skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Of course, what you want is understood.

Put on your OS designer hat and let's think this through. A generalized capability for persistent data with universal semantics -- the analog of the magical universal driver for networked IPC -- is a design brief for a generalized database. So your first decision is 'how is the data organized'? Given the generality of the brief, the optimal candidate is a graph of documents. So a graph database that would allow arbitrary, semantic, linkages between files.

So now we need to get a handle on the semantics. At the individual document level, the OS will need to provide some sort of type system for data, the equiv of your example of types in languages.

Then we need a generalized mechanism to allow for creation of higher level semantics -- the bits that semantically relate doc A to doc B. These would be the arcs of the graph. So now we're looking at something like RDF.

https://www.w3.org/RDF/

https://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Metadata

Will this be a freaking cool OS? Definitely. Will it be performant? TBD, but obviously not as performant as the current state of affairs. And that's only the mechanisms aspect of it. You will still need to address all the issues related to 'shared/universal semantics' that the Semantic Web people have to deal with.

At that point you the OS designer need to ask yourself if this is a reasonable task for the OS.
> Donating money to the Prop 8 committees was helping an effort to strip group of people of their human rights.

It is a democratic committee. It's called democracy. Sorry if you don't like it.

I disagree with it, but what's the alternative, that what we think is best shouldn't be even allowed to be voted upon? We both know what this is called, and it's not democracy. Remind me why are we surprised that the entire world is moving towards autocracy and extremism?

One has a right to be an ignorant idiot just like I have a right to call them an ignorant idiot.
You'd likely need a higher frequency scope if you're debugging timing issues or something on a processor that runs in the GHz range.
Exactly. Measuring things at 10-200 MHz is easy and relatively accessible, and there are only so many things that can go wrong.

Dealing with anything in the GHz range is not only extremely expensive (order or magnitude more), but you also start to deal with far more complex problems that boil down to the need for a very good understanding of the underlying physics of signal transmission: concepts like impedance matching, crosstalk between signals on the PCBs, etc.

The design AND debug requirements are far more complex, and you need to account for a lot more explations of why something isn't working as expected ... and the software/firmware AND physical level.
>>"I had to confirm three times that I only wanted coverage for damage I do to others with no coverage for damage to my own vehicle if I'm at fault."

But.. why tho?
>But why can't you just ask for what you want without people automatically assuming you're stupid?

I guess the reality is that huge majority of customers in those shops aren't proficient at technology at all,

so it's incredibly good bet that customer has no idea what s/he's doing.
TV prices are the highest they've been in at least nine years
I don't know if your a fanboy or not, but personally I don't think Teslas are luxury symbols, maybe they're status symbols for environmentally conscious people, or the subset of them who can afford Teslas.

I think anyone buying a Tesla because s/he wants to show off being rich would be similar to the kind of people who buy Trump-branded products because they think that brand is a symbol of wealth/luxury.
Heh... and neither can you take it as a given that physical objects outside of your skull have a more substantial existence than mathematical ones.

Let's do a simple thought experiment... Do you believe that GAI is possible on conventional computers? If you do, then you must believe that a mind not significantly different from yours can exist inside a particular configuration of Conway's Game of Life (since Turing machines exist in GoL). But GoL is purely mathematical, so the mind-in-GoL is composed of, and senses and interacts with, objects "external" to it which are purely mathematical.

But... 1) such objects would seem "physical" to the mind-in-GoL, and 2) both mind-in-GoL and its entire reality are fully deterministic and their existence is thus entirely independent of them ever being "simulated" (or instantiated) on an "actual" computing device. If they can exist, they can be said to actually exist, regardless of any external (to them) observer observing them. One of us running such a GoL configuration on one of our computers is just a way for us to create a window into that existence, not to "bring it into being".

