skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Receiving a funeral wreath and books on dealing with the death of a spouse seems not laughable to me. Same for being tailed by a van, then an SUV later. Have a look at the website(s) for "Progressive Force Concepts". They don't seem like your average prankster.

Edit: The scary part to me isn't just what Progressive Force Concepts might do within the bounds of whatever their internal guidelines are. Those are bad enough. But, it looks like a paramilitary organization. The pool of people they hire from is loaded with people that are likely to do whatever they want.
Singapore gets a large part of its water supply from Malaysia, although it’s sourced more internally lately.

When relations go South, Malaysia has in a few instance threaten to “cut off water to Singapore”. And when Malaysia violates Singaporean airspace Singapore fire up the jet fighters (they have one of the largest air forces in SE Asia?)

So not hostile in the sense of East and West Germany, but hostile none the less (at least Malaysia and Indonesia).
That's well timed - busy doing essentially the same. Finally got self-hosted gitlab-CI to spit out docker images via kaniko so need to deploy them somewhere.

Tried OpenFaasd but it isn't a good fit so now having a go at K8S instead. Really don't need the clustering part but there is something to be said for picking the mainstream tech.
Is it just me or is scrolling through the article and then being constantly presented with a screen size parallax kind ad extremely irritating?
GitHub stats -- if I remember right, if a project lasts more than ~1 year, the odds are it'll keep lasting, and you can redo the exercise every year or two

'few devs vs despite' matters a bit less when picking: it's the results + future expectation, irrespective of how :)

'how' is interesting . having observed dedicated oss devs owning a proj for years vs contracted devs working through tasks for their latest gig, I have unsurprising theories. Trickier is when going sustainable via revenue (which we do), how to keep that sense of ownership, vs usual employee code: industry increasingly adopts OSS practices like GitHub flow, but that misses much of the OSS maintainer magic.
Thanks for your answers! Maybe you could answer this one as well? The size of the mushroom material is most likely only limited by the size of the vessel that the fungus is grown inside, isn't it? That is, it becomes possible to produce larger pieces than they could be made from animal skins/hides?
Eh, even Facebook is something where the value lost to users will be too great to just have ML model autoban people. They offer email and photo storage. Getting banned from gmail, which is also a free service would be terrible for many reasons.
I'd call spam one of the biggest problems with email.

To solve it, I'd say a protocol extension is needed.

In the ideal case, you could have a certificate authority and everyone's email gets signed. Spam and get your cert revoked globally.

That would be hard to pull off though.
In the case of Veloren it’s rather relevant since it’s a community project and this way they actively recruit new contributors among people (interested in) using rust for gamedev.
>If the crypto community wants to demonstrate that it isn't a giant Ponzi scheme, why not come up with

a product that does anything at all?
So they hire a special agency which jumps from LinkedIn to GitHub to actually verify their needed tech stack.

That's actually a cool business model, because we know that hiring agencies are not able to parse GitHub, and thus are not able to check the needed tech stack.

You could also go the easier route, but big companies prefer the slow, expensive ones.
> Does Traefik autodetect the containers from the Docker socket?

Yes, it can do that. you can put annotations(? tags? I forget what the docker terminology is) on containers that Traefik reads so it knows "expose port xyz on this container as https://example.com".
what is to be owned in case of (a) and (b)?

at the most extreme (a) means that you are opening an issue in the name of the company. the question then is: were you allowed to do that? (many contracts forbid you to speak in the name if the company unless explicitly instructed)

and (b) would mean that you contributed a company resource to the project (namely you contributed yourself, your knowledge, etc), but it is the company who gets to say where you are allowed/supposed to contribute to

those would be the extreme interpretations, and in both cases, once it's done, it can't be taken back.

only code that you write can be taken back, so if you report a bug to me, i may not be able to use your solution to fix it, but your company can't stop me from knowing about the bug and then fixing it myself.

so (a) and (b) may be a contract violation and they may fire you for it, but that's all they can do. only (c) contains actual code that they can revoke if you didn't have the right to contribute it.
An upper bound on one-to-one exposure to infectious human respiratory particles
> That's not virtualization. That's explicitly not virtualizing that device.

