skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Do you live 150km away from your office? A super commuter commutes >50 miles one way, that's a little over half of 90 miles (which is 150km). Again, the point is what matters isn't peak power or rate of any quantity but the integral, the total. Most of the time commuting is spent moving much slower than 60mph.
I guess for the most part it's just marketing, since it's a good fit for IoT as well, you can definitely run it on servers as well, as i am doing!

What makes it different from other K8s distros is listed here: https://rancher.com/docs/k3s/latest/en/

And here's an architecture overview: https://rancher.com/docs/k3s/latest/en/architecture/

At a glance:

- by default packaged as a single binary, so is extremely easy to install, even uses SQLite for storage (though that can be swapped out for others as well)
- includes the functionality that you'd expect, like local storage, load balancing, ingress, while at the same time getting rid of some of the unnecessary plugins that you'd get in other distros
- as a consequence of the above, has a small runtime footprint, so running K8s clusters on VPSes with 2 to 4 GB of RAM is no longer a pipe dream, also has way less overhead on the actual nodes that you want to manage (think along the lines of a few hundred MB)
- also includes a variety of tools with it for managing your cluster more easily, so you don't need to install those separately
> account pulling in >$10mil annually. An email would be nice. Maybe a fruit basket.

They cut you a cheque for 10mil each year, maybe you are the one that should be sending them a fruit basket at christmas.
The Supply Chain Crisis: How We Got Here
The same way it worked before it had the ability to take pictures.
> United democracies.

Between Hong Kong and the Ukraine those democracies have shown little willingness for action. TSMC may be Taiwans trick to change that but with all these Fabs outside Taiwan who knows if that will remain the case.

> There are only a few times in the year that China can safely cross the straits without fearing typhoons or rough sea.

Thyphoons don't come out of nowhere and there are usually at most a couple per year.

> And landing only on a few spots.

Could you expand on that? Almost the entire west coast is flat with normal beaches that don't seem particular incessible.

I really hope that Taiwan will remain independent, but I don't think relying on Taiwan's defenses or western military support will guarantee that. The economic argument is a better one - there is a lot of chinese investment around the world that they probably don't want to risk and the world is (slowly) starting to realize that it might be a good idea to have manufacturing capacity outside of china.
I don't understand why you focus on apple. The problem is accros the entire mobile space, the frightening thing is not the power of apple, it's the fact that _alternatives are not much better_
It should be noted that nuclear is a significant export business for France, their companies routinely bid for contracts to build new plants elsewhere (UK etc). This is probably a significant factor in Macron's steering, considering the hunger for economic growth post-Covid.
Not a snark, but a genuine question - Have we figured out what to do with the spent nuclear fuel yet?

What are the options and how bad/risky are they versus the impending climate change problem?
Thank you for sharing this creative idea. "so that the fingers can touch (or almost touch) the screen" I think this is a big advantage of this approach since you can only achieve this with the back facing camera. On the flip side, with a back facing camera you either have to place the camera in between yourself and the screen which might be awkward or you have to ensure a placement of the camera behind you that isn't prone to occlusions (e.g. your head or chair might occlude your hands from the cameras point of view). The latter might also make calibration more difficult or impact precision since you might have to mount the camera with some elevation causing a less optimal camera angle.
This is a case where a little knowledge makes everything look like a conspiracy. Sadly none of what you wrote is even remotely true.

Glass cockpit upgrades are very popular. For example, an Evolution E5 is $5k to $10k depending on the model. You can remove your vacuum system at that point. There's nothing stopping anyone from upgrading, aside from the cost. There's no conspiracy here, no evil FAA paperwork or regulations standing in your way.

I have no idea where you got the impression that the FAA tolerates faking paperwork. The FAA even has a page showing off some of their enforcement actions https://www.oig.dot.gov/agency/federal-aviation-administrati... Check out https://www.oig.dot.gov/library-item/37661 That's literally what you are describing, the mechanic said they did something according to the manual, but didn't.

So no. The FAA isn't trying to keep GA down.
Maybe this makes me sound like a luddite, but I think same and next day delivery is bad for us all. I left the US 2 years ago, where I was ordering nearly everything from Amazon, and moved to a place where it's significantly difficult to get "stuff" without a long drive or a few week's wait time.

The initial lifestyle change was a little rough, but I found myself over time just accepting I didn't need all the crap I used to order. People are fast to call out amazon's treatment of workers, small businesses, etc., but here we see other companies doing their best to emulate it because people still dump money at Amazon.
I'm delighted to see that at least somewhere people are sane enough not to phase out nuclear energy. (I'm looking at you, Germany)
what kind of questions are you looking to pose? you could try https://sqwok.im
Because it is a shit-ton of money. It is not like an app is going to be a multi generational sustaibale business. It will be on trend for a while, print money, and then be the next angrybirds or clubhouse (if you are lucky).

