skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I'd much rather the opposite: an honest public DNS service that offers all data collected to the public, with some premium paid for high frequency data, and free from any conflict of interest. I would happily use a service like this since I could benefit from it.

The business case to collect DNS statistics is clear and imminently useful to numerous people and organizations, it's the complete lack of honesty about why they offer the service that bothers me.
Right now, there is not much in the way of Chinese exports coming into America. What would be different?

And Chinese manufacturing is practically at a standstill with their electric grid paralyzation.
That's something that have to be tested - I would expect that mirror prions would misfold normal proteins too, but it's dependent on details of chemical process.

Prions are scary.
> Probably eating the oatmeal that made his cholesterol get higher.

I... don't think so

https://www.health.harvard.edu/heart-health/research-were-wa...

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/10/161007085247.h...

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5885279/

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/01/080108102225.h...

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5394769/

> There are now tons of research coming out about how cereals (wheat and corn specially) are basically the culprit of a lot of diseases

Care to share more on what you are referring to?
https://twitter.com/iBobbyShell/status/1453531178967846912

It's a hoax.
Good post.

I think that for most it's best to start with self publishing which is what I did for Deployment from Scratch[0]. I cannot imagine I would have just half the revenue or something like 15%/2.

Technical publishing won't make you rich but you can have an equivalent of a minimum salary at least.

[0] https://deploymentfromscratch.com/
A normal trade is not zero-sum
The winds are shifting towards technicals. Not to sound repetitive, but hilariously, being long DOGE doesn't look crazy.
They claim to be making fake retinas, not that they actually work. I would imagine the device is fully capable of measuring anterior chamber depth and the like making any image/display just not work. I should query my optometrist brother-in-law about that sort of thing.

Part of my does wonder if other mammal eyes work though, I could see someone reaching out to their friend that volunteers at an animal shelter and being like "yo, let me in after hours and let's scan doggo eyes and make a little extra money".
huge plus one there.
i.mx8 Nano supposedly can idle at <0.2W, with max power somewhere around 2W. They have also announced ULP version if i.mx but that seems somewhat vaporware at this point.

As for the relative unpopularity of Cortex A3x series, I suspect that might partly because Cortex M series has been creeping into similar performance territory, like for example the i.mx rt mcu on Teensy 4.x, which has Cortex M7 running at 600 MHz.
Say Codecademy and Code Academy out loud. Also in general, weird little made up words are more defensible in terms of trademarks.
I think he means as a teacher?
This is a good starting point: https://www.cambridge.org/us/academic/subjects/mathematics/l....
I think OP probably means he was rejected from working for codecademy. Their loss judging by codeamigo.
I think it was SN11 that stuck the landing. I was there.
>My favorite part of the photographic process was watching prints come to life. I loved starting with a blank sheet of paper and applying various photographic methods to bring the image to life.

>I found that building websites was similarly satisfying. For example, click the "Reveal Image" button to watch an image fade in to the blank canvas!

I think a lot about why I went into computer science and this is the same conclusion I came to. There's something really cool about starting with a blank page and coding in elements that appear one by one and adapting the code to be what you want. Maybe there's other ways to do it but programming seemed to be the most powerful.

Just to be clear, it was video games, not photography that kinda nudged me into programming, but same idea with a blank canvas and having control of it.
How long before cutting edge hardware trickles down to stuff like the Pi Zero? I think a usb-c port would be more useful for these small form-factors, but it's probably a long way of considering there's only usb 2.0.
There's a difference between "no expectation of privacy in public" and a permanent record tracking your every movement, fart, and sneeze in public. Combined with gait and facial tracking, it can become very problematic.

> The oversight is literally done by the owner of the camera.

