skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Cannaleafz CBD Gummies Canada Reviews: Is Scam or Legit?
Assuming you need to dispose of all your physical and psychological wellness issues, you really wanted to utilize this item successfully and totally. To utilize this CBD chewy candies item, clients can bite each or two chewy candies in turn. From the producer of the item to all clients, purchasers are encouraged to utilize this item in some measure double a day, once toward the beginning of the day and once in the evening. Every day utilization of these chewy candies communicates with the body's endogenous cannabinoid framework with the assistance of all aggravation, irritation, rest, diet, contemplations and then some. Assuming you need to find out about this item, if it's not too much trouble, visit the authority site of the item.

https://buddysupplement.com/cannaleafz-cbd-gummies-canada/

https://www.facebook.com/reviewsforsupplement/posts/944952632758487

https://www.bulbapp.com/u/cannaleafz-cbd-gummies-canada-%E2%80%93-is-it-legit-or-fake-read-real-reviews

https://groups.google.com/g/cannaleafz-cbd-gummies-buy/c/vcEJ-M5D94I

https://sites.google.com/view/price-cannaleafz-cbd-gummies/

https://www.fuzia.com/article_detail/299692/cannaleafz-cbd-gummies-canada-reviews-is-scam-or-legit

https://promosimple.com/ps/14542/cannaleafz-cbd-gummies-canada

http://cannaleafzcbdgummiesbuy.educatorpages.com/

https://www.sdcindia.ac.in/forum/college-week/cannaleafz-cbd-gummies-canada-review-does-it-work-price-to-buy

https://dribbble.com/shots/16720734-CannaLeafz-CBD-Gummies-Canada-Reviews-Is-It-Fake-OR-Work

https://www.getrevue.co/profile/cannaleafz-cbd-gummies/issues/cannaleafz-cbd-gummies-canada-issue-1-826633/186b206b-3220-47e7-af2c-c7c671a11ac7

https://www.keywesthydrobikes.com/forum/general-discussions/cannaleafz-cbd-gummies-canada-read-shocking-review-before-buy

https://cannaleafz-cbd-gummies-canada-3.jimdosite.com/

https://buycannaleafzcbdgummiescanada.splashthat.com/

https://bumppy.com/tm/read-blog/6891_cannaleafz-cbd-gummies-canada-does-it-work-or-scam-read-real-reviews.html

https://twitter.com/CannaleafzCBDG4

https://www.protocols.io/view/cannaleafz-cbd-gummies-reviews-powerful-34-side-ef-bzfup3nw

https://cannaleafz-cbd-gummies-reviews-72.webselfsite.net/

https://www.completefoods.co/diy/recipes/cannaleafz-cbd-gummies-reviews-2021-it-work-

https://ethicseducationforchildren.org/es/discussions/what-are-the-means-to-burn-through-cannaleafz-cbd-gummies-canada
What other candidates are there?
These days, zero-days come in packaged as a Cellebrite forensic imager on airports. Hell, Germany is doing that on refugees (https://netzpolitik.org/2020/gefluechtete-klagen-gegen-das-a...).
I think a few questions could be answered with this video:
https://youtu.be/0eyyuNvKNzw?t=242
Facebook Messenger, if I remember correctly, was also originally authored in Erlang.
This article does very little to explain how they did that. It basically states the type of tech they used (Erlang, FreeBSD and SoftLayer), and something about not trying to over engineer stuff. The title also makes it sound like 500 engineers would make it easier to scale up WhatsApp, which does not make too much sense either.
Ah, the "should-have-but-didn't" class of frustrations! Often undocumented, often not even believed when asking for help online.

I understand your frustration!
Does it? The only thing it does I am aware of that it does differently is decide between negative or positive infinity, which doesn't exist for integers.
Yeah maybe. There are two aspects to outrage culture:

(1) New School - groups that previously couldn't get their outrage heard and are now using the internet to organise and amplify their voices. I'm thinking something like the Muslims getting angry about Mohammed cartoons.

