skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I disagree. Love language improved my relationship for the better. It gives us language and priority to things that felt important but were difficult to describe and help the other understand.

To your point tho we use all the languages, and many other things beyond the languages. I think it’s important to not get too fixated on them. It’s just one piece of the puzzle. There’s many other things required besides speaking someone’s love language, but it helps!
MS Windows does the same thing with Hibernate.
That assumption lies in ignorance of how our brains work.

The gist is that we have some world model that arises out of the structure of the brain and the chemical state of it.

Your mind doesn’t change because you have free will. Your mind changes because you have collected a sufficient amount of experiences that alter the state and structure of the brain.

You don’t learn stuff because you “decided” I will learn this and that and I will store it in my brain somewhere. All your learning is actually involuntary because as you accumulate experiences, your synapses get positively or negatively reinforced and that causes the learning. You may choose to study something but you don’t choose which exact information gets stored and where. Instead, when trying to recall something your brain probes its world model and tries to find the circuit that triggers the correct response.

So why would anyone argue that free will doesn’t exist? Because it gives people the opportunity to prove their world model, see the inconsistencies, experience new trains of thought and rewrite their brain.

But no person who is not open to the idea will ever get to accept despite mountains of evidence because for most people, the idea of free will is so integral to their world model, that any challenge feels like a threat to their very foundation, which causes cognitive dissonance, and the shut down of executive functions that process information logically.

Our brains have two competing circuits, one that tries to break the mould and challenges everything, and one that tries to be grounded and conservative. Cognitive dissonance occurs when the former is pushing the latter around but the latter has trouble coming to terms with reality and falls in denial.
Well done, maybe you add something like name or any identifier that'll make the avatar not always random for certain query like ui-avatars.

Also I'm also building a dynamic image generation with one of the feature is using URL: https://duply.co
Nitter (https://github.com/zedeus/nitter) provides RSS for Twitter.
I also don't have complaints but then reading the thread I realized I'm on version 68. Apparently some of the issues are regressions introduced in newer versions.
Not really ironic or related. The privacy here is, well, keeping the tools entirely private -- no distribution or highly limited distribution, not obscuring their function.

Irony would be applying obfuscation or other DRM protection techniques to tools intended to de-obfuscate/reverse engineer which are then distributed/sold. This is fairly common in commercial reverse engineering solutions, although I don't think the irony of the cat and mouse game is lost on the authors in that case...
So, the no fault divorce system has to be absolutely perfect to be acceptable?

To be honest, I don't see anything wrong in your scenario. People fall out of love for lots of reasons, making them miserable by making it harder to split up doesn't seem like a particularly good solution to me. The scenario you've raised would have to involve a very emotionally shallow individual whom the other partner would be better off without anyway.
It's a strange logic we are operating on.

Soon the unvaccinated will be denied care, I wonder how the statistics will play out then. With the amount of vitriol being marketed - some doctors and nurses might already be giving sub par care to the refuseniks.
At the bottom of the thread I explain the intention is to protect against unauthorized access.

I also wouldn't obviously edit the obfuscated production code, so it wouldn't really be a problem.
1 mile of rail costs same as 20,000 Tesla's...
Dendrite is their own project. Conduit is the project of another guy they don't get on with it.

The Python server is a memory hog, and instead of rewriting it in a more performant language they have decided to scale horizontally instead.

How is that feasible for the average guy who wants to run it on the their own server?

https://matrix.org/blog/2020/11/03/how-we-fixed-synapses-sca...

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16747174

After a $30 million funding round we should be seeing a lot better from them in the next few years. That python server ought to go.
Ok, fine but then I ask you to do the same for for example Christianity:

Do see the difference between Catholicism as abused by various Spanish and English kings and Christianity.

Do see the difference between abusive cults that do things that the rest of us disapprove of and the rest of us.

Otherwise be prepared to defend Stalin, because he was an atheist just as much as the mad guys during the dark ages were Christians.
Towards a Theory of Bullshit Visualization [pdf]
It's not a supply/demand problem, they have enough fuel for everyone but due to a lorry driver shortage deliveries now take ~10 days whereas previously they were within 24h. The shortages are because demand over this type of timespan is unpredictable.
Yea. I mean, GM has a group of maybe 20 people that do nothing but fog lights on trucks. If you took 20 engineers away from McClaren, I think the company would shut down.

I’m pessimistic about the industry from the moment that OTA updates were possible. Everything has gotten worse with that. “We’ll fix it before Dealers get them!” (No, you won’t). But for the most part, car engineering is a really unique thing. Tons of time, tons of money, because there are tons of them. How many people have private jets? How many people have boats? Trains? Etc. but everyone has a car, and they basically all have to work all the time in any condition with a flat out assumption you aren’t going to take care of it.

