skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
If you look at the sample project you can see that this is a way to create nested objects which describe the page you are rendering. [1]

Those objects can contain I/O logic (database calls or http requests) which are used to populate the "component". [2]

This is not a true replacement for Javascript SPA frontends like react or vue which offer much more than rendered HTML. It's more of an opinionated way to organize and populate your HTML templates for plain server-rendered pages.

I am not a huge fan of this format as I prefer regular template partials + inheritance. [3]

1: https://github.com/yuriizinets/kyoto-hn/blob/master/page.sto...

2: https://github.com/yuriizinets/kyoto-hn/blob/master/componen...

3: https://lets-go.alexedwards.net/sample/02.08-html-templating...
I agree with the sentiment but you're conflating what someone believes with who they are, ie, something someone can change vs something they can't.

I don't really think anything should be off limits and off color jokes are an important art form to feel out emotions but I also think there's a clear difference in your examples.
Is it better than most modern dashboard computers?
If it continues, in a clown world like this soon you won't be allowed to paint a clown face anymore.
It doesn't fit. The point is that we need new regulatory language that does fit.
A good angle I read (but can't cite, unfortunately) is that some comedians punch up until the only people left to punch are the ones paying their salary, so they punch down at whoever it's still socially acceptable to make fun of. And then they keep doing it until it's no longer acceptable and start making their critics the whole focus of their routine. We used to call comedians who attacked critics hacks. Now they get Netflix specials.
More importantly than any of your associates, I have two important data points:

I watched it and it was definitely not transphobic.

Dave's trans female friend that committed suicide, her family supports Dave and says they believe it's not transphobic.

Every single criticism I've seen has been general. None of them, except the ones which take stuff out of context, have specific gripes. That's how you know this is about shutting down debate they don't want to hear.
Come on. Your graph starts in 1971 and you're using that to argue about differences in the 1960s.

> You can see curves here, math is 40%

A 40/60 split in mathematics does not support your claim that women prefer abstract thinking more than men do, and also incidentally is a pretty noticeable gender gap to most people, hence the large amount of discussion you can find online about gender gaps in mathematics fields and mathematics testing.
Whenever I’ve seen teams formalize this, it’s been cut down by someone higher up who wants to show how they’re saving costs or making the team more efficient. It’s possible I’ve only worked at bad organizations, but I’m willing to bet that s the reason why such “benefits” are not formalized.

However it then leaves you vulnerable to the naive worker who will voluntarily push all gears because they’re such a hard worker.
I couldn't find this in the design document but the only obvious solution is to track globals via the shared count. Since a global reference is part of all threads simultaneously, it cannot be treated as local.

If you follow this reasoning, the operations above result in local=0/shared=0 after the last assignment.
> The fed IMO deserves a ton of credit for saving the American economy from a massive depression - twice so far since 2008.

I'm not sure I agree with this. I think The Fed stepping in after the stock market crashed in March 2020 gave stock investors an unreasonable expectation that stocks are safe. Stocks are a risk-on asset and should be treated as such. Right now many people treat them like a savings account. IMO we should've let the stock market crash lower so people understand that stocks are not risk free.

Also, we may not know all the consequences from all that money that The Fed printed yet. So far we are seeing increased inflation, which hopefully will go down when / if they raise interest rates again, but we'll have to see what happens. I think, if anything, The Fed having to step in showed that the traditional markets are a house of cards as well. Just like in crypto, people just want the of price of stocks to go up, but that isn't reasonable. Volatility is normal and sometimes there should be crashes in markets so that people understand the risks.
From their website: "Every Tether token is always 100% backed by our reserves, which include traditional currency and cash equivalents and, from time to time, may include other assets and receivables from loans made by Tether to third parties, which may include affiliated entities (collectively, “reserves”)."

They don't claim 1:1 USD backing. They claim that every tether is backed by 1 USD of value. So, when their crypto holdings go up in value, TADA!, more reserves to print tether against. The problem here is they never explain what happens when the value of their backing assets goes down.
It's all about incentives.

Everybody knows Tether is a scam - and it will probably take down crypto once it implodes. But the people 'with knowledge of the matter' have 0 incentive to expose it, and they have every incentive to keep it as it is. People are making hundreds of millions of dollars on it. Until the music stops, they will keep dancing.

Anyway, it's fascinating ! As Patrick McKenzie put it ""we are living in the middle chapters of a Michael Lewis book."
Productivity: If you need an X, how quickly can you implement an X at a high level of quality?

If your product manager asks for a new widget or api, can you implement it without any major bugs in 1 hour? Or will you take three days because you don't understand your programming language, your codebase and your requirements?

Will the widget/api be free of major bugs, or will it fail on a variety of edge cases that could have been solved ahead of time?

