skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Reading the OA, I also believe that there's a wide variety of technical detail that could be the cause of, say, not responding.

Maybe the reports get to the tech teams, the tech team figures out that this bug will definitely be caught by the static analyzer, and they have other more pressing issues.

The main problem today IMO is that the incentives for finding and actively using exploits are much higher than the incentives for fixing them, and certainly much higher than building secure code that doesn't have the issues in the first place.

After all, nobody will give you a medal for delivering secure code. They will give you a medal for delivering a feature fast.
They call it cadaster income, which, according to the Belgian ministry of finance website, is “a fictitious income that corresponds to the average yearly net income of the property to the owner.”

Isn’t that pretty much the same as “imputed rent”, after subtracting costs?

(I haven’t seen an Belgian tax bill in over 20 years, but I remember that estimate income to be very low indeed.)
Agreed. My wife and I are more likely to get frustrated with each other because we both are trying to take care of the others needs. We want the other person to be more selfish because we so much want to take care of each other. On the spectrum of problems to have it’s a pretty minor one.
Io_uring gains more 3% IOPS
Obfuscation is like locking your front door. It won't stop anyone who is dedicated, but it might stop someone who isn't.
And if anything, governments are in a privileged position to create and enforce these standards across multiple large regions.
Or perhaps.. aspergers? Which Elon does have. Yall are placing way too much emphasis on an outburst of an autist with a medical disorder.
Did you give a try of Deno. This is a JavaScript runtime but it produce a single binary. This would make sense in your case because it can be harder to inspect it.
“quattro” is that term. there is still no “quattro engine”
Python behind the scenes #13: the GIL and its effects on Python multithreading
Smartphone Sensor Data Has Potential to Detect Cannabis Intoxication
That blog is horrific on mobile
Sell covered calls on your investments for income and you won’t have to worry about draw downs so much.
Sorry, I don't mean the article is trolling or bad-faith. What I mean is that the author seems to have been trolled and the article is only responding to that trolling. That's just my guess after seeing this 4chan wiki and after seeing some very hostile statements made about this over the years. The discourse is being driven by trolls. The questions asked here aren't "bad" per se but if there had been any communication with the real developers at all then I wouldn't expect anyone to ask these questions, they don't make any sense in context. It seems to me the only reason they're being asked is because trolls spread misinformation about the project. Please try to avoid falling into the same trap, I'm noticing that you're doing it and it's not helpful. Don't let the trolls win.

I'll go a step further and say: I don't think your assessment is correct. There isn't anything absurd about an open source project missing a popular feature, it's a completely normal situation. Most open source projects are underfunded and understaffed and seem to have a giant "wishlist" of unimplemented features. Also, please avoid making hostile jokes or mocking people, that's more of that cruelty-focused 4chan-style discourse that is against the rules here. It's not an interesting discussion. When you drift into that unproductive stuff that's just being cruel to other people, I would say that absolutely is unfair trolling, so please don't do that. A more productive discussion might be something like: we discuss ways to fund the project, we discuss ways to get bugs fixed, we discuss technical advancements that could help speed things along. Does that make sense? I'm happy to discuss that stuff with you further.

>And lol at the goalpost moving

This again is what I mean, please don't dismiss my comments like this, it's really hostile. I gave you an answer for what it costs, and I also explained why that's not really a good question to ask. If you want me to clarify something then just ask, I could also suggest some better questions to ask if you really do want to help open source developers.
Wouldnt be surprised if the package then gets sold to some shady people.

Desperate people do desperate things and this surely looks desperate.
And "retry" what? That "all states are based on coercive violence" doesn't mean Nazi Germany and modern Sweden or Finland are essentially the same, and when someone pretends that's a good argument, that even needs rebuttal, anything I reply to that will get some further sophistry in response. Might as well say considering the heat death of the universe, the outcome of all actions is the same. Technically true, but realistically not worth my time.

> And somewhere in between those two is "don't be in the wrong place when we are rounding up people we don't like in a country we just invaded, else you might just spend 15 years in an island prison without charge, representation, or compensation."

What actually matters is that "coercive violence" ALSO applies to locking up rapists. So instead of avoiding that, tell me how there is an issue with that, as if all coercion was the same, no matter the reason or context or outcome. You can bring countless examples for violent coercion in bad faith with bad outcomes in Western democracies, but I still only need that one example to refute the idea that all coercion is the same, and equally bad. This is so trivial that it shouldn't even need mentioning, and that comment I replied to doesn't even pass the smell test.
> a philosophical tradition derives from Kropotkin rather than Marx.

Bakunin, another early anarchist, at a conference of the First Internationale in about 1870, said to Karl Marx something like "If you take the most convinced revolutionary, and give them absolute power, within a year they will be worse than the tsar himself." I think that has to qualify as one of the biggest "I told you so"s in history.
There are big European software companies, such as Avast, but they are mostly now owned by Americans.