Not if the footage is subpoenad.
Space is probably harder just because there is less experience and it's much more difficult to get it. Temperature extremes and lubricants seem to be obvious difficulies.
"Wreaking havoc" = "temporary minor inconvenience"
What models are you using? Your problem seems simpler than general NER (just identifying a subset of entities). I would wager a good ol' LSTM or GRU can do it just fine.
If it was 15 years ago it probably would have been named "Codr.io", so there is progress
Looks like a cool project. Are any of those positions remote-friendly?
They certainly make better privacy commitments and have more transparency than my ISP.

Cloudflare DNS supports DNS-over-HTTPS and DNS-over-TLS.

Cloudflare DNS claims to anonymize IPs in logs and only retain anonymized logs for 25 hours.[1]

Cloudflare has warrant canaries[2] and publishes transparency reports[3].

Many (most?) of us do not have more than one to two choices for an ISP. Voting with our wallet is not possible and doesn't even make sense for DNS.

I agree that centralizing under Cloudflare is unideal and I would gladly switch back to my ISP's DNS servers if they provided the same level of service and made similar commitments.

[1] https://blog.cloudflare.com/announcing-the-results-of-the-1-...

[2] https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/privacy/what-is-warrant-...

[3] https://www.cloudflare.com/transparency/
- Fully-guided health plan: diet, supplements, exercise, preventative measures, etc... SelfDecode gets very close, but I'm thinking of those reports analyzed by an assistant that would schedule and plan medical interventions, meal plan, provide accountability, be an advocate, etc.

- A system to build knowledge more effectively than whatever it is that people do now. This would go along with some sort of training to improve idea synthesis, factual integration, etc. Basically, activate my inner savant for the low, low price of $999.99.

- Direct training-to-employment pipeline: Employers provide the service a list of skills they need, the service generates a training plan, the employer approves the plan, vetted students pay to join with a guarantee of employment if they meet some milestones, successful students are refunded then employer pays the service a commission.

- A car service that shows up to do routine maintenance, clean your car and track major issues
In other words, NASA doesn't want to move fast and break things.
Their job applications were rejected: https://docs.codeamigo.dev/blog/why-codeamigo
Trades in a market are not zero-sum since the buyer still has something that can be sold for a non-zero amount
Hey actually explains in a blog entry here:
https://docs.codeamigo.dev/blog
People with passion. JPL people were/are (and I hope will continue to be) believer in the purpose of what they are doing.
Unfortunately, statistically, those following that model are not all going to succeed.

Except, statistically, most people jumping the fire pit (going to college) do succeed, so making the jump, in aggregate, is worth it. On an individual level, sure, somebody should consider the pros and cons. But from a policy perspective, we absolutely should be pushing some sort of higher education (albeit not necessarily the standard 4-year BA).

And I do hate that college costs have gone up as much as they have. My parents paid cash for my and my sister's undergrad. Despite similar incomes (adjusted for inflation), doing that for my son was a real stretch.
NASA just announced that they want to spend $1B per launch for SLS once a year until 2050. For a capability less than what SpaceX might provide for $10M.

That's not sensible risk management, that's head in the sand denialism.

https://arstechnica.com/science/2021/10/nasa-wants-to-buy-sl...
China beats Google by launching fastest programmable quantum computer
I find this entire project weird. I wouldn't let anybody scan my retina for a few $
IMHO, this (client hints) is still not the right way to do it. Any hints (as for preferred quality levels etc) should be part of the tag. Any available options with specific qualifiers should be transparently and extensively provided by the host response (preferably in a human maintainable manifest format). The browser should then select the optimum for the situation, based on any preferences expressed in the tag and available options as provided in the host response. A browser should be also able to adjust situationally (e.g., as network bandwidth, scaling, or orientation changes) and select the new optimum without further negotiations (using standard time offsets).
Riot-OS 2021.10 released with initial support for GD32VF103, RP2040
So they can copyright their name.
China's New Quantum Computer Has 1M Times the Power of Google's
"Low power" and "something that runs an OS as heavy as Linux" are two conflicting features.
> Just put the IPs on your hosts file, it's easy.

