skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Because somebody (customer) is monitoring the status page and measuring how long it was not green and hold you accountable for your service being down. So it‘s „better“ to update your status page afterwards when your legal team is all on board.
Maybe the comment would have been better off just saying "Wouldn't it be great if at the end of it's life we could bring Hubble back to earth to put it in a museum". Because that's how I read it, it's something I completely support (just like putting ISS into a parking orbit instead of letting it burn up when that decision comes). Hubble is an important part of history and deserves to be preserved; to inspire current and future generations.

Dragging a specific method of accomplishing that into it was kind of unnecessary from GP.
Can anyone familiar with it give a TL;DR on how it compares to Processing?

Both are FOSS environments that are suitable for quick graphics programming in a minimal language.
Julian Assange, who shined a light on US warcrimes, might die in prison.
I would be have been pretty sad to hear that so much enthusiasm to improve the product resulted in problems regarding your career. That's promotion material, in my book. Glad it worked out.
Possibly relevant: Mundi is Latin for world/universe/earth - similar to the Greek kosmos.
This just goes back to what the original person said about "Building walls in physical world is also very stupid hehe"

It's entirely reasonable to create a system designed to allow people to share things once, and indicate to others that they don't want it spread any further. It's reasonable to design software which attempts to honor such requests by introducing friction, making it 95% effective despite knowing that 5% of people will be able/willing to work around it.

Most people are "path of least resistance" and are too lazy to work around something like this, which is exactly the point. Pretty much every person using such a system is aware that the recipient could just take a picture of the phone with a camera.

Perfect is the enemy of the good.
A Minimalist Guide to SQLite (2017)
Agreed, that's why I put "If you are running a server where only you SSH in" but maybe I should have been more clear about it.
Dogfights are pretty rare these days. Most air combat between planes revolves about launching & dodging air to air missiles that are fired from beyond visual range, and dealing with surface to air missiles while doing so. Shooting planes down with an actual gun in an actual dog fight is mostly reserved for countries that don't have modern planes (i.e. anything newer than half a century).

Fighter planes do have a few remaining roles. They are delivery vehicles for cheaper missiles and bombs to take out smaller ground targets or lighting up targets for missiles/bombs that are launched from far away. The longer range missiles (e.g. cruise missiles) are more expensive. An additional role would be reconnaissance even though most of that is probably done by satellites and drones these days. Then there is the job of escorting bigger, more vulnerable planes like bombers or just generally patrolling areas of interest (which could be done by drones as well). And finally there's the psychological warfare factor where flying them over the enemy has a demoralizing effect.

Basically a missile is an autonomous drone that happens to destroy on impact. Missiles have a few advantages over fighters: they are much faster and maneuverable. And they are disposable by their very nature which means they can go where no pilot would go except when very desperate. And a few disadvantages that mainly boil down to cost and range. The cost is high because they are 1 time use only. The range is limited by fuel and size. Which is why using fighter planes as a launch platform is common.

Autonomous planes aren't particularly hard. It's mostly the price performance that needs attention. Cheap, autonomous drones already exist. Making them bigger and beefing up their abilities is just a matter of time. That's all there's to it. At some point their abilities encompass most of what fighter planes currently do.
Exactly. When you share something, that information is out and you have no control over of it. Plus, why would my friend want to share and then un-share something, or why would I want to do that to someone? The answer is that it is not for the regular people, it is to protect creators and such, not some regular Joe. Telegram is targeting a particular audience with this change. That said, I am pretty sure it will not be successful because I have access to a lot of creators' stuff through the Internet, be it music or books. If people want to save or share stuff, they will find a way.
The connection is simple in my eyes:

> With messaging inherently you are trying to share with others. If you’re sharing why stop saving?

When sending packages to the Internet you are inherently trying to share with others. If you're sending, why stop receiving?
Remote working jobs: 5 problems we need to solve in 2022
Finally, night vision goggles that look like something out of the movies
Yes, I tell Facebook especially where they can stick it when they reach out, and why I would never work there and won’t use any of their products. I think they’ve finally stopped!
I guess I’m not surprised that a bunch of folks who have made a career out of advising politicians on income inequality….discovered income inequality in their study.

The two questions in my mind are:

1. Should we trust the government to spend the money more wisely than the folks who earned it? Or said another way, how do you combat the almost inevitable corruption you see with large government spending?
2. What will incentivize people to work at insane rates if the vast majority of their income and wealth is taxed? Would I be willing to put in the long hours and sacrifices usually required to work up to a $1m+ salary if it’s taxed at a 90% rate?
Wonder if the Rust team is aware of the work on the C++ side of the fence on the executors+senders/receivers approach: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2021/p230...

