skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Plenty of people living in Oslo have exactly the same problem. The fact that some, even many, people are unable to use something doesn't many that a large number of other people in the same country can't use it.

In my travels in Germany, France, Italy, I saw plenty of houses with off street parking. Not the majority of course but a significant minority.
Fans pour funding into ‘The Chosen’
Dr. R. Malone: Billions of People Are Affected by This and They Don't Realize It
If you use Azure Application insights, it will generate a dependency graph of your application.
The point he is making is that trying to optimize C without any UB at all is basically impossible, even basic stuff like register allocation. If you're willing to forego that much performance just for the nebulous goal of producing "platform-specific UB" (which in practice can be just as damaging as the "regular" kind of UB in most cases) to simplify reasoning about your program, do you really need to be writing in C? Or would another, memory-safe language suffice? For that matter, if you really only care about what happens on the platform you're on, why not write in assembler and avoid having to worry about an optimizer at all? After all, "platform-specific" UB will otherwise vary across systems, leading to the same kind of unexpected behavior when you port your program (e.g. weak memory bugs in code designed for x86-64 machines that only surface on ARM).

(And to be clear--I think the article is being incredibly diplomatic in saying "there isn't enough research" into compilers that don't optimize based on UB. It would be absolutely shocking if a non-UB-based compiler were able to come anywhere close to modern C compilers on either real-world programs or toy benchmarks, because almost every avenue of optimization would be closed to them. When any out of bounds write from anywhere in your code, including another thread, can modify a variable on the stack, it's not even usually possible to coalesce or rearrange writes, or remove redundant reads! These sorts of things are the bread and butter of compiler optimizations. Hell, are we even allowed to inline function calls? It might break out of bounds writes to the saved stack pointer!).
This is a brilliant start. Maybe rename it to avoid annoying Mozilla unnecessary.

I'm one of those who want a softfork(?) of Firefox: a set of patches on top of official Firefox that keeps getting expanded until it eclipses the official Firefox.

I already tried to donate but failed.
> Globalizing democracy means that increasingly , half of the population of the earth will be oppressed by the other half

History shows the very opposite. Oppression goes hand in hand with empires, dictatorships and colonial powers.

> At least the division of nations leaves people with the option to leave one democracy and go live in another that fits them better

You are confusing nations borders, democracy and decentralization.
Alexa, ask my TV to do something thanks to my Raspberry Pi
> That implies to me that someone did some very deliberate manipulation to the way the language is written, which coincidentally made it very different from other natural languages at the word level. But at the same time, they included information that ultimately works the same way as other natural languages, and we can see that structure when we look at sections or pages of the manuscript. It’s a very interesting contradiction. It’s quite a puzzle!

I think that the reason the Voynich Manuscript has resisted analysis for so long could be that researchers approach it with one of three assumptions:

* it's a meaningless hoax

* it's a natural language with a simple writing system that just needs to be learnt

* it's a natural language that has been enciphered using some encryption system

but what if the truth is some combination of the three?

It's at least conceivable that the original writers might have been speakers of some uncommon language (perhaps one without a writing system available at the time) and they were trying to write something that they thought was meaningful, but ended up devising a writing system that wasn't practically readable, and that didn't matter to them. Perhaps their goal wasn't to deceive a buyer or troll future researchers, but merely to capture in physical form a body of work from their culture, as a performative or devotional act.
>from age 20 to about 40-50

Really? Just that range? Not sure about your own family history but the vast majority of 50+ and 60+ year olds I know are quite healthy, vital and fully independent, perhaps more so and especially more independent than many people in their 30s and 40s even due to greater accumulated assets and self care. There are many exceptions of course but most people in developed places seem to live quite well and independently into their 70's even these days.
52 things I Learned in 2021
Indeed, this looks quite good: https://cln.sh/5MWsIR
> Not to mention that new generations have grown up with the current status-quo and seem to be happy enough with it not to search for alternatives.

Even though this is true, it is not impossible to expand their horizon. We still have not figured out the pedagogy or even andragogy of how to teach technology.

Check out my progress with my daughter(10): https://github.com/jackdoe/programming-for-kids, We are also making a card game https://punkjazz.org/programming-time/easy.html to play with her and donate to other kids interested in learning.

Spending time with pi zero and arduino and building retropie games, using links2 instead of chrome from time to time, she is making great progress. Make the lights in her room work after few claps, with arduino nano and sound sensor so her code can control the light.

And this is only with 20-30 minutes per day.

You might think that the kids are blind to what is going on, but they do see, they know something is wrong, they know they are being exploited and cheated to buy lootboxes and skins.
> I hear your argument, but if global confidence in government and central economic control collapses then bitcoin isn’t going to save you.

