skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Because Tesla effectively doesn't have AEB while AutoPilot is enabled.

In a Tesla AEB should be an entirely self-contained ("dumber") system. Its only job should be to look for any ground-level object ahead and brake. It should do this using simpler but more reliable ("dumber") techniques like forward bumper-level radar or camera parallax, not NN/deep learning/object recognition/AI.

To use an analogy, AEB should be like two-factor authentication. If your "second" factor is the same as your first, then it isn't two-factor. In this case AutoPilot is the "first" and "second" factor i.e. it is AEB and in control of the vehicle.

So Tesla's vehicles absolutely have AEB, when AutoPilot is disabled, because it is offering a "second opinion" relative to the driver. So IIHS's ratings are correct in that instance. But as soon as AutoPilot is enabled it is no longer a "second" opinion and therefore may as well not exist.

Unfortunately Tesla aren't alone in making this mistake. We're seeing other vehicle manufacturers stepping into the vehicle automation space double-dipping their auto-drive systems into AEB. It is a bad practice regardless of who, AEB should be its own system with its own simpler/dumber logic that protects people from auto-drive mistakes, not compounds them.
Google Isn’t in Smartphones Business
> Wouldn’t the taxpayers foot the bill for whatever the price is?

No, that's not how state budgets work. It's the other way around. Universities will get whatever the state appropriates to them and then have an obligation to take all comers.
> where it might just go into a bank account and stop moving.

Banks don't make money by storing your dollar in a vault. They make money by loaning it out. They loan deposits out as fast as possible.

People who get the loans don't sit on it, either. It's madness to be paying interest on money just to let it set. They borrow money in order to promptly spend it.
Towns we have not moved toward
The case of flu displays that we as human species could eradicate some of diseases with a coordinated effort.
In my opinion, Microsoft is the same Microsoft they were two decades ago. The company is still as efficient as they were back then at destroying what goodwill they have with developers[1].

However, I can't ignore that they've certainly created value for engineers that use Windows to develop software that runs on Linux, similar to the value created by WINE's developers. It's just a shame that similar value and innovation are stifled by the limitations set by Google's SafetyNet when it comes to running Android software on other platforms.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28779342
> Mon Cheri Bridals and Maggie Sottero Designs alleged that Cloudflare contributes to copyright infringement by providing performance-improvement services, including its content-distribution network and caching capabilities that improve the quality of webpages and make them load faster, Chhabria wrote. But the "plaintiffs have not presented evidence from which a jury could conclude that Cloudflare's performance-improvement services materially contribute to copyright infringement. The plaintiffs' only evidence of the effects of these services is promotional material from Cloudflare's website touting the benefits of its services. These general statements do not speak to the effects of Cloudflare on the direct infringement at issue here."

> The plaintiffs did not prove that the faster website-load times enabled by Cloudflare "would be likely to lead to significantly more infringement." Additionally, Cloudflare removing infringing material from its cache would not prevent users from seeing the copyrighted images. "[R]emoving material from a cache without removing it from the hosting server would not prevent the direct infringement from occurring," Chhabria wrote.

The claim was that the caching of the copyright infringing content is an issue. Cloudflare said "that can't be the issue".

You took the last sentence of the second paragraph out of its context.
The issue is, cars used to be all analog. You pull this wire that thing moves. But nowadays cars are more digital than analog.
I'd strongly recommend looking at GiveWell specifically: They avoid the weird "AI risk" stuff and mostly focus on Malaria prevention and other very well studied, high-value third world interventions.

In particular, they also list where your money is going, so you can just pick and choose which of their causes you want to support (although I personally donate directly to them so they can decide which charity they think currently maximizes impact-per-dollar): https://www.givewell.org/charities/top-charities

> I'd just encourage people to take 5 minutes and choose their own charities instead of blindly choosing their suggestions.

The problem here is that some organizations have a very well proven track record of solving real problems; some organizations instead focus on very nebulous "social messaging and awareness"; and some organizations exist primarily to pay their executives well.

