skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Think about this way: both companies are bidding on the same keywords. One party (the developer) collects either $97 if the consumer signs up on their website directly or $70 if the consumer downloads the app and signs up via the app store. The other party (apple) collects only $30 (at a maximum) if they drive the user to sign up via the app store (30% of a $100 LTV).

If they’re both bidding on the same keywords, which they are, then the price of the keywords is the same to each of them. It’s an auction, so whoever bids the most will win the auction. The developer can spend up to $97 to bid on that keyword and still be profitable or at worst break even, while apple can only spend up to $30 to stay profitable or break even. So if Apple is winning auctions, it means they’re spending more than the developer, despite having less than half the purchasing power of the developer. So they’re spending negatively almost no matter what.
This is the exact classism that has pretty much killed Boulder. I lived there for 12 years, and every time I go back it does a better job of convincing me I made the right choice.
Sure. All of them can be organized as hierarchies and that's the point, the organization is codependent with the communication.

Let's say you have things with locations and a map (scooters, restaurants, hidden gold, whatever). You click a thing, it highlights it on the map. You click the map, it highlights a thing.

The obvious to me way of doing this is singletons (or globals).

You've got some routine itemhighlight(thing) or mapcenter(thing) and you generate the things on the page and use something simple like html data attributes to pass things around.

In react there's a fairly unorthodox hack I've got to do things like this but normally you'd have a map component and then some list component with item components.

Then when you tap the map, the stuff is passed up to a container component that gets passed to the list component that goes back to the item component, so long as you create some connections for that to happen.

Everything goes up and down the hierarchy. You don't just directly talk horizontally.

Now sure, there's arguments for and against both approaches and they are as contentious as type systems and editors. But the question was about the "scolding nanny".

Without react you can do both approaches, the first of which requires competency and skill to do well without creating a mess sure. But in react you are precluded from doing the first unless you wrangle it and work around the framework.

It disciplines and limits your freedom. I understand corporate hierarchies, pecking orders, and reasons for doing this. I'm a true anarchist though and that limitation really pushes my buttons.

Given all that, I use react regardless because I first and foremost try to be responsible adult and think it's the current most popular and professional way to do things for the day I'll eventually move on and hand over my code to someone else.

But I fucking hate it. It's a seething and very unhealthy vitriolic hate.
Here's how it was done:

1. do it at dawn, when the air is the stillest

2. have the pilot make pass after pass, each time a bit lower

3. have a ground observer in constant contact with the pilot giving the clearance from the ground
I'm going with Jack Kilby and Robert Noyce as giants who's shoulders we stand on. A particular generation of chip is just one stepping stone of the many along the way.

https://www.keranews.org/health-science-tech/2014-09-12/on-t...

Also, a quibble, it's Halon not Argon. Nobody sprays water around a room full of burning electrical equipment.

Halon is no longer being manufactured for greenhouse reasons (afaik.) Alternatives being worked on:
https://www.firetrace.com/fire-protection-blog/why-is-halon-...
Have you programmers ever tried to fix a problem with your program by trying random things? Did it work?

I am so tired of hearing about some random thing that supposedly helps with mental illness as if trial and error without understanding was a reasonable method.

What mental illness is, is an ordinary illness that occupies a social niche where it's exempt from normal scientific or medical study. It evades our social immune system the way retroviruses evade our physical immune system.

The sane, rational, reasonable approach would be to put everything into developing tools and measurement techniques to establish what mental illnesses are.

Depression, mania, and psychosis need, above all else, tools like blood sugar tests and A1C provide for diabetes.

99% of solving any problem is describing it. Administering random treatments to suffering people and lab animals is not progress, it is a tragic waste, cargo cultism, part of the disease that transcends the actual victims.

The only thing I know of that's really seemed like progress in ages is opto-genetics.

Just...develop tools because without them there is no evaluating treatments. Stop using surveys.

I would like to think that researching mental illness would lead to ways of enhancing normal cognition that would help everyone. I would expect that people would think of this possibility, and therefore there would be plenty of funding available. But it doesn't seem to work that way.
You're creating a false dichotomy: we can either add new features, or stabilize the current version, but we can't do both!

Yes you can. You can spend some time to stabilize, and then add new features on top, then stabilize again if needed.
I also use iOS shortcuts for TinyGem. How is the registration page broken?
All it would take is one person smoking in their shared car to ruin it for the rest of us.

Once a vehicle (or a home) has been smoked in, you can never completely get the smell out.

