skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
In Finland, the law implementing the GDPR used to be interpreted so that browser settings were enough to opt out of cookies and you just had to inform the user about what cookies you were setting. This interpretation was suggested by Traficom (the government office in charge of traffic and telecommunications). Some individual complained to the Helsinki Administrative Court, which issued rulings (H1515/2021 and H1516/2021) stating that this interpretation is incorrect - as far as I understand, this is because browser settings cannot differentiate between necessary and optional cookies. The new Traficom advice requires the same annoying pop-ups as everywhere else in the EU.

But I agree it shouldn't technically be too hard to standardize the settings so that your browser could communicate to each site what the user consents to. The hard part is enforcing compliance - we already had Do Not Track, which had very little effect.
Of the alternatives I like fnm the most. It's a single binary, blazing fast and just works how you'd expect it to.
I would be curious to learn more about your setup. MongoDB should be able to recover in these situations...
Unless you're doing something very special, I'd guess that most container based solution will just get the memcached Docker image on Docker Hub. There's very little to be gained by building your own memcached image, with a "single binary" alternative.
Either way, OP has an extremely Apple centric view on this and completely ignores decades of work on Linux and many others to get us here.

For example, consider that golang has been able to cross-compile to ARM since almost the very start. That alone has probably contributed more to actual ARM server deployment than M1 (which is by the way not available for cloud or any server systems).
There is no need to be rude. I have no “hypercapitalist fantasies” thank you very much :)
“No racial slurs or homophobia?! What kind of fascist PC hellhole are you running here?!” - a user on day one of a online forum
Could we synthesize this chemical and feed it to rapists?
In fairness,

I did include instructions for configuring both Visual Code and Sublime in my comment.

How to create a simple and minimal WinUI app here:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/winui/winui3/c...
1. Hackernews

2. Pocket : https://getpocket.com/explore

3. Reddit

4. Serious websites & books on specific matters i.e. I like to read on Philosophy, so I read websites & books on that (such as plato.stanford)
FYI: Chesa Boudin is the adopted son of Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn.

They were involved in the Weather Underground (bomb-makers, not the weather website).

His birth mother and father went to jail when he was 14 months old (they were also WU).
I’d say that Flutter[1] probably meets that same definition today of cross platform development and tooling in a much slicker way.

[1] https://flutter.dev/
meltdown and spectre are 4 years old, at least two generations of chips have been made since by everyone in the industry.
> There is this paradox, the name of which I forget

It's called the Rebound Effect: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rebound_effect_(conservation)
I remember GNUstep since the 90s. It existed even before Gnome. It had a (for the time) pretty home page, but very little information and very little outward progress. What happened behind the scenes I have no idea about.
Peppermint Patty is a character in the Peanuts comic strip, there are probably only 4 characters in the strip that if you say someone is like that character it would be taken as disrespectful.

I don't think Peppermint Patty is disrespectful personally.
Dale Carnegie has a beautiful book about this matter: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/4865.How_to_Win_Friends_...
You can configure it how you like.

Just as a standalone application, or to replace explorer.
> we can't use it for everyone.

Obviously it should only be used by the poor, so they have longer to find happiness. Someone has to blow the horn and push the wheelbarrows.
Why is everyone not from CA so obsessed with it? Why did you feel the need to bring it up more than once?
Keanu, or literally any famous celebrity's word has more impact solely because they are a celebrity. Much more people will be interested to know what he thinks than what you and I think about NFTs. It sure seems asinine considering he is no expert in the field, but that's just how it is. Fame trumps expertise when it comes to having your voice heard.
I do think NFTs are a bubble now. By investors that think that one NFT is worth the same as the next one minted while it is just the exact pointe that they are not interchangeable. You don't get a piece unique with significant history attached. Mondriaan, Van Gogh and Monet were innovators now it is just a deep learning gan style trick. I do see the value of NFT in asset tracking of unique pieces to provide transparency, fairness and safety in supply chains.
Seems like you'd just compute combinations at compile time. The point of the article is not that things should be done at runtime, the point of the article is that the entire system can be made easier to use by putting more smarts in front. Those smarts can happen at runtime or compile time.
Reddit in general is pretty good, if you find the right subs.
Postmortem: Hudson River Trading Fired Me for Requesting Holidays
I have to agree with you. On the other hand, closed hierarchies can be an elegant solution to certain problems. Eg. sealed classes (and basically their single-class counterparts, final classes) avoid the mentioned problems in Java’s parlance.

