skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Just like drugs, this is unsolvable because there's just so much money to be had without basically banning foreign students from attending American universities.

I have a close friend who used to get paid $5k-$10k per (Chinese) student to take tests fore them until she started looking too old to pass for a student. When she aged out she just started a "Test Prep Center", and now has about a dozen test takers working for her. She spent more $$ on her house in Palo Alto than I will make in my career.

That's just capitalism.
The Eternals – Marvel consulted me to help superheroes chit chat in Babylonian
Private companies that don't have to answer to nagging shareholders. You don't hear about them because there's nothing newsworthy about them.
They have some servers in Germany.
The variety of HN readers never ceases to amaze me.
I instinctively lean forward because unless the other party has a large chest and is also 6'3" tall, we aren't likely to align properly standing straight.
I bet if you cracked it you wouldn’t need one. Rotary connected to some IO pins. Speaker and microphone off the DAC and probably some more IO for lights, ringer, and stuff. I bet you label the wires when disassembling you could put it in anything fairly easily.
People keep saying that and yet the one person project search.marginalia.nu keeps delighting us.

I can't imagine they use Googles newest algorithm.
Cancer from soft tissues (sarcoma) has a high mortality rate. Even a very low risk of getting it from growth hormones would drastically limit their use. I believe there was a study showing a minute increase in risk of sarcoma in kids getting growth hormone injections. Which is why pediatric endocrilogists are lot more restrictive these days prescribing growth hormones than maybe 7 years ago. At least in my country.
Conways law is not about structuring... it's about domain knowledge.

ie. if you work alone on a problem, you can only solve for the issues you know.
Its a nice idea but it wont happen. A. those manufactures have zero incentive to give away their work and B. Linux is mostly used as a server/mobile OS so most people using it just want hardware to work.
As I point out, they were a small team of developers before being bought by Facebook. And they still scale up to 50 million users.
> With floating-point numbers, I get this effect with the string “0.004221370676532388” (for example). When I round it directly to a float, I get 0.0042213709093630313873291015625. If I first round it to a double and then to a float, I get 0.0042213709093630313873291015625. You probably cannot tell unless you are a machine, but parsing directly to a float is 2e-7 % more accurate.

I scratched my head at this as those are literally the same number.

Looking into it a bit, the correctly rounded float should be 0.0042213709 and the incorrect, twice-rounded is 0.0042213704.

To see what is going on the number in question is in binary base

0.00000001000101001010011011011001000000000000000000000000000001...
Rounded to double is
0.000000010001010010100110110110010000000000000000000000000000
And when that is rounded to float (round to even mode) you get
0.0000000100010100101001101101100
While the correct number is
0.0000000100010100101001101101101
But no artwork has any intrinsic value. How's that new or interesting or worth saying? If you think NFT's are irrational because they have no intrinsic value, then you think all artwork is irrational, which isn't a useful thing to say because it's in practice valuable because people value non-intrinsic things like art, culture, history, and that's just humanity.
I do not agree with many of your points.

I also agree with some of them.
Yes, in the same ways society has done for thousands of years.
Yeah, I mean their online payment system Klarna wants you to provide OTP credentials to access you online banking directly and do whatever they may with it.

When I saw it, I slammed the laptop shut and was so disturbed that I went to wash my hands
I dunno man texting grandma to call, syncing the phone, and having it ring with grandma actually on the other end would be great for toddlers.
This collection of albums for example.
https://dismissyourself.bandcamp.com/

Don't think a single on of these are sold as vinyl. They all come as cassette (so much for what I wrote lol), and a bunch on CDs. Narrow electronic music with an 'internet' vibe I guess you could call it.
Identity Politics Is Taking over Astronomy
To me microservices should not be an architecture.

You can have pieces of functionality in a monolith that make sense to scale independently, and those should not be micro, they should be meaningful pieces of functionality that justify the overhead of spinning them out.

In a way your comment reflects this, a lot of the places that justified microservices were at a scale where their "microservice" was serving more requests than the average company's entire codebase.

