skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yes, you're right. Iterating is not the right word, and it's the ordering of the data in the internal queue that I was thinking of, which is fixed by the order in which the hooks are called. During rendering, your component itself will run through the queue. It's not React doing it.
Are you speaking of Barcelona or London?
Sure, both things matter, but this gives good insight into one thing (the cycles) at least. Now what would be really neat would be if it would simulate memory and change behavior under some set of assumptions as well. Maybe such a thing exists?
Google, Facebook and other many tech companies are providing many free services which has led to so many new business, innovations and employment and these free services could cost a lot of money if not funded by advertising.

These companies are not selling drugs like Purdue pharma or exploiting Weapons, natural resource like water or Oil or causing pollution or causing deaths.

All those who are complaining against these companies and online advertising ask yourself do you want to live in 1990's world without free communication and technological advancement? If yes, then be honest to yourself and stop using any free products provided by these companies and derived products such as Uber, Doordash etc.

It's easy to complain against those who are doing good.

There are so many other bigger problems to solve instead these money making job providing companies are being targeted. Such a shame.
There are facts and figures given in the article but the terms describing them (eg "Paid off") seem quite subjective, eg:

50% unemployment after 2-6 years residency is a success

10k out of 1.5m going to university (0.6% or 1.2% of those not in work) are not "outliers"
`exec <shell>` would avoid nested shells and inherit the environment. Which might be preferable if you find your terminal emulator complaining about processes still running on close.
If it is a medical doctor saying that there is science that says that smoking is good for you.... I'm taking a wild guess here, but I'm pretty sure that's getting taken down. At least if it starts getting lots of views. Because it would be a dangerous lie.
The laws recognize that there are legitimate reasons for processing personal information - banking, medical records, utility bills, etc. I personally wouldn't mind living in a world where use of personal information for all of those activities were outright banned, but it's understandable that the law would attempt to make carve outs for them.

The actual problem is the inability to update the law as companies iterate on their malicious compliance. And ascribing the bad faith actions of companies as consequences of government helps erode the political will required to enact sane updates.

The prop 65 issue is somewhat orthogonal as it's the result of an impossible ask by California's citizen initiative process. Ideally that too would have been updated as its failings became apparent.
I like this youtube video that goes over various crossover points. The tesla beats the RAV4 prime at ~45k miles and a rav4 ICE at ~28k miles: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MEqxaH47DTs

I think 5k miles is a bit low, and using tesla as your only source biased.
100% wrong. Roads are for everyone. Just because you are in a vehicle you can use as a weapon shouldn't allow you to threaten other road users out of their road.

Just wait patiently and drive at the speed of traffic.
So the first link is not a study. There isn't an examination or even a reference of studies that provide evidence to the contrary. Not to say that the article can be dismissed fully but keep in mind it's not painting a full picture.

The second link is about a study that looks at transmission of the Delta variant from a breakthrough infection. It did not look into wether the chances of getting infected after vaccination decreased.

Finally the vaccine dramatically reduced your chances of dying. I'd say that's some pretty good protection from symptomatic disease, not just some protection.
Zoning mistakes have also resulted in the death of vibrant neighborhoods. Having mixed residential and commercial zoning enables things like grocery, corner and hardware stores that make a good place to live even better.

Zoning shouldn't be able to limit how high containers are stacked. If the facility operates in a safe way consistent with OHSA laws, the municipality should come in with a half baked zoning law that prohibits an otherwise reasonable operation from working effectively.

In my travels I have found that many communities across the US seem to generally fear use of height. I've always found this odd compared to rest of the world. Maybe it's just because land is cheap, but it does tend to mean that zoning laws, which try to codify standard practice, do end up overreaching on this particular issue.
Part of the problem is defining your threat model. For example, if you're trying to avoid surveillance dragnets like geofence warrants, that can reasonably done by GrapheneOS+prepaid service+ cash-bought phone, combined with keeping your phone turned off near home (separate device for home use). It's also best if your mobile phone number is never used or known by anyone because you use a VOIP number (further decouples your mobile tracking identifiers from your public persona.)

But yeah, at some point you have to accept that you can't be zero-trust with your mobile provider.

Edited to add VOIP recommendation.
Surprised how quickly YouTube deleted this video, when they firmly resisted both internal and external calls to take down a different rap video promoting violence against Chinese:

https://www.theverge.com/2021/3/30/22358804/youtube-yg-song-...

I wonder how Chinese Googlers feel about this development.
I'm pretty sure all of this is common.

