skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Silently gathering data about a person's activities without their knowledge is antithetical to human dignity and people's freedom. It's no accident that no tracking is done in the open or asks for permission.

I disagree. Tracking happens very much all the time, everywhere. People know habits of those they're interested in at work, be that their boss or clients, for the benefit of their career. That's tracking. Corner shops track their customers' routine. We call their attention "charm", "nice touch", that make them superior to the big boxes. The subjects in both case certainly aren't aware and it's hard to claim it's antithetical to human dignity and people's freedom.

You may argue that Google do it at scale, and that make them vile, so at which scale does tracking become a problem? Is my little website free to do so? If not, what is different than a little shop with a book that details frequent customers' name, address, birthday, etc.?

Tracking isn't the issue. Using the data against the will or to do harm to people is the issue that needs to be addressed.
It's all fun and games until you have to wade through hundreds of posts of tech CEOs selling their brand of overly-positive "corporate Kool-Aid" and then having even more fun checking the box that says "I'm open to considering a new job" and then getting spammed by thousands of industry-blind tech recruiters and scammers from overseas. :/
"you will get a lot mote of that if you get infected"

Prove it. You won't be able to because no such relative measurements exist.
no such story
The good news is now there's a deadline to do so as new issues were announced this month.
They're not. It's not even close. You're more likely to kill yourself than get killed in traffic. You're actually more likely to be killed by a sober driver than a drunk one (due to the populations).

I'm not saying it's a good situation, but if getting hit by a drunk driver is the number one risk you face, you have a remarkably safe existence and I'd be curious how you eliminated the risk of heart attack or suicide.
Guide from Zero to WebRTC Hero
WebRTC is a great technology for creating ultra-low latency interactive video applications but with most DIY technologies, scaling beyond 50,000 viewers is a challenge. Using a WebRTC service provider to exceed these view counts can be expensive and inflexible. One DIY alternative, the Ant Media Server, can deliver a sub-0.5 second latency WebRTC experience to a six-figure audience for minimal cost. This white paper discusses set up and user experience for a simulated production with 150,000 viewers. You can check the guideline from here. Also, let me know if you have any questions!
>Silently gathering data about a person's activities

(As a privacy fanatic who uses GPDR all the time to get control of his data) sadly, I think that this is the fundamental nature of the technological era that we're living in. This is just how software works, many things that were previously private in an analog era are now explicit somewhere in the code. Do you really think that if various Apple or whomever policies are struck down, the tech that's built in the 2020s & 30s & 40s & the rest of the 21st century somehow won't gather data on people? As someone who's really unhappy about that state of affairs, it just seems inevitable.

Edit to include: I suspect that 'privacy' is going to be viewed as just a brief moment in time for humans. Previously we all lived in small groups or villages with little privacy (I grew up in a small town, I know!), so the 'privacy' era may have just been for urban dwellers for a few centuries
And you don't have to buy the "expensive" phone. Their phones last nearly 10 years so you can buy used or get a new SE for $400.
Javascript does have finalizers now[1], which is a much-needed feature for webassembly interop where you need to explicitly call destructors to clean up any wasm data the object owns. However, this wouldn't help with promises where you need cleanup code to be called deterministically, not whenever the GC gets around to cleaning up the object. As you mention, using cancellation tokens that raise an exception is a reasonable solution

[1] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Refe...
It was not the zoom feature it was the image enhancement feature that the expert failed to guarantee didnt change key pixels to one color or another. Expert witness said he had no way to know and never compared his work to original. Defense asked expert if he ever held his enhanced image next to original to see if they matched. Expert said no I never did that. So the unverified forensic photoshoped image was not admissible.
You can pay for YouTube, and not have to see ads.
p2p: there's the Yacy effort. https://yacy.net/ I… couldn't find a portal to try it out (I did years ago, the results need… to be discussed. It's anyways easy to install and to choose what part of the web to crawl.)

