skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Policy routing works exactly the same on IPv6 as on IPv4. People misusing NAT or internal addresses to handle policy routing are the problem.

I've no idea why SLAAC would prevent you from doing policy routing - the prefix is deterministic.

In IPv4 I presume you guessed who each host is by some sort of DHCP registration. For IPv6 you would use either NDP, or perhaps even way more secure SEND enhancement with PKI instead.
Of course static assignment still just works, including in NDP/SEND. (e.g. by MAC address or per link)

RIPng/OSPFv3/IS-IS/EIGRP can also tell other hosts which route you prefer packets to return by with better granularity and dynamically. This works even better with v6 since global addresses are always available.
> This is just a normal usage of imprecise language, not very different than saying you own a house when technically you have a mortgage

Lol, this is a joke? You have the rights to live in your house even if you have a mortgage, the house isn't going anywhere, it is a contract with lots of meaning. NFT's on the other hand doesn't mean anything at all.

Here is a link to a house: https://www.google.com/maps/place/California,+USA/@37.455368...

This is backed up by the ycombinator server, and as the owner of this link I can change the data etc.

Does this mean that I own that house? No. Do I own the picture of the house? Still no. Do I own that link? No, not even that. I just own this post that is stored on the HN server. That is how NFT ownership works.

Do you want to pay me $100 for this post? It means you can own this post which links to a house, cool huh?
At least right now I control the domain. I think the registry messed up as they allowed my registration, not the registar.

Thanks for the info on the migration, that could indeed explain this.
> So fragmentation is still an issue.

Maybe Apple is doing the right thing by forcing everything to go through the App Store on iOS.
Indeed. The problem is not lobbying, but campaign finance reform. Conceptually simple, politically impossible.
First, start learning the language. Then ask if you can go along for lunch. Let them know that they should continue to speak in their language at lunch and that you are trying to learn. Be light hearted about it and accept any help they offer. This will build bonds.

If you don't want to learn the local language, then perhaps you should start looking in companies or countries that do speak your language primarily. I would think there's a high chance of encountering a similar issue again if you stay in that location.

Also, start implementing some standards like meeting agendas and action items. This is the type of stuff a lead should be setting the standards on.
> The structure of the code handling this type of div is identical to code handling an actual exception

You would never write an exception handler to handle such a failure from div. The divisor being non-zero is a precondition of calling div in the first place, which is something the caller is responsible for upholding. You shouldn't ever need to write an exception handler to catch precondition violations. Do you also write handlers to 'handle' null dereferences? Representing the partiality in the return type is just pushing the responsibility to some code that can't reasonably do anything.

> What then happens when I pass a zero?

I've already explained this, you obtain a NonZero[Int] from a function

fromInt : Int -> Optional[NonZero[Int]]

and you can optionally add an unsafe version with type

Int -> NonZero[Int]

> All you did is propagate the issue to somewhere else

Yes, the check has to be done somewhere since that is the point of encoding the property in the types. But encoding it in the argument type ensures the check is done before div is called which is where it needs to be done.
his company makes the closed source financial infrastructure for digitising cash for multinational corporations, that is made useless by crypto becoming popular.

of course he doesnt mention this when writing hit pieces on crypto culture.

https://twitter.com/TBSocialist/status/1456963980577153026?s...
Someone once told me the key to a successful startup is to pick a protocol of one of the well-known ports and bring it to the browser.
This is so wholesome. I like how these new types of tastes on traditional messaging keep showing up.
Otherwise, all messaging apps are some packaging of chat bubbles, video/voice calls, and attaching files.
Porsche's whole lineup before the latest set of refreshes was nicely physical and traditional.