(2) Old School - the classic entrenched issues that gin up a silly outrage as a distraction to sneak through something politically they wanted to do anyway.

It is becoming a lot harder for the old schoolers to fake a confident consensus since it is too easy to show them up, so the outrage from them is all a little more desperate than historical precedent would suggest.
This. Recently took the TGV. When no automated greeting was playing after each stop it was some broken speaker from the cabin crew, truly horrible without noise cancelling headphones & decent volume music.

Also needing over 2h to book a ticket as things are made extra complicated to accomodate each parties interests in international train lines as well as the systems which are just horrible to use.
Is this because you observe yourself on screen?

I feel very uneasy looking at myself when talking, so I've figured out how to remove my tile and it's suddenly like a normal conversation.

There are way less social codes you have to follow when wfh and people tend to not bother as much with enforcing them.
I don't want to be too harsh, but in my view this is mostly tosh. For example:

> 'Higher than nature' contrast is a core requirement of art

There are so many counter-examples I don't know where to start. Turner's watercolours. Hiroshi Sugimoto's seascapes. Do So Huh's installations. I mean come on, what about Rauschenberg's White Painting? I suppose if you don't consider anything after the 18th century you might be right, but it feels like you're deliberately narrowing down what you call "art" so you can make confident statements like that.
Submitter, you cannot discuss a currency's half-life without discussing inflation.

In fact, a currency's half-life is nothing more than a fancy arbitrary value determined from inflation: the time it takes for a currency to lower it's value by 50%.

Also, economists do discuss it, specially within the scope of hyperinflation, but it so happens to not add much value to the discussion, if any at all.
I'd definitely be curious about which signals you're drawing on. From what I've seen, the Valhalla OpenJDK wiki has gone without update for quite some time, and even that wiki refers to JEP 169 ("Value Objects") as old.

I do get the feeling that there's activity, given that JEP 416 is targeted for Java 18 and specifically refers to Valhalla (and Loom) as benefactors of the proposal, and seeing as the mailing list is reasonably active. But since there's little official word and not much buzz on my radar (even Loom has significant buzz), I'm not expecting anything soon.
True.

I expect trackers to continue migrating to server-side tracking, which is harder to mitigate technically.
With 50 employees their "please pay $1/year" model might have actually made enough revenue
Lets extend the time scale a bit. So you really think that in 10.000 years we cant figure and build a computer that rivals the human brain ?

assuming that we havent destroyed ourselves and of course dont enter a dark age of a large percentage.
If this had a FPV / drone mode, looks like it'd be ideal to rescue those dogs on La Palma.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28920693
> How is that different?

It's not, no one has said it is. Being inattentive is bad no matter how it's done.
Some of these points are a bit suspicious, and I bet don't tell "the whole story" the way they're intended. For instance, the statement about not investing in automation unless absolutely necessary or the point about hot-swapping Erlang code.

Would be good to actually hear from one of these engineers for a discussion on the paint points of working on WhatsApp back then.
It’s just “simple” type inference.

As for what style is preferred: yeah I have also seen plenty of not so friendly debate on it, but I think it is fairly simple (and we do have “prior art”, with Scala Haskell, etc): in case the type is trivial, use var. Like new SomeLongAssClassName is a perfect candidate for var as having the typename twice doesn’t constitute any additional information. I would wager that with good method names, it can also be used for things like `obj.getLocation()`, where we happen to have a Location class as well. The other use case is when we just don’t care about the type, either because it is very complex with low info density (like a Map with a nested generic value type, which is easy to recognize from context and variable names), or because it is trivial (like I like to use things like var i = 2)
seems nice and simple, but doesn't seem to be working on Firefox, nothing happens when I hit the "play" button. also, a quick feedback for the makers: it would have made onboarding easier for me if it came pre-filled with a simple animation instead of an empty canvas.
All this does make Microsoft sound very reasonable, actually. People have been painting dystopian pictures of an ultra-locked down hardware future, complete with evil corporate overlordship etc for many years. Really as long as I've been using computers. Yet, here we are in 2021 and not only old hardware is still open but newly designed hardware too, and Microsoft has even been ensuring that platforms which didn't get the memo (mobile, ARM) open up.

