skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The difference in strategy makes sense when you consider humans know we are likely to make some variable (suboptimal) choices and so our strategy includes building a buffer to guard against the inevitable gaff.

GAI/NN doesn't 'fear' variability and so it's OK to ride a razor thin margin all the way to the victory.

[edit: rephrase]
If you are talking cross-border money transfer, in countries like the US you cannot just willy-nilly have an exchange that changes fiat for crypto and vice-versa. In order to sign up for Kraken/Coinbase/etc you have to pass through KYC / AML on-boarding and are under continuos AML monitoring of the size and structure of your transactions. In the original example, the US company buys crypto from an exchange in the US using fiat from a US Bank Account and will transfer that to another exchange off country (in my example it would be a LATAM country). There is a trail of the entire process on the sender (US side). However, it is true that the responsibility and thoroughness of the AML on the other side depends largely on the receiving country(the KYC/AML program requirements of the exchanges in the other side will vary great). Legally and conceptually, it is just like it would happen with transfering Fiat in the traditional way (e.g. once I send you money to your bank in LATAM you can take it out and do whatever you want with it - legit or shady), except with all the fee/speed/etc benefits. The main conceptual difference is how you create liquidity (changing from crypto to fiat) on the other end (i.e. through p2p or through the exchange). Of course the gray area is what happens on the other end, but as a sender you have gone through all the checks and requirements. You even get paperwork at the end of the year and the US exchange will submit suspicious activity reports (if necessary) to the US govt just like a regular bank would do. Totally legal and correct.
Within the BSD realm, the GPL is frowned upon, and there is a current moving away from it.
How do you define "praxeology"? My recollection from reading Human Action is it was only defined as "The study of human action."-- which could be scientific or might not be.
On a fundamental level the recommendation is the wrong way around as a matter of basic physics.

Filters work better under suction than pressure - because they are less likely to leak.

So why have a nonsensical system where everybody has to wear a mask properly all the time and change it regularly in the correct manner just to have any material effect, when an individual that is worried could just wear a better one that filters inbound properly and everybody gets to do what they want.

What's interesting about this is the psychology of why intelligent people have swallowed this. Do they believe the mask is filtering inbound when it isn't? Or is it entirely political - signalling membership of a group to others. Or is it that the perennially worried believe they should have the right to tell others what they can and can't do, when there is a perfectly reasonably 'live and let live' option available.

Why choose a position that divides society when there is one that brings people together?
> Kind of scary how ... it's always CP

kind of hilarious given the present context that where I come from, CP means Communist Party
Wow, that would take a very kind of special person who could just go through that much information, even if it was computer aided review.
That’s an interesting point. However, AIs are much more opaque in their logic than laws are. I’m not so optimistic that the public visibility will be quite the same.
I'm not talking about that of course. Smart people will always be in demand.

I'm talking about ditches that need be dug. Floors that needs to be swept. Notes that need to be taken. Automation has eaten low end jobs since the industrial age began.
So gVisor for C++?
> How is "go build ." and scp more complex

You have to define what do you mean by "complex". For starters, you don't need go build or scp at all.

> managing an integration with a 3rd party using a proprietary API

Nothing to "manage" really. You just drag and drop your static files. There are no API calls, no handling exceptions or debugging build errors. Everything is automated for you.

If the 3rd party goes down for whatever reason, you can always host it on your own or on any other 3rd party competing services (which there are now plenty of that follow similar model).

Either ways, web hosting inherently is hosting on a 3rd party. It is literally impossible to host everything on your own without any sort of dependency on something: even if you buy your own physical server rack, you still are dependent on electricity provided by your Government, your internet service provider giving you uninterrupted connectivity, DNS for resolving your domain, your domain registrar etc. There is always going to be some 3rd party dependency. Whether you like it or not. If this makes you uncomfortable, just confine to developing standalone apps. You are trying to define complexity in an inherently dynamic environment that web apps run in.
I have a theory about this: in America people seem to be aware that at least some of them are racists. Therefore, they're doing something about it.

In the places I've been to in Asia, racism is not something that's actively thought about. People still have biases within them, but because it's not something they ever discuss or think about. Hence they don't even realize they have those biases.

Perhaps one reason could be that some those places aren't very racially diverse to begin with, at least not as much as America.

I'm from Asia, and I've lived in America for a few years. Trust me, I was treated more politely in America than I would've been in my own home country lol.
My guess is that mega-rich people (most of congress) prefer that the IRS not be more litigous and well-funded than it already is because a significant number of them have doubts about how legal their tax activities actually are. Also they certainly don't want to anger their donors and super PACs
I don't think that quite saves a click. Yes, you've posted what the idea is, but completely cut out the entire point of the article (that the actual amount of risk compensation that happens is usually low, and policy based on the idea tends to be more harmful)...

