skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You are correct on the ISP level. I am a network engineer for an ISP, we utilize Corero to monitor and mitigate DDoS attacks into our network. Since 99% of the time the DDoS is not targeted to us but rather the customer, I also kill the active IP addressing to their Modem/ONT, and configure that endpoint so it isn't allowed to pull an IP. Once the attack stops, re-config the endpoint and have it pull a new address.
When was the last time you read any good news about oil companies, tobacco companies, Nestle, etc?

All the noise doesn't necessarily translate into action.
Exactly, cookie banners are an annoyance where the user ends up clicking Accept All just to make the banner go away.
Easiest Online appointment scheduling platform
The legal environment is not new to the companies operating in it. Nothing in that environment prevented them from preparing properly, yet they didn't.

Example for why your argument doesn't hold water: one of the issues mentioned in the thread is that trucking companies can only stack containers two high in their yards. Well, what do you think would have happened if that regulation had been changed to six high (one of the suggestions) 20 years ago? Trucking companies would now own or lease smaller yards!

GP is absolutely right that the capitalists need to foot the bill of clearing this mess.

It does seem to me that government should step in to resolve the Gordic knot of coordination problems discussed elsewhere in the thread, but the companies who screwed it up in the first place need to be stuck with the bill. That's part of the deal of capitalism: you get the chance of profits, but also the risk of losses.
You got the ability to demand to see your data from every company and get it deleted, you didn't have that before. They could just keep whatever data they want and there is nothing you could do to discover or stop them from doing that.

If you care about privacy at all you should be very happy that is possible today. It is how we got all those articles showing what data Google and all other companies collects about you, since they asked about this referring to this EU law and the companies has to comply. So even if you don't use it yourself it greatly helps you anyway.
The advice of putting yourself in social situations is a start, but you also need to 1) be approachable, 2) be able to handle the social interaction, 3) know how to grow the relationship.

All of this depends on the type of social interaction, the people around you and will change over time.

For #1, I've noticed that people who are attractive or have a pleasant demeanor will generally have more social interactions initiated by other people, so at least make sure you don't hurt your appearance.

For #2, having a good sense of humor helps, as well as being able to have a conversation and relate to other people.

For #3, honesty, shared values, boundaries and timing is important. Here, like others have mentioned, you want to spend time doing various activities together.

Also, people can sense when someone's 'forcing' the friendship to happen, so try to not to stress out about it. You'll get direct and indirect feedback when interacting with other people, so learn to read between the lines.

When in college, you will cross paths with other people without a lot of effort, just make sure you take that first step of putting yourself in social situations, because it's only going to get more difficult as time goes by.

Lastly, friendship has a maintenance cost (both time and resources) and a dynamic between the parties, which may not always be beneficial for you. For example, my best friend in college was a great friend in the beginning, but as soon as he got comfortable with the friendship, he began to undermine me, push the boundaries and use the friendship to his advantage. I believe that's just his personality and as much as it hurts to lose your best friend, I had to cut the friendship for my own well being. I don't recommend breaking ties at the earliest sign of trouble, I only want to make sure you're aware that a friendship can end up being a net negative for you and you should evaluate the friendship once in a while.
No. I will never trust them. Fool me once…
"Thou shalt not violate causality in my historic light cone," I believe.
This sort of research always runs stuck on the concentration of CO2 required to operate it effenciently. Even the climate-change tripled CO2 content of the atmosphere is only 0.04 percent. If you can get even 0.5% CO2 gas it is possible to hit 10% efficiency with very old processes, but that's just not possible to do without a lot of energy. Efficiently isolating it either takes months or uses way too much energy.

Now of course in warfare conditions "way too much energy" may not such a big problem. Price may also not be much of a problem. Militaries have done it in the past.
Tesla alone adds 3500 new stations (each with avg. 8 chargers) per QUARTER. And that will continue to grow. And that is outside of many companies doing such network.

But yeah 5000 stations in 2025 maybe, how amazing. I know understanding scale is hard.

And the government is subsidizing it in China as well. When they stop some car makers there will also stop.

Wireless charging is a waste of energy, and literally a horrible thing for climate change.
Livestreaming on twitch and join discord-communities is a great place to practice social interactions.
I went to US embassy with his letter, and was turned around at the gates.
>> the cost of achieving GDPR compliance could very well make the difference between whether some companies can succeed or not.

Is this a bad thing? If we take privacy seriously then it shouldn’t be. We don’t see too many people fighting food or drug regulations intended to keep us safe because it might be costly for companies to comply. Maybe if a company cannot afford to comply with privacy regulation they should not be handling our personal information. I guess the reason it seems heavy handed in the tech/web world is that the barrier to entry started at next to zero and so much of what we put on the web is not monetised that any cost/compliance seems like a massive burden.
Problem is that RSS is not in the interest of the publishers, but mostly serves the interest of readers:

* Hard to keep users on your site - in an RSS reader you just open the next interesting article, most likely from another site. So it reduces page views.

