skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Thanks, that's great to know about! Unfortunately it's also experiencing random kernel panics, so I suspect there's more at fault here.
A Wireless Intrusion Detection System for 802.11 WPA3 Networks
If there are disputes about consumption and production across national boundaries, who resolves that? Different parts of the world don’t even have similar objectives within the energy market. I also think an unaccountable international power utility that can control if I survive the winter or not is a terrible idea.
Someone should start an ethical product company that does not take on investors so they cannot lose control and have s** like this happen. It seems like there are a lot of opportunities in the printer and tractor worlds.
New?

This error message has appeared since I first used Netflix.

It happens about one third of all times I pause the video and then try to continue.

F5 will not fix it.

Only solution is to close the browser and open it again.
> However, it is very clearly a supply issue.

Says who?
My mom has implanted electrodes for pain relief, so this technique isn’t new, although it sounds like it might be much more targeted here (and implanted in the brain rather than the pain site)
> They should ... explain the narrative of why the recipe is exciting, and where it comes from, and what it means for the cook.

You've just described practically any modern recipe website.
Instagram Pro Mod v7.80 APK Is Here
How to Choose the Right Database using real world use case?
Gabby Petito. China Mimics the Taliban. Reclaiming Dignity in Digital Age
A business is still an individual customer. (Whether that customer has 1 employee or 1 million) I'm talking "individual" in the many to one sense, not the C in B2C sense.
"We have no idea how they did this"

Hypersonic is Mach 5 or greater. The US often under estimate Chinas will and capability.

Original: https://www.ft.com/content/ba0a3cde-719b-4040-93cb-a486e1f84...

https://archive.is/F8MhB
As someone who owns 6 bikes, been car-free for years, and uses them as his main mode of transportation, I've decided that be best bike one can buy as a daily driver is a Brompton.

They come with fenders, racks, dynamo lights, and internal gear hubs. It checks all the boxes of a "dutch bike" but it's light and portable... so portable that you can take it as carry-on onto an airplane or bus. You can take it into the supermarket and use it as a shopping cart. Hell, they even make electric ones.
I think they understood that. I read that comment as a friendly, good-natured way to point out the typo.
It's hard to understand , not because it's boring, but because it's inherently hard and opaque. If mathematicians tried to make complicated topics easier to understand the papers would be 10x as long.
Can you name one of these sectors? Cloud for instance has cutthroat competition. CRM software as well. Mobile phones also have pretty fierce competition.
Looking thru the source, there are many binary blobs. So no, this is not safe, or auditable without extensive reverse engineering.
I actually tend to agree with this take honestly. If I was an Architect over at netflix implementing QoE, and all my minions were making calls directly to the html element for seeking instead of using the API I created, I'd want to catch that regression quickly too.

That said, there is no public API for that functionality beyond the DOM element for anyone else, so I'm not sure what was expected for any sort of integration.
What's this got to do with "emerging as a field"? Yes Maths is hard, yes generally people don't like to do it, but that doesn't mean it hasn't "emerged as a field".
Every time I read about inflation, it is only attributed to governments via the central banks.

I wonder how it works with the private banks.

Say some entrepreneur goes to their bank and borrows $100k. They try to build a business, pay rent, employees, SAAS license costs, advertising and ... goes bankrupt.

So the $100k never comes back to the bank.

Did this create $100k?
This link gives me a 404.

https://help.obsidian.md/Plugins/List+of+plugins
> I've peripherally known Corretto is the Amazon distribution of Java (specifically, OpenJDK), but I never really looked up what the difference between, say, the releases from AdoptOpenJDK and Corretto are. (...) Did I miss anything?

According to [1], Amazon Corretor is a OpenJDK build which is:

* maintained by Amazon (back ported bug fixes, patches),

* includes Amazon's custom crypto provider optimized for AWS,

* Optimized builds for Amazon's Linux distro, Amazon Linux 2.