The problem with a completely unlocked bootloader is that the distinction between "a Linux distribution" and "malware" is not one that can be decided technologically. Otherwise malware could just install a heavily customized Linux kernel that directly boots into Windows, hot-patching it along the way, and who is to say it's not really Linux? Someone has to make that call for the ordinary userbase that doesn't care about operating systems and it sounds like out of an ideological fit of pique - what a surprise - Linux vendors just noped out and refused to do their part. Because, you know, malware is other people's problem. So now Microsoft finds themselves carrying water for their own competitor.
What about its original purpose, which was telecoms infrastructure?
> only requires the car be able to report faults related to emissions

I'm just a layman who dabbles in diy car repair but from my experience with a cheap Chinese bluetooth obd-ii interface and an android app it reports far, far more than that. There's almost an obscene amount of data, and this was with an old car that was made only a few years after obd was released. I don't think this statement is correct.
This is the essence of the method described in the link, and the ability to pull it off is called "mathematical maturity". How one acquires mathematical maturity is the matter of some debate.
This other link doesn't work as well.
Not saying it’s a good alternative, but if you believe Apple’s marketing about privacy, they now allow you to use your own custom domain for family emails.
Whatsapp used to charge 1 eur or usd per year per user.

Assuming a 20% vat, that’s $800M in yearly revenue. If you spend $500k per engineer per year, you’re still left with $775M to handle infrastructure and all other expenses.

Whatsapp would have been sustainable without fb. That’s the regret.
Many gas stations are on valuable land, such as on the corner of two major streets.

So maybe whoever is redeveloping that land will be willing to pay the cleanup costs to gain access to it.
Family strutures today mean that you might suddenly need to care for others not in your vicinity. You need to bring them to doctors, nursing or any social activity. Good luck doing that with public traffic. That only works for pure city dwellers.

The reality would be that people with such responsibilities would be driven from the city along with those that don't have their own parking spaces. Individual traffic is not going away again, so this is no feasible solution. You could build more parking garages to get unused vehicles from the street perhaps.
Is there even a correlation between scale and engineers, other than scale = VC money = hire more cause we can afford it?
Slighlty offtopic:

Having shipped an Odoo project this year, how is the developer experience for you?

It seems like Odoo forces developers into time consuming and frustrating workflows (for example using xpath + upgrade modules + possibly reload the server) that make developing for it a pain.
Or I might be missing something?
I think they require you to have iMessage enabled. If you don't use iMessage you should turn it off.
That code also has the same problem for one's complement and sign+magnitude, which are allowed encodings in C.
Yep. After what he faced he might get help or even sponsored.
Yes, not so easy and the sound, just great :-)
Discord also if I remember correctly?
This approach seems to be quite innovative.
Compression and decompression (gzip) takes computing power and RAM. The resulting JSON (in memory) is still harder to parse because of the required field names...
The only people claiming Tesla has full self driving are internet commenters who are mistakenly confusing things.

Tesla does not claim to have full self driving. They claim to be working on the technology and they have a beta of an early version of it. A beta of a thing is not the thing.
Yep agreed, I didn't think the author's point got lost at all - just that the title didn't match it.
"The simpler product makes it much easier to maintain and scale."

This is good news for the developers, the product owners and the customers.

I still can't understand why today people choose a (Javascript) stack of build systems, ton of dependencies, and all kinds of exotic tech that is the latest and most hyped. As a developer you need to support this in the future. It might be nice to build today but it will be a nightmare later.

