skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Most seemingly common sense solutions fail miserably. Trying to break prisoners' dilemmas by nailing all responsibility to someone (a) may be a lot more disruptive and aggressive than you imagined and (b) will often result in elaborate CYA responsibility avoidance.

Or, that is what the management chain does and this is the only way to scale it.

There is also a perspective on this which is along the lines of Turner's social evolution ideas.

To recap that, bureaucracy is recast as a gene for a successful organization. For Turner, this is in some sense a very literal survival of the fittest, because he is asking the question, “why do modern militaries and governments regress to The State as their model, rather than the other governmental styles through history?” And his answer is that The State, or bureaucracy, is legit a better gene, it propagates itself and it propagates the organism better.

“But, the thing we know about bureaucracies is that they are super inefficient, how can that be the best way to go?!” Well, maybe we need to revisit that. The modern military that is structured like a bureaucracy is vastly vastly larger than the militaries that are not. Is there a forcing function that would drive efficiency way down at these resource scales? And once he's asking that question the answer seems obvious, the same answer as in OP: corruption. In computing terms, a tree with fan-out 5 has 5/4 as many nodes as leaf nodes, with 10 you can drop to 10/9, so you have an 11% - 25% intrinsic overhead. (Substantially more in terms of cost of labor since they also want to be paid more than the front-line employee, which again suggests incentives.) We look at this minimum 20% waste and are shocked by it, but the claim is that the transition to bureaucracy starts to happen precisely when you are moving so many resources that the 2% of bad actors that slip through your vetting can sipon off 5x-10x what they actually need and produce a 10-20% corruption. This combination sets a Dunbar’s number, rather than it being some aspect of human evolutionary psychology.

The cost was built into the game rules at these scales, it stops being waste and starts being opportunity cost, in the economic sense... Put another way, maybe it is not the hard question of social science, but a constraint in which social science necessarily operates?
Referential Transparency in FP and Scala
> How does this person respond to something they heard but don't quite understand? Do they pretend to understand and go on, or stop and clarify at the risk of sounding unknowledgeable?

This. I would additionally also say, how does this person react when shown they misunderstood/misinterpreted something. How do they deal with being wrong about something.
It seems (OP correct me if I'm wrong) that it uses actual browser events, which are asynchronous (where normally Redux messages are sent and reacted-to synchronously). This probably simplifies things when you do want asynchronous chains of events, but complicates things when it comes to UI consistency and race conditions.
From what they said in the presentation video QA, they will be keeping that promise.
But everyone uses roads, driver or not. The food in the store was not grown there, your mail was probably brought along the road at some point…
Excluded from cryptocurrency airdrop, a lot of money, what recourse
In 2020 Flare announced an airdrop

more info:

https://dailyhodl.com/2021/07/03/flare-unveils-plan-to-send-100000000000-spark-tokens-to-xrp-holders-in-massive-airdrop/

My address was eligible for the airdrop and I had completed all the necessary steps to claim it

A second airdrop, songbird, was unveiled., which dropped 2 weeks ago.

https://flare.xyz/introducing-songbird/

I saw that I did not get any songbird. After contacting support, a week later I eventually learn that my XRP address was added to an exclusion list. This means I get nothing. The total amount that I am owed is easily in the thousands of dollars (tens of thousands of dollars, possibly even $100k depending on price) over the duration of the airdrop (which is over a three-year period):

https://flare.xyz/further-information-on-the-spark-token-distribution/

It says:

Other than Ripple inc and the non-participating exchanges, there are a few groups that are completely excluded from the distribution. These are Jed McCaleb and accounts that are known to have received XRP as a result of fraud, theft and scams.

So I am guessing they assume my XRP was fraudulently obtained, so I get nothing. However I never engaged in fraud. I received XRP in 2020 as payment, but how was I supposed to know at the time something was wrong? That is not the issue, the issue is I am excluded for a lot of money.

