skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> That is, only paying you for those 2h a day instead of 8...

In the context of tech-based work, If pay is based on productivity, then those two hours should be paid the same as 8.

I think tech companies are realising that it's paying for performance that matters; not paying by time. In many cases paying by time doesn't make sense. If you have an idea in the shower, does that count as working? If you going for a walk prompts a better idea, does that count as working?
Modernizing how? I've lived in multiple other countries and they all had pretty strict regulations around opening a bank account, even as a legal resident.
Yeah, scary, in the "you signed an agreement without reading it properly and now your souls, er, your projects belong to us" sense. And in the case of WiX Toolset, they apparently never agreed to the terms & conditions of the .NET foundation in the first place. Also, being forced by the .NET foundation to give an account admin permissions for your repos, and then having that account move your repos to GitHub Enterprise without your permission, even without informing you... I can understand how that creates mistrust.

According to the article, the only thing the .NET foundation did for them was provide certificates, other than that they did nothing for a very long time. And then, of course, this...
The perpetrator probably isn’t in the same jurisdiction.
I think the problem for current members is that they gave away their copyrights for some small benefits (code signing and DNF branding??). Which might have been shortsighted but I think at the time it seemed like the DNF was going to give them more benefits. So they would probably have to create a new project name and stop using the old accounts?
Based on daily volume and number of posts per day [0], it kept up consistent usage and growth over the years. It is still a great way to distribute information to large numbers of people.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet#Usenet_traffic_changes
Is Star Wars Cultural Appropriation?
Dear alwaysanon, I humbly invite you to try ShareTheBoard (https://sharetheboard.com)

We believe you shouldn't need an iPad/apple pencil to conduct remote whiteboarding. With some handy CV/ML/Math your laptop is all you need to share legible content with remote viewers and even let them contribute to your board.

Check it out and let me know your thoughts, please. Thanks in advance.
I wish this wasn’t just a proxy for who western elites deem important or politically advantageous, but was actually honoring those who have made the world more peaceful. In an increasingly multipolar world, such an award would be appreciated by everyone, I think.

I’m not even sure to include on such a list, which itself indicates the problem. Probably some inventors and technologists that have reduced fights over resources.
But the collateral is also in crypto! Tether is a systemic risk: if the peg breaks and there's a run, every cryptocurrency will suffer in fiat terms.
I think the weight difference is more like hitting a badger with a fully loaded semi truck.
There are many neighborhoods across the
US that do not have a Walmart but do have a bunch of predatory check-cashing businesses and a post office.

There are ~ 5,000 Walmart locations in the US vs. more than 30,000 retail Post Office locations.
The SSH links aren't replaced by the gh links, the gh links are just an additional option.
Transactions are confirmed when they are at least 6 blocks deep to avoid double spending.

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Confirmation
The point is more that he did actually negotiate some kind of ceasefire, whereas... Obama?
Apparently the view I voiced is controversial. I can see how some organisations vitally depend on a strong decision hierarchy. The military for example, or some startups. Someone running such an organisation will not be open to the view that such decisions can frustrating for their employees.
Latest studies don't seem to agree with your statement:
"Increases in COVID-19 are unrelated to levels of vaccination across 68 countries and 2947 counties in the United States"
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10654-021-00808-7

The theory of vaccinating people to protect others is taking another hit.
It looks more that we should focus on proposing the vaccine to the people at risk (clearly identified, >65 years old, or multiple co-morbidity) for their own survival
You’ve just cited it. I never said they squeezed in all places. They squeezed it where there was sufficient short interest: Kraken.
what if you were in r/compsci or r/algorithms
Hm, so they got rich and you didn't?
Worth listening to Maria Ressa's episode on Your Undivided Attention podcast back in 2019, where she talked about how authoritarian regimes like in her native Philippines have been using social media to manipulate discourse.

https://www.humanetech.com/podcast/9-the-dictators-playbook
Did you just call a SEC subpoena FUD?
Pretty sensible and important judgement considering how destructive and plentiful wrong DMCA claims alone have been.
It's not like it is the same people now who were on the committee when either of those were chosen to receive it the current member who have been on it for the longest got appointed in 2012

https://www.nobelpeaceprize.org/nobel-committee/
The more important question to me is how bad it is. Myocarditis is inflammation of the heart muscle. If you get that as a long term thing with no obvious cause it's obviously bad. But if you get it for a couple of days after a vaccine and it goes away it wouldn't seem a big deal.
There is was a tiny http server called hibachi that was about 1500bytes(or whatever ioccc max?) and many years back I implemented mjpeg cgi script for it in busybox posix shell script. I forget how long it was but I would guess no more that 100 lines of sh.
Ask HN: What does it mean to you as DBA if DB is running at 99% CPU utilization?
> It is an indefensible decision that will cost lives

