skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I'm not convinced that the problem is all that more difficult than for Java. Rust is pretty strict about requiring either the trait being implemented or the thing the trait is being implemented for to be defined in the declaring module. Additionally, Rust is conservative in requiring "forall" trait implementations to never come into conflict. The compiler does not allow multiple "forall" trait implementations if it is possible for code not yet written to satisfy both implementation requirements.

The bigger issue is that the number of implementers for certain traits is going to be huge due to broad "forall" implementations. Instead of doing that, you can just list out actual implementations and condense the "forall" implementations into one node. In practice, I have found it pretty easy to figure out what code implements what interface, particularly if you build the docs for your own crate.
It's true that some art -- and most big-P Postmodern cultural products -- require a lot of prior knowledge of their context in order to get much out of them, and I agree this is hostile to a general audience.

But first, some of it does manage to be engaging and even fun ; and second, I blame the universities and not the Art World per se. There's a lot of very idea-centric work in the museums and in private collections, but the stuff that (probably) makes your eyes roll is not a big part of it. And the business of speaking in a priestly tongue unintelligible to the laity is absolutely a product of our (mostly US) universities in the last 20 years or so. Art critics within that caste do their best to promote artists of the same caste -- and have done for ages -- but it only goes so far.

That said, this:

> Contemporary artists with any skill now work in classical styles, illustrations, or graphic design.

...is obviously and demonstrably false for, I dunno, say >= 90% of all professional artists making a living at it today. Which leaves you with a pretty circular definition of "skill" I guess.
I remember reading about this as a kid in one of Martin Gardner's books, either "aha!" or "aha! Gotcha"
Some of the comments in this thread seem intentionally bad-faith or ignorant to how much hate and abuse actually exists on these platforms. The Internet fucking sucks. I stopped using social media because I'm trans and I don't feel like there's a place for me online anymore. No matter where I go, including large platforms like Reddit and Twitter, I'm inevitably subjected to someone expressing their grievances about trans people or the LGBTQ community. There's a part of me that wants to reply and give my perspective, but it's like I can't even have a voice online without the fear of people belittling and harassing me, sending me abusive messages, trying to doxx me, telling me to kill myself or scouring through my profile to try to find whatever they can add to their "cringe compilation" or Kiwifarms thread about how degenerate and disgusting trans people are. My mental health is more important than participating in the shitfest that is online discourse so I just avoid it. I post on Hacker News and a few other places where people are generally respectful, but other than that I've given up on having conversations with strangers online.

I'm an artist and a software dev, I have a lot that I want to share with the world but I don't think I'll ever get the chance to. This world is cruel and these online platforms and social media algorithms amplify that to the point where it feels like the only way to win the game is to not play. Personally, I don't feel one way or the other about online censorship at this point. I think social media has ironically ushered in a culture of anti-social behavior and maybe it's time to move on to something else.
It gets a lot of attention because VCs were publicly conned.
I click every global tracking network link out there and am on HN daily and often more time than I perhaps should. This is the first I hear of it. Yeah I really need to get out from under this rock and spend more time on HN.
Perhaps there is a way to add a bitterant to the sheathing. Im sure this has been researched, maybe around the time they switched to tasty biodegradable soy-based harnesses.
It’s called NewPipe
I got vaccinated as soon as I did in large part because I didn't have to deal with my primary care.
The Packet ID logic is not enough restricted.

For exemple, the emitter is not restricted in the ID it should use for it's packet, it can be any unsigned 16 bit number.

In contrast, a lot of protocol the ID must be incremental, and the receiver can detect that a package is missing (which result in smaller network overhead, the client can ack, or re-ask for a dropped packet, which result in a single roundtrip when there is no issue, instead of having the double round trip that mqtt have).
It means that, the receiver can't know if it missed a packet.
Because you don't have to waits for the acks to propagate the message, it mean the message delivering is unordoned.
It also mean that if the same message keep dropping, the protocol should continue to work.
Now if you implemented your mqtt with an i++, this where you can start to have dataloss, because now that you sent 65k messages you finished you start to need actually free packet id.

