skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Example you picked has a flaw that nude wife will be fined even if she exposes herself on your property - but in a way that others can see her. Police officer will be quite quick to explain her why she should not do this :)

Other point on "Karen request" is spot on because Shodan is making requests for research purposes and selling the results. They don't access anything that is behind password and they don't scan with intention to find something that they can break through.

While I mostly don't agree with people "scanning is not a crime", because I don't believe randoms on the internet that they are "scanning just for fun" and I expect they scan to find something they can get into which is first step of crime "preparation".

Then people don't understand intent of scanning is what makes it illegal/legal not the scan on itself. Just like knife is not good/bad but if you hold it to harm someone it makes it bad and illegal.
Developers will destroy everything good!

DDD has some great ideas about how to model things and talk about things. But it is not a concrete architecture prescribing a particular number of layers or lines of code.
a calendar "order of magnitude". I can't think of a better term.
New Jupyter evasive delivery through MSI installer
The site is super slow on desktop Firefox on macOS (and fine in Chrome and Safari). I don't have Firefox for Android, but there's probably a connection. I filed a Firefox bug for the performance problem and mentioned the Android crash:

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1732608
> subtitles go out of sync regularly

can be problem with subtitle source?

> "codec not supported by browser"

probable problem with browser not jellyfin?

> There are also other annoyances like the player forgetting my subtitle selection when jumping to the next video of the same season of a show.

+1

> There's also no quality setting that is just "stream the source file directly". It seems to always want to transcode when embedding subtitles, which I guess is done by ffmpeg on the server but is really the player's job.

Direct source file is download button it can play in vlc, or can use FTP. why embed subtitles? here i think jellyfin use external track for subtitle (default parametres)
interesting. While I'm open minded to this, I have to say I am starting from a place of skepticism. I've come to view bike lanes painted on the road as a dangerous half-measure in most places. Studies show that Women do not take advantage of these types of cycle lanes at all, and many people view them as simply too dangerous to use. still interesting that there can be benefits to car traffic in the right conditions!
Thank you for your perspective, much appreciated.
Seems to be resolved now
The traceroute hand is stealing your data
Because not allowing customers the opportunity for competence or independence increases the amount of money Apple can extract. The walls in the garden only ever get higher.
Depending on a number of factors, Tether falls under a few of these designations (which are overlapping and not mutually exclusive by design).

Tether is without a doubt (by their own design/admission) both a "transferable share" and a "certificate of deposit for a security" (since the majority of their "reserves" are supposedly securities).
What is a zero-day exploit?
The Mom Test, the entire book, is a couple hour read... honestly if you have any interest at all in selling or building (or simply work at a startup) it's worth reading the whole thing, and not a summarized recap... the book itself is summarized.
Are you certain they don't have Apple's private keys? They have many ways to compel or persuade someone who does have access to those keys to give the keys to the NSA, or to infiltrate Apple with their own agents.
The work that you're saying you do daily from 7am-1pm, do you feel satisfied about it at the end of the day? Does it create meaning for you on the grander scheme of things? (based on what your personal values are, and you personally find meaningful)

If not, then it's probably time to switch employer, to one that has a product/mission that is aligned with a topic/field that would bring more meaning into your life.

If that's not possible, you could try spending one less hour per day on that job you have, and invest that hour in something that creates meaning in your own terms.
Webinar: Sophos explains how to break a hacker's heart and ruin their day
Biwascheme has some weird scoping bugs that makes me a litte afraid of using it for serious stuff. It seems nixe and all, but this: https://github.com/biwascheme/biwascheme/issues/125 is not very confidemce inspiring.

There is another schemey language that compiles to JS that accepts things like this:

(when (start-are-aligned?)
(define wtf 5))

wtf ; may or may not be bound.

The ick-factor is high.
Pinball Fantasies assembly source code
How India flipped its vaccine fortunes
Invariably, comment threads like this, pop up when I provide some current thoughts about my career. A career that quite a few HN readers share apparently, but that's where the similarities end.

Quite a lot of you didn't grow up in abject poverty and it shows.

The hole this puts you in, 99% of people have a really, really difficult time climbing out of and describing what this process is like, is lost on a lot of people. My biological mother made extremely poor choices and never took my future into consideration. We were housing insecure and we were food insecure. My personal safety was at times in jeopardy.

I've been in survival mode most of my life. It's only the last 5 years that I was in a position to finally make thriving choices for me AND for my family. It was only this month that I finally made the ultimate thriving choice to live in a place that I've dreamt of living in since I was a kid. I'm not even going into any other details about what effect this has on you as an adult, like homelessness, how expensive being poor is, etc.