Take the guardrail thing for example - you posted the arguments of proponents, but cut out the response where it goes through how the actual evidence shows it's not at all the case that guardrails increase risky behaviour!
Pg&e has performed similarly over the past 10 years, averaged across California.
I didn't realize Intel switched the meaning of DX/SX between their 386 and 486 CPU's.
I don't think it is integration like we are used to: you don't need an SDK to do this, and there is no need to have an agreed between both companies.

I think this would end in a lawsuit it you do itm
Oof, yeah, those are some great examples. They're all utopian societies now that the US has imposed their views.
No issues Xena. It is natural to not always have up to date information! Everyone fucks up in someway or the other! Happy you corrected it.
so just to play out the thought experiment here, what you could get is a new vocabulary for time abstraction. AM/Morning, PM/Night, mid-day, Mid-night are all relative to the observer not consistent to the standard clock time. Your early morning in NYC is still my evening in Japan, but they both happen at 09:00MST (Metaverse Standard Time)on Earth Cycle 245 of 365. The concept of days of the week and months of the year would also be subjective to the location of the observer - not part of the official Meta-calander which is just the same 365 units of 24hrs wherever you happen to be. What they call day-time Tuesday in Botswana is part of two date units, for some people hour 17 is always in the morning, and these local facts would get normalized as habit over time. An interesting thought experiment perhaps for some future inter-galactic post space expansion civilization's standards body (ISO Technical Committee 2.34 x 10^14)
protecting ipv6 Networks works just the same as ipv4 networks. by using firewalling.

NAT is not a security mechanism. most consumer routers seem to block any incoming traffic from the outside world by default anyways.
Presumably Google will require me to send them a report of how much money I'd made?

And then I guess I'd write Google a check for 11% of my earnings…?? Quarterly? Monthly? What happens if I miss a payment?

There has to be some sort of callback into the app on successful payment so that the purchased functionality can be unlocked. Seems like Google would be able to inspect the combination of the app purchase metadata and the callback activity to come up with their vig. Just my guess though.
This would go a long way towards making the process feasible.
Shell to Move Headquarters to London Amid Energy Transition
I was being sarcastic; there is no legal basis for an NFT to be any different than, say, the URL in your browser. You can copy it all you want, but it doesn't convey ownership in any way.
https://mobile.twitter.com/BigMeanInternet/status/1372530096...

Retweeted recently
People try to convince me that "nobody could have known masks were effective for respiratory illness until the science came in" like the doctor's office didn't have surgical masks specifically for people with flu-like illness well before anybody had ever heard of COVID-19.
The people hesitating to get the vaccine aren't doing it for scientific reasons in the vast majority of cases and nothing will convince them short of losing their job or similar negative consequences.
Sorry, I thought that was implied by the negative framing of the headline, but maybe not.

The current headline is a bit clickbaity--I wish they'd give a preview of what the article is about (like the old days?) and if people are interested, they can read the whole thing.
The same is true of Magic: The Gathering where an oft repeated lesson is "life is a resource". Meaning you shouldn't be afraid to spend it to win.

My guess would be that for chess it's more difficult to gauge the difference in real time.
Some moves are hard to understand, but it's more like one or two per game. The AI is after all a lot better than Nakamura and Co.

The usual way to detect cheating is detecting incredible accuracy over a whole game, not individual engine like moves.
That played into their thinking, according to what officials like Fauci have said later in interviews. They didn't want to encourage people to just buy up scarce masks. But if you ask me this was extremely shortsighted because turning it into a controversial political football was the worst thing that could have happened.
Oppressed 1/5 of world population is on track to become high income country and highest GDP?
https://mobile.twitter.com/BigMeanInternet/status/1372530096...

This is what "original victim" retweeted again, like yesterday.

> who have nothing to do with the original situation.

Speaking about lies, you made that up. It is assumption based on what you want to be true.
Let me perface this by saying thank you for being sincere and civil, because what I am about type might not be up to the standard you established.

I read that email and there's a serious tons of hand waving and 'dude, trust me.'

I am going to ignore "would be useful to a lot of people -- hundreds of millions of people who you may never know." There's no example use case of who the hundreds of millions of people might be, and how this proposal would benefit them. What are the benefits that the existing CG-NAT and ipv6 couldn't provide?

I am also going to ignore "one-line patches is almost risk-free." Sure if all the software in the world is only Linux/Windows/BSD TCP/IP stack and no one build anything on top of the stacks, then the patch would indeed be only 'one -line'.