A quick 5 minute search won't really yield a lot of information on effectiveness, but an organization like GiveWell can afford to hire actual researchers to answer these questions.

(I'm sure there's other decent sources to help evaluate that question, of course. GiveWell is just the one I'm most familiar/fond of)
Those are some pretty nice synthetic benchmarks! However, if you'd like a look at a more real world scenario or two, have a look at the TechEmpower benchmarks as well.

For example, here are filters for both JS and Python: https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r20&hw=...

Do note that for most of the "realistic" stacks out there, you'd probably want to filter out all of the micro or no framework approaches, to compare something like Express and Koa against Django and Flask, like in the following link: https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r20&hw=...

Here's the summary page with composite scores across all tests (though you might also want to filter by data storage solution, for example, MySQL): https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r20&hw=...

To summarize, the performance from the best to worst currently is:

Composite scores: Koa (JS) > Express (JS) > Flask (Python) > Django (Python)
Does 1981 qualify as a millennial? Do generational terms make sense in an international context? Hmm...
The only thing you can't do is the sum of two data registers, and this only applies when calculating an effective address.

When you have 15 registers to work with that's not going to be more of a problem than only having 7 or 8 registers to work with.
How would a government seize Bitcoin? Stealing Bitcoin is not the same as seizing.
And doing things like this are quite likely to make you guilty of money laundering, it can of course be noticed if you’re withdrawing large amounts of money from outside the country.
I should add that most of the Standard library will not often have many visibly dead code branches to prune. Most of what gets discarded is arguments and calls to no-op functions, all the scaffolding. But there is a lot of that. So, for example, an iterator on std::function isn't typically a pointer, but after optimization the instructions left standing are the same as if it was one.
Exactly this. Public ad companies with shareholders cannot keep growing if their userbase stays as constant value and no other methods are used. And grow they must.
Masterclass is the TED Talk of education, it's really glorified / overproduced video podcast / interview, some nice notes, the subjects themselves rake in a lot of money.

It's interesting fodder, surely it has value. But it's not a 'Master Class'.
If it bleeds, it leads. The corporate media has been the primary sower of division and spreads plenty of misinformation itself.

Polarization and vitriol precedes these platforms. Facebook, twitter, reddit, they all make it worse, I agree with that. And I would be in favor of requiring them to make their algorithms public at the very least.

But we must not give an even more centralized authority power over what's considered `harmful` or `misinformation`. You have to imagine this tool in the hands of your enemy because at some point it will be.
Yes it absolutely would. A better approach would be to test the creditworthiness of the educational program against the earning power of its graduates. That would go a long way towards solving literally every issue relating to student debt and tuition costs.
Presumably, the state has more leverage to negotiate/cap prices than the individual student.
Is Earth’s Inbox Full?
Bringing Objective-C to the Amiga (2018)
I think its simpler than that - journalists get a lot of positive reinforcement and attention from twitter, so they just like it more.
Then imagine if HN comments could only be 280 characters. And instead of seeing all the branches of the conversation tree, ordered by the vote count of the parent node, you instead saw a random subset of them, chosen on the basis of what Twitter thinks will optimise engagement for your specific account. Once you finish your assigned selection of replies, you're not able to see – hell, you're not even able to elect to be shown – the rest of the thread.

Instead, you're shown more tweets Twitter chooses for you, except this time unrelated ones, such that I recently followed a link to a Brendan Eich tweet about JavaScript and ended up being shepherded to the latest and greatest anti-vax thought leaders, in keeping with his current political leanings: https://imgur.com/a/755aOwI

I'm not going to make any grand claims about it being 'toxic' or 'destroying democracy', or how it ought to be banned, or about tHe AlGOrIthMs, or any of that. I'm just going to say that it's an extraordinarily, exasperatingly stilted way of structuring a conversation. And I'm mystified by that, given the size and success of Twitter, and the relative ease of just showing you the straight conversation like HN does. Hell, if they did that, I wouldn't even care about the character limit.</rant>
Author here. Thanks for your comments!