It makes me nauseous to sit in that smell for any length of time.
Thank you. This explains the hesitancy really well. It will be fine for the positions I target, but not at my present company.
Too YAGNI for me.
Sorry, I'm not sure I understand your comment. You can presume whatever you want, but I'm telling you how it works. :)

IIRC there are plans to switch Chromium to its own certificate store on all platforms, but they seem to be a ways off.
Mozilla Plays Matchmaker: Microsoft Store Offers Firefox for Windows 10 and 11
When it comes to local issues like zoning I think it makes sense that the people actually living there get to decide.
Guaranteed to be at least partly that, I would think, although I was expecting that between western European countries it would be relatively similar. One could look at number of deaths per capita to compensate somewhat, although that leaves the question of whether or not true survival rates could also be different.

USA's CDC estimate of the ratio is that the actual number of cases is 4.2*nbr of positive PCR tests. Which means that we only catch about 24% of the actual number of cases.

I would think also that countries like Italy which had big waves early have a more serious undercount (for total cases in the pandemic) as compared to countries which first got it somewhat later, when PCR tests were more generally available.
To me it seems obvious that React would be hierarchical. It is a view layer that creates a virtual DOM, that then gets rendered down into the browser DOM. Which is hierarchical.

Horizontal message passing is really a state related issue and lives outside of React.

You can manage your state however you want and then wire up the components however you want. Since those two things are separate concerns. Although there are a ton of options in the ecosystem to do that.
I’d say this. Eventually the computing power should fit in a watch that can project to AR glasses. It’s shocking how often I forget where my phone is around the house. Wearables are the key going forward.
>live in a parent component, use redux, use context or go more hacky.

My initial reading of OP's post is that this is the "hack" he doesn't like (even Context wasn't all that encouraged in React IIRC). My amusement, however, is this is, to him, a fundamentally philosophical disagreement with the design of React
I would add, surely there is a more pretentious name that could have been selected alternatively.
AirBnB is useful because it helps people wanting to rent their homes for short periods to people willing to rent them, which otherwise would be harder for both sides; without out, people would have more trouble traveling on a budget or making spare money from their homes. The service they're providing is a marketplace for the two parties to meet and communicate. I don't think this translates that well for journals; academics aren't getting paid by the readers of the articles published in the journals, and readers wouldn't have much trouble finding papers on arbitrary websites due to search engine nowadays. Moreover, renting your home to AirBnB once doesn't mean you're forbidden to let a family friend use it for a week next summer, but many journals forbid authors from sharing their papers for free.
The article is written as if by someone who barely knows technology and is writing for people who don't know whether the monitor or the box it's attached to is the computer.

"Special drivers"? What year is it? Is "the datacenter" run on Windows ME?

Seriously, PCMAG, try a little harder.
You can use a TinyGem bookmarklet from your mobile browser?
> People should get used to it.

Historically, this line of thinking never ends well.
it doesn't really matter right? Intel are so screwed
I remember looking at some of those houses. One was listed for sale for $1,500. Not a typo, one thousand five hundred dollars.

The catch was that the property taxes were still like $15k a year or something.
Montreal used to have more people than Toronto, now Toronto has more. That shows Toronto is better at building new housing?

https://www.macrotrends.net/cities/20402/toronto/population

https://www.macrotrends.net/cities/20384/montreal/population
Sure, if you ignore what the YAML documentation actually says.
I really like this quote

> Some of the foundational building blocks of our software world were built by people who knew one another only by mailing list or IRC channel. Software was built, but, perhaps even more importantly, strong connections were made.

With this in mind it seems silly many software companies are stubbornly insisting work-from-office.
That would be harder than Bourbaki, I guess. They had the benefit of a blank slate.

It would have to be done in Knuth’s spirit, and there would be lots to argue over what to include, before even writing about it

How complete are Knuth’s notes? Would he have found Foo important enough to include, even though his notes don’t mention it? Should the completion include stuff discovered after his death? Should earlier volumes be revisited, as Knuth probably would do, if he had an eternity to live?
> generate enough power for 300 local homes

This is a very misleading claim. Do they do this at night? How about on a rainy day?

Unless energy storage is made part of it, it is an incomplete and unreliable solution.
Not to mention a vast percentage of their energy usage is spent on manufacturing for the West. We're essentially off-loading our carbon output to less developed countries then blaming them for it.
Cop26 president is justifying his title. I imagine this issue is keeping all the world leaders up at night.
That's not what backdoor means.
Brings it into line with all other states in the country which have more sensibly priced housing market. Its crazy that someone who's owned a house in the bay area for 50 years pays a tiny fraction of the neighbor who bought just now. Its certainly one of the reasons CA housing is expensive. If I knew taxes were capped you can pay more.