"I'll only get the darn shot if it receives a Nobel Prize!"
No one is advocating that Cloudflare should be the moral arbiter tasked with policing all sites on the internet, and what you are complaining about is actually the opposite of what is generally true on the internet today -- it is far, far too easy to take down a website with a frivolous or even completely fabricated DMCA claim. For cases like this where there is legitimate fraud going on, there is a well-established legal process to follow -- get law enforcement involved, get a warrant, require cloudflare to release information on that particular customer through the legal process, get ICANN to revoke the domain if you own the trademark, etc. It shouldn't be as easy as "send a quick email to cloudflare and the site goes down". This is by design -- only in extreme cases should stuff get taken down. Please stop trying to make it easier to censor the web.

Lets also not forget about fair use -- right now the TOS on Youtube and Twitch counts cases of legitimate fair use, like using a 10-20 second segment of a taylor swift song in a gaming montage, as an automatic DMCA strike. Slowly but surely they have eroded the definition of fair use to basically mean there is no such thing as fair use in practice. Complain about that shit instead?
At this point, the credibility of the Peace Prize is already lost and is the lowest barrier to entry of all Nobel prizes.
Yes. We know.

Any ideas how to fix it?
Not anymore it isn't, and they've admitted it:

https://beincrypto.com/coinbase-drops-guarantee-of-usdc-stab...
You are doing the right thing. The .NET Foundation has to learn and change OR release the projects back into the wild (also legally). Otherwise, they will receive the bill by hundreds of project forking and changing names, creating damage to the ecosystem and leaving them with a mess no one wants to take care of.
Their responsibility is to report illegal behaviour to the proper authorities, not to confront them or kick them out.

edit: spelling
> But don't they store the copyrighted content on their servers?

IF they cache content, then they do store that content though, that's the whole idea behind caching.
I think Obama was awarded the prize, basically, because he was not Bush. It was the zeitgeist of that time. We (and by we, I mean most people in the planet) were really tired of the Bush administration exploits.

Kissinger could help to establish a ceasefire in Vietnam, but it feels like the things they did in Cambodia before that, should subtract some points for a Peace Prize.
Stepping sideways from the multinational revelations of the Pandora Papers, as a US citizen I'm floored by how much tax abuse comes from organized religion and how little we seem to be concerned by it.

I've considered creating my own church for along the same reasoning you describe. If I can make a Mary Mag Was Actually Jesus Church with minimal effort, and the end result is I get to play the same game that corrupt ministers do, shouldn't I ethically do so? There's good and bad about it, and I leaned towards no. But maybe the problem is it's unethical if too few people do it. If I scale it up, does it become ethically different?

Say TurboTax starts providing any Joe Schmoe the chance to click a few buttons and handle all the hard things to establish his new 'church' is a legally tax-exempt financial vehicle on religious grounds. What would come of it? Would it accelerate the good or bad?
As a Russian, this is a complete and utter disgrace. Kremlin is very pleased with this decision and has already congratulated Muratov. Good job, Nobel Peace Prize committee.
Navalny has rich history of hate against ethnic and sexual minorities, so giving him the prize would be very controversial in today's world. No?
> The ecosystem will adapt.

Sure, but as with climate change, you may not like the result. I guess there's a fair chance that it won't be "just like now, but no mosquito bites". Mosquito larvae are a big source of food for others, and extensively prey on larvae of other species, keeping those in check. Adult mosquitos are important pollinators, too, and as we're currently discovering with bees, taking out an important pollinator has big consequences and while the ecosystems will adapt, it may well end up shedding very desirable species entirely, ecosystems take a long time to bounce back, and may be a lot less appealing to us afterwards.

Frogs and fish might suffer, too, they'll have to make do with a lot less food when you take mosquitos out, and what takes their niche may not be as palatable. You push these below a sustainable population size in an area, you probably lose them entirely, and their function of keeping insect larvae and adult insects in check. Since we'd like to enjoy mosquito-free summers ourselves, and soon, the time scales we'd typically do such interventions on is way too short for much adaptation in vertebrates to take place, generation times even of frogs and small fish are too long for that. You may end up with ponds that are way emptier and more silent, and with lots more creepy crawlies and possibly a long-term balance that has, say, way more rats, roaches, etc.
It is a ponzi/illegal bank scheme the moment they mint more tokens than they have liquid assets.

Could they come clean, will there be a bank/USDT run?

Depends of how much USDT real clients hold and how much USD they hold, and how likely it is that EVERYONE wants to convert USDT back to USD -- it would take a very catastrophic collapse of cryptos for that to happen.

USDT has intrinsic value for money laundering, so even if all other cryptos would go to 0, not everyone would want their USDT converted to cash.