For example the 718 Cayman/Boxster supports Carplay so you get all the good aspects of digital, but climate control, drive modes, and everything else is physical. There are plenty of cars that are/were in this in between state like Mazda's lineup.
Citadel CEO Outbid a Group of Crypto Investors for Copy of U.S. Constitution
AI (ant intelligence) is nature’s computer
I'm talking more about the system that radio uses, where anyone who wants to run a radio station has a place to get the content and pay the same fee.
Does this mean the Zstd magic number is now cast in stone?
I think many of the things you find on Youtube aren't supposed to be there but they get uploaded anyway.
You can peruse his Twitter feed. It's full of nonsensical statements. I like to think what I write makes some modicum of sense and when I do make claims that don't make sense then someone would be willing to say so and explain why.

Weinstein put out a mathematical paper with disclaimers that it is for purely entertainment purposes. If that's not nonsensical and contradictory then I don't know what is. This is why I don't pay attention to him. He's not a serious and sincere person because a serious person wouldn't publish a mathematical paper with disclaimers about it being nothing more than entertainment. So his actions make him look like either a troll or someone going senile. In both cases it doesn't make sense to pay attention to someone like that.

He also likes to encourage conspiratorial thinking among his followers which is again a sign of someone that is not operating in good faith and trying to achieve any positive outcomes. It makes him seem like someone that enjoys stoking fear and paranoia in order to grow his clout on social media.

If you have references for any worthwhile work that he has produced then I'm actually curious to see it because whatever I've seen from him indicates what I already wrote.
I have an entry level 2019 Skoda Citigo. It is just a car, zero driver assist / digital gimmicks. The only digital features are a Bluetooth stereo and a CarPlay screen — but even they have physical buttons.
Half America was publicly making fun of the previous president. Try that in China.

Snowden while having noble intentions he broke the law and he should face the consequences of his actions.

If I kill the guard to break into the CIA HQ and expose a massive scandal do I deserve jail time or a Medal of Honor? I would argue both.
I think sex offenses are strongly related to "toxic masculinity" mindset (though, I don't like that name).
You technically do not own a domain, but you lease it them.

"ICANN's official policy is that domains are not property to be owned. Domain names are registered (rented) by payment of an annual registration fee."
> Sorry, I don't think you understand this technology at all. I appreciate one might want to remain sceptical of something that has so much FOMO

This is pure demagoguery.

> There's a well-known issue of third-party ticket sales and this method allows you to have digital proof that a ticket is authentic

You still haven't said how exactly we know the ticket is authentic: who verifies it's issued by the authorized org (not to mention resellers), who verifies it's authentic when the person shows up with it etc.

> The organisation selling the tickets can create the verifier.

The already do that, without blockchain.

For all the talk of "you don't understand technology" and "there are benefits", you come back to something that already exists and is already implemented: a central organization issues tickets and verifies them.

What exactly does blockchain bring into the picture?

> But it's very hard for someone who's buying the ticket from a third-party to verify the ticket.

How would they verify it form a "first party"? Who's to say who is "first party" and who's not? And that's before we get to the question of authorized resellers, people buying tickets for friends etc.

> If you're worried it's not allowed to be resold you can check the policy metadata embedded into the ticket saying "Resales are allowed".

Once again, there's some unknown "you" who somehow magically verifies some data.
Digital art has been free of this "inheritance" for years. We don't need to impose the arbitrary constraints of physical art on digital art. It's as backwards as Blockbuster trying to ban digital video so that they can sell more DVDs. It's philosophical DRM for jpegs.
Why would you try to watch a TV show on your phone? Is that a zoomer thing?

Can you not just download stuff from NZB and use whatever open-source software you like to stream and play it on your computer device of choice?
> It seems (being charitable) like the guy has a habit of making dramatic claims like “I have solved X and everyone currently working on it has it wrong!” and then not being able (not remotely able!) to back it up.

He’s a libertarian so it kinda comes with the territory
It's not a contradiction.

You can trust the law / trust the code, but not trust the judges / trust the machines that run the code.