And it cause a lot more issues that what I said there, that I hope I covered every case in my implementation: https://github.com/signature-opensource/CK-MQTT/blob/develop...

Then, this is just the PacketID Logic.
MQTT 3 doesn't do enough things, while MQTT5 do too much things.
MQTT 3 Have design issues which MQTT 5 acknowledged it, and tried to fix it with duck tapes.
One issue for exemple is the credentials being sent after the last will packet, which lead to a huge DOS issue, because now an attacker can attack you with your maximum last will packet, that you will want to save to disk, then wait to timeout without ever sending credentials.
MQTT 5 is not really a breaking change as this behavior still exist, but you can enforce a credentials packet for the connexion.

All this highlight that MQTT could be a far smaller, faster, simpler protocol if correctly done (and a protocol like this probably exist, I didn't looked at a lot of popular protocols for now, only a dozen of hardware custom ones).

If I knew all the above before starting to implement my MQTT client, I would had want with another protocol.
Eclipse Paho JavaScript Client[0] for the front-end and personally I prefer RabbitMQ Web MQTT Plugin[1] for the back-end[1].

Take note Paho MQTT Client is available for several programming languages(Py,Rust,Go,C,C#,etc)[2].

[0]: https://www.eclipse.org/paho/index.php?page=clients/js/index...
[1]: https://www.rabbitmq.com/web-mqtt.html
[2]: https://www.eclipse.org/paho/index.php?page=downloads.php
One fairly specialized developer is a lot harder to replace then a generic level 30 kubernetes wizard. You lose that developer as a company and the ramp up time for a replacement could be >year. In addition, more standardized approaches have better defined practices, tooling, and security.
That is from the novel "Hard-Boiled Wonderland and the End of the World" by Haruki Murakami[0].

[0]: https://everything2.com/title/Encyclopedia+on+a+toothpick
This is my third digital startup attempt.

My first was an education technology platform to replace 4th through 8th grade Textbooks. I found out the hard way that the education publishing business is nearly impossible to disrupt.

My second was a context-search engine, but machine learning killed that idea ... fast.

Mach9Poker is just a simple app that allows anyone to build and test poker strategies against other strategies running automatically in the cloud. Pretty harmless and may even help some poker players make more money and lose less...so all in all, I think a good thing to reduce the downsides of playing poker for money. There is a potential pivot to making it an actual gambling app, but that's only if the initial app makes a TON of headway.

I'm also having fun designing and building it. That's what entrepreneurship is all about.
Big boys BASIC had support for ISAM,

http://neilrieck.net/docs/openvms_notes_vms-basic.html#demo2
1. the boat has pretty much sailed on this.

2. correlation is not causation.

3. they've adjusted the numbers based on age instead of breaking out the numbers by age. So, it's very possible age is important in making a distinction. There's no break out of pre-existing conditions among the groups.
Phase3 Trial:Remdesivir Significantly Reduced Risk of Hospitalization with Covid
There is something that can be done about it! That's the whole point! It's crazy to me that people are actually all through this thread saying that some moron's right to make an internet video telling people that COVID is a hoax and the vaccine is a government conspiracy to turn men into femboys is more important than the lives of the actual victims -- the vulnerable people who fall down the rabbit hole, end up believing this junk and not getting vaccinated.
Great to hear, but didn't GIMP just make the switch to 3?
Not sure if everyone has read the actual policy (https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/11161123) but for those who hasn't:

Don’t post content on YouTube if it includes harmful misinformation about currently approved and administered vaccines on any of the following:
* Vaccine safety: content alleging that vaccines cause chronic side effects, outside of rare side effects that are recognized by health authorities
* Efficacy of vaccines: content claiming that vaccines do not reduce transmission or contraction of disease
* Ingredients in vaccines: content misrepresenting the substances contained in vaccines

Also, the policy states some exceptional cases such as countervailing views with a support from medical experts, firsthand experiences, etc.
I didn't buy any belts recently and half the ads I see on YouTube are still for belts. I think "internet belt company" is just a thing right now.

