skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
As others have mentioned, the peripherals/etc related to a specific model of microcontroller and how you work with them play a big factor.

But I'd also like to throw in:

- 16 years or so ago, the US side of the Auto industry was trying to steer towards PPC. Motorola/Freescale's presence in the market probably had a bit of a play in this, as well as ARM's then-status of 'not quite powerful enough to be future proof.' A StackOverflow post from 2012 [0] seems to indicate they did indeed standardize, whether they moved on from there is another question.

- Most Carmakers probably -don't- want to change designs outside of a refresh. There's a few reasons for this, including both external (updating documentation to repair network) and internal (when I worked at a place that did software/services for a US automaker, we had to submit pages of documentation/paperwork to change a couple of items placement/wording in a dialogue box.)

[0] - https://electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/26035/whats-...
> Everyone driving the FSD Beta knows pretty well what they're doing and what the whole thing means.

An example/analogy. If I am in the position of creating technology for automation I will implement the proven practices in aerospace industry, you have plenty of innovation and effective (with some exceptions in recent years, hello Boeing) regulatory process.
Testing autonomous vehicles on the public road is dangerous and non productive in any way or form (except gathering data cheaply).

> And how do you imagine a system whose improvements relies heavily on real world data is meant to obtain it without large scale participation? Have a hundred employees doing rounds in a test track?

Exactly. Last time I checked R&D is corporate responsibility not public data exploit or "free work". People don't get it at all.
If you will use my driving data, you must pay me or give me some incentive. I work for money, you are selling expensive product so how about half the price?

> Heavily regulating something that's in its infancy is the surest way to kill it. Those people who are constantly bitching about why robo-taxis aren't here yet even with lax regulations, can be certain to dream of it for the rest of their lives should walls be put up too early.

Again, your argument is weak. Example: Texting and Driving statistics:
https://www.simplyinsurance.com/texting-and-driving-statisti...

The technology must be produced and tested to death, before is introduced to public roads. Touch interfaces implemented without any concern of ergonomic prerequisite are proven distraction and risk.

>Ye, that's what they said about SaaS on the Internet. Who would, in their right minds, give up control of their service and store their data and code at the mercy of a third party. Saw how that turned out.

Again, the big and bold SaaS brush, yep I see how this is turning out. You can check the sales stat of NAS servers in recent years or resurrection of the flip phone.

People are stupid, until they are not. Information Security and Control will be the defining factor for businesses in the near future.

Yes, some people got madly rich on marketing Cloud and AI scams and "user generated content", so what?

This sounds as Davos idea of the future. You will own nothing and you will be happy.

Sorry, but not at all.

SaaS services have use-cases. Moving everything to SaaS model is clear madness.
I agree it is a mess, both domestically and internationally

We do this and are hiring remote largely fine in the US:

- book keeper shared w multiple startups

- who handles most states + outside person for rest

- we also use Gusto here, though they did screw up one key state and never took responsibility, so we will be leaving them

We will be switching to an intl'l friendly PEO so we can do intl better, if folks have recs

Anyways if you have enough $ to hire people, I strongly recommend paying a bit: they can do it way faster and properly, including maintenance, so you gain time and $ vs you doing it slowly and at opportunity cost. Problem still exists, but a small but of $ per new hire makes it go away.

I do occasionally worry about rogue states / districts who increase our legal risk, like parts of Texas...
> And we have evidence of the harm it, specifically, causes,

Just to reiterate, it's not that it is "just" harmful. They are actively studying how to make it even more so.
The question becomes, what are NFTs adding to this system?

It sounds like the current system is working, that the social system for determining value based on context is working. NFTs aren't making that better or worse, we're using the same social process that we used before.

And I mention elsewhere, NFTs aren't even really helping that much with the distributed ledger either, they still have to hook into the existing systems for determining seller trust and authenticating that the NFT you're buying is "real". There's little benefit in decentralizing the ledger when sellers have to coordinate with each other to ban bad actors anyway.

So we have two systems that already work, that have worked for ages, and now they're linked to the blockchain because... why? All of the use-cases people talk about with NFTs are stuff that you could always have been doing, you don't need a blockchain for any of this. And it's not clear that the blockchain makes any of it easier to do.
>In a free society, people are allowed to surrender some freedom and privacy if they choose. It seems like what Facebook offers is worth the cost to the average person.

That is quite the platitude when being applied to an industry that is built on manipulating people and eroding "free will" at every turn.

>But in the normal world it doesn't seem like enough people care to me.

1. "normal" people lack a comprehensive understanding of just how much their privacy is being invaded and how manipulated they are. I'd guess that some of us on HN have the foresight to see exactly where this evil path leads. I am moderately technical and all this surveillance and manipulation tech (and its counters) are sometimes confusing to me.

