> these are all facts

Everything you wrote has a small nugget of truth wrapped in a bigger, totally misleading statement. It's a strategy that is typical of right-wing talking points.

Regarding the MRI: Richmond Hill is literally the second richest neighbourhood in Canada. Getting a second (you left this part out, unsurprisingly) MRI machine via donations makes perfect sense. Rich people don't like to wait and the clout of donating to a hospital goes a long way.

TL;DR: It's an extra machine so rich people get better treatment.

>Canada ranks second to last in high income countries

So we're calling something in the top 2% of the world "underdeveloped" now? Are we? Really? Or are we trolling? Be honest.

>Price in Canada

Your numbers are misleading (Ontario is a province, and healthcare is 40% of the province's budget).

Aside: I thought you said "these are all facts"? They can't be if you're correcting yourself here can they? How do you open a post with "these are all facts" and then adjust your claim later in the exact same post? Are you serious?

>Obamacare promises you won't pay more than 9.78% of your income

Great! But, when did this become a Canada vs U.S. thing? Are you alleging that low income people have it better in the US? Citation please.

(Note: Don't get me wrong, for cutting-edge treatments, and for rich people, America is best in the world for healthcare, hands down. No-one will argue with that.)

>says 217,500 Canadians left the country for health care in 2017

Second Street is a right-wing, pro Oil and Gas (!), pro privatization, "think tank". And The Sun is akin to Fox News.

But anyways, taken at face value, the phrase "for health care" is pretty broad term, no? Is it an experimental treatment and only offered in one place? Is it elective (not medically necessary)? Is it a rich person who can expedite their treatment by paying big bucks for it?

Based on my experience (and the GoFundMe observations below), it's likely equal parts of the above. Speaking of which. The first page of your GoFundMe "evidence" has 18 entries. Here's what they are:

The fund raising is not for the medical procedure but to help the family in other ways (lost income, etc): 4. Is for medication: 1. Is for overseas surgery because Canadian Doctors have deemed it too risky or experimental: 2. Is for overseas treatment on inoperable cancer with a "Doctor of Oriental Medicine": 2. Is transgender Facial Feminization surgery: 1. Are Americans, posting a Canadian version of their GoFundMe for Canadians to help out: 2. Is a fundraiser for a Dog: 1. Is a Canadian who underwent unexpected treatment in the US which they didn't have insurance for: 1. Is an American kid who needs Cleft Palate surgery (possibly in Canada): 1. Is surgery too specialized to be available in Canada: 1 (will be performed in Germany and covered by Canadian Insurance). Is a Canadian who opted for a more cutting edge version of a treatment already available in Canada overseas so is uncovered: 1.

How embarrassing for you. Among people with a legitimate need, there are more Americans in your "proof" than Canadians. Please stop looking at headlines and investigate deeper to find the real truths.

The real truth is often much more nuanced than your Fox News inspired, absolutist talking points.

>Let's summarize

Summarize your alternate "facts" all you want. I'll be over here enjoying an "underdeveloped" system that miraculously boasts some of the world's highest life expectancy [0]. And... I'll be doing that with the knowledge I'll never go bankrupt from health care costs[1].

[0] https://www.worldometers.info/demographics/life-expectancy/
[1] https://www.cnbc.com/2019/02/11/this-is-the-real-reason-most...

PS. Don't bother replying. I'm not interested in debating with someone so disingenuous as to claim "these are all facts" in the same breath as admitting they aren't. You don't seem well-intentioned and debating you doesn't interest me.