skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I work daily with a client who has a profitable SaaS on Heroku and for them it’s cost-effective but I have another client with more cost constraints that I deployed on Render and I’ve very much enjoyed its simple dashboard (and performance is great even on entry-level instances). Looking forward to the opportunity to convince a customer with some bigger services to deploy a lot more on Render.
Motorcyclists use airbags too for spine and neck protection. When inflated they look a little like a life preserver.
Frankly, the more I think about it, the more I fail to seen actual way to attack the management interface.

Because the interface listens on a private IP-address on your home network. And if you want to be able to talk to that IP-address, you need some device that you control (as an attacker) connected to the switch, and be able to add an IP-address in the same range as your home network and then attack the managment interface?

The most likely scenario would indeed be the DMZ machine as a stepping-stone.
> Therefore just have no laws, I guess?

No. But have a system where some single powerful person can't just make up laws on a whim.
Behavior-Altering Parasites and Parasitoids
Oh, that integration does changes things. I admit that I did forget about the built-in cloud storage, but that was more cumbersome than email for me. And plugging in a USB cable seemed particularly low-tech for 2021.
It's been done...

https://www.antepavilion.org/hackney-fight
> This way, 1/N ends up performing very poorly on a risk-adjusted basis while undoubtedly at the same time outperforming any other kind of allocation on the basis of return alone.

I fear I'm misunderstanding you. Are you saying despite having higher returns, the higher risk makes this strategy worse? That really feels like handwaving to me, since the only thing I care about is ROI. I understand nonlinearity and how it could tank your investment, but if it doesn't and you make more money then you're criticizing something that never happened. The higher risk is already baked into the ROI, because it includes the times that failed. The point is, in aggregate, you make more money - and most of the time that is the only thing I care about when investing.

Or am I misunderstanding you?
It should be a Schedule I drug.
> experimental drug

When do drugs stop being experimental?
Translation: "elitist authoritarians" => "those who know what they are talking about".

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2110475
"I irrationally don't like ethnic group X" is deplorable, but generally legal and part of free expression/association.

"I won't give them equal protection under the law because of that dislike" is another story.

The treatment of Jews in 1930s Germany went well beyond "we don't like your views and thus won't hang out with you".
To me all this cleverness has become a bit boring. I am aware that there is a story behind all these "masterpieces" and the story makes the art more or less, but it's become such a predictable trick-fest that I stopped paying attention. It's not even an original statement, it's been done countless times before. Am I missing anything?
Right, this is the most common model I’ve seen: forming a foundation and companies contribute via that foundation, either workers/staff/people or money.
Paywall-free link: https://archive.is/PaVGZ
By "the vaccine" are you referring to an mRNA vaccine? Are they skeptical of the J&J vaccine?
Marcuse was a communist but not pro-Soviet by most measures.

Academia did indeed have quite a few Soviet sympathetic figure. Tbh, I'm not sure why the gp picked the 70's. The cold war was mostly thawing then as the failure of the USSR was becoming visible (though Reagan partly reignited it in 80s). The 1950s was a period where real and suspected sympathizers of the USSR were drummed out of their positions in academia, entertainment and elsewhere. The witch hunts died down in the 1960s as US society relaxed a bit itself.
I see. Your source is moral panicking in the news and journalists psychic ability to determine that dangerous radicalism is on the rise without ever bothering with any sort of data collection. Who could argue with that?
> What the hell is going on when we are silencing senior scientists who are extremely worried about an experimental drug that we're giving to the entire world??!

What exactly is “experimental” about a vaccine that has not only been through very robust phase III clinical trials, but has also had literally billions of doses deployed?
That is needed to see the tweets mentioning the page, but it is not required to use Ampie. This is done because twitter api is very limiting otherwise.
More dangerous than any of the irrational Islamic terror group leaders who believe makey-uppy words written ~2000 years ago give them a right to oppress and kill women/gay/non-believers?
Do you know that the reason for this is that the compiler is too slow, or are you making an assumption? I agree that this would be a good feature to have in docs.rs, though it could potentially make the docs very messy to read if there was no way to choose which crates to show together.

I know that Rustdoc can do this; see SWC's docs for example: https://rustdoc.swc.rs/swc_ecma_visit/trait.Visit.html#imple...
The publicity towards the museum is worth every penny of that $84k.

The best part is the work is fairly unreproducible now. Few artists will dare deliver blank canvases.
It's interesting that a TV manyfacturer or a HDMI cable manufacturer is not expected to be liable for the content that streams through their products. But when it comes to YouTube, they aren't treated as just a vessel but as an actual source of content. I think the distinction is just the capability of each entity.
I didn't describe anything as ineffective. On the contrary: those who vaccinated are now very effectively avoiding being seriously sick or even dead. What was ineffective is an information campaign about vaccines, their direct and side short and long term effects. At least in US, I believe.
I think this is brilliant. Art is supposed to inspire emotion and tell a story. Thought doing it in a different way, this piece quite literally demonstrates the purest form of "story behind the art".

