skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
i don't know. The more i look at hn the more i appreciate the thought that went into it. Stories are far more black and white- either they violate the guidelines or not. The only thing a downvote would do is to make the story float all over the front page as there is an inevitable vote war. I would even say that most users don't like any given news story, which would lead to the situation that everything would get downvoted into oblivion. Comments OTOH lend themselves far more to moderation by downvotes. Remember we still get the "nuclear option" of flagging a submission.
5,000 years ago it kept us alive.

Now it just adds unnecessary stress and impedes our functioning 99.8% of the time. We no longer live in a situation where a tiger lurking in the bushes is likely, but our brains haven't evolved to compensate for that.
>Almost always a large number of dislikes on content like "rewind" videos expresses widespread genuine disapproval of content

Presumably he's referring to this?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbJOTdZBX1g
I feel like F150 lightning will be more popular due to name recognition. Ford has gotten some pretty solid reviews on their electric cars.
I enjoyed the code walk-through. :D
Sounds like the tax laws needs changing. I don’t know how we can blame companies from leveraging loopholes if they are available.
VeraCrypt
I don't really feel like the comments are that low quality anymore, at least not on the videos (cooking, tech, science) videos I enjoy watching. It's about on par with your average Reddit comment which isn't quality but again, not dumpster fire.
Good Customer service is very contextual. A bank teller line or a counter where you order fast food should be fast, efficient, while attempting to be rude and uncaring. But, you'd want your doctor to be at least personable and a waitress at a full sit down restaurant needs to be able to converse with diners.

Service also needs to be cognizant of overall "load" on the environment. It might be ok to chat when there's no one else around, but not when ten people are waiting. It's a bit of a balancing act and so few people providing service really understand it.
SpinLaunch's rocket-free kinetic launch system conducts first test flight
chill out dude
Or, the author doesn't want to bother with a brigade of trolls and spammers descending on it.
So there's obviously a lot of reasons why this is too much, but can anyone opine what the pro reason are?

The main one I see is Ford's involvement looks an awful lot like they're considering the future of the F-150.
This is an industry famous for charging a small fortune for BS undercoatings. For Doc fees, Nitrogen air in tires, destination fees etc.
As I stated in a follow up comment, this change explicitly targets the trolling dynamic as whole, not just giving individual some controls. Most creators (and trolls as well) don't even know that option exists, so that option alone doesn't do anything meaningful. As always, the default option is what really matters.

I personally suspect that this is a step toward removing the dislike button at all (which is an obvious way to eliminate this attack vector) but they're just not ready to remove the button due to some other factors.
That was filmed over 2 years ago with prototype vehicles. Hard to expect the trucks didn't get incredibly better from the experience.
Google does let you create multiple accounts with a single phone number. There's legitimate reasons to have multiple email addresses. I have a handful of different ones that I use for different identities I have online.
First-ever multilingual model to win WMT, beating out bilingual models
> But that's why you have a brain, so that you can make that decision for yourself! When you censor an opinion by downvoting something, you are making an unfair decision for future viewers of that content who would rather make that decision on their own.

Would you make the same argument in favor of getting rid of upvotes?

Also, expressing disagreement isn't censorship. The availability of the content is unchanged. YouTube doesn't eliminate content from their platform based on some number of downvotes.
Making it harder to read is tantamount to censorship. It also erodes the user experience. Why do I need to highlight or squint at something a ton of ignorant people disagreed with?
First, congrats for replying to a comment asking you for concrete arguments without using any of those, nor replying directly to anything that was said.

Then, I don't think you actually understand what we mean by patches: for anyone who has looked into the topic, patches are obviously not equivalent to commits except in the most basic cases (where all tools "work", in your own terms).

A datastructure is defined only with respect to the operations you define on it, I'm sure you use other commands than checkout. For example, people who review snapshots rather than patches before a merge (or even a commit!) either have really small projects, or way too many man-hours to spend.

> if you take one or two hours to learn the documentation is actually intuitive

Git isn't "intuitive" at all for anything but the most basic operations (I agree it is easy for those, if you are willing to work with snapshots). For example, the existence of `git rerere` clearly shows that Git doesn't model conflicts at all. Then, merges are not unique, Git chooses one at random when there are more than one. Rebase is a horrible hack, "replaying" commits doesn't even always work.