Productivity may not have crisp, clear lines. There's always context. But it comes down to: if you can do X in half the time at the same level of quality, you're twice as productive.

I admire Dan Luu's work and this article in particular really resonated with me.
> As a general rule

The whole movement of correcting social wrongs is made by barking at a social hegemons. And now we come full circle as people seem to believe there are general rules again, except they are the opposite of the rules that started to be barked at.

With a caveat: it's not possible to agree that we have come full circle. The previous hegemon canonized the ones in the "down" direction. And so we get to you, babbling about everyone agrees that it's better not to attack the "down" people.

Sure.
Trace, matrix multiplication and every type of convolution in a single line
The assumption you're making is all groups are formed on an equal premise. [People who see psychics] and [korean women] are both groups
I am building a web based Travian inspired game. It will have nfts for all ingame items and one of the stretch goals is to integrate some other's project nfts. At least in a way.
Main goal here is to get more recognition / free advertising
But to what end?
Fair point. Async is a big enough idea that it probably warrants designing the language with it in mind. I guess another way of phrasing it would be that it violates the "there's only one way to do it" maxim, and the "two ways of doing it" circumstance necessarily came about because the idea was discovered long after the core language and libraries were already written.
Yeah, been eyeing Framework laptops for a while.
Is this at all like Symbolics' Lisp Machines from the 80's?
I really enjoy the idea. Seems like a good tool to use. do you plan to release an arm64 docker version soon?
MediaTek puts the responsibility of releasing the downstream kernel tree source code on the Android OEMs.

And some of those don’t comply with that.

(but otherwise, they are upstreaming support for their SoCs nowadays anyway)
The product page doesn’t include the word “beta” anywhere.

I wouldn’t even call it a phone if it can’t act as a phone out of the box, let alone use the “pro” moniker.

Why is it not labeled as a development board with a touchscreen and cell modem?
The paper:

> When the shared counter for an object becomes negative for the first time, the non-owner thread updating the counter also sets the object’s Queued flag. In addition, it puts the object in a linked list belonging to the object’s owner thread called QueuedObjects. Without any special action, this object would leak. This is because, even after all the references to the object are removed, the biased counter will not reach zero — since the shared counter is negative. As a result, the owner would trigger neither a counter merge nor a potential subsequent object deallocation.

> To handle this case, BRC provides a path for the owner thread to explicitly merge the counters called the ExplicitMerge operation. Specifically, each thread has its own thread-safe QueuedObjects list. The thread owns the objects in the list. At regular intervals, a thread examines its list. For each queued object, the thread merges the object’s counters by accumulating the biased counter into the shared counter. If the sum is zero, the thread deallocates the object. Otherwise, the thread unbiases the object, and sets the Merged flag. Then, when a thread sets the shared counter to zero, it will deallocate the object. Overall, as shown in invariant I4, an owner only gives up ownership when it merges the counters.

Well, that works, but it's a bit naff.
Is a black man above or below a gay man in the oppression Olympics ranking?
Nobody presecutes them in the west.

From what I see what happens to people that have the audacity to not cave to their demands completely and immediately that are victims of persecution.

Governments, NGO, academia, media and big corporations are outwokking each other on the issue.

I prefer dave to jessica yaniv...
> An idea that's become increasingly popular in my extended social circles at major tech companies is that one should avoid doing work and waste as much time as possible, often called "antiwork", which seems like a natural extension of "tryhard" becoming an insult. The reason given is often something like, work mainly enriches upper management at your employer and/or shareholders, who are generally richer than you.

If you really are not comfortable with the consequences of your personal labor you should probably leave your job or not take it in the first place. This sounds like a decadent rationalization for highly compensated people that want to feel moral while being lazy.
To get your time back while still meeting professional obligations, at least that's my "end" in being productive.
For what it's worth, I think splitting up Facebook makes very little sense, but that requiring open protocols would be an excellent direction. A big reason I have a problem with the "monopoly" framing is that it limits the options for how to fix it to pretty much just this "break it up" idea, which isn't the right tool for the job.
> |your age: under 18|

Why this restriction? Are you also young?
Web3 gaming, meaning decentralized games in the browser on the blockchain is the future. No 30% cut from walled gardens, and direct distribution for developers to their end users.
It's desktop Linux, so you can do this now! I know of at least one Flutter app available as a Flatpak on ARM Linux (FluffyChat).
> Instead LinkedIn will launch a new service named InJobs that will advertise and process job applications. InJobs will not have a social feed, people will not be able to write posts or share articles.

This actually sounds like an improvement.
Would the history deniers downvoting me actually care to explain why it's important to oppose interracial marriage only for parsis? Would they actually care to debate some actual history? https://www.academia.edu/11951841/THE_PARADOXES_OF_PARSI_IDE...
This is the result of decades of anti-government propaganda from the conservatives.