In general - this is expensive stuff. Training big, accurate models just requires a lot of compute, and there is a "barrier to entry" wrt costs, even if you're able to get those costs down. I think it's similar to startups not really being able to get into the aerospace industry unless they raise lots of funding (ie, Boom Supersonic).

Practically speaking though, for startups without funding, or access to cloud credits, my advice would be to just train the best model you can, with the compute resources you have available. Try to close your first customer with an "MVP" model. Even if your model is not good enough for most customers - you can close one, get some incremental revenue, and keep iterating.

When we first started (2017), I trained models that were ~1/10 the size of our current models on a few K80s in AWS. These models were much worse compared to our models today, but they helped us make incremental progress to get to where we are now.
Is it not easy to do this in the US with several popular legal local exchanges?
Chickenpox vaccine lasts a lifetime, giving it to kids protects them as an adult as well.
Why not? A doc is a file, and GDrive still has directories, or folders. Not everything is a doc, there are sheets, pdfs, pics, among others
Thanks everyone. Donated $100 https://i.imgur.com/BasBMKg.jpg
Which language did you mean? Also in any case wouldn't that be IDE issue.

I used Python and I noticed over the years that things like type interference drastically improved.

Similarly type checker in Rust extension for IntelliJ was lacking even though Rust has superior type system.
>I wonder if open source ODE solvers are getting good high-order symplectic methods by now...

Up to 10th order https://diffeq.sciml.ai/stable/solvers/dynamical_solve/#Symp... . Also Magnus methods https://diffeq.sciml.ai/stable/solvers/nonautonomous_linear_... and exponential integrators https://diffeq.sciml.ai/stable/solvers/split_ode_solve/#Ordi... . And the expmv implementations are highly optimized as well: https://github.com/SciML/ExponentialUtilities.jl . A lot of this specialized matrix exponential stuff is rather fun, for example see https://github.com/SciML/ExponentialUtilities.jl/pull/64
I don't think that's enough signal to disambiguate "coordinate use of a 'fake whistleblower' against Facebook" from simple fortune. Some members of the Democratic party want to rein in Facebook and other big-tech companies; of that I have no doubt. But "big tech" in general has been shedding whistle-blowers for years now as individuals find their consciences no longer let them play the game... My 'common sense' tells me if it weren't Frances Haugen, it'd have been someone else.
It's very different constitutionally: the German situation is that the supreme court holds that EU constitutional supremacy is valid, but must not contradict the basic law. The Polish situation is that the supreme court was pushed to one side in a constitutionally dubious gambit in order to declare constitutional supremacy invalid.

The German situation is weird, but it's not essentially different that a government might agree to an international treaty and then take its time over passing legislation to conform to it that isn't unambiguously identical to what it agreed it would do.
I'd say that chess fundamentals is three things: Endgames, tactics, and positional strategy. OP's strategy of studying openings and tactics is a very fun and accessible improvement path for intelligent new players, but it is very fragile, as you become vulnerable the second the opponent gets you out of your opening theory. Studying endgames and positional motifs gives you important decision-making tools in unfamiliar positions. Hiring a chess coach is probably the easiest way to systematically improve in these areas, if you're not a robot immune to the tedium of working through Dvoretsky's endgame manual and Silman's Reassess your Chess.

After getting a handle on the fundamentals, the next step is just the accumulation of ideas. GMs use this word all the time in lectures and their post-mortem interviews. Some are common and obvious -- pressuring f2/f7, or yoloing a pawn storm in oppositely castled positions, or outposting an "octopus knight" on the sixth rank, for example. Other ideas require so much genius to see they become famous -- Fischer's Nh4!! at age 13, or Short's king walk, or Shirov's bishop sacrifice, for example.

