skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You assume that there are no scenarios where you want two windows up at the same time; e.g. for comparison or quick reference.

I have a custom setup where I can quickly switch between windows and applications using keyboard shortcuts and save e.g. cursor positions.

I still prefer having the relevant material on-screen rather than switching between them. And it's due to the reason previously mentioned: for me it's faster to reference material that is on-screen at the same time rather than switching between them.

Perhaps this has something to do with the type of code bases one works with? I work quite a bit on legacy apps, where one has to reference both documentation, tests and git history (when it's of value), as well as a browser window to actually run the code. That'a already a lot of things to be switching between.
> Intel and AMD

> monopoly

Pick one?
I've read this take a number of time and I really think the VC crowd is mostly missing the point when it comes to why DAOs etc are able to get such good talent.

1. I would wager a good amount of people working on DAOs would never have gotten a job at Google. This isn't poaching the top tier talent from FAANGS but rather unlocking an ignored pool of talent because they lack traditional credentialism. To wit one of our investors is a co-founder of Sushiswap. Knowing them I don't think its possible they would have ever been considered for a FAANG position.

2. People mostly just want to work when and where they want with clear objectives and a chance to earn a good chunk of what their labor produces. I would argue for many that having a decent equity stake in a startup that is worldwide remote solves for this.

I keep hearing about this war for talent over and over and even though we're functionally a nobody seed stage startup I've never felt it because from day 1 we've been worldwide remote and asycnh. People say they can't find developers but the last time we posted a job we got 300+ applications in less than 24 hours and probably 1/3rd were reasonably qualified. DAOs are fine. I think they'll exist to some degree moving forward, but it isn't the end all be all I think some folks make it out to be.
I imagine he was using the sqlite backend rather than something bigger. I've had issues with it when connected to larger groups.
I don't think that judges should be allowed to overrule juries. You can see how many individual opinions there are in this thread - do you think any one of us in isolation should be allowed to make that decision?

The intentional homicide charge was the right thing for the state to do, but I also think it was right he was found not guilty.

Based on the law as it's written, I don't think there's anything that Rittenhouse could actually have been charged with that he could have been found guilty of (except possibly the dismissed curfew violation charge). I just can't reconcile that with the fact that a kid took a gun to a protest and killed two people, which I think almost everyone would agree is not a good outcome for society (although I know there have been discussions about the value of human life around Rosenbaum particularly).
Please don't argue by metaphor.

Unlike the age of sail, modern warfare doesn't use simply bigger weapons. We've got all the megatons of nukes anyone would want.

The USS Hornet was much less powerful than the land-based airfields of Hawai'i. Guess which one was able to bomb Japan first.

Obvious complication with a Moon-based laser system: beam divergence. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beam_divergence . What Moon-based laser system is able to deliver enough power 380,000 km away to a rocket able to take multiple g's and handle the aerodynamic stress of supersonic travel?

Another complication: The power and accuracy loss of the atmosphere makes it hard to target rockets during launch phase. And if you wait until it's out of the atmosphere, how do you track it once its engines are off?

A third complication: Not only is it relatively small and hard to target from 380,000km away, but the round-trip speed-of-light delay is 2.5 seconds. Add some jinking to the rocket's trajectory and it will be quite hard to hit. (How wide do you think the rocket-damaging part of the beam will be?)

A fourth complication: what if the launch is on the other side of the Earth from the Moon?

Given all of these complications, orbital battle satellites are the obvious equivalent to the Hornet, able to be on station in a way that more powerful land-based systems cannot. And these can be supplied from the ground.

Or, if it's truly "not complicated", what are your solutions?

> to build economic exploitation

Which is a euphemism for "use force to extract labor and resources from other people." Look at all that British architecture built on the broken backs of black slaves in the sugar trade. Leopold II certainly managed to 'economically exploit' the Congo Free State. And of course the delightful opium trade with China.

