skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
OAuth is typically used to delegate authorization, e.g. let some site or CLI read your GitHub repos.

To be able to delegate authorization in this scenario, you're first going to have to prove who you are to GitHub. Thats where you'd use WebAuthn.

They basically solve separate problems.

Now, when you are doing OpenID Connect (which adds Authentication), this becomes more of a question like - do I have users sign in with their Github account to my site, or do I just support all that directly via WebAuthn. Quite a bit more overlap. *

However, its not that uncommon for sites to support multiple ways to log in. Having a cloud-based login and a local login might prevent some random event causing the user to completely lose the ability to log in.

* Note I took some license here, since Github built their own thing rather than using OpenID Connect.
It also has the benefit of apparently producing a high purity carbon sheet having existing industrial applications. The cost could be offset substantially if they're producing inputs for high margin industries like carbon fiber products...
As capex shared, you get text too.

https://github.com/carbon-app/carbon#exporting--sharing
Out of curiosity, how confident are you that there aren’t any other novel systems that didn’t exist before on a similar level as MCAS?

Having not had a public debacle around them, how much effort would it take for you to personally certify that MCAS is the only novel system of its caliber on these aircraft?
This guy[1] seems to like using the Quest 2 as a monitor replacement for 8 hours a day, 5 days a week. Previous HN discussion[2].

[1] https://blog.immersed.team/working-from-orbit-39bf95a6d385

[2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28678041
No, he’s implying that an infinite series doesn’t have to be infinite in both directions to be infinite.
Yes there is an interview with that feature phone guy on Hanselminutes podcast.
Why do you say FAANG has been an intelligence front since the beginning?
Why is D the one for you? Between Crystal, Zig, Nim and D it does seems that D is the most "mature" and production ready...
Yeah, it's generally understood that you need to change the URL to cache-bust when the content changes, but it's easy to forget that you need to do the same thing if important headers change.

Hmm, I think I'll add a section to the article on this when I'm back at my laptop.
I had the rare opportunity to visit Encana's offices in the Bow a number of years ago... Their offices really embodied the "live large" aspect of oil & gas.

As the founder of a small company that hadn't yet turned a profit, I was suitably impressed. Sad to hear they no longer even occupy the space.

On the other hand, their tech scene blew me away. Polar opposite of Toronto's "network first, friends later" attitude. Startups were helping each other out as a matter of course, whereas it always seemed like a competition in TO.
CORS has been no shortage of greys in my beard!

When I'm writing some frontend that is hosted on localhost, with an API that is hosted on its domain somewhere, it always is some sort of PITA to get the dev environ started.

There's a plugin for firefox that ignores CORS which is helpful for this. It's becoming less useful for me as my APIs now usually have a toggle to add a cross origin header which allows localhost. Still useful.
Does the supreme court, currently the closest we have to monarchs, generate better outcomes? Arguably not.

I believe it's the institutions of selection that matter more. Who and what are they constituents of and where have we manufactured their incentives to be.

For instance let's say you have unborn generations rights such as say the right to a tamer climate, just as a theoretical example. Then you could take people into courts for violating those rights.

You could have some kind of trust that can fund candidates based on long term ROIs so if they say, support early childhood education, a great ROI, they can access funds as an instrument of debt (really an issued bond) which will be covered by the yield of their investments into our children's futures.

So for instance, there's some agreed upon metric that ever dollar invested in preschool will generate an extra say $100 in lifetime earnings, taxed at ~30%, that dollar will yield a 30x return. So a debt instrument of say $1 funding per dollar invested up to some cap is issued by a trust to future generations to finance candidates who will allocate funds accordingly. The bond will be paid in the future through the increased tax revenue. It can be a convertible note so if the politician fails to act, it can become debt on the books. This makes the pool of money more secure the more candidates dip into it, creating a virtuous cycle and thus institutionalizing it.

Candidates who successfully diligently invest in far future payoffs, perhaps well after they're dead, will have access to a large pool of money to win election today.

If corporations and other legal fictions have rights, there's really no reason they can't be granted to other concepts as well.
Things are getting a bit wild since the pandemic but prior to 2020 we only had a handful of tech IPOs per year, for every Uber there were thousands of promising failed startups.

That's why in my other replies in this thread I recommend only joining later stage startups that are backed by top VCs and have clear product market fit. At that point things are derisked and compensation is pretty competitive with larger tech companies.

When I was graduating I had an option to work at Google or be the first employee at a very promising startup. I chose the startup and worked my ass off, the company raised a ton of money and got too big to be an acquisition target but not successful enough to IPO. My friends who went to work at Google made 2-3x more than me in salary and their RSUs 10xed during that time, all of them have millions in the bank. I bounced around incubators and in the startup ecosystem and have not met many people who did better than an average engineer at FAANG, in most cases the ones that did were founders.

