skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Plebit is a dumpster fire filled with angry woman trying to take down the "white male patriarchy", Every type of Agender alive blaming Republicans and Christians of crimes against humanity, Woke Warriors/Antifa labeling every white male not part of their group racist and a NAZI, and just your general NPC looking for some kind of "belonging/tribe".

The only good thing about Plebit is that it is a honeypot that attracts most of these types and keeps them off of sites like HN. Although I have noticed that there is some bleed over but thank god it's not much. This site and 4Chan are still decent.
The extension is agnostic with respect to the actual width of the chip's registers, and you also won't have to separately account for the "last iteration" where you have not enough elements to fill a register, or at least it will be more convenient. It also has strided load and store as well as scatter and gather.

This is all I remember, there is probably more.
The tweet has a nice summary:

"Wasmer 2.1 released. Features added, bugs smashed, don't wait, try it now!
- Wasmer-JS
- Virtual Filesystem
- iOS Support
- Singlepass in Windows
- Faster Singlepass compilation
- Deterministic builds
- LLVM 13"

After some of the recent news about wasmer discussed here (e.g., https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28772863), I was worried wasmer 2.1 would not appear, so I'm very happy to see this.
I tried powertoys fancy zones (from MS itself) and never looked back. Can’t tell if it will work with 11. My layout is 4 overlapping vertical full-height panes, so I can split the screen in half, or around 2:3 either way. E.g. my browser is usually x=0, w=3/5, and my vim is x=1/2, w=1/2. This way I can see the changes in 1500+-width but slightly overlapped by an editor to feel comfortable with line widths and their left margin.

What stands out in fancy zones is that these areas do not have to tile each other and may overlap. Positioning windows in there is also very UX. I couldn’t find anything close enough in linux world (well, one may always program i3 or awesome, but it’s beyond my scope of interest).

I don’t get why MS doesn’t just build it into windows, since it’s their own, free tool.
This is a real possibility, albeit a sad one.

No amount of FUD will save ARM. Only pivoting into a different business model could.
No one knows the degree of red tape or dysfunctions at Apple until they're actually in the company. The aura of secrecy masks what's going on.
> Which rock do I live under?

Linux, apparently.
If Windows says "restart" that should always mean a full reboot as far as I know.

I usually disable fast startup, and it sounds like she should disable it too.

Whoever set it up so that you have to reboot to shut down should have realized that the way they were implementing this was a bad idea.
Denmark and Iceland sequence every single positive sample. Currently 4k per day for Denmark. So I think there's more surveillance than you think.
I feel like the title of this article comes across as Anti-vax but it is genuinely interesting. Amongst all the FUD a group of scientists say down figured out the problem. I love science. Awesome stuff.
With parking requirements, families who don't have/need/want a car still have to pay the extra price for a built-in feature they don't need. When we bought our first home, it was a condo in SoMa without car parking. We loved it because we didn't want or need a car, and we couldn't have comfortably afforded a place with parking included. Especially in metropolitan environments, minimum parking requirements are the near the core among the reasons many things don't work well (public service, street safety, runaway home prices...)
Messari's Crypto Theses for 2022
In this analogy, Julia is the student? Or are you and Julia is the martial arts?

I'd be curious to hear more specific critiques if you don't mind
No, technical progress is key part of progress. Most innovators are not driven by the constant complaints of other people.
According to a sysadmin I interviewed several years ago, they use standard x86 server hardware from other vendors like Dell. If I recall correctly (there's a good chance I'm misremembering), they ran something like VMware, and ran Linux and OS X in VMs.
Nope. I have actually found that the less monitor space I have the more efficient I am forced to be.

I work in vim and often have multiple tmux panes. Sometimes I can literally be writing code in a pane that’s only a handful of lines tall.
The food is really good here.
That is still a public subsidy as the city is expected to maintain that on street parking.
It's kind of mind-blowing that the universe allows us to do this at all: Convincingly prove that you have a solution to a puzzle without revealing anything about the solution itself.

On the sudoku example, I built out a playable version of zero-knowledge sudoku a few months ago: https://github.com/nalinbhardwaj/snarky-sudoku

It doesn't use the same strategy as the article, but the underlying idea of non-interactive SNARK based proof is the same (just using the more general circom circuit library to compile the constraints into a ZK-SNARK).
Vaccinated individuals have shorter infections and a lower viral load than unvaccinated people, and therefore provide less opportunities to develop new variants. More virus = more chance for new mutations.

The more likely theory is someone immunocompromised who stayed sick for a very long time.
UK is now recommending boosters be applied just 3 months after vaccination. If that's the trend, Vaccine as a Service has a bright future.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/nov/29/covid-booster-...
This is partially tangential, but they have misidentified Wanda as Waldo in the original image. In some of the books, there are multiple Waldo characters to be found on the pages. In this image, Waldo is elsewhere.

