skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
China Leaps Ahead in Effort to Rein in Algorithms
I think most people with those requirements treat the SD card as a bootloader and keep the main system on a USB connected SSD (or make the system not write-heavy while still only using the SD). It'd be nice to have a rpi that supported NVMe (or just more reliable boot from USB) but I can see why that is not exactly in-scope.

IIRC the most destructive thing to a rpi that is SD-storage only is excessive logging. If you use journald (part of systemd) you can configure it to only keep a small rotating in-memory log, if you use traditional textual logs you can probably do something similar by mounting a in memory fs on the log path.

If you need to keep logs for longer (or between boots/crashes) it's probably good to not use the SD-storage for that. IIRC Tesla had problems with their eMMC storage because they used it for log storage and I've worked on related parts for IoT devices that used SD-cards.

I'm not sure how user-friendly/defaulted all of this is on the recommended rpi distros.
Best and High Paying Careers in United States
GitHub Offical Collection
Recently I dived into researching Github Official Collections, there are tremendous number of repositories and tools so useful to build your startup - all are manually picked up by Github Team! Here is my vision of all the repos collected by GitHub.
No, because I find I can always learn anything easily. Once you know one or two frameworks well enough, you can learn anything easily. I used Angular for years. Then decided to try React and had no problems with it, actually liked it a lot more. The secret is: Go to Github, find some well written boilerplates/templates that use the things you want to use. Study it, see how everything works, base your project on that starting point, and build upon it, learning as you go. Then as you go, look for completed project examples, using your tech stack, and see how the usual stuff that every project needs is implemented: Pages, Components, API calls, DB access etc. Then just keep iterating.
Mantium Inc. | Multiple Roles | REMOTE | Full-Time

Mantium enables AI enthusiasts (personal and professional) to rapidly prototype and share large language models like OpenAI’s GPT-3, solving one of the biggest barriers to AI adoption: deployment. And to keep your deployed AI behaving well in the real world, Mantium also includes security measures, logging, and human-in-the-loop. It’s your AI, make it heard.

Tech stack: React, Typescript, Python, FastAPI, PostgreSQL, Redis, Kafka

We are looking for people who want to make an impact on a rapidly growing company that values autonomy, mastery, and purpose. Mantium is a globally distributed team and well funded by top-tier venture capital firms. Currently, we are looking for:

- Sr. Developer Advocate: engage with the community, teach best practices, and create relevant developer collateral for the Mantium developer site.

- Sr. Python Engineer: contribute to the design of new features, review code of your peers and mentor them when/where needed, facilitate engineering discussions, mentor junior engineers.

Visit our careers page for up-to-date openings: https://mantiumai.com/careers/
We look forward to hearing from you!
Unfortunately no, there’s no law of nature which says companies/competitors will appear to serve this kind of function.

Mostly bc short term profit maximization can be thought of as a greedy optimization which is blind to long term gains. This is why the tragedy of the commons happens
It's interesting that 푸르다 (blue/green) uses a very similar character: 靑, with 青 listed as a variant. Red is the same, 赤 (붉을 적) and yellow (누를 황 / 황색) uses 黃/黄.

Green (녹색) uses 綠. There's also 초록 which is 草綠.

赤: https://hanja.dict.naver.com/#/entry/ccko/ad2ad1893b5c49f8ab...

黃: https://hanja.dict.naver.com/#/entry/ccko/17a2b69699474d5bb8...
Technology Can Help Boost Restaurant Profit Margins
I'm curious what reaction people have to the info so I made a poll: https://share.zigpoll.com/2kParn8gL6RvpveWu/2qZxbgjD3pu2ATqz...

Personally I'm thinking this is decent PR for twitch since the market is still small and the payouts can be relatively high even in the middle tier.
Try taking a good magnesium supplement. It should be a chelate (for example magnesium glycinate), and depending on your diet somewhere around 2000mg/day of that (chelates are only about 8-15% elemental magnesium). Avoid magnesium oxide (which is what is in a lot of multi-vitamins), it's very poorly absorbed.