So what? You are still running on top of the hypervisor. It’s entirely doable from a unikernel.

> It doesn't make much sense for a unikernel - would you really dedicate a NIC to each app?

Of course it makes sense. The point is if you need the performance of a dedicated NIC you can get them, same things for the other I/O interfaces. Need a dedicated disk array with full performance? You can get it.

> There is no magic extra isolation. You think there is because of what we've built with VM technology. The underlying hardware doesn't provide extra isolation.

I think there is because there is. When you write « what’ve built with VM technology », that’s what that means. It doesn’t matter that you could in theory do the same on the kernel because there is no underlying mechanism at the hardware level. In the actual world, VM are safer.

> But the kernel is there. It's right there outside the unikernel. You just have a smaller attack surface because its paravirt hardware interfaces are better designed than its syscall interfaces.

If you can’t even call the interface because support is not there in the unikernel it’s not part of your attack surface.

But you are once again using a completely flawed argument. It doesn’t matter that syscall interfaces could be as safe as the one provided by the VM because they are not. This is not an argument about potential. You are completely missing the point because you live in a fantasy.
Australia regulator approves Pfizer vaccine for children 5-11
> Decidability by limitation of dynamic program behavior

This claim sounds suspicious. If the authors really solved this, they have a bright future. A turing award for sure.
Zulip ?
Bladderworts suck in animals and eat them alive. But which species?
To be fair, the term "institutional racism" is usually intended to mean what would be more precisely termed "systemic racism". It bothers me a little bit too but at least it's mostly consistent.

What really grinds my gears is when people call it "systematic racism". "Systematic" and "systemic" are not even close to synonyms. No one is out there making sure everyone gets a little bit of racism and no one is missed.
You need to do it because you prove the statements separately. Currently the inductive step statement is false, it says that applies for all sets. It doesn't.

Note that you can use false intermediate steps like that and still reach a correct conclusion. Then the conclusion is correct but the proof is still wrong since the steps you used were wrong.
> In particular, h_1 is brown. But when we removed h_1, we got that all the remaining horses had the same color as h_2. So h_2 must also be brown. Hence, all horses in H are brown.

This is an error. h1 and h2 don’t have to be the same by any previous conclusions. If you have two horses, white and brown, it’s true to say if we remove one or another that “all horses that are left are same colour”, but they by no means need to be of same colour between themselves.
Choice is not a principle concept of decentralization. In decentralization the only quality that matters is degree of autonomy. If I need your common access point to send/receive content the system is highly centralized as autonomy is fully vested in the third party content host.

The presence of choice only means there are multiple centralized systems not interconnecting.

This is why the web is highly centralized despite choice and why Web3 won’t work. Web3 is focused upon federated solutions. A federated solution is semi-autonomous, less centralized than the web but not fully decentralized.
I don't see how increasing efficiency is seriously distinct from increasing scalability? It seems to me that efficiency is a solution to scalability.
Why is that a "usb c problem" as opposed to "cheap 3rd party charger problem"?

I buy a lot of 3rd party chargers myself, but frying electronics with a bad cheap charger has existed long before usb c.

(my personal life now with usb c is better... I buy a couple of quality chargers and cables and I'm good for everything. My Lenovo adapter can charge my phone in a pinch that's amazing! :)
Lots of better players existed at the inception of VLC. Most existing players that worked at all were probably better. That's how most projects start off.
Gold has spiraled indefinitely in value and has been used as currency and/or infrastructure for thousands of years.

https://www.thebalance.com/gold-price-history-3305646
I think, web3 has potential.

Is it full with grifters?

Sure, but I wouldn't call the stuff that happened in the last 20 years on the internet as sound, even if it was often law abiding.

