skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Tesla Model 3: 5 stars

https://cdn.euroncap.com/media/55749/euroncap-2019-tesla-mod...

BMW iX: 5 stars

https://cdn.euroncap.com/media/67239/euroncap-2021-bmw-ix-da...

Jaguar I-Pace: 5 stars

https://cdn.euroncap.com/media/63559/euroncap-2018-jaguar-i-...

Nissan Leaf: 5 stars

https://cdn.euroncap.com/media/62961/euroncap-2018-nissan-le...

VW ID3: 5 stars

https://cdn.euroncap.com/media/64338/euroncap-2020-vw-id3-da...

VW ID4: 5 stars

https://cdn.euroncap.com/media/64335/euroncap-2021-vw-id4-da...

Hyundai Ioniq 5: 5 stars

https://cdn.euroncap.com/media/67127/euroncap-2021-hyundai-i...

Ford Mustang Mach-e: 5 stars

https://cdn.euroncap.com/media/65695/euroncap-2021-ford-must...
It really depends what do you mean by Social Media.

For example I define Chat as a different category then Social Media.

How do you define Social Media and what is the value (or good) they add that is unique to these platforms?
Uh, because you could get 4X the "amount of shit" done in the same amount of time? So ideally they should pay you 4X.
I would because they'd be more productive than me.
> The fact that iOS plays nicely with apps that ask to prevent screenshotting is a foundational bug.

In fact, iOS does not provide any tools to prevent screenshotting, on the contrary, this feature requires some nasty hacks to pull off.

One of them is actually even patented and it requires rendering whatever you want to protect (text, image, etc) into a one frame DRM protected video and rendering that instead.
I am curious to know, which checkboxes did the account check to qualify as misinformation and being a Russian troll?
Running IntelliJ Idea with JDK 17 for Better Render Performance with Metal
> Huh. Supply side economics is exactly giving more people money to spend”. You even admit that.

What, no! Here, let me quote myself from the previous answer I gave you.

>> But "Give people more money and they spend it" not supply-side economics, actually, is it?

Here, have a look at what supply-side economic is[0]. Supply-side economics is basically just lowering taxes.

> Real wages grew and unemployment was at record lows during the 80’s.

Nope, they didn't. Check [1] or [2]. Here's a pretty picture of the same data, just to be sure: [3].

Here's one for unemplyment: [4]; in the early 1980 unemployment skyrocketed, only to slowly fall back towards the level it was at the beginning of the 1980. I guess you could say that you are technically correct say that is was falling for most of the time - because it shot up so much at the beginning. Technically correct; the worst way of being correct.

In fact, ever since the introduction of supply-side "economics", wages have more or less flatlined and the profit from increased productivity has gone pretty much excursively to the very small layer of scum floating on top of the economic sewage water while everyone else is eating shit.

> Are you saying that’s wrong?

I guess I am? My suggestion would be to check the data.

> Please stop getting your information from social media.

There's no need for insults, is there?

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supply-side_economics

[1] https://www.epi.org/publication/swa-wages-2019/#fig-e

[2] https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/AHETPI

[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:United_States_real_wages_...

[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:US_1980s_unemployment.png
You are making a pretty good case for why they should continue to not share it with anyone.
On the contrary -- welcome to the world trust building.

If you only know one thing, you keep your mouth shut until you know more. And if the thing you know isn't actually known, like how effective the vaccine really is, that goes double.

Notice that doesn't require you to "know the truth from the beginning in one step." It requires the people in charge to show some restraint.

You only get so many opportunities to be wrong before that trust is eroded.
Programmatically talking to the Android system via ADB shell commands
I first read it as "Please step into the window opening on your left" and thought how creepy it was, but then I realized that it would be a loss of a consumer and associated future profit, on the other hand in this case missed future profit can be charged from your possessions.
I use dwm because it's lightweight and performs well on my old laptop; plus I like the minimalistic approach and I've been able to configure it to run as I want (I like to full-screen my apps and use large font).
Do you happen to know if there is a linux version?
Or rather, destroyed by the touch of Yahoo...
No, strictly.

