skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Of course, there's no fool-proof solution to knowing what code is running in the server side, but https://searx.space at least shows if an instance modified their client-side code, which you can see in the HTMl column.

To mitigate server-side code from identifying you, you can consume an instance from Tor. Of course, you could try to do that with any other search engine, but most of the other search engines either block exit nodes or provide incomplete functionality if you disable JS.

It's not perfect, but it may be good enough depending on your threat model.
You're totally right and the SRE book by Google goes over this - the company's culture does not allow firing people for outages. If you're somewhere this still happens, run away (or you'd better be getting paid more than top-end ICs at Google.
Clojure is no where near top, nor near go?

Go 9.55%
... about a dozen entries ...
Clojure 1.88%
Elixir 1.74%
LISP 1.33%
While I enjoyed the history part towards the end it got super hand wavy; especially as it went from describing "i" as a rotation to e^ix; Better Explained does a fantastic job of explaining these from the first principles.

https://betterexplained.com/articles/a-visual-intuitive-guid...

https://betterexplained.com/articles/intuitive-understanding...
3800chf is an amazing price for that.

By contrast, that's roughly the same price as an annual ticket between central London and a town about 30 miles away.
I have been trying to repro with a small nodejs server but either the server cut off the content-disposition filename or firefox truncates it. When I get that in the wild I'll post an update.

In the meantime:

$ touch 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
touch: impossible de faire un touch '1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111': Nom de fichier trop long

https://serverfault.com/questions/9546/filename-length-limit... 255 bytes it is then.

Firefox cut off at ~217, httpie at 255.
That makes sense, thank you. I assume you use a "regular"/beater bike for such activities (like supermarkets)?
The people who deserve empathy definitely arent those who choose to do drugs and commit drugs to pay for it. Ill reserve empathy for people who were forced to take drugs and couldnt help their addiction.
1. Does your account let you see comments made by new accounts in which the comment might not be approved by moderators yet?

2. How often do you create a thread like this? What is the schedule that you follow when creating this thread
> You do know that statically typed languages have REPLs too? Like the ML family, including Haskell.

I do, but that I don't see how that relates to the bit of my post which you've quoted. I certainly didn't claim or imply that REPL and static type systems were mutually exclusive, only that REPLs are a poor substitute for many static analysis tasks.

> And when using something like a Jupyter notebook with a kernel for your compiled language https://github.com/gopherdata/gophernotes you can do similar interactive programming.

Yeah, I'm aware. I operate a large JupyterHub cluster (among many other things) at work. :)

> Lisp REPLs take that a step further, as you interact with and in your whole actually running program.

That sounds nice, but it's too abstract to persuade IMHO. Personally, it seems like REPLs can make certain feedback loops a bit faster, and to that extent they seem like a modest quality of life improvement; however, considering how lisp folks positively rave about them, I assume I'm missing something.
You wouldn't rather have an arguably very slighter faster memset, with the caveat that it might explode in your face?
Indentation instead of brackets in Python was a masterstroke in my opinion. Despite complaints from folks that don't use it much, and therefore run into an issue here and there due to lack of familiarity.

As a regular user the tradeoff pays great dividends every single day in readability for years on end. I would remove more punctuation if I could… every single new feature to Python seems to include colons lately. :-/

No, I don't miss brackets everywhere one bit.
No. It's just about developer experience.
PostgreSQL core developemnt under MacOS is just so great. You can develop PG patches completely without internet connection on a very old MacBook Air. And everything will be so blazingly fast.
For Odyssey development MacOS user needs VM, Linux box or Docker.
> See tire pressure monitoring for example.

I am not sure I understand what you are saying. I appreciate knowing when my tire pressure is low.
> I have been working remote for 17 years

This suggests you are likely a member of the professional class. A lot of labor regulation in the US (my country) is intended to protect the working class, not the professional class. Perhaps that was the intention of your politicians?

(This legislation does sound like treating a symptom, and not unlikely to have unintended detrimental consequences. But we should still empathize with and consider the needs of those workers less privileged than ourselves)
I think it's insane this is allowed on the streets without a license or anything. I'm afraid of riding my regular bike if there's no bike lanes, let alone something like this in the middle of all the cars. Insane.
Suitable: A Tool to Boost Hiring via Referrals
Speed of light is a problem in that it makes a lot journeys essentially one-way.

If we're talking about manned-space travel, the acceleration needed to get to anything approaching the speed of light would itself take months, if not an entire year.

So that's two years of travel just accelerating and braking. And to the next nearest star, you will probably be traveling at speed for somewhere around 3 years. I'm just assuming that you'd travel half a light year accelerating and braking. It's likely wrong. But I also suspect it's generous.

That's 10 years round trip to get to our closest neighbor.