I have seen days go to waste because of Docker misconfigurations, problems with dependency versions, outdated dependencies not available anymore, bugs deep down in an unknown dependencies, and so on. Personally I want to build systems. I don't want to spend my day debugging all kinds of weird problems.

The (old) WhatsApp teams sounds like a great workplace.
Presumably the GP means that the NSO employees should be held personally responsible for actions taken by the NSO group, without diplomatic cover or ability to claim that they're law enforcement/military/intelligence. They are civilians, not uniformed government employees.
The point is in "required". The makers can do the car report anything that they want, but older cars often report the bare minimum. If your car has android is modern. The difference between a car made before 2000 and a car from 2005 is huge.

Cars currently are really sophisticated computers with tires. There are a lot of systems all managed by the central ECU. Things like airbag, electric windows, seat heaters, electronic brakes, ABS, coolant circuit... each one are managed by its own circuit.

Not needing oil changes or air flow meters for the mix, electric cars will be much more simplified in some parts but I bet that are absolutely arcane in the other. And the battery can kill you easily.
Generally around when you're too frail to safely stop unexpectedly. Or probably a little after that, just like how people keep driving their cars a bit too long.

As an anecdote, my father has trouble walking nowadays - I think getting him to walk one km is ambitious. He does still use an electric bicycle though.
Participate in community building activities. Engage into giving back to society. Meet new people from diverse background.
It’s not an either-or thing though. I prefer defaulting to vars and changing specific variable definitions to show explicit types based on the right hand side expression. These “no var allowed” and friend global rules are almost always bad (looking at the myriad c++ rules) —- there are cases where it will make code more readable and others where the traditional style is the preferred.
Maybe have a look at https://strapi.io/ and https://directus.io/. They are really easy to setup so yo can spend an afternoon trying out both and see if you like them.
Simply because a car is moving you cannot conclude that it’s brakes do not work.

If the rate of childhood obesity would have been higher without the warnings, then they do indeed work.
I often wonder how do people find those ideas that earn money with a year of man work or less. I'm seven years into my own company with a stable team of four developers, two business ops and an extremely competent board of directors. We solve a critical high-tech problem to our 170 business customers in an area with "gorilla" competitors. We even have "growth". Getting here took blood and tears by the wagons. And we are not even profitable yet.
Of course art is much more than randomly generated aesthetics, but I still think this project can be insightful, if not useful. Sure, it's not telling us what objectively makes great art, but I don't believe anything can.

But if statistically significant, it might tell us something more fundamental about the pure aesthetics assigned by people to patterns. It's more like the bouba/kiki experiment.
C++ is a pretty-much-everything language and that includes OOP.
It is a little hard for me to interpret their comment. I took it as meaning that the learning strategies should differ for pure and applied mathematics, hence my response.

Maybe another way to say this is: pure math is just a kind of applied math where the applications are resolving theoretical problems. Essentially all of the big mathematical programs/fields/whatever were created to solve or understand some Big Central Theoretical Problem(s), and prove their worth by continuing to be useful in solving other problems. And generally these problems can be understood in terms of concrete examples.

Even Grothendieck, perhaps the canonical example of a "theory builder," had resolving the Weil conjectures firmly in mind while writing his famous texts (and then got annoyed at Deligne for doing it the "wrong way"; see https://webusers.imj-prg.fr/~leila.schneps/grothendieckcircl...).
I'm still very confused of how you'd do nested data, or data with children elements with IO ... this just take us back in the CSV era
I had hoped that Nano Server would make it's way onto the Raspberry Pi (natively), but that never happened. Instead Microsoft offered up Windows IoT, which is a horribly slow beast with a convoluted management workflow, and practically useless for any real-world application (and also restricted by licencing to keep it out of reach from hobbyists).
For older languages, it’s also pretty common for some of the stdlib’s corners to be very dusty with API design, naming conventions, and coding patterns considered at best way outdated.
> It still does have a non-zero cost, especially in the long run, when security vulnerabilities pop up.