Not saying that is the ultimate answer to building async and/or parallel algorithms, but being aware of what others in the same space are doing is certainly useful.
How Much of the Derivatives Market Is Now Cleared?
Mitto AG – FDPIC opens preliminary investigation
Can drones achieve air superiority?
This sounds like the least arguable edge case possible even if they were interested in chasing it (which they wouldnt be).
One of my biggest customers was bought by their competitor after a big SAP implementation. The consensus amongst management was that the project weakened them so much they became vulnerable to takeover.
I recently came across a fairly modern looking website that blocked my right click and displayed an alert “you’re not allowed to view this sites source code”. I could not help but to laugh out loud
Intel updates mysterious ‘software-defined silicon’ code in the Linux kernel
I can also imagine one company disabling Neuralink DRM and another one publishing full-page ads in NYT how much it hurts small businesses in the USA.
You can use silver, or any other material with an abundance of surface electrons, but gold gives SPR signal at convenient wavelengths
If you want to live in the metaverse, fine, but don't claim that it's the only "meaningful" thing.
Your limited time license to Disneys "The Lion King" has just expired please assume a stable position while the licensing system purges your long term memory of any audio, visual or emotional response associated with it or pay $10 for the limited time chance of upgrading your memories to the latest Lion King remake with a monthly subscription fee of only $5.99^1 .

^1 Actual viewing of the movie not included, use of IP during social events requires a premium license, disparaging comments are subject to filtering and may result in license termination, Disney is not responsible for any long term damage to your brain, ... .
>For example: USA war against Afghanistan.

The US successfully invoked NATO article 5 after 9/11 requiring all NATO members to assist militarily.
I don’t think it’s reasonable at all. The wall example isn’t the analogous situation.

Is it reasonable that someone give you a gift and you cannot sell it or give it to anyone else?
Disney's FastPass: A Complicated History – A Deep Dive into Line Theory
SCP-like name for SCP-like neural network.

"SCP-29123 Player Of Games"
The Theranos Trial Shows Why We Should Be Suspicious of Nuclear Fusion
> There are multitudes of people living in other countries, doing the same jobs as millions of Americans, living much better than their US counterparts.

America/American is a religion for many, and its believers won’t be swayed by factual arguments.

Some outrageous percentage of Gen Z Americans believe they will be crypto—wealthy soon. Just like their parents and grandparents held onto the hope that they’d become millionaires one way or another.

When your foundational principle is a sort of wealth faith, you can overlook the positive societal outcomes in other countries. Because they are not a function of personal wealth, they are inauspicious.
It's not about sharing, it's about proof of provenance.

If I say "Alice told me this", there is no proof that it actually happened; Alice can deny it. If I forward the message or show you a screenshot, then the case that the communication happened is significantly stronger. (Of course screenshots can be doctored, but that's another problem)

That's mostly what this is about - reducing the chances for accidental or willful disclosure to third parties.
They've absolutely lost their roadmap, and I think they've also lost the distinction between solving a problem that Microsoft has versus a problem the users have.

And they've never quite dealt with having their platform be eaten by the web and the Apple Store / Google Play Store. See https://blogs.windows.com/windows-insider/2021/10/20/introdu...

There's also the tension between dotnet core trying to be properly cross-platform vs having it actually support the various Windows toolkits. They've historically been welded into the build system as first-class citizens, rather than optional packages, which causes trouble as soon as you do a cross-platform build. WinUI3 goes halfway to fixing that by being installable as a package, but still relies on "<UseWinUI>true".
> If it did then the server’s password file would effectively be plaintext.

Send seed and hashing parameters to the client, then client does hashing, client sends hash, server compares hashes. It's vulnerable to replay attacks, but it's the same with client sending plaintext password to server (assuming that you're not using SSH or similar).
Word’s modern Equation Editor.
> Who of us ever really cares about every single aspect of another person? Even your spouse or close family member will have parts of them that you don’t care to engage with. In fact they may choose to keep those aspects private from you, meaning you cannot care about them.

I guess I take the inverse conclusion. I think if you don't engage with people holistically, you're ultimately just using them for your own entertainment.

As for the employer-employee thing, I think it's helpful to come at this from the facts - we know that employee abuse, including very extreme forms, is both pernicious (it persists even when illegal) and ubiquitous, in the present, and in history. This suggests that there should be some structural reason.
After Security...on Performance, Brendan Gregg First 60 Seconds:

https://netflixtechblog.com/linux-performance-analysis-in-60...
Many things are shared in confidence.

While I an certain the current state of affairs of having DRM and personal privacy is unstable in the face of even the tech we had 10 years ago, we still have a strong personal need for control over our information and our works.
> So what if the enemy detects one and shoots it down? The four other drones can carry on with the mission.

