AT&T also owns CNN.
Do you know just how many times they've been caught openly lying to push an agenda? They also have much broader reach and mainstream appeal.
Furthermore, stop with the brainwashed "everything I don't like is "far-right"" nonsense.
Typically, that's a key indicator of person's vacuous consumerism habits and them being inculcated into a cult of outrage where they attempt to silence anyone who doesn't agree with their media manufactured hate-fantasies.
So many people have become intellectually lazy and wait to be told what they should think in order to fit in with their social circles while parroting information that's not even close to accurate.
In fact, as previously mentioned, off the top of my head I can name dozens upon dozens of times that media has openly promoted misinformation, obfuscated the truth, misrepresented, removed context for outrage, or outright lied, in order to push a left political narrative.

If we're speaking exclusively of which of the two entities has had a much larger impact from the lies and deceit they've promulgated, who do you think would be the more egregious offender of the two?

It's truly staggering how many people can't even recognize that their own consumerism habits have shaped their views about an entire group of people; their hate doesn't even belong to themselves, it's been finely crafted and spoon-fed to them until surfeited. They base an overwhelming amount of their views off mainstream culture stereotypes of the people they've been indoctrinated by mendacious prevaricators to hate. Very few of their views are their own, but rather, an aggregate of consensus-driven make-believe so they feel like the fit in with whatever collective they're a part of.
I don't believe it's a coincidence that as we see increased demands for intellectual conformity people become more and more depressed and manifest "diversity" through the physical self. It's all shallow and empty.
People can't drone on with didactic speeches about "tolerance" and then hypocritically decide when, exactly, they want to to practice what they preach. They need to learn that the world does not, in fact, revolve around their themselves and that other people do have views that are just as valid. Although, admittedly, it does seem that hypocrisy has become concomitant to the virtue chasing progressives of modern society — their modus operandi, if you will.

Here's the things: Free Speech doesn't exist to protect speech you like. I don't understand how intellectually stunted a person has to be to not grasp such a basic concept. It was created for the sole purpose of protecting speech that people dislike.
Why would any Government or Institution want to block speech that lavishes them with praise and aligns with what they agree with? It's beyond foolish.
Advancement of society and changes leading to a better world have always — without a single exception — come from those who were willing to break away from "consensus" and the status quo in order to voice their beliefs.
By advocating for silencing those they disagree with, people are not only advocating for authoritarianism, they're also advocating for something that will inevitably be used against them in the future. Chances are, they're also completely ignorant of their opposition to begin with. Studies have shown that in the US political system, people on the right understand the views of the left vastly more than the left understands the right. Why do people think that would be? I think the answer is pretty simple: only one view ever gets any sort of mainstream platform.

One way to look at things that many people don't consider is through a different perspective.
It's no secret, for instance, that as people get older that their views slowly begin to shift more to the right.
Do people believe that somehow, by some completely unknown means, people get dumber as they get older?
Or, is it possible — as well as much more likely — that they've accumulated experience, have seen through the nonsense and continued predatory lies, and decided to stop supporting them?
Do they think it's a coincidence that politicians on the left side of the spectrum specifically target the young and naive — those who have zero world experience but are desperate to prove they're "adults" now?
Do they truly believe that the original "Social Justice" advocates, the flower power hippies and activists, who are now Boomers, just suddenly stopped caring about others?

All of these things add up into a very clear picture: the presuppositions of youth through consumerism and the sheer arrogance that accompanies them to feel like they have everything figured out without ever having participated in society in any true meaningful way.

It's become such a pernicious part of our culture that it's literally become a meme at this point.
Whenever someone presents an argument counter to the new left's dogma, if the 'progressive' — although I don't particularly like labels — doesn't have a copy/paste response they've been given through their immediately responds with ad hominems, dehumanizing labels of "-ist" or "-phobe" and the stereotypes they've been made to believe. It almost never fails.
The biggest obstacle in their way is their own ego. The unwillingness to even briefly consider that they may actually be wrong.

How many actually take the time to deeply look into the views of their opposition? At least people on the right literally have no choice, since it permeates every facet of mainstream culture. But how many others actually set down the video game, pause the movie or anime, spend a couple weeks truly looking into as much information as possible about what views the people they hate hold?
It's purely anecdotal, but I would propose that it's very, very, few.
Convenience and instant gratification have cost so many people their intellectual autonomy. They take the easy way out, allowing those they deem "better" than themselves to do the thinking for them. They have entertainment they want to escape into, after all — so it's much easier. Not to sound too cynical, but self-reflection has not become a trait found very often these days. If people did, they'd realize much of the very apparent things mentioned really do apply.

Personal accountability requires people to try and work on themselves, to strive to become better; it's much easier to simply point the finger everywhere else and pretend to be the victim.

Two links I'll leave with with before this becomes any more garrulous than it already is:

First, Albert Herong, Jr., entered "The Communist Goals" into the Congressional Record all the way back in 1963. If people can't recognize some things that are strikingly familiar — particularly later in the list — then they're completely blind. These were objectives stated in order to cause the complete destruction of the US from within using subversion tactics and infiltration through core institutions.

https://edberry.com/blog/polymontana/political-platforms/the...

The second is one that some people might be familiar with. Yuri Bezmenov, a former KGB informant who defected to the west taking the time to explain precisely what the Communist's goals were, warning of the disastrous consequences, and speaking about the subversion tactics used.
It was recorded in 1984, fittingly enough.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQN4c3uN_tA

People who are brainwashed never actually know that they're brainwashed.
It's the human ego that prevents them from pausing and realizing. The arrogance of believing they're above it.
But if they did actually realize, it wouldn't be very effective, now would it?
Although there's always a chance if people simply stop and reflect. The human mind is a wonderful thing.