skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
https://www.tutorialspoint.com/ipv4/ipv4_packet_structure.ht...

The IPv4 packet structure looks like it has a lot of leeway to evolve/handle/crossmap to ipv6. especially with the version and "option" sections.

So ipv6 came out almost 24 years ago. And its adoption is a disaster. It's adoption rate was a disaster at the decade mark.

I don't understand why ipv4 wasn't evolved to interoperate with ipv6 at whatever level was necessary (servers, OS, routers).

I don't understand why there isn't an evolved ipv4 that can route ipv6 and ipv4 traffic to the same application endpoints.

I don't understand why there isn't a section of ipv6 address space that is "special" that contains all of ipv4 + possible ports for NAT.

I'm sure there are reasons, but I've also seen a lot of dogma from ipv6 people over the years that comes off as my way or the highway.

But why you can't get the big boys in the room in the modern corporate-consolidated internet (AWS, MS, FAANG, US government, europeans, mobile carriers etc) and work out how to get ipv6 transitioned.

To me, ipv6 was always a lot like the security group at large companies: they dictated a policy, tried to enforce compliance, but never offered solutions. And solutions is what gets your policy or protocol adopted.
> I've plopped my phone down on my charging pad on the other hand, and walked back to find that I had just missed my mark, and the phone was sitting there for hours not charging at all.

Yes, this is why Apple is including magnetic guided wireless charging in its new iPhones. Lacking that, I had to carefully choose my charging pad to avoid these kinds of problems.

Fishing around for the lightning chord and then trying to line it up with the charging port on the phone is annoying, especially at 5AM in the morning when I'm half awake. Not sure this would be a win for everyone, but it is for me.
> Steve Jobs never forgave me for joining Commodore instead of Apple and he never spoke to me at computer events, even when I walked up to him, he turned his back on me! He was not a particularly friendly guy.

Seems like some kind of pattern.
Yes, he has a website where he pats himself on the back for all of the good calls he's made. I've seen it. Ask yourself, why does a short seller need public confidence at all? It's because they want to be able to move the stock price when they publish something.
IndexNow – initiative by Microsoft and Yandex to push content to search engines
Disclaimer: I'm the author of these books.

I have a book that might be of interest to you and/or your girlfriend as a review of math fundamentals like high school math (with exercises): https://nobsmath.com/
see also free concept maps https://minireference.com/static/conceptmaps/math_concepts.p...
and book preview https://minireference.com/static/excerpts/noBSmath_v5_previe...

For university level stuff, I have a Linear Algebra book: https://minireference.com/static/excerpts/noBSLA_v2_preview.... and a MECH+CALC book too https://minireference.com/static/excerpts/noBSmathphys_v5_pr... Check out the reviews on the amazons https://www.amazon.de/dp/0992001005/ and https://www.amazon.de/dp/0992001021/

Good luck with re-learning math topics... it's very cool stuff. A good source of knowledge buzz ;)
I'm glad you asked! I've invoked it as a rhetorical device to highlight how different each opiate is from the next.

I'd like to less misery caused by heavy-handed drug policy — and it seems to me that decriminalization (and perhaps even legalization) is the way forward.
Yes, clearly ice <-> water is a state change and not chemical, but my point is mostly that prions / protein folding is neither a state-change nor a chemical change, so I don't see how it's relevant to the posited scenario.
Read MY point, please prove (or show any evidence) that it did not happen.