Moreover, saying Git is easy isn't a very effective way to show off on HN: if you feel you have to defend Git so strongly, even though it wasn't actually attacked, and to the point of refusing to reply directly to any rational argument, it clearly shows you invested enough time in Git to feel you would lose something if you had to move to a better solution. So, sorry, but I don't think it was just "one or two hours" for you.
Yes, cost to consumer is the same, by regulation. Maintaining part of the fleet as handicapped-accessible is just part of doing business, despite the additional costs associated with acquiring/maintaining wheelchair-accessible vehicles (usually vans or buses with hydraulic lifts/ramps).
I have high hopes for the electric F150. But we're still talking about a traditional automaker here. They always find a way to screw things up when it comes to EVs.
You should also consider Elixir with Phoenix, as it's a comparable experience with Rails (although not as many libraries) while giving you much better performance. And Phoenix LiveView is just an incredible productivity boost, there's nothing quite like it.
The thing about Go that pulled me in around 10 years ago was that I could inspect the source code of an open source Go project on GitHub and actually tell what was going on. And on top of that I could easily cross-compile and deploy binaries in a way that blew automake/CMake away. And of course the goroutines... no more pthreads. It's a real case study in opinionated language design.
I'm calling BS on this entire pile of nonsense.
I knew Biden's YouTube videos would get dislikes years ahead of time.

It's hardly a shocking conclusion. He's old, boring, out of touch, and wildly disliked by both the far left and the entire right.
I think a panic is still better than a chain of if err != nil { return err } that bubbles up and does nothing. Of course the best solution would be proper error handling but not everyone does that (and it's not always obvious what to do).
Sure, that was in C. Go is an improvement.
FWIW, the quoted article is from Japan.
Ha, I love that! My comment seems to suggest that maybe I am right-leaning and you sneak in a reference to Q-anon! Genius!
Well, when the authors write the following sentence, and in two tries, I get a racist result, yeah, maybe a little bit of shame should be involved.

We tried our best to avoid this issue by doing extensive dataset filtering. As a result, our benchmark indicates that Cedille is indeed less toxic than GPT-3.
"No inheritance - no more digging through the massive world-tree of objects to find the code that actually does things."

You still have interface methods? I had problems navigating a new codebase and find the places "actually doing things". Some object was passed in somewhere which mysteriously implemented a one method interface defined on the spot in the other go file. I.e. the implementation had no relation to the interface which was obvious without a lot of searching and finding the right implementation.

Also passing in functions (callbacks?) all over the place is a little messy at least for a newbie. It was hard to find where the functions where called and at what point and how the program flowed.

(this is hard to explain but maybe somebody gets the point...)

edit: somebody else touched on what I also meant: " duck typing make refactoring and understanding new codebases error prone"

Also the modules and dependencies management surely is a joke? Pulling stuff from github willy-nilly? Quite bad in any case when compared to maven where you have a local repository with all the dependencies (so they don't change or disappear from the internet so that you can actually build your software 5 years later, exactly in the same way)
This is a known issue with GPT (and all other current language models, really), I don't know why you'd expect a french version to be any different.
Reminds me of the time when Berkeley deleted their online content.

https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2017/03/06/u-california-...
No, but they are like the iPhone notch. After you see them a few times, it won't look strange.
> No inheritance - no more digging through the massive world-tree of objects to find the code that actually does things.

That's not 100% accurate; as a concrete example, tell me which files (to say nothing of the actual downstream types!) contain the implementations of this interface method: https://github.com/kubecost/cost-model/blob/v1.88.0/pkg/clou... (err, without using github's fancy new SourceGraph-lite integration, of course, that'd be cheating)

I find the sibling "No declared interfaces - they are defined at the point of use, not declared elsewhere" similarly suspicious, but suspect we're having a nomenclature mismatch
Probationary hiring also doesn't work that well for many candidates. Despite at-will employment, there's an understanding about W2 white collar employment that gives new hires the confidence to buy and sell houses, move across the country or around the world, terminate talks with other prospective employers and pause interviewing, etc. This is a cultural thing that could change over time, but it would be a significant change.
The Worst Censorship of Research in History – Psychedelics with David Nutt
Also the effect basically disappears if you take only male candidates, so the study is a bit suspect. Men and women typically aren't that different in studies.
What?

Seatbelt laws exist, in many places in the US if a cop sees you driving without your seatbelt on you are getting pulled over and getting a hefty fine.
Don't Break Our Tech
Because few companies / cities / etc do it without being regulated to do so. I would imagine in the case of Uber they will grant additional time for anyone who files with them the paperwork indicating they require an accommodation. Generally speaking if Uber extended the wait period to 5 minutes for everyone it would also be in violation of the ADA as again, they are not providing an accommodation for people with disabilities.

ADA exemptions exist for small companies where it would be unreasonable to bear the additional costs.

Fundamentally it's a political question of what kind of society we want, do we want one where cities have to make curb cuts in sidewalks or do we want one in which it is extremely difficult for wheelchair users to use sidewalks. The balance the US has currently settled on is that small business is largely exempt, and larger businesses must accommodate.

It should be noted that this case has not been ruled against Uber yet, and that the suit revolves around wait times, not wheelchair accessible cars.