I think it’s really funny that if I walk into a building with supercars, and I mean Bugatti, Koenigsegg, the rare Porches, the million dollar plus crew, that they ALL have to sit with trickle chargers on them. Because otherwise they would ALL run their batteries dead in two weeks or less.

The LaFerarri issue I mentioned was the batteries were all dead, the ebrake was on. So it couldn’t be loaded on a trailer. The access to the ebrake release is behind a door you can’t get to without power. No one designed this as a car for humans. To this day the only person I’ve seen actually drive one like a car was a guy in Taiwan that was definitely some gang or cartel executive. Nice guy though. He didn’t care it isn’t a real car.

I think it’s funny because people who dream of these things, have no idea what a pain in the ass they are to even get in and out of.

Porsche makes some higher end ones that still feel like cars, and the Ferrari touring aren’t bad, big though. IDK. I’m probably just jaded on vehicles.
I have noticed the same thing with Mac fans. Another meme from the past which needs to die is that Mac has better user interface. There are so many annoying and missing UI issues in Mac and dare I say Windows has better UI for some aspects of the OS than Mac.
That's the prettiest 'make' I've ever seen. I wish I had something more useful to contribute but I'm still staring at its beauty.
How to Live in Airbnbs for the Price of an Apartment Lease
I think it's ripe for it yet again.
The danger is that declaring too much at the API boundary makes the problem worse. Declared effects result in more ways that API’s can be incompatible and fewer ways that an implementation can change without breaking compatibility.
https://lukesmith.xyz/articles/matrix-vs-xmpp

They also have a nasty habit of flagging posts which don't show them in a good light.
It's very carefully marketed "othering" from the government + media. And everyone is playing along. We all want a scapegoat for our problems. Good to find a scapegoat for some of that built up anger because your boss is an idiot ?
Unfortunately, large corporations like this often utilize lobbying and regulatory capture to actually squash smaller competition which is not able to buy "justice".

Might makes right is not old fashioned at all, the mighty are just better at fooling people.
why not - after all, none of the open source licenses say that you must actually distribute the program, they only say that you should also include the source code if doing so.
It's surprising how many sites don't even let you edit your name after you've input the data. I've seen this on a lot of them as I slog through my password manager to scrub and delete every account that I can.
Zig is a better C in many ways. Memory handling, error handling, security, but most importantly it can be used together with C. No need to port your code base just swap to zig and continue. Of course now you have a code base in zig and C... :/
Great question. In fact this WFH scenario makes it worse. In the in person interactions, one can interprete better.
Answering your question, I got a very low performance rating for the first time. (Of course above the minimum required rating, which they had to do). My skip level manager doesn't talk/IM with me. (We were on very good terms before). If something is needed, he emails me. My direct manager also doesn't talk to me much. Only silver lining is that, its happening with a few other seniors also. (Based on what they share/my reading of the situation.) We dont have a lot of features in the roadmap. That also could be the reason. Not necessarily the performance. Recently they hired a lot of fresh grads and junior developers. Of course, I am not 100% sure that I am being pushed out. But every action points at that.
I think it depends on your definition of programming; the technology to build complex systems has undoubtedly improved, however the bar for hobbyists and learners is now sadly far higher than it was in the eighties, when almost anyone with a home computer could knock up a fun little game in BASIC as per the article. What could we recommend to the eager youngster for this sort of stuff today? JS + HTML canvas? Pygame? Not even in the same league of approachability sadly.
I’m confused by sf. They did this for Uber in 2016, Amazon’s zoox, and a host of other companies, etc.

Tesla has a safety record that’s not unimpressive compared to the 36k people who die every year even though their failures have been more public and newsworthy. Their stats have been relatively objective.

We also have a framework for this:
https://www.nhtsa.gov/technology-innovation/automated-vehicl...

As there is a framework in place already, shouldn’t we push forward? As long as we are reducing the statistical risk of driving below the risk of human drivers, shouldn’t that be the litmus for whether these programs are allowed to progress? I know I am being simplistic, and I understand that no statistical model will ever make up for the loss of a family member, the generally accepted foundation for the morality of self-driving car technologies hinges on whether they can beat the human-driven statistical equivalent.

If there is concern about that they shouldn’t continue. But if there isn’t, these experiments should progress as they could ultimately reduce mortality.

There were 3,723 deaths in California in 2020. The lifetime odds of dying in a motor-vehicle crash for a person born in 2019 were 1 in 107. These odds suck. Is that really acceptable? Can we do better? We know we can. If we can reduce that number we should.

If we can’t, we should restrict this technology’s rollout until it can.

Am I overly objective?

I’m not an expert.