I can understand you want to reward people who stay in the area for a long time, the reward is too great IMO.
This reminds me of a job I had about 13 years ago. I worked for a startup called SafeDesk. The idea was that we created custom debian-based live images that we network (PXE) booted to diskless PCs. So naturally the system would be instantly "wiped" when rebooted. We sold this to a few libraries and schools and even prisons.

Somehow we got into running vmware player with Windows 7 (?) on those diskless systems because of course some customers wanted windows. We PXE booted linux and then ran windows on it through vmware. It was insane and pretty stupid and terribly slow, but I learned a shitload about linux from that job.
> time for democracy 2.0

What’s your proposal? How do you find that altruistic leader, and if you find them, how do you get them elected, and if you do, how do you arrange to get them enough support in Congress?

I don’t like democracy that much, and it looks like Churchill didn’t either. But neither Churchill nor me can come up with anything better.
Can you elaborate and explain this further to a curious non-american?
So, sounds like the problem is in transportation: if train ride from a low-cost area to a high cost area would take minutes and cost almost nothing, then the problems you mentioned would not be an issue, right?
So, why try to fight the laws of economics? Why not let the rich where they want, and let the poor commute to high-job areas by solving the transportation problem?
Why there is so much ado and drama? What am I missing here?
Take a look at the salaries before you do.

Engineers may be disappointed compared to the Bay Area.
or underdosing.

Like, software can have failsafes and error handling, but at some point any healthcare product may require user intervention.
So people who make less than ~$2/day are supposed to now save up (and spend less on food/water/etc) for these "so affordable" panels? And even if they could, how are you going to get those panels (or parts replacements for these "so affordable" systems when they will degrade and break down) to these places that have bad or no roads at scale and struggle to get __anything__ to their regions? And completely eschew local mines and resources that are easier to access with less (upfront) capital? Nuts.

I worked remotely for a nigerian fintech that had to do intergrations between the big banks in western africa (and crypto markets) and farmers trying to sell their crops and they pretty much had to get access to capital (which is hard for most people not already intimately connected to wealth/power) to fund __infrastructure__, even before doing anything else (market places local producers/traders getting access global commodity markets via crypto). Even the big banks in nigeria don't even want to fund infrastructure stuff…

Same is true for many places i've visited within Indonesia (been living thru ME to east asia since 2016), its crazy to see local news about new airport being built in an area with pretty much nothing there for most people who are quick to overlook these types of things because they take it for granted in their everyday life.
Sweden did and theyre fine...
There were 3 B-17s in the movie. If you look close, one of them is named "Round Trip Ticket", which was the name of my dad's B-17 ride in WW2.

Sadly, the movie company burned all three to the ground after the shoot, in order to avoid paying the import duties the British tax people demanded. They didn't have the money, and didn't have the gas money to fly them back the US. They tried to give the bombers to a local museum, but the tax people still wanted the import duties, and the museum couldn't pay it.

What a tragedy.
Makes you wonder if there could be a scenario where the Fed raises rates for interbank lending and for loans to the general public but maintains a near zero percent interest rate on its own debts. As far I can tell the Fed operates with impunity and can do whatever it wants. So why not stave off inflation while protecting itself at the same time.
Metaverse: What 24 Hours Feels Like
There still is universal time signal, at least in the US (don't know if that still makes it "universal")

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WWVH
If anything I found Ruby's breadth of syntax sugar a defining characteristic of it - you can express the same program in a million different ways based on the programming paradigm you wish to emulate, or even make a DSL of your own to express the feelings in your heart. Not that I think that's necessarily a good thing though...
If it encourages them to downsize from their family home after their children have moved out, its a better outcome than having lots of older couples living in 5 bed houses mixed in with families in High Density buildings.
Do you expect to have to justify your employment history for the rest of your life? Can you imagine some reasons why someone would work for FB that have no value judgment besides being different from your view of the world?

There seem to be a few assumptions you're making in the post above about someone you've never met and only know based on their current/former employer.
* Not everybody can work remotey (nor want to)
* Health and Education services tend to be much poorer
I think it's unfair that countries with relatively little cumulative emissions historically (India, China) are made to comply with the same restrictions as countries that have already built a lot of infrastructure with emissions over the past 150 years (e.g. Europe and North America). I know nature doesn't give a fuck about borders and what's fair, and that everyone on this planet is fighting against the same threat, so I don't know what the solution is. I just know this is a problem.
Amazon driver survives truck split by train
If I recall correctly Halons (bromomethanes) are ozone depleting, though they may also been a greenhouse gas I’m not sure.

