skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
A signed document sent from my email address has the same properties.
8 year old SSD was manufactured on huge (by todays standards) lithography, and was most likely MLC.
Yes, but that actually somewhat reinforces my general point if you think about it. Robin Hood hid in the woods because that’s where the power of the state couldn’t reach him. The legend tips it’s hat to the general understanding that deep forests were effectively stateless territory beyond the reach of the law.

For most of human history untamed woods and mountains have been dangerous, unordered places. This is where political dissidents, bandits, and runaway slaves have gone specifically because they’re not places that most people wanted to go given the choice. That’s why the legend of Robin Hood had him there rather than in a safe house in London.
Ran into this with Verizon.
If we were doing things right and wanted to really benefit from having these giants around, we'd go 1950s-Japan on them and harness them to drive a broader prosperity-increasing economic engine, while still letting them thrive and grow huge, while guiding them to advance broader economic-strategic goals.

Having them around and so globally dominant is a huge opportunity, and one that won't last forever. But I doubt we'll use it like we could before that time's over.
Please name all these similar generator. I don't know any that covers at least 50% of functionality.
> its color pallet and disproportionate human forms makes it feel universal

So we went from having Homer Simpson universal-color emojis, to a pallet of specific-color emojis, to be more inclusive. And then switched from stock photos of diverse people, to Homer Simpson cartoons, to be more universal.

We're just making this all up from year to year, aren't we?
1. Text editors can autocomplete just about anything, including CSS styles.

2. The code you write shouldn't be compromised by the tool you use to write it.
One element that results in less security is that it becomes more difficult to replace.

For example, QWACs cannot legally be automated (e.g. via ACME), because of certain restrictions applied to needing to validate the natural or legal person making the certificate request. This actually was an issue for one CA (BuyPass) that tried to support ACME but ran afoul of the framework.

While originally QWACs were proposed as optional, regulation such as PSD2 attempts to make them mandatory for (financial services) servers to obtain. If one of those keys is compromised, then the server wishing you obtain a replacement certificate may have to wait weeks to obtain such a certificate, or make an in-person visit to the CA (e.g. the post office).

A considerable number of compromised or misissued certificates have failed to been revoked on the industry-agreed upon timelines (24 hours or 5 days, depending), because of challenges CAs have faced because their customers haven’t (or legally can’t) automate replacement, and because the additional information in the certificate requires manual validation, despite having no technical impact on the TLS connection.
I was fortunate enough to subscribe to the Times through the Apple Subscription platform. Only took me one click to unsubscribe.
Great question! It does lots of things. The CLI (https://github.com/screenplaydev/graphite-cli) lets you:

- Recursively rebase changes to keep your branches correctly stacked

- Allow you to shift half of a stack onto a different branch

- Open up PRs/push changes for all the branches in a stack

- Offer to delete merged branches from local, rebases the remaining branches, and adjust github pr merge bases.

The web dashboard lets you:

- See an inbox of PRs spanning any number of repos, based on which ones need action

- Navigate between PRs in a stack

- Modify Prs, review, all of which is synced to Github

- Shortcuts, client side caching for fast loading, Phabricator style interface, macros, landing a stack of PRs together, and much more :)

Give the tool a try, we'd love to hear your feedback in the community Slack! https://join.slack.com/t/graphite-community/shared_invite/zt...
Would you please stop taking HN threads further into ideological flamewar? You've been doing this repeatedly and we've already asked you to stop. It's not what this site is for, it lowers discussion quality dramatically, and we ban accounts that keep doing it.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
By not encrypting the call signs because unencrypted call signs aren't the problematic restriction. It's the content restrictions that are stifling in the modern world.

Also: progress has changed the landscape. HFDF used to be difficult for the military but now it's easy for hobbyists, and not just in last-mile form, but in coordinated always-on infrastructure form. The regulations were not written with this in mind. With an active community this fact alone might obviate the need for many a regulation.
Showcasing a better system that the US could emulate is a great way to offer insight into how the US could improve.

Interpreting it as "See how we are better than you!?" -- literally no one has said this. Interpreting it like that is just putting insecurity on display.

Given the choice of two reactions:

- "Geez, that system does sound better than what we've got going on here, we should consider adopting it"

and

- "I get it, you think you're better than us! stop being so divisive!"

...which do you think would lead to positive change? which do you think is a more fair interpretation of what the OP actually said?
I dont think anyone in the US sells that tho.
The _data_ should be replicated, but the compute infrastructure doesn't need to be. Many companies I suspect would be fine having to restart pipelines on driver failure (increasing tail latency, basically) if it yields a substantial cost reduction.
This is a facetious retort and adds very, very little value. Maybe there's something else you can provide to further the discussion.

