skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Specific:

We are looking for POs with experience in credit card products, credit risk, marketing, customer experience, collections, or fraud.

As a Product Owner, you will collaborate with colleagues from a Top Management Consulting firm on national and international client projects. Together with our clients, you will develop superior IT concepts and digital solutions as well as execute technical implementations actively and on site, applying your sound technical and design know-how, your understanding of business contexts, and your analytical and conceptual skills.

Responsibilities:

Product Owners at Top Management Consulting Firm:
• Handle responsibility for product definition and delivery, working with design, strategy and engineering to create a compelling vision
• Work with the design team to gain an understanding of user personas, pain points and journeys
• Participate in ideation and brainstorming sessions to devise creative and disruptive digital solutions
• Work with teams to build responsive digital apps, APIs and data solutions to drive digital transformation projects
• Implement agile principles and methodology
• Assist in presenting client demos
• Travel around the globe to work with clients and teams. At times, this role involves significant travel to client sites. The amount of travel will depend on client needs and nature of projects.

Required Qualifications:

• BS or MS in Computer Science or equivalent professional experience: 2+ years Agile development in a production environment at a startup or tech organization
• At least 2+ years professional software development experience within the enterprise or consumer market
• Proven success working in and promoting a rapidly changing, collaborative, and iterative product development environment
• Strong interpersonal skills, analytical skills, combined with intellectual curiosity, and a desire and ability to "get things done" are essential
• Demonstrate a passion for customer centric products and services
• Must have experience in launching digital products

Desired Qualifications

• Fluency in modern web technologies (React.js, Node, NoSQL Databases)
• Work experience in one or more of the following industries: FinTech, Insurance, Pharmaceutical, Health Care, Retail, Telecom, Luxury Brands
• Familiarity with IoT platforms and technologies

Please message me at chris.miller@topfolio.co
Guide to Android SSL Pinning Bypass (Free eBook)
Yes, actually. I recognize that its a burden but thats part of the point I'm getting at - it is easy to tell people to switch, it is hard to give them good solid advice on how to go about doing so. And it isn't just you, its a trend I've noticed around these topics. People want others to make the jump but they don't want to hold anyone's hand while they do it.
In Canada, the duty of care, or fiduciary responsibility of the directors is to the corporation. This can be shareholders, environment, employees, and anything else that makes up the corp. This is a fairly recent ruling and is vague but I think begins to recognize the complexity of the balancing act a director must take into consideration when making a decision.

I think it’s easy to throw headlines around “Facebook does not care about you…” and maybe this is true, but I would argue that they do care, and they care a lot, as you are there primary source of income and if they loose you, they will cease to be an operating company. They definitely push the boundaries, and I hope society and FB course correct soon as sometimes it’s hard to put their experiments in the search of new revenue back in the their box.

SpaceX is a private venture, with the vast majority of shares being held by one person, who is also the CEO. I would argue SpaceX mission is what ever Elon says it is, as he is the primary shareholder. All that to say, IMO Elon thinks on a different timescale than most, and also with varying priorities over that time horizon, and I would not bet he would do all of this without the eventual long term payoff being part of his plan, even if it is decades away from when he started. Elons formula , build profitable company, take profit from company, repeat
I’m not sure if your language was intentional but this was literally Mark’s attitude from day one. [1]

1. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.indiatoday.in/amp/technolog...
> It has definitely changed my view on what money is and how it came to be.

You may be interested in Money: The True Story of a Made-Up Thing by Jacob Goldstein (of NPR's Planet Money).

* https://bookshop.org/books/money-the-true-story-of-a-made-up...
If you pay government taxes in any capacity anywhere, I wonder how you will live with yourself knowing that you're directly facilitating all the horrible things that governments do, like drop bombs on humans for oil and bulldoze homes.
Calling people psychopaths and pathological liars implies that there is no reasoning behind their actions. You’re saying they’re mentally ill. Pathological liars lie compulsively, about things for which there is no reason to lie. Is that what you’re claiming is happening with the entire executive staff of Facebook? They are all physiologically incapable of being honest? That they know and believe their actions are destructive and are committed to doing them anyway because they have a mental disorder that makes them unable to stop?
So you get the full Apple MacOSX experience.
I think the difference is from where the request comes - from the police during interrogation, or from the judge during trial.
I gained a better understanding of git through this document:

https://eagain.net/articles/git-for-computer-scientists/

I'm not a computer scientist and I think it's understandable. Everything became a lot more clear in my mind once I understood the inner workings.
> banning cash, stops all petty crime, tax evasion, drug dealing, etc. immediately.