To be honest once accessibility standards are adopted by society at large they are not very expensive in general. It is however, VERY expensive when accessible goods and services are not provided at scale.
It's a Subaru, they blow through engines. A relative had a 2014 Forester and it had two engines replaced under warranty. This is apparently a known problem with a certain recent version of their 4 cyl. boxer engines.
Should we also allow companies to run sweatshops and dump pollutants in the local water supply because not doing those things causes prices to skyrocket?
Perhaps "less" is the operative word here.
Are you aware that dislikes have the same effect as likes on YouTube? Both of them increase exposure- dislikes don't decrease visibility of a video at all, much to the contrary actually.
Shitloads of adults were on anti-anxiety meds (and anti-depressants, for that matter) 20 years ago. Plenty more self-medicated for those symptoms with alcohol or illegal drugs. One of the big shocks of my growing up was learning that, more or less, "everyone and their brother" in fact relied on mood- & perception-altering drugs, legal or otherwise, to get through the day.

And they all still do (except that the weed and some of the psychedelics may be legal now). It may just be zeitgeisty, now.

Then again, I'm not sure coverage of it is even greater now than it was in past decades. Future Shock was published in, what, the 70s? Or Affluenza? Bowling Alone's not new, though that treats of more than just anxiety. Direct associations between first The City and anxiety were so common they got really tropey in the first part of the 20th century, and later (starting in the 1940s and '50s) the suburban middle class and their (alienating, unfulfilling, and sometimes nearly or entirely useless, as in Graeber's Bullshit Jobs, the core observations of which were made by others all the way back at the start of the modern postwar economy) office jobs got similar treatment, which has continued ever since.

If there's a difference, I expect it's because people are using anxiety to cover more states of mind than it used to. It does seem to have become a blanket term for "mentally ill-at-ease, but maybe not full-on mentally ill" in some usage.

Or maybe it's just that Future Shock was right, in which case we'd expect that kind of thing to get worse over time, until something about the pace of change itself changes.
> One would think it’s basically impossible to get millennials and zoomers into covert jobs. The youngest of this bunch of young people have spent their entire lives online, some since their parents blasted out their first ultrasound picture as a pregnancy announcement, before they’d even gained sentience.

> how exactly are you supposed to achieve this level of anonymity when you’ve flung untold reams of identifiable content across the digital world?

Assuming that that applies to every single Gen-Z or Millennial is the most "OK Boomer" stereotype ever
Yeah, this kind of toxic output sadly still can happen :-/

We have fully analyzed the training dataset (1128 GB) using Detoxify (https://github.com/unitaryai/detoxify) to filter out problematic content. But of course detecting toxicity is a tough challenge in itself, so this process is imperfect at best.

We are using the RealToxicityPrompt framework (https://realtoxicityprompts.apps.allenai.org/) to analyse how toxic our models are and to steer our efforts in this direction. This means we are generating thousands of completions and analysing them to see how "nasty" the model is. We plan to write more on this topic soon.

But yeah, this is definitely far from being a solved problem, and our model (as well as all large language models) should be handled with care.
Good god. Anybody else on iOS reading this article having the text jump around on the page as ads load and unload? Completely unreadable.
> EVs are a different beast than traditional ICE vehicles, so margins will initially be better on EVs for all EV manufacturers.

Please explain. This runs counter to the common understanding that unless a manufacturer scales up their battery production significantly, their profit margins on EVs are lower due to the high cost of the batteries. The California compliance EVs were sold at a per-unit loss. Tesla shook this up by targeting and marketing to the luxury market, where they could charge a premium.

Many smaller scale non-luxury manufacturers have pretty lackluster EV offerings (looking at you, Subaru).
The fact that client binaries are signed doesn't mean you can't use your own client. It means you can't make your own binaries and pretend they were from Signal.

You aren't suggesting that Signal share their code signing key are you?
I'm not saying they were copying the concept of sattelite imagery, but rather they were late to the business model of maps-as-a-service. And thus, significant components of their modern (after usgs) imagery had licensing terms onerous to competing with Google.

Also, it's not just satellite imagery, but street view. I'm referring to the google strategy of selling the maps as a service, something that microsoft took a while to catch up on.

> involved with satellite imagery back in the 90’s

Yes, they partnered with the USGS to distribute already collected map imagery. They didn't, for example, purchase/build a whole fleet of imaging cars and planes like Google did.

Also, because google had their eyes on a different prize than microsoft, the licensing terms of the map imagery had language baked in around reselling.
Absolutely true, being genuine doesn't mean being an asshole. Lots of assholes are not genuine, or they're genuinely assholes. However...

> It's called being a decent person.

Engaging in small talk can be inconsiderate, as the post upstairs demonstrates. Maybe the guy doesn't have time for the ceremony and the chitchat. A lack of small talk doesn't mean you're automatically rude or an asshole. Small talkers can be huge assholes, too, by doing things like wasting everybody's time with BS and worthless blather.