One exception comes to mind though — Java’s SAMs, or in the general case, classes that more or less only wrap around a few methods intended to be overridden/implemented with clear requirements (but maybe this use case also should be restricted to interfaces?)
But the default should be to add an explicit open instead of defaulting to non-final.
You're not taking into account technological and industrial innovation. Presumably there will be new ideas iterated upon that get us closer to universal abundance.

My main concerns over the next few decades are cyberwar collapse (< 1% chance), runaway AI (10% chance), robotized world war (30% chance), and solar flare induced societal collapse (40% chance).

Yeah, cereal is 20% more expensive but DeepMind just beat GPT3.
This is so incredibly disrespectful of Apple. Behind their shiny facade hides a rotten company with no morals.

So now they are just tools in the CCP propaganda machine. I have bought my last Apple product for sure.

I would like to know at which point would they say no. Anything goes as long as they are paid.
I have the feeling (I might be wrong) that etcd, etc., would be more suited for long-lived state/data. What we need is a pretty short-lived shareable state. The data is very transient.
* Physical fitness. You need to be able to run and swim a specific distance. Lift yourself from the ground and up to someplace, etc.

I believe this website can also help you:
https://www.artofmanliness.com/skills/
How Cloudflare security responded to log4j2 vulnerability
Male and Female Athletic Performance: Worlds Apart
Probably not the right place to comment this but man, it was amusing to see Carrie-Anne just sitting there smiling silently for so long, while Keanu and the interviewer go into long engaging dialogues about things she apparently has no idea about.

An apt comment down below:

>Carrie-Ann Moss is every parent listening to their child talk about their cool new hobby.
This probably leads to wider social and economic inequality, the richer states are more likely to have the better hospitals and better public health systems.
I was talking about the people giving them money, for example by paying them for their education.

If the discussion is about removing charity status from Yale, it would be a different thing. As I see it, Yale is offering a service and people voluntarily decide to pay for it, so removing that option would be authoritarian.
I think this argument suffers from tunnel vision - that FSD will be a boon to humanity. Also, many historical sacrifices of people to the progress of civilization (e.g. medicine) have been made coincidentally, or have been forced by mass murderers. I don't think that that is company one should aspire to be in, to aim at forcing those 'necessary' sacrifices.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilitarianism#The_Brothers_Ka...
The Abu Dhabi Grand Prix Crowned Verstappen as F1 New Champion as Mercedes’ Ap
Those are sad times when the new generation doesn't intimately know about the Peanuts anymore.

Peppermint Patty´s best frient, Marcie, tends to eccentrically call her "sir", which may be due to Marcie´s bad eyesight and Patty´s slightly tomboyish behaviours. Patty at first is hugely annoyed by that, but eventually starts to accept - or better, less obviously discourages - that behaviour.
If they manage accounting and marketing hat might make sense. Many projects are probably looking forward to such forms of free contribution.
> NFTs are technically good, with strong fundamentals, and real world applications, the same way ICOs were. But the way they are used has been absolute shit, and nothing sort of utterly useless.

I keep thinking that all the use-cases for NFT's can be replaced with current digital certificate signing. Transferring something only needs signing with the private key, right?

What are the real-world use-cases for NFT that simple and existing PGP signing won't work for?
Which may be in certain cases trivially optimizable. Eg. an object available only inside a class can have its method calls inlined into the containing class’s methods.

