skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Thanks. Very glad to hear that you and your kid enjoyed NoiseCraft :)

Grouping is in the works. I also think it's going to be a huge win in terms of productivity. I think it would be create to be able to reuse delay modules, synth voices, or kick drums for example.

In terms of combining closely-bound nodes, I'm not sure how that would work. Would you have an example of what that looks like in another piece of software?
That isn't quite correct. The Blender team did and does more than just the usual community building. They are more actively seeking attention from media than other open source which I am aware of.
Right, insightful for some but I don’t think it disagrees or adds to anything I wrote?

I’ll try again: I would like my taxpayer dollars going to smart contract development, auditing, and promulgating industry standards in a collaborate way. Just an additional signer for industry participants to consider or lean on the opinion of. Conditional execution on a distributed ledger with standardized conditions could easily get its own legal carveout to trump the analogous contract law, no different than someone someone agreeing to arbitration, but even as far as the local law invalidating private sector legalise when a parallel smart contracts is involved to limit possible behaviors already.
http://web.archive.org/web/20211206051520/https://www.nytime...
C++ and Posix are both ISO Standards.
Yersinia presumably multiplies adequately at a wide range of temperatures?

Are there papers on its doubling in cold storage Vs pantry storage?
For the amateurs like me, remember this is a personal opinion. If you haven't heard of this guy or familiar with his DB usecase (which I am not), you should be smart enough to know not get on the bandwagon.

People who are religious about stack either have been working with it for ages and testing it to its limits or are just writing SEO blogs. Flow my stupid plan if you want to really want to get preachy about DB. I started with CSV, then SQLite3 then I stopped. I am familiar with the syntax and basic workflow of MySQL and PostGreSQL just so I can get a job. I still use SQLite3 because it works for me period.
This is the Amazon way.
Whats the link?
Nice paid ad for Amazon.

"Shop at Amazon, you will get your Christmas gifts on time, here's why."
> We pay for the wars we don't want, we get the blame, we get to deal with the immigrants, and in the end, we still have to pay for the oil - the oil companies that benefit (always unnamed) don't hand it out for free!

I understand the evil ways of our leaders... However, I cannot face a person whose town has been bombed to oblivion by my purportedly elected officials, and tell him that I'm a "victim of the system" just like him.

As for "protests on the streets", I've certainly participated in most of the anti-war protests that have happened around me. Problem is that my neighbours consistently keep voting for our ever murderous leadership!
If you're going to talk about the performance of a production site, use real-user data.

To do that I'd have to implement features that track users, or at least report back to a server with data I could use to track users, and I don't want to do that. As unfortunate as lab-data-only tests are, I'd rather accept those limitations than gather data I don't have any genuine need for. Heck, I'd rather deliver a slightly slower website than do that.

Some websites probably do have a need for super accurate perf metrics, and the devs who build those sites will have to wrestle with the question of what data get to from users for themselves, but I believe we ought to be normalising limiting what data we gather in the real world for everything else.

Ultimately, when I ask myself whether performance is more important than user privacy, I end up answering no.
That would be very dramatic.
Not sure if that's the right comparison, sure both are DBs, but very different paradigms.
Maybe you could give a link to the post
I've definitely seen this happening more than once, so to me this is a thing for real. The people you you'd want to stay leave, and the people you'd want to leave stick forever.
I have two problems with Firefox - I use "print to pdf" often and Chromium renders that more accurately.
Some sites are better supported on Chromium.
Other than these two, Firefox is very good.
(On the other hand, Firefox mobile is quite slow).
The UI Fund
impact > intent

You are not being attacked by parent.
Parent is merely pointing out the difference so other users are aware of it.
You could just thank them for the clarification and move on.
How easy/legal is it to grow your own in CA? If it's very easy, the underground market will probably be entirely homegrown, and still beneficial to the local economy even without tax income. If it's hard or illegal to grow, wholesale importation from cheaper areas will continue funding criminal logistics operations, and most of the revenue will leave the area.
Yes this was an unprecedented case because it was rejected after being peer reviewed and accepted. If they are going that far to censor inconvenient truth imagine how often good papers are rejected in review or not even written in the first place because the would be author knows what would happen.
It's pretty hard to give helpful advice without clearly understanding the existing situation and what the actual bottlenecks are.