* Harder to serve ads - RSS readers show the text of the articles, not all the other stuff on the page of the publisher

* Easier to steal content - other sites have an easy way to take your content and republish it on another website.

* Harder to track your users - most rss readers just show the content, not all the javascript nonsense required to track the user.

* Harder to monetize - for profit sites like to keep their readers behind a paywall, but how likely is it that you'll pay for a new site, if your RSS feed shows content from 20+ news sites? You can't pay for all of them, so you'll most likely pay for none.

If you want RSS to succeed, it needs to bring value to the publishers.
Understanding Anonymity vs. Privacy
> Are most machines involved in attacks like this compromised?

Yes

> Are we talking generic consumer desktop machines, like my grandma’s old XP desktop running in her basement?

Those combined with hundreds of thousands of compromised VPSes, etc.
Makes your head explodes, dinnit?
I bought de-googled GS2900 with e/OS this week, will give it a try. Decided after I read an article posted here (Study Warns Android Phones From Samsung, Xiaomi And Others Are Spying On Users - https://hothardware.com/news/samsung-xiaomi-other-android-ph...).
You have some more phones available: https://esolutions.shop/
I also created new @e.email address and got 1GB of space on ecloud.global, migrated contacts, still have to migrate SMSs and call log.
Does this have anything to do with GME + Robinhood + WSB saga?

https://hothardware.com/news/amd-robinhood-gamestop-gme-shor...
>no honest business can compete with free

The resources required to provide the world with the valuable parts of these services are small enough to be funded through non-profits or benefit corporations. I'd gladly donate my time and money to a 501c3 facebook killer.
Collusion and monopoly behaviors are nothing new. Competition as defined in modern day capitalism is destined for these market structures.
Good eye! That's indeed a typo in the notebook. Somehow in the actual design I have the correct pairing https://github.com/newhouseb/onebitbt/blob/master/onebitbt/r....

Since writing this particular notebook I've actually built out a proper CORDIC module, so once I get back to the environment where I was writing all this (I am nomadic right now w/ anemic compute) I can fix this and rerun things (and add in my CORDIC implementation).
Physically, the same.

Electrically, not perfect (but I don't know what the old ones were like). I have a USB one that simply died when I lost power one day. I was astounded to find that it was the keyboard that actually died and not the USB port stopped working or something.

The most reliable keyboards I've found to actually be basic Keytronic models.
I run multiple online properties without advertising. I would (and in some cases do) support the sites I use regularly by paying them directly.

I pay for YouTube to not advertise at me, and I'm a Patreon. I happily pay AWS and GCE costs. I pay for streaming services and other random hosted services.

I'd love to have an advertising free option for search engines (Yes, I use DDG), Reddit, Twitter etc.

I'd also like it if any news services I subscribed to removed advertising on any articles I accessed, but this still seems like it hasn't settled into their mindset, so I'm still hesitant on this particular front.

I'd also happily subsidise other people's access to these sites. I'm a regular donator to Wikipedia, and I've funded archive.org . I want people to have these resources. I Just don't want them to be advertised at when they access these resources.
(redacted above to help out someone who's apparently been getting spam and hate mail)
Any kind of multi-component mechanical modeling will require the use of constraints. Single components in mechanical modeling literally use dimensional constraints.
Teladoc: Why the biggest telemedicine company ultimately will lose (2015)
I have an unofficial policy of only working for small companies. I broke that rule once, and I was consistently miserable. Completing features consistently took 3x longer than they should have, and the team was too big to be able to make the necessary changes to fix the accumulating problems that caused it.

Additionally, people I hadn't met during the interviews but were in my direct chain of command were obnoxiously political. I am pretty much done with working at places where I dont have a direct line to the owners, and meet the owners before I accept the job.
Network effects don't generate themselves
Yes, a pebble in the shoe of Google but could be a mountain in the way of smaller company.
PBS.
It looks like a modified Fischer-Tropsch, so they're likely concentrating CO2, blowing off one O to make pure carbon monoxide, and then adding hydrogen gas (from water) under pressure over a catalyst to generate long-chain hydrocarbons.

Now, what would be nice to see as a proof-of-concept is an entire oil tanker's worth of jet fuel made by this process. How far off is that?
The sarcastic tone was because it felt like someone tried to help by saying "just replace your convenient infrastructure with something much less convenient and everything will be okay"
This discovery engine sounds like something that would be amazing to have integrated directly into your RSS reader. I'm not sure I'd use it standalone, but I absolutely would appreciate it alongside my usual feeds.
> It’s impossible to get some people to use wires.

