skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Chu spaces generalise the idea of concept-attribute table in formal concept analysis [1], by allowing the possession of an attribute by a concept to not simply be yes or no. Topological spaces are already a generalisation, where concepts are points and attributes are the open sets, but sometimes even topological systems are not general enough for the modelling you want to do.

Vaughan Pratt (the same Vaughan Pratt who was a cofounder of Sun), has done a lot to interest people in Chu spaces and his page might be of interest [2].

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formal_concept_analysis

[2]: http://chu.stanford.edu/
> We used to buy things that had physical value, now we just buy memes.

Money doesn't really have physical value, only speculative (you want it because you trust that someone else will want it in the future).

Shares in public companies don't really have physical value unless you own enough to change the management. Sure you 'own' that fraction of the company and their assets, but the managers of the company don't ever have to pay you out any of it. Almost all the value of a share for most people is in its speculative value.

Art generally doesn't really have physical value, the value is almost entirely in the story that goes with any specific piece. This isn't just true of modern art, being part of the story of the Mona Lisa is much more important than the aesthetic experience of looking at it (they let plebs do that for free!).

Education certainly isn't something with physical value. Sometimes it has utility value for what you can do with it, but more often it's just something that people want you to have because it distinguishes you from people who don't have it.

Insurance doesn't have physical value, it's more the value of feeling safe, which is a meme.

Entertainment is almost entirely memes and people have been paying to listen to music or watch drama for millenia.

Even the stuff that we 'used to buy' that was physical, like a car actually has a huge segment of its value that was meme based. You can tell by watching what companies advertise for. They rarely advertise for utility, they advertise for meme value.

Certainly monuments like cathedrals, huge stone circles, shrines etc were memetic as well as physical, and humans spent a phenomenal amount of effort on those things.

A huge amount of stuff that people spend money on has been primarily mimetic going back into prehistory.
I should have known better!
Spaces in file names are a bad idea because spaces delimit the name of separate distinct files,

At least in my crazy old illogical head anyway.
Others are discussing the important and serious stuff, so I wanted to touch on something more lighthearted.

I was in the e/n scene so knew of SA but never got involved, and it wasn't till 2013ish when he started doing YouTube playthroughs of the worst indie 'games' he could find which were quite entertaining on their own merits and showed off people's creativity that might otherwise be ignored. Examples: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4pIFud0Bsa8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zsCF-mz6Y6A https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F9II_cq01hY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JRQC9c6RkeI
Love the #Coup2022, now the CIA is desperately looking to plug a leak on their plan, thanks a lot jjk166!
Would a USB-C cable that handles both power and audio transfer not work?
I stopped watching the video after the guest stated that the Fed makes “counterfeit money”. This is deep into lala land.
The Nazis also sent millions of German troops to war. Around 8 million of them died fighting IIRC.
If you actually intend to do that for whatever reason, sixel is a far more usable alternative (if your terminal can actually process the frames in real time, that is).
> How about the thought process it takes to derive a optimal solution? Maybe interviewers want to test someone who can actually collaborate with them, explain their reasoning, and logically come up with a solution? Maybe that's more akin to real life than being in a cubicle coding all day alone with 0 human contact?

I don't think that that's a sufficiently generous consideration of how differently people think. Not everyone narrates all of the steps that are needed to solve their problems in a linear way of fully coherent arguments and needing to do so might slow them down, similarly to how some people don't have an inner monologue at all.

Instead, consider that some might have "checkpoints" in the problem solving process that they can formulate after a bit of discovery and trying some things out: "Okay, so i felt that X might work because of Y, but it didn't because of Z and now i probably should try something else..."

Having 5 to 10 minutes of silence between such sentences would be awkward in probably every single real time interview, thus people are forced into a mode of thinking that they won't do in practice, unless pair programming with someone else live.

I don't know about you, but most of the communication with my colleagues happens either before or after development, mostly asking questions about specifics in Slack when needed, or rarely escalating to calls for non-trivial situations/questions (even though i fail to recall the last time when i called someone about a particular bit of code, yet have often explained things to others).

So, as opposed to calling said people morons or claiming that every single thought needs to be representable to others, maybe it's useful to consider that the way people think might play a part in it, that there are also preferences people have for synchronous vs asynchronous communication (which doesn't imply NO communication) and that there might even be cultural differences?
> university years are probably going to be your last chance to fuck around and explore and enjoy life as a young person.

I could barely keep my head above water during university. Problem sets,
projects, and exams occupied me 24/7. Holding down a job was a piece of cake
relatively speaking, admitting all manner of idle mischief, not to mention
fun encounters with the opposite gender in and out of the office.
File names should be long enough to clearly communicate meaning/purpose/context, no more no less.
I missed the CollegeClub days but I think I still have an old Neopets profile, although I don't think there's anything too dangerous on there I could be blackmailed with...
So it starts from the generic untyped lambda calculus and then shows that it is possible to reach erroneous states: so far so much like any dynamically typed language (so javascript, lua, python). Bear in mind javascript is also quite weakly typed, but that doesn't matter much for the point I am trying to elucidate.