In short, if you believe that GAI is possible and that your physical reality is posited within an essentially deterministic Universe (and here it does not matter much how you resolve the quantum dilemma), then there is no reason to give physical objects a privileged position over mathematical ones. In other words, your position is based on nothing but "quasi-religious mumbo-jumbo", an unjustifiable faith that your existence is special.
There's an element of truth in that, but also there's the fact that as a developer, if you have to choose between
a) shipping on a new console with a smaller install base,
b) shipping on an old console with an established user base,
c) shipping on 2 platforms at once

Then option (c) is only possible if you reduce the game to the lowest common denominator(with option option (a) becomes more appealing 2-3 years after the fact).

Nowadays the difference is less significantbetween PS4 and PS5 (or Xbox One and Xbox Series), but it's still a non-trivial amount to maintain; it would have been vastly more difficult with orders of magnitude in performance (between a PS2 and a PS3), or different programming paradigms (PS3 cell vs PS4 x86).
> Sure, there is some nuance in that you wouldn't want some fine detail to get lost at the displayed size, but presumably you know you're making a favicon when you do so.

On the other hand, SVG is really not designed for the fine pixel control you want to make the icon look good at smaller sizes as it does not have the equivalent of font hinting.
These are AC costs not total costs and the $8m is probably an annual figure - although it's not clear.
>that it is most important to engage a shooter as soon as possible for this exact reason.

"Shooting your way out of an ambush" (i.e. taking initiative when attacked) has been tactical doctrine for literally every armed group, police, military, etc, for decades.
Or certainly the "eccentric" theory.
Nope, `fmap` is indeed short for functor map. It's a historical accident in Haskell as `map` was specialised for lists (ie. `[]`) from the start and later, when mapping would be generalised to all things Functorial, it needed a new name so as to not break everything, hence `fmap`.
The number of doses administered should be not decrease as time increases.
'Obsessed with Suicide' the Mysterious Side of Napoleon's Life
IIRC "WSA" does ARM translation instead of relying on x86 builds like (classic) BlueStacks. Seems like BlueStacks 5 added ARM compatibility and also recommends a powerful CPU. (Microsoft's are basically "recommended" system requirements, and IIRC WSL2 also requires some large amount of RAM)
>That OS is a web browser.

The key point os "glorified browser" being "you still run non-natively in a sandbox, whether it is JS or web assembly, and you still call the DOM for drawing".
78% of the Web Powered by PHP
MacBook Pro's M1 Max GPU Is over 3x Faster Than M1 in First Metal Benchmark
No, "fmap" is actually the name in Haskell given to the function defined by the Functor typeclass. It was named "fmap" ("f"unctor map) because "map" was already taken by the map specialized to lists.
I'm pretty up-to-date on front-end developments but Hotwire is barely on my radar, so I had to look up the release date, but it seems to have been released just this year? (I thought it was last year.)

Though my stack has certainly evolved, it's been mostly the same since 2016, with really not that much new to learn. Adopting something released just this year doesn't seem like the most obvious choice when looking for a stable stack.
> people with partners that are non-citizens?

In NZ you become de-facto partner after living together for few years. Marriage has become pointless and mostly done as a token party.

So wherever you live the problem is lack of partnership laws...
As a web developer who's a keen electronics hobbyist I definitely feel this too. But how did you make the switch? In London, there are few embedded roles, and they seem to pay worse than web developer roles. On top of that, companies seem to be looking for people who already have extensive professional experience of embedded development (which is fair enough, I guess).
IMHO, ditching Intel is a smart move for apple but a bad one for hackers. I’m sticking with older intel mbps until decent emulation scores are achieved with qemu, and probably further down the line. Hypervisors (say VBox proxmox combo) are so useful when you have to experiment/test with other platforms. Happy to see HDMI and escape key back tho, and it looks like we’ll even get a Target Display Mode equivalent! We’ll be back to my 2015 setup.:-)

My ideal M1 mbp would be this new one with 64gb ram but with a second cheap mid tier i5 with 16gb dedicated, and a rtx2070(cmon NVdia has Cuda —we need that) with 8gb, connected via internal tb3. I don’t care that it would be 700g heavier and a bit bigger or have less battery life when used to the max (idled chips should not eat a lot). It terms of bare costs thats maybe 1000$ more silicon, but it’s a world more of possibilities. What’s wrong with dedicated gpu offering— not for everyone but hackers love it and help the aura.

