skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The most friendly and welcoming open source communities in my experience are Ruby, Elixir and Clojure. I'm sorry you had bad experiences, but don't let that stop your projects.
Please cite your sources for these claims. No one is claiming it is good thing, but when you start to spray FUD around you run the risk of having a few of your wilder claims (cancer, really?) shown to be complete bullshit and then no one cares about any other claims you might make.
> The idea that every personal vehicle should have 1000 pounds of lithium-cobalt-etc is crazy to me

Whether it seems crazy is evidence of unfamiliarity, not whether it is actually crazy. Is it really any crazier that continually pumping every car with juice made from literal fossils?

At least the battery is continually reusable — and at the end of its useful life, over 90% recyclable.
For as many times as the article stated they are "surprised" and "completely baffled", maybe they still are.
I've had this one SSD since at least 2013 and it ain't dead yet. It's been duct taped in laptops and formatted and overwritten multiple times with different operating systems. it's been used as an external USB drive with a little connector. For a laugh I've actually forced a defragment on it using mydefrag a couple times. If any SSD should have died due to excessive writes it should have been this one.
Sorry I could have stated the DHCP-PD issue more clearly. Comcast doesn’t support it. [1]

> I honestly don't understand the difference with IPv4. You can have multiple addresses and do load balancing on the router with both.

A PC cannot easily have 2 different IPv4 subnets in the same NIC, which is what IPv6 permits with RA. Even if a PC did have 2 networks, how does the router tell the PC to use fibre for everything except backups, and cable for backups, and cellular only if the others fail? These decisions are best made by the router, not an arbitrary client device connected behind it. With IPv6 and no NAT, how does the client PC know what IP to use as its source at any given time? Yes NAT66 works- and for a very very long time the IPv6 community has resisted any NAT, which has resulted in poor NAT support in IPv6 stacks across many vendors.

> Wrong! Everyone needs routable addresses, even if they don't know it because they need VoIP, video calls on webRTC, FTP, p2p file sharing, online games, etc. All of these barely manage to work in a NAT by using workarounds like ALGs, UpnP, NAT-PMP, relay servers and other atrocities that greatly complicate the network design and are a security nightmare.

I didn’t say a routable IP isn’t required. I said a dedicated unique public IP is not required.

A gas station or fast food business doesn’t need online games or p2p file sharing. Their VoIP is done over VPN or uses NAT ALG in the firewall. Their web browser and payment systems are happy with a NAT’d IP on a LAN behind their router (which may or may not have a public static IPv4).

1. https://forums.businesshelp.comcast.com/conversations/ipv6/i...
Another property of NFTs I enjoy is that being an early supporter of an artist can yield you sharing in their future success.
The website seems to be done by one guy only and abandoned (look at the "news" section).
This is a shockingly concise, accurate and readily digestible by the common person description of what Facebook actually is. If you don’t mind, I’m going to save this for the future.
Firefox drops Google as global default search provider, switches to Yahoo – Extr (2014)
The only thing close is Big Tobacco's manipulation of the product specifically to tweak the addictiveness of the product. It's one thing for the product to naturally be addictive, but by hiring people to study ways to make the product even more addictive, then to hire people to implement those ways into the product goes towards showing intent on creating a harmful product.
If we settle at about double the preindustrial CO2 level, we would need to block about 8% of the solar radiation [0]. You could do that eg with floating structures of ultra-thin translucent sheets that reduce light intensity in their shadow. To maximize effectiveness you can put them in a sun-synchronous orbit, so it casts it shadow always at high noon [1].

However this solves only the warming itself, it does nothing about things like ocean acidification.

0: https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn11993-solar-shield-co...

1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun-synchronous_orbit
I decided to check when I did. Apparently 2014-09-09.