You introduce types to try to describe the program state in a way that a static analyser is able to prove that the program will not reach erroneous states. You learn that types limit computing: the simply typed lambda calculus always halts. Note that a human reader is a type of static analyser.

You start introducing more advanced types to try to get back that unbounded possibility: to be a real programming language, you need the halting problem--a real server doesn't halt.

Anyways, after some chapters you learn that you may need a lot of rather advanced type theory to truly describe some of the complex things that some crazy people did in previously dynamically typed languages. That's why python type hints and typescript sometimes (but not usually) need some really crazy stuff: people were able to and did do all kinds of crazy things.

Arguably, there are easier ways to solve a problem than the way that requires advanced type theory to describe. The dynamic languages don't make it easier to write, verify and reason about such code other than the fact that many static languages prevent it outright.
I find this attitude misguided. More descriptive names are more ergonomic for things you only use rarely but they need to be combined with much better autocompletion than most shells provide by default.
I think so, unless you expect your workplace to generate the same levels of anxiety during day to day work.
Facebook the service no. Facebook/Meta the company yes :)
This is a UI/UX problem that I only face when dealing with shells and shell scripts. Never had any issues when spawning processes from within languages/runtimes that support sane argument arrays.

sh, bash and cmd.exe are shit. The shell needs serious rethinking.
This looks to me like you admonished GP for creating a hypothetical situation and drawing a conclusion from it one paragraph before you do the same. Both scenarios add to the conversation in different ways.
Steam Deck Release Pushed Back to February 2022
I'd tell you but I'd have to kill you after. :)
#metoo was literally about bringing the attention to the scale of the problem and raising awareness, and normalize talking about abuse, so that it wouldn't continue in silence.

The court of public opinion has existed before and after #metoo. Let's not pretend that #metoo invented it. If twenty people were to go public and say that Justin Bieber beat each of them with a crowbar, Justin Bieber would have some 'splainin to do, whether or not there's a court case.

If twenty people gave interviews and said that Martha Stewart personally fed them poisoned pies for shits and giggles, Martha would be affected by that, whether these people decide to sue or not.

But the society made an exception for sexual abuse. Rape and drugging in particular. #metoo simply made it count just as much.
Make your home network faster with Raspberry Pi (DNS Caching)
Please do a "Show HN" when your first (generated, AI-based) album is out.
I think you have the makings of a new Netflix series there. I propose it be called Check In (or Cheque In for those of us in the UK).
Not if you are careful (a bit like "$@" vs $@ in shell scripts).

Edit: replace $@ with quoted version which actually changes the behavior (I was wrong that the difference is between $* and $@).
What's wrong with camelCase? It's easier to type than snake
What vibe do you get?

The deconstructed 7-ring version has some cleverness, I'll give you that. The rest is really generic and lacks overt symbology of historic [royal/government] seals IMO.

It doesn't matter though, they got what they wanted, Ive's name attached to provide publicity.
I was on the Internet since 1991. Usenet was great but it was hard to find other stuff. There were mailing lists for specialty topics and Archie and Gopher to find FTP sites. Then you'd have to use an FTP client to download files.

The creation of the World Wide Web and the graphical browser is what really made the Internet explode in popularity. When I came back to college in fall 1994 there were a lot of web sites and search engines to find sites. The ability to edit a text file and add more HTML links made it so easy to use and create.
I find this odd as how signal looks and works is one of the reasons I enjoy using it.

Can you highlight your collective pet peeves ?
> Who is to say if a room was occupied or not that night, if that foreigner who paid in cash really existed.

Here in th EU, they usually have a look at your passport. I think it's enforced by law in some places. Government overreach
Test and trace never worked nearly as effectively against Covid as the media claimed. I don't know about the Netherlands, but here in the UK the media coverage was pretty much outright lying about how well it worked in South Korea to convince us our government was incompetent and had failed, saying it let them achieve things like lifting social distancing restrictions and reopening bars and clubs pre-vaccine when in reality every time they tried that cases immediately went exponential and they had to reimpose the restrictions. Even the countries which were pursuing zero covid with some success had to rely on repeated, strict lockdowns to achieve that (and most of them have given up on that now).

And it's been much more effective pretty much everywhere at preventing Covid getting in than it has once it's endemic in a country - reducing the number of cases doesn't help much if there are undetected infections, and the difficulty of finding those doesn't really scale down much with the number of cases or infections since they could be almost anywhere in the population.
Yeah, because in life you have to put in the work.