EDIT: Not leather belts though, nylon with magnetic buckles or something
Or Remote Administration Tool.
But some are. Is 10% of those deaths worth social media platforms not censoring false claims about vaccines and masks?
Certainly, but I think it's important to consider that the Prussian landed gentry did not utilize slaves as did the land owners of Jefferson's fellow Virginians. Jefferson's writing often show someone ahead of his time, but his actions contradicted them in many ways since he was clearly addicted to the financial security of slavery (he also owed a lot of money throughout his life). Von Humboldt had no such ties to slavery in his affairs or those of his family or Prussian neighbors.
Right; it’s nominally outlawed in that it’s outlawed in name but not in practice.
Accepting money can be a pain. Now you have to do accounts and taxes, and possibly argue about who actually gets the money and what it is used for. I can see why some projects might not care about small donations.

Maybe try offering a few million and see what happens. :-)
replying to this comment, even though actually applies to multiple replies to my parent comment.

> This is categorically false. The unvaxxed aren't the ones preventing you from doing anything. They don't have the power to do so!

That itself is categorically false. unvaxxed folks provide a tremendous wealth of externalities, such as undue burden on the healthcare system, behavioral and legal changes that require masking due to lack of critical mass in vaccinations, etc.

But, to get to the crux of your arguments:

you do have the personal liberty to not vaccinate. That is not being taken away from you.

However, you do not have the privilege of making it a protected class (which is really what you are talking about).

If you choose not to be vaccinated, you can:
- home school your children
- self-employ and self-insure
- self-medicate and avoid the healthcare system entirely
etc..

Now, none of this is practical in reality, but never at any point is your choice to remain unvaccinated impinged upon.

You simply don't have as many career or social options as you would like, equivalent to being unvaccinated as a protected class.

And that is a horrendous idea (i.e., being a protected class). You can't have it both way... personal liberty often comes as great personal cost. If you truly walk the walk, then be prepared to pay the cost.
Not just influenza either. We've known for decades that other viral infections can cause long term symptoms. Epstein-Barr Virus has been frequently implicated.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2540242/
And your argument is that if the venues hosting Hitler's speeches had Reddit's moderation policies then Hitler would not have been elected?
> Then at some point it became "no one can ever get covid again" and we did wild things like close schools even if a person so much as got near a person with COVID.

Anecdotally, I have never heard anyone make the argument "no one can ever get covid again" nor heard of a school being closed because "a person got near a person with COVID".
> Money is just a unit of account. Creating more or less of it should not create more resources or products.

Actually creating money does create more resources and products and vice versa. It's pretty much the modern economic system. More money makes more investment possible which can make more resources accessible and therefore create more products. But there is a physical limit on the resource side. And if society fails to justify the money creation with more resources, products and services, then you have inflation and ultimately a currency collapse as everyone loses faith in the value of money.

It's a balancing act between money and products - whether money has to catch up to more products or whether products have to catch up to more money.
haha yeah. that's a good point. Its desensitization. If it's not a life crippling bankruptcy inducing, I'm like "only the price of a car? not bad!"
Wow that is Amazing Azaan! You are a very gifted kid.

It really looks great for a MVP.

I suggest you had the ability to book multiple classes with a tutor and grow the tutors for more subjects
This is awesome, and is a cool enough feature to actually make me upgrade. Love it.
If your art requires context to be understood, then it is broken.
What does it mean when a 'cited by X' is crossed out? I tried clicking it but it isn't explained.
An NFT? More like one NFT for every of his screams while he's burning to death, and they wouldn't record any so the screams can't be duplicated.