Web3 is full of ponzi schemes and, at least to me, the rich people web2 "created" tell there is something wrong too.

Decentralization is an opportunity, and I know this doesn't require blockchains, but I had the impression that OSS, and software in general, lacked in terms of "payment on the protocol level".

So, I think, this could lead to a new, better, era, for the internet. If we take the right steps.
> The idea that an asset is deflationary or inflationary implies that the supply of the asset determines its price.

Isn't this one of the most basic properties of supply and demand, though?

I mean,what do you expect to happen if your supply is artificially capped and early adopters start to pump up demand for the stuff they own?

In fact, isn't that the whole point of these schemes? I mean,do you know anyone who decided to waste their own money subsidizing anything related to crypto? Each and every single evangelist and proponent of crypto is invested in getting in cheap and pumping it up to get out with the maximum possible markup.
Big Tech braces for breakups as UK opens new era of enforcement
Widdler is a single binary that serves up TiddlyWikis
Yes, there are already type-c pd testers that do that. The price is about $20-40. Easy to buy them on aliexpress.
> it needs to be obvious to anyone using the "child" account that it is under control.

This can be achieved by providing a notification/an indication on how many people are using that account and providing access to the login history?
Wait, the cryptocurrency community is going back to smart contracts? I thought the hype had died down there after (1) the DAO hack showed that smart contracts are nothing more than self-funded bug bounties, and (2) the founders using social pressure to override the DAO contract showed that smart contracts are just as vulnerable to human interpretation as any real contract.
> Where is this assumption coming from? I have never heard this before.

The global supply of bitcoins is fixed if and only if financial institutions are not allowed to hold fractional reserves against deposits.
I wish more people said this: P2P is discussed far less than it should be, in my opinion.

Blockchains have their uses - some of which I think offer real value - but from both a utility and ideological standpoint, if many people in "web3" truly stood by their principles they would be working on these kinds of technologies first. (For context, for my small part I'm attempting to build P2P zk rollups to allow users to prove to each other the correctness of their off-chain work)
Isn't there already a viable technical solution in use for all listed issues?

E.g. spam/scam can be avoided by SPF (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sender_Policy_Framework),

identity verification and encpryption is solved by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S/MIME.
> what would be more precisely termed "systemic racism"

> grinds my gears is when people call it "systemic racism"

clearly you wanted to use a different word in one of those - which one is it?
OP said M-16 not F-15.
Only your processes for this terminal.
> It would be really nice if all cross-border hatred was isolated in one theater where it could easily be dealt with, but that's not the case.

Yeah. I'd vote for naked MMA mud matches between heads of state.

> One wonders how long it will be until they move on to taking care of their neighbors.

If the Six-Day War was any indication, they have that option any time they choose to exercise it. But it's doubtful they'd ever be able to hold the peace even if they could win the wars that way. Israel didn't survive by being brash and careless... they're not the United States. One mistake and they'd be wiped from the planet, at least until World War 3.
Thanks. I am sorry and I take my words back but this is what I wanted to say:

Apple, probably in 2016, tried to hide their malice when they paid millions when their own tech posted a customer's nude on Facebook

And due to two 'when' I corrected second 'when' to 'to'. And I probably messed it up after that :).

The statement you mentioned on last line is what I wanted to say.
> Only Bitcoin is actually sufficiently decentralised to withstand large take-over attempts and politics, IMO.

This is just a meme. If large blockers in the blocksize wars had won, the statement would still be true. Today, you cannot go against Blockstream's capture of bitcoin's IP (whatever happens will happen with the direction of /r/bitcoin, bitcointalk, @bitcoin, bitcoin.org, and bitcoin github owners).

