skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yes, reforming users who already want to engage in hate speech is not the goal; isolation is. Look at the pre-internet times, certain forms of radicalization were far less common than they are today because they aren't very present in the in-person community (while those that WERE geographically concentrated, like racism in certain American communities, were still spread in those places).

When the status quo is bad, "maybe that won't work" is not an effective argument against taking action anyway if you don't have a better idea. If we don't take action, we already know we're going to (continue to) have a bad result!
I appreciate the explanation of that phrase - thank you!
pcengines is as good as it gets for DIY whitebox router. Their prices are really good too, $100-150 USD for very capable high efficiency x64. https://www.pcengines.ch/newshop.php?c=4
> ...that idea is definitely harmful...

This seems like a dramatic concession if you're trying to defend point that there exists no ideas that are harmful.
It feels like I'm hearing hints of past symphonies, but nothing new and it lacks overall coherence.
I'd never heard of this, how interesting. I'll save this for a rainy day (and there are lots coming). Thank you.
Funding bodies should consider spending money on boring maintenance and reimplementation of critical infrastructure in languages safer than C (e.g. Rust, but there are other interesting alternatives). We would avoid many future fiascos.
It can even be tested with the author's own tool[1] and the sample image he provides. I'm surprised the author didn't experiment themselves? Or maybe the did, and the it's the further reduced settings they decided should be used...

[1]: https://doodad.dev/dither-me-this
This is laughably wrong actually as most consumer grade routers will not provide adequete network throughput to standard home setup without eventually choking.

A quick perusal of /r/openwrt will show that most power users suggest fanless X86 boxes instead of consumer gear to handle modern GB fiber connections at full use.
I can't speak to intent, but I do recognize divided populace as being ineffective in the body politic.
Exactly, they have just as many examples of people who publicly say the vaccine is safe, who end up hospitalized or dead within a few weeks due to adverse reactions to the vaccine.
hTTp //
Open-sourcing Mariana Trench: Analyzing Android and Java app security in depth
I use this. Best Router ever. Never will use something different anymore
I’ve only seen papers from the automobile industry where they used MQTT but fed it into Kafka to scale.
An issue with that is that even if you use a FOSS solution, your devs might not have the domain experience to contribute. Of if they could, it may be pretty inefficient to or take a while to get up to speed to get any meaningful contributions in.
i think it comes down to difference in sources of the information, rather than difference of interpretation. These days people rarely form an opinion of their own, it's mostly a sort of digest of media they consume.

The assumptions can almost always be traced to some "fact" they believe to be true. And facts are easy to fake.

A good example is this recent Reddit thread based entirely on false "facts" promoted by the media, but believed to be true by significant chunk of the US population https://www.reddit.com/r/PoliticalHumor/comments/px9vr2/bles...

So the debate can often be reduced to something as basic as difference in sources you trust, rather than semantics.
I feel like everyone has the wrong idea about web components. Perhaps it's in the name. There's no "WebComponent" class on the window object, but there is an HTMLElement you can extend and a `window.customElement` registry for tagName invocation, a thing called a shadow root, and so forth. Those are all things that I am glad exist. If I thought of them grouped together as "Web Components" and compared that to components in frontend JavaScript frameworks then yeah, I guess I'd be disappointed. Otherwise, the people who say they "don't use" web components are being as unreasonable as it would be to say to not use the `<video>` element because it doesn't support all the things that `<canvas>` does with some 3rd party library for compositing.

Custom elements are awesome for small things that don't need to appear in an SSR context (assuming you're using shadow DOMs). No, they don't support composable stylesheets, whatever those even are, but seriously, who really needs them? If what you are doing is complicated enough that the browser's native APIs are too obtuse then yeah go for something like React or Svelte. No matter what, there's going to be something that someone's JavaScript library is going to do better than the browser. I'd use uncommon browser and language features if they made sense for a task.