So what should my next step be. The holding company is in the UK:

https://www.xrpchat.com/topic/38453-company-incorporation-info-for-flare-networks/

I am not even sure what the assessed damages will be given that the airdrop has not actually commenced yet, or if there is any way to proceed legally.
Here we are, at a fantastic version 14, and still no sign of an MySQL AB-like company able to provide support and extensions to a great piece of open source software. There's a few small ones, yes, but nothing at the billion dollar size.

I am still unable to understand why.
I think eventually all infrastructure software tends to be written in a language like C, C++, or Rust where you have fine grained, low-level control of memory and performance. For widely used infrastructure, the optimization time is justified by how much it will be used.
If one considers the idea of map reduce to be taking a set of data and ending up with a subset that is relevant, I've used tons of simple things to do that, and never Hadoop.

I think parsing logs to find pain areas or potential exploit/exfil is a map reduce job, for instance, and grep or awk can manage that just fine.
As privacy issues worsen, Congress looks to the FTC
Nobody under 18 should be on the internet, period.
This site is auto-blocked by my organization's internet filter and is categorized as 'high-risk'. I wonder if it is because of the some techniques or examples shown?
I'm not that familiar with SEO, so maybe I've only done some very basics of it. I wouldn't think that would cost that much. You're basically looking for fast pace loads, cross-linking, and keywords, right? Or am I missing some much more involved stuff?
Not necessarily a fan of scrum. Most of the times it feels like companies strive to do scrum instead of striving do work iteratively, closer to the customer and all of that jazz.

Scrum could be a consequence of a goal it shouldn't be the goal.
FP programmer here and I agree insofar as ecosystem matters a lot and you want to be able to onboard juniors easily and on. To that end a pure FP language is often not the best choice, especially in lowering the learning curve. However it can be great a choice on the right project and with the right team. Overall it makes sense that we have way more JS and Go programmers than Haskell or 'pure FP' Scala. JS is fine as a language but so is F#, they fit different niches and different contexts.

I love the diversity of our industry and I see having all these different paradigms and languages as a massive strength. I welcome them all.
... And I should have read the other comments before posting :)

Have a good day
And for the flash card type of learners it is good to see the "HANDY ONE-LINE SCRIPTS FOR AWK" page is still available. See the links in the Credits section at the bottom for more great reading:

https://www.pement.org/awk/awk1line.txt

That author also edited the "USEFUL ONE-LINE SCRIPTS FOR SED" page:

https://www.pement.org/sed/sed1line.txt
I always thought a huge blind spot in hiring is that nobody counts or worries about false negatives: Those people who you said "no" to but would have turned out to be great. False positives are often, but not always, easy to spot, and you can know and feel regret about how many hires turned out to be low performers. But it's hard to know or feel regret about the people you turn away. I mean, how would you even track this or correct it? Keep track of everyone you interview, then look at their career 10yrs in the future? Flag people as "no, but maybe we're wrong" in the HR system and then wait for them to re-apply?

As an interviewer, I sometimes wonder if I made the right "No Hire" call on that person who might just have been nervous. As a candidate, I always know that when they say "NO" they're wrong :)
I don't see the point of this. As an engineer you get a task and then pick a solution from a bag you have, that is not optimal, but fulfills the constraints you got. Time and money, features, accuracy, speed, waste, etc.

Where is the difference with software? You get the same kind of constraints and need to build something from libraries and custom code, that fits all of them.

There may be more constraints for a skyscraper than a small garage, and there are more constraints for airplane software than a website. You can't write flight controllers in javascript, the same way you cannot build your airplane out of toilet paper. There are also more constraints for airplane software than for your backyard garage. It only depends on the regulations in the field. Most of the times software doesn't have the potential to harm people, like houses and bridges have. So you have less regulations.

If you want to build a bicycle, there is no right solution either. You could benchmark it by weight, like you could benchmark software by memory usage.