And —-please—- bring back a modular slot (m2?) for (additional?) storage! (Also good for hackers but not for Apple)
What does it mean by open sourcing chips?
Does that mean I can bring the source to fabs and fabricate them out?
VigorNow
VigorNow is a male upgrade supplement comprised of a characteristic recipe. VigorNow Reviews manages normal sexual issues that might be a reason for disturbance in your relationship. These enhancements work by expanding the blood stream to corpora cavernosa, the penile tissue, and growing it to accomplish an increment in size. Simultaneously, it guarantees smooth blood supply to the remainder of the organs of the body to give numerous advantages.

VigorNow has a protected equation that comprises of normal fixings as it were. Since these fixings are acquired from plant sources, they don't have incidental effects. The expense of this item is reasonable with an iron-clad 90-day unconditional promise accessible for every one of the clients. Does Vigor Now Male Performance Pills Really Work? Customer Report Released.

With a 90-day unconditional promise, this item is a danger free speculation that assists you with transforming you. Visit Official VigorNow Website Here

https://sites.google.com/view/vigornow-ca/

https://dietaryhealthsupplement.blogspot.com/2021/10/vigorno...

https://groups.google.com/u/1/g/vigornow-ca

https://groups.google.com/u/2/g/vigornow-male-pills

https://vigornow-ca.tumblr.com/

https://www.scoop.it/topic/vigornow-by-fiams-neoma/p/4127625...
Try out fogleman/sdf[1]. It is like OpenSCAD in many ways but the distance field model gives you offsets and fillets more easily.

[1] https://github.com/fogleman/sdf
I guess the technicality they can use here is "we're not shipping a device based on AOSP, but a software feature based on AOSP". Even Surface hardware is technically a Windows-based device with AOSP features.
Respecting Users’ Motion Preferences
*Learning things that are hard for me: this is a "feeling stupid" thing and not a "looking stupid" thing, *

When I was younger I found out that things that were hard for me were making me angry. I would say that "this thing is stupid" or "it sucks". Where in reality I was stupid and I sucked.

At some point I realized it was that I simply don't understand something that made me angry and then I started using that emotion as a telltale that I should step back and learn a bit more about the thing.

In the end it evolved that I don't get angry anymore at things. I directly realize that I don't understand something and accept that I have more work to do on understanding it.
I wonder if Intel would see the obvious from a safe distance and play to their strengths instead of a death for pride.

Imagine, if Intel would swallow their pride and start building ARM SOCs… they could show their engineering prowess, and use X86 synergies to their advantage. As a buyer, I’d buy ARM cpus from intel if they also provided me a slow path for legacy x86 workloads that I haven’t migrated yet. Also, ADM is just the ISA, so, once a customer locks in to intel’s ARM cpu ecosystem, I’m sure they’ll come up with lots of special additions that then the customer would be hesitant to walk away from.

Or, they could be this decade’s IBM and make x86 look like the next generation’s mainframes - niche, even great in some dimensions but out of mainstream use.
I faced the same exact question (I'm from the UK), and I have decided to study law. So I'm studying law now and support myself as a web developer. You don't need a degree to be programmer, but if you intend to study anything then law is something usefull and interesting (to me at least).

I don't think money is everything as a barrister you can actually do something that's really usefull for the community if you chooses.

I still love to code and enjoy what I do.

But it's only my opinion, do what your heart tells you.
If they're not really an expert then they cover up their lack of knowledge and then get promoted into a management position telling the actual subject matter experts how to do their jobs.
I think it's clearer to think of map as a function

(a -> b) -> (f a -> f b)

i.e. one which lifts function application over values of the functor. This is then analagous to the role of `f` for mapping types, and corresponds to the concept of a functor in the category of types. This relationship is harder to see in the tupled version. There's a similar argument for e.g.