You are claiming something that there is literally NO EVIDENCE of, while vast piles of available evidence points to the very opposite. Tether is, has been, and will continue to be insolvent. The only question is when people will notice.
Yeah, that seems a bit hyperbolic. There are lots of the translations out there, varying from literal but incomprehensible (“TAO called TAO is not TAO.”) to classic-but-probably-wrong ("The Tao that can be spoken is not the eternal Tao.”) to modern ("The Tao set forth as dogma is not the everlasting Tao.").

https://www.taosurfers.com/ideasandwellbeing/2020/4/21/whats...
also not related to criminal investigations, but I've found How to Solve It by George Pólya to be very useful
"Both sides are just being tribal, there's no real right answer" is one of the more common methods used to dismiss the very real differences between the two sides and attempt to prevent progress from being made.
Recent and related:

Google Pixel 6 Launch [video] - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28920140 - Oct 2021 (155 comments)
No Daylight Saving Time in UTC

Daylight Saving Time (DST) is not used for UTC as it is a time standard for all time zones

https://www.timeanddate.com/time/zone/timezone/utc
> No, people do the same things with every new generation of smartphones.

People who use the same apps and do the same things as 10 years ago don’t upgrade until it fails them, or they upgrade anyway because of other reasons that were worth the money. People who do benefit from the improvements do upgrade. People who do benefit from the improvements and can afford them do upgrade and are happy with the power and features.

Why is it even a discussion, and who among us can categorically say “yes” or “no” beside what we see in our small life circle ?
> that destination is the thing we want

Agreed. But...

> moving symbols around is only one encoding of computability

I think we may be using different definitions of the word "symbol" then. Can you give me an example of an instantiation of this "destination" that is not moving symbols around?
I like how framing a hypothesis against the norm was framed as a conspiracy. Ha.

Now we know that there were GoF research proposals by the same scientists squashing these ‘conspiracies’. Wups conflict of interest.
How can people really be pro shoplifting enough to write this?

Shoplifting is a CRIME. Don't support it by saying something insane like "They probably should before Prop 47 is repealed and more faceless Black and Brown kids are thrown in prison."
So you're looking at needing to be a 100,000,000 X programmer do have a decent shot at winning that lottery.
I really see this as a problem further up the chain - why is wasteful packaging even on the shelves? Why is there so much crap to throw out? Why was it legal to wrap a product in another 25% of its weight in useless, non-recyclable packaging? I'm not sure why I as an individual am forced to bear the brunt of colossally wasteful pipelines and processes that I had no say in. I can do a bit and reuse bags, buy stuff with minimal packaging (or avoid buying new stuff etc.), but broadly, I have no choice most of the time.
As I understand neither running code nor selling an object containing copyrighted material is prohibited by copyright law, so unless you needed a license to that code for some other reason you probably haven't agreed to the contract at all and can't violate it.
Where's the source for your "mostly"? And you're arguing against a study with "probably"?

That's not a compelling argument.
Any presentations from Apple after quarantine is really well made.
Funnily enough, almost all end user computers are multi-user machines now. A user account for the user, but temporary access for all the JS under the sun, all the time.
It is entirely possible the 'briber' did not know. Companies, particularly startups, tend to assume that the other party will 'do the right thing' and quite literally may not know any better. Ignorance isn't a defense, but assuming that the other party will properly disclose the conflict of interest is not an unfair assumption; that Kail didn't is, frankly, the main problem here, at least with regard to shares.

With regard to kickbacks, I have no idea how it was 'sold' to the startup; for all I know it was sold as a separate entity that Netflix buys from which they have premade contracts for, etc. I wasn't there, but I wouldn't assume Sumo or Netskope are running around offering people bribes. My guess is it went the other way.
How do you feel about stocks that have completely unrealistic P/E ratios? Is that not the same speculation that happens in crypto? And yes, I agree, prices don't go up unless people are putting more in, but I'm just saying that crypto is not unique here. Yes, traditional companies can liquidate their assets, but my point is, a lot of what's going on in stocks, at least ones greatly differing from traditional P/E ratios, is also speculation.