[1] https://whichjdk.com/#amazon-corretto
I do get monetary compensation - my salary, which I agreed too while knowing that I’d have to put in extra hours a few times a year.
Angband is way better than real life tho
> The USB in question would need military grade security

Which is widely available and effectively free.

> BTC is a fiat currency whose scarcity is determined by the actions of some random computer programmers who, for now, aren't leveraging that power for their own personal benefit

Statements like this are a sure sign of not actually understanding how Bitcoin works. There is no person or cartel in the world who could successfully unilaterally change the Bitcoin consensus rules.

> Gold is a natural element whose scarcity is a function of the laws of nature

The amount of gold we’ve mined compared to the amount of gold in nature (on earth, in asteroids, etc) is infinitesimal. The amount of Bitcoin we’ve mined is 89.5%.
As a doctor in quantum physics, we probably will be able to test between interpretations in the future, so you should not use this as an argument.
It is established legal precedent that the police have no duty to protect or serve the public

https://www.barneslawllp.com/blog/police-not-required-protec...
For the endgame of this, look no further than Figma. Their entire engine is custom-built in C++ and has been since 2015: https://www.figma.com/blog/building-a-professional-design-to...

> Instead of attempting to get one of [HTML/SVG/JS Canvas] to work, we implemented everything from scratch using WebGL. Our renderer is a highly-optimized tile-based engine with support for masking, blurring, dithered gradients, blend modes, nested layer opacity, and more. All rendering is done on the GPU and is fully anti-aliased. Internally our code looks a lot like a browser inside a browser; we have our own DOM, our own compositor, our own text layout engine, and we’re thinking about adding a render tree just like the one browsers use to render HTML.

For what it's worth, this isn't all that dissimilar from game development on proprietary engines, and that hasn't stopped indie game devs from experimenting. But it will be a huge problem for accessibility.
This PRNG is a truncated LCG. It can be "broken" if enough outputs are known. But that's not news: _any_ PRNG can be predicted if enough outputs are known.

For this specific generator, knowing 6 outputs is not enough to pin down the seventh output. Not by using a NN, not by brute-forcing the possible starting seeds, not by lattice methods, not by solving a linear system over a finite field. Unless you know the internal state of the generator, you won't be able to predict the seventh output. And the first 6 outputs simply don't reveal enough information to recover the internal state.
How to Evaluate If Deep Learning Is Right for You?
Teams is creepy. This feature is creepy and creates drama for people who don't feel they get enough attention.

"Sorry, we are going to let you go because you didn't say 5 nice things a day to your coworkers."

"But last month the metrics said we needed to offer praise four times a day."

"We are cutting people who don't go above and beyond"

Fast forward to the next job, where our protagonist has made a script to automatically send out meaningless praise to colleagues.

"Good work, <Coworker> on your <Item completed in ADO>."
Solution: This already exists, Google Lighthouse is one (https://developers.google.com/web/tools/lighthouse) but many non-Google alternatives exists too (https://alternativeto.net/software/google-lighthouse/)
Also Joplin's mobile app is poor compared to obsidian's, and that's with obsidian basically just shoving the same content as in the desktop app into a mobile web view.
Reading the article on which this is based (https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.06636), the researchers don't appear to specify how they randomly select the 25 interests from the interests assigned to a user. This could have a considerable effect on their results, leading to a number somewhat higher than 22.

The random selection could be uniform or it could be weighted by the global popularity of the interests. Presumably it's uniform. But if so, you could challenge the reasonableness of that assumption since it would be more likely to know a more common interest of a user that one in the tail of the distribution.

For example, suppose I have three interests, two of which are very common and one of which is extremely niche. If you select two of these interests uniformly at random, chances are you'll get the niche one and be highly likely to identify me. OTOH if you randomly select weighted by the global popularity of the three interests, chances are that you'll get the two common interests and be very unlikely to identify me.
You can't begin work as a doctor until you're in your thirties. Usually with a ton of debt.
My agenda is, I don't like it when healthy young people develop debilitating heart problems, and I hope to avoid that as much as possible. Were you hoping for something more than that?