It really doesn't. Unless you were planning on doing a one-and-done deployment, it's trivial to update and redeploy Docker images. Even in my side projects I have CI/CD pipelines updating and redeploying Docker images daily.

> With distribution package management, on Ubuntu, you can rely on your Nginx being updated and restarted automatically while you sleep.

Whatever you can do with Ubuntu, you can do precisely the same with Docker when running a base image of Ubuntu.

> With Docker, you need to subscribe to a security mailing list in order to know about the vulnerability in the first place, and then run some commands manually that re-create the container.

No, you really don't. Just pull the latest base image, build your images by calling apt to update your dependencies, and you're done.

Whatever you can do with a bare metal/VM install, you can do with Docker.

There is nothing magical stopping you from doing the basic stuff with Docker.
Theres a high scalability post from years ago that has a bit more information. http://highscalability.com/blog/2014/3/31/how-whatsapp-grew-...
How to win friends and influence people, I guess
I think it was relatvely recently still possible to get HyperV minimal hypervisor (it was also one of the use cases for NanoServer, essentially minimal HyperV + tiny layer of userspace)
I have used Retool to create a (well-received) PoC of an internal-facing admin app. I was pretty impressed, even though it had some rough edges.

Setting up UIs was relatively painless thanks to many out-of-the-box integrations, and it was surprisingly easy to implement auth/error handling/component dependencies.

The thing I liked the most is that it's not really a "no code" - you need to be technical to build good apps in this tool. However, that's where the power comes from - it simplifies the mundane development tasks and lets you focus on something more high level.

I wish the team would make it easier to consume your own, custom API however.
You are very naively assuming it would actually reach 1B users if it was paid.
I used the reader mode that Firefox provides on Android. It solved most of the issues but mangled the ascii art. Oh, well.

I suppose that if OP cared, they could write a tiny shell script to wrap blog.txt inside HTML <pre> with some inline CSS to provide word-wrapping.
On Mac it's significantly more locked down and judging from recent comments by Tim Cook they still aren't happy with it. Presumably they see iOS as the gold standard internally and would love to make OS X work the same way, but can't without breaking too many apps. The recent stance taken by the judge on Epic v Apple re: Gatekeeper will certainly push them further in the lockdown direction :(

On OS X Intel the operating system will basically refuse to run unsigned code unless you know an ever-shifting series of magic undocumented cheat codes. You have to do weird things like hold down certain keys then use the right click context menu to open unsigned apps, you need magic CLI commands to disable notarization checking, you have to go into the system preferences window to enable drivers to be approved and then reboot etc. The UX is atrocious and gets worse all the time - it's barely acceptable even for developers. That's for usermode. Kernel mode drivers are dead now, more or less.

On OS X ARM unsigned code will not run. Period, end of story. The magic cheat codes are gone. All code must be notarized, which is a server-side approval process of the type Microsoft only use for kernel drivers.

There are a few silver linings to all this. One is that getting a cert isn't actually that hard. You need a credit card, basically. It's not like getting an EV cert where you need a company and for a CA to verify the corporate identity. Likewise their "notarization" process is not a manual app store like review, it's fully automated and is mostly just checking that the app is well structured and properly signed. It probably does other things like checking you aren't using internal APIs, and they presumably archive all the binaries they notarize so they can go back in time to investigate malware and so on. But it's not being used for political or commercial purposes, at this time.
Perfect for beating London traffic
Without any changes!

Ah the Google's advocate at his best.

Lets not show the people that the libraries that happen to work are those that match Android Java capabilities.

Please show us how to use a possible Java 14 library from Maven Central on Android, using records or Panama interop.
I'm not sure how this is relevant? For addition, multiplication, and subtraction, it is indeed modular arithmetic. For anything involving division it's altogether different, but, I took that as being outside what's being discussed, as nobody would mistake that for a finite field.
Saying you can't be secure at all isn't a solution.

https://blog.cryptographyengineering.com/2021/07/20/a-case-a...