We don't know that. Nothing like Bitcoin has ever existed. And I'd imagine most people would prefer the short-term uncertainty and pain of reorienting their usage of money over starving or fighting to the death.

If people take off the goggles, they will realize that it's all an illusion. The government is just other people like you and me with access to violence and the ability to indirectly control/manipulate other systems we depend on (e.g., banks, housing, etc). Their ceasing to exist doesn't preclude civilization collapsing long-term; they've just convinced people that it would.
India has (so far) a very pragmatic approach to balancing the rights of all parties when it comes to copyright and intellectual property claims. PepsiCo chose the wrong country to pick this fight. Surprised they didn't learn from Monsato packing its bag and leaving India. India was forced to open its economy to foreign seeds company by the WorldBank. But it recognized the danger of allowing a few foreign corporates to have a monopoly on seed production and distribution, along with flawed claims on intellectual property on biotechnology that favour them at the expense of the farmers and national interest. It has thus always been hostile to them to protect its food security.
That's more of an intermediate level; I think https://www.redblobgames.com/maps/terrain-from-noise/ is a simpler place to get started. For concepts ("frequency", "octaves", etc.), see https://www.redblobgames.com/articles/noise/introduction.htm... but I would recommend starting with the practical page and then reading the theory page afterwards.

Also, there's a procedural generation reddit (https://old.reddit.com/r/proceduralgeneration/) which has resources in the sidebar and there's also a procedural generation discord https://discord.gg/67yD223
I think it's funny that it's kind of like a blockchain, and as soon as the business people and MBAs realize this, they're going to "evangelize this amazing application of blockchain to all code!" to death.
You're not going to go from 0 to $8k in legal expenses that quickly.

See if you can find a lawyer that you can trust, ideally one who has experience with this kinda thing to give you an opinion.

A good lawyer will be frank about whether or not the cost to engage is worth it. Others are probably correct in saying there is probably an arbitration clause involved.

You might just find that a letter from a lawyer might lead Amazon to reconsider their decision to hold your funds.

Also I'd be wary of lawyers quoting you a flat fee like 8k to "take care of it". I had to deal with a completely different legal issue several years ago. Some lawyers gave an up front figure of like $5k-$9k or something. Ended up consulting with an attorney at an agreed hourly rate of ~$300/hr or something. Ended up using less than an hour of his actual time to consider the situation and give me legal advice. Ended up only paying a few hundred for the whole thing.
Awingu can do this. (https://www.awingu.com)
Can easily enable reverse SSH at home through 443 and 80.
Log in with RDP just to enable the reverse-SSH and use that for RDP.

The benefit is that you can access other things than RDP with this solution.
Huh, any reference about this? How much of the binary does it run?
Dig gives more information, such as TTL and the resolving server. If you also want that information from host, you need to use the `-v` flag, at which point the output is almost as verbose as that from dig.
Yep.

But it must be weird to go from everyone supporting and cheering you forward to everyone suspecting you of having something foul in mind again.
No, that's 5th generation computing...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifth_generation_computer
The Great Depression? Many countries had to abandon the Gold Standard to get out of it. In my country we also had a real estate bubble in the late 19th century.
True. It's not a religion or a credo. We're simply evaluating our options because our cloud bill is way too high for what we do.

Time will tell but IMO it's super important to reserve the right to take a deeper look if you don't like your costs.

We're not as helpless as big tech wants us to believe.
My initial title was:

The <ruby> HTML element

But the ruby tag got stripped by HN and I ended up with

The HTML element
My wife and I grew up outside of Denver. We both remember vividly that the first big snow was expected, and almost guaranteed to happen around Halloween.
All masks are for protecting others from your virus.

Microfiber N95 is used for making masks that protect you IF is used properly ( real material, disposable, snug fit)
The reason I ask is because that phrasing is particularly arrogant and seems to come up a lot when describing his character - while the email that started it all is relatively polite
Forseti is an open-source project to build dependency graphs of your usage of GCP services. It's primarily designed for security but can be applied into other areas. You could extend the model to understand relationships between services and SLAs, but this would be limited to how you design and run services on top of GCP.

https://forsetisecurity.org/docs/latest/concepts/

To understand the underlying design of how each GCP service relates to each other is complex and definitely not available to the public. There is also a huge amount of nuance between GCP services relying on underlying Google services vs. other GCP services. Container Registry and Artifact Registry may both depend on the same underlying storage service, which isn't necessarily GCS, but could be an internal Google storage service. How this is specifically managed, partitioned and run is very hard to extract. Failure modes and scenarios are well designed and understood internally, but not shared publicly.

If you had a very specific use case you could approach your Google Cloud TAM/sales/customer engineer with the questions and they will be able to help you understand.