The only people consistently getting rich off of startups are VCs.

EDIT: I do have to admit that I enjoyed startup life and got to work on and learn things that I'd never get to at a large company.

EDIT: Also if you're set on startups I'd recommend working at FAANG for a few years first, saving up and then bootstrapping your own company for a year or two before you think about investors. Being a founder is a completely different experience than an employee, you hold a lot more equity and have much more control over things.
Yeah but after each "validation round", the stock option grant for new hires becomes 0.1x before the validation. Kinda sucks to join right after Series A, get a tiny % (say less than 0.1%) of the company even after 4 years of grinding away, and even then the company doesn't go public so your options are still worth a tiny % of... zero.

Right now it only kinda makes sense when you join as a co-founder (at most seed round; definitely not post-series-A), or pre-IPO.
Wow. They didn’t go after an executive? Just a pilot? So blatantly corrupt.
Why does it have to be a conspiracy, rather than the wheels of bureaucracy churning. The export of American culture is as strong as ever, and rather than considering evil intent, consider ignorance. An individual, faceless government unit, deemed "Department of Health", consisting of individuals who had the media spotlight on them for the past few months, power and prestige compared to before, can choose to fund certain studies.

Studies, many of which are absolutely useless, pounded out by the hundreds of thousand over the past 2 years in the name of moral good and saving lives.

Constant hypocrisy from certain protests being good for health, to football games not. From no links between lockdowns to case?death counts. Constant promotion of cloth masks, with lack of evidence, rather evidence against present.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GqkG4OZmV8o - towards the end you can see a player without a mask and a player with a mask, a player with a mask over his chin as well. The NBA is 95% vaccinated and players are exerting themselves greatly whenever on the court without a mask. Go back to the bench and put on a mask.
Is it not common knowledge that clickthrough rates for online ads are execrable? I recall a discussion here a bit ago about ad tracking and it seemed like a lot of commenters thought that knowing how well an ad worked was as easy as taking the tracking ID of the click that brought the buyer to the seller's site and looking up which ad it was and where it ran.

But clickthrough rates are so bad that they are effectively useless for even for so-called useful ads that nobody with any sophistication cares about that metric. Pretty much the only thing that adtech talks about is CPI now.
Put 'Crystal takes the “designed for humans” part of Ruby, and applies it to a typed and compiled language that is extremely fast.' right on the top of the landing page! Earlier, I looked over the whole page for a while and couldn't figure out what the point is; your description is exactly what I was looking for.
Today I used an exercise machine at the gym for the first time and noticed the buttons: their design was Web 2.0! Flat buttons but with stickers, and the stickers have these glossy cartoon buttons printed on them. The machines were fairly recent and I wondered if the design was intentional (more buttonlike than flat labels) or if they just hadn't bothered to update them in a while.

As a side note I found it comical that they're using computer UI-styled buttons printed onto actual paper on a physical machine instead of "real" push buttons, but I guess it's a cost-saving thing.
This, and also terrible review articles, "top 10 best X" lists, and anything that can gain an SEO edge.
You've got the basics right. An optimally coupled pair won't radiate. Nothing is optimal, however, so there is a small amount of RF radiation. Obviously this means not all RF energy from the environment is common mode as well. Thus the ever more substantial shielding that has appeared in later copper Ethernet cabling.

The implication of this click bait is that ordinary traffic is being recovered from RF leakage. While that's theoretically possible given short range and a sensitive receiver, what we have here is someone creating a low frequency transmitter using copper Ethernet. That doesn't mean it is without interest or value; dismissing side channels like that has a poor track record. But it's not what you're led to believe with "attack reveals Ethernet cable traffic!"
I think compared to the people who make a lot of noise and outrage claiming to care deeply about the plight of these people who can't vote due to lack of ID, no. I don't know if I've ever heard about the issue when it hasn't been prompted or in the context of voter ID.

> It’s hard and expensive.

Again, I don't think it is relative to what else gets spent and what else gets done. Social services spending on a state and federal level is just gargantuan and increasing so I don't see quite where your last sentence connects to reality.

https://madison.com/lifestyles/the-us-states-spending-the-mo...
i have friends that talked about this concept years and years ago.
Still not following how it is ethically wrong to accept technology freely given by others.
I tried really hard to get <video> and <audio> to default to requiring same-origin but people were still skeptical about CORS deployment, and there were also arguments for consistency with <img>. Oh well, I think we eventually got to a consensus that that "consistency" is not worth having.
If you think anything can be made foolproof, then all I can say is that you must not yet have met a sufficiently foolish fool.