Every advertiser auction selects the winning bid on a combination of the bid price per click as well as the quality of the ad because per-click payment means they want to optimize for the highest expected revenue - if nobody clicks on your shitty ad, Google makes less.

Then there's the added little bit around optimizing for secondary objectives like user engagement so that you don't kill the golden goose by running shocking/negative but highly clicked ads.

I actually don't think the system is "incomprehensibly complicated," but it is opaque.
If you don't have any place to put the excess energy then the comparison is between inefficient synthetic oil and 0% efficient unused capacity.
Barcelona.
Making that public would enable SEO but on steroids.
Herd immunity from measles requires at least 95% of the population vaccinated. For polio, it's 80%.
Kudos for doing this. Would you be willing to share your list of BBC feed URLs with the rest of us?
I would think that for optimal citizen mental health, you want something like a honeycomb: citizens should ideally have 2 parks within walking distance of their homes where they can get outside, relax, enjoy nature. Similar principles apply for coffee shops, grocery stores, bars, and many other amenities: you can get by with one within walking distance, but you ideally want at least two options to insulate against closures, times when one is closed or too busy, or in the case or parks, when a large event, like a public market or a concert, is happening in one.

I can say from experience in NYC: Central Park is nice, but one giant park for a large chunk of manhattan is not ideal. Works fine for UES/UWS, who have other park options on the island coast. But the section down near Midtown is miserable. And “parks” in the rest of the borough often don’t even have accessible grass (it’s fenced off, as if it was a garden or something).

There are problems in my current city, Denver, as well. But parks are very pleasantly pockmarked around the city to give residents options. Now if only they’d close off the biggest park to car traffic…
Serialized binary encodings don't require a schema. They can have all the expressability of JSON and more.
Couldn’t you use the same line of argument for tariffs on a vast number of imports? (Electronics, software, services, etc.)

It could even extend to most consumer product. e.g. Some obscure chemical compound for plastics is much more costly to produce in an environmentally friendly way, therefore it’s nearly all produced in the least regulated jurisdictions, therefore the compound and all derivative products have to be tariffed from those jurisdictions?
Seems like a stereotype.
TikTok Blocks US Users with Hong Kong ESIMs
If it did it wouldn't be able to boot, right? The OS/bootloader is on the SD.
Search is very expensive business to run Yahoo! and MSFT tried and still they are at behind. Will you pay $$ for each search query?
Easy to asking breaking up these companies. Will you help all small business and companies relying on free internet products?
I've been saying things like this since 1991 and before; so its not just "choosing now to draw a line in the sand". Back then it was "Politically Correct is just being sensitive, it's nothing like censorship" ...

The goals keep creeping but the justifications are always the same: People have to be saved from themselves!
The net result of relaxing zoning would be more residential housing built, not industrial. Industrial parks around the united states are sitting fallow while housing is being bid up to the moon. Demolishing houses to build a dog food factory would be very unprofitable since you would be replacing high value land use with low value land use. What you are saying is not a good argument for strict zoning, because your hypothetical scenario isn't realistic.
> they aren't preventing the spread.

> less likely to infect their close contacts than are unvaccinated people with Delta

I don't see these as contradictory. Vaccines are more effective against transmissions, yet vaccines don't slow down transmissions in a significative way. As per the article:

> Unfortunately, the vaccine’s beneficial effect on Delta transmission waned to almost negligible levels over time. In people infected 2 weeks after receiving the vaccine developed by the University of Oxford and AstraZeneca, both in the UK, the chance that an unvaccinated close contact would test positive was 57%, but 3 months later, that chance rose to 67%. The latter figure is on par with the likelihood that an unvaccinated person will spread the virus.

> A reduction was also observed in people vaccinated with the jab made by US company Pfizer and German firm BioNTech. The risk of spreading the Delta infection soon after vaccination with that jab was 42%, but increased to 58% with time.

Fully agree on the mask though. Plus social distancing, if possible.
Without a permit? In California? lol
Thank you for your comments regarding the material about the Soviet Union.
> Increases in COVID-19 are unrelated to levels of vaccination across 68 countries and 2947 counties in the United States

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8481107/
"Had a bad experience" ...?