Source: Former Customer Engineer in Google Cloud for 4 years
So was what I meant by the same word two comments earlier, but others still went out of their way to misread it. Why was that OK but then I have to "come on" for clarifying my original intent? Save your eye-rolls for the people who deserve them.
Oof, and to think one could helpfully inform the other! :) To be clear, I am a programmer, not a computer scientist, so my opinions are based off writing code and managing teams to write code that works, and less so about abstract machinations of computer scientific thinking.
> so what are you negotiating with?

A group. You negotiate with a group. coordinated actions by groups of people or the threat of coordinated actions can be a form of negotiation. That's what the antiwork movement is about to me.
A primer on digital twin technology
My only experience with Mister is playing SNES games with the device my brother set up on a CRT tv. Playing an SNES game is just a matter of choosing the SNES core, picking the game rom from the default directory, and learning the hot key combination on the controller to go to the save menu to save your in game save file to the sd card.

For this use case it's easier than Retroarch- you don't need to fiddle with resolutions since everything outputs natively to the CRT and you don't need to fiddle with cores since only 1 core exists per system.

Maybe there's more complex features that are harder to use, but as a replacement for a super nintendo I find it to be dead simple to use once setup.
Do you know this from first hand experience? Or is it just something you heard somewhere? It is certainly not my experience of my 2015 Model S 70D. If it is really cold (-20C) and I am doing short journeys (so the battery never gets warm) then it might drop by 25%.
Ask HN: Does anyone know what’s happening at GitHub?
Their CEO and COO left the company, pretty much within a month.
More here https://twitter.com/gortok/status/1466889934623674370?s=21
The best part about 2 weeks to flatten the curve is the first 2 years.
Yeah, planning is key. We do a Bay Area to Central California trip regularly and there is no super charger at destination, nor is there one close enough on the way back along the route, so you can’t drive there and back and land at a super charger on the route. And if you use the car (or just let it sit) some power is drained at destination.

Charging on the way there just doesn’t feel right since we have enough juice to get there and everyone is anxious to reach destination, but it’s the only way to ensure we don’t have to take a detour at some point.

We solved this by getting an adapter so we can charge at their house using their dryer plug.

Yes, these are completely first world problems but it adds just enough hassle I could see some people just wanting to use an ICE car to make the trip.
Fiber may be simple, but the way we use it is not. Unlike copper, a GPON fiber install is going to have active electronics and splice trays for every several dozen subscribers.

Plenty of opportunities for water ingress to still cause problems.
Easy to do when small businesses don't know much about cybersec and have zero firewalls between their gateway and their machines. LPD is pretty "dumb". Send it text, it prints the text.
Well... This [1] kinda answers it. Mind you, it is in the process of evolving into new products and markets. As I said a few days ago, I'm not sure what is next but somehow I'm gravitating towards IoT and embedded devices.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge%27s_law_of_headline...
The video on the main page is amazing. Rare that a product demo video is both entertaining and informative with a high information density!
How then am I so different from the first men through this way?

Like them, I left a settled life, I threw it all away

To seek a Northwest Passage
at the call of many men

To find there but the road back home again

Stan Rogers, "Northwest Passage"
Being a more technologically advanced vehicle for speculation doesn't make it less of a vehicle for speculation.
But I bet the early versions of facebook wouldn't scale as well..
> Personally I disagree. We should be using state machines and pure functions. If+for loops are just what's easiest to express in the major languages of today. they are no more or less computationally expensive but due to lack of tooling they are often cheaper to write.

In my experience programming programming with primitives and basic flow control operations frequently tends to be at least be order of magnitude faster than more complex state management paradigms. Compilers are very good at optimizing that style of code. Loops often get unrolled, the and the branch predictor is kept happy. A good compiler may use vector expressions.

In many cases with cold code it flat out doesn't matter, the CPU is plenty fast, but when it does matter, explicit if-and-for code absolutely mops the floor with the alternatives.
I thought the same. Now that I read the documentation I think I will be fine and confusion less likely.
When I worked as a contractor at Apple Retail Software Engineering, they bought for themselves the full final couple of shipments of thousands and thousands of the rack-mount Macs they had designed and built, and then ultimately killed. They filled a couple of data centers with them. And then they ran VMware on them so that they could have a lot more virtual Macs as servers.

They were also buying rack mount hardware from other vendors and running VMware on them, too. But I don’t remember what the vendors were that they were buying from. I doubt it would be Dell, given what Michael Dell said about Apple years ago, and the rivalry that has existed ever since. But I don’t know for sure.
Thanks to you for the working demo, and to gvx for figuring it out!

UPDATE: Here's an example for theobromine - https://jsfiddle.net/j84z1kyb/ .

It looks great!

But it's not as useful as I hoped it would be. Copy&paste captures the numeric annotations. I probably should have expected that, but didn't.

