skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Should we all get a patch of land and grow food for ourselves?

A lot of those types would loooove to see lots of people to go back to subsistence.

That is a lot of people but not them, they are way too smart for that and they’ll reluctangly agree to take the job of guiding lights for all those that went back to subsistence.
> How religion emerged has nothing to do with how things should be in secular societies today.

This assumes literally everything is different today. Which of course is nonsense.
Forum on Risks to the Public in Computers and Related Systems
Or over differently advantaged populations, with a large sample size.

Should we not start now, if this is a question worth discussing – it's worth exploring.
Excellent storyteller! This reminds me of a long running series from the Chicago Sun Times: ''Things I Learned En Route to Looking Up Other Things.'' That column dovetailed with my love of reading the World Book Encyclopedia in a random fashion.
I have the Fastmail Amdroid app installed. I received push notifications that had contained the beginning text of emails, but I couldn't load the app and actually read the whole email.

Now that the attack is over, I can open the app and read those emails.
Are we ever going to start talking about Stanford’s connection to this and related?
I suspect one reason why professionals in the industry were not listened to is that we are very used to hearing experienced voices in an industry in the process of being disrupted explain why the disruption can't happen and won't work, right up until it does both. The most famous example is the "PC guys are not going to just figure this out" quote regarding the iPhone. A lot of VCs will see people they regard as 'incumbents' being witheringly critical and think that's a good sign.

Clearly there's a big difference between a businessman saying such things and professional scientists and clinicians.
Are you joking? This is the exact opposite of plausible deniability. This feature requires premeditated user action to hide evidence in an attempt to mislead law enforcement. It is illegal.
I trust that my "profit-seeking" dentist does the right thing, just like I trust that the "profit-seeking" engineer that built the home I live in and the "profit-seeking" restaurant owner from the place I had lunch today.

Please stop demonizing "profit-seeking". The problem is the lack of ethics of Facebook and Big Tech in general. Putting it on "private, profit-seeking" companies is a tired, sophomoric take.
Actually Marxists are the best. They tend to express somewhat coherent viewes as Marxism have quite strong philosophical roots. Lots of others are just “views”, that is a pile of incoherent whims that should be realized somehow.
Forget about Walking Dead. Nobody prepares for that. It is a strawman.

Think Argentine 90's hyper-inflation crisis. Think Venezuela economic colapse.

Heck! think Argentina RIGHT NOW.
Yeah, 'tis amazing most of us survive. Thinking back and leaving the military aside, I never cease to be amazed that I've survived so long (nowadays I shiver a bit just thinking about it). Nearly bitten by a snake, trapped in a waterfall at cliff's top, blowing rocks up in mines and more. These incidents weren't out of gung ho bravado. I reckon I'm a reasonably timid person and they somehow snuck up on me unexpectedly.

BTW, I had a bullet whizz past me on a 50-yd mini range after it ricocheted, it left a lead trail on the concrete several inches from where I was lying. I'm still completely mystified how this could have happened. How could one of us have been so off-target when instructors were standing behind us and carefully watching what we did?
Imagine If Your Therapist Could Access Data from Your Smartphone
...until the cops learn about that and add a countermeasure, then send you to jail for using it.
I'm starting to see more and more sites employing faulty JS that happens to work in Chromium...
Evil mode supports leader keys. It’s pretty trivial to setup.
Grandpa Amu makes items with bamboo: https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=grandpa+amu+bam...
I don't think that explains it. Measured by wafer starts/mo, Samsung is the largest semiconductor manufacturer in the world, bigger than TSMC.

https://anysilicon.com/five-semiconductor-companies-hold-53-...

Edit: it is maybe a little more complex than that, because much of that is memory, and memory and logic processes may not be able to share the same learnings and developments.
I remember at the time so many experts I knew in the field would say the Theranos claims were total BS and what she speaks of was tried and doesn’t work for X, Y, and Z reason. A science company board full of people without a science background was also a giant red flag. There were very much some she wasn’t fooling, but the broader media-sphere, PR engine, and high profile folks without a technical background bought the whole thing hook, like and sinker.

In that way it was a textbook con. Avoid those that would sniff you out and focus on those that will be gullible to your play.
Besides pairing devices, there isn't a lot of actual use cases for balanced PAKEs.

Some PAKEs have the interesting property that passwords are never sent to servers.

Which is definitely a good thing. Insider threats and excessive logging are real threats, and passwords can be leaked before being hashed.

However, these PAKEs still don't prevent brute force attacks. Sure, every attempt requires an interactive protocol. But if you are operating the server, or have a copy of the database (including keys for salt-hiding PAKEs), that can be done locally, and the PAKE doesn't provide any value.

