skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Isn't fiat money much more reliable than cryptocurrencies? We frequently cite the failures that led to hyperinflation, but nobody bats an eye when a cryptocoin fluctuates by a double digit amount in a single day.

The central authority that controls the money supply might not be perfect, but I trust it vastly more than a currency with no brakes that's mostly used for speculation.

That, and I can buy a hotdog with money. Peer to peer, without it being logged into a permanent record tied to my pseudonym.
Thanks for clarifying. I think there are better ways to ask a question like that (eg. "what differentiates x from y.."). It's also built on an assumption: looking at those two sites side by side, there's nothing glaringly obvious that one is "much better designed" than the other.

One thing I try to remember is that this site is probably something someone loves and takes pride in. It's fine to offer a critique and constructive crits, but I try to remember that a sharp comment like that (without much seemingly obvious interest in an answer) can be super tough for the designer.
How does this garbage make it into production code?
People keep saying "pin versions" as a defense against supply chain attacks. That's all well and good until something widely used like log4j has a remote-code-execution exploit and then it all comes crashing down.

Trusting any single author is a single point of failure — eventually the author of one of the packages you depend on will get compromised and an attacker will publish a malicious package. To combat this, you need package validation by multiple independent identities. The classic ways to do this are to have multiple people sign a package using PGP, or to rely on vendor endorsement — but the theory behind it is just multi-factor authentication.

A second useful step is connect releases to an open source commit history. This makes it much more feasible for independent authorities to review the differences between release versions as a sequence of logical, coherent commits. The ideal is to have multiple committers on a project sign a release package, after having followed the commit history as it played out.

If a package cannot be connected to an auditable history — because a source package is grossly transformed from what's in a repo, because there's no public repo, because the history is just one big commit or similarly useless, or because a binary package is not created using a reproducible build — then it is harder to have confidence in it.
The obvious thing for local good mortgage brokers/originators to hire some UX designers and get themselves a slick ui too. And yet, for a lot of them the UI is atrocious. It can't be that expensive, so it looks like they just do not care.
Yeah, it's trickier when they're coming in with an existing job, and the current professional quitting culture dictates that you couldn't start any time sooner than in two weeks at least. Add that to the list of difficulties involved in lower time-to-start dates.

I've been fortunate (or not) that the hiring decisions I've played a part in have all been non-urgent with no struggle to find more candidates, so in the face of risk the org could afford to wait. The moral hazard you describe is interesting though. I don't think I would worry about it, as you say the hiring side isn't their fiduciary, and you don't necessarily know that their current situation is all that stable. I might try and assure myself that even if things don't work out, they're unlikely to be put out on the streets, since if they got past us (even with our "risky" assessment) they can probably get past someone else quickly enough, and possibly even go back to where they left depending on how stable it really was.

I'd consider being honest with them about the risk if an offer is extended. If I were on the receiving end, I'd prefer to be told before I accept something along the lines of "Honestly we're a bit unsure how well you'll adapt to our work [because of risk factors x], but we see your potential and think you'll rise to the occasion. We hope you'll come join us!" I don't think having my risk factors pointed out would affect me negatively at all, even if I think they're BS things the company shouldn't worry about, though I can see it possibly affecting the company somewhat negatively in that they're potentially giving the candidate who all-in-all they think is worth taking a chance on an extra reason to decline (and thus they'll need to continue searching which sucks). Whether that decline happens really depends on the candidate. With that information they might conclude/agree it's too risky to leave their current role for you right now, or they might actually be motivated to do better and start proving themselves right from the start especially at a company that is so forthcoming about such things. And they might fail, but at least they leave with the knowledge of what went wrong, and even if what went wrong wasn't an identified risk factor they still have your list of risk factors (some possibly valid, some BS, some that can be worked on, some that can't) that other companies might be looking out for to have for future interviews.
granted. so if the Op makes phone calls on day 1 (a Friday), how many return calls will he receive on day 2, a Monday? Doing anything on a Friday, aka take out the trash day, is just a game move to make things harder.
Maybe Watchy does what you want. No personal experience though. https://watchy.sqfmi.com/
I'm sad to hear that, I have been optimistic about this helping people actually. Good news is that there are other options besides Chivo, so hopefully conditions improve as the market develops.
Yeah, isn't it a legal requirement subject to penalties, as you say? Then surely it's fair to measure success of the program on those terms as well -- i.e., is it being used as a currency for daily life? The answer is seemingly not (for technical, social, and speculation reasons), meaning it's fair to comment that this part of the project seems to be a failure. OP can't carve off criticisms they don't like or _personally_ care about.
Person who charges $600/hour: "your only correct action is to hire a person who charges $600/hour."

