skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Personally, I haven’t followed this story or the trial closely at all. But what you describe would be woefully inadequate coverage of an event. The details are important, and to me the important details (that allow me to form an opinion) are “guy traveled waaay out of his way with a giant gun in order to ‘protect’ strangers’ property; guy has history of saying he would shoot shoplifters.” Nuff said. My opinion is the same as it would have been 20 years ago based on those details.
After you open Wireless Diagnostics, select Window > Performance.

There's also tool in the AppStore called WiFi Explorer that may be more what you're looking for.

https://www.intuitibits.com
TensorFlow Metal Back End on Apple Silicon Experiments
If you do it a couple times the process is easy to remember. A recipe can be written down. If you remember the basics you can make up the recipe as you go and check pH with strips or the zap test (and hope you weren't too heavy on the lye!). Many other basic things are similar. After all, they were inveted/perfected with ancient tech/resources.

There are plenty of other things that would be more difficult make, source, or do. How do you preserve food to modern standards if you don't have canning lids and can't make them, refrigerators don't work (some climates might not matter as much), or a local salt/nitrites source? Fermenting is one way, but doesn't work for everything.
your best hope is that this story picks up steam and a bunch of unsophisticated investors think it’s a hidden nugget of gains, and then you have to avoid falling for the hype yourself. sell the moment you’re in profit.
It's not affordable if you take into account hidden costs of greenhouse gases on the planet.
Or, in other words, businesses are losing their viability resulting in lost jobs as they shut down.
Does. Not. Work. Against. A. Random. Machine. That. Fetches. It.

You pulling 15Gb of Nodejs modules in your app that you have no idea about because you think someone, somewhere ensured that they are "correct" importing a supply chain attacks works every single time.
The average relative velocity between objects in LEO is ~10 km/s with a maximum of about 14km/s [1]. You would have a very hard time shielding against even tiny pieces of metal at those speeds.

[1] The new SMAD
Thanks for this! Yes, take advantage of any available programs. We were told to even apply even if you don't meet the criteria. It's better to apply and get a "no" then to not apply at all.

Our social worker was knowledgable on IL programs, but not much on any in IN, so we had to do a lot of digging ourselves, even though the hospital is near the IL-IN border. Only when my wife joined an FB group did we find out about the Katie Beckett program.

We were in the process of applying the for the IN A&D Waiver, as it's not income-based (well kinda). Apparently being approved for the A&D Waiver makes it "easier" to get approved for Medicaid as it shows a disability, in addition to other benefits. I think we waited a month for the interview, during the interview I mentioned my child was a very sick newborn, but the interviewer still had to ask whether my child was anxious or depressed, lived a fulfilling life, etc. I think I broke down afterwards. We were still waiting for the response when she passed away, actually, I think we're still waiting for it? It wasn't a fun experience. I understand the need for the questions, but I wish there was the questions were catered to the age of the applicant.
As people noted elsewhere, you have to be VERY careful with using databricks for a full data warehouse due to the fact that it drives you to notebook driven development and scheduling of those notebooks when data pipelines should follow similar development practices as other software projects.

Great for proof of concepts, but when you start to build out complete pipelines please look into how to make the pipelines more sustainable and maintainable.
The numbers instantly say to me, "we are is lower case ASCII" due to the 0x6N and 0x7N values.

One way to do this, however is:

#define FOURCC(a, b, c, d) ... insert shifting-oring expression here ...

Then:

ctx->state[0] = FOURCC('a', 'p', 'x', 'e');

That doesn't tell you where those characters came from but at least unmasks the ASCII connection.

However, the code now breaks on EBCDIC compilers, where 'a' won't have the value 0x61.
> Social-signaling games explain lots of weird fashion shit

For example, not wearing white after labor day to tell apart nouveau riche from old family money circles.
Hmm, not sure. I'd have to read up on the lore more, or maybe pay more attention to the game.

The thing that catches my eye there is that they say lifestream can condense into mako through natural processes as well as artificial ones.
I basically have to constantly rotate through new music, once I get used to songs I start being able to predict them and they take up mental energy. Doubly so if they have lyrics.

I've found SiIvagunner works well for this, they release like ~10 new song mashups a day and maybe half of them are good. Just load up some random youtube playlist consisting of thousands of songs and I won't recognize a single one of them.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC9ecwl3FTG66jIKA9JRDtmg
I know you're being rhetorical, but since some may not actually know:

If we're being pedantic: A machine-gun with a box magazine, chambered for an intermediate rifle cartridge. Rittenhouse's rifle only had two of those three characteristics. Some would have you believe the missing characteristic (being a machine-gun) is unimportant, yet that's the characteristic with the most stringent federal regulation.