Why did they stop shooting?
L2 is further from the Sun than the Earth is, so no Hubble wouldn't be pointing at the Sun if it is looking at JWST.
>I can tell you: "I'm conscious and aware", but there's no way I can prove to you I'm not a philosophical zombie(someone that acts like it's conscious, but isn't).

You can't prove that to yourself either, because a zombie has the same thoughts as you. You can't differentiate even subjectively whether you're a zombie or not.
Switching from object-oriented Ruby to procedural Python
Barndominium
It has been there since atleast windows 95.

Screenshot: https://i.imgur.com/vCJF5UW.png
Gotta love that SaaS reliability
And if someone uses the telegram web client or simply hands over the phone?

And it is about sharing - that’s how communication works, no?
Copyrights are not only unnecessary for ensuring that the work you receive matches the original as copyright holders are free to make modifications. Worse, with the current copyright system the copyright holders can prevent the original from being distributed at all.
The drones turkey is using and F35's are in completely different class of usage, they're not comparable.

We don't have the ability to field highly survivable drones into enemy territory remotely just yet, we still need humans for the time being.

The US has a comprehensive drone program and 'lots of drones' to fulfill the kinds of missions the Turkey drones were operating.
Neither the macOS swift app, nor Unigram on Windows does this in my experience.
> accuse Russia both of a) it sells to much gas to Europe too cheap to make it dependent on Russia; b) Russia doesn't sell Europe enough of gas, it should ramp up the sales immediately

a) RF increased its share in EU market for natural gas too much. Everybody worried that RF can decrease supply rapidly to skyrocket price.

b) RF decreased supply of natural gas rapidly to skyrocket price.
I've actually seriously suggested that we make pronouns like that for English.

The conventional system with just "he" and "she" and "it" is clearly inadequate because it doesn't handle the case where you have more than one noun that should have the same pronoun. That's a very easy case to hit.

We are essentially using a 1.58-bit hash function to map nouns to pronouns, which has very poor collision resistance and it is a somewhat subjective hash function when dealing with anything whose gender you aren't sure of.

We could add a bunch more pronouns to support more bits in the hash--that's what many people who consider themselves non-binary gendered are advocating. That can solve the problem of not having enough bits in the hash, but still leaves the problem of the hash function being subjective.

In fact, it makes it more subjective because at least with "he" or "she" the default is to go by appearance unless you know that this is incorrect. With zie, zir, xem, and the rest everyone is a special case.

Position based pronouns fix the hash problem by not using a hash, and fix the subjectivity problem by not being based on any characteristics of the noun to which they refer in a given sentence.

Keep "he" and "she" with their current meaning for backward compatibility, and then add new pronouns that refer to the 1st noun in the sentence, the 2nd noun in the sentence, and so on, and add a similar set that refer to the nouns in the previous sentence (and count as nouns for determining pronouns in the current sentence).
>What do you think about the organizations and people that actually accomplished these things?

Presumably the OP thinks of them what they wrote about them in the comment - that they explore and inspire.

To address your later comments as well, there was no specific promotion of SpaceX in the OPs comment, no implied criticism of any other space tech company or reason to believe the OP thinks anything but good things about them. Just a space enthusiast enthusing about space. But no, you have to turn it into an argument.
The hammer and the documentation associated with proving that they weren't spending excess money on the hammer and providing a chain of responsibility if that hammer breaks. Plus cost-plus contracting encourages companies to find clever ways to spend more money on everything since their profits are a fixed percentage of their costs. Seriously, yes it is actually that screwed up, that money is going into salaries for stupid makework and profits rather than black budgets.
I've not seen anything convincing that slide can approximate convolutional layers like at all without almost doing a full convolution at which point it is not competitive.

Can you link me to paper about recent (2021?) work or improvements with slide?
Your analogy is not relevant at all to the situation.

It's completely reasonable for someone to give you a letter or photo of a personal nature and ask you not to share it (or simply expect you to understand that it's not to be shared). In the physical realm, the honor system comes into effect. In the digital realm, there's nothing wrong with adding an imperfect layer of accountability/protection to greatly reduce the chance that it becomes shared.
I don't think the parent's "our company" is Amazon, because Amazon does indeed make more than $50m, but I can attest to cloud provider multi region replication being extremely expensive for us (also not Amazon), if only due to data transfer costs
All major file/image upload services use signed URLs to prevent this. It's a minor abuse vector and not much of an issue.

Cloudflare started as DDOS protection and should add similar features rather than limit functionality.
That was explicitly mentioned in the article, as was disabling password-based logins entirely.
Whoa, whoa. You’re not supposed to ask these questions. It’s actually quite simple:

1. Wealth inequality is bad. Like, really bad.

2. If we take wealth from those who have it, and give it to those who don’t, then we will reduce this bad thing, which is obviously good.
I've heard the communication argument but I'm not convinced since the F-35 itself is sold as the "connected platform" which is supposed to be constantly communicating with the base and the troops on the ground and have complete situation awareness thanks to that integrated communications.

