skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Even though what you are saying is techically correct and the reason why things work this way I wish they didn’t. I would argue that since there was intent with the action and there were victims it should be considered a criminal case rather than just breaking the rules. The victims in this case being everyone losing money during a scheme like this.

The likeness of this towards accidently killing someone while breaking the rules for driving falls apart using this reasoning as well since in that case the intent isn’t to kill anyone. In the scenerio comparing this however to bank robbery both cases have the intent to get money.
Matplotlib cheatsheets
https://matplotlib.org/cheatsheets/cheatsheets.pdf
Good point! But there's an abundance of network tools to simulate latency and packet loss. Last i checked, even my Tor Browser has that in the debugging tools (F12) and can also disable caching.
> I joined a few orgs fighting for a systemic change, understanding the decisions process and be a part of it, more collective life in support of all the discriminated people and a more ecological way of life. Left-leaning stuff.

That's fascinating, because when I joined similar groups last year, they all emphasized using Signal for private comms. They were, in fact, the only people I talked to Singal on, because nobody else I knew really used the app back then.

Perhaps there's a stronger privacy culture in some activist groups versus others.
> but all of that is still better than Telegram, which offers no encryption for group chats at all

I think Telegram (group) chats are encrypted, just not end to end.
Your username and hashed email were already public information if you used gravatar. It would be like complaining that hackernews is leaking my username right now.
What keyboard are you using?
Most of that time is spent executing poorly crafted Oracle SQL queries

Start by looking here. As much as we love to bag on Oracle, it is at its core a really fast and capable database. I don't know what you are doing, but doing anything with only 81M records shouldn't take 17 hours. Profile you SQL, rewrite it, if necessary bring in a Oracle SQL expert, and I'm pretty sure you will find some easy wins just here. Perhaps even enough to solve your performance problems. If you're doing relational database type work, it's hard to beat a relational database.
Agile (if the culture incentivises honestly) does have the benefit of feedback. Rather than a black-box which "could" be done in a month, you can instead see that the team on-average under-estimates by 10 days, has x stories left, so it'll likely be done in 2-3 months at this rate.

The downsides are that it opens up the team to feature-creep, introduced a pile of weird buzzwords, and can be massively wasteful if the team doesn't want it and it's forced on them.
Don't have money for that. May be an IP attorney here on HN can help us out?!
Also nice to see that this project is licensed under the GPL - very much in keeping with the spirit of open access to knowledge and information; this way future generations will also be able to benefit from these efforts, and malicious evil companies won't be able to steal this work and deprive their customers of the 4 computing freedoms.
> Ultimately, when I ask myself whether performance is more important than user privacy, I end up answering no.

Thank you for this! We need more people like you building websites. Or less people unlike you, not sure which :)

Like others pointed out, it's fairly easy to test in a "lab" without affecting actual users. I wish more developers did just that to see how their software/website fares on low-resource hardware or lossy connection.
VidGear Is a High-Performance Video Processing Python Library
DocuSign actually let's you download documents to paper sign and reupload. You could do the same on DocuSign.
They don’t. They clearly cover both cases.
Asking me to login multiple times a day will probably help people doing the hijacking

We are talking accounts with 10 year positive reviews, selling trinkets, being treated like a 0 reputation account selling the latest iPhone
Alcohol has long shelf life, can be easily produced at large scale, etc.

Selling flower buds of a plant will hardly be accessible. But the industry will eventually find a way to make a viable cannabis product from waste.
I don't think anyone is accusing either project of breaking license terms. In fact, I find the GP's argument tenuous, since the Kelling says "you're making less free coreutils than their predecessors" and the GP says "that's rich, considering that the original coreutils were more free than their predecessors".
Newly created CCP 50 cent army account doing its job.
Serving Static Files with Django
I think any marketing page would be.
WIP? Dude, chill… you’re not paying for it
Ways on how to buy Bitcoin in Australia in 2022
Maybe that explains your results. Have a behaviour someone dislikes, they don't revisit, and thus don’t answer your survey question
One of the "open source" licenses that it is under is LGPL, you can do whatever you want with your code. (Although this does not mean that you should, please avoid publishing closed source software)
Are you really free without the right to enslave other people?
Agile fails not because of the engineering side of the house but because the business can't "get it", and just ignores it...seen this too many times to count across many different biz domains.
I mean it all depends on dosage right? And if you're smoking more CBD or THC. I had a friend who overconsumed caffeine until his heart rhythm started going bananas and he was hospitalized. But I've known many people who got stuck in the druggo trench, be it because of cannabis or not, a common denominator was they were all smoking weed.
Why not just use Signal instead?
Well, Philip K. Dick was mentally ill commie. Thus not really "dreams" but rather ravings. Also talented narrator at the rare occasions, can't deny that.