> YaCy is free software for your own search engine.

maybe they rebranded and don't aspire to be a complete web search engine?
How to deal with Docker Hub rate limit on AWS
Yeah a way for me to not pay much, but still more than my measly ad views would be to a creator, without individually giving them a few pennies every month or a bit at the end of the year. A bit problem is this kind of micro payment is expensive to process unless you can aggregate them at the scale of a platform.
If money (and influence) are so meaningless, then why bother cloning WaitButWhy, not only in the style of content but also the domain name syntax?
It's currently undergoing its monthly maintenance just FYI. It's up and technically working, but with a drastically reduced index size.
You should also add YaCy: https://yacy.net.
I’m certain AOL had a Mac client in the 1990s, but I’m not sure when the first Mac AIM was released. This exploit wouldn’t work on the Mac version, because Macs at the time were 68000 and PowerPC-based, so it seems quite short-sighted to depend on i386 exploits for client identification.
The article brings up a new point which I haven't considered before (otherwise I could see why it was being flagged, you can't downvote submissions right?):

Allowing students in with lower scores is actually detrimental to those students. Students are more likely to succeed when grouped with peers that they score more similarly to.
It's kind of ridiculous to argue for a one-byte address space in 2021, then kludging on an extension mechanism to handle the obvious fact that's too small.

I'm saying that it's not too small. You still haven't mentioned anything about your use-case of needing several hundred(!?!?) different unique headers. 30 years of HTTP and so far there's been less than 100 defined.

So we'll all get to ask ourselves "what header is 3849, again?" way more than we ever should.

Note that even those who have only a very vague idea of what HTTP is, know what a 404 is; and probably 403 too.

There's about a light year between worrying about a dozen bytes and something like Electron.

Multiply that dozen bytes by however much traffic goes through the entire Internet... and it suddenly doesn't look small anymore.
Veterans Day is not a day off for US Googlers.
The blockchain at COP26 – substantive developments (net zero chain,circ economy)
Having spent much of the past week wondering the same thing, I think I'm now in love with your product. Looking forward to giving it a try. Thanks for jumping into the page to tell us about it.
"Also, why see no code as a "competitor" or something completely different?"

Only, solely, and singularly because overexcited no-code proponents are holding it up as such. Otherwise it's no problem.

I actually came up with the insight I posted above while I was typing it. There'll probably some future variant of this post that has it expressed more cleanly, instead of burying what should have been the lede.

I'd say that no-code advocates should be more careful about their messaging; I understand the desire to sell to management, but pissing off "normal" developers is eating your seed corn. There's also architectural ways that manifests in the product itself, where if you think "normal" code is an exception, you'll build it as an exception, and cut yourself off from later growth.

If everyone understood no-code as a follower (and honestly, generally a rather late one... the developer community as a whole needs to process things down to maximum degree before it's ready for the non-developer community), and everyone involved saw it that way, I think we'd end up with a productive harmony. If no-code developers insist on attacking developers (or attacking their job security, or attacking their credibility with their managers, or attacking their work ethic... no-code advertising has done a lot of these sorts of things), it's going to raise hostility and ultimately be self-defeating for the no-code startups.
Wow the group supporting them is "Mothers Against Drunk Driving".

This is literally, "We need to put cameras and microphones into everyone's car and constantly monitor everyone all the time.... to protect the children of course".
> To keep Signal a free global communication service without spam, we must depart from our totally-open posture and develop one piece of the server in private: a system for detecting and disrupting spam campaigns.

It has been irreversibly admitted this time; quite painfully confessed by Signal. The point of no return that Signal is no longer free, libre and open source software (FLOSS).

It was disqualified anyway as a privacy-based messenger due to requiring your phone number. Now it is completely disqualified as a FLOSS messenger; all thanks to using your phone number.

What a shame.
How do people get to the stage where they're prepared to get involved in protesting/resisting? What role does individuals influencing others play in the build up to this?

Is boycotting (i.e. not buying certain products or from certain companies) a form of resistance/protest?
Buy hard assets, land, houses, condo, PM's, etc. You can try finding investment vehicles that will do that for you but at the end of the day you're better off physically owning them.