Is this sarcastic? You do realize the vast majority of tax evasion happens through banks right? Like African dictators stashing dirty money in European or Swiss Banks, or Mexican druglords using HSBC to launder money. Specifically in scandinavia:

> the leaks with the detailed administrative records of wealth, income, and taxes paid that Norway, Sweden, and Denmark maintain to offer a detailed portrait of tax evasion in the three Nordic countries. The findings are fairly shocking. Throughout the three countries, about 3 percent of all personal taxes are avoided. But among those with more than $40 million in assets — not the top 1 percent but the top 0.01 percent — about 30 percent of taxes are evaded [0]

Do you think the top 0.01% avoid their 30% of taxes by carrying cash?

What about drug dealing with cryptocurrency? Or petty crime with credit card copying? How would banning cash make a material difference?

[0] https://www.vox.com/2017/6/7/15745978/tax-evasion-zucman
> This sounds like a conspiracy theory

Could you clarify?

That is, I provided my references. More specifically, yes, I am claiming that some people spread false conspiracy theories about vaccines, including using "sterilizing vaccine". As supporting evidence I pointed to https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12529-013-9340-z ("conspiracy theories ... with the hidden intention to exterminate part of the population" .. "sterilizing vaccine").

(Granted, in Romanian, so not using the exact phrase 'sterilizing vaccine'.)

Is there something wrong with the evidence, or relevance to this thread?

At the very least, my citations disprove the claim that "2021 consumer media is offering variable definitions", given that pre-2021 scholarly media also offers variable definitions.

Your [2] refers to something different - "any process that removes, kills, or deactivates all forms of life".

Your [3] refers to something different - "is any of a number of medical methods of birth control that intentionally leaves a person unable to reproduce."

The one you want is the hyperlink used by your [1], to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sterilizing_immunity , which redirects to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutralizing_antibody .

I think you've made my point.

Yes, "everyone knows" about [2] and [3]. My references show people avoiding vaccines because of a belief that a given vaccine causes the sterility of [3], so since walterbell actually means [1], then my suggestion is to avoid "a highly technical term that only science-worshipers can understand" which is easily confused with [3] - a confusion that you, I, and others on HN have had!

FWIW, the phrase "sterilizing vaccine" is not used in Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=%22sterilizing+v...
> when not everyone has the same opportunity and has died in a war or from lack of health care, as their country was not able to help them due to wealth accumulation in one area

The U.S. government is more than able to spend on these things today. Spending isn't constrained by taxation. We don't do those things because we don't want to. It's magical thinking to imagine that if we expropriated wealth, that it would be spent on what you want it spent on.

Also, if only we had historical examples of governments that confiscated wealth, and how that turned out for its poor...
Not personal, but chinese agents would wait in front of the ASML buildings and target ethnic chinese workers offering them money and honor if they come back to the motherland and work there. Stories about stolen laptops and so on.
He's well known in certain areas (Debian, Hypervisors)[0]

I worked with the author a few times while he was at Citrix. Always struck me as extremely clever and pragmatic, I think Tor has gained a real asset.

[0] https://www.theregister.com/2015/11/01/no_were_not_sorry_for...
If hypothetically Tether ever crashes, then a lot of big accounts will need to cover their losses. Meaning they will exchange USDT to BTC (also a big IF), and then will immediately sell those BTC, and primary points of sale would be USA exchanges specifically because they don't list USDT and are reputable. Tether flash crash will bring down all crypto prices a lot.
And they sure are fighting hard against having to negotiate with the government.
People that live in countries with unstable or collapsed currencies use USD (I assume the same of Euros and GBP) as well. Everyone in Cuba wants USD now for example. It isn’t for money laundering or terrorism, it is for toothpaste and clothing. I imagine Euros are popular in Turkey these days.
I would think quite the opposite - if you've got "set for life" money, there is now zero time pressure to release, because you don't need the money from sales.

This makes it way easier to make the choice the second time round to solo-develop an indie game, and be able to take the time to make it just as you want to make it.
If Clouds Are Made of Water, How Do They Stay in the Air?
British entrepreneur sells group chat app Sphere to Twitter
Does Potion support formulas?
Being so privacy focused in this day and age...

FOSDEM was (and is!) accessible without a reservation, without handing them your personal details. They were an example before I was ready to understand the importance.

I hope they will be able to "get back to normal" next year.
> Having a single rendering technology to support would be preferential

I disagree. Monocultures never work out well for users.
Never did find a band widener, but did get to talk to everyone in the radio department...
>I don't see what communism has to do with everyone needing to be employed full time. That's just what they made of it in the USSR etc.

Like your definition says:

and each person contributes and receives according to their ability and needs.

That equates to everyone working. There's very few exceptions, usually like you lack arms and legs or something extreme to allow you not to work.

