skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Thank you very much for the response!

> - 'Close to open' cache consistency. In practical terms this means that open() is a round trip to the server to validate any data that might be cached already (unless you use delegations), write() goes into the page cache (as a writeback cache), and close() flushes all dirty data. Building a kernel tree reading and creating tons of small files, each of which requires two serial round trips over the network. Compare that to a local fs where neither open(O_CREAT), write() or close() actually go to disk and therefore run at memory speed (unless you use things like O_DIRECT or fsync/fdatasync()).

That definitely sounds like a concern for writable NFS filesystems, but I was benchmarking reads to a read-only NFS mount.

Related: Is there some option I can pass to make it clear that the data on the server will never change and thus no possible write-to-read or close-to-open consistency issues can arise?

> - Per-TCP flow throughput limitations. On the AWS network the per-flow limit is 5 Gbit in general and 10 Gbit within a placement groups. To work around this, people use the 'nconnect' mount option. (which does not work currently with EFS). Local networks might have different limitations, but single TCP streams will typically always have some bw limit lower than the physical network bandwidth. I believe that this (very cool!) fio plugin works around this by using multiple connections.

Interesting! I've never seen the per-flow limit mentioned before. Is that documented somewhere?

I'd be concerned about that if I were getting anywhere close to that limit, but I was experiencing 4-5MBps network throughput. It seemed like individual file operations (like stat) were taking an excessive amount of time.

> In your example of a kernel build, you could -j much higher than the number of CPUs because the compile jobs will be IO bound on reading input and writing output.

I'm writing output to a local tmpfs (via overlayfs), not to NFS. And I'd love to tune the NFS setup to the point that reads (and stats) from NFS aren't causing a 10x slowdown.
I wrote the AWS post and did my best to share lots of technical details; are there any specific things that you want to know more about?
Fable is becoming the best way to compile to JS.

https://fable.io/
It does not show that at all.

Taking Nintendo as mentioned above, they have plenty of reason to aim for a stable, low price. The economics of their business are different than somebody, say, selling their labor by the hour. If they maximize per-console profit, they end up screwing themselves by creating a platform without many users, which is then unattractive to both game-makers and game-purchasers.
Here is an excerpt. The language sounds like encryption is enabled and the chart includes iCloud features as server and in transit protected. Seems like smoke and mirrors then.

> On each of your devices, the data that you store in iCloud and that's associated with your Apple ID is protected with a key derived from information unique to that device, combined with your device passcode which only you know. No one else, not even Apple, can access end-to-end encrypted information.
Embroider Vector File
Indeed. This is especially important because if, say, TSMC or Nvidia increase their MSRP's, then they go go re-invest that into additional capacity to solve the supply shortage. Instead, middlemen take the markup profits and have no ability to put that towards additional production.

I do wonder if it's a bit of an backdoor anti-inflation deal thing:

- TSMC/Nvidia boards don't want to raise prices because it might cause rank-and-file consumers to feel like inflation is higher, and there's perhaps fear it could lead to a cycle of increasing across-the-board inflation on wide basket of goods.

- USA/etc offers TSMC/etc subsidies for building additional capacity to make up for the revenue/reinvestment shortfall on keeping artificially low MSRP's.

And then this is a ham-handed attempt to exert some limit on any scalping operation getting "too large" and potentially drive consumer prices down a bit more until the additional capacity (funded by govt. subsidies instead of MSRP) finally comes online.

Is that hypothesis/"mad ramblings" completely unreasonable? It might be. I just really feel that the producers should increase prices and reinvest in capacity, rather than allow middlemen to skim the arbitrage.
People in USA would literally riot if required to carry around a government issued dongle.
Telegram is encrypted OVER THE WIRE and AT REST by default with strong encryption no matter what you do. It's E2EE if you select private chat with someone.

Lots of FUD out there there about Telegram not being encrypted that's just not true. There's nothing either side can to do send a message in clear text / unencrypted.
This is quite a long flowery article that mostly manages to stay away from invoking web3 but the idea of miniverses built and run by small communities sounds great. Like MUDs, BBSes or Quake servers way back when.
6kW OzInverter – DIY Pure Sinewave Inverter
Nice.

I have it hooked up to the toggleterm plugin [0]. This way I can pop layzgit and other things (gdb, ipython etc) on a floating term

[0] https://github.com/akinsho/toggleterm.nvim
* Law enforcement wants to stalk ex-girlfriend: can render all message content for the last 1-7 years
Does it? UK and Dubai are USA partners in Intelligence gathering and work together several times.

