skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
As people already mentioned here, try running a free-for-all moderation-free discussion board and see what happens.

Back in the day, the Internet was full of HTML discussion boards just like this one, and idiots were banned with no questions asked. It was beautiful, and no one complained.

This site has moderation, no one is complaining. YouTube is a "person" - legally now, but somehow they don't have the responsibility to be a good citizen?

The fact that allegedly smart people on HN use the term "censorship" in the context of non-government control is pretty shocking. You don't know censorship.

"Censorship" has absolutely nothing to do with it. A private company can allow/disallow whatever content they f---ing please, and the Wild West capitalists on this board should be the first ones to support this move. Who is going to force them? The government? Oh, hello.
> I doubt many elites were surprise considering the 1929 crash happened because the elites decided to start ww2 - japanese invasion of manchuria in 1931.

First, how in the world did the Japanese invasion of Manchuria show that the elites weren't caught by surprise by 1929? I mean, you've listed two events, and one came after the other, but that in no way demonstrates that the elites had advance knowledge of 1929. You're going to have to demonstrate a link there, not just list events.

Second, the amount of influence that western elites had over Japanese foreign policy in 1931 was very close to zero. The amount of control that Japanese elites had over the western financial system was also very close to zero. So you're talking about disjoint sets of elites, which means that your "proof" is lacking in another way.

> Once again, I'm talking about elites. Not bernie madoff.

Yeah, sure. "It's not who you're thinking of, it's someone else." Some never-specified someone else, so that the claim can never be disproven. I notice that you don't name any of these "elites", just "not Bernie Madoff".

You're sounding more and more like a conspiracy-theory nut case. If you've got an actual case, you need to do a better job presenting it.
When investing in something like the FAANG index or Google you're not betting on how the companies will do. Predictions like "Google is going to do well in the future and continue to grow" are not useful for making investments.

You're making a bet that Google will do better than everyone else thinks it will. And even more than that. You're betting that it will do so by a wider margin and/or with a higher likelihood than the available alternative investments you could make with that same money.

And even more than that, you're betting that Google will do better than everyone thinks it will and that the market will
acknowledge this the way that you expect and the price will adjust accordingly in a time frame that is relevant for your investment goals and solvency.
There was a lot of pivoting going on near the end, unfortunately. The "companies pay" version of the site wasn't around for very long.
Julia Computing is hiring.

https://juliacomputing.com/careers/

Relational AI is hiring.

https://www.relational.ai/careers

Beacon Biosignals is hiring.

https://beacon.bio/careers

Invenia is hiring.

https://www.invenia.ca/

and I can keep going. There's to cause pleasant competition, so it's a good pool for people to enter (and a good pool for me to find more people for haha).

In julialang.org/slack there's a #jobs channel that gets a lot of posts. https://discourse.julialang.org/c/community/jobs tends to get some (but surprisingly not most) of the posts, and it's more about academic positions (though #academia in the slack tends to be better). And the #julialang Twitter tends to post some jobs around.
Thank you. In my view you did everything appropriate, including seeking out advice from people with training and experience who could help you decide.
Posted in another reply.
For "2", the answer is "it's complicated".

Properly disposed of, minimal plastic packaging can prevent damage and therefore waste, resulting in a smaller environmental footprint than alternatives, including no packaging and reusable materials.

The problem is that packaging is not always disposed of properly, and is not always minimal or justified by reasons other than marketing.

Also, not all plastics are the same, some are more environmentally friendly than others and you may need more or less of it.
For me modern art is about my reaction to the piece, and the insight and illumination into myself that that gives. So looking at a piece is in a way looking at myself.

Modern art can also be a way of communicating feelings and ideas that language cannot express very well.
> What I do see people doing when they lack control is to attempt to gain control.

One way in which people gain (the feeling of) control is to imagine the world differently (superstition, conspiracy, religion) in a way that makes them virtuous or special and others not (i.e. essentially Nietzsche's idea of ressentiment). If you haven't the power to take part in a real struggle, this is not so surprising to me.
Because "politics" has been redefined into the intense prescriptive study of politeness and protocols into which people can be plugged like a USB device.

Legality has changed around pot, so new politics have to be given to people to create a new consensus.
Hello Elixir!
Hello Clojure!

:)
Post Modern art is terrible. At least with early modern art (think Vienna Secession or other movements ~100 years ago), most of the artists had classical training and moved into modern art. Now they are just all terrible. The devaluation of aesthetics in favor of meaning make it unapproachable to those with no context on the subject, and unappealing to even those with context.

