skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> This divisive rhetoric is what got us here in the first place

What you're doing is called "pearl clutching", and is not adding in any constructive way to the conversation.

The way we got here is intentionally by using divisive rhetoric to ellicit "engagement". Traditionally, this has been used politically by identifying wedge issues with the explicit intention to divide people along belief borders.

This has been accelerated and amplified n-fold via social media. Engagement is a proxy for divisive rhetoric, as that is what algorithmically produces the most engagement, thereby triggering the reward function(s).

The cat's out of the bag. Its too late to go back and say "but what about the kids?" etc, (especially since there is so much overwhelming evidence that these themselves are simply rhetorical devices to push a particular argumnent or point of view).

We know these arguments are not in good faith, so why should we give them that due process and respect?

Cut the BS.
Wifi on buses has never made sense to me. It just can't work. It's too technical. Connecting dozens of clients with competing streams over a very narrow and lossy channel simply is beyond the capabilities of all but a very small subset of network engineers, none of whom are working on wifi for buses. Tethering your own mobile to your laptop always works better.
What's the thing about notion anyway? Can someone explain what I am missing out on and how it compares to other tools out there like google docs?
“Examining Load Average” by Ray Walker:

https://www.linuxjournal.com/article/9001
By released I assume you mean into the air? I think only if it's burned?
Hypothesis: this is your brain doing normal garbage-collection on pieces of information that you haven't accessed frecently (frequently + recently) - you're at the tail end of the forgetting curve[1].

Does your experience confirm or deny this? That is, do you have much more trouble with languages you learned 5/10/25 years ago than ones you were using last month? Or is the process random, and you'll forget features of a language that you were just using?

Alternate hypothesis: you're getting old, and your memory is starting to go - nothing to do with programming languages in particular, the process is just more noticeable there because we have to remember so darn many little things.

Less depressing hypothesis: your brain has gotten out of the habit of remembering those things. I used to be extremely bad at remembering names, until I started paying attention to them because I learned that people really like it when you remember your name. Now I'm great with names without even trying, and I'm convinced that you can also train yourself to be better at remembering other things (i.e. programming stuff) than your natural tendencies.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forgetting_curve
> Too little too late for that.

> Invoking Godwins law, cause it seems apropos:

> "As we say in Germany, if there's a Nazi at the table and 10 other people sitting there talking to him, you got a table with 11 Nazis"

Is this in jest? Or are you truly suggesting that even conversing with someone who holds an opinion that differs from yours somehow makes you of the same opinion?
By soft this means brightness is continuously varied using some fixed point math and software based pulse density modulation. All in 6 lines of C.
And bloggers miss the readers...
> We are back at UNIX/VMS/mainframe timesharing infrastructure.

It is worst. We are in the new times of "surveillance economy", "data hoarding", politically driven business decision making, 4th industrial revolution, real-time data driven "psyops" and "marketing", "AI advancements", you will own nothing and you will be happy.

I will gladly return to UNIX/VMS times with low connectivity, real human connections and minimal dark patterns in design and product implementation:)
I still sometimes feel awkward zooming with my doctor. I know it sounds silly. I’ve exploring various online learning opportunities.
FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!
No, that's still ignorant of ecological processes, I think. We need to adapt culturally/economically.

What do you think happens, if we continue as we do, but assume "infinte" ressourses? You would still exhaust regenerative/reparative capacities, accumulate chemical byproducts and waste - shift balances. See nitrification of water bodies.

The core problem is our lazyness to recapture uncompressed former dense resources; to operate closed cycle.

And well, I have my doubts we can establish the extend of space exploitation to meet our current e.g. global phosphorus needs within the next 30 years. Is phosphate rock even plenty around in asteroids?
If you believe Donald Trump gave up on democratic norms and was "aiming [for] an authoritarian takeover," then surely you must recognize that it was Republicans like Mike Pence, Mitch McConnell, Brad Raffensperger, Stephen Riche, and others who stopped him... right?
This is an interesting set of thoughts here and I would love to delve deeper into this with actual news stories and speeches and polling of people who have beliefs of different sides of this.

At the moment I am leaning towards disagreeing, I do feel that they have been sold and over-sold as the cure for x y and z - and those who do not get the shots are the reason that x y and z are not a thing for all of yous that are doing your part.

I've been watching the news (many sources) on this very closely for a while now, so I can say I am pretty confident in how I feel it's been sold - but I don't have a way to poll people at the moment to see how they've been actually sold on all of it - thought anecdotally I can say I've seen a few who parrot what their tribal others have been saying - so half have been sold one way - little less than half the other perhaps.