E.g. maybe 15 of the 17 hour running time is because the database is doing sequential scans of some tables as some essential indices haven't being defined. Or maybe the indices are defined but the queries need to be written to take advantage of them. Or maybe the queries are blazing fast because the python scripts are taking it upon themselves to perform outer joins in very slow pure python code rather than just getting the database engine to do it. Or maybe all the queries are happening implicitly through SQLAlchemy ORM and the entire analysis is a fractal mess of lazy n+1 select antipattern OO nonsense, and most of the running time is actually network latency between the machine where the python sits and the machine where the database lives. Maybe 4 of the 17 hours of running time is due to compute heavy hot loops in pure python code that can be sped up 1000x if someone is willing to roll up their sleeves and spend a week rewriting as C / C++ / Cython code that lets the CPU loose to crunch numbers in arrays without allocating or hashing or reference counting or waiting for the GIL. Or maybe the entire thing is relatively well engineered, given the physics of the computations involved, and 17 hours is pretty reasonable!

If no one knows yet what the bottlenecks are, maybe spend a few days profiling stuff and comparing it to theoretical estimates of the throughput or processing speed that the hardware is capable of, assuming the system was making optimal use of the hardware, and try to figure it out. It'd be a bit unfortunate to not understand the bottlenecks and migrate everything to pyspark and end up with something that runs slower than the original version.
So I chose not to believe your implicit accusation that the author is defaming Google.
> rm, cp require -r, mv doesn’t, no auto-directory creation for mv

These are all like that on purpose.

mv doesn't have -r because it's a safety feature for rm and cp, since deleting or copying an entire directory is expensive so you should have to specify it explicitly. Moving a directory is really just renaming it, which isn't expensive when it's on the same filesystem (and it usually is).

The most common case for the destination directory not existing when moving something is a typo in the path. Then you'd end up creating a directory you didn't intend to, possibly on a filesystem you didn't intend to, and moving all the other arguments over there. It could be useful to make it possible to explicitly specify that you want this, similar to mkdir -p, but you could add that to the existing mv without breaking anything.
Yeah, you just do a single click on "+" (which says "Start chat"), and then it says on top "Start a conversation with someone using their name, email address or username (like @foobar:matrix.org).", so you just type in @username:server. Is it difficult? Could it get any easier? There might be other ways as well, such as the one you mentioned.
Still don't see the point but to each their own I guess. Seems like a waste of money.
I voted up although I think it is probably a dupe since I posted the same thing 6 days ago and then there was some discussion about the findings in another article maybe 3-4 days ago where I put the link.
vested stocks shouldn't count towards your salary (since you are taking a risk holding it) - and in fact i would garner to say that pre-vested stock barely counts as your salary!
Fitch’s Paradox of Knowability
on a fresh install of FF, if I click on extensions it shows AdBlock± as the first in a list of suggested add-ons. Also in that list is Ghostery. no sign of UBlock Pay for placement?
> This is not true

The fact that I recieve advertising in FB for things discussed in a 1:1 chat in whats app, minutes after discussing them, means it's not secure. E2E is end to end, not end to FB to end.
> Who is MIT a turnoff for?

For me. I want my software to be as much gplv3 as possible. Not trolling. Also not arguing, it's just the way I roll.
Yeah, it's phrased weird. In the inductive step, what you want to do is prove that "if all sets of horses with size n have the same color, then all sets of horses with size n+1 have the same color." In order to prove that, you start with the assumption that all sets of horses with size n have the same color. They're not actually assuming it's true for all n right away, they're just assuming that they've gotten it for some n.
Omicron's spread across hotel hall highlights transmission worry
This is me, basically every time. Most of the articles don't get opened.
That, or it remains free to use, but offers optional paid features. Seems to work well enough for free-to-play video games; Fortnite is presumably a decent enough money maker for Epic Games, for example.