The US is a failed / faux democracy. People believe the US is supposed to function with certain democratic rules, one person one vote, etc., but it was designed specifically not to allow progress, not to allow democratic rule, to protect the minority (wealthy ruling class) from the majority (everyone else).

Anyone can look that up, read about, etc., but it isn't the common perception for how democracy is supposed to function in the US.

So, when people vote for politicians that promise one thing and do the opposite , eventually people lose faith in the system and reject government altogether.

The solution to our problems isn't small government, it is education about the failings of our current institutions and massive democracy reforms. We don't even need to implement a single new idea, just promote and pursue democracy reforms that people have been pushing for over the last century.

But we absolutely need to gut our current institutions (constitution, supreme court, congress, etc) and start fresh.
I believe a tether collapse would have a significant effect on the entire cryptocurrency ecosystem
> your claim that women prefer abstract thinking more than men do

I never claimed that women prefer abstract thinking more than men do. I claimed that women prefer abstract thinking more than they prefer working with machines relative men. It would be massive if women in engineering or computer science were anything close to 40/60.

> Come on. Your graph starts in 1971 and you're using that to argue about differences in the 1960s.

You have provided no data supporting your claim. I wont dig up more data just because you can't look for it yourself. You are obviously ignorant about this topic and don't want to educate yourself.
I filed https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1736108 for that case.
> I have sufficient resolution on it from people who did watch it

Never trust other people's opinions on matters like this.

Other people trust other people trust other people and you get mountains of wrong. Forming an opinion-based purely on other people's opinions is just a form of prejudice.
If that's the trend, by the time it reaches it's final form we'll all be smoking husks left over from the great AI uprising wars, but don't judge those AIs too harshly, that new testnet that paid out for verified kills was just too good to pass up.
> Bigger matching pools mean better conversion rates.

So the smaller networks would make less money than Google. Less money than Google isn't the same as less money than is necessary to run servers.

And servers get cheaper as time goes on. The number of "megawatts" you need to serve a given number of ads is exponentially decreasing over time.

> This is not theoretical - adwords/search has destroyed almost all of the competition, save those who have other ways of funding themselves.

You can't ignore the companies they bought out when you say the others went out of business. They don't have any reason to buy a competitor that was just going to fail anyway, and they empirically have bought several competitors.
I wonder will it cost less to produce and maintain than to train and maintain a soldier.
How fast and accurate is it at dispatching multiple targets , possibly moving , compared to a human sniper .
This has to be one of the most negative reactions in the history of Hacker News.
It looks like the Reatta was basically a smaller version of the Riviera, with the same control system available.
Got my Pinephone today. Currently the most usable modus operandi is to install openssh server and remote from desktop) Getting so much fun anyway, worth every buck.

I wonder. Firefox has Android version with mobile-optimized look and feel. I beleive it shares a lot of code with desktop version. How hard will it be to build that version for Linux graphics desktop?
I tried solving this with a search engine that accounted for reviews with some manual curation, but I realized there's actually an extremely limited set of 'good' recipe sites and kept returning the same 10 sites with a long tail of average sites.

You could improve upon this by establishing site authority for a topic (cuisine), but it still seemed pointless to me.
This is not related to the medial meaning of the term. In this case, it's closer to "office hours", a specific time when constituents can come and ask questions.
Most of the time - the recipes are pretty similar.

It's usually just a difference in spices, oils (or other fats), or emulsifiers. Or vegan / gluten free substitutes.

Nothing beats knowing your tastes and learning how to actually cook - then you can look at a recipe and know which things you'd rather substitute with something else and how and when, etc.

But are there any good websites for this?
This may be a silly question, but if you really need concurrency, why not use a language that's built for concurrency from the ground up instead? Elixir is a great example.
What’s interesting about Amazon is they don’t seem to have been any worse affected from supply chain issues than anyone else. At least not that I have noticed anecdotally.
Sorry about that. I did indent before pasting the code - but gedit indents with tabs, which HN ignores!
> Good luck trying to figure out why something exists and not nothing

I don’t see how assigning a (culturally loaded) label to an unprovable hypotheses could possibly be useful for figuring out anything objectively true.
>you should probably leave your job or not take it in the first place

sounds like a decadent rationalization of some kind.
As someone who also tracks time in some amount of detail (to bill clients for it), communication, and _written_ communication in particular takes a surprising amount of time. All those Slack threads you might not even think twice of engaging in can easily destroy half your working day, even if you ignore the cost of context switching. Emails take longer than you think. Design docs take _much_ longer than you think. Code reviews take longer than you think also.