I think your retort conflates "corporation" and "corporation owner / billionaire". Generally the intellectual property, capital, lobbying relationships and business relationships of the corporation are self-sustaining and do a good job of keeping competition at bay. That's axiomatic because if they didn't, the corporation would be succeeded by another which did. Surely you understand that sub-optimal systems can be self-perpetuating.

The core issue isn't so much "Can employees create as much value outside of a corporation?" but rather "How much of that value was created by one particular employee / investor / owner?"

> Man those corporations should really start their own countries, since their owners don't need to pay taxes to their nations and are capable of creating value outside of them.
From the console:

All 181 images loaded.

All 230 images loaded.

All 154 images loaded.

All 50 images loaded.

All 230 images loaded.

All 242 images loaded.
I most recently cancelled my NYT sub a couple months ago. I was able to do so w/o interacting with anyone. I'm in NC.

I think they've just finally relented on forcing you to interact with a human.

They have also allowed me to keep reading past my subscription termination point, but they keep asking me to re-subscribe. At some point, I assume I'll start getting blocked entirely.
I tell myself that most other jobs are just as meaningless or come with their own baggage, but I don't know for a fact. I do know that when the stars are aligned, when I'm in a flow and have something interesting to work on, I like the job, and consequently it seems "meaningful" - I think that's just sensory, a feeling. On the other hand sticking with it could be embracing mediocrity.

I think of Candide from time to time. Who can say if this is the paradisaical garden and alternatives could be much, much worse. Either way it's human nature to be restless. Maybe we can't all have the better job. This turns my attention to side projects, but I think as it pertains to tech, I don't have that much interest.
I understand where you're coming from, but you're talking as if this "Jeff" is a machine and not a person. He's a real human who can think and make decisions regardless of what this "algorithm" could potentially dictate. This prioritization of the "face" is all speculation at the end of the day, and until the "Jeff"s of Youtube stop acting like machines and start acting like thinking-individuals who don't think that the end justify the means, the stupid face will take over, and this is what I and others are criticizing.
We did a rock candy experiment in 6th grade and probably attempted it a few separate times, specifically because we kept having issues. I think at least one batch got moldy. But, if I'm remembering correctly (this is over a decade ago), we may have been placing the dishes near where sunlight hit, so that could've been part of it.
Biden Administration to Auction Off Gulf of Mexico for Offshore Drilling
It also completely prevents any interesting radio experimentation. There isn't anything left on that frontier that couldn't be conflated with encryption.
> On a separate note. Why is it really hard for HN community to make a compliment?

You can find a bunch of compliments in this thread, and others. Don't portray the "HN community" as a monolithic entity with a single will. It's not. And trying to guilt-trip the community into making compliments is bad form, really annoying, boring to read, and goes against the spirit of intellectual curiosity.
> gear which did not lend itself easily to such conditions

could you expand on this a bit? I don't see how software vs hardware could impact this, doesn't it all just go through an amplifier to your headphones at the end?
It doesn't really matter what kind of improvement they get. Places get into recession while¹ workers are let go, have hours reduced, or settle into lower salaries.

When work conditions are stable, you don't see a recession. When they are improving, you really don't see it.

(But yeah, things in the US are confusing enough right now that this may be an exception.)

1 - The causality here is highly complex and circular, so there is no "because of".
Thats changed then - several years ago they gave me a right dance involving phone calls and emails. Lost me as a customer for good.
not even with a stupid face on a thumbnail? cmon its so clickable!!1
Saw this a few months ago and briefly considered it, but it seemed too risky to use on a production website.

Next.js is maintained by an entire company (Vercel). If Flareact ever gains official Cloudflare support, that'd be wonderful!
On a slightly different angle, my frustration is that it's not done on a general standards or outcome based requirement. For example rather than dictating a specific thing or even standard like micro-USB, simply require, e.g., that 90% of all power cables must comply with an industry self-organized standard within 3 years of the final release and, e.g., that the largest firms must subsidize the compliance by the smallest firms in order to prevent gaming the system to drive the small companies out of business.

There is a rather significant and major issue that this change highlights; essentially all our politicians and bureaucrats see themselves as smart and wise enough to be central planners and masters of the universe … when the truth could not be farther from it.
> ... there is also a negative impact to the reference implementation of ntpd, which uses 127.x.y.0 to communicate with drivers ...

127.127.x.y, for what it's worth (cf. any of the individual "Type n" reference clock drivers' documentation pages linked from [0]).

> ... but we believe that it's easy to change this in ntpd since other implementations don't use the same mechanism

How easy do you believe it is to change (update) all of the dozens or possibly even hundreds of models of "embedded devices" (i.e., so-called "appliances" and such) built on or around ntpd that are deployed throughout the world but upgraded only rarely, if ever?