The last data centre I worked in had an FM200 liquified has fire suppression system, that’s 1,1,1,2,3,3,3-Heptafluoropropane - so probably still a greenhouse gas to some extent due to the propane, but wouldn’t be a significant concern given they’re not routinely discharged.
You should mention on the site, clearly, if none of the images of the product actually show a real product. Especially if you're already taking pre-orders.
> Luckily, cement is not a big part of the total emissions.

This is patently false. A quick search shows a number of 8% of global CO2 going to cement production and use emissions.
Typically when weaker countries do this, it was once considered a sign of fundamental weakness and a sure sign that a currency crisis was imminent. The US abandoned the same principles in government finance that it once advanced through institutions like the IMF. It's not that it was bad advice; we see the results of the irresponsibility in today's markets. The US is just a big bad 'basket case' without much in the way of financial credibility past what it can dictate through market manipulation.
Remember two things:

1) more demand in auctions means higher prices. so if apple is taking the second slot they’re almost certainly increasing the cost of the 1st slot for hbo. which is apples whole point: to increase the cost (literal and figurative) of hbo’s efforts to get people to sign up via web rather than via app.

2) in the world of search marketing - including both on google and the app store - there is a strong belief by brands that they MUST be the #1 paid result for their branded search terms, no matter what. so what you’re seeing here is hbo saying “we always have to be #1 on our branded search no matter the cost”. This is exactly why people complain constantly about google showing competitors ads when the original company’s brand is specifically searched for by the user - effectively the competitor is freeloading on the incumbents brand searches to drive traffic (by paying to show ads on those searches). Google doesn’t care because they make more money this way (more competition for the branded keyword drives up CPCs).

all of this is to say that apple being in the #2 slot doesn’t say anything about the intent of their actions here, which is to make it uneconomical for companies to move users off apples rails onto their own systems.
I thought LORAN is fully decommissioned already?
That's a good read regardless of your level.
This is easily fixable by using tooling to help review. For example I have high hopes in the crev project: https://github.com/crev-dev/crev

As soon as you are no longer implicitly trusting all future versions of your dependencies, things become much more sane.
Large-scale family farms and industrial nonfamily farms account for only 4.8% of farms, but 57.4% of production (in $). Small-scale family farms represent nearly 90% of U.S. farms, but only 21.5% of production.

Source is USDA (2020) America’s Diverse Family Farms.
Using the energy to build infrastructure is just the finders fee. Doesn’t make sense to keep doing something known to be unsustainable. That’s a tragedy of the commons
I don’t think that people are denying the economics, only that for high-demand housing the game is different.

The price of housing isn’t completely elastic since for a given area it’s a function of the available salaries in the area. You hit a ceiling where above which there are no buyers and below which you get 20 cash offers the day you list.

So oddly the thesis is that housing prices are actually too low and we’re playing by concert ticket rules. Part of this has to do with the availability of mortgages as a function of income. And that there is so much demand for housing at a given price that any increase in supply we could actually realistically build would just get bought up instantly at the current price and we can’t increase the supply enough to actually drive prices down.
“Patently false?” No, I see 3% in direct emissions from the cement itself: https://ourworldindata.org/uploads/2020/09/Emissions-by-sect...

(As far as indirect emissions like transport, the heat to make the clinker, etc, then yeah, I can believe that it gets to 8% total.)
Further to this you can even include the trailing commas and hack in comments in the yaml-like json value:

import yaml

data = yaml.load("""
{
"firstName": "John",
# Woah comments
"lastName": "Smith",
}
""", yaml.SafeLoader)

Granted I still like YAML when it sticks to the basics and avoid some of the messier aspects, like anchors, when I can.
The criminal part I am referring to is failure to pay (assuming you are able to in the scenario that one fled to another country to avoid paying)
If farms got charged for their water use (a high enough price to reduce usage and prevent drought), I wonder if the small farms would still do a better job on that front, or would the more industrial farms do their optimizing thing and become more efficient? I suppose you could also price the impact on soil quality, but that sounds harder to administer.
Others are free to do the same, except that they have to continue to commute to where the jobs are. If they're lucky they might live on the fringes of BART but increasingly people are just condemned to hours-long gridlocked freeway commutes to get to their $17/hr job in SF. To recover any kind of decent quality of life you're talking about moving to a different region/state.
Anyplace you use for service will have a fix it in two hours or you get a loaner policy. The two hours starts when you call, even it the mechanic is an hour away on a different farm. When it is busy season they maintain extra hours