skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Nomad is the BetaMax of container orchestration. Better quality than K8s in a lot of ways (supposedly), but there's no ecosystem around it so it's a moot point. Want a continuous delivery system that plugs into Nomad a la ArgoCD or Spinnaker? Or a serverless platform that can run on top of it. Or access to people that know how to use it. Be prepared to write your own Nomad bindings and train your team on it.
FF is funded by Google. They have no choice.
America _currently_ puts a premium on freedoms of current land owners. However, as land ownership demographics shift I would imagine the political calculus changes in-kind.

That being said, the rural-urban divide also divides this issue: rural counties have higher levels of property ownership. Given America's political geography (heavily favoring rural areas), land-use reform will likely take longer to enact, regardless of (urban-driven) necessity for reform.

I could see actors at the state level implement measures to more fairly regulate land-use though, so perhaps change could come to more urban states sooner.
Passive solar heating requires loads of storage, and often active systems to transfer heat.

But there’s a much easier, more economical way to use solar power for heating in cold climates: heat pumps! PV panels give you electricity and then you get 2-3X the power for heating. There are economies of scale in the supply chain, low CapEx, and not a lot of plumbing.
another challenges I can see is wheee to actually store the state of a connection. Even if we just focus on http/1.1 then not all headers will be received at one, and data from previous segments needs to be carried forward. Would it be eBPF maps? Those also seem rather limited for this usecase, and are probably also not extremely fast.

I can imagine getting something to work for http/1.1 - but http/2 with multiplexing and stateful header compression is a completely different beast.
It's possible if you substitute "without modifying the HTML" with "without modifying the HTML for styling purposes." That's because the HTML is adversely and unnecessarily bare-bones, missing semantic markup that the CSS could hook into if needed. Specifically:

- There must be a logical reason for wanting to make the word "tiny" use a small font, so that word is missing a tag that represents that prosaic intent. I've used <small>, but depending on how you'd verbalize the word "tiny" (which is what you're representing both with making it use a smaller font and with wrapping it in a semantic tag), you might also wish to use <em> or another tag.

- Similarly, there is missing semantic markup inside the <figcaption> for the person's name, job title and company. Those are semantically separate concepts for each other, but for some reason the example HTML was written without semantically differentiating them. This is much like trying to represent two paragraphs of prose with just a couple newlines, rather than actually wrapping each in a <p> tag. To fix this error, I've added tags as necessary to implement the semantic hCard microformat -- independently of styling.

- I've also added the recommended attributes to the image tag, because it was missing. (And for the sake of the Codepen, I replaced the image's src with a placeholder so as not to hotlink from tailwind's site.)

Given those improvements to the semantic structure of the HTML, here's how you can make the author's name appear on the right, with the quote underneath, with a line break before the company name, and "tiny" in a small font: https://codepen.io/Kerrick/pen/KKXgPYw
You might be referring to this: https://intuitiveexplanations.com/tech/replit/

I'm like you, but every company gets one mulligan from me, so this is replit's.
> a load of fun as is and feels distinctly like Halo.

Which is no small feat making a game that feels fun like Halo (as we remember it), without just retreading on the same themes. 343 could have made "another Halo game" and I don't it would have felt like Halo fun.
I think 99% of the population will be more secure using a non-self-hosted PW manager (e.g. bitwarden) than following the directions here.

Either way though, yes. Use a password vault!
The problem would be the resource would be too sloppy to be useful. For example, the phrase "Lipschitz: a space that isn’t too stretchy" doesn't tell you about the precise definition of Lipschitz, which is absolutely essential, and there are tons of names in math that would all be sloppified to "a space that isn’t too stretchy".

Not knowing precisely which definition you need for an application or which one you need for a proof to hold is essential for progress.

Math doesn't make up "jargon" for no reason. The names are to denote to professionals the least needed elements to make something true.
Aside from the other responses you have received, I want to say:

Exceptions do not disprove the rule. We can look to one or a handful of officers who put on their big kid pants and fulfilled the nominal job description that they consensually agreed to (despite not being required to do so, by law). Statistically speaking, they are completely insignificant when you want to draw conclusions such as those you imply are proven by the counterexample you've provided.

"Police officers you know" are probably nice to you, and recount stories from their perspective. Sure some may actually be decent, but again, that's not exactly a safe bet considering the evidence we have. Even with the 5th amendment, we can include the evidence that cops regularly hide evidence which would otherwise make them look bad as a factor in comprehending the reality of the situation.

Even the nice ones among the officers you know are regularly silent about numerous abuses, large and small. The fact that no one speaks up against the ne'er-do-wells means they are complicit. Complicity is generally not any more morally good than performing the action yourself, especially when you are in a position to prevent it from happening.
Will this finallly motivate Zoom to use proper Pipewire API so that screen capture works on Wayland KDE?
It depends on the repository settings. If you have write access (and note the person who opens the PR appears to be a member of Apache, so I'm assuming they have write access), the default settings in Github allow merging even without approval, or with requested changes. (I.e., the defaults are pretty lax; you have to enable the "requires approval to merge" stuff.)