Contemporary artists with any skill now work in classical styles, illustrations, or graphic design.

EDIT: I should clarify by Post Modern I mean a specific genre of art focused on deconstruction. Not all contemporary art is Post Modern, and there are many genres alive today that are not Post Modern.
The Raspberry Pi is a device I always see many capabilities for that are better served by other hardware devices that people usually already own, or there is a cheaper device that can do what it does, as well as many that does it much better for the same price. I don't get the useage of the Pi anymore since its no longer fanless, it is trying to be a desktop replacement with outdated hardware, and doesn't have anything specialized for it that is exceptional, in fact it is a jack of all trades, master at none while many more have better raw specs and have much stronger performance. I don't know the audience for the Pi4 anymore, except maybe people who had a Pi3 and just wanted to port their config easily and switch the hardware they had into it.

In regards to the suggestions for the better hardware, would you use an old laptop or desktop with a network card for the same purpose? It could act as a server as well, no need to get this hardware if you are going to just use it on a server you need anyway, unless you are using the hardware as a server.

Edit: I am posting too fast, but to the person under me, there are much stronger SBCs that are the same size, and with the fan requirements on the Pi4, it isn't as small as it was, nor is is power efficient as other SBCs that would be much better. If using a server at home, having a router with custom FW would save much more space (the pi hole project could be easily served with a hosts blocker and custom firmware), having a blade server with virtualiziation would save even more space in terms of computation if you are comfortable with virtualized compututing, an old laptop isn't going to make a significant size difference, but if it does the Pi 4 still isn't the best hardware for the job.
The word “single parameter” is doing a lot of work in this statement.
On the first point, one idea would be to implement the simple bracket pairs language as a TS grammar, stand-alone and independent of any other syntax highlighting. The C# problem of making the syntax invalid and killing the brace highlights disappears.

The linear scanning behaviour you describe is due to the change in the left and right parse context for all of those pairs. Yes, it’s linear when you invalidate a subtree, but in the case of a simple bracket pairs language, the damage is limited to scanning through the children of top level brace pairs, and each child subtree is trivial to check.

From the IGLR paper:

> In a state-matching implementation, each node representing a nonterminal symbol contains a record of the configuration of the pushdown automaton (the ‘parse state’) when the node was shifted onto the stack. A subtree can be reused when both its left and right context are unchanged …

Imagine { is prepended to abc(def, {ghi}). I believe the “abc” needs re-parsing, and so does the () subtree as their left parse state is now the “looking for }” state instead of “looking for ({[“ and “looking for )” respectively. But it’s limited to one level deeper — after you split the () subtree, every subtree inside it is still in the “looking for )” configuration on both sides. Specifically, the “def”, “,” and “{ghi}” are fully reused. There are only three possible parse states, so generally you get a lot of subtree reuse. You get even better subtree skipping performance by making long sequences without an brace into a single node, instead of eg tokenising by word and not grouping them. (In this case, “def, “ instead of splitting that.)

So realistically for your C# example, only the namespace node is split, and the linear scan is through all the top level brace pairs within the namespace but no deeper. You’ve described IGLR’s best case scenario for incremental parsing an initial brace insertion. Languages that don’t have namespaces would be worse off (but still not too bad). For more realistic languages than {}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}.js I think this approach would work very well.

If I liked brace pairs (I don’t) then I would implement this dead simple new grammar and turn it into a Neovim plugin. The existing nvim-ts-rainbow plugin uses queries on existing languages, so is very good at giving perfect/correct pairs and customising per-language, but exhibits the invalid syntax problem and also performance issues which appear to be resolved for most people, but may be back with bigger documents. (Edit — you would need a few variants to account for comments and strings. That makes it a bit more annoying.)
Modern art is a great example of how semantics don't change reality. You can call modern art art, but the average person will never put something like the pieces you described in the same category as something like a Michelangelo painting.
TI Logo II for TI-99/4A was the same, and even incorporated a bitmap editor for character and sprite definition. You needed the PEB and disk drive, though, which was an expensive proposition for 99/4A owners.
Here's a simple chart of relative risk by age group: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/covid-data/investi...