Doesn't detract from the main ideas and shouldn't be too hard to fix.
Aha! | Rails / React / Data / Devops | REMOTE | Full-time | https://www.aha.io

Aha! is the #1 tool for product managers to plan strategy and roadmaps. We serve more than 500,000 users worldwide. We are looking for:

* Experienced full-stack, front end, data and platform engineers to work on the Aha! product. Our application is built in Ruby on Rails, with React on the frontend for rich client-side experiences.

Aha! is profitable, you can work from anywhere in North or South America, and we offer excellent benefits. We use our own product to manage our work (which is especially rewarding) and we deploy continuously.

Our entire team has always been 100% remote - in North American timezones so we can collaborate during the work day.

Current Openings: https://www.aha.io/company/careers/current-openings
Interesting, I just got more depressed every time.
Microsoft owns a significant amount of Apple stock.
Sorry, but no. Electron is the absolute worst piece of technology that I have come across in at least the last 20 years. It's not only that it is bloated, ridiculously resource hungry and terribly inconsistent because every program has it's own set of UI controls, but it's also just absolutely plain terrible to work with:

The APIs are a complete mess, half of them are not working properly, things constantly get broken between even minor version revisions, the documentation is usually outdated and incorrect and you need to plaster your code with OS-specific if-else statements all over the place because many of Electron's APIs behave differently on different OSes. The whole thing is just a complete disaster.
The police pepper sprayed him when he got close.

He called his friend who owned the gun. No need to call the police when they were less than a block away. I'd also imagine that 911 was swamped given how so much of the city was being destroyed.
It's just a long time habit of Hackaday. They've been doing it since I started reading in like 2008. Just be glad they decided to move beyond black and white pictures!
A paper, while not specifically addressing vaccination in immunocompromised patients, documents pretty clearly the phenomenon of runaway mutation chains in such patients.

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMsb2104756

Edit: Another piece, specifically addressing immunocompromised + covid + vaccines:

"Studies have shown that immunocompromised people are more vulnerable to being hospitalized or dying from COVID and less likely to develop strong protection from vaccination. But there are also some hopeful signs: additional doses of some COVID vaccines, strategic timing of immunosuppressive treatments and prophylactic COVID treatments may boost protection among some immunocompromised individuals—and restore at least some of the freedoms they have lost."

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-immunocomprom...
No, you're not alone. I tend to get lost in a screen as large as the 27" iMac I used for a few years. I usually ended up keeping my windows small and sticking them somewhere in the middle of the screen. For work (IT admin) I have a Surface Pro with a 10.5" screen docked to a 24" monitor at my desk, but I tend to only use the docked monitor for remote desktop or documentation. I often end up just ignoring the big screen and working right on the Surface's tiny screen.

At home (programming, hobby graphics/illustration)I use a 15" ThinkPad and have never felt the need to add another display. It's nice to have the option for some workflows but the reduction in mobility is a definite trade-off. (It's hard to use a second screen on the couch, etc.)
Quiero ser Billonario para ayudar a otros a ser Billonarios
He pensado últimamente sobre qué sentido tiene tener tanto Cash en el Banco que solo me ofrece un statusquo algo trillado.

Qué pasaría si las empresas destinan el 50% de sus beneficios a desarrollar personas y ayudarlos a encontrar su vocación en la vida donde generen valor a la sociedad?. Qué pasaría si se mantiene por 100 años ese ejercicio?

Puedes imaginarlo siquiera como seria nuestra sociedad?

Bueno creo que nadie podría tener una respuesta a eso pero creo firmemente que seria un mundo increíble, lleno de cosas mágicas y una vida y un mundo mejor a la que cualquier persona puede pensar hoy en día.

He pensado esto desde que encontré incongruencias en los discursos de los multibillonarios y poderos del mundo don creen generar valor a una sociedad al mismo tiempo en que no les importa en absoluto. Solo vean afirmaciones como el que no triunfa es porque no ejecuta o toma acción. En parte es cierto pero eso es demasiado subjetivo ya que a veces mentes brillantes se pierden en el vacío de la indiferencia, solo por que en su entorno nadie es capaz de creer y dar un apoyo inicial para que brille. Todos alguna vez hemos necesitado de un push en cualquier aspecto de la vida, ese push que nos saca del cubo sin salida o simplemente de una zona de confort que no nos permite despertar con el potencial que cada ser humano tienen.

Por esta razón les pido queridos amigos dejen de culpar a personas por no sobre salir al igual que ustedes, traten de entender donde están realmente sus habilidades y sus motivaciones y denle la mano amiga. Solo se necesita de un Push. Solo eso.