What I would love to see is a standard scheme that requires at least a third party. A multi-party computation, relying on servers operated by different entities, that don't know about each other's secrets, and can be semi-honest. So, if any of these parties gets compromised (even internally), this doesn't reveal anything about passwords or the data held by the other party.

All the pieces to build this exist, but an actual protocol doesn't.
For me personally, in the current situation, this wonderful review of the best gay dating sites https://gayhookupguide.com/ helps to clarify the situation very well. Surely each of you has friends who prefer to look for like-minded people and love online. It is this useful resource that will help you very quickly if you want to find an unconventional relationship.
I started out saying "Majit" because it sounds less gross, but I think it's probably "Maggot" because it has Git in the name.
Could you elaborate? I’m burnt of the JS thread mill and having to relearn my job every other year so I’m interested in switching languages/tech if it buys me a more lasting skill set.
https://archive.ph/SNtZD
I wish that for you too.

I've been struggling with "neurosis-based" depression all my life. They still don't have a cure for that. You know what the medical consensus is? Breathe.

That appeared in 2015.

And I have myself discovered Wim Hoff independently of medical science the year before. That got me started.

Maybe it could get you started too.

<3
Same, though it was about 20 years ago for me.

I remember a guy withdrawing $25k in cash one day. That was unusual, which is why I remember it, but it wasn’t a problem either. (We gave it to him in a big sack, and I was disappointed that the sack didn’t have a large $ printed on the side.)
Yes the functionality is available on nvidia quadro cards and nvidia very recently added the same options to some of their more recent consumer cards specifically for HyperV.

I will say though from a hobbyist point of view this project is just great. If you're trying things and spinning up VMs just to see what you can do then one of the first bottle necks is going to be that you can't use dedicated graphics (without passing through the whole card, and then you need a card per VM). This project makes it a lot easier for anyone fiddling rather than doing stuff commercially, especially with current GPU prices.
Conspiracy theories bypass people’s rationality
You can't be convicted again for refusing to provide it, if that's what you mean
When people talk about VCs here, they normally mean venture capital firms, who are relatively sophisticated, do due diligence, etc. The vast bulk of Theranos's investment came from, for want of a better term, elderly rich people operating in a personal capacity. I mean, you _could_ call Betsy DeVos or Rupert Murdoch VCs, but it's not how people typically understand the term.
Yeah, you are correct, this is what we used, and during filming that wouldn't look good yeah. I remembered these more like a safety precaution - although sometimes some managed to fire off one of those. Probably we were talked about that how they help reloading for blanks, but I didn't remember.

Then there were also machine guns we fired blanks with, I don't remember if we fired live ammo also from machine guns or whether they also had nozzles. Actually, never mind, I think we did also do target practice with machine guns.
I disagree with the dichotomy presented. People who like a specific, niche culture aren't necessarily closed to other cultures, and people who like mainstream culture don't necessarily like most cultures and don't necessarily get along with everybody. As such, this is the progression I've watched happen:

- Niche possums and niche otters create a small community focused on a specific culture

- Otters from mainstream culture enter the community, and are welcomed by the niche otters, but this opening is disliked by the niche possums.

- The niche possums either try to moderate the community more heavily, or leave the community.

- The community grows in size, being overwhelmingly filled with otters. Mainstream otters dominate as they are more numerous.

- The community's content and culture gets shifted from niche to mainstream culture.

- Mainstream possums join the community as they identify with the community's new, mainstream culture. This completes the community's shift from niche to mainstream culture.

- Most of what remains of the community's original, niche culture is suppressed by mainstream possums, as it goes against the community's current culture.

- Niche possums create a new community, and the cycle repeats.
10 mile away sounds terrible when you don’t have a car and public transportation is inadequate.
OP here. I just realized that it may seem like I'm trying to drive traffic to the post on StackExchange. I was more trying to get some discussion going here as well and see what people might think, as I suspect many people have an opinion on that around HN. I didn't want to duplicate the question, though, and wanted a single point of reference.

But obviously I'm looking forward to comments and thoughts from people who may not be able or wouldn't want to answer on SE.

Sorry if that intent wasn't clear.
Don't a lot of cp cases hinge on being able to compel computer owners to decrypt hard drives?
Facebook plans to soon rebrand with a new name
There is no saints or sinners.
This is naive view of the problem.

As I stated it before, the problem is legislative and law enforcement related. Facebook or any other company will use every lawful opportunity to gain ROI. The system in place is the reason corporations to avoid responsibility and this is not Facebook or tech company related. You cannot have expectations of morality or any form of ethics. You can project in your mind or imagination, but this will not make a difference at all.
As we can see historically with tobacco companies in the past.
Investing and working, in order to... make more money?

