skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Despite its reputation, Kubernetes is actually quite easy to master for simple use cases.

This has so many assumptions rolled up in it. When we move from niche assumptions to the masses of app operators and cluster operators (two different roles) it tends to fall apart.

Which ultimately leads to things like...

> This has some great account of war stories - https://k8s.af/

We shouldn't assume other people are like us. It's worth understanding who folks are. Who is that ops person who wants to run Kubernetes at that insurance company or bank? Who is the person setting up apps to run for that auto company? What do they know, need, and expect?

When I answer these questions I find someone far different from myself and often someone who finds Kubernetes to be complicated.
First author's layman description: https://twitter.com/rishirajgoel/status/1448711946010710023
Relevant, from deep in the footnotes of a 1820 edition of Nennius I found in a used bookstore

>Not only men, but women were thus occupied, to whose insufficiency the defects of many manuscripts are assignable. (P. Sarti de Profess. Bonon.) This authority refers to the female scribes of Bologna. We may, however, believe the practice to have been general; for Engelhardus (anno 1200) reports an accident which happened to a nun in the exercise of her employment: "Cum soror una cui usus erat scribendi membranam, dum ad lineas punctaret subulam incaute trahens, oculum transfigit." Defective transcript is, however, not solely to be attributed to females; for the accurate and elegant Petrarch indignantly exclaims, "Who shall prescribe an effectual remedy for the ignorance and worthlessness of copiers, who spoil and confuse the performances they undertake?---At this time, every one who can redden letters or guide a pen, though void of learning, skill, or ability, assumes the character of a scribe. I should not censure their defects in orthography (for that is a long forgotten art,) if they would faithfully transcribe what is before them. They might betray their insufficiency, but we should have in the copy the substance of the original. They now confound both together, and, by substituting one thing for another, we can scarce identify the author from which they transcribed. If Cicero, Livy, and many other illustrious writers, could return to life, and re-peruse their own compositions, would they understand them, and doubting the whole, would they believe them to be their own, or rather, those of some barbarous people?"
The comment you're replying to says "using company resources", those are the operative words here.
Most of the big Bitcoin talking heads did.
I think both work.
They already have an insurance in California. However in California some of the scoring system is not allowed, its essentially insurance version 1.

The reason why it is not in other places is that insurance regulation is insane and totally different in every state.
I agree 100%, and not letting stocks crash is a severe policy error.
The 'proposed solution's tramples on a fundamentally more important right.
That's actually out of date.. a decade ago, the US FDIC upped the limit to $250k per depositor.
I was going to donate $1000 to charity (or nothing to charity), but now I have the option to pay an additional $100 gas/minting fee for a pointless proof-of-wasted-energy token?
Saudi Falcon
>The way you talk about addiction, however, makes me think you don't really understand how it works and seemingly view any addiction that isn't physical as invalid and that is not how it works.

Poor assumption. Psychological addictions are just as valid as physical, and I've never claimed otherwise. I just believe that you cannot legislate the sources of psychological addictions like you can with sources of physical ones. Primarily because literally anything can be a source of psychological addiction, depending on the flavor of the month.

Cannabis has a strong psychological addiction component, and yet people tend to conveniently forget about it when it comes to legalizing it recreationally (I am in full support of the legalization btw).

Why? I think we know why, it is because people decided that it is the responsibility of an individual to not abuse something that doesn't have a physical addiction component. But if they end up getting psychologically addicted and need help, then sure, I am all in favor of supporting those people and helping them to get out of the addiction rut they are in.
The risk is certainly not zero but the calculation isn't that simple because the underlying mechanism isn't random. Vaccines work by training your immune system and don't persist in your body; for long-term concerns what we're really looking for is evidence that there's a previously-unknown time delay mechanism for immune responses or evidence of something specific to a disease such as the way Dengue fever can be more severe on a second infection (which is why the vaccine is restricted to people with a prior laboratory-confirmed infection).

Again, I'm not saying that there's no chance of a problem but by now a billion people have been vaccinated and a significant number of people are 18+ months out, with no indication that any of these hypothetical scenarios are actually happening.
> Tuesday's report showed that hiring slowed in August, while the number of jobs available fell to 10.4 million, from a record high of 11.1 million in July. The largest decreases in job openings were in health care and social assistance (-224,000); accommodation and food services (-178,000); and state and local government education (-124,000).

> The date on quits is likely too early to show the impact of vaccine mandates. It wasn't until mid-September that President Joe Biden on Thursday announced sweeping new federal vaccine requirements for as many as 100 million Americans — private-sector employees as well as health care workers and federal contractors.
That makes sense. If the original complaint wasn't "busting trusts" is opposed to libertarian values, but rather "some of the existing techniques to bust trusts" is opposed to libertarian values, then this makes sense as the libertarian friendly approach to busting trusts.