Sorry for the snarkiness, but I'm continuously gobsmacked by how oblivious people, especially attorneys, can be to the fact that the Game of Justice as it is played in these parts is simply not accessible to the vast majority of people, who can only try to find another way to work around the system even if it's probably doomed to failure.
You need to speak with a qualified domain name attorney, not just any attorney or solicitor.

As Director of a domain name protection company (and not an attorney) I can offer this:

If you registered the domain name before the other party files for a trademark, then there is no way you would have known that they would file for the mark. So, in most cases you probably don’t have to give up the domain name. It comes down to whether or. Or you registered the domain “in bad faith” or not. And again, how would you know they would start their business and get a trademark? You wouldn’t.

Are you in the same industry and compete with each other? If so, there might be an issue, but I’d your site offers different products and there would be no confusion between companies or websites, then there may not be an issue.

The best way to handle this is to get a domain name attorney to respond to their letter to you, essentially telling them to go away, and that you plan on keeping the domain name.

If you cannot afford an attorney, look for a company that offers domain name insurance or a domain name warranty, if you have an issue like this with your domain name, your legal fees to defend the domain are covered.

As you have described the situation here, you bought the domain before they filed for their trademark, and you’re not pretending to be them. So you should be able to keep the domain. They are just trying to “ strong arm” the domain away from you with a threatening letter. If they do sue you or file a udrp, defend yourself with the help of a good domain name attorney.
That's a great thought; however, we most often discover the conflict during the hiring debrief when we have mixed feedback on a candidate leaving the candidate "on the bubble".

It does give me some ideas to consider when we extend the offer (as @Jach's sibling comment also suggests).
Agree, just got a TM, and the journey was full of grey areas and few to zero xor solutions. For all the lawyer haters, the game is already rigged, so don't hate the player.
Brest vs. Montpellier – Ligue 1 Conforama Goals and Highlights
Unless they start a UDPR claim with WIPO, they are hoping you will just hand it over.

This has happened to me. Ignore them until WIPO claim shows up. Which they probably tried and were denied. A good example is nissan.com

https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/guide/
I take it that you prefer FF over Brave?
If you wanted to write a rule based on the edit distance between strings, it doesn't seem possible with declarativeNetRequest. This is useful for a lot of use cases, such as spam sites pretending to be a legit site by changing one character in the URL.
Ah corporate greed ... will it last?

Like everybody can afford $8 monthly subscription to tens of thousandth pseudo-micro-services ! Madness.
Evenso fingers get pretty cold quite quickly. I would have thought they'd have at least knitted mittens.
It might be interesting to map the quality of the hn conversations to the distance from the source in either time or internet distance.
Here's the code https://github.com/deepmind/mathematics_conjectures/blob/mai...
That's a very interesting variation of the broken window fallacy
Is there any legal/procedural aspect to self-insuring, or is it just a placeholder for saying "we'll eat the costs" ?
> Although we entertained occasional thoughts about implementing one of the major languages of the time like Fortran, PL/I, or Algol 68, such a project seemed hopelessly large for our resources: much simpler and smaller tools were called for […]

Precisely my point. The definition of fun is up for a personal interpretation.
https://archive.md/7MshA
> Something is definitely wrong.

Oh absolutely. More than one thing.

The US is structurally messed up in a dozen different ways and it puts people in a corner. People are angry and have no idea what to do about it. Undirected rage because people don't know where to direct it.

Then the media directs it to shooting up schools by plastering that all over the screen. It could just as easily be pipe bombs or political assassinations or riots.

Or something actually constructive. But actually solving the problems that many organizations exist only to mitigate means you have to fight them, and they often win. Especially when people are led to believe that supporting those organizations is the way to eliminate the problems that they now exist to preserve.
There is a lovely mountain town in North Carolina that is called Little Switzerland
Worked in tech for decades, had some very heated disagreements many times, never had abusive language used towards me by bosses or used it myself towards colleagues or subordinates. I don't think it's expected. It happens, but it's not a normal thing.
That is a pretty weird perspective. If a flash mob stormed your home and stole 0.07% of your yearly income, I’m pretty sure you’d consider it a problem even if the relative amount isn’t higher.
This actually should be the way codes are written. This is how we reason about codes in our minds.
Oh! You might enjoy nand2tetris then... A classic, most probably worth your time.
He lacks enough of it to become one at this point in time (when we have Magnus and Nepo has his current mental edurance) :)

Actually relative strength is one of the things that wonder me the most I would say in the game: when one of the opponents is much stronger than the other the wins look so easy and the loses so stupid, but when the winner is matched against someone even stronger you see the same exact picture.
I love you all I dunno why I say that now but here you go.
I'm curious, if we exclude all your open-source work (assuming you have some), what did/would you submit when given the question?
Whether or not you, or anyone else, believes, and / or can demonstrate, the current state of society and legal systems is a racket, doesn’t magic away the problem of a potential default judgement.
Does Mac not ship with X11 anymore?
Writing this article on a computer and servers that maintains it may have indirectly consumed tones of CO2, too, I assume.
what is deficient with firefox’s profile manager in that regard? last time i used it, it completely isolated every part of the browser experience, which seems to be what you want.

