skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
My "Warehouse/Workshop Model" is a IT architecture based on mathematical prototype that the simple, classic, and widely used in social production practice, elementary school mathematics "water input/output of the pool".

Software and hardware are factories that manufacture data, so they have the same "warehouse/workshop model" and management methods as the manufacturing industry.

the "Warehouse/Workshop Model" will surely replace the "von Neumann architecture" and become the first architecture in the computer field, and it is the first architecture to achieve a unified software and hardware. Because "von Neumann architecture" lacks mathematical model support, it is impossible to prove its scientificity.

It is an epoch-making theoretical achievement in the IT field, it surpasses the "von Neumann architecture", unifies the IT software and hardware theory, and raises it from the manual workshop production theory level to the modern manufacturing industry production theory Level. Although the Apple M1 chip has not yet fully realized its theory, Apple M1 chip has become the fastest chip in the world.

It has a wide range of applications, from SOC to supercomputer, from software to hardware, from stand-alone to network, from application layer to system layer, from single thread to distributed, from general programming to explainable AI, from manufacturing industry to IT industry, from energy to finance, from the missile's "Fire-and-Forget" technology to Boeing aircraft pulse production line technology .

The Grand Unified Programming Theory: The Pure Function Pipeline Data Flow with Principle-based Warehouse/Workshop Model: https://github.com/linpengcheng/PurefunctionPipelineDataflow

Why my "warehouse/workshop model" can achieve high performance and low power consumption (take Apple M1 chip, Intel AVX-512, Qualcomm as examples) https://github.com/linpengcheng/PurefunctionPipelineDataflow...
Irrelevant, but (a) is technically incorrect. 'computerized devices, like smart TV s', do not necessarily require an "operating system" in order to function. If you removed the comma between 'devices' and 'like', then I think this would be correct.
I strongly disagree. When regulation is absent we can rely on trust. Not blind trust, but trust built over time. You can see this in action in other unregulated spaces such as trading card (pokemon, magic, baseball) markets.

These markets are prone to scams and counterfeit. In response, various appraisal services rose up (like Beckett) that promise to verify the authenticity of these cards. They've managed to build community trust over time and are now a staple of the industry.

The same thing will happen with DeFi, it just needs room to grow and mature. I think your opinion will change once heavyweights like Visa join the club (see below).

https://www.coindesk.com/business/2021/09/30/visa-unveils-pr...
Nice link, looks like they still might have enough meat on the chassis to not require weird temporary structural bracing when unbolting the pack. It's almost like a body-on-pack, like the body-on-frame of old.
Discussed at the time:

The Disappearance of the World’s Greatest Free Diver - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10027307 - Aug 2015 (54 comments)
For those interested in an introduction to the world of cosmology, MOND vs Dark matter, etc, I highly recommend the book "Cosmic Revolutionary"[0].

The premise is "okay, you have a theory to explain everything better. Here's all the data we've collected that you need to match to make your theory be accepted".

It's very approachable and really taught me a lot. It gives you what you need to read stories like this better.

[0] https://www.cambridge.org/ca/academic/cosmic-revolutionary#b...
Inheritance also allows overrides, which is something CUE errors on. CUE has Go like embedding so you can reuse common schema or config.

CUE's constraints are in the "middle" of the spectrum (lattice, partially ordered graph) from abstract types to concrete data.
Insolvent doesn't mean that the company folds up shop immediately. As the person you're replying to points out, it is possible (if unethical) to lie about being insolvent.

And, as the other reply to my comment pointed out, there's a decent likelihood that Tether is actually already insolvent and is doing creative accounting to get the numbers to appear to come out to solvency. 100.2%--especially when a significant amount is in as volatile an asset as cryptocurrencies during an upswing--seems too precisely close to 100% to me to not involve some amount of shenanigans.
> It's because they want to be able to move the stock price when they publish something.