While I don't like USDT, and I don't think that's the case --someone printing USDT could have already amassed a great fortune, and if he was benevolent enough, could probably redeem all USDT of all the real people holding USDT.
Or Stanislaw Lem from 1964's "The Invincible" where autonomous drone swarms take out all life and complex machinery. In the story, they evolve, but a lot of the swarm behavior is similar to killer bot drone swarms like from the clip above.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Invincible
It's not the first time that someone who was awarded the peace prize turned out with their later actions to be unworthy. So while this isn't exactly Nobel's will it may be better.
How to Purchase VigorMax Male Enhancement?
VigorMax Reviews definition is essentially to be had on line at the authentic web webpage of the creating association. be cautious for miscreants and phony people. Their transporter is secure and speedy. They need preliminary gives for ahead of time customers so cross first and benefit them. You best go to the hyperlink call attention to under and fill withinside the necessities for requesting your item. You might get hold of your request in couple of days.

https://doctor4supplement.com/vigornow/

https://www.facebook.com/maleenhancementsupplements/posts/973389933210592

https://promosimple.com/giveaways/vigornow-reviews-is-vigor-now-male-performance-matrix-scam-pills-price/

https://www.fuzia.com/article_detail/296098/vigornow-male-enhancement-reviews-vigornow-pills-price

https://kit.co/VigorNowPillsPrice/vigornow-male-enhancement

https://www.spreaker.com/show/vigornow-male-performence

https://r2.community.samsung.com/t5/Galaxy-S/VigorNow-Male-Enhancement-Reviews-Shocking-Price-amp-Website-of/m-p/9771650#M492630

http://getvigornowpills.educatorpages.com/

https://vigornow-11.jimdosite.com/

https://twitter.com/vigor_now
Because they didn't "get it wrong":

* They knew about the heinous crimes for which recipients such as Kissinger had already been responsible. (With Obama this is somewhat less of an issue, but he already had a record as US senator and president for a few months; and those did not suggest a future worthy of a peace prize, to say the least).

* They knew those recipients were not penitent regarding their crimes.

* They never acknowledged the awardings of these people as a mistake.

So - they got it right, in their view. It's just that your or my idea of what's right is not theirs.
I don’t think you statement is correct. Multiple colleges of Muratov have been assassinated. Muratov never knew he would live this long, by continuing his work he has continuously endangered not only his freedom but also his live.
The Nobel peace prize has had a long tendency of handing out awards short-sightedly for promises rather than solutions, not just when giving it to American politicians:

• In the 1920s, Britain and France got the Peace Prize for telling Germany that it's allowed to attack Poland, and Germany received it as well for graciously accepting these terms.

• The International Peace Bureau and Inter-Parliamentary Union got multiple prizes for the great accomplishments of existing, despite having achieved nothing of note in the 120+ years of their existence.

• Similarly, the League of Nations got several prizes in the first few years of existence (when everyone was too broke to afford another war anyway), despite being a toothless paper tiger that did nothing to prevent WW2.

• Kellogg received the prize in 1930 for a treaty he organized in 1929, which failed as early as 1931.

And that's just the questionable awards up until 1930. Its track record later isn't much better.

I don't have any objections to this year's laureates (though I'm not too familiar with their works), but ultimately, the question is whether the prize is living up to its high expectations, and if not, what should be done to improve it.
If you owe money to a bank for example have your financial life crash during one of the many fiscal disasters in the last 20 years and end up with an account closed with a negative balance either because you are overdrawn or because you accidentally had an auto payment drafted from it it can become impossible to get a bank account with another institution.
They are related by the Boltzmann equation. The intuitive interpretation is this: entropy is the amount of information required to determine a particular microstate from the associated macrostate. (This is how you solve Maxwell's demon)

(Note that I don't really know what I'm talking about, I'm just parroting what I remember from my information theory course)
Plan 9 has had a very active development community during the past decade, nothing is preventing people from coming up with interesting ideas and patches, even to APE if that floats one's boat. Mixing different contrasting cultures usually just doesn't work, if you want POSIX, use a POSIX system, if you want Plan 9, go native, i.e. how the system was intended to be used.
you've got no headroom left for load spikes!

but this sort of question obscures the reality. are you asking this in the context of a machine which is running slowly? are the clients which are querying the DBMS acting differently? has there recently been a change to the application which might have brought this about? have the marketing department started an advertising campaign without telling you?
> If you were to believe popular media narratives, rich Americans would be the number 1 client of most of these firms.

Not my expectation exactly because

> The US has relatively low capital gains taxes

This is very euphemistic. The US is a maze of tax havens and loopholes. Some states make it easier to launder art, some make it easier to zero-out income taxes and so on. Plus endless tax benefits “for the sake of the economy”.

