skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yes, it goes into full anti-lock braking, but it only does this at the very last possible second it can be done without a collision - the driver usually gets enough time hearing an audible alarm to stop, provided there is enough time.

I haven’t heard of any rear end accidents due to false alarms with AEB, though that doesn’t mean they don’t exist. I’d guess the system is tuned to need enough confidence that a forward collision is likely to engage braking, knowing of the potential consequences of suddenly and dramatically stopping.
Short version is no unless you actually get someone to loan you their tethers under contract, and you sell them to someone else for USD with the promise you'll return them.

This architecture doesn't exist AFAIK - certainly no trustworthy parties are offering it (since why would they want Tethers?).
The Hyperion fork seems to be quite active.
Alternative Mobile Browser for Social Media
> There is very little actual consensus in the scientific community about anything... eggs are bad for you - no wait, eggs are good for you - no wait, only 1 egg a day - eat as many eggs as you can! Nobody agrees on eggs - how can we have agreement on far more important and challenging-to-study things like the climate?

Yes and if you ask Philip Morris, cigarettes are good for you and there is some evidence to the "benefits" of smoking by scientists. That doesn't mean smoking is healthy, nor is there a general consensus that it is good. The weighted evidence points to smoking being bad for you.

Now while I don't fully agree with the global warming fanatics, I am still sitting on the fence personally but leaning towards there being a problem, I don't see why a group of publishers and advertisers are not able to determine whether they want to be associated with the global warning deniers, given that there is such weighted evidence against them.
Yes, probably they are going to use ML to classify if content has some kind of climate change denial. There could be some persantage that will be evaluatef wrongly by the AI. That is okay, I mean it cannot be perfect. Some Youtubers will loose their channel just becaouse they said somwthing about climate change. At the and everyone will stop talking about climate so that they don't fall under false positeves.
I don't think that's the right question or comparison.

If this young person below 30 gets a side effect from the vaccine, is that side effect worse than what they'd get by having the virus?

It should be clear that we aren't going to suppress or eradicate covid, so you shouldn't be comparing getting the vaccine or nothing happening, but getting covid with or without the vaccine
Norway has a 1.4 trillion dollars in oil wealth. In Australia individuals save for their own retirement. Comparing these two retirement funding mechanisms on the basis of how much individuals benefit and transaction cost per AUM isn't sensible.

Obviously being given free oil money is better than needing to save.
No, because it's enough that it exists as an existence proof refuting the hypothesis. The burden is on people contending that e.g. AP can't stop for emergency vehicles (or the related point in the linked article that emergency braking doesn't work) to show that it is unsafe. That analysis doesn't hold for obvious interpretations of the data we have. That doesn't mean it's wrong, it means you need to come to the table with more work. It's not enough to argue with me on HN.
Constitution Grove – the Navy’s White Oak Forest on a High Tech Base (2020)
Was overwork / fatigue what caused the incidents OP listed?
what's wrong with blue-collar work? tech elitism never fails to amuse me.

anyway, there is a push to do the same for doctors [1] and lawyers [2], so your point is moot anyway. the problem is that with credentialed backgrounds it will never be as easy so it will always seem like tech is more accessible, which it is inherently.

finally, with respect to incarceration and being a part of a profession, unfortunately many hospitals and law firms will not hire felons, which is a problem in itself, but it's a fact. so this kind of website would be difficult for those fields. so even if med school and law school respectively weren't necessary, it would still be difficult. tech companies are very liberal in this aspect, actually.

[1] https://www.ama-assn.org/about/leadership/ama-s-strategic-pl...

[2] https://www.americanbar.org/groups/litigation/publications/l...
"Company allowing the spread of nasty election lies" quite literally describes what any media company is doing when they give air time to pretty much any running candidate.
Why is visual out? Cameras are cheap
You're right, sort of. Because C doesn't have proper arrays, you make up for it by passing a pointer to the first element and the range. So for C to do as well as Fortran on matrix operations the compiler developers need help. One source of help is that if you have a pointer to double and a pointer to int, you can assume that writing pdouble[k] doesn't alter anything reachable as pint[m].
The bulk of miner income is mining new bitcoins. And the money received from that goes to burning energy mostly.

So if someone new buys a miner btc at $54,000 today, that represents money paying for coal that was burnt. It isn’t profits and the money is gone. Effectively you are transforming $54,000 into burnt coal and a bitcoin.

Eg:

1. Miner expects $54,000 bitcoin sale. Takes $53,000 loan, buys coal, burns it. Gets bitcoin

2. Received $54,000, gives 1 BTC. Pays back loan

If you ask for your $54,000 back, it isn’t there. It’s gone.