Well worth it to get my name into the game. https://i.imgur.com/RftBXWG.png
It might be easier said than done, but at some point you have to stop indulging your addiction if you want to stop indulging your addiction.
Record profits for four large processing firms, whose lobbyist claims labor shortage is the real problem.
People deal with their addictions. If people can overcome alcoholism, drug addiction, sex addiction, etc., people who are genuinely addicted to Facebook can do more than say "I'm addicted."
So what?

You can come up with something like:

(from u in users where u.age > 18 select u.name)

It's a simple matter of programming.
Does that make them horrible?
> Also there's no technical need for global consensus. It seems quite possible to me that a country, say China, will decide to just go do it. That's terrible politically, and could be dangerous. But it may happen.

it's not Chinese billionaires who are pushing their scary technofixes on talk shows.

https://africasacountry.com/2021/03/bill-gates-and-his-techn...
Vimeo Has Removed “Password Protection” in Vimeo Basic
This is a fantastic, well-reasoned article that I agree with. The danger of methane release, particularly methane hydrates, is beyond scary. We must use whatever tools we have in our toolbox to contain this, and geo-engineering is by far the fastest and possibly the simplest. I think what holds us back on this front is fear, fear that we don't understand the impact as dropping sulphur or salt into clouds is the mother of all environmental impact statements. But holding off one degree of warming? That's some insane impacts right there, which include the catastrophic danger of methane release, the raising of sea levels by 2-7 meters, and other unknowns such as the halting of the gulf stream, ocean acidification, coral reefs and god knows what else. These considerations must be included in COP26 and similar summits for serious consideration, starting now.
Does Apple care?

They already essentially killed off "ad supported apps" with App Tracking Transparency, and Apple doesn't earn anything from ads anyway (as opposed to paid apps where they take a cut).
I’m sorry but as a Hungarian, this is laughable.

Any positive we had at a time comes from socialism’s general focus on education (one of the few positives of it) - eg. both Russian and Hungarian math education went up to differentiation/integration by the end of secondary school. It also had very extensive programs for talented students.

Unfortunately, currently we have seriously laughable pay for teachers (barely above the seriously laughable minimal pay), so we have a bunch of burnt out, old teacher with no motivation.
> Is a problem because most plastic products release substances that mimic sexual hormones

This is simply not true. There is a small set of softened plastics (BPA, DEHP & DBP) that are widely known to have some endocrine disruption consequences and these are being phased out for the most part, but 'most plastic products' are NOT endocrine disruptors. Please keep bullshit gay panic 'feminization' crap out of HN, it is just embarrassing.
My impression is that Strike is not providing these features, it's just inserting a central hub in the LN path used by its users.
It exists somehow with Elixir. It's not homoiconic and the interactive development experience is far from being as good as Common Lisp or even Clojure but it supports metaprogramming at an advanced level, is functional and dynamically typed.
You can easily build a robot that you feed sheet music, and that robot will then be able to press the right buttons on a piano keyboard.

This is not possible for a guitar (and others) because there is no unique mapping between the note on the sheet and the position on the instrument.
I used to hate it, but async/await, typescrypt and ts-node makes it more acceptable nowadays.
So it looks like a perceptual thing, the result of how your physical brain has been wired, where you cannot perceive the phenomenon directly despite having a solid analytic understanding of the matter.

This reminds me of Frank Jackson's famous Knowledge Argument for Qualia

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qualia-knowledge/
". . . with a namespace for functions that is different from the one for ordinary values", then!

I got into this trouble by wanting to avoid contributing to the perpetuation of the terms "Lisp-1" and "Lisp-2". I find those 2 terms regrettable because using a short name for a concept implies that the concept is important, but whether functions share the same namespace as values do is not IMO an important decision in the design of a programming language: changing the decision changes the character of the language in only a few superficial ways.
And yet we currently uncritically accept the denouncement and suppression of “misinformation” championed by our various media institutions, all of which either derive a plurality of their income (television) or a significant fraction from pharmaceutical companies.
I think it is liked quite a bit, but if I had to point out; 1) the ecosystem; it is rotten 2) people think JS is the old JS which had callback hell and other misery: there still is misery but less and with Typescript it is ok. But I think not as many hate it vs like it.
This paper discusses the concept: https://www.pnas.org/content/103/46/17184