The happening is projected on the year of 2042, not 2049.
Not surprised TBH. Brian Krebs has a history of questionable ethical behavior, like doxxing people who leave negative reviews on his book[0].

[0]: https://itwire.com/security/infosec-researchers-slam-ex-wapo...
Would love to know how you categorize and index 200k photos.
I don’t think elections are being won by being honest about your military intentions.
I don't think it's any issue of individual raw productivity. It's about not wasting that work by focussing on building exactly what the customer wants as fast as possible.

With pure waterfall you spend a lot of time writing and reviewing specs, then you spend a lot of time coding, then tests, then deliver. This means a longer lead time to working software and to any sort of feedback, and usually a waste of time in the docs/specs phase. Even trying to write a whole perfect spec before doing any coding prevents you from benefiting from the practical feedback that comes from actually doing.

For some types of software this works mostly fine, but others not so much. Hence why most methodologies since then have feedback loops and try to make then small.

IMHO sprints are not to pressure (though the name may not be well chosen in that respect) but to enforce small-ish iterations rather than spending 6 months developing something in isolation.
Read my comment again, I'm not saying what you think I'm saying.
What's funny about this is that client-side "performance metrics" scripts is really close to the definition of malware (only the data points gathered differ with an actual tracker), doesn't work in all cases (older browsers, NoScript..).

But what's really hilarious about it all is that in my experience this kind of sites doing metrics gathering are the worst offenders in terms of performance. Please, just do what you need to do and don't add more bloat in the name of performance.

If you need to do tests, setup a test VM with 512MB RAM, 1s artificial latency and 20% packet loss. By testing for the "worst" case (which is close to the reality of many people) you ensure the average case is great.
Shareholders literally own the company. Not making them accountable for their companies actions is prob the worse incentive system ever.
> The la la stuff exists, to be sure, but so does my neighbour offering to share veggies from their garden.

In my experience there's quite a bit of overlap between the kind of people who like to smoke weed and the kind of people who like to grow their own vegetables and sell them from their garden. Perhaps less so in cities. I think this is one of those stereotypes that has quite a bit of truth to it.
Telegram is not end to end encrypted, and thus does not preserve privacy at all.

The best way to get your friends to switch messengers is to not be reachable on the bad ones: ie delete your accounts and uninstall the apps.

Retaining your account on bad platforms makes those platforms more attractive to other users and makes the world worse.
>they'll get discount from Intel/AMD.

This would only make sense if Intel and AMD are still the dominant platform for Amazon. But in reality nearly 50% of all new EC2 instances built on are Graviton, and they are only limited by TSMC capacity. ( Or more like Amazon inability to predict the Graviton demand ) in another year or two this could close down to 70-80%. Last time I heard this pace is two years ahead of their internal estimate and schedule. And most of these deals were signed years before, i.e Amazon are still enjoying discounts while producing Graviton. So I dont think discount from Intel and AMD factor much into those decisions. If Intel no longer give discount AWS just purchase more from AMD. Amazon has all the cards in these deals. Not Intel or AMD.
Isn't their own best commercial interest to get their drivers accepted into the mainline Linux kernel? Why they would just release a random distribution??
You can't find the mandate?

https://www.federalreserve.gov/aboutthefed/section2a.htm
A version of this is Scaled Agile (SAFe) which somehow manages to combine the worst of both worlds. If you see your organization preparing to go SAFe, run!
Woo: A fast non-blocking HTTP server on top of libev
I am. None of the media I have was purchased.
Maybe you're right. I thought it is understood why pro-gplv3 people like the licence.

Just to elaborate then, I personally want my software to use gplv3 because I side with the ideological/ethical aspects of free software. I want to support projects/teams/orgs that build this future. An mit licence would allow a company to capitalise on the community's effort withought giving nothing back. Or even worse, make modifications and deliver closed source blobs to users. I personally do not like that. Thus, I wouldn't support/use this library.

To be clear, I am not running 100% gpl software atm, but I see it as a journey going there, slowly transitioning.
Commander Keen in Keen Dreams
You mean your ISP actually new you were pirating GoT ?
Cross-Team Communication: Avoid Dependencies
Turns out I can cross out a todo item off my list, because I wanted to make exactly the same thing.

Now, to find a query tool with a saner language than Jq...
Disclaimer: I work for Ghostery. I respond to protect my own name, not my employer.

Ghostery is not selling user data.

Let me point out a few facts:

All browser-side code is open source https://github.com/ghostery/ghostery-extension and https://github.com/ghostery/ghostery-dnr-extension.

Yes, Ghostery has a subscription based business model and that another reason to great care in protecting users privacy. Take a look on how we use blind tokens to authenticate subscribed users while searching on glowstery.com https://github.com/ghostery/ghostery-search-extension (notice that even when you are a subscribed user there is no session cookie so queries cannot be linked).

