skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I've been in a Tesla running the self-driving beta in Manhattan and it is NOT fun or relaxing at all. The car is overly "jumpy", but by jumpy I mean "breaky." The way a lot of pedestrians cross streets (walk into the side of the road and get 2 feet away from a passing car before crossing right behind the car) causes it to slam on the break constantly while people "stage" their crossing. It's also terrible at left turns without a light. Both of these flaws are completely understandable because it's a complex safety situation, but people who think human drivers are replaceable within 5 years are naive.
Lovely work - i'm wondering if you now have enough info to build a VHDL model from this? It would be very cool to run an emulation on an FPGA.

My interest in these instruments goes back a long way - I reverse engineered my DX7 to build a VST instrument around 2001 or so. My reverse engineering was 'black box' with putting test patches and midi through the instrument to build a model, but was good enough to produce patches which I couldn't tell from the original except at very extreme settings where the different in sample rate became apparent (e.g with aliasing frequencies being very obviously different between the two).

Actually, thinking about it, I also did the same with the TX instrument to produce a simple model written in SOUL a few years back. There's a LatelyBass patch here based on this - https://soul.dev/lab/?id=LatelyBass
I said usually, not always. You need a visa to do so which developed countries only grant in limited circumstances (e.g., to educated people with job offers in high-demand fields).
Widespread exploitation of critical remote code execution in Apache Log4j
> why do a lot of people talk about speed limits as the speed you need to be driving

In the UK you’ll fail you driving test if you drive below the speed limit, eg 60mph in a 70mph zone.

Hard to find an authoritative source, but this seems to break it down pretty well: https://www.drivejohnsons.co.uk/learning-centre/faq/driving-...
Did not fail, cope and seethe.
Domesticated farm animals are far enough removed from their wild cousins to be their own species. They have been selectively bred over millenia for traits that make them easy to exploit for humans. Most of those traits work against them in the wild.
The Magic Email – Stop being ignored and start getting shit done
In the UK, and I think the rest of Europe, things like tax have recently been changing to strongly discourage this. Contractors now have to be hired for specific projects with identified goals and deliverables or the whole thing starts to get unattractive expensive.

Of course, it's all paperwork that can be bullshitted, but it's had at least some effect in my experience.
Justify that «abrahamic tradition» is «psychopatic» as opposed to another «empathic» tradition.
> And I still wonder if dogs think it is weird when humans pick up their poop.

Or "my shit's so valuable it needs to be saved, I must be important".
German highways are special when it comes to this. Many of them have no speed limit at all.
If traffic permits, you can travel at 180 mph and it's perfectly legal.
You will see many Porsches doing so, you will see the electronically limited BMS do 155mph and you will see that things like vans travel at 100-110 mph as if it's a normal thing.
This 60kph speed limit would simply look out of place on an Autobahn as they call it, and I gather this stem is only to be used on the motorway, specifically designated.

Sounds incredible until you witness it yourself.
Fauci should probably be sent to jail, for lying to Congress, and public money funding the alteration of virus in Wuhan lab should be investigated
The game has an end, and you can get there in a much more reasonable amount of time.
> These techniques cannot be used by a person who have to walk a dog early every morning, help his son to go to a school and work with complex code base.

Of course they can. Just not by you. Mutual exclusion does not apply here.
To be totally honest? Who the fuck knows. It’s a shit show out there. They could be all the things you are suggesting, or none of those things. A more typical sounding job post could signal … nothing as well. Granted, even this reads typically to me, but that might have more to do with my JIT translating of bullshit as I read it. For example, ‘We prefer to hire 1 great fit, versus hire 3 good fits’, translation ‘your ass has to move super fast or we are absolutely firing you’.

Things get even harder when their product doesn’t even exist yet or available to use. You can’t assess their values.

Yeah, who the fuck knows! They offer money and are looking for the best. Give it a go, what more can you do.
> instinctively want to climb hierarchies

But that also means you still see managers "a top" of engineers (a "better" job).