I think they were targetting "stop warming" more than "1990 levels", but they estimated 20 million tons/a few million square kilometers.
I'm illustrating a similarity, not making a judgment on which is better.
Energy efficiency is a major concern when you need literally three times the energy to achieve the same goal. Clen energy is already scarce, only places with a lot of nuclear have a semblance of it. BEV would already increase electricity demand a lot (grab vehicle-miles per year and turn it to TWh needed and see), doubling or tripling that would put the goal of decarbonization decades further away.
the only thing that separates SC from other messaging apps is that SC wanted to make it a social platform with accepting "followers" from any random person rather than people you know. Their use of the snap codes etc to help promote yourself is another example.
It seems so, unless I'm misunderstanding the documents. From an old, random readme for a workshop, then the official wiki:

- https://github.com/mjordan/archivematicaworkshop#archivematica-and-aip-migration
- https://wiki.archivematica.org/AIP_re-ingest

Perhaps someone with better knowledge than I could tell whether this implies that each version gets its own PID (crucial for publications etc).
I’d say Twitter has done more damage to the society than FB. Twitter is a pure outrage machine.

I might be in the minority but Instagram is still awesome. It’s gotten more ads but most of them are quite interesting.

I’ve found made in USA goods from IG ads like this: https://psudo.com/
My guess is the parent poster was assuming the concern with liability was if they were charged by someone with a hammer (unprovoked), and you are assuming the concern with liability was based on stopped the robbery - both seem like pretty legitimate readings.

In less populated areas, my experience has been that individuals pretty much have to take responsibility for intervening in things they see - since no one else is around or could be around to do anything in time - or quickly things get out of control in a wider sense. I have property in an area that it’s easily 45 minutes before you could get a police response to a real, active emergency just due to travel time from the station. If you don’t intervene in anything weird, even if it isn’t your property, then the whole area gets a reputation for lawlessness pretty quick and attracts more problems. The attitudes of the local law enforcement generally are friendlier too towards getting more help, as they are well aware of how little they can do without it. They also deal with fewer things like folks itching (or able) to sue, due to it often being poorer areas, and everyone being less up in each other’s faces all the time.

In urban environments, there are often dedicated folks nearby (as in a few minutes response time), and everyone tends to be tenser - and the problems are often less ‘help me, I’m stuck in a ditch’ and more ‘semi-insane and/or drunk people getting in a fight in a public place’, and more people have the resources and/or access to lawyers to make things a nasty mess. So in general it IS better to call in the specialists who are used to dealing with it, and stay out of the mess if you can.
Any method/framework that is based on a "Manifesto" is despicable. The Manifesto gives the sense of entitlement of a moral standing. The principles become moral principles, and produce a Manichean divide between the new (good ones) and the old (bad ones), undermining any hope of truly collaborative work places based on trust and purpose.

Rather than moral principles, I prefer to base all discourse on scientific principles.

And those moral principles, deemed to be good, can be taken as assumptions. Assumptions can be questioned. Improved. Even replaced.

A manifesto and the holy writings like the Scrum Guide are unquestionable and give rise to dogma, tribalism, and all sorts of psychotic reality distortion perspectives.

If you're tired of Scrum, Manifestos and Holy Guides, there are better alternatives which foster much more humane, sustainable and collaborative working environments. I invite you to check out my TameFlow Approach.

Ask anything if you want to know more.
> Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook’s founder and chief executive, has argued that only companies as large as Facebook have the resources to fight misinformation, election meddling and harmful content.

