skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
And then those who are reluctant delegate or are cornered to delegate to bastards.

This quote don't carry us very far.
This is the BladeRunner and Rollerball(original 1975) world we increasingly live in, with corporate exchanges reminiscent of Cold War spook exchanges.

Corporate senior leadership, especially in Big Tech, are moving along the continuum towards sovereign diplomatic immunity.

Yesterday, power was energy/natural resource/auto manufacturing.

Today, power is telecom/networking/search/social media.

Tomorrow, power might be AI/quantum/longevity/space.

Huawei is the fulcrum upon which much of China’s digital layer global ambitions are being built.
the point is, there is no backup for 15 days. These guys could be sued for million in US or other country.
The pinnacle of sharing music was Audiogalaxy
If an extra-governmental criminal were to get access to the data and wanted to go steal some specific property they would have an efficient seed dataset to be combined with for example MyLife data which lists addresses and family members given a name to go on holiday with.
Yeah not sure why the thread ended up restricting the domestic electricity source to solar. The main conversation is what to do when gas stations cannot be re-fueled due to truck-driver-shortage-induced panic buying, and not because there is a general fuel shortage that would affect electricity distribution
This App does not have chat; that is kind of important to be a wechat clone. A major part of China lives in wechat and that helps the in App money spending and advertising aka when you are talking with someone it's easy to share an article with a buy button into that chat and frictionless buying from the other side.
Why shouldn't it be public record, like voter registration and property records?
And then we'd need to replace them with new institutions to pick up the slack they were originally set up for. And we'd staff them with the same people because we need their skills. A bit like what happened in Germany post ww2.
Create a single HTML file and inside that you can create a UI app that can easy communicate with thousands of different apis. Run in a local server and use it immediately without packaging or compiling it.
Amen. “We” is a word that is different than “you and I.” It is a word that requires both a plurality and a sense of unity. It’s an entity that needs both “you and I”, but also transcends “you and I.” It does need to compete with or replace you or I.
Open-source framework for implementation of CRUD operations in ASP.NET Core
Thanks for going through the docs and linking them here.

Our home page contains two slides (one for the Movie Consumer, one for the Movie Producer) and one footer slide. We wanted it to be brutally minimal and convey its message within 20-30 seconds to the reader.

We know it doesn't fit in with the regular websites we are used to seeing, but it is the way we like it.
Because if you followed this logic there would be many lifetimes of things to pay attention to, most of which are just noise surrounding topics you find valuable.
And shame on you for speaking for such disgusting company.
The way my guru would respond to question like “how do I avoid giving too much” type questions was to retort with a question…

“If you’re a giver, what are you looking for?”

…

“Takers!”

That is, if you’re giving with an expectation of something in return, you’re not looking to give, you’re looking for a transaction. True giving, then, does not carry with it the weight of any expectation or fruit. The joy is in the act of giving itself, the sacrifice, as a candle sacrifices itself to give light.

He elaborated further to say that if one person is giving oriented in a relationship, it would be stable. If both, it would be heaven. To come back to the point of the OP, it’s the focus on “me, me, me” that’s the issue.

Abraham Lincoln said (paraphrase) “there is one way to bring up your children, and that is to walk that way yourself.” I feel in relationships it’s similar. Less sermons, more leading by example without expectations.
Voting history is explicitly not public record because it would lead to voter intimidation. This is the same reason why people are concerned about this legislation.
It”s very interesting when you play code golf . Check this out (https://codegolf.stackexchange.com/a/17980). You have 100% chance to lose
Offtopic: does anyone have the following thing on Android on techcrunch; if you open the page and immediately search (I was searching for 'chat'), it activates my phone vibration. Guess it is the artificial scrolling thing on TC, but why the buzzing?

(Tried on 2 different Samsung phones just now)
It's my firm belief that transparency is what will help us as a society to reform these institutions, little pieces at a time, bit by bit. Transparency and liability.

Corruption was built-in, easy, while "we-the-people" have the power to highlight corruption and act on it there's hope to get a better system at some point.
Personal Carbon Allowances Revisited
Not sure if that is true, did you know that Black people are significantly more religious than White people?

https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/09/26/black-men-a...
So you self identify two groups and further assume the logical leanings of those groups and thus you have an argument, you think?

Wow, dude. This is HN. I'd expect more intelligence. And before you begin typing out a response saying "What have i missed, please correct me". . .this is not a forum for babysitting people.

If you're going to comment on a complex topic like Gun Control, you are expected to familiarize yourself with the pro and cons at least by doing a little bit of due diligence in googling around and reading up on the forums representing the two sides.