With complete censorship both bitcoin subreddit and bitcointalk site stopped and advocacy of increase in blocksize. I hardly consider this as 'defending a take-over attempts', but if you think that was a fair action then sure bitcoin is 'decentralized' enoguh to withstand take-over attempts and politics, whatever.
We live in a different world. I'd like to live in yours! Prior to usb c my Hp Dell and Lenovo, all in their enterprise line favouring practicality over fashion and looks, all used wildly different chargers. Even Lenovo alone, in that 15 year span, had round and rectangle tips with 12 and 20v.
Given how much SMS and phone spam there is I am not sure this would work.
Yeah, but as others have pointed out, I know my bank, and I know my aunt, so wouldn't a properly implemented signing mechanism just solve the problem? I know that PGP failed, but with a better implementation and greater support it just might work. This would also solve phishing, where the attacker would be willing to pay a few cents per attempt.
The "current" use of web3 kind of started like that (at least my impression), it's only somewhat recently that the big noise about it comes from the blockchain corner. Which is kind of annoying, because it drowns out the rest.
Uhhh okay....
We are talking about maintainers here, not developers or contributors.

And if a project stalls, he/she probably considers it done, in opposition to others. You can easily extend such a project under your own maintainance then, but then you must be capable of maintaining it.
The housing program was explicitly socialist. LKY hated the communists (and socialists) but he recognized that he had to accede to some of their more popular demands before tossing them in prison - part of that siege mentality you refered to.

They similarly reduced their class sizes in the 90s under democratic pressure from an opposition party that was later torn apart.

Despite being a one party state run by thugs, Singapore experiences stronger democratic/anticorruption pressures than a lot of places because of the close proximity of people to leaders (there are studies on this - Brazil/Myanmar are at the other end of the spectrum with very remote capitals).
And it's butt jointed. There's no engineering excellence unlike the lego pieces themselves. It's really not hard to do better even just with cncing dovetails. Outrageous indeed.
The company would have to remove all contributions of external developers though. If the project was not licensed under the GPL, but external contributors did contribute to the project under the GPL, then it seems to me that either the company has to release the project under the GPL, or remove all the third-party contributions and any code that might be derived from those contributions (since it would be a derived work). Realistically they would have to revert the project to where it was before the first external contributor contributed and rewrite all subsequent development from scratch.
Maybe new-email could be linked to a cryptocurrency?
I don't believe this was done entirely on a lunch break.
They never stopped? Smart contracts have grown vastly more sophisticated since the old DAO, with flash swaps, decentralised exchanges, overcollaterised loans, bridges, NFTs, and more ERC20 tokens than you can count.
What would be the same but for Paypal?
> if the recipient system would require an ε payment to the recipients' public wallet

And allow recipients to whitelist senders who don't need payment.
> Show me a stock anyone is interested in that isn’t expected to go up and reward early adopters.

Eve though you framed your challenge as a "no true Scotsman" argument, history is packed with IPOs that tanked after the companies went public.

https://money.howstuffworks.com/10-biggest-ipo-flops.htm

Last year Uber dropped considerably when it's IPO got out of the gate.

The main mistake of your argument is trying to compare something with tangible value with schemes driven by speculation and fear of missing out.
I think the theory is that for code review to be its best, it sits on a contextual pyramid composed of reviewed design docs, pair programming, standups, and all the rest of it. That the "reviewers" are not hearing about the background, motivations, alternatives that were considered, broad implementation choices, etc etc for the first time when the PR goes up.

But often there are some or all of those pieces missing, and so yeah, code review ends up being a bit shallow and performative.
In one town I lived in were doctors Slaughter and Fix.
This is a fucked up sentence. It tries to make it sound like the Communists were the dangerous ones…

Seems like a basic knowledge of history would show this fear of communism was completely founded?