Most engineering products only rely on best practice and the way the company does it since years, from experience. There is no "right" solution, neither in civil-, nor in software-, nor in engineering in general.
I just meant to say that wherever the line is, I don't think Minecraft telemetry is anything to get angry about.
But what if something unusual happens, for example if something happens with my son phone I instructed him to ask a friend to call me (we wrote my number down)... I think as always the problem needs to be solved at it's root and not with some hack that fails in some important cases.
Helpful, thank you!

(Its worth noticing exactly what happened here, and your previous responses a) citing information which was irrelevant to the theory I raised and b) you jumping to conclusions about my intent/agenda.)
My personal experience with large organizations (over 100,000 people) is that everything is so hard because 10-20% of the people do most of the work and the others are not just minor contributors, but many times just roadblocks.

For example 1 hour ago I was discussing with my business counterpart about a project we are working on. We just got approval to hire 4 more people (that means we have to hire them, it is not optional) and half of them are diversity targets (meaning: skills are irelevant, we will get them anyway) and the other 2 will be hired and given to us without knowing what are the skills we need. Based on such organization dynamics, we plan to be sufficient without these 4 people and if any of them has any useful skills, it will be a nice surprise. At the same time, we need to give them some work to do, so we need to invent some roles that should be as harmless as possible.

This is just a project, in my department of ~100 people about half are just mouth breathing, but it makes it a lot more complicated for the ~ 20-30 that do work to just do their work: some of these people have invented roles to rubber stamp steps in the projects, so they are adding 10-20 steps and a few days of work just to justify their existence. With the department half the size, everything would be much simpler, faster and even more productive.
The Vanishing Climate Archives
Hope you have Google it in the mean time.
Glad to hear! Please file issues if anything is confusing or missing, it's a pretty friendly GitHub community.
I hired a lot of very good developers, so I was able to rely on my intuition pretty well.

Then one time I hired an excellent candidate, technically very strong. Then it turned out he couldn't figure things out on his own. I had a co-interviewer who also thought he was very strong. In the end we had to fire him after a month since he couldn't pick up the pace (his colleague who started at the same time is actually very good)

I was "very good at hiring", until I hired the wrong person. Even now it's hard for me to tell what actually went wrong there. It was mostly theory and understanding underlying concepts, but now I definitely mix in a lot of practical issues and examples. Sometimes I think we interviewed his twin brother who could actually program ;).

Hiring developers is indeed very difficult. You can only tell when working with them for a few weeks.
"It's shit" is not constructive feedback. As the parent commenter said, this is a relatively UI toolkit, and this desktop environment implementation is even younger. It takes time and effort to tweak things and there's no need to be hostile to new efforts. Especially when you consider that Qt, Windows, GNOME etc all have had years and years to tweak their design, and have also been redesigned.
> the enum values received by an actor-isolated method are not the same values that were passed by the caller.

> ... i also noticed that i could influence the specific enum cases that the real values are overwritten with based on user input

Wow. These issues are HUGE. This really needs some official response about blast radius. Xcode 13 with Swift 5.5 has been released for iOS (though not macOS). Developers are shipping, or planning to ship, with builds from it. Do they need to pull those back?
Thanks for that reply! It's good to work with an example.
I do a lot of work with structured data--json, yaml, etc. For me, this is how I feel about jq. One of my favorite use-cases is querying Kubernetes resources. E.g., `kubectl get secret <secret-name> -o json | jq -r '.data | map_values(@base64d)'` (fetch a secret and decode all of its values).
I'm perfectly happy to not understand your "theory".
This was not a fun morning for me. All of my sites which are running on Debian 9 suddenly weren't able to contact our authentication and other internal systems. I had to disable SSL verification until ops can move them to newer servers.
Goldman Compliance Analyst Wasn’t Compliant
So if I understood it correctly this is a toolkit for building both desktop and app GUIs? It's a cool product, but someone needs to rework the design, both in terms of UI and UX. I think it will be a hard sell otherwise.
Yeah I thought so too, but reading the ticket they linked it looks like in a specific version of Minecraft, strongholds we’re not being generated at all?

