How are these examples of anything "invasive". Seriously?

I have no pony on this race, but it just stands to reason that abortion is, in fact, invasive (just ask the fetus). I don't think they force anyone in TX to get one. Right? So, how is their position on this invasive? It's kind of the opposite.

I am not following the blow-by-blow of changes in this domain. Has anything changed? From memory, I think most of the anti-abortion laws establish a viability threshold. Please tell me what that is in TX?

I am an atheist, so my position on this isn't religious. I just think it is perfectly reasonable to think that an abortion might be wrong beyond a certain threshold.

I would be surprised to learn that pro-abortion folks actually think you can terminate the baby all the way up to the 7th. or 9th. month. How would that make sense at all?

BTW, despite what the above may sound, I absolutely believe this should be 100% the woman's decision. I have trouble with the idea of government forcing anyone to do anything with their body.

Which is something interesting to note, because, this very moment, liberals are engaged in wanting to force millions of people to do something with their bodied: get vaccinated. It's interesting how, on the one hand, this school of thought claims that a woman's body should not be the domain of the government and, at the same time, they are OK forcing people to get vaccinated with a threat to lose their livelihood. What do these people actually believe?

So, a woman has the right to choose when to terminate a life, yet a person cannot choose to not get vaccinated?

BTW, my entire family is fully vaccinated. We chose to get the vaccine the second it became available. Interestingly enough, my 15 year old boy spent two weeks in the hospital with heart inflammation because of the vaccine (one of 700 cases in the nation at the time). Had we been told that the second dose could have adverse effects for young boys we would have held off (just on the second dose). Yes, he could have died. He is healthy and strong, so all was well. In other words, I understand people who are very concerned about the government forcing them to do something with their bodies, whatever that might be. The right answer is that either you are free or you are not.

On the other subject, limiting voting rights. How? Who is doing that? Can you provide a link to the law or laws in TX that actually limit voting rights? I don't know of any. I could very well be misinformed.

Being in California I can tell you that the business climate here is horrific. We might close a $10MM financing round in the next few weeks. Our investors are demanding that we locate the operation in Arizona. Not because of some political alignment. No, it's because doing business outside CA is so much easier in so many states it's kind of silly. I am very tempted to make this the get-the-hell-out event. I can't tell you how many jobs will go with such a deal. Lots. And more later as the venture grows.

If you don't have the context of living and doing business in CA you might not be able to appreciate just how fucked things can be here and how much of a breath of fresh air places like AZ and TX can be --again, nothing whatsoever to do with politics. And, no, nothing whatsoever to do with greed. Please.