(But I’m no JVM developer (unfortunately) so I’m not sure whether this exact optimization exists or not)
We shouldn't. But low social mobility and further stratified wealth divisions is a sign that the effort is pointless for a growing number of people.
> Would you mind elaborating? I find him very convincing, but it's not my field.

Not OP but here is an example: Steve is famous in Australia for having predicted the collapse of the Australian Housing market in a significant, and (locally) capitalism-ending way. This has obviously not happened.
It's possible to teach how to ride a bike to a robot. So, why not to a human?
> For instance, virtually all scenarios in world3 end up in a peak->collapse, but it strains credulity to imagine that similarly applies in the real world.

Why? Many civilizations have come and gone through the collapse cycle already. Why do you suspect we're any different? What makes you think the ecosystem can even tolerate 9-10 billion of us?
Job interviews are like this too. Nothing as vetted as somebody from a FAANG!
"Removing an ideal opportunity to learn"

A script like this is also a reference, a known state, which is valuable, even necessary, all by itself regardless if you agree with what it does or the state it produces or the value of being forced to do it all wrong and discover and file off all the edges yourself over time.
Maybe this should have been posted on a sunny summer's day.
Overgrowth was such an enticing game to play. It didn't have AAA graphics, but its physics were so much more realistic than the games I'm used to that I was sucked in, and it left a strong impression on me. I wish more games were doing procedural animation, and physics-based damage.
Github is owned by Microsoft. Github IS the big five.
> The thing that immediately jumped out at me was the 24fps target

The demo runs capped at 24fps? That has to feel almost unplayable in an interactive setting? A dip below 30 in an interactive first person perspective is usually pretty disturbing.
There are a huge number of references online. Just Google “in group out group social evolution”. Or simply go to Wikipedia for a quick summary:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In-group_and_out-group

Now I think we are done here.
Some anecdotal experience:

- we switched our nodejs workload to graviton (c6g from c5), and it resulted in needing more instances, which ended up costing nearly exactly the same price

- ARM is annoying in practice for some stuff (we build our docker images on our CI which is on premise and not ARM)

- AWS pushed a bit to have us move to graviton

- Where are the c6a ? :)
P5 – Python package based on the core ideas of Processing
> I walked away from this (um, got up from the sofa) thinking Epic’s gambit is to push Unreal Engine 5 as a virtual movie set

I think they have been doing this for quite some time already:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gUnxzVOs3rk
At any given moment in time, let n be the number of people who are an ancestor of everyone alive in 2021 (or 2022!).

Right now, n = 0 because there is nobody on earth that is the anscestor of everybody else.

If you go back far enough, you'll get n = 1. That's a single person that is an anscestor for everyone alive today. That's the most recent common anscestor. Other people then were anscestors to only some people alive today.

If you go back further, you'll get n = total number of people on the planet at the time. Everyone on earth is an anscestor of people alive today.

Except, wait, that's not true! There will always be some people alive who aren't anscestors to anyone alive today. Maybe they simply didn't get lucky at all in their lifetime, or were infertile. Maybe a collection of people only bred within a community (tribe, city, etc) which then got wiped out in a war. Maybe something more complex happened. So n=1 is possible, but n=everyone never happened.

So, totally ignore all the people who aren't anscestors to anyone in 2021, leaving only people that still have at least some anscestors today. Then n = 1 is (still) the most recent common anscestor. And the earlier date, n = everyone (that we care about) is the identical anscestors point.
Is there any indications that it was taken down by GitHub and not by the owner themself?
That's not how it would play out. In a large warehouse with dozens or hundreds of employees, the place would be leveled before everyone has caught up on the fact that something is going on.

There's a good reason why so much emphasis is put on clear procedures, and regular drills when it comes to mitigating more common disasters such as fire.

It's the responsibility of the employer to provide a safe workplace. Of course, nobody can ward of natural disasters, but it's totally valid to hold employers accountable for providing adequate affordances to ensure a modicum of worker safety.