Maybe, just perhaps, it's possible we can do without a repeat of that?
Faster DevTools navigation with shortcuts and settings – DevTools Tips
Anyone else find something distastefully cynical in the description of "gift-giving" as "credit extended on a personal basis with an inter-personal balance maintained over the long term"? I'm not saying its wrong exactly, it just tastes awful.
Hmm you have not yet had your 24th covid booster. Your car will no longer work. Public emergency after all.
I'm not sure how I'm supposed to have more than basic compassion - the same I have for humanity - for folks that aren't showing compassion for others. It is a free vaccine.

I do not extend this judgement to folks that aren't healthy enough. I'm judging folks by choices, just like you are judging me by my choice to speak my mind.
I really wish they put a woman emoji at the end, labelled "Your Mom"
Fair enough. It wasn't meant to come across as flamebaity but I can see how it might. Apologies.
This is interesting, even if it paints your favourite gang of thugs in a bad light.

There are always other posts you can move on to if this one bothers you.
This article ignores the fact that many people outside the "founder-bubble" would happily trade less autonomy/self-determination for the peace of having someone (or an organization) telling you what to do and giving you a predictable path into the future.

Nothing in DAOs is new. Look at 30 year-old open-source projects, or books like "Reinventing organizations" from Laloux. And as such, it's fair to believe that DAOs will work to the extent that all other previous attempts at distributed organizations have.

In short: it works for some people, in some cases.
Azure Container Apps
> raise $20m on their own through a yield farm

What is a yield farm and how is is structured?
Hbuy ttps://sites.google.com/view/trimlifeketo-buy/home
Trim Life Keto It includes radically lessening calorie utilization and supplanting it with fat. It utilization makes the body enter a metabolic action state known as ketosis, in which it shifts from consuming glucose to consuming greasy acids.Trim Life Keto is made altogether out of regular and natural substances that have been therapeutically surveyed and are demonstrated protected to devour.

https://www.jpost.com/promocontent/trim-life-keto-safe-weight-loss-pills-or-scam-686853

https://sites.google.com/view/trimlifeketo-buy/home
https://trimlifeketoorder.blogspot.com/2021/11/Trim-Life-Keto.html
https://www.facebook.com/Trim-Life-Keto-111342714717283
https://www.spreaker.com/show/trim-life-keto-cost
https://trimlifeketo-cost.jimdosite.com/
https://trimlifeketo-cost.yolasite.com/
https://www.homify.in/projects/1100134/trim-life-keto-are-these-fat-burning-pills-legit
https://www.facebook.com/Optimal-Max-Keto-105617281964762
https://optimalmaxketo-cost.jimdosite.com/
https://medium.com/@TrimLifeKetoCost/trim-life-keto-are-these-fat-burning-pills-legit-ed48bc7dc3d2
https://trimlifeketo-cost.tumblr.com/
https://groups.google.com/g/trimlifeketo-cost/c/RSxJ9AeUI-U
https://promosimple.com/giveaways/trim-life-keto-are-these-fat-burning-pills-legit/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=24yD-C2Navg
https://vimeo.com/652767792
Agree again, but the article assumes linear gamma for RGB. Also if I remember correctly, the CIE-RGB is specified to be linear as to be compatible to CIE-XYZ. Since the article omitted the CIE prefix on XYZ, I believe they also meant to refer to the CIE RGB variant. Or at least, that's where that conversation formula came from.
Oh my Emoji feel like Chinese writing system!
>You're right, and remarkably Apple has found a major roadblock to clock speeds while using ARMv8.

What? Where is this claim coming from?
Sounds like this is a term used to make them happy about working additional paid time on a Google-owned product. I mean, if they spent this volunteer time (even if paid) on a public good, I could appreciate that, but choosing to do paid work on your own company's money-making products is not volunteering, it's just regular work but you choose what to work on during 20% of your time.
Most AV receivers feature an option to reduce dynamic range. It may be labelled as nighttime mode, as in trying not to distrub others.
Someone is chasing you in another (older) car? Sorry, citizen, you are driving too erratically. Killswitch. Call the cops if you need help. The nearest one is 10 minutes away.

