skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Do you have a source that constructs a story around existing knowns that does show AP to be unsafe, then? Because again, the deaths and accident counts simply aren't there. There's not enough of them to be "unsafe", no matter how you do the accounting.

That is, take the numbers we have and show that if you select out the right data set from public numbers about other kinds of driving, that the Tesla AP values are actually more dangerous. This surely isn't easy but it's absolutely doable (and, let's be clear, such an analysis would be worth a lot of money to Tesla's competitors -- there's a built-in incentive to do this). But no one has numbers like that anywhere I've seen. Likely because, as seems like the obvious hypothesis, there aren't enough events to make a story for a safety problem via any analysis.

So you are arguing about methodology and not results. That's pretty much the definition of "nitpicking". And it will never end. You'll insist that Tesla AP is somehow hiding phantom deaths for years, because it's your prior. But it's not supported, it's just not.
I think the point is more of a bikeshedding problem: people are more willing to accept “AI” because they are not knowledgeable enough to come up with a counter-example, whereas given a simple automation like “don’t go above the speed limit” any joe on the street can think of why that’s a problem.

But AI is not magic, its just more rules.
The corresponding number in the US for 2021 is 26.7%. The highest ever..
> Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts. When someone says ‘science teaches such and such’, he is using the word incorrectly. Science doesn’t teach it; experience teaches it

-- Richard Feynman

Feynman is an expert on science; so if you believe you should trust experts, you should trust him, and hence, distrust experts. It's a self-contradictory position to take.
I never said anything related to that.

But governments and organized crime have a lot in common.
I'm pretty frustrated that Tesla has taken fantastic innovation in bringing electric cars to market and marred it with these stupid fixations on both self-driving tech and things like ridiculous steering wheels.

Go ahead and add more tech to avoid collisions and improve safety. But quit it already with these features that seem like the manifestation of Elon Musk's personal hangups.
I also feel it is a problem, but perhaps for different reasons. As an illustration, my first thought regarding this particular CA law is that some people will prefer gas vehicles and that is okay by me. Freedom matters - it isn’t just an empty slogan but something that really changes people’s perception of their life, their role as an actor with control, and their ability to undertake the activities they seek without fear of an intangible authority. To me, approaches that favor local choice are better - like pricing in the externalities (for both gas and electric vehicles) and letting people buy what they want. But as we create a larger and larger body of laws that move control into higher and higher levels of government, that sense of freedom gets eroded. It starts to feel like too many facets of our lives are subject to the whims of the government, which is to say, other people. It starts to force everyone to invest heavily in battling politically rather than saving that time for living their lives, because if they don’t, they will be subject to that loss of freedom based on the whims of those who are overly politically involved. A sufficiently complex legal system, like in west coast states, is also difficult to interpret and difficult to enforce fairly. You end up with the potential for abuse in the form of regulatory capture or selective enforcement or whatever else. The original vision for American government was a limited body that protected a small set of higher level principles (as you said), with everything else left to lower levels of government. There’s a lot of wisdom in that and I feel there’s a way to retain something closer to that instead of where we are today.
The bigger Wikipedia gets, the less contribution is required, since the “static” content gets more and more covered.
Wow that's cool. I'll definitely be checking it out. Ironically though, it illustrates one of my points: the documentation link is already broken (although it also exists in the download). It says it runs on a POSIX environment and uses cc so it still has more dependencies, but definitely worth digging into and a step in the right direction. Thanks.
Ridiculous. The aspect of being genetically modified or not has by itself no influence on parameters of taste. At the local supermarket, you will be hard pressed to find "lab grown GMOs" in any produce section - most of it is grown in southern Sweden using traditional high yield crops (that may taste like nothing for reasons of production).

The Swedish Food Agency[1] states that there are very few genetically modified products on the market at all.

1. https://www.livsmedelsverket.se/livsmedel-och-innehall/genmo...
Driven mainly by gas costs.
Wouldn't it indicate that we are even more sexist now, if the most important thing about the politician's is their sex?
I 100% agree with everything you're saying.

However, let's not forget that 50/80 years were dominated by a two-headed fight for world hegemony under the threat of nuclear war and potential apocalypse.

In this fight, while the US was far more evil than anyone cared to admit at the time, and the USSR far less than the US propaganda would have you believe, RELATIVELY speaking one side did offer more freedom, liberty, and prosperity than the other. And the primary counterargument from the Communists was https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism

This remains true today with China. CPC apologists are all too happy to point out (factually correct) gaps in US integrity and freedom. But in the grand scheme of things, relatively speaking, for all it's flaws, "The West" still has due process, doesn't ban religious expression, and doesn't put millions of citizens into force re-education camps.