Most people are noticeable calmer and sleep better when they start supplementing magnesium. Magnesium deficiency is extremely common, and even if you eat a really good diet with lots of whole grains and vegetables you might not be getting quite enough (but in that case about half the above dose may be enough to top you off). Anyway, it won't hurt to try and it's not expensive... if it helps, the cost-benefit is huge.
If SQL would just allow a trailing comma on the last column, none of this leading comma shit would be necessary. I still use trailing commas, because code readability is more important that writeability IMO, but the fact that I'm forced to sympathize with such an ugly shit sandwich is really frustrating.

Can't sympathize with the clause alignment though. And I can't figure out why someone who does leading commas for editability would chose a style that forces you to use different indentation levels for different lines. Oh wait, you wanna make that join a left join? Time to go re-indenting my whole damn query...

It's not even an improvement in readability...who actually reads text like it's a column format? It's not a spreadsheet.
Data Observability vs. Software Observability
> It's also dynamically typed which disqualifies it for large collaborative projects.

You can add type declarations and a good compiler will check against them at compile time:
https://medium.com/@MartinCracauer/static-type-checking-in-t...
> exceptions are a fundamental control-flow mechanism in Python

Where do you have this from?

In almost all Python code I have seen, exceptions are still for, as the name says, exceptions. So in the common cases, there would be no exceptions raised. I would assume that the exception handling code (under `except ...`) will be run only a tiny fraction of times compared to the other code, at least in most cases.

I would argue, if one abuses exceptions for any sort of control flow logic, this is bad design.

See also the list of builtin exceptions: https://docs.python.org/3/library/exceptions.html

From those, yes, there is StopIteration and StopAsyncIteration, which are used for control-flow, but the handling of those is anyway internal in CPython, and so the discussion about zero cost does not apply, as it would not change this (as far as I understand the current proposal).

Otherwise, all other exceptions are not used for control-flow.
Will Yang succeed where Teddy Roosevelt failed? Somehow I doubt it. But I do wonder what motivates this kind of endeavor. I can't for second believe that a never-elected, fourth place mayoral candidate who didn't win a single delegate running for president actually thinks he can forge a competitive party amidst the world's most famously rigid two-party system.

So what's the real motivation?
Author has a lot of terrible advice on his site. Also this code is their recommend way to convert a double to float[1]:

public float doubleToFloat(double d) {
return (float) d;
}

1 https://www.teamten.com/lawrence/programming/dont-invent-unn...
Facebook messenger is not private.
This is a first step toward regulation. No PRC-style indiscriminate/"predictive" profiling, as a first step. Now let's come up with a way to use this tool to catch actual criminals when investigating actual specific crimes, with judicial oversight that protects our civil liberties without making the tool useless (by creating onerous obstacles to its use, or delaying it unacceptably).
FWIW, I own stock in a lot of companies that are net-negatives for society directly and through index funds. When these companies succeed in the market I get a consolation prize.

In our modern market, I don't believe that my owning FB stock is contributing to their success. If I were to work for them I would be.
What would you want to see in a new version that isn't in the 4 or other pi variants? Personally I'd like more USB3 ports, but it works for all my other needs.
Of course they want to keep their source code private, like most software companies do. They consider it their "secret sauce", their prized IP.
First sentence: "Color is a spectrum: Red fades from orange to yellow, whereas green merges to turquoise, then blue." Not true… Or where is brown on this spectrum?
Jonathan Kanter, Biden choice to be the antitrust chief, became foe of Big Tech
>>AI, by its complexity and opacity should not be used to profile people. Just because it could be so easily manipulated.

True, but I'd add in a touch of Hanlon's Razor — don't attribute to malice what can be attributed to mere incompetence — far too much of the time, the technology is just bad and wrong. It has been over-promised and under-delivered.

It is so often wrong that there are numerous lawsuits, including one today about Uber being sued because the so-called "AI Facial Recognition" system cannot even recognize it's own employees [1]. Great idea to verify everyone automatically, but if the technology sucks, it is worse than nothing.