(I know mining doesn’t work so precisely but that’s just a thought experiment to illustrate the dynamic)
And also presumably for the Chinese. Who, if the preliminary reports are not to be believed, possibly received a notification that one of their UUVs or subs was damaged. While tensions are high with Taiwan. And there are five(?) international carriers / amphibs conducting manuevers off Japan.
They are ridiculously complicated to operate. Teslas can't avoid hitting stuff on the road completely, I wouldn't feel great about having one completely automated and deciding for itself when to initiate nuclear war if it isn't in communications range. I highly doubt they were all sitting around drinking beers and not watching the road in front of them, but it would be good to wait until we have more information before throwing the sailors under the bus.

> with crack seal-type units only operating them

There already are highly skilled individuals that operate them. Seal team members are in limited supply and think it makes more sense to have those that are more intellectually strong run them.

They are a deterrent and non-nuclear submarines have large drawbacks when in combat. China has become more and more aggressive and they have scaled up their nuclear missile silos a bunch in recent years, have been sprinting towards a large more effective navy and I don't think they will have qualms about using morally questionable tech.
timewise it checks
25 MPH
The main assumption that is incorrect here is that there is no alternative to the mRNA vaccines targeting the spike protein.

I'm not against vaccination but I would not recommend it to anyone after what it did to my body. Whatever it is.

Give me anything else and I'll take it, all I need is COVID risk reduction and due to where I am it will likely be one of the Chinese alternatives.
Bennett has done a fantastic job. There WILL be a movie about this company when investors lose faith. Like next decades, "the big short".
The bar is lower because we don’t have formal testing like they do, e.g. the bar exam or med school.
A grown blue whale weights about 1/50th of the submarine (~200 tons vs ~10k tons) and is quite a bit squishier. But maybe that would still be enough to knock some submariners around and cause some injuries? I'm not sure.
Sugar alcohols, if overdone, can screw up your GI tract.

I keep a bowl of fruit in the house at all times, and it's time to go to the store when it's getting low. I make it easier for myself to get some fiber with my sugar than to make myself something sweet. It's not enough on its own, but it sure helps.
I would like to second this. Thanks for linking this. As someone starting out in deep learning and noticing that a lot of things are still more art than science this seems great for avoiding some footguns!
1 in 3 workers saw higher health costs this year, survey finds
That's actually not true, people who got the first dose of moderna will not get a second one, and it's being stopped for all persons under 30, not just males. In practice it will be stopped for everyone above 30 as well.
/Swede
That's pretty amazing. I vote we use it for good.

(Though that POV shot in the forest looked straight out of Evil Dead II.)
Oh hey I interviewed with y'all a few years back, glad to see you're still around.
> Margin has "come to" DEX the moment smartcontracts offer collateralized DeFi lending, which they have, so I'm not sure what you mean here.

Ok, fair. What I mean is high leverage, which is the fuel for the type of manipulation I’m referring to.

To your point about CEX lying about price, that’s a very risky proposition for the arbitrage reasons you mention (CEX arbitrage actually easier for a number of reasons, but I understand why you’d think DEX is easier).

If I run a CEX, unless I collude with every other venue I risk all the arbitrageurs buying/selling my fake prices which means it’s not fake, I’ve just traded against them.

> Furthermore, even the issue of more expensive liquidity from transaction fees wouldn't be true for the far-cheaper L2 sidechains.

No, I said capital efficiency, not execution cost. DEX costs are crazy, but that’s by choice, whereas the capital efficiency is a structural issue. If I want to provide liquidity on 100 CEX markets, I only need enough capital to wear the orders I actually get filled on at any given point in time. As an AMM I’d have have enough capital to be in a 100 different LPs.

To illustrate: let’s say I want to provide $1m of resting liquidity in 100 CEX markets. Let’s say that in doing this, I end up having positions at any point in time that require $10m of capital. If I want to provide the same $1m of liquidity in 100 DEX markets, I need $100m.

So a CEX ends up being 10x more efficient from a capital use perspective.
Yeah by drinks I mean the alcohol-based unit, not 10 glasses of Vodka lol.
Go ahead give me one good argument for brexit, I would love to hear at least one tangible concrete argument.
I was more saying there needs to be no system of domains per se. Let any person register any "internet address" and ICANN maintains authoritative servers for all internet addresses.
Huh. You and I have two very different readings on this. I'm talking about the ML researcher's time (what if they hired more people instead) and you're talking about human text processors (what if people did this work by hand instead). Kinda neat that we had such different readings.
A small tethered float with accelerometers that ascends along the path of the surfacing submarine.
>Facebook has taken on the role of managing the distribution of information to billions of people. It handles communications between groups and individuals. Given how critical those activities are to a healthy, liberal, free society, we should take steps to protect the rights and duties of individual users and platforms. Maybe we'll coalesce into a roughly cooperative country sometime in the future an accomplish that.