If F-35 can stay connected, so can the drones.

Drones also have the inherent advantage to do manoeuvres way beyond of what human can do or withstand, they don't carry the human and the devices that are made to keep it alive and in control.

F-35 is also know for not flying that well, it's not really a dog fight machine and the scenarios where the plane is supposed to excel are stealth operation, remote intelligence gathering, launching missiles way before visual contact etc anyway. I don't see why drones can't do any of that.
It is amazing the blatant nonsense people will believe if you dress a pig in a lab coat and call it science. There's been instances of politicians unironically calling to ban the dangerous drug 'dihydrogen monoxide' for example, the general public's understanding of the scientific method is probably far worse than most on HN think it is.

There really needs to be a term for this widespread inability to differentiate between 'the science' as in the correct application of the scientific method to arrive at empirical conclusions about the world around us and 'The Science' as in the socio-political institution of various experts and technocrats. One is a powerful tool in humanity's toolbox for getting shit done, the other is subject to all the fallibility of human social institutions - perhaps even moreso because people will blindly trust it meaning there's fewer checks on it than other social institutions. Usually people going up against 'The Science' are cranks which means there's a tendency for people to believe anyone who goes up against the status quo is a crank.

You see this in commentary about climate change, people blindly trust 'The Science' to fix everything in a glorious deus ex machina without the tiniest scrap of evidence 'The Science' even has the power do to such a thing in one fell swoop. That's not saying we shouldn't pursue efforts like geo-engineering etc but we should at least keep things in the realm of what the current scientific evidence is saying which is we need to heavily cut our emissions no matter what rather than relying entirely on speculative mega-projects.

Ultimately you should never trust anyone who claims to have a monopoly on truth or that $group or $profession has a monopoly on truth.
The Internet and computers just keep getting more and more annoying. Is this really what people want?
The name of the game here is generality. For a really general agent, they are looking to have superhuman performance, not get state of the art on every individual task. Beating stockfish 8 convinces me that it would be superhuman at chess.
> these kinds of restrictions actually start working.

This - it didn't use to be true because most computer users were literate enough to bypass simple restrictions, and if a platform was restricted, others were available.

With the latest changes in Windows, Android, and demographics, now a vast majority of users cannot easily bypass restrictions; the war on general computing has been won. Yes, a small number of highly skilled people can easily dump binary data through hacked devices, but in the grand scheme of economics, that doesn't matter.
Like we could all learn Russian that fast…
How the US census led to the first data processing company 125 years ago
wow. i can totally see this happening. It's not even funny anymore
This reminds me of Tom Scott's "Welcome to Life: the singularity, ruined by lawyers" video [1]

[1] https://youtu.be/IFe9wiDfb0E
> It's completely reasonable for someone to give you a letter or photo of a personal nature and ask you not to share it (or simply expect you to understand that it's not to be shared).

Yeah, and because I am a good friend, I will not share those photos with anyone, especially if they ask me not to. :)
The Sad State of Web Browser Support Currently Within Debian
> When sending packages to the Internet you are inherently trying to share with others. If you're sending, why stop receiving?

Except this isn’t the analogous situation.

TLS is more like three people in a room, one of which cannot be removed, and you want to say something to one person without the other person hearing.

Ultimately the person who the message is intended for can do whatever they want with the message.

If all chat communication was public in a single thread I’d agree with you.
Willfully unvaccinated should pay 100% of Covid hospital bills, lawmaker says
"Internet addiction" doesn't strike me as a particularly unique expression, so I doubt he was the only one to come up with it. As a matter of fact, I'm pretty sure I'd never heard of it before I first thought of myself as "computer-addicted" when I was a child, before I even knew what the Internet was (and then, soon enough, I would see myself as "Internet-addicted" as well).
How we use React Context to customize our apps for our clients
Software engineer Heather Haylett explains how the Vouch UI team apply branded themes to our apps
'may not' is a bit ambiguous/context-dependent in English. For what it's worth, I didn't read it differently to 'are not allowed to'.

(I assume you parsed it as 'it might happen that they don't', which yes it can also mean...)
My Developers Are Too Slow
> Money isn’t supposed to sit in a bank feeling “safe;” it’s supposed to be running around, acting young and risky, learning new things and creating new opportunities.

But how is this different for crypto currencies compared to fiat currencies? From what I understand by far most crypto capital does not move at all?
In Michigan (where I can speak to) they don't really occur together. I guess we have wild blueberries more than we have huckleberries though.
>Can you drill into a supervolcano to relieve pressure?

Yes, but I'm going to need a bigger drill . . .