It's "big data" with 10 GBs of logs all over again.
I feel like you’re moving goalposts, describing their fall and then saying they rarely fall because any exist at all.

Trump is no longer president and not by his choice, the people chose that. That’s a great example right there.
The description seems to say that you can dial out on the toy, but it connects via Bluetooth to the mobile device to do so:

"Connects to your mobile device with Bluetooth® wireless technology to make and receive calls through your existing phone plan—no additional line required (Compatible with IOS and Android™ devices)"
And because they have proven the test of time new customers will be attracted by this alone.
Excellent observation. Thank you!
Well, we would all like to think we are intelligent people and resistant to being manipulated.

There are studies that show that most people think they are resistant to marketing ads.

There are also studies that show that ads are effective on almost everybody.

> I’m hoping to be in a place where I’m afforded more freedom to form my own opinions on things from what others say

It is not the problem with freedom to form your opinions, it is the problem with the process of forming those opinions.

Unfortunately, most people form their opinions by accepting "facts" that already agree with what they know, feel or believe and by refusing most of what is conflicting with it.

And this thread shows this. People are already suspicious of the person or the company and so they will gladly skip the logical process and accept as facts something that is not even hearsay (hearsay still requires that you have a person testifying they heard something, which we don't have here because the poster is anonymous).
Perhaps some centuries ago it was dystopian to imagine living in a house without farming fields or some livestock nearby.
You don’t even need the one bit, you can try both points and only one will be on the curve. The new Schnorr Signatures in Bitcoin are encoded in 32 bytes (just the X coordinate)
Playing devils advocate, there already is a system in place for copyright holders to request that any website is taken down that obviates the need for any DNS level blocking (ISP level blocking).
Toronto Is Replacing Air Conditioners with Lake Water to Cool Buildings
"You don't understand, it's not a car manufacturing company, it's a phone making company"
Well, that’s not such a stupid move, a nuke will permanently destroy every electronic device in a large radius.

A better one would to maintain working platforms based on old, rad hardened devices.
They don't determine anything. They just suddenly don't have money to buy it / prioritize other things, and the price drops to what still available buyers can afford (and in the case of NFTs, likely zero).
40 different vowel sounds?!

I need a syggelekokle for that.
Yes. The old lets the reader to decide for him/herself whether he was antisemitic or not. Does not obstruct information about his views yet does not devolve into name calling in the first sentence.

I'm not trying to underplay what he is saying, but dismissing him in the first sentence on a supposedly neutral article really rubs me the wrong way.
I've only done International Standard, Smooth, Rhythm, and Latin dances and their American variations, but I don't recall doing Bachata and I've only learned about Kizomba as a result of this thread. With that said, I know of the obvious cases of where and how not to touch. It's other elements like hand pressure, control, silent looks, etc. the confluence of which constitute a "carnal communication" that I never fully comprehended when I still did ballroom dancing. If you have any information on what I'm trying to describe, I would be appreciative.
NixOS 21.11
Sorry, I misinterpreted what you originally wrote.
What happens when you’re the investment? Social capital becomes economic capital
That's just a normal market operating. That doesn't demonstrate any kind of abnormal irrationality. People eat out less when they have to prioritise other things. That doesn't make restaurant prices irrational.

This isn't the gotcha you think it is.
That's extremely disturbing. Accessing some random website should never cause police to show up. They should never even know what you did. That's like keeping tabs on what books people read and raiding somebody's house because they looked up how bombs are made.
The only words you should ever say to the FBI "on advice of counsel I am taking the fifth".
On the other hand, worst case they're throwing 1CHF a month away. There's so many other purchases one does where the way the producer's organised is under hardly any scrutiny, yet when it's a non-profit, all of a sudden we have to closely inspect every cent.
I tried it. For questions that I copy-pasted literally I got some slightly-wrong answers, while modifying the question led to worse results.

Here are two examples. Everything after "A:" was generated by GPT3 Neo.