Your wife is bleeding out and every second counts? Sorry, citizen, you are driving too erratically. Killswitch. Call an ambulance if you need help. The nearest one will take 15 minutes to arrive and another 10 to get to the hospital.

Pissed off a bear? Sorry, citizen, you are driving too erratically. Killswitch. Call the forestry service if you need help. The nearest ranger is an hour away.

Your town is flooding and you need to get out by any means possible? Sorry, citizen, you are driving too erratically. Killswitch. Call FEMA if you need help. They'll be here in a few days.

Caught in a blizzard with the wrong tires and are sliding around as you limp your car home so as not to freeze to death? Sorry, citizen, you are driving too erratically. Killswitch. Call roadside service, but don't hold your breath; there's a killer snowstorm out there!

In critical danger but your phone is dead? Sorry, citizen, you are driving too erratically. Killswitch. You should have planned ahead and charged your phone.

Etc, etc...

Oh the horror flicks are gonna have a field day with this trope.
Our bodies/biology is a perfect example of agency + regulation ;-)
I cannot agree with this more! I'm so frustrated, since I actually managed to get nvidia + wayland (sway) working on my laptop, and an update of some kind broke my external monitors this week (I haven't had time to roll everything back individually to figure out what yet).

It's an incredibly frustrating experience, and I really wonder if nvidia realises the long-term impact they're having by alienating the tech crowd (i.e. the ones that give recommendations to friends, and decide what hardware their companies will buy).
So what you're saying is that companies should never employ people or put capital to work in more than one country or do anything else across borders that requires a legal entity that can be locally regulated, taxed and held accountable.

All failing companies should be liquidated and sold off in bits and pieces, employees fired, contracts and debts voided, pension schemes closed.

Entrenched local incumbents could only ever be disrupted by individuals starting new companies, funded exclusively by other individuals. Presumably, none of these individuals would be allowed to own a controlling stake in another company, otherwise it would effectively be one company.

You would have to convince those wealthy individuals to start companies in small countries in spite of the fact that the growth potential of their company would be far more limited than if they started a company in a big country. The only incentive would be local protectionism.

You would also have to make sure that companies don't enter into contractual relationships that effectively make them act as one (such as McDonald's franchises)

You would effectively hand absolute power to local family clans and oligarchs closely intertwined with local bureaucrats and politicians. It's a recipe for stagnation and corruption.

This is not a glass half full and it's not moderation. It's a glass smashed in an act of vandalism and blind rage. It's the sort of revolution that countries take a century to recover from.

Turning the clocks back a couple of centuries is not progressive either.
Also have to be noted, that the change to make bucketloads of cash from shitcoin peddling is something the traditional corps can't offer. Yeah for sure something like sushiswap requires talent, but it is only couple of years old and is already churning out millions if not billions. With many other business lines the same work/reward rate just isn't there.
"2. People mostly just want to work when and where they want with clear objectives and a chance to earn a good chunk of what their labor produces. I would argue for many that having a decent equity stake in a startup that is worldwide remote solves for this."

So true. And the challenge to this, at least in Europe, has nothing to do with technology - it's a legal challenge. The process of issuing and trading shares of a company is super simple in itself, it's the regulation that makes it hard.

And since securities regulations apply to things like profit-sharing tokens... then, good job, you just solved nothing and made the tech 10x harder.
The more I think about CPU implementations the more I think that what RISC-V is doing isn't as bad as many people think. Everyone is going "more instructions = worse".

But the truth is that if you can build a CPU that fetches an infinite number of instructions per cycle, your biggest bottleneck isn't going to be the number of instructions, it's going to be unpredicted branches, jumps and function calls because fetching the entire function + everything behind it doesn't help, if you're going somewhere else. But the opposite is also true, adding more instructions than you need doesn't hurt as much as many people seem to think.

