skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I agree one can care without getting "cripplingly anxious". But you're ignoring how being anxious can definitely make you conscientious, something very helpful in work where fussbudgetry is half the job.

If you have evidence that software developers and sysadmins are no more anxious that the average person, I'd be interested to see it. But my experience is definitely different.
Person Detection on tiny Lattice CrossLink-NX FPGAs
My normal challenge with recipes is that I have no idea how authoritative the reviews are. On some sites, there are a lot of recipes that make no sense whatsoever, and yet have 5 stars.
People do occasionally order buildings to be done in an older style that most enjoy. You know what happens afterwards? The architect involved gets ostracised. It’s “grotesque” apparently.

The problem is absolutely the architects and their profession. They are no longer producing buildings that people enjoy but rather caters to their own perverted aesthetical sense of pride.
It's great stuff, that's how I survived most of the time I ran Linux. Whenever I had to do anything more complicated, I grabbed my old MBP and shared the files between the PCs. Nothing beats alt-tabbing into a Photoshop instance running at 5+ FPS, though :)
If it’s really down to social consensus and not the state of the blockchain, then does the blockchain mean anything at all?
Yep. Every time I see a US-focused article complaining about pay adjustments when people move to new regions to work remotely I just wonder where everybody has been for all these years where their coworkers in London or Vancouver are getting paid 50% of their wage for the same work.
> 1. DRM realistically wasn't an issue due to pirates (remember naptster?)

IIRC, it did have a couple consequences like Apple embedding PII into music files..

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2007/06/should-apple-embed-you...

..or going even further back, the arrest of a hacker at a Defcon convention who broke the DRM from eBooks.

https://yro.slashdot.org/story/01/07/17/130226/fallout-from-...

I can't specifically recall but I think there was a time a Stanford (?) researcher published a paper on SDMI (?) watermarks in music files as well.
There are lots of ways the fossil fuel industry is currently misrepresenting science, such as overstating the potential of carbon capture technology to undo the emissions they intend to keep making.
Edwin the Editor
fml, are we really heading towards virtual reality offices?
Few languages truly speak full C (e.g. through clang plugin), they support ABI, but there are libraries like libpng and gtk with API disconnected from ABI, for them FFI doesn't resemble heavily macro encumbered C API.
I was talking to an engineer from Raytheon about a project and one thing came up I found interesting. When a system is developed the prototypes are built using lab conditions meaning very tight tolerances often coupled with equally ridiculous tests. This ensures the thing works reliably in any situation it might encounter and possibly beyond. Once you have a working prototype then the manufacturing design phase begins where you then look to relax the stringent lab standards. This means lower tolerances that still allow the thing to be reliable while now making it more easily manufactured at volume.

BUT That isn't always the case because of deadlines and and some parts or the entire project never move past lab spec and retain insane tolerances. So yes, sometimes tests are "stupid" but that doesn't mean you ignore them and lie because of "feelings".

In the case presented here I think the accused wasn't very forward thinking. She only thought of the sub as a purely water born ship but fact is they operate both at and below the surface. They also need to operate near the earths poles where they might surface for hours exposing the hull to temperatures damn near -100F.
This is a very powerful way of thinking, and one I use often when thinking about things like career direction and personal life. I think I also learned it from Charlie Mungers book, but I don't recall clearly. However, it does have two downsides as a way of engineering thinking that is worth being aware of: completely enumerating badness is hard, and the solution space might be much sparser than the problem space.

Say I'm designing a distributed replication protocol, basically trying to discover Paxos from first principles. So I start with things that don't work, like "fire the packets off at each server and hope they arrive in the order I sent them". So I close that gap. Then find the next problem, and close that, and so on. That finds a lot of problems, but doesn't necessarily find the solution: the space of problems is dense, but the set of solutions is small and tightly clustered in a few "islands". So I can churn through loads of broken protocols without identifying the key insight that leads to a working protocol. In the case of Paxos, that's having acceptors return their previously accepted values and having proposers drive those values instead of their own proposals. It's a brilliant insight, which doesn't seem to lead directly from the set of problems.

Then there's the issue with enumerating badness. What are all the ways a server can suffer gray failure? Spend a minute writing them down (bad RAM, bad RAM that still passes ECC, CPU corrupting floating point calculations, etc etc). Ask a colleague to do the same. Compare your answers, and you'll likely find their list of badness is different from yours. This is where you need, again, a simplifying insight (like "look from the outside" or "use a quorum" or whatever). In other words, sometimes it's easier to enumerate goodness than badness.