You trust the law beacuse you can read it / You trust the code because you can read and mathematically prove that it works

You cant trust the judges -- you have to have faith in them

You cant trust the machines either -- but blockchain gives you specific mathematical guarantees that it is very hard for them to break the system.
HPPD is a FAR cry from getting "slightly detached from reality and pure reasoning."
They don't make them for the US anymore.

The best you can do is buy a "fleet model" truck or something, but its still going to have a host of electronics and probably a GPS and cellular radio inside. Fleet models are designed to last, as not to anger large-scale fleet customers.

Yeah, you can find cars with more knobs and less touch screens, but in most cases, those analog-appearing knobs are just digital input devices to an (eg for Honda since at least 2018) low-end, cheaply-made Android device.

If you're sincere, your best bet is to buy a year and model with something that still has plenty of spare parts available (eg. 2000 era Honda, Toyota trucks, etc)
I stopped caring about any coding style, as long as we agreed on a prettier configuration.

Not caring about this saves me so much mental capacity, I would recommend it
What bothers me is missing shows from my Countries' offerings. Netflix is supposed to have Arrested Development. Not from my Country. Why? No information.
What you want is a "driver's car". They typically have fewer bells and whistles and provide a more connected driving experience. You're expected to expend effort to pilot the car.

There are actually quite a few these days, but I'm partial to Japanese cars, myself.

1) Mazda MX-5 Miata
I own one. It's awesome to drive. Has few features and a simple dash. It's quite economical to operate (inexpensive to insure, gets over 35 mpg, very popular so lots of parts availability and lots of aftermarket parts, Mazda reliability and maintenance costs).

2) Subaru BRZ / Toyota 86
Also awesome to drive. This car is a bit more practical than the Miata because of its roof and trunk space. Less economical to operate: it's less fuel efficient and people speed in them so insurance is more expensive. The boxer engine gives it inherently better handling than most vehicles.

3) Honda Civic Type R
This is my dream car.

4) Subaru WRX
If you need all-wheel drive, this is pretty much it.

5) Nissan 370Z
Nissans aren't my cup of tea but they go fast.

As for trucks, the only truck that interests me is the Toyota Tacoma, since it still comes with a manual transmission. I wish I could purchase a Toyota Hilux in the US. I also wish I could purchase a Suzuki Jimny here, alas. I'm not at all interested in SUVs, so I can't help you there.
Getting the undercarriage sprayed with a lanolin-based spray before winter can do wonders for cutting back the damage from road salt.

Otherwise the rocker panels just rot out so quickly, and they are wicked expensive to get replaced. I was quoted almost $4000 to fix mine on my last vehicle (only 100k miles, otherwise near perfect condition), so I could get an inspection sticker. So I traded it and put that money down on a new one instead...
> I don't want MTV and VH1, but I do want Tennis Channel (which isn't an option).

Do not pay Disney, and send an email to the US Tennis Association or whoever keeps contracting with ESPN.

If you keep paying Disney to watch Tennis, you will never get it a la carte.
But what is it really that they own? Bragging rights, that they paid for the artist to proclaim them the first (or subsequent) person to own a hash on one of multiple blockchains, that contains a link pointing to an image file of an artwork hosted on a CDN? And the artist can create infinitely more? And the image file might be taken down at any time? And while you can trace the provenance on the blockchain easily enough, linking the originating address with the actual artist needs some external evidence off blockchain that might not be around forever? And the blockchain it’s on might well lose popularity at some point and be forgotten? Etc?

I just can’t see why it’d be valuable to anyone, unless they’re just caught up in the hype and don’t think too hard about it. I can however see people taking advantage of the many, many people who feel like they missed out on, say, Bitcoin and want to get in on ”crypto”.
You could not pick a better person to be the buyer
I'm the opposite. I want "internet but not TV". If you're in Comcast land, you'll pay for cable either way.