Also, in terms of siphoning of "real money" from the ecosystem each time, if some of the money going in is fake, i.e. Tether printing without having 1:1 USD backed up, and that is going back into crypto, then how do we quantify that exactly, in terms of "real money" lost? Is it because "real money" is also buying at the inflated prices, or is it because some of the Tether that is buying other crypto is backed up by "real money"? I'm trying to understand the argument here.
Licensing was going to be only one part of it. You could also assign rights — work for hire. You could also negotiate per-use rights — like single-view rights. In other words, the grammar should be continually be extensible to new types of rights negotiation.
You can generate OpenAPI from CUE, though the path section is not done yet.

You can also compile CUE to wasm, but CUE is still not concurrency safe yet, so you'd have to lock certain (an evolving set) of the function calls.

If you shell out, converting csv to json is pretty straight forward.

Good questions for GitHub Discussions https://github.com/cue-lang/cue/discussions
A seventeenth century Jesuit who constructed his own monument
That short changes industries that may be important but just don't pay as much as others.

And it also perpetuates the "magic number" of visas, which is not based on anything rational or reasoned. It's just a number someone invented.
Agreed. At the bottom of any long-to-debug issue I've encountered is some assumption I absolutely knew to be beyond suspicion that turned out to be wrong.

(That said, it's easy to say in retrospect. In the moment there is always judgement about what to verify first, and of course its always the last thing you check that turns out to be the problem)
Also consider that now everything is in shortage.
What's really needed is a decoupling of the hearing test from the calibration activity. A basic hearing test takes a few minutes in an isolated box with headphones (the 'ol click a button if you hear the tone test). From that profile it should be trivial to build out the profile of what frequencies to boost and what not to and program the aids there.
OK, fair enough, I made a mistake not verifying the Little Albert study before saying that it didn't hold. I have since checked on that one and I can't say that I consider it valid.

The Prison Experiment's methods were repudiated (in the sense that the methodology as described and carried out is unlikely to answer any sort of true psychological research question). |

I'm not sure what to make of the Milgram experiment.
"You operate a little bit like a therapist and confidante, most men do not want to f*k just a body, they want to f*k a soul."
Does anyone know how the actual conversation for something like this goes? I just can't imagine having the chutzpah to ask for a bribe. Is there some kind of euphemistic lingo people use to make it clear they want a bribe without saying the words?
Assertion of rights was going to be separated from enforcement. Imagine, for example, that you "file" your rights with a central authority. Then if someone else comes to try to to jack you, there'd be a mechanism to find infringement and negotiate either a) a successful negotiation of lawful rights, or b) revoke the unauthorized use, or c) send it to some formalized method of arbitration.
I didn't mean to say every regulation and enforcement is totalitarianism.

The only non-totalitarian ways a state can defend its people from information warfare are education (propagation of rational thinking, awareness of manipulative techniques and fallacies, factual knowledge), enforcement of mandatory fact-checking in mass media and prosecution of proven spreaders of intentionally malicious fake news.

Nevertheless many governments prefer to apply the same manipulative techniques to their own people (and avoid educating them to keep these efficient), suppress "undesirable" opinions and facts falsely labeling them as fake and spy on them (their people) as thoroughly as reasonably possible. I consider such governments totalitarian, wildly or mildly.
Very little in SOX scope is going to detect transactions outside of the company such as these. SOX is primarily about having effective mechanisms to assure that the financial information you report is accurate and complete, and then those mechanisms are inspected internally and audited externally. SOX is about what happens inside a company and with a companies resources -- you might have different means of preventing an employee from exfiltrating the company's money, and those are SOX-scoped.

Being able to detect whether a given employee has taken a bribe from a vendor might trip over SOX-relevant things incidentally but not directly. For example, you might need to certify that every employee has taken anti-bribery training every year, and that's your preventative mechanism so at least employees know what is permissible and what the consequences are.
Yes and yes. It would cause a net increase because there'd be a larger pie. But there would be fairer competition to the small players who literally have zero leverage now.
This is the harsh thing about computers: they mercilessly point out your character flaws.
You're fine :) it's just ironic
Film composer bets that NFTs will change his industry
I'd say that Shulgin and the people who worked with him on his mental adventures all had strong egos and had been tested by previous experiences with psychedelics. So there is some selection bias about whether the general populace could enact PIKHAL and TIKHAL.
It’s easy to represent 3D data as JSON polygon soup, which can then be diffed and merged as text. A lot of game engines store geometry data in this way. It often works fine until there’s a merge conflict, at which point things become difficult.