And let's please stop with the account age shaming. There are reasons why people who want to keep posting to HN have to create new accounts sometimes, but it's against the rules to discuss it, so let's drop that and talk about the information in the document.
Not seeing real-life examples is the most frustrating thing about JD in my opinion. Not John Noble's fault of course. In that spirit. My structure is below.

- 10-19 Documents
- 11 Scans
- 12 Health
- 13 Travel
- 14 Contracts
- 15 Home
- 16 Visas
- 17 Education
- 18 Employment

- 20-29 Finance
- 21 Banks
- 22 Bills
- 23 Investments
- 24 Taxes

- 30-39 Hobbies
- 31 Hiking
- 32 Running
- 33 Climbing
- 34 Music
- 35 Programming
- 36 Yoga

- 40-49 UNUSED

- 50-59 Work
- 51 Archive
- 52 Work Project 1
- 53 Work Project 2
- 54 Literature
- 55 Code in language 1
- 56 Code in language 2
- 57 Publications
- 58 PPTs
- 59 Trainings

- 60-69 UNUSED

- 70-79 UNUSED

- 80-89 UNUSED

- 90-99 Writing
- 91 Drafts
- 92 Personal Vault
- 93 Work Vault
- 94 Website 1 SSG contents
- 95 Website 2 SSG contens

I generated this using: https://johnny-decimal-generator.netlify.app/

The Writing bits contain my two obsidian vaults as well as the static site generator contents for two websites I write on. As you can see, pretty much most things of any importance are covered, and yet I've got tonnes of space free to add onto later. Hope HN formats this danged list properly.

I'm far from a strict adherent to it though. Not everything is three levels deep. Some things are much more than that (like the SSG stuff for instance). But this is real life and not an abstraction after all.
Wireheads incoming
I think them being separated makes sense if you think how it's really targeted towards in-field experts. Usually if you know the field it's very clear which results come from which methods.

Not saying the status quo is optimal of course just why it is the way it is now and probably won't change soon
> Which is widely available and effectively free

What? Who is going to fight off people trying to obtain or destroy that USB drive to increase the value of their own holdings (i.e. speed up deflation by reducing available bitcoin), or extract the passcode from its owner, for free?

EDIT: I realize this is the plot of Goldfinger, but the author did invoke Fort Knox, and the strategy of destroying stores of value to increase the worth of your own stash makes sense.
are these numbers correct by wide margin? Because I know many browsers like brave etc seems to use Google User Agent. And the funny thing is I am on firefox and I use Google Chrome UA so that skype etc works.
So Google's Lighthouse? Or more on-the-fly fixes by the webserver like mod_pagespeed?
Not trying to brag but I've crossed hundreds of bridges.
And this is why you need ad blockers and privacy protection plugins for your web browser. If you can't stop Facebook snooping on you at least make it hard for them. As my grandfather taught me, "if you can't win then make it hard for the other guy to win."
I would have hoped to see the tech take on "42". It's ascii for the widely used wildcard, the asterisk.
>shorten this feedback loop

Lasting help on this cannot be had in any short time, because cultural change is required: A citizenry engaged with and learning about government at a practical, local level -- rather than playing games to maximize the volume and audience of their own ranting.

Schools would have to teach concepts like "regulatory capture", "rule of law rather than of men", "plausible deniability" -- along with the fundamental math, economics, and cultural history needed to apply them.

And parents would have to inspire their children to some effort in outward, altruistic directions, rather than inward, to their own immediate pleasure.

It starts with families, and with schools.
I think yes. The money will remain in circulation forever.
Hell has become much scarier than it used to be. There's a pretty cool new species that can't use spellbooks but gains spells at level ups and trains all spellcasting form a single skill. Food is gone. Many quality of life simplifications. Most spells have become a more interesting than the previous iteration of "fire blast" vs. "ice blast".

I'd say on a whole it's become a much nicer experience.
Useful, thank you. It appears that this is the setting the Ubuntu / Gnome's "Power -> Power mode" setting changes as well.
They're going to more heavily regulate it over time. That's how they're going to deal with Bitcoin. The goal will be to keep it at the margin (compared to other assets, other investments), along with gold ownership. They can and will easily accomplish that outcome (which also doesn't prevent Bitcoin from gradually becoming a multi trillion dollar entity given the scale of the global economy).

