skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This is what I wondered about back in physics class. Does that prove the universe is not compact? If it were, then inside-outside is the same. But surely that's not enough to know the shape of the universe. My 'resolution' of this was to say that the universe is surely very large and so the time to reach equilibrium will be very very long. So the experiment cannot really be run to completion.

But would a point charge outside a conductor cavity ever come to equilibrium where it does generate an electric field inside the conductor cavity? Assuming compact but very large universe. It seems strange but I guess it would.
The *pay is good, not the okay.
It is probably impossible to regulate Crypto altogether, as it is merely a term with no sound definition.

Regulations would probably also hit, eg., in-game economies, that are essentially the same as crypto economies, just them being controlled by a central agent.

Essentially it would mean a ban on ... platform?
> a lot more low-quality content

I wish there was an easy way to filter ALL search results, by permanently excluding specific websites, and/or keywords.

Surely there has to be some browser extension that does this...
The very first thing you would do is audit for 'unsafe' though.
I'm not sure what the point of this post is - it just restates Bartle's player types. The introduction implies there's going to be some sort of analysis of how to tailor game play to each type, but there's only a vague sentence or two for each type. There aren't even any example games that would at least give you an idea of the games each type might prefer.
> Google promotes Chrome on YouTube, search, and gmail. Strategically Microsoft needs a message to counter the pop ups on Google sites that are leading to the Chrome download page

You know what I say to that? Tough cookies. Websites and OSes have different responsibilities to their users -- if MS wants to use shady cross-promotion tactics like Google, they should provide web services that justify the annoyance and do their cross-promotion there.

Why are we making computers harder to use for the everyman? It's such a grossly short-sighted decision that will only serve to further the divide between an increasingly mobile-oriented consumer class and a primarily desktop-oriented professional class.
The stock definitely was at a peak, and fell dramatically on the release of that news and stayed low. That part is absolutely correct. Now you can argue that it wasn't a permanent loss, but the damage was done by the hacker and the journalist.

It has also stayed relatively in that range afterwards - but you can definitely argue that this is due to the supply chain problems that the entire world is dealing with - but it's a pretty straight line to say that billions in shareholder value were wiped out.
you know that legitimate sites perform SEO as well, right?
I'm not the smartest guy in the world, but I don't think .dmg files do much good on Windows.
Will you open source this? If yes, i would like to contribute another language.

Also, since this is supposed to be pseudocode, maybe it would be better to replace the atribution operator with something else, and the comparison operators with their math variants.
1980 Franz Kafka Teatro Escuela Central Federico Herrero
doxxing is doxxing. Don't care if the media think they are special.
I think you're making my point for me, no? Your arguments are all variants on "I don't understand modern Java and prefer to keep writing buffer overflows than finding out".

To answer your questions:

1. Java is these days like UNIX, there are lots of "distros". OpenJDK is the upstream on which most of them are based. You can just use that unless you have some particular preference for the other vendors. However the compatibility situation is much better, there aren't any compatibility issues and JVMs are all more or less drop-in replacements for each other (Android is an exception but has got a lot better over time).

2. You don't need to install Java alongside your app. The JVMs is just a library and a few data files. You can easily bundle it with your app and the user will never know.

3. JCA/JSSE is built in to Java so there's nothing to build. Additionally you don't have to build Java libraries to use them anyway, because binary distribution works so everyone just distributes binary JAR files.

4. The source code is spread around several modules because JCA is pluggable. But for example a lot of the crypto code is found here:

https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/tree/master/src/java.base/sha...

5. Oracle maintains it but other companies contribute, like Amazon, Microsoft, Red Hat etc (well, to Java as a whole). It's released under the GPL with Classpath exception license. They aren't going to come after you for using it - there are 12 million Java developers in the world. The only company that has ever got sued is Google and that's because they violated the (at the time non open source) license of Java to make a mobile version that wasn't from Sun. They knew they were doing it and chose to chance it anyway (which worked out quite well for them actually). Since then Java became fully open source and this no longer applies, and it'd have never applied to normal users of it anyway.

I'm not trying to convince you here of anything, only to point out that everyone saying "there was no alternative" is just wrong. The failure mode here is not sufficiently advanced fuzzers. The failure is that there has been an alternative to NSS for years but C++ shops like Mozilla keep maintaining crappy decades old C libraries with memcpy calls all over the place, because they know and like C. That's it. That's all it boils down to.
Slack has no concept of a hard delete. There's always a record, as far as I know.

