skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yes, I find it quite fun as long as I can turn it on and off with a single keypress. Then you can have it mostly off, and consult it only when you want to.
https://github.com/codevin/script-manager

Similar attempt...
SpaceX is somewhat expected to produce profit at some point, else it would have been registered as a non-profit
SEEKING WORK | Remote | India | Full Stack Web and Mobile Developers, QA

We are a team of 5 devs and 1 QA who are available part time or full time available individually or as a team.

We have extensive experience with Building Web and Mobile Apps, automating tests and have a designer coming onboard soon.

Portfolio of our work done and CVs will be made available on request.

Tech Stack that we are familiar with - Javascript, React.js, Python, Django, GraphQL, Selenium, Scrapy, EndTest.io, AWS, Docker, Kubernetes

Get in touch at varun.rathore@outlook.com.
Unfortunately it's too much work to throw away all code written in unsafe languages. So it's valuable to try and improve tools and techniques that make these languages less unsafe.
I had this one as well, I think around age 7. It was my first "expert" set. Legos were my life until computers!

It was also great when the electric motors and battery box came out. With a bit of gear work, you could actually take that 853 and motorize it... working engine and all.
More about those zero-dot users
Looking at it, I wouldn't want to use it either. It seems to add a lot of overhead. In the first 15 lines of the function it's mostly implementing type checking at runtime using reflection. Every single time this is used it would redo that type checking. In most statically typed functional languages that would just be done once at compile time and the implementation would be the equivalent of the last 7 lines or so.

I imagine with generics it could be greatly simplified, but I don't know Go well enough to venture how it would be done. Though if it weren't faster than that version I'd be shocked.

For clarity, I was looking at reduce.go, all the others seem to do similar tricks with reflection that would also add overhead that generics should eliminate.
In the UK I assume that taking a gun anywhere would be illegal. So let's use a different analogy. If there was a protest in the UK and someone brought pepper spray, would that be interpreted as a sign to use it? If during that hypothetical protest, there were people jump kicking him and swinging skateboards at him, and he used the pepper spray, would he be charged with battery for bringing the pepper spray in the first place?
I pay for Interview Cake.

If you could create a site with both interview prep and quality code tips I'd pay for it.
It's a clear case of censorship.

In censorsing they might have amplified the story, but this amplification only occurred after the matter/case was decided. That is too late.

> If you decentralize you will end up with a media for each particular group, and you will have less engagement as you are only discussing with people you agree with.

This already happens with centralization, as the OP raised. Multiple groups at least offers the choice.
> The inner leads have changed to allow 1LT8 to have 147 pins in a reasonable die size of nnnn by sorrynnnnnons.

can't tell is that was redacted in the typed document or is a very bad OCR error.
Dude relax, no need to be snarky
The article you linked says that it's a myth that most gun violence is committed by drug gangs. OP didn't argue that, he argued that most mass shootings are gang activity related. At no point does it mention mass shootings.
Looks like corporate umbrellas [0] are making a come back.

I get the need to productize endlessly on sea of ideas and perhaps incubate spin-offs but even GE and J&J are running away from its conglomerate ways… I mean umbrella corporation [1] ways.

—-

I think the current trend is coming about because of SAAS - in the olden days, startup feared big companies because they could make your product / company a feature in their product - but we’re seeing the reverse- they’re now seeing that millions of customers are willing to pay $X dollars a month for what amount to a feature as a separate product instead of licensing SAP type product.

[0]https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/corporate-umbrella.asp

[1]https://residentevil.fandom.com/wiki/Umbrella_Corporation
SpaceX definitely wants to make a profit. I don't think building a city on Mars is profit maximization though and this is Elon's explicit reason for not taking SpaceX public.