This is almost Reddit's model (with Reddit Gold, and now the various other comment/post awards added recently), except Reddit also sells ads; it'd be interesting to see if the awards alone are enough to keep the lights on absent a need to appease investors.
> What solution already existed for transferring money across distance without a trusted 3rd party?

This is a solution in search of a problem.

> If we go down this line of arguing we will end up with one or more of

Yes. Yes we do. And for a good reason. And no, not just those, though I see why you would only chose those.

And yes, "ordinary people" do care about these things when it comes to reverting transactions, enforcing contracts, guaranteeing safety of funds etc. etc.

> proving my point that if you don't value decentralization

When you select your own questions that you assign to your opponent, it's so easy to win an argument, doesn't it?

For example, you and sanderjd completely skipped the three bullet points I provided as criticism. And it's no wonder you did. Because all you, and other crypto-peddlers, can talk about is "BIG BAD GOVERNMENT CONTROLS AND CENSORS THE MONEY", and have literally nothing to offer in terms of actual concrete arguments for the "solutions" you peddle.

Blockchains in their current form are 13 years this year. And these are still the only talking points you have.

I will not engage in this thread anymore, so don't bother to reply.
It would make a great addition to the Bootstrapping Wiki [1]!

[1] https://bootstrapping.miraheze.org/ (also a great trove of resources if you are into this kind of things)
> Who is MIT a turnoff for?

For me, for example. I personally prefer my foundations on xGPL (preferably V3 and later), because some company or set of companies just can't fork and run away with it.

I personally consider computing utilities and compilers essential infrastructure and their sustainability while being completely transparent are critical for me.
> It's a 2.3 MB file, which seems like a lot to download when you visit a new page.

It is, But I feel it's still better than what ever framework they're using nowadays to generate doc/wiki for APIs which hijacks Ctrl-F with a useless pop-up which rarely gets me what I need[1]. Please bring back plain HTML document pages.

[1] https://stripe.com/docs/api
33AD?! You can substract zero. No one believes that the event of the gospel happens in 33AD apart from Colin Humphreys and his arguments are completely bogus.
Healthcare companies following a schema? Ha. Maybe the closest thing to there being any consistency is companies making sure they can be listed in Apple's Health app.
50% is worth the diminshed crime, and nobody should consume cannabis daily.
> A lot of the coreutils development effort goes into testing, and new implementations should be able to leverage the existing GNU coreutils test suite, as it just uses whatever utilities are in the $PATH

This makes me really happy.

Separately from this, I've been wondering for a long time if there's a way for standards (and de facto standards) to share test suites for other implementers to re-use. Sort of a npm but only for test suites. Does such a thing exist? I wrote a TOML parser recently and had to re-derive the test suite from the specs.
Could you point to some resources on how the underlying (distributed) runtime is architected/works? Also, is it primarily designed to support 'bringing the code to the data', or can it also support 'bringing the data to the code' a la snowflake?
Innodb can be split into individual per table files and has had this ability for years.
Ah no, it's something more special. Like, everyone panned Juicero, but all the mainstream guys loved the iPad. TechCrunch loved it and they didn't even get a trial device. /r/technology made fun of it ("more like maxipad haha"/"4 iphones glued together haha"). I think the key element is watching techies act in a way that's clearly from some deeper place.

If Airpods were a separate company, they'd have more revenue than any company on half of the Forbes 500. I think your comment has a bit of this. On HN, everyone treats Airpods like some sort of fad toy. In real life, my friends love the device.
Can you describe what kubevirt is? I'd like to understand, but having spent 15 mins on their github, blog and docs site, there's no one-liner or even a summary of features offered.
That we have to worry whether "pull down" is patented shows how far the patent system is from fulfilling its promise.
> you have to reach some threshold before you have to start paying AB+ to whitelist you

Irrelevant. I (and 99% of other users) spend the majority of my time on the internet on websites large enough to meet the threshold.