After a certain point - when you can afford literally everything it's possible to want to consume - it's no longer about improving your own quality of life. It's either about increasing your "score", or about increasing your power over others.
Or perhaps if Servo is. It's the newer upgraded replacement to Gecko.
Generally speaking a court can compel self-incriminating testimony if they first grant you immunity: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Witness_immunity

Say, for example, you were a low level drug dealer and the court wanted evidence from your phone to convict your boss/supplier/whoever. They could compel you to unlock your phone, but could not use the evidence on it against you, only against your supplier, thanks to the 5th Amendment.
I hear you, and putting the scale there was something that I wanted to check and why I commented. At that scale it’s almost like one of Google’s moon shots…

But yeah - joint programs are fraught with problems and dynamics (tragedy of the commons is one major one).
A much simpler time, pre-brexit, pre-trump, pre-covid. I, for one, am all for it, reject the JIRA ticket and we will embrace it as a feature.
Good luck finding any VPNs/Proxies that isn't also used by criminals, which was the initial point you made. Tor is also different because it's a open source project, driven by their own non-profit foundation and doesn't costs any money to use. Also hard to find any VPNs/proxies that offer those things.
Throwback to 2015 letter to the editor in fortune rebuffing the stories they published about Theranos

https://fortune.com/2015/12/20/letter-to-the-editor-theranos...

https://archive.md/NE7NB

Really quite something.

Original story: https://archive.md/BpOhV

And the even more original glowing and fawning cover story they did on Holmes in 2014: https://archive.md/XN6i6

> Precisely how Theranos accomplishes all these amazing feats is a trade secret. Holmes will only say–and this is more than she has ever said before–that her company uses “the same fundamental chemical methods” as existing labs do. Its advances relate to “optimizing the chemistry” and “leveraging software” to permit those conventional methods to work with tiny sample volumes.

Interesting how that reads in retrospect

> Holmes counters that because, as noted, her tests employ “the same fundamental chemical methods” as existing tests, peer-review publication of validation studies is both unnecessary and inappropriate.

Incredibly arrogant to the end fits well with her past behaviour

> Theranos, which does not buy any analyzers from third parties, is therefore in a unique position. While it would need FDA approval to sell its own analyzers to other labs, it doesn’t do that. It uses its analyzers only in its own CMS-certified lab. All its tests are therefore LDTs, effectively exempt from FDA oversight.
Let's not mention all the undefined or compiler specific behavior. I love C but come on - let's be realistic
If action is not an option and inaction leads to suffering, are you settled on suffering? That doesn't seem right.

At least dedicate the appropriate amount of time to this, methinks. Put "explore immediate surroundings, going-ons, and people" into your weekly schedule, and do.
> You’re competing with a lot of addictive content out there, and educational content generally doesn’t fare well in that regard. Remember all of those educational video games in the past? Math blasters? They sucked. There’s no way they could compete with Mario and Zelda. This is the same phenomenon.

I think you took the wrong lesson here (seems appropriate given the subject).

Edutainment (Word Rescue and so on) wasn't unpopular because people are stupid. It was unpopular because it wasn't very good. They chased two rabbits and lost them both (education, entertainment).

Mario was more fun, better art, and probably better for your mind.
Yep, and you're free to not purchase this model if it doesn't fit your needs.

> And the better compromise is: the notch is there because of Face ID.

The notch has nothing to do with FaceID. It's for the webcam. FaceID can exist without a notch just the same and no-FaceID. All it needs is to waste the area around the notch with a bezel, like the older models. As a rock climber who every few days has trouble unlocking the computer with TouchID, I also want FaceID on my Mac.

> Someone stated that "there is no way to do a web cam without the notch".

I mean, that's obviously untrue since we've had webcams in laptops for many years without notches. The more correct statement would be that you cannot reduce the bezel further than the vertical size of the webcam without a notch - or a retractable webcam like some laptops have (I wouldn't want that moving part on my MacBook though).

> reminded me about iPhone 4 - "You are holding it wrong" fiasco.

The notch is an aesthetic thing. The iPhone 4 antenna thing actually made the device unusable as a phone. I don't see how these are related.

In any case, I am fairly certain there will be (either as part of the OS or as a 3rd party add-on) an option to make the top stripe permanently black and out of the usable screen eventually. If I'm right about this, everybody wins - extra space for those who don't mind the notch, regular 16:10 screen for the ones offended by it.
By the author of such measured and balanced essays as "are the branch covidians coming unhinged?".
Well the conservative side you are saying doesn't work these days because raising kids is not something that used to be in 90's. As a parents I think everybody want to see their children get high quality of life, luxurious things, good school etc. So both parents have to go to work to fulfill these demands. And we are taking about US which provides lot of incentives to parents tbh. And most of the time the costs starts to grow when children starts to go school.
I'm not a lawyer, but I've heard that the 5th Amendment is an "all or nothing" thing - that a judge might say you answered all these other questions, so you can't pick and choose which ones you don't want to answer, so now the court is compelling you to answer.
Is this a bad result ?: I would say that bartering would increase immersion.