There are roughly 53,300,000 people aged 18-29 and ~3400 deaths (https://www.statista.com/statistics/1191568/reported-deaths-...), which works out to 1 in 16,000. Of course, you say, that's assuming all 18-29 year-olds have had COVID, which is wrong. There's only been 7,400,000 cases among that age group (https://www.statista.com/statistics/1254271/us-total-number-...), giving a 1 in 2200 risk.
Good reminder to never pay upfront for work (or art in this case).
Improving Generalization in Reinforcement Learning Using Policy Similarity
I thought so too for a while, but after using concurrent mode a bunch I came to agree that the usecases it’s built to support (rendering fallback UIs while async processes occur) actually do belong as first class citizens in the framework. It’s the kind of this you implement yourself over and over again. And often the async processes you’re waiting for are React components themselves to load and parse. I’ve come to like the implementation too. I’m glad to see it mature and I like how they’ve taken their time with it.
With Easy Anti-Cheat and BattlEye having recently announced they're supporting Proton/Wine, there will be very few games that won't be able to be run on Linux in the near future.
Yeah, the whole thing about Web Components is weird. And is getting increasingly weirder.

Quite recently Constructible Stylesheets were released in Chrome:

- because lit wanted them

- despite Firefox and Safari being against the state of the spec

- despite Safari clearly stating they are not going to implement the spec, ever (there was a trivially reproducible race condition in the spec)

The entire discussion here: https://github.com/WICG/construct-stylesheets/issues/45#issu...
Excluding an integral part of the costs to say they are profitable is like saying you are cash flow positive, after including external funding. There is a reason why companies are running their books the way they are. Very good and valid ones!
So Ready Player One basically? :)
Sure, but I'm saying compare it to something like Oracle (what other commercial software is still out there? I don't know). What does a company pay annually for Oracle (expressed per engineer for comparison)?
Micron-scale devices from multiple materials on a single chip via transfer-print
It also includes the ability to sponsor through Liberapay, the remaining Gratipay fork.
This makes it sound like the scientific method is somehow soft or relative. It isn't. Short circuiting the scientific method was pseudoscience then, it's pseudoscience now.
Regarding the management interface being exposed on every interface: I think this might be true for the TP-LINK device I linked in my article.

However, in this particular setup/context, I think the risk of this is minimal, as the actual interface should be using a private-IP address on your home network.
According to the tweet, the "benchmark" used was "Stripe's production API traffic". Certainly will have its biases but not a microbenchmark.

Regardless, I hope to hear of some kind of apples-to-apples comparison as the respective projects progress!
It's interesting to see people labeled as "anti-vaxxers" or "vaccine hesitant" or "unvaccinated".

If I was not looking to purchase a medication because I had no ailment, and then a medical professional came up and showed me the following chart and told me "Vaccines have cured most of the calamitous diseases of yesteryear, and here is a new one that you should take.", I would not then decide to get a vaccine. Would you? Look at the chart.

https://learntherisk.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/diseases...

No need to argue with me; why bother. I didn't create the data used to make the chart. When that feeling starts to come back look at the chart once again. The data doesn't change. Your feelings might change, but facts will stay the same each time you load the chart. Try it out.

Labeling people, because they haven't made a choice to do something that you think they should do, is a strange phenomenon.
> It compared a portfolio of putting equal money into each security, vs a bunch of fancier approaches

They compared equal weighting, but did they also check market-cap weighting?
Mum's the word mate, haha.
Do you know if they tried the other rendering modes (shaders?) included in the game? From memory there were at least five and some of them looked more suitable for livestreaming.
Every con artist ever. Pun intended.
That works well... until you have stateful components and you want to send in new props. At that point the recommended approach is to replace the entire component by using the key property.

For simple components, especially stateless ones, React works well. When the component needs to manage user interactions it needs state, and then if you need to update props you have to make a new instance of the component, and that point React has failed in its promise.
Government poised to approve 16 mini nuclear reactors to hit net zero
> The devaluation of aesthetics in favor of meaning make it unapproachable to those with no context on the subject, and unappealing to even those with context.

This is an incredibly concise and effective summary of the situation. I agree completely. I think aesthetics have really been devalued in the modern world. Even comparing distant lands like Ancient Rome or Ancient China, there are still commonalities in their approach to aesthetics compared to modern culture.
IDK... There's a strong strain of "cat-pictureiness" to the internet... always has been. Most of us indulge in it, in one sense or another. If people are christian, and they're in vapid cat picture mode... these sites might grab their attention.

Social media is a niche finding, attention grabbing device. There's no mystery in how these got so many people's attention.

The question is what is being done with their attention. Most likely it's just selling them stuff. Most likely. A more unlikely, but also more worrying scenario is that some scheiter has suddenly become a messiah with 100m followers because FB algorithms accidentally did it.