There's likely to be no need for the US Government to worry about, for example, confiscating Bitcoin as FDR's administration did with gold. Today Bitcoin is comparable to Facebook's market cap. Back in FDR's day the scale of US gold holdings in relation to the US economy and its asset base was radically greater than these entities are today (today gold holdings in the US are trivial compared to the US stock market or housing market). For that type of confiscation event to happen Bitcoin would have to become a super giant asset vs global currencies, which will only occur if the US Dollar, Euro and Yen collapse or something close to it. If that happens, all manner of confiscations will be on the table, a lot of very, very bad things will be occurring.
How automatic mahjong table works [video]
Not my experience - people usually start hating things after first experience with them... because if you never used it, hating it just stupid.

So for example with Jupyter notebook, the easiest way to reuse code is copy-paste. Sure, you can open library py file in a separate window and keep reloading, but this is pretty painful and most tutorials don’t cover this aspect. So if I were an engineer trying to directly use code from jupyter notebooks? I’d hate them a lot. (Fwiw I personally don’t care, and even use them occasionally, great for demos!]

And that answers why JavaScript gets so much hate: because it is forced in the face of pretty much everyone. Example: First time I encountered it, I was working on this nice C++ codebase.. and then I had to debug visualizer in JS and apparently global “array” class had some methods with generic unprefixed names injected that made buttons! And then it broke, because a different library also injected generic unprefixed names into global array class. This was the flagrant abstraction violation, and the stupidest decision I have ever seen in my programming carrier. In C, this problem was discovered and fixed decades ago, and those JS people just ignored those lessons from the past. And don’t get me started on non-existing error handling.

So no, no parroting, just an outsider seeing the bad decisions with the fresh eyes.
Yesterday I noticed 42 is shorthand for 420. Today I'm annoyed.
I have not tried it yet, but will defently check it out!
Quantum computing isn't fringe science and almost no one in the physics community questions the validity of the underlying theories. It is a large engineering challenge so it's unclear whether a working large-scale quantum computer will be realized anytime soon, but that doesn't make it fringe science.
Only way to make sure.

Alternatively, throw a pinch of sand on the keyboard, close the lid, bag the Mac. Now, with some vigor, take it out blindly by any corner and trow it down on the thick wooden table, slamming it with it's own weight.

A few times.

And tell me how that gentle test went for you. :)
I've seen a video of these protestors(looked like a quite tour group) politely asking things of the security there. It looked fake judging by how the media blew this up. Never saw that video again, just disappeared. Tech is aligned with the establishment, they have been censoring videos at the request of our politicians for a while now. That technically isnt government censorship is it?
But were Go modules a better solution in that space? Should we have stuck with a less better approach (not casting a judgement on dep necessarily) just because it was an earlier attempt to deal with the same problem?
It’s not kind to encourage delusions or mental illness.
Loving someone enough to tell them the truth is kind.
>Also I am still bitter that the DRM race led to the death of 3D sound cards and some cool stuff that was possible with analog video on Windows versions before Vista.

I share your bitterness about this same issue.
Word on the street is fed "printing money" = "inflation like Venezuela." I've had these conversations dozens of times this year. I'm not extra smart, but somehow almost everybody misses your point about demand.

There is also the matter of where the money the fed "prints" ends up. Its not handing out singles, they're using other instruments like buying paper. I'm not educated enough to recount exactly what the mechanisms are.

If you allow me to contrive that essentially the fed is buying stock dips for example, the funds they are creating to do so doesn't end up as you mentioned buying loafs of bread and driving up demand, it ends up in the dragon's horde of large corporations and the beneficiaries of the windfall.