Biggest example as of late: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-58558690
"Quantitative" doesn't mean "empirical". I read the question to mean has google search returned _fewer_ results. Not fewer good results, but fewer results full stop. Perhaps the asker made a typo and meant "qualitatively".
I have had the opposite experience: I once borrowed a more than 100 year old edition of U.S. Grant's autobiography from the university library. There were some pencil notes on the first pages, but I had to cut open the last hundred pages. Apparently, no one has read the book in its entirety in more than a century.
uh, I love Rails, and I get even paid to code with it :) :)

and so many says it's even better then Rails.

I do really wish to write code that is used by millions (super fast and easily scalable) and not just a small teams of engineers (I write mainly backends for my clients/contracts)

Then it is something new: I am so glad I moved to Rails many years ago (10), and now it's the first time I'm tented .... :)
This pure economist point of view feels so unwelcome & reductionist. That the market isn't taking every ounce of profit being viewed as inefficiency, this idea that prices must be as high as possible seems like a diseased view to me.

Consumers should have access to things like GPUs at a rate the manufacturer is happy to charge. There's a net benefit to society when supply isn't maximally constrained & exploited. Recently, folks are wondering whether PC gaming is going to be able to survive, when even shitty ass lower-mid range graphics cards cost as much as a console. That would be horrificly sad for computing.
Generally, price gouging is frowned upon by society and detrimental to a healthy market.
Perhaps not the answer you're looking for but 'Mastering the Art of French Cooking' has remained a top-tier cookbook.
> Maybe there are laws preventing legal access to message content?

Well sure. A lot of laws require a court order. In the U.S. that's usually not too difficult.
I think there is still a point. Lets think about this from a scalpers perspective.

I want to make as much money as possible. I know there will always be a market for products people can't get on the traditional market. I can clearly identify these ahead of time and spend thousands buying them.

If when I use automated bots to buy, my products then become illegal's aka 'slightly harder' to sell. That might reduce my income.

If I then have to employ people to click the same buttons as normal people click using the same software normal people use, and not circumventing order limits or 1 per person rules. That means I can't get products as easily or cheaply and reduces my profit.

I see two solutions to scalpers. Incentivize or require a demand based market. So that prices shoot way up on their own. (bad for many reasons) or cut into profit margins and restrict overall volume of the people that will create that demand based market legally or illegibly.
An Intro to Banano – The Next memecoin ripe for virality?
I don't know what Giphy's financials looked/look like, but it felt like the type of startup that could only ever run on VC funding to eventually be bought up by a larger player. I'm not convinced there's a self-sustaining business, there.
All it shows is that price discrimination is needed, not that the price is too low. Indeed, raising the price may net reduce revenues if they’ve already priced the MSRP optimally on the price demand curve.

The only solution here would be to have an MSRP that’s dependent on your net worth but that’s seen as undesirable so instead we get 2 price points: scalpers and normal channels. So rather than the manufacturer or consumer seeing the benefit of price discrimination, the scalper, who’s essentially rent seeking, gets to arbitrage that opportunity.

Either ban resale for more than retail or let manufacturers alter their prices based on your price sensitivity.
I think in some cases this would effectively mitigate a vulnerability entirely. If you require control over the return address you're basically shit out of luck. A buffer overflow at that point is going to have to target some other function pointer or data, which may not be feasible in a given function.
Source for Telegram storing the information unencrypted at rest?
Everyone has their own opinions. In my mind, it's not a 'small risk'.

This has nothing to do with other countries - I'm talking about Canada not allowing ANYONE (with very few exemptions) from leaving the country on flights, boats, trains. I wouldn't be going to other countries that don't want the 'unvaccinated'.

I don't blame you for being brainwashed by your own government into thinking one side is evil. All you have to do is listen to all the false news from the media outlets, and you'll be indoctrinated day after day. All governments and the media are doing is pinning people against each other, nothing more.

We should be able to have mature conversations without being attacked for a differing opinion.
what about a bill to not be able to sell something over MSRP

outlawing bots IS IMPOSSIBLE, you can spit what ever text article, it won't stop someone from automating things even more

the only that that's gonna do is make them even harder to detect ;)

bots creators don't burn all their cards whey they do automation
How? They can physically overpower you and place the sensor against your finger, or in front of your eye and pry it open without your consent and gain access with 0 input from you. How do they similarly force you to type something that requires deliberate, repeated concrete actions on your part?
> Read my comment in the context of what it was responding to.

I've read the comment an the context. It says "that person is wrong, only my opinion on what Apple does its right"

> Despite what you may infer about each company's motives, each company's actual actions show a very clear difference in privacy on their devices.