1 year later... the artist is alive and well, enjoying a mojito on a Cuban beach with a satisfied smile.
It will work fine for your small scale IoT, but when they said "for IoT" they never meant it for high scale.
Here's a 60 minutes clip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NUHsEmlIoE4
this is legitimately dystopian. only can mention side effects that have been "recognized by health authorities" ? how would whistleblowing even be possible in this environment?
To some extent, aren't startups supposed to be doing things to challenge the status quo which sometimes can mean that they are breaking rules ? Uber overall has been a net positive in my humble opinion so I definitely think that to an extent, the means are justified if the end is noble.
What is not clear about the message that says exactly what this?
The title should include "multi-threading" with "tiny binaries" also being of interest. Merely TS with borrow-checker makes no sense at all (or makes for good click-bait--it got me :-)
Existence of analog reality is quite problematic, because it opens can of worms - eg. hypercomputation is possible.
I make a concerted effort to upvote stuff I like, so maybe that helps. When I was watching videos from /r/videos (which I haven't done in a while) I would actually make sure to click through to YouTube to give an upvote on things I thought deserved it (it always seemed kinda sad to me that some someone else might post a video to reddit and get a bunch of karma but while the creator might get a lot of views, most of those viewers wouldn't even be presented an upvote option for stuff they enjoyed).

In addition to that, while my subscriptions does have some crap in it, it's also got quite a few math and science educators, as well as people doing visual essays. I'm also a sucker for educational crossed with pop-culture, so stuff from LegalEagle usually gets a watch and a like (and I'm subscribed) as well.

I agree is does seem to weight recommendations to much on what was recently watched sometimes, but I imagine that's so people that are in the rabbit hole can go deeper if they want. Unfortunately, it makes it hard to find something interesting for me on occasion when the last stuff I was watching is not what I'm in the mood for at all.

I treat YouTube like I do any other media source, like Netflix. I go to it and look for stuff to watch when that's what I actually want to do, so I don't generally mind watching a few things in a row. Often I'm doing it on my TV.
> But most free speech absolutists will be pretty content if we get to a point where the thrust of the free speech debate concerns itself with outlier cases like this one (rather than "is it 'hate speech' to criticize woke excesses?" or "to use a Chinese word that sounds vaguely like an English racial slur?").

In your absolutist world how do you stop the trolls on the current incarnation of social media from flooding the medium with references to these outlier cases until it triggers censorship?

When those same trolls continue pentesting the medium until they trigger censorship on less direct references, you're going to be left with examples functionally equivalent to the ones you are comparing to above.
Meanwhile, it seems that Russia has complained in the past 24 hours against some censorship on YT, based on "the fight against covid related misinformation", and raised a diplomatic issue accusing Germany to have supported the censorship.

Some may find curious or even amusing this odd paragraph on Le Monde:

> A la fin de janvier, le président Poutine avait jugé que les entreprises majeures du secteur de l’Internet étaient « en concurrence » avec les Etats. Il dénonçait leurs « tentatives de contrôler brutalement la société ».

The main online enterprises being in competition with the states - in the attempt to brutally control society?! The formulation could probably have been less "suggestive".

https://www.lemonde.fr/pixels/article/2021/09/29/moscou-mena...
You can almost certainly get the vaccine from your physician, and you can also call your physician’s office and leave a message asking them whether you should get vaccinated. They’ll call you back.
The funny part of this whole thing. Is that the same people that all they do is complain about privacy concerns by Apple and Alexa etc. here on HN are the same people that consistently downvote anything I say that is anti-vaccine. I thought this community knew no blind spots. Even if I am dead wrong on my stance, the concept that it gets downvoted just because I have a differing opinion is pathetic.
I think it is still not proven that Pi contains all possible strings.

https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/216343/does-pi-cont...
The vaccine can 1) hurt me with probability p1, and 2) help me with probability p2, in case I get COVID later in a few-month-window after the vaccine when it is efficient.

