skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
In Linux, the CPU affinity (i.e. the list of cores on which a thread may be run) is inherited by any child process or thread, from its parent.

Nevertheless, the CPU affinity of any process or thread can be changed at any time with sched_setaffinity() so the httpd process itself could run its children on different cores, if it wanted so, but it is unlikely that any httpd program does this.

The new feature that is discussed in this thread will limit the cores on which the threads of a user can be scheduled to those having the same cookie, so a process will no longer be able to reschedule its children to run on the same core as the threads of another user.
If we're comparing lossy compression mode, WebP is close to equal to MozJPEG for higher res images. Check the 1500 px comparison: https://siipo.la/blog/is-webp-really-better-than-jpeg
Meaning everything else is on the table:

- names of participants, and their ad profiles

- meeting title, time, length

Now you are getting ads for dogfood because your coworker has a new pet.
So you're saying use nix flakes instead of `nix env -i`?

I've been using `nix env -i` without any issues till now, but I'll explore nix flakes.
No one wants Philip Morris cannibis. They want microbrew from their friends. Black market is a lie. They wanted the law to back off, not to enshrine corporate pot.
> However, if companies have working hours, why couldn't websites? What a funny thought.

Our banks have those, and it's a really shitty experience.

Yeah, sure, e-bank works, you pay, but if the person receiving the money is at another bank, that my bank has no extra contract with, I have to wait until the next workday for the funds to be transfered. If I want to buy something with a bank transfer on a friday night, the funds won't get transfered until monday morning.
This kind of sensationalist, non-tech news really isn't right for Hacker News.
People never miss an opportunity to reap karma from a "Trump Bad!" story
It matters because kids use this software. Who knows what will pop up
That's a surefire way to make sure proprietary software solutions win:

https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/programs-must-not-limit-freed...

>I've stated some of my views about other political issues, about activities that are or aren't unjust. Your views might differ, and that's precisely the point. If we accepted programs with usage restrictions as part of a free operating system such as GNU, people would come up with lots of different usage restrictions. There would be programs banned for use in meat processing, programs banned only for pigs, programs banned only for cows, and programs limited to kosher foods. Someone who hates spinach might write a program allowing use for processing any vegetable except spinach, while a Popeye fan might allow use only for spinach. There would be music programs allowed only for rap music, and others allowed only for classical music.

>The result would be a system that you could not count on for any purpose. For each task you wish to do, you'd have to check lots of licenses to see which parts of your system are off limits for that task.

>How would users respond to that? I think most of them would use proprietary systems. Allowing any usage restrictions whatsoever in free software would mainly push users towards nonfree software. Trying to stop users from doing something through usage restrictions in free software is as ineffective as pushing on an object through a long, soft, straight piece of spaghetti.

>It is worse than ineffective; it is wrong too, because software developers should not exercise such power over what users do. Imagine selling pens with conditions about what you can write with them; that would be noisome, and we should not stand for it. Likewise for general software. If you make something that is generally useful, like a pen, people will use it to write all sorts of things, even horrible things such as orders to torture a dissident; but you must not have the power to control people's activities through their pens. It is the same for a text editor, compiler or kernel.

>You do have an opportunity to determine what your software can be used for: when you decide what functionality to implement. You can write programs that lend themselves mainly to uses you think are positive, and you have no obligation to write any features that might lend themselves to activities you disapprove of.
That's because brain/synaptic plasticity in relation to learning was made up on the spot and simply repeated ever since. It's just been a convenient shared crutch to not learn new concepts after a certain age because the incentives are not strong enough for most people.
To be honest, deciding if you are not breaking ml5.js Code of Conduct feels like a material for full-time research on its own.

How to define who is marginalized by whom? And by what actor? Creators of the code, users, customers? What if both groups think they are marginalized by the opposing one? Who can use the code then?

Forbidding manipulation of public opinion is also too lax of a term to use that way. Look for example into such polarizing topics like pro-life/pro-choice debate worldwide. Each side can accuse the other of manipulating the public while still believing they are in the right.

Controlling weapons is probably the point that could be easily defended in terms of being rather concrete, but I think it could be placed as some kind of custom license (IANAL).

Putting things that should be confined to decisions made by some kind of regulatory body like a country’s judicial system in a text file is rather a pointless signaling in my opinion, although it can be easily understood why somebody would want to include something like that.
Swift is indeed a complex language, although relatively simple when compared against C++20.
Thank you!

This is something I'm actively working on. I've already begun to implement functionality to import subscribers from Substack (you can test it out in the /settings/blog page).

