skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I remember being so excited when I figured out how to hide the borders of frames and do a layout with nested tables.

Probably the one trick I learned back then that I still use today is naming the target in links. I remember noticing Yahoo doing it on their Fantasy Football setup so that if you clicked on the news beside a bunch of different players and clicked the same one more than once, it would only load the player into its specific window. Since I’ve always been a person that opens tons of links as I’m going through a page and then reads each of them after, it was nice to not have duplicate windows (tabs) everywhere.

Still works and to this day I never use target=“_blank”.
Yeah, I clicked over to see if this was a joke or a mistake. I'm still honestly not sure.

It was definitely "Dynamic HTML". Just a few weeks ago, I threw out a bunch of old issues of MacWorld... one of them had a cover article on the then-new technology of DHTML.
I don’t think crustaceans or insects have the capacity to suffer as a result of their extremely simple neurology and behavior. I do think octopus deserve the benefit of the doubt that they might, and if they had longer lifespans and different reproduction behaviors that there’s a good chance there would be octopus civilization.
I think it has to do with the idea that someone who does a bad thing is a bad person and we don't want bad people in our society.

As opposed to, someone who does a bad thing is a person in a bad situation and society should help them.
Activision Blizzard CEO Bobby Kotick Tells Colleagues He Would Consider Leaving
But this isn't a hobby like extreme sports. It's a job, and one which can now be replaced. If people want to do free diving for fun, that's fine, but I'm not seeing much reason they should go out of their way to preserve it as an industry.
This 1000! Take more cash always!
I don't understand the fish story in the context of the "meaning you assign to what happened". Can someone explain?
I Lost My Sight Kinda..But Gained a Super Power
No doubt that when repeated in whatever echo chamber they come from, those arguments attract nothing but approval.

However, since they're quite clearly a load of intentional misrepresentation and false equivalences, they don't wash with a critical outside observer.

> You can't have that as your argument

Excuse me, no, as with the previous misrepresentation of countervailing positions, once again you don't get to decide what someone else's argument is. This coercive attitude is consistent, but it doesn't hold any water.

There's no proposal to eliminate governments and ruling classes, so ignoring the realities is facile. The outcome of a downward trajectory is literally killing people, and this is not OK.
probably because we have alot more neural wiring the recognizes bears as a threat while ruminant have long history as food thus less of a embedded fear reaction.
While you're technically correct that the specification doesn't specifically say that you can't have a CNAME on the root domain, it is still true that you cannot have a CNAME on the root domain because DNS requires that you have SOA and NS records on the root domain, which means that a CNAME is not possible due to the rule you cite.
I did not read all responses, perhaps someone mentioned it already...

It is not about execution or killing someone. In fact, the very first thing I was taught in the CHL class - never think about shooting someone as killing someone, but rather as "stopping them". In the court, such a small detail of intent will matter.

The idea of letting shooting someone who is stealing at night is again - stopping them, because otherwise in nighttime it will be nearly impossible to find them (hence limitation of night time).

I don't hear many cases like that. It is certainly not widespread. People are given a right, but not a requirement to stop criminals stealing property.
Perhaps not but the claim that this article is the work of marketers scamming their way onto the Harvard domain is bogus.
Every time I end up on a five lane road with the center turning lane and tons of curb cuts and cross streets and abutting parking lots, I remind myself that it's one of the most dangerous places I am likely to be in.
Interesting. I don't experience much of what you're describing -- especially B.

How often is it that you have a service that drastically differs in purpose from it's original intent? Can you give an example of how that comes about?
This is fascinating and instead of replying I've been reading about this and looking up words like cacti. For what it's worth, both plural forms for Octopus are in my phone's autocomplete dictionary.
Rules of Program Behavior
Because it's an easy way to acquire resources. And a low-risk one, in your punishment free world too. Look at SF, where crime rings will happily walk straight into a store, scoop things off the shelves and walk out with nary a care.