I can choose to not get the vaccine, but I can't choose to not get COVID. COVID may hurt me either way.

Depending on the values p1, p2, it's better to get the vaccine or not get it. The problem is, most people have no idea about values of p1, p2 and that they are highly dependent on personal details.
I think you can reasonably argue that you're still "dollar tree" if everything is $1.49 (rounds to a dollar) or maybe even $1.99 (hey, it's less than $2).
My wife had contact with a raccoon which tangled with our dog in the middle of the day about a decade ago. Since confirmation from the state lab takes weeks, she was off to the hospital for rabies shots straight away as a precaution. Total cost to us - pretty much nothing minus some trivial co-pays (< $100).

True to the US health care system, today, a decade later, we would likely pay a few thousand dollars or more - if it was covered. If incidental contact (no bite) was not covered, then it would be on my wife to either take the chance that the risk of rabies was insignificant or go ahead and pay thousands for the shots just in case.

About 5 years ago, I was bit by a stray cat we'd been feeding. I am a bit cheap, so going to the doctor is the last thing on my mind unless I'm gushing blood. I did give thought to the risk of rabies, so I did a little research. Seems you can be successfully treated for rabies within 10 days of exposure - depending a bit on the location of the bite (head/neck vs leg) - mine was on my hand. Cats typically die within a week after they become contagious and show clear signs several days prior to that. Lucky me, this cat continued to show up at our door for food every day through the week with no obvious behavioral changes.

So, having rolled the dice on my life for a few thousand dollars, I figured I was fine.

Mate, I wish, cheapskate that I am, that I was never faced with a moment where I pondered the economic worth of my life. I live in the US and my fellow citizens (from what I'm told) do not want the same kind of health care system that the rest of the prosperous nations enjoy. Makes perfect sense, doesn't it?

I wish I could find logic in it, but I can't.
Take a look outside the US, you’d be surprised. The world is not centered around the US.
Covid vaccine hesitancy does not seem to be about poor education, nor about poverty. The visible antivaxx activists are well-to-do people.

Distrust of government and authorities is a big factor. You have much more vaccine hesitancy in the U.S. than in Nordics (high-trust societies); Russians and Bulgarians are extremely sceptic of their governments, and extremely sceptic of vaccines.

https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/coronavirus-data-explor...
I think it could be argued to have been, at times, conceptually thin, if you like.

I agree that the tooling and even React itself, under the hood, have never been thin, or if they ever were it was only very early on in the project. Well-functioning enough that one could forget about them at times, maybe, but not thin.
Just say that you're 11 a lot, that's your best selling point (;
They look mostly OOS, wouldn't a nice old x64 laptop be just as capable for cheaper? I see this in the same catagory of the smart clocks, its just a rebranded withered technology (nintendo term). Love the simple site though!
Ahh the old paradox of tolerance. What you preach has failed literally every time it has been tried throughout history. You can’t stop intolerance with tolerance, you will lose every time. Full stop. And the irony of preaching tolerance while downvoting me is ripe.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance
https://healthcare.utah.edu/healthfeed/postings/2021/07/bloo...

>VITT is not associated with the Moderna or Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccines.

We're talking 400 cases of VITT from two specific vaccines (AZ and J&J) out of 6.2 billion doses given. Furthermore, COVID itself is associated with getting blood clots. In fact, you have a much higher chance of getting blood clots by staying unvaccinated than getting the vaccine. Even further, blood clots are entirely treatable if caught early.

Of course, as others have said, blood clots aren't a legitimate concern for anyone. This is yet another shifting of the goalposts.
Education is only a part of it. One of other parts is trust in the system. Countries with more trustworthy politicians and more humane social policy have better response both to lockdown measures and vaccines.
Extortion.

That's the perfect word for medical pricing model in America.

Apparently the treatment has been around since the 1800s so it's not like they're recouping money for the development.

It's just extortion.