> technically an independent entity gets to determine what's "acceptable"

Skimming the first page of that "independent" committee's bylaws: they self describe as being "hosted by eeyeo" (the developer of AB+).

> So even if you find the model icky, it's also "improving" the overall quality of ads (i.e. making them less intrusive/obnoxious/annoying)?

I don't care about via what mechanism advertisers improve their ads - that is their job to worry about not mine.

> what do you think is a better way of defining acceptable ad standards

I, the user, choose what is acceptable in my browser, not a for-profit company that benefits from bribes to whitelist ads. Believe it or not I do whitelist some websites with what I consider acceptable ads, but I do not and will never use an ad whitelist.

> generating enough revenue as an organization to build/maintain ad whitelists

Ad whitelists that generate revenue essentially always have a conflict of interest.

Web advertising's abysmal reputation isn't some freak accident. Websites and advertisers should work together to create actually acceptable ads rather than trying to bribe adblockers and hope users don't notice.
Hah.. I am from Turkey (Yogurt is a Turkish world) and I grow up eating yogurt very regularly. I am living in states but my wife regularly makes yogurt at home - no sugar :). Though we keep it in the fridge as it would go bad much quickly otherwise. Also, it tastes better when cold. .. Anyways, I am diagnosed with CD a couple of years ago, so I don't believe it is "western diet".
Have you recently, or are you currently, consuming cannabis?
Wow, if that’s true, it’s the first time I’ve ever heard of it — and it seems like something that ... A lot of people might need to know? Can we lazyweb into some citations and more data on that?
Thanks for the helpful advice
What the Mysql folks never say is that these companies never run the off-the-shelf version, but instead have built engines, tooling and expertise that allow them to prevent developers from being too close to the real Mysql.
But I don’t think it really reduces the amount of fake or tainted drugs, at least not for those who really suffered from the prohibition.

The heavy taxation and the strict regulation of the market creates a massive cost overhead. Even the lowest quality of legally sellable weed is so expensive that it’s out of reach for poor consumers. The undergroud market may even be able to offer the same quality product for a fraction of the price, for obvious reasons of course.

So many people, especially those with less financial stability, will still choose the underground market over legal options. Also, I’d assume that since the legalization, the pressure by law enforcement has dropped quite a bit, at least for consumers. This would make the underground an even more compelling choice.
If people can sell pies, vegetables, dairy and sometimes cider at informal farmers markets, cannabis should be the same.

Moldy cannabis is self-apparent in most cases.

Toxic distilled alcohol isn't. Some claim you can use a flame test to detect poisonous liquor.
> Your proportions seem off.

Do they?

Let's see how you and @jallen_dot_dev engaged with the criticisms I had in the form of a short list:

- "knee-jerk reaction"

- "it's like email vs. fax"

- "you disagree that distributed coordination is valuable"

Nope, my proportions are definitely not off. Even in the context of "litigation funding" any criticism is dismissed because blockchain. Even though it's on crypto-peddlers to prove that their "solutions" improve anything, not on the rest of the world to point out obvious flaws and problems.

But, no. If it's blockchain, it's immediately good, and perfect, and improves things. If you do't agree, it's a knee-jerk reaction of a person embracing fax against the glorious new email. Because anything blockchain is always revolutionary in all "it's just a metaphors".

I will not engage in this thread further.
There's people who engage in Helminth therapy (purposefully getting parasitic infections like a hookworm) for purposes of inflammatory disorders. I don't know much about it but enough people take it seriously
what are you doing in terms of javascript?
So, basically, you are painting the US military as the hapless victim of incompetent and unskilled external forces, bearing absolutely no responsibility for any of it’s failures.

That seems like blind and dichotomic wishful thinking.
Does iPad have something similar to DNS66?
Pirates reduce Global Warming. Fact[1]

[1]: https://www.forbes.com/sites/erikaandersen/2012/03/23/true-f...
Postgres is an odd choice now that blockchain services are now mature
Was excepting arm64 assembly but this looks like videocore ISA.