People like to talk about desperation, and "they're just poor", but this is very much not the reality. SF again, the crime isn't from some down on their luck guy trying to get his next meal, it's organized crime.

There will always exist people who will happily and without remorse take from others for their own benefit. The motivation here is always the same. Getting shit without having to work for it. The disincentive is similarly the same. Risk-reward balance. The motivation? The risk is negligible and the reward is large. Either reduce the reward or increase the risk, or both.
> when the coastal cities are flooded and the flyover towns all Lyttonised,

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lytton,_British_Columbia, ie reach casual 120F+ and possibly are burned out.
How would they know? It's not too hard to generate X-rays. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLSu_UjrcUA
Ask HN: How often do you use “I think”?
When commenting on colleague's work, or when arguing constructively, how often do you use "I think" in an attempt to appear less authoritarian/harsh, or conversely, more open minded. How did it work out? What are the pros and cons that you've observed?
I really doubt a spider is as smart as me. Perhaps a contrived problem solving test proves a certain kind of spider is good at solving a certain kind of problem, but I really doubt I’d be the same with a brain as complex as a spider.
Sure but if enough people say it a certain way, it becomes the “correct way” doesn’t it?
The castle doctrine would not apply if you're illegally blocking the road. It applies to your "castle" i.e. your property.
The shield would affect price, weight and mileage.
> For example, baked-in assumptions of how business works in Market A as you are expanding into Market's B and C. This isn't the fault of engineering

And you can bet the farm that some dev (or team) was trying to build in some flexibility in to the models which might have added an extra 2 weeks to deliver, which would save months of re-development a year later, and was shot down with 'YAGNI!' or just... "we don't have time!"

For some reason "management" folks get to plan out for the next 4-8-12 quarters, but a dev putting in basic plumbing to accommodate change that will happen 6-12 months down the road is simply rebuffed. "Oh, developers just want to write stuff all the time, they don't understand business", etc, and other nuggets I've heard over the years - grates me to no end.
Do you think most city dwelling office workers in the first world would eat steak if they had to kill and butcher a cow themselves? I hazard a guess that half would faint at the sight of blood.

We have this meat industry that gides away all the nasty bits and we just get ouece of meat iwrapped in plastic. I have. No accusations against farmers doing what they have to do, but in the first world cities we have one grand hypocrisy
This is probably a bit after the 90s but for some reason young me got incredibly excited when I learned about the voice-family CSS hack. Simultaneously it felt like such a brilliant hack to leverage poor CSS parsers of the day, and yet the mere existence of voice-family felt like an early glimpse of a futuristic audio browser.
It wasnt until we today were adding a range of flags to the footer of our website that we realise, hang on, not all flags are using the same aspect ratio.

Anyone have humerous stories of having to deal with a lack of a single unified standard for Flag Aspect ratios?

Begs the questions, what or whos flag gets cut and where when creating a series flags?

Seems a number of wikipedia's own files are not using the stated aspect ratios also.
Honestly, at this point we should classify "Email HTML" as a different subspecies than regular ol' Web HTML. They evolved from a common ancestor, sure, but Email HTML is like some sort of flightless bird on a remote Pacific island: it kinda just... stopped.

Gmail and Outlook basically define "Email HTML".
We know how to make wildfire-resistant homes, and it has nothing to do with framing materials:

https://www.readyforwildfire.org/prepare-for-wildfire/get-re...

There are a lot of relatively low-cost interventions that homeowners can do for hundreds-to-thousands of dollars (rather than the ~50% increase in construction cost of this proposal) that have proven benefits. Keep dry brush and plants more than 5 feet away from the home. Use fire-resistant roofs (which don't have to be expensive; asphalt shingles qualify). Prefer vinyl or stucco siding over wood. Cover attic vents with 1/16" mesh. Clean your gutters.