Why anyone would want to implement taxes in a video game is beyond me.: Generally you want to have money sinks in a game to delete currency.
Both those things are "profitable" at the societal level.

Nuclear has two problems. One, for people who choose to ignore externalities, it's not competitive with coal (though it's obviously cheaper if you include them). But if you do include externalities, it hits problem 2, it's still more expensive than building lots of wind and solar.

This leaves it in this awkward position where only the people who believe (or claim to believe) renewables are this intermittent, subsidy driven boondoggle support it and all their arguments allegedly in favour of nuclear in the end boil down to "renewables are crap" which isn't actually true but is a very well funded alternative fact.
Apple – Support – System Status
“ - To commit you `commit`, to undo a commit you `reset --hard HEAD^`

The last example is also where you get pointed to an unsafe command”

Who pointed you there? If I want to undo my last commit, meaning the commit itself, not the changes to my file tree, shouldn’t I say `reset --soft`?
You know what tor needs far more than a rewrite in some corporate meme language? Someone to work on the onion services side. There's plenty of people working on the pseudoanonymous proxy to the clear web features but .onion is left to decay and rot (https://blog.torproject.org/v2-deprecation-timeline).

Because of the lack of developer resources or anyone at the tor project giving a damn they have removed support for all tor v2 as of october 15th (a week ago). And this is extremely silly since >90% of HSDirs are tor v2 (https://www.encryptionin.space/tracking-hsdirs-and-the-versi...). But they don't have the resources to maintain the (slightly less secure) v2 stuff alongside v3, so they're just throwing the entire 15 years of all of tor's domains, linking, search indices, and writing in the trash and starting anew from very few users and little infrastructure.

And apparently no one cares that Tor has deleted itself. No news. No blog posts. Nothing but the well hidden post and upset comments from a year ago. I've talked to various people on their IRC and they say even if people continue to run tor v2 supporting clients The Tor Project will eventually push out their centralized consensus flag to ban them from the network.
https://www.gutenberg.org/files/2701/2701-h/2701-h.htm
NFTs and commercial rights to the underlying art
I call bullshit on this:

“More lately, renewable energy has been the main beneficiary of the government's benevolence, receiving more than three times as federal incentives as oil, natural gas, coal, and nuclear combined”

This is simply not possible, although it would take a very lengthy breakdown to show the real numbers. Many of the subsidies for oil and gas are just not counted by some groups, but that is intentional. And then you have delayed costs which at borne by the people, such as unlivable areas due to earthquakes or groundwater contamination which are also often not counted.
There are plenty of ways in which profit-seeking can hurt consumers. Just look up "dark patterns" for starters.
Contra is the best one!
You might not stand out but it would still be contempt of court. Not turning over evidence with a constitutional defense is easier to defend in court than malicious fake-compliance.
>"Westerners look at pictures of non-smiling Russians and think they are angry or serious or sad."

Please stop. If you ever bothered to look at regular people walking on the street you would find exactly the same proportion of smiling or neutral (mostly neutral) faces. When I first came to Toronto I actually paid attention just to that expecting to see this myth - bunch of people walking on the street and smiling. Did not happen. And if you ever bothered to punch "Russian astronauts group" into Google search you will find plenty of smiling faces except when those were taken during some highly official situation.

So yes I am "in any way familiar with Russians" and from that perspective you are at least simply misinformed or a victim of how Western (totally unbiased and objective of course) media represents Russian.
What about hooks? That's a pretty significant change.

Even if class based components are still supported, the community is moving to hooks be the standard so you don't have much choice but to learn them.

Redux became popular and then has slowly been replaced by context and libraries like React Query.
Agreed, it's almost always political. Product has a schedule, developers find it convenient to say "Well, we have a firewall", and now suddenly they can hit the deadline! That they got there by deciding to not validate their inputs isn't important. They can handwave it away as "We make certain assumptions about the traffic coming in over the network" and Product learns a neat trick to ship faster.

I've seen this exact dynamic play out several times. Lots of vulnerabilities were created, and infosec pointing to this only attracted the ire of Product. And angered several Director-grade people in engineering who were spreading the idea that a firewall is a replacement for input validation.
I wonder if it will feature Chocolatiers [0] as a mini-game...

0. https://www.proudlion.co.uk/product/chocolatiers/6476
I really enjoy using JustWatch for this. Their service allows you to search across all the streaming services, and browsing through their suggestions is fun. I also like using it to keep track of what I’ve watched and what I’d like to watch in the future. Their mobile app is pretty solid too.