No doubt the artist will be giving the money back, this seems to be too perfect not to be the plan from the getgo. My only question is, was the museum aware of this plan from the start and is the "omg where's out money" is just manufactured for the marketing.

Either way whether just for marketing or the entire point of the art piece, brilliant.
Why Are People Nostalgic for Early-Pandemic Life?
intentionally:

> In addition to casting doubts on the validity of parameter-counting methods and highlighting the importance of complexity bounds based on Occam’s razor such as minimum description length (that trade off goodness-of-fit
with expressive power), we hope that fα may also serve as entertainment for curious data scientists
The Pi 4 has just been re-released with the newer and cooler chip revision from the Pi 400. This should make passive cooling (w/ a heatsink) viable for most workloads. Though the Pi 400 heatsink design still adds a lot of heat capacity which helps performance there.
Could you elaborate? My understanding of what you’re saying is the organization will be specified in code, whether that be compensation via commits or transactions or what have you, and then companies pay into this DAO contract?
Any particular pundit you had in mind?
Now this is why I don't feel like buying new hardware
Webcomponents are a huge mess, caused partially because it requires to do (some) composition in html. React is much simpler, it uses basic html elements (div, input, ...) and event apis to compose an application in javascript.

These are some disadvantages of webcomponents that I can think of.

- Can't register multiple versions of a webcomponent. Let's say you are using "x-dropdown"@2.0.0 which depends on " x-icon"@2.0.0 and "x-menu"@3.0.0 which depends on " x-icon"@1.0.0. Your app will crash because html tags can't have multiple versions ("x-icon" 2.0.0 and 1.0.0). It makes handling big projects a nightmare. And there are name collisions too.

- Not all properties can be serialized into attributes as strings, so you end up just binding properties. Boolean attributes have special are weird when used in the javascript side (an empty string is treated as a boolean)

- The shadow dom can be too restrictive and inflexible. Implementing portals for instance, requires using ugly hacks that depend on your webcomponent framework.

- Some complex webcomponents are not interoperable among different frameworks.

- Static analysis on webcomponents is poor and fragile. Compare declaring types of events in webcomponents, to declaring types of event handlers in react.
Robot vacuum defeated by door stop
If the exclusion of a single piece of evidence whose use in a trial was unconstitutional meant there wasn't enough evidence to convict, I would say there wasn't 'overwhelming evidence'.
Ask HN: Accessible resources on making a modern static type system?
Crafting Interpreters was a great resource for parsing, but working on the static type system for my language project I'm mostly feeling my way around in the dark and making stuff up as I go. That's going better than expected, but I still feel I would benefit from something at around the same level as CI but for type systems (checking and inference; mostly inference, but also things like generic types and refinement). Something practical and light on formal theory, with insight from industry, that lays a foundation from which to keep learning. I tried reading about Hindley-Milner etc directly, and it went way over my head.
How much is a low dose? I hear that less than 400mg is safe to consume, though I consume approx 300mg a day myself. Currently trying to reduce that
Art has a long history, and aesthetics have changed over time. Techniques like Chiaroscuro and Contrapposto come and go. Highly developed cultures usually have highly developed art and vice versa. Art is usually a balance of ideas and aesthetics. No matter the contemporary techniques, the subject matter has usually been immediately recognizable by a lay viewer, and symbology can be decoded by the specialist. For example: is there a dove flying through a window and Mary is in the picture? That means God is impregnating Mary. But even without knowing that you can still understand the picture is of Mary and is religious in nature.

Post modern art is probably the most extreme example of destruction of aesthetics in the name of pure ideas. Sometimes people say modern art can express feelings that are inexpressible by language. But I argue that either 1) there was no meaning to begin with and its all self-derives and 2) it requires being a specialist to understand the art. Its the ultimate appeal to ego since no interpretation is wrong, since there was nothing really intended.
Does she get flu shots because that has been all about coercion since the ramp up of medical profiteering that started in the 90s. Nevermind that the lethality of influenza precipitously declined in the 40s and isn't a mass killer. Covid is a far more credible threat that shouldn't be ignored so readily.
I won't even go there. Now that we spent half our days in meetings, how can that be done schedule wise? Nos sustainable except for the 0.01% that dont hace meetings. Or a different timezone but then you dont sleep, still not sustainable.

This will never be a mainstream 'thing'
IIRC the color gradients only started to appear once PCs which could display "True-Color" (or at least "High-Color") modes were widespread enough. The original Windows 95 definitely didn't use them yet.

