skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Well, Ireland was neutral in World War 2 and the IRA actually allied itself with the Nazis. See "Operation Dove". "Enemy of my enemy is my friend" sort of thing.

Fact is, a bunch of European countries refused to fight the Nazis, or only declared war on them right at the very end when the Allies had already defeated them. It's never widely discussed because it's kind of shameful for those states. If the Allies had fallen, so would all the neutral countries and they wouldn't have been treated well by Hitler. They let the Brits, Americans and Russians fight, whilst sitting back and waiting to be saved.
This has nothing whatsoever to do with entanglement.
Why are those bad results? Neighborhood character matters - what's wrong with people having a preference for low density, open air, fast access, uncrowded parks, and so forth? You are engaging in the same dishonest recasting of people's personal preferences by summoning a caricature about increasing property values or "keeping out the poors". No one I know who favors low density cares about those things - it is first and foremost about preserving the kind of life and community feel they get from a lower density neighborhood, that you simply cannot get in an impersonal dense city.

I would argue that neighborhood character is prioritizing people. It's prioritizing the ones who live there already, who have built their town into a desirable location, and want to protect what they have. It's about prioritizing a connection with others that you would lose with higher density. There's nothing wrong with that, and I would argue those are very good results.

> Meanwhile, very-dense-by-US-standards cities like Vienna and Munich often top the charts for quality of life.

Based on what opinion? Self-reported opinions of European residents? Why are those a useful measure? It may just be they simply don't know their lives could be better elsewhere or that they have a low bar for quality of life or that they simply hold a different set of preferences culturally. I've traveled and lived all over the world, and have spent a lot of time in both Vienna and Munich. They're fine, but to me they're not amazing and they don't strike me as having a great quality of life. I did appreciate high speed rail providing easy access to other cities and countries. But locally, I didn't feel life was happier or better - rather it felt like these were dull, boring cities that lacked the character of American towns that many people appreciate. To me they felt culturally repressed, with less of an entrepreneurial or lively spirit, and life felt a lot like living in a limited sandbox. That's not surprising, since the urbanist push to design lives within 15 minutes necessarily means living with a small set of hyper-local choices.

> you were less likely to get hit by a car, people were much healthier, you had actual options to get around

There is no rational basis for living in fear of getting hit by a car. It is just something that is exceedingly rare in America. Health is also orthogonal and dependent on so many other factors, including personal choice and priorities. Everyone can certainly choose to be healthy while living a car-centric lifestyle, if they wanted. As for options to get around - cars are the ultimate option, because they give you far more freedom to go where you want, when you want.
Your mistake is that you think that what people think matters, while in reality only the laws approved by the rich are enacted. What the poorer part of the society knows and thinks has no influence on anything.

So unless you tought up a scheme in which not torturing foreigners might be profitable for the rich Americans, the information you have has no influence on the future.
High prestige journals often will not accept replication studies. Only interesting and novel results. Therefore the incentive is low since there is little utility in doing the replication unless it is a prerequisite for something the researcher wishes to do.
If it works it works. Very few of my problems with shells can be blamed on C. (Maybe two in total?)

The oldest commit is from 2013. Rust hadn't hit 1.0 yet, Go only barely.
Because it is not portable and therefore not the blessed Java entreprise way of doing things. /rantoff
Never forgetting the gold standard, that was just scandalous, against their own folk and allies. Not even against enemies, opinion or whatever geopolitical thing... not much margin here for flexible moral. They just do with us whatever they want, and forcing inflation onto the population is just as closed as evil an economy can be against the general interest of the whole population.
You take the issue to a crypto court which controls the escrowed funds.

If the crypto court makes an unfair ruling, you tell everyone to never trust their judgement. Now they’ve lost credibility and nobody will want to escrow funds with them in the future.

Whichever court provides the most consistent fair rulings attains the best reputation and becomes the most utilized.

By contrast, if government courts make an unfair ruling, they’re still going to be in business tomorrow and there’s nobody that can stop their monopoly on broken justice.

Some people might argue that their western country has a fair justice system and that everyone should be glad to be subject to that system.

That argument would be overly generous to even the most fair countries, and completely falls flat in the many countries where corruption is rampant.
Zeroday in ubiquitous Log4j tool poses a grave threat to the Internet
How might this affect me on Steam?
Yeah at those temperatures it really depends on how much wind there is and how long you will be outside. -20F did freeze all my car doors completely closed to the point where they could not be wrestled open once though.
1. If you put credit card, do chargeback and put your card on hold. Do not accept payment unless your lawyer tell you to do so.