Indeed it does. And Google is many magnitudes more invasive than Apple. Including, but not limited to "applications which have location tracking disabled can use location tracking information from another Google application" https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/ne...

> So you admit an iPhone from 6 years ago is insecure. The fact that only recent devices from either vendor are secure is the same for both

It's emphatically not the same for both:

- Apple: support phones for up to five years.

- Google: supports its own "flagship phones" only for three years.

HN poster: see, they are the same.

> I was just illustrating that there will be more options in the future.

Once again: I'm not interested in fantasies and comparisons against non-existent phones.

> Read my first post. You still haven't refuted it.

I mean, your approach to argument is "I'm right just because I say is right", so nothing will dissuade you.

This is pointless. So, adieu.
For somebody who isn’t super cyprtography-savvy, what’s the difference between over the wire and e2ee? Does the former mean that telegram itself can read non-private-chat messages if it so chooses?
I remember people making very similar claims about AWS EC2 in 2007.
I don't understand this article at all. It says every pricing page should have gifs, but doesn't say why. Maybe it says in the images, but they don't load at least under my current adblock configuration. For that matter, JS and gifs of any sort on a web page are effectively another annoying captcha when I just want the information. For pricing, please just post a CSV or equivalent, and get out of the way.
Wanted: A Town Willing to Host a Dump for U.S. Nuclear Waste
>We look back at those times now, and think it to be ridiculous that people lived under such conditions

Honestly, I don't. I'm glad I'm alive now and not then, but it isn't too difficult to acknowledge that industrial pollution in urban areas (which absolutely did kill people both passively and during smogs) was a necessary evil for the era and helped us get to where we are today.

I'm sure people will say the same thing about internal combustion engines in 50 years' time.
What would happen if they just disabled Giphy in the UK?
This is a great idea in concept, but sadly I don't think it'll ever work. Most etailers spend good money trying to prevent these type of bots. There are dozens of players in the anti-bot space. Unfortunately it doesn't stop the most dedicated attackers. And this is a cat and mouse game that can evolve at the speed of technology. A game that evolves at the speed of law will be out of date before it's even made it out of the draft stage.

Even if a law is written so well that there isn't a single loophole (which will never happen)... all the scalpers need to do is operate in a different country. Between botnets, proxies, re-shippers and other middle-men groups... you aren't going to stop it through the law.
The fundamental, unavoidable problem is that the cost of providing high-quality results on the long-tail of possible searches tends to grow faster than the revenues that can be earned from those increasingly rare, obscure, long-tail searches.

I think even two years ago, Google searches had far more depth and yet Google was quite profitable (then the searches were still biased but now stuff is simply gone). Sure, if someone looked at the marginal profitability of every single search result, it would look like what we're seeing. But there was a time when good indexing of stuff that didn't turn a profit by itself was done as a service to attract people to Google and/or to improve the Internet generally. That time has passed, clearly but it was a decision.
Mostly by cutting out the BS. There's a lot of contemporary nonsense floating around there hungry for our attention, a lot of super-normal stimulation. Stop letting it into your life. Psychedelics might help with that. Therapy might too. Get off the internet for fun, stop social media, stop playing video games, etc...
I wish that one day, there is a non-profit organization which provides social media and almost everyone uses it. Direct ads are forbidden. There are set of some high level rules and any country can be part of moderation as long they follow these same rules.

Maybe money could come selling from some anonymized data. Even partially government funded. Infrastructure should be decentralized. Maybe you can pay 1€ per month to get more some features.

It takes only tiny fraction what these current companies are making money, to maintain such environment.

Forbidden dystopia...
It's not almost equivalent to the geometric ratio, it is the geometric (aka golden) ratio, at the limit, as first observed by none other than Johannes Kepler [0]. You are in heavenly company!

[0]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fibonacci_number#Limit_of_cons...
I just tried this an it does not work for iPhone is it only on a certain iOS? I am a bit behind on updates. Thanks
Relevant XKCD: https://xkcd.com/1865/

Which seems to be true for me. Despite having semi-pro levels of wifi gear and a "fiber" provider at home, I can often get transfers work by turning 'off' the wifi and going to LTE.

If I were a campus IT administrator, it probably makes a lot of sense to get rid of wifi costs.
not a lawyer but I have a feeling there are constitutional hurdles here to consider.
Shibboleth? It does OIDC and SAML, etc.

https://shibboleth.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/IDPPLUGINS/page...
3-4 years ago we already had Lytro / the Light camera. Wasn't great apparently[1], but a much more practical idea than this massive lens.

