skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The customers picking up Talos II boards won't be interested until you can show them a threadripper/epyc system with coreboot.

IIRC some of the latest AMD boards to end up with coreboot support is using opterons from 2011-2013.
Yeah I'm not saying my experience is everyone's. You should read on the subreddit CSCareers ha people saying "I applied to hundreds of jobs got nothing". I do wish I knew about CS when I was going into school, I didn't really plan my school and yeah just failed out (this is a personal discipline problem). Thankfully even without a degree I can get work in this field... I know I would not see myself working on something (qualified) like Tesla autopilot or whatever (for one I'm not good at math). But there is a lot of random things you can do out there... for money or personal joy (what I'm after eventually).

Anyway yeah time is the main thing, I feel lucky in this case not to have a family/have time.

Viruses are cool, I don't know I never got the itch to do that kind of work like pen testing. It's pretty crazy the abstract ways to get you to load some executable say in a macros.
> It’s about the suffering from birth to death.

I would suggest for most all animals being raised with constant supply of food and having your health maintained by intelligent actors is far better a life than the brutality found in nature. Caveats apply I'm sure, but in general a farm animal is raised intentionally to eat as much as it can with as little stress as possible. I'd be curious what criteria you could give that would rank animals in nature as suffering less than animals specifically raised in captivity with a specific goal of reducing stressors.

> Human’s system for producing meat has an insane amount of harmful externalities. The polar bear fits into an ecosystem that generally find balance.

harmful to what? to the world ecosystem? You mean the ecosystem that we generally believe has had 5 mass extinction events prior to humans ranging from 75 to 95% of species being wiped out in each of those events? Is that what you call "balance"?

> Not to mention, straw man. You can’t sidestep the question as to whether it is moral to kill an animal a certain way by making a weak argument as to how they might have had it worse.

Well this isn't a strawman at all. I'm not building up some weak argument as you suggest. It's a documented and understood that most animals have predators and of prey species, predation is the most common way to die. Have you ever seen an animal kill another animal gracefully? It does exist, but it is not common.

also, yes I can bypass the moral question and I will do so gladly - completely subjective arguments are pointless, I feel very comfortable in accepting a different moral code than you and I'm fine with your moral code being different than mine.
> But seems like there is a new drama every week

That's what happens when you elevate micromanagement of language to a task of equal or greater importance than the creation of code.
Let's maybe see the magic rocket fly first, at the promised cost to orbit. Musk enjoys making promises about doing stuff at huge scale and fractional cost.
Good. If Rust's management falls apart, the language will become more decentralized, like it should be. I was always very, very nervous having a systems language totally controlled by only one organization. Hopefully this will result in a fork of rustc and some new interest in gccrs.
From Software Developer to Engineering Manager: Mastering the Transition
Most of these don’t really look too bad for godaddy, the first thing on your list paints them in a very positive light.
(laughs in cryptocalvinism)
Money vs people re-deploying their votes. Who wins? Why?
No, because there are still many hours until it's going to be cooked.
Some months ago somebody else was complaining about the fact that most of the rust core team was being hired by big corps (mostly Amazon iirc).

In my opinion these people resigning will have the effect of just making core team's life (read: Amazon's and other big corps' life) easier in doing whatever they want.
The first pancake doesn't always suck, you're just not patient enough to let the pan heat up enough.

Maybe it's the same with your team members? Let them soak up the project a bit, and maybe their first contribution sucks a little less than if you didn't let them "heat up the pan"?
Agree with your overall post entirely, the thing about physical attacks is they don't scale well. If you're subject to an actual individual threat, it's a whole different and enormously scarier/more challenging threat scenario.

>Think this is still overestimating the threat. It's kinda like saying you can hack someone's password by watching video of them typing. True, but also non-trivial.

Isn't that genuinely getting pretty trivial in public though? And in turn I think that is a real argument for biometrics too. The amount of over-the-shoulder camera surveillance in business and urban areas is pretty scary at this point, as are the concealability and cheapness of even very tiny spy cams. There have been plenty of scandals around it even in things like AirBNBs or hotels, historically from the context of sex, but not a stretch to imagine that passwords could be a much bigger and more lucrative target. And ML/AI is getting ever more sophisticated, and humans entering PINs/passwords is pretty repetitive behavior with a high degree of uniformity in how it's done, at least the device-unlock level. Seems very amenable to highly reliable automated analysis, to the extent I'd be genuinely surprised if that's not secretly deployed already in surveillance states.

I don't enter PINs/passwords in public anymore if I can possibly help it. It just seems scalable in a way that physical attacks aren't.
Can we reel software into this philosophy? I want no shit on my software either. To me, software and hardware at some abstraction layer become the same. They're just products and services.