2. Hire a lawyer. Make sure lawyer is competent in objecting all collection agencies.

3. Make it go viral. Try to reach out community to make story around it, like https://twitter.com/quinnypig
I’m not in the feelings camp either. But these others have a point, I think. Full-rational world for what?
More than 2 billions of people live in authoritarian regimes where the government rules exist only to oppress the population and make it more easily controlled. Bitcoin gives them the option to maintain their property rights, avoid financial surveillance and money controls. Saying that crypto is only used for ponzi schemes is simply false and disingenuous.
> We simply evolved like that and next step of evolution was to become more rational. We are somewhere in the middle.

While I'd never call myself agreeable, as I really enjoy argument as a means of engaging communication and establishing bonds with others. I have found this lack of rationality to be a widely spread defect and when reduced is as simple as you describe: I've never been steadfast in even my deepest held beliefs, I often question them myself and look for ways to validate their merit when given the opportunity. Whether that be engage with people who hold opposing views, or simply analyze them to exhaustion on my own.

This philosophical outview is what I felt the Sciences would laud as it is the crux of what Scientific model which relies on and tries to achieve via the highy touted peer reviewed model wherein experiments are meant to be replicated and derive their credibility on these criteria: instead after my experience in undergrad in the life sciences and then having spent time in graduate level courses (not enrolled) and befriending two professors I soon realized it's really a petty, tribal, and often passive aggressive environment where it's less about merit of your experiments results and more about 'who knows you' and 'who they know.' On top of that, most experiments are never replicated and when they are they seldom get the same results.

I'm not sure which dismays me more, but either way, we need to get past this and I fear social media's optimization models has entrenched this defect deeper into the Human psyche than anyone will ever admit. I think it's less about evolving and more about halting the regression of base feelings and reactions in the Human Condition to be honest.
I once knew a man that was campaigning against a proposed metro line because he feared it would be too noisy, harm the environment, scar his neighborhood, etc.
One day he organized a walk along the entire proposed path of the new metro line. At the end of the walk, they discussed it and to his own surprise he came to the conclusion that actually it was not that bad after all. His anti-metro group did of course dissolve.
I had a lot of respect for him.
I've heard similar stories about Paris and other places. Business often resist changing their street to a pedestrian area, and every time it turns out that it will actually boost their business.
You should ask yourselves: which organizations have an interest to delete the data available at the Brazilian DoH that could incriminate them after Bolsonaro’s censured statement?
Sorry you don’t feel like this meta analysis addresses your comment.

To answer your follow-up question about anxiety, severe Covid-19 presentations commonly exhibit neuroinflamation that may damage the nervous system and may manifest as a variety of psychiatric disorders, including anxiety.

This is likely why the authors of the original meta included these neuropsychiatric symptoms in their analysis.
I inherited an enterprise-critical application in, I kid you not, Autohotkey. 5000 actual lines of it, none of them containing any sanity whatsoever. Apparently, some random end user decided to automate a job, other people liked, and it grew all kinds of unholy features. So after one very visible crash too many, the corporate overlords decided it was critical enough for IT to take over.

By the time I got it, most of it was calls to Win32 functions, and almost nothing was using any functionality Autohotkey was any good at. I didn't even dare talk about it on the Autohotkey fora at the time, because I was sure the developers themselves would consider me an insane idiot and/or hit me with an axe. I migrated it to another language the day I understood it well enough.

One of the great truths of ICT is: Anything can survive production if someone decides to bless it with insane amounts of time and money.
I love Scala by the way and have written hugs code based on it. However the reason why Scala can encourage bad code from smart people is that it allows people to max out their budget for writing smart code.

It’s like, let’s say it requires 2x more intelligence budget to read/debug than it is to write code. So if we all have more or less an intelligence budget of like 10, maybe some it’s 12 or others even 15-20, and you write crazy intelligent Scala, like at a 6, then you’ve already maxed out most peoples ability to read and debug the code, as we all more or less have a 10.

Scala let’s you write code that maxes out these budgets if you’re not careful. Sometimes, very rarely, it’s necessary, but most of the time there is a simpler, dumber way to do the same thing that is actually much better.

For most of my career in Scala, when I had conflict with other engineers, it was over this kind of stuff. They insisted on using cats or scalaZ or writing these crazy complicated, overly generic abstractions, and it’s like… I get what you’re doing and even I think it’s stupid and could just be done more directly and more attainably for other people.
The stance that anything that cannot be touched exists only as a reflection of the observer is philosophically interesting, but not much more than that. It directly stifles communication with almost everyone else and it stops you from seeing harmful behaviour besides. There is, to my mind, very little point to it except as a (fun) thought exercise.
Not just elitism, it's actual racism, quite simply. Can you imagine the outrage if it was "overweight, black trash, gang tattoos of aesthetics"?
Heh yeah but we don't call it security by obscurity because those are dirty words, we call it "best practice" instead. ;)
Who you think is ruling you in Brasil is just the front-man. The puppet of the real rulers.
Log4j is not essential. There‘s slf4j as an abstraction layer and logback as native implementation for quite long time, supported by many libraries and frameworks.
Thanks for that. I wish they were a little more honest at the top when they claim there are no merge conflicts. Yes, they can automatically merge, but some cases will inevitably produce conflict objects and you are going to have to handle them in some way, or indicate to users that some of their edits have been lost.