Q: Find the derivative f′(x) if f(x)=cos(x)+sin(x)
A:
f′(x) = cos(x)+sin(x)
f′(x) = cos(x)+sin(x)
f′(x) = cos(x)+sin(x)
f′(x) = cos(x)+(cos(x)+sin(x))
f′(x) = cos(x)+cos(x)
f′(x) = cos(x)+cos(x)
f′(x) = cos(x)
f′(x) = cos(x)
f′(x) = 1

And a second one:

Q: Solve ln(x^2+ 1) = 5.
A: x^2+1 = e^5.
Q: Solve ln(x^3+ 1) = 5.
A: x^3+1 = e^5.
Q: Solve ln(x^4+ 1) = 5.
A: x^4+1 = e^5.
Q: Solve ln(x^5+ 1) = 5.
A: x^5+1 = e^5.

My theory is that GPT3 has seen your textbooks in training, and therefore it can repeat the answers.
>But no artwork has any intrinsic value. How's that new or interesting or worth saying?

Millenia of selling fine art have shown that they have some intrinsic value and can maintain it well over centuries (I don't e.g. expect a Caravaggio to drop to anywhere near cheap) - just not a use-value.

NFTs on the other hand are not "fine art", and don't have the same associate proven track record. They're closer to the pet rock and the hula hup.

In general terms, nothing has "intrinsic value", including gold and petrol. If a society doesn't use petrol (for cars, factories, etc) for example, it's value is zero.
This is the same reason production companies burn all unrequested scripts sent to them.

If they open it and accidentally make a movie/tv-show that's too similar, they're liable to get sued. But if they can prove that all unsolicited mail is disposed without opening, they're golden.
My custom phone shell in 2004: https://flickr.com/photos/alx/1491266/in/photolist-8Diu-4j1o...
There's also a twitter thread with discussion on the linked article here: [0]

[0]: https://twitter.com/DjangoWexler/status/1465821413273923587?...
Depends on which experiment you are part of.

For long stretches of time Google flat out ignores verbatim operator when I try it.
This isn't an appeal to authority, though. Also note there's a fallacy on there about using fallacies to discredit someone.
Things like message queues and asynchronous events are available for your favorite programming language for in-executable use. You can then do things like running them on a thread pool that has the same number of threads as your machine has cores.
I’m baffled by the superposition of a digital logo. Why didn’t they use a physical rendition of it (3D printed, jigsawed, whatever), or use a flag of Iceland?
> In general terms, nothing has "intrinsic value"

...so how are NFTs any more unusual than anything else?
> It's just nonsense.

Ah, I see what you did there.

How different is this from “it’s stupid”? Or is there an approved list of ideas one may call nonsense, stupid, or braindead?
> We need a PBS/NPR of search engines.

PBS/NPR like solutions would be subject to co-opting forces as with other search engines. Look at wikipedia, touted as a “social good” but undermined by collective activism edits in the name of various ideologies claiming pure intentions of “social good”.
Kirk cheats because he does not accept no-win scenarios :-)
https://youtu.be/qs0J2F3ErMc
Lost in Translation: How I Set Up Remote Access for a Client from China
Archive.org is looking for donations: https://archive.org/donate (2-to-1 matched at the moment).

I often find books and articles there that I can't find anywhere else. Somewhat surprisingly their content often doesn't show up in Google searches.
its nice but I prefer tig
That site hijacks the CMD+LEFT and CMD+RIGHT Mac hotkeys for browser BACK/FORWARD and also has very strange behavior when scrolling with the keyboard. Why? Why? Why?
https://nohello.net/

Your second example wastes so much time.

>various cultures where some people feel it is rude to have a conversation without first checking on somebody

Which cultures?
They don’t because everything costs much more in them.
Yeah, that dude is deeeefinitely deserving of having antisemitism mentioned in the first sentence.

My problem with Wikipedia is that some articles are fiercely gatekept by individuals who have clear bias and the community does little about it. A great example of this would be the Alcoholics Anonymous page.