Revisions A and B have, as part of their changes, both modified vertices originally on lines 437 and 7689, and A has changed 5678 while B has deleted it. It’s often easier to discard one revision and redo the work in-order, rather than try to resolve.
Pretty sure johns pay with literal cash, not any digital variant.
That's addressed in the piece.
At least it would be straightforward to implement.

Sigh. I miss the old web. It was messier, but it was a bunch of people doing very cool things and was damned inspiring. It felt like anything was possible.
Python seems like a good match since the tutorial seems to use what comes with a base python install. Python ships with Tk, for example, so the drawing section is cross-platform and not bogged down with a lot of instructions on adding new stuff with a package manager. That would detract from the lesson, IMO.
So I wonder how people close to or within vicinity of this person at Netflix are feeling? Anyone from Netflix care to chime in?
I think it's not appreciated enough how much they got right by putting the fingerprint sensor on the back in a natural position to touch and hold the phone. You are correct, it is unlocked usually before the screen is visible.
The biggest difference is probably CUE is Turing Incomplete, which means no programming or functions. CUE is logical and proves that what you have written is valid and correct.

CUE is a superset of JSON, so all JSON is valid CUE.

The other main thing is the value lattice where everything from abstract types to concrete data lives.

I haven't actually used Dhall, the syntax rubs me the wrong way or something.
But that process by itself is always going to be more energy efficient than winning the aluminum from bauxite ore.

Of course you need a purification step after dealing with scrap, but aluminum scrap, even when contaminated is quite valuable, basically the price is a function of how pure it already is.
Probably should delete this, mods. Most of the worlds people are blocked from viewing this page.

On the other hand, I can view everything there is to view about iPhones on the Apple website even though I can't buy one.
Firefox had this feature years ago:

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Tools/3D_View
I think hobbies are distinctly different from careers. I suck at golf. If I had UBI I might golf all day. I’d still suck. I think you need something that fits your skills that makes you feel like you’re contributing
> Does anybody use all of the new power of these incredible devices?

My problem is they are too good. If they were duller, harder to use, jerky video, crashing games etc I wouldn't be so addicted.
> Without time zones, there would be universal agreement about what day it is

Sadly, it's not so simple.

Let's assume we just globally adopt UTC. Let's suppose GlobalFriday starts at midnight UTC, and runs through to the following midnight.

For a person in Hawaii, midnight UTC happens around the middle of the day - early afternoon. So, Hawaiians who woke up around 18:00 UTC on a GlobalThursday greeted GlobalFriday shortly after lunch. They go to bed on GlobalFriday evening, and wake up again on... GlobalFriday morning. GlobalSaturday will be rolling around shortly after lunch.

The interesting question then is, do Hawaiians go to work on GlobalFriday mornings?

Let's assume they decide to. For them, Friday-Saturdays are a workday in Hawaii, but Saturday-Sundays and Sunday-Mondays aren't (this is how Hawaii's work week runs today - they end their week on what they call Friday evening around 04:00UTC on a GlobalSaturday, and don't show up to work until 19:00UTC on GlobalMonday).

What about Australia, though? If they keep their current work week, they finish up around 05:00UTC on a GlobalFriday for the weekend - When they get up on a GlobalFriday morning at 19:00UTC (they today call that 'Saturday') they don't head to work at all.

So Friday-Saturday is a workday in Hawaii, but not in Australia. If you ask someone to schedule a meeting Saturday afternoon, will they think that's fine, or think you're crazy? Depends if they're Hawaiian or Australian.