Publicity helps move the market which is how they make money. Why do you think that make [him|them] illegitimate? You've not explained this part. It seems to me that you've got an axe to grind with short sellers in general. Hindenburg seems to clearly be "the real deal", whether or not you approve of what "the real deal" is.
I have a pixel phone myself and know four other people with them and they've all been perfectly reliable. Not a single issue.
Isn’t it a wonderful thing ?

Just as some people never felt the need to upgrade their DSLR once it hit 24M pixel, or change their TV for the last decade, or buy a new car, or buy a new house.

That’s arguably how things should be for the vast majority of people, if we consider the product getting marketed to have any lasting value.
The article's by https://twitter.com/Aella_Girl (i.e., high on the leaderboard of OnlyFans) - not exactly obscure.
The Unabomber suggested a solution... I'll show myself the door now. (joking btw)
How close are the semantics to F#? For example OCaml has bucklescript which produces reasonable looking JavaScript but doesn’t always follow the language semantics, and js_of_ocaml which produces horrid JavaScript (it compiles from 32-bit OCaml bytecode to js, and fakes the OCaml memory layout of objects by using arrays with their first element being the tag of the object, so e.g. a float is represented in js as [<magic number>, <the actual float>]).

Similarly, Common Lisp has something called parenscript which compiles a lispy syntax to js but e.g. uses JavaScript arrays for its lists (so you don’t have a cons function).
Did you know that Elizabeth thernos is corrupt. She should go to jail for at least 5 years for what she did since money is the second most important thing in life. Also did you know the former ceo of Wells Fargo is corrupt. He is now an advisor at some other company. How is that allowed? Also remember Martha Stewart. Well she is now ceo of her company. So it always seem like rich people are given a Lesser sentence than those who are poor. Also why does google not write corrupt businessman or businesswoman in front of their names? It makes it seem like she is paying google.
I don't think it was available until after hours, but don't kill me if I'm mistaken, I didn't try to buy any, nor have I paid that close of attention. My understanding is that it should be available on most brokers tomorrow AM.
Getting OT, but I am a fan of state machines.

They get big, but it is not right to confuse size with complexity. A huge state machine (size measured by the number of states) can be quite simple. Both in the whole, and each state transition can be isolated and considered independently
Unlike, to use an example that is close to my heart, Atlassian @atlaskit, that while open-source, was clearly not meant to be used outside any Atlassian app.

So many undocumented hooks everywhere.
Do I really have to specify "for a phone"? Obviously you can get better pictures with a $2000 full frame camera...
For sure. The circular dependencies and the turtles-all-the-way-down nature of the crypto ecosystem is kind of terrifying to behold. Like watching a car crash. I have a feeling that this all will unravel exactly as everyone has predicted; but at a time no one expects.
The problem with working (or communicating) with people in other timezones is not simply time conversion. The problem is that they are at a different phase in their day. So even if you flip everyone to UTC, you'd still have to figure out and understand what the others might be doing over there. The only issue is that now it's harder. Because now it's not enough to know the time difference, you also have to understand (or somehow convert) to their local phase. E.g. if you are just after lunch in the US on the East coast (what used to be 1PM in EST for you but now 5PM UTC for everyone) then you'll now that it's 5PM for your Indian and European colleagues but will have no idea whether they might still be at the office. So you'll have to know when their day starts and ends in UTC. And keep that in your mind.