> I don't think it's realistic to assume "no internet" is a standard default these days

About 1 in 6 US households has no internet access, nowhere near a small enough number to start rolling up alternatives.
It's not done at work, that's not even a remotely valid comparison. Twitter is an open platform that is not a professional setting. People should be able to talk about something and let it be unaffiliated with the company they work for.
You can either clone the blockchain BEFORE the token attribution and attribute the NFT to you; or modify the rules of the blockchain to attribute you ownership.

Legitimacy of the original blockchain compared to the cloned one is purely a marketing result. There is no blockchain of blockchains in other words.
Yeah, but with enough of these "nudges", maybe it finally happens.

The EU has already fined Google, South Korea is adding these new rules, I think even the US is thinking about some regulation, let's see what happens in a few years.
From the wiki, looks like they are holding her:

On 17 November, Chinese state media outlet China Global Television Network released an email allegedly written by Peng to chief executive of WTA Steve Simon, which stated that she was resting at home and that her allegation of sexual assault was not true, and that she was not missing. The email also criticized the WTA for releasing what it claimed was unverified information about Peng without her consent. The authenticity of the email was cast in doubt with many pointing out that a typing cursor appears to be visible on the screenshot of the email. Responding in regard to the email, Simon stated that it only raised his concerns as to her safety and whereabouts. He reiterated that Peng's sexual assault allegation must be investigated "with full transparency and without censorship".

CCP is insane.
>The medical professional is greedy, i.e. they want to charge you as much money as possible, and they do not (per se) care about your health. They only care about your health as far as they can get money from you.

I'm not even going to read the rest of the article because the premise up front is so flawed. It assumes that doctors alone have say over pricing / compensation, and that's just not reality. It's much like engineers being blamed for things that rest entirely with management. It also makes the same flawed premise that I deal with in my profession every day - that I'm so greedy and so focused on my own pocketbook that I will screw over my clients. Are people motivated by money? Certainly. But a professional will put their client above money assuming no other perverse incentives.
I replaced microtik router with this, because it was annoying to have to run an odd duck that I always have to keep figuring how to manage differently, or how to workaround its defficiencies, because it doesn't run a reguar OS, but some dedicated thing for routing. It's much easier to me to do more complicated things, the manufacturer didn't add UI for on a general distro, than on some special purpose OS.

+ now I run the same OS on the router I run on 12 other server machines at home. This is just easier to manage and backup, and replace with any other SBC that I have at home, regardless of the model as long as it has an ethernet port.
That one literally changed my life. It probably doubled my productivity without exaggerating and maybe more.
Honestly one thing netflix has done for me: I'm watching far less.
Implementing and maintaining this system, as well as training administrators how to use it, would cost millions of dollars, and lead to all kinds of controversies because people don't remember their votes all that well [1]. Further, it's not useful to verify your own vote if you can't verify the total. All your system tells a voter is that there's a mapping somewhere of their key to their vote. It doesn't say that vote is included in the total. So it doesn't help us verify elections, introduces doubt, and costs lots of money.

It's also worth saying whether or not your vote was counted is already public record, resulting in even less relative benefit for a system like this.

[1]: https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/articles-reports/2019/0...
A TV antenna plugged into a TV that can change channels brings multiple networks together in a single interface.

But the point is all those bundles were only necessary due to lack of technology that could connect content owners directly to content viewers. We even have search engines that, theoretically, you should be able to search the content’s name, get to the content owner’s website, and be presented with the options of how you can watch it.

Edit: I think I get your point, that bundling might be more economical for content owners. And that cable facilitated that by subsidizing less watched content with more watched content. But I guess in that case, I am guessing the cable company just becomes the content owner (like Comcast) and the various content owners get big and produce a variety of media.
I'm pretty sure my 2019 Honda's HVAC knobs are physically connected to the flaps they control. You can feel/hear the dampers moving with the knobs.
This is hardly a typical domain registration experience.