And yes, while time dilation would cause those on the vessel to experience far less time than that, the people on Earth will still experience every minute of those ten years. It's also about 9 years before you even get a message. Because at least the information can be sent at SOL without having to worry about killing the messenger. 5 years to get there, 4 years to send a message back.

And some people will say "well, what about Von Neumann probes". Well, that still has the problem of at least a decade long wait to see if you have any return on that investment. And it assumes that we can develop artificial intelligence to the degree that such probes are possible. Which is a big leap considering we don't even really know what intelligence or conscience even is. We know what it can do, but we don't know how either works.

So, in order to colonize the galaxy, a civilization needs to be able to dedicate enormous resources to projects where the potential payoff, if any, are going to be at least a decade away. And to have developed technology far surpassing anything we have at the current moment. To have figured out very fundamental questions about exactly what life is.

Yeah. I'm not surprised we haven't seen any extraterrestrial life. The universe is simply too vast.
> Pretty sure you can edit most office documents in google docs via the browser without issue.

That's just the tip of the iceberg. Using Google Docs means that you're opting out of the substantial ecosystem of legal-specific Word add-ins - document templates for court filings, semantic analysis for contracts, metadata scrubbing, etc.
Yes but probability of a crash is probably related to the spread in the velocities of various agents.

This is why I often ride my 40 km/h max electric moped on bike paths. Cars don't give me enough following distance so I'm not risking my life there. I also slow down drastically when passing pedal bikers.
Even allies conduct espionage against each other. One of the major activities is gaining or creating blackmail material in order to influence policy. Do this enough, and you can essentially control a country, even one as powerful as the US.
MeiliSearch – A next generation search engine for modern web
Too close to the ground; that's what "killed" Sinclair's version of it.
> #collect is an alias for #reduce

It’s not, though. (If it was, we could write about its equivalence with Python’s [from functools in py3, core in Py2] reduce function, though, saying much the same thing as about the actual equivalence with map upthread, except reduce/inject is less often a substitute for generators than map/collect.)

#map is an alias for #collect. [0]

#reduce has the alias #inject. [1]

[0] https://ruby-doc.org/core-3.0.2/Enumerable.html#method-i-col...

[1] https://ruby-doc.org/core-3.0.2/Enumerable.html#method-i-inj...
Hi there, denoflare is still in early development, thanks for trying it out - that issue you found should be fixed in the latest release 0.3.1
Is working on a Mac as difficult?
Ok, let's do some math.

Let's assume image compression randomly flips the last bit of every pixel (this is a crude approximation but it should do).

Let's further assume your original image was 1k x 1k and was shrunk by a factor of 3, so each downscaled pixel is the average of 9 original ones.

Let's then assume that all nine pixels have to "flip" in a specific way to change the downscaled one, so a 1/2^9 chance.

The odds of this bit flip propagating past the last two bits you dropped are 1/4 (dropping bits is not very effective at combating random behavior!).

That means there is a 1/2^11 chance that adding compression to the pipeline changes any given downsampled channel-pixel in the 360px/6-bit-per-color hash input.

The SHA256 stays the same if this does not happen in any of the 360 x 360 x 3 channel-pixels. The odds of that are (1 - 1/2^11)^(360*360*3) = 3.4e-83. You could drop two more bits and the odds would still be 2.4e-21 (each dropped bit amounts to taking the square root).

In effect, your suggested scheme would simply never assign the same hash with any amount of compression happening.

Fundamentally, you still have way too many pixels that might spuriously change from tiny perturbations of the input image. Reducing resolution further is actually much more effective than dropping bits, because it both increases the averaging effect and reduces how many pixels have a chance to flip.
45 kph flat out, if you try to go faster you are fighting the motor. But practically you're going to top out at about 40 kph on the Bosch system, using a Stromer or a Klever s-pedelec you will be able to maintain that 45 kph a lot longer. But 38 is plenty for me, it's still a bike and the little bit of extra speed does not weigh up against the risks.
Great project. I have a 2018 giant quick e+ that is speed limited to 28mph for the US market - in reality gets up to 26-27. In general the push bike cycling technology is universal (SRAM, shimano, campy, etc kit works everywhere) but for e-bikes there are wierd oddities where all the enthusiasm of the international DIY community doesn't quite translate to different locations because of differences in the battery and motor. I wanted to add a supernova headlight to my bike and what seemed like it would work was really hard because the US wire harnesses were different, voltages were different, etc.

In order to support the weight of the motor and batteries these bikes tend to be really beefy and top out at around 50 lbs. Not sure how much your extra batteries weigh - but if you exhaust the batteries on a 50lb bike you need to make sure you have a super granny gear to get you home if you have hills.
I don't think it's accurate to say that light is slow on any timescale. It's literally the fastest thing, no matter what scale you're on.