I don't mean to attack a strawman version of this way of thinking. It's a useful tool. But it's one analysis tool, and it's worth being careful of applying it to the exclusion of other ways of analysis that lead more directly to the synthesis of the "correct" answer.
It's amazing! You could use it for so many things! But what if honest participation becomes expensive? What if speculators find some way to make money off of this and the whole system's purpose is hijacked away from its original purpose?

All of these technologies come with such incredible promise. None of them solve the original intended purpose.
Maybe, but not necessarily. I bet many of us paper over requirements we think don't add value, where we can get away with it. Solely because we think it adds no value.
> What I do have a problem with is the idea some folks have that NFT’s are magically portable into other games. They’re not.

Where have anyone in this specific thread claimed such thing? No one has, and in fact I explicitly wrote about that the game developers have to get the content into the game (if Gucci for example published the NFT, ID and assets (.obj/.mat files)).

Why are you going on about that here?
So, you cannot afford enough space to store your stuff (your car, which besides having an impractically huge size is a major ecological burden) and you want that your city allocates premium street space just for you. Then you say cyclists ask too much. This over the top attitude would even be cute if it wasn't sadly so common.

You complain that bike lanes are not used "enough", but a single parked car forces a whole lane to have a throughput of 0 commuters per hour. A bike lane that gets a single cyclist per hour is infinitely more efficient!
South pole mean winter low is -76F but -128F has been recorded. While the water isn't going to get that temperature, subs need to surface periodically. I bet they've looked at the probability of needing the ability to operate in extreme cold, and -100F is the compromise.
Looks good once the 404 issue is fixed. Perhaps for a future release you could tag / filter sources by country? A big problem for me in recipe search is avoiding localisation issues (e.g. Having to do all the conversions from cups; remembering that 'heavy cream' is somewhere in between single and double cream etc.)
This is a salient point I hadn't considered. I absolutely would not trust a mob or even most armies if they catch you in hostile territory with a radio at all, much less a sophisticated radio that might be able to interoperate with an army's.

At the high end of the price range, some of the satellite internet receivers aren't outrageously conspicious, like this [1]. I mean, it's odd looking, but you could probably pass it off as something at least semi-innocuous like a proprietary wireless receiver for audio-video gear or something. From a naive perspective, it screams "wifi" to me, rather than satellite. I'd just tear the silver regulatory label off a consumer wifi router and replace the one on that box with it.

1. https://satellitephonestore.com/catalog/sale/details/thales-...
How do you check who was the first in practice? Blockchain is large and will grow larger. NFTs hold URLs not hashes, so the same artwork could be represented by multiple hashes. The url could also point to a different artwork now compared to what was there before.
how would MMT work in a pre-industrial economy? Technological progress that boosts efficiency is what drives real growth, not economists printing money
...especially prison doctors.
Yeah, that doesn't sound exceptional in any way. Whether or not the Navy's spec was overly cautious wasn't her decision to make. She defrauded the government and potentially put sailors at risk.
That was mostly a walled garden trading something in 1 game for fiat. I think building your NFT on a platform that allows you to essentially escape that in game asset and let it accrue value and be tradable to assets in other games is the key. A competitor may even let your NFT from some other game unlock the equivalent weapon/item/whatever in their game. Competition of eyeballs. The dev does anything to nerf that asset or screw up how its interpreted, causing the value to crash and angry gamer, they lose the eyeball. Markets will evolve. I don't think anyone that walls off their garden will prevail. If Nintendo NFT's / coins only apply to Nintendo games, then who cares. Steam coin/NFT's for the win.
No,it’s mainly that business won’t change until it’s forced on them. Big tragedy of the commons problem
Freedom makes a huge requirement of every human being. With freedom comes responsibility. For the person who is unwilling to grow up, the person who does not want to carry his own weight, this is a frightening prospect. - Eleanor Roosevelt

That's a great question. Free speech doesn't mean lawlessness. There are many exceptions listed in the US constitution and those can be pursued by authorities to the degree they navigate IPFS - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_free_speech_exce...

For starters, we deliberately made a conscience decision not to make it easy to include photos or videos in content. We also made a decision not to create a general feed where all content is accessible.
Ask HN: How do security pros manage their investments?
Mint.com and analogous products aggregate investment data (poorly...) by scraping or via OFX.

Assuming those solutions are completely off the table because we don't want to share credentials, have PII stored in multiple places, create a new attack vector, etc...

What tools do very security conscious people use to get a holistic view of their investments?

* Investments include 1) stocks/bonds/ETFs/whatever, 2) real estate, 3) angel, 4) alts (e.g. masterworks, lexshares), 5) crypto.
Nice! I'll definitely take a close look at that.
I think you are right that most people critical of crypto don‘t hold any significant assets. But that seems obvious and means nothing.