You might think 'we can get Hawaii and Australia to agree on working the same days'

Obviously, they could, but that pesky international dateline winds up needing to be somewhere.

Fundamentally, the model we have now where New Zealanders are the first to get up on Monday morning and the first to pack up on Friday evening - with the rest of the world following the same weekday schedule on a time delay behind them - is a reasonable compromise not just around having clocks make sense locally, but also around us being able to share the same calendar globally.
If that's your definition of formal, then "thingy" is also a formal term in mathematics.
> How can people really be pro shoplifting enough to write this?

The author does not present a pro-shoplifting argument.

Rather, he presents a cogent argument that the media-supported narrative that Walgreens is closing SF stores due to shoplifting does not account for the facts

1. Walgreens is closing stores in areas (New York, for example) that did not experience an increase in shoplifting.

2. Walgreens closings nationwide were forecast in SEC filings since 2017.

3. No evidence has been presented that shoplifting is the deciding factor for Walgreens closings.

4. Walgreens is politically motivated to repeal Prop 47 and may be funding efforts to recall DA Boudin.
I'm also quite slow at typing with my thumbs, but swipe keyboards are getting surprisingly good.
Agreed, despite the fascinating topic I gave up skimming the article halfway through due to low signal:noise
This book's browser supports JavaScript but the book itself skips over it because the browser just uses DuckPy. Which is a reasonable pedagogical choice. Building even a moderately "realistic" JavaScript interpreter would be its own semester-length course.

(This is a really fantastic resource; I'll probably use it as the basis of course once I get around to semi-retiring and taking a teaching job. Thanks, OP!)
Past threads:

Why I hate frameworks (2005) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12635142 - Oct 2016 (65 comments)

Why I Hate Frameworks (2005) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9203959 - March 2015 (62 comments)

Why I Hate Frameworks (2005) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6542817 - Oct 2013 (36 comments)

Why I Hate Frameworks (2005) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6283601 - Aug 2013 (117 comments)

Why I Hate Frameworks - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2787525 - July 2011 (99 comments)

Why I hate frameworks (2005) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1533274 - July 2010 (54 comments)

Why I Hate Frameworks - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=431786 - Jan 2009 (124 comments)

Why I Hate Frameworks - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=95722 - Jan 2008 (17 comments)
Every time I fast-read this as Software Freedom Conspiracy. I would probably love such a conspiracy to exist though :-)
Well, they can also just…not give you a redemption at all. Even if you’re an “authorized” party, they can delay the redemption indefinitely. It’s not so much a house of cards as it is…nothing at all.
100% truthful, yet 100% dishonest.
Prices are inflated in the US, I guess because it's illegal. In the UK you can bang a really hot clean looking escort for like $200.
Indeed, I’d wager that most transactions conclude well before six Bitcoin blocks are mined.
I think those records should be public.
Wouldn't reducing the amount of typing by thinking about what you're doing instead of copying it increase that upper bound?

And wouldn't thinking about what needs to be done (and what doesn't need to be done) increase that upper bound even more?
The security problems of a browser are very similar to the security problems of a traditional mainframe OS.

You need to execute potentially malicious code in isolated containers (processes / pages). You need to protect the system from these processes, and protect these processes from one another. You need to run some code with elevated privileges / additional capabilities (setuid / permissioned APIs), including some with superuser privileges (root user processes / browser extensions).
Well, if that's a legit name, it's sure doing a good job looking fake!

My cousin married a guy named "Chris Smith" and I was like, "yeah, that doesn't sound made-up or anything".
It's about knowledge, and depends on how it was presented to the companies. If the originator of the bribe was Kail, and if it was not presented as a quid-pro-quo, the companies may not have known better and would have assumed that he is disclosing the relationship appropriately to his company. The startups would have to disclose it within their own company, but they weren't playing both sides and were not effectively 'stealing' from their own company or from Netflix; Kail, on the other hand, was taking money directly from the pile Netflix was owed, and not disclosing it.