Disclaimer: I am not qualified to give Investment advice.
Feels to me like you have zero experience scaling outside the big cloud provider as this is simply not true
Right. And you cannot be a Bayesian thinker about COVID vaccines because the data quality is way too low for that. People are saying things in this thread like "the risk of heart damage is X%", as if that's actually a robust statistic.

Virtually no accurate, trustworthy and useful information about the safety or effectiveness of the vaccines is available. The public health and media establishment is far too biased in favour of vaccines and far too biased against anything that might discourage people from taking it. In such an environment it doesn't matter whether you understand Bayes theorem or not. You can't just do some calculations and understand the risks.
Gordon Ramsay of all people noted that the Thames is now teeming with eels because they compete very well in polluted water, while potential competitor species just can't survive and reproduce in those conditions like they can. He was trying to encourage consumption of eels as a protein source as a result.

So apparently, some species can be fit to eat but it's highly dependent on their biology.
$107 million sounds really cheap compared to NYC trying to unilaterally prevent a changing climate.
But for me finding that holy balance is in itself is tiring. some times the contents are no engaging and so it feels easier to skip through the slacking and get some work done. But in other times it is hard. The balance of this mechanism seems so dynamics.
In these instances where you find a one liner useful but you use it rarely, just put it in a function with comments on how it works. When you want to use it the function is ready and the explanation too.
Too many characters
not just in Scotland. The Forest (eh) of Bowland, in the North of England, is continuously swept by strong winds. Other areas like the Goyt Valley seem to struggle in a similar way: they can be prettly lush inbetween hills, but as soon as the landscape opens a bit they become very raw.
I'm interested in the source/methodology on these ratios. US equity markets have deep global participation -- for example, 67% of Apple's revenue is overseas but it is a US stock.
No they wouldn't. There really aren't enough devs around to make that statement true. Plus, if so many devs would do that, they can buy the 6-month-old refurbs at that time and do what they want. If they aren't doing that, then they wouldn't buy the machine you're imagining.
Infidelity in marriage is never a thing of joy, I was battling with infections in marriage, painful right. I'm not so ashamed to say this because I'll like this to serve as an eye-opener to young couples out there. my ex-husband was a university lecturer and was always involved with extramarital affairs. I found myself in and out of hospitals treating myself for STDs, I had to get an ethical hacker cyberethiicalhacker {@} GMAIL . COM, to help me clone his phone and social media platforms in Whatsapp and Facebook messenger. I was able to gather several proofs from the hack he was able to help me with. I'm so thankful and appreciative. he makes me feel invincible going into any relationship now. knowing fully well I'll be sure of my spouse's intention. contact address is an email describing your hack needs and exploits.
ALSO, if you are in need of a legit hacker for DELETING OF BLEMISHES FROM CREDIT REPORT
CREDIT SCORE INCREASE
PHONE CLONE
PHONE TAP, SPY
HACK YOUR CHEATING SPOUSE TO FIND OUT WHAT THEY HAVE BEEN UP TO
MORTGAGE LOAN LENDERS AND APPROVALS.
EMAIL HACKS
WHATSAPP, MESSENGER AND OTHER SOCIAL MEDIA APP
DELETING OF CRIMINAL RECORD AND EVICTION HISTORY
FUNDS RECOVERY SERVICE
send a descriptive message to cyberethiicalhacker AT GMAIL DOT COM

Contact cyberethiicalhacker AT gmail DOT com for any hacking job, he is good and reliable. He helped me track a con artist I was dating online, this fake lover scammed me for over 6 months and collected over $13000 from me. Thanks to reality I was able to get his location. I reported him to the police and gave him his location. He is behind bars now thanks to cyber ethiical hacker.
Being used to hear Stan Rogers' voice sing about privateers, whalers and other such things, at first this song felt odd.