I only recently started playing Minecraft again after years. Last time I played it, The End did not exist yet in Minecraft. Back then we used to joke about “winning Minecraft”. Also, lava used to be an infinite resource if you built a cross and filled each corner with lava, you could then take infinite lava out from the middle which was neat. But they decided to remove that for some reason.

Anyway, bugs happen and I think the GP is wrong to suggest that telemetry is not helpful. Being able to see how people actually use the software is how Microsoft has done it since many many years AFAIK. And it helps Microsoft to develop better software.

There are many things I don’t like about Microsoft and I don’t use their Windows operating system almost at all. But I think they still got a lot right about how to develop software.
That’s hilarious. I think Darwin would disagree though.
“At this point the only implemented event is world load.”

Are you certain about your assertion? Can you link to the document where you found it?
The CEO sounds all well and nice, but they're already tainted with the original sin of taking VC money, so I say good luck to him building a sustainable company that will be around "20, 30, 50 years from now"
That isn't remotely what MMT is. It also isn't remotely fed policy.
What jobs? You know this stuff is alarmist and complete nonsense because it's written by a reporter, not within the institutions that be. She's picking random numbers, and based off of some things written on her home page, clearly has a liberal bias to make the article seem more pressing to discredit republicans.

I'm not saying "red good blue bad" but jesus maybe don't make it so damn obvious you're trying to write a biased article that you're opinions are right because they go against the conservatives. I mean the past two years have encouraged the greatest amount of inflation in the US in well over a decade. Prices more than doubled in just two years of absurd stimulus and rent controls. The halted economy and over reliance on China as well has caused egregious supply chain problems as a whole.

This isn't a "republicans are evil cause they wanna default" issue. This is a "government is so big and autocratic that they're playing with gasoline stoking our retirements" issue.
Use docker buildx, it's the Buildkit engine which fully supports cross platform builds. It's essentially just what you mention, add a CLI flag and it spit out an ARM image even on your Intel machine. See: https://www.docker.com/blog/multi-arch-build-and-images-the-...
It's also worth noticing this took about 30 seconds to find via a quick Googling.
Well I was going to re-install and check out new updates but I guess not anymore. I don't care how helpful it is, if there is no details on the exact specification of what data is shared and no way to disable it, I won't support the product.
Most folks don't look for higher pay if they're satisfied with their job. Once they are unhappy and start looking, then it always looks like "They left for higher pay" which is technically true. But doesn't address the root cause.
That's why capturing the animal and prompt testing is important. If you get treated/shots right away, your prognosis is good. If you wait until the disease starts to affect you, your chances go way down.
Words easy.

Good words hard.
Yeah, and I think those threads are ridiculous personally, with all these people playing armchair engineer without access to any of boeing's data that an actual engineer would need to refer to in order to critically analyze a process.
Sounds like your target would be whoever made the fraud part of the exclusion list and included your address on it. I would assume that they bought that list from a blockchain analysis company.
Go Like Hell: Ford, Ferrari, and Their Battle for Speed and Glory at Le Mans
Solid math and reasonable general principles, with an element or two I question. He comes close to clarifying it, though not quite. And while the percentage of 50 was a disposable placeholder to illustrate valid points, I doubt cotton could be quite so effective as 50% leading to 75% (and certainly not 100%) and some assumptions are required to flow along with the logic, as was mentioned. This is still reasonable for a fast-paced video; some finicky details must be overlooked. However, it is primarily based on math and no data was shown giving any unambiguous indication for cotton efficacy. Also, he addresses directionality as nearly equal for the illustration, but later provides another resource that accounts for it in detail. Was this prefactored? Otherwise surprisingly apropos and worthwhile.