So the ultra-wealthy, corporations, large institutional funds (Stanford?) and/or corporate stakeholders see their paper balances of stocks increase, and along with the fabulous credit that having lots of assets brings you, they are free to leverage these assets to consolidate other assets such as real estate, stocks (and buybacks), maybe (but probably not given the yeilds) bonds and maybe a yacht or three.

Corporations, institutions, and ultra-wealthy wouldn't suddenly be able to afford to pay off their credit cards or buy extra calculators or yogurt, that is covered nicely in the first 100k/yr.

The rest is fiefdoms and trust funds for generational transmission. Probably lobbyists too.

Gotta add about 401k/retirement plans: That money is more or less a stipend for end-of-life, how much could that really balance the scale given the facts about the business cycle?
The argument was not about interviews but tests and skills. Which I did.

The "luck/unfair" argument is exactly what I was talking about. You shouldn't need luck to get hired in a system after 7+ years of hard work.

Add to that that I've seen a lot of incompetent people (both in skills, dedication or even diligence) in the field. This renders the excellence argument moot.

The system is filled with low efficiency bits at every scale, HR only call you if they match a tag or a fancy school, the tech interviewer might very well be a young dude knowing moot but not willing to annoy his superior with bad hires. It's mostly tribalism and politics driving the machine. Not objective qualities.
The conditions that are left when those above median have chosen theirs. If you want better you work for it. If you don't want better then you share the work those who worked for theirs produced. So you work just as much as you want, and others working more means those who don't have more.

It is true that if you want a luxury resource, like a very attractive location to live in, then others working more for that position means you also would have to work harder if you want to have it. But I don't consider people competing for luxury resources a problem, no that is a feature and is what makes the economy tick. If you don't want that rat race you have to live in median conditions.
Not so long as there are still farmers and the Iowa caucus is first.
Here in Switzerland the calculation on whether you can afford a mortgage is made based on a fictional increase of interest rates to 5%, so probably the same people could still afford the same mortgages for quite a while. Prices are still insane.
One doesn't have to be a professional anthropologist to see that since some time in the 19th century “science” became a popular set of religious beliefs that explain the world to a commoner, thanks to mass education. Semi-jokingly, the watershed was when charlatans started promoting snake oils using scientific language. The spherical Universal Observer in a vacuum, which is understood (at least by some scientists) to be an idealized part of the imaginary model cleaned from the impurities of reality, is considered a possibility, a goal, a metaphor of “all human knowledge combined” in that trivialized belief.

Various faces of scientism have been criticized in various ways for all that time, from obvious examples in Dostoevsky novels to hardcore philosophical papers.
I think the point is that it's just a random number.

And here we are trying to associate meaning to a random number like we do to all the other random events/things that happen in life.

Like writing an article after 42 years as if it means something.
Pretty sure Yahoo and google both had a service that did that a decade or more ago.
That would be a brilliant move. Elon's expertise in defying covid rules would keep the factory running.
Apple benefits its own ads in the name of privacy
> What if no one wants that 1 hour of labor?

Doesn't have to be hours, the hour was just to represent that it is a human working and not a finite resource. Different human work can be valued differently.
So Expensive Season 5 Marathon – So Expensive [YouTube]
It's self imposed because mathematicians love to use their own notation.

Math is at its core philosophy and logic, they are both hard too, but they don't get the same level of hatred that math gets because unlike mathematicians philosophers and rational thinkers take the time to explain what goes through their mind instead of condensing very complex thoughts in 20 characters strings.

Turns out there are some social rules which not even math can break, if your attitude is :

"I don't give a damn about people understanding what I am trying to say, they are all dumb and uninteresting because they don't even put the time in to learn my special notation"

You won't be very popular. And your field will be kinda hated, which is what is happening.
Not paranoid. There are many undocumented binary blobs. I wouldn't touch this project. Not worth he risk.
This is true, but one problem is that in our current system fairness is always secondary. Something we tweak for when things go askew. A more ideal economy would flip this around, to ensure we don't allow some people to spoil it for others. And certainly not a minority spoiling it for the majority, as is the case all too often. The law simply can't keep up with the evil business schemes cooked up by a rich and greedy minority.