Using math as an example, you can't master it without a lot of practice, and that practice is homework. Albert Einstein wrote that he was practicing mathematics often and at length from an early age.
Looks like I'm in the minority. I always use spaces and non-ASCII characters in filenames.

In many languages it's a requirement. For example, in Romanian, there are 8 words that collide with „fata“ if you remove the diacritics (fata, fată, fața, față, făta, făță, fâța, fâță).

Given that we have to use diacritics, spaces don't seem like a big deal.
Booking takes a 20% cut of the reservation, so I expect every hotel to gladly you offer a 10% off the booking.com price.
How far is this from Taxi Medallions 2?
I ran into the grandson (already retired) in a Bay Area McDonald's. Interesting conversation.
That was one of the most interesting 20 min history lessons I have ever watched.
One day facebook.com will be parked domain :)
Cheers for not answering the question.
>growing cohort of people who now reactivity think that any accusation is more likely to be false than true

And hopefully both will join a third cohort that withholds all judgement in the absence of proof.
One of the main reasons why Windows used "Program Files" and "Documents and Settings" was to force the programs (and programmers) to deal with paths with spaces. And you know, for the most part it kinda, more or less worked out although of course even today you will find programs that ask you to install them in a folder without spaces in the path.
What is a "normie"? Sounds like a vaguely inflammatory/derogatory term, but not 100% clear on what you mean by it.
>You present strawman (seeing it makes it credible)

Seeing something happen does make an allegation more credible; this is the whole point of, say, witness testimony. Why we are more likely to believe things which are attested to by others. Credibility is also an element of character and relation to the victim. If I told my parents I was mugged in an underpass on my way home, which explains why I don't have my cell phone, I'd be a little weirded out if they simply replied with "your allegations are not credible, that's a strawman."

>we can and should considered guilty until proven innocent.

Guilt and innocence in which epistemic context? Consider that there are both very well known cases of public opinion being wrong (and overturned by a court or other method), or the findings of courts being wrong (and overturned by public investigation and revelations). Guilt in one arena does not necessarily equal guilt in another[0], and I think that's part of the point GP was trying to make.

>a couple fights, she takes the kids, he shouts, she calls the police and claims abuse, he is beaten and arrested; during the divorce she uses the arrest as evidence of the abuse, and frames the beating as evidence of her husbands violent tendencies

You can't seriously accuse GP of setting up a straw-man, then relay an idealized (for your point) situation which is, to my knowledge, not backed up by any statistical power.

>Because this is what I'm arguing against, and I can't understand how or why anyone would want this to be how things work.

You're arguing from a view-from-nowhere, that is, you have already relayed the facts of an unfair situation and the legal consequences of that situation, without taking into account that the situation you relayed is a failure of the justice system, not only of the allegation. Your depiction of how a single allegation snowballs like that isn't impossible - but you haven't done anything to show that this is the result of most (or even a significant number of) allegations of domestic abuse.

[0] "In at least a wide variety of cases, our orientation toward testimony is a non-skeptical one: when someone tells us that P, we end up justified in believing
that P. And ordinarily, if the speaker knows that P and tells us that P, we end up ourselves knowing that P. That testimonial knowledge is common is both commonsense and philosophical orthodoxy.

But we do not always take this kind of stance. Sometimes we interrogate testimony; sometimes we explain it away or demand proof. As much recent literature in both social psychology and epistemic injustice has shown, social and cultural factors influence the degree to which testimony is considered credible."
Departments of Agriculture and Education don't own intelligence agencies?
> You present strawman (seeing it makes it credible)

Multiple eye witnesses help make the allegation credible, yes. Which would go against the idea of no allegations being considered credible by the general public. That was your opening statement.

> But I'd suggest stepping back and considering the overall point you're trying to make.

It's very simple. Some allegations are credible, and it is entirely reasonable for the general public to thing some allegations are credible and others not.

> You might start with a scenario which is, by construction unfair: a couple fights, she takes the kids, he shouts, she calls the police and claims abuse, he is beaten and arrested; during the divorce she uses the arrest as evidence of the abuse, and frames the beating as evidence of her husbands violent tendencies; the court accepts this argument and he loses the children, getting supervised visitation only 90 minutes once a week.

> Does that sound right, or fair to you?

It sounds like it has nothing to do with whether any allegation can be considered credible. It could be an argument against all allegations being considered credible and it can be an argument against people mixing up someone _alleging_ another is guilty and that person being _found_ to be guilty.

> all in seeming defense of the principle: we can and should considered guilty until proven innocent.