What I really have a problem is 'simply include them in new releases of the various operating systems and router OS's that implement the Internet protocols.' I work for a _major_ hardware firewall company, and it is ridiculous the amount of effort we would put on our customers to upgrade their firmware. There are still hardware that run with 15 year old firmware (with all the accumulated CVEs). You are telling me it's easy to convince these people to upgrade their stuff? Are you serious??? 'People naturally upgrade their OS's every few years." Oh I guess we can ignore all the IoTs and middle-boxes on the interweb then.

"We have tested major routers, and none so far require software updates to enable most of these addresses." As mentioned I work for a firewall company. I just logged into a sample firewall under my control- yes the configuration is doable. But in enterprise, everything needs to be rigorously tested or else the sysadmin's not gonna touch it. The sysadmins are certainly not going to waste a few weeks of their lives testing things that might bring down their entire network, and would only benefit the select few who managed to grab ahold of the new IPs.

It's late at night and I don't want to continue. So here.
You'd setup your firewall to protect your IPv6 network. This policy says do this, firewall defaults to no traffic pass. Same as you have now.

IPv6 privacy extension (been around for many many years, and default on at least MacOS and others for many iterations), gives you a new IPv6 address every time period, and rotates through them transparently.
I read that differently: the list on the phone itself wasn’t modified, but the lithuanian report about it, presumably under pressure from china.
I upvoted it. It doesn't seem to matter how ardent or detailed crypto proponents are about the technology, for some strange reason the only truly successful applications always seem to be crime, money laundering, tax avoidance, grifting or greater fool farming.

We have had a long time for BTC to show a compelling use case that isn't easier using traditional finance but by some strange coincidence its always the nefarious uses that are the most successful.

I wonder why. (Well, I don't wonder why really)
Unironically agree. Haven't we forgot the morbid situation in contemporary Libya? Along with buyer's remorse on Arab Spring?
Faster smart phone processors and 4G (now 5G) together with mobile sites actually having better UX makes the advantage of AMP a lot smaller these days.

It simply is a technology that naturally over time will become less and less relevant.
>Have you wrangled with JSON using Go? Absolutely dreadful.

What's dreadful about it? I use it all the time and find it easy to use. I love static typing though and prefer my JSON to have a proper schema (to automatically generate transport layers in both Go and JS from the same source)

>The lack of an opinionated framework often means that each microservice contains code that is organized in its own unique ad-hoc way with lots of repeated boiler-plate code.

Our organization has a microservice generator tool which creates a new microservice for you so that you could start writing business logic immediately and didn't have to think about how to organize your code. It doesn't really do much - it defines a source generator for the transport layer (from protobuf descriptions so you don't have to deal with JSON), creates a bunch of folders ("put domain logic here" etc.), and adds some infrastructure code to connect to DB, RabbitMQ etc. while also adding imports to our org-wide common utils Go library. It took like a few days to create this tool, but the author already had a lot of experience writing microservices so he knew how to structure code and what dependencies to use.
Every year Ruby is dead.
php is very easy to use,it saved a lot of my time,I have used PHP to created a simple Social networking site: alovez.com ,this is my homepage on my website: https://www.alovez.com/bing
Ask HN: What is a decent tool for patch review
We use Mercurial and Mercurial Patch Queue and our review process currently is to either look at the patch or apply it, check the changes and provide the review feedback (obviously everyone has different formatting and style) directly on the JIRA issue. I want to improve it, what is a decent tool to do this that supports Mercurial.

I setup, Phabricator and it’s pretty cool, but now it is not maintained and the CLI tool Arcanist is a bit of a pain. I am checking out ReviewBoard. What else is out there?
I haven't seen a single IPv6 network configured to behave like that by default. Just because it has a globally unique address doesn't mean it's reachable.
If you re-read my post above though, I'm not saying they're symmetrical. But to me it's striking that one state put in severe restrictions on business/etc for over a year, and the other state just pretended there was no pandemic, and yet California's did not even halve the case/death rates compared to Florida (per capita).

So the question California dares not ask itself is: were all the restrictions actually necessary? Maybe small businesses could have been allowed to open sooner with a mask + ventilation requirement, for example. Or maybe a single, uniform policy did not make sense for the enormously-varied state. But you can't ask those questions.
> The rational angles are only used to introduce the trigonometric functions. From then on we can deal with any real angle using arcs of circles and trigonometric functions.

This whole technology is built on a foundation of calculus (limits, infinite sums).

> we need angles to make sense of geometry

Euclid’s version of geometry involves no angle measures whatsoever. Vector methods (of the type which should be preferred for most geometrical modeling and computation) generally need no angle measures.