The issue at hand, and the reason that we can make light look slow, is that we can't comprehend the distances we're talking about covering. No one said anything about restricting the search for life to our galaxy, so let's set that aside. Given the distances involved, the odds that evolution has gone complex in more than one galaxy are high, but the odds that we might find evidence of this are low.
The only workload I've done lately that buried all the cores was a significantly parallel CSV import into clickhouse from compressed zips of multiple CSVs, while filtering the CSVs with python. Running nproc=cores was 5% slower than nproc=cores+smt in overall throughput.
Why 2 star? I get the whole "forget about the 5 star reviews, because they're not going to tell you any of the downsides of the product," and "forget the 1 star reviews, because they're often unrelated complaints about shipping or delivery, and generally don't tell you much about the product." But, why not 3 star reviews?

I generally pay the most attention to 3 star reviews, because they tend to be pretty balanced and actually tell you the plusses and minuses of the product. It seems like 2 star reviews would be somewhat like that, but leaning toward the negative/critical side. Is the negative/critical feedback what you're after?
It's like cloud computing if any code I wanted to run ran redundantly and simultaneously on all of AWS's computers and I had to share those computers with the rest of world in a competitive bidding process.
Organizations without an engaging referral program cannot leverage the potential of this powerful channel, resulting in sub-optimal recruitment which is equivalent to no recruitment we believe, therefore, we built Suitable, a next-gen referral and rewards platform focused on improving employee referrals by:

- Using AI to gamify the process
- Giving TA teams an in-house talent pool
- Making it accessible, transparent, and fun
Modern Signing and Encrypting (2020)
> Blocks are syntactical structures. Your statement is like saying that the parens and commas that are part of the argument list should be "regular values".

Well, no. Know what else is a syntactic structure? Numeric and string literals. People would never have touched the language in the first place if Ruby required you to write code like

x = String("abc")
y = Integer(123)

But people bend over backwards to explain why

z = { |x| x + 1 }

Is bad and shouldn't be allowed.

What?

The whole block vs proc thing is an artificial distinction. It doesn't add value, it removes it.

(Yeah, I know about the difference in how they handle return. This strikes me as an incredibly ad-hoc way to address something they could have solved a lot more elegantly.)
Thanks to the way math is taught in India I still have very little understanding of so many of these concepts though I'm very good at remembering formulae/steps, mechanically calculating them, and applying them to real-world problems.

It wasn't until I stumbled upon Better Explained[1] I began to appreciate the need to understand math at a deeper/common-sensical level. Now I make it an effort to teach math to my son using examples, analogies so that he gets concepts like positional numbering system, why we need it, its advantages etc.,

https://betterexplained.com/articles/intuitive-understanding...
Is that with or without the weight of the battery ;)
Anything over 45kph or 750W is illegal unless registered as a moped in California at least (and much of the rest of the US as well). Enforcement is lax in most places though.
Definitions are invented, theorems are discovered.

The Pythagorean theorem is a discovery about Euclidean geometry. But in order for that discovery to be meaningful, one must first invent Euclidean geometry, or at least something sufficiently similar to Euclidean geometry.
The app created by the FBI was more recent and was called ANOM.

See “similar cases” section of https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/EncroChat for links to anom and other infiltrated apps.
Denmark Spends $150K to Clean Beach, Then Dumps Seaweed, Plastic Back in the Sea
The intrinsic value is a property of the mining effort, the decentralized peer to peer censorship resistant ledger and the full faith in the inability to inflate the monetary base. Many consider Bitcoin to be the hardest money ever created.

A house is valuable because you can live in it (intrinsic). A Bitcoin is valuable because only you control it, it cannot be confiscated, it cannot be censored, and others will always be willing to buy it from you. The day will come when nobody sells their Bitcoin. Why on earth would you trade the hardest asset for a softer one (Greshams Law) — unless your personal requirements needed that asset for other purposes (personal preference).
The specifics aren't yet known, they only approved the generality of the law.
But the news only mentions employers, so it doesn't seem like it will include co-workers. Also your example would be considered an infraction.

Another reason why it won't mean much is that the employee is the one that needs to make a complain with the work authority, and then work authority has to evaluate the case and decide it they will issue a fine or not.

So what this really means is that if my boss contacts me after work hours I can (and should) ignore him without any repercussions.
So roll back to a previous version and start there. Android is open source. No reason a community couldn't fork it, maintain it and do what they want with it.

Jailbreaking is also a thing. Modifying the OS enough to break through vendor imposed restrictions. Why is that implausible for this example?

I'm not saying it's easy. There are certainly limitations due to the secure boot process of Android devices. But what if there was a way to change the root keys? Then it's an open game. Black market for devices with modified keys, unique per device, sign the image loaded on them to ensure the same level of security, and then load whatever you want.