The comment you're replying to was an employee, not a customer! It sounds like the main point is that TJ exploits its employees and is willing to turn a blind eye to their wellbeing in order to make a good experience for customers, which isn't a healthy strategy.
How are you going to support innovation and free product for those who can't afford across the world without online advertising?
The virus is real. "The pandemic" in popular culture includes both the actual virus and the response to it. "Ain't real" is also an incredibly interpret-able phrase. If somebody said to me "homosexuality isn't real" - I wouldn't think they meant nobody had ever had gay sex - I'd have to guess at their meaning, but it'd probably come out to something like "sexual preference isn't innate". Similarly, if somebody were to say to me that the pandemic wasn't real, I would understand that the concept they were trying to express is probably closer to the idea that the severity of government intervention or perhaps the intensity of media hype was unwarranted - not that the virus didn't exist. Whether or not the responses were appropriately sized aren't "medical" questions - they are political / sociological questions.

I'd prefer that, particularly in music, which has a rich history of slang, multiple meanings, and political commentary, we lean in the direction of permitting speech, to avoid censoring political commentary. In this particular case, when the chorus and title "Let's go Brandon" are CLEARLY political commentary, the chance that the work as a whole is political commentary (as opposed to "medical information") is further increased.
> For social medias: cleave advertising from search.

I would make a slightly smaller claim. Google Search should still be able to operate adwords, but they shouldn't simultaneously be able to operate the marketplace.

Similarly, I don't think Amazon ought to be able to operate a marketplace as well as selling Amazon branded goods.
ah, nice. another reverse order law.

Maybe soon we will finally go back to the Star Chamber days, can't wait. /s
Try Cambridge in England just once. The commuter gridlock is appalling. On a bicycle you could just zip by the madness, and you don't even need much fitness.
> You can see it with prostitution, it's legal in most of Europe, however it's still in the hand organized crime groups, nothing has changed

It's slightly less bad for sex workers, since their activity not being a crime means they can theoretically go to the police, which is better than nothing.
In comparative studies of populations it has been shown to still be substantially effective at preventing infection even after antibodies wane.

You are trying to make a statement about a counterfactual what if ___ country didn't vaccinate the imputation being that the vaccines aren't effective because 2 different countries with dozens of confounding factors doesn't show a high enough correlation.

It is a remarkable conclusion to suppose that studying individuals in the same society fewer got infected if they were vaccinated because of comparison between different societies.

It would be as if we proved that people didn't smoke in the USA got lung cancer far less than smokers but you sprung up with a study that showed that rates of smoking between societies wasn't highly correlated with lung cancer ergo smoking didn't cause lung cancer. One would logically suppose that your study didn't prove what you think it proved.

At limit you are supposing that if we got 100% vaccinated somehow we would see as much covid spread despite everyone having antibodies which are known to decrease chance of infection and extent of spread ergo effecting the time one remains infectious and how many virions are available to be spread.

Beware of anyone who doesn't feel the need to disprove that raindrops fall in buckets who nevertheless has proven that storms can't cause floods.

More importantly.

The MRNA vaccinations are 95% effective at keeping you out of the hospital or the grave.

https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7038e1.htm

This is even more important than decreasing spread.
I don't think the point is to compete with power grid energy storage, but for cases where the energy must be in the form of aircraft fuel, so it doesn't quite matter if it's less efficient on all metrics that pumped hydro -- unless you plan on running a cord from a dam to the planes.
You have to eat something, but you don't have to drink. I've seen it described as: Imagine telling alcoholics to keep it under control, while still making them have 2-3 drinks a day!
Google can sell search ads on an ad exchange that they don't operate. They shouldn't be able to simultaneously operate a major seller and the exchange.
"Your quote shows that the AstraZeneca vaccine loses effectiveness over time. However, the chance of an unvaccinated person passing on the virus is 67%, which is significantly higher than the 58% for a person who received the Pfizer vaccine."

The word "significantly" has a specific statistical meaning. The paper discussed on the Nature article implies it is not a statistically significant difference between 67% and 58% (likely accounting for covariance and measurement error).

Unless you have a different source showing there is statistical significance between those two results?
On the one hand, there's people with money who want to move to a new area. They have plenty of cash and resources, and they want to move primarily out of a lifestyle desire.

On the other hand, there's people without money who live in a neighborhood, who can no longer afford to live there. But they usually cannot simply "move somewhere else". Remember: they're poor (since they can't afford to even pay a property tax increase). They may not have good credit, not qualify for a loan, or even have any savings. They may already be stretched to the limit in terms of transportation to a job, or rely on their neighbors for child care. If they were a homeowner, it may have been the last vestige of generational wealth in their family, and they may simply have no money for rent or a new home. If they can rent, it'll certainly be much more than they were paying before, which may have just been their property tax. And if they are one of the millions of Americans whose parents brought them to this country in search of migrant work, they might not even have a birth certificate or social security number, or perhaps have difficulty speaking English.