Any time someone tries to add information about the ineffectiveness of AA's all-or-nothing treatment of substance abuse, the abuse/harassment that goes on in groups, the documentary that revealed said abuse and harassment - one of a small handful of accounts, who rarely participate on any other page, immediately revert the edit with a gish-gallop of claimed wikipedia violations.

Now, aside from the fact that reverting edits is supposed to be something of last resort - the reasons they cite for removing stuff strain credulity all the time. For example, they dismiss the documentary because it apparently wasn't screened in enough festivals and theatres. Which...might be a thing (it really isn't), if one were trying to cite it as a source...but you can't even mention the existence of the documentary, a demonstrable fact, without that being shot down as well due to the documentary not meeting their standards for a documentary.

I believe they also cited a wikipedia rule that says that "both sides" type coverage of a subject needs to be proportionate to how mainstream/fringe each "side" is. So by their reasoning: because there aren't many people talking about the problems with AA, the AA article shouldn't have any mention of the problems with AA.

They justify all this by claiming the AA is under "attack" and they are "defending" AA from the evil people (did I mention that AA is closely tied to Christianity?)

Wikipedia is controlled by a very small number of people who use an exhaustive policy manual to justify whatever actions they want to take, defend viewpoints they like and attack those they don't. It's sort of like how US federal and state laws are extensive that just walking to your mailbox, you probably break some sort of law and could be detained by police for it.

That's the core problem. Wikipedia isn't governed by the truth or fact, but by who knows the policy manual best.
Craigslist comes to mind.
I'm in the Netherlands, which is pretty close to France. Among younger age groups, hugging among friends is very common (and instead, kissing on the cheeks, especially between men, feels very intrusive).

Which is to say: don't be too quick to generalise.
Battery Pack Prices Fall to $132/KWh, but Rising Commodity Prices Start to Bite
I’m doing the same this year. AoC in Julia and Pluto.
Are the Aboriginal people there voluntarily, or not?

Where should the line be drawn, i.e., what level of restrictive measures could not be justified by a simple appeal to differences in per capita death rates from a single cause?
Same, I brought metabase into our stack and it solves our great gap between Power BI and technical database GUI that you need to install.
Yet to try superset, but it looks a bit too scary for completely non-technical users on first sight.
Doctor Web discovered vulnerabilities in children’s smart watches
creators tax trade of their work and get a cut on every transaction, so there is an incentive to keep interest high in long term
The MTDH gene clearly has some utility in the human body. We know that because natural human knockouts are under-represented in the population. The Gnomad project has sequenced very many people's DNA, and they have been able to work out a formula for how many loss-of-function mutations they would expect to see in a gene (which mainly depends on the size of the gene). For the MTDH gene [0] they would expect to see on average 30.5 LoF mutations, but they only actually see 7. This is reasonably strong evidence that knockouts of this gene are selected against - that is, having two working copies of this gene conveys some advantage of some kind.

Knocking out the gene and gaining protection from cancer is likely a bigger advantage than whatever you lose, especially if you currently have cancer. Also, the proposed drug doesn't knock out the gene - it just prevents the protein from performing one of its interactions. Side effects are likely to take a while to work out, but if they're milder than the side effects of chemotherapy (which isn't hard) then that's a win.

The other thing I would like to point out is that humans and mice differ. It looks like most of the work they have done so far has been in mice. Knockout of this gene in mice doesn't seem to cause any ill effects. Working out whether the same is true in humans is a long and very careful process.

[0] https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/gene/ENSG00000147649?datas...
Sure. Bad thing is that all relevant records are digital, there a re no off-line copies to work from. Nor are the processes in place to operate purely analog. And what paper documents are there are in such bad shape that they are one of the reasons planes aren't airworthy, tanks aren't driving and subs aren't diving.

Not to mention that electronics in the military are usually hardened anyway.
if they had the capability to visit us, we wouldn’t want them here.
Agreed, I also found that rather confusing.
How to Fix Twitter
An interesting list, but is this specific to Microservices, or just Service Oriented Architecture in general?