There aren't big European social networks, but that might be caused by the fact that Europe is linguistically and culturally very fragmented. Which does not matter as much if your product is an antivirus, but it does matter when you build a product whose value is in the sheer mass of mutually communicating users. The Anglosphere is HUGE.
And this is why I would not marry someone with significantly higher income. Because that would mean, I do all housework and my job don't matter.

Unless explicitly arranged and agreed upon by both in advance, it is unfair to assume the partner should be doing it all and that you should be doing only stuff you enjoy.
Ask HN: Online History Courses?
Hello HN. This is a Sunday-heavy question. I love history and I usually learn it from sporadic books that I read. My knowledge end up being "spotty" (I can tell you everything about Cesar and Augustus but I know nothing about the Roman Republic).

There are some things that have proved to be easy (or possible) to learn online: Data Science, programming, etc.

Is there anybody doing the same for history courses? Anything to recommend?
Authoritarian tendencies existed well before the US came to power. The best defence against the US 'empire' is to avoid authoritarian tendencies.
But that isn't what the article is about.

Most (many) people have no (basic but proper) understanding of the scientific method and statistics.

When I hear "trusting since" it's most times not "trust the scientific method but be wary about interpretations of results yielded by it" but instead "fully non-questioning trust a specific interpretation of some scientific results" worse often a biased speculative interpretation based on some other speculations based on the scientific results.

As such "trusting science" because "it's science" is in many peoples vocabulary something I can't say is good. Especially if politicians use the terms.
Is cesium filter something that actually exists?
I don’t know that I agree, especially if you used the previous software in a way that caused real harm or loss.

Imagine you were a financial consulting firm and I sold you software that guaranteed that you could make 20% per year every year for your clients. But, oops, my software couldn’t do that initially and you lost millions of dollars, garnered a bad reputation, etc. Would it be okay if I eventually delivered an update that fulfilled that promise at a later date?
You think because the computer is in California that it only knows how to drive in California? Maybe you should learn the first thing about something before spreading FUD about it?
Or get this, we could walk and never get into a car crash!
What about LGPL which is quite explicitly designed for libraries?
This is another chapter in the battle of ethical mindsets that I see playing over and over again in America, consequentialism vs deontology. From everything I've heard of Tesla self driving is that per-mile it is more safe than human control (consequentialism argument for self driving). However, there have been a few high profile accidents recently with emergency vehicles (deontological argument against self driving). You ultimately need to pick an ethical mindset to judge the viability of Tesla self driving. I think we have seen a trend in American culture recently to more of deontological ethics especially in places like San Francisco. I'm personally more towards consequentialism and therefore are pro Tesla self driving, if per-mile it is statistically safer than a human driver.
This:

> [a] situation where you seek divorce because you’re no longer in “love”

is not:

[a] situation where you seek divorce because you’re no longer infatuated

One might well call the second situation absurd too, as, if you knew it was absurd then you shouldn't have wed, but it's still a different absurdity.
You can see the original commit history in forks of nanocolor that occurred before Andrey Sitnik rebased:

* https://github.com/antonk52/nanocolors/commits/main

* https://github.com/corysimmons/nanocolors/commits/main?after...

You can, indeed, see that they lack all of the original repo's commits.
What is the worst case scenario of Assange being a free man, exactly?
What is the role of cancer and birth defects in the animal population in these areas? Those are very significant issues for humans that make us very scared of radioactive contamination. Are animals impacted less (maybe due to shorter reproduction cycles or larger litters?)?
The Greater London area has pretty great bus service everywhere, and TfL (Transport for London) have been investing in bus routes radial bus routes that can be used to move around the suburbs, rather than just the traditional transport options that only focus on moving people into and out of the city centre.

Shopping malls exist, but it seems the majority of the towns the make up the Greater London area have managed to preserve big chunks of their town centres, and recently it feels like there’s been an effort to build out those town centres. The town centres usually have every you need from big to small shops, and open late (the U.K. is a little unusual for Europe in that most of our store, regardless of size, are open late, with a substantial number being 24/7).

Driving into and out of these town centres is painful. Taking the bus and walking is much easier. And because shops are open late, doing small shops after work is very easy and extremely common.

Equally driving “out of town” is incredibly painful. For me, reaching the edge of London is a one hour drive in mostly stationary traffic. Far easier to walk or bike to our nearest town centre, assuming the nearest corner shop doesn’t have what we need.
Ssshhhhhheeeeeeiiiiiittttttt
flag my assh*le you piece of crap
I remember that quote but it's not backed by reality. Plenty of mammals haven't reached a "natural equilibrium" and are destroying fauana/plantlife unchecked.