Angle measures get useful when dealing with uniform circular motion: astronomy and navigation, signal processing, etc., but are largely superfluous for geometry per se.
I mean it's not technology that most people will use in their day jobs, so in many companies it's unlikely to be suggested as a language to build something new in.
I know one company in my area that has a Fortran codebase which continues to exist because it's critical software, but they continually struggle to find anyone who knows Fortran, let alone enough Fortran to work on such an important system.
You are speaking for all mainland Chinese? Ok, well, let me speak for all Australians affected negatively by the b/s extra 'taxes'/trade restrictions/etc put in place by the Chinese government... because they didn't like some things that were said about them?
That is a cool idea even if it doesn't work out for you. Good luck and I hope you get there!
> Have you wrangled with JSON using Go? Absolutely dreadful.

That was my first semi-serious project. It was around 2012. Yes it was dreadful. The problem is I was still programming with mentality of someone who wants to use dynamic typing.

I would read JSON from an http endpoint, and then just make assumptions as to what keys are availabe, and just read them off like this:

data['key1']['key2']

Just like with dynamic typing, when the keys don't exist for whatever reason, your program crashes.

I don't do that anymore. When programin in Go, JSON is just a serialization format for a struct. You have a concrete struct type and you just use json to fill it with data. It's so easy and trivial.

> Have you written multiple microservices in Go?

God no! Why would I do that? I hate microservices. I like Go because I can make a self contained application.

> The lack of an opinionated framework often means that each microservice contains code that is organized in its own unique ad-hoc way with lots of repeated boiler-plate code.

So you're talking about working within an organization with multiple insulated teams, each writing services that are supposed to communicate with each other, but the teams themselves don't follow any standard.

Well, that's just one of the awful things about microservices. I don't think the language matters.

> With Ruby and with RoR I never have to waste time with this and I can get straight to the business logic.

Having to debug a RoR codebase was the worst experience in my programming life. It's all magic. Trying to read the code helps you with nothing. You can't read the code to understand the program. You have to read the RoR documentation to understand all the magic. Worse, you can't just read a part of it: you have to read all of it. Because nothing in the code will give you any hint as to _which_ magical aspects of RoR this codebase is using. So unless you know all the magic that RoR does, you have no idea what's going on.

> When writing one-off scripts, I can see the advantages of dealing with just structs and functions.

It's the exact opposite. When writing one off scripts, I can see why someone would not want to bother with structs. You usually are dealing with strings any way (filenames, paths, keys in a json/yaml file, etc).
Yes, and I think the whole concept is seriously dangerous. I hate it generally, because I hold truth is such an important ideal personally, but at a time where trust in democracy is dropping around much of the 'Western world', intentionally hiding information because you worry people will misuse it just throws fuel on the fire because it gives conspiracy nuts a 'grain of truth' to build their falsehoods on.

I think it's just so bad - when you have people making up crazy stuff about Government control (like the crazy stuff around vaccines being population control, injecting tracking microchips, the QAnon cult, etc. that are all getting massive), actually having real examples of the Government lying is basically the worst thing that you can have!
It is not appropriate in families. It just does less harm, because parents are more likely to notice harm and change.

When I wrote "I have seen it" originally I meant siblings in families. At this point, I have seen dynamic three times. Each time one kid ended up being systematic aggressor and other victim. The victim was pushed to submissivity and aggressor honestly believed he/she is entitled to act like that. And that victim is bad for defending own toys or boundaries.

And each time it went on, until parents changed approach.
> but I wonder sometimes how much of the racism on the right could have been avoided if we hadn't told them they were all irredeemable racists and that we hated them. The vitriol kind of makes everyone have to pick a side.

It doesn't though. You can be a white person, even a white Conservative, be opposed to CRT and not "pick a side." If their response to being called racist is to lean even harder into the racism, that just proves that their critics had a point.
How so? SX was always the crappy version.
Not sure how to do that from OS perspective without introducing some kind of module concept (either through shared object or some other ways).

The SAPI solution seems pretty straightforward to me. Jail the particular library into a sandboxed process and IPC with it transparently. Compatibility will be tricky (especially for libraries that is more complicated). But the solution itself is straightforward and I can see it work.
If I keep running the search several times in a row, sometimes I get results about escorts, nudity (not clear if illegal just by the DDG small text blurb), etc. and the other times I get normal news. DDG likely has an issue with this website, but I won’t investigate this further either.
Earth cycle 245 is one of the big problems in the modern world. When does it change over to 246? Do I wake up on the 245th but the date changes before lunch? What happens with billing systems, calendars, and what not?

Left/right, port/starboard, north/south are all in common use because we need to be able to talk about directions relative to different frames of reference. It’s just as true that we need to talk about time in multiple different frames of reference.