After a bit of thought though, I realize there's no reason why that should be the case. Ours is a real life experience that, while not physically demanding or adventurous, isn't less worthy of being captured in song. We have our own experiences of drudgery, adversity, camaraderie that have gone mostly unsung. Thank God we at least had Stan Rogers.
>Scientists using a monitoring station near the Houses of Parliament found there was a constant low level of cocaine entering the river, The Sunday Times reported.

That explains a great deal of things!
On POSIX system file paths are C strings, which are sequences of bytes that cannot include the 0 character. UTF-8 or oher meaning is not required for something to be a string.
> And two libcs in the same program (one from the dylib, one from the binary) is a recipe for a very bad time - imagine freeing a pointer allocated with a different malloc implementation, or a different layout of libc structs

Depends on the exact architecture of the program, y'know. I remember a Windows app written in Delphi (so no libc whatever) that supported loading plugins written it whatever; and I've seen it load simultaneously plugins that linked against msvcrt90.dll and msvcrt100.dll with no problem. But that worked because plugins were required to export a FreeObject function that is supposed to be used to free whatever structures a plugin returned from its other functions. The main program tracked what piece of data came from where and called proper deallocation functions.

But that requires acknowledgement of a fact that there is no "single, global C runtime".
I am going to try out this.
Well, who knows? This data is being sold far and wide so it sounds rather likely that this is somewhere right now being used to rob peoples bank accounts or publicizing their illicit affairs to friends and family...

I think there should be a law against large-scale espionage. E.g., collecting, storing and selling of all peoples browsing history should be illegal.
Hiya Colin!

Disclosure, I'm head of devrel at FusionAuth, as well as a co-worker of the author of the post.

We think there is value in separating identity in the way you describe for a number of reasons.

* While this tutorial is about one app, that isn't usually how things work beyond demo land. In most places you have more than one application authenticating against FusionAuth (a couple of custom apps, OSS software like forums, COTS like Zendesk). In this case, isolating identity to a single component allows you to manage it centrally and to, if needed, bolster security.
* If you use OAuth, you get access to a tremendous selection of libraries across different languages. Every language has an OAuth framework you can use.
* Developers can have portable skills. Sure, figuring out the Authorization Code grant can be a bit of a pain, but once you do it once, you can do it again and again.
* By standardizing on OAuth/OIDC, you can move between identity providers. Yes, there are differences at the edges, but you'll have more flexibility than if you code to say, Clerk. This may or may not be worthwhile.

I haven't taken a close look at clerk, but I'm not sure how you handle the multi application setup. It is likely that both FusionAuth and Clerk are approaching the same problems in different ways (which is fine!).

If you want to see a take on how we think about authentication, the Modern Guide to OAuth is a great article to read: https://fusionauth.io/learn/expert-advice/oauth/modern-guide... particularly the "OAuth modes" section.
$DEITY help you if you're a developer on LinkedIn. Not only do you get the recruiter spam if you say you're looking for work, but even if you don't have the box ticked you get spam from half of fucking India trying to network with you.
You won't receive that clarification. This company has already taken funding and have to profit somehow. First it was the browser plugin, soon it's who knows what. You're not getting an answer, and that's likely very intentional.
[Story submitter, FWIW]

Oh, they definitely did – I used it myself.

I think these shenanigans were mainly to counter 3rd parties from connecting to AIM. MSN tried to very briefly, I think, but AOL attacked GAIM (now called Pidgin) consistently for years.

JOOI: the author of the piece is the same person who uncovered Microsoft's AARD code that made Windows 3.1 fake failing on DR-DOS.
EU to AI:

Here's a €2.4 billion fine for you.

AI to EU:

OK, human.
> 1. dlopen has interactions with static linking that you should understand if you use both at the same time.

Using dlopen when static linking is used is deprecated in glibc.
Fuck what they think. The office has no future.
There are ways to regulate the burden.

If I can't privately listen right now, I don't, and if they get annoyed, I'll tell them why.

If something would require me to replay it multiple times to take notes, depending on the situation I'll tell the sender to type it up.