But just because you are managing a project shouldn't mean you stand above all the people in the project. Like e.g. a trainer in football/soccer might direct the Team but the highly experienced players in the Team are, while directed by the trainer, not in a social hierarchy below the trainer. Because most times they stay when the trainer gets fired and they might get the trainer fired too if they believe the trainer is incompetent.

So in the end the problem just again boils down to seeing being a manager as a advancement of your carrier but becoming a senior engineer just as a continuation/negligible advancement.(1)

(1): assuming proper standards for senior engines, I have seen many people in senior engineer positions which do not have the skills to call them senior engineer IMHO.
This was common sense in 90s and early 00s.
There are very few people who can juggle running chainsaws with their penis.

So maybe it's not something we should be doing then?
That book (Graeber's Debt) really opened up my eyes to how valuable anthropology is for understanding human interactions. (No shit! In hindsight.)

(Well, it did that, and taught me a lot about economy and finance in the grand scheme of things.)

Since I read it, I've started looking more into some anthropology-leaning literature, and found that when people are a something-slash-anthropologist, there's somewhat reliably always fresh insight in what they're saying.

Anyway, I'm about to enjoy Graeber's post-humous Dawn of Everything now.
Bethesda oversold their AI all the same though. Google for Oblivion and "Radiant AI", pretty big drama back in the day.
Can't tell whether you're being sarcastic.
Kasparov's definition is pretty biased in his favour though. It's far easier to dominate through pure chess talent in an era before engine prep, because the skill difference expresses itself across many more moves than modern games.
I probably missed some but a general overview:

- Helping figure out the right goals and metrics for the team and ensuring everyone is on the same page.

- Holding 1-on-1s with team members, non-technical feedback and yearly reviews. Seriously, yearly reviews are a massive time sink if you actually care and spend time on them.

- Passing around information to the team and making sure they are involved in the right meeting/conversations.

- Attending various management meetings that usually could be replaced with a wiki page.

- Resolving non-technical issues my team members are having. This includes listening to venting sessions, complaints and general bitching. Need to handle these situations in a diplomatic non-judgemental way.

- Keep track of team non-technical blockers (people, process, etc.) and try to resolve them (short or long term). This includes resolving product management issues and other teams blocking my team.

- Keeping stakeholders close and happy

- Selling the team, it's vision and achievements broadly

- Hiring

- Planning team promotions and executing on those plans. This includes telling your team members what they need to do to get promoted and then ensuring those promotions happen.

- Non-toxic (or toxic depending on the company) politics

- Talking to random people in the company for networking. It's amazing how much people from HR will tell you if you are friendly and get coffee with them.
Don’t forget the Dock that represents all the running applications.
Both reasons weigh very little.

The first one makes a jump from quantity to quality. But, counting to three and counting to whatever is not a qualitative difference. A definition of "personality" is required to define where it starts, and it is easy to conceive interpretations which allow for broad labelling.

The second one is just a caveat. As John had to tell his wife as he surprised her in bed with Frank, and she went "Yes but you know you are jealous and a bit paranoid".
Aside from the RISC instruction set part, all the specs scream standard 8-bit "microcomputer" of the late 70s and early 80s.
I was looking at Go vs Shogi time control and was surprised that at top level Shogi match usually give more time to players, despite being mathematically less complex. AFAIK the longest allotted time in Go is Japanese Mejin match at 8 hour/player. Longest for Shogi is Shogi Mejiin Match at 9 hour/player. Even standard ranking match in Japanese Shogi allow 6 hour/player, more than any Chess tournament I have seen (at present).

I watched a lot of Shogi match, and that just make 3.15 hours allotted in WCC looks low.

(The 8-9 hour match is a 2-day match. At specified time on the first day player do sealed move, to be reveal at the beginning of a match the next day.)
> Once you’ve got your images fine, but if your build nodes are elastic you can easily hit cold/new nodes and pay the penalty.