Accumulating ideas is why studying openings can be helpful in the beginning -- you will learn common plans as well as the most dangerous ideas and traps by brute force just by looking at enough theory. But rather than this inefficient approach -- since you'll never remember every single possible move -- I would recommend studying books and lectures that cover common ideas in the setups you prefer. Specifically, work through the pawn structures you like from GM Mauricio Flores Rios's Chess Structures book, and then study grandmasters who match your style or otherwise inspires you in some way -- e.g. Fischer/Tal for tactical wizards, Karpov/Kramnik for positional specialists, Carlsen/Capablanca for endgame grinders, or Rapport/Jobava/Larsen if you are a weirdo -- and watch Youtube videos analyzing their games and/or buy a book with GM commentary of their best hits.
Buildkite Test Analytics, a new way to identify, track and fix problematic tests
Or do what I would do in this case is generally withdraw from the conversation. I really don't want to needlessly offend folks by using terms out of favor, but upon reading the Wikipedia article it's clear I don't have remotely sufficient understanding of the cultures to successfully address the same population with some substitute that I naively pull out of my ass.
The hosting, downloads, updates, reviews are all covered already by the $99/yr developer fee, because this is what is charged for that to free apps without IAPs.

Apple is just using their anticompetitive stance to charge 10x more than the standard industry rate for payment card processing.
If this allows US dollars to be laundered for drug money this is actually not a terrible idea.
Actual paper cash is more anonymous than most crypto, including Bitcoin.
That's the thing. I am super bullish on El Salvador. I think It could be next Switzerland in the new world order.
> Lots of jokes about invading or overthrowing the gov't but I believe they would just cut El Savador off from the U.S. financial system entirely.

Good thing they're using bitcoin now!
I think they should have rubbed it in with E0 == egress is zero.
It is not as convenient as a redirect, but on iPhone and iPad you can use the "Share" function when on the page in Safari and select "News" as what to share with and that usually works.

I don't know how to do that on a Mac.
>Another thing to consider is that the myocarditis rate from C19 itself may exceed that of the vaccine, which would basically refute the argument against vaccination

No, because you need to consider not just the odds of getting myocarditis from covid vs vaccine (Pc:Pv), but the bayesian probabilities of getting infected (Pi) or vaccinated (1) and then getting myocarditis, such that the full risk analysis would look more like Pi*Pc:Pv[1]. Point being when you are talking about vaccinating the entire population, you can easily end up in a position where there are more cases of heart inflammation from fully vaccinating the population than simply letting the virus run its course. I believe the term is relative risk reduction but don't quote me.

1. This isn't quite right, there should be a 1-x term or two in there somewhere to account for the probabilities of getting vaccinated/infected and not developing myocarditis, but its been a few years since my probability course...In any case the point still stands, that the vaccine may be less likely to cause heart inflammation does not imply that it would produce fewer cases overall if a sizeable proportion is vaccinated. To properly estimate that you need an accurate estimate for the myocarditis rate from both covid and vaccine, which I don't think anyone has.
> The reason was because of environmental regulations.

It's also because shipping a 100 pound lump of iron from China is too stupidly cheap.

Shipping something of that weight halfway around the globe should not be cheap. That causes a lot of perverse incentives.
I agree with you. My dad only drinks coke and says water is bland/bitter. There is definitely a connection between the two.
This is message selectors. We've finally rediscovered OOP in functional programming, and can close down the whole racket (pardon the pun). [Obligatory talk where I did this same trick, but in Swift, in 2018: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQl1EmR9Hus&list=PLKMpKKmHd2...]
Low-effort memes with cheap wit get more likes, which in turn bumps your content higher in the feed which in turn invites more likes, cascading into dozens or scores of your friends liking and validating your post.

Long-form content with more depth gets fewer initial likes, resulting in being hidden from most of your ancillary friends altogether.