After I finish Substack, I'll begin adding support for importing posts/subscribers from other platforms.
Today, you could train such a "Physics Model" simply by having it crunch on FB or Google Data annonymized User Data. One could even apply social engineering models to that simulation and watch the outcome ahead of time.
Sell it to politicians and 3 letter agencies and get yourselves a catchy name - like palantir and you are the future.
While there are clear differences between obesity rates between rich and poor in the US, basically everything you've put up is personal speculation:

> Poor folks don't always have steady electricity nor a refrigeration, either: Living without a fridge makes your diet go to crap pretty quickly.

Differences between access to steady refrigeration is extremely slim for people in the US for all but the poorest of the poor (basically homeless)

> Time is another luxury poor folks have issues with, which also makes diets go awry.

In the US poor people have more free time, on average, than wealthy people: https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2016/09/the-fre...

There are other studies that suggest the causality is the opposite: obese people are more likely to become poor: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5781054/

That study is definitely not broadly convincing in my opinion, but just want to point out that there is a ton of baseless speculation in this thread trying to explain the obesity/wealth relationship.
Lol. Another sponsor is Mark Mitchell from https://www.bestblowjobmachines.com/
You pretty much listed off what my response would have been. I use Gajim quite extensively, and I've also got Kaidan installed on desktop and mobile for testing. It is certainly coming along, with more improvements in the future pipeline.
I've yet to try Dino on my PinePhone, but it runs just fine on desktop.
The way things are going, they’re probably defining discrimination as any negative outcome for a member of a marginalised community (where ‘marginalised’ is also defined on their terms.)
Just disable the auto-updates.

Also, I'm 100% certain all it did was update the formulae (similar to apt-get update, NOT apt-get upgrade).

I've been using homebrew for years and this is the default behavior, so unless you purposefully set it up to upgrade everything this is PEBKAC.

AFAIK the only time it upgrades everything is when you do a blanket `brew upgrade`. And if you're pinned to something like postgresql@10 it will stay at that major version.
I also liked his take on safety.
Thanks a lot, Steven! Appreciate it!
I avoid it at all costs. Sometimes it takes more time to figure out how to install something because guides are quick to recommend brew, but there's usually an alternative
> I always wonder why wokeism hasn't reached software licenses yet?

The license you’re waiting for was JSLint. It was brilliant and the effect it had on users was a hilarious thing to behold:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5138866

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4762035

Nothing involving Trump’s projects will provoke the same sort of hilarity. A desire to avoid litigation on the part of the user, combined with at least a minimal, superficial concern over good and evil, are necessary for the gag to work.
Marketing Video Maker App
If you have an old version of a package, say OpenSSL, that was installed a year ago when you wanted PackageA, then both will be updated when you get PackageB which also depends on it. B’s bottle only refers to the new OpenSSL, and the old version is deleted so you need the new A bottle. No auto update just means you use the state of homebrew-core that you had before you ran the command, rather than updating it right before using it.

It makes sense, but then I don’t do full upgrades and get delayed just like OP. I live with it.
> The people that I see day to day are generally extremely fit. (Or is it just students?)

At least in germany it's quite depended on your social class. I am also a student I am sitting in a huge library. There is literally not a single obese person here and nearly everyone I personally know goes to the gym. I only know a single person who's a bit bigger, but he plays American football and needs more "mass". He's definitely not out of shape. It's encouraging to not let yourself go too much, I think. A good environment to also pick up the habit of going to the gym.

Compare this to the stats of Germany ("Two thirds of men (67%) and half of women (53%) in Germany are overweight. A quarter of adults (23% of men and 24% of women) are seriously overweight (obese).") and one can see that it's a different world. Noticeable if you're in a bigger city.
I too started one in my town. Started for same reasons. We grew it to 180 members last month and 2 sponsors.

I would look into Kahoot maybe
I feel your pain, but can't help blaming Apple rather than Homebrew. They made an OS that users can't bear to upgrade because of removed features, homebrew is merely following their lead and focusing on bleeding edge users. Maybe the logic is: if you don't want constant churn you wouldn't be on a mac.
Maybe I missed it, but from the spider's perspective do we / can we know if sensing the web vibrations actually feels the same as hearing shorter-range sounds they could pick up naturally? Or is it possible they're just reacting to the web vibrations as more of a touch stimulus?
You don't know who you are until you've experienced the stress of a family and little kids.

Even if I didn't have to, I decided to get a job while having kids to maintain sanity and use the paid paternity leave. Now that the kids are older and I feel like I have a brain again, I'm back at doing what I like: building online businesses.

I highly recommend pursuing family, but you need to be careful in your situation.
Getting in a relationship on a lavish lifestyle is a good recipe for a divorce later on. Once I started looking (~at 25), I was extremely blunt in what I was looking for and that helped screen things considerably.