The one and only job that any fool has is to defeat any so-called “foolproof” system that they come into contact with. And, taken as a whole, history has proven that they are unbeatable.
It really depends on what you want from them. If you enjoy writing, then write. If you want traffic, then you can measure if they are or aren't generating it for you.

I have a few thoughts on the writing itself, if you're open for feedback. If not, look away now.

These posts feel like they could do with a lot more personality. As an example, in the anxiety post you talk about what anxiety feels like ("Your heart is pounding and your brain won’t shut up.") This is a _great_ opening. Tell me more.

But it very quickly turns into a list of generic (sorry) advice. Which is fine, but there are millions of '7 ways to help with anxiety' posts. But there's only one of you.

I feel like that post could have really focused on the specifics of your situation, rather than "eating healthy, exercising, getting 8 hours of sleep, being outside first thing in the morning, and meditation."

For example, it's _very_ interesting that you'd previously never had anxiety and that the interpersonal drama in your startup contributed to you developing anxiety. How did you know that you were anxious? How did you sense that it was different to short-term stress? Did the people around you notice? Did you withdraw from social event? I want to read that post!

Or to take a hackernews approach, what is it specifically about being in a startup that's anxiety provoking? Did you borrow money from friends that you can't afford to lose? Did you leave a comfortable job and are now watching your friend's careers progress while yours seemingly flounders? Are you struggling with technical challenges that you don't know how to overcome? Is the jump to management taking you by surprise? I want to read that post!

Hope that wasn't too harsh. You're doing great just getting things out there, which I have never done. So be proud.
Blogs can add value in two ways that I know of, content marketing and audience. Content marketing is a strategy of providing quality content to improve SEO for your startup and bring in attention. Another way your blog can help out your startup is if you have an audience and you can inform that audience of your startup when you are launching it.

A few people have written about their experience optimizing blog posts for HN. I've mostly ignored that advice, focusing on writing the way I want to, for my own edification.

One thing that would help is an extra obvious link to your startup. I just saw the name mentioned in your bio.

The other thing is that you may want to think about your blog posts as marketing content. Since your blogging goal is to help your startup, ask yourself "How does this blog post convince my customers that I or my product are right for their business?"
https://youtu.be/l3kjsbmZ-g0
I'm not an SVG expert, but surely that shouldn't be a 1.1 MB export?

I just quickly created a text-based SVG image in Inkscape, and it was a few KB in size and the text was all selectable. I couldn't even open the Carbon SVG export in Inkscape, so I'm not sure what it's doing?
Big difference between FAANG and other fortune companies is that FAANG expect their managers up to very senior level to be technical and be able to code even if they do not code day to day. Other Fortune 100 companies are happy to have non-technical managers to manage engineers with mixed results.

In all SV companies coding interviews are strictly required at interviews at M1/M2 level (up to 60-80 reports) and required at some companies at D1 level (150 reports). CTO at start up with 20-30 reports is M1 and will have to do coding 100% and failing coding interview is automatic no hire.
I got HTTP 500 when trying to download anything using the demo site. Not sure if the server is overloaded, or a bug (would non-Latin characters in title affect anything?)

The video I tried is https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5-X_2VXpEds and I just set a start and stop time.
> Embed a snippet

> This is the recommended method for sharing Carbon on your own website or blog. Readers can even copy the code with the click of a button.

Snipping tool can't do that
To remind people, Haber-Bosch process produces fixed nitrogen in the form of ammonia from hydrogen. In the US, almost all hydrogen is produced from natural gas (not coal), although other fuels are more common in places like China.

We used to use hydroelectric power to make hydrogen (using electrolysis) for Haber-Bosch, but gas reforming of methane ended up being much cheaper in the 1950s once that process became invented and widespread.
> Out of curiosity, how confident are you that there aren’t any other novel systems that didn’t exist before on a similar level as MCAS?

Me? What makes you think I would have information on this?

If I had to hazard a random guess, I would think that, if you're talking about the MAX 8, there have been enough leaks and testimonies and whistleblowers that any comparable system would have probably been mentioned somewhere. I have no idea either way, I haven't read everything that's gotten out. But I don't see why a regulator couldn't use various means to figure stuff like this out with reasonably high confidence.
> There's nothing unusual about private parties being able to assess penalties against other private parties

Absent a contract, there is, and even with a contract there are limits.

> Your bank does it all the time.

Within a contractual relation and governed by the contract, sure. But that's not what you are talking about.

> It does not make a mockery of the justice system.

Outside of the bounds of contract, it would, as it would amount to private parties making and adjudicating public law.

> If a failed frivolous lawsuit against Twitter automatically gave Twitter a claim on the plaintiff's assets, that would in fact not violate every tenet of the western justice system,

Yes, it would. Now, if merely a failed lawsuit did, it might not, as the failure itself is the conclusion of an adjudication, leaving no private determination to be made.