Perhaps try reading my comment again, and if after that and this extra explanation you still think I am claiming somehow that all allegations should lead to convictions or that all allegations are credible or that guilt should be assumed, then I have no way of reaching a consensus with you as to what point I'm even trying to make.
> downvotes on HN are, by official policy, for disagreeing with ideas

Care to link to that policy? I was always of the impression that short low-quality comments that don’t further the discussion are prime examples of acceptable downvote targets here. Disagreeing with a constructively expressed idea is best done by expressing your own argument in a reply.
Or just leave it empty and never change its size. It may look strange, but our fear of technically correct “nothing wrong” ways is irrational. Many useful services are so much more broken than that, but still are used because of the value they provide.

And we tend to ignore this in real world, so it’s really just the designer’s OCD. When an information/ads stand is half-empty, when roads are padded with safety zones, when spatial configuration of anything real is technical, then nobody notices. But when the same happens on a site, every figma guy goes mad about the extra space it takes.
Buynow HTTPS://www.facebook.com/Exipure-Customer-Reviews-103065415531186
what is Exipure Customer Reviews?

Exipure Customer Reviews :- Exipure Customer Reviews is a weight reduction supplement that assists ignite with bodying fat and further develop energy levels. It assists you with disposing of overabundance fat rapidly and adequately and furthermore helps in lessening weight.

OFFICIAL SITES :- https://www.facebook.com/Exipure-Customer-Reviews-103065415531186

https://sites.google.com/view/exipurecustomerreviews/home

https://exipure-customer-reviews.yolasite.com/

https://www.spreaker.com/show/exipure-customer-reviews

https://exipure-customer-reviews.jimdosite.com/

https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/exipure-customer-reviews

https://www.completefoods.co/diy/recipes/exipure-customer-reviews

https://promosimple.com/giveaways/exipure-customer-reviews-updated-does-it-work-or-scam/

https://www.homify.in/projects/1086887/exipure-customer-reviews-made-up-natural-ingredients-is-it-safe-to-use
er. I don't cross in front of a car unless I make eye ccontact and know they see me. This has so far kept me alive, although it's certainly not foolproof.

You're right, the bicyclists will likely ruin the possibility of total automation for the self-driving fans. I hadn't thought about that. Two clashing visions of a testicle-less utopia. Both entirely devoted to their vision of different worlds in which no one dares take a big machine themselves and drive it down a road without permission.

If it comes to the point where you cannot drive your own car on the highway without computers in it, then you have no freedom of mobility. Your most basic right as a human is gone and your children will grow up in a world where they don't know they have a natural right to go places without asking permission. The only people who will go wherever they please without asking permission will be the people who sold you that technology and who captured the regulatory process to make it required by law.
och my emojis didn't display, sorry
> One can dispute this belief, and no doubt they were both brutal, but there is a difference between a genocidal policy with the aim of extermination, and the state exerting its power to punish those it thinks are working against its interests.

The whole system was set up to routinely fabricate absurd evidence against innocent people and send them to Gulags (or straight against the wall). It was needed, because the rulers needed their population to be terrorized (less chance of a rebellion) and also because it provided huge amounts of free labor for the Gulags.

I don't think anybody up high believed for a second that any significant fraction of people they condemned to death, torture or lives destroyed in Gulags were guilty of anything.
Discussion: I have an idea how can we recycle old tec?
I want to talk about a potential idea to recycle old tec to help stop contributing to global warming its been ticking over in my head. Can we turn old machines into arcade devices and use the profits from this to buy up more and expand. I can not do this alone and need help as its a very big proejct.
VFAT and stuff like that actually provided alternate names like PROGRA~1
There's a tendency away from snake_case and towards kebab-case in things you interact with via CLI. Even moreso towards nocase.

Programs like Powershell eschew ease of use in CLI for readability in scripts.
“Jokes at someone else’s expense = bad” seems to me like it literally* requires some social awareness.

* in its original definition
I would assume it doesn’t affect people equally.

Then the question is whether or not the anxiety will become a problem in the workplace. I can see arguments for both sides.
gjere/gjøre are equal but I edited the sentence to plural after checking a screenshot and forgot to remove "en".

As for how to translate it, I'd say almost anything would better.
What incentive is there for the Fed to continue printing as opposed to doing the right thing? What’s the conspiracy here?
Accusing your spouse for domestic abuse to prevent them from seeing their kids is like toxic divorce 101. It doesn't cost anything, carries no risk and in a divorce court you don't have to prove much, rather your spouse would have to prove that he didn't abuse you. This is different from criminal court where getting a guilty verdict is very hard. If he was found guilty in a criminal court it would be very different.
All that intelligence and they still can't figure out how to stop a bunch of unemployed basementarians from organising on Facebook to storm one of their principal seats of government...

(Sorry for the Twitter-grade comment - but I do sometimes wonder what these people really spend their time doing, that they couldn't catch that one.)
I also need to learn a lot but I am willing to give this a real go as I beleive it can work I just need a good serious group to get into this.