Thanks for that clarification!
It really depends on how the library is written, and how much shared data it has. It has been very common to use GIL as a general-purpose synchronization mechanism in native Python modules, since you have to pay that tax either way.
But that's the whole problem with "trusting" microsoft. Their stated motto used to be "embrace, extend, extinguish". How do we know that has seriously changed on all levels?

I do not believe that Microsoft is fundamentally on board with the open source model. Its an alliance of convenience. If suddenly they think they can make more money some other way, they'll do that. They might not even actually destroy anything explicitly, merely ruin things out of indifference.
#1 & #2 dont touch with a barge pole.

#3 get a copy of excel.
They just actually bought up a lot of Australia’s electricity grid, no need to back door it (tho when you own it I guess you can do that too)

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-08-21/chinese-investment-in...
I feel like the title is a bit misleading. The article doesn't much talk about the planned walk out, instead it focuses on the aforementioned employee being fired on suspicion of leaking internal metrics about a show that is apparently controversial (which I have never seen so I don't have any opinion or reference) and about other employees.

I'll confess I don't know anything about anything- I certainly don't have any insight into what evidence Netflix has to support the assertion that this employee was the leak; I doubt we'll ever see it.

I guess I'm just grousing about the title implying the employee was fired for organizing the walkout, yet the article doesn't expound upon the employee referenced by the title, the titular planned walkout, or the evidence for or against the title's implication. Instead, it mentions a show, some private metrics that were leaked to Bloomberg, 3 employees (at least one of whom is a trans software engineer) who were suspended for attending a high-level meeting they weren't allowed to listen in on and then reinstated after public pressure. So why imply that Netflix would fire an employee (who happens to be both black and pregnant) for organizing a walkout in the name of activism that hasn't even taken place yet in order to protest the show referenced by the leaked metrics if the only time they're going to bother even asserting the title's implication is when quoting an employee about discrimination?

Is discrimination the reason she was fired? Is it retaliation for a walkout that has yet to take place? Is there a smoking gun indicating that she was the one leaking private company data? I honestly don't have a clue and we probably won't ever know for sure. But for once I'd like to read an article where the experience at least begins in good faith instead of implying a conclusion without ever actually going into detail about it.
[/rant]
https://old.reddit.com/r/HermanCainAward/comments/psspcx/a_g...
Going with that comparison, it's like having an especially vicious rage towards feminist women who are homophobic, despite almost everybody else also being homophobic.
Dividing your attention between two different messaging apps is more than twice as inconvenient/costly as having just one. If the first company to lay tracks could force later companies to charge double for journeys along their parallel tracks, then that would be a clearly anti-competitive situation.

The situation is even worse with messaging apps than with railroads, though, since there is a coordination problem between customers/users of each service, rather than each customer/user being able to make their choice of service in isolation. It's very hard for a messaging service to compete if it requires users to ruin the experience of not just themselves but also at least one of their friends.
I haven’t used it but Hasura[0] supports MS SQL
[0] https://hasura.io/docs/latest/graphql/core/databases/ms-sql-...
Ha that would be cool but actually I just followed up on my old email
Really nice. I could really have used this when I was getting started. I'm sure I'll still refer to it from time to time.

[I used to get peeved about calling long pages 'cheatsheets' being used to compact formatted for double-sided laserprinting. But then I realize I'm old and no one uses paper. An even denser pdf or HTML/CSS page would still be very much appreciated.]
The title is falsified within a few sentences of the story, where it becomes clear that:

Most Canadians believe that Facebook harms the mental health of others; their own use of Facebook is healthy and fine.

Facebook issues are everyone else's problem, not mine, believes the average Facebook user.
> the constitution, even considering the various amendments, is unfortunately not aligned with your opinion.

Sure it is. Article I of the Constitution says that all legislative power shall be vested in Congress. That means anything that has the force of law--and all Federal regulations created by executive branch agencies under the current US regulatory regime have the force of law; you can be fined or jailed for violating them--has to be passed by Congress using the process described in Article I. So any Federal regulation that has not been passed by that process--i.e., every one of them--is unconstitutional.

The fact that current US jurisprudence disagrees with that statement just illustrates how far current US jurisprudence has diverged from what the Constitution actually says. The status of Federal regulations is by no means the only example: current US jurisprudence says that Congress can regulate farmers growing crops for their own personal use because of the Commerce Clause; and that a city government can use the eminent domain power to evict people from their homes and turn the property over to a private development corporation (that ends up never developing the land anyway), and that counts as a "public use" under the Fifth Amendment.
I guess we’ll find out on Monday, but have you seen anything to suggest Apple is releasing new Intel models? Everything I’ve seen says that they’re transitioning completely to the M1/M1X.
This is the classical "broken window fallacy", for which there are multiple convincing refutations. I'm sure you can find them yourself. But besides that, wouldn't you want most of your tax money spent on the things it is purportedly spent on (setting aside even whether spending it on those things makes sense in the first place, which is something we the people have zero control over), without leaving most of it in the pockets of whoever owns the federal contractor?
>Furthermore pretty much everybody in every non-western country is a TERF.