Chances are the users will have moved on before the users of the app have.
English also contains many accented words: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_terms_with_diacritical...

You are supposed to be able to type them if you write in English. Also, if you are in polite company, it's alright to drop the occasional Greek word. So here we are: if you can fully write in English, you can use all these characters.

Ascii-only is the modern equivalent of all-caps. Something archaic, still used by old people with hopelessly limited input devices.
> Then a bunch of weird generic scenarios - what have you done that fits this scenario and how did you handle it.

That part was particularly frustrating; often I couldn't think of anything relevant to the specific wording.
At least you got a rejection letter, though. Multiple interviews over >1 day and I had to log in to the Amazon Jobs account to see my application's status had changed to "no longer under consideration".
People think things get invented by white coat wearing "scientists" in a lab. The reality is it was always tinkerers and inventors, the scientific models and explanations came after.

Why is it that we have given up on building beautiful buildings and cities? I suspect one factor is that we moved from a culture based in craftsmanship to university-educated architects.
There's a lot to dislike about some Apple software, but it mostly works, kind of.

In comparison MS are legendary for user-hostile experiences that fundamentally don't work and are time-wasting black holes of frustration and lost productivity.
France’s oldest operating reactors are in the 900 MWe range, so more like 3. Their newer fleet is 1300 and 1450 (now 1500) MWe, plus the 1600 MWe EPR under construction at Flamanville.

The 300 MWe NuWard really only makes sense as an export product, even if they build a couple in France. Framatome and EDF are working on an EPR-2 that is meant to be more efficient and inexpensive to build, and I hope that means it will be a bit scaled down from the EPR, which is frankly too large for many electric grids, and takes far too long to construct.
I'd love to use Apple maps for driving directions, but I just can't get used to its mostly-overhead navigation view. I regularly take wrong turnings when following Apple Maps, which almost never happens with Google Maps or TomTom.
How Laravel Livewire works
In “SQL Server”, “SQL” functions as an adjective modifying “Server”; its not unusual for what are normally nouns to do that, distinguished only by position(e.g
, “hat” in “hat rack”.)
I commented more below, but you’re exactly right. This is an export product.
I think there's a far simpler explanation.

Dev jobs are heavily skewed towards men and these stats generally tend to be US-centric (and even more skewed towards men) for obvious reasons. As of 2015 the typical age for men in the US to have their first child was just a bit over 30 and the trend was this age moving up rather than down.

The glorified image of a developer sleeping at their desk, going to meetups after work, coding at home and building their entire life around their job falls apart as soon as you start a family and for many men becoming a father is a major shift in their understanding of their place in life and their goals.

As we tend to roughly associate with people in our age bracket this also has a knock-on effect for childfree developers whose peers suddenly no longer share the tween dev lifestyle.

Additionally for some people heavily buying into the lifestyle around 30 is probably the time they'll first hit burnout.

The "dark matter developers" (the mythical silent majority who just do their 9-to-5 and then go home to their private life away from development) have been a common talking point for decades, so it doesn't even have to be that all the devs hitting 35 just shift career tracks into management or "go rogue" and start their own companies. They just turn invisible to the metrics that so reliably work for tweens. If they've been doing their job for 3 decades or more, chances also are they won't be on the "cool" tech stacks that garner the most attention.

I know that some people like to pretend the glorified behavior I described is a thing of the dot com bubble and no longer relevant, but I'm just over 35 now (and incidentally rarely ever use SO anymore) and that's not only how I spent a part of my 20s but I also (pre-pandemic) kept running into young developers who still did much the same, although for those working at the more well-known companies a lot of the "sleeping in the office" took the form of Google-style on-site gyms, cafeterias and laundry services. They didn't literally sleep at their desks but their place of work and their profession defined their identity more than anything else.

[0]: https://www.livescience.com/60278-american-dads-age.html
Such articles perpetrate the myth that developers die after X. It's obvious that the majority of devs will sit in the 20-30 bracket just due to popularity and increased opportunity over time. Industry is growing and the only way to get new people in is to train young people.

Stop asking yourself this stupid question. Only bad developer careers die at 35. If you're good and keep developing your skills, you enter the gray-beard mode right around 35-40. We have our share of 40+ engineers and we've just hired a 50+. We also hire 20 somethings, and they are great, but totally different.

I laugh at the idea of a 24 year old senior engineer. Unless you've been hacking from 10, there is no way you've seen enough shit to prevent shit from happening. The really senior engineers really know their shit and are less prone to making wrong choices.

The only challenge you have with 40+ is culture fit. You can mold young engineers according to your culture, while 40+ is take it as it is.