The most recent Chinese return of the 2 incarcerated Canadians in return for the Huawei executive is the most blatant current example that China will do absolutely whatever it wants.

Whereas even in this news story - where you have government agents freely discussing assassinating Assange - there are others working against them, Lawyers using legal guidelines to flummox the plan, and ultimately it doesn't go forward.

For all of the US's evils, Russia and China would not have hesitated to kidnap or execute Assange in identical circumstances if he was hiding in an Ecuadorian embassy on their soil. He would have been disappeared a decade ago.
Nano Colors is mentioning Colorette in docs, COPYRIGHT and keep git history.

If Nano Colors are following all Colorette’s author asks, why he didn’t do it in return?
But Java 8 -> 16 doesn’t work without changes.
As an aside, some classic video game artists relied upon NTSC phase shifting to create artifacts that were themselves part of the art. A good example of this is the double high-resolution graphics (DHGR) mode on the Apple II, where this method was employed by a number of different games, and hence can be a challenge to emulate properly.
By higher level, I mean big picture. Not necessarily introductory, but ones that don't employ logical concepts such as "proof", "formal" etc, because you cannot define a field of study using concepts from that field. This example is good, but not sure what are you trying to say by posting it (I didn't say that noone ever wrote anything on what logic is.)
What about when it’s dark?
> So what about when you can only see half of the car? Like when it’s changing lanes or pulling out of a parking spot? You know, like those times when a signal is MOST useful?

I don't understand how this is different with any other indicators.
I always found it hard to understand what are the ultimate generic principles that drive people with the attitude that you demonstrate (which is even more surprising given that so many people around me also do that).

Why should the percentage of women in parliament be related in any way to their percentage in the population? Why don't we apply the same reasoning to all the other properties which can be used to divide people into groups (e.g. right- vs. left-handed people, gamers vs. book readers, engineers vs. lawyers, meat-eaters vs. vegans). When there's literally an infinity of possibilities, what makes women vs. men so special?

Why does your notion of representation require sharing traits with the elected person? If I took part in the elections (and I believe they were honest and not rigged in any way) then the person who wins represents me in the sense that this person is now legally authorized to make the decisions (limited by the laws) on my behalf.

As some others noted here, since women voted on elections before, how can one claim the elected people did not represent them?

You seem to be having a different idea of representation. What is it and why should it matter? This is an honest question, not trolling or anything.
Very surprising how many anti-green comments there are here. What do solutions for a cleaner, greener world look like, if not ones that include steps like these?
I mean ya that would match a query string, but it wouldn't parse it?
No, I am asking you why you keep claiming again and again that Apple wants this data. You have this clear evidence that they tried to make it harder to for themselves to get this data.

Why would they do that, if they want the data? Are they just complete morons?
I think, Tesla claims that the brakes will last lifetime for the vehicle, as the regenerative braking is very aggressive and regular brakes should not be used that much.
If you see the other player die, you can make literally any legal move and win.
What is it that decides what those laws are?

Can it be changed, globally or within a confined space?

Are „those laws“ the physical constants?
It's extremely distracting while driving, and if more cars adopt that, then everyone will be worse off. I wish they were illegal (and I wonder if they technically are, because flashing means that for a brief second the light is off while the pedal is being pressed, and I have to imagine the law is written that the brake light must be lit when the brake pedal is pressed).
i wonder about the commercial feasibility of restricting auto pilot to specified zones, maybe even specified expressways similar to turnpikes. would this allow self driving technology the room to develop with a socially acceptable level of risk or would it condemn it to go the way of the concord?
There are many great ones listed here, but I wouldn't give any single book more credit than how they combine in practice, as the question sort of implies.

The best lessons I've learned is how to balance all these good ideas for each problem, idea, implementation. How do do OO without lots of racy mutable state, using immutability efficiently, composing pure functions, identifying what to abstract explicitly vs allowing something to permeate, intention and priority when separating factors/aspects, good naming patterns and when to use which. I don't know of a book that tells you how to find balance.
I was just telling someone[1] that I explored Forth for this exact purpose a few years ago, but ended up with a more imperative, statement-oriented approach: https://github.com/akkartik/mu

[1] https://merveilles.town/@akkartik/106978783913724906
Changed from https://woodenfossils.wordpress.com/. Thanks!
Most people are probably working at the Unity or Unreal or Godot level anyway. Interaction with graphics APIs is pretty niche these days.
You just keep digging here, and it's all wrong. I don't know how else to reply but with facts:

> AP literally disengages when off the happy path, it's other safety features that help when things go wrong.

AP never disengages autonomously, ever. You turn it off via driver action, either via steering input that countermands it or via the stalk control. (Same deal for TACC -- it's on until you hit the brakes to kill it).