Facebook has specifically designated itself as a platform, not a content provider. IF what you are saying is true, we need to remove Section 230 protection and force Facebook to be accountable for all of its content.

Personally I think there are countless alternatives to Facebook and trying to nationalize into a utility, or regulate it with an agency will only serve to foment authoritarianism.
> I don't know why people don't understand this.

That old Upton Sinclair quote comes to mind: the finance guys are making a ton of money getting people to ante in and when you buy a cryptocurrency the only way you get your money back is by talking it up so anyone who's already in has a big incentive not to ask questions.
I've probably given away 15-20 endgrain cutting boards over the last few Christmases to various family and friends - nothing fancy, just random pattern to use up scrap from other projects instead of tossing it in the fire pit. I know of at least 4 that have never been used for anything but serving trays because they're "special".

I find it hilarious every time - they're made to be used and abused. I've told every one of them "if you actually manage to use it enough to damage it, I'll just make you another one", but they still sit there in pristine condition.
If I got a serious case of covid, my priors would be that my immune reaction sucked, not that it was sufficient.
I have friends that have played on Lichess for years and never reached above 1400. How you study is much more important than how much you study. Analyzing different modes of study, as done in this blog post, is quite useful.
I'm like 34 and I think I'm worth like £12k. No kids, no waifu, no gf.

I started really late in life but I hope to build a house next year, already got the land and I think its going to be brilliant, after that I'll just continue to work, pay my mortgage, have a nice holiday every few years, drink a few beers and then expect to die alone, just like everyone else, since the beginning of time.

I do care to have that cushion-fund to allow me to get over hard times, other than that I think having death insurance is wise so you can pay for your own gravestone and maybe have an Elvis impersonator sing Amazing Grace. Which is kind of like an odd idea since I tell people they're 'not invited to my funeral' as much as I can.

In the end, it doesn't matter... as long as you've got enough for the odd BBQ with friends, the staycation, the nice steak dinner, laughs and help a friend or family here and there... Enjoy life folks, remember, you can end up in a grave with a million bucks in your bank account any single day of the lord...
> For something that doesn't even seem like much of a problem

Presumably the author’s occupation, “marketing science”, is interested in getting people to use things (and use them up) so that they’ll need to buy more of them, so that they a marketer can then sell them those things.
Looks like the parent comment is some sort of "reply" to the title.

Curiousity might lead some to actually look at the article. It is very short.

For those who won't, the tag line is "The problem starts at the top". Perhaps that is a reference to Zuckerberg.

The topic is reputation. The article quickly summarises the recent complaints being made against Facebook.

Then it cuts to the chase.

"The most damaging claim this week gained the least attention. Ms Haugen alleges that Facebook has concealed a decline in its young American users. She revealed internal projections that a drop in teenagers' engagement could lead to an overall decline in American users of 45% within the next two years."

This is where FB could potentially run afoul with the SEC.

Its also where FB is continuing to provide material for lawyers representing large instutional investors who want to sue Facebook.

The parent comment, typical of others routinely shared on HN, seems to suggest the only thing that matters is what "most people" think. IOW, whatever is discussed on HN should be ignored because people who do not read HN have no opinion on it. (If they do not read HN, then how would they.)

Here, the Economist suggests otherwise. What matters to the Economist is not what "most people" think. Instead it focuses on what the people who work at Facebook think.

"Facebook is nearing a reputational point of no return. Even when it set out plausible responses to Ms Haugen, people no longer wanted to hear. The firm risks joining the ranks of corporate untouchables like big tobacco. If that idea takes hold, Facebook risks losing its young, liberal staff."
Those steps of regulation of opinions is silly and eventually eat itself.

Problem is that with big tech centralisation and data surveillance we are vanurable to ideology in global scale more then ever in history. Whole covid agenda is proof of it.
One thing, as the other commenter alluded to: Japanese in US English is almost strictly an adjective, for some reason. Really, any other ese too, including Chinese.

It doesn't sound abnormal to call someone a Korean, or most of the 'an's. But it does to call someone a Chinese/Japanese, as it's only used in the adjective form. We used to have noun forms, but they were deemed offensive long ago - so I'm not sure what the correct way is today.
Big debate around that, apparently — and one vs. more locations, etc. I should remember the exact area after having to draw so many version of the interaction graphs, but not on the top of my head — did check: Bed Nucleus of Stria Terminalis.

I know one of her coauthor has doubt that the location matters that much (we are talking places that are less than a centimetre apart, at the very center of the brain for anyone who isn't up to date on their basal ganglia) and suspects that current works because it actually affects the whole area. Telling neurosurgeons that millimetres are not a matter of life-and-death apparently didn’t go too well at the latest conference… and honestly, it sounds a bit nerdy from the outside, but I’m really impressed by how much they care, and very happy that they do.

