skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The country of the Netherlands also might like to disagree with this
Raspberry pi? Keyboard? Mouse?
When someone says :

"Its the overweight, white trash, lower back tattoo of aesthetics."

It completely comes over as high level elitism.
100% agree. The NIH could replicating studies a requirement of funding for graduate or postdoctoral training. In addition to the scientific and societal benefit, it would just be good training.
While that's an interesting vector for attack, is it realistically an issue? Terminals are run as root all the time. I would guess any mainstream ones are well reviewed to not have such exploits work. Are you aware of any actual attacks exploiting terminal parsing in the wild?
No - it's worth that much because of who painted it. There are shitty drafts of Guernica that Picasso did that sell for hundreds of thousands. There are infinitely better drawings that one could not sell for a single penny. The artist is what gives it value. It's truly scarce because only so much work came from that artist - who people are obsessed with.

I will 100% grant that it's mostly about signaling and bragging rights. But NFTs are artificially scarce. Original work from Picasso is truly scarce.
The Nobel prize is about discovery of the telomeres, not about anything about lab populations.
I don't want to point a finger, but the same time period has seen explosive growth of the life sciences. Doing good science on "squishy stuff" is just plain hard, for two reasons: First, isolating a single cause and effect, is almost always impossible. Everything is multivariate and noisy. Second, many of the things we're urgently interested in learning involve human health and welfare, and there's probably a widespread feeling that we don't have a century or two to wait for solid answers.

My day job involves designing measurement equipment, some of which is used in life science. I absolutely care about knowing whether a measurement is any good or not, to the point where it's not just a paycheck, but a true passion. And I work with people in actual research who care just as much, using my stuff to do front-line work.

There are certainly problems, and I don't wish to defend the "publish or perish" system, but I don't think a cynical view of the causes is a complete or even accurate picture of what's going on.
The recommendation engine does tend to hover around recommending more of the same topics you like, because it looks like it's mostly driven off "people who like the stuff you like also liked this other stuff".

The solution to that is to bootstrap the engine with a variety of topics. I'm subscribed to channels about game design, film critics, engineering, urban planning, math, sudoku, beat saber, figure skating, history, and stand ups.

This much does mean the homepage gets pretty diverse and once in a while new topics do show up.
The idea that Earth being accessible to everyone at infinitely faster speeds is not a dark age. That is a golden age. It's sad that you've confused the two, but it's modern propaganda at work. The environment is damaged by humans. Not cars. If we banned cars, people would still ruin the environment, just in different ways. But that's cutting the nose off to spite the face.

The truth is, cars are, for the most part, amazing pieces of technology that allows nearly every person freedom of movement. You aren't going to change that without creating something better.

It seems like electric, self-driving cars are a possible dream, albeit even close to a pipe dream. Cars none-the-less though.
It's hard to take EFF seriously when they write so hyperbolically. What's clearly also the case is that Chrome extensions are one of the great modern security and privacy challenges --- to the point where multiple tech company security teams have people whose job it is just to screen them. Another detail that EFF doesn't want to share is that ad blockers are some of the worst offenders --- they demand maximal access to user data (think about how they work), and there are lots of them, not all of them, uh, implemented scrupulously.

EFF doesn't want to give you the other side of this story, because they're not an honest interlocutor.

If you had the other side of the story, you might still think Manifest v3 was a bad deal. Random ad blockers are very dangerous, but there are ad blockers that everyone trusts, and you might not want to make it harder for them to maintain their projects.

But EFF doesn't trust you to make that decision on your own.
if your logger is running an eval, you shouldn't trust it one bit
I feel like there's several industries that are practically computer science yet don't utilize open source effectively. Data science is definitely one, but the video game industry definitely comes to mind.

You could argue game engines are notoriously complex, but the Linux kernel would like a word.
There’s no demand for “tech stacks” in small, medium, or large business. The demand is for solutions to business problems. Those solutions may involve software. The form the software takes — the “stack” — is largely irrelevant. The only time companies care about languages and tools and frameworks is when they have committed to those already and need people who can work effectively with what they have.

No business ever had the requirement “We need 10,000 lines of Javascript” (or Rust, or anything). I think you misunderstand the difference between solutions and tools.

“Small business” is not a market for software and services, either. That term describes everything from coffee shops and restaurants to dry cleaners to lawyers to nail salons.
Your critique of lithographs is valid.

And that's the reason you don't see many lithographs selling for millions of dollars.

Still, the combined "wealth" of lithographs may very well be in the 10s if not 100s of billions.
I've never used Tailwind CSS. I watched the video "Just-In-Time: The Next Generation of Tailwind CSS" and all of it seems like they're solving problems that are entirely of their own creation, and doing so in an impressively complex way.