EG, the ECB recently "loaned" EU member states quite a lot of euros. They do this every year, with the amount determined by public deficits. The amount is not determined by the amount of savings in ECB savings accounts. They can loan as much as they need, subject to EU law.

Public surpluses (deposits by EU member states into their national ECB savings account) are not common. The public doesn't make up the difference. There's no auction of ECB bonds before budget season to balance savings and loans.

Banks access funds in a similar way, though the EU chain is more complex that the UK or US'. There are often rules that dictate a balance between savings and access to central bank funds. Basically though, banks can loan as much as their regulators allow them to... for the same reason that states can.
Look in the headers. What do you see? Maybe they rolled their own thing.
> Isn't that a little bit like saying that you shouldn't change your views after reading a book, if you are aware that the book commonly changes views?

No, it's closer to changing your belief from "chocolate is bad for you" to "chocolate is good for you" after having a particularly good-tasting piece of chocolate. Unlike reading a book on the health benefits of chocolate, your change in belief does not logically follow from your experiences, at least not in an obvious way. Since drugs aren't going to alter your priors, it seems as though the change in belief is purely emotionally driven. Which is odd.
Ubisoft Announces Quartz, a Blockchain-Powered NFT Cosmetics System
Today I learned that any statistic created using <95% of the population is invalid
That is true on macos. I'm being prompted for any consequential actions.

In Windows 10 + 11, that prompt does not exist, if you are signed in with the admin account.
Your brain is all chemistry but your experience is still variable. You can choose to live on matter or orient your brain on other directions.

It's said that some of these drugs can make one more social, more emotional, which imo is a better existence than other paradigms.
The code involved isn’t even that long… but mistakes can result in very annoying behavior. Debugging issues with that code is a pain.
You'd want / it would be an "at least once" delivery. If you need to restart delivery due to some issue, the consumer might see a message twice; it's not out of order per se, it's just that the delivery/queue system doesn't know for sure whether it got delivered, and is thus redelivering.

The consumer, of course, must be aware of & ready to handle multiple deliveries. (E.g., you keep a "log position" which represents where you've processed the incoming messages up to.) But if you need ordering+not losing messages, it's the mode you need. (Since "at most once" implies "sometimes losing messages".)
The conspiracy theories are funny, but the bullshit situation of being locked out of things you yourself OWN isn't. I think that's what most of us hate about things like ME or PSP.
Chan Zuckerberg Initiative Annual Letter 2021
That’s… fine? I don’t care if I have to get a jab every 6 months. I don’t care if Pfizer and Moderna make a ton of money off this—they deserve it.
Real time error messages are useful, but I don't see how they could make you win 4x time
Is every six months (and, keep in mind, "every" is one six month increment so far) really that different from every twelve months, the schedule I've received a flu shot on for some number of years?
> The GCC backend for the Rust compiler (through `libgccjit`, although
used for ahead-of-time compilation) was merged into upstream Rust:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc_codegen_gcc
If the backend keeps progressing, we hope to soon be able to start
experimenting with compiling the Rust side of the kernel with GCC!

This means that using it for the core parts may be feasible sooner rather than later, no? Developing those abstractions may not be a priority of course, but it might be allowable at least from a platform support perspective.
You seem to imply customers demand bridled CPUs. Thinking about it, there is one scenario for which their "sw-defined silicon" (hello newspeak) would both make sense and not be too much of a fuckery: instead of their regular process that now consists of shipping unvalidated HW and waiting for complaints about bugs for triggering chicken bits in the next microcode, they could ship processor with only the properly validated parts enabled at first, and make people pay for extra perf or features when the remaining validation is actually completed and if it passes.

I do not really believe this is their intent thought: people are way too much continuing to act like mean 5% better perf on arbitrary benchmarks has any significance (even regardless of power consumption). So Intel will likely continue to ship broken but allegedly fast processors, and will continue to kill the perfs to remove the bugs once they sold enough.