=< :: (a -> m b) -> (m a -> m b)
Consider that the shop is unlikely to have the laptops stored or annotated by box size.

Dan was asking the employee to expend considerable additional effort to find the smallest laptop box when he potentially knew the model number, or least had a reason that would justify the extra work. I would have just said "I'm really tight on carry-on space", not to avoid looking stupid, but to assure the employee I wasn't breaking their balls for no reason.
All scientific arguments for and against AGW became irrelevant the day the debate became religious and political. The only thing that matters (at least to me) is the weaponization of this consensus by believers in the developed world against the energy infrastructure of the developing world.

This phenomenon used to be called "Global Warming" till narrative builders decided that the term was inconvenient and switched over to "Climate Change." You can see Google Trends for the terms over a period of time and even predict with some accuracy as to which party is in power in any given US state based on searches for the two terms in those states.[1] Then you have the nice propagandists at Wikipedia rewrite history by pretending that the article had always been on "Climate Change."[2][3][4][5]

This is how you manufacture consent. And consensus.

[1] https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=US&q=g...

[2] Global Warming. 21 August 2020. (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_warming&ac...)

[3] Global Warming. 29 July 2019. (https://web.archive.org/web/20190730111640/https://en.wikipe...)

[4] Climate Change. Today. (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Climate_change&di...)

[5] Climate Change. 29 July 2019. (https://web.archive.org/web/20190730191647/https://en.wikipe...)
> Example: Finder, that thingy can't show you full paths

It can

> If you try to get to your home directory to get some files you have to jump hoops.

You don't

> Sorry, that poor choice of basic utilities (some time ago bash there was ages old), that everyone has to use brew to get anything useful there.

Ah yes, unlike the great linux where everyone is using apt-get/yum to install anything useful

Disclaimer: have used Macs as my primary developer machine since 2008 across 4 industries as both frontend and backend developer in half a dozen different programming languages.
That looks like a... whatever the graphical analogue of a typo is. It seems they mostly reused assets from earlier in the page for that summary.
>Let's imagine there's a natural number exists between 7 and 8

8 is by definition the label for the number after 7.
See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peano_axioms

So maybe you are thinking that there exists very different Set for natural numbers that has this nice properties, /

I think you can try an exercise to define such axioms and rules, see if actually they are consistent and not trivial and then see if they are different then the natural numbers.
I understand the references, and maybe its that I work in robotics and not web dev. But if the criticism of web dev is that domain knowledge erodes unlike law or medicine, the response shouldn't be that long term stable skills exist such as these two things that have come into prominence in the last decade in go's case, and the last year? in hotwires case
As expected, the article says nothing of single-parent households. It mentions the black people that don't get married being disadvantaged but fails to mention that a majority of black children are raised in single-parent households.

Do you think that not getting rewarded for being unmarried is more of a problem than children being raised in a single-parent household?
Might be a factor if taking in a plane or traveling overseas etc. taking it unopened.
Leading with Empathy and Love
You mean there's something wrong with being skeptical? Come one...you can't say you don't believe that 'climate change' is a political bat used to beat opponents with.

Anyone who takes this topic seriously understands that the environmental problems we face today are in the 1000s. And the solution to one problem is the producer of another. Environmentalism does not equal climate change does not equal global warming does not equal planet health.

This is why it is such a frustrating topic to talk about. Saying I'm skeptical about the political influences and thoughtful about the multi-variate problem means people call you a 'climate denier'. You're right - it doesn't matter how many 9's there are. I'm still going to be skeptical about this and everything else I'm told.

For example, I explained my position with my sister in-law that Greta Thunberg is a child who is used by the politicians around her and that she has never had anything thoughtful to say on the subject despite her prowess in the media. Apparently, now I don't care about the environment.