And the "modern flat solid color designs" still use stuff like subtle shadows and transparencies that would have been either impossible or wouldn't have looked nice in the nineties...
Actually that's what convinced me to get the vaccine, the fact of how the new bioengineering for mRNA worked. I was convinced that it would be highly successful and effective. And I honestly don't believe the theories that it's effectiveness is somehow wearing off. It's much more likely that it's just not effective against Delta+mutations as that is so far from the original variant the vaccine was designed for. I don't plan to get any booster shots until a new delta variant vaccine is available.
The growing "social discontent, division, and distrust in institutions and democracy" is fueled by the over zealous authoritarian push by certain elements of society to stamp out any disagreement or discord as "misinformation". The more one side doubles down on control from the top the more distrust in institutions will grow.

We've abundant historical examples of this occurring, and we're busy repeating the same mistakes and causing fundamental mistrust across a broad spectrum of society.
When do you consider the left to have moved on climate? Climate change was a fairly bi-partisan issue initially. George Bush is famous for pushing cap and trade ideas in the late 80s early 90s for instance

ClimateTown has a fairly entertaining video about it https://youtu.be/MondapIjAAM
Whether truth is relative or not has no effect on politics, because truth is simply not a concern there. The point of political claims is political interests, not truth, so they can't be defeated by walking and talking about truth.
Why would you be so sure the money will be returned?
How to have fun with mpmath :)
>> Ads are usually arbitrary fluff plus a logo.

Just like superhero movies.
But do you understand how your statements here actually cause pretty significant disruption, and cause the problems that you claim to care about?

When you act like this, and berate people, by linking something over and over again, it comes off as pretty bad faith.
> The last few years have shown me how many people are willing to believe utterly stupid things, and how easy it is to make people turn against each other. I knew this in the abstract, but watching it happen in real time is something else.

If anyone wants some good examples of this, go to Reddit and read the posts /r/HermanCainAward that are marked "Awarded". No need to read the comments there--they are often rather mean. Just take a look at the submissions themselves.

For those not familiar with /r/HermanCainAward, the typical submission is a gallery of screenshots of someone's social media posts, usually full of memes about why they are not masking/distancing/getting vaccinated and invariably ending with them getting COVID, asking for prayers, and then someone else announcing that the person has died and often asking for donations to help their widow and/or children get buy (because apparently the kind of person who feels that they should get get all their COVID advice from stupid memes and conspiracy theories is also the kind of person who does't believe in life insurance...).

> The human mind (myself included) has some serious bugs, and "we" as a society - with help from technology - are getting better and better at exploiting these bugs at scale. I don't think censorship is a solution, but I don't know what IS a solution.

This too is illustrated nicely on /r/HermanCainAward. Before all this I would have thought that if I needed to convince a lot of people to make the kind of mistakes that the HCA winners do I would need to carefully craft an individual plan for each one of them. I would have never guessed that just making a dozen or so memes would be enough.
I upvoted both you and the OP, for making good, honest observations.

And for relating stories about thoughtful, controversial engagements with art. Because that's kind of the point of art.

The Mona Lisa isn't "art" anymore; it was once, and now it's a pretty artifact with a lot of historical significance. But that's not art.

Art is the kind of thing that makes educated people say, in public, "that's not art". And, thus, by its existence and the reception to its existence, true art makes our conversations about art richer, more emotional, and (over time) more precise. And once all of the nuances of this conversation are exhausted, we need new art.

Which is why the Mona Lisa isn't art. At least not anymore.

And if you disagree with that, then we need to have a deep conversation about art, and history, over the course of which both of us will have hopefully learned new things about both art and history.

Art is a recursive question, not an engineering problem.

Edit: I should point out that this comment is intentionally recursive.
I feel the same way in the modern day about Processing.

https://processing.org/examples/mousepress.html
IIRC it's the US allies who do that: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jamal_Khashoggi
I don't really see anything here that would be massively more complex in React. And besides, I've been hurt enough times by manual DOM manipulation to never want to do it again for interactive UI. It's a maintainability nightmare.
No one gives a shit about classically trained painters beyond upvoting their work on reddit, and even commercial illustrators struggle to make ends meet. The most stable avenue for working in graphic design is advertising.

It seems everyone has an opinion on what makes good art, but no one wants to fucking pay for it. The top 1% of artists are basically con artists trying to trick the rich into impulse buys.
I don't think the speed of Rails will lead to a renaissance. Rails was very popular at one point because it allowed you to ship a MVP way faster than with the alternatives. It was also at the peak of Heroku, so the ops part was easy. These days it's not true. Pretty much every major language has a viable Rails alternative (except JS for some reason). You could argue that we've grown backwards, as it seems that deployments are harder than before, and same with building things. I think it's a symptom of the industry being dominated again by a few big players, so the ecosystems are optimized for them.