I personally decided to start a family without marrying because marriage laws are pretty unfair towards men where I am and create an incentive towards a divorce and lies just to extract money from the other part. You don't know how your partner will turn out in 10 years, so better safe than sorry.
We're still buying a house together and splitting 50/50 irrespective of income / savings.
That should make sure there won't be a wife maintenance for me to pay in case we split up and that I won't lose 50% of the house. We also have wills to make sure we have guardianship of kids and access to money in case someone dies.
Probably the same reason the WNBA sponsors are all hard liquor. You take what you can get.
An advantage of a rifle is that it is conspicuous. This can make people feel uncomfortable because there is a big obvious gun, but it can also avoid a potential confrontation (someone is more likely to mess with someone who’s gun is concealed than someone holding a large rifle). Personally I think I would prefer if the availability of pistols were very limited and people who wanted to carry firearms had to carry conspicuous large rifles. (I’d prefer this to the status quo but not to e.g. all arms being limited)
Most of the "real" processed meat has more overhead than its counterparts. Most people do not buy from a local butcher, to imply otherwise is turning a blind eye. They buy big brand overly processed "meat" that comes in a cardboard box wrapped in plastic just the same.

With respect to "crazy overhead" animals require land, food and water at an exponential rate of consumption compared to alternatives. They also taint and pollute groundwater sources and contribute to a significant amount of food recalls due to the above.

Lastly in the metro I live there are about a half dozen alt meat "butcher" shops that supply alt meats to consumers and local restaurants. They're insanely popular and have been for over 5 years now. There's great brand recognition of those alt meats on local menus. You don't often see that with "real" meat because there's not as much differentiation in the product in real meats, just price.

A lot of the above points are simply ignoring facts and the market. Hopefully, like with EVs, more people can continue to make positive progress and acceptance with alternatives to real meats as we've been seeing.
I've wanted one of the jets ever since I went over there - as soon as I'm out of an apartment, I'm putting them on any and every toilet in my home.

I always kept some TP around, though, even when I was in places with the jets - but for the reason you mention the towel: it's handy to dry off with.

Well, and for sticking on shaving nicks or blowing your nose.
There is a commnonly accepted standard about what is (ultra) processed or not. It's called NOVA and it's summarised in the following article:

https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/processed-foods...

And I quote:

"Ultra-processed foods

Also commonly referred to as “highly processed foods,” these are foods from the prior group that go beyond the incorporation of salt, sweeteners, or fat to include artificial colors and flavors and preservatives that promote shelf stability, preserve texture, and increase palatability. Several processing steps using multiple ingredients comprise the ultra-processed food. It is speculated that these foods are designed to specifically increase cravings so that people will overeat them and purchase more. They are typically ready-to-eat with minimal additional preparation. Not all but some of these foods tend to be low in fiber and nutrients. Examples are sugary drinks, cookies, some crackers, chips, and breakfast cereals, some frozen dinners, and luncheon meats. These foods may partially if not completely replace minimally processed foods in some people’s diets. One study using data from the U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey found that ultra-processed foods comprised about 60% of total calories in the U.S. diet. [4] An association has been suggested between the increasing sales of ultra-processed foods and the rise in obesity. [3]"

In short, ultra-processed food is food that's full of stuff you don't need to eat or you don't want to eat, but that's there to make you buy the product, and keep buying it. It's food whose purpose is not to nourish, but to sell.
You might want to look into the book Nonviolent Communication.
Not if they hand out free beer and sausage.
While I agree wholeheartedly, since the overly-clever invention of copyright that ship has kind of sailed. The vast majority of IP is owner controlled, because a few people hundreds of years ago thought it would be cheaper to just throw things into the court system, rather than deal with taxation, subsidies, and other regulation.

And way back then - when courts where a thing, but a broad tax base was not, and in any case society didn't have the kind of near-instant communication networks available now - that might even have made sense.
Rolling pin!
It's ironic that Ingvar Kamprad said that and then optimized IKEA stores for spending as much time walking round looking at everything before you get to the shop bit as possible.

Maybe he should have added "... and don't let anyone else steal your time units from you." at the end.
That’s not relevant to the question asked.

For some people, meat is a moral issue that makes the literal holocaust look like a one-off homicide, and must be utterly eliminated. (Personally, given what I believe about the nature of minds, I suspect the moral issue varies by species; but the number of dead is that order of magnitude).

Other people believe it to be a mere personal health issue, which is basically just “you do you, none of my business”.

