skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Hopefully all these "wokeness" vs "conservative" lines are drawn in the sand. I really enjoyed when we were writing lines of code rather than writing borders, rules and obvious regressive in-fighting. I can't be the only one looking at all this political garbage and ghost drama with shame.
At least in NYC it is still fashionable to dress well (as in curating one's own style or to the upper-end styling haute couture well). If in NYC it is still fashionable, I am pretty sure it is still fashionable in a lot of places :)
ICMP should be allowed anyways because of MTU path discovery.

stop disabling ping
It would save humanity. Maybe that's a start?
But they have little nutrional importance. As such producing them cause substantial extra CO2 load relatively. I think ban of them in such scenario is absolutely justified. As we clearly then want to do everything to combat climate change.
If the community cares they'll try and find out people that do that and blacklist them. hicetnunc does that, it's the only one I could speak to.

That's generally referred to as copy-minting.

EDIT: here's the hicetnunc community write up for basic steps to minimize the change you buy a copy-mint: https://github.com/hicetnunc2000/hicetnunc/wiki/Beware-copym...!
The vast majority of agricultural land today are for feeding animals (between 70% and 80% depending of the studies). The end product meat is maybe more efficient, but compared to what was needed for its production it is not. It’s not humans that eat that much monocultured corn and soy.
Meanwhile, hospital healthcare systems are collapsing. But hey, why fuss?
That's true! But ANNs are sometimes able to do things we haven't found a way to do more efficiently, as in this case.
It honestly amazing we had e-mail before the messes of today. Otherwise we'd be stuck with a dozen different "mail" apps.
No infrastructure in venues integrating NFTs but it’s no different than a traditional ticket.

Your NFT could have an associated QR code read at the door. In case of conflict there’s only one owner with access to the associated wallet and will be able to proof ownership via app / website…
> Recall that just a generation or two ago meat was something you ate once a week if you lived in a fairly developed country.

What do you mean by a fairly developed country? McDonald's was selling hamburgers for 15 cents in 1955 (roughly the same as the price of a loaf of bread at the grocery store).

Catholics eating fish on Friday (instead of meat) I believe goes back many generations.

See also this article about historical meat consumption in the U.S.[0]:

"“These sources do give us some confidence in suggesting an average annual consumption of 150–200 pounds of meat per person in the nineteenth century.”

[0]: https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2014/06/how-ameri...
I see you've just discovered the direction of progressive change! Backwards.
Equating eating meat to owning a private jet won't get the point pretty well to the masses.
How would reducing food waste reduce emissions? After all food is just condensed CO2, eating it releases that CO2 back into the atmosphere the same as rotting. It’s a closed cycle.
I think this is a big difference between US and EU.

In EU we like to joke around, tease each other, and not get fired over that.

When we tell a sexist joke with a woman present, you will get a witty reply from them, not a call to HR.

I hope this US bullshit stays in US.

Seems that EU women are not victims but can stand their own ground.
> Maybe this is why I like homebrewing: everyone is a bearded, chubby 35 year old nerd and there no way to make a 5 gallon carboy of bubbling alcoholic liquid into something "glamourous"

Alcohol is very prominent on Instik, don't give them ideas. They might not have the brains to actually make it but they sure can buy the equipment and use water pretending it's moonshine :D
That is really for the insurance companies covering them.

The actuaries at Insurance Co do that kind of analysis for all products for life/ medical to workplace/ product safety this would probably fall under.

The courts also have fairly well known tables/methods for calculating cost/value of life used to compute compensation for injury/death.
"If you're a green card holder" is a pretty big caveat to be leaving out! Suddenly the framing of the crime is less "walking around without ID" and more "being a foreigner who can't produce documentation of legal presence".

Both are shitty situations, but do you see how much more surprising it is to hear that a court will uphold the criminality of something that everyone seems to do all the time with no consquences, than that there's apparently no political will to fix what amounts to, on the happy path, a trivial inconvenience for a small class of politically unpopular noncitizens?
Inspiration for writing my working with me page, helpful in these remote times
It doesn't really matter to me...

(as long as tabs stops/indent are 4)
But his cardiac surgery was in 2015.

Meanwhile, according to the article, symptoms began to appear far earlier. There is mention of migraines in 2009 and 2011 appears to be the start of some sort of sleep disorder (him sleeping for three days is used as an example) as well as the beginning of marked personality changes.

All this was already underway before the 2015 surgery - the surgery seemed to accelerate the deterioration but does not appear to be the trigger.