The current system is a lot simpler. You have a rough idea when people sleep and work: it's the same time in their time zone as it is for you in yours. (Unless you are as shifted as e.g. me :) . But even then, the 'normal' people follow a normal schedule.) You just have to convert it to yours. Not that hard.
ATL / WTL / COM are built on top of Win32, so they're still good!
Phone will look good inside a case, also I left my Sony in the bag when on holidays
I don't remember whether Aaron's downloads were added to this database or not (which means this isn't technically an answer to your question), but you can access a lot of PACER documents through

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/

https://free.law/recap
It just drives more companies to be more careful about their license. My company has for years banned any GPL3 code on devices we ship. If GPL2 is suddenly found more restrictive than we expected we will ban that too. FreeBSD/NetBSD will be the winner there, along with other projects. We don't contribute much, but we already consider license before we contribute back - and if we can't get GPL code we will make the changes needed to BSD code. Most of our changes will be contributed back - only changes that are actually things that matter to us will be withheld and those are not part of open source projects to anyway)
Thanks, that’s exactly the simplicity I wanted you to share, you did good.
A ‘stalkerware’ leak puts the phone data of thousands at risk
SARS-CoV-2 mass vaccination: Urgent questions
The Antisemitic Rabbi Who Became a Priest
Very elegant and very unimplementable at the time. The make They seem to avoid the under sized address ranges which time and again plague computing.
eg.
-IBM mainframe OSs with below/above the line addressing.
-The 1MB 8086 & Dos Limit and the hacks that followed (EMS,XMS) etc.) for more than a decade. The Disk access size limitations in the same era.
- IPV4 address depletion.
The authors in 1980 seem to be aware the issue would be there but I don't see how the thrashing could have been avoided even if 1980's developers/designers had read the paper when it was published.
M&A stupidity is not the same as fraud though. M&A is hard. It's not unreasonable for execs to tell the team not to do X because they're buying it, and then to screw it up.

It's also normal for companies to want to buy via a dealer because they don't want to deal with your little startups legal issues, compliance, regulatory, billing. They just want to deal with small tier of vendors.

In fact, that's kind of a startup idea: AppStore for SaaS because most corps don't want to deal with your little vendor BS. Everyone would be happy to pay an extra 10% just to have everything easy and clear.
The situation has definitely improved since the 80's, but there is a long, long way to go to reach the original goal.
It's not an over-correction, they're just trying to sell a new feature. That's like they were trying to market Night Sight, they'd do it by posting a bunch of pictures in the dark.

As a white person I've never had to wonder if a camera would be able to properly capture my skin tone, so them showing pictures of white people won't really give me anything new. The whole point of this is to show underrepresented people that their skin tones are now better supported. Those are the people who care about this new feature. And the photos are there to convince them. A white person doesn't need convincing that a camera can capture their skin tone.
It works very well, both on the implementation side and the user side. Also (depending on the use-case) includes document verification which OIDC/SAML applications can use to accept proven-accurate personal information.
Hmmm... this seems quite close to SWE salary differences as well.

Good SWE in Europe - $40k-$60k

Good SWE in US. . . . - $250k-$350k
One of the costs built into hearing aids is the lavish perks that the suppliers give to the audiologists. My partner got a trip for two to the Caribbean every year, to 5-star resorts, for selling a certain number of their hearing aids. There were about 60 people in our group, probably costing well over $5,000 each.
> There's IPC. There's memory management. There's process management. There's network management. There's security. There's device management.

OSs are built on hardware, browsers are built on OSs. Even though they "sort of" do the same types of things, the abstractions are very different.

- OS memory management is more about managing hardware page tables, copy-on-write, page sharing, page protections etc. Browser memory management is typically custom allocators optimizing for different types of structures.

- OS process management is about using CPU primitives to multitask segments of code, context switching, timers, wait queues, interrupt management etc. In the browser, it's more about managing webpage/process relationships, application threading, rendering pipelines, and the JS runtime.

- OS network management is all about interfaces, packet processing, buffer management, low level protocols (ethernet, IP, etc.) Browser network management is all about protocols, and not really much about the hardware.

Sure there's a lot of broad-stroke similarity between OSs and browsers, but for a university course, where one typically gets deep into the details, they're entirely different.
Unbreakable? I highly doubt that.
Chilling Effects
I tread that article, hoping it would explain why, in the giddy universe, would it ever have been a good idea to require prescriptions for hearing aids?