Some examples from present time--
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rabbits_in_Australia,
http://www.iucngisd.org/gisd/100_worst.php
You’re right about preprinted coding forms. I wrote a lot of code in Ryan-McFarland COBOL in the late 70’s, and used coding pads I bought at the college bookstore.

In some companies, coding forms were sent to keypunch operators. They took your input forms and punched them quickly and accurately onto 80 column punched cards for you.
You are changing premise. Just like the person I am responding to changed premise from "partner does all boring stuff" into "education level".

The original comment and rwsponse were neither about stay at home wife nor about educational differences.
Sometimes. The entire problem is that the infatuation stage just doesn't last that long, which of course makes one ask...why did you get married too soon?

The bigger problem as I've seen over the years with people is that they confuse the two with -other- people. A person married for 5 years becomes infatuated with someone else, which of course means they love them and not their spouse anymore. In their eyes, at least. And the problem with that thinking should be immediately apparent.

It's a complicated subject and I'm not an expert by any means, just sharing my observations.
My hypothesis is a lot simpler:

Hacking is much more profitable than preventing hacking.

Incentives are heavily biased towards security exploits on all levels.

End of story.

There's no reward for "your code never got hacked". There's a reward for delivering a feature in time and a penalty for not doing so.

You'll get a bonus or promotion for delivering features. If you take twice as long because you made your code really secure - no one will know.

I think that's really all there is to it. Security is obscure and complicated.
I find it pretty hilarious that “too much micro libraries” is a criticism, but then you recommend TypeScript - which runs on Node.is, the progenitor of “micro libraries” in the next sentence.

We’ll ignore every other bullet point containing fundamentally incorrect information also.
I appreciate your comment and your sibling, but I still don't think it is the same thing.
You don't need to make it so that homeowners are prevented from making the permitting process more difficult, you need to change the incentives so that homeowners do not gain from doing so. I can assure you, if you don't address the disease a new symptom will pop up.

The problem is that whenever you build a new park, a new store, provide jobs, you have a positive externality in your neighborhood that is not captured solely by yourself. When someone who owns a parking lot and does nothing to earn that value gets richer, he goes out and buys more parking lots. He's taking your positive externalities.

We've already figured out the fundamental solution. Henry George worked all of this out 100 years ago.

If property taxes were raised to 100% annually of the cost of the home, the price of the house would instantly drop to somewhere near the annual rent cost. "Buying" the house would end up being close to a security deposit. It goes without saying though, that 100% annually is not a good number. It would disincentivize building, which is something we really need right now.

The right number is a Land Value Tax such that the cost of the property equals the cost of the building. So if you have two properties, one in downtown SF, and one in the middle of Montana, and each are the exact same house, but the Montana house sells for $200k and the SF house sells for $1M, really it's the land in SF selling for $800k. So that SF market price should move to $200k. To do so we need to tax the property at increasing rates(per sqft of land) until they match. When we tax enough, the new price will reach its improvement value.

In the short term this will have devastating effects on the Net Worth of individuals who took out loans or otherwise bet their income on owning a home, so I advocate for a one time tax credit(that for exceptional cases like the elderly would be transferable for straight cash upon sale of the property) equivalent to the drop in market value of the home. So in the SF case, they would get a $800k tax credit.

Once this system is in place being a NIMBY will no longer be a profitable stance, and will instead cost that area money in taxes. As it will no longer be a perverse incentive, the population will mostly switch to becoming YIMBY's, and advocate for better Zoning rules and to ease up on silly restrictions. The tax money can be spent on high value improvements to the area that will boost everyone's quality of life, and if none are found, can be simply given back equally to all.

Once this system in place and the tax credits have been used up, we can even go further and get rid of income taxes, sales taxes, corporate taxes, and capital gains taxes. The value of the land tax will be enough to replace all of them(by removing them, the land values will rise, which means the land taxes will rise). All from a tax that because land is at a fixed supply, is completely non-distortionary and results in no dead weight loss.

Housing can either be an investment or affordable long-term, it can not be both.
It's because it's something that can be easily influential. At some point every sufficiently large CLI tool needs a terminal color library, and if you can make yours 1% better than anything else, then you can make a library that touches a lot of projects, which is great for your resume and improves your job prospects (at least that's what they hope).
The recent/many old "Submarine cable map rendered onto a globe" is a good example of this.

If there existed a good digital globe you could have in your house I'd have it as one of the skins, because it looks cool, but it is useless for learning about the true topography.