Hope this sheds some light on the accusation. If that’s not enough, I do sincerely recommend uBlock Origin or AdGuard on Apple’s platform.
json.parse(input)
> fsf.org links to this gnu.org article to define what they mean by "free software" https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html

We were discussing the term “open source”, not “free software”.

> From this page:

No, the text you cite is not present on that page. It is present on Why Open Source Misses the Point of Free Software; <https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point....>.

> Nonetheless, their definition agrees with our definition in most cases.

In context, they obviously mean “[The OSI’s] definition [of ‘open source’] agrees with [the FSF’s] definition [of “free software’] in most cases”. The FSF does not have an alternative definition of “open source”; they explicitly use
the OSI definition.

> the obvious meaning for the expression “open source software”—and the one most people seem to think it means—is “You can look at the source code.”

Contrary to what you seem to be implying, they are arguing against that definition of the term “open source”. This is evident by their phrasing: “That criterion […] includes many programs that are neither free nor open source.”
Anecdote-tier remark: Try to edit "search engine definitions" which Mozilla pushes to your Firefox deployment when they just discovered who are you to kill intrusive and thin affiliate entries and then allow Firefox to update itself to see it restores their monetization stuff.

PS: I don't get why that tweet about making tea is relevant at all.
Video: Martin Fowler on the Fundamentals of Software Development
Can you elaborate on this? I had no idea that a date of roughly 33AD was controversial, and Wikipedia seems to say that the consensus is that 30AD or 33AD are when the later events of the gospels occurred.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crucifixion_of_Jesus#Chronolog...

When I google Colin Humphreys, he seems to be a physicist who dabbles in bible studies. According to Wikipedia, his argument was that the Last Supper occurred on a Wednesday instead of a Thursday, not that he disagreed with anyone about the year.
Don't suppose you know what that image was rendered in? Guessing not Overviewer since the angle is weird and it doesn't do water shading like that...
It's true GDPR is so broad you don't need to gather consent for such metrics, as it should be covered by contractual obligations (providing a best-effort service) and the legitimate interest of the operator (improving their service), both of which are exemptions to explicit consent.

However, if you want good performance, do actual UX/performance studies without treating your users like lab rats (hell, even poor rats don't deserve that). Just nitpicking, but "first-party tracking" really falls into "phoning home" (just a different "home").
Is MDX going to be the only way to use it? I prefer authoring content with WYSIWYG tools (block editors and so on), so would love to be able to use this kind of thing with those.
Aren't Latin C's mostly K's? As in, Julius Kaesar? I never quite looked into it in depth, with all the gradual evolution, Church latin etc.
I struggle to drink 2 litres. I got frustrated and got an app which will remind me and keep track of how much I am drinking and turns out I am drinking on average 1L. Any techniques you follow ?
Improve your website's Core Web Vitals and reduce its carbon impact?
Fight a war against the country you sent all your manufacturing to, what could go wrong?
Executives needs to get jail time. But then they’ll just lobby for a new facility to be built in Aspen and for skiing to become part of the rehabilitation program.

I have no answers.

-Frustrated consumer protection attorney
FYI, CloudFlare like most (all?) big corps, hates privacy and will block Tor/VPN users as well as NoScript users. Clear win-win solution: don't use CloudFlare unless you absolutely have to.
As far as I am aware ipv6 and webrtc are privacy regressions, so one should enable them only if necessary.
The FSF director, per the post you linked to, made no comments on the merit of the project. Instead, commented on the project choice of license.

As anybody can also see, from the reference you provided, the way the discussion was closed, with not a hint of an effort to reply, already raises a small red light. Had the project replied along the lines of: "Its the one we choose for the project" even without a rationale attached, would turn it less into the interesting event I think it is.
> Ubiquiti does a great job of having good defaults out of the box, a straightforward UI, and remote management.

Which UI? The UDM has two. Mobile devices have another. Some features are only available on one of the UIs, and when the feature is available on both, it often behaves differently. Sounds pretty straightforward to me.

I ended up buying a Protectli box (FW6E) with OPNsense preinstalled. It's been fantastic, and blows Unifi out of the water.
Actually you are right, they apparently did the spoofing with the intent to deceive specific traders so that the traders take action on this false information.