> According to the company, the short-term demands of shareholders conflict with his long-term ambitions.

https://www.investopedia.com/articles/markets/121515/will-el...
Dial the rhetoric down, we can't really read the "context" in which this line was delivered by the interviewer. Glib? Sure. Incredible display of disrespect? Give me a break.
Sony staffer accused of embezzling $155M while working remotely
I used to recommend them. Not anymore. My complete home setup is all their kit (the GUI means that if I kick it, the family can likely sort - it is import). I opened a case that a replacement switch (new model, old is EOL) did not work with one of their POE devices. I know this stuff backwards and forwards. I did my testing and basically sent the case to support with all the details (I know this stuff at the ASIC level). Wasted my time for a week. Finally I just said screw it and RMA the switch (nothing wrong with it) because support would not move. I received the replacement and surprise, same issue. Only after that I got the "sorry, we will reach out to L2 support." Wasted my time on a good debug that clearly ID the issue and I had to pay for shipping on RMA. I am stuck with them for now, but as soon as I can find a better offering I am going switch.

(My issue is that I understand that most users are clueless, heck I started in support for Win3.1 for an ISP, but the stuff in the debug clearly was a statement that I understood what I was say, and even as a Jr. engineer 30 years ago, I would have read it and said "hum, this dude knows his stuff, maybe I should ask at the next level").
If you read OP, it’s mentioned in detail that the decalogue never applied to hardboiled/noir American stories.
The article didn't say either way. The comments gave info that I didn't particularly have reason to disbelieve. I didn't have any interest in watching the video once I found the info I wanted. The article could have just said "it throws ball bearings" but it didn't, making it useless.
Great link as it mentions Radar Detector Detectors. This is actively enforced in the US state of Virginia.
I think of society as in the best case providing good for the public, not simply as a vehicle for companies to extract money from people.

If a company creates something, that does not happen in a vacuum, it requires the support of a whole society of people to happen.

The value created should ideally be for the whole society to use.

If a company can't even be bothered to sell it, or goes out of business, then that work that the whole of society did, was wasted. The historical record, which belongs to everyone, becomes incomplete.

I don't think that's right and in my opinion they should then forgo their claim to it.

Our historical record should not be at the whim of bean counters.
FAT32 timestamps are also stored as local time instead of UTC, so there's no way to know a real mtime at all, unless you have out-of-band knowledge. Just nonsense all round -

- by modern standards.

The really impressive thing is that our industry has managed to paper over most relics from The Olden Days to the point where this discovery is surprising!
> There was a lot of hand-waving around the fact I was writing about the sRGB spec without having seen it, and a lot of the content in my post on that topic was inferred from information on Wikipedia and in the draft spec for sRGB.

What a ridiculous situation and a great example of why specs should be open.

(Speaking of which: anyone know how to get a free, legal copy of any revision of ISO/IEC 14496-15? I've had luck with some of its close friends, but not that one.)
I suspect many, perhaps even most, are aware of the bias they are exposed to.

I don't expect I'm particularly resistant to it.

I am keen to learn more about what I can do.

An alternative might be to focus on local community matters. I think this is common in practice.
Ask HN: What are your favorite web libraries and frameworks?
George Trepal was certainly one of the better episodes! Amazing that one detective had to go undercover for almost two years before he slipped up. Then they found traces of the rare poison in his home. You’d think he would have trashed it and cleaned like crazy but I bet he thought he would get away with it and may want to do it again.

Great show
Once you have high strength steel tubes freely available in a HD store, the rest is pretty easy. Also, I'm amused by the lack of concern over crossbows and archery in general by busybodies.
Personally when I'm thinking about a hard problem I have to pace around, not lie down.
He was both incredible and incredibly exacting - something the discussion of west side story doesn’t cover is that he also hated some of his work in that show. For “I feel pretty” he regretted that the lyrics were more poised than the character would have delivered, and for “America”, he hated how some of the rhymes landed, e.g. “everything free in America/for a small fee in America” - a great rhyme, but sung at tempo it sounds like “for a smafee in ame-ri-ca”

So you write the lyrics for one of the iconic musicals of the American canon, and spend a lot of time dissecting the flaws in your own work.

