things.

There's a reason that every Uber driver who has the opportunity will take you onto the nearest real road (e.g. a highway) as soon as they can, and stay on it for as much of the trip as they can: given the same destination, driving on a road is both less work for them, while also having a higher profit margin!

Roads are for professional drivers. Streets are for people. Stroads are, perhaps, optimized for Sunday drivers. But why should anyone optimize anything for Sunday drivers?
It depends on the audience you are targeting. If it is the audience on HN, here is a good way to do it: https://blog.arnica.io/hacking-hacker-news-for-fun-and-profi...
oh electro beanie babies and thr global grester fool crisis
Does GitHub Copilot know the meaning of life and the universe?