Ivan Puerto
ceo@welcomedly.com
> Un-democratic in the sense that it casts out folks that don't live there, but democratic in the sense that the voices of those who own homes are clearly heard.

California’s housing crisis has given me a clear perspective on the debate between centralized and distributed powers, a topic I have long struggled to resolve. It harkens back to debates as old as federalism vs anti-federalism. States rights versus federal rights. Similarly, in this case, it’s about county rights versus the state’s right. Debates on this topic usually resolves around one or the other, leading to rather binary positions. But really, the discussion should be about the appropriate balance between the two. I find we are well informed about the tyranny of centralized power by the state. As a specific example, there is a narrative that the Robert Moses era of the mid-20th century lead to massive civil projects, such as freeways, that put the interests of the state ahead of individual neighborhoods, leading to destroyed and fractured communities. It appears there has been a political whiplash against this era which has lead us to the predicament we find ourselves with today, which is that powers are now heavily distributed. What can and cannot be built is now dictated by the counties and the neighborhoods within it. This is wonderful in the sense that you, as an individual property owner, have much greater control on what goes on in your community. But this also has a systemic effect of acting as a problem that the federalists originally warned about in their own debates, which is the tyranny of the majority. Because powers are so heavily distributed, it has lead to an artificially constructed zero-sum game, as you point out in your post, where everyone who owns a home is content and will do whatever they can to limit supply as doing so feeds their natural own self-interests. In this regard, I think it is clear that we have an improper balance between distributed and centralized power. I believe it weighs too heavily on the distributed side. This results in the trampling of interests of both developers, who wish to produce supply, and individuals themselves who wish to participate in the society, but cannot due to unaffordability. This is a shift in position that I would say is rather unique for me. I tend to advocate for the inverse, a reduction in centralized power. But in this particular case, I think centralization is an appropriate step.

I also want to make one additional disclaimer. By centralization of power, I don’t mean the state should be involved in housing construction itself. This is a position often proposed by progressive advocates. Instead what I mean is that the state should have the power to override local interests so that the market can do its job, which is its interest to increase supply. In other words, the state should do what it can to remove the local bureaucracy that stifles development.
>The difference here is that the existing codebase isn't just broken, it's structurally resistant to being fixed.

The key point here then is that the engineers and maintainers of that original (legacy) system probably did not properly take scalability and structure into consideration. Maybe the system was pre-SDLC, which is an important consideration, but each system is usually a different case, and some tech is often labeled as "legacy" because it's simply not part of a "bright and shiny new money-making solution" marketing plan... ehem.

It's important to not create the same issues in redevelopment, and reducing complexity is a key step in ensuring future compatibility.

Some systems are not as "legacy" as others. This is also a vital point to the discussion.

Most clients aren't concerned with overall cost and lifetime of service on solutions from what I've observed; Most clients are people working towards raises and their retirement and just concerned about not exceeding their max budget and not generating embarrassment for themselves or for their company.

This is why one of the first questions I ask of my customers is how long they intend for the system to be in service for.

There are several factors of why a proper solutions architect is necessary throughout the development process of major and mission-critical systems, but too many PMs decide to just use the tech stack a team agrees upon, or what's cobbled together and patched to work, or what worked as an MVP during early demos.

We suffer from environmental factors, because budgets are under-cut, deadlines are always too short, and because people only care enough to prevent their own headaches. This does not meet a mark for vital systems though. As we ignorantly rush towards more and more software dependent operations, the failures will become more and more amplified in all aspects (cost, loss, recoverability, technical debt... you name it).

Keeping everything as simple as possible is now, and always has been, the better ideal.
There is video evidence.

The two police in the vehicle testified during the trial.
I think for many people, Zipcar or other car shares would cover their mountain needs. But for those who need one all the time, they can buy or rent a parking spot if street parking doesn't work for them.
To be honest I'm more impressed by the Polly TTS widget at the top. The neural version is incredibly good.
> there are hundreds of derelict, abandoned malls, clubs, bars, parking structures, and other edifices of commerce including giant grass and trash lots that just seem to exist. Theyre all owned by property management cabals or millionaires who refuse to do anything with the land

The fact that developing the lot causes the property tax to be reassessed may have something to do with this. If you make someone pay a gigantic fine for putting something on their lot full of trash, they may opt not to.
Some common and widely used electron applications are VSCode, Spotify, and Slack. I think Microsoft teams might also be electron based but I'm not sure. There are many more as well.
I was in the middle of a refi with them and my loan was dropped into the abyss. Can’t reach the loan officer or the processor, this explains why!
That is not the definition or description of "conservativism". That is a strawman.
I've found this to be the optimum as well. The fact that you can have 2 1080p monitors worth of display height stacked on top of each other is invaluable when writing code/reading docs. For the other half of the monitor I can usually split it up between a browser/target app I'm debugging and something else, which usually varies by the actual use-case.
I am exactly the same way. I have a 50" 4k TV in my basement that exists solely as a monitor for my laptop(s). TVs have the advantage of being ridiculously cheap, and there's no law saying that you can't just plug into the HDMI port and use it as a monitor. The refresh-rate is so-so, but since all I don't really play games, it's not a problem.