Then there’s some of my favorite lyrics from his shows, for example, from Into the woods, where jack’s mother is singing to jack (of beanstalk fame) about selling their cow:

“We’ve no time to sit and dither
While her withers wither with her”

Amazing. Even Sondheim talks about one of his proudest moments being when he played for coke porter late in his life:

“ Porter had recently had both legs amputated, and Ethel Merman, the star of Gypsy—in which Sondheim’s words accompanied music by Jule Styne—had brought the young lyricist along as part of an entourage to cheer him up. Sondheim played the clever trio “Together.” “It may well have been the high point of my lyric-writing life,” he writes, to witness Porter’s “gasp of delight” on hearing a surprise fourth rhyme in a foreign language: “Wherever I go, I know he goes / Wherever I go, I know she goes / No fits, no fights, no feuds, and no egos / Amigos / Together!”

The level of detail and precision is incredible. The music is just as, if not more, precise.
It’s not a very satisfying answer but personally I believe that there is no material thing linking the price of a stock to the amount of money the company makes. The only thing that drives the price of a stock is whether people think that other people will want to buy the stock for more later. This kind of implies that the whole stock market is a bit of a sham. Which I think is also true. I think the stock market essentially operates as a semi-perpetual Ponzi scheme. It does suck to come to the conclusion that one of the most central systems in world finance is not based on any fundamentals, but the good news is that in no way does that mean the system is unstable in the short to medium term. Nearly the whole world, and almost everyone in power anywhere in the world is pretty heavily invested in the stock market Ponzi scheme continuing to “work”. So it probably will for quite a long time.
Which is one of very few places radar detectors are against the law in the US.
If you don't then solve it, you burned $100,000 in good will and a year of your life. Better not to even suggest it, there's little enough going around as is.
>But you have a young person being driven to a counter-protest by a parent

This is where I stopped reading, because you're incorrect about basic facts of the case:

https://news.yahoo.com/kyle-rittenhouses-mother-did-not-1838...
>If you have views that are ignorant and prejudice, and you act on those views in ways that harm other people, you should take responsibility for that

Will DA Chesa Boudin take responsibility for his "progressive" / "anti-incarceration" policies in San Francisco which led to a rise in crime?

Will the "defund the police" crowd take responsibility for the rise in crime they have caused?

Both political parties have ignorant views which are harmful. In a lot of ways, pro-choice policies are harmful and even deadly (and through a different lens, pro-life policies are also harmful and even deadly). The whole thing about politics is that you cannot objectively determine the harm of the beliefs involved.
Funny, it was the "lots of internal linking" bit that felt wrong to me. Not that these low-quality sites don't do that, but I'm surprised to hear that the new algorithm rewards internal links. I'm certainly not a full-time SEO guy, but I happen to have or work with a few sites - some fairly established - that make extensive use of internal links for design/editorial reasons. As far as I can tell they are helpful for (a) user navigation and (b) getting search engines to discover/index the pages but I don't think I've seen any notable advantage in or even impact on ranking based on those internal links (whether in the body copy or in head/foot/side "navigation" areas).

Searching just now I do see some other sources making a similar claim, so maybe I'm just out of the loop. But in my cursory scan I haven't found much detail or real evidence beyond "google says they matter" either. I mean, that's not why those internal links were created in the first place, but it sure would be nice to get a ranking boost out of them too. I wonder what I'm doing wrong :)
Location: India
Remote: Yes
Willing to relocate: Maybe
Technologies:
Front-end
TypeScript / React / React Hooks / NextJs / Redux Toolkit / Tailwind / React Query

Back-end
TypeScript / Node / Express / Sequelize / Knex / Mongoose / Apollo Server / Prisma / GraphQL / REST / Golang / Fiber / Clojure / Ring