(ntpd (i.e., the reference implementation) is slowly dying anyways, but that's beside the point.)

One of the few benefits I can see from this proposal is that someone -- or a handful of someones, perhaps -- will make a nice sum of cash when they sell their future allocations (from 127/8) to AWS.

With my network engineer hat on, I'd also be against this proposal and would rather see the resources spent migrating to IPv6 instead.

---

[0]: https://doc.ntp.org/archives/4.2.8-series/refclock/
Yup! In this whimsical style, the people shown can have skin, hair, etc. shades in every possible color of the rainbow.
Can you expand? I don't understand what you're trying to communicate.
Not to mention, the thing the article eventually points out; that ivermectin had the most efficacy in areas that also have large populations suffering from parasites, isn't new.

Nothing this article says is new. This is all old hat.
Link to Impossible's trademark (for nutrition - they have 18)

https://trademark.trademarkia.com/impossible-nutrition-87116...

This was from 2018 (important I think).

Another was this:
https://trademark.trademarkia.com/impossible-85578345.html

But the class is not a super overlap with impossible foods.

Here is impossible foods mark.

https://trademarks.justia.com/861/02/impossible-86102158.htm...

2013 was the filing date here.

With an english language word, the trademark protection is (generally) going to be a bit narrower (ie, specific class etc).

For what it is worth, at a 10 second glance this is not the slam dunk little vs big player thing.
Interestingly, apps like TinyPNG are able to bring down the size of that file by −74% (255.3 KB -> 67.5 KB) in a way that is invisible to the eye.

Someone should have compressed their files better.
> Go back to other discussions about veganism here on HN and you will see the common anti-vegan memes.

You will also see a lot of outlandish claims about veganism, human diet and health and, food in general which is generally where the backlash starts.

I've seen claims like "humans have evolved to be vegan", "beef only has vitamin b12 because of b12 supplements", "if you eat properly, your body will generate it's own vitamin b12".

You'll also see dismissive, no true Scotsman, responses to issues with vegan diets like struggles to get enough b12, calcium and iodine.

I try to eat vegan, or at least vegetarian, a few days a week, mostly by eating traditionally vegetarian meals. Impossible meat is highly processed and is neither healthy nor a climate change solution.
I think you might be just remembering the good times and forgetting the bad. When I first upgraded my box to XP, things weren't very snappy. Even Notepad took a second to open. The OS definitely required more RAM and CPU power than its predecessors.

Despite this horrible injustice, you still visit your parents, right? :)
It's ultimately my decision which certificates I will trust. I can choose to trust just one certificate, and ignore the Mozilla root store, or I can use Mozilla's root store, and modify it. These are my decisions, not Mozzilla's.

So this proposed regulation mandates that my browser must support QWAC, and include TSP roots? Does that mean that browsers MUST deprive me of the ability to control my root store? Would I be in violation if I modified my (open-source) browser so that it was no longer in compliance?

Supposing I published my patch on a website outside the EU (e.g. in the UK)?

To be clear, I don't want a root cert from any entity that is effectively controlled by a government, to be trusted by my browser. Some governments bother me more than others, (for example) a Turkish government-controlled CA was caught forging certificates. There's still a Turkish CA in there, I see; Debian have seen fit to remove it.

It's all fine, the sky won't fall. As long as I can still decide who I trust.
Hmm, this is interesting but I come away with the feeling that there is just too much of a flaw here.

I think the main issue is that there is no scale on the Y-axis.

And ultimately the goal would be to minimize the area below the curve, right? So there has to be some scale on the Y-axis. You could front-load the worry or you could spread it out over time. Either way is probably fine if the total area is the same.
The problem with the typed interfaces are the many cases where the JSON isn't strongly structured, so you end up jumping through all sorts of hoops to make it work, or using a sub-par API like you mentioned, and casting everywhere.

Maybe it's just unavoidable with strong typing, I've had pleasant experiences with C# dynamics with JSON data, but nothing is as easy to me as "let thing = JSON.parse(stringstuff)" and then being able to just do "thing.?someprop" for consumption.

Sure, it only takes 30 secs to add a new type, but the issue is that it has cascading effects. Then build and deploy, etc... whereas with Node, I can just do runtime checks and fail softly.

Sorry, I don't mean to resurrect the old strong vs dynamic typing debate, they each have their use - but for REST APIs specifically I find JSON + dynamic types to be a lot more effective.
Ask HN: Ridiculous job interview. What do I do?
Who: Series B startup with ~$100 million in funding, me open-source developer

What: engineering manager writes me e-mail that goes like: “we found your open-source project and want to offer you a job”

In a meeting they explain how they were interested in using my open-source project and want to hire me so i could carry out a similar work for them

Then they go on and explain i’d have to do 4 more meetings 1-2 hours each, including a leetcode-style tech interview

In my head i’m thinking: “If their leetcode-engineers are that good why do they have rely on my open-source?”