I don't think you know a lot of the meanings of words you're using. Firstly "TERF" ideology is pretty new and not the "traditional position of gender debates." It branched off of recent feminist movements. Most of non-western countries are not TERFs, probably not even feminist by most current definitions, and definitely not radical.
I think a better scenario would be if games I paid for worked offline after the developers leave, and there were no micro transactions.
Your layman definitions of monopoly do not matter when it comes to antitrust laws[3]:

> Courts do not require a literal monopoly before applying rules for single firm conduct; that term is used as shorthand for a firm with significant and durable market power — that is, the long term ability to raise price or exclude competitors. That is how that term is used here: a "monopolist" is a firm with significant and durable market power.

[1] https://www.ftc.gov/tips-advice/competition-guidance/guide-a...
> Gjøvik’s latest charge alleges that Tim Cook’s anti-leaking memo might violate US labor law. In September, the CEO sent a note to all Apple employees saying that “people who leak confidential information do not belong” at Apple.

Is The Verge implying that it might violate labour laws to say that people who leak confidential information will be fired? Even for someone from social democratic Scandinavia, it's very hard to object to leakers being fired.
No, really? And comedy isn't?
Alcoholics know they are destroying their liver buy still drink, heavy caffeine addicts know their sleep cycle is being disrupted but still drink coffee. Thing is, there is a socially acceptable amount that not significantly destructive. I can drink a coffee at 8 am and still get to sleep, I can have a beer at the monthly game night and still have a functional healthy liver. How much social media can I consume and not fall in depression, compulsive behavior or be polarized in a fringe ideology?

Well for me I have mostly quit Facebook (other than messenger and using it for event scheduling for game night.) I don't do TikTok, Twitter, or Instagram. I only use Reddit for niche interest/hobbies and deleted all the default subs. I only use Snapchat to talk to a couple of people because its the best way to get ahold of them, and then there a couple of forums like hackernews i lurk and occasionaly post in and that enough for me.

Used in moderation social media is fine. Just like a beer every month or so or a coffee in the morning
I have a friend who has an M1 and runs StarCraft I and II on it without a problem. I don’t know much more beyond that.
Transphobia is contradictory to any definition of feminism rooted in the actual history of feminism. TERF ideology depends on the belief that trans women are confused men, trans men are confused lesbians, and nonbinary people are just confused.
There's a couple of big reasons, as I see it:

- licensing: some people, myself included, think a FOSS/Libre license such as LGPL/GPL3 is better for people and society. Android is mostly apache, which means it's not resistant at all to a company "stealing" it without giving back to the community.

- dependency on google: like it or not, key components of android are completely maintained by google. That means that the future of an open platform is at the whims of one organization. Sure, you could fork, but android is a massive project and a small team could hardly keep up.

- "the core of android can still be used by any phone manufacturer": android, and the related IPs, is pretty firmly in the control of the US government. A lot of funding for non-android mobile OSes comes from other governments interested in a platform and support that is unencumbered from five eyes states

My personal opinion? Having more platforms is good, as are more compatibility layers. Android is more than just an OS or a platform, it's a set of ABIs for running apps that's used by over a billion people.
It will once the various factories have been blown up. Imagine they are in the short list.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qTiQOaxR1VU
I was using Spotify before, until they ruined my playlists by pulling most of the musics on them...
Not only that, but Calgary was the place young people were coming just 5-10 years ago. We were (and in many ways still are) a really young city.
I watched it as well. All nuance on the topic has been obliterated by the topic being absorbed into the larger culture war, but above anything it just wasn't funny.

On net, the people calling Chapelle out are more correct than his defenders. He really did spend an hour making unfunny jokes at trans people's expense. Was the whole thing as bad as many who didn't watch it are assuming based on a few cherry picked quotes? No, but it was still pretty bad.

Should Netflix remove it? I wouldn't say so, but I think much of the criticism is well deserved if lacking nuance.
That app is different from the Quest version of Virtual Desktop. The steam version runs on a PC and lets you use your desktop while in VR (on a headset connected to the PC). The quest version runs on the quest (with a paired "streamer" app on the PC) and lets you wirelessly connect to your PC. While connected to your PC through the quest app you can not only view your desktop, but also can play any pc vr game.