Even if approval is required, anyone with admin access can override the lack of approval. (For that user, the merge button is a different color/state: it very clearly warns you when you exercise that right.) I don't think it's clear which is the case here.

(But also note that there is an approval, in addition to the "changes requested". So, even in the scenario that approval is required, the PR could be merged, technically, but it would require dismissing the requested changes in that case, which was not done here.)
Regarding boars hunters are currently somewhat counter-productive, given that they are known to feed the animals.
When I press the ? button it does also add a space. I'm using Google Keyboard.
you're neglecting the important asymmetry. If we fail to tax a rich person, it doesn't actively hurt someone, it may passively prevent some people (who would have wanted to move in) from having an easier time with certain life-paths. If you eject a middle class person from their home, you are actively forcing them to find a new life-path. Suppose that lower-middle class person is a mobility-challenged elderly person on a fixed income that is already being eaten away by inflation. Yes, sure, they get to sell their house at a high mark to market, but they have to suffer the hassle of finding a new place, which at best is equivalent quality minus income tax on LTCG, on an eroding deadline. That is a really shitty situation to be in.

> this wouldn't happen very often

Then, I suppose we would have no reason for the term "gentrification", if it's that damn rare.
One point worth of note when it comes to Docker caching, more specifically pulling images, is the rate-limiting on Docker Hub.

While hosted GitLab might make use of a transparent pull-through cache (as I've gathered from glancing at relevant parts of the docs), you can benefit a lot by using one with your own local GitLab instance (assuming it does not already provide it via container registry).

We ended up switching to Harbor[1] from the vanilla registry and almost by chance stumbled on the fact that it supported a pull-through cache from various other sources (including Docker Hub).

This was especially useful after we hit the rate-limit after one of our pipelines got out of hand and decided to rebuild every locally hosted Docker image (both internal and external).

[1]: https://goharbor.io/
Unfortunately, works of one of my favorite writers - and ones that people on HN would appreciate - aren't translated into English. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janusz_Zajdel
The former. Firefox tries to make it possible to port Chrome extensions to Firefox with minimal changes. Mv3 contains lots of new stuff beyond nerfing adblockers.
Life survives. :)

"Best" is subjective.
Yes, and if you use it to work on an open source project that Repl.it's founder thinks might compete with his company, then said founder will send you increasingly unhinged emails insulting you and threatening to sue[1].

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27424195
Yes, there are many techniques we've tried for around a decade, with each being a filter that helps a certain amount, and nothing being a magic bullet. This doesn't really answer your question, but maybe gives a sense of perspective at least. I've run a range of sites that provide free online compute to people for over 20 years, starting with sites related to number theory that I hosted at Berkeley back in the late 1990s. Cryptocurrency mining wasn't a problem for the first 10 years, since cryptocurrency didn't exist. Before cryptocurrency, the problems were mainly spammers sending out spam emails, people launching attacks or abusively trying to exhaust all resources (disk, cpu, memory, etc.). People using up all resources became a lot easier to deal with the advent of cgroups and Docker (VM's were not a solution since they are too expensive to allocate for each free user).
The next useful filter is to completely disable the network, except for paying customers: this dramatically reduces malicious use, since it's not possible to use CoCalc to launch outgoing DDOS attacks, run port scanners for weaknesses, etc. Disabling the network also discourages crypto miners, since the default crypto mining software typically communicates over the network with a mining pool. Of course, some small percentage of crypto miners will: (1) use a stolen credit card, or (2) manually upload data from a mining pool and manually copy their results out, and similar issues. You then have to deal with each of these problems, and they do cost you time and money. The goal is that they cost you less than the value that comes from having non-paying users, and so far that is the case for us. For (1), using Stripe helps a lot with stolen credit cards, since Stripe is quite good at detecting and preventing use of stolen cards, but they definitely aren't 100%. Regarding (2), there's really no way around having to develop heuristics and scans of your infrastructure to look for malicious and costly behavior, and manually look into it. Indeed, some technique involve silently throttling abusers, so they hopefully don't even realize their attempt to waste your resources is failing.

There's also a discussion of this problem linked to from a big red box at https://sagecell.sagemath.org/

All that said, providing compute as a free service to mathematicians at least, isn't hopeless! People appreciate what we do, and the jerks who try to wrecks things for the rest of us haven't succeeded.
Oh, I do like the electromechanical machines of the 70's. All the clanking and grinding and clunking and burned out lamps made it real.
Within O365, ATP is a E5 feature, although I’m sure the legacy AV in E3 is awesome. The ability to limit client access is very limited. Anything ActiveSync will sync. I believe the only other option is to only allow the Outlook for Mobile App.