Look, they’re not a propaganda machine! I’m so thankful we have them to “fight” against “misinformation”. I read that and my blood began to boil. Evil is the perfect description of such disgusting, deceitful pandering.
If it was a custodial service, then the amount of "energy wasted" was basically equal to any of the above.
Those drugs aren't better, in my experience, as a chronic pain patient. Morphine is way less addictive, longer lasting, with fewer side effects. Not to mention, it's natural, one of the main alkaloids from poppy. Now, I'm not a dolt who thinks natural is better. However, most synthetics are strictly worse from a therapeutic standpoint. This view is based on my experience with them and from my discussions with other patients. From what I understand, the synthetics are pushed on patients for incentives. I had to pretty much demand morphine instead of oxy. Thanks Sackler family!

Morphine XR (MSCont) is also pushed instead of normal morphine, again, I think for similar reasons. Although on the surface, it might seem like an XR would be helpful. Instead it just causes more constipation and doesn't give a great absorption profile.

Morphine IR 30mgs taken throughout the day pretty much vaniquished my pain. These days though, I use Kratom, Mitragyna Speciosa. It's as effective as morphine with less side effects. I also try to work out every day. Having strong muscles in the painful areas seems to help with the pain, either due to increased blood flow or perhaps for other reasons.

Nucynta (Tapentadol) was the most effective synthetic opioid I ever used but without insurance it cost me $3000 a bottle. Kratom is cheap as dirt even without insurance. $70-80 buys 1 kilo / 2.5 pounds of the ground up leaf. I have enough kratom in my cabinets to last a covid apocalypse.

You can get lab tested Kratom that is cGMP certified these days. I have nothing to gain by providing this information, just happy I found a pain reliever that is sustainable and doesn't require talking to a doctor playing a drug pusher every month.

Lots of people have had bad experiences with kratom giving them headaches/nausea. This is largely due to poor quality kratom from head-shops and gas stations or from consuming excessive doses. Never buy Kratom that isn't lab tested with GC/MS. And don't take too much of any opioid unless you want motion sickness.
I think many people feel threatened by the success and the pace of the Node.js ecosystem.

Most arguments, even in this thread already, are just wrong. Obviously they have never had any experience with the Node.js ecosystem and another.
Oh look, SponsorBlock: https://sponsor.ajay.app
If you work for an hourly wage, theft of your property in a very real sense is theft of hours of your life.

I think you have it exactly right with "privileged take". Salaried with PTO and direct deposit makes it feel like money just magically appears in your bank account.
It’s still antagonistic because sheet music is not ‘a problem’ for guitarists.
With different Hardware combinations you could do this on other operating systems too, even windows. I recorded the entirety of weekend at Bernie's 2 from Amazon when they had it using Nvidia Shadowplay.
I love the Internet Archive, but they’re fighting the last war here. There will never be any scary, Orwellian ministry of truth in our timeline, because there’s no need for one when all the power is concentrated in a few oligopolistic platform providers whose risk appetite is such that deplatforming is the only acceptable measure when that appetite is exceeded.

Furthermore, the calls (for censorship) are coming from inside the house at this point. In a rush to combat genuine issues like health misinformation, even organizations like the ACLU have come to support platforms clamping down on speech - and certainly they have a point; these are private companies, not the government.

I don’t have any solutions to this, but the future to worry about is not what’s dramatized here. It’s something much tidier, less threatening, and more insidious.
I passed a kidney stone a month and a half ago, and switched from a codeine-based painkiller to ibuprofen because of the constipation. (Also, for me, at least at the prescribed dose, codeine-with-acetaminophen/paracetamol gave less pain relief than 400 mg of ibuprofen. I'm also aware that morphine is significantly stronger than codeine.) The increased abdominal pressure from the constipation probably helped the stone pass a bit faster, but it also certainly seemed to increase the pain.