The use case demonstrated was suppose you have a twitter button on your site, and it has to have a background color of #1da1f2 because that is Twitter's brand color. Instead of writing style="background-color: #1da1f2" like a normal person they have a class name called bg-[#1da1f2], and their "JIT compiler" generates a named class with that property.

In another part of the video, they use className="font-bold" instead of style="font-weight: bold". Apparently the advancement in this version is that instead of having all of those pre-defined classes they only generate the ones you actually use. The feature list for 3.0 includes the ability to use any color you want, and even arbitrary CSS properties that the framework doesn't explicitly know about.

Is this progress? I could use the style attribute in 1999.
I have a question. It seems very unlikely that Georgist policies will take hold in the US any time soon, at least not at the state or federal level. The question then becomes: A) what "Georgist-lite" policies can we realistically hope to get enacted in the US, and B) is it feasible to start new countries built around Georgism? If so, where and how?
I think it's interesting for figuring out whether this was a profitable long-term move for Amazon requires thinking about revenue rather than profit. Compared to the temporary loss due to the fine (who knows what will actually end up getting paid, how it gets paid, etc) the revenue share (that will recur) that matters more long term.

If you paid 1.3B one-time to secure yourself a revenue stream that pays out 200MM than you would have otherwise gained a quarter, you're going to make your money back in ~6 quarters. It's absolutely worth it to take the temporary hit to income (obviously better if you didn't, which they were counting on) -- in fact knowing up front it'd be worth it.

Considering only the hit to short term income makes sense only in the short term, I think -- the Italian industry that was muscled out because they didn't want to use FBA, or the italian logistics providers that weren't chosen because of the incentive to use FBA face more difficulty. Amazon is amplifying solidifying it's own revenue streams, and that effect is likely to persist past a quarter or two.

I may be mistaken but I think of it like the other non-profit making tech companies that are floating around -- unexpected losses in the service of market domination are worth the gained and/or even-more-stabilized revenue streams.
I used to have an X1 Carbon 4th gen. I was super excited to get a 9th gen.

I was utterly disappointed. The fan would turn on for no good reason and make noised. My 4th gen never did that. And the performance was not that different from my 4th gen.

So, I returned it after a while. Got myself a Macbook Air M1. The hardware is brilliant. But to my taste, Mac OS is nowhere near close to how comfortable I was with my Linux/KDE setup. So now I'm backing marcan's effort to get Linux running on this device, but that doesn't seen to be close. Thus, I'm thinking of giving the Lenovo T14 Gen2 a try. As of now every moment I use the Air is pain.
The sole advantage that I'll grant ad-funded services is that they tend to far more open-access than the alternatives. Bill Gates and homeless people get the same features from Facebook. The rich subsidize the poor without ever having to actually open their wallet.

Ads are still a net negative, but it's worth considering that requiring payment will price some people out, because the poor aren't usually subsidized with paid services.
For example - just Google "Picasso The Kiss"
> overweight, white trash, lower back tattoo

is elitism. Even if it's right, it's elitism.
Probably in the S1
"Have you tried TPPMTINTATO? It's great!"
Interesting how all the team members are left unnamed except for the VPs.
A Plex UI for YouTube would be fantastic indeed. Does that exist?
your first task in lab will be to reproduce our competitor's work!

in seriousness though, there's enough money and trained scientists looking for work... moreover i think there's a whole personality type that is prevalent in science that would be very happy to replicate and reproduce results...
Would like to try your recommendation, KakaoTalk permissions are a little scary though

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.kakao.talk
How much land devoted to agriculture/mining/manufacturing/power/landfill is required outside of the city to support New York City? Sure, it wouldn’t move the needle on condo rent but land scarcity effects everyone.
Tech geeks forgot that pointy nosed bosses exist, y'know, the bad ones that seems to invariably hired for "accounting" reasons.

The google of old might have been OK, but at this point its as tedious to hear that they are "responsibile" as it was to hear that Microsoft Windows was "more customizable" than a mac and therefore somehow better. (I still know a lot of so called geeks that are ms fans for this reason).

A generation of socially unaware engineers got too popular and laid the groundwork for a behemoth that we let get too large...

Don't worry, FAANG still exists and is a major problem, the lesson shouldn't be that we need another player, just that monopolies, or things approaching them like big business, are always bad.
My point is SF likely has more gun freaks than you've convinced yourself of.
More than half of all studies can be replicated?
...can you expand on that?
> Well-designed cities don't rely on 18-wheelers

When was the last time you saw a delivery to any restaurant or grocery store? They're almost all from 18 wheelers. Furniture store? 18 wheeler. Appliance, electronics...all still 18 wheelers.

> cargo is then transshipped onto "street-sized" delivery vehicles for last-mile delivery to homes and retail shops.