E5 allows you to limit the types of clients that can connect.

M365 E5 or EMS allow for conditional access, and to terminate sessions based on various criteria. Without it, you are limited as to how you can affect application access.
Assange Decision Expected Shortly
If anyone is interested I just updated a bunch of my example Docker apps to use TailwindCSS v3. That includes examples for Flask, Django, Phoenix, Rails, Node and Play.

Here's a link to the repos: https://github.com/nickjj?tab=repositories&q=docker-*-exampl...

It took longer to rebuild the Docker images than making the v2 to v3 Tailwind specific changes. In my case it came down to deleting and renaming a single property in my Tailwind config file.
It's a good point. Probably best to build it into the browser and let me add my own lists for it to use. That would be a good move for Firefox, they could have it off by default but it would help to reduce the chance of a compromised extension have too much access.
Fridman: #247 – Jamie Metzl: Lab Leak Theory
That's good clarification, thanks.

I got the POC to RCE with `-Dcom.sun.jndi.ldap.object.trustURLCodebase=true` seeming sufficient.

While still not great, I'd expect that to meaningfully reduce the severity for most, as that seems a pretty … odd option to enable.
He is telling you because you come off as a know it all who can figure everything out while at the same time you question why can't other people figure out the same as you can while at their own home labs. Apparently though you couldn't figure out this answer to your obviously self answerable question.
wait, Stylish went rogue?
I found a copy of Be Here Now for sale at a thrift store and bought it as a curio.

A few days later I opened it to read it and a dried, pressed cannabis leaf (not the flower) fell out.

The book did not disappoint, but it was definitely odd.
It may be worth noting that such was the polarization of Great Britain in WWII that Ireland remained officially neutral while London was being bombarded with rockets, and they went right back to bombing each other within a few years of the external threat being removed. This is the level of polarization and sectarianism I've been warning about for years, and we're way deeper into it than I think most people realize.

People only hate because it feels good to do it, righteous hate feels the best of all. There isn't a lot to compete with that feeling, except maybe actualizing one of the sadistic fantasies it creates. When your basic needs are taken care of and there's nothing else that is more intense in your life available to you, the little rush it gives you from hating those scumbags feels good and becomes a habit, and then it becomes as satisfying as having a cigarette or even a coffee in the morning, and so we seek out conflict. In nature fighting is expensive, so the conflict itself in many ways is also a luxury. The reason people are doing this is because they love it.They're going to do it until they realize they love it and then decide they don't anymore.

I've thought a lot about what beliefs people would need to change to mitigate the chain reaction we've set in motion, and there is no single one or cluster that makes much of a difference. We like this too much, and we're affluent enough to indulge it. While I have opinions on which ones would really help, barring a wave of Damascene conversions, I can't think of anything persuasive enough to change someones idea of self. It would require a viral idea that improved the quality of someone's thought in general, where through transmitting it you could raise enough boats to head off the imminent dark period.

Anyway, maybe we will just see what shakes out of a period of attrition.
> that is of course. Another way of building an even bigger d.ck.

I don't think it's appropriate to deride the security motivations of modern Russia, so casually.

In the 20th century, Russia was very nearly wiped out, by surprise attack, TWICE. Their casualties were staggering, more than any other nation on earth has ever endured. And the trauma to their politics, economy, and culture will probably persist for decades, if not centuries.

In the direct aftermath of WWII, a huge swath of top US & UK military and political leaders publicly insisted that the West should re-arm and continue Total War against the USSR, and completely dismantle their military capabilies.

I don't mean to excuse ANYthing the Soviets or Russians have done, as a result of the national character they've been left with. But if we fail to fully understand how the world & its history look, from their perspective, we will be actively participating in the extinction of the human race.
> The real question is how can we attract and retain officers that want to do the job?

Maybe the job just doesn't make sense in modern America? If police as a concept didn't exist already, no one would create it.

If you broke it down into its parts, you find plenty of people who would sign up to handle mental health crisis and plenty of people to sign up to handle quality of life problems. You'd have a third group that wants to do the more dangerous stuff.
"Defund the Police" has been just one part of the problem. Combine it with catch-and-release no-bail, Soros prosecutors who refuse to prosecute, COVID policies that released criminals to avoid infections, immigration policies that allow the free flow of gangs and drugs across the border, and the hyper-sensationalist efforts of the media to cause a riot every time there's a killing of a black suspect by a white police officer... and disaster was inevitable.

I'd really respect Progressives if they took a long hard look at all these factors, admitted their culpability in promoting them, and actually did something about them.
Growing pains; it reminds me of Twitter when it first started to gain traction and people started to use it enforce. I'm sure it will be down again but in time the techs will learn how to keep it up.
If you don’t need the Shamir part of Vault, create fewer key shares.