On a side note, drink plenty of water. 42 is pretty young for passing a kidney stone. Working from home this past year, my wife would give me a hard time that some days I drank only 500 mL or so of water. (I drank plenty of coffee in the office, but cutting down on coffee while working from home unfortunately didn't translate into replacing coffee with water.) My urologist says I should be drinking at least 30 mL of water per kg body mass per day. Yes, most of our food is mostly water, but at least for me, that didn't cut it. I've heard people compare passing a kidney stone to childbirth, but I'm sure that's a gross exaggeration. A really bad hangover is worse, but a kidney stone is painful enough that I was pretty useless for 5 days and could only sleep in a really hot bath, and then only for about 1-2 hours per day. You don't want a kidney stone.
>Any positive we had at a time comes from socialism’s general focus on education (one of the few positives of it)

If we're still talking about "the martians" here, don't they predate the socialist control of Hungary by at least a decade?
Carbon capture schemes are over sold and so-far under deliver to such an extent that these schemes serve almost no purpose whatsoever other than green-washing the polluters it enables to continue to pollute. Most of these schemes have good old coal, gas, or oil companies backing them. Their only agenda: delay the shutdown of their planet destroying activity for as long as possible. They spend billions lobbying for that. It's actually way more than what they spend on actual carbon capture. Planting a few trees here and there and going to ridiculous lengths to put a few tonnes of actual captured CO2 in the ground while they continue to release CO2 by the mega tonnes.

The total amount of captured carbon (since people started doing that) is measured in tiny fractions of a percent of what we dump in the atmosphere every year. The best form of carbon capture is leaving it in the ground and not removing it from there to begin with. It would be cheaper to pay these companies to simply shut down their business than to allow them to keep making things worse and then funding the cleanup of their mess.

Before we start hacking our planet, we need to pull the plug on doing the things that are actively making things worse to a far larger extent than we can feasibly clean things up. Why spent billions re-capturing a fraction of what we actually still put out every year? Much cheaper to stop doing that. That's carbon we won't have to put back into the ground.

Even better: instead of spending money on that, we could simply stop spending public money on enabling the active adding of carbon to our atmosphere. I'm talking about the collective tax benefits, subsidies, government sponsored 'research', the odd bit of war fare in the middle east, etc. that the oil and gas industry continues to benefit from. That adds up to being way more than we're spending on renewable energy or indeed carbon capture. The amounts are measured in trillions.
What does that statement even mean? So we walk into the path of the speeding train? We have at this point billions of data points showing that these vaccines save your life. Refusal to use them is both illogical and irrational. Their use should be globally enforced, just like MMR, Polio, and the other 30+ immunizations. Again, fuck your idiotic feelings.
This is certainly more true. That explosion of logics I mentioned was a big movement of many authors to expand our understanding of types (among other things).
On my recent trip to that area, I saw people all over cycling with masks on.. which seems pretty insane to me for how hot it was there when i visited (90's) and i only saw a small handfull of people with helmets
It's almost like there's a good reason society invented bank regulation.
This doesn't sound very promising.
"Give users more control over their data" < what does this even mean.

It sounds more like, look we give users more control over data, but please let us do the meta verse project.

From what I see there, it will get even worse. Fb collects data and sells ads based on that data, meanwhile the users are undergoing gamification aka incentivized to spend as much time as possible on the platform.

The best governance would be if people simply stopped using it, but people do want to share and like, they think it adds value to the life.
Depends on what device generates the image perhaps? DJI Drones have a lot of info as EXIF XMP. I just parse that as XML.

EDIT: It's not 80k, but good enough as a GPS log.
It is hated so much because it is used so much. If it was a niche or obscure platform then no-one would have cared.
>Sure, as a society we figured mass media out.

Are you saying this as in mass media is "safe" from manipulation? I would 100% disagree with that. Stating that it only took a world war to figure out mass media seems very odd as a qualifier. Along those same terms, social is leading us to world wide civil wars.
In fairness, the U.K. adverts for probiotic yoghurts have said it contains natural bacteria found in the gut.
I worry that simply breaking up FB could make things worse. Today, with a safe monopoly feedung high profit margins they can afford some mitigations (more reviewers, etc) and to "hold back" a bit on some of the worst/unhealthy engagement tricks.

Several more equal competitors would feel pressure to outdo each other. Some other fix is needed (probably in addition to breakup).