The downside of anything like this is that for it to work well everything change must go through this framework because the fine grained change information is needed to effectively replay changes. That can make it hard to use existing domain libraries which might require a round trip data conversion as it may not be possible to differentiate between an insertion plus a deletion versus a complex modification.
> If you trust science as an institution the white garment of the doctor standing in the hospital which is an achievement of science will play in favour of whatever the doctor says

You seem to be assuming that people are fools... Blinded by symbols and holding Ideas. That is very much not necessary.

Experience, education and wisdom naturally put every input into perspective. Actually, you are pretty much required (deontically, for intellectual fitness) to vet your ideas, so you should be well trained not to be fooled by a garment or by capital letters ("Science" - or Whatever Big Word).
What obscure JVM errors do you talk about? I’ve never ever had a JVM bug and while I don’t have decades of experience, I didn’t start today either. The JVM is hands down the easiest to debug platform, where you can connect to a prod instance remotely and see basically everything. Clojure does have a few not too readable errors, but I think that’s on Clojure’s semantics, has nothing to do with the JVM.
Charge a $250/hr consulting fee.
> If adblockers (and other classes of legit and common extensions) can be migrated to a safe API

Sure, but Manifest v3, doesn't have such API. It has a very limited API, that can't do a lot of things uBlockOrigin does.

I am not even taking about way too small limit for filtering (30k urls, my current are at 80k+)

I mean in manifest v3 you can't hide various banners or fullpage overlays and similar. That to me is one of the more important parts of what uBlockOrigin does for me.

So at best I will get half of the functionality (that is if google raises the limit)

> EFF are smart people. They know what the actual security benefit is

yes. Chrome with manifest v3 + uBlockOrign (assuming we even get it for v3), is less secure than chrome with manifest v2 + uBlockOrign

EDIT: Almost forgot. You also cannot block, adds on google search, any more.
How to Increase Viewership on OTT Video Streaming
Forgot to mention the key feature. Users can search for entities/products using trademark names and registration classes, i.e., by searching the appropriate name containing the entity/product name and/or classification. Currently, a page of search results from a "state of the art web search engine" can leave one guessing about the sites represented by the domain names listed in the URLs. The searcher trusts that the search engine "knows what she is looking for" and has performed a disambiguation for her, automatically.

Whereas under the new system, the domain names unambiguously indicate trademark-protected names of companies or products, including their trademark classifications. This tells the searcher exactly what type of entity/goods the site purports to describe/offer and the source of those goods. No need for the search engine to second guess what the searcher is looking for.

For example, a name might be formed as something like productX.companyY.classZ. A user could search for URLs with subdomain "productX" and TLD matching "classZ", or a search for domain matching "companyY" and TLD matching "classZ", or perhaps a more broad search for domain under "classZ".
I keep hearing this line about how cars are faster because cities 'choose' to make it that way. This isn't a convincing argument to me. Cars are fundamentally a faster mode of transportation. Just like walking cannot realize a maximum speed similar to bicycles, neither walking nor biking can realize a maximum speed similar to cars (at least safely). Driving is faster, first and foremost, because cars are faster and not because cities are making other modes slower. The faster travel times that cars unlock is a massive boost to quality of life that many, many people enjoy and take advantage of. That inherent value is why people are willing to pay taxes to fund roads for cars, and why cities have developed road infrastructure. It's not some kind of conspiracy theory to bring down bikes - the reality is that bikes are simply slower and there isn't some deeper level of insight beyond that.
GCP how to use IT at a glance
The constant transitions in the narrative about Sweden are perhaps a good example.

At first it was "Sweden has become the world's cautionary tale", and "a red flag as the United States and Britain move to lift lockdowns".

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/07/business/sweden-economy-c...

Then Sweden dropped to the bottom of the rankings in both Europe and the world for deaths. It did much better than the UK and America. Suddenly it's not got any lessons for the world anymore, and when it's mentioned at all it's only to tell us that for unclear reasons it can't be compared to anything except its direct neighbours. Then Baltic states did worse than Sweden so the narrative became, you can't compare to anything except a cherry-picked list of specifically Scandinavian states.