I mean ultimately I want legislation built on objective data and loving values with human compassion at the core. I feel like sometimes we see these decisions based on how fast the system can adapt the ocean of existing automotive and roadway regulatory compliance to the technology changes, rather than new realities. People have no idea how much the books and legal cases that many cal trans engineers have spent their lives developing stand in the way of self-driving vehicles. I honestly think the biggest issue is probably the legal a s regulatory overhead of responding to the technology rather than the technology itself, but since it’s so hard to quantify I don’t often bring this up. But the biggest passion I have seen if from those same engineering minds, who truly understand the complexity, but also want to see it happen. Their timeframes are just long. I’ve heard 2045 and 2050.

Anyone more expert than I care to weigh in? I’d love to learn more. I am not trying to weigh in with any merit — I am a nubile entrant and simply sharing the output of conversation with people who will always be more qualified and I, but I’d love to learn more about this.
How else would we even know Japanese puke porn existed!
I don’t see how running real-time experiments invalidates absence of free will and I’d like to discuss this further.

However, I would like to point out that a non deterministic system does not imply a system where the agents have free will. The scales at which QM apply are many orders of magnitude smaller than those of individual neurons and I don’t believe Penrose has reached a meaningful conclusion with his work. And any deterministic system can be simulated as far as we would like and at any point we want, even if it is chaotic, if the initial parameter are the same the outcome is always the same.

I would also like to argue that consciousness, being aware of one’s own actions or probing some world model does not imply free will. This occurs simply because your brain was in such a state to perform such actions. The act of self referencing can be achieved with things even more dumb, like natural numbers, and I can recommend Hofstadter’s work here, like Gödel Escher Bach.
> A blanket flat makes no sense.

What do you think rates are based on now?

Either this is another straw-man in the making or you genuinely think they were only based on credit scores?

It's not even allowed to be a factor in some states, and it's not allowed to be the only factor in many more...

-

Driver age, home zip code, car driven, miles driven per year, accident history? Do none of those tell anyone anything?

Always-on driver monitoring that's not even adjusted to geography... so someone in midtown Manhattan dodging jaywalking tourists has FCW compared on the same scale as someone on 10 miles from their nearest neighbor in the middle of Wyoming... you think that's more fair?
>Where is the covid source?

Probably in bats or other animals prone to corona viruses. Likely some animal that naturally does not interact with humans a lot, and has significant populations in remote habitats. Basically everything that can live in difficult terrain is rather likely. Less likely, but far from impossible: it mutated over extended periods of time in some animal meat factory farm on an accelerated schedule thanks to how these farms operate, with animals showing few if any symptoms thanks to the young ages of the entire population (no old animals in your factory farm ;), until it finally made the jump to humans.

>to aquire the necessary 1000 mutations

They compared strains we already now about because somebody sequenced them; the important word there is "known". The thing about that is that there is a ton of strains we do not know about because nobody sequenced that particular local cohort of animals. Hell, we do not even know every species of animals are on planet at all, if the still hight rate of discovering new species is any indication - and we do constantly discover species that we can see with our naked eyes without having to whip out lab equipment.

>And yet here we are, almost 2 years since the pandemic started, with no identified natural reservoir for covid.

There is a real good chance that this "natural reservoir" is just a place nobody looked at with a sequencer hunting for virus strains, i.e. most of the Earth.

Or it might have been created in a lab.

The thing is, we do not know. But there is some evidence apparently that it was a natural origin because a) it looks like a natural progression from previously known strains and b) because there are no hallmark indicators for direct manipulation. Not entirely conclusive evidence, but sound argumentation making a case for the possibility of natural occurrence. And the theories you recapped arguing it cannot be natural just do not use a sound argumentation in my opinion as even I myself - not a domain expert and thinking about it for a few minutes - can poke gigantic holes in it.

Frankly, the "no natural source" argument as you presented it immediately reminded me of the pro-Creationist "missing link" argument.

All the while the evidence you mentioned is that there probably was a lab in Wuhan which probably did stuff with Corona viruses... which is rather vague argumentative. Sure, it's a clue furthering the lab theory a little, but it's hardly conclusive. Post hoc ergo propter hoc.
I normally go out of my way to avoid anything that goes to this site out of protest for their horrid paywall. Thank you.
As and artist and designer I don't need machines to be creative. My brush is a tool under my control, my computer is a tool under my control.

Focus on doing one thing well as a tool.
Leave creativity for people.
They already use terminal tools to do their dev so this is about keeping within that environment to avoid unnecessary tools or context switching. It’s always good to avoid this even if you primarily use GUI tools e.g. using plugins so you don’t need to leave VSCode for instance.
Less than 24 hours ago, the top story on HN was a tranche of iOS 0-days released by a whitehat who got frustrated by Apple's mismanagement of its bug bounty program. So it's open season on that afib data right now...
>Signal is the most trusted app in authoritarian countries.