Really, go rent a Tesla for a few days and experiment. I think you'd find it enlightening.
Also speaking personally, I know more divorced couples than married couples, and have seen a married partner (who has a child) cheat on their spouse for going on a decade “because it’s the path of least resistance.” Also saw someone during a divorce light $100k on fire (from combined assets) in lawyer fees just to spite the other person (who had exhausted all options in attempting to repair the relationship before asking for the divorce).

Everyone is winging it, and the only beauty is in finding happiness while causing the least harm to others (imho). Do the best you can with the information you have, maybe it works out, maybe it doesn’t.
Are there no regulatory agencies that review new car designs? Like if a car is to be imported into country X, besides meeting all established regulations (emissions, safety, etc), there isn't anybody who gives it even a once over?
This will undoubtedly cause an accident at some point.
It'd be interesting to know how a design like this made it from whoever's idea all the way to production.
For the engineer to ask the employer or the other way around?
Rwanda elects 30% of its parliament on a separate women-only list.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elections_in_Rwanda
That’s not the aspect of the deduplication process that I was referring to.

Btrfs only supports offline deduplication, where you periodically run a process that searches for duplicate blocks and combines them.

Meanwhile ZFS supports online deduplication, where every block written is checked against an index to see if it is a duplicate of some existing block.

That index is what takes up the memory that jcalvinowens complained about. When deduplication is turned on, ZFS keeps that whole index in memory all of the time. Meanwhile btrfs only needs that index to be loaded while the deduplicator is running, so it doesn’t show up most of the time.

Personally I don’t think that either is really worth the cost; the benefit is so small that the cost isn’t worth paying.
Intel Graphics Card Rumors Point to Three GPUs, Top Die Close to RTX 3070 Ti
Here's a question that I sometimes ask an engineering candidate:

You have a list of 100 numbers with values in the sequence 1 to 100. Each number of the sequence appears once except that one value is missing and one value is repeated. Determine which value is missing and which one is repeated.

Notice that I didn't say anything about writing code.
If asked,I will answer no questions like "are they in order?" and so forth.
This is unsurprising in that Scrum does not scale up to large technology industry environments, and team expertise ofen outstrips the roles defined in Scrum. SAFe, on the other hand, looks like a bureaucratic mess to tech companies. The article suggests SAFe is used in non-tech companies.

As for "No formal methodology" that is probably a good thing for companies that institutionally understand software development. It may also be another way of saying "Agile, but without the Scrum dogma and jargon."

The article's emphasis on product management is also spot-on: "Product owner" is a debased and unempowered job title. Product manager is the job where product direction is set and communicated.
You want a source on the absence of evidence? I don't have that. No one has reported an accident to a FSD beta car anywhere I am aware of. The source is me.
Domain driven design made functional. It takes the weird world of functional programming and shows how it can be applied to building run of the mill business apps. Instead of being an app that only functional programmers can understand these apps, at least some of the domain modeling can be understood by stakeholders.
There are a few things here https://www.infoq.com/news/2020/01/ibm-stop-work-swift-serve.... From what I remember when it was announced, the small ecosystem was mentioned, but not the performance.
Except the world does not operate in only black and white - not everybody goes to vote, not everybody becomes a politician, not everybody has the same political views etc. This can be seen in gender equality/feminist "success" countries where when people are more or less free to choose, the distribution is not 50/50 and some groups of people simply don't want to agree to the fact that men and women can be different and want different things in life.
Totally agree, open source is about sharing code, designs, solutions to problems, etc. not running, maintaining, and and promoting a project.
> Have you ever driven in a snowstorm at night? (I am not being facetious, there are terrible snowstorms in the winter where I live due to lake-effect snow. Your mileage may vary depending on where you live.)

Yes, once or twice. The general recommendation is NOT to drive during a snow storm. For those that must drive during a snow storm probably aren't driving these Minis.

After all, most cars are not designed for every possible climate/severe weather scenario, I don't see why Minis should be held to a higher regard.
You don't need to click any ads silly goose.
Double high-res mode is also quite complicated to program, so it should be complex to emulate, right? Only fair.

But really I have the highest respect for people who can manipulate Apple ][ graphics well, it's definitely an art of its own.
Well, one of them at least. Getting another match is kind of tricky with that strategy.
How do you have autonomous robotaxies if the "full" in "full self driving" isn't "full" in the sense that every native english speaker assumes?
With other indicators, if you lack context your brain is aware that you don’t have enough info to deduce what’s happening. With the MINI, they are providing additional (incorrect) context to reassure you of the (wrong) result.
Are you assuming that women can’t participate in patriarchy? Or that people never vote against their own interest?