Would be truly unfortunate if a hypothetical decentralized alternative had a similar bug that let someone else register and already-owned domain, as that bug would likely invalidate the entire structure of the registration and bring the whole system down as people exploited the vulnerability to steal every possible domain in a decentralized manner. At least this centralized solution can fix it and adapt.
He doesn’t know what he is talking about.
The item count is stored separately so that the len() function also performs in O(1) time, and does not have to count the elements each time.

Could you kindly explain this part in detail?
Wow, you shouldn't have self tapping screws anywhere near an engine bay. But since you know what they are, I guess their danger is minimized.

It is quite OK to run w/o an engine cover, it is a worthless piece of plastic.
I wonder how Dr Walter would describe the difference between "animal and human cells". The statement makes it sound like he's a Young Earth creationist.

One criticism[1] of the above linked study, the one that states Ivermectin acts as a 3CL protease inhibitor, is that it uses an "in silico approach" (computer simulation).

The way that we know PF-07321332 is a 3CL protease inhibitor is via an "in silico approach".

It's important to note that the dosage of Ivermectin required to act as a protease inhibitor would be way above the accepted levels for human use.

Even still, this "animal/horse drug" rhetoric along with asymmetric acceptance of evidence is what lead me to want to understand more about the ivermectin controversy. It smells more like propaganda than science. Then, the sheer number of studies showing positive outcomes made it hard for me to accept that all the science was bad. Astral Codex did a great job of explaining why the studies were flawed.

[1]: https://www.factcheck.org/2021/10/scicheck-merck-pfizer-covi...
Build yourself a Caterham. I did this at one point, you'll learn a few things and the thing is totally analogue.
So in a surgery situation where you are under and something else is discovered, then that's a situation of unexpected costs. So you look to who is best able to bear them and that's who bears them. What exactly is the purpose of insurance if they do not cover you from unexpected costs? And if there is no insurance (say a cash procedure), then the hospital bears the cost and bakes the possibility of complications into the price.

Point is, you need clarity of prices rather than the situation today where you sign a promise to pay whatever costs the hospital decides to charge you, and you may not even know what those are until weeks after the procedure. There is no meaningful way a market can operate under conditions in which blank checks are demanded in order to get anything done.

If that can't work, and the hospital insists it cannot quote you a cost at all, then go full socialized healthcare since obviously no market is possible.
> It's a dying breed though, complicated "driver assist" systems are becoming standard or even mandated :(.

I'm on the opposite side of this. All the new safety & driver assist features are the best part about getting a new car. I wouldn't buy a new daily driver that doesn't have blind spot monitoring, collision avoidance, lane keep assist, etc. Once you have these features and you are accustomed to how they work, you can't go back.

I drive a 2019 XC40 and these safety features are my favorite part about it. Being able to turn on Pilot Assist on the highway makes driving so much more comfortable, it's like having two people driving at the same time! I don't let my guard down completely of course, but it definitely takes the edge off. I don't find these features getting in my way.
Don't photons have zero mass?
You probably need to buy a used car. Or, buy a new car and remove the fuse for the infotainment system.
Uh, that's the worse citation source I've ever seen? It's a speculative twitter post?

Also, what you said is like saying someone working at Stripe felt threatened by crypto. He's still not selling you a product (anywhere I can find in his online presence!)

A full decade later, crypto still isn't used for payments except in PR puff pieces, like the El Salvador fiasco. No one working in serious online payments feels threatened by crypto. Some want to ride the crypto PR mania into popularity, however.
Yes, they just don't have any mechanism to assist you in doing so. Not that resale is of any use as regards funding the artist anyway.
Developer Burnout Survey
If people here are seriously asking for evidence-based proof that acid can destroy people, then they are not very old or have survived partying / rave scenes.

The term "acid casualty" exists for a reason. I've known a few people that over-indulged and became detached weirdos and never came back.

It's not a 'wives tale' as someone here said. Take acid by all means. Just know that you could become a despondent ghoul if you go too hard and frequently.