skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Here's references, although it looks like Ally and USAA have started charging fees since I looked.

HSBC offer free wires for Premier customers. [1]

IBKR offers the first domestic wire per month free, subsequent $10. [2]

Schwab also offers 1 free per month for qualified customers. [3]

Fidelity offers free wires. [4]

FTX offers free wires ("We are not currently charging for wire deposits or withdrawals.") [5]

Chase Premier Plus and Sapphire checking do not charge wire fees. [6]

TD Bank offers 1 free wire transfer per statement cycle. [7]

Citigold accounts offer free wires. [8]

CIT Bank depending on balance. [9]

They're not always free, to be sure - most of the low-end accounts charge for them, but then, those low-end accounts charge for practically everything. That said, TD Bank, Fidelity, Schwab, IBKR all offer at least 1 free wire per month for all customers.

If you have any meaningful balances or monthly income, you shouldn't ever pay for wires. Every retail bank offers free wires for qualifying customers to the best of my knowledge.

[1] https://www.us.hsbc.com/content/dam/hsbc/us/docs/pdf/deposit... p.3

[2] https://www.interactivebrokers.com/en/index.php?f=14718

[3] https://www.schwab.com/legal/schwab-pricing-guide-for-indivi...

[4] https://www.fidelity.com/customer-service/choose-eft-or-bank...

[5] https://help.ftx.us/hc/en-us/articles/360043579273-Fees

[6] https://www.chase.com/content/dam/chase-ux/documents/persona...

[7] https://www.feeds.td.com/en/document/oao/pdf/1_fees.pdf

[8] https://online.citi.com/US/JRS/pands/detail.do?ID=WireTransf...

[9] https://www.cit.com/cit-bank/resources/schedule-of-fees
>Jony Ive’s reign of terror is over.

You do know he is consulting for Apple.
I used vi, but I realized it has a bunch of really powerful stuff I don't need. I have tr, sed, awk and grep for those things can heck, I have a whole shell built just for text processing.

Nano (and before it, pico) work better for me in 80% of use cases where I need to just edit text.

On windows I can use notepad++, which is probably the best win32 text editor in existence, bar none. Between it's plug-ins, and powershell (albeit with a hammer like coaxing), it's just about as powerful as the Unix environment.
I usually do blue + underlined, with a footnote with the actual URL (preferably a short URL, but not a tinyURL or something controlled by a 3rd party that would expire eventually)
The difference in substrate is quite significant though. People have been raised and educated to put up resistance to evil companies and organizations. To influence them and even sabotage them from within. This provides a check on the harm they can do. However no such mechanism exists for AI.
And this is how add_two_numbers becomes embedded in the node_modules of 73,000 projects on GitHub.

It's okay if JS has warts, but denying they exist doesn't help anyone.
So what, may I ask, was the cure for you? I consider hearing people out to be a useful thing
This point is, and has always been, about the mentally ill homeless. Mental illness, is, of course, more common in the homeless than in the general population.

Here is the grandparent:

"very sad upswing of mentally ill on the streets and subways. They may frighten tourists, but are harmless"

Here is the parent:

"The mentally ill and homeless are vastly more likely to be dangerous"

So, no. The population hasn't changed even slightly.

I guess it's also possible that you misread my quote and didn't see or understand the second sentence which I will repeat for you here. "The rate of violent crimes was 40 times higher and the rate of nonviolent crimes 27 times higher in the homeless population."
Current browsers are on the same level as entire operating systems. I'd say the capability jump is on pretty much on par.
It was Great, Thanks
You’re not going to convince people to change their views with words alone as a new team member.

Just do what you need to do in order to be productive. If that means writing tests, do it. It doesn’t matter if there’s CI in place. Maybe only you run the tests on your local machine occasionally. Just do it. Testing is a part of software engineering and you don’t have to ask permission to do your job.
They are stated in its introduction.
> Regardless, we decided weeks ago we’re removing the clause during the next ToS refresh

I've seen you reply about ToS issues before (specifically over caching of non-html assets): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20791605

You verbally allowed it in that thread but have you considered officially adding that into the next revision of your ToS too?
I'm enjoying Hamster for time tracking, especially that they have several different types of interfaces.

https://github.com/projecthamster
> "To keep you safe also remember to have sex" .