I can also see how it could be said that you are not wrong - that 'technically' most the news stores and speeches did not actually say it's a cure - technically what they said was 'this is the best way to get ...' or whatever - but the overwhelming slew of additional opinion stuff thrown around the discussions seemed to allude that if everyone gets a couple of shots this thing goes away and all goes back to normal.. and I'm not sure I'm sold on that at this point, but I do think that's what lots of people have been trying to sell everyone on.
The author mentions this as the biggest drawback, understandably so - if getting a job depends on knowledge and confidence, which it usually does, you really need to be careful with how you come off
There are two parties and you have to pick one. If the argument is that trends on the republican side are so insane you must vote democrat, it's certainly not whataboutism to argue there are also similarly insane trends on the democratic side... you can disagree but you can't honestly call it whataboutism.
The problem would be separating correlation and causation. It’s obvious that higher education is correlated with critical thinking (uneducated adults are far more likely to deny climate change or believe in pizzagate etc)

But maybe this isn’t causality, maybe people with better critical thinking are going to be more attracted to college
Bit off topic w.r.t Tesla but could you elaborate more on the SpaceX vs Blue Origin point?

Do they have different methods in building their rockets and their supply chains?
FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!
> For the record, these are false statements. zeeg did get me, a paid employee, to step in and deal with the situation, which I did:

I stand corrected.

Ah, by the time I stopped reading the issue. That took an extremely long time.
Australia sorting algorithm:

Stay at your index!!!
Thesis:

> Cognition comprises the means by which organisms become familiar with, value, exploit and evade features of their surroundings in order to survive, thrive and reproduce.

Call-to-action:

> I called the view of cognition grounded in ideas originating in human experience and reflection the anthropogenic (human-born) approach, what Buzsáki calls ‘outside-in’. Although cognitivism asserts that cognition can be realised in different physical forms (including robots), the approach remains anthropogenic because it derives from the human capacity to compute numbers. The contrast case is what I call the biogenic (life-born) approach, which privileges the biological mode of existence as the source of cognition and entails the ‘inside-out’ view.

The author uses the analogy of moving to a Sun-centered view of the solar system instead of an Earth-centered view. She presents a line of argument in the article for her position. (Worth reading, in my opinion.)
Be nice. Golden rule. Don’t call bullshit on people honestly trying to have a dialogue in good faith. That’s divisive.
Godwin amended his law in this particular scenario.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2015/12/14/...

> First, let me get this Donald Trump issue out of the way: If you’re thoughtful about it and show some real awareness of history, go ahead and refer to Hitler or Nazis when you talk about Trump. Or any other politician.
> Record labels will become more relevant than ever - by specialising and becoming experts in very specific niches they will be able to amplify artists better than ever, owning audiences and data to ensure that they become the "go to" for artists looking to succeed.

If I understand it correctly, that would mean targeting very specific audiences based on genre and similarity to other artists a user listens to?

That doesn't seem to be a core strength of current big 3 labels. Their approach is using radio and mass exposure, getting a top 10 hit etc. We should see a big disruption in their business then.

>This has been the case for years. One of the major labels did some consumer research 5 or 6 years ago polling a bunch of late millenials/Gen-Z on current hit songs - they all recognised the breakthrough hits but barely any recognised or even cared about the artists. This is amplified by lean back consumption driven by "music second" entertainment platforms like TikTok and playlist-driven platforms like Spotify where you can consume music without ever being aware of the artist.

I wonder if youtuber/tiktoker have replaced musicians as the personalities young people connect to.

Pewdiepie might be a bigger 'personality' than any new artist of the past many years.
Anyone watching me work would probably think I don't know a damn thing. And after 25 years in the industry, I sometimes wonder the same thing.

I suspect the people watching who thought you didn't know a thing would probably be the ones too inexperienced to recognise what you describe.

I also suspect that every other programmer with 25 years of experience who can be productive using many different programming languages would immediately recognise and empathise with the feeling you describe, and they also have a search window permanently open while working.
Which I would have called "six ounces".

The American measuring system is a pain in the butt for a lot of reasons, but "16 ounces to a pound" does make for a lot of very nice even divisions. Half is 8; a quarter is 4; midway between the two is 6.
> You're gonna have to cite some kind of example of what you believe pseudo-science is if you're saying critical thinking was somehow detrimental to someone intellectually.

I said that colleges are teaching the opposite of critical thinking, not that critical thinking was detrimental intellectually.

> considering they decided to attend a university.