And highlighting is wonky. In Safari and Firefox, I seem to get a character and the ruby annotation for the character next to it, more often than I do the one overhead.
Perhaps! Because people are trying to create opportunity from the lack of scarcity maybe?
next level recycling!
https://youtu.be/otAcmD6XEEE?t=1965

Sequence, selection, iteration (or recursion if available).

Note that the child overlooked the assumption that it's sequential.
Need hard data that it's actually less lethal, which means waiting a month or so from the uptick in cases to make sure no hospitalizations or death actually occur. If it is, spread away. If it's not, and has similar mortality to the original strain but with immune escape and better transmissibility, you've screwed us all.
I guess it depends what part of the world you're in, but flu vaccines are not mandated in hospitals here in the US.

https://www.kff.org/other/state-indicator/flu-vaccine-requir...
> In 1917, when the first two photographs were taken, Elsie was 16 years old and Frances was 9. The pictures came to the attention of writer Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, who used them to illustrate an article on fairies he had been commissioned to write for the Christmas 1920 edition of The Strand Magazine.

Impressive how naive people were. Actually I can't say they were specially naive or that we simply live in a world where better access to information is possible. Still, people continue falling for conspiracy theories.
Indeed.

While it may be true that hunter-gatherers had a lot of leisure time, it's also true that hunter-gatherers typically didn't have much beyond a spear, a knife, a loin cloth, a cooking pot, a subsistence amount of food and maybe some sort of hut with a fire pit.

Making enough money for that level of existence wouldn't take much time even today. It would be easy enough to do the experiment (and some have). Just pay a bush pilot to drop you off somewhere in the Alaskan wilderness and hunt and gather to your heart's content. Alaska has regulations that allow subsistence hunting, so you could even do it legally (you might have to fill out a few forms...).

However, we seem to like having things like electricity, running water, central heat, desktop supercomputers, global computer networks, airlines, interstate highways, modern medicine, more than one change of clothing...
Ah the memories of going for a coffee break at the university, as $HOME failed to mount over NFS due to a bad terminator on the campus network.
You need a lot less people per computer when you have millions of computers like big tech has than when you have 10.

The cost of these services is not because big tech has to use that much to run them, but because big tech would make less money if they lowered prices. AWS generates tons of profits, why lower that for no reason?
We did 400 miles / hour at super charger just recently on a 2018 car, so 100km in 10 mins. Yes, not there, but getting closer. 2x better than where it was a few years ago.
Your immunity is not effective enough (sorry, blame you, your ancestors or your vaccine manufacturer ) or you were infected by a variant with enough differences in its antigens that it counts as a different virus.
> You have to tacitly admit Israel and the US are democracies, to argue they are not perfect democracies (in your words "flawed").

This is a common logical fallacy. “You have to admit the existence God in order to not believe in him.” You could read my post as saying that: If Israel is a democracy, then it has a serious flaw. This is a value judgement on the state of democracy in Israel, not a simple binary: If Israel has democracy then Israel is good, otherwise it is bad.

Now, whether foreign citizen can vote in a country they do not reside in I believe this is misleading the debate. If I hadn’t misunderstood your original point I probably wouldn’t have engage at all. But since I am already engaged I might as well continue (sunken cost fallacy).

Both the Mexican and the Canadian governments have full (or near full) control of their own territory, the same can not be said about the Palestinian Authority as their territories are constantly being encroached on by Israel settlers, sometimes with the permission of the Israeli authorities, and always without their interference. There is also the “puppet” nature of the Palestinian authority. In 2006 when the “wrong” party won a majority, they were promptly invaded by the Israel Military. That doesn’t sound very sovereign to me. There is no world where the USA military would invade Mexico after they would elect a government which the USA didn’t agree with.

No, Mexican relations to USA is not remotely comparable. That is unless you consider Palestine to be a completely separate and autonomous from Israel, which I kind of doubt.
Apparently not obvious, or they wouldn't be asking.

DNS is public data, what harm can come from asking for all of it? It doesn't leak any secrets, it doesn't take a lot of bandwidth or server load, it doesn't give you any power to imitate the domain, and it's nothing you couldn't find by brute-force eventually.

It might speed up some recon "what does this company have?" but DNS caches the world over will know what the company has as soon as users reference it. For all anyone knows they could be malicious DNS caches selling the information behind the scenes. Don't put secrets in public DNS records.
Look around, everything is a vehicle for speculation, from houses to baseball cards to oil.

Of any network that exists over the internet, Bitcoin is the least elitist. Participation is permissionless; anyone can spin up a wallet, and it requires no identification. Transactions are borderless, code is open source. No one can prevent you from sending/receiving at a protocol level.
Instead of using the title, could the changes be put in the description using a custom syntax? Prefix the line with `CHANGELOG:` or something like that.

git --no-pager log | grep 'CHANGELOG: '

https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Customizing-Git-An-Example-Gi...