If we're being emotive: Any rifle that looks 'assaulty'. Obviously this is extremely subjective. It's possible to construct an assault rifle that fulfills the pedantic definition but lacks the 'assaulty' aesthetic.
Because there are still more people to dupe into buying ASIC miners, as well as many more who haven't broken even yet. Can't you see what's at stake?!
I really don't understand the dislike of macros. They would be super handy for things like WPF's INotifyPropertyChanged or for a lot of logging and parameter checking. Instead you have to do all kinds of weird tricks with refelection that are way more complex.

They are adding all this stuff in small pieces instead of having a comprehensible solution.
There is no official implementation but http://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin is most widely used to achieve consensus
They are financed by the right wing, and continuously release heavily edited and out of context versions of recordings to push a right-wing narrative.

They have paid settlements and plead guilty for causing harm through their sting attempts and disinformation multiple times.

Anyone taking Veritas seriously is not looking at their history, which makes it very clear that anything they release is untrustworthy at best. They are very clearly far-right political operatives, and in no way a neutral entity.
This one event? I'd be mildly surprised if it were even detectable, other than the brief fireball. There is a constant rain of meteors and meteorids - estimated 139/day more than 10 grams hit the surface of the earth every day [1]. I don't know how many more thousands of small bits burn up every day without ever coming close to the ground. So, I'd say it is at least far down in that noise.

Also, if the total mass of the satellite is a ton, vaporizing all if it in the atmosphere would make make a change of less than one part per 1000 trillion, considering that the atmosphere weighs, 5.5 quadrillion tons[2]. So maybe if it was all made of some element that is very rare in the atmosphere, it might get up to a 1-in-a-trillion concentration when it all burned up? But then, it also is now scattered all over so won't even burn up at once, so heavy elements from the first chunks may have already settled out from by the time the later ones arrive.

There's no way I can concoct anything that it is an atmospheric pollution risk. But space pollution, we might be talking Kessler Syndrome [3]; I don't think this will do it, but I'm worried.

[1] https://universeexplained.com/how-many-meteorites-hit-the-ea...

[2] https://www.britannica.com/story/how-much-does-earths-atmosp...

[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kessler_syndrome
$7.5M seed round for Woolf University
Putin doesn't care about his own people on the station. He is too obsessed with his weapon toys. Same reason recent nuclear accidents happened for his flying wunderwaffe megalomania.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nyonoksa_radiation_accident
The seals won't be very helpful if tampering is being done at a state sponsored level: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/05/photos-of-an-nsa...
IMO new keyboard layouts should all reflect usage-frequency. (Full disclosure: lifer dvorak user)
Omg...Skype for business has been dead forever but the app lives on. Can't be removed...I have deleted it manually and it still starts up. Wtf?

Perhaps I should spend more time figuring this out. Meh.
Show HN: I made a no-code tool to create animated technical papers
"memory safety bugs" sounds pretty broad. What sort of vulnerability doesn't involve memory access?
I was JUST telling a peer today that something like this 'just makes sense', and here it seems the inevitable has happened in very short order. I can't wait to show this to them! Thanks Niko and team
I'd like to invoke Sturgeon's law[1] here. Basically it's not useful to claim that the overwhelming majority of pop-music is "low-effort shit" because that's true of nearly all genres.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturgeon%27s_law
Hm. I switched to US QWERTY twice. Both times my wrist started hurting after half a year. The special characters feel badly spread out.

Never had any issues with Belgian AZERTY. Much prefer the useless number row to be behind the shift (there's a numpad for those anyway), and having special characters readily available on that row.
I'm really surprised Apple let Shenzhen, China show on the tracking.

Why? The reality is that Apple is reselling a Foxconn product made in Shenzhen.
PoS is something fundamentally different from PoW. PoS-like ideas were around since before PoW, but such a system can never be used in a trustless way, which was what PoW enabled.

So it's fair to say that Bitcoin could never "transition" to PoS since the whole premise from the start was that it wasn't! It could not exist before. Now that it exist, and has been shown to work, it has caused a cambrian explosion of sorts of protocols with less reliance on trustlessness. But they solve a different problem.
Would a state-run operation just not be able to replicate the seals, considering that the seals are just as likely to have been manufactured there?
The beginning of the rapid end of human delivery drivers, assuming that other courts agree with this.
> you can still buy DDR3 --- used --- from various shops in China, and it'll be 100% perfect and Rowhammer-free because it was made before the insane process shrinkages that caused it

That's demonstrably false. I remember rowhammer being thought of and demonstrated on DDR3 modules.

[0] https://hammertux.github.io/rowhammer-ffs-ddr3
Good news! https://pytorch.org/docs/stable/notes/hip.html
There exactly what we did, and empirically it didn't.

https://www.militarytimes.com/flashpoints/2019/12/09/afghani...
Reminds me of my favorite quote:

“C'est pire qu'un crime, c'est une faute” - Some guy that is not Talleyrand
This was mostly interesting. I disagree with a few minor points but none that matter, except its predicated (or maybe not*) on the idea that this university will be an institution of principled right wing / conservative thought.