As if falsely losing your employment is bad enough, the consequences of broad adoption of technology that is not fit for purpose is far worse than merely wasting money and time of law enforcement, courts, etc - it will literally falsely steal people's freedom, while letting actual criminals run loose.

The EU is wise to call a halt to this over-hyped tech.

(And frankly, calling it "AI" is ridiculous — it is just a fancy pattern-match search. This is what the industry gets for over-selling it's new stuff before it is actually ready - and deservedly so. It'd be an entirely different story if they'd fully developed and tested it until it was six+-sigma reliable).

[1] https://techcrunch.com/2021/10/05/uber-faces-legal-action-ov...
Peter Schiff is a broken clock that was right once in the last 20 years. Even broken clocks are right twice a day.
Unfortunately, a lot of the same environmental interest groups that halted the scaling up of fission also hate fusion.

It's best to think of fusion as a way to generate effectively unlimited amounts of energy, kicking in 50-100 years from today. This could be super useful for the long-term ambitions of human civilization - energy has been such a hard constraint for so long that people have barely thought about the amazing stuff we could do with an effectively unlimited energy supply.

For addressing climate change, it's likely to be too-little-too-late to bank on. But a century from now it'll be nice for cheap fresh water / agriculture / climate control anywhere on this planet, space elevators, interplanetary/interstellar travel, terraforming, cheap fresh water / agriculture / climate control on other planets, etc. This sort of stuff is incredibly energy-hungry and it's unlikely that renewables will be able to supply the requirements alone.

(It'd be awesome if one of the private fusion start-ups gets us there a lot faster, but this is what I'm projecting for now!)
The first fission reactor was in activity 10 000 years ago. Well, probably not even the first.

Wind power was exploited since the 11th century? Or is it 13th? I'm not that clear on that. Solar cell appeared somewhat late in the 19th century.

Fusion is real too, and older than all of those. The issue is the scale.
You're right, I somehow missed that select was in a different order.
>Modern fission plants are totally safe

Ha what? The number of flaws in any system is unknowable. We thought the Fukushima Daiichi reactors were safe and then what happened? Meltdown because the backup generators were flooded.

That statement transposed to software engineering is like saying "we use Kubernetes so we have 24/7 uptime".
Mira Health is hiring Growth Director Remote ($130K-$170K)
Probably not rhetorical, I don’t think most people know about what obscure laws that make these kinds of loopholes work. I’m actually surprised you thought it was common enough knowledge that you suspected the question was rhetorical.
>What's the big benefit of fusion that makes it worth investing so much money?

4-20 times the energy density of fissionable materials[0] and fuel that's the most common element in the universe.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_density#In_nuclear_reac...
Huh? The author specifically says organic chemistry is actually complex.
You can take any activity and break it down into extremely large number of parts that interact with each other in complex ways.

Let's take handwriting for example. There are a lot of anatomy: muscles, joints as pivots and bones as levers, a lot of physics in a ball pen and the manufacture of pens can explained to the chemistry of plastics and beyond. Ink absorption in paper depends on how many factors?

Now imagine a product, book, course, whatever, that expands on the above paragraph in an effort to teach you how to write. As absurd as it sounds that's the recipe for a lot of commercial stuff out there. Technically correct in describing things but absolutely zero help for the task.
That seems fine/palatable to me. And honestly, that's good leadership. Social policies should follow popular opinion and be flexible enough to shift ever few years. But economic policies may require unpopular actions to be taken.

The population may not want higher interest rates, or a trade deal that kills a local factory. But those things might be for the greater good of everyone.
My point is that, on average, in my experience, they are more interested in big complex theories and hypotheticals than in reality and all its tedious subtleties. They can miss the point that all these tedious subtleties add up in terms of complexity and shouldn't be scoffed at.