Why are broadcom and rpi foundation not following ARMs recommended boot system? They could save time and money by using trusted firmware-A.
There is much to love about this!

GNU coreutils is one of the pillars of our civilization. Re-implementing it in several new languages can only benefit everybody, as it will lead to a higher understanding of all the implementations, including the original one.

So far, the tests of this Rust version seem to be used to compare against GNU coreutils, with a goal to attain feature parity. I hope in the near future, the careful memory management of Rust will motivate new tests that will be passed by the Rust version but failed bu the C one (e.g., some memory leak, or an input that triggers a segfault in the C version). Then, you will see a new curve in the graph concerning the number of tests failed by the C version, which at some point will cross the decreasing curve of the Rust version! The coverage of the rust implementation is still a bit sparse for that, but hopefully it will improve.

There is one feature, though, that is unfortunately missing in this Rust re-implementation: the fact that users of coreutils will always be able to examine the source code of the programs that they run. This is guaranteed by the original copyleft license. Βut this Rust version uses a "stealable" license that allows distributors of these programs to strip users of that right. This is really sad.
Last time I tried it, Chromium didn't support video
300/hr annualizes to 600k. And just because he was making 1MM/yr doesn't mean that's market rate. In 2017 Apple stock was in the 30s. Most of his comp was coming from equity. And Leon started instamentor.
I'm writing a book "Rust From the Ground Up" which teaches Rust by rewriting a coreutil per chapter, from the original BSD sources. The first 3 chapters (true/false, yes, and head) are released. wc is next, then cat, cut, rev, and uniq.

https://rftgu.rs/
I mostly agree. But that's only true for the very small subset of GNOME's own applications for which the little set of actions provided by the hamburger menu is enough.

I doubt they ever had the strength to push for a osx-style global menubar (or this hamburger menu thing) for the whole desktop. Too much fragmentation, too many toolkits, too many partners pushing their own user experience.
Nothing wrong with using incredibly un-fancy data structures, like arrays, in a FP way. You just need to make sure that you don't do operations that modify individual elements, but work in large batches. So no for loops inserting elements one by one, but map, filter, flatmap...

Most good FP data structures will be tree like, but with a low branching factor and chunky leafs. Now of course that does not save you from lots of memory consumption if you use a language/platform where even primitives are boxed, like the JVM. But that is a completely separate topic.
I don't think tech workers are making barely livable incomes.
Well, a flame test is suitable (at least against liquor that isn't deliberately trying to kill you), but the naked eye isn't sophisticated enough to analyze the spectrum.
The industry complains plenty about Adobe cloud and the lock in of their products. They strongly need a competitor. Pipelining is a problem because designers rarely are experts for digital formats, but when more people switch, this is a temporary inconvenience.
I wrote about this a while ago [1].

Far too many organizations don't pay attention to operational risks...

[1] https://dsebastien.net/blog/2020-05-13-whats-the-bus-factor-...
> PostgreSQL has gotten built-in logical replication only recently, and it's still very annoying. It doesn't replicate schema change statements, so those have to be applied independently by some external system

I’ve been using PostgreSQL built-in replication since 9.1 (when it was introduced) and this is definitely not my experience....

In fact it wouldn’t be possible to apply out of replication changes because (unlike MySQL) Postgres replication forces immutability (the replica nodes cannot become r/w).

The "issue" could potentially be that it's async? But I use postgresql a _lot_ and I've never experienced this.
Being the best burger flipper gives you zero job security because your boss will believe they can’t afford you if you suddenly realize how much you are worth. They may preemptively let you go, if they’re a good boss that wants to see you grow.

There’s no such thing as job security without a form of a contract.

Also, you should look up the minimum wage in the 60’s and 70’s and adjust it for inflation. They were getting paid $40USD+ per hour in today’s dollars. So, no $10 is not a lot.