A drive by comment with an authoritative take such as yours should be better informed and constructed with more logic.
It seems like you're trying to draw an equivalence between being LGBTQ and choosing to own guns?
https://archive.is/4Y4Gq
Windbg version for conditional breakpoint should be: bp /w "x == 3" foo

Windbg also supports full c++ expressions and even linq style list comprehension with the "dx" command (instead of the old "??" command). You can even extend that with Natvis or JavaScript. Windbg has a script window built in to help you write extensions. You can do regular scripting stuff as well as extending the type system. For instance, if you have some special type that you want to provide a visualization of, you can write it in js and then whenever you look at the data with dx it'll use your js visualization.

I'd give some examples of what you can do in windbg with that but I'm on my phone. But someone wrote a js extension that could extend the built in type system to include types from an arbitrary c++ header... Or do things like a query for the largest function in a program with a single line of code.
Ultimately you can only control your actions and attitudes. What happens if the SO is not playing for the team?

So again, team play comes down to self-giving, because you are not in control of the other person.
Illegal guns are former legal guns. S&W doesn't run a factory that only sells to criminals -- those legal guns are diverted to criminals, via the generally lax attitudes of American gun owners.
The US still has said lists(eg. No fly list and sexual offenders lisssst); are you just more okay with having some people on a precrime list than others?
Personally I like the ability to drive myself to the ER or away from an abusive spouse not being dependent on the false-positive rate of some device built by a notoriously shoddy car manufacturer, but to each their own I suppose.
Agreed. This is why "perception of corruption" indexes can be misleading. I came from a country, where, if you ask residents would say there is little corruption. I would argue it's just not visible.

While other countries that attempt to root out corruption in the public way, get the perception of being more corrupt only because the government is transparent about it.
I stopped worrying about breaking linux workstations and not-virtualized servers after discovering "Relax and Recover" (ReaR) which allows "Acronis-like" ISO rescue to previous "snapshots". I think it's nice to at least know you can. I wrote a guide to backup using sshfs with ReaR, here[1]

[1] https://devblog.juangacovas.info/relax-and-recover-bare-meta...
At the individual level, you're denying the copyright holder and the dependency chain of rent extractors the money from a purchase transaction they're legally entitled to, if you were willing to pay and jump through whatever hoops were in place as a potential customer. Game of thrones streaming issues showed people don't like hoops or shitty service.

If you're not a potential customer, and don't share the media, copyright holder et al have lost nothing. If you do share, they're out whatever percentage of people who you passed the data to that were potential customers.

If I own something via other distribution channels or physical media, I have no compunction against downloading, nor if I know I will never pay for it otherwise. I have on occasion tried out software I've pirated and paid for a real license after continued use, or purchased physical media despite having the album or movie from a torrent. I have to assume that I'm not an outlier, so it occurs to me that piracy may actually be a net positive influence on media companies revenue. The marketing of content is good in terms of exposure, software reviews and recommendation, and so forth.

It may actually be a social good, depending on the culture at the time, creating more free channels of distribution and communication about content products, and services that otherwise wouldn't exist or would be stifled.

It's not theft. At worst it's cheating at the game of commerce.
You can call an async from a non async function of course. You just can’t return it’s result synchronously.

Nitpick aside, I have got to the point where I care little! Every language has its boilerplatish things, be it Elm’s JSON parsing, GO’s “if (err != nil)” or Haskells myriad language extension declarations. I don’t think asyncs on a chain of functions, or converting a callback function into a promise based one is that bad.
You always hear about the bad. You never hear about all the good. In any case, it is never futile to make your slice of the world better. Volunteer, help, donate, all help to turn the ship around.

A friend of mine started small with a organisation and now helps tens of people a year with domestic issues. All people who might have been worse off, and perhaps start doing bad things.
Love languages were invented to sell a book in 1992.
Precisely. Can't wait for employers to include this in their background checks and deny employment if you own a gun.

I was going to write a statement saying "I hope they sue and the state of CA is held liable for damages" but then the gravity of that sentence hit me. Why do private citizens wanting to simply enjoy a constitutional right have to go to such lengths to do so?

What even if they win the suit? The information is out there legally right now and any one who wishes to use that information to target or harass law abiding citizens is going to be free to do so.
If free will doesn't exist, what's the point in arguing with someone predetermined to believe in free will? They have no free will to change their mind!
But if people are free from scarcity, how will Apple and Google continue making trillions of dollars? Corporations are people, too! /s
Most Christians have already became atheists though. USA is lagging the rest of the world a bit, but the trend is clear all over.
Hit.Movie coexists with other platforms. You can put your movie on Amazon AND on Hit.Movie. Those who do not want/have a Prime subscription can watch it on Hit.Movie. That's the idea.
It is public record which elections you voted in -- not who you voted for. E.g., http://www.soundpolitics.com/voterlookup.html
Chip with wings. the smallest human flying structure
Yes he is, and it seems like you’re upset by that.