If you have a lot of crypto assets, you think it‘s a good thing. If you didn‘t, you would probably divest or would have done long ago.
Even if you where ambivalent you may keep it to yourself or erase that doubt, because "you have to believe, wagmi“ seems to be pretty strong in the community (maybe thats too harsh, I‘m not in it).

If you don‘t think they are a good idea, why would you buy into them? Most people in tech aren‘t really strapped for cash and becoming a millionaire with something you think is bad for the world is something many people don‘t want.

But yeah, I also regret selling my 2013 era playing-around assets that would make me a millionaire today. It probably does color my opinion, and if for some reason I had kept them till now, I would have a very positive take, which is also self selecting and means nothing.
If I had changed my opinion at any point in those 9 years, I would have sold at the next 10x.
I still think that analysis and opinion is colored much stronger for those who hold then for those who don‘t.
Automatically Fix Security Issues at the Source
You're right, PyPy _used_ to base it's wizardry on PE (I don't know if it's Futurama or not, that's honestly the first time I hear of that term), but now they are using something called meta-tracing JIT, where, instead of JIT-tracing the program that your language's source describes, they JIT-trace your interepreter while it's running your language's source.

The extremly cool and awesome thing about this is that this is effectively a general purpsoe JIT, one JIT to rule all interpreted languages that could ever be written. There is nothing specific about Python in the toolchain. For _Any_ interpreted language:

- You write only your naive-but-readable interpreter in Rpython, a restricted subset of python that tries to preserve the readability but ditch the dynamic madness. (This is not python, this is an entirely different language. It just happens that every valid Rpython program is also a valid Python program. There is nothing special about Rpython here either, they could have theoretically picked any readable language to write your naive interpreter in, but they chose Rpython)

- The compilation pipeline produces two things: an exectuable image of your naive interpreter*, and a bytecode image for the general-purpose JITer.

- Normally, it's the executable image of your interpreter that runs your language's programs, but once it detects a user-program-level loop (e.g. because it has encountered a backward jump.), it invokes the supporting runtime (the general-purpose JITer) and delegates to the bytecode version of itself.

- The GP JITer starts tracing the bytecode image of your interpreter (which, remember, is itself executing the user-level program the whole time), once it detects that the user-level loop is done, it says so. Now the general-purpsoe JITer has a record of all the operations that your interpreter executed while it was running the user-level path, which is the same as {all the operations that the user-level path executed} (minus all the interpreter-specific operations, which the GP JITer also knows about because this info is contained in the bytecode)

- The GP JITer treats the execution record as any other JIT, it produces an optimised native version from it, and bingo!, you got yourself a native image of that user-level loop.

- The original interpreter, the executable, now goes back into the picture. It puts that native version of the loop in its pocket, ready for the next time it encounteres the loop.

It's so f*ing cool, that's why their logo is a snake eating itself: there's so much meta shenanigans going on. Their implementation of Python is merely the application, it's the amazing toolchain they built to build it that is the real treasure.

*: One of the steps in creating the exectuable is, I kid you not, is running the standard Cpython interpreter on your Rpython source (as it's valid python), waiting for interpreter to do it's expensive startup, then freezing the whole enviroment it produced to package it with the executable. This couldn't be done to speed up normal Python because its extremly dynamic nature messes with this.*
That's been slowly happening [1]. For instance, with Ruby 3.0, net-telnet and xmlrpc were removed from the stdlib and now have to be installed as standalone gems.

[1] https://stdgems.org/removed/
Replacing Docker Desktop with hyperkit and minikube
Risk is uncertainty, it’s not about loss or gain. If I lever my portfolio 2x, I’m taking on twice the risk but if I’m in the money I’ll make twice as much.
Seems to be coming back in the Chicago area as of 9am Central.
The sound rationale for the tests to be conducted at -100F is that the Navy contracted for the tests to be conducted at -100F.

If someone, and particularly a military organization, asks that something be tested according to a certain spec, then you do it. Who's to say the steel was even actually being used for submarines?
Meeting Should Have Been an Email
An NFT doesn't include the assets, it's just a receipt ID.

For a recent example, Riot has just released a bunch of tie-ins for with other games. Like the character Jinx is now in Fortnite. You could use an NFT that says this person owns the Riot character Jinx and thus the Fortnite developers could let you pick the Jinx skin in game.

Although a realistic example I think it would be stupid to do in practice because why would would Epic want to give away Jinx for free just because you bought it from Riot? Then there's a much smaller advantage of having the tie-in, sure you could get cross-play between Riot games players and Fortnite players but you also lose on a quick cash win of getting Riot fans to buy a Fortnite skin.
> mid air on my skidive

While air diving I would enjoy it with focus while it lasts, but while walking in open nature I consult my informational, "virtual", displayed material and take a break from time to time to switch focus and enjoy the colours of the season :) ...Which by the way, are quite nice to enjoy as the background of the material you have in front. Also because with the AR headset you will keep your head oriented towards spots that enhance the readability of the foreground, so somehow you are dealing with nature even more.