Judging from the samples, the iPhone with ML-based depth sensing and Lidar also seems to do a much better job. As will most of the latest ML models available.

[1] https://www.theverge.com/circuitbreaker/2018/4/10/17218758/l...
Las Vegas Personal Injury Lawyer
In the case of a band, openly pricing out a bunch of your loyal fans isn't a great idea.
I'd hope using a personal bot to buy online goods (ie for convenience) is still lawful
> You must really dislike it [Nix] if you can convince yourself that is fair comparison.

No, I do not give a single fuck about Nix versus Docker. I have no personal attachment to either. I am just worried that pushing Nix at my company would be some form of professional malpractice given the downsides. I literally have a meeting tomorrow about incorporating Docker into a different team's product. I've used both Docker and Nix before. If Nix would be better for them, I would tell them as much. I'd be fine continuing this discussion we are having, some parts were interesting. But unfortunately you seem incapable of formulating an argument without resorting to personal attacks and condescension. And I cannot tolerate that.
I think you should maybe read it again. The author is not making a claim anywhere near as strong, but I get that you have reasons you want to read it that way.

Just make sure there is room in your soul to recognize that principled outrage can exist, or at least careful critique; and in general, there is a space in things where there is nuance. Not everyone is looking for large stacks of money, or bitter they don't have some. One can look at the world and its dealings passionately, without that being some kind of naivete or misunderstanding.
I don't care if they spy on me; they probably have a good reason to! But I do care if they spy on everyone, so I make it hard to spy on me.
I used this for a while. It was a great system for running a couple of DOS BBS instances (on two lines![1]) in the background while also running Windows 3.1.

Although, I can't imagine that this use-case was all that popular. It was a great glimpse of what was possible on the hardware of the day, but still seemed like more of a gimmick. But given that we run everything on virtual servers these days, it was really ahead of its time.

[1] PCBoard, if you want to know. Writing door programs in the PCBoard language was my first real taste of programming.
You can’t do it all and that’s a beautiful aspect of a mortal life. You continuously have to choose what’s most important to you, what’s fulfilling.
I could write up code in a day to take the place of a million humans, plenty of people could. That’s the difference.
I can't tell if your joking or not, but wouldn't summarization at that level require some pretty insane AI? The closest I have seen is pretty decent and runs on some of the reddit news subreddits.

But it is far from the work of a person skilled in real summarization, because real summarization requires you to predict what I care about based on the world at large.
Seriously. If you ever meet any of these people in real life, take their car keys and remind them the market dictates the price of all goods and the police are a statist intervention.
Is there also a difference on how you collect the feedback. I imagine there must be a difference between face-to-face, phone, video call, email, chat? With different types of communication leading to different results (i.e people not wanting to hurt your feelings).
They are giving you a core and a RAN (Radio Access Network). The RAN uses “lightly licensed spectrum,” (CBRS in the US), which I believe is supported in newer iPhones.

That’s enough to make bars appear on your phone. What’s missing is the IMS, which adds traditional calling, voicemail, SMS, etc. However, FaceTime, iMessage, etc. will all work.
Open source alternatives to aspnetzero boilerplate framework
Are there any opensource alternatives to the aspnetzero boilerplate framework based on the likes of Java, NodeJS, Golang etc
The video demo makes the article make a little more sense. But essentially there is a GIF tooltip for every feature listed on the pricing page so that you know what the listed feature in the comparison matrix, it's talking about.
i noticed the exact same thing..

it's almost impossible to google game dev programming things... IMPOSSIBLE to find good resources anymore, it almost as if old (and valuable) resources are not referenced anymore!
Please can you provide some sources for the childhood IFR of the common cold? I can't find anything myself. I suspect your numbers are very wrong.

Please also provide sources for subsequent reinfection (as opposed to vaccination) being less severe.

Lockdowns have certainly worked in China (20% of the world's population), so it is possible, if we choose it.

(to my knowledge, no significant outbreak has occurred from spillback)
Performance rating
Bret Taylor named Salesforce co-CEO, one day after becoming Twitter's chairman
This assumes the only purpose of selling is to maximise short term yield on that particular item.

One of the reasons ticket scalpers associated with events are particularly despised is that the promoters of the event would much rather the event was affordable and full than expensive but half empty, which might be the capacity which yields the most ticket revenue.
Your statement on the 5th amendment is no longer accurate broadly, but the matter still has some cross-jurisdictional disagreement: https://americanlegalnews.com/biometrics-covered-by-fifth-am...