These are not complicated things, and many are things you should do anyway. They're much cheaper than building out of reinforced concrete, and more effective.
The reason why at night, because it is not about killing/executing/etc, but about not letting the perpetrator to run away without consequences, which is very likely at night - hence the night provision.
Both of your points are relevant to #1, which considers only the safety concerns of wood frame homes.

Neither are relevant to #2, as neither focuses on the relative safety differences of concrete versus wood frame houses.

(Your second point suggests that sprinklers are necessary for all types of frames, whether wood or concrete or other, which removes the first point from consideration as a “wood frame only” cost, at least not without diving further into the comparison.)

Casually discussing #1 is easy, while casually discussing #2 is nearly impossible. For example: which is higher precedence in a relative comparison: fire or earthquake safety?

Assumption-by-framing that precedence is a frequent source of political manipulation by well-funded buyers, and it’s very effective. Identifying such a framing bias in the proposed legislation would be grounds to kill it in committee, if discovery of such a bias were politically unprofitable for the committee.
I like the 1ML idea (unifying records and modules), even if I don't really understand it. I just like the idea of fewer - but more powerful - constructs in a language.

The devil on my shoulder is kind of telling me that it's just another example of FP people slowly re-inventing a form of Object Orientation, though. But I think that's a good thing. A rose by any other name...
50 years is longer than Japanese housing is presumed to last. According to https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2017/nov/16/japan-reusabl...
I used to run a services business, and thought that attending conferences and meet-ups would give me business. Networking (in real life) is not something I enjoyed - but had to do to get more business.

Some of the best business and personal relationships I've had IRL, have been a byproduct of writing something online.

Some the advantages that I can think of
1. Putting yourself out there has a lot more scale when you broadcast your thoughts by writing online. Even reaching 10s of people takes more time in real life.
2. Cumulative and compounding - someone can find out a lot more about you by just reading more of the things that you've written about in the past.
3. Pull vs Push - It lets the best connections come to you - instead of putting the impetus on you finding the best connection.
Yes. That's called language.
Did you see his talk at the Meta event on October 28? Here's a liveblog https://mobile.twitter.com/badlogicgames/status/145393051764... but I'm sure there's video available somewhere.

"I want VR to subsume all our devices, from TVs to phones"

"There's some styling of the upcoming hardware as being metaverse oriented. And, I really don't like that, and I keep pushing back wherever I hear that. All of these future of work and metaverse things will work just fine on Quest 2."
I don't have any good sources to back this up, but I thought it was typical for homes in Japan to only have a 30-40 year lifespan anyway. This [0] cites average age of wood-framed homes between 27-30 years, with concrete more like 37 years, and contrasts with US wood frame building lifespan roughly 2x that.

Would enjoy reading comments from someone who really knows about this.

[0] https://japanpropertycentral.com/2014/02/understanding-the-l...
This is what it comes down to in the end. Words are memes, and the best replicating meme wins.
I programmed some creatures. They Evolved
In Linux there is fanotify for monitoring for filesystem-wide events.
>because they lack X they are not worthy of consideration. It’s okay if they suffer. This is precisely the same logic that was used to justify slavery, for example.

Wowzers, this is the most strawmanny characterisation of this view I think I've seen outside of scifi villains in B movies. I don't think the most charitable view is that species "deserve to suffer." It's that they have different capacities for suffering, and that differences in the complexity of the nociceptive and the nervous systems are inputs into our understanding when we try to figure this stuff out. That leads to, say, jellyfish being treated with different moral urgency than mammals, or eggs being treated differently than hatched birds.