The `<template>` and `<slot>` elements are really dopey and hard to understand. That's where something like React or Svelte comes in. Nobody would use either of those libraries if they didn't have better templating than the browser.
That may be true about the ERC, but the NGI Zero scheme works very differently. Take a look at the grantees and you'll see.
side effects of a two dose vaccine are almost certainly going to show up in the near term of less than 6 weeks. it's not something like a drug you take daily for years and years and get a side effect from years down the line due to prolonged use.

These are, by nature, very ephemeral due to them being mRNA and either being transformed into an instruction to make a small protein that then gets the body trained to neutralize or it gets neutralized on their own because they are not long lasting in the first place. There is no instruction inside the mRNA to make anything like the long lasting effects of a retrovirus. it's simply not there to do that.

vaccines like this are more like the effects of taking a Tylenol or aspirin once... yeah you can get side effects from it but there is no long lasting effect because it's gone from your system.
An Occasion to Learn Tragedy
isn't FB in USA available to FB in Australia? or are we already more divided then I thought... soon we will need to rename the Internet to the Intranet if that is the case
https://youtu.be/lw2BVI9OhC4
Explain to me how exerting selection pressures through a leaky system prevents the likelihood of variants.

And to evince you of known hazards of leaky immunity, I suggest you look up Marek's disease.
> It's not the wackos we should be worrying about. It's the stifling of legitimate public debate, the stifling of legitimate voices who find themselves in the minority.

We should be worrying about the wackos -- and stifling legitimate voices who find themselves in the minority.

I doubt I will agree with exactly where Google draws the line between whacko and legitimate voice, but I have no doubt the line should be drawn.

I also think there's no doubt Google has the right (and responsibility, IMO) to draw the line on their platforms.
There's something in human nature such that when we learn something that we don't like about someone else, we wish to think them even worse, perhaps to feel justified in our own hatred.

I like the way C. S. Lewis wrote it:

> The real test is this. Suppose one reads a story of filthy atrocities in the paper. Then suppose that
something turns up suggesting that the story might not be quite true, or not quite so bad as it was made
out. Is one's first feeling, "Thank God, even they aren't quite so bad as that," or is it a feeling of
disappointment, and even a determination to cling to the first story for the sheer pleasure of thinking
your enemies as bad as possible? If it is the second then it is, I am afraid, the first step in a process
which, if followed to the end, will make us into devils. You see, one is beginning to wish that black
was a little blacker. If we give that wish its head, later on we shall wish to see grey as black, and then to see white itself as
black.
Not the OP, but You are not going to like my answer....

My Answer is simple "Unless the content constitutes a "True Threat" [1] as understood under US Constitutional Standards it should be allowed"

As to suicide, I advocate for assisted suicide to be Safe, Legal and Rare. if a person chooses to end their life that choice absent a clear and confounding mental health crisis should be respected by society. This idea that suicide is always wrong is simply false, there are all manner of reasons why one can logically choose suicide.

[1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/True_threat
Suspense is a pretty weird step into "magic" for a library that has been a pretty damn thin layer on top of JS for so long, I fully agree with that. Using it is somewhat pleasant in terms of terseness, but very unpleasant for the fact I do not have a good understanding of how the lifecycles of the async resource(s) influence the render schedule, which is really the core of React from my perspective
Just drop the features, priority support with SLA are really what they are looking for on critical pieces.

Note that you can have a one week (or more) lead time for support requests: the timing doesn't matter, you only need a maximum window so they can share visibility and socialize issues like this: "ticket opened with vendor, next update in one week".
The book People Skills by Robert Bolton [0] is great resource for getting better at this IMHO. Big mental note to finish it and really learn those concepts.

First eye opening concept were the 12 roadblocks to communication, divided in three categories:

JUDGING:

1. Criticizing

2. Name-calling

3. Diagnosing

4. Praising Evaluatively

SENDING SOLUTIONS:

5. Ordering

6. Threatening

7. Moralizing

8. Excessive/Inappropriate Questioning

9. Advising

AVOIDING THE OTHER'S CONCERNS:

10. Diverting

11. Logical Argument

12. Reassuring

[0] https://smile.amazon.com/People-Skills-Robert-Bolton/dp/0671...