If you have your own Nexus or Artifactory, or even just a registry that's configured as a pull through cache (https://docs.docker.com/registry/recipes/mirror/), then it shouldn't be a problem.

If those two servers are in an internal network, even better, otherwise just get a VPS with a good port speed. Honestly, even 100 Mbps should be enough for 2 GB, taking less than 30 seconds, with 1 Gbps that time becomes 2 seconds: https://techinternets.com/copy_calc

The difference here would be that you're using your own software on your own servers and therefore can deal with the load that you generate yourself with the full allotment of resources that you have, vs having to rely on public registries that are used by tens of thousands of other developers/processes at the same time.

That's not that different from S3 either (apart from maybe more capacity being available to you on private buckets, depending on the vendor), since you can also use something like MinIO or Zenko on your own servers as well instead of relying on the cloud.
I don't drink caffeine and I rarely dream, just to chime in. When I dream it's almost always because something is disturbing my sleep. An upset stomach is the most common cause of dreams to me.

Or quitting cannabis, in which case I have vivid and wild dreams for a couple weeks and then back to normal.
> So… go ahead and share your ideas for paying doctors and hospitals less, because otherwise you’re talking about stuff which doesn’t amount to much!

Think twice before you ask for it - you might get it.

I often hear that doctors in US make more than they should. Compared to what? My significant other is a practicing physician in a second highly compensated (after surgeons) medical specialty. Besides her daily work she has at least one (sometimes two) night calls a week in the hospital plus another one or two calls from home (should be back to the H on a 30 minutes notice). I am embarrassed that as a computer scientist I make more than her working from home in a comfy chair in front of a screen. Paying doctors less than other skills professions is a sure way to guarantee that the next generation of doctors will be composed from the folks that could not make it into the "better" professions. Don't forget there is no "restart" button on a human corpse after failed surgery. You want a person holding your life in their hands to be top notch.

Last thing to point out: even in equitable societies like Western Europe doctors make more compared to other skilled professionals like software engineers. America is unique that FAANG pays more to their engineers that Mayo Clinic to its physicians.
I play an ideal move in a solved position, and you play a less-than-ideal move in response, I have already gained an advantage.

That assumes the less-than-ideal move stays within your preparation. If, on the other hand, you dismissed that move during preparation because of its sub optimal evaluation then I have succeeded in getting you out of prep and into a middle game with a small disadvantage but potentially a lot of play. If I can then steer the game down a very sharp line then your small advantage means a lot less due to the dynamics of the position.
All highly paid celebrities without managers, including many streamers, are effectively running marketing and PR campaigns for million-dollar brands. It's quite believable to me that the job would select for higher intelligence, or at least better cash flow management, than being an athlete who plays a team sport.
Depends on the jurisdiction, but at least where I live, yes, preventing escape from imprisonment is explicitly listed as a legally permitted reason for officials (both prison guards and police) to shoot someone.

In general (but not always, not in e.g. armed escape) there is a requirement of warning, giving a chance to surrender without violence, but if they refuse to surrender, the society has decided that it is acceptable to shoot to kill. It's not murder (murder being unlawful killing), it's enforcement of the designated proper punishment (staying imprisoned for a certain time) by the threat of death. The death penalty isn't appropriate for most (or even any) crimes, other penalties are, and they are free to take (and expected to take) those other penalties and avoid the risk of death - however, if they intentionally refuse the appropriate punishment (prison sentence) and try to escape, that is their own choice of putting their life on the line.
To everyone asking for a recording: I appreciate the curiosity, but we were very much a live act.

But I hope my little story encourages you to pursue the arts, and nurture them in your local area. Your local live music scene needs your support, so we can see serendipities like this appear :)
All overtime at CD Project was paid in full accordance with EU policies. This isnt Japan/Korea where you cant leave your desk before supervisor even if it means sitting up to 23:00 doing nothing and not being paid for it.
> Playing for draws is easier than playing for wins.