The media is a major, major driving force of political polarization everywhere, because it acts as a firehose of ideological propaganda. It's not even the stories you see that's the biggest problem. It's the things they know about but never tell you, in case it'd make you doubt your commitment to the journalist's ideology.
https://dev.to/brianboyko/tailwindcss-adds-complexity-does-n...

If you work in the front-end, you've probably heard a lot about TailwindCSS, a CSS library, much like Bootstrap. Much unlike Bootstrap, however, Tailwind takes a different approach - it is all "utility classes".

And I am not a fan. I got a whiff of it and quickly learned the name is appropos: it was as welcome and useful as passed gas.
Off the top of my head, the only place strict Perl allows a bareword is the left-hand side of the => fat comma operator and pre-declared subroutines (IIRC, I never could quite remember the rules for that).
You can find the motivation for looking up jndi resources on the ticket that introduced the behaviour : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-313
25 Billion out of the nearly 700 Billion from a bank that didn’t need the money proves that “most of the money was returned long ago”? Not very convincing.

JPMorgan was actively buying up assets in 2008 and were one of the banks that was well capitalized.

“JPMorgan Chase did not want or need TARP money, but we recognized that if the healthy banks did not take it, no one else could — out of fear that the market would lose confidence in them.”

https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/economy/2018/09/14/jami...
Author here! I'll hold me hands up to getting the maths wrong.

With Strava, you can choose metric or imperial units. However, I discovered that this only effects activity distances (which the API reports in km or miles). Elevation is always reported in metres (via the API).

I've fixed that now: https://github.com/ColinEberhardt/running-report-card/commit...
Court: Man Injured on Way to Home Office Had Work Accident
I am currently using Tailwind JIT and so far it has worked well. What does WindiCss or UnoCss offer over it in your experience?
If you're building a package, pip install -e . is preferable to -r requirements.txt. Most projects don't need and shouldn't use requirements.txt. The only ones that do are where you're shipping a whole tested environment out, like a docker image for deployment. And in that case you need to be using something like pip-tools to keep that requirements for up to date.
I think this comment doesn't portrait the situation with abusive tracking honestly and I fail to see how this could get so many upvotes. No, adblockers are certainly not the worst privacy offenders. Sure, there are bad plugins, but that isn't an issue exclusive to blockers and the problem with infromation extraction is mostly relegated to malicious scripts on the websites themselves, as the article points out.

The worst privacy offenders are ad trackers and I don't think it has to be explained that Google has an interest in putting constraints on them. How much that influences Manifest v3 is everybodies guess of course.

But your framing is dishonest as Manifest v3 does take away user choice. A choice that allows you to install bad addons with all the implications. But turning that around and saying the EFF tries to take away choice is just false in this context.

I also fail to see hyperbole, I think this is the usual relativization that puts users in a worse spot than before.

> EFF doesn't want to give you the other side of this story, because they're not an honest interlocutor

And who would that honest interlocutor be in your opinion?

The best and most user oriented ad blockers will be affected by this and this is the actual security issue here. No other scenario comes even close.
I go out of my way to avoid buying touchscreen laptops. If my mbp 2015 was a touchscreen I wouldn't have bought it.
It’s called deficit spending. No need to raise taxes now; defer it to future generations.
> It's interesting, because in these stories Canada is never the first choice. Seems like every story starts with someone being unable to qualify for US immigration using Canada as a back up plan.

Yes, because these are economic migrants and economic migrants are going to try for the most active and lucrative market first. If they can't get a visa, they'll certainly take their second pick. They'll then build up that market over time. This is why we have Shopify in Canada. The ecosystem builds on itself and it one day won't be quite so distant a second choice.
Chrome: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/tree-style-tab/oic...

Opera: https://addons.opera.com/en/extensions/details/tree-tabs/

The latter I use myself (from time to time, when opening many tabs for aliexpress/etc research). Would like to know what’s different in firefox-based addon.
"Burn: The Misunderstood Science of Metabolism" by Herman Pontzer

"Humankind" by Rutger Bregman

"The Dawn of Everything" by David Graeber and David Wengrow

"Work: A history of how we spend our time" by James Suzman

I sort of want to include "The Ministry of the Future" by Kim Stanley Robinson because it feels almost as much like political treatise as it does a work of fiction.
DocuSign: Why the Stock Dropped 42%
> ... it's simply someone's ability to get a job no American is qualified to take.

Not exactly, its someone's ability to get a job that their employer cannot find a more qualified candidate after advertising the job in the local newspaper for 6 months including at least two separate Sundays.
React vs. Vue: What Is the Best Framework for Your Project?