Just wanted to say: Thank you for posting an actual solution!
That would be very interesting :)
I don't use a lot of advanced mathematics these days -- most of my time seems to be spent shuffling bytes from point A to point B.

I do have two kids in school, though, and my daughter just finished some higher level calculus courses. In my attempts to help her, I've found that we have endless and fantastic resources available online. Every type of problem has a YouTube video explaining, step by step, how to solve them.

In my opinion, there's never been a better time in history to learn advanced (or even basic!) mathematics than right now.
Interestingly, the author himself works for JPL.
You say "that actually worked". What tools have you tried?
> I think the risk to NASA of assuming the benefits of Starship before it’s proven are just too high.

I think the risk of not doing so is to high.

And NASA is already relaying on it. They have had all the data and they selected it for Human Landing System. They knew what it required and they were comfortable with it.

> If NASA (or other industry players), assume Starship will deliver the benefits it promises

It doesn't have to deliver on everything to be worth designing for it.

> But that leaves them with no backup plan

Going back what they always did before is the backup plan.

How come wasting 20 billion on SLS is totally reasonable, but risking a few billion on starting with designing for a rocket that doesn't exist isn't.

> I think once Starship has proven itself capable of deliver on its promises, you’ll see NASA changing its approach radically in the manner the author describes.

But that will leave a years to decade long gap of actually profiting from it.

> but a different calibration of “risk”

Yes an incredibly conservative one that would have meant the US could never go to the moon.
And better for SEO as well, is it not?
you might feel that about yourself, but would you have expressed it to another person about them? Lots of people can feel that they have failed as a human being when they get fired, but it takes a real nut to say that about someone they don't know as a piece of objective fact!
Nah, GPL is still shitty, it's enforcement is a joke and I have numerous examples of large companies abusing it even now. And it doesn't stop the developer buyout and forks scenario, just makes the fork inconvenient.

We poisoned pilled KiCad even further by getting it trademarked under the Linux Foundation. That's a whole extra layer of protection.
if you don't mind a soldered-on header then berrybase seems to have plenty of Pi Zero WHs
> scuttle the ship

You mean deliberately sink a $10 million ship, causing a massive environmental disaster. Not to mention being a hazard to other shipping if the water is shallow enough or the ship breaks apart.

Do you blow up a grocery store because someone attempts to steal a jar of pickles?
Where is that $5M a day figure from? Coinmarketcap lists it at 39B€ in the past 24 hours. https://coinmarketcap.com/de/currencies/shiba-inu/
An assistant that fills forms out for you?
Using ClickHouse to serve analytical needs
We have been using Clickhouse for our analytics needs for quite some time and have been highly satisfied with it's performance.
Here is a little something about it.
No, but you can see that AMD beats Apple in Power-Performance:

https://www.cpubenchmark.net/compare/AMD-Ryzen-7-PRO-5850U-v...

AMD 5850U 1253 scores vs Apple M1 1004 scores

Waiting for apple fanboys telling me something like "but TDP is not a good measure"...
Not to mention power comparisons are not entirely fair considering the node disadvantage Intel has. I would be excited if Intel can show higher clicks and overall IPC with reasonable excess power attributable to node difference.
Recruit New Employees from LinkedIn Recruiter – LinkedIn Scraper – Justpaste.it
If whoever-it-is actually demands their peppercorn, yes.
Yes and no.

Yes in the short term.
Picking the best tech is disincentivized, because there are many and powerful forces beyond technical characteristics at play.

No in the long term, because technology really does matter once people actually try to use the coin. Ether was once the best tech, and it was $10 a coin. Now it isn't, and it's >$4k.

For example: More and more of the people who make money using their graphic cards to mine Ethereum are choosing to have their payment transferred in Nano, and other alts. It just makes more sense to go with the fee-less and near-instant option, when there's a choice like that to be made.
China's quantum computer is 10M times faster than current fastest supercomputer
The context was how technology is invading people's lives via always being connected. This is clearly pointing at consumer tech, which is almost universally ad supported.