Element and the Matrix protocol would disagree.
That's the default modus operandi for the German 3-letter agencies: If they spy on you, up to installing surveillance devices at your home, and following you wherever you go for years, you will be never told that happened in case this observation doesn't lead to some "official" accusation. It's now like that for a few years. Before that they (usually) needed to at least inform you after surveillance stopped. Now they don't. The justification for the new regulation is that it would be "too much work" for them to inform all people they spied on.

The law was changed in light of mass surveillance by the German agencies… Because they did spy on most of people by searching almost the whole German internet traffic but never informed anybody they got data from, and that was illegal, our government just changed the law and made it legal.
Is this currently illegal?
Or Dante's "Commedia" where each line contains 11 syllables

in triplets, that rhyme in chain

for 100 chapters,

for 4711 triplets
I love the video Robert Miles made on this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5qWzDA84pKQ
Let's try another question. How does not believing in free will give you an advantage in life? Studies seem to show that a "growth mindset" is superior to a "fixed mindset", and I would guess a belief in free will tends to correlate more with a "growth mindset".
I doubt he said it was a stupid idea due to the look. It probably has more to do you have to design the car from the ground up to be electric and Lotus won't have the expertise for doing that.

Also Tesla, just likes vertical integration in general. I believe they control their whole battery manufacturing pipeline.
One of my personal websites contains lots of game code I wrote going all the way back to 1978 when I shipped my first game. And one of my other personal websites contains many of my notebooks (since typed up) going back to those halcyon days of making an interesting game in just 500 bytes or so. 6502 C compiler. Word processor. Sprite utils. I've been slowly pushing my code on to github too, no matter how bad or disorganized it is. There are typed up notes of me working through how to juggle bits to fit more words in to a memory for a word puzzle game, or figuring out how to make a Minotaur hunt you down in a maze. It is amusing to look back on those notes at times.
Pilots dont design complex systems. They are trained to use them. More apt to compare them with esports pros.

The problem solving within a well defined game with fixed rules/moves etc is very different type of problem solving than when you play no rule games which is what software design is.

Ofcourse the chimp troupe tries to impose rules on such a complex game, but the rules will always break down, cause of how easy they are, for anyone who is unhappy with them, to rewrite.
I agree. But it's debatable. And since it's the law none is to blame for accepting the requests from law enforcement agencies
I don't know the details of Nortel, but I saw Ericsson post dot-com bubble from the inside, and that company was being stripped of anything of value, right down to cancelling cleaning and free fruits in the office over outsourcing everything to the cheapest bidder.

The rise of ZTE and Huawei comes much later (around the introduction of 4G - they start winning contracts in Scandinavia), and to me mostly because they were willing to invest in research at a time when western companies were not.
Is a pretty silly question too, since NTP uses whatever port you set it to.
Patents benefit the inventor (or at least they did until 2013) through compensation for their efforts and society as a whole through disclosure of information. The alternative is that every bit of applicable knowledge is kept as a trade secret.
Are you saying if somebody who is naturally gay chooses to have straight sex it's then okay to publish a list indicating their sexuality?

Sex acts being a choice or not is irrelevant.
its open source project you always could make that better
people just love to hate trains
How is the internet changing the way you think? (2010)
"he’s considerate and unromantic, whereas I’m romantic and inconsiderate."

I appreciated this observation. I have been married for 26 years. I am more expressive to my wife with my words, "I love you" etc. However, her actions speak louder than my words. I seem to be wired for me first where she is wired for me next. I'm trying to get better at being more helpful rather than grand gestures.
That may be relevant if you are working on a javascript engine, not if you build webapplications.
At a personal level, one very visible difference I have seen religion make in people is that it makes them more disciplined. Pious people who regularly and "religiously" perform their rituals every day tend to have a nice bonus effect of being easily able to start and adhere to good habits and exercise self-control over superficial cravings.
What you say sounds nice, but either I don't understand it, or I feel it just isn't true.

For example, you want to watch a movie together, but neither of you have the same tastes in movies. What do you do?

Because both of you are self-giving, you both say that the other can pick, you're thus in a deadlock.

At some point, there's going to need a compromise, because you can only pick one movie and neither of you happen to like the same movie.

So best you can do is compromise by alternating, this time you watch your preferred movie, next time there's.

Or you compromise by not watching movies together, but seperately.
The first book in the past 6 months section is incorrect.
And the Teslas need expensive highways to run on. You should be comparing highway vs rail, and Tesla vs train.

A railway has a much higher and faster capacity, even if it does indeed cost that much ( it doesn't, it varies highly based on terrain, conditions, regulatory framework, etc.).
I thought this was settled in Shmullus v. Broht & Forrester.
Is this an American thing? I had no idea the OP was talking about an actual thing until now and understood the phrase "love language" as figurative.