This infatuation with complexity is itself a big problem. I've observed a lot of PhDs neglect the cost of complexity. Choosing complex solutions with significant practical drawbacks over simpler ones in order to get some tiny gains in performance (for example) or to get some specific characteristics which they feel is important but which the average user doesn't care about at all.
If even fission is too hard, wouldn't fusion have just the same problem but 10x harder?
>Add to that the fact that there is no fukushima style meltdown in a fusion power plant. If something goes wrong, it just stops.

That's already the case with the CANDU reactors. They also don't need upgraded uranium, and can use uranium from decommissioned nuclear weapons.
Hah! All nerds are attracted to women.
Hah! Nerds don't know how to have sex.

God he is tone deaf.
The difference between is smart argument and a straw man is nuance. You have none.
There is just something about these 'old' Operating Systems that takes me back to my super geeky youth :)

Sitting in my bedroom with my 386 and trying to install Linux from stiffies and getting IPChains to dnsmasq/forward basically share the dial up connection for 'the house' lol the other 386 !

#GoodTimes :)
> Same as the most recent fission plants.

How are these 2 things the same?

On one hand, you rely on a good design and execution to achieve an automatic stop. History has shown time and again that there will always be something that goes wrong: from the cracking rods of Chernobyl to the backup power at Fukushima.

On the other, if you don't design and execute perfectly, nothing works, so there is nothing to shut down. This is the definition of "fail safe".

It's like saying both a meteorite and a rocket will reach 500km/h in the atmosphere, but me it's pretty obvious one is much more likely to do so.
It receives a pretty small level of funding, so I'm not quite sure there are many losses to cut.

$2.2bn over 5 years is about $1.50 per person per year. It's comparable to the funding for the CPB.
No, it's common for someone who's won an election somewhere, once or twice, to fail for President.

Nixon won several (Congress, VP). Biden won several (Delaware, VP). Bush 41 won Congressional elections. Reagan won as Governor. Carter won as Governor. Shall we continue?
The straw man fallacy occurs in the following pattern of argument:

Person 1 asserts proposition X.

Person 2 argues against a superficially similar proposition Y, falsely, as if an argument against Y were an argument against X.

This reasoning is a fallacy of relevance: it fails to address the proposition in question by misrepresenting the opposing position.

Additionally, Ad hominem (Latin for 'to the person'), short for argumentum ad hominem, refers to several types of arguments, some but not all of which are fallacious. Typically this term refers to a rhetorical strategy where the speaker attacks the character, motive, or some other attribute of the person making an argument rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself.

I will note you replied to a comment accusing the whistleblower of being trans. That comment (that you replied to) was, of course, ad hominem.

For the comment in question, person 1 is the zestyping or the whistleblower, depending. Person 2 is you. Your proposition Y (flagged and hidden now) is not invalid, exactly, but "explaining" it to you is pointless given it is a fallacy diverging from the relevance of the content.

The proposition X, which is, in part, "These qualities are what really set this apart from other criticism of social media, and both are incredibly important and healthy in a world where Facebook and Twitter have normalized the opposite."

Your proposition Y, is an attack on the whistleblower and her credibility, not the the content of her own propositions, which may be viewed here:

https://www.commerce.senate.gov/2021/10/protecting%20kids%20...

No mention of "banning" "hate speech" at all. Just a plea for someone to do something to remove the blocks in place by way of Facebook (as a corporation) needing to continue making profit, perhaps at the expense of collective sanity, by not addressing the dissonance their platform creates in the population.

If you had addressed those claims by her in your comment, you would avoid making strawman arguments.

In closing, I get that you and others are frustrated that certain types of posted content are targeted for removal. However, that in and of itself does not mean meaningful and opposed discourse can't occur or that anyone has a "right" to post wherever they like, saying whatever they want. It is that it (your comments) may not occur without significant work involved that we all care about. Cheap and easy discourse isn't good for anyone, harms society, and will continue to be exploited until we come up with a technical solution to solve it.

In the meantime, explanations and education are in order. Thanks for the question! Hope this helps without too much blame.

P.S. Entirely speculative at this point, but I suspect if we built an inverted index of a fallacious argument, we'd find the weights/distances between words significantly divergent from the original proposition.
> I do think that corporations can also employ violence, albeit of an emotional, social, or even financial kind, against their users.