Perhaps I missed it....
Best practices for functional pipelines:

- [The Grand Unified Programming Theory: The Pure Function Pipeline Data Flow with Principle-based Warehouse/Workshop Model](https://github.com/linpengcheng/PurefunctionPipelineDataflow)

- [Implement relational data model and programming based on hash-map (NoSQL)](https://github.com/linpengcheng/PurefunctionPipelineDataflow...)

- [Everything is RMDB](https://github.com/linpengcheng/PurefunctionPipelineDataflow...)

- [Clojure is a FP based on RMDB](https://github.com/linpengcheng/PurefunctionPipelineDataflow...)
Home buyers and other debt owners sure. But otherwise they weren't intended to help workers as that isn't part of the Fed's mandate. It helps indirectly in that it helps pave the way for the federal government to enact fiscal stimulus via debt.
It's such a shame because the Macbooks are so close to being the "do everything" machine. I want to sell my gaming desktop because it seems like such a waste to have such an expensive machine sitting there getting used a few hours a week to play games which would run fine on the macbook if it had software support.

My hope is that if the macbooks start to take up more of the market, either Apple will cave on Vulkan or Valve will find some way to make proton work.
I think GP was referring to Montagnier's support of the water memory theory (a fraudulent theory made up to support homeopathy), rather than his comments on covid 19.
Grafana is adopting CUE for dashboard schemas in the mainline. I believe it is internal validation with the intention to expose it to end users
That's exactly how it works for me too, in the US. I haven't had to take a paper prescription to the pharmacy in many years.
It's the individual advisor, not the company, that gets the fee.

The company would generally have no interest in that kind of setup.

When the advisory board is public, it appears to be 'above board' even though it might be a conflict of interest at least it's hiding in plain sight.
It would be nice if we could just regulate this industry to protect the people in it and start the work of reducing the stigma. Similar to abortion, people are going to do it whether or not it's legal. It will never have an "end". It's one of the oldest professions in human history. I do not understand why people fight this battle.

The number of hoops these people jump through only to be eventually assaulted and robbed anyway are ridiculous. It's a very dangerous job and it doesn't really have to be!

The ongoing stigma around sex is ridiculous... censoring female nippes (not necessarily even related to sex!), bans on "suggestiveness," etc... I've heard of people who run OnlyFans accounts (not escorts) essentially get run out of town if they live in conservative areas... and they really only get found out because the men in the area are patrons!

The tech industry supports these stigmas in huge ways by automating it (often unsuccessfully I might add! at one point I was suspended from Facebook for sharing a sculpture). Push back against this nonsense if you can.
Yeah, that's what I thought about interrupt handlers. (Also if you're allocating in your interrupt handler, your background thread can't allocate without either disabling interrupts or using some kind of lock-free synchronization.)

I still haven't read the Metronome paper.

I don't know if I'd go so far as to say GC is usually faster than manual memory management, even if we measure by throughput, but at least "often faster" is justifiable. I think usually you can find a way for manual memory management to be faster.
> "The US Securities Exchange Act defines market manipulation as "transactions which create an artificial price or maintain an artificial price for a tradable security"."

They are 'manipulating the market' in an informal sense, but not in the sense that actually matters. There is nothing wrong with publicly stating that you think some stock is overvalued. Particularly not if you back up your claim with some evidence, which is what Hindenburg does.
I'm also very positive on Akka having been deep into Cluster and Streams and Actors over the last few months. The barrier to entry is high because the problems Akka is appropriate for are complicated. Every time I want to complain I imagine managing state in a performant way using "simple" threadlocks or Futures and then magnify that over a distributed application.
It's like the old adage in Hollywood that you had to sell your soul to the devil. Clearly the predators in Hollywood were the devils.
For inappropriate behavior, and fired very quickly
Stock P/Es, while high, have a non-zero denominator, so it's hard to consider the same as crypto speculation. I think both have a lot of the same driving factors (low interest rates, get rich quick culture, etc.), but, to me at least, crypto is a much riskier endeavor considering the net negative nature of its value.
I think a lot of programmers secretly want to be carpenters.
Of course, which is why there isn't "one" model, there's lots of models, and they provide a statistical range of expected possibilities. And of course Crichton knows that damned well himself.