In practice the code density of RISC-V is not significantly worse than other architectures. So we don't even have to imagine an infinitely large fetcher, a finite fetcher that is bigger than what x86 CPUs have is good enough.
Angular not going anywhere. Just because you don't use it doesn't mean it has no value
‘Enemy combatant’ held at Guantánamo petitions for release because war is over
But we have pi and many others. If all these are slowly killed may be they moved to more expensive chips.

The business model does not fit.
I'd abolish intellectual property as a category. Yeah, there's no chance this will happen short of a communist revolution or something, but you didn't ask specify whether the fix would be practical.

Yes, this would abandon patents and strengthen trade secrets, but with no IP laws trade secrets would eventually either be leaked (because you can't keep secrets indefinitely) or reverse engineered.

Workers already have to sign contracts granting their employers all the rights to their output. Without IP laws they could just walk off and build on their developments if they wanted to.

The renewed interest in trade secrets would also drive some innovation in how businesses can cooperate without spilling their beans because simply licensing their IP would no longer be an option. Without trademark protections a lot of the more blatant trademark infringements would probably just be treated as fraud (e.g. impersonating a well-known brand).

IP laws reward ownership, not innovation. Inventors seldom get to keep their inventions unless they're wealthy enough (read: own enough capital) to begin with. The prolific fan fic communities and countless amateur musicians (both garage bands and online "creators") demonstrate that creative expression does not depend on compensation as they're already barely making any money off their labors of love.

You'd of course probably want some public grants but most foundational research is already publicly funded because private companies are too risk averse to fully fund research with no immediate path to monetization. I think systems like Patreon could also become more important, maybe even to the point that they could be supported as public infrastructure the same way banks are (in some countries anyway). You could still justify protecting your likeness via privacy laws, but there will always be fans who want to know the band merchandise they buy actually is licensed by the band they love, not just churned out by some third party (on the other hand, consider etsy and its creators' rampant "derivative works" of major well-known franchises).
I'm confused why anyone would think this is about optics and not about performance.

If something Does Not Work Reliably - when it has no reasonable reason for not doing so - then it Does Not Belong In Production.

As for mature markets - useless and/or broken buildings happen all the time. Sometimes this is because a starchitect is good at making buildings that look incredible but bad at making buildings that don't have problems. (Calatrava, Frank Lloyd Wright, many more.)

Sometimes it's because the project is extractive and the goal is money at the expense of quality - or even usability. (Many housing estates and not a few McMansions.)

Both of these are different to a tech co hiring the equivalent of a minor starchitect to Make A Thing Happen, but getting something non-performant and/or impossible to maintain. The difference is that unless it's a greenfield startup Thing is likely to be easy to define and its performance should be easy to measure objectively with simple metrics like uptime, throughput, and so on.
True, exactly the same thing happened all around my childhood home during and after my time there. I might be prone to take that as a given...

But that's still just a marginal density increase that is unlikely to reach any of the density thresholds where the density starts having benefits from the individual point of view, not only downsides. Benefits like walkable range amenities and necessities becoming economically viable. Without reaching those thresholds, the density increase is only beneficial on society level. On the individual level, you only get the drawbacks and none of the rewards.
This. Good software can be made even when using Electron - just take a look at Visual Studio Code. It pains me during my work as a software developer how many times we have to cut edges, because companies want to minimize their expenses (and developers get in a habit of doing so even when they don’t have to).
Operating systems are there to help you share resources.

You're going to have numerous applications share the same NIC, PCI bus and memory. As far as performance is concerned, running those applications bare metal on a traditional kernel makes a lot more sense than creating virtual resources that each application can pretend to have exclusive ownership of.

The only way to get efficient networking out of a VM is to dedicate the hardware to that VM which defeats the point.
Can anyone elaborate on what these attribution techniques might be? My understanding is that explainability is a bit of a holy grail for DNN research - are reliable techniques starting to emerge?
How did they fail? They were posting to the flyertalk forums, a site where Matrix is still understood to be the Matrix search engine provided by ITA - a company Google purchased years ago.