So yes, you'll want to:
1. Delete the message
2. Revoke the token
3. Notify the user/ security operations team
Or perhaps they value their job (read: fat paycheck) over arguing with random people on the internet?
Is it built on chromium?
Scientists link Volcanic fertilization of the oceans to severe mass extinction
Same. For the sorts of searching I do, anyway, the results I get from DDG tend to be better than what I get from Google. Google tries to infer what I want rather than take me at my word, and is very bad at it.
Smart branding
Anything about FB becomes so toxic and pointless and ultimately very boring, that I more or less flag/hide anything touching on the subject
Correlation isn't causation, especially with stock prices.
What type of role does failed founder look for?
Except WASM made the big mistake of not having bounds checking on linear memory, so attacks with input data that corrupt internal state and by it try to influence the outcome of WASM modules behaviour are still a good attack vector.

Being sandboxed is good, however if one can start an internal fire from the outside, not so much.
Apparently, the video can be found via search or on her page currently.

However, it was tweeted was two days ago.

It's unclear whether it's a bug on Youtube side or real censorship actually happened or user error.

At this stage this is not a valid censorship case against Youtube.

I would remove the post if I could.
Every feature update they try to get you to reset your browser preferences. And sometimes it'll say "oops! Something went wrong and we had to reset your browser preferences."
I can't see that being practical. My setup for the last few years has been 2 ordinary monitors - one portrait and one landscape. I'll often read on the portrait and code on the landscape. It works for me. Give it a try.
Then again, if you look at today's search results, where everything above the fold belongs to Google, maybe we have been trolled indeed.
The vast majority of the value proposition of crypto is that it operates outside of legal and regulatory frameworks. It doesn't settle faster than instant payments (which, in many countries, are usually much cheaper or free and have settlement targets of <60 seconds), and it's a store of value because of technological controls (vs monetary policy).

I want to be open minded and am really trying hard to "stay curious" in this technology domain. Please share any points I would've missed about the benefits of crypto, besides the ability to evade government controls around value transfer or storage and that there is no ability to reverse fraudulent transfers (to the benefit of billions of dollars in theft). I will readily admit it has benefits for folks in places like Venezuela, Turkey, or anywhere else with bad faith fiscal and monetary policy, but not the world as a whole. I know of people in Venezuela who are attempting to operate outside of the dysfunctional financial system, and they use Zelle [1]!

[1] https://www.google.com/search?q=Venezuela+zelle
You're just wrong. The rest of the world does not play by Reddit rules. In a very real sense, "doxxing" is literally the core job of journalism.
"Microsoft Edge runs on the same technology as Chrome, with the added trust of Microsoft."

Hmmm, can I trust you to not put your own ads onto competitors websites?

That is beyond f'd up. Will they never learn?
Agreed. Most people find it more comfortable to abdicate their intellectual responsibility and blindly trust than to seek individual awareness and evaluate their society independently. And for good reason! It's pretty painful and scary to think independently. I think it's at least a little painful and scary for everyone who is really doing it.
So your response to the author saying "I'm trying to be commercially successful, but it's really hard for these reasons" is "You should try being commercially successful"?

Ok...
If you really want to see more anonymous posts from employees at these companies teamblind.com is a better place.
Depending on the intended metaphor, trolling could work too :) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trolling_(fishing)
Clearview AI's Facial Recognition Tech Invites Big Funding and Fines
There's an old bluegrass song called "I'll Fly Away," the music is very happy and upbeat. When you listen to the lyrics, you realize it's a slave song about how the narrator is looking forward to death so they can escape the horrible life they are living. The point of that is just because we live longer doesn't mean we live better.
Tangentially related: does anyone know of a vendor offering YouTube-style comments and live/super chat as a service?
>- explorer randomly dies when switching virtual desktops and then comes back. I've had this one 3 machines now and I've no clue why.

Were you using an Nvidia graphics card and did you right click on the left box of explorer where the quick access toolbar is? This is a common issue with Nvidias context menu in that situation.
As far as I can tell all social media companies (FB, Twitter, Tumblr, Reddit) receive a lot of dislike in general as being a source of societal ills.

I think people just don't like having a mirror held up to the very negative parts of human nature.

Social media as an industry may be joining tobacco, oil, "wall street" finance, gambling, and weapons as one where if your employment is involved in it, some people in some way will feel you're profiting from exploiting society and making it worse.

I personally don't think Facebook does anything wrong aside from being a normal social media company.

But any social media that wants to be "successful" in terms of revenue and usage will have to exploit vulnerabilities in human nature like our increased interest in negative rhetoric about "out-groups". Any of the other companies in the stigmatised industries will either have to exploit human nature to be successful or be regulated such that their competitors can't do the same (like with tobacco advertising being heavily regulated). Regulation of social media seems to be the only real solution for society if we aren't happy with the status quo.