(edit) formatting
I remember discovering Heroku while I was in grad school in 2014. I was learning how to use AWS...which in a way was a lot simpler back then. But I was working on different kinds of workloads and more focused on learning Hadoop so it didn't seem that useful to me and I kind of, disdained things that were "too simple." Seeing it again several years later it seemed a lot more useful to deploy webapps for dev projects but there didn't seem to be a way for us to leverage in in prod. Needed much more control and capability to run complex apps. Like, I was setting up ELK stack and I couldn't see how to integrate so I just...stopped thinking about Heroku, lol.
+1 another side effect of internet is normalization of fringe behavior. Imagine some subculture/behavior that expresses one in 100k (0.0001% of people). And imagine most people know something on the order of 1000 ppl IRL. If those subcultured people congregate on the internet (~4.5B) we find a group of about 45k people which overwhelmingly validates that behavior to the group because it's a group so much larger than everyone they know in real life. It feels like it's so much more normal (as in within a std deviation) than it truly is.

It's totally benign when it's something like fans of silly hats, but also quite dark when its a criminal behavior.
The creator of Logux etc. is also known for forking a package and erasing git history: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28659838
Fly-Pie: an innovative marking menu written as a GNOME Shell extension
I feel as though there's actually nothing that would convince people like your wife to get vaccinated. Or at least the ultimate deciding factor cannot be predicted or understood. The problem is that people begin to personally identify with an opinion that they hold. And then they'll find any reason or justification for holding onto it.

CDC says get vaccinated? Oh, but they said not to wear masks early on. They can't be trusted. Medical researchers release studies showing vaccine effectiveness? Oh, but look at this random other study that shows otherwise. YouTube decides to moderate vaccine misinformation more strongly? Oh, what are they trying to hide? What are they scared of?

You can keep asking questions and doubting as long as you want if you're emotionally attached to an idea. Welcome to the mind of an anti-vaxxer.

What this all means is that we shouldn't take into account the effect YouTube's action will have on anti-vaxxers because we'd see the same effect regardless of what we do.
No, I understood you. What I'm saying is that a) your concern for bad motives is separate from the question of whether science if value-laden (which it is), and b) the question of "what is the correct aim and motivation for science?", meant rhetorically, demonstrates that your judgement about what is a bad motive for entering a scientific field itself involves a value judgement.
The bottlenecks were in WSL1, 2 is "just" a linux VM with good guest additions.
That's why I'm suggesting you take control and turn the meeting into what you want it to be. It doesn't have to be a checklist but it sounds like you -have- to have this meeting at the company you are at. So instead of suffering through it, you can turn it into something beneficial for you. Ya know?
I can't answer that question, as I'm only an electrician, not an electrical or RF engineer.

That said, we're referring to power delivery here, and the highest frequency I'm aware of in this space is the 400 Hz power distribution systems used on warships.
You issue is likely due to a heavy computation blocking the main js thread (rendering). In this scenario the suspense api will not solve the UI lag. I've had the exact same pattern with a home build markdown editor where the right side preview should render quick, but lag behind if too heavy and give priority to left hand side. I tried the alpha and speak from my own experiences, you'll have better luck by offloading render computations to a background web worker. The preview can do a 1 time synchronous render, cache the result in it's local component react state, then all future state updates are computed async on the background thread. Main thread left unblocked
That's a lot of assumptions about me and my behavior. You're right on one thing, I don't understand how pride and selfishness can be such a driving force behind people's views. I don't think your analogy with creationism holds water though, it doesn't cause a public health hazard. While I don't personally endorse creationism, I could care less what you believe and only have an opinion if you are trying to force me into the same mindset and while science has undeniably proven creationism false, there is no real detectable detriment to folks believing it.