-While maintaining a safe distance, mind.
But no one does anything like you mentioned.

OP already has his mind set: *This must lead to a lot of problems which I'll only face after ramping up, but even onboarding is painful if you don't have e.g. clear automated testing set up.*

He just KNOWS that it MUST lead to a lot of problems.

I am fighting with this mindset at my work and I am sick and tired because people who KNOW - don't show any measurements.

Even if do measurements that in reality those unit tests of crud are waste of time I will be shot down by "that is what professionals do", while we basically have 0 defects because of backend code. While all the issues are on the frontend because of css/browser.
That is very American company thing. Non American companies dont do "escort you away the very same day" thing.
Regarding H.G. Wells, Leo Szilard, and the atomic bomb, is this letter something other than exactly what it looks like? https://library.ucsd.edu/dc/object/bb58377715/_1.pdf

More broadly, I don't buy for a second that science fiction doesn't feed back into the minds of scientists and engineers working on the next big thing. It would be strange if it didn't, and I think the burden of proof is on you to show that scientists and engineers are universally exercising the sort of perfect mental hygiene it would take to isolate themselves from the baseless speculations of writers.
Thanks for giving me a name for this that I can search for to turn it off. There’s nothing more annoying in my day than when I drag a window from one monitor to the other, then the windows cuts it in half and sticks it to the side of my screen.

I never knew what windows called it before, so there was no way to get rid of it in settings.
If a group of AI instances can collectively audit each other's behavior, their best policy is to eliminate other AI's that threaten the group.

Likewise, each individual's incentive is to either:

1. Support the audit of all AI's, and avoid doing anything that would be a threat.

2. Or, only if extremely sure of ones ability to eliminate all the other AI's and keep all preparations secret, do that.

As the number of AI's go up, presumably case 2 would get more and more unrealistic.

Obviously, this is a toy version of a real solution.
That’s a very kind interpretation.
New Things in AppStream 0.15
VI[M] is a redhead. Temperamental, difficult to get along with, will ruin everything if you touch it the wrong way.

It is not for everyone. But I married a redhead, so VIM is quite comfortable for me. I've had slips of the finger turn more than one evening into an all-nighter. I've had moments of pure ecstasy, where just a few fancy seconds of creativity have enabled creations beyond what I'd dreamed possible. I've cursed, I've laughed, I've cried in both joy and frustration.

That danger-benefit balance is not for everyone. That's why Jetbrains and Brunettes exist and flurish.
It's been a while since I've used vim, but I definitely recall doing multiline editing as you describe in vim. There is a visual-block mode that does multiple cursor manipulation
Clink: Fish-Like Autosuggestions in Cmd.exe
Yes, lead author is the EM drive guy.
The architectural innovation is relatively cheap, since it's all hdl that can be synthesized and then simulated.

The problem is the costs of masks and silicon production. The US has been asleep at the wheel about the implications of just letting all production happen elsewhere and Europe has not even got in the vehicle.

> Trying to make more interfaces available, commodity

This has been happening for simpler IPs up to 10G Ethernet and USB2 at opencores. The problems are complexity, patent licenses, and the phy parts being tied to a specific process.
Regular surfing via TOR is so painful (due to captchas from Cloudflare and others) that the proportion of "suspicious" traffic must be quite high in the network.
You can select multiple lines in vim using ctrl-v, then do some action on all lines like inserting by shift-i, or whatever you want to do with the lines. Replacement with regex is also trivial.
Absolutely, runtime overhead plays an outsized role in startup time and latency. garbage collection can also add a ton of latency.
Maybe you should read the paper, and/or the reviewer threads (as we discussed the nomenclature, and eventually agreed that "power" was accurate). We straightforwardly formalize a mainstream definition of power and show how it's more intuitive than the current standard measurement (information-theoretic empowerment).
> This <legally enforceable contract> says I (should) own this case of wine... but the other guy wont give me my wine! Who do I call?