Other people say the environmental consequences of meat production affect us all, and therefore needs to be minimised: here, if everyone wants it but only the super-rich can afford it, that’s still a win.
If I interpret all this correctly. What if the project was bought out by the kind of people who run patent-troll companies? Suddenly your retroactive license that can at any point be invalid based on someone's opinion of wrong is a giant liability. I'd struggle to recommend such a risk.
"Technologist perspective" - BS, you can only afford to entertain your philosophical takes because of strong reliability of the services around you, from your grocery store being full of goods to electricity at your place, to HN being online.
The humble flashlight must be one of the most abused pieces of modern technology in fiction. According to video games, it doesn't matter what century you're in, it is impossible to create a flashlight that lasts for more than a few minutes, and only provides a feeble cone of barely-light for that time. According to science fiction, despite the fact ~98%+ of the people reading this literally have a flashlight in their pocket or equally available right now, they are rare things that you have to remember to take with you, and even if you do remember, they'd often be outshone by a 1970s campground flashlight.

Back here in the real world we have more light than we know what to do with. We have things that seem to light up the world accidentally, like the screen of our phones, better than flashlights can do the job in the future.

There's some other tropes where super-futuristic, sci-fi technology is noticeably worse than our real-world technology (weaponry in particular, most "ray guns" are noticeably inferior to real-world guns in almost every way except perhaps ammo capacity), but none I can think of where the every day experience of everybody now is so readily at-hand to know better.
> There's absolutely no reason to stop eating meat, and we're not going to.

Most people in the west definitely eat too much and too low quality meat. In Germany it's pretty much the norm to eat two meat based meal a day, if not three. Meat in the US is an abomination, both in term of quality and amount consumed. No reason to stop eating meat altogether but plenty of reasons to start eating less of it

I personally reduced my meat consumption by about 80% and mostly eat a vegetarian diet based on non processed food, I feel as good as ever, my performance in the gym didn't decrease, there is no reason to eat as much meat as we do really, it's purely cultural. I don't have anything against meat morally speaking, I still get a nice piece of it whenever I can when I'm eating out, I just cut the garbage quality meat (aka 80% of what's available in supermarkets)
`No one learned anything from Game of Thrones.`

I actually find GoT later and dumber episodes most re-watchable. I imagine it is hard as hell to film shows that are both smart and cinematic. Nolan seems to be the only one who can consistently accomplish this
I could dispute the use of the word “indiscriminate,” here, and even ask who is being bombed, but instead: who (that has a realistic chance) would you rather have as the world’s leading military superpower, and how would they be better?
I assume they're just being used as ads? The page does say you get a logo and a non-follow link for donating.

Then again, I checked a random company, Fire Stick Tricks, and they donate to a bunch[1] of open-source projects. So maybe they're just companies that have extra money to give back?

1: https://opencollective.com/fire-stick-tricks
Not everyone needs to agree with your "One True Scotsman" decree.
I agree with this. It's like 90% of the way there for ground beef (impossible) and I've had some very convincing chicken nuggets. We'll probably never replace steaks with veggies, but maybe meat as a special-occasion food (grown sustainably and to extremely high ethical standards) is the best way forward.
Apple’s app tracking policy reportedly cost social media platforms nearly $10B
Are there actually viable alternatives with similar quality and latency factors to Zoom?

Last I checked, the competitors, whether free or not, all had meaningful downsides (quality, latency, self-hosted, inextricably bundled to another system, etc) with the only upside being “it’s not Zoom.”

Honest question. I’m sure the land has changed a lot in the last 6-12 months.
But he did violate their terms of service over and over while in office. You could argue that they should have booted him sooner, after a few warnings and repeated violations. And they can argue that they gave him, and other political figures, extra leeway due to their public positions and their newsworthiness. But at the end of the day he was repeatedly given special treatment that most of us would never get on any of the platforms he was banned from.

If there was anything nefarious going on it was Twitter, FB, etc. looking the other way because they knew that his violations of their terms was attracting attention and therefore making them money.
Obviously, these are just for BSD, but for Python 3, the standard library provides enumerations of error codes and provides a dictionary to map to the underlying system message: https://docs.python.org/3/library/errno.html
Sometimes, I think the best thing America could do to improve it's long term military ecosystem and capability, is to bomb all it's business/MBA schools. Or relocate them to China.

When you need to 'get shit done' you really need to focus on the shit, not on how you can best profit from it.
> We evolved to eat and digest animal based foods.

I doubt we evolved to eat large quantities of (mostly low quality processed) meat two or three times a day though, that's a very very modern lifestyle.
>"Eat lentils and beans"

Not that I do not like those but eating those in any reasonable amount for more than one day in a row is causing very strong heartburn sensation for me. So thanks bot no.

>"eat moderately instead."

I am very physically active (2-3 hour of daily physical activity) and have decent amount of muscle. How the fuck am I supposed to "eat moderately"? My main daily diet is greens with tomatoes and chicken/meat/fish.