This is nonsense. Neither Caruana nor Carlsen were playing for draws.
Consider that they may have some self-restraint module you are unaware of, and you should start letting them bite you.

Edit: I do not see how anyone can find this (contentful) statement disagreeable, which I see as purely logical conclusion (in form of a joke) after a few really simple assumptions. I am starting to assume disagreement comes from masochist insects which are part of the poster's collection, as they probably cannot type.
> This is simply insane warmongering. Since you throw such threats around casually I suspect you might be a US citizen.

Take many deep breaths and cool your jets. Think about your biases - it’s not good to go through life hating an entire nation and it says more about you than about them.

I am not American.

If you actually do want to explore this topic, read On The Genealogy Of Morality by Nietzsche.
It absolutely is written down. The issue is that the results you get from modeling systems using queuing theory are often unintuitive and surprising. On top of that it's hard to account for all the seemingly minor implementation details in a real system.

During my studies we had a course where we built a distributed system and had to model it's performance mathematically. It was really hard to get the model to match the reality and vice-versa. So many details are hidden in a library, framework or network adapter somewhere (e.g buffers or things like packet fragmentation).

We used the book "The Art of Computer Systems Performance Analysis" (R. Jain), but I don't recommend it. At least not the 1st edition which had a frustrating amount of serious, experiment-ruining errata.
It's not a numbers game. The remaining 0.1% can be very important too.

There are times to kill history, and there are times to bring it along. History does a lot of things.

- Giving people credit.

- If, in 20 years, you want to pull up an old (no-longer-compatible) document

- Public patent prior art

- ... and a swarm of others

"Internally" is likely to no longer exist a decade down the line.

Whenever I've open sourced, I've brought along history. In one case, we did need to rewrite history to remove a few sensitive files, but git makes that easy enough.

If keeping history is a heroic effort, by all means kill it. However, that's not a good generic best pracitce.
I had this analogy not long ago, insects might be 8 bit while we're 3D vulkan compute shader in 4K, but we still have the same game dynamics at the core.
It is close to the Czech highway speed limit for trucks, which drive on the same highway, so they must be taken into account.
Being on the move is part of the skill. I expect a good developer to be effective in a ew tech faster than a younger one barely knowing one tech. I think THAT is part of the appeal of a senior+ dev, having proven they will be able to adapt to the new framework or the next pivot.
If they are escaping prison, that presumes they have been convicted.
> makes less money than you is managing you , doesn't really work

It can, managing is (should be) a collaborative effort. It only is a problem if the manager manages in a non collaborative forceful top down manner.

It's all a question about communication skills.

Like in some sports you will find top players earning multiple times of what their trainer earns, and potentially having enough influence to get their trainer fired. They work together with the trainer for optimal results.

Similar enough wealthy people hire fitness trainer, or people which manage their cullender, schedule, appointments and might even majorly decide career directions. And it still works even through the person in power is the person being managed.
I really hope you never have to learn how misinformed that stance is.
A demand for a hand written apology?
In a nutshell: thundering herd.
I replayed it several times actually. Then I cleaned up my local storage without thinking about this game, deleting all my universe/sim count.. and was off the hook afterwards :) Not regretting it though!
This was sort of alluded to in the article, they mention both avocado and papaya.
Humans have bloodlust, some make a fuss out of having to keep that in check for the sake of everyone else.
I asked for some ownership from the CEO. He said maybe but never followed up with it, so I quit for a job that gave great stock options (and was actually worth a lot).