If you integrate properly throughout the stack (i.e “not being negligent”) then secrets will not hit properties files, rotation will happen correctly, and you will be able to audit everything.

You can also do this using a native secret management system if you’re in a a public cloud, but Vault is, for the most part, just better.
And Mozilla has said they will continue to support the old web request blocking API.
The mystics agree (most of 'em anyway) that whatever it is, it is real and it can be personally experienced. In my case the sense that _something is wrong_ and there was something missing - maybe some piece of secret knowledge - went away. Life became "complete." Questions that had nagged for years sort of dissolved: they weren't answered, but there was no impulse to ask or discomfort from not knowing.

The overall effect is very much like "knowing the meaning of life" although the implementation is a lot more "I no longer care whether life has a meaning or not. Whatever this is this is fine."

Hard to describe the "no longer needing an answer" - it is a very distinct thing. Not at all the same as having the question answered.
According to WikiLeaks[0] "Ruling on the US's appeal against refusal to extradite Julian Assange will be given tomorrow, December 10th at 10.15am at the Court of Appeal in London".

[0] https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/1468964377336242183
> The word "detainee" should refer to someone who is in temporary custody.

We need a new word for people held indefinitely (technically temporarily, but with practically infinite renewals of a 'limited' term by a compliant judiciary). There will be an expansion of the sort of exigent circumstances used as justification for such treatment.

This seems like a recurring antipattern, as with IP maximalists pushing for 'forever minus a day'[0] copyright terms (which, thankfully, seems to have abated, with works now entering the public domain every year).

[0] http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/ads-l/2009-Decemb...
I'm so confused by what you're saying.

> money has value because we choose to value it

Yes, in a broad sense.

> and fungible tokens often don't give you enough information to adequately make that choice

If by "fungible tokens" you mean things like fiat dollars or crypto bitcoins, then this is a nonsensical statement. The "we choose" of the prior clause isn't an individual choice, it's a collective choice expressed via government.

> which means that nonfungible tokens have a bigger part to play than their current form would indicate

This doesn't follow at all.

--

> the endgame of NFT's

What is the endgame of NFTs? It seems like you're speculating about a post-scarcity society? But in that scenario there would be no reason for any money, fungible or non-fungible, to exist at all. Money is an abstraction, a time-tested mechanism for economic exchange and growth. And the purpose of economics is to _manage scarcity_. If you remove scarcity then economics, money, bitcoins, NFTs, they all have no reason to exist and disappear.

--

> If you anticipate that whatever government mandates your money will still be around when you retire

Yes. Obviously this is true. China and the yuan, Russia and the ruble, Europe and the euro, America and the dollar, they will all be around, in one form or another, when I retire. And when you retire. And when my children retire. And their children.

Sovereign states are the evolutionary output of humanity's effort, over all history, to achieve peace, growth, and stability. They're not problems waiting to be disrupted. They're solutions that we as a species have arrived at, after enormous toil and suffering.
Jamie Metzl: Origins of SARS-CoV-2
GTA 5: PS3 vs. Xbox 360, gameplay and graphics quality comparison
>who can figure everything out

If this is what you got from my comment, it seems you need to read more closely. I listed specifically what I did learn, pointing out how it was not everything but was enough for setting up a LAN.
> "Microsoft said we have to do this so we have to" overcomes a LOT of internal barriers to technical change

“Microsoft said we have to do this so we have to” is a lot of internal barriers to technical change.

At least, that's what I see working in an public sector enterprise shop whose cloud transition started as involving a break from being a solid and conservative narrow Microsoft shop which is currently backsliding as that transition broadens and innovators at all levels (including the CTO that spearheaded it, who is departing for a CIO gig) move on or are marginalized.
To anyone saying "just use Firefox", I would think again. I think Firefox is (marginally) better than Chrome, but they are also pulling some of the same bullshit:

https://github.com/mozilla-mobile/fenix/issues/20736
He said that about a non-fiction book by her, an essay about a school reading realist Polish novel from XIX century. In Poland, being a good fiction writer is correlated with being a good literary critic as much as in any other country.

DYPOtBotD on the other hand is pretty much a whodunit, as such there is a certain threshold to impress book club readers, I guess
Assuming your naval gun doesn't misfire and delete your ship.
Here’s a deck that describes some of this (2006!): https://archive.nanog.org/meetings/nanog37/presentations/ala...

I never thought about the scale of their internal network. It’s nuts.
>Lithium-ion batteries are too expensive... Molten salt is a more efficient solution

Well, I just spent an hour bringing a pound of salt to a nice boil. The I tossed in my phone, which was at 10% battery. It did not recharge.
vim and the Android/iOS Notes apps gives me 99% of what I need, 99% of the time

general note-taking and text editing has been well-solved for decades now

though I do respect the attraction of trying to reinvent and monetize the wheel