The B-Movie scifi villian characterization also is problematic not just because of it's anti-intellectual shallowness, but also because it considers moral assessment in it's negative sense but not it's positive. Namely, that this is about tending to the needs and moral well-being in cases where the urgency in protecting it is greatest, and we can make good choices to do the most good. We make choices that prioritize the well-being and safety of our children in ways that take their well-being seriously, and we prioritize saving our children from a burning building in a way that we don't prioritize saving the mice living in the basement of that burning building. To treat them equally, or to prioritize the other way around, would find someone facing the moral condemnation of the community as well as legal consequences, and nobody would be convinced to withhold those judgments by speeches about speciesism.
That would be interesting, and I'd probably use it!
I do not propose cryptocurrencies as uniquely capable of solving the problem. I propose them as actually solving the problem today. Similarly, I don't propose that you *couldn't* travel internationally using a personal jetpack or an ornithopter. I just think that a passenger jet is a likely to be better choice for now.

My experience with international wire transfers so far is that KYC/AML performed at the time of the transaction is cursory. They're just slow because I have to wait for business hours at the sending bank, then wait for the bank to call me (if it's my personal bank rather than my business bank which just sends them automatically), then wait for the funds to make their way to the recipient through intermediary banks who will skim off an unknowable-up-front amount of money.
Yeah, their observations of their behavior over a history of catching and eating them.

Oh, you mean tabular, quantitative data? Come off it.
Web Rings: the original social media network.
i think it's way too soon to call it a failure. we work is still worth billions. Uber has been losing money forever but the stock is still above IPO price.
Right, so not a single consideration that you're taking the life of another human being.
The one linked seems to have a useful life of 12 months. Seems quite good.
This is my best.

If you have a habit of seeing yourself as capable of more than you typically (or ever) do, you’re likely to continue at that lower level of performance because you can take comfort in your elevated self image. By believing that your best isn’t a hypothetical, but just an observation of what you’re doing, you have to accept the lower performance or actually try harder and achieve what you believe you can.

This mindset helps me both push myself in all areas, and be more humble as well.
I call them octopuppers.
I'm discovering via this article that Wework still isn't bankrupt, and I am amazed.
No, a stroad is more like trying to do supercomputing tasks on a Raspberry Pi. Except you also expect it to get ridiculous perf/watt despite running at it's highest performance band all of the time. Oh, and you're also overclocking the Pi to the point that it explodes.

The point they're trying to make isn't "you should only have tiny side streets and massive highways, with nothing in between". It's "don't build roads that require you go from a driveway or parking lot straight into high speed six-lane traffic". Drivers need reserved space for speeding up and slowing down, something that stroads do not provide.
tomshardware is all about performing benchmarks exactly to their corporate masters specification in product briefings.

Here https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/hot-spot,365-4.html they "tested" throttling in a somewhat famous burning Athlon video (later revealed they used board with disabled/non functioning thermal cutout) during Intel Pentium 4 payola timeframe. Some quotes:

"AMD did not bless the Thunderbird core with ANY thermal protection whatsoever."

In reality AMD socket certification required thermal cutout, same as Intel for Pentium 3. AMD processors do include thermal diode just like Intel ones.

"Intel's older processor is also equipped with a thermal diode and a thermal monitoring unit"

is a lie. Pentium 3 thermal throttling is performed by the Bios just like in Athlon case. Serendipitously tomshardware picked broken Siemens motherboard for AMD system as recommended by Intel, imagine that.

Tomshardware eventually published a non-retraction retraction after AMD pointed out Siemens lie/defect (not adhering to socket certification requirements) and showed proper AMD setup safely shutting down. Of course you cant read that one because its buried down, excluded from wayback machine and deadlinked http://www.tomshardware.com/column/01q4/011029/index.html
"Fundamentally impossible" sounds like a challenge. Rust's unbounded type inference imposes quite a large cost that I wonder if the language designers have come to regret. But macros might, in principle, someday be run provisionally, first without inference, and then applying inference to the output, until a fixed point is reached. That would only be if you were willing for Rust compilation to get even slower.