For many disadvantaged Americans, being forced out of your home due to gentrification can leave you homeless, jobless, and broke, with no lifeline. No extended family to give you money or support, no savings to cushion rebooting your whole life. This has been a reality for decades, and I'm still surprised when people don't realize how much of a risk to human life there is here.

So.... if the question is "When will you let people build high rises and gentrify out poor people?", my answer would be: "When those same people who want to build high rises are forced to reconcile with the people whose lives they might destroy." If you want to gentrify a neighborhood, it should be a requirement that every single person who will be negatively affected by that move should be supported such that their lives won't end up in shambles just so a developer can get rich and some hipsters can have an expensive loft.

It's a choice between giving rich people a cozy pad, or letting poor people continue to have a livelihood and home. I just don't see that being much of a choice.
Mesquite, bamboo?
They tried to control for that by choosing a control group that got a different vaccination: “The team studied 6.4 million people who had been vaccinated against Covid-19 and compared them to 4.6 million people who had received flu shots in recent years but who had not been vaccinated against coronavirus. They filtered out anyone who had died from Covid-19 or after a recent positive coronavirus test.”
Is a custom binary format that much more efficient than a gzipped human-readable format? If not, then it makes all sense to have a mostly universal decoder instead of a hundred different ones, especially since decoders of custom binary formats has traditionally been a major source of security vulnerabilities and other bugs even when those decoders have been written by skilled people and used in production for years.
I thought it was brilliant wokeness by the NBC reporter to translate "F* Joe Biden" chant to say "Let's Go Brandon". The subsequent adoption of "Let's Go Brandon" as a code for what people really want to say is hilarious and has become a major meme across America. For YouTube to deny this hilarious turn of events is happening is downright laughable. Clearly YouTube (and Facebook) are in deeply in bed with the Whitehouse, which should make everyone very concerned.
Guys and girls. This starting to look exactly like communism In which I have lived to my 17th year. You will own nothing and you will be happy, cars were only available trough 4+ years wait list and expensive.

Collective and tribalism ideas were created by government and abused (when apparatchiks decided), we had a plethora of Activists organizations funded by the government.

Today: Apparatchiks like Claus Schwab are creating totalitarian ideology and are funding this "change" and normalization of "not owning in the name of the powerful".
As a rule of thumb, before reaction or participation in some "woke" or any other form of reactionary thing - investigate.

The bottom line: Demand billionaires from Davos to give public information on which NGOs are funded by them and which leader is owned by them. https://www.younggloballeaders.org/
There are a lot of projects which are designed to appear as grassroots movement but in actuality are designed as a diversion. The western world has no collective instincts for protection from communistic tactics and psy-ops.

Demand adequate wages and transparency from your governments.
Cars are not the enemy. The enemy is the lack of adequate city planning and the lack of clean tech for cars. (Example: Porsche's synthetic fuel will reduce CO2 from cars dramatically, but no government wants to back it up).

Little aside: This will not work globally. Even in cities. The risk of biking injuries is always present. I bike regularly, and I love my Specialized bikes.:)
It can only not avoid it because that’s how the deck is stacked. Different rulesets would give different outcomes. Just because we are riding one certain economic theory, does not mean its the only way of value creation.
They didn't make VSCode altruistically, they did it to kill a raft of competing text editors that were on the rise. Atom, Sublime Text, etc etc.

I think you call it commoditize your complements.
It would be cool if it could “peek forward” to “build up” some visualizations.
Social media with metrics is a failed experiment. The metrics need to go away and "engagement" needs to be based on something more substantial than getting likes and upvotes. Otherwise, democratic institutions will continue to deteriorate.
What are some good business leader books to read? I realize memoirs are 20:20 hindsight but are there any discussing uncertainty?
Nintendo pisses off and alienates fans so much. They're going to get steamrolled by the Steam Deck and Nickelodeon All Stars if they're not careful. They don't listen or learn from their customers.
> 4. Keep track of everyone you speak to. Everyone. Write down what they mentioned they liked, who their family is, what matters to them. Maintain their contact. Reach out during holidays and birthdays in a heartfelt way.

This reads as borderline creepy and sociopathic. If I discovered a friend of mine did this to me I'd find it really needy and a bit unnerving.

OP - you really just need to actually chill. Throw a party like others said is a good start - but don't be a weirdo about it and overthink all this shit.

I made lifelong friends at this age by going out to shows/parties - occasionally taking recreational drugs and baring souls to one another. 20 years later we don't do any of that stuff, but we're still close and just as no bullshit as back then.