in any case, if containers don’t work for you, you can run developer edition for work and standard edition for personal. this is what i do, and the added advantage is that you can use containers on top of it for more granular isolation within each context.
This is what worked for me a few times. It is painful for a bit but better than spending money on a lawyer. I would also suggest to try and find a lawyer in your network willing to help at below their retail price. Despite the bad rep, lawyers are humans and are very eager to help good people
I think it would be amazing if Gitlab CI would allow to send CI pipeline traces to a OTLP endpoint; I can then decide via Orel-collector where I want to send the trace spans to e.g. Google Tracé or Jaeger etc
Also https://www.Reddit.com/r/retrobattlestations
They may not check their email, but how is anyone on social media without email? I'm not aware of a single social site that doesn't require an email address to create an account.
> You can still see every request

I pointed this out in a thread yesterday too, but the whole point is that you will no longer need to grant "see all my requests" permissions to ad blockers. In fact, due to the removal of the old blocking API, if an ad blocker asks for such permissions it's highly suspicious.
The GitHub README gives more context for the somewhat inconsistent state of the docs. It's an open source release of a language that had been a commercial spinoff from academia decades earlier, and now gets only occasional updates from two people as a spare-time project:

> The Nial language was developed by Mike Jenkins and Trenchard More in a collaborative research project supported by Queen's University at Kingston and IBM Cambridge Scientific Center from 1979 to 1982.

> [...]

> Nial Systems limited licensed the interpreter from Queen's University and marketed it widely. Mike Jenkins continued to refine both the language and its implementation. In 2006 Mike released Version 6.3 as an open source project to encourage continued development of Nial.

> In 2014 Mike started working with John Gibbons to develop a 64-bit version and to add capabilities that John needed for his work. The decision was made to target the open source for Unix-based platforms and release it on GitHub.
two out of three common auto mechanics were caught here giving false estimates and cheating to some extent on common operations.. how many people can discern minor errors with law?
I take no issue with you choosing whatever license you want. It's your own work, after all.

My dissatisfaction is only with the Open Hardware claim, present and prominent in what I assume is your website[0]. It has a definition[1], and your choice of license does not meet it.

I do not wish for the meaning of Open Hardware to be diluted, thus the comment.

[0]: https://scsi.blue/

[1]: https://www.oshwa.org/definition/
I don't know the answer, but I would like to take this opportunity to announce how excited I am to be an active contributor in an international project that aggregates tech and innovation news and delivers it to millions of exceptional people around the planet: hackernews.

#newsthatmatter #grateful #workhardplayhard #money #neuralnetworks #nanoscale #web3 #blockchain #openforhire #leverage #parallelmarkets #hitthegroundrunning #synergy
Zero info on the process, progress, etc. PR puff piece
It's the collection of data that I find difficult. A lot of it is locked with various cloud providers, and can only be retrieved with manual exports.
25 million divided by 10k employees is indeed $2500. Seems correct to me.
The advice sort of extends to any profession doesn’t it? Sometimes you can get good advice from strangers on social media, most times you probably shouldn’t risk anything on it though.

It’s sort of like Google programming isn’t it? I’m sure you’ll get it to work, but you hopefully wouldn’t do it if you were building medical software that could end up killing people. That’s when you pay the experts.
Does anyone know of an article that sticks to the relevant facts? (Without burning pages and pages on speak easies, gap teeth, sexual intrigue, etc.)
A default judgement requires that a case be filed. In the US, that means they have to serve you notice of the case.

Obviously they have the OP's address, so if they fail to serve him the judgement should be easy enough to set aside.

I'd do absolutely nothing in this circumstance until and unless they actually initiate a legal proceeding. If they did sue for the domain, depending on the value of brand I probably lawyer up, and perhaps seriously consider counter-suing them for both their domain and the use of the business name itself.
This happens with music too. The Spotify wrapped posts with my friends are completely different, whereas ten or fifteen years ago we would have watched the same Top 10 videos on MTV a half a dozen radio stations that were not much different with each other..
Oh that's slick. Was that all through the customize screen, or was any of it via CSS?

Edited to add:

I had to add the following to move the system UI buttons to the same "bar" as the rest of the UI in Firefox:

/* Adding empty space for buttons */
#nav-bar {
margin-right:80px;
}

/* For dragging whole window by mouse*/
#titlebar {
appearance: none !important;
height: 7px;
}

/*
Fix for main menu calling by Alt button
THIS BREAKS THE UI FOR ME!!
*/
/* #titlebar > #toolbar-menubar {
margin-top: 10px;
} */

/* Move minimize/restore/close buttons to empty space */
#TabsToolbar > .titlebar-buttonbox-container {
display: block;
position: absolute;
top: 17px;
right: 1px;
}

From: https://github.com/piroor/treestyletab/wiki/Code-snippets-fo...
Show HN: Host files quickly on a dumb HTTP host with optional time-to-live
The College Park (Prince Georges County) Tornado of 2001 September 24
Fantastic, I think I'll go with the
Colmi P8 and try to build something silly with it.