Plus, in a competitive market, it would be an equilibrium hard to achieve if competitors are not making pay for their own deferred enablement.
This is getting into the more nuanced argument of “taking private property” for the public good - or at least allowing access to it for first amendment activities.

One issue with “forcing” first amendment protections on a private party is compelling speech from that party (in this case Twitter). If Twitter is entitled to first amendment “protection” from the government then it can’t be compelled to “speak” on behalf of a user.

Prohibiting shopping centers from blocking first amendment activities recognized that there are only so many “publicly available” squares in “real life” where people can exercise their first amendment rights. This doesn’t exactly hold true on the internet. There are an “infinite” number of public squares.

Another way to look at this is how IP “theft” is thought of. If I steal your CD you can’t listen to the music on it - but if I copy the MP3 then no one has been “deprived” of the original. Similarly “anyone” can stand in the “public square” of the internet without depriving someone else of that same space and access - an argument that doesn’t work in real life.

If there are infinite public squares do you need to be given access to all of them? Do you want to be compelled to speak for someone else simply because you’ve become large enough?

As a US citizen I’d prefer that these issues with corporations be addressed via other means that deal with monopoly power, open standards, data privacy/portability and similar. The first amendment is a powerful sword but it’s not a solution to a “bad actor” at the scale of Twitter - break up the company if you don’t like what they’re doing but don’t force them to speak for other people.
While I wouldn't be terribly surprised if this user was botting their own account (I remember them tweeting the same photo on their Nancy account twice, attributed to different dates for example) this seems like an abusable ban condition. Couldn't I bot someone else's account in order to get them banned?
Definitely, was just describing the base level reality that you can in theory just use syscalls and skip libc. In practice, that doesn't mean there are "enough" useful kernel interfaces or graphics libraries implemented right now that also skip libc. Much like how there might not be enough no_std compatible crates available in rust. For systems programming, I find nolibc and kernel32 adequate.
So you agree that there is a different nuance when using “newspeak”.
I don't understand this sentiment at all. I have no idea what any of what you're posting has to do with "well intentions" or "money mak[ing] people do anything".

Are you just mad that dislikes were removed from YouTube? I don't see what that has to do with any of those statements.
Critically Conscious Computing: Methods for Secondary Education
First neutralization test results posted by the Sigal group in Durban and the Ciesek group in Frankfurt agree with the BioNTech/Pfizer data.
One thing I've wondered: how hard would it be to smuggle a nuclear warhead into a foreign city, hide it somewhere and keep it there until you're ready to launch it via automated trebuchet or some other low tech method?
Yes, lots of things. Some services have started to try to detect virtual numbers used for 2FA. I have a way to circumvent that which I don't want to share publicly here.
I feel like the idea could be covered by commodore 64. Even adding basic networking in any way opens up an absolutely massive amount of un-abstracted concepts and processes to keep in one head.

That said I flippin love people re-inventing a computer into something not derived from a VAX timeshare machine from the 70s.
What do you expect to add support to connect the mikrotik to a shadowsock server (socks5)?
John Paul I was pope for just 33 days. The story of his death is still evolving
They shouldn't have "invented" a new language, they should have just embraced Python and started providing Microsoft supported modules for managing their products. That was a big miss.
Just because reviews are gamed on Amazon doesn't mean that there are no real reviews on there. For many purchases, there are no other sites with useful reviews. It's the best bad system we have...
Is there a GNU rust yet?
Seems like a brilliant fit for introducing Rust to Linux kernel.
For your safety.
That reminds me, I need to get my Polio booster
Design by internal committees is largely a bad move since your users will always want decisions reversed, or call any new features 'feature creep' or over-engineering. There is a trend of design where secrecy is allowed because devs code for 'the developer experience' and not the 'user experience'. Striking a balance between those two is worth it IMHO. (If that means feedback from your users then so be it, but don't let the users dictate the whole of the system).
fail2ban works for a lot more than just SSH.
>"being part of a network that was artificially promoting tweets and content."