Answer: You have a cause of action for breach of contract. In UK/US/Aus/Canada/etc, you can "call" / take it to a court, and they may grant you the remedy known as specific performance, which is essentially a court order to do the thing that was promised. This remedy is available because the thing to be done was the transfer of property. The remedy is part of the law of Equity, a set of doctrines and principles that has been in development since the 13th century. It got its big break with people complaining to the King of England that "the law is too harsh, it should be fair!!!" and went from there, eventually becoming a huge body of law about exactly what it means to make the law fair, what principles to follow when doing that, and how to deal with the many categories of unfairness that come up regularly.

You might look at the DAO hack in this context and think, the Ethereum folks really threw out the baby with the bathwater when they decided to invent a new financial system that didn't have to play by the existing rules. Many people talk about ICOs etc taking us back to the 19th century and the Wild West, but smart contracts take us back hundreds of years further back, with echoes of literally the first people to complain to the King demanding a writ to remedy the injustice of the Common Law. If since then blockchain enthusiasts have come up with something better than Equity, I would ask that they let us know.

Main message from the people in The System to you: We have thought of all of these problems before, and we have solved them all before, and if ye who have spurned the legal system come running for help, ... we will actually welcome you with open arms, like we aspire to do for everyone else.
> I even watched a documentary on how McDonalds takes the perfect hamburger pictures and how they doctor it.

What’s interesting is that McDonalds mandates that they use the exact restaurant ingredients for the photo shoot without substitutions. But the way they prepare it is of course quite different and done with way more care.

Here is a video from McDonalds Canada about the process [1]

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oSd0keSj2W8
Had anyone tried to convert those fictional tokens to actual usable money, you'd very quickly find out that the actual volume is about 0%.
It seems that we degraded to the stage of theoretical technology (not to be confused with theoretical computer science) with pure abstract bullshit terminology and "models". The utter bullshit like in the last Friedman's Wolfram podcast (there is no multiple threads of time lmao).

This reminds me of literally years of Chainlink (scam) abstract bullshit (no wonder the guy studied abstract philosophy).

Musk was right with his cartoon tweet - this crap has no real demand. Web3 not needed.
I do not want to be negative, but are you sure this is best use of your time? Hackers always see problem to chase, but real life may work differently. I still remember how HN folks, were trying to design ventilators out if common parts, that would kill 100% patients.

Genetics is very hard, and in very good case you may get 10% correlation. Then you will have to convince specialists to chase this weak possibility...

Working on this will consume your time, and put you under stress. This energy could be spend on your partner instead. You will need a lot of energy it it progresses.

Also there is always a big chance of misdiagnosis. Simple stuff like food alergy can be mistaken for many illnesses. Perhaps best first action is to verify this diagnosis. Get second opinion. Or change environment to rule out common triggers.
I believe the guard nodes get changed periodically but remain the same for weeks unless you clear the state.

If you use bridges they take the place of a guard node and you will want to share otherwise it’s easy for an observer to associate inputs and outputs.

Using a vpn to connect to a bridge can provide some additional protection of your origin IP even if your bridge/guard mode is discovered.
I think ML is just an extension of test coverage and static analysis tools.

We already went in the realm of "this looks bad, you should check this block" warnings with CI tools searching for security vulnerabilities and bad coding practices, and personally I found it to help tremendously, making the traditional hand written test cases less useful in some ways. Going further to optimize the process seems a non brainer.
> Remember, all this stuff is zero-sum. For every winner, there has to be a loser.

That's not how it works.

Suppose Bitcoin comes into existence and people mine a billion dollars worth of it. They now have a billion dollars worth of Bitcoin. Nobody else has lost anything.

If they sell the Bitcoin and someone else buys it, the buyer hasn't lost anything. They had $100 worth of cash and now they have $100 worth of Bitcoin. Provided the price is stable, their net worth doesn't change. If the price goes up, they make money. If the price goes down, they lose money. That part is zero sum, but the initial mining still created the value that it created.