But his comparison in the context of the fundamental human right to privacy is valid. You have a right to not publish a list of what you own, and you also have a right to not publicly declare your sexuality.
Fair enough. So say hypothetically speaking, say we just assumed that basically everything the gun rights advocates are predicting is going to come to pass. Why does it matter?
Because some things shouldn't have been "services" in the first place.

The "service" label allows a business to paper over many ills. Some think the record industry is bad and has been abusing its position for too long; wait until the streaming industry grows big enough and see how they abuse their monopoly.

----

Do note that your parent said they're "anti-subscription", not anti-paying. Like people can be anti-renting without being homeless. Tell me, would you like living in a world where the only way for you to have a home is to rent?
Maybe they realised how many forms they'd have to update and they gave up.

"Family name - GPT, ethnicity - X86/ARM/NVidia?, Birth date - [not an adult?], gender... fuck that. Joe, tell them no, I'm not doing this shit!"
The amount of crimes committed with firearms seems to generally correlate with the ease of access to firearms. Trying to make it less convenient to obtain and own firearms, and this includes registration thereof, generally reduces the amount of firearms in circulation, implicitly also reducing the amount of crimes committed with them.

It's like seatbelt-laws, yes, they infringe your personal liberty to do however you pleases, but they also generally help to reduce accidents and, implicitly, reduce cost for society (and not just in terms of money).

Again; from my outsider-point-of-view, that the US even has to have these kinds of discussions seems so weird to me. There are way too many people dying in the US because of the absurd amount of guns, not trying to address this with legislation (as every other advanced nation managed to do) seems outright absurd.
That's quite a logical leap. Would you care to lay out the exact steps from somebody saying they find violence unacceptable, to asserting that they definitely support state sanctioned violence?
I'd go one step further and assert that "love languages" are mostly bunk, in the same way that "learning styles" are not really a thing.

Meyers-briggs, zodiac, learning styles, love languages, etc. are all self-fulfilling prophecies that are sold as empowering but are mostly just traps which limit your potential.
Gun ownership is a choice whereas sexuality and gender identity generally are not. I agree that privacy is important and that there are sensible gun owners out there but this is a poor way to frame the argument.
You are only being rude regarding some of the key people working on Android, ChromeOS, Dart, Go and Chrome.

It is a matter of how their lack of cleverness and dedication might affect some of the products you might be using right now.
You mean like they do on windows? It's like gay marriage. Linux users just want a chance to have that thing that everyone else has. Regardless of its merits.
"Couple of iterations" – since 2016. Tesla is changing nothing here. Waymo is, but only in Phoenix, AZ.
You won't be able to access any of the money until 65 years of age, after retirement. And if it's a traditional IRA account, you'll pay taxes on them on withdrawal. For Roth, there is an annual CAP ($6000 for 2021) on how much you can put into the account/LLC.
You've already paid taxes on the money you've put into Roth. The whole point of Roth is so that you get tax-free gains so that when you withdraw at retirement, you don't have to pay taxes again.
You can accept that the brain is governed by physical laws, without conceding that the brain can be simulated. Emulation on the atomic level may not be computationally feasible. The emergence of human behaviour from a less detailed simulation is not guaranteed. These possibilities are discussed under the heading “Scale separation” in the roadmap to whole brain emulation published by the Future of Humanity Institute [1].

> At first it may appear unlikely that a complex system with many degrees of freedom like the brain could be modelled with the right causal dynamics, but without taking into account the smallest parts … However, state variables of complex systems can be quantitatively predicted when there is ‘scale separation’: when different aspects of the system exist on sufficiently (orders of magnitude) different scales (of size, energy, time etc), they can become uncoupled … [an] example is the scale separation between electric currents and logic operations in a computer …

> When there is no scale separation (such as in fluid turbulence) macroscale predictions become impossible without simulating the entire microscale. An important issue to be determined is whether such a cut‐off exists in the case of the human brain … if it could be demonstrated that there is no such scale, it would demonstrate the infeasibility of whole brain emulation.

The FHI is assuming scale invariance in order to test it experimentally. We shouldn’t assume it for the purpose of analysing the roles played by humans and AI under IP legislation.