That's not violence. "Emotional violence" is a contradiction in terms.
The goal is to be able to say no to working on a Wednesday
> Why stop at one coin?

Because the coin can be any arbitrary amount, and its only use will be to redeem federal debt held by the Federal Reserve. Using multiple coins serves no purpose.
Well, nukes (which didn't exist then) sure put the brakes on Japan's military.
Yes. And the common thread is, it's a problem, but only when it impacts my life. It's like there's a vague unreality in that we are all connected, and what impacts one of us will eventually impact all of us, or an unwillingness or inability to be truly empathetic.

I don't really know, to be honest.
Do you have an example of this? I mean, there's a pretty good case to be made that the US and the companies it supports and enables are guilty of some serious environmental crimes that majorly contribute to climate change and negatively impact people's health. Climate change is an existential issue. How do we decide that other countries are engaging in whataboutism by bringing things like that up as opposed to us engaging in whataboutism to distract from our refusal to take meaningful action on environmental issues that directly impact people across the globe?
what’s more interesting about dunbar’s number is that it suggests a potential maximum for the size of an effective organization (say, 520) rather than pinpointing an optimum. the idea of a maximum like this appeals to intuition, so it’s worth studying more (and more quantitatively), but opposes ambition, which is probably why we don’t have plentiful research in this area already.
Different contracts between Twitch partners have different levels of ad density, as well as differing amounts of cuts of subs/bits taken by Twitch. It's pretty negligible though, and could have been kinda estimated previously. For example, Hasanabi is claimed to have one of the lowest ad density requirements on twitch (1 60 second ad per 1 hour of broadcast, plus 3 minute ad at end of broadcast) which does line up with him making less than multiple streamers with less subs than him (and with probable higher ad densities required by contract).
On Dec 22nd the sun rises where I am at 8:49 AM and sets at 4:17 PM. On June 22nd that's 5:05 AM and 10:07 PM. It's just not feasible.
YouTube’s Ban on Misinformation
The wear of the sdcard can be lowered using zram and log2ram. The only distribution i know that does that by default is https://dietpi.com/
The problem with “not real yet” is that it applies equally to things that eventually became real, and to things that never came to pass. We once said the same about both fission power and flying cars, and yet I still drive on the ground to get my groceries.

There does seem to be some movement in fusion technology, but it has also been in the “soon” state for decades now. There is no obvious way to balance these two contending data points
HackMD: Get everyone on the same page with Markdown
Cornerstone On Demand | Senior Backend Engineer - Python| France Remote | Full-time

We are looking for a new backend engineer to join our Paris-based Machine Learning team. We build data products for 75 million users on Enterprise HR use cases (Job matching, Learning recommendation, Career path exploration, Skills detection, Company-wide skills visualization, etc.). The team consists of 9 people with a strong level of seniority (around 10 years in average) both in backend and data science. All model trainings are reproducible with versioned code and the data scientists develop and deploy themselves their models in production. The backend can then focus on the interesting parts: scalability, performance, developer efficiency...

Our stack: Python 3 with mypy, AWS, Docker, TensorFlow Serving, Kinesis, Spark, FastAPI, SQL/NoSQL datastores, etc. Buzzwords: DevOps, infrastructure as code, microservices, code reviews, 90% test coverage, automated deployments in 23 AWS regions. We offer: 60,000-70,000 EUR + annual bonus of up to 10% Job Description: https://cornerstone.csod.com/ux/ats/careersite/2/home/requis...
> Look at how much we injected in banks in 2008.

If you're talking about the US, those were loans which, simply put, returned a profit to the US within a short number of years.

https://projects.propublica.org/bailout/

$634 billion out, $743 billion in for about $109 billion in profit for the taxpayers in about ten years.

While I agree that major investment into future technology is important, I think comparing it to short term loans that had collateral in the form of bank equity, and which were repaid with a profit to the government, is a poor comparison.
Yeah, I wish I could unflag it.