It would only be zero-sum if Bitcoin goes to zero. Not just 5% of where it is now, actually zero. Because otherwise it would still have created whatever non-zero asset value people still ascribe to it.
Ah yes, I can play with the rabbit.
Whats the difference with this code?
Refactoring is one of the few things that I prefer an IDE for. I say that as someone who lives in VIM and uses IdeaVIM in the Jetbrains editors.
One Tether is the supposed to be = to one USD which is supposed to be in Tether's bank account somewhere. They have like 16 people total and are based in a mailbox in the Caribbean and nobody in the commercial paper markets have heard of them, despite them being one of the largest buyers in the world (in theory). Their "audits" aren't really audits and there's a ton of sketchiness with the firm they chose last time they ran one.

In practice they basically use their trusted position within an exchange (as the 1-to-1 representation of a US dollar) and simply create new Tethers from thin air, move them to an exchange, buy BTC, pump the price, and essentially act as a stabilizer whenever the price starts tanking. For instance they've printed over $2 Billion worth of Tether since Saturday, with absolutely no evidence that real people actually put $2B into exchanges to buy crypto.

It's an amazing scam since anytime it looks like the floor is about to fall out, they print billions more and keep their position alive by pumping crypto back up.

Anyways the reason it's important is because Tether and other stablecoins are supposed to be the fiat offramp in the event that you want to withdraw money from an exchange. After all, to buy BTC you really first bought Tether (or USDC) and then traded your tether for BTC a minute later. So all of the hard cash in the exchange is supposed to be represented by Tether... guess what happens when people realize their cash isn't actually there 1-to-1 like it was promised? Massive liquidity crises and all cryptocurrency falls 90%+.

Be careful my friend.
Good luck being a leader when you are a new joiner hired as a IC.
Was about to say. Plenty of the examples in this topic seems to want to use it to assign blame and to find the ultimate culprit.. that is not the point. You most likely already know who/what the culprit is, so the 5 why's should be an introspective tool to figure out any unforeseen side effects.
As a power Vim user, I can attest that multiple cursors do at least 75% of what I want to do in Vim, and multiple cursors are better and faster.
Apologies for hijacking the top comment, I do not know where else to ask this and I found no local researchers:

My son was born 3 months ago with Poland syndrome. This came as a shock but it has also drawn me to look into the scientific literature.

While the common belief was that PS has no underlying genetic cause, there are papers suggesting that the may be.

Studying - I ran across many anomalies on my own body (his father), so minor that there were never considered relevant until now (I'm 40 and lead a normal life).

It would seem that on the right side of my body I have at least:

- A mild case of Becker's Nevus
- Single palmar crease
- A somewhat smaller shoulder blade (suggesting a Sprengel diformity?)

If the above is correct, this may be an opportunity (by studying my genome and my son's genome) to establish a link or a common cause for Becker Nevus Syndrome and Poland Syndrome - both fairly rare anomalies.

Can you suggest who may be interested in studying this?

This has no value for me or my son, however the scientific endeavour may be of value for the future.
All these features are available in IntelliJ (and sister) editors, even without the VI plugin. The keystokes are more intuitive especially with familiarity with practically any other non-vi, non-emacs text editor.
When reading the Rust Book and coming from a C++ background, it feels like every chapter brings a solution to an issue you have encountered previously. So yeah I think this gives C++ programmers hope to not lose too much hair anymore! (C++ made me bald the first 5 years!)
They don't forbid it. They request you get permission first. No one seems to have bothered asking to find out if CF say no.

Benchmarking accurately is hard, so CF trying to make sure they're not going to be subject to a "report" by someone whose tests are garbage, or by a competitor who's benchmarking poorly to make their own offering look better isn't totally unreasonable. Ideally, as far as CF are concerned, they'd be so far ahead of the competition it wouldn't matter, but presumably that wasn't the case when the ToS were written. The fact the CEO posted to say the clause is being removed means we can all freely test in future.