So we search for 20+ that are open minded and are willing to grow and we're looking for 40+ that have not stopped growing and will fit in our culture. I've seen people at 60+ that can replace full teams of people in terms of quality and quantity of output.

The "age" problem exists only in your head.
Could you give some examples of traditions that an average American follows which are beneficial and would be hard to explain? I honestly couldn't come up with anything...
> This is by design. The Vancouver market is aimed at rich foreigners trying to park questionnably acquired assets in a western jurisdiction.

Of course Vancouver’s market is appealing, but it’s not because of foreign induced demand. Do you know anybody who doesn’t want to own a home here? 96% of housing purchased in BC is traceably domestic. There simply isn’t enough housing to meet the demand even amongst domestic buyers!

> Why would they? They cost more to build, Create more supply

They only cost more to build because of zoning bylaws. I’m not a building contractor but I have to imagine the cost per square foot is much lower for a low rise if you don’t have to factor in Comprehensive Development permits and community feedback sessions. Making development more financially accessible would also create new opportunity for smaller developers.

It is Vancouver that has created the problem for itself, which creates the right circumstances for foreign investment to be lucrative, but it is very easy to solve. Just flood the market with supply.
Meanwhile, in other parts of the world it cannot even get the shape of land and country borders right.
Here's an example on the border of Montenegro and Albania: https://imgur.com/a/B3aVJYH
Github repo: https://github.com/livewire/livewire

Website: https://laravel-livewire.com
That said I have a synology NAS that's about 8 years old and still going strong. The dashboard no longer works in firefox's latest builds which is very unfortunate. Obviously it used to work fine
The Principle Devs I’ve worked alongside didn’t manage or even directly delegate to anybody. They were glued to the monitor, doing architecture, and writing and supporting tons of code. Typically difficult narrow-domain stuff and frameworks leveraged by many people. Seniors did similar with a somewhat smaller scope.
This is why Bruce Lee I think is so right with:

- Learn the rules
- Master the rules
- Break the rules

You can't go in straight away into life, or anything, and break the rules. Because you know fuck all about why those rules are in place, and what purpose they serve. The only people who really should be breaking rules are those that have mastered them and understand everything about them.

The most obvious place to illustrate this is art generally. You can't as an 18 year old paint a canvas red and say its art, people will laugh at you. But once you've built a reputation of being a master, like Mark rothko, you paint a canvas basically red which doesn’t need much skill. But you might be able to get away with breaking all the rules.
Apple Maps really look nice. But depending where you are the information can be shocking barren. Especially in Japan. They look really great but there is no labels, or anything. And if they are not as well double labeled (english and japanese).

They are amazing compared what crap we got back in 2012 or so when apple maps replaced google maps.
This is very interesting and it strikes me that things could be more balanced if pro-rata rights decayed if the investor is not active.

So similar to vesting for rights — a founder / employee needs to continue to be active to continue to vest. Ideally an investor could continue to be active to continue to exercise pro-rata.

It’s pretty hard to enforce / codify “active” for an investor though and could just result in time wasting by pretending to be involved helpful when just coasting. Was that intro genuine or just designed to protect the pro-rata?
> In a benchmark I made for the company I work for, Redis was only 30 - 40% faster than Postgres for our use cases because of the network trips.

Obviously I'm not familiarized with your use case, but there are a couple of things to keep in mind when performing these kind of analysis; The first one is connection cost & limit - Postgres client connection cost is quite high when compared to Redis (thats why tools like PGPool exist). Also, the upper bound connection limit in Postgres is quite low, compared to what you can achieve with Redis.
Then there's the caching issue - it seems, from your description - you were actually benchmarking Postgres & filesystem cache. This happens if your dataset is small enough and your query is simple enough, but also indicates the database is idle - no other queries are running that will compete for cache resources or trigger disk I/O or buffer invalidation. If this is not your production scenario, the numbers you measured are meaningless.

Following the cache issue, by the description (and how well it fitted in cache), it seems you're not analyzing throughput. Reading 10 items is different from reading 10^6 items, and you will quickly find out that the throughput of your database server is several times lower than what you can achieve with Redis, specially considering you can easily store your data compressed. It may or may not be relevant to your particular case, but its always good to also check this.

Finally, there is the predictability aspect of the design. Having data available with predictable performance cost on a system that will happily handle tens of thousands of "simultaneous" operations, with a very low connection cost, instead of hammering your complex, multi purpose database is often a godsend, even if the performance difference was 0.
According to this [1], the strategy is twofold:

* replace the oldest massive plants with EPRs (hoping that the construction of the next ones will be less chaotic than the first two in England and Northen France) to maintain domestic production capacity

* build expertise on small modular reactors for exports and additional capacity where it make sense.