The quest app is one of the popular ways to wirelessly connect to a PC and play PCVR experiences. Other ways include Oculus's offical Airlink, and a free open source app called ALVR. Personally, I find Virtual Desktop the best experience out of those, but I think many people prefer Airlink.

if you purchase the steam version instead of the oculus store version, you would need to find another method to connect your Quest to a PC.
Its this sort of sensational/half-true reporting that makes people lose faith in media brands.
Somewhat related is the r/LeopardsAteMyFace/ subreddit, of the Leopards Eating People's Faces Party. (https://www.reddit.com/r/LeopardsAteMyFace/
The rates are mostly affected by sudden changes in demand.

The demand for Tether comes mostly from Binance and the other centralized Asian exchanges.
The demand for Circle dollars comes from the DeFi ecosystem and FTX.
Based on the animosity of the masks, I would not be surprised where you will not be allowed to wear a mask in public just so some people can prove a point. Buisness owners are already refusing service to people wearing masks in some places (you can probably guess where if you're not already familiar).
> I am entirely serious when I say that I believe it is designed

This is entirely conspiratorial. Subscribers are subscribed to this not through some advertising campaign, but because they already believed those people deserved to die.
Many very old games worked flawlessly on my girlfriend's M1 MBP. Baldurs Gate, Diablo, etc.
Needs an RSS feed :P
You have the same rights as every biological man or woman that was born in us (depending on your sex). You already have equal treatment. You want to extend, change and bend the law because the outcomes with current system doesn't suit you
The difference being that pro-gay activists are not doing any of the bad and absurd things that pro-trans activists are doing: attacking freedom of speech, denying the biological basis of sex in the ape species Homo sapiens, ending people's careers who disagree with them, attacking feminism, damaging pro-gay movements, canceling people, etc. You don't get to assume that people aren't angry about the behavior of pro-trans activists or are too scared to say so publicly: they have behaved awfully in recent years.
TypeORM is not fantastic.

https://redd.it/lwje83

What other frameworks have you used professionally?
this is so hyperbolic, people have been saying political correctness is killing comedy for decades and it’s fine - louis ck literally ejaculated in front of women without their consent and is still touring and doing comedy
There's a stable definition in textbooks.

If 2021 consumer media is offering variable definitions, Cui Bono?
Because it's factually not. You can't get the art from the hash. It's one-way. That's the whole point, to create artificial scarcity and non-fungibility.

Since it's not actually a copy, there's no first sale doctrine license to the copyright, making it illegal to have a copy of the art unless you have a separate licensing agreement. And if you do have such an agreement, that's the thing giving practical value.

You and I can agree that a rock represents your car, but I'm still not going to pay you for it.
Hm, I wonder who mschuster91 is. Let's click on his username...

> You call it "alt-left", I proudly call it "Antifa".

It's interesting to see a "proudly Antifa" account on HN with 10k karma complaining about Republicans in Texas. A comment like that would typically be chastised by dang for being predictable, political flamebait, but accounts with 10k karma seem to get away with a lot here.
You mean a liability for the users of that exchange
The BTC price increase is because of rumors of a US BTC ETF being approved. The Tether fine is a non-event in crypto social networks.
I am trans. The debate is that I would like to live, and they do not want me to live. Either I'm a human being or I'm not, but framing it as a debate does very little to conceal the violence.

Netflix platformed violence which didn't surprise me, what does surprise me is the extent to which people play it off as just jokes or bring out the same tired token minority friend defense
Well, I've been hanging around feminist women for some decades and my perception of events is that a significant proprtion of women who used to just be called feminists now get dragged for being TERFs.
Thanks for that context. I learned a bit about something new :)
Covid vaccines reduce symptoms. They increase the risk of asymptomatic transmission, since the person would otherwise self-isolate.

BBC article on immunity, https://www.bbc.com/news/health-58270098

> There is a whole different suite of antibodies (known as immunoglobulin As) in the nose and lungs, compared with those (immunoglobulin Gs) that we measure in the blood. The former is more important as a barrier to infection. Natural infection, because it is in the nose rather than a jab in the arm, may be a better route to those antibodies, and nasal vaccines are being investigated too.

Intramuscular (arm injection) vs intranasal (inhaled) vaccines: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28165287

Nasal vaccine trials: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28284504
In my state, the "app" is actually a website (https://myirmobile.com/).
I sincerely hope you're being sarcastic.
Not even remotely similar.

I am once again reminded of my favorite Dril tweet "the wise man bowed his head solemnly and spoke: 'theres actually zero difference between good & bad things. you imbecile. you fucking moron'".

Loudly proclaiming ignorance (usually ideologically driven) of modern medicine while actively endangering those around you and then facing the consequences of your actions is a totally different beast than making a decision about your body (or affirming something about your body) and societal pressure around that decision fueling depression and resulting in suicide.

HCA is much more similar to looking at posts made by people who drive drunk celebrating their inability to drive sober and then that person dying in a single person car accident.

Really gross take.

[1] https://twitter.com/dril/status/473265809079693312?lang=en