What would you do in this situation?
Would you jump through the hoops in hope of getting relevant work?
The EU has exactly as much authority as we believe it to have, and as much as the member states are willing to enforce.

Those of us not within their bounds could just decide not to comply with their nonsense, and there isn't a great deal that they could actually do about it.

Instead we're letting Europe pull a California, to the detriment of the entire internet.
I'll give a concrete example. Around 2000 I was running molecular dynamics simulations. Goal is to get the longest trajectory you can in a reasonable time. You can add more processors and speed up the simulation, but at some point, adding more processors doesn't speed things up unless you can speed up the network, because there is some computational barrier you can't cross until the network delivers some data to other nodes (btw this is the same as allreduce in horovod).

I had access to the fastest supercomputer at the time (a T3E with 64 nodes) as well as a small linux cluster.

The speedups I saw on the super computer were: 60X for 64 nodes. The speedups I saw on my linux cluster were: 4X for 8 nodes. All the problems were due to the slow network (10Mbit ethernet with TCP) and congestion (allreduce hammers the network). However, I didn't have to wait a week for my job to start running, and I could add more nodes and run different jobs in parallel.

I concluded that, unless I had an MD jhob that couldn't fit in the linux cluster, it was always better to use the linux cluster instead of the supercomputer.

It really depends a lot on the simulation and how much you can adjust your system to run faster on smaller machines.
This is fantastic, I am still bitter from having to wait on the phone for 45 minutes to cancel my NYT subscription, only to have an argument with the poor call-center employee about how I was really resolved to cancel the subscription.
In my experience, big companies provide a good way to help determine what you never want to do again.
> I've always been disappointed with the performance and debugging experience

I think a comment like this deserves some details!
Absurd. Have you heard of "religious prejudice"? That's prejudice and based off of a choice.

Racial discrimination does not own the term prejudice.
I think one time I took enough time to send the recruiter a polite reply saying "sorry, not interested" (with no further elaboration), but otherwise I just ignore their messages.
While I'm super glad that Citi added the Virtual Account Number feature back to their credit cards, I'm puzzled by the fact that the virtual credit card numbers can no longer have an associated total spending limit. Now it's a daily spending limit which is fairly useless.
"available early next year in the US and expand to additional countries throughout 2022"
I cannot believe I am reading someone claim prejudice is a word that should not be used if you have a certain skin color.

Did the judicial system stop dismissing cases with prejudice?
Neat!

I think your business plans are underpriced. You're saving human hours with increased accuracy, which probably is worth more than $25/month.

edit: nevermind. Your annual pricing shows per-month pricing which is $299/month.
>Especially when these vaccines were explicitly billed as a solution to containment of the virus

My whole argument was that the experts I listened to in the media didn't bill it as such, and your argument to refute that is to restate the argument I'm combating.

>Maybe you could argue that there was a disconnect between what virologists/epidemiologists were saying and what media, pharma, and government talking heads were saying

That's exactly what I'm arguing.

I'm saying "most experts I listened to in the media, from day one, stressed that they didn't know it's efficacy on transmissibility yet"

and your point back is

"ok maybe the experts said that, but what about what the media and phrama and talking heads were saying"?

When did I mention them?

My entire point was that from day one this was being said, but people either weren't listening, or strategically choosing to forget.
Agree, thank you! New favorite word!
I had this same reaction, but I also felt it wasn't wrong entirely. Some of the other comments helped me work out what I believe is the key to this claim.

> More like, being able to serialize your thought process well fosters interoperability with fellow human beings. Written word lasts longer and goes further.

> It's more than that. Reifying your mental symbols affords better and more complex symbol manipulation. It's the same principle behind writing down equations instead of doing them in your head.

> And writing/editing helps to serialize your thought process.

So if you're trying to have people act based on your thoughts or even trying to clarify your own ideas, then I buy the claim.

The act of serializing your thoughts forces you to follow through on threads and scrutinize connections that may seem obvious but unable to articulate. It also gives you the opportunity to poke and prod at pieces instead of needing to manipulate whole, like fixing a solution to a math problem instead of rewriting it after a mistake.
Are you accusing him of anything else than having an opinion, and arguing for it?
Amazon will stop accepting Visa credit cards issued in Britain
The proposed regulation requires that QWACs MUST be accepted and recognized as such, such as using the European List of Trusted Lists as part of the root store.

That is, if a QWAC is issued by a CA that is not part of the browser root store, it must not be rejected (as any other untrusted certificate would be).