Thank you
> S3's margin is R2's opportunity

Indeed, it looks like "your margin is my opportunity" motto can work both ways for Amazon :)
Elasticsearch: Index was created with version X, minimum compatible version is X
It seems to be a very general phenomenon, first noticed by Christiaan Huygens.

E.g. "32 Metronome Synchronization"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5v5eBf2KwF8

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christiaan_Huygens

See also "entrainment": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brainwave_entrainment https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entrainment_(biomusicology) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entrainment_(chronobiology) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entrainment_(physics) etc.

There also seems (to some people) to be some form of "energetic" aspect to mesmerism/charisma but this has been contested going right back to Mesmer and Ben Franklin (in the West.) It's been rediscovered (and "debunked") several times in the last couple of centuries, for example Baron Von Reichenbach's "Odic force" and Wilhelm Reich's "Orgone". I should not fail to mention "chi" or "qi" in this context.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_magnetism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Odic_force

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orgone

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qi

Gurdjieff called it "being-Hanbledzoïn" and said:

> “Hanbledzoïn is nothing else than the ‘blood’ of the Kesdjan body of the being; just as the cosmic substances called in totality blood serve for nourishing and renewing the planetary body of the being, so also Hanbledzoïn serves in the same way for nourishing and perfecting the body Kesdjan.

https://gurdjieff.work/ae/terms/en50/0238.htm

To the scientific skeptic this is all nonsense, of course.
Abbyy FineReader 15.2.118 Crack Key Download [ Latest Version ]
Using Modern Image Formats: AVIF and WebP
Agreed. It's sometimes hard to distinguish the things Google does that contributes to its success from the things Google can get away with (waste, etc.) because of its success.
It very much is. The author of the article has a very clear liberal bias and it makes me believe she didn't write this cause it's true, but because she just doesn't want to analyze why republicans would vote unanimously for that.
The US was pulling out of the Philipines when WW2 started, as it had been decided almost a decade earlier to slowly transition to Philippine independence.

Your entire justification for Japan attacking the US was that America was no saint and had done terrible things previously. What I'm advocating is that a major source of unnecessary wars all over the world is continued eye-for-an-eye long-held grievances resurfacing, mostly because it is convenient for a state to resurface them in accomplishing whatever they wanted to do in the first place (expand their territory and resources to enrich themselves).

Your equivalent today would be a country saying "look what they did to us 80 years ago, let's go attack them." Almost everyone sane has realized this doesn't lead anywhere productive, even when the grievances were true. Should China invade or attack Japan today for the Rape of Nanking? That's what you're justifying.

Lastly, US being world police is a hotly contested issue for good reason. You can advocate they had "no business" in Vietnam and Korea, whereas others can point out that without the US, the fate of South Korea would be a North Korean state over all of Korea, at the expense of millions of Korean's rights and welfare. Following what the US prevented in Korea, and without any hindsight, they thought they could do the same in Vietnam, though in hindsight this was fraught for many other reasons.
The history of rabies in Europe is particularly interesting. Rabies has been eradicated between 80's and 90's from France, Finland, Belgium, Switzerland, etc when the countries started to develop programs to vaccinate the main wild reservoir (and is not a bat, it was the red fox). The problem was reduced by an 80% or eradicated in many countries.

Currently things are starting to became more complex because we have a new actor coming from the east that is basically an European coyote, the golden jackal and because the 2008 crisis hit hard reintroducing the problem in Greece. Poland had problems with rabies also but vaccination of wild carnivores worked really well when culling failed loudly. Is the way to do it.
Similar story to friends of mine, only in their case the bat tested positive. They had to get the full series of shots.

Their cat who found the bat was already vaccinated but they had to take it to the vet for a booster. The cat does not travel well, so it got freaked out in the car and was sick, including foaming at the mouth. There was a new tech at the vet who I guess hadn’t been informed of the situation, so when my friends walked in and said “hi, our cat needs a rabies booster,” the tech was suitably freaked out for the 30 seconds it took them to explain.