If I purchase a movie, I want no DRM just as if I purchased a CPU.
One thing that's never been explained to me is how large the space is. Does everyone have one big swirl on their thumb that goes clockwise or counter-clockwise? Could you have two swirls? What is the space of potential fingerprints?
I am still utterly baffled by the way people are impressed by a reusable launch vehicle. This stuff is old hat. This person worked at NASA! They probably worked on systems that were launched on Shuttles!

I'm a bit baffled as to how you dont see how Falcon 9 and Starship are different to the shuttle. Much more re-usable, must faster turnaround. And hence much cheaper cost per kg to orbit. Granted that Starship might turn out to not work (Musk likes to gamble, thats what innovation _is_) but even Falcon 9 is reusable in a much more comprehensive way than the SLS ever was.
Khabi Lame's take on C++ move semantics
Quick reminder that there is more to life than getting tangled in unnecessary complexity. And when I say "pointers" please include smart pointers and intrusive smart pointers in particular.
Give yourself a break and save your company a few bucks by ditching move semantics and embracing that ancient tool called POINTERS.
vomit emjoi + anything else is pretty hilarious
Have a look at the relationship between productivity and salaries, and also minimal wage and inflation.

It's not development jobs that are inflated; rather, it's most of the other jobs that are deflated.

(this is a rule of thumb, and exceptions apply)
Also for a public repo sticherd[0] (Disclaimer: I am the author) can pull the content from github and inject it onto the page server side. Also not static, but has caching and no need for JS.

Soupault or even Hugo can pull remote content as well.

[0] https://stitcherd.vhodges.dev/ && https://github.com/vhodges/stitcherd
Funfact you didn't want to know today:

Figs are technically not vegan (nor vegetarian) as during the (highly complex) pollination process some fig-wasps have a wild time in the fruit, where eventually some of the wasps die and get absorbed by the fruit.
Fivelessminutes's dismissal is indeed shallow, but then again, the rule being dismissed looks like shallow dogma (though we are not seeing it in context.)

Enums are essentially categorical variables, and there is nothing wrong with that: they are widely used in statistics and other real-world applications (arguably, even, booleans are a case of such.)

As a junior programmer, I was once assigned to work on an example of what could happen as a result of following this advice: an explosion of subclasses for the sake of avoiding a few conditional clauses. Algorithms had been broken up so that the common parts could be put in base classes, and you had to jump all around the code to see what was going on. Worse, objects could change their categorization during their lifetime, which required the substitution of a new object for the previous one. This complexity was contagious; once this one type was implemented in this manner, a lot of other things had to follow suit.

This was one of the experiences that turned me into a skeptic with regard to the proposition that there's no problem that cannot be simply solved by being more object-oriented.
Well, obviously, but that's why you should be skeptical of both sides. It's just that the resigned moderation team aren't saying anything. I'd expect the core team to also urge people to be skeptical if the former moderation team do speak out about the situation.

I'm not saying who is right or wrong. I'm just responding to the parent comment because I think they're extrapolating too much from the statement.
Emojis aren't racist.
>In scenario #1, there is no financial incentive...

FALSE, In scenario 1 there would be a profit but not the maximum possible profit. This means some dudes will have to use fancy cars and not giant yachts.

>In theory if the amortized cost of a dose (including R&D salaries, equipment, drug trials, and manufacturing) is truly $1 per dose for such a tiny addressable market, competitors will pop up all over the place and undercut you on price.

FALSE, competitors will not be allowed to make this for 10 or 20 years.

>From a game theory perspective, a firm choosing option #3 would lose ALL of their market share to another firm choosing option #2, and would have profit of -$1000 because they are unable to sell any of their doses.

FALSE, if there are 2 companies that sell same products there is an equilibrium where you split the market in half and have both more profits then one dominating the market but with small prices. This is the prisoner dilemma, if you cooperate you get better results for both.
It would be funny to use this technique to make fake fingerprints that are used as the keys. “Hardware key on MBP!”
If you still get the exact same pay as you did in 2008 than you can definately talk to your employer.
Remains the same colour for me on both Firefox and Safari.
I wonder if those areas would be ripe for disruption by people thinking outside the box they've obviously put themselves in.
> There were no opportunities on the data science team since I didn't have an MSc

As an aside, this is total nonsense. For gods sake, if someone has the skills to do data science (and if you can code and do analysis then you definitely do) arbitrary gatekeeping on a credential makes no goddamn sense.

EDIT:
> At the same time, I underestimated how little my experience as a data analyst meant to data science teams.

Not all data science teams, I've been doing this for a while and absolutely adore getting people with analytics experience, as it's critical to success in a lot of DS teams and is hard to train.
Why the future of work needs bike lanes
Yep. The list of things that could make Earth a worse place to live than Mars is very short. A big enough asteroid to liquefy the entire crust would do it, for a while. A "mere" dinosaur-killer wouldn't be enough. Nor would nuclear war. Most of the rest of the options are still sci-fi, like Grey Goo events, or a very contagious very deadly infectious disease (and that would have to have some way of sticking around for a long time, for an orbital habitat or sealed earthbound habitat not to still be better than Mars, since you could get back more easily once it was gone or we had a way to fight it).