2. Even where "normal" people are vaguely aware that their privacy is being invaded, they are being trained into a state of learned helplessness.
I've only run into one person IRL who smacktalks Javascript. Then later I edited his Ruby script. And I was like "uhh... this could all be done in nodejs, or python, it really doesnt matter". He said javascript is a toy language.

Whereas... I had worked with php, python, R, and once I got to NodeJS I fell in love with it. Then picked up ReactJS

And man, so glad I went this route. I never have to apply to jobs again, given the hunger of recruiters for full stack JS devs
I don't agree with "given the last few years". Conspiracy theories have always been a thing, now information just flows faster.
You don't need licenses and gatekeeping to do that. All you need is a signed commit message. It's trivial for a corporation to require something like this.
Wow, didn't realize there was such a discrepancy between Model 3/Y volume and Model S/X volume. I expected it to be substantial but not a 25x difference.
> This attitude is terrible and corrosive to your own sense of self-worth.

For some context: That subreddit is historically very cynical. It's more of a support group and a place to vent than an actual advice forum. A lot of people arrive on /r/cscareerquestions thinking that the only way to succeed is to spend all of your spare time doing side projects and grinding leetcode while pursuing FAANG jobs.

I would sometimes try to answer questions there in between long builds but it became very demoralizing. Many of the regulars there are struggling with their careers or disgruntled with their jobs and they extrapolate to the entire tech industry.

There were occasionally people putting in good comments in the sub, but it tends to get drowned out by cynical complaints. You know how internet relationship advice forums devolve into everyone telling the OP to break up or get divorced? That sub felt like the CS equivalent of a relationship forum: The advice is always to blame your employer or the industry and quit your job, ignoring any nuance in the situation.
"the potential for needing medical care, hospitalization, or funeral services which could result in someone else being unable to receive care is similar" reads as a (patently false) supposed fact.

There is no plausible future in which medical care needs to be rationed due to an overwhelming number of bicycle accidents.
There's such a thing as a lie, but "misinformation" isn't a synonym for "lie". Efforts to fight misinformation are almost always understood to encompass misleading information - that is, information that's literally true but is used to advance an argument the misinformation checker doesn't think is valid.
Rules of the Classroom
This is due to supply chains choking. Lack of truck drivers, containers spots on air cargo. If they is choice to pick up food or mail, I guess is other contractors and logistics partners are picking transporting food and medicine instead of mail.
I believe this is the average experience of most in Europe, I am Italian and I find the US (lower) education system worse than the Italian one too, and we score _terribly_ in all international rankings.

I believe it's probably a different distribution: european education is maybe flattened around the average, while in the US there is possibly a wider distribution.
"async/await" makes it very easy to reason about async stuff-- async stuff can be done in series, or it can branch off into a pyramid structure of tasks, etc.

I think its awesome :D
Give me a microcontroller with between 32K and 2MB of onboard flash, some eeprom, multiple CAN peripherals, ADC, SPI, good timers, and some specialized peripherals - synched PWMs with dead time for driving power electronics, and some other special things. Dual-core lockstep for safety critical things (like the fronk latch). Some combination of all that at a price starting under a dollar.

Oh, and a temperature range of -40 to +125C ambient.

Can Intel do that on their obsolete 16nm multipatterning process for anywhere near the price target? Didnt think so.
I think the difference between untruth and misinformation is the intent. The latter is on purpose in order to shape a narrative and mislead people. Misinformation is Trump and related people claiming the election was stolen from him - it's blatantly untrue, easily debunkable, and there's an obvious interest there. (I'm not american, just an easy example that came to me)
As a current CS student who’s getting tired of stressing out over grades, thank you. I think I was starting to have this realization but someone else putting it into words really helped.
> Gmails spam filtering lately is atrocious.

I've gotten 3-4 emails in my inbox in the last week that all are 'from' a different Russian / eastern European woman, have body text == the very short subject line, and have a pdf attachment. It feels like 2003 levels of spam filtering, but I haven't looked in my spam folder to see what it is blocking.
This is a blowout quarter. They are well on their way to sell maximum cars this year in their history.
See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w5c5KzpamiM by someone who worked for a number of auto OEMs including Tesla where he explains how Tesla does agile hardware
Yeah definitely, I was mostly responding to say that there is a somewhat flexible option for health insurance.

We use Gusto for payroll but have to spend a not-insignificant amount of time wrestling with each state’s system. Plus there are a growing number of cities or metros that you have to register with as well.
This service doesn't prohibit decentralized services from existing and evolving? Cue why not both gif.
Exact. And this is why societies usually focus more in how to reduce the amount of people killed when walking and paint crosswalks in every city, whereas people killed when sea diving is a minor problem for most of us.
An important addition is that all these discussion are strongly country dependent. While the difference between engineering/science and humanities MAs and PhD exist everywhere. Specifics vary quite strongly between countries. One example: in Australia most PhDs only require an honors year (a fourth year in the bachelor, which is even normal for many engineering degrees) while any several other an MA is required.
Yes, it’s more subtle and multi-faceted than the example I picked. I just figured that was an easy one to point at as a difference.