[1]: https://www.fhi.ox.ac.uk/brain-emulation-roadmap-report.pdf
Group 3: People who don’t want to live in a society where violent thugs use murder or threats of murder to impose their will upon their neighbors, and are tired of seeing their compatriots die easily preventable deaths, in numbers vastly exceeding any other developed country.
I got my private pilot 14 months ago. I hope you get a chance to return and complete the journey. It’s worth it.
The companies going bust buy energy wholesale and resell to consumers. The companies generating the power are different.
And there will certainly be a great influx of illegal guns once you provide thieves with a state-compiled shopping list of where to find them.
If you don't even have the right to install docker on your own machine what makes you think that your sysadmins are ok with you compiling this random software from the internet anyways ?
you've conveniently missed the main idea: it eventually expels a person out of the community
Nice trick with including all the changed files into the review alias. One thing that always bugged me about git difftool is it runs your configured diff.tool on each changed file one-by-one. When reviewing code you quite frequently have to toggle back and forth between files, which then becomes very tedious.
What makes you think Rust will be out the door? None of those languages are as fast, while also being memory safe
Or more simply power lets people abuse, and hierarchy indicates power differentials.
>This is why a lot of us keep our tools private

How ironic, that you want to open up other peoples code but keep your own hidden.
>if your significant other doesn't speak your love language, no matter how much you give, it may not be right for you

Thats why people communicate.
I wonder if ‘home_has_gun’ will be a useful feature in an ML model lmfao
I am not a lawyer, but here's my summary:

1. There's going to be a California-state-government-run list of gun owners. People who buy a gun or have it transferred to them get added to it. Not reporting a transfer is a crime.

2. When someone gets a restraining order against someone else, they can request information on whether said person is on the list and which/how many weapons they have. They are then allowed to use that information as they like. Law enforcement will be able to check whether someone is on the list.

3. There will be a second list of people ineligible to own a gun for various reasons. These are primarily the people who the state expects to fail a background check (which is required for purchase as I understand it). Anyone selling or transferring a gun will have to ask the registry whether the person they are transferring to is on the blocklist. Not doing so is a crime.

4. There will be a third list, which is the correlation of people who are on the first list and on the second list. This is a list of people who have firearms but would not be allowed to acquire firearms now. This list can be shared with universities and "bona fide research institutions".

As someone who lives in a place where gun ownership is not normal or tolerated for the most part, this is all really weird to me, so I'm not able to evaluate the significance of it, but this is what it says.
Same here.

I was there, when cool GUIs were only available in very expensive computers, and I could buy a car or give a house entry payment with similar price points for graphical workstations.

I really don't get the point why people keep doing the extra mile to work just like we were forced to during the early days of computing.
> The “ Some safe and some bold predictions” comment is almost exactly my view on how programming should evolve. (functional, reactive, going toward dependent types etc ) Interesting how in 2012 it was already so clear!

Given that languages used broadly in the industry are lacking behind research 20+ years that's not a good prediction. It's just the way things are going.

BTW: There's still no mainstream language with full dependent typing… (I count Haskell as mainstream; Scala seems closest¹ but still a long way to go).

Actually people are already so overwhelmed by all that really old stuff coming now to languages that some of them resort to even much more basic approaches on the level of the 70'ies, like Go, thinking programming is otherwise "too complicated". To add on that: I don't think "the average dude" will ever use for example depended types even they would appear in some broader used language.

My guess for the future is more that we will see a kind of split between a big group of people using advanced low-code like tools for programming day to day things and data exploration, and some much smaller group of "experts" doing the "hard things" needed to make those tools work. On the one hand side this will bring programming further "to the masses". But on the other hand side the hard parts will not only remain, they will get even harder and much less approachable by arbitrary people.

¹ https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.07653
"+" isn't some singular operator. They are different operators for different types using the same character. You'd have to memorize a table of all JS types and what "+" does for each, which is silly considering that the only place it should really be used in modern JS is arithmetic and the occasional string concatenation.
Every time we get a bad President, we get a slew of bad judges.

It's very difficult to get a set of rules and practices that are better than the political system they came from.
My oldest documented program is here: https://gabrielgambetta.com/computer-graphics-from-scratch/d... I was six and a half so it doesn't do much, but I guess it showed an early fascination with drawing things on the screen and making some sounds.

Sure enough, years later I ended up starting a gamedev studio [1] and teaching computer graphics [2] :)

[1] http://mysterystudio.com
[2] https://gabrielgambetta.com/computer-graphics-from-scratch/d...
>In particular, during the COVID-19 pandemic, restrictions on individuals for the sake of public health, and forms of individual accountability and responsibility that were unthinkable only one year before, have been adopted by millions of people. People may be more prepared to accept the tracking and limitations related to PCAs to achieve a safer climate and the many other benefits (for example, reduced air pollution and improved public health) associated with addressing the climate crisis. Other lessons that could be drawn relate to the public acceptance in some countries of additional surveillance and control in exchange for greater safety.
Indeed. If every gun were registered, and the gun owner (or gun store, or gun manufacturer, whoever last had the registration) faced personal financial/criminal liability when one of their registered guns was used improperly, it would make people take their guns a lot more seriously.