Additionally, if these ad supported services use paid-for services, they are paying for them with ad revenue, making them effectively ad supported themselves.
it's a sad club we're in. Occasionally I even go to bitinfocharts.com and look at my wallet that I will never have access to. Wonderful!
I don't think you should, keep them out in the same way.

If they can't integrate in society, they can go and live in the woods or start their own town, for what I care.

I'm not opposed to helping people with problems: I think we should use voluntary charities (eg. not forcibly taken taxes) to help them - but healthy citizens' lives should not affected because of the problems of a minority.

If that means keeping someone outside of cities, so be it.
> The Raspberry Pi isn't competing with a microcontroller. They're on opposite ends of the computing spectrum.

The spectrum is wider than that, but if you're comparing Pi and MCUs, today you have 32 bit multi-core ARM microcontrollers that run at hundreds of MHz and make a 486 look wimpy. And for a microprocessor, the first gen Pi is pretty darn wimpy (wikipedia compares it to a 300MHz Pentium II). Yet the performance difference between a first gen Pi and a Pi 4 is absolutely massive.

That's what I mean by the awkward space. Yes it's still faster than a high end microcontroller, but if I need an application running on modern Linux, chances are I don't want to deploy it on Pentium II class hardware except in very niche circumstances. So it's neither a microcontroller, nor is it a decent microprocessor for modern OS. It's about right in the middle of the spectrum where it kinda sucks for any application that can be implemented on a microcontroller and sucks for anything that needs a "real computer".

I need to point out that I actually work as an embedded software developer in this space where we have high end microcontrollers running a custom RTOS and applications that offer largely the same functionality and interfaces that we also implement using low end Linux-capable ARM solutions; what you can implement on a microcontroller is a heck of a lot, but Linux capable chips have gotten cheap and using them sometimes saves development effort on the driver & application stack. There's plenty of overlap, they're totally not opposite ends of the spectrum.
I think people gravitate to it because "kernel" feels like a cool word and some people have heard of OS microkernels being modular. As you say, "modular architecture" is a much clearer way to express the intent and conveys the purpose without being pretentious.
I believe they use liquid nitrogen, which achieves the same results while not being ridiculously expensive :)
I think the author is arguing for NASA to take a cautiously optimist stance on Starship, instead of assuming it won't work at all until it does.

For example, NASA could start allocating a small-ish budget (e.g. 50M$) to design a parallel mission to their Artemis-IV mission that is currently scheduled for 2026 (but will slip) and that should deliver the Gateway i-HAB module to Moon's orbit.

While 50M$ (excluding launch costs) for a mission like this would be lunacy today given the constraints on weight imposed by current rockets, with Starship that would be a sizeable budget to design a much bigger and more useful module.

If by some cut-off date (say 2024) Starship still hasn't proven itself, then scrap that mission, proceed with the original one and the wasted 50M$ will be a rounding error in Artemis-IV budget.

If Starship proves itself before then, scrap the original mission and go with the redesigned Artemis-IV based on Starship. Billions of dollars will be saved (SLS launch cost + at least 2 years worth of development), and we will have a Lunar Gateway 10 years ahead of what we would have had otherwise in terms of capabilities.
§42 UrhG (https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/urhg/__42.html, english translation https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_urhg/englisch_ur...) is probably core to what an author can do about their personality rights in relation to their works:

---

Section 42
Right of revocation for changed conviction

(1) The author may revoke a right of use vis-à-vis the rightholder if the work no longer reflects his conviction and he can therefore no longer be expected to agree to the exploitation of the work. The author’s successor in title (section 30) may exercise the right of revocation only if he can prove that the author would have been entitled to exercise this right prior to his death and that he was prevented from exercising the right or provided for its exercise by testamentary disposition.