The car analogy would have been accurate if they did what they did without a specific target.
It's a problem we all encounter. Personally, Tor Browser's Safest mode (no javascript) is the only way i find the web usable these past few years. I can have hundreds of tabs open and still browse in a breeze, but if i dare enable JS in a browser, somewhere somehow one tab will manage to tank my whole machine in under a few hours.
They didn't move the foundation.

https://www.newspapers.com/clip/74880470/11000-ton-bell-tele...
Once an exploit allows running arbitrary code in a sandboxed browser process, NT kernel syscalls become relevant even if your computer isn’t otherwise infected. See project zero for a rundown of NT kernel vulnerabilities actually exploited from sandboxed processes (Firefox uses the same sandbox as Chrome on Windows): https://googleprojectzero.blogspot.com/2021/01/in-wild-serie... .
No surprise at all, having user data is FB core business, they need to do this to earn money. Google core business is displaying adds, so don't be surprise that one day you'll wake up with a Chrome browser update in which adblock will no longer work.
If you're talking about transmitting money, it's a regulated activity in the US. [1] If you think that you will be able to bypass regulations by using crypto-currencies and suffer no consequences, I think you're in for a surprise.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Money_transmitter
it is the FSF's role to comment on software licences first, and the technical merrits second (even that is a maybe). FSF is about software ethics and in that case ian's comment is appropriate since all he asks is that at the very least license differences be acknowledged
The extremes were bad, not the essence of the idea. Stay lightweight and you can have the best of everything.

When anything is non-trivial to implement, i.e. it has dependencies, then it benefits from _some_ waterfall planning. Meaning to think before the work begins about the approach being taken, all of those dependencies, and who you need to engage and when... tada, you've made a GANTT chart in your head and are now waterfall because you put some thought into the dependencies and the order of execution.

Within that, each epic / task can be SCRUM or agile or whatever... all you really need here is an idea of a "definition of done", to prioritise the work so that you hyper-focus on just doing what needs to be done to get you to done. You probably want to continuously remind yourself of those priorities... tada, you've created an agile process.

The names are irrelevant, understand the essence of project / program management and do the least you can do execute on that.

It's when the processes become formal, tooled up, etc... this is when the worst creeps in. The status meetings for middle management, the reporting of time to project management tools. But no-one has to do this, lightweight project management can work without any of this stuff.
That isn't unique to pg though: just look at the number of performance questions in dba.stackexchange and on web hosting forums that, once you take out those that turn out to be bad queries and/or non-existent/inappropriate indexes, come down to tuning certain settings in my.ini.

I've not used either for a long time so my knowledge may be out of date, but mysql definitely used to be the easiest to get started out of the box which was part of the reason it won out in the shared hosting space. Of course the main reason it won out in that area was because it was faster than pg in many artificial benchmarks because at the time it didn't bother with silly things like transactions (as MyISAM was the default table type), and foreign key constraints, and other necessities…
I haven't tried any amount but I can now happily have 300ml and eat foods containing milk and lactose in normal quantities. According my genetics I should be mildly lactose intolerant (2 of the 5 genes IIRC) so I am fairly average in that regard but the intolerance with cramps and pain was more recent.

I bought a KEFIRKO and Kombuchaorganic grains and the kefirko came with the instructions on the process but you can also get guidance on /r/kefir. Its just 250ml of milk + grains for 24 hours (initially probably 36 hours until it thickens) and filter it and clean and do it again.
Reminds me of Mes[1] from Boostrappable project.

[1] https://bootstrappable.org/projects/mes.html
> Agile (if the culture incentivises honestly) does have the benefit of feedback.

Doesn't Waterfall incorporate feedback? In my memory and experience, it does.

My memory of learning Waterfall back in the early 90s is a bit hazy, but I distinctly remember that one of the advantages touted was that mistakes earlier in the process of developing software are cheaper to fix than mistakes later in the process (no matter what the process is).

Finding an error when drawing up the requirements is orders of magnitudes cheaper to fix than finding an error after piloting at the client.

As I remember it, Waterfall was taught (to me) as a way to avoid developing the wrong product, or a product that does not meet the requirements of the end-user (sound familiar?)

My SDLC textbooks from back then were filled with different ways to elicit requirements, because fixing broken requirements after the product was developed was (and probably still is) bloody expensive.

In the same way, fixing bugs during a test phase is a lot cheaper than after a deployment phase (hence various types of testing were introduced by the textbook).

Fixing bugs during a pilot phase is a lot cheaper than after a full deployment, hence piloting was in the textbook as well.

Agile aims to deliver features one sprint at a time. Waterfall aims to deliver the specified system as a whole or not at all. Which one works better is probably contextual, but I cannot see either one being unconditionally better than the other.
What is the point of fiat money other than greed?

And we are talking about currencies and the utility of said currencies. About the governing structures and operating costs of those currencies. Looking at USD, a well accepted traditional currency with the backing of the territorial violence monopoly we so kindly call sovereign nations, is certainly a reasonable argument as we are essentially comparing green apples to red apples.

So what does the traditional economy system gives us? War, global unrest, dependency on fossil fuel extraction.

Choosing to have a personal war with a system that proposes to do away with the violence monopoly because it requires a nuclear power plant or two of power to operate is an odd position.
Already happening...
The utilization of 44/8: the reason I mapped IPv4 and IPv6