EDIT: Came across this paper while browsing PubMed:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6837928/

Here's an interesting quote:

"Additionally, infants and children with congenital heart defects often show disorders in folate metabolism (low folate, higher homocysteine, or low vitamin B12)."

Considering the surgery was to repair a leaky aortic valve which he's had since birth, it just seems like another data point.

Just my two cents.
I think it is unfair to call this “whataboutism”. If there isn’t a fair accounting applied to all activities and externalities, then what you’ll see is that those with political power will regulate only activities that aren’t important to them, while what they value personally is allowed unabated. Put another way, unequal application will lead to oppression.
I think there lies the problem:

> fortunately if cattle population stays constant, their portion of the atmospheric resident methane will also remain constant

I have the impression (as a person uneducated in this topic) that current levels are already too high, and the world population is only going up.

Is there a way to produce more food with lower emissions or should the main target be a steady population? Or both?

I know some people who started eating insects and stopped planning for kids because of this. Me? I'm just confused.
I think trying to get average urban/rural numbers is interesting but also misleading. What matters is what is actually happening and where the harm is produced.

My city is heated with district heating, which comes from coal. Thats big chunk of my personal carbon footprint and makes living in a city look bad vs rural life.

I think focusing on consumers and making this about urban/rural lifestyle choices is only half the equation and to change things you need to go in and swap the power plants, farms etc.
At least in English you have the neutral word "they". In french you only have the plural of "he" or "she". This means that when you point to a mixed crowd, you must choose which of the plurals you use.

The grammatical rule is that one male flips the plural gender to male. If you do not know the sexes, the plural is male.

As a French, the construction comes naturally because we've been taught that at school since kindergarten. This always sounded a bit weird, though.

I do not approve some "grammatical inclusivity" horrors that are being invented from time to time, but some innovative-but-not-distruptive changes would be welcome.
But online collectible card games have existed for well over a decade without any need for NFTs, including the ability to trade and sell your rare cards. What does having an NFT add?
Interesting. Would people be able to “buy” more budget? And how would that work for complex activities that have a chain of carbon producing activities. For example let’s take something like a bar. People visiting the bar to share drinks with friends are buying alcohol, which has its own impacts. The building the bar is in might be made of concrete, which has a carbon impact. The high frequency with which dishwashers are run there have an impact. Do all of these get included into the price of a drink? Whose budget does it come out of?
> true 0 would mean the battery couldn't ever charge again

what?
Incredible. Thanks for sharing. I had no idea. What is “pumping loss “?
It remains to be seen, the future is uncertain. There is also a lot more emotional attachment in the space...people do really like the art. Maybe not when it comes to cryptonarwals or whatever, but pieces that are genuine creative endeavors...deafbeef, art blocks, cryptopunks - there is a real love of these in the space, and it does help bind communities together. There will always be scammers and grifters in every walk of life, and it's a personal responsibility to apply critical thinking. But it doesn't discount the value of what is bring brought into focus with the innovation.
So we’re trusting a centralized service, cool.
You seem to have missed the fundamental truth that NFTs are not scarce. With the example of a Vermeer, you create one original thing, and then imitations of that thing. Minting multiple NFTs of the same thing is creating more originals, but of the same thing. One is not somehow "more original" than the others.

This is a difficult concept for people to get their heads around because of the obvious but incorrect parallel between original art and reproductions. It would be slightly closer to say that an NFT is a photo of a Vermeer. Anyone can make more originals at any time and there's nothing you or anyone can do about it.
A rant looking for a racist angle...
As mentioned earlier, methane breaks down after 10 years into CO2 which makes livestock more part of the cycle rather than a producer. Applying the tax to any process that directly removes carbon sinks (eg. drilling/forest clearing) should take care of any downstream processes that rely on it.
> … UCLA that did everything right.

I disagree with that statement, based on the article's paragraph starting "Without any deliberation I was aware of…"

The big question is, were the actions of and statements by Anderson made as part of a normal, documented procedure for this sort of occurrence? Were these actions taken in consultation with, or under the direction of, the relevant disciplinary authorities?

If not, then I think Anderson does have a case to answer to.
Like others have pointed out, it’s not about the margins on egress. Cloudflare claims that AWS marks up egress by 4-17x depending on the region, but this isn’t about making money off egress directly. It’s about creating a moat around all AWS services. If you’re already using some services inside the moat, you’re strongly encouraged to use the other services within the moat.