So I'm only left feeling like laughing (and sometimes crying) when someone mentions savings. Shit, it's only been in the last 10 years, that I got over mentally calculating the cost of everything I put in my shopping cart, to make sure I could afford it. To this day, I still have anxiety over swiping my card in front of people at the grocery store, thinking that surely it's going to be declined (it hasn't in years).

I'm only just now able to start dedicating some of my salary to a savings account (or other investments). There is no time left to ultimately retire with anything matching my current salary, so I've resigned myself to work until I literally can't anymore and with a remote IT job, sitting at a desk, that sounds like 30 more years or more.

Change jobs? I guess you missed the part where I'm encountering ageism? I've had to lop off a decade of my experience in order to try to not appear older with my experience alone.
Oh I see, I misread it as scare-quoted secret rather than specific classification level but there are also piles of SECRET documents/cables that are about human rights, promotion of democracy, etc as well.

I don't think it makes much difference either way because I think you're over-interpreting the classification level as some sort of extra level care. All of this stuff was readily available to a Private First Class stuck on a forward base in the Iraqi desert. And I think my point still holds - whatever views one might have on US foreign policy, one can form them and support them just as well by simply reading the news. Besides piles of detail, the cables don't tell you anything different. They're basically this but for diplomacy:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TEtrT3E4vb8
Element on the Matrix protocol. Not perfect UX but keeps improving. Free but it has a solid business model servicing business cases with the open source set stack that suits corporate needs.
You can passive-aggressively link them to https://nohello.net/ or https://nohello.club/, see if they get the message.

A worse one yet is where they go "hello?", then an X minutes after you sigh and say 'yeah?' they call you.
Sounds like we just need to gamify productivity, it's a wonder no-one has ever tried that before...

(/s for the dull and witless hordes)
Sadiku bows out at NIPC after 5-year tenure with no hope of renewal
Services providers such as Heroku should be easily able to have five-nines uptime.

They ONLY offer fully managed services, which can be backed by the multi-cloud, multi-AZ setup I refer to - but instead a single product outage from a single upstream provider in a single datacenter is affecting all their clients.

This is a regular occurrence for Heroku - and they charge a substantial premium for their "service".
I receive notifications for apps that I use less than this, like Lyft. I manage my notifications very carefully, and I have never silenced Signal on my phone. Also, I don't go that long between sessions of using Signal — just apparently long enough to trigger this issue.
I think it's perfectly acceptable to leave them 'on hold' until they actually write something. If they don't, then it wasn't anything important.
> It's absolutely comical to compare various European empires who despoiled Egypt (and many other places, including Greece btw) of their history with the plight of the Aboriginal Australians.

You seem unable to respond to what I wrote rationally. Perhaps this is has something to do with your fear of questions.

And I did not compare their plight, I specifically used the example to refute your incorrect assertion that genetic lineages do not matter in such cases.

> You have no idea who I am, where I'm from or what my connection to my ancestors is, so please refrain from ad hominem stuff.

I did not justify my argument with an insult so it's not really ad hominem. And I didn't intend to insult at all, I was just musing as to why you believed such a ludicruous and clearly wrong idea that ancestry would be irrelevant and nonsensical in a case like this. I'm surprised you took it as an insult. Or are you again just using that as a tool to try to shut down questions you are scared of?
If you're tempted to switch back to WhatsApp because of Signal reliability issues, consider the possibility that you may be the target of a downgrade attack.
But I don't want my entire history to be available on a website? Who would even want that, what's the use case? Who looks at their months or years old messages?

If my message is over two weeks old, I'd prefer it not to be on anyone's server. I can keep a local backup if I wish to do so.
I think one should make a distinction between chat in public channels and direct messages; with the latter, you're causing the other party a notification and drawing the attention, with the former, the reader can engage with it at their own leisure.
Perhaps “up a unit of measurement”?
Best book on early stage startups period. And it's barely 100 pages long.

My favorite quote from it:

“Someone should definitely make an X!”

“Have you looked for an X?”

“No, why?”

“There are like 10 different kinds of X.”

“Well I didn't really need it anyway.”

Long story short, that person is a complainer, not a customer. They’re stuck in the la-la-land of imagining they’re the sort of person who finds clever ways to solve the petty annoyances of their day.
Companies desire a successful platform strategy because:

1. Being a platform means you can grow to face reduced competition and earn lots of income while those on the platform perpetuate your relevancy (and your income stream). For example the network effects of iPhone purchasers and app developers makes it very hard for new mobile ecosystems to challenge Apple (outside of Android anyways).