Neither of which is true. The implicit and explicit biases are common to both/all genders.
Technically yes, but it is likely not a lawful defense to murder.
free/libre != Do what you want

Copying and redistributing software without a license IS the definition of software piracy.

The current version appears to be MIT licensed. It is safe to assume that the fork was made under the same license. Given this assumption, and given that the MIT license requires copyright information to be preserved, stripping attribution is a license violation.

The claim of piracy is valid.
I’m not sure we can separate the two so cleanly, equality of opportunity comes along with all of a child’s inputs and external forces as they’re growing. Equality of opportunity would absolutely mean not funneling them in one direction or another based on something like their sex, gender, or whatever.

A 50/50 outcome might be a flawed measurement of something like equality of opportunity if it were the only measurement we were using, but I don’t think it is the only thing we see.

When we consider the not too distant past, this ratio indicates we are probably doing something correctly to mitigate those external forces that used to funnel people into (or away from) certain professions purely because of something like which sex they were born.

We don’t yet have an agreed upon and accurate way to measure whether or not we are indeed offering equality of opportunity, and until we do, seeing something like this at least indicates we’re much closer than we were 20, 30, or 100 years ago.
I think the general program of categorical logic, the work of Lambek and Scott, and J. Bell on topos theory and local set theory really make clear the relationship between category theory and logic, as well as lambda calculus.

A topos is essentially a cartesian closed category with a subject classifier. In Set this is the two element set of 1/0 which is a Boolean algebra and thus the internal logic of the category Set is classical.

In general though the subobject classifier is a heyting algebra which expresses the semantics of intuitionistic logic.

There is also a very good, but introductory, book by Goldblatt on Topoi that covers this logical aspect

So in terms of logics the category of Sets is the exception.

By internal logic I mean that for every topos one builds up a theory using it's objects and function between them. An equivalence theorem (see J. Bell) states that a given topos is essentially equal to the category generated by this internal theory.

This program began with Lawvere who noticed that conjunction and implication were really adjoints, the same one as between the product and hom functors in a cartesian closed category.
The VA, Medtronic, USC and Me
If output is the same, and HVDC is now available, should we actually start building them in the Arctic? Pros: no population centers, lots of cooling, no hurricanes. Cons?
Ok, what did they promise?
This is logical, but the situation when the other player dies needs some solution too. Because the living player finishes their turn and then ... what? There isn't even anyone to have a turn anymore.

So for the sake of completeness, I would expect the rule to cover all deaths at the table.
Sure, you can do it on the server with Node. Node has `http` as part of its standard library and you can write a simple webapp without third party dependencies. Check this tutorial for example [0].

The problem is that Node's http lib isn't super productive and you gotta write some "solved" stuff like cookie handlers. Also, there is no database standard library. If you want to persist data, you could use files. If you need a database (even SQLite), you gotta use third-party stuff.

In comparison, PHP has a lot of stuff build-in and you can be more productive with zero dependencies in PHP.

But then, maybe it doesn't really matter if you include a well-maintained npm package or if you have a more powerful standard library that has some features deprecated after a while. It's still "other people's code", although npm packages require some kind of installation, whereas a standard library usually doesn't.

[0]: https://www.section.io/engineering-education/pure-node-js-no...
The most common scenario in which you may be without the sqlite package is when you build Python from source, which is fairly common nowadays thanks to tools like pyenv.

Also the FreeBSD Python package doesn't come with sqlite by default.
As someone who has kept track of all calories in for a while now, there are some discrepancies. For example, I can eat more fat calories than I can each carbohydrate calories and moderate my weight. So somehow my metabolism doesn't create fat when eating fat, as much as it does when eating carbohydrates. That suggests that for me, not all calories are calories.
It's really crappy that US ISPs block ports. I'm in little New Zealand and have a static IP that allows me to host anything I want.
Surely - if this is your goal - then its better to focus on encouraging a 50:50 representative choice of candidates and humbly accept whoever the men and women then chose to represent them?

You may just get a large group of competent women who are very popular to all. I can't see why it would be better for as you say - democratic idealism - to then decry that some incompetent men candidates didn't get the gig.
Expanding slightly to say, “…not a lawful defense to murder in the jurisdictions of which I am aware.” :)
Bill Gates, Larry Fink 25mins Interview on Clean-Energy Push
> I’ve literally been hunting airbnb properties

If anything, you’ve figuratively been hunting properties; the opposite of literally.
> Those things would have been done in the name of something else too. Religions here is just a pretext.

...and there it is. I literally addressed this in my comment already.

> Terrible humans will use any rationalization to do terrible things.

Sure, but you can say the same thing the other way: fantastic humans will use any rationalization to do good. Good people aren't going to suddenly turn into monsters if they don't believe in an All-Powerful Judge in the sky.