> It is a system that has obtained elsewhere and that people frequently advocate for.

No, its not, nor is it Twitter assessing a penalty. Loser pays is civil lawsuits is a thing, but it involves the court, not the offended party, assessing the penalty.

Loser pays for frivolous lawsuits only (but not all failed lawsuits) is also a thing, and is common in US jurisdictions, but requires a separate court determination that the claim was frivolous as well as the court assessing damages.
While there are obviously genuine environmental concerns, Calgary's decline seems to me a combination of two major forces. First and foremost is economic opposition from the US, who went from the largest consumer of Canadian oil to its largest competitor in the past 10 years. Second, political polarities in Canada that tend to favor concentrating political and economic power along the cities of the St Lawrence instead of Alberta. It would probably be too much to say that the Eastern provinces want Alberta to do poorly, but given the Liberals an d the NDP simply hold no seats in Alberta, there is no incentive to defend its provincial interests (in comparison to say a Quebec company like Bombardier).

However at the moment maybe it's for the better, you don't need to be in the 1% of income earners to buy a house in Calgary.
Lots of highly educated grads in Boston relative to jobs. (Compared to Denver)
What measurement network did you use?
I pretty much agree but what do you mean stolen tech?
If you're a European developer and underpaid, are you going to start your own company to do the same work but sell it yourself and take all the margin?

Probably not, from comments I've seen here, it takes an awful lot of work to make a legal business. In the US, it takes minutes to incorporate, and even less time if you don't care to incorporate and just want to file a Doing Business As to use a separate name. Business banking doesn't take a lot to get going either. If you live in California, your employer probably can't stop you from quitting to start a competitor (as long as you don't take IP with you)
I think The Good Place really nailed this one on the head: as our world has become more connected, it no longer fits in our heads. It becomes impossible to know for sure what impact we are having, or even what we might want to change.

Basically, we are living inside a spaghetti mess of a civilisation.

But I’ve also spent twenty years working in various big balls o’ mud codebases, at companies that had big systematic problems that got them that way, and in that time I’ve found some strategies that can make positive changes, even under conditions of extreme chaos & status-obsessed executives. And they all start the same way:

Find a coworker, ask them how their work is going, and then really listen.

Don’t go in with any agenda except building a relationship with you coworker. If the have stuff they are proud of, tell them what you like about it. If they have stuff they are struggling with, you can commiserate. You might be able to help, but probably not: you are both living in a giant mess of a disaster world full of incentive systems that push people to behave the ways they are behaving.

But by setting that aside, by prioritizing your relationship with even just one other person over that perverse system that exists today, you are resisting. Authentic, caring conversations that prioritize people over process are radical acts.

Maybe the first person or the first dozen aren’t interested. That’s okay. Eventually you’ll have a second genuine conversation, and now you have two relationships. You can introduce those two people to each other, and suddenly you have a community.

A community can get things done none of us could do alone.

I learned these techniques from the grouchiest, grumpiest old grey beards I worked with, because they were how they built support for the infrastructure they wanted to use. I’ve use the technique for different purposes (livable code, low alert volumes, sufficient time & space to mentor junior engineers into being the mentors of junior engineers, not selling contracts to Palentir, more than two weeks vacation time, fixing user problems before adding shiny new whistles to get the PM promoted, not planning two years of work at once, etc), but fundamentally it is the same. Positive changes start with building a tiny little corner where we set aside our doubt, gather up our courage and build a community rooted in sufficiency and willing to trust.
Actually if it wasn't for Microsoft they wouldn't be shipping those phones and MacBooks now.
> And yet 1.2 breaks many things.

What are they? I looked at the blog post and it shows deprecations, not breaking changes.
I could maybe understand the value of this if it were somehow impossible to display nicely styled code as text. But in the edit box they literally have the editor formatting the code. The image seems to be a snapshot of that.
Look at your kitchen sink. On that metal lives a billion bacteria cells. Maybe some of them are even sentient. Do you even care to find out? Not really - its far beneath you. Humans are infinitely inferior to a god. We are no different to a moving rock.
A nice result, but I was getting the heebie geebies watching him push a round piece of metal though the band-saw with his knuckle across the line of the blade. One slip... Why didn't he rough it out in the mill?
Wait until you hear how much Benzene (& similar chemicals Toluene and Xylene) are in gasoline. A little off gasing from plastics is tiny compared to exhaust in traffic or fumes while refueling.
I didn't compare Dave Chapelle to Goebbels. I said film has the power to cause real harm and brought up historical examples.

But he did in fact establish violence as a normal reaction in his set, multiple times. It sounded to me like he supports violence when I heard him. He told a story about how threatened to assault someone he assumed was gay, and then alluded to them being racist because they tried to call the police. Then he tried to justify assaulting someone else.