If your data is in S3 or DynamoDB, egress fees will encourage you to process the data within AWS. You’re not going to use BigQuery for that. If you want to add a search index on that, you won’t go shopping around for search products on other clouds, you’ll likely use AWS elasticsearch. That’s where AWS makes money - through this soft lock-in.

They’ll survive and maybe even thrive if they lose the revenue from egress. But who knows what’ll happen if the moat is destroyed? Every AWS service would need to compete on merit with every service on other clouds. They won’t be chosen simply by default.
Significant portion of them should not be legally driving either, being Drunk/High etc.
It’s legal to be armed in most jurisdictions. We should be specific about that part too and what does and does not pose a threat.
All that is true, but when it comes to S3, price was absolutely part of the magic.

S3 was orders of magnitude cheaper than anything comparable at the time.
I understand that, but I still wonder if it is.
What's "major" useful for doing it with pure digital money?
...and then returned it quietly to the person who had loaned it to him temporarily to elevate his brand?
Haha, thanks for the downvotes. Let's see what happens when EU is awake.
I think you're overthinking it. Yes, those are issues, but they're hardly blockers. Few rides will fuck up the interior, and fewer still will have a dispute about who's responsible for a mess. Compared to having one 'employee' per car at all times, there's still plenty of economies of scale to exploit for profit.
> How is this different from training a neural network on a data set and relying on interpolation for inference? Isn't that exactly what neural nets learn, statistical relationships between inputs?

The huge difference is that humans has a rational part of the brain which determines if examples are important to train on or not, doing extremely efficient problem space pruning. And then it trains the neural network in real time using that rational part as guidance. We can't program without the rational part, so computers likely wont able to program without it either. We can read sentences and detect objects in images without the rational parts so ML AI can do that.

We have no idea at all how to build that rational part, without something replacing its role the current methods will just give us extremely primitive parts of human thinking such as image recognition.

AlphaGO actually got a rational part, the code they used to play through the game and see if moves leads to a win. That means that AlphaGO has the full human capability, but for a very limited domain, just GO, the rational part of GO doesn't generalize well to more interesting problems.
Employees raise safety concerns, allegations of sexual harassment at Blue Origin
Trying to parse your question, for the digital answer first.

An NFT is verifiable metadata that can link to any other arbitrary data, such as a PNG, JPG, MP4, or whatever. Following the standards set forth by ERC721, you can add an image, external URLs, names, and various attributes that define the item's traits in relation to a broader collection that it belongs to.

It is very common to use IPFS for hashing the contents of both the metadata and the image (or other linked media), since it's an easy standard to adopt to back up in multiple places. You can even back up IPFS files permanently using a storage solution like Arweave.

NFTs have been linked to physical items. Typically the way it's handled is the NFTs are sold, but are redeemable for the physical item by the creator. So you can either hold the NFT or redeem it for the physical item. At which point the creator will need your shipping info to get it to you.

NFTs could also be used to represent things like real estate titles and mortgages, but at some point there would need to be a centralized connection or oracle connected with a centralized entity for that use case.

They're also used to represent liquidity positions in decentralized exchanges such as Uniswap v3.
It's not exactly useless, as it is a serious business concern. However, asking it the way it has been phrased is useless, as you've stated, stating from the start that you are planning on paying out fees like this is just dumb. It is good business planning to be aware of the fact that it is a >0% chance of unintended bad things happening, so let's take out an insurance policy to cover for that contingency. There's a difference between planning for the fact that an accident is possible vs planning to cause an accident.
Coal is a fossil fuel. Returning ancient carbon to the atmosphere.

Cattle is a bio-fuel. The methane/carbon they release was captured by the grains and grasses shortly before the cattle consumed it, and will continue growing after they've consumed it.

Cattle should be the trendy and expensive thing among the outspoken, virtue-signaling greens. It's plant-based. Contains all-natural ingredients. Isn't made in a lab/on an assembly line with a a bunch of chemicals with scary names. Old hippies should each buy a cow to keep their lawns mowed and fertilized without burning gasoline.
and hard real-time.

It really inverts some priorities (I mean development priorities, not the priority inversion on mars pathfinder)
Ticketmaster is the middleman. NFTs skip all of that and give much more flexibility to the issuer. You can code anything you want in the smart contract. Variable royalties depending on when is sold, increasing royalties on each transaction… Any incentive structure you can imagine is possible and nobody is gatekeeping.
I have bad news, they are not going to keep it to the US.
You have a good point. At the end of the day, this is an implementation detail and something that can be easily changed. =)
Interesting construct, the teacher as the personal guide or someone to help you get unstuck rather than a deliverer of knowledge.
It was just coincidence :) - but I did just see your email.
This is a lot of words to say "there is by design no way to do that".