Instead, if you were at a coffee shop - are you sure you would not be more comfortable and efficient with a laptop? Because the optimal case I can think of is: AR (transparency-based) eyeset, big between sunglasses and skiing goggles, that you do not remove but wear also while walking - so, something always-on, something you do not alternatively extract and put away... The main control (dpad, mousepad, buttons - and the SOC and power of course) in your pocket. But you need a good input method for text.

Always-on with good input method for text seems better than laptop. Otherwise, if you remain keyboard dependent, the laptop is probably better.
I'm sure that now that OP has found out he is wrong, he'll update his tired anti-MS rhetoric, right? Right? (cue Star Wars Padme meme)
The purchaser can just claim they spent X on art, sure, declare away.

But how do you recover the funds again? You'll need to declare that you sold art for X, and tax it so you can actually use it.

Again, nothing has been washed here, you've just made a normal transfer with zero benefit.
With us humans, yes we're social creatures but if there's no social environment directly outside our window and we get on with getting our needs met, then we do fine alone and find comfort in it.
It's like what happened to many during our isolation lockdown, at least for me and what I saw. Having a shorter temper in males I related to as well. If you're not socialising, you have less of a tolerance for communication with others and get tipped off more easily because you want to go back to the comfort of being by yourself.
Only reason you'd socialise and communicate more often is from pressure to do so, whether it be self inflicted or external factors. For example, when going through depression I was a hermit and only near the end did I feel pressure from myself to do more, and only then did breaking out of that isolation shell occur.
I have a feeling I'm not making myself clear, but I can always clarify.
Correct, some "corporate NFTs" are run on their own chains, etc. This is why most of the price action is on Ethereum.

Assuming you are somewhat technical, you can read about the actual smart contract standard, it's called erc721.
IIRC most of these stories are about bitcoin payments.
If they switch to monero, sure that's different.

But then we need to conduct the debate on the basis of different cryptos requiring different policy. Rather than saying crypto->criminal.
I can't speak to the foundation's performance or communication, but the purpose is more than holding its trademarks; it's for holding any/all assets for the organization. I thought the main catalyst for the rust foundation was there being many people/organizations which wanted to donate/fund development of rust but no means for handling the money (responsibly).
> it is self-correcting

Unfortunately we can't reverse environmental disasters, poisoning, cancer, and death, so we really need to be proactive on some things.
Salt water won't go much below zero. At oceanic salinity levels I doubt there's any place with liquid water below -2C.
Study links particular kind of fat, not amount, to higher stroke risk
I usually have mine off and never actually printed from my iPhone, but if it’s just CUPS as a standard I don’t see why not. Theres tons of old tutorials for getting it running with a router. http://tomatousb.org/forum/t-573238/airprint-google-cloud-pr... so to me it’s a solved issue.
Known Limitations
With statements
Pyjion does not currently support with blocks.

This is on the roadmap (and related to try..except).

=====

I thin with block is used all of the places, so this limitation make it not usable to a lot of projects
I don't see any real problem with that usage. It seems like the right way to express that a neutral tool is being used to cause harm — that is, as a weapon. For example, if you complained that my eight year-old is weaponizing a hammer, you'd be a) probably right, and b) correctly expressing that he's using it in a way that's likely to cause harm.
> I've also seen some evidence that new Wifi standards will also allow for this, which is utterly terrifying.

There are legitimate uses for this, but it's frustrating that we have to feel opposed because it will definitely be abused. I for one would like to be able to implement my own presence tracking for rooms in my house without needing additional hardware.

I just don't want Facebook to do the same thing.
Sonos speakers are weird and I don’t get the hype. They’re not Bluetooth, so playing anything on them has to go through the Sonos app and server. Sonos is also a shady company, doing things like bricking your device if you try to sell it after upgrading, or not letting you use your speaker if you disagree with their privacy policy.
Very well done. I love the design and simplicity.

I would be cool if you could search by ingredients or food allergies. Somewhere you can basically state the ingredients you have and then it'll suggest recipes, but I understand if you don't have all the recipes indexed by ingredients

Sorting the table too!
I had assumed the tests were related to pressure and depth, where the temp isn't much off of 0C. Not an area of expertise for me though.
He dedicated most of his comment to your arguments, which is why you're focusing only on the last two sentences. You've let yourself be humiliated again, and for what? Bizarre.