This is part of the reason why I detest Twitter's leadership. It's the tyranny of selectively enforcing the rules and hiding behind it. If someone tells me the same dozen or so twitter handles that always manage to chime in at the top of just about every trending social topic are authentic, I simply won't believe them. Why aren't these banned?
The profit motive is what created the vaccines. It’s fine.
Could you are more about your tech stack and what was the most challenging part of using nocode tools?
> I'm pretty confident that if a suitable case made it to the supreme court, social media like Twitter would be deemed a de facto public square under the US Constitution.

Any case law to that effect?
I’m no expert, but from the looks of thing it seems like a local privilege escalation vulnerability/exploit, tied to the Linux kernel’s eBPF subsystem.

So depending on your use case it may not be a “stop the line” vulnerability, but I would still like to know if this is patched yet or not in the latest Ubuntu repos.
One workaround...launch a Google cloud shell from a personal google account and try the ssh toy from there. It's free. https://cloud.google.com/shell
Are we just completely forgetting about AWS here?
On smallish servers it can keep the logs human-browsable without filtering. Not necessary, but nice.
I cannot open the status page from aws. Is it just me or everyone?
Flu shots are not required for any healthy individual
Let me give you another analogy.

Let's say Macbook keyboards fail much often than mechanical keyboards. Why is that?

One could say, the reason they are failing because "they were poorly engineered/calculated or badly built" and that might be true.

But another way to state this is the reason they are failing is because we like thin laptops. And making laptops thin pushes the engineering into territory where it is much more difficult to make the keyboard be designed and function reliably.

Just like our love of vertical walls makes it much more difficult to engineer retaining walls that do not topple.

You see, both of these do not necessarily conflict with each other. They are just different points of view on the same problem.

I think that blaming the problem only on engineering is shallow thinking. It is obviously right and at the same time it gives absolutely no understanding of what is happening.

It is the same kind of thinking that, for decades, blamed drivers for all accident. Obviously, it is the driver that caused the accident, but it gives no further useful understanding of the problem.

Once people understood there are other factors at play some countries started introducing solutions that make the traffic much safer without messing with the driver side of equation.
Newspeak was not confusing either. To an outsider the term reads more as an attempt to obfuscate and misdirect away from what is actually happening, ostensibly precisely what newspeak is meant to do.
what's that? I thought it'd be related with inferno OS.
As an historical note, Pascal was very popular in the late 70s and 80s for systems programming. The entire Apple Lisa/Macintosh platform started out in Pascal, for example. The limits of Pascal led Apple to team up with Wirth and develop Object Pascal, which is basically the language Free Pascal implements now.

The gap between Pascal with a couple extensions and C, or between Object Pascal and Objective-C, is very small, anyway. Most semantic elements have a one-to-one correspondence. There were even UNIX clones written in Pascal.
In the context of a file-based vs api-based shell scripting language, I think the point stands though. That's the main problem with the original statement, I think.
That's a confusing conversation that I still don't understand.

1. "Don't put ifdef"

2. "Why?"

3. "Put this other ifdef"???
A lot of people are assuming the worst intentions here but anyone who has worked in an enterprise knows sometimes it's useful to build tools for your use and not to share. The tool might not even be allowed, C# is probably not in the supported platforms and even if it was, getting it into the official repos can be arduous.