What we might see is less people moving from Ruby/Rails to X because of speed, but that's about it.
I've been wishing for the UE to take care of the Mozilla Corporation for quite some time. This would reduce the influence of Google, and also force the Mozilla Foundation to stop using their money to sabotage Firefox and paying huge salaries to higher ups. I wish the EU would take tech seriously. Have people in the TC39, have people on the Rust board, have people working on Linux, things like that.
Russia could ban YouTube

Huge, high CPM audience we're talking about. Google must be petrified now.

the reality is, unless it's the EU, governments threatening to unilaterally block websites in protest, is immaterial to the bottom line. Turkey has been blocking websites forever.
Probably high blood pressure for 15+ years, but at the point where this was discovered it was impossible to know for sure if it was the primary reason or a consequence of kidney failure. Fortunately, the blood pressure turned out to be easy to manage with medication.

And after the transplant, things have gone exceptionally well and I live a completely normal lifet. I just need to down a fistful of pills every day :-)
I failed high school algebra largely because I lost my glasses and was just trying to imagine in my head what the teacher was talking about. The adults in my life knew I had a prescription, and had the money to pay for them and yet nobody did anything. The bystander effect is truly bizarre.
No one is trying to invade a superpower. Certainly not China.

The point of hypersonic missiles is to paralyze the force projection abilities of an exceptionally powerful military. For that striking only 30-40 very high value targets is enough.
Sometimes, I'm wondering if he is putting down fuel cells only because he is heavily invested in conventional batteries
So we need to apply heavy-handed censorship to silence dissent so that we don’t turn into an authoritarian country like China or Russia where they use heavy-handed censorship to silence dissent.
How to migrate Xamarin.Forms apps to .NET MAUI – an early look
Unfortunately, people will be saying "we don't know what happens 10 years after getting vaccinated" for 10 years
IMHO unfinished sketches by great artists can be amazing little stories unto themselves. They can give you insight into the creation process of the artist, which fascinates me. And sometimes they are even more fresh and dynamic than the finished work.
Handling Disappointment in C++
You don't need uncountability. Any nontrivial interval of rational numbers contains every finite string that exists, in fact infinite copies of each!
It's not about uncountability, but simply that their space is infinite. The same would work with (unbounded) integer numbers.
Youtube and facebook are no more different than the printing press was different from what lay before.
what kind of IOT devices are we talking about? linux embedded or is wireguard available for something like nodemcu?
Rowing is great, but I don't have a rower. So my version of this is "the biggest health mistake I make in a day is not (bicycle) riding". Bike riding is my outlet for getting exercise in, and I have been working on ramping up my activity levels the past few months. There have been some bumps in the road due to health issues, injuries, weather, and what-not, but I'm committed to getting back to a place where I ride at least 40 miles a week between road biking and mountain biking. I'm also going to start adding in a couple of miles of trail running, probably starting this week.

As they say... getting older pretty much inevitably means slowing down and losing some physical vitality, but exercise seems to be right near the top of the list in terms of ways to help combat that and at least slow the decline. And as somebody who just turned 48, I definitely need all the help I can get in that regard.
(Render founder/post author) Thanks. We already have features Heroku apps don't [1]; with many more features in the pipeline, it'll only get easier to convince your customers even if you ignore the huge cost difference.

[1] https://render.com/render-vs-heroku-comparison#flexibility
Legal proceedings in the court room can at times be performance.
I once rode in an original Model T. Ride was horrible: super slow, very uncomfortable, and the handling was ghastly. But clearly we don't judge "ancient" developments exclusively by modern standards...

Artwork of old was commissioned and preserved by the wealthy. All of the old works are rare (relatively), fairly impressive for the time, and some are true masterpieces.
The only way I could see is if there is a malicious device on the WAN side (as in, actually on the same network as the WAN interface) that is configured on the same subnet as the internal network and it communicates with the management interface over the WAN VLAN - but very unlikely (and probably have to be an untrustworthy ISP, which sounds like a problem in itself :) ).
The room for their opinion is in peer reviewed medical journals. Short of conducting their own study, they could, for example, write a dissenting letter to the editor, or submit what's known as a "brief report." Posting to Youtube for clicks and views is to not take seriously their own knowledge. Covid-19 is a very serious issue; on the chance that your two senior scientists have information that the world needs, the appropriate venue is in the medium scientists and doctors use to communicate with each other.

Also, what does it mean to be "skeptical" of "the" vaccine? There are several vaccines. Were they skeptical of mRNA? Viral vector vaccines? All of them? Do they think that the covid-19 vaccines secretly don't work?
One problem is the lack of trusted information sources. This is not fixed by limiting the total information available.
As someone who has beat the market over a 17 year period, I attribute it to having made very few trades AND being lucky.

There are a lot of ways that a company can go under. All it takes is one mistake or one black swan event and what would have been an amazing investment 99.9999% of the time goes to zero.