No, it's really not. Not in large US cities, at least.
Something ive needed on my learning journey is attacking "both ends" -- so something like sedgewick for reading and then something about using pre-builds and c# in unity.

Its nice to actually hang out in 3D space and start to build an intuition between fiddling with the c# and whats going on in your unity scene.
Maybe your toy engine has legs and you're better off with a more foundational approach. Personally though i find dense coursework obfuscating and like having my "microwave dinners" on the way to knowing how to cook from scratch ;)

Dont listen to my advice tho listen to someone pitching a bunch of boring books. Its the right way...
No. No they are not.

I just bought my 3rd X1 Carbon (gen 9), and then returned it the next week. It made a constant buzz. $$$$ laptops aren't supposed to sound like the cheapest USB charger knockoff. Plus it would never go to sleep (so it just discharged every time I shut the lid).

I've never been able to get any X1 to seamless work with a thunderbolt dock either. 3 docks tried, and the Macbook is fine on 2, but the thinkpad always has problems. A firmware upgrade helped a little, but it's never seamless.

I wish I could find my next linux laptop. My gen 5 is getting a little long in the tooth.
Same.

It's a fairly accurate predictor of a company downturn after getting sunk in total complexity and ensuing certain employee churn.

The only reason for Scala adoption was Spark 10 years ago. Scala/Spark engineers were pulling the top buck. With pyspark and other cloud big data options on the scene, no one sane is using scala for this anymore.
In this case it's a description of the 6-dimensional coordinates used in Lagrangian mechanics, which dates to the late 1700s.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrangian_mechanics
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Position_and_momentum_space

The symplectic geometry from the article is an abstract version of ideas from Hamiltonian mechanics, which is from the early 1800s.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamiltonian_mechanics
> I'm suspicious of cars because I have literally gotten hit by them while cycling

This is entirely the fault of bike culture in the US. Outside of inner city/25mph limit roads a bicycle has no place being on a normal road. 55mph+ 3 ton metal machines and tiny bikes with no bumpers or crumple zones don’t mix.

It’s perfectly legal to do, and technically the person hitting you is in the wrong, but all your friends will think you’re stupid for risking your life in this way even if they don’t say it.
What does "it" refer to? Oxycontin or fentanyl?
I never said the quality was bad. MKB is the best quality on YouTube (usually) and he's entirely about subjectivity.

You can have high quality whilst also realising that the video is not made to be purely informative or educational.

>That you don't like the fact it gives cyclists "ammunition" sounds like a You problem :-)

??? Why are you talking about cyclists? I never mentioned cyclists.

>I don't think it's possible to talk about what he talks about without being opinionated

It is, and that's the crux. Though it's a lot more boring and harder.

>But he doesn't compare apples to oranges.

He very much does. I don't even need to argue on this point, it's that visible.

It's a shame indeed, but I have good reasons.
That sounds like spending money on trying to replicate results that can’t be replicated doesn’t it? Isn’t that what this study was doing? Doesn’t it make more sense to revisit how the existing funding is spent?

I have very little insight into this area of research, so I’d just have to guess everyone’s in a hurry and reaching for results or published papers.
Article has no insight.
The notion that only the President could order a strike was sheer fantasy for much of the history of nuclear weapons. There were no codes required to activate them for the longest time; the only security mechanism was just, really, the morals and mental stability of half a dozen crew on any of dozens of bombers flying 24x7.

When the Air Force was forced to institute Permissive Action Link, a system whereby nukes couldn't be armed without a numeric code (in theory from the President's Football, I guess, or maybe from a place like NORAD, after the president authenticated himself to them)...they set the codes on all weapons to be zeros. That level of petulance over nuclear weapons is pretty mind-blowing.

It is, frankly, amazing that we've never had anyone go completely nuts and set one off on purpose. Never had one malfunction. Never intentionally, but for mistaken reasons, launched/dropped any.

We've come close to thinking we were getting nuked (as has the USSR; literally one Russian dude deciding to play it safe was all that really kept both the USSR and the US from near total annihilation. A satellite told him it had detected a launch and he knew there was a chance it was sunlight glint. Yes, the USSR was relying on a satellite to decide on whether to start WW3...that could be triggered by sunlight glinting into its lenses.

There's also the rather shocking number of nuclear weapons the US Air Force has 'accidentally' dropped or had in planes that crashed. In some of the incidents, a number of the safety interlock systems were found to be "satisfied." Some of the warheads haven't been found, which is also quite disturbing. Somewhere out there is at least one nuke, waiting for anyone to grab it and make a dirty bomb.