Or a more obvious example the stupid sliding photos the media use. Before and after a storm or whatever. Actually hiding the data from you to get your dopamine up from making you slide to try and see it. Which if you view the media as just entertainment is ok.
This. Part of the thing that makes for a good marriage mindset is just being willing/able to find/recognize the humanity in another.
Right. The article starts out disingenuous at best. Just be honest: “middle class” people are mostly not using this stuff.

It makes me hope it passes is what it does.
sad that you had to create an anon account to make this comment, as this sentiment gets downvoted here without fail.
And if a cheater makes it non obvious by being a bit worse sometimes, and has become indistinguishable from a regular or just really good player, then... Mission Accomplished? At that point, it's no worse for the other players than playing with someone who is organically good, unless the sanctity of some matchmaking algorithm is more important to them than the gameplay.

Which is fine too, but the solutions for that problem may ultimately need to extend our be situated beyond the game software itself.
> allowing the rest of the planet to recover and thrive.

Are humans extra-terrestrial? How is humans thriving not part of the 'planet thriving'?
> Illustrated

Curiously, Category Theory appears to be the most “illustrated” mathematical theory by its very nature (because of the wide use of diagrams in any text on it) and, at the same time, the most misunderstood one (or, often, not understood at all) - because its conceptual content and the patterns it considers are so deep that no amount of illustration could convey that depth, to the point that even drawing diagrams, however complex, is a skill comparable to being able to write numbers on a piece of paper - which is just as far from what we think what the understanding of the subject is.
I think if I’m interpreting your comment correctly you are correct. Physical attraction is what you mean instead of romance. Romance by itself is simply a series of steps you use to express your continuing interest in a partner or possible partner. Small gifts, kind words, charming activities. Those are romance, and I think are critical to Maintaining a solid relationship (all couples may find different things romantic—-some people may want sunset sails on the harbor, some people might want kebabs from round the corner).
As an outsider, it's really hard to discern what I might choose to learn amongst graphics tech. I've tried to invest my learning in subjects and technologies that aren't going anywhere and where my knowledge will pay off over decades — computer science fundamentals, math, SQL, C, vanilla JavaScript, HTML, CSS, LaTeX, Git, Python, etc. It looks like everybody's still fighting it out in graphics though.
Have you ever heard of an alert, sober driver just driving into a wall for no reason? surely 99% of the time thy were drunk, or texting, or falling asleep at the wheel.

I am not using FSD untill it's better than an average professional driver, like a bus driver, who have to be sober, etc. If something goes wrong there is not enough time to intervene.
That's a No True Scotsman when EV enthusiasts don't count as auto enthusiasts.

Think of hypothetical scenario where EVs were the norm first. I don't think EV people would consider switching to ICE as increasing fun: much more complex, louder, hotter engine with worse torque that needs extra hardware and operations to avoid slowing you down.

The noise and gear shifting is only associated with power/speed/fun because that's how cars used to work.
The federal constitutional court in Germany forbid the use of electronic or online voting machines in 2009 anticipating exactly this kind of misuse.
Well I do think it's very possible if not certain that they have unusually advanced systems that have been kept secret, but I would expect them to be in the areas they actually have data for.

As in security cameras, finances, cell tower data, etc. Facial and gait recognition, location tracking, etc. far beyond anything commercially available. But I'd doubt they have an AGI behind closed doors :P
How did we possibly survive as a species with corners like that.
You mean like getting into a university? It might be a lottery at some level, but you definitely increase your odds by cheating the system (good grades, good SAT/ACT scores, etc...)
I’m confused by this comment. Humans were nomadic for thousands of years, you could even say we’re predisposed to it.

Why shouldn’t one feel comfortable in a permanently “rootless” existence?
Almost as if slavery is still very much a thing.

Said poor countries are exactly where the do called west wants them to be. Do the Swiss grow coco? No, they buy it for peanuts, add some milk and sugar, then sell the final product for at least a modest profit.

I wish it was easy to support the people doing the actual work but how? Supporting native brands? Sure but how I know who controls the company and if they are any better than the exploiter I am trying to avoid?
You could just start redesigning your cities and improving your public transport. America is not unique in it obsession with cars, the Neatherlands used to be the same. Their city centres were mostly parking, and driving a ginormous highway through the centre of a city was once considered good public policy.

For the past 30-40 years, the Dutch have managed to completely transform their urban landscapes into something far more people friendly. Additionally American cities used to be dominated by pedestrians and bike, the car centric city is a relatively new phenomenon. So it quite possible for the US to reverse the damage done by cars, and plenty of case studies to base the work on.
This reply is non-sensical and unrelated.

A widely held stock means that many people fundamentally believe in a company and its leadership, and are voting with their wallets.

#2 most widely held on Robinhood, #1 most traded on Fidelity this last Friday.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nasdaq.com/articles/the-top...

https://eresearch.fidelity.com/eresearch/gotoBL/fidelityTopO...