Database
PostgreSQL / MongoDB / MySQL / Redis / Elasticsearch

DevOps (Developer Knowledge):
Docker / Kubernetes / Gitlab (CI/CD) / AWS

Analytics
Segment / Amplitude / Mixpanel / Customer.io / Google Analytics

Third-party services
Firebase / Stripe / Twilio / Mailchimp / mailgun / Trackjs / Sentry

Résumé/CV: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Wj-7PinJy4IXj1r2S2za7E8I89aCgxiT/view?usp=sharing
Email: akshay.deep0@gmail.com
Welcome to the Era of Fake Products (2020)
Ameca Humanoid Robot AI Platform
> assuming you have enough expertise in-house to run it.

Most small to mid-sized companies would almost always opt to pay a bit more for a managed offering and not have to bring in expertise in-house for things that are not their core competency.
Then why aren't the majority of the miners or large wallets selling at all-time highs?
I was scared of turning the subscription off, but no, it's fine. My own library is still there. They used to have a terrible matching algorithm for Apple Music, different to iTunes Match, but switched it pretty early on. I've had no issues for a number of years now.
Under AGPL they do not have to admit they use Mastodon.

They do not have to release Mastodon code under AGPL.

The fact users are attacking them using AGPL over an accidental pre-release shows no one actually cares about what AGPL really means or stands for nor cares.

AGPL, one might guess like GPL is now nothing more than a tool to attack people with. Similar to how MPAA and RIAA uses copyright.

It's about time we say fuck GPL. They are not friends to the free information movements, they are the enemy.
Not sure how this could really work compared to what we have already? Most people with jobs and currently at max capacity can't take a sliver of time off every day for a 5% decrease in wage (and how would you use it well?), or an extra 2 weeks of unpaid leave a year even if they had money to replace it. There's a reason it's only news when some OSS dev finally has enough money coming in that they can afford to quit their job altogether or take a 6 month sabbatical to work on their true calling.
You are a mind reader? Cool. How have I made up my mind?
It's been the source of at least two Android vulns that I can recall, since code-path A uses the top manifest for signature verification but code-path B uses the bottom manifest for reading out "the file" and poof!
public health, public education, representative democracy, universities

Sure, there's lotsa flashier tech; I'd start with the boring stuff above first
I see you have missed the 5th Amendment rationale memo.

>That's a law enforcement role in most of the rest of the western world.

Might want to take a step back and realize what they were protesting.
Ask HN: What's so bad about NFTs?
Honestly not sure how I feel about them.
In need of some wisdom / perspective / reminders from the dev community.
It's time for peer to peer hosted content.
It seems like there was a decent amount of context missing here which leads to this ambiguity. Reading the original I can see it a couple of different ways but it seems to me that what is implied is that there was a genre of story in which the villain was always Chinese and that genre was full of shitty books that relied on racist cliches rather than clever plots or good writing. The advice then is to not follow down that path.

To me a modern equivalent would be if Spielberg decided to make a reality show to try to do a good version of it: at the end of the day the genre is just shitty and unsalvageable for more reasons than one.

Also it is hard to figure out if the original source was prejudiced against Chinese people or not from this alone. This is a discussion about good and bad writing, not about race directly.
Sorry, yes. I thought it would be evident since they're the largest privately valued company in North America.
Pex | Multiple positions | REMOTE (United States, Canada, and EMEA), FULL-TIME | https://pex.com/careers/

Pex is on a mission to democratize digital rights for everyone. We are the team behind the Attribution Engine, a licensing infrastructure for the Internet enabling fair compensation and increased access to content. With its advanced identification technology, Attribution Engine ensures compliance and safety for platforms, gives rightsholders total control of their content, increases access and confidence for creators, helps law enforcement prevent toxic content, and provides brand safety for advertisers.