I mean personally, 40 hours per week is too much of my life to be spending on something, and yet too little to be a good experience. Giving a little extra is where the thrill comes in. I can start a company any time, and do better than most people, but it's less efficient and more risky than just joining an established company and getting some shares.
These code schools are so ridiculous. Anyone can code in 12 weeks! Also, there are only 4 types of developers and good ones post blogs and do TED talks. Such bullshit.
Everything else aside, am I the only one who thinks putting two function keys right below the muzzle is a poor design?
I think you missed the point. It's not about literally tracing the physical source of the paper. I mean the network of printing, distribution, any feedback, etc. leave traces where there's a fairly short chain of people to follow before you find the initial source. This is completely different from online distribution. No agency will complain if you distribute information on paper - they're more likely to say "thank you, please continue, we'd like to learn about your whole network of collaborators".
If you have some people who do the work at hand, and some people who manage other people, you automatically put the managers in charge (because it doesn't make sense the other way around). And then you get the hierarchies we are used to, with managers and individual contributors. That's really a pity.

In German there is a phrase that translates to "content" or "substantive" work (inhaltlich). You use it in contrast to non-content or administrative tasks that enables the main work. It is like a neutral way of saying "actual work" without deriding the other kinds of tasks. I'm not really sure how to translate it properly.

As an experienced developer, I would really like to have a job with not much managerial responsibility, but a lot of "content" responsibility. Not a manager, so I wouldn't tell somebody how to organize their work, but I get to make larger technical and strategic decisions. Unfortunately such architectural positions (or maybe CTO) are very rare, even though I know a lot of companies could use benefit from somebody in this role, who would keep the greater picture in mind, make technological decisions, teach employees, and so on.
Looking for a Intel One API Specialist for OTT Platform
To create and design and engineer an OTT TV Streaming platform to become a Interactive TV Channel using the Json and SDK OTT format architecture. VOD and Real-time interaction with those on the licensed network. Using Intel OBS streaming infrastructure with Intel One API Toolkit and FPGA Technology to produce an Broadcasting TV Network Video Chat service with zero latency. All the above coding infrastructure to be fused into TV API Autonomous streaming platform for interactive live stream Video Programming TVaaS PLatform,. The Data scientist must be able to conform their codes to be streamlined in sync on The ROKU and Amazon Prime TV Network. t.reidy@hotmail.co.uk for feedback
Wow, didn't know this.

Polar opposite of what Tesla is doing. If they can't match this, that's the whole German fsd market gone for them, possibly whole EU, as they will harmonize the Requirements.
> But that also means you still see managers "a top" of engineers (a "better" job).

No. All that’s required is that 10-20% of individual contributors see it this way. They will start manoeuvring, “virtue signalling” their ignorance, effectively destroying the culture.

You don’t see it that way. I don’t see it that way. But they do. That’s enough unfortunately.

What you need to break this dynamic is that the opportunity to be a trainer (or at least coach) is a kind of reward for learning to play the game really well. I think that’s how it works e.g. in (European) football as well.
1920 pixels on a 27" external monitor. And yes, usually full width. I did test your site with narrower windows and it becomes a lot easier to read then, hence why I think a quick and dirty first step you could make it just reducing the maximum number of columns.
Why? I make less money than every single one of my staff. I’m an EM, I manage 9 engineers, and never once has the fact that they make more money seemed relevant.

_Maybe_ I could change careers and be an engineer and make as much of them, but I wouldn’t want to. I’m a manager because I like being a manager. It’d be a QoL decrease for me to be an engineer just for the money.
I have many times. About 20 years ago someone who had previously robbed me at knifepoint ran into me, recognized me as someone he knew and I was able to convince him that we played on a sports team together as children. I bought him lunch and we stayed in touch.

At the time I had aphorisms on my bathroom mirror. My favorite one was
"I need not convince that humanity is necessary, only that it's possible"
Or is accepting strings from untrusted users.
The borderlands are like that, yes.

Prague, on the other hand, is oversaturated with signs. I guess someone makes money on them, because some are clearly superfluous (Segway bans in distant neighbourhoods where no one ever drove a Segway; Segways were only a bane of the touristy center).