I personally think that police mentality matters a lot more than anything else. German police departments for example still have a lot of shame over their extensive involvement in the Holocaust, which affects how they see themselves and how they behave today. Doesn’t mean they’re perfect, but it’s a huge factor that changes police behavior from one country to the next.
Of course there is. A programmer writing free software in their bedroom is completely different from a professional writing softwafe for corporations and making 6-7 figures. Society expects a lot more from the latter.
> Focus on understanding the material and getting “good enough” marks.

This is a good advice but it's a bit like telling a kid her seashell collection
is worthless. Perspective is by definition something you develop over time.
> easier to trade and easier to verify.

Except no, not easier to trade/verify if you have to hook into off-chain validators to verify that the token is legitimate. The part of transaction security that matters for most people are the trust parts that NFTs explicitly don't try to solve.

The big problem with trust in any token system (and really any art market) is figuring out which tokens are being issued by whom and whether the token/work you're looking at is "real" and actually issued by the artist.

Which NFTs don't even try to help with; they leave that to off-chain validators.
My likely oversimplified take:

- Apache2 for things you're building

- Apache2, MIT (permissive licenses) for things you build upon and you're going to distribute (including all frontend)

- *, ideally avoiding licenses that explicitly prohibits non-commercial, for things you're going to keep inside your walls
What does this mean for mere mortals?
Rivian is installing 20,000 'waypoint' (Level 2) chargers. Many will be located in national parks and other remote locations.

It's much easier to install and maintain a charging station in a remote area than it is to install and operate a gas station.
Clickbait warning.
It also presumably further discourages theft since it negatively impacts the ability to “part out” stolen devices to work around activation locks. Basically once the owner remotely locks the stolen device, it becomes almost worthless until it’s back in the owner’s possession.
Respectfully, I’m not sure what point you’re making here. Yes this bill would exploit our political process to legally admit many future citizens. I don’t think that makes it ethical, just as I don’t think it was ethical for McConnell to exploit a technicality around a SCOTUS nomination, or for either party to exploit executive orders as a means to legislate. I view the interests of illegal immigrants as less valid because they’ve violated our laws in arriving here in the first place. Crimes normally result in citizenship not being granted to otherwise legal migrants, and the same should hold here. The reason this amnesty is under consideration at all is because it is a shortcut to political power, granting one political side more future votes relative to the other.
In theory they would adapt but in practice many lack the skills to do so. CEO's who are hired in simple times when market stays the same aren't tested on how well they adapt to change, so when change happens many CEO's wont know what to do. Easiest way to handle it is to ignore the change and just continue with the old ways (which often kills even the largest of companies).
It depends on the product and the target market. Given you're just starting you're going to have to experiment to see what works.
> The suffering people didn't choose this.

They 100% did, an article from 2011/2013 about the government distributing low cost appliances[1] and free houses[2]. They were getting tons of free and cheap stuff and the people were celebrating it.

[1] https://venezuelanalysis.com/news/6189

[2] https://venezuelanalysis.com/news/10258
I read somewhere in a newspaper article that it is now know to seriously affect aquatic life. Different environment but maybe not a good indication?

Sorry no source and I’m not remotelt a biologist.
You've mentioned two beliefs:

- the person is using a rude tone

- they are doing it for reason X

Neither of these are objective facts.

If I had to deal with a situation like this, the first thing I would do would be to examine what I have actually observed.

You may have a theory (e.g. "he uses few words and doesn't start with pleasantries before making a request" -> "he is intending to be rude"). But making that theory explicit will better allow you to examine it.
If you're familiar with refinement types, what he's mentioning is using dependent types to achieve refinement types.

Let's take the typical example of "lists of size n". It's either a special inductive type vec A n, or a list l with a proof that length l > 0. The signatures of a head function (using Coq syntax, where this approach is most common) would be:

head_safe1 {A n} : vec A (S n) -> A
head_safe2 {A} : forall (l : list A), length l > 0 -> A.

In both cases you match on the list and prove the nil case to be impossible.

One benefit is that one can easily stack predicates. Need a list of length n that is also sorted? Just add an argument of type Sorted l.

Programs that are 'truly' dependently typed have their benefits, but they definitely can feel more rigid.
In terms of wasted space, only 1/8th is actual xmp for that DJI exif chunk, the rest is padding for (13mb jpg:s in our case). 8k, so 1k actual xmp data of which a lot is structural. I've only tried with scripts, verifying with exiftool and a hex editor every now and then.
Yes, also see the UK where we also suffer similar levels of obesity, and have seen high numbers of covid deaths as a result. However we're not allowed to talk about it due to "body shaming", even though the ones who are obese suffer throughout their lives.
Whatever would have happened had their PR department not intervened.
Correct link is https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/4301718
I don’t understand what’s “automatically” about “Score while you play from any supported device”.