2. If a company doesn’t make a platform play, it may be displaced by someone who does. As an example, niche book retailers now mostly compete against each other as third party sellers on Amazon’s platform, where the shoppers are.

3. A platform is a way to diversify and make yourself less vulnerable to a single area or some external dependency. As an example, Walmart and many others have started offering “buy now pay later” plans that enable customers to buy on credit without relying on credit card companies and credit scoring limitations.

It is a problem, however. Large platforms inherently face reduced competition, disrupting healthy market dynamics. They gain influence and can participate in regulatory capture. They become powerful like pseudo governments, but yet aren’t treated like a public agency/service/utility. We need new legislative thinking and bold politics to rein in these massive institutions.
Thanks. I find it useful for finding things that are specific to Australia I am interested in.

I think it should be picked up in your browser already as there is the open search definition in there. If you are using Chrome and visit chrome://settings/searchEngines you should see it already in other search engines, but the query URL needed is https://bonzamate.com.au/?q=%s
I dont follow. Do you mean doctors are rich so they dont have to care? Last I checked a doctor needs 10 years since high school to make any real money. A fresh grad in SV needs 4, sometimes 3. By the time the medical student can legally be called doctor, you and I are already making "obscene money" by their standard
Getting Started with Azure Static Web App
You're right, it does automatically go there!
> why "the market" hadn't already corrected [Apple's ability to cut people off]

Because there are a lot of money to be made, iOS users spend a lot more than Android users, that's a well known fact. If you don't build an app on iOS, someone else will. There are always developers who don't know enough, or simply don't care and keep building apps for iOS.

> why regulators hadn't.

They're starting to notice the problems. Recent regulations from overseas and the Epic lawsuit will draw attention to it.
> WhatsApp has a better privacy story than Telegram

No it doesn’t. It’s owned by the 2nd largest surveillance capitalist; it shares a back-end with Facebook (so at a whim they can use the metadata around your chats to update their advertising models of you and your contacts); IIRC it leaks your engagement to FB (via web link previews).
> Why can't a folder contain both movies and tv series?

i don't understand this too... i just want to respect folder not have simple metadata control all

also subtitle SRT upload is broken (maybe fixed in source now)

and jellyfin want to own media plays ok with nextcloud but when i have permissions broken, after i fix chown jellyfin was 100% broken delete/add library didn't work (scan never started) had to entirely delete jellyfin db to work it again

jellyfin is good software, better to alternative, but needs work for improve
Your comment has been misplaced, it should be under https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28665395 (I was pretty confused until that realization).
I have taken them several times. Prague-Warsaw, Prague-Frankfurt, Vienna-Venezia, Prague-Tatras, Prague-Krakow.

First of all, trains shake a lot. I could at best take hourly naps, it was better than nothing, but far from optimal. The loud proclamations of station speakers whenever you stop somewhere do not help your sleep either.

Second, night trains are a paradise for opportunistic thieves. Yes, it is a solvable problem, but I haven't seen it solved.
They literally do have that.
There's a scene where Janel Moloney (Donna of West Wing fame), playing a conservative Senator from ND, refuses to relinquish her gun inside the Capitol[1]. This was ~2013.

And this happened in reality this past January: [2].

Life imitates art?

[1] https://preview.redd.it/moxs979434841.png?width=960&crop=sma...

[2] https://www.denverpost.com/2021/01/12/lauren-boebert-guns-co...
Also, spending your career in cynicism guarantees depression of some sorts. It makes you dull, you’ll have poor friends, you’ll attract the worst of people, you’ll create a toxic workplace that would resemble some of the worst run government departments. Impossible to fire, useless bloat of people that have zero interest in improving themselves or others, and life a fulfilling life.

Sad. But on the bright side, those that excel at what they do are going to be disproportionately rewarded. I love this aspect of society and certain political ideologies want to destroy this.
> Let us please dispense with the moral ambiguity of our view of the Soviet Union.

We're talking past each other. I'm talking about the *birth* of the Soviet Union.

Imperial Russia, no matter what you may think of its morals, was an ally of the Western powers. It fought together with them, it was completely exhausted by the war, it collapsed. Immediately after its collapse, the Western powers, acting very much like hyenas (US, UK, France, Japan, etc), invaded their former ally.

The new Russian factions fought each other and fought off the invaders.

How do you look internal politics look in a country in such a situation? Do you think moderates have any chance? When your former allies are betraying you, your country was ravaged by war and is now in a civil war?