What is more likely to happen is that its going to turn into "The Quilette" or Jordan Peterson as a university. By this I mean (to use an analogy from Canadian politics) running for the leader of the opposition - spending all the time complaining about the other side instead of putting forward ideas of it's own. This is great for getting a following, but it's not great for developing a principled viewpoint, or, as the gladwell article says, for exposing people to actual opposing views. It's more like exposing people to criticisms of their own views, which could be productive, but less so than actual different principles.

All that said, I think the university is an experiment worth trying, because as gladwell points out, the current situation sucks. Hopefully I'm wrong and it will really introduce people to a new set of ideas and lead to some good debates, instead of just becoming an echo chamber.

*Its possible that people like gladwell support this because it's likely to basically turn out to be a strawman that makes an easy adversary for liberals to feel superior in their views over. I'm not saying that's true, or at least they he's conscious of it, but there is an air of "let people go see how bad conservatism is" which can become self fulfilling if it's just a bunch of people whining about liberals instead of proposing ideas of their own
There is nothing preventing them to put more DC-DC up conversion mid-way.
That sounds reasonable on the surface, but cards don't cost a lot, and sending them out for free to leverage community interest for the open source stack could be extremely cost effective.
That's exactly the problem with C macros, they can do everything.
But why? What's wrong with macros? I agree that you can do stupid stuff things with macros but before disabling macros I would get rid of reflection first. With reflection you can do way more stupid things than you can do with macros.
> Ideally you put them in the hands of a court of law.

Why?
This is what Americans have never kind of enjoyed about "big government" (i.e. government heavily regulating some society rules): Private companies will always strive to minimize losses, and individuals have pretty tiny leverage force to negotiate. The government is capable of implementing laws fully in favour of such individuals, and maybe also unions could get more leverage, but they are also seen in bad light in the US.
> WTF "loves" their insurance provider?

I think this boils down to propaganda. Americans have been taught that the "competitive" private insurance system gives them "choice", even though in reality they have maybe one or three plans from their employer that they can choose from, assuming they are working for an employer that gives them health benefits.

The ACA marketplace does seem to give people choice, though decent, low-deductible plans are pretty expensive and are likely out of reach for most people who get their insurance that way.

The other rationalization -- which I am somewhat sympathetic toward -- is that people don't trust the government to do a good job providing health coverage. They believe it will be riddled with red tape and inefficiencies and bureaucracy, and will cost much more than the private insurance system. And that's even before we get to the "death panels" FUD and other invented nonsense.
> I’ve flip flopped for years, (I was using freebsd more than 20 years ago, genuinely ran Solaris 10 with my own build of kde4 on a hp probook, etc) but last time I tried to use Linux for work I got defeated by a conference suite projector at a client and it cost us a big contract. The happy path (for me anyway) is doing all actual dev work on Linux vms and using macOS as your browser/im/terminal client — which it’s great at.

It takes about one time of "this didn't work and it's your fault for using Linux" in a business context to break one of using Desktop Linux (or BSD, et c.), I think. I doubt similar stories are uncommon. I've got one, certainly.

At least if MacOS or Windows breaks, you're not the asshole. And it doesn't hurt that they in fact do break less often (well, Win10 with its abrupt, unexpected, and slow forced updates was a real problem for a while, but otherwise)
Not quite, but I'm not sure what your point is. People opposed to such reform often use the arguments I cited, and I specifically use the failure of medicaid in this article article to demonstrate the flaws of those arguments.

Those arguments' flaws aren't corrected with the implementation of a bad system.
> I'd love to see actual parameters for the error correction codes

Well, the spec is $369, but a PDF with some early discussion (rev 0.1…) says:

DDR5 devices will implement internal Single Error Correction (SEC) ECC to improve the data integrity within the DRAM. The DRAM will use 128 data bits to compute the ECC code of 8 ECC Check Bits.

However, I have no idea whether this is what got specified in the end. 8 ECC bits on 128 data bits would be half the amount of added redundancy compared to "classical" ECC. Note also it's not SECDED, just SEC, confirming the Micron paper you mentioned.

> But Single Error Correction, Dual Error Detection is not enough to prevent attacks.

The OP suggested monitoring for a sudden increase in ECC events, which hopefully this would work for. It's not a perfect countermeasure, just a statistical one, but I'll take what I can get...

> Also because DDR5 uses a smaller width you actually need to map 8 bits to 10.