If OP really cared about maximizing everyone's productivity of course they would share the tool. But if I'm working at a large enterprise and increasing productivity may only lead to laying people off I have exactly zero motivation to share something like this.
Yeah, there's still value in Amazon reviews despite the noise. If you take the time to just sit there and read through them one by one, you can definitely learn things about the product. Obviously you skip over the trash "ya this product great, exactly what I needed" stuff. If you just read the long, multi-paragraph ones you effectively eliminate the fake stuff, because fake reviews don't get paid more for being longer. Long ones tend to have detailed discussion of actually product function and/or appearance, and THAT'S where you find the the product's potential shortcomings.
"We" are people intelligent to recognize that vaccination against diseases like the flu is a good idea even if we're healthy and unlikely to have significant complications. "We" know that the shot will make it less likely for us to get sick, and that we're more likely to have a mild case if we do get it after being vaccinated. "We" also recognize that getting vaccinated helps reduce the number of people who spread a virus that can be deadly to other members of society, particularly the very young, very old, and those with compromised immune systems.

Getting vaccinated not only helps yourself, it helps those around you.
There's a lot of people who have their money tied up in the crypto space. If it takes off, they get rich without doing anything. If it crashes, they become poor. So they have a huge incentive to push crypto even if it's not actually good for anyone but themselves.
While this should work against unsophisticated users, the "analog hole" cannot be really plugged: the user has to see or hear the protected content. At that moment, the content may be grabbed (in a bit-perfect way, with some luck).

So, this can curb sharing but not really prevent it. Will it be a net positive? Let's see.
What happens? Everyone works 40 hours.
Player of Games is the second book, and the one I recommend people start The Culture series with.

The first book Consider Phlebas isn't bad, but it isn't as well developed as the rest of the series IMO.
I would say for lower level code, when C++ is used, it's a C-like dialect of C++ that is used. This is even true with something like clang and llvm.

Certainly the /more/ low level you go, the less C++-isms you see.

These days, sure you can use a highly restricted form of C++ in systems close to HW, but you might as well be using the industry standard in those environments, which is C, compiled with a C/C++ compiler.
It is a complete re-imagining of what a shell scripting language is. Hardly surprising that it isn't backwards compatible or requires that you have to learn it.

People feel inconvenienced, which I get, but I feel like people don't give it enough credit for just how well-thought-out the design actually is.

Once you grasp it (which is admittedly easier if you know a Java-like language) your productivity skyrockets as commands are largely guessable and results are largely self-documenting. They have man-pages/get-help, but when an object is self-describing you don't need them as often.

The thing that disappoints me is that nobody from the *NIX world has tried to bring the same ideas there. They're good ideas.
OpenSea IPO Hints Prompt Criticism from Crypto Users Expecting a Token
never made big system scripts but I wrote a funky mouse automation with powershell 5 and it was pleasant

it's not ideal but tapping into the whole system with a coherent syntax / object network is cool and you have blocks / classes to clean up your logic

you can even tap directly into .net (for some reason there's a shortcut to load and compile a god damn source code string)

It seems you're comparing it to ruby or python, am I right ? because IIUC powershell was more a MS OBash for Windows (without bash eternal fingercuts)
Neither are COVID shots, what's your point?
It's nicer when they're browsable. Might spot something you wouldn't have known to grep for.
-fno-exceptions is a thing. No grep required.
Why aren't thousands of gigabytes of abusive images removed from the web?
> I thought we were supposed to have each other's back,

There are 3 to 4 million devs in the US alone -- with a sample of that size, you'll get the full spectrum of people. Heck, you'd probably find some that like that the dislikes were removed. From their perspective, by blocking your extension they're actually making the world a better place.

It's shades of grey all the way down.
Sketch revealed beneath Rembrandt’s The Night Watch
> hy should a digital message expire when memories don’t?

In that case, why do you need a digital message if you remember everything? You also don't have any extra recording on personal communication except your (and the counterpart) memory, why it should be any different for digital messages?
See also uxn, uxntal, and varvara, which I feel have similar design goals. I love this movement. I miss personal computing.

https://wiki.xxiivv.com/site/uxn.html

https://wiki.xxiivv.com/site/uxntal.html

https://wiki.xxiivv.com/site/varvara.html
Wow I did not know this. I've been thinking about picking up an Nvidia card to play with vgpu on vsphere - so it sounds like this would be impossible without an additional license fee?! What a bummer.