Public Weather Forecasting Services can issue tornado warnings. States implement a multi-tiered system including sirens, media broadcasts and cellphone alerts to inform the general public. If you, as a worker, don't have access to any of those, it's definitely the responsibility of your employer to warn you when disaster is about to hit home.
You made the opposite claim. Where is your evidence for it?
Gold is not really scarce and as seen its price plummets multiple times throughout history as large quantities were unexpectedly discovered. If even a minority of the people currently hoarding gold decided to sell, the price would crash.

Gold is a strange asset. It is valuable because it is seen as a strong way to store value and it is a strong way to store value because people collectively believe it to be so. In that way, it is actually quite close to bitcoin.
Although Apple said 8GB was the maximum a 2.4GHz Core2Duo Macbook Pro 13" mid-2010 could handle, the Intel chip inside could support 16GB.

https://eshop.macsales.com/memory/maxram
Spring does (and perhaps even prefers where possible) constructor-based inheritance though — which is as pluggable as it gets, making testing easy.
What is this thing called Science? : Chalmers
Thank you, I'll give it a go. Explorer I don't mind but Finder I cannot get on with.
Does it break anything to allow datatypes to be parametric over instances? eg

instance absOrd : Ord Int where
-- ...

union :: (ord : Ord a) => MaxHeap a ord -> MaxHeap a ord -> MaxHeap a ord

If it's still impossible to create instances at runtime, I don't think this is equivalent to proper dependent types, only DataKinds.
I think any random video would do
We mitigated the Log4j vulnerability “Log4Shell” within 48 hours
Programming the Internet of Things
I remember all that! Wow, it's been a while. Yes there was a spate of things about -

"Linux might be free but look at our sponsored study which says that actually our hardware gives you more uptime and our devtools are better and our patch system does this and our FS is faster and we can cluster this amount of cores and ..."

But in the end the systems were still 5x or more what an x86 server would cost, and everyone was just having a go with linux at work and at home anyway, because they already had x86 hardware laying around.

(IIRC Microsoft tried a similar TCO gambit a few times as well)
> These are the big known-unknowns.

It's the big unknown-unknowns that are the problem. Is there a relatively simple implementation bug that hasn't yet been discovered in the biggest projects? They're all less than 12 years old at this point, it's entirely probable that they include 0-day vulnerabilities that are undiscovered.

That's enough to destroy the whole thing. One single 0-day, exploited slowly over the course of a week. It's not like the transactions can be reversed, so all of that value would have been reassigned to the exploiter.

No government is insuring balances in any of these projects - so a single shock will (rightly) shake all of these holders back out again.
Does David Chisnall hang out around here? I remember reading some of the stuff he was publishing around the time Étoilé was active, and their ambitions for the polyglot LanguageKit and associated Smalltalk dialect seemed especially attractive. Somewhat similar to what GraalVM is doing these days.
Organizations are good at diffusing responsibility. Even when crime is egregious, like the pfas leak, and would be enough to sentence everyone in the organization to life in prison, justice can't find anyone who is directly liable, so nobody is punished.
If AI upscale is undistinguishable for the average gamer I really don't see to problem. I much rather have 4k 120fps using AI upscale then full hd 30fps without it.
Hello,

I was the first employee of HRT in London in my niche skills. The company never granted holidays to UK employees. The issue has escalated to impossible levels with the company terminating me and openly threatening me and my family to cover up.

There is no recourse. I am in the UK, the company is a billion dollar company in the US. It's not playing by the same rules. The only option I have left is to make a public disclosure.

I found my first job in the UK thanks to Hacker News. This is my blog, you can see my history and comments for half a decade. It's real.

P.S. Don't expect further comments from me, I am relying on British law to make an official public disclosure, I don't think it allows to engage in open discussions.
If Rust occupied the same market niche (better and easier than C++ for large companies!) as Java did in the early 2000s when such features were considered desirable by paying customers, it totally would have been implemented.