So congratz to the US on allowing such nasty behavior inside instead of adding a few more contrived hoops to those who wish to evade taxes…
> its obvious why x86 won - you could get the critical jobs done.

It is a bit less obvious, in fact.

Motorola never looked at 68k CPU's as a serious business, more like toying around with the CPU's all the time or looking at them as a less important spin-off of the main business. Their main sources of income were defence contracts (e.g. specialised or hardened microchips), microcontrollers, DSP's (which were pretty cool, by the way, – all implementing the Harvard architecture), memory chips (I think), radios and the field radio equipment and later mobiles.

They carried largely the same attitude to 88k RISC and PowerPC CPU lines (albeit trying to compete more seriously for a while), but ultimately failing to catch up and leading to the eventual PowerPC demise. After that failure, they spun off anything CPU, DSP and microcontroller related into Freescale, and the rest is now history.
Keep cool friend. It gives me headaches as well but...
Everybody is entitled to their stupid opinion. So are we :)
But I have to react to :

> and you probably shouldn't be contradicting the experts.

As you know, expert themselves can disagree, and have strong evidence to defend their sides.

For example, Niels Bohr and Einstein had massive disagreements, both of them are references, and had convincing arguments.

In the end you got to choose what you want to believe in with your intellect and your guts.
And if you have neither, the New York Times it is haha
Yup, that sounds like the perfect solution to the problem of companies not paying enough taxes
On other side, judiciary system sometimes uses analogies. For example, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fruit_of_the_poisonous_tree
Which systems? I have a ten year old laptop it works fine on.
Not one to one though, it sounds like you know what you're talking about but the markets are of course decoupled. Home owners would like to pass along the entirety of their property tax, but whether they can or not will depend on the rental market, possibly renters can't afford the extra amount of the property tax and so adding it all makes the rentals unattractive and so the homeowner can only pass on some of the tax.
As someone with significant production experience in both this is heavily biased but also at least once totally completely false:

> React Hooks made it even worse. Now it’s overly restrictive, and it doesn’t even allow Typescript to work.

TypeScript works beautifully with hooks.

I'll give it one thing though: IMO redux is totally unnecessary.

We've been removing redux, rewriting to plain react for a while already and no one complains. Why? As far as I can see because everything we used redux for is better solved by composing views and services thoughtfully.
> The ... Committee has decided to award the Nobel Peace Prize ... to Maria Ressa and Dmitry Muratov for their efforts to safeguard freedom of expression, which is a precondition for democracy and lasting peace.

I would have expected to see WikiLeaks, or Julian Assange personally, among the recipients of a prize with this focus. Although, as other commenters suggest, the Nobel committee might be considered discredited enough for us not to have any expectations of them.
The protection these dodgy sites enjoy also protect a lot of other sites that could be quickly removed with simply enough capital, even if the legal claims had absolutely no basis.

Yes, it isn't optimal, but the advantages of hosters not carelessly taking down other sites makes hosting a few bad apples worth it.
Two Gotchas for ARM-Based Lambda
My case is a little special because I developed the WiX Toolset when I was an employee at Microsoft. I never owned the copyright (Microsoft did). So, I wouldn't be asking for the copyright back... I'd be asking for it for the first time.

And there are advantages to a legally well protected entity holding the copyright. One for example: my company (FireGiant) is "firewalled" from certain legal issues.

So I'm still contemplating the future and don't have a real answer for you yet.
I agree, that one seems wrong. From measuring some snapshots of the animating demos though, it looks like they are doing it correctly, as the width doesn't seem to be changing like in that red and grey diagram. I haven't tried to understand the code though.
Would you prefer that they don't report on Facebook actively harming society?
UK has quite a good reputation from a silicon design perspective

About ten years ago (so may not still be accurate) there were more chip design companies concentrated around Bristol / Bath area than anywhere else outside Silicon Valley

Was often cited as a legacy of Transputer being based in Bristol / South Wales
> The fact that Obama also turned out to be a murderous warmonger just illustrates how it's better to judge people on their actions rather than their rhetoric.

Or identity in general. Obama even admitted that he doesn't know why he received it. Perhaps everyone knows that the Peace Prize has lost respect in the 21st century since it can be won with little effort or for no reason.

What a shame and a complete waste.
Not a research on such behaviour but more an application to macroeconomics : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitol_Hill_Babysitting_Co-op

It illustrates :

> the paradox states that an increase in autonomous saving leads to a decrease in aggregate demand and thus a decrease in gross output which will in turn lower total saving. The paradox is, narrowly speaking, that total saving may fall because of individuals' attempts to increase their saving, and, broadly speaking, that increase in saving may be harmful to an economy.