Afterall, how do you stop 'You work, I'll be at home collecting UBI and watching TV.'
Everybody seems to be surprised on how capitalism works, forgetting that capitalism without some sort of proper market regulation and real proper heavy fines means jack shit.
They literally behave like parasites, thus the title. Reminder that this is the plot:

The Kims - mother and father Chung-sook and Ki-taek, and their young adult offspring, son Ki-woo and daughter Ki-jung - are a poor family living in a shabby and cramped half basement apartment in a busy lower working class commercial district of Seoul. Without even knowing it, they, especially Mr. and Mrs. Kim, literally smell of poverty. Often as a collective, they perpetrate minor scams to get by, and even when they have jobs, they do the minimum work required. Ki-woo is the one who has dreams of getting out of poverty by one day going to university. Despite not having that university education, Ki-woo is chosen by his university student friend Min, who is leaving to go to school, to take over his tutoring job to Park Da-hye, who Min plans to date once he returns to Seoul and she herself is in university. The Parks are a wealthy family who for four years have lived in their modernistic house designed by and the former residence of famed architect Namgoong. While Mr. and Mrs. Park are all about status, Mrs. Park has a flighty, simpleminded mentality and temperament, which Min tells Ki-woo to feel comfortable in lying to her about his education to get the job. In getting the job, Ki-woo further learns that Mrs. Park is looking for an art therapist for the Parks' adolescent son, Da-song, Ki-woo quickly recommending his professional art therapist friend "Jessica", really Ki-jung who he knows can pull off the scam in being the easiest liar of the four Kims. In Ki-woo also falling for Da-hye, he begins to envision himself in that house, and thus the Kims as a collective start a plan for all the Kims, like Ki-jung using assumed names, to replace existing servants in the Parks' employ in orchestrating reasons for them to be fired. The most difficult to get rid of may be Moon-gwang, the Parks' housekeeper who literally came with the house - she Namgoong's housekeeper when he lived there - and thus knows all the little nooks and crannies of it better than the Parks themselves. The question then becomes how far the Kims can take this scam in their quest to become their version of the Parks.
How does it compare to spruce/pine/fir in terms of environmental footprint for the same yield?
I don't want to destroy your hope but take a look at ARM support in linux. (TL;DR the ARM space is very fragmented so taking a running system from one machine with ARM to another is not possible).
I’d like a source for the “37%” profit from the App store.
Apple’s services division which includes the app store, music service, icloud services, apple pay, apple card, arcade/news/tv+ and fitness generated 20% of apple’s profit in their last filing.
If we rewind to before the addition of apple music and most of those other services we have this division earning just 10%.

It’s simply not supported that the app store is as profitable as you state - the figure you’ve suggested is closer to the iPhone’s share of apple’s profit.
Sources: fy21q3 & fy15q3 earnings statements.
>but this is not explicitly visible to the programmer
, and serious infrastructure is devoted to hiding that latency

What do you mean? You can hide latency on SPU by double-buffering the DMA but in a shader there is no infrastructure at all and no way to hide unlike SPU, you just block until the memory fetch completes before you need the data.

> they are outright programmer-hostile

Depends on the programmer I guess, I enjoyed programming SPUs, don't know personally anybody who had complaints. Only read about the "insanely hard to program PS3" on the internet and wonder "who are those people?". It's especially funny because the RSX was a pitiful piece of crap with crappy tooling [+] from NVidia yet nobody complaining about SPUs mentions that.

[+] Not an exaggeration. For example, the Cg compiler would produce different code if you +0/*1 random scalars in your shader and not necessarily slower code too! So one of the release steps was bruteforcing this to shave off few clocks from the shaders.
> No, the problem is lack of strong consumer protection

Not sure why this is a "no" versus "and," but whatever. The problem with "strong consumer protection" is it's vague. It means anything to anybody, which is useless from a policy perspective. It's language designed to gum up the legislative process, which is why Facebook's lobbyists use it. (Note: not insinuating shilling. Their lobbyists coöpted the term.)

Replace "strong consumer protection" with specific asks. Mine is breaking up Facebook. You may have others.
You sure about that? It's giving roughly $1000USD worth of shares to people in countries like Somalia, with a GNI per capita of $310USD, e.g. probably about 3x the average yearly wage over there. It's also only a 20% dilution, so it's not like the existing upper class would go anywhere.
New Library Releases in PyTorch 1.10, Including TorchX, TorchAudio, TorchVision
They need to offer sane paid products to fund themselves properly. With their reach they don't really have to be too creative.

For example, they could sell more features on top of their password manager and compete with things like Bitwarden.

There are a dozens opportunities like this, the fact that they still go towards ads as a way to make money is what has me pessimistic about their management.
I'm not religious either, that's why I recognize that protected features are not some immutable law of nature but a social construct.

As a society we have long come to the conclusion that, for good or bad, limiting religious expression leads do disastrous consequences.

That doesn't mean that religion should have free reign (we have for example long decided that church and state should be separate), but any change of the status quo needs to go largely through general social agreement, not mandated from first principles.
"The Michigan Supreme Court held that Henry Ford could not lower consumer prices and raise employee salaries."