COVID on the other hand is a massive public health problem and I view this unfounded resistance in the same vein as drunk driving and yelling fire in a crowded theatre. Your freedom ends when it begins to endanger other people. If there were any even remotely reasonable arguments, I could engender some empathy for these folks, however there is not, it is complete lies, fabrication, and fear mongering. 2000 year old ghosts, while useful for creating a system of morality to keep people in line, is not a basis for scientific discourse.
Not sure I entirely agree with that either. Scientific debate is evolving with the times. Online isn't a traditional formal venue where these debates happen, but they do happen here too. Scientists discussing actual scientific facts, or disputing each other's claims get silenced too. Seems like a reasonable interpretation of "scientific debate".

And I suspect the OP meant "scientific debate" as the public's discussion of science and the policies that should be formed around the facts as they see them.
Really devalues the meaning of censorship.

Social media platforms broadcasting your views around the world and moderating some of them was not censorship.
> With hard drives, the thousands of files a game uses would end up in little fragments all over the platters and lead to horrible latency and head thrashing.

I remember the PC game "Riven" which came on several CDs. The game would often pause and ask you to insert another CD to continue.
To your point, American anti-intellectualism continuously undermines the "I am trustworthy" aspect of science. For a country whose current rise to prominence was so clearly aided by technology, and whose future relevance depends on technical innovation in an uncertain global future...

We are so lucky that COVID is only going to kill a million americans or so (700k and counting, probably 850k by Jan 1st), if this was the death rates of smallpox or the black death... ye gods. Our lack of respect in science is a huge part of vaccine hesitancy and our key role in continuing the pandemic.

The news media are terrible because for decades they have reduced science and technology either to simplistic caricatures, star trek gobbledygook, or even worse the WELL THEY SAID THIS, NOW THEY SAY THAT.

The general media's constant use of the high school nerd trope for all science and technology proficiency has been a long term failure in the progress of our civilization. Only, and only, because such proficiency leads generally to some degrees of upper middle class money to vast wealth is the reason it hasn't been worse.

But that media trope has always colored all science and technology policy as culturally "well, that's what the nerds say, and they aren't cool or fun".

Possibly it goes back to how most ultra-rich """elite""" made their money in America: by control and exploitation. People that have influence and position distrust science, because it is complicated and unknown and preys on their paranoia, and so often for industrialists produces complications to their overall plan of "make money by selling products, offloading the actual environmental cost/impact of those products on ... anyone else".

Maybe I'm paranoid, but it does seem with the mastery of social media propaganda/manipulation by monied interests, sowing distrust in science is now at an all time high.

So the business-friendly right will distrust science because it threatens their money and power. The apathetic center won't like science because it isn't cool. The left... well, scientists are generally white and male so they are distrusted by identity activists, and the rest of the left is too disorganized to rally around science policy effectively.
...and we're still in peacetime. Wait until you see what you're not allowed to post once that changes.
Gotta love artists doing the unexpected and then presenting it as art. It is sometimes a fine line, because if you go too far, people may not buy it. But then maybe you make a media discussion about it, and you get more famous!
With a single port? How exactly are you planning on preventing one of your end-hosts from pulling the external IP by accident anytime the modem or pi gets rebooted? Are you going to make every host on the LAN a static IP? Ignoring the security implications.
As much as I have an inherent dislike for any art where it's obvious that more effort was put into the artist's statement than the work itself, this one gets a pass from me for being so naked and on-the-nose about it.
Another simple question: if actions were ineffective like you describe, why would people take them? There isn't some cosmic homeostasis keeping the world the way you percieve it. If you get rid of anti-vax videos, fewer people are going to be exposed to that, and fewer people will be resultantly anti-vax.
"My right to swing my fist ends where your nose begins."

Your freedom to catch and spread covid to me is not supported by established law. It's also why we don't allow smoking in restaurants, etc. And it's also related to seat belt laws. George Washington forced our soldiers to take a smallpox innoculation and it was pivotal to us winning.