For me at least coding seems to take less time objectively than subjectively, but it's also quite obvious that most of my time is not spent on coding, sadly. A good chunk of it is completely unproductive bullshit that simply has to happen because that's how the company chooses to operate. I tell them it's not the only way to do things, but they insist on wasting ~1.5 person days a week on "standups" and "scrum" (the team is 12 people, excluding me). They could _easily_ move 50% faster if they shed that bullshit and just gave people sizable tasks and some degree of autonomy and personal responsibility. Instead it's down to who can _appear_ the busiest during standup.
Yeah but he doesn't recognize that his entire argument is personal choice elevated to moral imperative.

> an easy way to do that is to be more productive at work and spend less time working

Why is need to be more productive at work framed as a prerequisite to spending less time working? Just spend less time working. His moral stance, which he never reflects on, is that working is good, and relaxing is predicating on completing the work first. None of that is necessarily true, but it does fit well with the Protestant Work Ethic, which is, of course, a moral framework for putting work before leisure.
A subreddit that celebrates people dying is disgusting. The fact that you linked to it even more so.
TF2 items are not NFTs. They're just entries in Valve's databases. There are several times where someone hacked someone else's account and stole hats which Valve returned, and I remember at least one time when a bug gave out hats by mistake and Valve trade-locked them to prevent the abusers from tanking the market and profiting from their abuse.
Don’t really get you guys saying Tether should be shut down… the big banks get routinely fined with much bigger fines for much bigger crimes, are we gonna shut them all down then?
At least Tether did not steal from nor defraud anyone.
Just as a random example: https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/jpmorgan-chase-co-agrees-pay-...
Yes, stepped down as a result of him forcing the walrus operator change into the language over significant opposition.
There’s just over $68 billion Tether.

The 24hr trade volume for BTC alone is just over $50 billion.

If all tether were to completely turn to dust, it would not lead anywhere close to a “gigantic defi crash”. This is in no way a defense of Tether. I’m just zooming out from the hyperfocus on Tether as the pseudo foundation of crypto. That is just simply not the case.
I've definitely run into companies in Amazon-adjacent fields of endeavor employing a "no AWS" rule.
I just watched it. I don’t feel like I live in a real world anymore. This whole outrage is manufactured and there are so many resellers.

Dave spends the last 15 minutes of the show telling a heartbreaking story of how he made friends with a transgender woman, and invited her to open his show for him, she sucked but then when she was being herself during the show and afterwards backstage she had everyone howling with laughter because she was so naturally funny but she needed to work on her show to get that side out.

She defended Chapelle on Twitter and got dogpiled for it and killed herself (not 100% if there was a correlation but sure it didn’t help).

Dave got to the point that he didn’t like her or find her funny because she was transgender but because she was a person. She was another human. Not someone who hid behind a label or an identity, but someone who was a human going through the same shit we all go through.

That’s what identity politics and extreme politicalisation denies people, humanity. How people watched that show and got that he’s a transphobe from it just blows my mind.
Many financial infractions operate in a different reality that has no analogy to non-financial criminal law.

You are focusing far too much on the marketing that uses the terms currency. Any individual or corporation is capable of creating a product said to be redeemable for something in their treasury. This has nothing to do with the parallels to the federal reserve when corporation calls its product a stablecoin or dollar-like. All settlements with Tether's companies have been exclusively related to the reality that the corporation's product was not in fact redeemable for the thing they said it was. That is the only issue, every authority that matters has said that was the only issue. Both crypto twitter as well as blockchain skeptic's opinion doesn't matter here. Their armchair legal analysis don't matter. Their comparisons to the state-monopoly on currency issuance doesn't matter. The corporation having marketing and legal agreements that accurately describe what their product can be redeemed for, if anything at all, simply has to be congruent with reality. That's the totality of the sanction from the CFTC, and the same with the NYAG at one state level. But I will give you one bone, and that's the reality that the DOJ can of course come with a parallel criminal prosecution for the same activity. So if that will validate your thoughts on anything, just wait for that if it ever comes. I'm not worried about "being right", only saying what this settlement is saying.
And hopefully the blockers will continue to work, as long as your browser vendor, mobile phone vendor, etc, don't change the APIs to prevent or make it infeasible to do it.
It feels disingenuous to use this as the headline as it implies they were fired for organizing the walkout instead of for leaking internal data:

A Netflix spokesperson confirmed the employees’ dismissal. “We have let go of an employee for sharing confidential, commercially sensitive information outside the company,” they said.
I used to be amazed wondering how people claimed to work 12 hours a day until I realized they consider writing emails and talking to people on the phone work (which it is). But of course me being a software engineer I imagined for some reason when they said work they meant something like coding which after 6 hours has me drained.
My trust is based on cancelling Netflix long ago after a string of stand-up shows full of bigoted jokes. I don't need another data point.