Doesn't this just prove my point?

I oversimplified my statement but would it be legal for lord Zuck to come out tomorrow and say "we are reducing ads by 90% on the platform and here's a checkbox that will disable all tracking and remove all data we have about you that you didn't explicitly upload yourself" with no alternative revenue source presented which inevitably leads to lower revenue for FB which then inevitably means reduced dividends etc.

note: I understand the users are not the "customers" and the actual equivalent would be for Zuck to say to advertisers that the cost to display ads has dropped by 90% which would be even worse for users. My point is the outcome of "lower dividends" being evidently caused by a decision made by the CEO (to now show ads anymore, to not track users behind their backs anymore, etc.) as being in the end illegal.
Fundamentally, it is many times easier to be negative than to be positive. Any (general) social media platform will (eventually) skew heavily towards the negative. Facebook just had a head start is all because of Zuck.
The three-or-four-hours rule for getting creative work done
No. Newspaper clippings don't give you impossible, unaccountable power. Money IS a proxy for power in a way that old newspaper clippings (even of your own great deeds) can never be.

If you hoard millions of dollars, it's not really the same: it's effectively saying 'I'm going to do whatever I gotta do, in order to seize unthinkable power over everybody I interact with, and rule them'. The money isn't useful in itself past a certain point, it's keeping score and it's a marker, showing what you can do if you want. It's a lot like if you are able to make nuclear weapons and you're hoarding uranium. It's not an inherent value in the uranium, it's what you're prepared to DO with it and how people must interact with you, knowing that.
The same way a lawyer who defends freedom of speech lives with themselves when a significant portion of people who invoke freedom of speech [and get in trouble for it] are terrible people promoting terrible ideas.
A more apt comparison might be crowbar manufacturers, since that is something people often associate with criminals even though it is a very legitimate tool in many other uses.
It is because major media described it as sorta analogy to class conflict. And I think it is such analogy. But then, people who did not seen movie and assume class war means "good poor people against cartoon bad rich" started to talk about movie and use movie as example.

The movie is not "dystopic, zombie, monster, battle royale". It is not about how poor are angelic. It is not about how rich are evil. It is not about how poor are lazy and deserve to be poor either. And that confuses people.
My review:

A brilliant book, possibly my favourite of all the books I have read, which is a lot, and certainly one that I have enjoyed re-reading time and again. Tragic that it wasn't more widely appreciated in Melville's lifetime. A must read.
Can't wait to swipe my Hello Kitty Icoca for a can of Boss Flash Brew ;)
Baltic birch isn’t cheap plywood - it’s good stuff.
Blue rubber dive watch strap 20mm 22mm 24mm
Israel and France hold secret talks to end NSO spyware crisis
It is very revisionist. But it was certainly not special in being web based or easy to use. MySpace, for instance, was far more web based than Facebook has ever been. The major differentiating feature was the marketing model that drove it's initial rollout. It was progressively released to a handful of elite US universities. This led to demand and excitement as it was further expanded. What's striking is that this specific plan was stolen. Without this marketing trick, I sincerely doubt that thefacebook.com would have survived and grown into it's current form.
You most certainly can clam up halfway through a conversation, and the fact that you did cannot be used against you in a criminal trial. It's a common (but not mandatory) part of the Miranda warning that a person being questioned in custody can stop answering questions at any time.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miranda_warning
that's not the same thing.
VCs are professional experienced investors and they failed doing their job.

someone falling for a romance scam is simply inexperienced in that matter, and should not be expected to know better
How do I choose a mens shirt
I’m not the person you’re replying to but I think they’re getting at the state/a jury’s ability to draw inferences from when and in response to which question you decided to invoke your fifth amendment right to remain silent.
PR is working wonders. People tend to forget anyways, and now they're supplied with an alternative narrative as well.
Yeah, Mass is illegible _not_ at a distance...
They lost their salary and legal employment, but the thing about religion is that you are not beholden to any authority other than the one you choose, so they can continue to practice being priests.
The difference is also that the UK doesn't have a Fifth Amendment, and their right to remain silent is subtly but importantly different.
Learning a language always affects your thinking. Each language evolved within a different society, so each evolution had different stressors forcing the invention of new words.

For example, there are some 1500 words describing ice within the Inuit languages [1]. English has only a few (e.g., ice, hail, icicle), and makes do with added adjectives. A poem about ice is nuanced much more than an English poem about ice, and a translation to English wouldn't make sense.

“The worlds in which different societies live are distinct worlds, not merely the same worlds with different labels attached” (Sapir, 1949: 162) [2]

Language even affects the way we perceive colors. [3]

[1] https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1541-0064....).

[2] https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-biolinguistic-tu...

[3] https://www.pnas.org/content/106/20/8140.long