In 1905, in Jacobson v Massachusetts, the US Supreme Court upheld the Cambridge, Mass, Board of Health’s authority to require vaccination against smallpox during a smallpox epidemic. It ruled that the public health trumps your ability to freely engage in society if you will endanger it.

You'd like to reach herd immunity, but you didn't offer a solution; instead, you gave a hopeful outcome if we do nothing. We have millions that refuse to vaccinate yet wish to move freely in society. They are clogging hospitals and costing our society an estimated $6B, and climbing. Reaching herd immunity while using your version of freedom means that long covid disabilities and deaths are just an inevitable that we're hopeless to prevent.
I used to have a similarly narrow view. And because my worldview was similarly colored and judgmental, I too would roll my eyes when I saw an off-road capable truck parked at a mall, and reflexively throw out similar loosely-substantiated stats (70% will never take them off-road, etc.), and even indulge in more vitriolic private musings such as "he's probably compensating for a smaller-than-desirable reproductive organ."

That changed when I traded-in my Tesla for a mid-sized, off-road capable truck, and found myself on the receiving end of this view.

I certainly did not buy a truck to "overcompensate" as the article suggests or to use it only to haul groceries. I'm not even a blue collar worker – decidedly white collar in SV, with no need to haul lumber or construction material. Luckily, being a SV white collar type also made me beneficiary of WFH, and killed my commute.

I loved my model S, but didn't need an efficient/fun tarmac shuttlecock between work and home anymore. I also found that an off-road truck was more suited to my new "commute": like the ability to go haul my astrophotography equipment to the middle of nowhere – far away from light pollution where regular cars can't make it.

I also traded-in my road bike for a mountain bike because I discovered that even small/mid-sized cars are hostile to cyclists in America. It doesn't matter if a Nissan Leaf runs me over or a Ford F-150 – I'm still dead. So now I also use my off-road truck to haul my off-road bike to places where a regular car can't run me over. A bear maybe, but not a car.

Rivian seems to offer the best of all worlds, and I'm rooting for their charging infrastructure to grow asap – so I can still do truck stuff, without the emissions.

Are there people who'll buy a truck/SUV only to use it as a mall crawler? Sure. Just as there are people who'll buy BMW M3s or Porsche 911s and never take it on the track.
Show HN: Ampie – See HN or Twitter discussions mentioning the page you are on
Tipper Gore and FDR weren’t liberal?
> how to stop them doing it again

But the Germans are not more prone to becoming "nazis" (again) than any other nation.
> A dead Jesus cannot create more followers, right?

Pontius Pilate doesn't really care, as long as he's washed his hands of the matter and has rid of the man (and crowds) from his court.
The fact that they completely ignore natural immunity in the USA is enough to be concerned about their motivations.
I don't want to litigate what culture is or isn't but surely being more connected to nature is not going to solve any of the listed problems?
“Light” Keto, I don’t think full Keto is something you should do long term. You can still get your body to produce ketones without doing the full Keto style diet.

I’m almost done reading The Fatburn Fix by Dr. Catherine Shanahan.
https://news.ycombinator.com/edit?id=28697803
She Is the First Female Prime Minister in the Arab World
ADD is an obsolete diagnosis; it's all ADHD now, with inattentive, hyperactive, and combined subtypes. (I think this is dumb--why have the H in the name if not everybody with the condition is hyperactive?--but that's what the DSM says.)
False dichotomy. Dithering is hardly the only or even best way to reduce image sizes. Just opening his 200x200 original in my favorite editor and resaving as JPEG with my usual parameter choices reduced it from 30K to 11K with no noticeable reduction in quality. I could have tuned the parameters for even more savings.

Dithering isn't usually worth the reduction in quality. And ironically it can make things worse if you're not careful - dithering the image and saving it as JPEG actually INCREASED the size to 39K!