Rust is able to learn from the many mistakes that other languages before it have made. But pretending that this means Rust is inherently purer instead of just "has less baggage, but will soon implement its own", is naive.
Those sound like idiosyncrasies of CPP that you shouldn't care about, unless you want detailed expertise in CPP.

... Which is fine if you've got an application in mind, but otherwise, they're a distorted view on the concepts to fit a specific implementation.

Most of those concepts are all describing, "when do you tell somebody where to point?" and "when do you follow the arrows?"
I looked around on the Copilot page and found a link to the papers: https://github.com/Copilot-Language/copilot-discussion

You might consider adding a Publications or Papers section to the documentation page that links directly to the PDFs. (But the link to the repo is fine too!)

Very nice project!
> Duck typing or traits are better ways to represent polymorphic behaviors. We've known this for over a decade now.

Any objective measure of that? Because there is a catch, we can’t do what doctors can. There are no double-blind tests for language design. All we have is empirical studies and based on that, OOP languages do objectively much better. So if anything, your exceptional claim require exceptional evidence.

But otherwise I agree that these Animal hierarchies are just dumb and many definitely overuse inheritance.
Well, you could also just use AWS' own NAT Gateway which also has NAT64 support. Admittedly natgw is not free service ($33/month+data charges)
That would create an even more parasitic security industry than we already have.

As many have said that the only defense against data extraction of personal information is to not collect them. I think this collection has to become more expensive than the benefits to marketing and advertising. Insurance might help here, but I expect premiums to be high if risk is adequately and realistically assessed.

Against exploits like the log4j thing... the library is popular and was used for years. In open source and commercial software alike. I doubt any audit would have found the problem. Most probably didn't expect it in such a library in the first place and would have started review with the more arcane dependencies. The only benefit of other components is probably security through obscurity. But what would you insure against here? Against exploits in software in general? I don't think that would improve software security in the long run.
How to deliver a baby. If been studying a few basic life saving skills just in case, and it turned out I needed this one.
I just reviewed this every now and then:

"Contractions 3-5 min apart, 40 -90 secs; support head and body at birth; dry off and keep warm; clear fluid from mouth; tie cord a few inches from mother with string e.g. shoelace; don't cut unless hours from hospital, but if needed tie again closer to mother"
I'm afraid that i can't agree there, because of how it was implemented.

Flutter is plain hostile from certain standpoints: in the browser, it does use canvas for rendering and therefore denies any ability to learn about how a particular site was developed (how many of today's devs have benefited from "Inspect Element"?). Not only that, but it also breaks much of browser functionality, such as right clicking, selecting text, using plugins that manipulate the DOM, user styles, and historically even screen readers (though they're getting better at that last bit recently).

Just have a look here: https://gallery.flutter.dev

Open the Reply app, open a message, try copying the contents. Try seeing how the block with the sender information has been formatted. Pretend that Taxes folder is spam instead (e.g. an ad, or a flashing element that could cause you seizures), try blocking it with uBlock Origin or a similar plugin.

I agree that technically it fits the criteria that you're describing, but it fails on certain platforms (the web) in my eyes due to all of the shortcomings and how badly it implements this platform support. Use it for native apps? Sure, i guess...
Raspberry Pi didn't have serious resources until 3/4 era. I have every iteration of the board, and while they're all useful in their own regard, only the latest boards can handle serious, biggish projects, resource wise.

Of course Pi has started a big movement and prepared the groundwork, but M1, which I also use, is something else in terms of performance, and it caused this build-up to become an avalanche. Cloud systems will inevitably ride this wave, and will seriously eat into Intel's market share.

Just provisioned a small docker-lab in an ORACLE Cloud Ampere system. This thing is seriously snappy at the first glance.
Access K8s services inside minikube from host as domain names without any tool
Hologram tech may soon replace video calls
Ah makes sense, I think the use of present tense in the original explanation was throwing me for a loop.