DeFi systems are all designed around the unspoken (although sometimes spoken, honestly) assumption that rules are bad and that the system should make enforcing them difficult-to-impossible. A fun exercise is to consider, if all businesses went to using *coin overnight and one accidentally overcharged your wallet, how would you get your coins back?
It's important for patients to know about the following medical side-effects:

- anesthesia can make you a vegetable, or kill you.

Fentanyl, an anesthetic shipped in bulk to South America and the USA, has made that more visible to the public.

- MRI dyes can destroy your kidneys, or worse.

- at a lower risk than above (usually), most pharmaceutical drugs and precursors are made in China. There's virtually no FDA oversight, especially during corona. This issue is still under the radar, but it's real.

The most famous case is when a US cardiologist died after surgery when the Chinese-made medication was contaminated.

"More than 800 arrests made in DEA crackdown on fentanyl-laced fake pills":

https://www.cnn.com/2021/09/30/us/dea-fake-pills-sweep-800-a...
If the original Mona Lisa had been done in photoshop there could be infinitely many indistinguishable copies of the “original” MonaLisa.psd
They’re intended to make titles less clickbaity, I think in the spirit of leveling the “curious discussion” playing field.

But the heuristics aren’t great, it’s like the world stopped at listicles and Clickhole is the oracle. I’m not necessarily opposed to the notion of curating link titles, but I honestly think it’s too high volume and produces the opposite of what’s intended.
That's just classism in a thin veneer of pretention.

Frequency and reliability are what actually drive ridership
But much less efficient at 65 and 75. Pushing the wind eventually gets you.
Exception events like are usually covered by Insurance.

However companies do provision for payouts in potential cases whether private/ class action or government regulatory ones , they are legally required to do so and disclose it in their filings.
Which is pretty much the business plan of self driving car service. Provide a method for people that 100% should not be driving a way of safely transporting themselves home.
And your "business internet connection that is offered by ISPs" is a joke compared to the backbone AWS uses.

Remember those ISPs need to make margin, that's why they charge what they do.

AWS _could_ make it's margin on services alone. They just choose not to.
Collectively you decide what kind of country you want to create and individually you have the choice to move. FWIW I spent years on the Canadian/USA border and have driven there quite a bit.
> Perhaps you can email Universal Talent Agency and tell them they are wrong.

About what? If anything, this goes to prove my point. These NFTs cannot "manage commercial and IP rights" to themselves, so Larva Labs has contracted with UTA to perform that task.

> Trademarks and copyright infringement exists in the NFT world, just because you can mint an NFT doesn't mean you own the art associated, particularly if you didn't create it.

Yes. Again, that's exactly the point I was making -- that a NFT does not "assure the authenticity and provenance" of anything.
Alternately, you could consider all of the people who don't think nuclear is the solution to climate change. Are they irrational?
"within designated parts of San Francisco" - as for Cruise, which parts of San Francisco those are?
Ocean drone captures video from inside a hurricane
Because I don’t know any unpopular art periods, I’ll swap to music.

NFTs could be boy bands. It was fun and a few things came out of it, but largely most people don’t know or care who was in Take That and we moved on.

Unlike Mozart or the Beatles which manage to have relevance beyond their times and lives.

NFTs will always be a thing, but current popularity or references in white papers doesn’t mean much in a broader context.
I read the introduction to the brief he filed as well, to see if there was something I was missing that he did not mention in the blog, about being maligned or slandered.

The closest I could find was:

> Moreover, the Dean of the Anderson School, Defendant Antonio Bernardo (“Bernardo”), disparaged Plaintiff to alumni and the general public based on the private communications between Plaintiff and the student who had requested preferential race-based grading policies (“Student”). Dean Bernardo even went so far as to publicly disclose the adverse personnel action the School had improperly imposed on Plaintiff.

The private communications he is referring to here is his emails with the student. Which isn’t private if the student chooses to reveal it, like he did in this case. I mean, there’s absolutely 0 legal expectation of privacy in an email sent to someone, but there is hardly even an ethical expectation of privacy if the dispute is based on the email sent.

But here’s the thing. Even here he doesn’t use the term defamation, because he knows that’s a legal term completely unsupported by the facts. Speaking badly of somebody is not illegal (and adds even more irony because if that was illegal it would chill public discourse far more than losing private at will contracts with 3rd party entities, when the party you’re suing decided to investigate a claim and then cleared you of it completely).