Indeed. Perhaps we don't worry about those people anymore. If you are interested in a high quality experience but don't want to satisfy the prerequisites, you are not entitled.

WiFi is never going to provide a reliable, ultra-low-latency streaming experience for the average person. This isn't a "we can but we won't" type of problem where, with just a bit of extra effort, we can somehow magically solve all of the deficits.

Yes, there are scenarios where WiFi is indistinguishable from ethernet, but those are exceedingly rare in my experience.
> Ambitious, hard working people like promotions

Ambitious maybe (though that's nearly the definition of ambitious). Hardworking, not necessarily. I know a cement guy that you have never in your life worked a harder day than who has never received a promotion nor even sought one.
Totally agree, I've been doing a ton of DSLs using Typescript's (super) expressive type system and am holding myself back from writing a full on HDL that compiles down to FIRRTL.
No. When a headline asks questions, the answer is always no.
If you point out that lax laws are the cause for something, then it's really easy to disapprove that by pointing out all the counter examples. It's really simple. Have a nice day.
The news reporting on this article has been a little misleading. First, the main goal of this is not to reduce CO2 into carbon, but simply to sequester CO2. The "carbonaceous sheets" that are produced are "graphene oxide", which is less oxidized than CO2 but still highly oxygenated. So the energy required is much less than what would be needed to reduce CO2 completely. But yeah, you won't be able to burn the end product.
Should we be more surprised that they’re selling us out, or more angry that it’s for so little?
Thanks for the recommendation! I've run across it in the past, but I still find Haskell syntax to be absolutely baffling so I was put off by the learning curve. (There's something to be said for sticking to syntax familiar to users of the incumbent - Rust vs C++ springs to mind.)

Perhaps I'll give Clash a shot - the homepage describes basically all the features I'm looking for. The documentation appears to be excellent.
Ask HN: What blog about C# do you recommend?
If you can go back in time, what blog about C# do you recommend for yourself?
> Critical race theory is not yelling to claim every problem is due to racism or oppression.

It largely is these days.

> While I don’t agree with all tenants of the recent evolution of critical race theory, I do with the historical purpose of it.

I don't. It's divisive hateful racist pseudoscientific nonsense that relies on bullying and threats to shut down its critics.

> Fast forward to today and you have a more broad and insistent approach developing with Critical Race Theory. Primarily due to all of the push back on having legitimate societal conversations and decisions about systemic discrimination since the civil right movement in the US (even going back to the 1968 Kerner Commission).

It's always funny when they talk about systemic discrimination while also being the ones trying to institute segregation, keep too many "undesirable" races out of colleges, and generally agitate for institutional racism.

> While the focus now on structural determinism, the critiques of liberalism or the use of narratives and lived experiences of CRT might upset you.

My conscience is quite clear, I have never lusted for policies of racism. I have never complained about too many Asians in colleges, for example. I am not a racist. I stand with greats like MLK Jr on the right side of history, and opposite them. I'm not offended by their attempts to invert definitions to absolve themselves and bully me, I'm only offended by their racism.

> CRT is not at all simply what you described.

I disagree, it is very much like what I described.
I agree but even if you throw Macs in there, the Windows marketshare is probably still over 90%. Maybe a bit lower if you include Chromebooks too.
> Unrestrained freedom to intentionally lie to the public

You're presuming that TV and news media never lied to the public before the end of the fairness doctrine, and the giving equal time didn't give undue weight to some bullshit ideas.

The controlled messaging around the war in Vietnam is a great counter point here.
So where the article says

loading // true
setLoading(false)
loading // false

they mean that it will become false in the next invocation of the render function, I hope?
Completely empty with no cargo? The ship itself is designed to be stable under nominal conditions. Also, remember that fuel is heavy and part of the load & balance equation. Carrying empty containers or with minimal cargo, or depending on cargo distribution, ballast tanks can be filled to get the center of gravity in the right place.
> But for the record, I am willing to suffer whatever consequences are necessary in order that the aggressive violation of individual bodily integrity and autonomy of peaceful people is unacceptable, up to and including the immediate destruction of the entire universe.

This is the most psychotic take I’ve read on this topic. Not only are you willing to get stuck in your home so some stranger doesn’t have to get a vaccine, you’re willing to inflict that same suffering on an infinite number of people in order to get your way.

Considering “destruction of the universe” would include a lot of innocent deaths, your weird moralizing sounds even more like schizophrenic word salad. You literally advocate for murdering both those that agree with you and those that don’t, as well as yourself, because things aren’t the way you want them to be.