They attended university because almost all came from an upper-middle-class background where there is no viable alternative according to their families. If you think they decided to attend university, you're speaking of different types of people — the only decision for them is which college to attend.
Microsoft locks .NET hot reload capabilities behind Visual Studio 2022
It was captured from the air when the wood was grown though - so as long as you maintain the forrest you took the wood from it works out.
The consensus among top physicists during the 'heroic era' was that Von Neumann was the smartest among them, higher IQ than Einstein's, but Einstein had something else.

Eugene P. Wigner:

> I have known a great many intelligent people in my life. I knew Planck, von Laue and Heisenberg. Paul Dirac was my brother in law; Leo Szilard and Edward Teller have been among my closest friends; and Albert Einstein was a good friend, too. But none of them had a mind as quick and acute as Jansci [John] von Neumann. I have often remarked this in the presence of those men and no one ever disputed me. [...] But Einstein's understanding was deeper even than von Neumann's. His mind was both more penetrating and more original than von Neumann's. And that is a very remarkable statement. Einstein took an extraordinary pleasure in invention. Two of his greatest inventions are the Special and General Theories of Relativity; and for all of Jansci's brilliance, he never produced anything as original.
What difference do you make between corporations and your "local feudal lord"?
Most likely prometheus-operator , very active and production utilized https://prometheus-operator.dev
In addition progress making steel with a lot less CO2, by using hydrogen (and other techniques) instead of coal has come a long way. This isn't just pie in the sky, the world's second largest steel maker plans to reduce CO2 by 30% before 2030. [1] And of course steel is eminently recyclable. I'm not against wood but steel has some good long term attributes as well.

[1]https://corporate.arcelormittal.com/sustainability/climate-a...
Could we perhaps engineer something like a virus to attack the cancer cells or perhaps infect the cells with a virus, and use the mRNA to encourage the immune system to attack the cancer cells infected with said virus?

Sorry if all of this seems too sci-fi or utopian. I am not a biologist nor medical professional.
FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!

FAGGOT!
literature review is not research in itself, its more like journalism/blogging.

To qualify for research it gotta include materials, methods, conduct experiments, build quantitative models - to have some research rigor applied to the climate domain. Only after that,a researcher can claim some novel contribution based on his own model.

Otherwise it is not climate research (a STEM discipline), but more like blogging/journalism - a a study of what other people write - human sciences type research which lacks rigor and suffers from inability to reproduce research
well, I mean i'm posing the question because I just don't know the limits of the aircraft
On one side are the computer scientists and engineers who understand the nature of the problem.

Which includes Republicans: https://twitter.com/tonylovasco/status/1448672694065668105

If you want to make scientific ignorance a political issue, we can discuss nuclear power, GMOs, unreasonable COVID restrictions, and plenty more.
Chrome 96 Beta: Conditional Focus, Priority Hints, and More
Yes my mistake thanks for clarifying!
This is classic victim blaming. It is the fault of the person being abused for either not being preemptively anonymous or for "choosing" to allow doxing, death threats, and the like being part of their "personal narrative"?
Guilt by association isn't just biased and lazy thinking - it's literally evil and a tool used by evil people.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCarthyism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smith_Act_trials_of_Communist_...
> people who don't believe facts

Much of it likely comes down to (a) misinformation coming from news sources they trust, (b) lack of trust in institutions (perhaps for good reason), and perhaps most importantly (c) prioritizing moral values differently than you do.

I suspect (c) is at the root of much of the R-D split, with (a) and (b) being symptoms of it.

Many Republicans and Democrats have non-negotiable moral values they hold to, and they hold their noses as they elect leaders who give lip service to those values but have glaring problems elsewhere. Elections are more about who people don't want in office than who they do want.
What distinctions between men and women are being denied that you feel need to be made?

Have you done any work to asses your biases along these fronts? What makes you think that the immunity after getting infected from covid is better than getting vaccinated and not getting sick at all? I know I don't personally have the time to be sick, I have a family to feed.
All fair points on the money printing parts. I am well aware Trump printed trillions as well. I wasn't a fan then and not now.

state laws != federal laws. I am pro-choice but I think allowing states to make decisions for their own is good and the system is working as intended. I want states to have more freedom to legislate what their constituents want than a giant federal government making decisions for the whole nation.

The taxes proposed in the infrastructure bill are egregious. For the first time in my entire life I will make a decent amount of money this year and will bump right into top bracket. Giving the government over 50% is insane.