Of course it is easier to talk about this than to design and implement it. Considering embedded and mutually recursive expansions, the Halting Problem rears its head, and there may not be a fixed point, or anyway none in the immediate century. But those would be exceptional cases.
This video blew up a while ago explaining exactly the same thing https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i7yEDz6bCfU

Basically what you said, these things all focus on the cheapest and least important part of construction while solving it in a pretty bad way.
"Top of the foodchain" is not where you think it is. Parasites that eat lions inside-out are at the top. Or the plague.
Yes. If supply chain management was just efficiency and forecasting, it wouldn’t be it’s own giant department in many manufacturing organizations.

There is an entire contracts negotiation side to it. Which is really fuzzy and filled with all sorts of intentional inefficiencies (price-wise) brought about by competing interests and incentives.
Cool seeing strongtowns here. Not Just Bikes is a YouTube channel that has helped popularize them recently, and has a lot of other videos about what makes living in the Netherlands so great (i.e. it’s not just bikes, although that’s a big part of it).

Here’s Not Just Bikes’ video about Stroads: https://youtu.be/ORzNZUeUHAM
You'll die faster dropped into boiling water than watching over hours as bears eat your guts and then wander off once their sated.

I assure you, getting eaten alive is far worse than boiling to death.
Why on Earth wouldn't you just make it a setting on the phone and expose that to apps? Have the apps read it on startup, and save it as part of the user profile server side. It basically becomes an email address.

> So this can't be a global setting. Instead it has to be a per-app setting where like the app provider needs to register a callback to update the notification server and support that in app. Of course most won't.

They seem to do fine with email addresses. Again, I don't see why 'username@notification.provider.com' (or an alternative with auth embedded) would be absurdly hard for developers. Someone will write a 'SendPushNotification' function that parses out the domain to send it to and the auth to use and send it, just like we've done with email since forever.

Google will likely know where you're sending your notifications, but they won't manage sending them (though they could probably scrape the contents since they own the OS).
It has as much to do with NFTs as your example has to do with your parking lot, which is not nothing.

The point is if 1M people all agreed to give a free milkshake to people who parked in your parking lot, the parking lot is pretty important.
The punchline is that they use an instruction that Intel themselves do not recommend.
They get money from google (that's why google is the default setting on FF), so they'd probably lose that funding if they tried.
If you see it the other way around - you just need one person to discover your writing to unlock the depth of your thinking as a person.

Writing for the internet > Doing that one on one through networking IRL
There is some thought backed neuroscience that lobsters can't feel pain in the human conception of it because of the lack of a neocortex. I don't know how well that can be tested, but it goes beyond justifying it because "that's what paw deid"
One could say that the point of a borrow checker is to guarantee that you don't deallocate an object until all references to it are gone (for some definitions of deallocate and object).
The only real solution here is to make the official plural term be Octopises.
Twitter, Linkedin, your own website
> far more violent than the Capitol riot

But weren't actually aimed at destroying american democracy, so there's that...
Ask HN: Where are the open source SaaS applications?
Disclaimer: i don’t have a dog in the fight…or a branch on a tree, in this context.

Sentient is defined as able to perceive or feel things.

The paper linked discusses how trees can “communicate” and “feel” based on release of specific chemicals.

An exert from the introduction: “Recent research has revealed that plants can sense their neighbours without direct physical contact; mechanisms for this include detection of a reduced ratio of red to far-red in light reflected from neighbouring foliage…”

This was also a plot of a terrible M. Night Shyamalan movie.

That’s the connection the poster suggested, as the bar for sentience is quite low.
It's still bullshit, mind you, and OP is probably deliberately misconstruing the law here. The law isn't "mow over protestors, we'll cover you". It's "If the driver was taking proper procedures and wasn't negligent and the person was blocking traffic, the driver will not be liable".

similarly:

>(b) This section does not affect a person's liability for an
injury caused by grossly negligent conduct.

That is to say, you're not allowed to just mow them over.

Sources are nice not because they magically add quality to a post, but because you can check them for yourself.