I mean, people will do these sorts of things. But, if Zuck does it accidentally for cheese... I will be mad with him. ISIS was bad enough.
Which investor actually made money from WeWork? If anything it's an example proving the opposite. The founder may have made some money but the investors were left holding the bags. The whole scandal was centered around the size of the investment loss that the main investor, Softbank, had to eat...
For retail traders, isn't it overwhelmingly likely that you're just going to trade with the inventory of a market-neutral internalizer?
I recommend QP if you are going to do FPGA processing using a softcore or hardcore processor. It's an event-based state machine framework that handles IO really well. A hardcore processor would be more performant and take less LUTs but softcore will give you more flexibility as far as sourcing FPGAs.
Teaching Machines: A History
While I don't know anything about art to disagree with you, I'd imagine people say the same thing no matter if it's 100, 500, or 2000 years ago.

I suspect the situation is the same with old appliances- only the Good Stuff survives the test of time.
In my experience it's close to impossible to register something like an F150 in California without using a commercial registration. A quick google suggests this experience is widespread. I don't think I have ever seen a F150/250 or Silverado without one in California, ever - easy to spot because the number plates are a different format.

There's always been fun debates among car enthusiasts about what you register a Subaru Baja (a strange half-car, half-truck thing) as in California too...
The website states "10x more screens ... 10x more focus ... 10x more productivity"

That's a stretch! Or where to improve your pitch. Personally the only 10x productivity I get is by disconnecting from wifi.

I'd love to see the windows non-square, more like a POV or fisheye if that's possible. Cool product, I hope to use it soon.
Frankly, this sounds like gate keeping, not a fan.

I think that even people who do have some interest in running their own firewall, may not be familiar with VLANs.
How about banning any videos that present literal Bible content, for example.
Harmonically and formally not as adventurous as the scherzo of Symphony #1.
"Ask not what your AI system can do for you, but instead what it has tricked you into doing for it."

In the original conception of AI, it was seen as something that could assist and amplify human abilities. What we've ended up with is a situation where humans are subservient to AI.
Decentralized and or federated
social and value sharing systems.
They paid him to direct an ad and he directed an ad. You are falling for the marketing my friend.
> Can you provide examples of the lies you're referring to?

The mask one not being useful is a lie where Fauci was trying to reserve masks for medical staff.

Why not lying again about the current vaccine effectiveness/side effects balance to reserve promising treatments to a certain category of the population?
Advantages and Disadvantages of Bootstrapping
You’ve just replaced the word “empower” with “exploit”.

Do you have some technical definition for the word “exploit”?
I wrote https://github.com/junkblocker/patchreview-vim for exactly that workflow.
It's "lame" if it makes you feel like garbage at work. Responsibility is annoying when you're stoned, and it doesn't get less annoying if the pot cures your epilepsy.
That’s really interesting - one of the nice things about the esp32 is the built in WiFi so integrating with these APIs would be pretty easy.
Right, it's not a conspiracy. When there are multiple participants in a forum, and one participant has already raised a point that you agree with, saying "I agree with so-and-so's point about..." is the normal way to do things.

What would be a conspiracy - and a genuine problem - is if Mozilla were repeating Google's line because they were there to advocate for Google's beliefs instead of what they thought was best, i.e,. the group was stacked in Google's favor. But the evidence we have doesn't permit us to conclude that this is happening or even likely.

As a simple example, Mozilla and Google tend to reach the same conclusions about whether a new CA should be trusted or an old CA should be distrusted. But this isn't because one is telling the other what to do; it's because they have similar standards and expectations of CAs.

(It would also be weird, and perhaps a conspiracy and a problem, if Google were not a participant in the W3C and Mozilla felt that its role was to represent Google's thoughts instead of its own. But that's not what's happening here, either.)
> to say the words “that makes sense, let’s try it.”
the lesson here should be that we're not really much different from our ancestors of 5-50k years ago and because of that, concentrations of power (and by extension, influence) are inherently dangerous. leaders with too much power will inevitably make mistakes, and keeping institutions limited and focused means the harms from those mistakes are limited in scope.

in government, that means extending federalism: smaller governing bodies loosely federated (primarily for mutual protection and interrelational fairness). in business, it means truly competitive (and fair) markets with diverse participants, not oligarcal ones (like these platforms).
Hey wuyishan, right now it isn’t able to retrieve the full text of content that’s behind login walls, but we are looking at ways to allow it to handle those sites as well
In the history of vaccines, virtually all side effects show up in the first few months. It isn’t too early to know they are safe.