Oh, and the group that transports nuclear materials (not sure if this includes weapons? I think the Air Force handles that?) around the country is apparently a total shitshow. Undertrained, overworked, underpaid, underfunded guys who manage to get into all sorts of trouble, including losing their handguns, getting drunk while on duty, and so on.

I think the only compelling argument someone could make with me for the existence of a higher power is that we haven't yet had an accidental nuclear weapon detonation.
My current home router is a cheap Microtik which does exactly what you describe. I also previously had a low end Ubiquiti EdgeRouter with the same setup as I have now. I am pretty sure the free router my ISP supplies does that as well but I have not had the opportunity to test it out.
Just listen to it. Stroad! It sounds strong, regal, majestic! Rolls off the tongue like music, it does!
I've never seen PEP582 until now, but it looks concerningly short. It doesn't discuss tradeoffs, alternatives, and is nowhere near comprehensive enough in its examples. It just doesn't seem very thoroughly thought through... It has the feeling of "this is such a great and simple idea! What could possibly go wrong??"
Respectfully I don't think you're characterization of early 20th century and today's research is accurate at all.

There is a stupendous amount of new science being carried out. Science that we'll look back on 80 years later (just as we look back on the science of the 1920s) and recognize how impactful that science has been. In fact, I would imagine that the science that is being worked on today will prove far more impactful than the research of the 1920s.

Think about the seminal technologies that are still in their infancy! Deep learning in it's current form (AKA the form that actually works) is ~10 years old. That's it. And in those ~10 years we've gone from cute theory to being able to convincingly emulate video, translate languages, solve dictation, and generate near-human quality text. Then there's CRISPR, which could potentially cure 1000s of diseases and dramatically improve diagnostic tools, and is similarly ~20 years old. There are many thousands of other groundbreaking technologies that are being worked on as we speak.

Contemporary scientists are conducting this research.
So I meant a percentage/time-based recurring fine -- as in x% of revenue for y quarters kind of fine.

I do agree with you though, just like the australian news outlets fining FB+Google thing, governments are figuring out that international mega corps are also a good source of income by way of fines.

I fear that even this is also short sighted -- even when imposed by static fines like this, the 1.3B number looks huge, but what we can't see is whether it was actually economical for Amazon to do this (I think it was), and the thing is the companies that were destroyed as a result are much harder to re-create in an environment where Amazon still has the overwhelming amount of marketshare/monopoly power. Eventually, if this continues and Amazon decides to hit back, the lack of natural competition (due to fines that came too little too late in regards to anti-competitive behavior) may put the nation state(s) between a rock and a hard place.
Index HTTPS://www.facebook.com/Kenai-Farms-CBD-Gummies-101223049088876
Kenai Farms CBD Gummies - Natural Solution For Mental Issues
Kenai Farms CBD Gummies << Reviews >> Kenai Farms CBD Gummies >> Kenai Farms CBD Gummies is the bear sticky improved with unadulterated concentrate of hemp plant leave. It is the bear sticky loaded up with clinical weed and it associates with your framework to reestablish the fundamentalphysical processes normally.

INDEX >> https://www.facebook.com/Kenai-Farms-CBD-Gummies-101223049088876
https://sites.google.com/view/kenai-farms-cbd-gummies-view/home
https://www.completefoods.co/diy/recipes/kenai-farms-cbd-gummies-offical
https://www.spreaker.com/show/kenai-farms-cbd-gummies-get
https://kenai-farms-cbd-gummies-offical.jimdosite.com/
https://kenai-farms-cbd-gummies-view.yolasite.com/
https://kenaifarmscbdgummiesoffical.tumblr.com/
https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/kenai-farms-cbd-gummies-3e7f
https://medium.com/@KenaiFarmsCBDGummiesoffical/kenai-farms-cbd-gummies-stronger-fast-effective-pain-relief-formula-31571cbcb7b7
https://www.homify.in/projects/1103572/kenai-farms-cbd-gummies-stronger-fast-effective-pain-relief-formula
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B-EBoveKw-Y
https://vimeo.com/655212827
Thanks, didn't realise that. So the issue is deeper than misuse of user input (I've edited my post).
It really should be. When you're trying to solve a business problem, Scala gets on the way.

And when I say Scala, I mean libraries like akka http, spray-json and slick. I like FP parts of Scala overall.

You would think that Scala 3 released in 2021 would have first class net/http and json that we can get rid of spray json. But no.
Google has access to Google's server logs, which the whole rest of the world does not.
I'm shocked that close to half can be replicated. It's not a matter of academic misconduct -- biology is just hard. There are a lot of ways to fool yourself. If you doubt, just take look at the number of drug candidates that make it out of the lab (it's a LOT lower than 50%).

The journalism side of Science magazine is far too credulous. Most science is wrong. Even when it is published in Science (perhaps, especially when it is published in Science).