This idea that our corporate overlords define what we are able to do is the only thing stopping us from proving otherwise. If someone says something is impossible, you ask for proof, question them, check their work. You don't accept and move on. This is a foundation of security research - any business claiming their product is "hack proof" is just asking to be hacked. Same goes here - if the vendor says you're not allowed to do something, you find a way around it.
>In my opinion it doesn’t matter which language you use as long as it’s the right tool for the job"

And "the right tool for the job" is of course language one knows and loves ;)
Leaving SMT enabled is most likely what you want to do. It's more performance, and the attack vector on a desktop machine for this is incredibly small. You'd need to run untrusted code (not hard, JavaScript is everywhere after all) but that JS code would need to have something to attack on a neighboring thread (unlikely) and know to attack that neighboring thread (even more unlikely) and not get mitigated by any of the browser spectre mitigations that have been in place for a while now (again, unlikely)
Complex numbers and (2D) vectors/matrices are different representations of multi-dimensional number systems. For each operation over one, you can find an analogous operation in the other.

You can even find attempts to mix the two representations, like i+j+k vector syntax. But matrices generalize better to higher dimensions and are easier to parse.
No there's about 150 chips in a s19
Connection Between Eczema and Stress
For the same situation, what if the visa is H1B1 and not the H1B?

It looks like H1B1 is non-transferrable to a different company and needs a new application from the beginning.
Yes. Like some sort of workspace? Google could make one. I wonder what they'd call it?
There should be a browser extension that completely removes any reference to Pinterest. Like it never existed.
> In 1689 the natural philosopher Robert Hooke gave a firsthand report on the effects of Indian cannabis to the Royal Society of London: “The patient understands not, nor remembers anything that he sees, hears, or does in that ecstasy, but becomes, as it were, a mere natural, being unable to speak a word of sense; yet is he very merry, and laughs, and sings, and speaks words without any coherence.”

Awesome find. Wow.
I would say that the question itself is badly formed at best, because the data that is being shown comes from teenagers who fit into a particular group who are working to get a grade and meet or exceed the expectations placed on them by an external source.

Ideally, government would work to get a passing grade and to meet expectations placed on them by an external source (the commonwealth of the people), so of course they are going to look better than whatever mishmash we currently have.

That overlooks, though, the simple truth that should we transition to a teenager lead world that we would be removing those two restrictions and therefore logically we would be creating a government of tyrants whose limited tenure (since they must be teenagers) would inspire them to actions of unimaginable selfishness to meet their immediate desires.

Sure, it might go well for a while, but such a system would be so fragile and so corruptible that when it went down we would long for the music of Nero's fiddle to comfort us.
> Many people write their own projects as well as contribute to other projects

Yeah, I know, I do the same thing myself! The question still remains: why would you want to have a popular project? It makes no sense to desire that...

Desiring that a project exists that solves a problem well... that yes, we should all desire that, but who created it doesn't really matter... if I create a project these days, it's to solve a problem I really can't find anything else to solve, not because I want to write something popular... TBH if it becomes popular, I might see that as a problem rather than a good thing given what comes with it: feature requests, bug reports, PRs that you need to spend time on while sometimes just not wanting to accept the change, self-awareness that you can no longer just change stuff at will if you want it...

I have a few slightly popular projects, but the ones I like the most are the obscure ones I use by myself :)
Less spectacular but highly entertaining is to take over the drive though boxes at fast food places.
Maybe you don't realize the amount of profit that can still be made in those 7 months?

Miners earn 2 ETH every 15 seconds.
Alas, Portugal, we hardly knew ye.

No sane business will grow in a country with insane lawmakers.
If you don't want to expose your IP address, you can configure searx to proxy all the queries through Tor. This obviously makes the instance way slower and you'll have to disable some engines that block Tor exit nodes, so it's a trade-off.
Chances of depleting this battery in normal use are nil unless you end up driving to Berlin from Amsterdam or so :) It can go up to the country borders in every direction.

The added weight is 130 times 50 grams + the weight of the enclosure. 170 batteries in there, but the original battery already had 40 of those.

Agreed that you don't want to pedal it uphill without the motor running that would get old really quick.
Fintech Funding Stalls in the Baltics
https://archive.md/r014U
I didn't ask them about the heat issue since I attributed the issue to my cheap non-Apple adapters. Issues they've fixed for me for free: broken back-plate on the old 2010 white unibody macbook, as well as a stuck key on keyboard of 2018 Macbook Pro.
I would say it's actually closer to DŽ; I just couldn't figure out the English equivalent late at night :->

I think Angelica, or perhaps Jeans or Jacob may be closer to Đ?

>>Does it vary by speaker?

Yes; and not only formally - it many parts of ex-Yu, a lot of people can't really distinguish between č and ć; and also dž and đ. (my dad has spoken the language(s) as a native for 75 years, yet though much more of a Canadian who barely remembers my initial tongue, I can still spell words like ćevapčići more consistently than him - some people just have a correct feel and others don't)