As an aside, I think if people can be so easily misled with "fake news" and radicalised along partisan lines, the issue lies with the U.S. education system and culture rather than the site that simply hosts the content.

At what point do people have to take responsibility for their own reaction to a world full of misinformation and tactics that seek to exploit them? If anyone reading this wants to post happy stories and accurate information on Facebook all day there's nothing stopping you, so why won't that fix the problem? Because of the issues with the users themselves.

I've personally stopped using Twitter, Reddit, Facebook, ect. because I've seen the harmful effects it has on my psyche. If consumers aren't smart enough to recognize that and willingly give it up, the issue is with the individuals who lack the education, cultural standards, and willpower to do so, and Facebook is not responsible for how 300+ million Americans were raised and educated such that they can't consume media healthily.
According to the WHO, efficacy refers to vaccine performance in controlled studies whereas effectiveness refers to performance in the broader population [0]. Data aggregated by JHU appears more or less consistent with estimates of vaccine efficacy [1].

[0] https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/detail/vaccine...

[1] https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/pandemic-data-initiative/data-ou...
RISC-V Int. Ratifies 15 New Specs, Opening Up New RISC-V Design Possibilities
One almost wonders if practicality wasn’t the objective of the exercise. Almost.
I agree that bank runs harm the general welfare, and the reason why we can make that claim is because of the material relationship between the banks and the general population, as individuals participating in the economic system in order to ensure their own welfare.

But if we look at other sorts of more complex financial instruments, the sort of thing that's inaccessible to an average citizen, then why are they protected by the state as well? The obvious answer would be "well, banks invest in complex financial instruments, and the state wants banks to be protected". But regulating financial instruments isn't necessarily the only way of ensuring that the banks' service to their customers remains stable, it's just one possible path.
Xenobots: Scientists Build the First-Ever Living Robots That Can Reproduce
Is it a proxy to other search engines or are they building their own?
https://vivaldi.com/blog/vivaldi-browser-open-source/
How is this different than getting everyone to adhere to capitalism or democracy? Lots of people die under this system, doing things they do not want to do.
I've been using Firefox as my browser on my Android phone for something like six or seven years now (I guess I'm weird). I don't recall any hard pushes to switch to Chrome. Using a non-Blink browser there is probably rare enough that making people switch isn't worth it.

The websites don't seem to want to support Firefox, so Google definitely isn't blameless, but we should probably at least blame them correctly.
I have to say, learning I could download books off the internet and read them on my Palm was a transformative experience as a child.
Two major reasons: costs to build and maintain and manpower needed. Both are practically impossible to come by.
COVID can never be stopped globally. SARS-CoV-2 is now the fifth endemic human coronavirus and will never be eradicated regardless of how many people wear masks or get vaccinated or whatever. There is no such thing as "safe", we just have to accept the risk and move on. Fortunately the vaccines and other treatments are very effective at preventing deaths.

https://www.businessinsider.com/delta-variant-made-herd-immu...
And then Brave bought them and it succeeded.

Cliqz is now Brave Search, I use it for all my devices, it's great.

Works better than DDG and sometimes better than Google.

I only hash bang every 100 searches or so, most of the time Google doesn't have it either. It's just to make sure.

http://search.brave.com/
I thought it was common practice to re-record dialogue tracks (i.e. ADR) to make them clearer.

Another option (if they wanted to use it) would be to use signal processing techniques to extract and improve the dialogue tracks.
I am talking about people who won't participate like me. It's in my interest to regulate crypto. It's not because I care about people who lose money investing in some nonsense. It's all good, stupidity should have consequences. I do care however about scammers having more capital to conduct more scams in other areas of life or worse yet using it to buy politicians. I also care about the danger of having some % of the population (mainly young men) who just lost everything and won't find a place in society pushing them to crime or marginalized life.

I mean those are the same reasons we have to ban pyramid schemes for example - we don't want to have a lot of losers (even if they are dumb losers who entered the scheme on purpose) and unethical now wealthy winners.
> Why is that acceptable but coding errors are not?

People voted for and happily accepted the policies that created the inflation. Inflation is a consequence of Congress allocates trillions of dollars in spending that can only be funded by debt. Whether the Federal Reserve converting that debt into money is merely the only way the elected government can receive the money it desires without collapsing the economy.
It's interesting AMC cites surveys. I haven't seen a survey but even if I did I'm not sure I'd complain to them about unintelligible dialogue -- as a layman, I've assumed that's mostly a problem with the movie and not the theater (they don't have a separate dialogue track they can boost). And I guess now that I read this I'm not sure how much it'd matter, given directors themselves are complaining about the problem.
Because a) Youtube does it too and b) often they get their Twitter accounts suspended.
If Trump runs and is re-elected, the American companies like Google will be under the control of his government. He has a lot of anger about being deplatformed, and they will be brought to obey his bidding as a priority and fairly quickly, since this time around it's personal instead of being some boring piece of paperwork.