Moderation in anger, reasonable patience, and appropriate friendliness are good, subject to judgement within the given circumstances, but the idea that being "nice" is some kind of virtue and a defining feature of decent human beings is preposterous. Many evils in the world are fostered by nice people terrified of speaking the truth and causing displeasure.
VSCode (or vscode compatible IDEs) is the main interface for Dendron. that being said, we do expose a CLI for a large subset of features and will ship and web version early next year!

No apologies necessary :)
I'm sure all the advertisers will be very happy when their ads for garbage content get downvoted.
Being disabled you get to experience the wonders of the free and efficient market every day.

For example when you need to go somewhere, as a rational actor you can choose with your wallet:

* You can choose to go by foot using the sidewalks that aren't accessible.

* You can choose to use public transport which is not accessible.

* You can call a cab and pay an exorbitant amount as long as you don't tell them that you're disabled or they won't come and they might still leave when they see you.

* You can call an Uber which is quite pricy as well as long as you don't tell them you're disabled or they won't come and they might still leave when they see you.

Thankfully after three years of bureaucratic mazes and appeals, the magnanimous state has granted you benefits, although they don't constitute a living wage and don't allow you to pay rent nor food. (The glorious free market has given you a choice of one of twelve accessible dwellings in a radius of a 100km so that you may rationally choose the lowest rent.)

Since you can't pay for rent and food and transportation you'll need to find a job to pay for your lavish lifestyle. Now if it's before 2020 don't expect remote work, disability associations have been asking for it for 10 years for jobs that don't require physical presence but as everyone knows that's entitlement of the highest order. Although if it's after 2020 then it stops being entitlement because the average person needs it and wants it.

Now if you've managed to get yourself an education before hand, despite your health issues, your inability to go outside, and your general standing as a second-class citizen, then you should be able to get a remote job, and even if it stops being remote you should be able to pay to go there using the methods listed above. Although if you make below or up to the median salary, it'll cost your more to go to and from work than what you earn there, also you no longer have your benefits. But at least you get to be part of society as long as it's the only place you go because leisure is entitlement.

This is not fiction, this is how I got my first job, although Uber wasn't a thing back then, and you couldn't be remote. Also I didn't have benefits, I did freelance while I was doing a Masters at a college I couldn't attend because of transportation costs, save for the exams. Then when I got my first job I did pay more than my salary in cab fares using my savings and the rest of my college loans until I could move up and get a higher salary.
The Tesla Superchargers network is the network effect.
Heh, that's amazing, we posted within 30 seconds of each other with basically the same observation. Great minds, and all that :-)
> But if you can't communicate and think while under a bit of interview pressure, then you're not likely to be able to cope long-term in a development job.

This may sound logical and like common sense, but it is flat out wrong. Pressure in interviews is not the same as pressure in a job. I've been the one to fix something in 5 minutes during a global outage with 10 people watching behind me, when the previous solution would have taken hours. I've been the lead on calls with 20 partner companies across 5 countries as the largest spike of traffic per year hits us. I can handle pressure.

I've also had panic attacks in interviews. I've shut down completely. I've had my heart rate jump to 150. Not every time, but enough for interviewing to be a really big problem for me.

Whats the difference? For me, it's the perception of conflict or adversary. Some interviewers LOVE to put it out, like they're some shining knight protecting their company from the slithering fake programmers. They're looking for reasons for you to fail. They're looking for whether you're a "cog", as you use the word, and more often than not when looking for that you find it. When I'm on a team who all has the same goal, I shine plenty bright. I would ask that you reevaluate your biases.
$148M correct? Seems small, like a fairly wealthy multi-billionaire could just pay that off in one fell swoop.
The more often a user dislikes videos, the less it should count.
I love the idea, especially because I think language models designers have a lot to learn from how other languages work.
> relaxing sleep music and halfway through you suddenly hear a loud voice screaming "AND HIS NAME IS JOHN CENA!!!"

You're making it hard for me to be against this change, haha.
It’s like saying you can pay off someone’s mortgage to keep them house by paying off their $1,000 mortgage bill for the month.

That’s not the end of their debt obligations, just the first one to come due that they’re not able to pay. There are many more debt obligations behind this one, so paying off this obligation just kicks the can a few days down the road.

To pay off all the debt obligations, would likely be billions of dollars.
Sure thing!
BTW, I upgraded and tried your game and it's great! LOVE the authentic indie DIY backstory -- and "No ads / IAP / data collection of any kind" -- and the game itself is charming and challenging enough to make for a fun diversion. An absolute winner for casual iOS game. Hope it's a huge success and you go on to make lots more!
Allegedly slimy Tesla has been scamming people into paying thousands of dollars for a useless FSD package for years.

The coast-to-coast test drive of a fully self-driving Tesla is four years late and counting.