Thanks
My entire argument is based on the fact that a free-market healthcare system is not even an option. Frankly, a free-market economy of any sort is a utopian fantasy. Healthcare is just a useful case study of the problems.
Especially given that more-or-less $5 is the floor of monthly subscriptions.

Things that used to cost between $0-$100 for 1-10 years of utility now cost at minimum $5/month and can break, disappear, or become useless at any moment in time.

Fcuk this subscription nonsense.
Of course an attorney would tell you to hire an attorney.
Computers don't run for computer's sake. They run due to extant human utility. That utility is itself existentially traceable to a human making a choice.

No computer ever, has done something whose chain of causality does not return to a matter of human choice in orchestrating the circumstances for said outcome.
Financially, no it is not feasible. In the parts of the US where tornadoes are common, any particular spot is hit by a tornado on average once every 2,500 years. Of those tornadoes, 80% of them will be EF0 or EF1 intensity. An EF1 tornado will cause some roof damage and break windows but it won't tear the roof completely off or collapse walls.

So it doesn't really make sense to spend money for something that happens once every few thousand years and is typically pretty minor when it happens. Especially given that it is usually completely predictable when it happens. Tornadoes don't suddenly appear out of a blue sky. There were warnings for the last few days that storms capable of producing tornadoes were likely for the areas that were hit last night. When the storms were going on, the TV networks interrupted programming and had the weather forecasters tell where the storms were and where they were headed next. Tornado sirens would have been going off long before the tornadoes hit. People would be getting texts on their phones warning them to take cover.

If you're in a well-built structure, you're going to be fine in most tornadoes. Even for EF2 or EF3, you would most likely be OK even in a house without a basement if you took shelter in an interior closet on the ground floor. If you're in a mobile home, you're toast. For an EF4, you have a decent chance if you are in an interior room in a basement. So for the vast majority of tornadoes, which are already rare, there isn't much reason so spend money to protect property when there is already a way to protect lives.

For EF5 tornadoes, it would be challenging to build anything other than an underground bunker to withstand them. They are incredibly rare, Wikipedia says 59 in the US since 1950. An EF5 tornado doesn't just level a house, it rips it from the foundation, sends it flying through the air and shatters it into a million pieces. Here's what an EF5 tornado does to a house: https://www.spc.noaa.gov/faq/tornado/f5.htm. It can rip the asphalt from a roadway and send it flying through the air. If you're in a building in the path of an EF5 tornado, you are probably best off following the advice my redneck step dad gave me when I was a kid for what to do in the case of a nuclear attack. He said to head down to the basement to an interior hallway, crouch down on the floor, tuck my head down between my knees as far as I could, and kiss my ass goodbye.
Have you heard of asking for a raise?

Also, last I checked, the price of essential good in Bitcoin, assuming the contra-factual that it were possible to buy such things with Bitcoin, hasn’t exactly been constant for 40 years.
> Anecdotally, I’ve never fucked anything up royally.

You're not necessarily wrong, but that's definitely a survivalship bias. You only need to lose once for a game over, so everyone still playing underestimates the stakes at play, as there is close to no interaction to people that have lost.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Survivorship_bias
I live in Nashville (moved from San Francisco in 2018) and this is the second Tornado scare I’ve had. The first in March of 2020 did significant damage in my last neighborhood of Germantown. The weather here in Tennessee still amazes and frankly scares me a bit. I’m just not used to it coming from California. Thankfully this time no real damage to my home or West side neighborhood.
If mememory serves me, everybody 16 (18?) and up was "the militia" by default.
Yes, I want to actually make apps for the tracker. Other watches do support this, according to other posts in the thread.

However, your use case did spark my interest. Were you running a fitness company or something, was the tracker a key part of making sure your customers stayed on track.
Top Customer Feedback Software Solutions for 2022
I heard all the kids on the other side of the road playing Green light / red light one day.
I agree that some titles could be changed not to have manager in the title and be a role instead. For example:

Product manager -> product designer

But what about the people who decide salaries, promotions, hiring, and reviews? Part of the role is “project coordinator” and another part is “staffing and compensation”. Is there an alternative title for that?
As I said, a “free-market” solution isn’t even an option.
I'm not comfortable with the idea of being recorded, especially when I'm already under the pressure of an interview. I don't know how they'll use my video, if it will be used in training, leaked, etc. I might never see that company again, but they could use my video forever without me knowing.