In that scenario, ironically, the Russians might end up being more free.
$9/mo is not going to cut it. Google's domestic annual revenue per user in 2019 was $256. [0] That's $21.33 per month. Not all of Google's revenue is from Ads, of course, but the vast majority is. (Let's ignore for now the valid counterpoint that Ads are increasingly served on other Google properties than Search.)

But even charging users $21.33/mo for an ad-free search experience most likely wouldn't be enough. By providing such an option, you'd greatly reduce the value of the remaining Ads pool.

The optimistic perspective on this is that if you are one of the users with disposable income, you're essentially subsidizing a great search engine and a suite of other tools for the less well-off ones.

[0] https://miro.medium.com/max/6545/0*YTqXb-F5UiVhtlIS
I don't understand that obsession browser developers have with themes. To the point it's a highlight in a major version.
YouTube Dislike Count which doesn't need external API call
SparkPost, a MessageBird Company | Multiple Openings | Full-time | Fully Remote, USA

Solve engineering problems from any State in the United States! We understand that “life happens” and give you the freedom to choose the best environment for you to be an engineer.

SparkPost, a Message Bird company, is the world’s largest email sender. Delivering 40% of all commercial email (4-5 trillion sends annually), while boasting the world’s largest data footprint to help enterprise-level brands make data-driven decisions to improve their email performance.

The world’s most sophisticated senders, including The New York Times, Zillow, Adobe and Booking.com trust SparkPost to elevate their email.

Visit our Careers page: https://www.sparkpost.com/careers/open-positions/

Sampling of Open Jobs:

- Sr. MLOps Engineer
- Sr. Software Engineer, Transmissions Team
- Sr. Software Engineer, Data Engineering
- Sr. Performance Test Engineer
- Software Engineering Manager
- Platform Engineering Manager
- Sr. Front End Engineer
Assuming OP is referring to Google Venture's participation in at least one of Cloudflare's rounds.

https://www.crunchbase.com/funding_round/cloudflare-series-d...
>But I am afraid that losing valuable contributions from FB people lead to groupthink and ideological bubbles

Perhaps then maybe FB will understand why it's unwise to create and maintain such bubbles.
What is intended to be the surprise there? That it acts just like the fine art world?

This discussion was about prices are driven significantly by wash trades and that paper doesn’t suggest or imply that.
What if we didn't try to replicate google. Smaller and niche search engines would probably work better in this new world of vast information.
Reddit is a heavily gatekeeped community by the mods in regards to specific topics
Murder means to unlawfully kill a person. Without laws against killing there is no such thing as murder.
> If the building hadn't been redesigned in a modern context several times throughout its life, it would have been an old dilapidated stone church and not the icon it is today. The reason people care about this church and that it resonated with people throughout history is that it has continuously been redesigned and renovated in a modern context.

The old Church did resonate with me (though the Sagrada Familia definitely resonated more), but a modern light-show definitely wouldn't resonate at all.

I think think part of the point of cathedrals is to be a little otherworldly, and chasing the "modern context" subverts that. That may not have been true in the past (stained glass is insanely expensive and you definitely wouldn't have seen it everywhere hundreds of years ago, even if it was state-of-the-art), but it's definitely true now.
Regarding the gatekeeper problem: it's a wild guess but maybe if there was a way to involve users by organizing distributed scraping just for the sake of building a decent index, I'm sure many of them would help.
It isn't the NFTs that are bad per se but how they are promoted and sold that can be bad. Using an NFT for concert tickets makes sense. Using an NFT as a "certificate of authenticity" makes sense. Using NFTs in a video game or in a VR realm can make sense if it accurately describes what value the purchaser gets out of it.

The problem becomes when you imply the NFT has a value it doesn't have like ownership of a work of art. Buying an NFT of digital art doesn't give you any real ownership rights. It only gives you the right to say "you own that NFT", which is the thing on the block chain and not the art, and potentially to sell that NFT in the future. That is where the scam feeling comes in because no or very few "certificates of authenticity" are worth a lot of money. So the idea that NFTs are inflated assets that will quickly lose value is very real. That said, we have stuff like that happen all of the time such as tulips or more recently Beanie Babies.
Stuff like this (not my post): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29416956

I just remember that every time I reopen Firefox (to test it for something), some new annoying thing like Pocket or some other trendy extension I didn't ask for has suddenly appeared. And it's always bugging me with CHECK OUT WHAT WE ADDED popups. I don't CARE about your new features, just let me browse the web and stay outta the way, damn it.
How Does NTP Work?