There’s been progress on imaging, but given the image quality and resolution, the very small number of patients for whom it didn’t work to compare against, I’d be surprised if they can make non-obvious judgements like “it can work as long as one of those is electrified” vs. “it works because anywhere of that area has some current of at least that much” vs. “it works because everywhere in that area has current above a low threshold, but you need to put more if you use electrodes in only some location”.

> crossover trial design

Good idea, definitely my recommendation (I implemented a lot of tests with that for on-line AB-tests to account for novelty effects); I think it has been discussed and was used before, but I remember a story of patients who got very concerned over loosing the sanity they had finally gained, and begged to get the current back. The risk of regression might lead to worst outcomes. That’s the different with say, tremors from Parkinson’s: sure they are impossible to live with, but if you are confident they can be switched on and off, they become an annoying party trick. Same as a prosthetic leg: you need it to walk but if you have to take it off, you can. Mental health doesn't have the same tangibility: you are not yourself anymore without it? It’s hard to explain but it drives a lot of the trickier ethical questions in psychiatry.

Check the literature because I could have made the patients up, or it could be a speculation from the ethics committee. But as the device gets more common, there will be better stats & methodology. I suspect that, to get from a research exception to a diagnostic recommendation, they will need to do investigate to recommend either switching it off in case of concern, how, how fast, which levels, when to stop lowering, etc.) or advise against any reduction, or recommend having the device removed… Crossover could be helpful in that context.
But want Pfizer vaccine also found to be linked to myocarditis and pericarditis in a very small percentage of younger people, primarily males.

OTOH, even COVID is linked to higher percentage of both, and other issues..
exactly, main feature/drawback of any computer is =

they do not know what reality is,
they can compute/evaluate only that which they obtain by some flawed means.
I've never thought about this before, and it is strange.

From the Wiki article on demonyms though, "Often, demonyms are the same as the adjectival form of the place, e.g. Egyptian, Japanese, or Greek."

I guess you'd also not say "I am a Japanese", but probably just "I am Japanese"?
he is a Facebook sock puppet that sends FB $50K a day... at least he discloses it
You basically have 3 choices then:
1. Hire a full time nanny
2. Have grandparents act as 1
3. Go fucking mental
S-23 lol
> It turns out there are climatologists that have models they interpret this way.

Won't be a problem when AI starts understanding scientific papers.
Evidence is just data which is collected with the best available methods. With eyes, ears or some engineered equipment.

If perspective changes, we did not have enough data.

The knowledge comes when hard science is applied on this data, e.g math or logic.
For a long time it was illegal to list calories on beer in the US, and the number of people who assume that Guinness is at the high end of caloric density rather than down near the lite beers is just astounding. I didn't believe it, and I've either told a number of people or got to back someone up when they did it. Almost nobody believes you.

It's the malt I think that convinces you that this stuff must be like a beer shake.
Your argument would be more compelling if programming languages with higher level iteration primitives were significantly more optimizable than C. The underlying processor architectures have loop indexes. Just pretending you can do applicative programming doesn't mean you can. C is very adaptable - even to GPUs. Also, I have yet to see that decent memory model.
Incompetent people sliding by is hardly limited to programming
It might have been worth it in 1992. By 1998 there was no point.

That is a really interesting what-if scenario, but I don't think the mid-90s Apple corporate management would have been willing to go through with it. At the very least they would have tried to lock it down to Apple designed Intel hardware, they've never been able to let go of being a hardware company.
Why do you assume I get information from the idiot box? Is it because that's where you get all of yours? You clearly have no idea what I was saying if your first statement tries to say the AHA is more of an authority than some TV taking head.
> and we can't see who registered the domain or who hosts the site (since Cloudflare masks the IPs.)

According to OP, it should be possible to get Cloudflare to tell you the originating IPs. I am not sure the mechanism though. From article:

> But here, the parties agree that Cloudflare informs complainants of the identity of the host in response to receiving a copyright complaint, in addition to forwarding the complaint along to the host provider.
> The broader sense of acronym inclusive of terms pronounced as the individual letters (such as "TNT") is sometimes criticized, but it is the term's original meaning[1] and is in common use.[2]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acronym
'Autonomous help-seeking' on the job pays dividends for workers
Who outside of the cryptocurrency industry would notice if they disappeared?

Who outside of the automotive industry would notice if cars disappeared?

That's your answer: pollution is still a concern but only one of those is balanced against significant real-world benefits for people other than the sellers.
in the indo pacific region?
>> "You also have a Cloudflare account to file a complaint, which I found to be odd."

That's incorrect. Anyone can fill out the web reporting form here: cloudflare.com/abuse -- absolutely no Cloudflare account needed.
How do they define “disadvantaged?”