(2) The right of revocation may not be waived in advance. Its exercise may not be precluded.

... (more stuff that is about compensation and how you can't use this clause to just start to exploit the works on your own after taking it out of circulation, but not relevant here) ...

---

Putting stuff into the public domain would either mean:

- that an author waives their right to revocation in advance (that "rightholder" would be the public, I guess), but that's explicitly forbidden by (2) or

- that they can claw back the work from the public domain, which keeps the work in some weird state where it's PD-unless-the-author-objects.

The only way to put a work into something that is somewhat similar to the public domain under German copyright (without dying and waiting for 70 years) is to publish it anonymously with a dedication to the public, so that redistribution etc is clear, and then remove all traces that you authored it (e.g. drafts, notes, ...) - and even then it falls back to you if somebody starts digging and finds proof of authorship (§66 (2) https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/urhg/__66.html, english translation https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_urhg/englisch_ur...). Any legal conscious redistributor wouldn't touch something like that with a 10 foot pole.

Just use CC0, it's cleaner.

As for

> Why do we think it can't be abandoned, again like any other property?

You can't sell yourself into slavery. That's the category personality rights operate in. Does it make sense for copyrights? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Your local law enforcement, hopefully.
SpaceX is already working on that with a professor from some Californian university.
I was confused when I first encountered it too. It does so much that I was left wondering if it is for digital animators, for 3D-printer artists? 2D art?

It turns out all those types use it (but I believe it started out for digital animators primarily).
Why does the rainfall chart start in 1992?

And the images at the bottom show the river in flood stage in 2019 and then "normal" in 2020. It gives a very misleading impression.
> Why is this here? It was launched last year?

FWIW, I'm one of today's lucky 10,000 and am thankful to have seen it.
Red Dwarfs are expected to burn for trillions of years.
Solving one of the Millennium Prize Problems would pay $1000000
https://search.marginalia.nu/

This website has helped me find new and hidden gems. It was posted to HN last month.
They also blocked all of Finland a few years ago for pretty dubious reasons:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archive.today#Finland
Consider a standard node_modules and installing via pnpm - that’s a lot of network round trips and downloads if you are on a marginal internet connection. When your development machine has Gbit uplinks all that pain melts away.

These cloud style development environments are lovely because all development is happening in a data centre and frankly it’s all sandboxed. Every time you run “git pull && make” from GitHub you are essentially rolling the dice that the end result is not “rm -rf /*” or “sudo apt-get install miner” (if you are lucky)
An inconvenience that did not need to exist.
Day to day life is already filled with too many of these.
You might be interested in OpenSeadragon : https://openseadragon.github.io
It would be cool to find out that World Coin was a ploy to get someone to come up with a way to create fake retinas. Like an edgy X-Prize.
NextDNS is fantastic. I love the level of control and flexibility it gives me to set network wide controls and then simple bypasses for the grown ups in the house.
That's what I was thinking as I looked at the list. It a nice little overview, perhaps for starting a discussion, but it doesn't capture how you'd use them in practice. When presented separately they appear like they should be applied in a standalone fashion.
The problem with waiting for all of humanity’s problems to be solved before doing space things is that humanity’s problems will never all be solved, and thus space things will never happen.

It’s also just not a resources problem. There is ample cash and manpower to make both space and clean drinking water for everybody happen. The real issue is the political will and obstructions to those who have such will. The fix for drinking water specifically is to vote out all who oppose improving public infrastructure.
Hey! I'm the lead ML engineer behind the solution.

We have trained our custom NER to detect merchants using millions of transactions as training data rather than a general NER.

We have tested with a few general NER models but they weren't detecting merchants properly. We haven't tested with LSTM/GRU yet but that's a good suggestion!
$8B is peanuts, $2B of SPY has already traded hands in 15 minutes today. $5B of TSLA call premium traded hands the other day. Crypto has pathetic liquidity.