And I don’t think LYK needed much encouragement to imprison the communists in Singapore (Operation Coldstore). He saw the threat for what it was.
:)

The cool thing would be multi-host static binaries i.e. binaries that host multiple "apps" and its dependencies and use commandline option to launch specific "app" from the binary(or without commandline option, provide a app list from which the user can select that app to run)
Why Dishwasher Rinse Aid Makes Dishes Cleaner and Drier
Perhaps in densely-populated areas, but certainly not in sparsely-populated areas.
No one was interested in it. :)

I don’t see why stocks have tangible value and tokens used to interact with a network don’t. A stock is a vacuous unverifiable virtual piece of paper. At least if you have a Bitcoin or Ether you can prove what you have and know how many there are.

https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2017-02-17/dole-f...

Most stocks don’t even have dividends any more so what else is a stock for other than selling to the next greater fool?
Just trying to put out there to expect undefined behavior or failures. Users might not understand how applications work and so might expect more than is possible. The strace trick is a nice workaround but I didn't see it in the readme
Unsupervised Topic Segmentation of Meetings with Bert Embeddings (Paper Summary)
"surge protectors" arent that reliable, and are sacrificial parts.

Any length of wire between two electrical ground points might, if there's a lightning strike in the vicinity, be subjected to huge "ground surge" currents. I buried 25 pair copper in a conduit and saw it vaporized; both ends of the conduit run belched flame and smoke and molten bits from a lightning strike that wasn't that close (half mile or less), and certainly not direct.
> so I do respect it when those to talk the talk actually walk the biblical walk.

Self sacrifice can be noble, though in my experience it can also become destructive. Biblical teachings--sometimes explicitly--proscribe things like putting unverifiable authorities above ones closest family and friends, poverty, never closely associating with non-believers, and faith without evidence.
For random world generation like this, how do you make changes to the generator (like adding taller mountains) without breaking saved games and world seeds that people have written down?

Guessing you could let the saved game or the player pick which world generation algorithm to use and you need to keep the code for the old and new generator around? It's probably less of a big deal for e.g. rouge-like games are over for good in a few hours, but not for games like Minecraft.
Heh - thanks. The second instance should be "systematic".

I have a browser extension that automatically replaces the term. I've just "cloud-to-butt"ed myself.
A couple of years ago, I signed up for an eBay account to buy one thing with Buy It Now. After buying it, my account was promptly suspended for no reason. I contacted support and they told me they don’t know why and wouldn’t reinstate it.
> most salaried employees are not paid on the basis of hours worked

In my experience salaried IC's in the UK are explicitly contracted for 40 hour weeks, excluding pensions, bonus, shares, etc.

It is only when you get on managerial tracts and C-Level that you have some form of hours exemption which means no OT and that implicitly you 'could' work 24/7.
Would you be willing to copy paste (redacted if needed) exactly what the "Intellectual Property Rights" section of your contract states right now? I would like to have it on hand to use as a "this is what others have and I want the same", concrete example.
Not particularly. Their description was that everybody has real problems that are changed by coming in contact with Jesus. Real problems, solved by a solution suddenly showing up in the third act. A deus ex machina.
It happens more in medicine.
Surge protectors are for standard load dumps, like air conditioners or other engines that can dump 1000V into your powerlines.

Lightning is like 300,000,000 volts. No surge protector is strong enough for that.
What Is the Secret Email System?
The Secret Email System is a strange way to deal with making a maintaining a web-based business, explicitly the opportunity way of life plan of action, that permits you to construct a manageable and productive long haul business that gives you the opportunity, fun and experience.
I think the pricing for small kits is where it’s most egregious. A small Star Wars set is likely to go for $30 minimum, I’m guessing due to licensing or something?

I don’t mind paying a premium for sets with thousands of pieces, but some of these work out to 25¢+ per piece and they get away with it because they’re the only option.

Not to mention most of the part counts are being driven up with 1x1 or 2x1 flat parts. I put together a $100 kit last month and it was largely these small pieces where longer ones could have been used.
Check out Reddit’s EOOD subreddit (Exercise Out Of Depression). I cannot recommend exercise enough as a way to kickstart more positive feelings about yourself and increased motivation to do other things. It compounds.
US20210042527A1 – Clearview AI [pdf]