It isn't a matter of trying to punish, it is negotiating preferences. Send me something I have to interact with, and it may well take me some time to get to it. This is no different than emailing me a PDF.
What?!
No. Isengard is somewhere in Central Europe. Britain is the Shire, and Bree. Industrial Britain is the Shire after Frodo gets back, the part the movie skipped (elevating the modern Iraq War veterans experience of “I am the one who changed and don’t belong anymore” over the WWII veterans experience of “even the place I love changed”.)
Is this video anything other than confirmation for people who already suspected it, and easily denial for everyone else?

The viability of the push by Propublica and friends to redefine tax rate and decry the low rates by their new measurement should be ample evidence to anyone who suspected low awareness of tax rates.
I see this a little differently. When I'm in a different country like Japan and I search for something, the results are very relevant.

When I go home to the US and search "something Japan" or "something site:*.jp" the results are worse than useless and completely different from what I get in Japan.

The internet is supposed to be our universal bridge, but here it is unwittingly segmenting us into fractured universes presented as uniform.
> The 100 pixels would still be there, but probably a bit mushed together to fit on a line 70 pixels in length.

This seems incorrect. It sounds like you are saying that you can store any 100 random values into 70 values. Or 100 bits of information in to 70 bits.

If you could, what would stop you from then storing that 70 bits in 49 bits, then that 49 in ~34 bits, etc and therefor have infinite information storage?
MADD is where that meme came from
The problem with self-hosted search engine is that they make you _very_ unique: you’re the only client of the ”backend“ engine with that (static and non-NATed) IP. Furthermore, you’re now one of the small group of people with ”hosting“ IPs. Using self-hosted SearX may make you easier to track, not harder.

Using SearX hosted by someone else is marginally better, but now you have to trust the owner of the server, which is probably not what you want for privacy-centered search engine.
SiteGround as WordPress Hoster
Aw, shucks. I thought that was the complete version.

I'd just pirate the damn thing if you weren't doing it for professional purposes.
Hmmm. This article explicitly uses an express server to avoid the token being sent to the client.

That said, if you must send a token to the browser because you don't want to manage sessions, we've seen folks have success storing the JWT in an HTTPOnly secure cookie.

Disclosure: am co-worker of the author.
I use sed -ibak ‘10d’ ~/.ssh/.known_hosts so many times a week. awk, sed, and regex really are the two programs I am happy to have learned well at my first job. They’ve helped me immensely throughout my 10 years as someone who bridges developer and ops roles.
> We care deeply about trust, privacy and choice so we want to be careful

Then disable your third party tracking, it's even enabled in private mode, it should not be present in any mode.

> getting feedback from our users on them

You've proven yourself to be hostile to feedback, as evidenced in your thread.
I'm for banning uncontrolled infliction of that and other carcinogens on one's neighbours, yes.
CentOS 7's sed doesn't support -E, but CentOS 8 does. That might cause some confusion.

Also, FYI, this is the link for the POSIX specification for sed:

https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/s...

Notice that -i is not POSIX.
These are the specifications from the bill:

(A) can--
(i) passively monitor the performance of a driver of a
motor vehicle to accurately identify whether that driver
may be impaired; and
(ii) prevent or limit motor vehicle operation if an
impairment is detected;
(B) can--
(i) passively and accurately detect whether the blood
alcohol concentration of a driver of a motor vehicle is
equal to or greater than the blood alcohol concentration
described in section 163(a) of title 23, United States
Code; and
(ii) prevent or limit motor vehicle operation if a
blood alcohol concentration above the legal limit is
detected; or
(C) is a combination of systems described in subparagraphs

So breathalyzer interlocks would be a functional solution under the bill. It'll probably be the solution, because I don't hold out a lot of faith that your car will be able to analyze your driving in real time and lock you out without an absurd number of false positives.
Standards Australia continues to exist as a non-profit industry association - you're thinking of SAI Global, which was SA's for-profit services wing that got sold off.