The hypothesis was that we will never know for sure if Russia wouldn't have gotten a more moderate socialist government without foreign invasion. It's an "what if" scenario.
Let me guess, you work as a low-level manager?

What you are suggesting is basically micromanagement-by-scrum.

* Identification of tasks you didn't think of is a fallacy in software engineering. There are very few actual tasks when it comes to writing the software. Yes, sometimes you can break a change. For instance across components or features, but most often that has already been done when a developer gets a task. Most of the additional tasks you can come up with are either trivial, come after the end of development (e.g., deployment), or are completely arbitrary and not self-contained (write this class or that function). Very seldom a software development task can be broken down into several roughly equally complex subtasks.

* It follows that you don't improve your estimate by writing down all these side tasks in your task tracker. You increase the busywork and friction and become less agile. These subtasks tend to become stale quite quickly when requirements change.

* Your stakeholders don't understand anything about aoftware development. Unless your task is trivial to begin with, there is little ground in any estimate.

* Developers either see progress through code reviews, technical discussions, or the source code itself. No need to maintain a list of tasks in some tracker for them.

* Commits should be self-contained and have a meaningful message anyways. It should be trivial to trace them to the main task.

* Your estimates won't improve at all if you break down your task arbitrarily.

If you create subtasks like "write the tests" it might help a junior to structure their work approach, but in a professional environment it is pointless. Worse, if time is at the essence, some product owner might ask you to deploy "just an MVP" before that subtask is done, postponing it forever.

The only reason to break down a task is when there's a time-like dependency in the process. E.g., I can do X after Y gets deployed. Or I need to remove Z once Q is done. Mostly, tasks like Y or Q will involve operational aspects (data migration, experiments) so the subtask will have a different owner or at least a different context.
Much better explanation of how it works here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNpAIZl4krc
How to not forget anything: Daily Logging
“Order of magnitude” is a colloquial, imprecise term that doesn’t actually mean “exactly ten” (otherwise, people would just say “ten”).
It's not clear to me if you were agreeing or disagreeing (nor does it really matter in this context), but yes, exactly!

Your fleshed out thoughts is exactly the kind of line I wanted to see in the article. Just mentioning QALY is no better than a manager vaguely promising to pay you when the product "scales". You'll end up arguing fruitlessly over definitions. I would have liked to see a concrete example of how an investor would expect to be paid in practice. Until specific examples of what that could translate to in practice have been offered, it's just a buzzword.
Looking corn farming's environmental impact in the US (eutrophication & Gulf of Mexico deadzone, top soil erosion, biodiversity losses), I wouldn't be so sure.
Whatsapp forces you to update to be able to use it further. Not a nice thing.
> There is a troubling and growing anti-intellectual, anti-scientific movement I have seen which seeks to make certain questions verboten.

The question was offensive, yet I didn't try to cancel the author in any way. I didn't flag the comment, I didn't email dang to have the author's account blocked etc. I instead offered an explanation of my position in polite but firm terms, with some argumentation.

The question had nothing scientific in it, so there's no need to worry about opposition to science btw.

> Social theories and traditions and status quo should be no safer from questioning than anything else.

Definitely agreed, freedom of speech should be sacrosanct in any civilized placed. You should have the right to, for example, claim that the Holocaust didn't happen and I should have the right to tell you that you're wrong and that your position is deeply offensive. That's how free speech works.

> unwilling or unable to provide answers or defend their position with reason.

I did provide arguments for my position.

> inconsistencies in the way these kinds of historical right to ownership are thought about in different cases

In general I think the first thing to ask is: did the majority of the people living in that place at that time freely consented with the removal of their artifacts?

I'm curious btw, do you think what Elgin did with the Parthenon is fair game too?
I noticed something similar. A minimal PR to introduce DDD on our code base ballooned the codebase by something like 1,000 lines, smattered all over the code base. I think it would have ballooned it by about 12-15,000 in total in the end if we'd used it everywhere. That would have been fertile breeding ground for bugs.

The ideas made sense on logically complex code that required frequent refactoring, but the strict separation between all the different layers simply led to a lot of code in most instance. Far too much.

We also couldnt agree on where the limits of the bounded contexts really lay. Most documentation on this issue is a mere handwave saying "you figure it out" or "it'll become clear when you do these exercises with the business" (it didnt), which is odd given how vitally important it is and how damaging it is to bound the wrong things.
If you get tired of repeating yourself, do what I wrote about in https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28663996 and just use the MIT license. It has all of this outlined explicitly already.
Bitten again by centralization. There's no excuse for not making Signal an open, federated protocol.