I expected text recognition on the umpire’s calls and/or ML on a video recording to discern scores (examples: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228810608_A_system_..., https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Chapter-2-Ball-Trackin..., https://www.usportfor.com/en/video-analysis-live-stream-tenn...), but it looks like this is an UI that allows you to tag a video by hand. What do I overlook?
It isn’t that their engineers are inherently better at writing software. The parent comment explained exactly why their organizational and supply chain structure allows them to be more agile and better at writing software and delivering it.
I have never heard the word "Leetcode" where I work, or indeed anywhere other than HN, and I've interviewed candidates for every rung of the IC ladder. Never seen it on a resume, either.
Those skills seem like a perfect fit for the video game industry, did you try there?
You said "Not mentioned here, but if you want an academic job in the humanities, in the US, don't be white. Universities have adopted explicitly racist hiring policies for the time being."
Im aware of facemash. I just dont get why kids feeling bad is somehow facebook's fault. Fucking absurd to think you couldnt survey any groups of kids at anytime in history and not find some who contemplate suicide or feel inadequate.
Vegans entered the chat

(sorry) This would mean, at a minimum, that every biological entity down to single cell organisms are conscious. They could be, I don't know.
The other day I heard someone say that Rivian intends to deliver 40,000 vehicles next year, total. Musk runs his mouth on a lot of stuff, but it's pretty hard to knock his manufacturing when he's got a 20x lead on the competition. Hell, I was blown away by how quickly Starlink went from concept to reality, but figures like these really help put the scale into perspective. It's like capitalism down to a science, for better and worse.
That's an interesting question: similar to seatbelts causing more dangerous driving. Maybe.

However, we're talking about on campus here, not riding down Mission in the City.
What do you think all those new CS professors want after earning their PhD? What about the PhDs that join the big-tech research labs? Why do you think they joined big tech?
That's a mechanical side effect of the torque converter used in automatics, which even at engine idle with no acceleration input is able to transfer power to the drivetrain.

The Toyota case was an instance of the car's engine control software unexpectedly commanding acceleration not requested by the user.

In principle it could happen on a manual car as well, but most of Toyota's vehicles in the U.S. are automatics.
I’m not certain if I’m completely correct here, but as I understand it - many of these trading platforms will allow you to use the money you deposit into their system immediately.

The actual transaction that fulfils that deposit often takes a day or two to complete.

If you deposit $100 and use it to immediately buy $100 of GME, RH and the other platforms effectively borrow money to fulfil that trade. At scale, if they have a large number of new customers making use of that facility simultaneously they may actually exhaust the amount of credit they have access to for the given amount of collateral they’ve fronted to their lender.
People are forgetting the history before when IE rose to the peak. It was the exact same story as Chrome. IE did play fast and loose with standards but not to lock you in (may be that as well). Thought like it was to offer better features.

Then the standards improved and the entire IE team was either caught flat footed or possibly even disbanded to work on other projects. IE7 was almost half a decade after IE6
Maybe change the title to “Heads toward our Solar System” or “Heads toward Saturn”?
ACLU should be granted copyright to all the badthink so they can DCMA places like TIA. There’s probably a bunch of president tweets on there causing indirection right now.
The first thing one has to face when considering such experiments is that they fundamentally have an inherent cost. Because in order to get that measurement accurate, quite a lot of your ad impressions have to be withheld. This is a cost, a cost of the lost opportunity. (provided that the actual impact of the ad campaign is positive, that is).

So, as an advertiser, you end up coming up with some meta-strategy: when to perform those experiments and when to forgo them and rely on your educated guess.

Google, Facebook and alike developed support for performing such experiments throughout the last decade. But this meta-strategy kind of judgment is firmly in the department of advertisers.

Certainly not a new dot com bubble as the title suggests, and the article even mentions Randall Lewis, so I guess it's just the style of journalism these days...
There is an informative interview with Linus Pauling on youtube from 1990 in which he discusses his life and scientific work.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a8maetlPd8Q
I suspect that Facebook has more users than Twitter, and heavier engagement. Facebook has multiple aspects that people heavily use, things like photo albums, marketplace, messenger, birthdays, etc. In comparison Twitter seems more limited.
You didn't use the radio or TV in bed or in between classes, on the bus (ok maybe you used radio on the bus).

I would say FB's reaches deeper into our lives than previous media did.
I mean they also just dropped certain feature, like radar on autopilot.
That sounds backwards? A million people in a city have much lower environmental impacts than spread widely across otherwise wild land?