Having a 50" TV lets me sit pretty far away from the screen and also gives me plenty of room to put a million applications next to each other which (at least for me) helps me avoid being distracted. I also have a lot of issues reading small text [1], so having a big screen allows me to make the text gigantic while not sacrificing a ton of screen real estate.

It's honestly great; if I ever am forced to work in an office again, I'm going to insist that the company purchase me the equipment for a similar setup.

[1] I'm reasonably certain that I'm not dyslexic, but I do find that reading off a screen is substantially easier for me when I use extremely big text. This is part of the reason most my book reading is either on the Kindle or the large-print vision-impaired versions of books.
I envy the Tokyo system, where you're required to show you have your own parking spot in order to be able to purchase a car. No wonder their public transit is world class.
> Sounds like WebComponents.

Interesting. I’ll check it out.

Update: checked it out. Shame that `Getting Started` > `Web Components` = 404.
I 100% sympathize with this feeling too. But the pattern I see over and over again is:

1. Society is getting worse.

2. I'm really good at writing software.

3. Therefore the solution is to write software to fix society.

That chain of logic is simply the streetlight effect [1] writ large:

A policeman sees a drunk man searching for something under a streetlight and asks what the drunk has lost. He says he lost his keys and they both look under the streetlight together. After a few minutes the policeman asks if he is sure he lost them here, and the drunk replies, no, and that he lost them in the park. The policeman asks why he is searching here, and the drunk replies, "this is where the light is".

It doesn't matter how good you are at software if you don't have a software problem. Many problems cannot effectively be transformed into software problems. Instead of continuing to search for our keys where the light is, we should be bringing the light to where we lost our keys. That means accepting that we have to get outside of our comfort zone and improve our non-software skills. (This does not mean immediately thinking "I'll write software to bring the light to where I lost my keys!")

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streetlight_effect
Also "at least we're not in WW3, life is good!" is such a crap argument I can't even.

A guy writes a blog post on important issues to focus on and what this guy comes up with is: "shut up, be happy".
You'll have to excuse the mess :) https://imgur.com/a/5uTm7VB

Also obviously I hid all the proprietary stuff.
For the community I was talking about, absolutely. Many of the residents in that neighborhood are in their last home, not first.
I suppose. Given that it checks the AWS/GCP api on a schedule not sure how effective that would be.

Then again, it's not like the hosting is costing that much. Actually I currently run it on a machine with lost of resources that is used for other things as well...so technically I could keep running it forever. That is to say the cost isn't the main driver for shutting it down. It's more a psychological burden at this point where I'm thinking "ok I tried, it didn't work time to move on".
> What are we doing?

> We:

> • Looked into what caused this issue.

> • Are taking steps to reduce the risk of this happening again.

> • Temporarily shut down the portal account

So, they cheap out on security, cause MY PII to be leaked (enough for identity theft) and all they do is shut my own access out?

No details on "Are taking steps to reduce the risk of this happening again" because I bet all they did was shut off this one hole rather than revamp their security.

For the record, this isn't even the first Anthem BC breach: In 2015, they had a breach so large that it has its own Wikipedia page. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthem_medical_data_breach

In 2020, Anthem had net income of $4.57 billion. If they are fined at/settled for the same level as the 2015 breach (~$150M), then their incentive is to continue playing fast and loose with data rather than invest in sane security.
there’s only one truly dedicated busway here in LA (orange line in the valley). some other buses (like silver line) have sections of busway, but are mostly traveling on shared streets. there’s been a back-and-forth on dedicated bus lanes and some plans for more busways, but there is a lot of misplaced pushback from drivers on this (that it would increase traffic).

i do think that buses are a good lower-cost mass transit option, but without the reliability/security that comes with dedicated infrastructure, it will be hard to get more angelenos to rely on the bus for daily use. currently metro is focused on removing fares, but all that will do is lower their budget (modestly) and worsen service, which will be counterproductive to the goal of increasing ridership.
Yeah, but it was explicitly brought up that macs don't have a good gaming story right now. Also, a lot of the focus was on office apps specifically.
https://www.macstadium.com/datacenters

There's an image there that appears to have the units mounted sideways for perhaps 6 minis in 2 RU?