This has behavioral impact on all of its users. Do you want to post content that only gets 5 likes versus what gets 50 likes?
hilariously not funny
I'm not sure there is hypocrisy. They can and should care about both. Without users there is no profit.
Eh, it's io-uring is pretty different too, which is why NT just added a clone of io-uring.

https://windows-internals.com/i-o-rings-when-one-i-o-operati...
> Real news is not subjective. There is no agree or disagree.

That's not actually remotely true. People Are Subjective, and "real news" is written by people, and often about people. For one example, they gave Sanders less coverage than Clinton in every single week of the Dem primary; about 2/3 overall.

Their visuals, style, tone and presentation are meticulously crafted to give the impression that they're trustworthy and patriotic; that things are simple. That really ought to give you a clue that they're selling you something.

Tip of the iceberg: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CNN_controversies
I disagree (again) because knowing something sells for a lower amount in X but sells for higher in Y is classical information arbitrage and opportunity cost.
Is rest the only treatment for it?

Also, how was it diagnosed?
I really doubt a central banks fiscal policy revolves around speculating in BTC.
RC's Wiktionary article dryly talks about it in the "Criticism" section.

But if you really want to be deprogrammed, seek out the testimony of passionate ex-RC people. I only allowed myself to look when I was done.

E.g. Jackins would do these weird-assed "sessions on sex" with young women, and when the Minnesota RC community insisted there be a reckoning about it, the entire community was banned. That's when Jackins came out with that encyclical on criticizing leadership.

> The clear anti-racist and anti-oppression stand of the org is admirable.

Meh. My first and only, I forget now what it is called, away camp, that I went on was a racism workshop, and it was cringingly awful. It was that penny-drop that caused me to jettison the whole albatross.

There was all of this mannered formalism that white people were expected - no, required - to maintain when interacting with a PoC that was ... just, embarrassing and worse than useless.

As an aside, it also made me realize that most "anti-racism work" are people projecting their own internal discomfort with other races externally, into other people. People who insist that everyone is racist, for example, are people who cannot imagine a non-racist mindset, likely because, well, they're racists. Avoid these people for the same reason you should avoid men who insist that all men are creepers and rapists. But, you cannot avoid such people in RC, because that's a tenet of the organization itself.

I could go on and on. Anyway, good luck.
Matched you $100 https://i.imgur.com/AIimbak.png
few things I do on Solana:

1. Lend USDC and earn higher interest rate than my bank using https://mango.markets.

2. Trustlessly swap crypto using app.saber.so/#/swap.

3. Occasionally buy NFTs from artists I want to support.
Have you wondered that Maybe people aren't really interested in mastery. Some do, ofcourse but most will be happy with learning just enough. Whenever I hear the word mastery, I am reminded of the Japanese documentary Jiro dreams of sushi. A Japanese sushi chef who is a master at sushi and that's what he has been doing for the last 40 years or so.

Only when one realizes the actual effort that needs to be done to achieve Mastery, most people back out. This is crazy, they say. Who has the time to practice 4 hours a day.

Masterclass doesn't sell mastery.
DuoLingo doesn't sell language learning.
It sells an aspirational hope that this new skill or language is just one course away. And that's comforting to us somehow. We are simple creatures after all.

BTW, I like the word mastery too much that I decided to start a company around it. Primerlabs(https://primerlabs.io). The goal is to create self paced courses that will allow anyone to truly self-learn difficult subject such as physics, mathematics, economics. We are focusing on CS currently but we will get there (hopefully).
Masterclass comes off as the coffee table book of online learning: neat to flip through but no actual substance.
>This is the fallacy in your argument. It's an infectious disease that spreads through the air. An infected individual will emit particles of the virus which will cause other people to become sick, permanently disabled or potentially die.

This argument would be stronger if a) People who wanted to be vaccinated couldn't get the vaccine that protects them and b) if vaccinated people themselves weren't able to spread the virus too.

All in all you are cramming down a rushed vaccine down peoples throat at the risk of their livelihoods for marginal impacts in the virus's ability to spread and little significant risk to those who are already vaccinated.