Otherwise you've gotta start stacking disasters to get close, and even then it's pretty difficult. Mars is really bad.
> Why should you work for a DAO – or should you?

Money, that's a good reason unless they are doing something illegal or inmoral. Not some "free" shares in the DAO, or other stuff that is difficult to assign a price.

> Therefore, recently founded Kleoverse

It's fine to post your stuff here, but users get angry when it's disguised as a question. I recommend to add "Kleoverse" to the title to avoid confusion.

I don't understand why the site has a waiting list? Is the discussion part of the site already functional, or only the blog is ready?

I pressed "Join the Waiting list" and it shows an error because I didn't fill the email, but I can't fill the email now. Also, after filling the email, I get a very long pool.
Perhaps no user avoided it (though that seems unlikely), but can't you imagine why some contributors may have avoided it? Wouldn't that lack of potential contributions be a material loss for the project?
You call it mature but an outsider would have no idea about what's happening.

I have no way of forming an idea whether it's utter bs or if there is something actually going wrong.
I remember seeing aiosql a bit back and being impressed. I'll give that a shot.

Right now I have a Flask application with separate dataclass models where I write a function like `get_by_id` and then then query the DB and get a dict back (using psycopg2 with DictRow returns) and then I can pass that directly to the dataclass constructor with `User(**row)`. Very flexible and working really well so far. Not sure how this scales though, but I'm happy with it at the moment.
Thanks for sharing.

Definitely trying to exit.

It just feels very hard to study enough to be able to get a decent job. Everything feels so dull and uninteresting.
To me, this line of thought is backwards.

It stems from seeing the people issues as small stuff and the tech issues as the "real deal"...

At the end of the day new features for popular language X are not that life-or-death (although I'm sure some Rust evangelist will claim the safety of it means it could save lives, ignoring things like MISRA)

-

If someone is being an asshole and damaging moral for real "meatspace" humans, that's way more of a problem than any loss of productivity that might result from dealing with them head on.

Contrary to popular belief, the world will not end if language X doesn't do Y right this second. So it's better to clean house as needed, rather than let things get to the point where everyone is burned out on interacting with your fiefdom .
Totally makes it okay! I assume that's after the data is stolen and sold.
I used to believe good ideas were self-evident, thus less structure was a good thing. Now however, I'm very conflicted. Those with enough previous influence can remain unchecked and sway the popular interpretations of the language and development.

Remaining small and consistent is still a nobel goal, but new features can be a boon to the community.

What do you do indeed?
The lack of workers rights, the high price of housing, and the lack of decent social safety nets has helped to create a lot of poor, desperate people and a high property crime rate, high enough that police do not have enough manpower to prevent them or even respond to them.
Gandi will suspend your domains for no reason and hold them hostage until you provide photographic ID proof, stay away.
Yeah, but getting that bachelor's at a good school is a full time job. I'm not sure he can afford 4 years away from work.
All for extra tools to help in emergency situations, that said I would also like it if I could see street names without zooming to a microscopic level which could be helpful in these situations especially.
Question to those in that did this

What did you do about your health insurance?
> Do you see any issues?

The only real issue that I see is that ﻻ is considered to be two letters, even if it is a single codepoint or grapheme.

Regarding שַלוֹם I personally would consider it to be four letters, but the culture associated with that script (my culture) enjoys dissecting even the shape of the lines of the letters to look for meaning, I'm willing to bet that I'll find someone who will argue it to be six for the context he needs it to be. That's why I mentioned it.

> In Japanese, which I am more familiar with, maybe it’s similar to ゙,

Yes, for the Hebrew example, I believe so. If you're really interested, it would be more akin to our voicing mark dagesh, which e.g. turns V ב into B בּ and F פ into P פּ.‎
It might be that they cannot censure the offending member in any capacity, due to their core team member status. In that case, resignation is the only thing they have to effectively rebuke behavior.
It doesn't look like an internal Rust issue when the moderation team disappears while saying "If the Core Team says anything about us/the situation, be careful about trusting it without verifying first" in a very public venue.

If they really wanted to keep it internal, it would require even less effort to just remove themselves from the moderation list with a "We resign" message without further detail.
Quick question (embarrassingly, I haven't looked into this yet myself), can I install this OS on my PinePhone?
Things are happening behind closed doors in Rust's leadership. First there was a post from Steve Klabnik, a member from the Core team, about how Amazon is taking too much power in the Rust leadership (discussed here https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28513130). Then that post, that seems against the Core team. I would appreciate some transparency and clarity about what's happening. Lots of people are currently wonder about whether or not to invest in Rust, me included. Stuff like that is a clear negative signal for me.
deleted, misread the question
You see - this comment is so vague, I still have no idea what (in the tech) they're fighting about.
The Little Book of Semaphores: https://greenteapress.com/semaphores/LittleBookOfSemaphores....