It's fine if you don't have the same expectation when referring to Matrix here on HN, but you can't expect them to cater to your understanding on every site.
$800 to preorder the smaller 13in one. The other one (25.3in as in the title) is $1800
It seems that you have insider knowledge of the workings of Intel.
I use PulseEffects (for its equalizer), and it has a compressor too, among a myriad of other tools. NB I had to tweak its buffer settings to get the audio delay down to 40ms from the original 140ms.
>People like Rachael (who obviously love this work at their very core) are doomed to end up a jaded curmudgeon unless they 1) start their own company 2) join a tiny company. Big tech is hell. Make your money and GTFO.

Absolutely correct. This reflects perfectly with my professional career. In the early 2000s I worked at a place which started hiring "bozos" in frightening rate. They killed an internal project for CMS (I was the PM) and proceed to hire external agency for content management, because - "Nobody of our clients is willing to do this complicated technical stuff".

After a heated "debate" with the "bozos", management and CEO of the company, I quitted my well payed job.
I created my own company and hired all of my team. For the next 10 years most of my ex company clients came to me by simple word of mouth marketing.
Wasn't it clear already centuries ago that deciding by consensus results in risk averse, mild, uninteresting solutions?
FTC opposes Nvidia's Arm buy, mostly over fears about data center innovation
As far as my personal eye care ritual:

- I use a BenQ anti-glare monitor [0] that automatically adjusts the brightness based on ambient lighting.

- I use f.lux [1] to automatically adjust the color temperature based on the time of day.

- I use Dark Reader [2] to enable dark mode on all websites.

- I work near a window that I can easily, and often, look out of away from the screen.

- I make sure to sit/stand with good posture while working. Slouching with your head forward causes the muscles in your face and neck to tense up which contributes to eye strain.

- I make sure to use f.lux (or adjacent apps) on my mobile devices and reduce the amount of time I use them before bed in order to get a decent amount of restful sleep. Tired eyes have to work extra hard to focus which contributes to eye strain.

One thing I've yet to do, but am going to soon, and highly recommend, is to see an eye doctor for a comprehensive exam. Uncorrected, or under corrected, vision problems can be major contributing factors to eye strain.

[0] https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0749RC47S

[1] https://justgetflux.com/

[2] https://darkreader.org/

Edit: formatting
This author claim that the main challenge for startups is attracting and retaining talents. They hypothesize that building the organization around shared values and like-minded people would solve the attraction and retention problem. They then present DAOs as a way to solve the problem.

I think these ideas are interesting, but I am not sure I agree with the main hypothesis: does providing shared values solve the talent problem? Good values are definitely a part of choosing to work at a certain company, but that is not all. Monetary compensation, culture, career possibilities and experiences are part of it.
Cool idea, but since one one dimension (height?) was considered, you get some weird things like a cactus (12m) being way bigger than a house (7m).
Read the link again....you're not wrong:

> Pulumi doesn’t “use” Terraform under the hood at all, it uses Terraform providers in order to map the cloud provider API surface.

Which is a real devious piece of sophistry.
Microsoft going back to its old ways. Hopefully this time when they get slapped by regulators it ends this type of behaviour once and for all (break them up into Windows and enterprise software; Azure; Office 365; Surface).
This might be fine for welthy Americans, but what about those who aren't? You're allowing hobby authors and musicians to be exploited. Also what about international works? Particularly those from poorer countries? 100USD is going to be unobtainable for people from some African nations or Indian states.

The one benefit of copyright being free and automatic is that it benefits everyone equally.
The $800 model has an "Add to Cart" button for me (in Germany). The 25.3 model shows "Pre-order".
Is it expensive because of the parents or because it's not cheap to create a big sized e-ink display? I mean small e-ink displays for ebook readers or e-ink tablets are quite affordable these days.