And interesting challenge will be to make SMRs safe enough to sell them to "post-developing" countries without any experience of nuclear-monitoring.

Also, the whole "nuclear is both a long term matter that requires multi-decade planning AND an electoral hot-button in France that is sure to split the country in two unreconcilable block every five years" thing.

[1]: https://www.lemonde.fr/planete/article/2021/10/07/nucleaire-...
I have seen first-hand what happens when you suddenly lose your job after 50 and it wasn't pretty.
I bet so
Microsoft Turns Windows Subsystem for Linux into an App for Windows
Thank you for pointing this out. I overlooked this. I presume that on top of that what also could be relevant is the movements of arms, facial expressions and maybe also general body posture. Please correct me if I'm wrong as I'm not too familiar with sign language.
I don’t know, how about in the 1,083,206,916,846 cubic kilometers of earth and rock under our feet that already holds 40 trillion tons of uranium?

Or we could set aside a 1km square plot of uninhabitable desert to store it above ground.

Or we could just spread it around in a few different places like we do today.
Somewhat similar experience here, but Walmart / Target / Macy's.

Last time I bothered looking at Walmart's web site, the "best" part of my experience was that I was able to phone the local store, and a live human there quickly told me "No, we do not stock $Item. Ignore what our web store says." This was after Target wasted my time by saying the opposite - then after I drove to Target it turned out to be a lie.

I ended up buying from Macy's - which has plenty of its own issues, but for my n=1 had $Far_More_Upscale_Item on their shelf, a competent sales person on hand, and a sale price less than 2X Walmart's and Target's prices for $Item.

(Another fun story about Target - they stock items which do not exist in their inventory and check-out databases. I once bought a great gift for a friend's granddaughter there...after the in-store security supervisor found it (or pretended to) in some anti-shoplifting security app, and the store's manager made a snap decision on the price.)
Well, I mean we coped before we had cameras, right? In a sense, we would go back to that. We would have to rely more on witnesses we trust than on evidence.

One point of postmodernism is that often the facts (as in what happened when exactly) don't matter as much as the narrative (Unless you are a historian or a scientist). I think this is true to some extent, but we delude ourselves that only the facts matter. And then we can be manipulated by the narrative. It might be interesting to make the narrative explicit.

Imagine a politician that is exposed to a scandal with an old sex tape. This could ruin their carreer, no matter how good their work is otherwise. But if the tape becomes degraded to mere hearsay - maybe it happened, maybe it didn't - then it is about which image we want to believe. Then the sex tape is one narrative, the campaign is another narrative, and the only concrete thing we really have to judge them on is their actual policies, and their actual recent work. All the "image" will be drowned out in noise.

Same if you think about people posting stupid stuff on social media when they are young, and then having trouble when they try to find a job. If it is trivial and ubiquitous to fake drinking pictures and dumb old tweets, you can just shake it off with "oh yeah that is fake". The only thing that will count is your impression and your performance in the moment (and accounts from other trusted people).

I'm not saying this would be a good development, or a bad one, just that I think it is a possible interesting consequence of current tech developments...
From 2020.
The prizes are awarded by different institutions.

Science prices including economics by Kungliga Vetenskapsakademien.

Literature by Svenska Akademien.

Peace by a committee in the Norwegian parliament.

These reflect the conditions at the time of Nobel's will.

Each institute is free to decide their own criteria, in accordance with their reading of the will.

https://www.kva.se/sv/startsida

https://www.svenskaakademien.se/en
I don't think this is really true if we apply an example:

- We need a way to travel faster and I've made a car to do that

- cars spread in adoption

- travel is much easier

- people now use cars without knowing why

I can't think of many solutions where we don't also have the original problem it solves?

The real problem is people do not have enough knowledge in a domain to infer whether a new proposed solution is better or not. So to take the example further:

- Cars should no longer be used because they are causing climate change

- People fight against it because they do not have the knowledge to infer the right decision

- Person takes a decade or longer proving out why they are right

- new normal is adopted
> K&R doesn’t even come up in a computer science education.

K&R was the main textbook for my first university CS class at Caltech in 1990. (Though, to be fair, the bulk of what I would call “computer science” as distinct from “mechanics of programming in the language used for the class” of that class was taught through other means, but still.)
Basically a model home to show prospective buyers. France also makes a decent amount of money exporting its excess electricity.

An existing nuclear site, with permits, security and likely communitity support is a great place to retire some old and build some new reactors.
I can also recommend paying attention to the decentralized p2p ecosystem Utopia p2p. Its developers have released a private coin Сrypton and recently released a stablecoin UUSD https://u.is/en/currencies.html . Therefore, this project is very well suited for anonymous transactions.