It's about multithreading synchronization issues like the Dining Philosopher's problem, and it's brief, interesting, and very readable.
> Should an indie software developer using a freemium model be crucified because the binary they ship already contains the code for full functionality?

Funny, but before the washed out "indie software" term caught on, people called these sorts of shareware programs "crippleware".

Which is basically what Intel is doing here, even if they claim they sell you additional features in reality they ask you to pay them for uncrippling their hardware.

And at least with crippleware you got the program for free.
I'm not seeing any connection between the linked discussions and identity politics, and I'm certainly not seeing any connection with Brendan Eich. Hopefully not every thread that involves reference to a CoC has to automatically turn in to a grievance bin for people who have a bone to pick with identity politics.
Those actions wouldn't provide capital and margins to Tesla, and whomever bought them from the used vehicle marketplace is likely receiving the lower emissions benefit of one of the vehicles that was a hybrid (the other was a pickup truck).

The economy runs regardless; those with capital must vote with their fiat. Sitting out leads other capital to make decisions that might be suboptimal. Think in terms of systems.
This is not from 2002, the earliest capture is from 2006. There's the GroovyMarkup entry for example, the Groovy language was created in 2003
How do you decide which of the many proofs of ownership are The Proof Of Ownership? By asking the Bored Apes bar folks? How do you know if they're the right owners? What if I open a Bored Apes bar in Tampa and let people in only based on another copy?
I was affected by the cancelations, the fraud may not have affected me directly but when a company makes a unilateral decision to not fulfill a contracted purchase to enable it to conduct commerce with others it does fall into the purview of a consumer advocate.

Anyways, I posted this to inform others of the actions taken by Amazon and how they affected myself and others that are currently cut off from all supplies in the North. I feel like Amazon just wrote us off with no regard to our current situation.
Who's to say that more contributors are turned off by Rust-style behavioral micromanagement? It's impossible to prove counterfactuals.

All we can say for sure is that dozens of critical projects in the past reached an amazing level of quality and importance to humanity without tone police lurking in the background and supervising it all.
But how boring do you have to be to give your hobby project a name so generic as Rust or Go? Like who opens up the terminal and says "I want to spend the next 6 hours working on Stapler." Have some fun with it. The last internal project I named was called Dumpsterfire, which was well optimized for memorability while remaining an accurate description.
> Proponents of the lab leak theory would have to explain what appears like a crazy coincidence of cases clustering around the market.

Expand?
Make sure to vote me here at coding challenge
Yea true most restaurants use a simple QR leading to a PDF from their menu. With menu.cards you can create a dynamic menu, receive payments, custom domain all the good stuff ;)

Currently most of the customers get acquired via outreach.
Maybe it will help to explicate what rubs me the wrong way about "corporate HR".

The facade of process masking Machiavellian reality is what rubs me the wrong way.

I'm always astounded by folks who don't understand that companies are feudal kingdoms and that all the stuff about processes and protecting people who are innocent/do the right thing is just hot air. And I've never been on the wrong side of HR, so this isn't a personal issue per se. But when I mentor new grads, I do make sure to find some time to explain how companies really work and stress that "getting along" with people is the most important skill.

I've always felt like the world would be a better place -- and workplaces would function better -- if Corporate HR was just honest: "this company is someone else's property, you have no rights to that property, we do what we want, so play nice and don't piss off the wrong folks unless you're ok leaving."

Most OSS projects aren't so dissimilar. I don't know about Rust, and suspect "Core" might have a different meaning here. But in most projects the core (aka primary) developers effectively own the project. Rules to the contrary are at best aspirational and at worst lies. If you disagree with the primary developers, it's much better the just fork the project than to imagine that there's some fair and rational process by which you will be able to plead your case and over-ride their edicts. Again, this isn't a value judgement. It's just a description of how reality works.
Handful of banks / Nissan's internal financing program. It was the first I'd ever heard of a specific interest rates for commercial vehicles. I'm not sure what all special rules commercial vans/trucks go under in the US because it doesn't even come with things like a listed crash rating or pollution rating you'd see on the sheet for a normal consumer car.
Why Is Septic System Inspection in North York Important for Buyers?
A home inspection in North York enables purchasers to discover large and minor concerns with a property before committing to buy it. Home investigations can reveal possibly serious issues such as fungus or defective wiring, which could lead to a major fire. Professionals examine the interiors and exteriors of a home, including the plumbing, electrical, HVAC, roofing, and foundations, among other things.