Let me guess, you’re in your mid teens and recently read The Fountainhead?
I pay for YouTube to get rid of the ads, although the ads I saw were actually really well targetted and I enjoyed most of them the first time around (!). The thing is the data that YouTube collects actually works for and against me - it is used for evil purposes, but it also works to make my experience on YouTube more enjoyable by recommending videos that I would like.
The company I work for has 60k employees. I think during the pandemic - which started before I joined - we let go of a ton of office managers and the in-house IT team. So now there is one office manager for each local office, and she had no capacity or skill to answer my semi-technical questions when I joined (“how does the software licensing work?” etc).

So, maybe. It’s risky, like you’ve demonstrated.
IIRC (I could be wrong on this one) protobuf isn't really a specification, it's a single implementation, and is quite hard to reimplement.

Here's a short comparison of serializing formats: https://drewdevault.com/2020/06/21/BARE-message-encoding.htm...
Here modern is not description of the RFC iteself,

modern web = today's web

https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=modern

> In history, in the broadest sense, opposed to ancient and medieval, but often in more limited use. In Shakespeare, often with a sense of "every-day, ordinary, commonplace." Meaning "not antiquated or obsolete, in harmony with present ways" is by 1808.
old vehicles are very inefficient in terms of safety, fuel consumption, and exhaust gases, for this reason alone one should prefer electric or modern era ICE
I would second this. Martial Arts is a great place to get know to people and overcome social aniaxy.
> I'm not sure what the theory of people advocating centralisation is on how this will be resisted.

Whenever I see political discussion about centralization vs diversification when you look into details it's usually actually about "diversification and centralization both, but on what level".

For example people who want "Europe of nations" with less EU integration and more national independence are usually also supporting strongly centralized nation-states and weak or non-existent regional autonomy inside them. And people who support strong EU integration and international organizations overseeing national governments usually also support far-reaching diversification on regional level inside each country.

So in both models you have things that are set in stone and centralized, and things that are left to change freely, it's just on different levels, and what people label centralization vs diversification is mostly about political marketing.
No, you and I kept up the demand on the fossil fuel industry without which it would not exist and all of us went along with it and now you want them to pay for your and my indulgence. How sweetly ironic! It's never our fault, is it?
I hope so, too, but it's not the way to bet.
My comment was clear and to the point on the availability of local on device data to car crash investigators. Take that as you may.
Optimistically, there shouldn’t be anything wrong with a law like this because when engaged with lies, kids should be able to figure this stuff out. It’s not like they’re incapable of critical thinking. They can look up if the claims are true and find that nothing backs them up.

But I get that most children won’t do this, so overall, yeah, it seems like a terrible law.

Ultimately, it comes down to what TX defines as “controversial.” Is this interpretation (teach Holocaust denial) legal or is it some rogue teacher who decided it means they get to teach whatever they want because all their opinions make their family angry at Thanksgiving dinner?
Is the Holocaust controversial? IS IT?

I am reasonably certain that in the aftermath of Charlottesville we arrived, as a result of extensive public soul-searching, at the nuanced and bi-partisan conclusion that Nazis are Bad, so I am not sure where the controversy lies.
I am really happy that EU forces you to properly track what and where you store data about users. Sloppily just storing data everywhere and not properly deleting it is a huge security/privacy hazard, making such reckless behaviour illegal is a great thing.
You still need to audit every application and technology so that you can create a cookie banner that lets you disable them, if necessary.
Here are mirrors if there is a site access issue for the OP,

https://web.archive.org/web/20211022003342/https://www.statn...

https://archive.md/t01LJ
Oh yeah, blame "nuclear", the science, for a mistake of a socialist regime.

* One one side no regulation, people living in fear of their superiors, money being drawn and sent to compete on the race to the moon and other reasons.
* On the other side "nuclear", which is based on science, and had about 6 decades of evolution in safety, regulations, etc. since Chernobyl was first built.

That was exactly what I was referring to when I said the EU is blind to science. And, yes, I read 2 papers and watched many videos, as well as follow the news for about the last 5 years of the safe confinement construction. I still hold the same opinion as my original comment.
Framework: Solving for Silicon Shortages
The sad part is the "idea guys" are generally too lazy to even learn a little basics of programming to converse with the ones building their idea.

Anyone can come up with ideas; there's no degree in ideas. Most of us got into programming/engineering fields because we ourselves 'have ideas', but sought out the education to build them.

It's very frustrating to work with others who can't directly contribute to the deliverable. It leads to burn out. I personally will never work with another team who haven't all been up until 4am crushing out code.
That is the way.

It is however politically impossible in most places.