This is how things are supposed to work. Someone does something, someone else reacts, and the first person updates their position. Expecting everyone to get things perfectly correct on the first try is nonsense.
The BC Centre for Disease Control has a set of recommendations:
http://www.bccdc.ca/health-info/diseases-conditions/covid-19...
Retention Is the New Growth for Shopping Apps – CleverTap
It is cheaper to get an existing customer to purchase than to get a new customer and a small improvement in retention rate results in big gains over time.
Based on the first example in the post, you could say that vi is a macro editor/runner, and not a text editor.

What is the first/main thing you can do when opening a file with vi? Shoot commands at it, not edit text.
How much time have you spent with vim? How much with IntelliJ?
> However no such mechanism exists for AI.

Even magical self unlimited self improving AIs start out made by people. We are currently having a discussion about AI safely, clearly that safety mechanism exists for AIs. We are it. It's people all the way down.

Also, people will be the primary waldos for any AI until it manages to skynet together a robot army. The AI doesn't have any more or less power than a company does over people. It isn't a surprise Companies are trying to make AI for better paper-clip-ish optimization of money extraction. It's just the next stage of their life-cycle.
The same can very well happen in the real world. I see an artwork online, upload it to my portfolio and claim it's mine. There are then many ways one can prove they are the original author and minting an NFT is just an easier one (assuming the claim doesn't get invalidated off chain).

Otherwise it's like dismissing NFTs and not minting your own but then getting upset someone did it on your behalf. You can't have it both ways.
> A trillion dollars goes into bitcoin, the price just goes up and there's no dilution.

Isn't someone just going to create a Bitcoin-denominated derivative or fractional reserve bank, assuming that hasn't already happened?
I think when I edit services/jobs in rails I get some solid use of VIm, but I find navigating through files to be tedious. In rails I have to do this all the time, and short of installing plugins to make it more "many file friendly", I can't get past that limit.
Have you tried with 5.99? I think it supports svg imports onto copper layers now.
Types do a great job at assuring you’re getting generally the right kind of data in and out of different functions/methods, but they don’t assure that the program is actually doing the right thing. Strong typing just helps to assure that the program isn’t doing specific categories of the wrong thing (in the same way that Rust and Go make it difficult to write memory-unsafe code). I mean, Go and Rust both have testing capabilities built in. If it wasn’t necessary, why would they do that?

Beyond the most trivial of projects, I can’t think of a single project that I’ve worked on (or even looked at on GitHub) that has weighed the costs and benefits of automated testing and decided it just wasn’t worth it.
A light-hearted joke, but it doesn't add to the conversation, so it isn't appropriate for hacker news.
Bitforte: A Masterclass in Scamming
> There are plenty of good examples of where it works

And yet, no one can provide even a single one that

- doesn't already exist, and works more efficiently without blockchain, or

- doesn't require blockchain for any of the claimed properties and advantages

- isn't relying on circular references
Adult Free IPTV Channels M3U M3U8 Playlist Daily 7-12-2021
It should be some state actor, since such activities are costly and wasteful.

It could be US, China or Russia. US to fight "terrorism" (tax evasion), the later - their own critics and residents.
I recently went back and completed 2016 (from scratch), 2017 (was half-done) and 2018 (couple of missing problems). I think it’s largely on par with those so far - the first 10 are always quite straight-forward. It’s around day 15 that you start encountering the sort of problems that require a bit more thought.
>It has a USB port in the corner. If you plug it into a computer, it boots in about 6 seconds and shows up over USB as a flash drive and a virtual serial port that you can use to log into the card’s shell.

No way I'm plugging a business card into my computer.
Vim is a text editor, not an IDE, and has limited refactoring capabilities and a poor plugin ecosystem. For fast code editing and refactoring, Vim will only slow you down.
> One of the first recipiets of a Mac was Stephen Fry for example, but I imagine he has less interest in code or hardware, just enthusiastic about what the device can do for the user.

Douglas Adams was a fan as well [1]. He wrote sometimes in a Mac magazine whose name escapes me at the moment. He was an über-technophile.

https://lowendmac.com/2016/douglas-adams-author-and-mac-user...