After raising a $57M round [0], we are hiring for numerous positions [1] to help us bring our services to the masses:

- Backend Engineers (Go preferred)
- Engineering Managers
- VP of Engineering
- Director of Data Analytics
- Product Designer
- Communications Manager
- QA Automation Engineers
- Senior Site Reliability Engineers
- Senior Cyber Security Engineer

For all employees, we offer:

- equal salaries within each region
- equity, with a 10-year exercise window
- 401(k) with a considerable match for all US-based employees
- 30 days of paid time off + 9 local holidays + the day off on your birthday
- 99% covered health benefits for US-based employees, 70% for dependents
- generous paid parental leave
- a fully remote work environment, supportive culture, and excellent work-life balance

To learn more, reach out to us at hire@pex.com and read about our hiring process and culture in our blog posts titled:

- Interviewing at Pex? Here's what you can expect during our hiring process [2]
- Pex culture: Focusing on what really matters [3]

—

[0] https://pex.com/blog/pex-announces-57m-in-new-funding/
[1] https://jobs.lever.co/pex
[2] https://pex.com/blog/interviewing-at-pex-heres-what-you-can-expect-hiring-process/
[3] https://pex.com/blog/pex-culture-focusing-on-what-really-matters/
Never found one I've liked, to be honest. Tailwind is okay. I found it useful enough even though atomic css is questionable. I suppose the same can be said for React though.
If you've never worked at a FAANG its totally worth it.

1) FAANG is incredibly incestuous and working at one is a ticket to others.

2) The brand name is worth a lot to others too.

3) Like you said, the okay is good.
Go strip rights and push your authoritarian, fascist bullshit to someone else.

Glad we got that out of the way, you want to harm others and remove their natural rights to defense.
Technically, that says nothing about whiteness having anything to do with unionizing risk vs. not. That one states low ethnic diversity of the employee base correlates with organizing risk. That just means they're targeting locations where there is an obvious thread tying people together, an easy marker of which that a surprising number of people voluntarily give you is self identification of ethnicity. Not that it's white, black, asian, etc...

What the real comment there is, is that there is a tendency for places where you have a pronounced homogenous workforce that culturally identify or share some other commonality with one another are considered unionization risks. Solidarity amongst the ranks breeds contempt of leadership, especially at a distance. It's harder to divide, and they're more likely to forge an outgroup of corporate. This is why you fill in "I'd rather not answer" on those forms, or leave it blank. There is no data point you are asked to give that some data analyst doesn't intend to mine for value in one way or another, and if you think "no one would ever do that!", I would advise you to eschew offers of bridge sales at questionable locations.

Also, it's damn easy to get even diverse groups to organize once everyone understands how the game is played. The thing is, most people don't talk about that sort of thing or haven't seen it with their own eyes/done it enough to understand just how much gets done in an "under the radar", "I never said that", fashion. If ya don't believe me, start asking for things in writing. Ask HR what they think Market Rate is. Whole different side of people comes out.

Workplaces in particular rely on the fact that workers are by and large, just out to make a living, self-interested, and conflict averse. When unions seem to be starting to form, it's easier to paint them as a threatening outgroup, threatening other worker's jobs because "paying more would impact margins/break the bank", or that the union isn't ultimately out to help anyone but the union; or is out to hold the high performers back. This predates on that self-interest motive, and tries to project an in-group association between the employer and the non-union employee. Psychology works, sadly.

Workplaces fear labor organization more than anything else. It's why the Taft-Hartley Act would never have gone anywhere without illegalizing secondary striking (whereby unions would shut down an entire industrial sector to show solidarity for one another). Capital allocators absolutely could not tolerate that kind of threat from the labor force. It's said that's balanced by illegalizing the practice of blacklisting by the Capital class; but you'll find that as capital gets more and more centralized in the hands of fewer and fewer investors, it's much easier to practice that type of collusion without paper trail, or make it so obfuscated as to not be worth looking for. See the Silicon Valley no-poaching agreement.