I never said covid wasn't a big deal, or that is wasn't a problem. Again, I said I took it seriously. But to have any sort of lockdowns/mandates at this point are not cool. Or make me choose between a job or some unnecessary medical treatment. the goal posts on vaccine metrics or herd immunity are constantly moved. No one talks about natural immunity. Biden has used excessively divisive language emboldening people who are pro vaccine to accost those who haven't received the vaccine.
I wouldn't mind if this flame war got a little less engagement from some of its participants, personally
What's curious, is that the PR that introduces this change is the only PR on the repo that has discussion limited to collaborators only: https://github.com/dotnet/sdk/pull/22217
Shouldn't we make sure it's a good idea first?
Really, the only option? You must be joking.
I did say that. The definition of product-market fit is indeed "having strong demand".

I am not sure how that relates to a formal definition of demand?
Thank you! The results don't look that great (e.g., EfficientNet models achieve greater accuracy on ImageNet-1000 with ~5x fewer parameters), but the works looks interesting and worthwhile. I'll take a look.
At least that's what they tell us the design was for.
I'm seeing a lot more APIs adding the "Bearer " prefix which I don't really understand. What's the point of it? This particular one doesn't even look like a "conventional" bearer token in the JWT sense.
> You're alienating people like me from being on your side. It doesn't matter that you're probably right.

You're blaming other people for something that is 100% under your control. If you don't want to accept the truth because you don't like the types of people who share it, that's just spite on your part.
There isn't even any blame to deflect! Like, why is this a thing? Does Parson have an axe to grind with that publication? Just stop displaying social security numbers ffs.
If it were "abused" by 100% of filers, it would almost be a UBI. Which would be a good thing. (It would be even better if the procedure for receiving it were "be a human living in USA", rather than submitting complicated bureaucratic forms on a particular schedule.) The problem with EITC and other similar benefits such as those instituted temporarily in response to Covid pandemic is that such benefits invariably have complicated means tests. Without that, not only would IRS examiners have more time to go after the big evaders, not only would more of the "deserving poor" actually receive the benefit, but also it would be great for the economy.
So I guess bring up negative facts is now contempt? One party is very much in favor of a more level playing field, for the most part. One party is very much against it.
It's not written in the announcement, but I am under the impression that Rust 1.56 compiles a bit faster. Is that right ?
Appreciate the additional insight. It wasn't something I gleaned from the blog post. It's something extremely difficult to measure, and open source funding is nebulous in reason and highly inconsistent due to difficulty in gauging value, among other reasons.

The flip-question leaves me a little confused. I hope it wasn't asked out of irritation or to be snide, as my question was very much asked in earnest. I've only ever used Sentry through employers who had a subscription. My experience with the product is mostly positive and I'd say that the folks I worked for thought it was a good value.
Outside of regulation which requires companies to actually hold the reservations, and keep a certain number of reserve vehicles on standby it's not gonna happen because customers will not pay the increased prices that such a company would need to charge. Effectively, the entire system is stuck in a local maximum that is much lower than the global maximum.

One possibility is to simply charge an optional premium price to actually hold a reservation, but I suspect the premium would probably be too high for anyone to really take up and would simply lead to a lot of bad press.
That also feels like regression, environmentally.

We have very good train systems in a lot of European countries. These trains run on electricity (which is mostly nuclear as I understand it), so very low emissions and cost effective.

But instead, let’s promote buses which are slow, polluting, noisy, add to road congestion… still a step better than the individual car but not when trains could be a viable alternative.
Opinions on FlixBus clearly vary but as a .uk person who used to take buses a lot First Group are far from well loved here so this is probably at worst still not actually a downgrade in terms of ownership.
In the US and UK you can choose a (completely unrelated if you want) “minor” subject to broaden your horizons
I've often wondered about this- I mean the US has it's share of coffeehouse anarchists and redistributionists. The large size of the US and the political structure make it hard for e.g. a 'Pirate Party' representative to appear, even if there is the same amount of support per capita.
From what I've read, they are pretty fire resistant because they are dense and so will char and burn slowly. There have been a couple articles on here in the last couple years about "wooden skyscrapers" and they have made that argument.
1/1000 errors/bugs/exceptions are still a big deal in my book! I have a relative who worked in high volume manufacturing. Uncaught errors that could hurt people were still a problem even if they could in theory happen at 10^-7 if you are making billions of something...
> Makes sense since undoubtedly the vast majority of those reserves are inflows

I don't quite follow. How does a Chinese national move money outside China by issuing commercial paper?

Edit: Do you mean something like issue commercial paper and then use proceeds to buy Tether?
It shouldn't even have to go to court to begin with is the real tragedy.