Applying impossibly high (or inappropriately high) standards of proof is a bog-standard rhetorical tactic - "how can we ever know anything with total certainty after all?". And yet the effects predicted by the consensus models have if anything proved to be too conservative, a possibility that the ever-so-open-minded Crichton never mentioned at all! Certainly that was always a possibility too, and yet he only cared to harp on the one possibility that was most comfortable to his mindset. And that's a kind of bias too - the willingness to dismiss presented evidence when it's inconvenient personally or politically.

As they say, though, science advances one funeral at a time. It's just rather sad that it occurred at such a critical time in our planet's history, and that this particular individual had a megaphone and yet used it for such negative ends.
I broke a Pixel and went back to my spare iPhone 7. I thought the spam calls and texts would send me past the edge of sanity. I suffered through that for six months and went back to another Pixel.
Well, the USA is a land of laws too. Everyone is also crying that the USA wasn't giving enough vaccines to the rest of the world and is now moving on to boosters.

Gotta put your mask on first.
Given their one country, one time zone policy, I’d assume China would only agree to a global time system if it caused them minimal grief.
Technical improvement has been pretty stunted since the 90s anyways. The hearing aide market is insanely marked up and ends up costing an extremely significant chunk of change whenever you need a replacement. I also would mention that custom in-ear monitors for musicians apply to a really niche market as well - so we don't really have a broad market to compare either of these to.
My wife's grandfather should have all of that through his VA, Medicare, and supplimental insurance. His hearing aids are the most annoying low quality overpriced pieces of crap you can imagine. And that stupid headphone amplifier thing they've sold him, garbage, literal garbage. A hobbyist could do better.

The new schema may not be a panacea but I don't expect it to be worse than the status quo.
LFP has lower energy density, but it's still good enough to be usable, and the technology keeps getting better. I think recently-made LFP cells tend to be somewhere around 150 wh/kg, which is equivalent to older-generation regular lithium-ion cells. Tesla has been using LFPs in some of their model 3s; I'm not sure if that's just their China-market version or if that's worldwide.

I think LFP is a good option for getting mass-produced EVs to the point where they're approximately cost-competitive with gas-powered cars. Energy density isn't amazing, but the materials they're made from are cheaper and more readily available, they're easier to recycle, they can last a very long time, and they're quite a bit safer.

I expect regular lithium ion will continue to be used in high-end vehicles until some battery technology comes along that's better and cheaper, or cobalt and nickel get so expensive that it's not worth the cost.

That's interesting that the BMW is that much less efficient than a Chevy Bolt. I wonder if that's due to aerodynamics, weight, drivetrain efficiency, or something else?
Back around 2012 my company was preparing an embedded system. The day the license was added one of our tester found the section about sending $5 to whatever address to get that source code. He sent the letter with his $5 and it came back return to sender. Even though this was an internal only release (most of the functions weren't even written yet) our lawyers made us go through the entire recall process to replace all the code the testers were working with - to show good faith just in case something more happened.
An old saying about the construction of one's sleeping device and the subsequent use of it springs to mind.
Looks like the Galaxy S22 will be smaller than the S21. (And same size as the iPhone.) Will likely be my next phone despite never owning a Samsung phone and not liking their take on Android, simply because of the size.
1,200 an hour!

Jeez, that is insane! good for them.

Once in a while, I come across something like this and wonder, what is it like to be that rich to casually drop 1,200 an hour, for anything, let alone on escorts.
Execute is in the name. There is a DAG engine (tool/flow) that automatically calculated dependencies. It powers the scripting layer and https://dagger.io