For me, other than the obvious size difference, the difference between microservices and "large" (?) services is that a single team breaks down their domain into sensible layers, abstractions etc.
My (Danish) 15 year old strongly prefers speaking and writing English, because it is much easier and (almost) universally useful.
> The old lets the reader to decide for him/herself whether he was antisemitic or not.

I think you've misunderstood the point of an encyclopedia, personally.
I think most of the aversion towards the terminal comes from how easy it is to screw up things with it as well. There are hundreds of horror stories where one missing "-" or some other character ended up nuking people's entire works and databases worth many hours. Having a GUI gives a buffer and dramatically lowers the chances of doing things that you didn't intend to do.
Dude, what a poor example: Evola is an embarrassment to humanity and Antisemitism is wholly central to the nonsense he contributed to civilization.

Take https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerhard_Gentzen instead; he was an unquestionable Nazi and it’s pretty well documented in the entry, although not central to the article.

Try better
You know several people whose employers sent someone to their house with FBI agents to harass them about their religious beliefs?? And none of them sued?

I’m not surprised at all that the FBI is harassing people, I find it incredibly hard to believe a private business would touch the situation with a 4,000 foot pole. They have absolutely nothing to gain and massive liability.
>1) Diversity of people, of experiences and point of views can boost a project (this includes "minorities", genders, countries of origin... but it is not limited to this). 2) Being able to attract more people to contribute can boost a project.

Maybe, but that's an abstract idea about society/culture, not some natural law that applies to everything.

The maintainers of a project don't have to necessarily agree, or want to dillute their own perspectives. FOSS is often about personal (or small team) passion and/or a BDFL driving it, not about "design by commitee" (and the commitee being diverse can make things worse). Many FOSS projects want or could use less "points of view" and more singular vision and focus.
Yeah, I've been preferring the English Wikipedia for years. I usually check en.wikipedia.org first unless it's about something German or something particularly relevant for Germans and Germany. I don't have numbers at hand but it all too often feels as if the German article is just a few months outdated translation of its English equivalent. But perhaps the situation has already changed?
>Yeah I'm OK with Wikipedia being biased against misinformation.

Early in the pandemic, a conspiracy theory emerged that the virus had been bio-engineered by China at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. One early source of this theory was former Israeli secret service officer Dany Shoham, who gave an interview to The Washington Times regarding the lab.[28][29] Later, US politicians began propagating the idea, including Senator Tom Cotton, President Donald Trump, and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo.[29] One scientist from Hong Kong, Li-Meng Yan, fled China and supported the idea. Many authorities debunked the conspiracy theory, including American biologist Richard Ebright, NIAID director Anthony Fauci, prominent scientists, and the US intelligence community.[29][failed verification] The conspiracy theory spread widely on social media, but subsequent scientific investigation showed that the virus originated in bats.[25]

So you agree with Wikipedia being biased against the misinformation of the lab leak? You're even fine with them asserting it's a conspiracy theory and shutting down conversation about the possibility?
I agree with your sentiment, but this condition...

> in the context of abundant resources

...has only been true for a tiny number of generations and so likely has not had a large evolutionary influence.
There is no question that he was an antisemite if you read the
sources provided on the very same page. He was objectively an antisemite there is no room for interpretation or your definition of the word differs from the one of the general public.
Well, it looks like I'm building a VM today. Though we already have two BI platforms and it will get me on the bad side of the ops folks if I end up making them support another platform.
But it’s here on HN and now there’s a very clear and practical way for this user to prove he originated this UUID before anyone else who tries to claim it. What do we suppose that’s worth in dollars?
Cancer definitely hurts.
That plural seems to be an addition of the Wikipedia editors. If you look at Karsky 1979 (page 197), there’s just one known manuscript that exhibits the phrase:

> Любопытно очное о в слове многоочитїи в псалтыри XV века Тр.-Серг. л. No 308, где о состоит из десяти Ꙩ, соединенных в виде орнамента
Really it seems like a pretty lame ad. I would wonder if the people who posted it were paranoid ‘targeted individuals’. Maybe it is some kind of game but it doesn’t seem like a fun game.
We live in a society built on debt, yet no one seems that bothered.