Now that kinda makes it better, doesn't it? :)
Due to how orbital mechanics work, debris will move away from the initial trajectory and return to it an orbit later. Since all the pieces have different velocities, by the time an orbit has passed they will have spread out significantly. The trajectories are not completely parallel, but the relative velocities away from the point of impact are insignificant relative to orbital velocity - thus they are all moving in roughly the same direction.
> the generic type parameters can be avoided by adding a parameter that looks like what you want to pull

It's possible but what's wrong with the generic type parameter? It's an unequivocal way of specifying of what type is expected on the other side.
Most modern armor seems to aim to disrupt a projectile before it can penetrate.

The wikipedia page says this type of armor is in use on the ISS already:

"Whipple shields consist of a relatively thin outer bumper spaced some distance from the main spacecraft wall. The bumper is not expected to stop the incoming particle or even remove much of its energy, but to break up and disperse it, dividing the original particle energy among many fragments that fan out between bumper and wall. The original particle energy is spread more thinly over a larger wall area, which is more likely to withstand it. A direct analogy is that a lighter bullet resistant vest is needed to stop a load of birdshot than a single rifle bullet with the same total mass and kinetic energy."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whipple_shield

Even on Earth, I have the impression that modern armor is a long way from just using thicker steel:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_armour

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Composite_armour
I feel it's getting really hard to keep up. They are adding a lot of piecemeal improvements but it seems there is no coherent strategy,
Thank you! That's a great idea!
Peer to peer on-chain transactions seem unkillable at this point.

Surely governments would target exchanges instead?

Without the dollars coming from retail investors, the value proposition for speculators disappears.

You could still trade bitcoin (slowly) at that point, but converting to fiat would be difficult.
That award immediately comes to my mind every time I read a story like this, which I find hilarious. I'd bet the same is true for a number of others as well, given how high profile and ridiculous that free speech award was.
go development surely affects your taste a lot. This is to me one of the greatest benefit of this language : realizing how much better your code becomes when you spend 90% of your time thinking about the problem and 10% on which language feature you're going to use.
You can always make new drives or new ways to read media.
We don't consider dollars less valuable if they're paid via American Express, even though it's less accepted than Visa.

As long as there's a critical mass of users somewhere, the "who accepts what" problem reduces to a software problem that most people will ignore.
Blender 3.0 takes support for AMD GPUs to the next level
I'm looking for a Library that can make timed message sequence diagrams. I.e message flows with timeouts and windows, for presenting radio protocols. Anyone know of one?
We're going to Kessler syndrome ourselves over some trivial dispute on the ground "requiring" a satellite to be taken out, then retaliation has to occur by the opposing party to save face. Repeat a few times and now you can't get into orbit.
Hi HN,

My name is Rahul Sarathy and I created TextFrame, a no-code platform to create animated written content. I've linked an example here where I use TextFrame to animate the Bitcoin white paper.

You can check out more examples are https://textframe.app/examples

If you're interested, feel free to sign up and play around with the software.
Writing OKRs is useful. Strict grading of OKRs is worse than useless.

During the year (or quarter), your picture of what's useful and feasible becomes more and more precise. So your OKRs that you wrote at the beginning are worse than your current knowledge of the true goals. It's really bad to cling to your old misconceptions of what was important when you wrote those OKRs.

Finally, the desire to quantitative-ize every OKR is beyond harmful. Does your organization really not care about anything qualitative? Well, it shows in your products. And no, you can't measure quality by surveying your users and averaging the results.
This sounds like the "Java can be fast" arguments from two decades or the "JavaScript can be fast" arguments from one decade ago, now with the next language.

I mean, sure I can prototype in python, then put a lot of additional effort into bringing performance of the bits I absolutely need fast close to native code performance.

Or I could code everything in C or Rust and get everything in native code from the get-go.
As it happens, fish seldom travel to the upper atmosphere to take a breath.
Apple is a big Deltalake (and Databricks) customer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SFeBJxI4Q98
In that case you could create a backend endpoint that accepts a request and makes the call with the API key on behalf of the client/front-end.

The title of the article says OAuth, and hence assumed that you wanted an authenticated client to be able to make the call to the backend for subscribing.
> Longer term, I'm going to be directing my teams to focus more on broad browser support in our work and less on newer Chrome-first (/only?) features

Not focusing on Chrome-only features? Interesting.
Bonjour mon ami! Ceci est attribué à Antoine Boulay de la Meurthe
We already know the answer to that via Medicare. It certainly has its issues, but it doesn't seem like retirees on Medicare are drowning in paperwork.
I actually want more structured work. I work for a large company. They are being too "agile" (a poor implementation of Agile) and there is tons of context switching. I already feel too old to switch. I've basically given up and realized I have a job, not a career. I have no motivation.
This is silly. The variable types are already giving you exactly this information. Why would you add a "p" when you already have the "*"? Likewise, size_t tells you that this is a size, no need for the "n".

Instead, the variable names should be used to convey information that the types alone can't convey.