It's not the skeptics you need to watch out for who are capable of original thought. It's the ones who treat the term 'climate change' as their dogma and cannot handle any thoughtful debate on the issue.
DotSwitcher – simplest keyboard switcher for Windows. How to install and use it?
Frankly don't believe this. Who do you give majority of leading node capacity to?

1. Biggest long term partner.

2. Someone who competes with you as a manufacturer.

Not a hard decision!
Doesn't matter the point stil stands unchallenged: you cannot generally use study count to judge consensus, and especially you can't use it if you're not correcting for the forcing effect of grants application.

Today more than ever since a lot of these studies are just p-value hacking ran off collected data and no theory behind to validate.

And if you apply such meta analysis to flat earther I still expect the results to be consistent, given 0 grants are given to study the opposite, if you run the result/grant meta-analysis, you'll get both that the research is biased (high correlation between grant and results) and that the overall result/grant ratio is skewed againt the flat earth theory from the studies that were granted from flat earthers and failed to demonstrate the hypothesis.
Depends on how you look at it. What's impressive about the M1 is that it gets highly respectable Geekbench scores while also being able to deliver 20 hours of battery life in a small form factor laptop. If there is an Intel chip that can do that, where are the laptops with comparable battery life?

We can nerd out about the exact definition of TDP all day, but ultimately these benchmarks are only useful insofar as they tell us something about real world performance and power consumption.
Although he may not be convinced by the rational arguments, I took the quote as mostly expressing the emotional/irrational draw of it; the dismissal as hyperbole to support that as a rhetorical device.
Have you read the referenced article?
That was helpful, thanks. What do you use instead of GTK?
It's not a chip, it's a CPU core. You still need to add a lot of things to make a chip: interface for DRAM, something like PCIe for input and output. And you have to do layout, timing calculations, and all that kind of thing.

But yes, if you have sufficient funding and expertise you can take their CPU core -- approximately as good as the performance cores in the Samsung Galaxy S8 or the Raspberry Pi 4 -- and without permission or payment or even notification use them in your own chips.
It's a tiny lib that replaced turbolinks from DHH and the gang. It's used for many prod deployments and it's pretty convenient for people who do not enjoy FE SPA style dev. There are obviously other options.
"At one point we came relatively close to using a nuke to deal with a hacking attempt"

That sounds like wet dream of a genocidal maniac. There is no way this claim is credible
At least 5% of this data is bogus. I know 6 people who didn't get the dose but got a confirmation sms and I know very few people
Unpopular opinion here.

I sometime find myself deliberately avoiding looking stupid because it could possibly damage my career. And that's because the people who make decisions are not some divine being who see through you, they are just humans like the rest of us.
The majority of H-1B employees at FAANG come on L-1 visas first. There’s no direct comparison because they join the company in a different country and a different market. The bar is not the same as the number of open positions in one market vs the other is not the same.
Yes, and because `the medical establishment` cannot risk that failure, they have to be much surer.

And they have to be able to communicate it in an effective way such that people believe it... AND can act on it. AND can act on it in a way that doesn't trigger panic or totally mess with supply chains needed to get proper equipment to front-line responders.

like Lawrence from azangru's quote above, the medical establishment needs to consider many more factors than 'common people' before making a public statement.
The coolest application of an FFT I implemented was for a custom oxygen sensor for a wearable breath measuring device. The sensor would flash a blue light at about 40 kHz, and there was a phosphorescent dye which would flash orange with a phase lag that changed based on temperature and oxygen level.

Using an FFT we could get that phase lag at 40 kHz and back out the % oxygen in exhaled breath! Typical oxygen sensors at the time were not anywhere near fast enough to do that.
Ya, it's not looking good.
Because the answer might take 10 minutes to explain.
I'm in the submarine AI camp[1]. I'd rather build tools that kinda help humans do thinking, rather than thinking machines. Like how submarines help humans swim but who cares if they are actually swimming.

1. "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than the question of whether a submarine can swim." - Edsger Dijkstra